Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

FILOMENA DOMAGAS vs. VIVIAN LAYNO JENSEN Court.

If he cannot be personally served with summons


G.R. No. 158407 | January 17, 2005 within a reasonable time, substituted service may be
SECOND DIVISION, J. Callejo Sr. made in accordance with Section 8 of said Rule. If he
Digest by: Shekinah Mae Fortuna is temporarily out of the country, any of the following
modes of service may be resorted to: (a) substituted
FACTS service set forth in Section 8; (2) personal service
Filomena Domagas filed a complaint for forcible entry outside the country, with leave of court; (3) service by
against Vivian Jensen before the MTC alleging that the publication, also with leave of court; or (4) any other
respondent by means of force, strategy and stealth, manner the court may deem sufficient.
gained entry into the petitioner’s property by
excavating a portion thereof and thereafter Thus, any judgment of the court which has no
constructing a fence thereon depriving the petitioner of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant is null and
a 68-square meter portion of her property along the void.
boundary line.
In the present case, the records show that Jensen,
The summons and the complaint were not served on before and after her marriage to Jarl Jensen on August
Jensen because the latter was apparently out of the 23, 1987, remained a resident of Barangay Buenlag,
country. The Sheriff left the summons and complaint Calasiao, Pangasinan. Considering that the
with Oscar Layno (Jensen's brother), who received the respondent was in Oslo, Norway, having left the
same. Philippines on February 17, 1999, the summons and
complaint in Civil Case No. 879 may only be validly
The court rendered judgment against Jensen. She served on her through substituted service under
failed to appeal the decision. Consequently, a writ of Section 7, Rule 14 of the Rules of Court, which reads:
execution was issued.
SEC. 7. Substituted service. — If, for justifiable
Jensen then filed a complaint against Domagas before causes, the defendant cannot be served within a
the RTC for the annulment of the decision of the MTC reasonable time as provided in the preceding section,
on the ground that due to the Sheriff’s failure to serve service may be effected (a) by leaving copies of the
the complaint and summons on her because she was summons at the defendant’s residence with some
in Oslo, Norway, the MTC never acquired jurisdiction person of suitable age and discretion then residing
over her person. Jensen claimed she was a resident of therein, or (b) by leaving the copies at defendant’s
Oslo, Norway and although she owned the house office or regular place of business with some
where Oscar Layno received the summons and the competent person in charge thereof.
complaint, she had then leased it to Eduardo
Gonzales. She avers further that Oscar Layno was Strict compliance with the mode of service is required
never authorized to receive the summons and the in order that the court may acquire jurisdiction over the
complaint for and in her behalf. person of the defendant. The statutory requirement of
substituted service must be followed faithfully and
In her answer to the complaint, Domagas alleged that strictly and any substituted service other than that
Jensen was a resident of Barangay Buenlag, Calasiao, authorized by the statute is rendered ineffective.
Pangasinan and was the owner of the subject
premises where Oscar Layno was when the Sheriff Moreover, there is no showing that the house where
served the summons and complaint; that the service of the Sheriff found Oscar Layno was the latter’s
the complaint and summons by substituted service on residence or that of Jensen herein. Neither is there any
Jensen was proper since her brother Oscar Layno, a showing that the Sheriff tried to ascertain where the
resident and registered voter of Barangay. Buenlag, residence of Jensen was on the said date. It turned out
Calasiao, Pangasinan, received the complaint and that the occupant of the house was a lessor, Eduardo
summons for and in her behalf. Gonzales, and that Oscar Layno was in the premises
only to collect the rentals from him. The service of the
summons on a person at a place where he was a
ISSUE: visitor is not considered to have been left at the
residence or place or abode, where he has another
Whether or not there was a valid service of the place at which he ordinarily stays and to which he
summons and complaint on Jensen. intends to return.

RULING: NO. In sum, then, Jensen was not validly served with
summons and the complaint in Civil Case No. 879 on
In Asiavest Limited v. Court of Appeals , the Court had April 5, 1999, by substituted service.
the occasion to state:

In an action in personam, jurisdiction over the person


of the defendant is necessary for the court to validly try
and decide the case. Jurisdiction over the person of a
resident defendant who does not voluntarily appear in
court can be acquired by personal service of summons
as provided under Section 7, Rule 14 of the Rules of

You might also like