2016 SPECTRA LABOR STANDARDS - Orals Purposes
2016 SPECTRA LABOR STANDARDS - Orals Purposes
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
w
w
m
m
w w
w
w
o
o
.d o .c .d o .c
c u -tr a c k c u -tr a c k
LABOR STANDARDS
COMPILATION
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Table of Contents
TOPIC 1: THE APPLICABLE LAWS ..........................................................................................................................................10
Law: PD 442 as amended by RA 6715 approved on March 21, 1989 .............................................................................................................................10
CONCEPT OF LABOR .......................................................................................................................................................................................................10
FOUR SYSTEMS OF LABOR (Sla-Ser-Free-Wage; Slasher Free Wage; S-S-F-W )..............................................................................................................10
THREE FIELDS OF LABOR LAW (S-R-S).............................................................................................................................................................................11
OMNIBUS RULES AS AMENDED......................................................................................................................................................................................12
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS .........................................................................................................................................................................................12
BASIS OF ENACTING LABOR LAWS (P-S-P-D) ..................................................................................................................................................................12
LIMITATIONS IN THE ENACTMENT OF LABOR LAWS (P-E-N-D-O) ..................................................................................................................................13
SOURCES OF LABOR LAWS - LABOR STANDARDS (R-O-L-J) ............................................................................................................................................14
SOURCES OF LABOR LAWS (LABOR RELATIONS) ............................................................................................................................................................14
PROVISIONS ON THE EFFECTIVITY OF LABOR LAWS.......................................................................................................................................................14
RULES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OF LABOR LAWS.................................................................................................................15
TRIPARTISM .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 3
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 4
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 5
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
INSTANCES WHERE THE LABOR ARBITER DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION ..................................................................................................................198
UPDATES....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 198
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 6
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 7
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 8
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
2008 MANUAL OF REGULATIONS FOR PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION (CHED Memorandum Circular No. 40, Series of 2008) ..............................................................411
FULL TIME AND PART TIME TEACHING....................................................................................................................................................................................................412
L. EMPLOYMENT OF DRIVERS AND CONDUCTORS IN THE PUBLIC UTILITY BUS TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.....................................................................413
DOLE DO No. 118-12, Series of 2012.......................................................................................................................................................................................................413
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 9
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
“A DECREE INSTITUTING A LABOR CODE, THERBY REVISING AND CONSOLIDATING LABOR AND SOCIAL LAWS TO AFFORD
PROTECTION TO LABOR, PROMOTE EMPLOYMENT AND HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND ENSURE INDUSTRIAL
PEACE BASED ON SOCIAL JUSTICE.”
Article 1. This Decree shall be known as the Labor Code of the Philippines
o May 1, 1974 – PD 442 was signed into law
o Took effect Nov. 1, 1974
Article 2. This Code shall take effect Six months after its promulgation
o RA 6715 – Herrera-Veloso Law
o Sen. Blas Ople – Father of Labor Code
Significance: Before the effectivity of the labor code, there was no provision on the terms and conditions of employment.
Significance of RA 6715:
Computation of Backwages – after RA 6715 took effect, the award of backwages from the time compensation was withheld up
to the actual reinstatement; However, Facilities should not be included in the computation of backwages for the reason that
such are given free, to be used only for official tour of duty and not for personal use.
CONCEPT OF LABOR
Ordinary Sense: is understood as the physical toil although it does not necessarily exclude the application of skill, thus, there is
skilled and unskilled labor; work; service
General Sense: it is the exertion of human being by his mental or physical effort towards production of goods or services.
Technical Sense: the working class or workingmen
Skill – the familiar knowledge of any art or science, united with readiness and dexterity in the execution or performance of the
application such art or science to practical purposes.
Work – it is broader than labor; covers all forms of physical or mental exertion or both combined, for the attainment of some object
other than recreation or amusement per se.
Worker – broader than employee; refer to self-employed people and those working in the service and under the control of another,
regardless of rank, title, or nature of work.
Employee – a salaried person working for another who controls or supervises the means, manner, or method of doing the work
1. Slavery
Refers to the extraction of work or services from any person by means of enticement, violence, intimidation or threat,
use of force or coercion, including deprivation of freedom, abuse of authority or moral ascendancy, debt bondage or
deception. (DO 65-04 S2004)
The worker is owned by another at his free disposal
Prohibited in the Philippines
Section 18(2) of the Constitution: No involuntary servitude in any form shall exist except as a
punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 10
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Article 272, Revised Penal Code: Slavery. — The penalty of prision mayor and a fine of not exceeding
10,000 pesos shall be imposed upon anyone who shall purchase, sell, kidnap or detain a human being
for the purpose of enslaving him.
Section 4(a) of RA9208: Acts of Trafficking in Persons. - It shall be unlawful for any person, natural or
juridical, to commit any of the following acts: (a) To recruit, transport, transfer; harbor, provide, or
receive a person by any means, including those done under the pretext of domestic or overseas
employment or training or apprenticeship, for the purpose of prostitution, pornography, sexual
exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
2. Serfdom
Worker, by customary right to his Lord, owes certain service
Enforced labor of serfs on the fields of the landowners, in return for protection and the right to work on their leased
fields.
Prohibited in the Philippines
Article 274 of the RPC: Services rendered under compulsion in payment of debt. — The penalty of
arresto mayor in its maximum period to prision correccional in its minimum period shall be imposed
upon any person who, in order to require or enforce the payment of a debt, shall compel the debtor to
work for him, against his will, as household servant or farm laborer.
Section 12-D, RA7610 as amended: No child shall be engaged in the worst forms of child labor. The
phrase "worst forms of child labor" shall refer to any of the following: (1) All forms of slavery, as defined
under the "Anti-trafficking in Persons Act of 2003", or practices similar to slavery such as sale and
trafficking of children, debt bondage and serfdom and forced or compulsory labor, including
recruitment of children for use in armed conflict;
3. Free Artisan
A free person who offers his services to others subject to nobody’s will
The same with modern independent contractorship wherein an independent contractor is engaged in a business
separately distinct from the principal, the performed job, work or service, and works according to his own means and
methods, free from the control and direction of the principal except as to the results thereof.
Governed by Article 1713 of the Civil Code
4. Wage System
A person offers his services to another under an employment contract for which such service is paid by wages.
The same with modern employer-employee system where there is an employee under the control and supervision of
an employer as to the means, manner or method of which the work is to be accomplished including the result thereof
and is paid for the work done in terms of wage.
Covered by the Labor Code
NOTE: Only the Free Artisanship and Wage System of Labor are recognized in the Philippines.
Aim or justification: SOCIAL JUSTICE – those who have less in life should have more in law.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 11
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Example: wages and hours of work, on safety and health of employees, employment benefits, overtime pay
Distinction: Labor standards Law is the material or substance of labor law; Labor Relations Law is the mechanism or the
processes on enforcing the substance.
Example: Social Security Law, Agrarian Reform Law, Law on Migrant Workers, or more recently, the New Tax Relief Law
Distinction between Labor Standards and Social Legislation: In LS, the employee is actually at work; In SL, the employee is
not at work or is unable to work.
• Have the force and effect of laws. Provided, however, that these rules and issuances will not expand the law or strip the law.
Otherwise, under the rules on statutory construction, these will be considered void.
• The DOLE is the lead agency in enforcing labor laws and it possesses rule-making power in the enforcement of the Code.
• But a rule or regulation that exceeds the department’s rule-making authority is void. The rule-making power is exceeded when
the implementing rule changes, wittingly or unwittingly, the content or meaning of the law which the rule aims to implement.
The implementing rule, on other words, must be subordinate to the law itself.
Example: Policy Instruction No. 54-88 (issued by former Sec. Franklin Drilon) has been declared void by the Supreme Court
because this has expanded Art. 83 of the Labor Code on Employment of Health Personnel by erroneously interpreting that
health employees are entitled to a “full weekly wage for 7 days” if they have completed the 40-hour/5-day workweek.
Article 8 NCC: Judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws or the Constitution shall form a part of the legal system of the
Philippines.
NOTE: Decisions of administrative bodies like the NLRC do not form part of the legal system of the Philippines. Only SC decisions set
legal precedents.
1. POLICE POWER
o Inherent power of the state to enact legislations that may interfere with personal liberty or property in order to promote
the general welfare of the people (General Welfare Clause)
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 12
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
o Consists of imposition of restraint upon liberty or property and in order to foster the common good.
o General welfare clause deemed written into the employment contract.
o Power to regulate personal liberty or property rights.
o Labor Code contains several provisions that affect life and property.
NOTE: Having a job is a property right
Example:
Article 263 LC: (g) When, in his opinion, there exists a labor dispute causing or likely to cause a strike or lockout in an industry indispensable to
the national interest, the Secretary of Labor and Employment may assume jurisdiction over the dispute and decide it or certify the same to the
Commission for compulsory arbitration…
Reason: SOLE may compel the employer to admit the employees and the employees to return to their work.
2. SOCIAL JUSTICE
o The promotion of the welfare of all the people, the adoption by the government of measures calculated to insure
economic stability of all the component elements of society through the maintenance of proper economic and social
equilibrium in the interrelation of the members of the community, constitutionally through the adoption of measures
legally justifiable, or extra-constitutionally through the exercise of powers, underlying the exercise of all governments on
the time honored principle of “salus populi est suprema lex”. (Dr. Jose P. Laurel)
o The law is geared towards the concern of labor because our legislators realize that social and economic imbalance
between the employer and employee.
o Philippines is a signatory of ILO Convention (International Labor Organization)
o UN Declaration of Human Rights
o All doubts in the implementation and interpretation of the provisions of this Code, including its implementing
rules and regulations shall be resolved in favor of labor
Reason: Employer stands in a higher footing than the employee because of economic dependence of the employee on the
employer and the greater supply of labor than the demand of it.
4. DOCTRINE OF INCORPORATION
Article II, Section 2, Constitution: The Philippines renounces war as an instrument of national policy, adopts the
generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land, and adheres to the policy of peace, equality,
justice, freedom, cooperation, and amity with all nations.
NON-IMPAIRMENT CLAUSE
Article III, Section 10. No law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be passed.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 13
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
• Congress could not pass laws which would impair the obligations of the parties, however, the same can pass laws to
regulate the obligations and contracts.
• May be impaired by the exercise of the state of police power.
PRIMARY (C-S-D)
a) Constitution
b) Statutes ( NCC, RPC, Special Laws)
c) Supreme court decisions
SECONDARY (D-R-O-R)
a) Decisions of foreign courts (where our labor statutes are based or patterned after statutes in foreign jurisdictions, decisions in
the high courts in those jurisdictions construing and interpreting should receive the careful attention of our courts in the
application of our laws)
b) Reviewers in labor laws/ textbooks
c) Opinions of labor department or agencies
d) Rules and regulations issued by DOLE ( department orders)
NOTE:
Labor laws do not only include PD 442 as amended but as well as decisions of the SC interpreting and applying the laws.
Included as well are rules and regulations issued by the appropriate government agencies (e.g. DOLE)
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 14
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Article 5 Labor Code: Rules and regulations. - The Department of Labor and other government agencies charged with the
administration and enforcement of this Code or any of its parts shall promulgate the necessary implementing rules and regulations.
Such rules and regulations shall become effective fifteen (15) days after announcement of their adoption in newspapers of general
circulation.
NOTE: Publication is indispensable. Rules and regulations are still valid even if no publication, however, it is unenforceable.
Article 2, NCC: Laws shall take effect after fifteen days following the completion of their publication either in the Official Gazette, or
in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines, unless it is otherwise provided. (As amended by EO 200).
Sec. 18. When Laws Take Effect. - Laws shall take effect after fifteen (15) days following the completion of their publication in the
Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation, unless it is otherwise provided.
Sec. 19. Prospectivity. - Laws shall have prospective effect unless the contrary is expressly provided.
Sec. 20. Interpretation of Laws and Administrative Issuances. - In the interpretation of a law or administrative issuance promulgated
in all the official languages, the English text shall control, unless otherwise specifically provided. In case of ambiguity, omission or
mistake, the other texts may be consulted.
Sec. 21. No Implied Revival of Repealed Law.- When a law which expressly repeals a prior law itself repealed, the law first repealed
shall not be thereby revived unless expressly so provided.
Sec. 22. Revival of Law Impliedly Repealed. - When a law which impliedly repeals a prior law is itself repealed, the prior law shall
thereby be revived, unless the repealing law provides otherwise.
Sec. 23. Ignorance of the Law. - Ignorance of the law excuses no one from compliance therewith.
Will not apply unless the people are informed through the required publication
Article 4, Labor Code. All doubts in the implementation and interpretation of the provisions of this Code, including its
implementing rules and regulations, shall be resolved in favor of labor.
Reasons: Employer stands in a higher footing than the employees and the State affirms labor as the primary social
economic force.
The policy is to apply the code to a greater number of employees to enable them to avail of the benefits under
the law, in line with the State’s desire to give maximum aid and protection to labor.
It is not always correct to think that the aim of the law is always to favor labor. The mandate under Art 4 is
simply to resolve doubt, if any, in favor of labor. If there is no doubt in implementing and interpreting the law,
labor will enjoy no built-in advantage and the law will have to be applied as it is.
The law in protecting the rights of the laborer, authorizes neither oppression nor self destruction of the
employer.
Court decisions adopt a liberal approach that favors the exercise of labor rights.
Article 1700, NCC (Relation Between Capital and Labor) The relation between capital and labor are not merely contractual.
They are so impressed with public interest that labor contracts must yield to the common good. Therefore, such contracts are
subject to the special Lawson labor unions, collective bargaining, strikes and lockouts, closed shop, wages, working conditions,
hours of labor, and similar subjects.
Labor disputes also affect the state and the public at large if employees are engaged in strike or other concerted activities.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 15
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Article 1701, NCC. Neither capital nor labor shall act oppressively against the other, or impair the interest or convenience of the
public. (PRINCIPLE OF NON-OPPRESSION)
Article 1702, NCC. In case of doubt, all labor legislations and all labor contracts shall be construed in favor of the safety and
decent living of the laborer.
“Labor is not a chattel nor a commodity, but human, and must be dealt with from the standpoint of human interest.”
(Asufrin vs. San Miguel Corporation, G.R. No. 156658. March 10, 2004)
TRIPARTISM
Tripartism refers to the representation of workers and employers sectors in decision and policy making bodies of the
government. Through tripartism, workers and employers on the one hand, representing their respective interests, and the
government on the other hand, representing the interest of the public, help shape labor, social and economic policies and
programs of the government.
Tripartism is in place in government agencies like the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), Employees Compensation
Commission (ECC), National Wages and Productivity Commission (NWPC), Technical Education and Skill Development Authority
(TESDA), Social Security System (SSS), Government Service Insurance System (GSIS), Philippine Overseas Employment
Administration (POEA), Overseas Workers’ Welfare Administration (OWWA) and Pag-ibig Home Development Funds (Pag-ibig).
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 16
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Reason: Relations between capital and labor are not merely contractual. They are so impressed with public interest that
representations from employer and employee in decision and policy-making bodies of the government are necessary. This is also in
affirmation of the role of the State as the guardian of the people’s rights and the constitutional provision on protection to labor.
Examples:
Creation of Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board (RTWPB) which is composed of government, employer and
employee representatives.
Composition of NLRC, chairman is government appointed, remaining 2 commissioners from employer and employee
sectors.
Such kind of representation is not ordained, not even by the Constitution. What is provided for, for the private sector is
worker’s participation in policy and decision-making processes directly affecting their rights, benefits, and welfare.
BAR QUESTION (1998)
Interpretation of Labor Laws
Article 4 of the Labor Code provides that in case of doubt in the implementation and interpretation of the provisions of the Code and its
Implementing Rules and Regulations, the doubt shall be resolved in favor of labor. Article 1702 of the Civil Code also provides that in case
of doubt, all labor legislation and all labor contracts shall be construed in favor of the safety and decent living for the laborer. Mica-Mara
company assails the validity of these statutes on the ground that they violate its constitutional right to equal protection of the laws. Is
the contention of Mica Mara Company tenable? Discuss fully.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 17
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
No, the Constitution provides that the state shall afford full protection to labor. Furthermore, the State affirms labor as a primary
economic force. It shall protect the rights of workers and promote their welfare.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
a) No, because a law which promotes a constitutional mandate does not violate the equal protection clause. The constitutional
mandate is for the State to afford full protection to labor such that, when conflicting interests of labor and capital are to be weighed on
the scales of justice, the heavier influence of the latter should be counterbalanced by the sympathy the law should accord the
underprivileged.
b) The contention of Mica-Mara Company is not tenable. The constitutional right to equal protection of the laws is not violated by
reasonable classification. Thus, it is constitutionally possible to treat workers differently from employers.
The social justice principle embodied in the Constitution could be the basis for treating workers more favorably than employers, in the
implementation and interpretation of the provisions of the Labor Code and of its implementing rules and regulations.
On the other hand, LABOR RELATIONS law is that labor law which regulates the relations between employers and workers like Book V of
the Labor Code which deals with labor organizations, collective bargaining, unfair labor practices and strikes and lockouts.
Labor standards laws and labor relations laws are not mutually exclusive; they are complement to each other. Thus, the law on strikes
and lockouts which is an example of labor relations law includes some provisions on the security of tenure of workers who go on strike or
who are locked out. These provisions are examples of labor standards law.
On the other hand, LABOR STANDARDS law focuses on the terms and conditions of employment of employees as individual employees
or those legal provisions dealing with wages, hours of work and other terms and conditions of employment.
There may be instances when the provisions of labor relations law may interrelate with provisions of labor standards law. Thus, a CBA
which is dealt with in labor relations law may have provisions that improves upon the minimum terms and conditions of employment
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 18
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
prescribed in labor standards law, like a CBA providing for a higher minimum wage, or for the computation of a higher overtime pay or the
payment of holiday pay not only for regular holidays but also for certain special holidays.
LABOR RELATIONS Laws are those labor statutes that deal with the relations of labor and management, like the laws on unions, collective
bargaining, unfair labor practices, strikes, lockouts and picketing.
LABOR STANDARDS are those labor statutes that prescribe standards relating to terms and conditions of employment for compliance by
employers, like the laws on hours of work, weekly rest periods, holiday pay, wages, and laws dealing with women, minors, house-helpers,
and industrial home-workers.
SOCIAL SECURITY Laws are those labor statutes that provide protection not only to a worker but also to members of his family in case of
loss of income or when there is need for medical care brought about by contingencies like sickness, disability, death, and old age.
Examples of social security laws are the Social Security Law, Revised Government Service Insurance Act, the Articles of the Labor Code on
Employees Compensation, the State Insurance Fund, and the National Health Insurance Act.
BAR QUESTIONS
Labor vs. Social Legislation
Is there any distinction between labor legislation and social legislation? Explain.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
LABOR LEGISLATION is sometimes distinguished from social legislation by the former referring to labor statutes, like Labor Relations Law
and Labor Standards, and the latter to Social Security Laws. Labor legislation focuses on the rights of the worker in the workplace.
SOCIAL LEGISLATION is a broad term and may include not only laws that give social security protection, but also those that help the
worker secure housing and basic necessities. The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform law could also be considered a social legislation.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
Yes. Labor Legislation is limited in scope, and deals basically with the rights and duties of employees and employers. Social Legislation is
more encompassing and includes such subjects as agrarian relations, housing and human settlement, protection of women and children,
etc. All labor laws are social legislation, but not all social legislation is labor law.
“The state shall afford full protection to labor, local and overseas, organized and unorganized, and promote full employment and
equality of employment opportunities for all.”
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 19
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Security of tenure
Workers cannot be dismissed without just and authorized causes
Workers shall be made regular after 6 months probation unless a different period is agreed upon by the worker and the
employee
Hours of work
Normal working hours of eight hours a day
Meal and rest period: meal break of less than one hour shall be considered compensable working time
Overtime pay
Ordinary days: 25% of the basic hourly rate
Special/rest/holiday: 30% of the regular hourly rate on said days
Service charges
85 % (distribution to rank and file employees); 15% (losses, breakages, distribution to managerial employees)
Separation pay
½ month pay for every year of service for authorized causes of separation
Payment of wages
Shall be paid in cash, legal tender, at or near the place of work
May be made through a bank upon written petition of majority of the workers in establishments with 25 or more
employees and within one kilometer radius to a bank
Shall be made direct to the employees
Shall be given not less than once every 2 weeks or twice within a month at intervals not exceeding 16 days
Labor-only contracting is prohibited and the person acting as contractor is merely an agent of the employer
Preference of workers money claims over government and other creditors in case of bankruptcy or liquidation of business
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 20
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Labor education through seminars, dialogues, and information, education and communication materials
Peaceful concerted activities in accordance with law
Participation an policy and decision-making processes affecting their rights and benefits
Free access to the courts and quasi-judicial bodies and speedy disposition of their cases
SSS Benefits
maternity
sickness
disability
retirement
death
Meliorative Labor Standard - Intended to expand the flow of income or benefits to workingman that are required for a decent living.
• overtime pay
• premium pay
Protective Labor Standard - Intended to protect harsh and oppressive conditions of work that inimical to health, safety and well-
being of the workers.
• Protect the health and safety and the well-being of the workers.
• Prescribed hours of work
1. Employment Contract – employer hires an employee and gives a high salary, in effect the former provides the latter a labor
standard plus car, allowances and other benefits.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 21
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
2. Company Policies and Practices – as a company policy, provision of sack of rice, it is meliorative. Practices could be unwritten,
deliberately granted by employer for a long period of time, although it is not a policy but consistently and deliberately provided
to workers such as vacation with pay.
3. Administrative Order of DOLE - Also prescribes the terms and conditions of employment.
• Ex. Compressed workweek
4. Compulsory or Voluntary Arbitration – the award given to the party, it is another source of a labor standard
5. Collective Bargaining Agreement or CBA – can also be a source of Labor Standard because it provides terms and conditions of
employment prescribed by law.
6. Statutes - REASON: Principle of Non-diminution of benefits.
Art 97b. “Employer” includes any person directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee and shall
include the Government and all its branches, subdivision and instrumentalities, all government-owned or controlled corporations
and institutions, as well as non-profit private institutions, or organizations.(expanded definition)
Art 212e. “Employer” includes any person acting in the interest of an employer, directly or indirectly. The term shall not include any
labor organization or any of its officers or agents except when acting as employer.
Art 212f. “Employee” includes any person in the employ of the employer. The term shall not be limited to the employees of a
particular employer, unless this code so expressly states. It shall include any individual whose work has ceased as a result of or in
connection with any current labor dispute or because of any unfair labor practice if he has not obtained any other substantially
equivalent and regular employment.(expanded definition)
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 22
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
It is in personam, involves the rendition of personal service by the employee, and partakes of master and servant relationship.
COMMENTS:
EMPLOYER
May be NATURAL OR JURIDICAL, a single proprietorship, a partnership or a corporation.
The Government is an employer within the meaning of the Labor Code in Labor Standards.
So, a government agency with an original charter contracts with a security agency to supply security guards, and this security agency
is unable to pay the wages of its guards.
Q: Is principal government agency considered jointly and severally liable with the security agency? Will Article 106-109, LC apply to
them? Can the guards file with the labor complaint with the nearest arbitration branch of the NLRC and sue both the security and
government agency?
A: YES, the Labor Code will govern. The government agency cannot move for the dismissal of the complaint for lack of jurisdiction
on the part of the Labor Arbiter and say that they are governed by the Civil Service Law Rules and Regulations. The government
agency contracted the services of an independent contractor, so they are considered principals. Therefore the LC will govern
regarding the monetary claims of the security guards.
A motion to dismiss filed by the government agency in the above-cited example will not prosper on the ground that the Labor
Arbiter has no jurisdiction, because the term “Employer” includes government agencies. It does not make any qualifications whether
it is one with or without original charter.
EMPLOYEE
An employee is always a NATURAL PERSON [may include Filipino citizens or foreigners
Hiring of employees
Of those corporations owned by foreigners, if they want to employ alien as their employees, the following
requirements must be complied with:
1. Such domestic or foreign companies should obtain a permit form the DOLE ( Alien Employment Permit) at the
nearest regional office
2. There must be a determination of the non- availability of a person in the Philippines, who is competent, able,
willing at the time of application to perform the services for which the alien is desired.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 23
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
“The existence or absence of employer-employee relationship is A QUESTION OF LAW AND A QUESTION OF FACTS, each in its
defined sense.
The character of relationship between the parties is not what they call it in their contract but what the law calls it after examination
of the facts. The characterization by law prevails that in the contract. In this case the existence of employer-employee relationship
is not a matter of stipulation; it is a QUESTION OF LAW.
But the conclusion an employer-employee relationship exists depends upon the facts of each case. In one case an employer-
employee relationship may be found to be present, but in another case with different facts, it may be absent. In this sense, the
existence of an employer-employee relationship is a QUESTION OF FACT.”
“Depending on the applicability of the tests of employment, an employer-employee relationship may exist regardless of the nature
of the activities involved. In other words, the kind of work is not the definitive test of whether the worker is an employee or not”
Sevilla vs. CA
GR 44182-3, 04/15/88
“The fact that one had been designated “branch manager” does not make such person an employee. Titles are weak indicators”
“Where a person who works for another does so more or less at his own pleasure and is not subject to definite hours or conditions
of work and in turn is compensated according to the result of his efforts and not the amount thereof, we should not find that the
relationship of employer-employee exists.”
“But it should be borne in mind that the control test calls MERELY FOR THE EXISTENCE of the right to control the manner of doing
the work, NOT THE ACTUAL EXERCISE of the right.”
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 24
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
“Exclusivity of service to the company, control of assignments and removal of agents, collection of premiums, furnishing of facilities
and materials as well as capital described as unit development fund are HALLMARKS OF A MANAGEMENT SYSTEM where there can
be no escaping the conclusion that one is an employee of the insurance company.”
“Substantial evidence is sufficient as a basis for judgment on the existence of employer-employee relationship. No particular form
of evidence is required to prove the existence of such relationship.”
“That the respondent registered the petitioners with SSS is proof that the latter is the former’s employees. The coverage of SSS Law
is predicated on the existence of an employer-employee relationship”
“In a business establishment, an identification card is usually provided not only as a security measure but mainly to identify the
holder thereof as a bona fide of the firm that issues it. Together with the cash vouchers covering the petitioner’s salaries for the
months stated therein, these matters constitute substantial evidence adequate to support a conclusion that the petitioner was
indeed the employee of the respondent.”
“Appointment letters or employment contracts, payrolls, organization charts, personnel lists, as well as testimony of co-employees,
may also serve as evidence of employee status.”
“If only documentary evidence would be required to show that relationship, no scheming employer would ever be brought before
the bar of justice, as no employer would wish to come out with any trace of the illegality he as authored considering that it should
take much weightier proof to invalidate a written instrument. Thus, as in this case where the employer-employee relationship
between petitioners and Esita was sufficiently proved by testimonial evidence, the absence of time sheet, time record or payroll has
become inconsequential.”
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 25
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
“The presence or absence of employer-employee relationship is not determined by the basis of the employee’s compensation.
Indeed, employment relationship is one thing, pay determination is another. The existence of employment relationship depends on
whether the four-fold test is present or not.”
ON “PAKIAO” BASIS
“The nature of their employment i.e “pakiao” basis, does not make petitioners independent contractors. Pakiao workers are
considered employees as long as the employer exercises control over the means by which such workers are to perform their work.
Considering that the petitioners did their work inside private respondent’s farm, the latter necessarily exercised control over the
work performed by petitioners.
The seasonal nature of petitioner’s work does not detract from the conclusion that employer-employee relationship exists. Seasonal
workers whose work is not merely for the duration of the season, but who are rehired every working season are considered regular
employees.”
Q: Why is it important to determine whether the relationship between the parties is that of employer and employee or that of
principal and independent contractor or of principal-agent?
A: To determine what laws will govern the rights and liabilities of the parties, and what tribunal will have jurisdiction over their
disputes.
Francisco v. NLRC
G.R. No. 170087; August 31, 2006
TWO-TIERED APPROACH
“The better approach would be to adopt a TWO-TIERED TEST involving (1) the putative employer’s power to control the employee
with respect to the means and methods by which the work is to be accomplished and (2) the underlying economic realities of the
activity or relationship.
This two-tiered test would provide us with a framework of analysis, which would take into consideration the totality of
circumstances surrounding the true relationship between the parties.
This is especially APPROPRIATE in this case where there is no written agreement or terms of reference to base the relationship on;
and due to the complexities of the relationship based on the various positions and responsibilities given to the worker over the
period of the latter’s employment.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 26
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
The determination of the relationship between employer and employee depends upon the circumstances of the whole economic
activity. The PROPER STANDARD OF ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE is whether the worker is dependent on the alleged employer for his
continued employment in that line of business.
Under the broader ECONOMIC REALITY TEST, the petitioner can likewise be said to be an employee of respondent corporation
because she had served the company for six years before her dismissal, receiving check vouchers indicating her salaries/ benefits,
13th month pay, bonuses and allowances as well as deductions and SSS contributions. It is therefore apparent that petitioner is
economically dependent on respondent for her continued employment in the latter’s line of business. “
Note: Unlike employee, independent contractor does not solely depend on the company for continued work as they can pursue
other jobs.
AGENT (Art. 1868, NCC). By the contract of agency, a person binds himself to render some service or to do something in
representation or on behalf of another with the consent or authority of the latter.
PRINCIPAL-AGENT RELATIONSHIP
Art 1868 NCC: By the contract of agency, a person binds himself to render some service or to do something in representation or
on behalf of another, with the consent or authority of the latter.
It is the principal who selects the agent. An agent is compensated under the contract of agency of services rendered. He is
disciplined by the principal as in the case of an employee because the agent is under the authority of the principal. The principal
controls the means and methods of the work of an agent. In this relationship, there is only one party. The agent is merely an
extension of the principal. They are regarded as one. So if there is a contractor relationship, it is not among three parties but is
between the principal/agent and the other party.
Thus, to make a distinction between a principal-agent and employer-employee, the four-fold test will not be used because the agent
is selected by the principal and is also compensated by the principal and most oftentimes, the principal substitutes his own
judgment for that of the agent.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 27
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Note: To make a distinction between a principal-agent relationship and that of an employer-employee relationship, the four-fold
test will not be used because the 1) agent is selected by the principal 2) compensated by the principal 3) and most oftentimes, the
principal also substitutes his own judgment for that of the agent.
Carries a distinct and independent business and undertakes to perform the job, work, or service on its own account and under its
own responsibility, according to its own manner and method and free from the control and direction of the principal in all matters
connected with the performance of the work except as to the results thereof.
The principal selects the contractor. The contractor is compensated for services rendered. The contractor is not under the discipline
of the principal. The distinction says that aside from engaging in the business separately distinct from the principal, the performed
job, work, or services is according to his own means and methods free from the control and direction of the principal except as to
the results thereof.
The definition says that aside from engaging in a business separately distinct from the principal, to perform job, work or service,
according to his own means and methods, free from control and direction of the principal except as to the results thereof.
Contractor may be Individual, Corporate Juridical Entity – no need of protection from labor code because they earn
better.
By contract for a piece of work, the contractor binds himself to execute a piece of work for the employer, in
consideration of a certain price or consideration. The contractor may either employ only his labor, skill, or also
furnishes the materials.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 28
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
4.1. Unionism and Method of Determination Conditions of Employment - Right of all workers to self-organization, collective bargaining
and negotiations.
4.2. Concerted Activities - Right to engage in peaceful concerted activities, including the right to strike in accordance with law.
4.3. Working Conditions - Right to security of tenure, humane conditions of work and a living wage.
4.4. Decision Making Processes - Right to participate hi policy and decision making processes affecting their rights and benefits as
way to provided by law.
5. Share in Fruits of production - Recognition of right of labor to its just share in fruits of production.
ANOTHER SUGGESTED ANSWER:
o The Constitution (In Article XIII, Section 3) provides that the State shall afford protection to labor, local and overseas, organized and
unorganized.
o The State shall afford protection to labor by promoting full employment and equality of employment opportunities for all.
o Workers are entitled to security of tenure, humane conditions of work and a living wage.
o The State shall guarantee the right of all workers to self organization, collective bargaining and negotiations, and peaceful concerted
activities, including the right to strike, in accordance with law.
o Workers shall also participate in policy and decision making processes affecting their rights and benefits as may be provided by law.
The State shall promote the principle of shared responsibility between workers and employers and the preferential use of voluntary
modes in settling labor disputes, including conciliation, and shall enforce mutual compliance therewith to foster industrial peace.
o The State shall regulate the relations between workers and employers, recognizing the right of labor to its just share in the
fruits of production and the right of enterprises to reasonable returns on investments, and to expansion and growth.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 29
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
In implementation of the principle of social justice, the Constitution commands that the State shall afford protection to labor. Thus Labor
Law may be pro-labor in the sense that labor is given certain benefits not given to management. But this is not necessarily violative of the
equal protection clause of the Constitution because said clause allows reasonable classification.
Thus, only the LBM Construction Corporation is the employer of Teofllo Lacson. The other corporation do not have any employer-
employee relations with Lacson.
The case in question does not include any fact that would justify piercing the veil of corporate fiction of the other corporations in order to
protect the rights of workers.
In a case (Concept Builders, Inc. v. NLRC. 257 SCRA 149), the Supreme Court ruled that it is a fundamental principle of corporation law
that a corporation is an entity separate and distinct from its stockholders and from other corporations to which it may be connected. But
this separate and distinct personality of a corporation is merely a fiction created by law for convenience and to promote justice. So, when
the notion of separate juridical personality is used to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, protect fraud or defend crime, or is used
as a device to defeat the labor laws, this separate personality of the corporation maybe disregarded or the veil of corporate fiction
pierced.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
Motion to Dismiss should be denied. In the case at bar, the Labor Arbiter would be justified in piercing the corporate veil and considering
the three (3) corporations as one and the same entity as the employer of Teofilo Lacson because based on the facts "the three
corporations were owned and controlled by members of the Lstimoso family; their incorporators and directors all belonged to the
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 30
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Lastimoso family. The three (3) corporations were engaged in the same line of business, under one management and used the same
equipment including manpower services." The facts show that "the notion of legal entity is used to defeat public convenience, justify
wrong, protect fraud, or defend crime, the law will regard the corporation as an association of persons, or in the case of two
corporations, will merge them into one.
After the expiration of the contract with Asia, Baron did not renew the same and instead executed another contract for security services
with another agency. Asia placed the affected security guards on "floating status" on "no work no pay" basis. Having been displaced from
work, the Asia security guards filed a case against the Baron Hotel for illegal dismissal, overtime pay, minimum wage differentials,
vacation leave and sick leave benefits, and 13th month pay.
Baron Hotel denied liability alleging that Asia is the employer of the security guards and therefore, their complaint for illegal dismissal
and payment of money claims should be directed against Asia. Nevertheless, Baron filed a Third Party Complaint against Asia.
1. Is there an employer-employee relationship between the Baron Hotel, on one hand, and the Asia security guards, on the other hand?
Explain briefly, (3%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
As a general rule, the security guards of a private security guard agency are the employees of the latter and not of the establishment that
has entered into a contract with the private security guard agency for security services. But under the facts in the question, Baron Hotel
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 31
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
appear to have hired the security guards, to have paid their wages, to have the power to promote, suspend or dismiss the security guards
and the power of control over them, namely, the security guards were under orders of Baron Hotel as regard their employment. Because
of the above-mentioned circumstances, Baron Hotel is the employer of the security guards.
2. Assuming that ASIA is the employer, is the act of ASIA in placing the security guards on "floating status" lawful? Why? (2%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
It is lawful for a private security guard agency to place its security guard on a "floating status" if it has no assignment to give to said
security guards. But if the security guards are placed on a "floating status" for more than six (6) months, the security guards may consider
themselves as having been dismissed.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 32
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
(1) Malyn Vartan is a well-known radio-TV show host. She signed a contract with XYZ Entertainment Network to host a one-hour daily talk
show where she interviews various celebrities on topical subjects that she herself selects. She was paid a monthly remuneration of
P300,000.00. The program had been airing for almost two years when sponsors' advertising revenues dwindled, constraining the network
to cancel the show upon the expiration of its latest contract with Ms. Vartan. The talk-show host protested the discontinuance of her
monthly talent fee, claiming that it was tantamount to her illegal dismissal from the network since she has already attained the status of
a regular employee. (6%)
(a) As the network's legal counsel, how would you justify its decision to cancel Ms. Vartan's program which in effect terminated her
services in the process?
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
As the network's legal counsel, I will argue that Ms. Vartan is under contract on a fixed term employment basis. The network cancelled
the show "upon the expiration of its latest contract with Ms. Vartan." Hence, this does not involve dismissal but an expiration of term.
(Felix v. Buenaseda, G.R. No. 109704, January 17,1995; St. Theresa's School of Novaliches Foundation v. NLRC, G.R. No. 122955, April 15,
1998)
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
As the network's counsel, there was no termination of her services, only the expiration of her contract, being an independent contractor.
(Sonza v. ABS-CBN, G.R. No. 138051, June 10, 2004)
(b) As counsel for the talk-show host, how would you argue your case?
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER.
As a radio-TV talk show host, Ms. Vartan is performing an activity which is necessary and desirable in the usual trade or business of XYZ
Entertainment Network. Hence, Ms. Vartan is a regular employee and cannot be terminated except for cause and only after due process.
The cancellation of the program is tantamount to closure but XYZ Entertainment Network did not comply with the procedural
requirements of law, i.e., 30 days notice to Ms. Vartan and to DOLE prior to the intended date of termination.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
As counsel for the talk show host, I will argue that she is a regular employee. First, she performs job that is necessary and desirable to the
nature of the business of the employer; Second, she serves for at least one (1) year which is an indication of regular employment.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 33
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Strictly speaking, the employer has no right to hire a person as his employee. The matter of selecting a person as one’s employee is
more appropriately described as a prerogative. It is not a right in which you can go to court and enforce the right to hire a person,
otherwise it will violate the constitutional provision against involuntary servitude, if one is compelled to be another’s employee. No
person can be compelled against his will to do an act whether legal or illegal. Thus, an employer cannot go to court and get an
injunction to compel a person to become his employee. If at all, the employee can only exercise the prerogative to invite that
person and to hire him if he so desires. In that sense, the right to hire is essentially a management prerogative.
MANAGEMENT PREROGATIVE
It is an act of the employer according to his own judgment or discretion to regulate his business. This includes hiring, transfer,
dismissal, etc.
SMC v. Ople
“Except as limited by Special Laws, an employer is free to regulate, according to his own discretion and judgment, all aspects of
employment, including hiring, work assignments, working methods, time, place and manner or work, tools to be used, processes to
be followed, supervision of workers, working regulations, transfer of employees, work supervision, layoff of workers and the
discipline, dismissal and recall of workers.”(ONE RIGHT OF AN EMPLOYER)
Law
Contract or CBA
Principles of fair play and justice
RIGHTS OF MANAGEMENT
Right to ROI
Right to prescribe rules
Right to select employees
Transfer or discharge of employees
The exercise of the right or prerogative to hire is NOT ABSOLUTE. It is regulated by law.
LIMITATIONS:
1. Special Laws
2. Contract
3. Basic principles of equity and fair play
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 34
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
(b) To require as a condition of employment that a person or an employee shall not join a labor organization or shall
withdraw from one to which he belongs
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7658: PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF CHILDREN BELOW 15 YEARS OF AGE IN
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UNDERTAKINGS
Section 1. Section 12, Article VIII of R. A. No. 7610 otherwise known as the "Special Protection of Children Against
Child Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act" is hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 12. Employment of Children. — Children below fifteen (15) years of age shall not be employed EXCEPT:
(1) When a child works directly under the sole responsibility of his parents or legal guardian and where only
members of the employer's family are employed: Provided, however, That his employment neither
endangers his life, safety, health and morals, nor impairs his normal development; Provided, further, That
the parent or legal guardian shall provide the said minor child with the prescribed primary and/or secondary
education; or
(2) Where a child's employment or participation in public entertainment or information through cinema,
theater, radio or television is essential: Provided, The employment contract is concluded by the child's
parents or legal guardian, with the express agreement of the child concerned, if possible, and the approval
of the Department of Labor and Employment: and Provided, That the following requirements in all
instances are strictly complied with:
(a) The employer shall ensure the protection, health, safety, morals and normal development of the
child;
(b) The employer shall institute measures to prevent the child's exploitation or discrimination taking
into account the system and level of remuneration, and the duration and arrangement of working
time; and
(c) The employer shall formulate and implement, subject to the approval and supervision of
competent authorities, a continuing program for training and skills acquisition of the child.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 35
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
In the above exceptional cases where any such child may be employed, the employer shall first secure,
before engaging such child, a work permit from the Department of Labor and Employment which shall ensure
observance of the above requirements.
The Department of Labor and Employment shall promulgate rules and regulations necessary for the
effective implementation of this Section.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9231: THE ELIMINATION OF THE WORST FORMS OF CHILD LABOR AND AFFORDING
STRONGER PROTECTION FOR THE WORKING CHILD
Sec. 12. Employment of Children. — Children below fifteen (15) years of age shall not be employed except:
1) When a child works directly under the sole responsibility of his/her parents or legal guardian and where only
members of his/her family are employed: provided, however, that his/her employment neither endangers
his/her life, safety, health, and morals, nor impairs his/her normal development: provided, further, that the
parent or legal guardian shall provide the said child with the prescribed primary and/or secondary education; or
2) Where a child's employment or participation in public entertainment or information through cinema, theater,
radio, television or other forms of media is essential: provided, that the employment contract is concluded by
the child's parents or legal guardian, with the express agreement of the child concerned, if possible, and the
approval of the Department of Labor and Employment: provided, further, that the following requirements in all
instances are strictly complied with:
(a) The employer shall ensure the protection, health, safety, morals and normal development of the child;
(b) The employer shall institute measures to prevent the child's exploitation or discrimination taking into
account the system and level of remuneration, and the duration and arrangement of working time; and
(c) The employer shall formulate and implement, subject to the approval and supervision of competent
authorities, a continuing program for training and skills acquisition of the child.
In the above-exceptional cases where any such child may be employed, the employer shall first secure, before
engaging such child, a work permit from the Department of Labor and Employment which shall ensure observance of
the above requirements.
For purposes of this Article, the term "child" shall apply to all persons under eighteen (18) years of age.
Sec. 12-A. Hours of Work of a Working Child. — Under the exceptions provided in Sec. 12 of this Act, as amended:
(1) A child below fifteen (15) years of age may be allowed to work for not more than twenty (20) hours a week:
provided, that the work shall not be more than four (4) hours at any given day;
(2) A child fifteen (15) years of age but below eighteen (18) shall not be allowed to work for more than eight (8)
hours a day, and in no case beyond forty (40) hours a week;
(3) No child below fifteen (15) years of age shall be allowed to work between eight o'clock in the evening and six
o'clock in the morning of the following day and no child fifteen (15) years of age but below eighteen (18) shall be
allowed to work between ten o'clock in the evening and six o'clock in the morning of the following day.
Sec. 12-B. Ownership, Usage and Administration of the Working Child's Income. — The wages, salaries, earnings and
other income of the working child shall belong to him/her in ownership and shall be set aside primarily for his/her
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 36
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
support, education or skills acquisition and secondarily to the collective needs of the family: provided, that not more
than twenty percent (20%) of the child's income may be used for the collective needs of the family.
The income of the working child and/or the property acquired through the work of the child shall be administered by
both parents. In the absence or incapacity of either of the parents, the other parent shall administer the same. In case
both parents are absent or incapacitated, the order of preference on parental authority as provided for under the
Family Code shall apply.
Sec. 12-C. Trust Fund to Preserve Part of the Working Child's Income. — The parent or legal guardian of a working
child below eighteen (18) years of age shall set up a trust fund for at least thirty percent (30%) of the earnings of the
child whose wages and salaries from work and other income amount to at least two hundred thousand pesos
(P200,000.00) annually, for which he/she shall render a semi-annual accounting of the fund to the Department of
Labor and Employment, in compliance with the provisions of this Act. The child shall have full control over the trust
fund upon reaching the age of majority.
Sec. 12-D. Prohibition Against Worst Forms of Child Labor. — No child shall be engaged in the worst forms of child
labor. The phrase "worst forms of child labor" shall refer to any of the following:
(1) All forms of slavery, as defined under the "Anti-trafficking in Persons Act of 2003", or practices similar
to slavery such as sale and trafficking of children, debt bondage and serfdom and forced or
compulsory labor, including recruitment of children for use in armed conflict; or
(2) The use, procuring, offering or exposing of a child for prostitution, for the production of pornography
or for pornographic performances; or
(3) The use, procuring or offering of a child for illegal or illicit activities, including the production and
trafficking of dangerous drugs and volatile substances prohibited under existing laws; or
(4) Work which, by its nature or the circumstances in which it is carried out, is hazardous or likely to be
harmful to the health, safety or morals of children, such that it:
(a) Debases, degrades or demeans the intrinsic worth and dignity of a child as a human being; or
(b) Exposes the child to physical, emotional or sexual abuse, or is found to be highly stressful
psychologically or may prejudice morals; or
(c) Is performed underground, underwater or at dangerous heights; or
(d) Involves the use of dangerous machinery, equipment and tools such as power-driven or
explosive power-actuated tools; or
(e) Exposes the child to physical danger such as, but not limited to the dangerous feats of
balancing, physical strength or contortion, or which requires the manual transport of heavy
loads; or
(f) Is performed in an unhealthy environment exposing the child to hazardous working
conditions, elements, substances, co-agents or processes involving ionizing, radiation, fire,
flammable substances, noxious components and the like, or to extreme temperatures, noise
levels, or vibrations; or
(g) Is performed under particularly difficult conditions; or
(h) Exposes the child to biological agents such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, protozoans, nematodes
and other parasites; or
(i) Involves the manufacture or handling of explosives and other pyrotechnic products.
Sec. 14. Prohibition on the Employment of Children in Certain Advertisements. — No child shall be employed as a
model in any advertisement directly or indirectly promoting alcoholic beverages, intoxicating drinks, tobacco and its
byproducts, gambling or any form of violence or pornography.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 37
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 38
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
i. Debases, degrades or demeans the intrinsic worth and dignity of a child as a human being; or
ii. Exposes the child to physical, emotional or sexual abuse, or is found to be highly stressful psychologically or may
prejudice morals; or
iii. Is performed underground, underwater or at dangerous heights; or
iv. Involves the use of dangerous machinery, equipment and tools such as power-driven or explosive power-actuated
tools; or
v. Exposes the child to physical danger such as, but not limited to the dangerous feats of balancing, physical strength
or contortion, or which requires the manual transport of heavy loads; or
vi. Is performed in an unhealthy environment exposing the child to hazardous working conditions, elements,
substances, co-agents or processes involving ionizing, radiation, fire, flammable substances, noxious components
and the like, or to extreme temperatures, noise levels or vibrations; or
vii. Is performed under particularly difficult conditions; or
viii. Exposes the child to biological agents such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, protozoa, nematodes and other parasites; or
ix. Involves the manufacture or handling of explosives and other pyrotechnic products.
SECTION 6. Prohibition on the Employment of Children in Certain Advertisements – No child below 18 years of age shall be employed
as a model in any advertisement directly or indirectly promoting alcoholic beverages, intoxicating drinks, tobacco and its byproducts,
gambling or any form of violence or pornography.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 39
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
(b) If the terms and conditions set forth in the child’s employment contract and/or employer’s undertaking have been violated;
(c) If the employer fails to institute measures to ensure the protection, health, safety, morals, and normal development of the
child as required in Section 7 (b) ii;
(d) If the employer fails to formulate and implement a program for the education, training and skills acquisition of the child; or
(e) If a child has been deprived access to formal, non-formal or alternative learning systems of education.
Sec. 3. Work, Education or Training-related Sexual Harassment Defined. – Work, education or training-related sexual
harassment is committed by an employee, manager, supervisor, agent of the employer, teacher, instructor, professor,
coach, trainer, or any other person who, having authority, influence or moral ascendancy over another in a work or
training or education environment, demands, requests or otherwise requires any sexual favor from the other, regardless of
whether the demand, request or requirement for submission is accepted by the object of said Act.
(a) In a work-related or employment environment, sexual harassment is committed when:
(1) The sexual favor is made as a condition in the hiring or in the employment, re-employment or
continued employment of said individual, or in granting said individual favorable compensation,
terms, conditions, promotions, or privileges; or the refusal to grant the sexual favor results in
limiting, segregating or classifying the employee which in a way would discriminate, deprive or
diminish employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect said employee;
(2) The above acts would impair the employee’s rights or privileges under existing labor laws; or
(3) The above acts would result in an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment for the
employee.
SECTION 35. Discrimination in the Workplace - Discrimination in any from pre-employment to post-employment, including
hiring, promotion or assignment, based on the actual, perceived or suspected HIV status of an individual is prohibited.
Termination from work on the sole basis of actual, perceived or suspected HIV status is deemed unlawful.
Forced Labor and Slavery - refer to the extraction of work or services from any person by means of enticement, violence,
intimidation or threat, use of force or coercion, including deprivation of freedom, abuse of authority or moral ascendancy,
debt-bondage or deception.
Sec. 4. Acts of Trafficking in Persons. - It shall be unlawful for any person, natural or juridical, to commit any of the
following acts:
(a) To recruit, transport, transfer; harbor, provide, or receive a person by any means, including those done under
the pretext of domestic or overseas employment or training or apprenticeship, for the purpose of prostitution,
pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
(b) To introduce or match for money, profit, or material, economic or other consideration, any person or, as
provided for under Republic Act No. 6955, any Filipino woman to a foreign national, for marriage for the purpose
of acquiring, buying, offering, selling or trading him/her to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual
exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
Discrimination on Employment. No entity, public or private, should discriminate against qualified disabled person in terms
of job application procedures, hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation and other benefits.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 40
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
No bank shall employ casual or non-regular personnel or too lengthy probationary personnel in the conduct of its business
involving deposits.
Sec 23: Prohibited Acts, (c) Any employer who shall suggest, require, unduly influence or cause any applicant for employment or an
employee to submit himself/herself to sterilization, use any modern methods of family planning, or not use such methods as a condition
for employment, continued employment, promotion or the provision of employment benefits. Further, pregnancy or the number of
children shall not be a ground for non-hiring or termination from employment;
OTHERS:
Art. 1703. No contract which practically amounts to involuntary servitude, under any guise whatsoever, shall be valid.
Art. 272. Slavery. — The penalty of prision mayor and a fine of not exceeding 10,000 pesos shall be imposed upon anyone
who shall purchase, sell, kidnap or detain a human being for the purpose of enslaving him.
If the crime be committed for the purpose of assigning the offended party to some immoral traffic, the penalty shall be
imposed in its maximum period.
Art. 273. Exploitation of child labor. — The penalty of prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods and a fine
not exceeding 500 pesos shall be imposed upon anyone who, under the pretext of reimbursing himself of a debt incurred
by an ascendant, guardian or person entrusted with the custody of a minor, shall, against the latter's will, retain him in his
service.
Art. 274. Services rendered under compulsion in payment of debt. — The penalty of arresto mayor in its maximum period
to prision correccional in its minimum period shall be imposed upon any person who, in order to require or enforce the
payment of a debt, shall compel the debtor to work for him, against his will, as household servant or farm laborer.
Art. 278. Exploitation of minors. — The penalty of prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods and a fine not
exceeding 500 pesos shall be imposed upon:
Any person who shall cause any boy or girl under sixteen years of age to perform any dangerous feat of
balancing, physical strength, or contortion;
Any person who, being an acrobat, gymnast, rope-walker, diver, wild-animal tamer or circus manager or
engaged in a similar calling, shall employ in exhibitions of these kinds children under sixteen years of age
who are not his children or descendants;
Any person engaged in any of the callings enumerated in the next paragraph preceding who shall employ
any descendant of his under twelve years of age in such dangerous exhibitions;
Any ascendant, guardian, teacher or person entrusted in any capacity with the care of a child under sixteen
years of age, who shall deliver such child gratuitously to any person following any of the callings
enumerated in paragraph 2 hereof, or to any habitual vagrant or beggar.
If the delivery shall have been made in consideration of any price, compensation, or promise, the penalty
shall in every case be imposed in its maximum period.
In either case, the guardian or curator convicted shall also be removed from office as guardian or curator;
and in the case of the parents of the child, they may be deprived, temporarily or perpetually, in the
discretion of the court, of their parental authority.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 41
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Any person who shall induce any child under sixteen years of age to abandon the home of its ascendants,
guardians, curators, or teachers to follow any person engaged in any of the callings mentioned in paragraph
2 hereof, or to accompany any habitual vagrant or beggar.
Technical Guidelines for Classifying Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Establishments, Workplaces and Work Processes.
Sec 3. Criteria for Classifying Hazardous Establishments or Workplaces. – An establishment or workplace may be classified as
hazardous if any of the conditions provided under Rule 1013 of the OSHS has been confirmed, as follows:
a) Where the nature of the work exposes the workers to dangerous environment elements, contaminants or work
conditions including ionizing radiations, chemicals, fire, flammable substances, noxious components and the like;
b) Where the workers are engaged in construction work, logging, fire-fighting, mining, quarrying, blasting, stevedoring,
dock work, deep sea fishing and mechanized farming;
c) Where the workers are engaged in the manufacture or handling of explosives and other pyrotechnic products;
d) Where the workers use or are exposed to power-driven or explosive powder actuated tools; and
e) Where the workers are exposed to biologic agents like bacteria and fungi, viruses, protozoa, nematodes and other
parasites.
DO NO. 65-04, SERIES OF 2004 (SEE RIGHT TO HIRE: PROHIBITIONS TO HIRING page 29)
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 42
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
SECTION 1. Basis. – This Guidelines is being issued pursuant to Article 139(c), Book III of the Labor Code of the Philippines, as
amended, and its implementing rules and regulations, and Republic Act No. 7658, An Act Prohibiting the Employment of Children
Below 15 Years of Age in Public and Private Undertakings, Amending for this Purpose Section 12, Article VIII of Republic Act No.
7610 (otherwise known as the Special Protection of Children Against Child Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act.).
SECTION 2. Policy. - (a) The employment of a person below eighteen (18) years of age in an undertaking which is hazardous or
deleterious in nature as identified in this Guidelines shall be prohibited.
(b) The employment of children below fifteen (15) years of age in any undertakings is likewise prohibited, except only in
employment that would not endanger their life, safety, health and morals, or impair their normal development, and in any event
subject to the requirements of Republic Act No. 7658.
SECTION 3. Coverage. - The following work and activities are hereby declared hazardous to persons below 18 years of age
without prejudice to Section 14, Article VIII of Republic Act No. 7610; to DOLE Memorandum Circular No. 2, Series of 1998
(Technical Guidelines for Classifying Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Establishments, Workplaces and Work Processes) and to
other work and activities that may subsequently be declared as such:
1. Work which exposes children to physical, psychological or sexual abuse, such as in:
lewd shows (stripteasers, burlesque dancers, and the like)
cabarets
bars (KTV, karaoke bars)
dance halls
bath houses and massage clinics
escort service
gambling halls and places
2. Work underground, under water, at dangerous heights or at unguarded heights of two meters and above, or in
confined places, such as in:
mining
deep sea fishing/diving
installing and repairing of telephone, telegraph and electrical lines; cable fitters
painting buildings
window cleaning
fruit picking involving climbing
3. Work with dangerous machinery, equipment and tools, or which involves manual handling or transport of heavy
loads, such as in:
logging
construction
quarrying
operating agricultural machinery in mechanized farming
metal work and welding
driving or operating havy equipment such as payloaders, backhoes, bulldozers, cranes, pile driving
equipment, trailers, road rollers, tractor lifting appliances scaffold winches, hoists, excavators and loading
machines
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 43
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
operating or setting motor-driven machines such as saws, presses, and wood -working machines
operating power-driven tools such as drills and jack hammers
stevedoring
working in airport hangars
working in warehouses
working in docks
4. Work in unhealthy environment which may expose children to hazardous processes, to temperatures, noise levels
or vibrations damaging to their health, to toxic, corrosive, poisonous, noxious, explosive, flammable and
combustible substances or composites, to harmful biological agents, or to other dangerous chemicals including
pharmaceuticals, such as in:
manufacture or handling of pyrotechnics
tanning
pesticide spraying
blacksmithing, hammersmiths, forging extracting lard and oil
tiling and greasing of heavy machinery
fiber and plastic preparing
bleaching, dyeing, and finishing of textiles using chemicals
embalming and as undertakers
painting and as finishers in metal craft industries
applying of adhesive/solvent in footwear, handicraft, and woodwork industries
brewing and distilling of alcoholic beverages
recycling of batteries and containers or materials used or contaminated with chemicals
working in abattoirs or slaughterhouses
garbage collecting
handling of animal manure in poultry houses or as fertilizers (compost and other decaying matter included)
in farming
working in hospitals or other health care facilities
assisting in laboratories and x-ray work
welding
working in furnaces and kilns working in discotheques
working in video arcades
5. Work under particularly difficult conditions such as work for long hours or during the night, or work where the child
is unreasonably confined to the premises of the employer.
SECTION 4. Applicability of this Guideline to Domestic or Household Service. - Persons between 15 and 18 years of age may be
allowed to engage in domestic or household service, subject in all cases to the limitations prescribed in Nos. 1 to 5 of Section 3
herein.
SECTION 5. Enforcement. - The labor standards enforcement officers of the Department of Labor and Employment shall use this
Guidelines in monitoring the compliance with labor standards and laws related to child labor which provides for only two
exceptions allowing children below fifteen years of age to be employed provided such employment would not endanger their
life, safety, health and morals, nor impair their normal development.
SECTION 6. Separability Clause. - If any part or provision of this Guidelines is declared invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining
provisions not affected thereby shall continue in full force and effect.
This Department Order shall take effect fifteen days after its complete publication in two (2) newspaper of general circulation.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 44
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
SEC. 33. Personnel Required. Except as otherwise provided in this Act, every electric plant, industrial plant or
factory, commercial establishment, institutional building, watercraft, electric locomotive or in any other
installation where persons and properties are exposed to electrical hazards shall not have less than the
following complement of professional electrical engineer, registered electrical engineer, and registered master
electrician:
(b) Industrial plants or factories, commercial establishments, or institutional buildings having a connected kVA
load of any size and employing voltages of any standard rating one (1) professional electrical engineer
or one (1) registered electrical engineer. However, for connected loads up to five hundred kilovolt amperes
(500 kVA) and employing voltages up to six hundred volts (600 V) one (1) registered master electrician;
Sec. 34. Personnel Required in Mechanical Plant. — Every mechanical work project or plant in operation shall have not
less than the following complement of resident licensed professional mechanical engineer, mechanical engineer or
certified plant mechanic:
(a) 100 kw or over but not more than 300 kw: one (1) certified plant mechanic, or more mechanical engineer or one
(1) professional mechanic engineer: Provided, That every mechanical work, project, or plant in this category
operating in more than one shift every twenty-four hours, shall have in addition to the minimum personnel
herein required, one (1) certified plant mechanical, or one (1) mechanical engineer, or one (1) professional
mechanical engineer in-charge of each and every additional shift.
(b) 300 kw or over, but not more than 2000 kw: one (1) mechanical engineer or one (1) professional mechanical
engineer or one (1) professional mechanical engineer: Provided, That every mechanical work, project, or plant in
this category operating in more than one shift every twenty-four (24) hours shall have, in addition to the
minimum personnel herein required at least one (1) mechanical engineer, or one (1) professional mechanical
engineer in-charge of each and every additional shift.
(c) Over 2000 kw: one (1) professional mechanical engineer: Provided, That every mechanical work, project or plant
in this category operating in more than one shift every twenty-four (24) hours shall have, in addition to the
minimum personnel herein required at least one (1) professional mechanical engineer in-charge of each and
every additional shift.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 45
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
ADDITIONAL NOTES:
To justify a bona fide occupational qualification, the employer must prove two factors: (1) that the employment qualification is
reasonably related to the essential operation of the job involved; and, (2) that there is a factual basis for believing that all or
substantially all persons meeting the qualification would be unable to properly perform the duties of the job.
A. DISPARATE TREATMENT – Plaintiff must prove that an employment policy is discriminating on its face.
B. DISPARATE IMPACT – Complainant must prove that a facial neutral policy has a disproportionate effect on a part of the
class.
ANTI-NEPOTISM
Banning all immediate family members including spouse from working in the same company
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 46
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
This answer does not contradict the ruling in ChuaQua where the teacher merely fell in love with a bachelor student and the teacher, also
single, did not get pregnant out of wedlock.
Was the Little Hands Garments Company within its rights to withdraw this benefit which it had unilaterally been providing to its
employees? Select the best answer(s) and briefly explain your reason(s) therefor.
(a) Yes, because it can withdraw a benefit that is unilaterally given;
(b) Yes, because it is suffering losses for the first time;
(c) Yes, because this is a management prerogative which is not due any legal or contractual obligation;
(d) No, because this amounts to a diminution of benefits which is prohibited by the Labor Code;
(e) No, because it is a fringe benefit that has already ripened into a demandable right or entitlement. (10%)
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
(b) Yes, because it is suffering losses for the first time;
(c) Yes, because this is a management prerogative which is not due any legal or contractual obligation;
An employer cannot be forced to continue giving a benefit, being given as a management prerogative, when it can no longer afford to pay
for it. To hold otherwise, would be to penalize the employer for his past generosity. (Producer's Bank of the Philippines v. NLRC, G.R. No.
100701, March 28, 2001)
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
(d) No, because this amounts to a diminution of benefits which is prohibited by the Labor Code;
(e) No, because it is a fringe benefit that has already ripened into a demandable right or entitlement.
A company practice favorable to employees had indeed been established and the payments made pursuant thereto, ripened into
benefits enjoyed by them. And any benefit and supplement being enjoyed by the employees cannot be reduced, diminished,
discontinued or eliminated by the employer by virtue of Article 100 of the Labor Code of the Philippines which prohibits the diminution or
elimination of the employer of the employees' existing benefits. (Sevilla Trading Co. v. Semana, G.R. No. 152456, April 28, 2004)
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
(b) Yes, because it is suffering losses for the first time;
(d) No, because this amounts to a diminution of benefits which is prohibited by the Labor Code. You cannot compel an employer to
continue paying the benefits if it is suffering from serious business losses. However, the benefit has already ripened into an employer
practice or policy, and therefore it cannot be withdrawn without violating Article 100 of the Labor Code on non-diminution of benefits.
Company policies and regulations are, unless shown to be gross oppressive or contrary to law, generally binding and valid on the parties
and must be complied with until finally revised or amended unilaterally or preferably through negotiation or by competent authority.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 47
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
(San Miguel Corporation vs. Reynaldo R. Ubaldo and Emmanuel Noel A. Cruz, Chairman and Member respectively of the Voluntary
Arbitration Panel, et al G.R No. 92859, 1 February 1993. J. Campos, Jr., 218 SCRA 293)
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
a) The action of the Harbor View Hotel is legal and valid. CONTRACTING OUT SERVICES or functions being performed by union members is
not illegal per se. In fact, it is the prerogative of management to adopt cost-saving measures to ensure economy and efficiency.
Contracting out services or functions being performed by Union members becomes illegal only when it interferes with, restrains or
coerces employees in the exercise of their right to self-organization.
b) The action of Harbor View Hotel would, at first glance, appear to be an unfair labor practice under Article 248(c), e.g. "to contract out
services or functions being performed by union members if such will interfere with, restrain or coerce employees in the exercise of their
right to self-organization."
Considering, however, that in the case at bar, there is no showing that the contracting out of services would violate the employees right
to self-organization, it is submitted that the hotel's action is a valid exercise of its management prerogatives and the right to make
business judgments in accordance with law.
A line must be drawn between management prerogatives regarding business operations per se and those which affect the rights of the
employees, and in treating the latter, management should see to it that its employees are at least properly informed of its decisions or
modes of action.
The attainment of a harmonious labor management relationship and the existing state policy of enlightening workers concerning their
rights as employees demand no less than the observance of transparency in managerial moves affecting employees' rights. [Philippine
Airlines, Inc. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al, G.R No. 85985, 13 August 1993. J. Melo. 225 SCRA 258, 301.)
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
1. The Union is correct. Workers have the right to participate in policy and decision-making processes affecting their rights, benefits and
welfare. (Art. 255J.
2. Yes. The Union is correct in asking for discussion of the revised rules prior to their effectivity. The reason is Art. XIII, Sec. 3 of the 1987
Constitution, allowing workers the right to participate in policy and decision-making on matters related to their welfare and benefits.
The Union's remedy however should not be to file a ULP case but to initiate a GRIEVANCE proceeding, and if unresolved, submit the
matter to voluntary arbitration.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
2) The answer would be the same even if the CBA was signed or executed before the ratification of the 1987 Constitution because it has
always been the policy of the State to promote the enlightenment of workers concerning their rights and obligations as employees. (Art.
211; PAL vs. NLRC, GR 85985, August 13, 1993)
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 48
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
FACTS: Solar Plexus Bar and Night Club allowed by tolerance fifty (50) Guest Relations Officers (GRO) to work without compensation in its
establishment under the direct supervision of its Manager from 8:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. everyday, including Sundays and holidays. The
GROs, however, are free to ply their trade elsewhere at anytime but once they enter the premises of the night club, they are required to
stay up to closing time. The GROs earned their keep exclusively from commissions for food and drinks, and tips from generous customers.
In time, the GROs formed the Solar Ugnayan ng mga Kababaihang Inaapi (SUKI); a labor union duly registered with DOLE. Subsequently,
SUKI filed a petition for certification election in order to be recognized as the exclusive bargaining agent of its members. Solar Plexus
opposed the petition for certification election on the singular ground of absence of employer-employee relationship between the GROs
on one hand and the night club on the other hand. May the GROs form SUKI as a labor organization for purposes of collective bargaining?
Explain briefly. (5%).
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The GROs may form SUKI as a labor organization for purposes of collective bargaining. There is an employer-employee relationship
between the GROs and the night club.
The Labor Code (in Article 138) provides that any woman who is permitted or suffered to work, with or without compensation, in any
nightclub, cock tail lounge, massage clinic, bar or similar establishment, under the effective control or supervision of the employer for a
substantial period of time as determined by the Secretary of Labor, shall be considered as an employee of such establishment for
purposes of labor and social legislation.
In the case at bar, it is clearly stated that the women once they enter the premises of the night club would be under the direct
supervision of the manager from 8:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. everyday including Sundays and holidays. Such is indicative of an employer-
employee relationship since the manager would be exercising the right of control.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 49
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Pedrito Masculado, a college graduate from the province, tried his luck in the city and landed a job as utility/maintenance man at the
warehouse of a big shopping mall. After working as a casual employee for six months, he signed a contract for probationary employment
for six months. Being well-built and physically attractive, his supervisor, Mr. Hercules Barak, took special interest to befriend him. When
his probationary period was about to expire, he was surprised when one afternoon after working hours, Mr. Barak followed him to the
men’s comfort room. After seeing that no one else was around, Mr. Barak placed his arm over Pedrito’s shoulder and softly said: “You
have great potential to become regular employee and I think I can give you a favorable recommendation. Can you come over to my
condo unit on Saturday evening so we can have a little drink? I’m alone, and I’m sure you want to stay longer with the company.”
Is Mr. Barak liable for sexual harassment committed in a work-related or employment environment? (5%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Yes, the elements of sexual harassment are all present. The act of Mr. Barak was committed in a workplace. Mr. Barak, as supervisor of
Pedrito Masculado, has authority, influence and moral ascendancy over Masculado. Given the specific circumstances mentioned in the
question like Mr. Barak following Masculado to the comfort room, etc. Mr. Barak was requesting a sexual favor from Masculado for a
favorable recommendation regarding the latter's employment.
It is not impossible for a male, who is a homosexual, to ask for a sexual favor from another male.
ANOTHER SUGGESTED ANSWER:
I do not see any sexual favor being solicited. Having a "little drink" in Mr. Barak's Condo Unit, as condition for a "favorable
recommendation is not one of the prohibited acts enumerated in Sec. 3 (a) of R.A. 7877, otherwise known as the Anti-Sexual Harassment
Act of 1995.
For an employer to commit sexual harassment, he - as a person of authority, influence or moral ascendancy -should have demanded,
requested or otherwise required a sexual favor from his employee whether the demand, request or requirement for submission is
accepted by the object of said act.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 50
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
A year later, Dinna Ignaclo requested to go on leave because she would be getting married to one of the club's regular guests. The
management of the club dismissed her.
Dinna filed a complaint for illegal dismissal, night shift differential pay, backwages, overtime pay and holiday pay. Discuss the merits of
Dinna's complaint.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The first issue to be resolved is: Is Dinna Ignacio an employee of the Star Karaoke Club? Yes, she is an employee per the provision of the
Labor Code that states: "Any woman who is permitted or suffered to work, with or without compensation, in any night club, cocktail
lounge, massage clinic, bar or similar establishment, under the effective control or supervision of the employer for a substantial period
shall be considered an employee of such establishment for purposes of labor and social legislation"(Art. 138). In Dinna's conditions of
employment have all the aforesaid characteristics.
She has been illegally dismissed. The Labor Code expressly provides, that "It shall be unlawful for an employer to require as a condition of
employment or continuation of employment that a woman employee shall not get married, or to stipulate expressly or tacitly that upon
getting married a woman employee shall be deemed resigned or separated, or to actually dismiss, discharge, discriminate or otherwise
prejudice a woman employee merely by reason of her marriage." (Art.
136)
Because of her illegal dismissal, she is entitled to backwages from the time her compensation was withheld from her to the time of her
actual reinstatement.
Dinna is not entitled to night differential pay, overtime pay and holiday pay because she belongs to one of those classes of employees
who are not covered by the provision of the Labor Code providing for these benefits. She is a worker paid by results, since her
compensation is determined by the tips and commission that she receives from her guests.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 51
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Carissa, a comely bank teller, was due for her performance evaluation which is conducted every six months. A rating of "outstanding" is
rewarded with a merit increase. She was given a "below average" rating in the last two periods. According to the bank's personnel policy,
a third rating of "below average" will result in termination. Mr. Perry Winkle called Carissa into his office a few days before submitting her
performance ratings. He invited her to spend the night with him in his rest house. She politely declined. Undaunted, Mr. Winkle renewed
his invitation, and Carissa again declined. He then warned her to "watch out" because she might regret it later on. A few days later,
Carissa found that her third and last rating was again "below average."
Carissa then filed a complaint for sexual harassment against Mr. Winkle with the Department of Labor and Employment. In his counter-
affidavit, he claimed that he was enamored with Carissa. He denied having demanded, much less received any sexual favors from her in
consideration of giving her an "outstanding" rating. He also alleged that the complaint was premature because Carissa failed to refer the
matter to the Committee on Decorum and Discipline for investigation and resolution before the case against him was filed. In her reply
affidavit, Carissa claimed that there was no need for a prior referral to the Committee on Decorum and Discipline of her complaint.
Resolve the case with reasons. (5%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
I will hold Mr. Perry Winkle guilty of sexual harassment. This resolution is predicated mainly upon the following considerations:
1. Mr. Perry Winkle exercises authority, influence or moral ascendancy over Carissa;
2. Mr. Winkle's insistence in inviting Carissa "to spend the night with him in his rest house" implies a request or demand for a
sexual favor;
3. Mr. Winkle's warning clearly manifests that the refusal of the sexual favor would jeopardize Carissa's continued employment;
and
4. Mr. Winkle's invitation for a sexual favor will result in an intimidating, hostile, or otherwise offensive working environment
for Carissa.
Carissa is correct in stating that there was no need for prior referral to the Committee on Decorum and Discipline of her complaint
because nothing in the law precludes the victim of sexual harassment from instituting a separate and independent action for damages
and other affirmative relief. (Sec. 6, R.A. No. 7877)
Josephine got married. She asked Owen, the personnel manager, if the company can reconsider the agreement. He told Josephine he can
do something about it, insinuating some sexual favors. She complained to higher authorities but to no avail. She hires you as her counsel.
What action or actions will you take? Explain. (5%)
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
I will file a criminal case against Owen for violation of RA. No. 7877, otherwise known as the "Anti-Sexual Harassment Act of 1995."
I will also file a separate and independent action for damages against Owen. By reason of the fact that the Company did not take
immediate action thereon, I will include the Company in the civil suit for damages and make it jointly and severally liable with Owen.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
Aside from filing a criminal case against Owen for violation of the Sexual Harassment Law (R.A. 7877) and a separate action for damages,
impleading the company, I will also file an action for constructive dismissal against the Company since the employee was placed in a job
atmosphere imposing oppressive work conditions contrary to public policy and morals.
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
No, her defense is not tenable. Under Article 139 of the Labor Code on "minimum employable age", no child below 15 years of age shall
be employed except when he works directly under the sole responsibility of his parents or guardian, the provisions of the alleged
Department Order of DOLE to the contrary notwithstanding. A mere Department Order cannot prevail over the express prohibitory
provisions of the Labor Code.
[Note: Sec. 3, RA 9231 allows a child below 15 years of age to work for not more than 20 hours a week; provided, that the work shall not
be more than four (4) hours at any given day; provided, further, that he does not work between 8 o'clock in the evening and 6 o'clock in
the morning of the following day; and provided, finally, that the work is not hazardous or deleterious to his health or morals. THIS IS A
RECENT LAW APPROVED ONLY ON JULY 28, 2003, which is beyond the cut-off period of the Bar Exams]
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 53
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
WAGE
Applies to the compensation for manual labor, skilled or unskilled, paid at stated times, and measured by the day, week,
month, or season.
Indicates inconsiderable pay for a lower and less responsible character of employment.
SALARY
Denotes a higher degree of employment or a superior grade of services, and implies a position or office.
Suggestive of a larger and more permanent or fixed compensation for more important service.
By some of the authorities, the word “wages” in its ordinary acceptance, has a less extensive meaning than the word “salary”,
“wages” being ordinarily restricted to sums paid to artisans, mechanics, laborers, and other employees of like class, as distinguished
from the compensation of clerks, officers of public corporations, and public offices. In many situations, however, the words “wages”
and “salary” are SYNONYMOUS. [35 Am. Jur. Sec. 63, p. 496-497]
Our SC reached the same conclusion, the words “wages” and “salary” are in essence synonymous.
The distinction between salary and wage in Gaa was for the purpose of Article 1708 of the Civil Code which mandates that, “the laborer’s wage shall
not be subject to execution or attachment, except for debts incurred for food, shelter, clothing and medical attendance.” In labor law, however, the
distinction appears to be merely semantics. Paramount and Evangelista may have involved wage earners, but the petitioner in Espejo was a General
Manager with a monthly salary of P9, 000.00 plus privileges. That wage and salary are synonymous has been settled in Songco v. National Labor
Relations Commission. We said:
Broadly, the word “salary” means a recompense or consideration made to a person for his pains or industry in another man’s business. Whether it
be derived from “salarium,” or more fancifully from “sal,” the pay of the Roman soldier, it carries with it the fundamental idea of compensation for
services rendered. Indeed, there is eminent authority for holding that the words “wages” and “salary” are in essence synonymous (Words and
Phrases, Vol. 38 Permanent Edition, p. 44 citing Hopkins vs. Cromwell, 85 N.Y.S.839, 841, 89 App. Div. 481; 38 Am. Jur. 496). “Salary,” the etymology
of which is the Latin word “salarium,” is often used interchangeably with “wage”, the etymology of which is the Middle English word “wagen”. Both
words generally refer to one and the same meaning, that is, a reward or recompense for services performed. Likewise, “pay” is the synonym of
“wages” and “salary” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Ed)
Q: Is there an instance outside labor law when wage and salary is distinguished?
A: Yes. In Article 1708 of the Civil Code where wage and salary are distinguished with regards to execution and attachment.
PRINCIPLES
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 54
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
“Where the failure of workers to work was not due to the employer’s fault, the burden of economic loss suffered by the employees
should not be shifted to the employer. Each party must bear his own loss.”
ISAE v. Quisumbing
G.R. No. 128845 June 1, 2000
“This doctrine/legal truism means that persons who work with substantially equal qualification, skill, effort & responsibility, under
similar conditions should be paid similar salaries, notwithstanding its international character.
If an employer accords employees the same position and rank, the presumption is that these employees perform equal work. There
is no evidence that foreign-hires perform 25% more efficiently or effectively than local-hires. Both groups have similar functions and
responsibilities, which they perform under similar conditions.
The “dislocation factor” and the foreign-hires “limited tenure” also cannot serve as valid bases for the distinction in salary rates. The
dislocation factor and limited tenure affecting foreign-hires are adequately compensated by certain benefits accorded to them
which are not enjoyed by the local-hires such as housing, transportation, shipping cost, taxes, and home leave travel allowance.
We find the point-of-hire classification employed by respondent school to justify the distinction in the salary rates of foreign-hires
and local-hires to be an invalid classification. There is no reasonable distinction between the services rendered by foreign-hires and
local-hires.”
Employees in the Philippines, if they are performing similar functions and responsibilities under similar working conditions,
should be paid under this principle.
FACILITIES
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 55
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
“FACILITIES are items of expense necessary for the laborer’s and his family’s existence and subsistence so that by express provision
of law, they form part of the wage and when furnished by the employer are deductible therefrom, since if they are not so furnished
the laborer would spend and pay for them just the same.”
More significantly, the food and lodging, or the electricity and water consumed by the petitioner were not facilities but
supplements. A benefit or privilege granted to an employee for the convenience of the employer is not facility. The criterion in
making a distinction between the two not so much lies in the kind (food, lodging) but the purpose. Considering therefore that hotel
workers are required to work different shifts and are expected to be available at various odd hours, their ready availability is a
necessary matter in the operations of a small hotel, such as the private respondent’s hotel.”
If the requisites are all present, that facilities may take the place of the cash payment of the employee’s wage. This is one
exception of the requirement that an employee’s wage shall be paid in legal tender, you cannot pay it in kind.
Art 97f provides that “wage” includes the fair and reasonable value, as determined by the Secretary of Labor, of board,
lodging, or other facilities customarily furnished by the employer to the employee.
This means that an employer may provide, for instance, food and housing to his employees but he may deduct their values from the
employees’ wages.
SUPPLEMENTS
“SUPPLEMENTS constitute extra remuneration or special privileges or benefits given to or received by the laborers over and above
their ordinary earnings or wages.”
Facilities – are items of expense necessary for the laborer’s and his family’s existence and subsistence.
Requisites:
1. Must be customarily furnished by the employer to the employees
Customary – is founded on long-established and constant practice connoting regularity.
2. Must be charged at a fair and reasonable value
3. The provision on deductible facilities must be voluntarily accepted by the employee in writing. (Mabeza vs. NLRC)
Facilities (Section 5, Rule VII, Book III)- articles or services for the benefit of the employee or his family but shall not include
tools of the trade or articles or services primarily for the benefit of the employer or necessary to the conduct of the
employer’s business.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 56
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Supplement – Constitute extra remuneration or special privileges or benefits given to or received by the laborers over and above
their ordinary earnings or wages.
The classification of an item of expense as a facility or a supplement will depends on the purpose and not on the kind. So, if it is
principally or mainly for the benefit of the employee, classify as facilities, and the fair and reasonable value of that can be considered
as deductible from the employee’s wage. An employer can validly pay the employee in the form of cash or in kind. And that kind
refers to facilities.
If the requisites are all present, that facilities may take the place of the cash payment of the employee’s wage. This is one exception
to the requirement that an employee’s wage shall be paid in legal tender; you cannot pay it in kind.
If it classifies under facilities, it shall include the fair and reasonable value of board, lodging, etc. as long as it is mainly and principally
for the benefit of the employee.
FACILITIES SUPPLEMENTS
Items of expense necessary for the laborer’s and his Constitute extra remuneration or privileges or benefits
family’s existence and subsistence. given to or received by the labors over and above their
ordinary earnings wages.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 57
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 357, Series of 2010, DOLE Rationalization Plan, Executive Order No. 366, and Article 121 (b) of the
Labor Code of the Philippines, as amended by Republic Act No. 6727, this Guidelines shall govern the procedures and standards for the
conduct of Facility Evaluation (FE).
RULE I
Section 1. Title. This Guidelines shall be known as the Revised Guidelines on the Conduct of Facility Evaluation.
Section 2. Construction. This Guidelines shall be liberally construed to carry out the objectives of Administrative Order No. 357, Series of
2010, DOLE Rationalization Plan, Executive Order No. 366, and Article 121 (b) of the Labor Code of the Philippines, as amended by
Republic Act No. 6727.
Section 3. Scope. This Guidelines shall govern the conduct of evaluation by the Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Boards of
facilities provided by the employer to his employees but shall exclude supplements.
3. Fuel including electricity, water, gas furnished for the non-commercial personal use of the employee;
4. Transportation furnished to the employee between his home and work where the travel time does not constitute hours worked
compensable under the Labor Code and other laws;
5. School, recreation and sanitation when operated exclusively for the benefit of the worker or his family;
7. Other articles and services given primarily for the benefit of the worker or his family.
(f) “Facility Evaluation” refers to an evaluation conducted by the appropriate RTWPB to determine the fair and reasonable value of
facilities furnished by the employer to his/her employees.
(g) “Facility Evaluation Order” refers to the Order issued by the DOLE Regional Director as Chairperson of RTWPB authorizing an employer
to consider the monetary value of the facilities availed of as part of the wages of his/her employees pursuant to Article 97(f) of the Labor
Code.
(h) “Fair and Reasonable Value of Facilities” is the cost of operation and maintenance, including adequate depreciation plus reasonable
allowance (but not more than 5-1/2% interest on the depreciated amount of capital invested by the employer; provided that if the total
so computed is more than the fair rental value (or the fair price of the commodities or facilities offered for sale), the fair value shall be
the reasonable cost of the operation and maintenance. The rate of depreciation and depreciated amount computed by the employer
shall be those arrived at under good accounting practices. (Sec. 6, Rule VII, Implementing Rules of Book III, Labor Code)
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 58
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
(i) “Supplements” constitute extra remuneration or special privileges or benefits given to or received by labourers over and above their
ordinary earnings or wages.
It shall include”
1. Emergency medical and dental services furnished by employer by virtue of the requirement of the Labor Code, as amended and its
Implementing Rules and Regulations;
2. Cost, rental and/or laundry of uniform where the nature of the business requires the employees to wear a uniform;
6. Tools of the trade or articles or services primarily for the benefit of the employer or necessary to the conduct of the employer’s
business.
(j) “Wages” means remuneration or earning, however designated, capable of being expressed in terms of money, whether fixed or
ascertained on a time, task, piece or commission basis or other method of calculating the same, which is payable by an employer to an
employee under a written or unwritten contract of employment for the work done or to be done, or for services rendered or to be
rendered and includes the fair and reasonable value of board, lodging or other facilities customarily furnished by the employer to the
employee as determined by the Secretary of Labor.
Section. 5. Assessment and Accreditation. The NWPC shall develop a system of assessment and accreditation of private facility evaluators.
Accredited evaluators shall comply with the procedural requirements consistent with Rules II and IV of this Guidelines.
RULE II
CONDUCT OF FACILITY EVALUATION
a. How filed. Application may be filed personally, by registered mail, or electronic mail (email) using NWPC-FE-Form-01. It shall be
accompanied by the following document:
1. Business permit for the current year issued by the appropriate government agency;
2. List of the company’s employees with their corresponding wages;
3. Job activities with their existing wage rates;
4. Method of payment of wages (e.g. pakyaw, takay, commission); and
5. Proof of notice of filing of application
Applications with incomplete documentary requirements shall not be accepted. If the application was sent through registered mail or e-
mail, it shall be returned upon the receipt using the Reply Form NWPC-FE Form-02 with all the submitted documents, indicating the
reason/s for non-acceptance of the application.
b. Who may file. The application may be filed by the union, worker or owner/manager or duly authorized representative of a micro,
small, or medium establishments in person, by registered mail, or by email. In case the application is filed by a union or worker, mere
application will suffice and the RTWPB shall immediately notify the owner/manager who shall be required to submit the documentary
requirements.
c. Where to file. The application shall filed with the RTWPB having the jurisdiction over the workplace using the NPWC-FE Form-01.
Applications filed with the DOLE Regional Office and field shall submit immediately be forwarded to the appropriate RTWPB.
d. When to file. Applications may be filed either before the introduction of the proposed facilities or at any time in the case of existing
facilities.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 59
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Section 2. Actions on Application. The RTWPB secretariat shall, within 30 days from determination of the completeness of the application,
act on the same as follows:
1. Determine if the facilities sought to be valuated are among those included in the definition herein, otherwise, the RTWPB Secretariat
shall recommend to the DOLE Regional Director, in his capacity as Board Chairman, the denial of the application.
2. If the facilities are among those included as herein defined, the RTWPB shall:
a. Secure from the DOLE Regional Director an authority to Conduct a Meeting and Facilities Evaluation
b. Coordinate with the applicant-firm for schedule and confirmation of the meeting to ensure the attendance and participation of
management and workers’ representatives;
c. Meet with an equal number representatives from management and workers to discuss the details of the application with a view to
come out with a voluntary agreement on the conduct of facility evaluation.
e. Record relevant observations, e.g. working conditions, workers benefits, labor relations, and other concerns during the actual
evaluation of facilities in the company, for the information of the DOLE Regional Office.
f. In case of doubt on reasonable value of meals and facilities, conduct an actual price/cost validation against the prevailing market price
in the region.
g. The RTWPB Secretariat shall, after the FE Evaluation, conduct post or closing meeting to discuss the expected FE output to be delivered
by the Secretariat, and the roles and responsibilities of the workers and employer.
h. Submit to the DOLE Regional Director as RTWPB Chairman for his consideration, a post- evaluation report using NWPC-FE Form-03
together with the complete records/documents.
RULE III
DEDUCTIBILITY OF THE VALUE OF FACILITIES
Section 1. Deductibility of the value of facilities. In order that the fair and reasonable value of the facilities may be deducted from the
wages of employees, the following requisites must concur:
a. Facilities subject of valuation are customarily furnished by the employer;
b. Deductibility of the value of the facilities must have been voluntarily accepted in writing by the employee; and
c. Facilities must be charged at a fair and reasonable value.
Section 2. Standards for Fair and Reasonable Value of Meals. –For the value of meals to be deductible from the wages of employees, the
meals provided must be nutritionally adequate.
In determining the fair and reasonable value of meals, at least 30% of the actual cost shall be subsidized by the employer.
Section. Standards for Fair and Reasonable Value of Housing Facilities. For the value of housing facilities to be deductible from the wages
of the employees, the same must be used exclusively for the living quarters of employees.
In determining the fair and reasonable value of housing facilities, the total yearly expenses of the employer comprising of 5 ½%
of the depreciated amount plus the cost of operation and maintenance and payment of electric and water bills are deducted from the
total cost of expenses incurred in the construction or acquisition of the housing facility.
RULE IV
FACILITY EVALUATION ORDER
Section 1. Issuance of Facility Evaluation Order. The DOLE Regional Director shall issue a Facility Evaluation Order (NWPC-FE Form-04),
within five (5) days from submission by the RTWPB of its recommendation.
Section 2. Contents. The Facility Evaluation Order shall expressly state the following conditions, where appropriate:
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 60
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
h. Acceptance of the reasonable rates deducted from the wages of the employees/workers should be written and voluntary.
Section 3. Duration of Facility Evaluation Order. The duration of a Facility Evaluation Order shall remain valid and effective unless sooner
revoked or suspended or revised or reviewed.
Section 4. Posting of Order. The employer and union/workers shall be furnished a copy of the Order. The employer is required to post a
copy of the Order in the bulletin board or in a conspicuous place in its establishment and shall submit a certificate of posting to the
RTWPB. The posting shall form part of the monitoring activity of the DOLE Regional Office.
RULE V
APPEAL
Section 1. Appeal to the DOLE Regional Office. Any party aggrieved by a Facility Evaluation Order issued may, within ten (10) days from
receipt thereof, appeal such Order to NWPC by filing a verified appeal with the RTWPB specifying therin the grounds relied upon, in two
(2) printed and legible copies.
Section 2. Grounds for Appeal. An appeal may be filed based on the following grounds:
a. Violation of procedures as set forth under Rule II, Section 2;
b. Serious error in computing the monetary value of the facility.
Section 3. Period to Act on Appeal. The NWPC shall decide on the appeal within thirty (30) days from receipt thereof.
Section 4. Effect of an Appeal. The filing of an appeal does not operate to stay the Facility Evaluation Order.
RULE VI
ENFORCEMENT
Section 1. Complaints for Non-Compliance of Facility Evaluation Order. Complaints for non-compliance with the Facility Evaluation Order
issued shall be filed with the appropriate DOLE Regional Office and shall be subject to enforcement proceedings under Article 128 and
129 of the Labor Code of the Philippines, as amended.
RULE VII
AVAILMENTS OF FACILITIES
Section 1. Provision of Facilities. The employer and the union/workers shall agree on the facilities that may be provided by the former to
the latter.
Section 2. Non-availment of Facilities. If the union/workers desire not to avail the facilities, the employer shall not be allowed to credit or
make deductions against the wages of its employees the value of said facilities.
RULE VIII
SUBMISSION OF REPORTS
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 61
h a n g e Vi h a n g e Vi
XC e XC e
F- w F- w
PD
PD
er
er
!
!
W
W
O
O
N
N
y
y
bu
bu
Societas Spectra Legis
to
to
k
k
lic
lic
C
C
Labor Standards Compilation w . d o c u -tr a c k.c
w
w
m
m
w
w
w
o
o
.d o . c
c u -tr ack
Section 1. Submission of Reports. The RTWPBs shall submit to the NWPC a monthly report (NWPC-FE Form 05) on the data of facility
evaluation applications acted upon including the studies conducted, for purposes of program monitoring and evaluation. The report shall
be submitted not later than the 10th day of the month preceding the reference month.
All Orders and this corresponding FE documentation should be filed at the RTWPB. One complete copy shall be sent to NWPC,
who shall maintain a database of all FE studies.
RULE IX
REPEAL AND SEPARABILITY
Section 1. Repeal and Separability. All existing rules, regulations or orders or any part thereof inconsistent with these amended
Guidelines are hereby amended or modified. If any part or provision of these Guidelines is declared unconstitutional or illegal, the other
parts or provisions shall remain valid.
RULE X
EFFECTIVITY
Section 1. Effectivity. This amended Guideline shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in one newspaper of general
circulation.
University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Based on the Outline of JMM Page 62