Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • PALE - Case List

    Uploaded by

    Michelle Escudero Filart
    108 views3 pages
    This document assigns law students a case digest assignment involving 35 legal cases. The students are instructed to prepare summaries of each case in a standardized format including the case title, petitioner's claims, respondent's claims, issues, and ruling per issue. The assignment also provides the list of 35 legal cases to be summarized and suggests the students may want to handwrite and sign the Lawyer's Oath to include with their submission.

    Original Description:

    Problem Areas in Legal Ethics

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document assigns law students a case digest assignment involving 35 legal cases. The students are instructed to prepare summaries of each case in a standardized format including the case title, petitioner's claims, respondent's claims, issues, and ruling per issue. The assignment also provides the list of 35 legal cases to be summarized and suggests the students may want to handwrite and sign the Lawyer's Oath to include with their submission.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    108 views3 pages

    PALE - Case List

    Uploaded by

    Michelle Escudero Filart
    This document assigns law students a case digest assignment involving 35 legal cases. The students are instructed to prepare summaries of each case in a standardized format including the case title, petitioner's claims, respondent's claims, issues, and ruling per issue. The assignment also provides the list of 35 legal cases to be summarized and suggests the students may want to handwrite and sign the Lawyer's Oath to include with their submission.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    San Beda College Alabang - School of Law

    PROBLEM AREAS IN LEGAL ETHICS (PALE)


    School Year 2019-2020 - 2nd Semester
    Atty. Numeriano F. Rodriguez, Jr.

    CASE DIGESTS ASSIGNMENT


    IN YOUR HANDWRITING, PREPARE REVIEW DIGESTS OF THE CASES USING
    THE FOLLOWING FORMAT:

    Case Title: Petitioner’s Claims: Respondent’s Claims: Issue/s:



    Ruling per Issue:
    USE standard Yellow Pad Paper.

    CASE LIST:
    1. EDGARDO AREOLA, complainant , vs. ATTY. MARIA VILMA MENDOZA,
    respondent . [A.C. No. 10135. January 15, 2014.]
    2. NESTOR B. FIGUERAS and BIENVENIDO VICTORIA, JR., complainants, vs. ATTY.
    DIOSDADO B. JIMENEZ, respondent . [A.C. No. 9116. March 12, 2014.]
    3. CF SHARP CREW MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED, complainant , vs. NICOLAS
    C. TORRES, respondent . [A.C. No. 10438. September 23, 2014.]
    4. CHAMELYN A. AGOT, complainant , vs. ATTY. LUIS P. RIVERA, respondent . [A.C.
    No. 8000. August 5, 2014.]
    5. HEINZ R. HECK, complainant , vs. CITY PROSECUTOR CASIANO A. GAMOTIN,
    JR., respondent . [A.C. No. 5329. March 18, 2014.]
    6. MARIETTA DUQUE, Complainant, vs. JUDGE CRISOSTOMO L. GARRIDO,
    Regional Trial Court, Branch 7, Tacloban City [presently assigned as Presiding
    Judge, Branch 13, Carigara, Leyte], Respondent. A.M. NO. RTJ-06-2027 February
    27, 2009.
    7. OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, vs. JUDGE HARUN B.
    ISMAEL, Respondent. A.M. No. RTJ-07-2045 January 19, 2010
    8. JUDGE ADORACION G. ANGELES, complainant, vs. JUDGE MARIA ELISA
    SEMPIO DIY, Presiding Judge, Regional Trial Court, Quezon City, Branch 225,
    respondent. [A.M. No. RTJ-10-2248. * September 29, 2010.]
    9. CITY OF CEBU, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE IRENEO LEE GAKO, JR.,
    PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 5, CEBU CITY ,
    RESPONDENT. A.M. NO. RTJ-08-2111 (FORMERLY A.M. NO. 05-2207-RTJ)
    10. ESPINA & MADARANG CO. & MAKAR AGRICULTURAL COMMERCIAL &
    DEVELOPMENT CORP. (MAKAR), REPRESENTED BY RODRIGO A. ADTOON,
    petitioners, vs. HON. CADER P. INDAR AL HAJ, Judge, Regional Trial Court,
    Branch 14, Region 12, Cotabato City and its OIC, Branch Clerk of Court, ABIE M.
    AMILIL, respondents. [A.M. No. RTJ-07-2069. December 14, 2011.] (Formerly OCA
    I.P.I. No. 05-2257-RTJ)
    11. IMELDA R. MARCOS, complainant, vs. JUDGE FERNANDO VIL PAMINTUAN,
    respondent. [A.M. No. RTJ-07-2062. * January 18, 2011.]
    12. Emil Medenilla, Pedro Anonuevo, Jericho Inocentes, Carlito Salomon and Atty.
    Jesus F. Acpal against Justice Socorro B. Inting of the Court of Appeals). [A.M. No.
    11-190-CA-J. April 24, 2012.]
    13. OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, complainant, vs. JUDGE CADER P.
    INDAR, Presiding Judge and Acting Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court,
    Branch 14, Cotabato City and Branch 15, Sharif Aguak, Maguindanao, respectively,
    respondent. [A.M. No. RTJ-10-2232. April 10, 2012.]
    14. OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, complainant, vs. JUDGE HARUN B.
    ISMAEL, respondent. [A.M. No. RTJ-07-2045. January 19, 2010.]
    15. REYNARIA BARCENAS, complainant, vs. ATTY. ANORLITO ALVERO, respondent.
    [A.C. No. 8159. April 23, 2010.](formerly CBD 05-1452)
    16. JESSIE R. DE LEON, complainant, vs. ATTY. EDUARDO G. CASTELO,
    respondent. [A.C. No. 8620. January 12, 2011.]
    17. DENIS B. HABAWEL and ALEXIS F. MEDINA, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF TAX
    APPEALS, FIRST DIVISION, respondent. [G.R. No. 174759. September 7, 2011.]
    18. IN RE: SUPREME COURT RESOLUTION DATED 28 APRIL 2003 IN G.R. NOS.
    145817 AND 145822, [A.C. No. 6332. April 17, 2012.]
    19. ATTY. EDITA NOE-LACSAMANA, complainant, vs. ATTY. YOLANDO F.
    BUSMENTE, respondent. [A.C. No. 7269. November 23, 2011.]
    20. ERLINDA R. TAROG, complainant, vs. ATTY. ROMULO L. RICAFORT, respondent.
    [A.C. No. 8253. March 15, 2011.](Formerly CBD Case No. 03-1067)
    21. IMELDA BIDES-ULASO, Complainant, versus ATTY. EDITA NOE-LACSAMANA,
    Respondent. 2009 Sep 29, 1st Division, A.C. No. 7297
    22. JOHN CHRISTEN S. HEGNA, Complainant, versus ATTY. GOERING G.C.
    PADERANGA, Respondent. 2009 Sep 8, 3rd Division, A.C. No. 5955
    23. ROLANDO SAA, Petitioner, versus INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES,
    COMMISSION ON BAR DISCIPLINE, BOARD OF GOVERNORS, PASIG CITY and
    ATTY. FREDDIE A. VENIDA, Respondents. 2009 Sep 3, 1st Division, G.R. No.
    132826
    24. ANTERO J. POBRE, Complainant, versus Sen. MIRIAM DEFENSOR- SANTIAGO,
    Respondent. 2009 Aug 25, 3rd Division, A.C. No. 7399
    25. RAUL H. SESBREÑO, Petitioner, versus HON. COURT OF APPEALS, PROVINCE
    OF CEBU, GOV. EDUARDO R. GULLAS, THE PROVINCIAL TREASURER, THE
    PROVINCIAL AUDITOR, THE PROVINCIAL ENGINEER PATROCINIO BACAY
    (sued both in their official and personal capacities), Respondents. 2008 Apr 16, 3rd
    Division, G.R. No. 161390
    26. HEIRS OF LYDIO “JERRY” FALAME, namely: MELBA FALAME, LEO FALAME and
    JERRY FALAME, Complainants, versus ATTY. EDGAR J. BAGUIO, Respondent.
    2008 Mar 7, 2nd Division, A.C. No. 6876
    27. WILFREDO M. CATU, Complainant, versus ATTY. VICENTE G. RELLOSA,
    Respondent. 2008 Feb 19, 1st , A.C. No. 5738
    28. MANUEL L. LEE, Complainant, versus ATTY. REGINO B. TAMBAGO, Respondent.
    2008 Feb 12, 1st Division, A.C. No. 5281
    29. ATTY. ALFONSO L. DELA VICTORIA, Complainant, versus ATTY. MARIA FE ORIG-
    MALOLOY-ON, Clerk of Court, Municipal Trial Court in Cities, Office of the Clerk of
    Court, Davao City, Respondent. 2007 Aug 14, 3rd Division, A.M. No. P-07-2343
    (formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 06-2416-P)
    30. MA. LUISA HADJULA, Complainant, versus ATTY. ROCELES F. MADIANDA,
    Respondent. 2007 Jul 3, 1st Division, A.C. No. 6711
    31. NAPOLEON CAGAS, Complainant, versus JUDGE ROSARIO B. TORRECAMPO,
    Presiding Judge, Regional Trial Court, Branch 33, Pili, Camarines Sur, Respondent.
    2007 Mar 12, 3rd Division, A.M. No. RTJ-06-1979 [Formerly OCA IPI No. 05-2268-
    RTJ]
    32. CYNTHIA ADVINCULA, Complainant, versus ATTY. ERNESTO M. MACABATA,
    Respondent. 2007 Mar 7, 3rd Division, A.C. No. 7204
    33. FIDELA VDA. DE ENRIQUEZ, Complainant, versus ATTY. MANUEL G. SAN JOSE,
    Respondent. 2007 Feb 23, 2nd Division, A.C. No. 3569
    34. CLARITA J. SAMALA, Complainant, versus ATTY. LUCIANO D. VALENCIA,
    Respondent. 2007 Jan 22, En Banc, A.C. No. 5439
    35. AND, AFTER YOU FINISH YOUR DIGESTS, YOU MAY WANT TO HAND-WRITE
    THE LAWYER’S OATH, SIGN IT AND ATTACH TO YOUR SUBMISSION. I WILL BE
    HAPPY TO KEEP IT.

    You might also like