Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 45 views

    Uta4612 Project 1 Question 3

    Uploaded by

    nicole

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Uta4612 Project 1 Question 3

    Uploaded by

    nicole
    45 views5 pages

    Original Title

    UTA4612 PROJECT 1 QUESTION 3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    45 views5 pages

    Uta4612 Project 1 Question 3

    Uploaded by

    nicole

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 5

    PROJECT 1

    Preparation of Bundles of Pleadings and Bundles of Documents


    General Information

    Faculty Faculty of Law


    Programme Bachelor of Law (Honours)
    Course Code UTA4612
    Course Title Civil Trial Advocacy
    Trimester 3
    Session 2020/2021
    Coordinator Nur Fazini Asro bt Ramzi Sulaiman (Ms)
    Examiner(s) Azwina Wati binti Abdull Manaf (Ms)
    Contact 06-252 3518 (MUMR 4023) – Ms Azwina
    E-mail [email protected]
    Oral Submission
    Date and Time Week 6-8
    Written Week 4
    Submission Date

    Breakdown of Assessment and Mapping to Learning Outcomes


    No. Assessment % LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
    1 Project 1 40 X
    2 Project 2 20 X
    3 Presentation 10 X
    4 Practical Test 30 X

    Mapping of assignment learning outcomes to course learning outcomes:


    Course Learning Outcomes
    Upon completion of this course, students should be able to:

    LO1 Prepare a case effectively through application of relevant law, facts and principles
    and management of the advocacy task in question.
    LO2 Demonstrate basic advocacy skills in civil trials and the rules of professional
    conduct.
    LO3 Display the skills of making oral speeches and submissions.

    LO4 Perform the techniques of examination-in-chief, cross examination and re-


    examination of witnesses.
    UTA4612 CIVIL TRIAL ADVOCACY 13 APRIL 2021

     Overview and General Guidelines

    Organisation Group Work


    Members Must not exceed FOUR (4) students/group
    Assessment 100% of the total coursework marks
    Registration Register groups with respective tutor
    Student Learning
    42 hours
    Time (SLT)
    Please use the attached cover page (Blue for
    Cover page
    Plaintiff; Red for Defendant; White for Judge)
    Mode Computer Typewritten
    Submission Binding Comb binding (Black)
    requirements Typeface/Font Times New Roman
    Font size 12
    Line spacing 1.5
    Margins Top: 1”; Bottom: 1”; Left: 1.25”; Right: 1.25”

     General Instructions to Students

    1 mark will be deducted by default for failure to follow format and


    instruction.
     Zero marks will be given for failure to complete and submit the assignment.
     Late submission will not be entertained.
     Plagiarism is a serious offence. The examiner has the right not to accept
    submission of plagiarised or duplicated work.
     Plagiarism include the following (but not limited to):
    o copy another student’s work,
    o hire or ask another individual to complete the assignment for you,
    o copy too many words or ideas from one or two sources, that make up a
    significant portion of your work, even with proper citation.
    Group work
     Each group member must actively participate in the completion of the assignment.
    Free-riding is unethical and extremely unfair to fellow group members.
     Each group member is expected to keep the contact numbers and e-mail
    addresses of the other members of the group.
     The group leader has the responsibility to ensure that all group members play a
    part in the completion of the assignment. The group leader is also responsible to
    ensure that all members’ names are written on the final submission.
     It is the responsibility of each group member to ensure that the final submission
    is complete and of the acceptable standard. Should any errors or omissions
    occurred in the final submission, each group member shall be held accountable.

    NFA/YMY/AWAM 1/ 4
    UTA4612 CIVIL TRIAL ADVOCACY 13 APRIL 2021

     Specific Instructions to Students

     Submit a written submission/judgment in accordance with the


    INSTRUCTIONS.
     Submit the hardcopy of the submission/judgment to Ms. Azwina’s during the
    submission deadline (Kindly refer to the link)
     You are allowed to make logical assumptions on the facts if they are
    incomplete.

    Assessment rubrics

    No Items Marks
    1 Identification of legal issues 4
    2 Proper understanding and analysis of issues which forms the basis for 10
    argument.
    3 Application of the correct law, authorities and procedure. 10
    4 Clarity and coherence of argument. 10
    5 Use of proper court language 6
    Total 40

    Holistic Rubrics

    Score Description
     Demonstrate complete understanding of the problem.
    35-40  All requirements are included.
     Well organized submissions.
     All authorities are properly quoted and referred.
     Demonstrate sufficient understanding of the problem
    30-34  All requirements are included.
     Well organized submission.
     All authorities are properly quoted and referred.
     Demonstrate partial understanding of the problem.
    25-29  Most requirements are included.
     Unorganized submissions.
     Authorities are not properly quoted and referred.
     Demonstrate little understanding of the problem
    15-24  Many requirements are not included.
     Unorganized submissions.
     Authorities are not properly quoted and referred.
     Misunderstood the problem.
    1-14  Significant requirements are not included.
     Unorganized submissions.
     Authorities are not properly quoted and referred.

    NFA/YMY/AWAM 2/ 4
    UTA4612 CIVIL TRIAL ADVOCACY 13 APRIL 2021

    FACULTY OF LAW
    TRI 3, 2020/2021

    UTA4612 – CIVIL TRIAL ADVOCACY

    No. ID Name (in CAPITAL LETTER) Signature Tutorial/Group


    (eg T1/G1)
    1
    2
    3
    4

    Date Submitted:
    Examiner: Ms.Azwina Wati binti Abdull Manaf

    Declaration:
    This is our own work. We have not previously submitted this work, in whole or in
    part, for assessment. This work complies with all the governing legal and ethical rules,
    including those concerning plagiarism and copyright. We have not plagiarized and
    have also acknowledged ALL sources which are not our own and have not merely “cut
    and paste”. We have retained a copy of this assignment.

    Each of us has contributed roughly equally to this assignment. If there are any
    complaints about non-contribution, then we will abide by the Lecturer’s decision
    regarding the allocation of marks for the assignment.

    Comments:

    Marks (/40):

    NFA/YMY/AWAM 3/ 4
    UTA4612 CIVIL TRIAL ADVOCACY 13 APRIL 2021

    QUESTION 3

    Plaintif, anak lelaki kepada Pewasiat, merupakan orang yang mengemukakan Wasiat
    terakhir See Yuu Soon (L) bertarikh 22 November 2011 (“Wasiat Pertama tersebut”) yang
    mana telah ditandatangani oleh Pewasiat.

    Defendan, adik lelaki Plaintif, yang mana mengemukakan kononnya Wasiat terakhir See
    Yuu Soon bertarikh 30 Ogos 2018 (“Wasiat Kedua tersebut”).

    Pewasiat yang berumur 95 tahun telah meninggal dunia pada 14 Mac 2020, meninggal
    enam (6) orang anak lelaki termasuk kedua-dua Plaintif dan Defendan, beserta empat (4)
    orang anak perempuan. Setelah kematian Pewasiat, satu perjumpaan telah diadakan di
    pejabat peguam Tetuan Good & Co. untuk membincangkan berkenaan pengurusan harta si
    Pewasiat. Sewaktu perjumpaan itu, Tetuan Good & Co. telah memaklumkan kepada semua
    benefisiari berkenaan Wasiat Kedua tersebut. Wasiat Kedua tersebut disempurnakan pada
    30 Ogos 2018 di pejabat Tetuan Good & Co. dan ia didapati sempurnakan dengan cap jari
    si Pewasiat.

    Pihak plaintif tidak berpuas hati dengan hasil perjumpaan tersebut dan memilih untuk
    mendapatkan nasihat perundangan sendiri berkenaan kedua-dua wasiat tersebut. Kedua-
    dua Plaintid dan Defendan memasukkan kaveat ke atas estet Pewasiat. Walaupun Defendan
    telah memohon probet bagi estet Pewasiat berdasarkan Wasiat Kedua tersebut,
    permohonan tersebut telah ditarikbalik serta merta. Plaintif memohon deklarasi yang mana
    Wasiat Pertama tersebut adalah betul dan adalah wasiat Pewasiat yang sah. Plaintif juga
    memohon deklarasi yang Wasiat Kedua tersebut adalah tidak sah, terbatal dan tidak boleh
    dikuatkuasakan. Manakala Defendan memohon vice versa terhadap Plaintif.

    Arahan:
    1. Pihak-pihak dikehendaki menyediakan pliding yang bersesuaian berdasarkan fakta
    kes diatas.
    2. Pihak-pihak juga boleh mereka butiran penting lain kecuali yang telah dinyatakan.
    3. Andaian boleh dibuat berdasarkan fakta untuk dibuktikan di Mahkamah
    End of Page

    NFA/YMY/AWAM 4/ 4

    You might also like