Chapter 3, Sec.4: Joint and Solidary Obligations
Chapter 3, Sec.4: Joint and Solidary Obligations
I.DEFINITIONS
1. Joint Obligation - this is the kind of obligation where each debtor is liable only for a part
of the whole liability and to each creditor shall belong only a part of the correlative rights.
2. Solidary Obligation – this is the kind of obligation where a debtor is answerable for the
whole of the obligation without prejudice to his right to collect from his co-debtors the
latter’s shares in the obligation.
II. DISCUSSIONS
1. If there are two (2) or more debtors in one and the same obligation, is their liability joint
or solidary? Explain.
Answer: According to Art. 1207, the concurrence of two or more creditors or two or
more debtors in one and same obligation does not imply that each own of the latter is
bound to render, entire compliance with the prestation. There is a solidary liability only
when the obligation expressly so states, or when the law or the nature of the obligation
requires solidarity.
2. In case of active solidarity, to whom shall the debtor or debtors make payment?
Answer: According to Art. 1214, the debtors may choose which creditor to pay;
however, if a creditor makes a demand, then the payment shall be made to him.
3. Give the effect of the condonation or remission of a debt by one of the several creditors
where:
(a) The obligation is joint;
- According to Art. 1215, the condonation will only affect the share of the certain
debtor. The obligation will not be extinguished, and the other co-debtors will still
have to comply with their proportionate shares.
(b) The obligation is solidary;
- According to Art. 1215, the part of the obligation which is condoned or remitted
shall be extinguished. It is now the responsibility of the creditor who made the
condonation/remission to be liable to his co-creditors for their corresponding
shares.
4. In case a remission is made by a creditor of the share of one of the solidary debtors, is
the said debtor released from responsibility to his co-debtor/s? Explain.
Answer: According to Art. 1219, the debtor is not released from his responsibility to his
co-debtors. If one of the co-debtors would become insolvent, he still has the
responsibility to share in the payment of the insolvent debtor.
Answer: According to Art.1220, the debtor is not entitled to reimbursement from his co-
debtors. The remission of the entire obligation is essentially gratuitous, and he paid
nothing, thus, he shall not be reimbursed.
III. PROBLEMS
1. X,Y, and Z bind themselves to pay W P30,000. Only X received the money as per
agreement between X,Y, and Z. On the due date of the obligation, has W the right to
demand the full payment of P30,000 from Z alone?
Answer: No. According to Art. 1207, if the obligation does not state solidarity, then it is a
joint obligation. And if it is a joint obligation, Z is only liable up to his proportionate share
of P10,000, thus, W cannot demand from Z the whole P30,000.
(c) Suppose Z turns out to be insolvent, how much can X collect from Y?
- If Z becomes insolvent. X can collect from Y his share plus half of Z’s share,
which is P15,000.
3. A owes B and C, solidary creditors, the sum of P20,000:
4. A, B and C are solidarily liable to D. For their failure to pay, D filed a complaint in court
but only against C. Has C the right to demand that A and B also included as party
defendants?
Answer: According to Art. 1216, C has no right to demand from D to include A and B as
party defendants because C, as a solidary debtor can be compelled to pay for the entire
obligation.
Answer: According to Art. 1221, as far as D is concerned, A, B and C are all liable for
the price of the printing equipment as well as damages. A and B can recover from C
since it was through his fault that the object was destroyed. If C paid for the price and
damages, he cannot ask for reimbursement from A or B.