Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UTS No 2
UTS No 2
Abstract:
Customer retention management (CRM) is crucial for the success of today's Madurai hotel
industry, as maintaining valuable customers is more cost-effective than attracting new ones and
this is of high importance in the current economic climate. Currently, the Madurai hotel industry
is introducing CRM strategies which have been revised after the economic downturn. Customer
Loyalty Programs are the most common CRM approach used in the hotel sector, which theory
suggests that loyalty programs are common in the hospitality sector. In the Madurai hotel
industry, there is uncertainty in marketing and a factor causing this is the reduction in marketing
budgets and that marketing workers appear not to be managers. In order to be effective, client
retention management has essential elements. Customer satisfaction, marketing of partnerships,
loyalty schemes, data collection, facilities for addressing grievances, recovery methods and
follow-up after purchase. The investigator noted that it permitted the data from both stages to be
corroborated and analyzed by using triangulation in reference to the theory highlighted in the
literature review. The researcher suggests that hotels develop written marketing strategies that
integrate CRM initiatives with other marketing processes and use marketing metrics to assess the
effectiveness of all marketing activities to be cost efficient and effective in the marketing
budgets.
Keywords: Customer Retention Management, Hotel, Madurai
Introduction
The retention of customers relates to the practices and measures taken by firms and organisations
to minimize the amount of customer defections. The aim of customer retention strategies, mostly
through customer loyalty and brand loyalty campaigns, is to help businesses maintain as many
customers as possible. It is crucial to note that customer retention starts with the first interaction
a customer has with a business and continues throughout the relationship's entire lifespan. While
most businesses typically spend more money on customer acquisition because they see it as an
easy and efficient way of raising sales, retention of customers is often quicker and costs up to
seven times less on average than acquisition of customers. Selling to clients with whom you
already have a partnership is also a more productive way to raise sales because businesses do not
need to recruit new ones, train them, and convert them.
It is also found to be a more effective process by businesses who turn their attention to customer
retention because they sell to consumers that have already shown an interest in the products and
are engaged with the brand, making it easier to capitalize on their interactions with the company.
Retention is essentially a more competitive business model that is important to sustainable
development. Customer retention is incredibly important for any company-the act of retaining
existing customers that you have already invested money gaining. On average, acquiring a new
customer costs five times as much as maintaining an existing one, and it can cost up to 30 times
as much to gain a new customer depending on the sector you are in vs. retaining an existing
customer! Growing consumer retention rates by just 5% raises income by 25% to 95% . Many
businesses do not understand how important retention is, concentrating instead on acquisition
and leaving their existing and loyal customers dissatisfied at times.
For the focus of this research, CRM in the Hotel Sector in Madurai is appropriate as the
researcher could not find literature on this particular field when choosing the research subject.
Tamilnadu, India, decided on literature that focused on the Madurai hotel industry. The analysis
was selective and no literature was found in the Madurai Hotel Sector on CRM. Theory indicates
that in the last ten to fifteen years, CRM and the achievement of customer retention strategies
have become gradually more relevant. It has been reported that attractive new customers are
much more difficult and expensive than retaining existing ones, and this has become well
recognized across sectors.
Review of Literature
Ashraf et al. (2018) conducted a case study on five lines of business engaged in services,
hotels, hospitals, education, and banks in Pakistan, reporting a significant effect of
service quality on customer satisfaction. Furthermore, service quality has been found as
an important determinant of customer satisfaction in retail banking (Caruana, 2002), the
game industry (Wu, 2014), chemical industry (Susanti et al., 2020), international medical
travel sector (Han & Hyun, 2015), and in cargo services (Arief et al., 2019).
Adiati and Dinna (2014) conducted research in the internet service provider industry and
found a positive effect of switching barriers on customer retention. Risdianto (2017) as
well as Samudro et al. (2019) similarly showed a significant effect of switching barriers
on customer retention. Shamini and Ragel (2018) examined the telecommunications
industry and reported a positive effect of switching barriers on customer retention.
Furthermore, Kim et al. (2007) found the same relationship in the context of mobile
telecommunication services, whereas Danesh et al. (2012) reported the same findings in
hypermarkets.
(Daneshfar et al., 2016), life insurance services (Nguyen et al., 2018), banking
(Ibojo, 2015; Mohsan et al., 2011), DIY retail loyalty program (Vessel & Zabkar, 2009),
telecommunication network operators (Gerpott et al., 2001), a continuous purchasing
setting (Ranaweera & Prabhu, 2003), and hypermarkets (Danesh et al., 2012). Posselt and
Gerstner (2005) also argued that customer satisfaction will improve customer retention.
(Mosavi & Ghaedi, 2012), banking (Vithya, 2017), e-banking services (Chu et al., 2012),
and in international medical travel industry (Han & Hyun, 2015). Leonidou et al. (2008)
and Chen et al. (2011) reported the same results for the export manufacturers of industrial
goods and the retail industry, respectively
Methodology
The theory and research approach to research investigation will be illustrated in this report. It
will also illustrate the study approach and the justification for the choice of strategy. The
researcher took a descriptive approach, as the researcher used survey questionnaires, the
researcher concluded that this approach was suitable for stage one. Descriptive research helps the
researcher to distinguish different answers relevant to the subject of the research. When
providing conclusions regarding the understudy, it encourages the researcher to be descriptive.
(McNabb 2004) The researcher thought that, if it also followed an exploratory approach, the
research methodology would be more fruitful as well as descriptive. This is relevant to the
research process as the researcher’s objective is to examine the research topic from an internal
perspective and also an external perspective.
Sampling design
The study aims at analyzing the performance of Customer Retention Management in Madurai
city. Both primary and secondary data were collected. Primary data were collected from the
employees and owners of the hotels in Madurai city. The secondary data were collected from
books, journals, daily newspaper and published records. The questionnaire is collected from 50
respondents of employees and owners from the selected Madurai hotels through the Google
forms questionnaire link.
Table 2 reflects the capacity of the respondent hotels, showing that the highest
response rate received was generated by hotels with a room capacity of 50-99, totalled
44% of responses.
Table 3 Marketing Personnel
S.No No of Respondents Percentage
1 Owner 12 24%
2 Manager 13 26%
3 Marketing Manager 10 20%
4 External 9 18%
5 Other 6 12%
Source: Primary Data
Table 3 reflects the personnel in charge of marketing in the respondent hotels. It identifies that
only 20% of the hotels have dedicated marketing managers. The majority of the hotels marketing
is managed by hotel managers (26%) or owners (24%).
In order to find out the significance difference between the facilitating factors are highly induced
the Repeat Customer, Turnover per Customer with the Marketing Strategies in Customer
Retention Management, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was attempted with the null hypothesis
as “ There is no significance difference between in Factors Influencing CRM and Marketing
Strategies in the customer retention Management in Madurai hotels. The result of the ANOVA
are given in the following table.
Total 18.320 49
Total 20.500 49
Total 16.420 49
Total 10.880 49
Total 7.380 49
Total 48.180 49
Total 6.000 48
The above table shows the results of ANOVA based on facilitating factors are highly
induced the Repeat Customer, Turnover per Customer with the Marketing Strategies in
Customer Retention Management, since the respective ‘p’ value of the facilitating factors are
highly induced the factors influencing with Marketing Research, Marketing Planning,
Relationship Marketing, Online, Advertisement, Media coverage, Marketing metrics are more
than 0.05. So Null hypothesis are accepted. Therefore it may be conducted that Factors
influencing CRM are not accepted with some facilitating factors are not induced by the
Marketing strategies in CRM in the hotel industry.
Chi Square Analysis between Year of operation and Factors influencing the CRM
In this part, Chi square test is used to discover the association between the Year of operation and
Factors influencing the CRM. There is no association between Year of operation and Factors
influencing the CRM
Count
Turnover per
Repeat customer customer Total
Chi-Square Tests
N of Valid Cases 50
yearofoperation 0-5 10 5 15
6-10 8 0 8
above10 21 6 27
Total 39 11 50
The result of Chi Square test between Year of operation and Factors influencing the CRM is
summarized in table. It shows that the Pearson Chisquare is 3.380 with the degree of freedom
at 2. Further, it is represented that the P value is 0.185. Since p value for chi square is more
that 0.05 for Year of operation and Factors influencing the CRM, It leads to accept null
hypothesis.
Findings:
The length of time in operation of the respondents hotels, it highlights that the hotels in
operation the longest have the highest response rate at 50%. The capacity of the respondent
hotels, showing that the highest response rate received was generated by hotels with a room
capacity of 50-99, totaled 44% of responses. The personnel in charge of marketing in the
respondent hotels. It identifies that only 20% of the hotels have dedicated marketing
managers. The majority of the hotels marketing is managed by hotel managers (26%) or
owners (24%). In table 4 the importance of a number of relevant marketing activities is rated.
20% of respondents identified that market research was either not important of not applicable
to their hotel. 18% of respondents also highlighted that relationship marketing was not
important to their hotel while 14%, one quarter of respondents identified that marketing
metrics were not important to their hotels. As evident in highlighted that loyalty, customer
service and customer complaints handling were of importance while they identified that 5%
classed customer data collection as not important. It is evident that the hotels that operate
CRM strategies that loyalty programs have the highest usage with 24% of respondents who
have CRM strategies in place stating that they use loyalty programs. While 17% of
respondents who state that they have CRM in place identified that they use customer service
initiatives in order to retain customers. the results of ANOVA based on facilitating factors are
highly induced the Repeat Customer, Turnover per Customer with the Marketing Strategies
in Customer Retention Management, since the respective ‘p’ value of the facilitating factors
are highly induced the factors influencing with Marketing Research, Marketing Planning,
Relationship Marketing, Online, Advertisement, Media coverage, Marketing metrics are more
than 0.05. So Null hypothesis are accepted. Therefore it may be conducted that Factors
influencing CRM are not accepted with some facilitating factors are not induced by the
Marketing strategies in CRM in the hotel industry. The result of Chi Square test between
Year of operation and Factors influencing the CRM is summarized in table. It shows that the
Pearson Chisquare is 3.380 with the degree of freedom at 2. Further, it is represented that the
Volume XI, Issue XII, December/2020 Page No:446
P value is 0.185. Since p value for chi square is more that 0.05 for Year of operation and
Aut Aut Research Journal ISSN NO: 0005-0601
Conclusion
The researcher has gained more knowledge in the field of CRM, the CRM method and also CRM
in the hotel sector in Madurai after completing this research dissertation. The researcher also
gained insight into the repercussions faced by the hotel industry in Madurai during the economic
downturn, and the researcher developed an understanding of the financial constraints that hinder
hotel marketing. It is also clear that the researcher has learned the latest CRM tactics used in the
hotel industry and also that the efficacy of the strategies they apply is not assessed by the
majority of hotels. The research method has not only allowed research to acquire knowledge in
the subject area, but also through literature research in related areas. In addition, the researcher
has acquired more knowledge of research methodologies, philosophies, and methods, and has
gained experience in research design. The researchers have achieved more than initially expected
from the research process.
References:
1. Adiati, H., & Dinna, A. (2014). The effect of customer service quality, customer
perceived value, customer satisfaction, customer trust and switching barrier on customer
retention. Journal of Economic, 5(1), 1–
17. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a546/13ca635ae1d153321cd92c4c36ee19fb46d4.pdf
?_ga=2.167073526.937505912.1579850546-2013836179.1579414528. [Google Scholar]
2. Arief, A., Simanjuntak, M., & Kirbrandoko. (2019). Analysis of factors affecting the
satisfaction and loyalty of the use of cargo services: A case study of PT. BEX. Russian
Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 87(3), 276–
283. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2019-3.32 [Google Scholar]
3. Ashraf, S., Ilyas, R., Imtiaz, M., & Ahmad, S. (2018). Impact of service quality,
corporate image, and perceived value on brand loyalty with presence and absence of
customer satisfaction: A study of four service sectors of Pakistan. International Journal
of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(2), 452–
474. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i2/3885 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
4. Daneshfar, Z., Roshani, A., & Sabzali, H. (2016, September 23–25). Evaluating customer
retention and satisfaction and the reason of losing customers in the auto insurance (A case