Professional Documents
Culture Documents
74 Tingson vs. NLRC
74 Tingson vs. NLRC
FACTS:
Petitioners were members of the crew of the vessel M/ V "Sea Princess" owned by Sea Proud
Shipping of Greece. They were hired on April 1983 for a contract period of 12 months. On 16
August 1983, while the vessel was at the port of Rosario, Argentina, they were ordered by the
ship master Captain Manuel Tacata to disembark for repatriation to Manila. As a consequence,
the petitioners, on December 5, 1983, filed a complaint with the POEA for illegal dismissal,
recovery of unpaid salaries, and non-payment of benefits against the private respondents.
The private respondents filed an answer alleging that the petitioners were repatriated because
they had committed acts of insubordination, incompetence and inefficiency, disrespect towards
a superior officer and abandonment of post of duty without having been properly relieved. The
overseas employment office rendered a decision sustaining the private respondent. On appeal
to the National Labor Relations Commission, the latter affirmed the POEA decision.
ISSUE:
HELD:
Yes. Prior to dismissal, the employer is obliged to observe the procedure on due process laid
down by the Labor Code. The employer is bound to furnish the employee two notices, the
written charge and the notice of dismissal, if after hearing dismissal is indeed warranted. This
procedure is mandatory, in the absence of which, any judgment reached by management is
void and inexistent. Private respondents fail to comply therewith, hence, taints the dismissal
with illegality.