Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United Nations Convention On Independent Guarantees and Stand-By Letters of Credit
United Nations Convention On Independent Guarantees and Stand-By Letters of Credit
CONVENTION
ON INDEPENDENT
GUARANTEES AND STAND-BY
LETTERS OF CREDIT
United Nations
1996
CONTENTS
P age
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON INDEPENDENT
GUARANTEES AND STAND-BY LETTERS OF C R E D IT ....................... 1
iii
P age
Chapter VII. Final clauses ............................................................................ 10
Article 23. D epositary.......................................................................... 10
Article 24. Signature, ratification, acceptance, approval, accession . . 10
Article 25. Application to territorial units .......................................... 10
Article 26. Effect of declaration ......................................................... 11
Article 27. Reservations ...................................................................... 11
Article 28. Entry into force .................................................................. 11
Article 29. Denunciation...................................................................... 12
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 13
iv
United Nations Convention on Independent
Guarantees and Stand-by Letters of Credit
Article 2. Undertaking
1
(2) The undertaking may be given:
(a) At the request or on the instruction of the customer (“principal/
applicant”) of the guarantor/issuer;
(b) On the instruction of another bank, institution or person (“in
structing party,,) that acts at the request of the customer (“principal/appli-
cant”) of that instructing party; or
(c) On behalf of the guarantor/issuer itself.
(3) Payment may be stipulated in the undertaking to be made in any form,
including:
(a) Payment in a specified currency or unit of account;
(b) Acceptance of a bill of exchange (draft);
(c) Payment on a deferred basis;
(d) Supply of a specified item of value.
(4) The undertaking may stipulate that the guarantor/issuer itself is the
beneficiary when acting in favour of another person.
2
(b) If the undertaking does not specify a place of business for a given
person but specifies its habitual residence, that residence is relevant for
determining the international character of the undertaking.
Article 6. Definitions
3
CHAPTER IIL FORM AND CONTENT OF UNDERTAKING
Article 8. Amendment
4
(2) If an undertaking is designated as transferable without specifying
whether or not the consent of the guarantor/issuer or another authorized
person is required for the actual transfer, neither the guarantor/issuer nor any
other authorized person is obliged to effect the transfer except to the extent
and in the manner expressly consented to by it.
(1) The right of the beneficiary to demand payment under the undertaking
ceases when:
(a) The guarantor/issuer has received a statement by the beneficiary
of release from liability in a form referred to in paragraph (2) of article 7;
(b) The beneficiary and the guarantor/issuer have agreed on the ter
mination of the undertaking in the form stipulated in the undertaking or,
failing such stipulation, in a form referred to in paragraph (2) of article 7;
(c) The amount available under the undertaking has been paid, unless
the undertaking provides for the automatic renewal or for an automatic
increase of the amount available or otherwise provides for continuation of
the undertaking;
(d) The validity period of the undertaking expires in accordance with
the provisions of article 12.
(2) The undertaking may stipulate, or the guarantor/issuer and the benefi
ciary may agree elsewhere, that return of the document embodying the
undertaking to the guarantor/issuer, or a procedure functionally equivalent to
the return of the document in the case of the issuance of the undertaking in
non-paper form, is required for the cessation of the right to demand pay
ment, either alone or in conjunction with one of the events referred to in
subparagraphs (a) and (b) of paragraph (1) of this article. However, in no
5
case shall retention of any such document by the beneficiary after the right
to demand payment ceases in accordance with subparagraph (c) or (d) of
paragraph (1) of this article preserve any rights of the beneficiary under the
undertaking.
(1) The rights and obligations of the guarantor/issuer and the beneficiary
arising from the undertaking are determined by the terms and conditions set
forth in the undertaking, including any rules, general conditions or usages
specifically referred to therein, and by the provisions of this Convention.
(2) In interpreting terms and conditions of the undertaking and in settling
questions that are not addressed by the terms and conditions of the under
taking or by the provisions of this Convention, regard shall be had to gen
erally accepted international rules and usages of independent guarantee or
stand-by letter of credit practice.
6
Article 14. Standard of conduct and liability of guarantor/issuer
(1) In discharging its obligations under the undertaking and this Conven
tion, the guarantor/issuer shall act in good faith and exercise reasonable care
having due regard to generally accepted standards of international practice
of independent guarantees or stand-by letters of credit.
(2) A guarantor/issuer may not be exempted from liability for its failure to
act in good faith or for any grossly negligent conduct.
(1) Any demand for payment under the undertaking shall be made in a
form referred to in paragraph (2) of article 7 and in conformity with the
terms and conditions of the undertaking.
(2) Unless otherwise stipulated in the undertaking, the demand and any
certification or other document required by the undertaking shall be pre
sented, within the time that a demand for payment may be made, to the
guarantor/issuer at the place where the undertaking was issued.
(3) The beneficiary, when demanding payment, is deemed to certify that
the demand is not in bad faith and that none of the elements referred to in
subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph (1) of article 19 are present.
(1) The guarantor/issuer shall examine the demand and any accompanying
documents in accordance with the standard of conduct referred to in para
graph (1) of article 14. In determining whether documents are in facial
conformity with the terms and conditions of the undertaking, and are con
sistent with one another, the guarantor/issuer shall have due regard to the
applicable international standard of independent guarantee or stand-by letter
of credit practice.
(2) Unless otherwise stipulated in the undertaking or elsewhere agreed by
the guarantor/issuer and the beneficiary, the guarantor/issuer shall have rea
sonable time, but not more than seven business days following the day of
receipt of the demand and any accompanying documents, in which to:
(a) Examine the demand and any accompanying documents;
(b) Decide whether or not to pay;
(c) If the decision is not to pay, issue notice thereof to the bene
ficiary.
7
The notice referred to in subparagraph (c) above shall, unless other
wise stipulated in the undertaking or elsewhere agreed by the guarantor/
issuer and the beneficiary, be made by teletransmission or, if that is not
possible, by other expeditious means and indicate the reason for the decision
not to pay.
(1) Subject to article 19, the guarantor/issuer shall pay against a demand
made in accordance with the provisions of article 15. Following a determi
nation that a demand for payment so conforms, payment shall be made
promptly, unless the undertaking stipulates payment on a deferred basis, in
which case payment shall be made at the stipulated time.
(2) Any payment against a demand that is not in accordance with the
provisions of article 15 does not prejudice the rights of the principal/appli
cant.
8
(b) The underlying obligation of the principal/applicant has been
declared invalid by a court or arbitral tribunal, unless the undertaking indi
cates that such contingency falls within the risk to be covered by the under
taking;
(c) The underlying obligation has undoubtedly been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the beneficiary;
(d) Fulfilment of the underlying obligation has clearly been pre
vented by wilful misconduct of the beneficiary;
(e) In the case of a demand under a counter-guarantee, the benefici
ary of the counter-guarantee has made payment in bad faith as guarantor/
issuer of the undertaking to which the counter-guarantee relates.
(3) In the circumstances set out in subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) of para
graph (1) of this article, the principal/applicant is entitled to provisional
court measures in accordance with article 20.
9
CHAPTER VL CONFLICT OF LAWS
(1) This Convention is open for signature by all States at the Headquarters
of the United Nations, New York, until 11 December 1997.
(2) This Convention is subject to ratification, acceptance or approval by
the signatory States.
(3) This Convention is open to accession by all States which are not sig
natory States as from the date it is open for signature.
(4) Instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval and accession are to
be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
(1) If a State has two or more territorial units in which different systems
of law are applicable in relation to the matters dealt with in this Convention,
10
it may, at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or acces
sion, declare that this Convention is to extend to all its territorial units or
only one or more of them, and may at any time substitute another declara
tion for its earlier declaration.
(2) These declarations are to state expressly the territorial units to which
the Convention extends.
(3) If, by virtue of a declaration under this article, this Convention does not
extend to all territorial units of a State and the place of business of the
guarantor/issuer or of the beneficiary is located in a territorial unit to which
the Convention does not extend, this place of business is considered not to
be in a Contracting State.
(4) If a State makes no declaration under paragraph (1) of this article, the
Convention is to extend to all territorial units of that State.
(1) Declarations made under article 25 at the time of signature are subject
to confirmation upon ratification, acceptance or approval.
(2) Declarations and confirmations of declarations are to be in writing and
to be formally notified to the depositary.
(3) A declaration takes effect simultaneously with the entry into force of
this Convention in respect of the State concerned. However, a declaration of
which the depositary receives formal notification after such entry into force
takes effect on the first day of the month following the expiration of six
months after the date of its receipt by the depositary.
(4) Any State which makes a declaration under article 25 may withdraw
it at any time by a formal notification in writing addressed to the depositary.
Such withdrawal takes effect on the first day of the month following the
expiration of six months after the date of the receipt of the notification of
the depositary.
(1) This Convention enters into force on the first day of the month follow
ing the expiration of one year from the date of the deposit of the fifth
instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.
11
(2) For each State which becomes a Contracting State to this Convention
after the date of the deposit of the fifth instrument of ratification, acceptance,
approval or accession, this Convention enters into force on the first day of
the month following the expiration of one year after the date of the deposit
of the appropriate instrument on behalf of that State.
(3) This Convention applies only to undertakings issued on or after the
date when the Convention enters into force in respect of the Contracting
State referred to in subparagraph (a) or the Contracting State referred to in
subparagraph (b) of paragraph (1) of article 1.
12
Explanatory note by the UNCITRAL secretariat on the
United Nations Convention on Independent Guarantees
and Stand-by Letters of Credit*
Introduction
1. The United Nations Convention on Independent Guarantees and Stand
by Letters of Credit was adopted and opened for signature by the General
Assembly by its resolution 50/48 of 11 December 1995.1 The Convention
was prepared by the United Nations Commission on International Trade
Law (UNCITRAL).2
*This note has been prepared by the secretariat o f the United Nations Com m ission on
Internationa] Trade Law (UNCITRAL) for informational purposes. It is not an official com
mentary on the Convention.
'The draft Convention was prepared by the W orking Group on International Contract
Practices at its thirteenth to twenty-third sessions. (For the reports o f those sessions, see the
follow ing volum es o f the UNCITRAL Yearbook: Yearbook, Volume XXI: 1990 (United Na
tions publication, Sales No. E .91.V .6), docum ent A /C N .9/330; Yearbook, Volume XXII: 1991
(United Nations publication, Sales N o. E .93.V .2), documents A /C N .9/342 and A /C N .9/345;
Yearbook, Volume XXIII: 1992 (United Nations publication, Sales N o. E .94.V .7), docum ents
A /C N .9/358 and A /C N .9/361; Yearbook, Volume XXIV: 1993 (United Nations publication,
Sales N o. E .94.V .16), document A /C N .9/374 and Corr.l; Yearbook, Volume XXV: 1994
(United Nations publication, Sales N o. E .95.V .20), documents A/CN .9/388 and A /C N .9/391;
and “Yearbook, volum e XXVI: 1995” (to be issued subsequently as a United Nations sales
publication), docum ents A /C N .9/405 and A /C N .9/408.) The deliberations o f UN CITR AL on
the draft Convention are reflected in the report on the work o f its twenty-eighth session (1995)
(iOfficial R ecords o f the G eneral Assem bly, Fiftieth Session, Supplem ent No. 17 (A /50/17),
paras. 11-201), annex I o f which contains the draft Convention as submitted by the Com m is
sion to the General A ssem bly.
2UNC1TRAL is an intergovernmental body of the General A ssem bly that prepares in
ternational commercial law instruments designed to assist the international community in
m odernizing and harmonizing laws dealing with international trade. Other legal instruments
prepared by UN CITR AL include the follow ing: United Nations Convention on Contracts for
the International Sale o f G oods (Official R ecords o f the U nited N ations Conference on C on
tracts f o r the International Sale o f Goods, Vienna, 10 M arch-11 A pril 1980 (United Nations
publication, Sales N o. E .82.V .5), part I); Convention on the Limitation Period in the Interna
tional Sale o f G oods, 1974 (N ew York) (O fficial R ecords o f the United N ations Conference on
Presc ription (Lim itation) in the International Sale o f G oods, New York, 2 0 M a y -14 June 1974
(United Nations publication, Sales N o. E .74.V .8), part I); United Nations Convention on the
Carriage o f G oods by Sea, 1978 (Hamburg) (O fficial R ecords o f the U nited Nations Confer
ence on the C arriage o f G oods by Sea, Hamburg, 6-31 March 1978 (United Nations publica
tion, Sales N o. E.80.VIII.1), document A /C O N F.89/13, annex I); United Nations Convention
13
2. The Convention is particularly designed to facilitate the use of inde
pendent guarantees and stand-by letters of credit where only one or the other
of those instruments is traditionally in use. The Convention also solidifies
recognition of common basic principles and characteristics shared by the
independent guarantee and the stand-by letter of credit. In order to empha
size the common umbrella of rules provided for both independent guaran
tees and stand-by letters of credit and to overcome divergences that may
exist in terminology, the Convention uses the neutral term “undertaking” to
refer to both types of instruments.
3. Independent undertakings covered by the Convention are basic tools of
international commerce. They are used in a variety of situations. For exam
ple, they are used to secure performance of contractual obligations including
construction, supply and commercial payment obligations; to secure repay
ment of an advance payment in the event that such repayment is required;
to secure a winning bidder’s obligation to enter into a procurement contract;
to ensure reimbursement of payment under another undertaking; to support
issuance of commercial letters of credit and insurance coverage; and to
enhance creditworthiness of public and private borrowers. Yet familiarity
with one or the other instrument covered by the Convention is not universal;
there is an absence of legislative provisions dealing with them, practices
concerning the two types of instruments have differed in certain respects,
and important questions confronting users, practitioners and courts in the
daily life of these instruments are beyond the power of the parties to settle
contractually.
4. By establishing a harmonized set of rules for the two types of instru
ments covered, the Convention will provide greater legal certainty in their
use for day-to-day commercial transactions, as well as marshal credit for
public borrowers. Also, by making a single legal regime available to both
independent guarantees and stand-by letters of credit, the Convention will
on the Liability o f Operators o f Transport Terminals in International Trade (A/CO NF. 152/13,
annex); UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (O fficial R ecords o f the G eneral A ssem bly, Thirty-first
Session, Supplem ent No. 17 (A /31/17), para. 57); UNCITRAL Notes on Organizing Arbitral
Proceedings (“Yearbook, volum e XXVIII; 1996” (to be issued subsequently as a United Na
tions sales publication), document A /C N .9/423); UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules {Official
R ecords o f the G eneral Assem bly, Thirty-fifth Session, Supplem ent No. 17 (A /3 5 /17), para.
106); M odel Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985) (O fficial R ecords o f the
G eneral Assem bly, Fortieth Session, Supplem ent No. 17 (A /40/17, annex I); United Nations
Convention on International B ills o f Exchange and International Promissory Notes (General
Assem bly resolution 43/165, annex, o f 9 Decem ber 1988); M odel Law on International Credit
Transfers (1992) (O fficial R ecords o f the G eneral Assem bly, Forty-seventh Session, Supple
m en t No. 17 (A /4 7 /17); annex I); UNCITRAL M odel Law on Procurement o f G oods, Con
struction and Services (1994) {O fficial R ecords o f the G eneral Assem bly, Forty-ninth Session,
Supplem ent No. 17 and corrigendum (A /49/17 and C orr.l), annex I); and UNCITRAL M odel
Law on Electronic Commerce (Official R ecords o f the G eneral Assem bly, Fifty-first Session,
Supplem ent No. 17 (A /51/17), annex I).
14
facilitate the issuance of both instruments in combination with each other,
for example, the issuance of a stand-by letter of credit to support the issu
ance of a guarantee, or the reverse case. The Convention will further facili
tate “syndications” of lenders, by allowing them to combine more easily
both types of instruments. Lenders participating in a syndication can spread
credit risk among themselves, which enables them to extend larger volumes
of credit.
5. The Convention gives legislative support to the autonomy of the parties
to apply agreed rules of practice such as the Uniform Customs and Practice
for Documentary Credits (UCP), formulated by the International Chamber
of Commerce (ICC), or other rules that may evolve to deal specifically with
stand-by letters of credit, and the Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees
(URDG, also formulated by ICC). In addition to being essentially consistent
with the solutions found in rules of practice, the Convention supplements
their operation by dealing with issues beyond the scope of such rules. It does
so in particular regarding the question of fraudulent or abusive demands for
payment and judicial remedies in such instances. Furthermore, the deference
of the Convention to the specific terms of independent guarantees and stand
by letters of credit, including any rules of practice incorporated therein,
enables the Convention to work in tandem with rules of practice such as
UCP and URDG.
6. It should be noted that, strictly speaking, an independent guarantee or
stand-by letter of credit is an undertaking given to a beneficiary. Accord
ingly, the focus of the Convention is on the relationship between the guar
antor (in the case of an independent guarantee) or the issuer (in the case of
a stand-by letter of credit) (hereinafter referred to as “guarantor/issuer”) and
the beneficiary. The relationship between the guarantor/issuer and its cus
tomer (the principal, in the case of an independent guarantee, or the appli
cant, in the case of a stand-by letter of credit, hereinafter referred to as
“principal/applicant”) largely falls outside the scope of the Convention. The
same may be said of the relationship between a guarantor/issuer and its
instructing party (the instructing party being, for example, a bank, request
ing, on behalf of its customer, the guarantor/issuer to issue an independent
guarantee).
7. Provided below is a summary of the main features and provisions of the
Convention.
I, Scope of application
15
e.g. “demand”, “first demand”, “simple demand” or “bank” guarantees) or
stand-by letters of credit (article 2(1)). Those instruments can be covered by
the umbrella of the Convention because they share a wide area of common
use. Both types of instruments, which are payable upon presentation of any
stipulated documents, are used to secure against the possibility that some
contingency may occur (e.g. a breach of a contract). It may be noted that
another major use in particular of stand-by letters of credit is as an instru
ment to effectuate payment of mature indebtedness (“financial” or “direct
pay” stand-by letters of credit).
9. In the undertakings covered by the Convention the guarantor/issuer
promises to pay the beneficiary upon a demand for payment. The demand
may, depending upon the terms of the undertaking, be either a “simple”
demand or one having to be accompanied by the other documents called for
in the guarantee or stand-by letter of credit. The guarantor/issuer’s obliga
tion to pay is triggered by the presentation of a demand for payment in the
form, and with any supporting documents, as may be required by the inde
pendent guarantee or stand-by letter of credit. The guarantor/issuer is not
called on to investigate the underlying transaction, but is merely to deter
mine whether the documentary demand for payment conforms on its face
to the terms of the guarantee or stand-by letter of credit. Because of this
characteristic the instruments covered by the Convention are referred to
commonly as being “independent” and “documentary” in nature.
10. Reflecting practice, various types of scenarios are envisaged in which
an undertaking may be given, including at the request of the customer
(“principal/applicant”), on the instruction of another entity or person (“in
structing party”) acting at the request of the customer of the instructing
party, or on behalf of the guarantor/issuer itself (article 2(2)).
11. Full freedom is given to the parties to exclude completely the coverage
of the Convention (article 1), with the result that another law becomes
applicable. Since the Convention, if it is applicable, is to a large extent
suppletive rather than mandatory, wide breadth is given to exclude or alter
the rules of the Convention in any given case.
16
13. Apart from this general treatment of counter-guarantees as “undertak
ings”, the Convention provides a specific provision on counter-guarantees in
the context of fraudulent or abusive demands for payment; in that context
counter-guarantees may raise questions distinct from those raised by other
undertakings covered by the Convention (see paragraph 48, below).
14. The Convention also includes in its scope confirmations of undertak
ings, i.e. an undertaking added to that of, and authorized by, the guarantor/
issuer. A confirmation gives the beneficiary an option of demanding pay
ment from the confirmer as an alternative to demanding payment from the
guarantor/issuer. By requiring authorization of the guarantor/issuer, the
Convention does not recognize as confirmations “silent” confirmations, i.e.
confirmations added without the assent of the guarantor/issuer.
D. Definition of “independence”
17. While it is widely recognized that undertakings of the type covered by
the Convention are “independent”, there has been a lack of uniformity in
ternationally in the understanding and recognition of that essential charac
teristic. The Convention will promote such uniformity by providing a defi
nition of “independence” (article 3). That definition is phrased in terms of
the undertaking not being dependent upon the existence or validity of the
17
underlying transaction, or upon any other undertaking. The latter reference,
to other undertakings, clarifies the independent nature of a counter-guaran
tee from the guarantee that it relates to and of a confirmation from the stand
by letter of credit or independent guarantee that it confirms.
18. In addition, to fall within the scope of the Convention, an undertaking
must not be subject to any terms or conditions not appearing in the under
taking. It is specified that, to fall within the Convention, an undertaking
should not be subject to any future, uncertain act or event, with the excep
tion of presentation of a demand and other documents by the beneficiary or
of any other such act or event that falls within the “sphere of operations” of
the guarantor/issuer. That is in line with the notion that the role of the
guarantor/issuer in the case of independent undertakings is one of paymaster
rather than investigator.
F. Definition of intemationality
20. The Convention limits its application to undertakings that are interna
tional. Intemationality is determined on the basis of the places of business,
as specified in the undertaking, of any two of the following being in differ
ent States: guarantor/issuer, beneficiary, principal/applicant, instructing
party, confirmer (article 4(1)). Special rules are provided for the case of an
undertaking listing more than one place of business for a party, as well as
for the case of a party not having a “place of business” as such, but only a
habitual residence (article 4(2)).
18
G. Connecting factors for application o f the Convention
21. The Convention applies to international undertakings in either one of
two ways. The first way is linked to the location of the guarantor/issuer in
a State party to the Convention (“Contracting State”) (article 1(1 )(a)). The
second way in which the Convention applies is if the rules of private inter
national law lead to the application of the law of a Contracting State (article
1(1 my
22. The Convention provides an additional layer of harmonization of law
in this field, in that its chapter VI (Conflict of laws, articles 21 and 22)
supplies the rules to be followed by courts of Contracting States in identi
fying in any given case the law applicable to an independent guarantee or
a stand-by letter of credit. Those rules apply whether or not in a particular
case it turns out that the Convention is the applicable substantive law for the
independent guarantee or stand-by letter of credit in question (see para
graphs 52 and 53, below).
II. Interpretation
23. The Convention contains a general rule that interpretation of the Con
vention should be with a view to its international character and the need to
promote uniformity in its application (article 5), In addition, interpretation
is to have regard for the observance of good faith in international practice.
Abstracts of any court decisions or arbitral awards applying and interpreting
a provision of the Convention will be included in the case collection system
called case law on UNCITRAL texts (CLOUT).
A. Issuance
25. On the question of the point of time and place of issuance (i.e. when
and where the obligations of the guarantor/issuer to the beneficiary become
operative), the Convention promotes certainty in an area traditionally of
some uncertainty owing to the existence of differing notions. The Conven
tion rule is that issuance occurs when and where the undertaking leaves the
sphere of control of the guarantor/issuer (e.g. when it is sent to the
beneficiary)(article 7(1)). In addition, the Convention defines issuance in
terms of its practical effect. Once issued, the undertaking is available for
payment in accordance with its terms and is irrevocable.
19
26. As is customary in legal texts of UNCITRAL, the Convention estab
lishes a flexible and forward-looking form requirement for issuance. By
requiring a form that preserves a complete record of the text of the undertak
ing, rather than referring to “written” form, the Convention accommodates
issuance in a non-paper-based medium (e.g. by means of electronic data
interchange). It does so by referring to issuance in any form that preserves a
complete record of the text of the undertaking and provides a generally
acceptable or specifically agreed means of authentication (article 7(2)).
27. The Convention does not deal with the question of capacity to issue
undertakings (i.e. who is permitted to be a guarantor/issuer). That question,
which raises regulatory or other legal implications that differ from country
to country, is left to national law.
B. Amendment
28. Legislative recognition is given by the Convention to the rule of prac
tice that amendment of an undertaking requires acceptance by the benefici
ary in order to take effect, unless it is otherwise stipulated (article 8(3)). The
Convention takes cognizance of the possibility that an amendment might be
authorized in advance by the beneficiary. In such cases, the amendment
takes effect upon issuance (article 8(2)).
29. In one of the few provisions of the Convention that directly addresses the
relationship between the principal/applicant and the guarantor/issuer, it is
made clear that an amendment has no effect on the rights and obligations of
the principal/applicant, or for that matter of an instructing party or of a
confirmer, unless such other person consents to the amendment (article 8(4)).
20
originally designated beneficiary). For that reason guarantor/issuers are
given the opportunity to consent to any given transfer.
32. Regarding assignment of proceeds, the beneficiary of the undertaking
may, unless otherwise stipulated in the undertaking or elsewhere agreed,
assign the proceeds (article 10(1)). If the beneficiary assigns the proceeds
and if the guarantor/issuer or another person obliged to effect payment has
received a notice originating from the beneficiary, payment to the assignee
discharges the obligor, to the extent of its payment, from liability under the
undertaking (article 10(2)).
E. Expiry
35. The Convention provides (article 12) that the validity period of an
undertaking expires in the following ways: at the expiry date, which may be
a fixed date or the last day of a fixed period stipulated in the undertaking; if
expiry is linked to the occurrence of an act or event, upon presentation of the
document called for in the undertaking to indicate the occurrence of the act or
event, or, if no such document is called for, by presentation by the beneficiary
of certification for that purpose; or after six years from issuance, if no expiry
date has been stipulated or if a stipulated expiry act or event has not occurred.
21
IV. Rights, obligations and defences
A. Demand by beneficiary
39. As regards the beneficiary, the process of demanding and obtaining
payment involves presenting a demand for payment and any accompanying
documents in accordance with the terms of the undertaking. In view of the
documentary character of the demand, the form requirements of the Con
vention applicable to the undertaking itself (see paragraph 27, above) apply
to the demand (article 15(1)). The place of presentation is at the counters of
the guarantor/issuer at the place of issuance, unless some other place or
person is stipulated for payment purposes (article 15(2)).
22
40. In addition, the Convention provides (article 15(3)) that by virtue of
making a demand the beneficiary implicitly certifies that the demand is not
made in bad faith and that none of the circumstances exist that would justify
non-payment in accordance with the provisions of the Convention on
fraudulent or abusive demands for payment (see paragraphs 47 and 48,
below),
23
tendency to arise when there is a dispute as to the performance of an under
lying contractual obligation. That difficulty and the resulting uncertainty have
been compounded further because of the divergent notions and ways with
which such allegations have been treated both by guarantor/issuers and by
courts approached for provisional measures to block payment.
46. The Convention helps to ameliorate the problem by providing an in
ternationally agreed general definition of the types of situations in which an
exception to the obligation to pay against a facially compliant demand
would be justified (article 19(1)). The definition encompasses fact patterns
covered in different legal systems by notions such as “fraud” or “abuse of
right”. The definition refers to situations in which it is manifest and clear
that any document is not genuine or has been falsified, that no payment is
due on the basis asserted in the demand or that the demand has no conceiv
able basis.
47. For additional precision, the Convention provides illustrative examples
of cases in which a demand would be deemed to have no conceivable basis
(article 19(2); e.g. the underlying obligation has been undoubtedly fulfilled
to the satisfaction of beneficiary; the fulfilment of the underlying obligation
clearly has been prevented by wilful misconduct of beneficiary; in the case
of a demand under a counter-guarantee, the beneficiary of the counter
guarantee has made payment in bad faith as guarantor/issuer of the under
taking to which the counter-guarantee relates).
48. The Convention, by entitling but not imposing a duty on the guarantor/
issuer, as against the beneficiary, to refuse payment when confronted with
fraud or abuse (article 19(1)), strikes a balance between different interests
and considerations at play. By allowing discretion to the guarantor/issuer
acting in good faith, the Convention is sensitive to the concern of guarantor/
issuers over preserving the commercial reliability of undertakings as prom
ises that are independent from underlying transactions.
49. At the same time, the Convention affirms that the principal/applicant,
in the situations referred to, is entitled to provisional court measures to block
payment (article 19(3)). This recognizes that it is the proper role of courts,
and not of guarantors/issuers, to investigate the facts of underlying transac
tions. Furthermore, the Convention does not annul any rights that the prin
cipal/applicant may have in accordance with its contractual relationship with
the guarantor/issuer to avoid reimbursement of payment made in contraven
tion of the terms of that contractual relationship.
24
undertaking in the types of cases referred to above, the Convention estab
lishes a standard of proof to be met in order to obtain such provisional
measures (article 20(1)). That standard refers to ordering of provisional
measures on the basis of immediately available strong evidence of a high
probability that the fraudulent or abusive circumstances are present. Refer
ence is also made to consideration of whether the principal/applicant would
be likely to suffer serious harm in the absence of the provisional measures
and to the possibility of the court requiring security to be posted.
51. While authorizing provisional court measures in the cases concerned,
the Convention minimizes the use of judicial procedures to interfere in
undertakings by limiting the granting of provisional court measures to those
types of cases, with one additional type of case. Provisional court orders
blocking payment or freezing proceeds are also authorized in the case of use
of an undertaking for a criminal purpose (article 20(3)).
VL Conflict of laws
52. As noted above (paragraph 22), the Convention contains in chapter VI
conflict of law rules to be applied by the courts of Contracting States in
order to identify the law applicable to international undertakings as defined
in article 2, regardless of whether in any given case the Convention itself
would prove to be the applicable law. Those conflict of laws rules recognize
a choice of law stipulated in the undertaking or demonstrated by its terms
or conditions, or agreed elsewhere by the guarantor/issuer and the benefici
ary (article 21).
53. In the absence of a choice of law as described above, the Convention
provides for application to the undertaking of the law of the State where the
guarantor/issuer has that place of business at which the undertaking was
issued (article 22).
25