Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study of Material Management Techniques On Construction Project
Study of Material Management Techniques On Construction Project
e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 13, Issue 4 Ver. II (Jul. - Aug. 2016), PP 12-17
www.iosrjournals.org
I. Introduction
Construction material constitutes a major cost component in any construction project. The total cost of
installed material may be 50% or more of the total cost. The goal of material management is to ensure that the
materials are available at their point of use when needed hence, efficient procurement of material represents a
key role in the successful completion of the work. Materials management is a critical component of the
construction industry. As such, organizations need to understand the effects of proper materials management
techniques on the effectiveness of project execution. Extensive literature and reports deplore the lack of
efficiency and productivity in the construction industry. Too often, construction projects suffer from delays,
budget overruns, and claims. A properly implemented materials management program can achieve the timely
flow of materials and equipment to the jobsite, and thus facilitate improved work face planning, increased labor
productivity, better schedules, and lower project costs.
Tracking materials and components on construction projects implies primarily two different sets of
requirements for positional accuracy; in both cases, identification is also required. When the delivery and receipt
of materials to a construction site are tracked, it suffices to determine their location in the supply chain, e.g., a
fabrication shop, or a constructor’s lay down yard. However, after delivered to the site, the location of materials
needs to be tracked with better positional accuracy. For example, though requisite materials may be known to be
within a constructor’ lay down yard, each item needs to be physically found in order to be issued to crew
workers for installation. Such positional accuracy may also facilitate automatic determination of whether a
certain material item is in close proximity to its appropriate handling equipment and by inference, whether it is
being handled by the equipment .Tracking materials thus helps ascertain the basic construction activities being
performed with the equipment.
It is important for the contractor to consider that there may be significant difference in the date that the
material was requested or date when the purchase order was made, and the time at which the material will be
delivered, thus material management is a key of project management.“Material management is defined as the
process to provide right material at right place at right time in right quantity so as to minimize the cost of
project”. Material management is concerned with the planning, identification, procuring, storage, receiving and
distribution of material. The responsibility of Material management department for the flow of material from the
time the material is ordered, received, and stored until they are used is the basic responsibility of material
management. Materials represent a major expense in construction, so minimizing procurement cost improves
opportunities for reducing the overall project cost.
To fulfill all these objectives, it is necessary to establish harmony and good co-ordination between all
the employees of material management department and this department should have good co-ordination with the
other departments of the organization to serve all production centers.
Objectives:-
Objectives which have covered in this project study are as follows:
1. To Compare Planned Vs Actual material consumption using MSP software then to find the problems in
planning, purchasing, procurement & to suggest remedies regarding the material management.
2. S Curve Analysis is used for comparison of planned and actual cost of construction material
DOI: 10.9790/1684-1304021217 www.iosrjournals.org 13 | Page
“Study of Material Management Techniques on Construction Project”
Research Methodology
The research approach, which is the combination of both the qualitative and quantitative methodologies
were adopted in this research. This research has the advantage of gaining a stronger research design and
achieving more valid and reliable findings. As such, semi-structured interview, questionnaire survey and
literature reviews were the methodologies conducted to carry out the objectives of the research. Accordingly, it
is believed that a deeper and more detailed quality of information could be obtained with interview opted as the
methodology instrument whereas questionnaire survey could cover a broad range of the study in fulfilling both
objectives. The experimental analysis consists of theories and practical consideration of the concepts. Therefore
the work can be classified as site management, inventory controlling, purchasing procedure, cost ,and
procurement and tracking etc. Basically this research is divided in two parts such as first one Qualitative
analysis & second Quantitative analysis. Qualitative analysis: This analysis is carried out using MSP software
for analyzing planned and actual material consumption through S curve analysis. Reasoning over the deviations
curve is the s shaped graph produced by the the cumulative expenditure of certain parameters (man-hours cost)
against time and it is the representation of project path. This analysis is carried for comparison of planned and
actual cost for material.
Quantitative Analysis: This study mainly focuses on Inventory Control techniques which includes ABC
analysis, EOQ analysis.
ABC Analysis. The ABC inventory control technique is based on the principle that a small portion of the items
may typically represent the bulk of money value of the total inventory in construction process, while a relatively
large number of items may from a small part of the money value of stores. The money value is ascertained by
multiplying the quantity of material of each item by its unit price. The items
“A” Category – 5% to 10% of the items represent 70% to 75% of the money value.
“B” Category – 15% to 20% of the items represent 15% to 20% of the money.
“C” Category – The remaining number of the items represent 5% to 10% of the money value. The relative
position of these items show that items of category A should be under the maximum control, items of category
B may not be given that much attention and item C may be under a loose control.
EOQ analysis: The EOQ refers to the order size that will result in the lowest total of ordering and carrying
costs for an item of inventory. If a firm place unnecessary orders it will incur unneeded order costs. If a firm
places too few order, it must maintain large stocks of goods and will have excessive carrying cost.
Above graphs shows the comparison of cumulative cost of planned actual material. This cost is less at
initial stage. This S curve Analysis recognize that there is too much increase in material cost while actual
execution. Though this is small project but material management aspect never differs whether it is small or big.
where,
Co = Ordering Cost, S = Total Consumption Cu = Cost of Item I = Inventory carrying Cost
III. Conclusion
1. Construction material constitutes a major cost component in any construction project. The total cost of
material may be 52% of total cost; so that it is important for contractor to consider that timely availability of
material is potential cause of successful completion of project.
2. S curve analysis: It is concluded that major causes of variations are as following :
Due to unavailability of RCC Design drawings this causes problems to contractor to work out accurate
actual quantities.
Due to deviation in Items it will affect on material procurement and finally affects the total project budget.
If the tender is quoted accurately so that non tender will not arises because basic rate of material fluctuate
day to day leading to increase in cost. Instead of quantities that item should be quoted as Rate only item so
it is profitable to contractor & Client.
Due to uneven geographical conditions in case soling extra depth of excavation to be considered.
EOQ Analysis
After EOQ analysis for cement it is concluded that economic order quantity which is 506 Bags &
frequency of ordering 15days which has overcome the problems of Stock out successfully over the actual
Site stock records.
For B class material such as sand and aggregate on site material are ordered as per requirement because of
space availability they could not maintain stock as per EOQ.
After performance of EOQ on sand & Aggregate it can be concluded that those material does not gives
satisfactory results because ordering frequency after EOQ was 8 days & 18 days but actually on site
demand is as per daily requirement
The Total cost of inventory after adoption of EOQ analysis is less than without adopting EOQ.
References
[1]. L.C. Bell, G. Stukhart “Attributes of material management systems”, ASCE, Vol.112, No. 1, March 1986
[2]. K.V. Patel, C.M. Vyas “Construction material management on project sites”, national conference on recent trends in engineering
and technology,1314 May 2011
[3]. E.A. Haddad “Construction material management system for gaza strip building contractors”, Dec 2006.
[4]. D.U. Kini “The material management is key to successful project management”, journal of management in
engineering/January/February 1999
[5]. Elbeltagi, E., Hegazy, T. and Eldosouky. A.,”Dynamic Layout of Construction Temporary Facilities Considering Safety”, Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 4, 2004, pp 534-541
[6]. Formoso, C. T., Soibelman, L., De Cesare, C. and Isatto, E. L, “Material Waste in Building Industry: Main Causes and Prevention”
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Vol. 128, No. 4, 2002,pp. 316-325.
[7]. J. R. Arnold and S. N. Chapman, “Introduction to Materials Management 5th Ed.”, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2004.
[8]. F. Harris and R. MacCaffer, “Modern Construction Management” London: Blackwell Science, 2001.
[9]. H. Abdul-Rahman and M. N. Alidrisyi, “A Perspective of Material Management Practices in a Fast Developing Economy: the case
of Malaysia”, Construction Management and Economics, vol. 12, pp. 412-422, 1994.
[10]. E. T. T. Wong and G. Norman, “Economic evaluation of materials planning systems for construction”, Construction Management
and Economics, vol. 15, pp. 39-47, 1997.
[11]. D. M. Lambert, J. R. Stock, and L. M. Ellram, “Fundamentals of Logistics Mangagement” United States: McGraw Hill, 1998.
[12]. V. Ahuja, J. Yang, and R. Shankar, “Study of ICT adoption for building project management in Indian Construction Industry”,
Automation in Construction, pp. 1-9, 2008.
[13]. P. Ang and N. B. Kasim, “Implementation of ICT in Materials Management in Construction Projects”, Degree Thesis, University
Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, January 2009
[14]. R. K. Yin, “Case Study Research Design and Methods, Third Editions”, Sage Publication, United Kingdom, 2003.