Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Con Ict of Laws: Notes and Cases
Con Ict of Laws: Notes and Cases
Conflict of Laws
Notes and Cases
IV. Conflicts Rules on Contracts 22 X. Conflicts Rules on Corporation and Partnership 23
A. Extrinsic validity of contracts 22 A. Corporation 23
B. Capacity of parties 22 B. Partnership 23
C. Intrinsic validity of contracts 22
XI. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgment 23
D. Choice of law by the parties In a contract; exceptions
A. Distinction between Recognition and Enforcement of
22
Foreign Judgment 23
V. Conflicts Rules on Wills and Succession 22 B. Bases of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
A. Extrinsic validity of wills 22 Judgment 23
B. Probate of wills 22 C. Philippine Conflicts Rule on Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Judgment 23
Santos was directly hired by the Palace Hotel without the
intervention of the POEA or any authorized recruitment agency
Facts of the government.
PARTIES Under the rule of forum non conveniens, a Philippine court or
● In May 1988, private respondent Marcelo Santos was agency may assume jurisdiction over the case if it chooses to
an overseas worker employed as a printer at the do so provided that the Philippine court:
Mazoon Printing Press, Sultanate of Oman. A month (1) is one to which the parties may conveniently resort to;
after, he was directly hired by the Palace Hotel, (2) is in a position to make an intelligent decision as to the
Beijing, People's Republic of China and later law and the facts; and
terminated due to retrenchment. (3) has or is likely to have power to enforce its decision.
● Petitioners are the Manila Hotel Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as "MHC") and the Manila The conditions are unavailing in the case at bar. The
Hotel International Company, Limited (hereinafter inconvenience is compounded by the fact that the proper
referred to as "MHICL"). defendants, the Palace Hotel and MHICL are not nationals of
● MHC was still a GOCC duly organized and existing the Philippines. Neither are they "doing business in the
under the laws of the Philippines. MHICL is a Philippines." Likewise, the main witnesses, Mr. Shmidt and Mr.
corporation duly organized and existing under the Henk are non-residents of the Philippines.
laws of Hong Kong. MHC is an "incorporator" of Neither can an intelligent decision be made as to the law
MHICL, owning 50% of its capital stock. governing the employment contract as such was perfected in
● By virtue of a "management agreement" with the foreign soil. This calls to fore the application of the principle of
Palace Hotel, MHICL trained the personnel and staff of lex loci contractus. The employment contract was not perfected
the Palace Hotel at Beijing. in the Philippines. Santos signified his acceptance by writing a
letter while he was in Oman. This letter was sent to the Palace
Hotel in China.
RELEVANT FACTS
Neither can the NLRC determine the facts surrounding the
● While employed with Mazoon Printing, Santos was alleged illegal dismissal as all acts complained of took place in
offered a job at the Palace Hotel for the same position Beijing.
but with higher compensation. Santos signified his
acceptance of the offer. Even assuming that a proper decision could be reached by the
● Santos then resigned from Mazoon under the pretext NLRC, such would not have any binding effect against the
that he was needed at home to help with the family employer, the Palace Hotel. The Palace Hotel is a corporation
business. incorporated under the laws of China and was not even served
● On June 30, 1988, Santos was deemed resigned from with summons. Jurisdiction over its person was not acquired.
Mazoon. On November 5, he left for Beijing to start
work at the Palace Hotel. He subsequently signed an
amended "employment agreement" with the Palace
Hotel, effective November 5. Disposition
● On August 10, 1989, the Palace Hotel informed Santos WHEREFORE, the Court hereby GRANTS the petition for
by letter signed by Mr. Shmidt that his employment at certiorari and ANNULS the orders and resolutions of the NLRC.
the Hotel print shop would be terminated due to
business reverses brought about by the political
upheaval in China. On September 5, the Palace Hotel
terminated the employment of Santos and paid all Saudi Arabian Airlines v Morada
benefits due him, including his plane fare back to the
Philippines. GR No 122191, 8 October 1998
● Santos then demanded full compensation pursuant to
the employment agreement. After his demand was Doctrinal Rule
rejected, filed a complaint for illegal dismissal with the A factual situation that cuts across territorial lines and is
NLRC. The complaint named MHC, MHICL, the Palace affected by the diverse laws of two or more states is said to
Hotel and Mr. Shmidt as respondents. contain a "foreign element".
(3) the situs of a thing, that is, the place where a thing is, arising out of this case.
or is deemed to be situated. In particular, the lex situs
is decisive when real rights are involved;
(4) the place where an act has been done, the locus Disposition
actus, such as the place where a contract has been WHEREFORE, the instant petition for certiorari is hereby
made, a marriage celebrated, a will signed or a tort DISMISSED.
committed. The lex loci actus is particularly important
in contracts and torts;
(5) the place where an act is intended to come into effect,
e.g., the place of performance of contractual duties, Hasegawa v Kitamura
or the place where a power of attorney is to be
exercised; GR No 149177, 23 November 2007
(6) the intention of the contracting parties as to the law
that should govern their agreement, the lex loci Doctrinal Rule
intentionis; In the judicial resolution of conflicts problems, three
(7) the place where judicial or administrative proceedings consecutive phases are involved:
are instituted or done. The lex fori "the law of the
forum" is particularly important because, as we have (1) jurisdiction,
seen earlier, matters of ‘procedure’ not going to the (2) choice of law, and
substance of the claim involved are governed by it; (3) recognition and enforcement of judgments.
and because the lex fori applies whenever the content Since the principles of lex loci celebrationis and lex contractus,
of the otherwise applicable foreign law is excluded and the “state of the most significant relationship rule” make
from application in a given case for the reason that it reference to the law applicable to a dispute, they are rules
falls under one of the exceptions to the applications of proper for the second phase, the choice of law. If the only issue
foreign law; and in the case is that of jurisdiction, choice-of-law rules are not only
(8) the flag of a ship, which in many cases is decisive of inapplicable but also not yet called for.
practically all legal relationships of the ship and of its
master or owner as such. It also covers contractual
relationships particularly contracts of affreightment. Facts
● Petitioner Nippon Engineering Consultants Co., Ltd.
After a careful study of the pleadings on record, we are (Nippon), a Japanese consultancy firm providing
convinced that there is reasonable basis for Morada's assertion technical and management support in the
that although she was already working in Manila, petitioner infrastructure projects of foreign governments,
brought her to Jeddah on the pretense that she would merely entered into an Independent Contractor Agreement
testify in an investigation of the charges she made against the (ICA) with respondent Minoru Kitamura, a Japanese
two SAUDIA crew members for the attack on her person while national permanently residing in the Philippines.
they were in Jakarta. ● The agreement provides that Kitamura was to extend
professional services to Nippon for a year starting on
Considering that the complaint in the court a quo is one April 1, 1999. Nippon then assigned Kitamura to work
involving torts, the "connecting factor" or "point of contact" as the project manager of the Southern Tagalog
could be the place or places where the tortious conduct or lex Access Road (STAR) Project in the Philippines.
loci actus occurred. And applying the torts principle in a ● When the STAR Project was near completion, the
conflicts case, we find that the Philippines could be said as a DPWH engaged the consultancy services of Nippon,
situs of the tort. This is because it is in the Philippines where on January 28, 2000, this time for the detailed
SAUDIA allegedly deceived Morada. That certain acts or parts engineering and construction supervision of the
of the injury allegedly occurred in another country is of no Bongabon-Baler Road Improvement (BBRI) Project.
moment. For in our view what is important here is the place Kitamura was named as the project manager in the
where the over-all harm or the fatality of the alleged injury to contract's Appendix 3.1.
the person, reputation, social standing and human rights of ● Petitioner Hasegawa, Nippon's general manager for its
complainant, had lodged, according to Morada. All told, it is not International Division, informed Kitamura that the
without basis to identify the Philippines as the situs of the company had no more intention of automatically
alleged tort. renewing his ICA. His services would be engaged by
Moreover, with the widespread criticism of the traditional rule of the company only up to the substantial completion of
lex loci delicti commissi, modern theories and rules on tort the STAR Project on March 31, 2000.
liability have been advanced to offer fresh judicial approaches ● Kitamura then filed a case for specific performance
to arrive at just results. In keeping abreast with the modern and damages with the RTC of Lipa.
theories on tort liability, we find here an occasion to apply the ● Contending that the ICA had been perfected in Japan
"State of the most significant relationship" rule, which in and executed by and between Japanese nationals,
our view should be appropriate to apply now, given the factual Nippon and Hasegawa moved to dismiss the
context of this case. complaint for lack of jurisdiction, following the
principles of lex loci celebrationis and lex contractus.
In applying said principle to determine the State which has the ● The RTC, in denying the motion to dismiss, held that
most significant relationship, the following contacts are to be matters connected with the performance of contracts
taken into account and evaluated according to their relative are regulated by the law prevailing at the place of
importance with respect to the particular issue: performance.
(a) the place where the injury occurred; ● In affirming the RTC, the CA ruled, among others, that
(b) the place where the conduct causing the injury the principle of lex loci celebrationis was not
occurred; applicable to the case, because nowhere in the
(c) the domicile, residence, nationality, place of pleadings was the validity of the written agreement
incorporation and place of business of the parties, and put in issue. The CA thus declared that the RTC was
(d) the place where the relationship, if any, between the correct in applying instead the principle of lex loci
parties is centered. solutionis.
● Petitioners posit that local courts have no substantial
Prescinding from this premise that the Philippines is the situs of relationship to the parties following the [state of the]
the tort complaint of and the place "having the most interest in most significant relationship rule in Private
the problem", we find, by way of recapitulation, that the International Law.
Philippine law on tort liability should have paramount
application to and control in the resolution of the legal issues
B. Evangelista, in their own behalf and on behalf of NLRC: 3 years as per Art 291 of Labor Code.
728 other overseas contract workers (OCWs) instituted
Sol Gen: 1 year as per Amiri Decree No 23 of 1976.
a class suit by filing an "Amended Complaint" with the
POEA for money claims arising from their recruitment ● The claimants are of the view that Article 291 of the
by AIBC and employment by BRII. Labor Code of the Philippines, which was applied by
● BRII is a foreign corporation with headquarters in NLRC, refers only to claims "arising from the
Houston, Texas, and is engaged in construction; while employer's violation of the employee's right as
AIBC is a domestic corporation licensed as a service provided by the Labor Code." They assert that their
contractor to recruit, mobilize and deploy Filipino claims are based on the violation of their employment
workers for overseas employment on behalf of its contracts, as amended by the Amiri Decree No. 23 of
foreign principals. 1976 and therefore the claims may be brought within
● The amended complaint principally sought the ten years as provided by Article 1144 of the Civil Code.
payment of the unexpired portion of the employment ● AIBC and BRII, insist that the actions on the claims
contracts, which was terminated prematurely. have prescribed under the Amiri Decree No. 23 of
● The claimants alleged that AIBC and BRII had waived 1976.
their right to present evidence and had defaulted by
failing to file their answers and to attend the pre-trial
conference. Issue/s
● The complainants-appellants allege that they were (1) Whether it is the Bahrain law on prescription of action
recruited by respondent-appellant AIBC for its based on the Amiri Decree No. 23 of 1976 or a
accredited foreign principal, Brown & Root, on various Philippine law on prescription that shall be the
dates from 1975 to 1983. They were all deployed at governing law.
various projects undertaken by Brown & Root in (2) Whether the prescriptive period governing the filing of
several countries. the claims is three years, as provided by the Labor
● Having been officially processed as OCWs by the Code or ten years, as provided by the Civil Code.
Philippine Government, all the individual complainants
signed standard overseas employment contracts.
Held
NLRC resolved the issues in the following manner: (1) PH LAW. As a general rule, a foreign procedural law will not
be applied in the forum. Procedural matters, such as service of
(1) As to applicable law, NLRC set aside Section 1, Rule process, joinder of actions, period and requisites for appeal,
129 of the 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence governing and so forth, are governed by the laws of the forum. This is true
the pleading and proof of a foreign law and admitted even if the action is based upon a foreign substantive law.
in evidence a simple copy of the Bahrain's Amiri
Decree No. 23 of 1976 (Labour Law for the Private A law on prescription of actions is sui generis in Conflict of
Sector). NLRC agreed with the POEA Administrator Laws in the sense that it may be viewed either as procedural or
that the Amiri Decree No. 23, being more favorable substantive, depending on the characterization given such a
and beneficial to the workers, should form part of the law.
overseas employment contract of the complainants. However, the characterization of a statute into a procedural
NLRC, however, held that the Amiri Decree No. 23 or substantive law becomes irrelevant when the country of
applied only to the claimants, who worked in Bahrain, the forum has a "borrowing statute." Said statute has the
and set aside awards of the POEA Administrator in practical effect of treating the foreign statute of limitation as
favor of the claimants, who worked elsewhere. one of substance. A "borrowing statute" directs the state of the
(2) As to prescription, NLRC ruled that the prescriptive forum to apply the foreign statute of limitations to the pending
period for the filing of the claims of the complainants claims based on a foreign law.
was three years, as provided in Article 291 of the
Labor Code, and not ten years as provided in Article The courts of the forum will not enforce any foreign claim
1144 of the Civil Code nor one year as provided in the obnoxious to the forum's public policy. To enforce the
Amiri Decree No. 23 of 1976. one-year prescriptive period of the Amiri Decree No. 23 of 1976
(3) As to whether the case is a class suit, NLRC agreed as regards the claims in question would contravene the public
with the POEA Administrator that the labor cases policy on the protection to labor.
cannot be treated as a class suit for the simple reason
that not all the complainants worked in Bahrain.
(2) THREE (3) YEARS. Article 291 of the Labor Code of the
(4) As to due process, NLRC found at least three
infractions of the cardinal rules of administrative due Philippines provides the prescriptive period for filing "money
process: namely, (1) the failure of the POEA claims arising from employer-employee relations." The claims in
the cases at bench all arose from the employer-employee
Administrator to consider the evidence presented by
AIBC and BRII; (2) some findings of fact were not relations, which is broader in scope than claims arising from a
supported by substantial evidence; and (3) some of specific law or from the collective bargaining agreement.
the evidence upon which the decision was based
were not disclosed to AIBC and BRII during the
Disposition
hearing.
(5) As to liability of BRII and AIBC, NLRC sustained the The three petitions were filed under Rule 65 of the Revised
ruling of the POEA Administrator that BRII and AIBC Rules of Court on the grounds that NLRC had committed grave
are solidarily liable for the claims of the complainants abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction in issuing
and held that BRII was the actual employer of the the questioned orders. We find no such abuse of discretion.
complainants, or at the very least, the indirect WHEREFORE, all the three petitions are DISMISSED.
employer, with AIBC as the labor contractor. NLRC also
held that jurisdiction over BRII was acquired by the
POEA Administrator through the summons served on
AIBC, its local agent. Bank of America v American Realty
GR No 133876, 12/29/1999, Buena, J
● Essentially, one of the common issue is on prescription
although the parties disagreed as to the time that Doctrinal Rule
should be embraced within the prescriptive period.
Doctrine of processual presumption states that if the foreign
For the POEA: 10 years as per Art 1144 of CC; law involved is not properly pleaded and proved, our courts will
presume that the foreign law is the same as our local or
Under the doctrine of processual presumption, if the domestic or internal law. Thus, since the law of the Netherlands
foreign law involved is not properly pleaded and proved, our as regards the obligation to support has not been properly
courts will presume that the foreign law is the same as our local pleaded and proved in the instant case, it is presumed to be the
or domestic or internal law. same with Philippine law, which enforces the obligation of
parents to support their children and penalizing the
Territoriality principle provides that penal laws and those of
non-compliance therewith.
public security and safety shall be obligatory upon all who live
and sojourn in Philippine territory, subject to the principle of We likewise agree with petitioner that notwithstanding that the
public international law and to treaty stipulations. national law of respondent states that parents have no
obligation to support their children or that such obligation is not
punishable by law, said law would still not find applicability,
Facts when the foreign law, judgment or contract is contrary to a
sound and established public policy of the forum, the said
● Petitioner Norma A. Del Socorro and respondent Ernst
foreign law, judgment or order shall not be applied.
Johan Brinkman Van Wilsem contracted marriage in
Holland on September 25, 1990. They got divorced in
Holland in 1995. At that time, their son, Roderigo, was
(2) YES. Based on the foregoing legal precepts, we find that
only 18 months old. respondent may be made liable under Section 5(e) and (i) of
● Norma alleged that Ernst made a promise to provide
R.A. No. 9262 for unjustly refusing or failing to give support to
monthly support to their son. However, since the
petitioner’s son.
arrival of Norma and her son in the Philippines, Ernst
never gave support to the son. In addition, considering that respondent is currently living in the
● Ernst came to the Philippines and remarried in Philippines, we find strength in petitioner’s claim that the
Pinamungahan, Cebu. Territoriality Principle in criminal law, in relation to Article 14 of
● In 2009, Norma sent a letter demanding for support the New Civil Code, applies to the instant case, which provides
from Ernst. Ernst refused to receive the letter. This that:“[p]enal laws and those of public security and safety shall
prompted Norma to file a complaint against Ernst for be obligatory upon all who live and sojourn in Philippine
violation of Section 5, paragraph E(2) of R.A. No. 9262 territory, subject to the principle of public international law and
for the latter’s unjust refusal to support his minor child. to treaty stipulations.”
● The RTC-Cebu dismissed the instant criminal case As to prescription, the act of denying support to a child under
against Ernst on the ground that the facts charged in Section 5(e)(2) and (i) of R.A. No. 9262 is a continuing offense,
the information do not constitute an offense with which started in 1995 but is still ongoing at present.
respect to the latter who is an alien. Accordingly, the crime charged in the instant case has clearly
Issue/s not prescribed.
(1) WON a foreign national has an obligation to support
his minor child under Philippine law. Disposition
(2) WON a foreign national can be held criminally liable
under R.A. No. 9262 for his unjustified failure to WHEREFORE, the petition is GRANTED. The Orders of the RTC
support his minor child. are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The case is
REMANDED to the same court to conduct further proceedings
Held based on the merits of the case.
(1) NO. HOWEVER, under the doctrine of processual
presumption, if the foreign law involved is not properly pleaded
and proved, our courts will presume that the foreign law is the
same as our local or domestic or internal law. Having failed to Edi-Sta builders International v NLRC
implead the law of the Netherlands, Ernst is bound by Philippine GR No 145587, 10/26/2007, Velasco, Jr, J
law to support his minor child.
To determine whether or not a person is criminally liable under Doctrinal Rule
R.A. No. 9262, it is imperative that the legal obligation to
Failure to furnish the adverse party with a copy of the appeal is
support exists.
treated only as a formal lapse, an excusable neglect, and
We agree with respondent that petitioner cannot rely on Article hence, not a jurisdictional defect. Accordingly, in such a
195 of the New Civil Code in demanding support from situation, the appeal should not be dismissed; however, it
respondent, who is a foreign citizen, since Article 15 of the New should not be given due course either.
Civil Code stresses the principle of nationality. In other words,
insofar as Philippine laws are concerned, specifically the
provisions of the Family Code on support, the same only Facts
applies to Filipino citizens. By analogy, the same principle ● The CA affirmed the NLRC decision ordering Expertise
applies to foreigners such that they are governed by their Search International (ESI), EDI-Staffbuilders
national law with respect to family rights and duties. The International, Inc. (EDI), and Omar Ahmed Ali Bin Bechr
obligation to give support to a child is a matter that falls under Est. (OAB) jointly and severally to pay private
family rights and duties. respondent, Eleazar S. Gran (Gran) the amount of USD
In international law, the party who wants to have a foreign law 16,150.00 as unpaid salaries.
applied to a dispute or case has the burden of proving the ● EDI is a corporation engaged in recruitment and
foreign law. In the present case, respondent hastily concludes placement of OFWs. ESI is another recruitment agency
that being a national of the Netherlands, he is governed by which collaborated with EDI to process the
such laws on the matter of provision of and capacity to support. documentation and deployment of Gran to Saudi
While respondent pleaded the laws of the Netherlands in Arabia. Gran was an OFW recruited by EDI, and
advancing his position that he is not obliged to support his son, deployed by ESI to work for OAB, in Riyadh.
he never proved the same. It is incumbent upon respondent to ● OAB informed EDI that, from the applicants’ curricula
plead and prove that the national law of the Netherlands does vitae submitted to it for evaluation, it selected Gran for
not impose upon the parents the obligation to support their the position of “Computer Specialist.” After accepting
child. OAB’s offer of employment, Gran signed an
employment contract that granted him a monthly
In view of respondent’s failure to prove the national law of
salary of USD 850.00 for a period of two years.
the Netherlands in his favor, the doctrine of processual
● After only 5 months, Gran's employment was
presumption shall govern. Under this doctrine, if the foreign
terminated. Gran received from OAB the total amount
law involved is not properly pleaded and proved, our courts will
of SR 2,948.00 representing his final pay, and on the
presume that the foreign law is the same as our local or
same day, he executed a Declaration releasing OAB
specific denials and affirmative defenses are set out in the the record of the case filed by the plaintiff in Hong
Bank’s answer. Kong against the defendant.
● The trial court held that since the Hong Kong court
There can be no summary judgment where questions of fact
judgment had been duly proved, it is a presumptive
are in issue or where material allegations of the pleadings are
in dispute. The resolution of whether a foreign law allows only evidence of a right as between the parties; hence, the
party impugning it had the burden to prove want of
the recovery of actual damages is a question of fact as far as
jurisdiction over his person. HERAS failed to discharge
the trial court is concerned since foreign laws do not prove
that burden. He did not testify to state categorically
themselves in our courts. Foreign laws are not a matter of
and under oath that he never received summons.
judicial notice. Like any other fact, they must be alleged and
Even his own witness Lousich admitted that HERAS
proven. Certainly, the conflicting allegations as to whether New
York law or Philippine law applies to Guerrero’s claims present a was served with summons in his Quezon City
residence. As to De la Vega’s testimony regarding
clear dispute on material allegations which can be resolved
non-service of summons, the same was hearsay and
only by a trial on the merits.
had no probative value.
Under Section 24 of Rule 132, the record of public documents ● The trial court concluded that the Hong Kong court
of a sovereign authority or tribunal may be proved by (1) an judgment should be recognized and given effect in
official publication thereof or (2) a copy attested by the officer this jurisdiction for failure of HERAS to overcome the
having the legal custody thereof. However, certain cases have legal presumption in favor of the foreign judgment.
admitted exceptions to this rule. These cases involved ● The CA reversed the trial court underscoring the fact
attorneys testifying in open court during the trial in the that a foreign judgment does not of itself have any
Philippines and quoting the particular foreign laws sought to be extraterritorial application. For it to be given effect, the
established. On the other hand, the Walden affidavit was taken foreign tribunal should have acquired jurisdiction over
abroad ex parte and the affiant never testified in open court. the person and the subject matter. If such tribunal has
The Walden affidavit cannot be considered as proof of New not acquired jurisdiction, its judgment is void.
York law on damages not only because it is self-serving but also Summons should have been personally served on
because it does not state the specific New York law on HERAS in Hong Kong, for, as claimed by ASIAVEST,
damages. HERAS was physically present in Hong Kong for nearly
The Bank’s intention in presenting the Walden affidavit is to 14 years. Since there was not even an attempt to serve
prove New York law and jurisprudence. However, because of summons on HERAS in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong
the failure to comply with Section 24 of Rule 132 on how to Supreme Court did not acquire jurisdiction over
prove a foreign law and decisions of foreign courts, the Walden HERAS.
affidavit did not prove the current state of New York law and Issue
jurisprudence. Thus, the Bank has only alleged, but has not
WON the judgment of the Hong Kong Court has been repelled
proved, what New York law and jurisprudence are on the
by evidence of want of jurisdiction, want of notice to the party,
matters at issue.
collusion, fraud or clear mistake of law or fact, such as to
overcome the presumption established in Section 50, Rule 39
Disposition of the Rules of Court in favor of foreign judgments.
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED for lack of merit.
Held
YES. Under paragraph (b) of Section 50, Rule 39 of the Rules of
Asiavest Limited v CA Court, which was the governing law at the time this case was
decided by the trial court and respondent Court of Appeals, a
GR No 128803, 9/25/1998, Davide, Jr, J foreign judgment against a person rendered by a court having
jurisdiction to pronounce the judgment is presumptive evidence
Doctrinal Rule of a right as between the parties and their successors in
interest by the subsequent title. However, the judgment may be
The testimony of an expert witness may be allowed to prove a
repelled by evidence of want of jurisdiction, want of notice to
foreign law.
the party, collusion, fraud, or clear mistake of law or fact.
Also, Section 3(n) of Rule 131 of the New Rules of Evidence
Facts provides that in the absence of proof to the contrary, a court, or
● In issue is the enforceability in the Philippines of a judge acting as such, whether in the Philippines or elsewhere,
foreign judgment. is presumed to have acted in the lawful exercise of jurisdiction.
● Asiavest Limited filed a complaint against private Hence, once the authenticity of the foreign judgment is proved,
respondent Antonio Heras praying that the latter be the burden to repel it on grounds provided for in paragraph (b)
ordered to pay to the former the amounts awarded by of Section 50, Rule 39 of the Rules of Court is on the party
the Hong Kong Court Judgment. challenging the foreign judgment -- HERAS in this case.
● The following facts were agreed upon by the parties:
The main argument raised against the Hong Kong judgment is
(1) Heras admits the existence of the judgment
that the Hong Kong Supreme Court did not acquire jurisdiction
but not necessarily the authenticity or validity
over the person of HERAS. This involves the issue of whether
thereof.
summons was properly and validly served on HERAS. It is
(2) Asiavest is not doing business and is not
settled that matters of remedy and procedure such as those
licensed to do business in the Philippines.
relating to the service of process upon the defendant are
and
governed by the lex fori or the law of the forum, i.e., the law of
(3) HERAS "is a resident of New Manila, Quezon
Hong Kong in this case.
City.
● Heras presented two witnesses, namely, Fortunata Lousich testified that the Hong Kong court authorized service of
dela Vega and Russel Warren Lousich. summons on HERAS outside of its jurisdiction, particularly in the
● The gist of Ms. dela Vega’s testimony is to the effect Philippines. He admitted also the existence of an affidavit of
that no writ of summons or copy of a statement of one Jose R. Fernandez of the Sycip Salazar Hernandez &
claim of Asiavest was ever served in the office of the Gatmaitan law firm stating that he (Fernandez) served summons
Navegante Shipping Agency Limited and/or for Heras, on HERAS by leaving a copy with HERAS’s son-in-law. On
and that no service of the writ of summons was either redirect examination, Lousich declared that such service of
served on the defendant at his residence. summons would be valid under Hong Kong laws provided that
● Mr. Lousich was presented as an expert on the laws of it was in accordance with Philippine laws.
Hong Kong, and as a representative of the law office There is, however, nothing in the testimony of Mr. Lousich that
of the defendant’s counsel who made a verification of
touched on the specific law of Hong Kong in respect of service ● The legal grounds of opposition are (a) that the
of summons either in actions in rem or in personam, and where distribution should be governed by the laws of the
the defendant is either a resident or nonresident of Hong Kong. Philippines , and (b) that said order of distribution is
In view of the absence of proof of the Hong Kong law on this contrary thereto insofar as it denies to Helen, one of
particular issue, the presumption of identity or similarity or the two acknowledged natural children, one-half of the
so-called processual presumption shall come into play. It will estate in full ownership.
thus be presumed that the Hong Kong law on the matter is ● It was alleged that the law that should govern the
similar to the Philippine law. estate of the deceased Christensen should not be the
internal law of California alone, but the entire law
It will be helpful to determine first whether the action is in
thereof because several foreign elements are
personam, in rem, or quasi in rem because the rules on service
involved, that the forum is the Philippines and even if
of summons under Rule 14 of the Rules of Court of the
the case were decided in California, Section 946 of
Philippines apply according to the nature of the action.
the California Civil Code, which requires that the
An action in personam is an action against a person on the domicile of the decedent apply, should be applicable.
basis of his personal liability. An action in rem is an action ● The CFI ruled that as Edward E. Christensen was a
against the thing itself instead of against the person. An action citizen of the United States and of the State of
quasi in rem is one wherein an individual is named as California at the time of his death, the successional
defendant and the purpose of the proceeding is to subject his rights and intrinsic validity of the provisions in his will
interest therein to the obligation or lien burdening the property. are to be governed by the law of California, in
In the case at bar, the action filed in Hong Kong against HERAS accordance with which a testator has the right to
was in personam, since it was based on his personal guarantee dispose of his property in the way he desires.
of the obligation of the principal debtor. Before we can apply
the foregoing rules, we must determine first whether HERAS
was a resident of Hong Kong. Issue
WON the intrinsic validity of the testamentary disposition or the
We therefore conclude that the stipulated fact that HERAS "is a
distribution of the estate of the deceased Edward E.
resident of New Manila, Quezon City, Philippines" refers to his
Christensen should be governed by the laws of the Philippines
residence at the time jurisdiction over his person was being
sought by the Hong Kong court. With that stipulation of fact, under the Renvoi Doctrine.
ASIAVEST cannot now claim that HERAS was a resident of
Hong Kong at the time.
Held
Accordingly, since HERAS was not a resident of Hong Kong and
YES. There is no question that Edward E. Christensen was a
the action against him was, indisputably, one in personam, citizen of the United States and of the State of California at the
summons should have been personally served on him in time of his death. But there is also no question that at the time
Hong Kong. The extraterritorial service in the Philippines was of his death he was domiciled in the Philippines.
therefore invalid and did not confer on the Hong Kong court
jurisdiction over his person. It follows that the Hong Kong court The law that governs the Validity of his testamentary
judgment cannot be given force and effect here in the dispositions is defined in Article 16 of the Civil Code . The
Philippines for having been rendered without jurisdiction. application of this article in the case at bar requires the
determination of the meaning of the term "national law" as used
therein, which, in the case at bar, the private law of the State of
Disposition California.
IN VIEW OF ALL THE FOREGOING, judgment is hereby The next question is: "What is the law in California governing
rendered DENYING the petition in this case and AFFIRMING the disposition of personal property? The decision of the court
the assailed judgment of the CA. below, sustains the contention of the executor-appellee that
under the California Probate Code, a testator may dispose of
his property by will in the form and manner he desires.
But appellant invokes the provisions of Article 946 of the Civil
F. The problem of characterization Code of California, which is as follows:
"If there is no law to the contrary, in the place where personal
G. The problem of renvoi property is situated, it is deemed to follow the person of its
owner, and is governed by the law of his domicile."
1. Ways of dealing with the problem The theory of the doctrine of renvoi is that the court of the
2. Reasons for and against Renvoi forum, in determining the question before it, must take into
3. Usefulness of Renvoi account the whole law of the other jurisdiction, but also its rules
as to conflict of laws, and then apply the law to the actual
Aznar v Garcia question which the rules of the other jurisdiction prescribe. This
may be the law of the forum.
GR No L-16749, 1/31/1963, Labrador, J
We note that Article 946 of the California Civil Code as its
conflict of laws rule while the rule applied in In re Kaufman,
Doctrinal Rule
supra, its internal law. If the law on succession and the conflict
The national law mentioned in Article 16 of our Civil Code is the of, law rules of California are to be enforced jointly, each in its
law on conflict of laws. own intended and appropriate sphere, the principle cited In re
Kaufman should apply to citizens living in the State, but Article
946 should apply to such of its citizens as are not domiciled in
Facts California but in other jurisdictions. The rule laid down of
● The CFI directed the executor to reimburse Maria Lucy resorting to the law of the domicile in the determination of
Christensen the amount of P3,600 paid by her to matters with foreign element involved is in accord with the
Helen Christensen Garcia as her legacy, and declaring general principle of American law that the domiciliary law
Maria Lucy Christensen entitled to the residue of the should govern in most matters or rights which follow the person
property to be enjoyed during her lifetime in of the owner.
accordance with the provisions of the will of the As explained in the various authorities, the national law
testator Edward E. Christensen. mentioned in Article 16 of our Civil Code is the law on conflict of
● Opposition to the approval of the project of partition laws in the California Civil Code, i.e., Article 946, which
was filed by Helen, insofar as it deprives her of her authorizes the reference or return of the question to the law of
legitime as an acknowledged natural child. the testator's domicile. The conflict of law rule in California,
Article 946, Civil Code, precisely refers back the case, when a the application of the law of the place where the properties are
decedent is not domiciled in California, to the law of his situated, renvoi would arise, since the properties here involved
domicile, the Philippines in the case at bar. The court of the are found in the Philippines. In the absence, however, of proof
domicile can not and should not refer the case back to as to the conflict of law rule of Texas, it should not be presumed
California; such action would leave the issue incapable of different from ours. Appellants' position is therefore not rested
determination because the case will then be like a football, on the doctrine of renvoi. As stated, they never invoked nor
tossed back and forth between the two states, between the even mentioned it in their arguments. Rather, they argue that
country of which the decedent was a citizen and the country of their case falls under the circumstances mentioned in the third
his domicile. The Philippine court must apply its own law as paragraph of Article 17 in relation to Article 16 of the Civil Code.
directed in the conflict of law rule of the state of the decedent. Article 16, par. 2, and Art. 1039 of the Civil Code, render
We therefore find that as the domicile of the deceased applicable the national law of the decedent, in intestate or
Christensen, a citizen of California , is the Philippines , the testamentary successions, with regard to four items:
validity of the provisions of his will depriving his acknowledged
(a) the order of succession;
natural child, the appellant, should be governed by the
Philippine law, the domicile, pursuant to Art. 946 of the Civil (b) the amount of successional rights;
Code of California, not by the internal law of California. (c) the intrinsic validity of the provisions of the will; and
(d) the capacity to succeed.
Disposition Appellants would however counter that Art. 17, paragraph three,
Wherefore, the decision appealed from is hereby REVERSED of the Civil Code, stating that ?
and the case returned to the lower court with instructions that "Prohibitive laws concerning persons, their acts or property, and
the partition be made as the Philippine law on succession those which have for their object public order, public policy and
provides. good customs shall not be rendered ineffective by laws or
judgments promulgated, or by determinations or conventions
agreed upon in a foreign country."
Bellis v Bellis This is not correct. Whatever public policy or good customs may
be involved in our system of legitimes, Congress has not
GR No L-23678, 6/6/1967, Bengzon, JP, J intended to extend the same to the succession of foreign
nationals. For it has specifically chosen to leave, inter alia, the
Doctrinal Rule amount of successional rights, to the decedent's national law.
Whatever public policy or good customs may be involved in our Specific provisions must prevail over general ones.
system of legitimes, Congress has not intended to extend the prevails as the exception to Art. 16, par. 2 of the Civil Code.
same to the succession of foreign nationals. For it has
The parties admit that the decedent, Amos G. Bellis, was a
specifically chosen to leave, inter alia, the amount of
citizen of the State of Texas, U.S.A., and that under the laws of
successional rights, to the decedent's national law.
Texas, there are no forced heirs or legitimes. Accordingly, since
the intrinsic validity of the provision of the will and the amount
Facts of successional rights are to be determined under Texas law,
the Philippine law on legitimes cannot be applied to the testacy
● Appeal upon a question purely of law. of Amos G. Bellis.
● Amos G. Bellis, born in Texas, was "a citizen of the
State of Texas and of the United States. He had
legitimate and illegitimate children from 2 marriages. Disposition
● On August 5, 1952, Amos executed a will in the
WHEREFORE, the order of the probate court is hereby affirmed
Philippines. In 1958, he died, a resident of San
in toto.
Antonio, Texas. His will was admitted to probate in the
CFI of Manila.
● In the project of partition, the executor - pursuant to
the "Twelfth" clause of the testator's Last Will and Llorente v CA
Testament - divided the residuary estate into seven
equal portions for the benefit of the testator's seven GR No 124371, 11/23/2000, Pardo, J
legitimate children by his first and second marriages.
● Maria Cristina Bellis and Miriam Palma Bellis filed their Doctrinal Rule
respective oppositions to the project of partition on
Intestate and testamentary succession, both with respect to the
the ground that they were deprived of their legitimes
order of succession and to the amount of successional rights
as illegitimate children and, therefore, compulsory
and to the intrinsic validity of testamentary provisions, shall be
heirs of the deceased.
● The CFI overruled the oppositions. Relying upon Art. regulated by the national law of the person whose succession
16 of the Civil Code, it applied the national law of the is under consideration.
decedent, which in this case is Texas law, which did
not provide for legitimes.
Facts
● The RTC declared respondent Alicia F. Llorente, as
Issue co-owner of whatever property she and the deceased
Lorenzo N. Llorente may have acquired during the
WON Texas law or Philippine law should apply in determining
twenty-five (25) years that they lived together as
the existence of legitime.
husband and wife.
● Lorenzo was an enlisted serviceman of the US Navy
Held from 1927-1957.
● In 1937, Lorenzo and petitioner Paula Llorente were
TEXAS LAW. In the present case, it is not disputed that the married in Camarines Sur.
decedent was both a national of Texas and a domicile thereof ● In 1943, Lorenzo was admitted to US citizenship. He
at the time of his death. thereafter discovered Paula was having an affair with
Even assuming Texas has a conflict of law rule providing that his brother.
the domiciliary system (law of the domicile) should govern, the ● The couple drew a written agreement to the effect that
same would not result in a reference back (renvoi) to Philippine Paula's daily maintenance and support would be
law, but would still refer to Texas law. Nonetheless, if Texas has suspended, they would judicially dissolve their
a conflicts rule adopting the situs theory (lex rei sitae) calling for marriage, they would make a separate agreement
marriage, among other. sense, the term means merely residence, that is, personal
● Petitioner Rodolfo San Luis, one of the children of residence, not legal residence or domicile.
Felicisimo by his first marriage, filed a motion to
THEREFORE, it is incorrect for petitioners to argue that
dismiss on the grounds of improper venue and failure
"residence," for purposes of fixing the venue of the settlement
to state a cause of action. of the estate of Felicisimo, is synonymous with "domicile."
● Rodolfo claimed that the petition for letters of
administration should have been filed in the Province In the instant case, while petitioners established that Felicisimo
of Laguna because this was Felicisimo's place of was domiciled in Sta. Cruz, Laguna, respondent proved that he
residence prior to his death. He further claimed that also maintained a residence in Alabang, Muntinlupa from 1982
respondent has no legal personality to file the petition up to the time of his death.
because she was only a mistress of Felicisimo since
the latter, at the time of his death, was still legally
married to Merry Lee. (2) The significance of the Van Dorn case to the development of
● The RTC denied the motion to dismiss. Felicidad limited recognition of divorce in the Philippines cannot be
submitted documentary evidence showing that while denied. The ruling has long been interpreted as severing
Felicisimo exercised the powers of his public office in marital ties between parties in a mixed marriage and
Laguna, he regularly went home to their house in New capacitating the Filipino spouse to remarry as a necessary
Alabang Village, Alabang. She presented the decree consequence of upholding the validity of a divorce obtained
of absolute divorce issued by the Family Court of the abroad by the alien spouse.
First Circuit, State of Hawaii to prove that the marriage With regard to respondent's marriage to Felicisimo allegedly
of Felicisimo to Merry Lee had already been dissolved. solemnized in California, U.S.A., she submitted photocopies of
● RTC then ruled that Felicidad had legal standing to file the Marriage Certificate and the annotated text of the Family
the petition and that venue was properly laid. Law Act of California which purportedly show that their
● The case was however re-raffled. The RTC then marriage was done in accordance with the said law. As stated
dismissed the petition for letters of administration in Garcia, however, the Court cannot take judicial notice of
holding that the petition should have been filed in Sta. foreign laws as they must be alleged and proved.
Cruz, Laguna and not in Makati since at the time of his
Therefore, this case should be remanded to the trial court for
death, Felicisimo was the duly elected governor and a
further reception of evidence on the divorce decree obtained
resident of the Province of Laguna. It also ruled that
respondent was without legal capacity. by Merry Lee and the marriage of respondent and Felicisimo.
● CA reversed the RTC holding that under Section 1, Even assuming that Felicisimo was not capacitated to marry
Rule 73 of the Rules of Court, the term "place of respondent in 1974, nevertheless, we find that the latter has the
residence" of the decedent, for purposes of fixing the legal personality to file the subject petition for letters of
venue of the settlement of his estate, refers to the administration, as she may be considered the co-owner of
personal, actual or physical habitation, or actual Felicisimo as regards the properties that were acquired through
residence or place of abode of a person as their joint efforts during their cohabitation.
distinguished from legal residence or domicile. It also
In the instant case, respondent would qualify as an interested
held that Felicisimo had legal capacity to marry
person who has a direct interest in the estate of Felicisimo by
respondent by virtue of paragraph 2, Article 26 of the
virtue of their cohabitation, the existence of which was not
Family Code and the rulings in Van Dorn v. Romillo, Jr. denied by petitioners. If she proves the validity of the divorce
and Pilapil v. Ibay-Somera. and Felicisimo's capacity to remarry, but fails to prove that her
● Petitioners claim that a person can only have one
marriage with him was validly performed under the laws of the
domicile at any given time. Since Felicisimo never
U.S.A., then she may be considered as a co-owner under Article
changed his domicile, the petition for letters of
144 of the Civil Code. This provision governs the property
administration should have been filed in Sta. Cruz.
relations between parties who live together as husband and
wife without the benefit of marriage, or their marriage is void
from the beginning.
Issue/s
Meanwhile, if respondent fails to prove the validity of both the
(1) WON venue was properly laid in Makati and not
divorce and the marriage, the applicable provision would be
Laguna.
(2) WON Felicidad, as widow, had legal capacity to file the Article 148 of the Family Code which has filled the hiatus in
Article 144 of the Civil Code by expressly regulating the
subject petition for letters of administration.
property relations of couples living together as husband and
wife but are incapacitated to marry.
Held
YES TO BOTH. Disposition
(1) Under Section 1, Rule 73 of the Rules of Court, the petition for WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The Decision of the Court
letters of administration of the estate of Felicisimo should be of Appeals reinstating and affirming the February 28, 1994
filed in the Regional Trial Court of the province "in which he Order of the Regional Trial Court which denied petitioners'
resides at the time of his death." In the case of Garcia Fule v. motion to dismiss and its October 24, 1994 Order which
Court of Appeals, we laid down the doctrinal rule for dismissed petitioners' motion for reconsideration is AFFIRMED.
determining the residence - as contradistinguished from Let this case be REMANDED to the trial court for further
domicile - of the decedent for purposes of fixing the venue of proceedings.
the settlement of his estate.
This term "resides," like the terms "residing" and "residence," is
elastic and should be interpreted in the light of the object or
purpose of the statute or rule in which it is employed. C. Dual citizenship
Even where the statute uses the word "domicile" still it is
construed as meaning residence and not domicile in the D. Statelessness
technical sense. Some cases make a distinction between the
terms "residence" and "domicile" but as generally used in
statutes fixing venue, the terms are synonymous, and convey
E. Personal status and capacity
the same meaning as the term "inhabitant." In other words,
"resides" should be viewed or understood in its popular sense,
meaning, the personal, actual or physical habitation of a person,
actual residence or place of abode. It signifies physical
presence in a place and actual stay thereat. In this popular
Republic v Manalo
2. Consistent with Articles 15 and 17 of the New Civil
GR No 221029, 4/24/2018, Peralta, J Code, the marital bond between two Filipinos cannot
be dissolved even by an absolute divorce obtained
Doctrinal Rule abroad.
Under the principles of comity, our jurisdiction recognizes a 3. An absolute divorce obtained abroad by a couple,
valid divorce obtained by a spouse of foreign nationality, but who are both aliens, may be recognized in the
the legal effects thereof, e.g., on custody, care and support of Philippines, provided it is consistent with their
the children or property relations of the spouses, must still be respective national laws.
determined by our courts. 4. In mixed marriages involving a Filipino and a foreigner,
the former is allowed to contract a subsequent
marriage in case the absolute divorce is validly
FOREIGN LAWS MUST BE PROVEN. It is well-settled in our obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him
jurisdiction that our courts cannot take judicial notice of foreign or her to remarry.
laws. Like any other facts, they must be alleged and proved. Paragraph 2 of Article 26 confers jurisdiction on Philippine
courts to extend the effect of a foreign divorce decree to a
Filipino spouse without undergoing trial to determine the
Facts validity of the dissolution of the marriage. It authorizes our
● Respondent Marelyn Tanedo Manalo (Manalo) filed a courts to adopt the effects of a foreign divorce decree precisely
petition for cancellation of entry of marriage in the Civil because the Philippines does not allow divorce. Philippine
Registry of San Juan by virtue of a judgment of divorce courts cannot try the case on the merits because it is
rendered by a Japanese court. tantamount to trying a divorce case. Under the principles of
● The RTC set the case for initial hearing. comity, our jurisdiction recognizes a valid divorce obtained by a
● The Amended Petition, which captioned that it is also spouse of foreign nationality, but the legal effects thereof, e.g.,
a petition for recognition and enforcement of foreign on custody, care and support of the children or property
judgment, alleged: relations of the spouses, must still be determined by our courts.
(a) Manalo is previously married in the Now, the Court is tasked to resolve whether, under the same
Philippines to a Japanese national named provision, a Filipino citizen has the capacity to remarry under
YOSHINO MINORO. Philippine law after initiating a divorce proceeding abroad and
(b) A case for divorce was filed by Manalo in obtaining a favorable judgment against his or her alien spouse
Japan and after due proceedings, a divorce who is capacitated to remarry.
decree dated December 6, 2011 was
rendered by the Japanese Court. Both Dacasin v. Dacasin and Van Dorn already recognized a
● Among the documents that were offered and admitted foreign divorce decree that was initiated and obtained by the
were: Filipino spouse and extended its legal effects on the issues of
1. Court Order dated January 25, 2012, finding child custody and property relation, respectively.
the petition and its attachments to be In addition, the fact that a validly obtained foreign divorce
sufficient in form and in substance; initiated by the Filipino spouse can be recognized and given
2. Affidavit of Publication; legal effects in the Philippines is implied from Our rulings in
3. Issues of the Northern Journal dated Fujiki v. Marinay, et al. and Medina v. Koike.
February 21-27, 2012, February 28 - March 5,
2012, and March 6-12, 2012; There is no compelling reason to deviate from the
4. Certificate of Marriage between Manalo and above-mentioned rulings. When this Court recognized a foreign
her former Japanese husband; divorce decree that was initiated and obtained by the Filipino
5. Divorce Decree of the Japanese court; spouse and extended its legal effects on the issues of child
6. Authentication/Certificate issued by the custody and property relation, it should not stop short in
Philippine Consulate General in Osaka, likewise acknowledging that one of the usual and necessary
Japan of the Notification of Divorce; and consequences of absolute divorce is the right to remarry.
7. Acceptance of Certificate of Divorce. Indeed, there is no longer a mutual obligation to live together
● The OSG did not present any controverting evidence and observe fidelity. When the marriage tie is severed and
to rebut the allegations of Manalo. ceased to exist, the civil status and the domestic relation of the
● RTC denied the petition for lack of merit. former spouses change as both of them are freed from the
● CA overturned the RTC holding that Article 26 of the marital bond.
Family Code of the Philippines (Family Code) is Paragraph 2 of Article 26 speaks of "a divorce x x x validly
applicable even if it was Manalo who filed for divorce obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or her to
against her Japanese husband because the decree remarry. " Based on a clear and plain reading of the provision, it
they obtained makes the latter no longer married to only requires that there be a divorce validly obtained abroad.
the former, capacitating him to remarry. The letter of the law does not demand that the alien spouse
● Cited as similar to this case was Van Dorn v. Judge should be the one who initiated the proceeding wherein the
Romillo, Jr. where the marriage between a foreigner divorce decree was granted. It does not distinguish whether
and a Filipino was dissolved through a divorce filed the Filipino spouse is the petitioner or the respondent in the
abroad by the latter. foreign divorce proceeding. The Court is bound by the words of
Issue the statute; neither can We put words in the mouths of the
lawmaker.
WON the divorce decree obtained by Manalo, a Filipina, abroad
should be recognized. To reiterate, the purpose of Paragraph 2 of Article 26 is to avoid
the absurd situation where the Filipino spouse remains married
to the alien spouse who, after a foreign divorce decree that is
Held effective in the country where it was rendered, is no longer
married to the Filipino spouse. The provision is a corrective
YES. Divorce, the legal dissolution of a lawful union for a cause measure to address an anomaly where the Filipino spouse is
arising after marriage, are of two types: tied to the marriage while the foreign spouse is free to marry
(1) absolute divorce or a vinculo matrimonii, which under the laws of his or her country. Whether the Filipino
terminates the marriage, and spouse initiated the foreign divorce proceeding or not, a
(2) limited divorce or a mensa et thoro, which suspends it favorable decree dissolving the marriage bond and capacitating
and leaves the bond in full force. his or her alien spouse to remarry will have the same result: the
Filipino spouse will effectively be without a husband or wife.
In this jurisdiction, the following rules exist:
Conveniently invoking the nationality principle is erroneous.
1. Philippine law does not provide for absolute divorce;
Such principle, found under Article 15 of the Civil Code, is not
hence, our courts cannot grant it.
an absolute and unbending rule. In fact, the mere existence of parties, and asking that Alice be ordered to render an
Paragraph 2 of Article 26 is a testament that the State may accounting of that business, and that he be declared
provide for an exception thereto. Moreover, blind adherence to with right to manage the conjugal property.
the nationality principle must be disallowed if it would cause ● Alice moved to dismiss the case on the ground that
unjust discrimination and oppression to certain classes of the cause of action is barred by previous judgment in
individuals whose rights are equally protected by law. The the divorce proceedings before the Nevada Court
courts have the duty to enforce the laws of divorce as written wherein respondent had acknowledged that he and
by the Legislature only if they are constitutional. petitioner had "no community property" as of June 11,
1982.
The foregoing notwithstanding, We cannot yet write finis to
● The RTC denied the motion to dismiss.
this controversy by granting Manalo's petition to recognize
● Upton contends that the divorce is not valid and
and enforce the divorce decree rendered by the Japanese
court and to cancel the entry of marriage in the Civil Registry binding in this jurisdiction, the same being contrary to
of San Juan, Metro Manila. local law and public policy.
Jurisprudence has set guidelines before Philippine courts
recognize a foreign judgment relating to the status of a Issue
marriage where one of the parties is a citizen of a foreign WON the divorce decree obtained in Nevada is valid and
country. Presentation solely of the divorce decree will not
binding in our jurisdiction.
suffice. The fact of divorce must still first be proven. Before a
foreign divorce decree can be recognized by our courts, the
party pleading it must prove the divorce as a fact and Held
demonstrate its conformity to the foreign law allowing it.
YES. Aliens may obtain divorces abroad, which may be
Under Sections 24 and 25 of Rule 132, on the other hand, a recognized in the Philippines, provided they are valid according
writing or document may be proven as a public or official record to their national law. In this case, the divorce in Nevada
of a foreign country by either released private respondent from the marriage from the
(1) an official publication or standards of American law, under which divorce dissolves the
(2) a copy thereof attested by the officer having legal marriage.
custody of the document. If the record is not kept in Pursuant to his national law, Upton is no longer the husband of
the Philippines, such copy must be petitioner. He would have no standing to sue in the case below
(a) accompanied by a certificate issued by the as petitioner's husband entitled to exercise control over
proper diplomatic or consular officer in the conjugal assets. As he is bound by the Decision of his own
Philippine foreign service stationed in the country's Court, which validly exercised jurisdiction over him,
foreign country in which the record is kept and whose decision he does not repudiate, he is estopped by
and his own representation before said Court from asserting his
(b) authenticated by the seal of his office. right over the alleged conjugal property.
If the opposing party fails to properly object, as in this case, the
divorce decree is rendered admissible as a written act of the
foreign court. As it appears, the existence of the divorce decree Disposition
was not denied by the OSG; neither was the jurisdiction of the WHEREFORE, the Petition is GRANTED, and respondent Judge
divorce court impeached nor the validity of its proceedings is hereby ordered to dismiss the Complaint.
challenged on the ground of collusion, fraud, or clear mistake of
fact or law, albeit an opportunity to do so.
Nonetheless, the Japanese law on divorce must still be
Pilapil v Ibay-Somera
proved.
GR No 80116, 6/30/1989, Regalado, J
It is well-settled in our jurisdiction that our courts cannot take
judicial notice of foreign laws. Like any other facts, they must be
alleged and proved. Doctrinal Rule
The person who initiates the adultery case must be an offended
spouse, and by this is meant that he is still married to the
Disposition accused spouse, at the time of the filing of the complaint.
WHEREFORE, the petition for review on certiorari is DENIED.
The Decision and Resolution of the Court of Appeals are
AFFIRMED IN PART. The case is REMANDED to the court of Facts
origin for further proceedings and reception of evidence as to ● In 1979, petitioner Imelda Manalaysay Pilapil, a Filipino
the relevant Japanese law on divorce. citizen, and private respondent Erich Ekkchard Geiling,
a German national, were married in Germany.
● Three years thereafter, Geiling initiated a divorce
proceeding against Pilapil in Germany.
Van Dorn v Romillo ● In 1986, the German court promulgated a decree of
GR No 68470, 10/8/1985, Melencio-Herrera, J divorce on the ground of failure of marriage of the
spouses. The custody of the child was granted to
Pilapil.
Doctrinal Rule
● The records show that under German law said court
Aliens may obtain divorces abroad, which may be recognized in was locally and internationally competent for the
the Philippines, provided they are valid according to their divorce proceeding and that the dissolution of said
national law. marriage was legally founded on and authorized by
the applicable law of that foreign jurisdiction.
● More than five months after the issuance of the
Facts divorce decree, Geiling filed two complaints for
● Alice Reyes Van Dorn is a Filipina, while Richard Upton adultery against Pilapil alleging that, while still married
is a US citizen. They were married in Hongkong in to Geiling, Pilapil "had an affair with a certain William
1972 then resided in the Philippines. Chia as early as 1982 and with yet another man named
● They were divorced in Nevada, USA. Alice has Jesus Chua."
remarried in Nevada. ● Pilapil filed a petition with the Secretary of Justice
● Upton filed suit against Alice stating that the latter's asking that the aforesaid resolution of respondent
business, Galleon Shop, is conjugal property of the fiscal be set aside and the cases against her be
dismissed. ● In reversing the RTC, the CA opined that there is no
● Pilapil filed this special civil action for certiorari and law allowing the change of either name or sex in the
prohibition, with a prayer for a temporary restraining certificate of birth on the ground of sex reassignment
order, seeking the annulment of the order of the lower through surgery.
court denying her motion to quash. The petition is
anchored on the main ground that the court is without
jurisdiction "to try and decide the charge of adultery, Issue
which is a private offense that cannot be prosecuted WON Silverio can legally change his name and sex in his birth
de officio (sic), since the purported complainant, a certificate.
foreigner, does not qualify as an offended spouse
having obtained a final divorce decree under his
national law prior to his filing the criminal complaint." Held
NO. The State has an interest in the names borne by individuals
Issue and entities for purposes of identification. A change of name is
a privilege, not a right. Petitions for change of name are
WON Geiling does not qualify as an offended spouse having controlled by statutes.
obtained a final divorce decree under his national law prior to
his filing the criminal complaint. Section 1 of RA 9048 provides "No entry in a civil register shall
be changed or corrected without a judicial order, except for
clerical or typographical errors and change of first name or
Held nickname which can be corrected or changed by the
concerned city or municipal civil registrar or consul general in
YES. The law specifically provides that in prosecutions for
accordance with the provisions of this Act and its implementing
adultery and concubinage the person who can legally file the
rules and regulations."
complaint should be the offended spouse, and nobody else.
RA 9048 likewise provides the grounds for which change of
As cogently argued by petitioner, Article 344 of the Revised first name may be allowed:
Penal Code thus presupposes that the marital relationship is
still subsisting at the time of the institution of the criminal action (1) The petitioner finds the first name or nickname to be
for adultery. This is a logical consequence since the raison ridiculous, tainted with dishonor or extremely difficult
d'etre of said provision of law would be absent where the to write or pronounce;
supposed offended party had ceased to be the spouse of the (2) The new first name or nickname has been habitually
alleged offender at the time of the filing of the criminal case. and continuously used by the petitioner and he has
been publicly known by that first name or nickname in
The person who initiates the adultery case must be an offended
the community; or
spouse, and by this is meant that he is still married to the
(3) The change will avoid confusion.
accused spouse, at the time of the filing of the complaint.
Petitioner’s basis in praying for the change of his first name was
In the present case, the fact that private respondent obtained a his sex reassignment. He intended to make his first name
valid divorce in his country, the Federal Republic of Germany, is
compatible with the sex he thought he transformed himself into
admitted. Said divorce and its legal effects may be recognized
through surgery. However, a change of name does not alter
in the Philippines insofar as private respondent is concerned in
one’s legal capacity or civil status. RA 9048 does not sanction a
view of the nationality principle in our civil law on the matter of
change of first name on the ground of sex reassignment. Rather
status of persons.
than avoiding confusion, changing petitioner’s first name for his
Geiling, being no longer the husband of petitioner, had no legal declared purpose may only create grave complications in the
standing to commence the adultery case under the imposture civil registry and the public interest.
that he was the offended spouse at the time he filed suit.
Before a person can legally change his given name, he must
present proper or reasonable cause or any compelling reason
Disposition justifying such change. In addition, he must show that he will be
prejudiced by the use of his true and official name. In this case,
WHEREFORE, the questioned order denying petitioner's motion he failed to show, or even allege, any prejudice that he might
to quash is SET ASIDE and another one entered DISMISSING suffer as a result of using his true and official name.
the complaint in Criminal Case No. 87-52435 for lack of
jurisdiction.
The determination of a person’s sex appearing in his birth
certificate is a legal issue and the court must look to the
statutes.
Silverio v Republic
Under RA 9048, a correction in the civil registry involving the
GR No 174689, 10/19/2007, Corona, J change of sex is not a mere clerical or typographical error. It is a
substantial change for which the applicable procedure is Rule
Doctrinal Rule 108 of the Rules of Court.
The status of a person in law includes all his personal qualities To correct simply means “to make or set aright; to remove the
and relations, more or less permanent in nature, not ordinarily faults or error from” while to change means “to replace
terminable at his own will. something with something else of the same kind or with
something that serves as a substitute.” The birth certificate of
petitioner contained no error. All entries therein, including those
Facts corresponding to his first name and sex, were all correct. No
correction is necessary.
● Rommel Jacinto Dantes Silverio filed a petition for the
change of his first name and sex in his birth certificate Sex reassignment is not among those acts or events
in the RTC. mentioned in Article 407. Neither is it recognized nor even
● He underwent psychological examination, hormone mentioned by any law, expressly or impliedly.
treatment and breast augmentation. He then “Status” refers to the circumstances affecting the legal situation
underwent sex reassignment surgery in Bangkok, (that is, the sum total of capacities and incapacities) of a person
Thailand. in view of his age, nationality and his family membership.
● From then on, petitioner lived as a female and was in
fact engaged to be married. He then sought to have The status of a person in law includes all his personal
his name in his birth certificate changed from “Rommel qualities and relations, more or less permanent in nature, not
Jacinto” to “Mely,” and his sex from “male” to “female.” ordinarily terminable at his own will, such as his being
● RTC granted the petition of Silverio.
IX. Conflicts Rules on Torts and Crimes XI. Recognition and Enforcement of
A. Torts, defined
Foreign Judgment
E. Three(3) theories in determining the locus delicti C. Philippine Conflicts Rule on Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Judgment
F. Modern theories and rules on tort liability
D. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
G. Conflict rules on maritime tort Judgment
H. Foreign tort claims; conditions for enforcement of Requisites and Defenses
tort claims
E. Value and Conclusiveness of Foreign Judgment
I. Philippines rule on foreign torts
F. Jurisdiction over Action for Enforcement of
J. Distinguish tort from crime Foreign Judgment
B. Partnership
1. Personal law of partnership
2. Domicile of partnership