Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Methods of Research For Mechanical Engineering (FME 3) Assessment Task 7
Methods of Research For Mechanical Engineering (FME 3) Assessment Task 7
(FME 3)
ASSESSMENT TASK 7
I. Analysis and Interpretation. Analyze and interpret the following research problems and
Results.
A.) State the type of data analysis.
Comparative Analysis
D.) Compute the results with the use of computer. Show the steps.
Cell A B
1 90 87
2 88 85
3 82 78
4 80 75
5 91 88
6 85 80
7 81 76
8 89 86
9 83 79
10 84 78
Step 6: Highlight the data. Click Tools menu. Click Data Analysis
Step 7: Wait until the computer displays Analysis tools. Click T-test: Paired Two Sample- for
means. Click ok.
Step 8: The computer displays lnput. Type in Variable 1 Range: $A1: $A10 and in Variable 2
Range: $B1: $B10
Step 9: Type in the alpha, 0.01. Click Ok.
Step 10: Computer Displays as follows:
The computed t-value obtained is 11.78126 which is significant because it is greater than
the t-critical or tabular of 3.249836 with df 9 at 0.01 level of confidence, This means that the
effectiveness of teaching Mathematics by Mr. X. using,Method 1 and Method 2 to Grade 5
pupils really differ from each other because Method 1 is more effective in teaching
Mathematics. ln other words, Method 1 is better than Method 2. Hence, the null hypothesis
is rejected.
Method 1 got a higher mean value and has a lower variance than Method 2 and we’ve use
the comparative analysis and statistical tool of mean, variance and T-test therefore we can
conclude Method 1 is better than Method 2.
I.) Do you accept/reject the null hypothesis? Why?
We stated in my null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the two
methods but as we calculated using comparative data analysis and using our statistical tool
Variance, means and T-test we obtain and analyze that there is significant difference
between the two Methods in which Method 1 is better than Method 2 therefore null
hypothesis is rejected.
Scale:
There is no significant difference in the acceptability of ice cream made from ube, young
coconut and seaweed.
Weighted mean
D.) Compute the results with the use of computer, show the steps.
Cell A B C
1 7 8 9
2 8 8 9
3 7 8 8
4 6 7 8
5 6 7 8
6 7 8 8
7 8 8 9
8 7 8 8
9 7 8 9
10 8 8 9
Step 6: Highlight the data. Click Tools menu. Click Data Analysis. The computer displays Analysis
tools. Click descriptive statistics.
Step 8: The computer displays input. Type in the input Range: $A1: $A10: $B1: $B10: $C1:$C10.
N=10 N=3
df= N-1 df=N-1
df= 10-1 df=3-1
df=9 df=2
F.) Look for the tabular value of panelist and samples at 0.01 level of significance
Tabular value of 0.01 is 3.25 for panelist with df=9(can be obtain using t-table)
Tabular value of 0.01 is 9.925 for samples with df=2 (can be obtain using t-table)
G.) Interpret the Results
Ice Cream Mean ( x̅ ) Interpretation
Ube 7.1 Like moderately
Young coconut 7.8 Like moderately
Seaweed 8.5 Like very much
H.) Which product is the most acceptable and least acceptable? Why?
Base on their weighted mean the seaweed got the higher value of weighted mean than the
two samples which is Ube and Young coconut.
Job performance
Step 6: Highlight the data. Click tools menu. Click data analysis.
Step 7: The computer displays Analysis tools. Click z-Test: Two sample for means
Step 8: The computer displays z-test: Two-Sample for Means, Type in the input Variable 1 Range:
$A1: $ A15; lnput Variable 2: Range: $B1: $B15; Hypothesized Mean Difference: 0;
Variable 1 Variance (known):0.306667; Variable 2 Variance (known): 0.76;.and Alpha 0.01.
Step 9: Click OK.
Step 10: The computer displays as follows.
df=N-1 N=15
df=15-1
df=14
The mean job performance of private school teachers is 8.53, very satisfactory, while
the mean job performance of public school teachers is 6.67, satisfactory. The
computed z-test value is 6.99999 which is greater than the z-tabular value of 2.58.
This means that the job performance of private and public school teachers really
differ from each other because job performance of private school teachers is much
higher than the public school teachers. In other words, private school teachers are
more efficient than the public teachers, hence, the null hypothesis is rejected.