Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Lotus Case (France v.

Turkey)
Facts: A collision occurred shortly before midnight on the 2nd of August 1926 between the
French mail steamer Lotus and the Turkish collier Boz-Kourt. The French mail steamer was
captained by a French citizen by the name Demons while the Turkish collier Boz-Kourt was
captained by Hassan Bey. The Turks lost eight men after their ship cut into two and sank as a
result of the collision.
Although the Lotus did all it could do within its power to help the shipwrecked persons, it
continued on its course to Constantinople, where it arrived. On the 5th of August, Lieutenant
Demons was asked by the Turkish authority to go ashore to give evidence. After Demons was
examined, he was placed under arrest without informing the French Consul-General and Hassan
Bey. Demons was convicted by the Turkish courts for negligence in allowing the accident to
occur.
This basis was contended by Demons on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction over him.
Issue: Whether the exercise of Turkish criminal jurisdiction over Demons for an incident that
occurred on the high seas contravened international law.
Ruling: No, the Permanent Court of International Justice held that Turkey, by instituting
criminal proceedings against Lieutenant Demons, had not acted in conflict with the principles of
international law. The Court found that the French contention that Turkey, in order to have
jurisdiction, should be able to point to some title of jurisdiction recognized by international law
as opposed to generally accepted international law, as referred to by Article 15. It stated that the
first restriction imposed by international law upon a State was that it could not exercise its power
in any form in the territory of another State.
However, this does not imply that international law prohibits a state from exercising jurisdiction
in its own territory, in respect of any case that relates to acts that have taken place abroad which
it cannot rely on some permissive rule of international law. In this situation, it is impossible to
hold that there is a rule of international law that prohibits Turkey from prosecuting Demons
because he was aboard a French ship. This stems from the fact that the effects of the alleged
offense occurred on a Turkish vessel. Hence, both states here may exercise concurrent
jurisdiction over this matter because there is no rule of international law in regards to collision
cases to the effect that criminal proceedings are exclusively within the jurisdiction of the state
whose flag is flown.

You might also like