Pfizer Inc.: United States Securities and Exchange Commission

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-3619
PFIZER INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 13-5315170
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
235 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
(212) 733-2323
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.05 par value PFE New York Stock Exchange
0.000% Notes due 2020 PFE20A New York Stock Exchange
0.250% Notes due 2022 PFE22 New York Stock Exchange
1.000% Notes due 2027 PFE27 New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files.) Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing price as of the last business day of the registrant’s
most recently completed second fiscal quarter, June 30, 2019, was approximately $241 billion. This excludes shares of common stock held by directors and executive officers
at June 30, 2019. Exclusion of shares held by any person should not be construed to indicate that such person possesses the power, directly or indirectly, to direct or cause the
direction of the management or policies of the registrant, or that such person is controlled by or under common control with the registrant. The registrant has no non-voting
common stock.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of February 25, 2020 was 5,547,639,005 shares of common stock, all of one class.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders Parts I, II and IV
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Part III
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I 1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS 1
About Pfizer 1
Available Information and Pfizer Website 2
Commercial Operations 3
Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals Group (Biopharma) 4
Upjohn 5
Collaboration and Co-Promotion Agreements 5
Research and Development 6
International Operations 8
Marketing 8
Patents and Other Intellectual Property Rights 9
Competition 12
Raw Materials 13
Government Regulation and Price Constraints 14
Environmental Matters 20
Tax Matters 20
Employees 20
Disclosure Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 20
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 21
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 37
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES 37
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 37
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES 37
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 38

PART II 40
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES 40
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 41
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 41
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 41
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 42
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 42
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 42
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION 42

PART III 43
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 43
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 43
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 43
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 43
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES 43

PART IV 44
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 44
15(a)(1) Financial Statements 44
15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules 44
15(a)(3) Exhibits 44
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY 48
Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K i

DEFINED TERMS
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “Pfizer,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” in this 2019 Form 10-K (defined below) refer to Pfizer Inc. and its
subsidiaries. We also have used several other terms in this 2019 Form 10-K, most of which are explained or defined below.
2019 Financial Report Exhibit 13 to this 2019 Form 10-K

2019 Form 10-K This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
2020 Proxy Statement Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
ACA U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act
Alliance revenues Revenues from alliance agreements under which we co-promote products discovered or developed by other companies or us
Akcea Akcea Therapeutics, Inc.
Array Array BioPharma Inc.
Astellas Astellas Pharma Inc., Astellas US LLC and Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
Biopharma Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals Group
BMS Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
cGMPs current Good Manufacturing Practices
DEA U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency
Developed Markets U.S., Western Europe, Japan, Canada, South Korea, Australia, Scandinavian countries, Finland and New Zealand
EMA European Medicines Agency
Emerging Markets Includes, but is not limited to, the following markets: Asia (excluding Japan and South Korea), Latin America, Eastern Europe,
Africa, the Middle East, Central Europe and Turkey
EU European Union
Exchange Act Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FCPA U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration
FFDCA U.S. Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
GPD Global Product Development organization
GSK GlaxoSmithKline plc
Hospira Hospira, Inc.
Ionis Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
IPR&D In-process Research and Development
LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate
LOE Loss of Exclusivity
MCO Managed Care Organization
Mylan Mylan N.V.
NMPA National Medical Product Administration in China
NYSE New York Stock Exchange
OTC over-the-counter
PBM Pharmacy Benefit Manager
PGS Pfizer Global Supply
Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K ii

PMDA Pharmaceuticals and Medical Device Agency in Japan
QCE quality consistency evaluation in China
R&D research and development
SEC U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Teva Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
U.K. United Kingdom
U.S. United States
VAI Voluntary Action Indicated
VBP volume-based procurement in China
WRDM Worldwide Research, Development and Medical
Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K iii

~$51.8 Billion in Revenues in 2019

8 Products with Direct Product and/or Alliance Revenues of

Greater than $1 Billion in 2019

3 Distinct Businesses in 2019* —
Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals Group (Biopharma) (~$39.4 Billion 2019 Revenues) /
Upjohn (~$10.2 Billion 2019 Revenues) / Consumer Healthcare

6 Primary Therapeutic Areas in Biopharma —

Internal Medicine, Oncology, Hospital, Vaccines, Inflammation & Immunology and Rare Disease

20 Globally Recognized Brands and the Greenstone generics

platform in Upjohn

>125 Countries Where We Sell Our Products

95 Projects in Clinical Research & Development**

~$8.7 Billion 2019 R&D Expense

42 Manufacturing Sites Worldwide Operated by PGS;
7 Manufacturing Sites Worldwide Operated by Upjohn

~88,300 Employees Globally

Unless indicated otherwise, the information contained in this summary is as of December 31, 2019. This summary does not include information that will be incorporated by reference into Part III of this
2019 Form 10-K from our 2020 Proxy Statement.
* On July 29, 2019, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan, creating a new global pharmaceutical company, Viatris. On July 31, 2019, Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare
business, an over-the-counter medicines business, was combined with GSK’s consumer healthcare business to form a new consumer healthcare joint venture. For additional information, see the Item 1. Business—
About Pfizer section in this 2019 Form 10-K.
** As of January 28, 2020
Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ABOUT PFIZER
Pfizer Inc. is a research-based, global biopharmaceutical company. We apply science and our global resources to bring therapies to people that extend and
significantly improve their lives through the discovery, development, manufacture and distribution of healthcare products, including innovative medicines and
vaccines. We work across developed and emerging markets to advance wellness, prevention, treatments and cures that challenge the most feared diseases of
our time. We collaborate with healthcare providers, governments and local communities to support and expand access to reliable, affordable healthcare around
the world. Our revenues are derived from the sale of our products and, to a much lesser extent, from alliance agreements, under which we co-promote products
discovered or developed by other companies or us. The majority of our revenues come from the manufacture and sale of biopharmaceutical products. The
Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on June 2, 1942.
We believe that our medicines provide significant value for both healthcare providers and patients, not only from the improved treatment of diseases but also
from a reduction in other healthcare costs, such as emergency room or hospitalization costs, as well as improvements in health, wellness and productivity. We
continue to actively engage in dialogues about the value of our medicines and how we can best work with patients, physicians and payers to prevent and treat
disease and improve outcomes. We continue to work within the current legal and pricing structures, as well as continue to review our pricing arrangements and
contracting methods with payers, to maximize patient access and minimize any adverse impact on our revenues. We remain firmly committed to fulfilling our
Company’s purpose: Breakthroughs that change patients’ lives. By doing so, we expect to create value for the patients we serve and for our colleagues and
shareholders.
With the formation of the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture and the pending combination of Upjohn with Mylan, which are further discussed below, Pfizer
is transforming itself into a more focused, global leader in science-based innovative medicines.
We are committed to capitalizing on growth opportunities by advancing our own pipeline and maximizing the value of our in-line products, as well as through
various forms of business development, which can include alliances, licenses, joint ventures, collaborations, equity- or debt-based investments, dispositions,
mergers and acquisitions. We view our business development activity as an enabler of our strategies, and we seek to generate earnings growth and enhance
shareholder value by pursuing a disciplined, strategic and financial approach to evaluating business development opportunities.
Our significant recent business development activities include:
• License Agreement with Akcea Therapeutics, Inc.––In October 2019, we entered into a worldwide exclusive licensing agreement for AKCEA-
ANGPTL3-LRx, an investigational antisense therapy being developed to treat patients with certain cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, with Akcea,
a majority-owned affiliate of Ionis. The transaction closed in November 2019 and we made an upfront payment of $250 million to Akcea and Ionis.
• Formation of a New Consumer Healthcare Joint Venture—On July 31, 2019, we completed the transaction in which we and GSK combined our
respective consumer healthcare businesses into a new consumer healthcare joint venture that operates globally under the GSK Consumer Healthcare
name. The joint venture is a category leader in pain relief, respiratory and vitamins, minerals and supplements, and therapeutic oral health and is the
largest global OTC consumer healthcare business. In exchange for contributing our Consumer Healthcare business to the joint venture, we received a
32% equity stake in the new company and GSK owns the remaining 68%.
• Acquisition of Array BioPharma Inc.—On July 30, 2019, we acquired Array, a commercial stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery,
development and commercialization of targeted small molecule medicines to treat cancer and other diseases of high unmet need, for $48 per share in
cash. The total fair value of the consideration transferred for Array was approximately $11.2 billion ($10.9 billion, net of cash acquired).
• Agreement to Combine Upjohn with Mylan N.V.—On July 29, 2019, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to combine Upjohn with
Mylan, creating a new global pharmaceutical company, Viatris. Under the terms of the agreement, which is structured as an all-stock, Reverse Morris
Trust transaction, Upjohn is expected to be spun off or split off to Pfizer’s shareholders and, immediately thereafter, combined with Mylan. Pfizer
shareholders would own 57% of the combined new company, and former Mylan shareholders would own 43%. The transaction is expected to be tax
free to Pfizer and Pfizer shareholders. The transaction is anticipated to close in mid-2020, subject to Mylan shareholder approval and satisfaction of
other customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals.
Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
• Acquisition of Therachon Holding AG—On July 1, 2019, we acquired all the remaining shares of Therachon Holding AG, a privately-held clinical-stage
biotechnology company focused on rare diseases, with assets in development for the treatment of achondroplasia, a genetic condition and the most
common form of short-limb dwarfism, for $340 million upfront, plus potential milestone payments of up to $470 million, contingent on the achievement of
key milestones in the development and commercialization of the lead asset.
For a further discussion of our strategy and our business development initiatives, see the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and
Outlook—Our Business Development Initiatives and —Our Strategy sections and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2. Acquisitions,
Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative
Arrangements in our 2019 Financial Report.
Our businesses are heavily regulated in most of the countries in which we operate. In the U.S., the principal authority regulating our operations is the FDA. The
FDA regulates the safety and efficacy of the products we offer and our research, quality, manufacturing processes, product promotion, advertising and product
labeling. Similar regulations exist in most other countries, and in many countries the government also regulates our prices. In the EU, the EMA conducts the
scientific evaluation, supervision and safety monitoring of our products, and employs a centralized procedure for approval of medicines for the EU and the
European Economic Area countries. In China, the NMPA is the primary regulatory authority for approving and supervising medicines. In Japan, the PMDA is
involved in a wide range of regulatory activities, including clinical studies, approvals, post-marketing reviews and pharmaceutical safety. Health authorities in
many middle and lower income countries require marketing approval by a recognized regulatory authority (i.e., similar to the authority of the FDA or EMA) before
they begin to conduct their application review process and/or issue their final approval. For additional information, see the Item 1. Business—Government
Regulation and Price Constraints section in this 2019 Form 10-K.
Some amounts in this 2019 Form 10-K may not add due to rounding. All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts. All trademarks in this
2019 Form 10-K are the property of their respective owners.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND PFIZER WEBSITE
Our website is located at www.pfizer.com. This 2019 Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments
to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are, or will be, available (free of charge) on our website, in text format
and, where applicable, in interactive data file format, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file this material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
Throughout this 2019 Form 10-K, we “incorporate by reference” certain information from other documents filed or to be filed with the SEC, including our 2020
Proxy Statement and our 2019 Financial Report, portions of which are filed as Exhibit 13 to this 2019 Form 10-K, and which also will be contained in Appendix A
to our 2020 Proxy Statement. The SEC allows us to disclose important information by referring to it in that manner. Please refer to this information. Our 2019
Annual Report to Shareholders consists of our 2019 Financial Report and the Corporate and Shareholder Information attached to the 2020 Proxy Statement.
Our 2019 Financial Report will be available on our website on or about February 27, 2020. Our 2020 Proxy Statement will be available on our website on or
about March 13, 2020.
We may use our website as a means of disclosing material information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation Fair Disclosure
promulgated by the SEC. These disclosures are included on our website in the “Investors” or “News” sections. Accordingly, investors should monitor these
portions of our website, in addition to following Pfizer’s press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls and webcasts, as well as Pfizer’s social media
channels (Pfizer’s Facebook, YouTube and LinkedIn pages and Twitter accounts (@Pfizer and @Pfizer_News)).
Information relating to corporate governance at Pfizer, including our Corporate Governance Principles; Director Qualification Standards; Pfizer Policies on
Business Conduct (for all of our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer); Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors; information concerning our Directors; ways to communicate by e-mail with our Directors; Board
Committees; Committee Charters; Charter of the Lead Independent Director; and transactions in Pfizer securities by Directors and Officers are available on our
website. We will provide any of the foregoing information without charge upon written request to our Corporate Secretary, Pfizer Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New
York, NY 10017. We will disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of the Pfizer Policies on Business Conduct affecting our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller on our website as promptly as practicable, as may be required under applicable SEC and NYSE rules.
Information relating to shareholder services, including the Computershare Investment Program, book-entry share ownership and direct deposit of dividends, is
also available on our website.
The information contained on our website, our Facebook, YouTube and LinkedIn pages or our Twitter accounts is not incorporated by reference into this 2019
Form 10-K. Pfizer’s references to the URLs for websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS
At the beginning of our 2019 fiscal year, we began to manage our commercial operations through a new global structure consisting of three businesses—Pfizer
Biopharmaceuticals Group (Biopharma), Upjohn and, through July 31, 2019, Consumer Healthcare, each led by a single manager. We have revised prior-period
segment information in our 2019 Form 10-K to reflect the 2019 reorganization. Biopharma and Upjohn are the only reportable segments.
For additional information regarding the 2019 reorganization, as well as our Organizing for Growth initiative, see the Overview of Our Performance, Operating
Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our Strategy––Organizing for Growth section and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 17. Segment,
Geographic and Other Revenue Information in our 2019 Financial Report.
On July 31, 2019, Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare business, an over-the-counter medicines business, was combined with GSK’s consumer healthcare business to
form a new consumer healthcare joint venture in which we own a 32% equity stake. For additional information, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements––Note 1A. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation and Note 2C. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method
Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Equity-Method
Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale in our 2019 Financial Report.
Some additional information about our Biopharma and Upjohn business segments follows:
Pfizer
Biopharmaceuticals
Group
Biopharma is a science-based medicines business that includes six Upjohn is a global, primarily off-patent branded and generic medicines
business units – Oncology, Inflammation & Immunology, Rare Disease, business, which includes a portfolio of 20 globally recognized solid oral dose
Hospital, Vaccines and Internal Medicine. The Hospital unit commercializes brands, as well as a U.S.-based generics platform, Greenstone.
our global portfolio of sterile injectable and anti-infective medicines and
includes Pfizer’s contract manufacturing operation, Pfizer CentreOne. At the
beginning of our 2019 fiscal year, we also incorporated our biosimilar
portfolio into the Oncology and Inflammation & Immunology business units
and certain legacy established products into the Internal Medicine business
unit. Each business unit is committed to delivering breakthroughs that
change patients’ lives.
Select products include: Select products include:
- Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 - Lyrica
- Ibrance - Lipitor
- Eliquis - Norvasc
- Xeljanz - Celebrex
- Enbrel (outside the U.S. and Canada) - Viagra
- Chantix/Champix - Certain generic medicines
- Sutent
- Xtandi
- Vyndaqel/Vyndamax
On July 29, 2019, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan, creating a new global pharmaceutical company,
Viatris. For additional information, see the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook—Our Business Development Initiatives
and —Our Strategy sections in our 2019 Financial Report.
For a further discussion of these operating segments, see the Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals Group (Biopharma) and Upjohn sections in this 2019 Form 10-K, the
table captioned Revenues by Operating Segment and Geography in the Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income section and the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 17. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information, including the tables therein captioned Selected Income
Statement Information, Geographic Information and Significant Product Revenues, in our 2019 Financial Report, which are incorporated by reference.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PFIZER BIOPHARMACEUTICALS GROUP (BIOPHARMA)
The key therapeutic areas comprising our Biopharma business segment include:
Therapeutic Area Description Key Products

Includes innovative brands from two therapeutic areas, Eliquis, Chantix/Champix and Premarin family
Internal Medicine
Cardiovascular Metabolic and Pain, as well as regional brands.
Includes innovative oncology brands of biologics, small Ibrance, Sutent, Xtandi, Xalkori, Inlyta and Braftovi +
Oncology
molecules, immunotherapies, and biosimilars across a wide Mektovi
range of cancers.
Includes our global portfolio of sterile injectable and anti- Sulperazon, Medrol, Vfend and Zithromax
Hospital
infective medicines, as well as Pfizer CentreOne, our contract
manufacturing and active pharmaceutical ingredient sales
operation.
Includes innovative vaccines brands across all ages—infants, Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 (pediatric/adult), FSME-IMMUN,
Vaccines adolescents and adults—in pneumococcal disease, Nimenrix and Trumenba
Meningococcal disease and tick-borne encephalitis, with a
pipeline focus on healthcare-acquired infections and maternal
health.
Includes innovative brands and biosimilars for chronic immune Xeljanz, Enbrel (outside the U.S. and Canada), Inflectra
Inflammation and
and inflammatory diseases. and Eucrisa
Immunology
Includes innovative brands for a number of therapeutic areas Vyndaqel/Vyndamax, BeneFIX, Genotropin and Refacto
Rare Disease
with rare diseases, including amyloidosis, hemophilia, and AF/Xyntha
endocrine diseases.
We recorded direct product and/or alliance revenues of more than $1 billion for each of six Biopharma products in 2019, seven Biopharma products in 2018 and
six Biopharma products in 2017:
Biopharma $1 Billion+ Products

2019 2018 2017
Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13
Ibrance Ibrance Ibrance
Eliquis* Eliquis* Eliquis*
Xeljanz Enbrel Enbrel
Enbrel Xeljanz Xeljanz
Chantix/Champix Chantix/Champix Sutent
Sutent
* Eliquis includes alliance revenues and direct sales in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
For a discussion of certain Biopharma products and additional information regarding collaboration and/or co-promotion agreements involving certain of these
Biopharma products, see the Item 1A. Business—Collaboration and Co-Promotion Agreements and —Patents and Other Intellectual Property Rights sections of
this 2019 Form 10-K; for additional information regarding the revenues of our Biopharma business, including revenues by geography and of significant
Biopharma products, see the Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income—Revenues—Overview, —Revenues by Operating Segment and Geography
and —Revenues—Selected Product Discussion sections and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 17. Segment, Geographic and Other
Revenue Information in our 2019 Financial Report; and for additional information on the key operational revenue drivers of our Biopharma business, see the
Analysis of Operating Segment Information—Biopharma Operating Segment section in our 2019 Financial Report. For a discussion of the risks associated with
our dependence on certain of our major products, see the Item 1A. Risk Factors—Dependence on Key In-Line Products section in this 2019 Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
UPJOHN
Upjohn’s products are used to treat non-communicable diseases across a broad range of therapeutic areas, including:
• Cardiovascular (Lipitor, Norvasc and Revatio);

• Pain and neurology (Lyrica and Celebrex);
• Psychiatry (Effexor, Zoloft and Xanax);
• Urology (Viagra); and
• Ophthalmology (Xalatan/Xalacom).
We recorded direct product revenues of more than $1 billion for two Upjohn products in 2019, three Upjohn products in 2018, and three Upjohn products in
2017:
Upjohn $1 Billion+ Products

2019 2018 2017
Lyrica Lyrica Lyrica
Lipitor Lipitor Lipitor
Norvasc Viagra
For a discussion of certain Upjohn products and additional information regarding the revenues of our Upjohn business, including revenues by geography and of
significant Upjohn products, see the Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income—Revenues—Overview, —Revenues by Operating Segment and
Geography and —Revenues—Selected Product Discussion sections and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 17. Segment, Geographic and
Other Revenue Information in our 2019 Financial Report; and for additional information on the key operational revenue drivers of our Upjohn business, see the
Analysis of Operating Segment Information—Upjohn Operating Segment section in our 2019 Financial Report. For a discussion of the risks associated with our
dependence on certain of our major products, see the Item 1A. Risk Factors—Dependence on Key In-Line Products section in this 2019 Form 10-K.
COLLABORATION AND CO-PROMOTION AGREEMENTS
We are party to collaboration and/or co-promotion agreements relating to certain biopharmaceutical products, including, among others, Eliquis, Xtandi and
Bavencio. Revenues from Eliquis (except in certain markets where we have direct sales), Xtandi and Bavencio are included in alliance revenues.
Eliquis has been jointly developed and is commercialized by Pfizer and BMS. Pfizer funds between 50% and 60% of all development costs depending on the
study. Profits and losses are shared equally on a global basis, except in certain countries where Pfizer commercializes Eliquis and pays BMS compensation
based on a percentage of net sales. We have full commercialization rights in certain smaller markets. BMS supplies the product to us at cost plus a percentage
of the net sales to end-customers in these markets. Eliquis is part of the Novel Oral Anticoagulant market; the agents in this class were developed as alternative
treatment options to warfarin in appropriate patients.
Xtandi is being developed and commercialized through a collaboration with Astellas. The two companies share equally in the gross profits (losses) related to
U.S. net sales of Xtandi. Subject to certain exceptions, Pfizer and Astellas also share equally all Xtandi commercialization costs attributable to the U.S. market.
In addition, Pfizer and Astellas share certain development and other collaboration expenses, and Pfizer receives tiered royalties as a percentage of international
Xtandi net sales (recorded in Other (income)/deductions––net). Xtandi is an androgen receptor inhibitor that blocks multiple steps in the androgen receptor
signaling pathway within tumor cells.
Bavencio (avelumab) is being developed and commercialized in collaboration with Merck KGaA. Both companies jointly fund the majority of development and
commercialization costs, and split equally any profits related to net sales generated from selling any products containing avelumab from this collaboration.
Bavencio is a human anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Innovation is critical to the success of our Company, and drug discovery and development are time-consuming, expensive and unpredictable. Pfizer’s purpose is
to deliver breakthroughs that change patients’ lives. R&D is at the heart of fulfilling Pfizer’s purpose as we work to translate advanced science and technologies
into the therapies that matter most.
Our R&D Priorities and Strategy
Our R&D priorities include:

• delivering a pipeline of highly differentiated medicines and vaccines where Pfizer has a unique opportunity to bring the most important new therapies to
patients in need;
• advancing our capabilities that can position Pfizer for long-term R&D leadership; and
• advancing new models for partnerships with creativity, flexibility and urgency to deliver innovation to patients as quickly as possible.
To that end, our R&D primarily focuses on:

• Oncology;
• Inflammation and Immunology;
• Vaccines;
• Internal Medicine;
• Rare Diseases; and
• Hospital.
While a significant portion of R&D is done internally, we continue to seek out promising chemical and biological lead molecules and innovative technologies
developed by third parties to incorporate into our discovery and development processes or projects, as well as our product lines. We do so by entering into
collaboration, alliance and license agreements with other companies, as well as leveraging acquisitions and equity- or debt-based investments. These
agreements enable us to co-develop, license or acquire promising compounds, technologies and/or capabilities. We also enter into agreements pursuant to
which a third party agrees to fund a portion of the development costs of one or more of our pipeline products in exchange for rights to receive potential milestone
payments, revenue sharing payments, profit sharing payments and/or royalties. Collaboration, alliance, license and funding agreements and equity- or debt-
based investments allow us to share risk and cost. They also enable us to access external scientific and technological expertise, as well as provide us the
opportunity to advance our own products and in-licensed or acquired products.
For additional information, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and
Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements in our 2019 Financial Report.
Our R&D Operations
We conduct R&D internally and also through contracts with third parties, through collaborations with universities and biotechnology companies and in
cooperation with other pharmaceutical firms. In 2019, we continued to strengthen our global R&D organization and pursue strategies intended to improve
innovation and overall productivity in R&D to achieve a sustainable pipeline that is positioned to deliver value in the near term and over time.
Our R&D spending is conducted through a number of matrix organizations:

• Research Units within our WRDM organization are generally responsible for research and early-stage development assets for our Biopharma business
(assets that have not yet achieved proof-of-concept). Our Research Units are organized by therapeutic area to enhance flexibility, cohesiveness and focus.
Because of our structure, we are able to rapidly redeploy resources within a Research Unit between various projects as necessary because in many
instances the workforce shares similar skills, expertise and/or focus.
• Our science-based and other platform-services organizations provide technical expertise and other services to the various R&D projects, and are organized
into science-based functions (which are part of our WRDM organization), such as Pharmaceutical Sciences, Medicine Design, and non-science-based
functions, such as Facilities, Digital and Finance. Within each of these functions, we are able to migrate resources among projects, candidates and/or
targets in any therapeutic area and in most phases of development, allowing us to react quickly in response to evolving needs. In addition, the Worldwide
Medical and Safety group, within WRDM, ensures that Pfizer provides all stakeholders––including patients, healthcare providers, pharmacists, payers and
health authorities––with complete and up-to-date information on the risks and benefits associated with Pfizer products so that they can make appropriate
decisions on how and when to use Pfizer’s medicines.
• Our R&D organization within Upjohn supports the off-patent branded and generic established medicines and helps to develop product enhancements, new
indications and new market registrations for these medicines.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
• Our Global Product Development (GPD) organization is a unified center for clinical development and regulatory activities that is generally responsible for the
clinical development strategy and operational execution of clinical trials for both early-stage assets in the WRDM portfolio as well as late-stage assets in the
Biopharma portfolio.
We manage R&D operations on a total-company basis through our matrix organizations described above. Specifically, the Portfolio Strategy & Investment
committee, comprised of senior executives, is accountable for aligning resources among all of our WRDM, GPD and Biopharma R&D projects and for seeking to
ensure optimal capital allocation across the innovative R&D portfolio. We believe that this approach also serves to maximize accountability and flexibility. Our
Upjohn R&D organization manages its resources separately from the WRDM and GPD organizations, with operational support from GPD for select clinical
development regulatory activities and from WRDM for clinical supply operations and global pharmacovigilance processing.
Generally, we do not disaggregate total R&D expense by development phase or by therapeutic area since, as described above, we do not manage our R&D
operations by development phase or by therapeutic area. Further, as we are able to adjust a significant portion of our spending quickly, we believe that any prior-
period information about R&D expense by development phase or by therapeutic area would not necessarily be representative of future spending.
For additional information on our R&D operations and expenses, see the Costs and Expenses—Research and Development (R&D) Expenses section in our
2019 Financial Report.
Our R&D Pipeline and Competition
The discovery and development of safe, effective new products, as well as the development of additional uses for existing products, are necessary for the
continued strength of our businesses. Drug candidates can fail at any stage of the process, and candidates may not receive regulatory approval even after many
years of research and development. The process from discovery to development to regulatory approval can take more than ten years.
As of January 28, 2020, we had the following number of projects in various stages of R&D:
Development of a single compound is often pursued as part of multiple programs. While these drug candidates may or may not eventually receive regulatory
approval, new drug candidates entering clinical development phases are the foundation for future products. In addition to discovering and developing new
products, our R&D efforts seek to add value to our existing products by improving their effectiveness, enhancing ease of dosing and by discovering potential new
indications for them.
Information concerning several of our drug candidates in development, as well as supplemental filings for existing products, is set forth in the Analysis of the
Consolidated Statements of Income—Product Developments––Biopharmaceutical section in our 2019 Financial Report, which is incorporated by reference.
Our competitors also devote substantial funds and resources to R&D. We also compete against numerous small biotechnology companies in developing
potential drug candidates. The extent to which our competitors are successful in their research could result in erosion of the sales of our existing products and
potential sales of products in development, as well as unanticipated product obsolescence. In addition, several of our competitors operate without large R&D
expenses and make a regular practice of challenging our product patents before their expiration. For additional information, see the Competition and Item 1A.
Risk Factors—Competitive Products sections in this 2019 Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
We have significant operations outside the U.S. In 2019, operations in developed and emerging markets were managed through our business segments:
Biopharma, Upjohn and, through July 31, 2019, Consumer Healthcare. Emerging markets are an important component of our strategy for global leadership, and
our commercial structure recognizes that the demographics and rising economic power of the fastest-growing emerging markets are becoming more closely
aligned with the profile found within developed markets. Urbanization and the rise of the middle class in emerging markets, particularly in Asia, provide growth
opportunities for our medicines.
We sell our products in over 125 countries. Revenues from operations outside the U.S. of $27.9 billion accounted for 54% of our total revenues in 2019.
Revenues exceeded $500 million in each of eleven countries outside the U.S. in 2019, 2018 and 2017. By total revenues, China and Japan are our two largest
national markets outside the U.S. For a geographic breakdown of revenues, see the Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income—Revenues—Overview
and —Revenues by Operating Segment and Geography sections and the table captioned Geographic Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements—Note 17. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information in our 2019 Financial Report.
Our international operations are subject, in varying degrees, to a number of risks inherent in carrying on business in other countries, including, among other
things, currency fluctuations, capital and exchange control regulations and expropriation and other restrictive government actions. See the Item 1A. Risk
Factors—International Operations section in this 2019 Form 10-K. Our international businesses are also subject to government-imposed constraints, including
laws and regulations on pricing, reimbursement, and access to our products. See the Item 1. Business—Government Regulation and Price Constraints—Outside
the United States section in this 2019 Form 10-K for a discussion of these matters.
Depending on the direction of change relative to the U.S. dollar, foreign currency values can increase or decrease the reported dollar value of our net assets and
results of operations. While we cannot predict with certainty future changes in foreign exchange rates or the effect they will have on us, we attempt to mitigate
their impact through operational means and by using various financial instruments, depending upon market conditions. For additional information, see the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7F. Financial Instruments: Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities in our 2019 Financial Report,
which is incorporated by reference, as well as Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Financial Risk Management section in this
2019 Form 10-K.
MARKETING
In our global biopharmaceutical businesses, we promote our products to healthcare providers and patients. Through our marketing organizations, we explain the
approved uses, benefits and risks of our products to healthcare providers, such as doctors, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and pharmacists; MCOs that
provide insurance coverage, such as hospitals, Integrated Delivery Systems, PBMs and health plans; and employers and government agencies who hire MCOs
to provide health benefits to their employees. We also market directly to consumers in the U.S. through direct-to-consumer advertising that seeks to
communicate the approved uses, benefits and risks of our products while motivating people to have meaningful conversations with their doctors. In addition, we
sponsor general advertising to educate the public on disease awareness, prevention and wellness, important public health issues, and our patient assistance
programs.
Our prescription pharmaceutical products are sold principally to wholesalers, but we also sell directly to retailers, hospitals, clinics, government agencies and
pharmacies, and, in the case of our vaccines products in the U.S., we primarily sell directly to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, wholesalers,
individual provider offices, retail pharmacies, and integrated delivery networks. We seek to gain access for our products on healthcare authority and PBM
formularies, which are lists of approved medicines available to members of the PBMs. PBMs use various benefit designs, such as tiered co-pays for formulary

TABLE OF CONTENTS
products, to drive utilization of products in preferred formulary positions. We may also work with payers on disease management programs that help to develop
tools and materials to educate patients and physicians on key disease areas.
In 2019, our top three biopharmaceutical wholesalers accounted for approximately 37% of our total revenues (and approximately 79% of our total U.S.
revenues).
% of 2019 Total Revenues and U.S. Revenues from

Major Biopharmaceutical Wholesalers and Other Customers
PATENTS AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Our products are sold around the world under brand-name, logo and certain product design trademarks that we consider, in the aggregate, to be of material
importance to Pfizer. Trademark protection continues in some countries for as long as the mark is used and, in other countries, for as long as it is registered.
Registrations generally are for fixed, but renewable, terms.
We own or license a number of U.S. and foreign patents. These patents cover pharmaceutical and other products and their uses, pharmaceutical formulations,
product manufacturing processes and intermediate chemical compounds used in manufacturing.
Patents for individual products extend for varying periods according to the date of patent filing or grant and the legal term of patents in the various countries
where patent protection is obtained. The actual protection afforded by a patent, which can vary from country to country, depends upon the type of patent, the
scope of its coverage and the availability of legal remedies in the country. Further, patent term extension may be available in many major countries to
compensate for a regulatory delay in approval of the product. For additional information, see the Item 1. Business—Government Regulation and Price
Constraints—Outside the United States—Intellectual Property section in this 2019 Form 10-K.
In various markets, a period of regulatory exclusivity may be provided to certain drugs upon approval. The scope and term of such exclusivity will vary but, in
general, the period of regulatory exclusivity will run concurrently with the term of any existing patent rights associated with the drug at the time of approval.
In the aggregate, our patent and related rights are of material importance to our businesses in the U.S. and most other countries. Based on current product
sales, and considering the vigorous competition with products sold by our competitors, the patent rights we consider most significant in relation to our business
as a whole, together with the year in which the basic product patent expires (including, where applicable, grant of an additional six-month pediatric extension
and/or the granted patent term extension in the U.S. and Japan and Supplementary Patent Certificate in Europe), are those for the medicines set forth in the
table below. Unless otherwise indicated, the years set forth in the table below pertain to the basic product patent expiration for the respective products. Patent
term extensions, supplementary protection certificates and pediatric exclusivity periods are not reflected in the expiration dates listed in the table below, unless
they have been granted by the issuing authority. In some instances, there are later-expiring patents relating to our products directed to particular forms or
compositions, to methods of manufacturing, or to use of the drug in the treatment of particular diseases or conditions. However, in some cases, such patents
may not protect our drug from generic or, as applicable, biosimilar competition after the expiration of the basic patent.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
U.S. Basic Product Patent Major EU Basic Product Patent Japan Basic Product Patent
Drug
Expiration Year Expiration Year Expiration Year
Lyrica 2019(1) 2014(2) 2022(3)
Chantix/Champix 2020 2021 2022
Sutent 2021 2022 2024
Ibrance 2023 2028 2028
Vyndaqel/Vyndamax 2024 2026 2026
Inlyta 2025 2025 2025
Xeljanz 2025 2028(4) 2025
Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 2026 __(5) 2029
Eliquis (6) 2026 2026 2026
Xtandi(7) 2027 *(7) *(7)
Xalkori 2029 2027 2028
Besponsa 2030 2028 2028(8)
Braftovi(9) 2031 *(9) *(9)
Mektovi(9) 2031(10) *(9) *(9)
Bavencio (11) 2033 2032 2033
(1)
Lyrica lost patent protection in the U.S. in June 2019 and multi-source generic competition began in July 2019.
(2)
Lyrica regulatory exclusivity in the EU expired in July 2014.
(3)
Lyrica is covered by a Japanese method-of-use patent which expires in 2022. The patent is currently subject to an invalidation action.
(4)
Xeljanz EU expiry is provided by regulatory exclusivity.
(5)
The EU patent that covers the combination of the 13 serotype conjugates of Prevenar 13 was revoked following an opposition and has now been withdrawn. There are
other EU patents and pending applications covering the formulation, various aspects of the manufacturing process, and the combination of serotype conjugates of Prevenar
13 that remain in force.
(6)
Eliquis was developed and is being commercialized in collaboration with BMS.
(7)
Xtandi is being developed and commercialized in collaboration with Astellas, which has exclusive commercialization rights for Xtandi outside the U.S. Pfizer receives tiered
royalties as a percentage of international Xtandi net sales.
(8)
Besponsa Japan expiry is provided by regulatory exclusivity.
(9)
Pfizer has exclusive rights to Braftovi and Mektovi in the U.S. The Pierre Fabre Group has exclusive rights to commercialize both products in Europe and Ono
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. has exclusive rights to commercialize both products in Japan. Pfizer receives royalties from The Pierre Fabre Group and Ono Pharmaceutical Co.,
Ltd. on sales of Braftovi and Mektovi outside the U.S.
(10)
The U.S. expiration date in the table for Mektovi is provided by a method-of-use patent.
(11)
Bavencio is being developed and commercialized in collaboration with Merck KGaA.
The loss, expiration or invalidation of intellectual property rights, patent litigation settlements with manufacturers and the expiration of co-promotion and licensing
rights can have a significant adverse effect on our revenues. Many of our branded products have multiple patents that expire at varying dates, thereby
strengthening our overall patent protection. However, once patent protection has expired or has been lost prior to the expiration date as a result of a legal
challenge, we typically lose exclusivity on these products, and generic and biosimilar pharmaceutical manufacturers generally produce identical or highly similar
products and sell them for a lower price. The date at which generic or biosimilar competition commences may be different from the date that the patent or
regulatory exclusivity expires. However, when generic or biosimilar competition does commence, the resulting price competition can substantially decrease our
revenues for the impacted products, often in a very short period of time. In some cases, however, we can continue to obtain commercial benefits from product
manufacturing trade secrets; patents on uses for products; patents on processes and intermediates for the economical manufacture of the active ingredients;
patents for special formulations of the product or delivery mechanisms; or conversion of the active ingredient to OTC products.
Also, if one of our patents is found to be invalid by judicial, court or administrative proceedings, such as inter partes review, post-grant review, re-examination or
opposition proceedings, before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the European Patent Office, or other foreign counterparts, generic or competitive products
could be introduced into the market resulting in the erosion of sales of our existing products. For example, several of the patents in our pneumococcal vaccine
portfolio were challenged in inter partes review and post-grant review proceedings in the U.S. For additional information, see the Item 1A. Risk Factors—Patent
Protection section in this 2019 Form 10-K.
Companies have filed applications with the FDA seeking approval of product candidates that such companies claim either do not infringe our patents or our
patents are invalid; these include candidates that would compete with, among other products, Eliquis, Ibrance and Xeljanz. We will continue to aggressively
defend our patent rights whenever we deem appropriate. For additional

TABLE OF CONTENTS
information, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 16A1. Contingencies and Certain Commitments—Legal Proceedings––Patent Litigation
in our 2019 Financial Report.
Recent Losses and Expected Losses of Product Exclusivity
Certain of our current products have experienced patent-based expirations or loss of regulatory exclusivity in certain markets in the last few years, and we
expect certain products to face significantly increased generic competition over the next few years. For example, as a result of a patent litigation settlement,
Teva launched a generic version of Viagra in the U.S. in December 2017. Lyrica lost patent protection in the U.S. in June 2019 and multi-source generic
competition began in July 2019. Also, the basic product patent for Chantix in the U.S. will expire in November 2020. See the table above for the basic product
patent expiries of our most significant products.
We expect the impact of reduced revenues due to patent expiries will be significant in 2020, then moderating downward to a much lower level from 2021 through
2025. For additional information, see the Item 1A. Risk Factors—Dependence on Key In-Line Products section in this 2019 Form 10-K.
The following table provides information about certain products recently experiencing, or expected to experience in 2020, patent expirations or loss of regulatory
exclusivity in the U.S., Europe or Japan. Our financial results in 2019 and our financial guidance for 2020 reflect the impact of the loss of exclusivity of various
products discussed below:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Product Revenues in Markets Impacted

Products Key Dates (a) Markets Impacted Year Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017
Viagra(b) June 2013 Major European markets $ 134 $ 274 $ 850
May 2014 Japan
December 2017 U.S.
Lyrica(c) July 2014 Major European markets 2,208 3,852 3,901
June 2019 U.S.
Pristiq(d) March 2017 U.S. 42 71 133
(e)
Chantix November 2020 U.S. 899 838 742

(a)
Unless otherwise noted, “Key Dates” indicate patent-based expiration dates.
(b)
As a result of a patent litigation settlement, Teva launched a generic version of Viagra in the U.S. in December 2017.
(c)
Lyrica lost patent protection in the U.S. in June 2019 and multi-source generic competition began in July 2019.
(d)
As a result of a patent litigation settlement with several generic manufacturers, generic versions of Pristiq launched in the U.S. in March 2017.
(e)
The basic product patent for Chantix in the U.S. will expire in November 2020, which includes the FDA’s grant of pediatric exclusivity that extended the period of market
exclusivity in the U.S. for Chantix for an additional six months from May 2020.
Biologic Products
Our biologic products, including BeneFIX, ReFacto, Xyntha, Bavencio, Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 and Enbrel (we market Enbrel outside the U.S. and Canada),
already face, or may face in the future, competition from biosimilars (also referred to as follow-on biologics). In the U.S., such biosimilars would reference our
originator biologic products approved under the U.S. Public Health Service Act. Additionally, the FDA has approved a follow-on recombinant human growth
hormone that referenced our biotechnology product, Genotropin, that was approved under the FFDCA.
Biosimilars are versions of biologic medicines that have been developed and proven to be highly similar to the original biologic in terms of safety and efficacy
and that have no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity or potency. Biosimilars have the potential to offer high-quality, lower-cost alternatives to
biologic medicines. Abbreviated legal pathways for the approval of biosimilars exist in certain international markets and, since the passage of the ACA in 2010, a
framework for such approval exists in the U.S. In Europe, the European Commission grants marketing authorizations for biosimilars pursuant to a set of general
and product class-specific guidelines for biosimilar approvals.
As part of our business strategy, we are capitalizing on our expertise in biologics manufacturing, as well as our regulatory and commercial strengths, to develop
and commercialize biosimilar medicines. Some of the biosimilars that we currently market include Inflectra, Nivestym, Retacrit, Zirabev, Ruxience and Trazimera
in the U.S.; Inflectra, Retacrit, Nivestim and Trazimera in the EU; and Ixifi, Trazimera, Zirabev and Ruxience in Japan. See the Item 1A. Risk
Factors—Biosimilars section in this 2019 Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
We may face litigation with respect to the validity and/or scope of patents relating to our biologic products. Likewise, as we develop, manufacture and seek to
launch biosimilars, patents may be asserted against us.
International
One of the main limitations on our operations in some countries outside the U.S. is the lack of effective intellectual property protection for our products. Under
international and U.S. free trade agreements in recent years, we have seen some improvement in global protection of intellectual property rights. For additional
information, see the Item 1. Business—Government Regulation and Price Constraints—Outside the United States—Intellectual Property section in this 2019
Form 10-K.
COMPETITION
Our businesses are conducted in intensely competitive and often highly regulated markets. Many of our prescription pharmaceutical products face competition in
the form of branded or generic drugs or biosimilars that treat similar diseases or indications. The principal forms of competition include efficacy, safety, ease of
use, and cost effectiveness. Though the means of competition vary among product categories and business groups, demonstrating the value of our products is a
critical factor for success in all of our principal businesses.
Our competitors include other worldwide research-based biopharmaceutical companies, smaller research companies with more limited therapeutic focus and
generic and biosimilar drug manufacturers. We compete with other companies that manufacture and sell products that treat diseases or indications similar to
those treated by our major products.
This competition affects our core product business, which is focused on applying innovative science to discover and market products that satisfy unmet medical
needs and provide therapeutic improvements. Our emphasis on innovation is underscored by our multi-billion-dollar investment in R&D, as well as our business
development transactions, both designed to result in a strong product pipeline. Our investment in research does not stop with drug approval; we continue to
invest in further demonstrating the value of our products for the conditions they treat, as well as potential new applications. We seek to protect the health and
well-being of patients by striving to ensure that medically sound knowledge of the benefits and risks of our medicines is understood and communicated to
patients, physicians, payers and global health authorities. We also seek to continually enhance the organizational effectiveness of all of our biopharmaceutical
functions, including coordinating support for our efforts to accurately and ethically launch and promote our products to our customers.
Operating conditions have become more challenging under mounting global pressures of competition, industry regulation and cost containment. We continue to
take measures to evaluate, adapt and improve our organization and business practices to better meet customer and public needs. We believe that we have
taken an industry-leading role in evolving our approaches to U.S. direct-to-consumer advertising, interactions with, and payments to, healthcare professionals,
and medical education grants. We also continue to sponsor programs to address patient affordability and access barriers, as we strive to advance fundamental
health system change through support for better healthcare solutions.
Our vaccines business may face competition from the introduction of alternative vaccines. For example, Prevnar 13 may face competition in the form of
competitor vaccines, including vaccines with additional serotypes or “next-generation” pneumococcal conjugate vaccines prior to or after the expiration of its
patents, which may adversely affect our future results.
Our generics and biosimilars businesses compete with branded products from competitors, as well as other generics and biosimilars manufacturers. Globally,
Pfizer sells generic versions of Pfizer’s, as well as certain competitors’, solid oral dose and sterile injectable pharmaceutical products. We also sell biosimilars of
certain inflammation & immunology and oncology biologic medicines globally. We seek to maximize the opportunity to establish a “first-to-market” or early
market position for our generic injectable drugs and biosimilars, as a “first-to-market” position provides customers a lower-cost alternative immediately when
available and also may provide us with potentially higher levels of sales and profitability until other generic or biosimilar competitors enter the market.
Managed Care Organizations
The evolution of managed care in the U.S. has been a major factor in the competitive makeup of the healthcare marketplace. Approximately 300 million people
in the U.S. now have some form of health insurance coverage. Due to the expansion of health insurance coverage (see the Item 1. Business—Government
Regulation and Price Constraints—In the United States section in this 2019 Form 10-K), the marketing of prescription drugs to both consumers and the entities
that manage this expanded coverage in the U.S. continues to grow in importance.
The influence of MCOs has increased in recent years due to the growing number of patients receiving coverage through MCOs. At the same time, those
organizations have been consolidating into fewer, even larger entities. This consolidation enhances both their ability to negotiate, as well as their importance to
Pfizer.
The growth of MCOs has increased pressure on drug prices as well as revenues. One objective of MCOs is to contain and, where possible, reduce healthcare
expenditures. MCOs typically negotiate prices with pharmaceutical providers by using

TABLE OF CONTENTS
formularies (which are lists of approved medicines available to members of the MCOs), clinical protocols (requiring prior authorization for a branded product if a
generic product is available or requiring the patient to first fail on one or more generic products before permitting access to a branded medicine), volume
purchasing, long-term contracts and their ability to influence volume and market share of prescription drugs. In addition, by placing branded medicines on higher-
tier status in their formularies (leading to higher patient co-pays) or non-preferred tier status, MCOs transfer a portion of the cost of the medicine to the patient,
resulting in significant out-of-pocket expenses for the patient, especially for chronic treatments. This financial disincentive is a tool for MCOs to manage drug
costs and channel patients to medicines preferred by the MCOs. MCOs also use additional measures such as new-to-market blocks, exclusion lists, indication-
based pricing and “copay accumulator” programs to improve their cost containment efforts. We are closely monitoring these newer approaches and developing
appropriate strategies to respond to them.
Due to their generally lower cost, generic medicines typically are placed in lowest cost tiers of MCO formularies. The breadth of the products covered by
formularies can vary considerably from one MCO to another, and many formularies include alternative and competitive products for treatment of particular
medical problems.
Exclusion of a product from a formulary or other MCO-implemented restrictions can significantly impact drug usage in the MCO patient population and beyond.
Consequently, pharmaceutical companies compete to gain access to formularies for their products. Unique product features, such as greater efficacy, better
patient ease of use, or fewer side effects, are generally beneficial to achieving access to formularies. However, lower overall cost of therapy is also an important
factor. We have been generally, although not universally, successful in having our major products included on MCO formularies. However, increasingly our
branded products are being placed on the higher tiers or in a non-preferred status.
MCOs also emphasize primary and preventive care, out-patient treatment and procedures performed at doctors’ offices and clinics as another way to manage
costs. Hospitalization and surgery, typically the most expensive forms of treatment, are carefully managed. Since the use of certain drugs can reduce the need
for hospitalization, professional therapy, or even surgery, such drugs can become favored first-line treatments for certain diseases.
The ACA has accelerated payment reform by distributing risk across MCOs and other stakeholders in care delivery with the intent of improving quality while
reducing costs, which creates pressure on MCOs to tie reimbursement to defined outcomes. For additional information, see the Item 1. Business—Government
Regulation and Price Constraints—In the United States—Healthcare Reform section in this 2019 Form 10-K.
Generic Products
One of the biggest competitive challenges that our branded products face is from generic pharmaceutical manufacturers. Upon the expiration or loss of patent
protection for a product, especially a small molecule product, we can lose the major portion of revenues for that product in a very short period of time. Several
competitors make a regular practice of challenging our product patents before their expiration. Generic competitors often operate without large R&D expenses,
as well as without costs of conveying medical information about products to the medical community. In addition, the FDA approval process exempts generics
from costly and time-consuming clinical trials to demonstrate their safety and efficacy, allowing generic manufacturers to rely on the safety and efficacy data of
the innovator product. Generic competitors can market a competing version of our product after the expiration or loss of our patent and often charge much less.
In China, for example, we are expected to face further intensified competition by certain generic manufacturers in 2020, which may result in price cuts and
volume loss of some of our products.
In addition, our patent-protected products can face competition in the form of generic versions of competitors’ branded products that lose their market exclusivity.
As noted above, MCOs that focus primarily on the immediate cost of drugs often favor generics over brand-name drugs. Many governments also encourage the
use of generics as alternatives to brand-name drugs in their healthcare programs, including Medicaid in the U.S. Laws in the U.S. generally allow, and in some
cases require, pharmacists to substitute, for brand-name drugs, generic drugs that have been rated under government procedures to be chemically and
therapeutically equivalent to brand-name drugs. In a small subset of states, prescribing physicians are able to expressly prevent such substitution. Favoring
generics may reduce sales of our branded products.
RAW MATERIALS
Raw materials essential to our businesses are purchased worldwide in the ordinary course of business from numerous suppliers. In general, these materials are
available from multiple sources. In 2019, we experienced periodic shortages of select materials due to constrained capacity or operational challenges with the
associated suppliers. Supplier management activities are ongoing to work to ensure the necessary supply to meet our requirements for these materials. No
significant impact to our operations is anticipated in 2020.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND PRICE CONSTRAINTS
Pharmaceutical companies are subject to extensive regulation by government authorities in the countries in which they do business. Certain laws and
regulations that govern Pfizer’s business are discussed below.
General. Our business has been and will continue to be subject to numerous laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations, including
those governing the manufacture and marketing of our products, could subject us to administrative and legal proceedings and actions by various governmental
bodies. For additional information on these proceedings and actions, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 16A. Contingencies and
Certain Commitments—Legal Proceedings in our 2019 Financial Report. Criminal charges, substantial fines and/or civil penalties, warning letters and product
recalls or seizures, delays in product approvals, as well as limitations on our ability to conduct business in applicable jurisdictions, could result from such
proceedings and actions.
In the United States
Drug Regulation. In the U.S., biopharmaceutical products are subject to extensive pre- and post-market regulation by the FDA, including regulations that govern,
among other things, the safety and efficacy of our medicines, clinical trials, advertising and promotion, manufacturing, labeling and record keeping. Our products
are also subject to post-market surveillance under the FFDCA and its implementing regulations with respect to drugs, as well as the Public Health Service Act
and its implementing regulations with respect to biologics.
Other U.S. federal agencies, including the DEA, also regulate certain of our products. Many of our activities also are subject to the jurisdiction of the SEC.
Biopharmaceutical companies seeking to market a product in the U.S. must first test the product to demonstrate that it is safe and effective for its intended use.
If, after evaluation, the FDA determines the product is safe (i.e., its benefits outweigh its known risks) and effective, then the FDA will approve the product for
marketing, issuing a New Drug Application or Biologics License Application, as appropriate. Companies seeking to market a generic prescription drug must
scientifically demonstrate that the generic drug is bioequivalent to the innovator drug. The Abbreviated New Drug Application, or generic drug application, must
show, among other things, that the generic drug is pharmaceutically equivalent to the brand, the manufacturer is capable of making the drug correctly, and the
proposed label is the same as that of the innovator/brand drug’s label.
Even after a drug or biologic is approved for marketing, it may still be subject to postmarketing commitments or postmarketing requirements. Postmarketing
commitments are studies or clinical trials that the drug or biologic sponsor has agreed to conduct, but are not required by law and/or regulation. Postmarketing
requirements include studies and clinical trials that sponsors are required to conduct, by law and/or regulation, as a condition of approval. Postmarketing studies
or clinical trials can be required in order to assess a known risk or demonstrate clinical benefit for drugs or biologics approved pursuant to accelerated approval.
If a company fails to meet its postmarketing requirements, the FDA may assess a civil monetary penalty, issue a warning letter or deem the drug or biologic
misbranded. Once a drug or biologic is approved, the FDA must be notified of any modifications to the product and the FDA may also require a manufacturer to
submit additional studies or conduct clinical trials. In addition, we are also required to report adverse events and comply with cGMPs, as well as advertising and
promotion regulations. Failure to comply with the FFDCA may subject us to administrative and/or judicial sanctions, including warning letters, product recalls,
seizures, delays in product approvals, injunctions, fines, civil penalties and/or criminal prosecution.
Biosimilar Regulation. The ACA created a framework for the approval of biosimilars (also known as follow-on biologics) following the expiration of 12 years of
exclusivity for the innovator biologic, with a potential six-month pediatric extension. Under the ACA, biosimilar applications may not be submitted until four years
after the approval of the reference innovator biologic.
The FDA is responsible for implementation of the legislation and approval of new biosimilars. Through FDA approvals and the issuance of draft and final
guidance, the FDA has addressed a number of issues related to the biosimilars approval pathway, such as the labeling expectations for biosimilars. For
example, in 2019, the FDA issued final guidance regarding the standards for demonstrating interchangeability with a U.S.-licensed reference product. In
addition, in 2017, the Biosimilar User Fee Act was reauthorized for a five-year period, which led to a significant increase in the FDA’s biosimilar user fee
revenues, thereby providing the FDA with additional resources to process biosimilar applications. For example, since the enactment of the newly authorized fee
structure, the FDA estimates its revenues from biosimilar user fees generally will exceed $40 million.
Sales and Marketing Laws and Regulations. The marketing practices of U.S. biopharmaceutical companies are generally subject to various federal and state
healthcare laws that are intended, among other things, to prevent fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry and to protect the integrity of government
healthcare programs. These laws include anti-kickback laws and false claims laws. Anti-kickback laws generally prohibit a biopharmaceutical company from
soliciting, offering, receiving, or paying anything of value to generate business, including purchasing or prescribing of a particular product. False claims laws
generally prohibit anyone from knowingly and willingly presenting, or causing to be presented, any claims for payment for goods (including drugs or biologics) or
services to third-party payers (including Medicare and Medicaid) that are false or fraudulent and generally treat claims generated through kickbacks as false or
fraudulent. Violations of fraud and abuse laws may be punishable by criminal or civil sanctions and/or exclusion from federal healthcare programs (including
Medicare and Medicaid). The federal government

TABLE OF CONTENTS
and various states also have enacted laws to regulate the sales and marketing practices of pharmaceutical companies. The laws and regulations generally limit
financial interactions between manufacturers and healthcare providers, require disclosure to the federal or state government and the public of such interactions,
and/or require the adoption of compliance standards or programs. Many of these laws and regulations contain ambiguous requirements or require administrative
guidance for implementation. Individual states, acting through their attorneys general, have become active as well, seeking to regulate the marketing of
prescription drugs under state consumer protection and false advertising laws. Given the lack of clarity in laws and their implementation, our activities could be
subject to the penalties under the pertinent laws and regulations.
Pricing and Reimbursement. Pricing and reimbursement for our pharmaceutical products depends in part on government regulation. Pfizer must offer discounted
pricing or rebates on purchases of pharmaceutical products under various federal and state healthcare programs, such as the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program,
the “federal ceiling price” drug pricing program, the 340B drug pricing program and the Medicare Part D Program. Pfizer must also report specific prices to
government agencies under healthcare programs, such as the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and Medicare Part B. The calculations necessary to determine
the prices reported are complex and the failure to report prices accurately may expose Pfizer to penalties. See the discussion regarding rebates in the Analysis
of the Consolidated Statements of Income—Revenues—Overview section and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1G. Basis of Presentation
and Significant Accounting Policies: Revenues and Trade Accounts Receivable in our 2019 Financial Report, which are incorporated by reference.
Government and private third-party payers routinely seek to manage utilization and control the costs of our products. Efforts by government officials or legislators
to implement measures to regulate prices or payment for pharmaceutical products, including proposed action on drug importation, could adversely affect our
business if implemented. There continues to be considerable public and government scrutiny of pharmaceutical pricing, and measures to address the perceived
high cost of pharmaceuticals are being considered by Congress, the Presidential Administration and select states. For example, recent legislation revised how
manufacturers calculate the average manufacturer price on branded drugs with authorized generics under the Medicaid drug rebate program, which the
Congressional Budget Office has estimated will reduce Medicaid costs by over $3 billion over the next decade. Proposals for even more far-reaching reform,
such as immediately eliminating or phasing out private health insurance, are being proposed by some Democratic candidates for U.S. President. In particular,
several states have enacted or are considering transparency laws that require prescription drug manufacturers to report to the state and make public price
increases, and sometimes to provide a written justification for the increase. In addition to new state transparency laws and the introduction of several Federal
pricing bills, we have also seen the Presidential Administration introduce proposals related to importation and express interest in international reference pricing
in Medicare Part B. We expect to see continued focus in regulating pricing resulting in additional legislation and regulation that could adversely impact revenue.
In addition, U.S. government action to reduce federal spending on entitlement programs including Medicare and Medicaid may affect payment for our products
or services associated with the provision of our products. For additional information, see the Item 1A. Risk Factors—U.S. Entitlement Reform section in this 2019
Form 10-K. Also, the majority of states use preferred drug lists to restrict access to certain pharmaceutical products under Medicaid. Restrictions exist for some
Pfizer products under certain state Medicaid programs. As another example, access to our products under the Medicaid managed care program is typically
determined by the health plans with which state Medicaid agencies contract to provide services to Medicaid beneficiaries. States continue to explore options for
controlling healthcare costs related to Medicaid and other state healthcare programs, including the implementation of supplemental rebate agreements under the
Medicaid drug rebate program that are tied to patient outcomes. In addition, we expect that consolidation and integration among pharmacy chains and
wholesalers, who collectively are the primary purchasers of our pharmaceutical products in the U.S., and PBMs will increase pricing pressures on
pharmaceutical manufacturers, including us. For additional information, see the Item 1A. Risk Factors—Managed Care Trends section in this 2019 Form 10-K.
The potential for additional pricing and access pressures in the commercial sector continues to be significant. Many employers have adopted high deductible
health plans, which can increase out-of-pocket costs for medicines. This is a trend that is likely to continue. Private third-party payers, such as health plans,
increasingly challenge pharmaceutical product pricing, which could result in lower prices, lower reimbursement rates and a reduction in demand for our products.
Pricing pressures for our products may occur as a result of highly competitive insurance markets. Healthcare provider purchasers, directly or through group
purchasing organizations, are seeking enhanced discounts or implementing more rigorous bidding or purchasing review processes.
Overall, there is increasing pressure on U.S. providers to deliver healthcare at a lower cost and to ensure that those expenditures deliver demonstrated value in
terms of health outcomes. Longer term, we are seeing a shift in focus away from fee-for-service payments towards outcomes-based payments and risk-sharing
arrangements that reward providers for cost reductions and improved patient outcomes. These new payment models can, at times, lead to lower prices for, and
restricted access to, new medicines. At the same time, these models can also promote utilization of drugs by encouraging physicians to screen and diagnose
and consider drugs as a means of forestalling more costly medical interventions.
We believe medicines are the most efficient and effective use of healthcare dollars based on the value they deliver to the overall healthcare system. We work
with law makers and advocate for solutions that effectively improve patient health outcomes, lower costs to the healthcare system, and ensure access to
medicines within an efficient and affordable healthcare system. In addition, in response to the evolving U.S. and global healthcare spending landscape, we work
with health authorities, health technology assessment and quality measurement bodies and major U.S. payers throughout the product-development process to
better

TABLE OF CONTENTS
understand how these entities value our compounds and products. Further, we seek to develop stronger internal capabilities focused on demonstrating the value
of the medicines that we discover or develop, register and manufacture, by recognizing patterns of usage of our medicines and competitor medicines along with
patterns of healthcare costs.
Healthcare Reform. There have been significant efforts at the federal and state levels to reform the healthcare system by enhancing access to healthcare,
improving the delivery of healthcare and further rationalizing payment for healthcare. We face uncertainties due to federal legislative and administrative efforts to
repeal, substantially modify or invalidate some or all of the provisions of the ACA. There is additional uncertainty given the ruling in December 2019 by the U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Texas v. Azar that the individual mandate, which is a significant provision of the ACA, is unconstitutional. The case
has been remanded to a lower court to determine whether the individual mandate is inseparable from the entire ACA, in which case the ACA as a whole would
be rendered unconstitutional. In the meantime, the remaining provisions of the law remain in effect. The revenues generated for Pfizer by the health insurance
exchanges and Medicaid expansion under the ACA are not material, so the impact of full invalidation of the law is expected to be limited. However, any future
replacement for the ACA may adversely affect our business and financial results, particularly if the legislation reduces incentives for employer-sponsored
insurance coverage or dramatically increases industry taxes and fees. Any future healthcare reform efforts may adversely affect our business and financial
results.
Anti-Corruption. The FCPA prohibits U.S. corporations and their representatives from offering, promising, authorizing or making payments to any foreign
government official, government staff member, political party or political candidate in an attempt to obtain or retain business abroad. The scope of the FCPA
includes interactions with certain healthcare professionals in many countries. Other countries have enacted similar anti-corruption laws and/or regulations.
Data Privacy. Pfizer collects personal data as part of its regular business activities. The collection and use of this data is subject to privacy and data security
laws and regulations, including oversight by various regulatory or other governmental bodies. For example, we are subject to the California Consumer Privacy
Act (CCPA). The CCPA, which came into effect on January 1, 2020, imposes numerous obligations on us, including a duty to disclose the categories of personal
data that we collect, sell, or share about California consumers, and gives those consumers rights regarding their personal data. Noncompliance with any of these
laws could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, or orders to stop non-compliant activities, and could damage our reputation and harm our business.
Outside the United States
We encounter similar regulatory and legislative issues in most countries outside the U.S.
New Drug Approvals. In the EU, the approval of new drugs may be achieved using the Mutual Recognition Procedure, the Decentralized Procedure or the EU
Centralized Procedure. These procedures apply in the EU member states, plus the European Economic Area countries, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. The
Centralized Procedure, managed by the EMA, results in one single authorization for the whole EU, which provides the most rapid and efficient means of gaining
approval across the EU and is the one most commonly used for new products.
In China, the regulatory system historically presented numerous challenges for the pharmaceutical industry, as its requirements for drug development and
registration were often inconsistent with U.S. or other international standards. In recent years, however, China has introduced reforms and draft reforms, which
are discussed in more detail below, that attempt to address these challenges. Furthermore, in 2017, the China regulatory authority, the National Medical
Products Administration (NMPA), became a member of the International Council for Harmonization (ICH), which has resulted in greater adoption of international
technical guidelines and practices by the government. 2019 was another active year in this respect, with a number of reforms coming into effect, and more
proposals and drafts being issued for consultation.
In Japan, the PMDA is the point of entry for businesses looking to sell drugs in the country. The PMDA, which is involved in a wide range of regulatory activities,
including clinical studies, approvals, postmarketing reviews and pharmaceuticals safety, must approve an application before a new drug product may be
marketed in Japan. The PMDA also offers consultations on clinical trials of new drugs and provides advice on product classifications and approvals.
Health authorities in many middle and lower income countries require marketing approval by a recognized regulatory authority (i.e., similar to the authority of the
FDA or the EMA) before they begin to conduct their application review process and/or issue their final approval. Many authorities also require local clinical data
in the country’s population in order to receive final marketing approval.
Pharmacovigilance. In the EU, the EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee has the responsibility for reviewing and making recommendations on
product safety issues for the EU authorities. EU regulators may require pharmaceutical companies to conduct post-authorization safety and efficacy studies at
the time of approval, or at any time afterwards in light of scientific developments. There are also additional extensive requirements regarding adverse drug
reaction reporting and additional monitoring of products. Outside developed markets such as the EU and Japan, pharmacovigilance requirements vary and are
generally not as extensive, but there is a trend toward increasing regulation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pricing and Reimbursement. Certain governments, including the different EU member states, the U.K., China, Japan, Canada, South Korea and some other
international markets, provide healthcare at low-to-zero direct cost to consumers at the point of care and have significant power as large single payers to
regulate pharmaceutical prices or patient reimbursement levels to control costs for the government-sponsored healthcare system, particularly under recent
global financing pressures. Governments may use a variety of cost-containment measures for our pharmaceutical products, including price cuts, mandatory
rebates, health technology assessments, forced localization as a condition of market access, “international reference pricing” (i.e., the practice of a country
linking its regulated medicine prices to those of other countries), quality consistency evaluation processes and volume-based procurement. In addition, the
international patchwork of price regulation and differing economic conditions and incomplete value assessments across countries has led to varying access to
quality medicines in many markets and some third-party trade in our products between countries.
In particular, international reference pricing adds to the regional impact of price cuts in individual countries and hinders patient access and innovation. Price
variations, exacerbated by international reference pricing systems, also have resulted from exchange rate fluctuations. The downward pricing pressure resulting
from this dynamic can be expected to continue as a result of reforms to international reference pricing policies and measures targeting pharmaceuticals in some
European countries.
In addition, several important multilateral organizations, such as the United Nations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development, are increasing scrutiny of international pharmaceutical pricing through issuing reports and policy recommendations. In
2019, the WHO continued exerting pressure on pharmaceutical pricing practices by supporting strategies to reduce medicine prices, including calling for greater
transparency around the cost of research and development and production of medicines, as well as disclosure of net prices.
In Japan, the pricing environment for innovative medicines further deteriorated in 2019 with the introduction of a health technology assessment (HTA) system to
inform price adjustments of healthcare technologies after launch. Expansion of this system for reimbursement decisions, as seen in other HTA markets, remains
a risk. While significant challenges remain, the 2020 Drug Pricing Reform Package, unlike the last reform package in 2018, is not expected to fundamentally
change the access landscape. Furthermore, the eligibility criteria for the Price Maintenance Premium, a key policy that protects against price erosion for certain
products, is expected to be somewhat enhanced while expedited regulatory pathways are codified in law.
In Canada, the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) released draft guidelines to implement new pricing regulations in November 2019, which will
go into force in July 2020. These regulations drop the U.S. from the reference basket of countries used to determine price and add economic factors for setting
ceiling prices for new medicines. An initial analysis of the potential impact of these proposed changes to the PMPRB regulations estimated an approximately $26
billion reduction in industry revenues over the next decade.
China Pricing Pressures. In China, healthcare is largely driven by a public payer system, with public medical insurance as the largest single payer for
pharmaceuticals, and pricing pressures have increased in recent years. Government officials have consistently emphasized the importance of improved health
outcomes, the need for healthcare reform and decreased drug prices as key indicators of progress towards reform. While the government provides basic health
insurance for the vast majority of Chinese citizens, that insurance is not adequate to cover many innovative medicines, and alternative funding sources for
innovative medicines remain suboptimal.
In 2019, China’s government negotiated with companies to add approximately 90 innovative drugs (mainly oncology medicines) to the National Reimbursement
Drug List. This builds on 60 drugs already added through negotiation in 2017 and 2018. Prices for drugs have been reduced dramatically through this
government-led process. While these negotiations have included a path to access for companies, market access is not assured. In addition, significant questions
about the processes and negotiations for provincial tendering remain, as well as the need for multi-layered negotiations across provincial, municipal and hospital
levels.
In the off-patent space, in 2013, China began to implement a quality consistency evaluation (QCE) process in order to improve the quality of domestically-
manufactured generic drugs, primarily by requiring such drugs to pass a test to assess their bioequivalence to a qualified reference drug (typically the originator
drug). In 2018, numerous local generics were officially deemed bioequivalent under QCE. A pilot project for centralized volume-based procurement (VBP) was
then initiated including 25 molecules of drugs covering 11 major Chinese cities. Under this procurement model, a tender process has been established where a
certain portion of included molecule volumes are guaranteed to tender winners. The program is intended to contain healthcare costs by driving utilization of
generics that have passed QCE, which has resulted in dramatic price cuts for off-patent medicines.
Upjohn and most off-patent originators were not successful in the first bidding process under this pilot, which was finalized in December 2018 and implemented
in March 2019, and most contracts went to local generic companies. The first bidding process resulted in significant price cuts by the successful bidders, with
some bidders reducing the price of their products by as much as 96 percent, as companies attempted to secure volumes on the Chinese pharmaceutical market.
The drugs that lost the bidding were also requested to reduce their selling price up to 30 percent based on the price difference with the successful bidder.
China’s government began nationwide expansion of the VBP pilot in December 2019. The expanded model, which is being implemented nationwide, applies to
certain drugs that are purchased for public hospitals as well as some military and private medical institutions. As in the first bidding process, our Upjohn business
unit and most originator brands were not successful in

TABLE OF CONTENTS
the bidding process for this nationwide expansion, and those contracts mostly went to local Chinese generic companies. The QCE-qualified generic makers of
atorvastatin and amlodipine bid aggressively, lowering prices even further from the March 2019 tender. Our Upjohn business unit continues to take steps to
mitigate the revenue impact of these initiatives but anticipates that they will continue to affect our Upjohn business in China in the future. We expect to utilize our
presence in the retail channel, private hospitals and tendering capabilities to mitigate some of these pricing pressures. In addition, we believe that our
geographic expansion to under-penetrated and lower-tiered cities and counties and additional focus on non-tendered products will increase sales volumes in
greater China and partially mitigate pressures from QCE.
In late 2019, China announced another round of expansion of the national VBP program, which covers 33 new molecules, including Biopharma’s Zithromax
tablets and Diflucan tablets and no Upjohn products. Biopharma was not successful in the bidding process for this expansion.
Furthermore, the Chinese government has discussed moving toward efforts to unify the reimbursement price between QCE-approved generic medicines and the
applicable original medicines. The government currently plans to implement this universal reimbursement price initiative within the next two to three years. If this
policy is implemented, the new reimbursement level for Upjohn’s products will likely be lower than the current reimbursement level, placing additional pressures
on price and/or patient copays. There remains uncertainty as to whether, when and how this policy may be officially implemented. The Chinese government
could also enact other policies that may increase pricing pressures or have the effect of reducing the volume of sales available to Upjohn’s products. This
potential policy, and any other policies like it that could increase pricing and copay pressures on Upjohn’s drug products in China, could have an adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The government has indicated that additional post-LOE drugs could be subjected to QCE
qualification in future rounds, which could also be tied to volume-based procurement. The scope of future QCE products and timing of any program expansion is
currently unknown, making it difficult to determine the impact on Pfizer’s business and financial condition. We will continue to monitor the market for
developments.
EU Regulatory Changes. The EU adopted a new Clinical Trials Regulation in May 2014, but its implementation has been delayed by the need for the EU
authorities to establish new technical systems. This regulation is aimed at simplifying and harmonizing the administrative processes and governance of clinical
trials in the EU and will require increased public posting of clinical trial results. It is currently not anticipated to be fully implemented until the first half of 2022 at
the earliest.
Brexit. In June 2016, the U.K. electorate voted in a referendum to leave the EU, which is commonly referred to as “Brexit”. The U.K. left the EU on January 31,
2020 with status quo arrangements through a transition period scheduled to end on December 31, 2020. The consequences of the U.K. leaving the EU and the
terms of the future trading relationship continue to be highly uncertain, which may pose certain implications to our research, commercial and general business
operations in the U.K. and the EU, including the approval and supply of our products. However, both the U.K. and the EU have issued detailed guidance for the
industry on how medicines, medical devices and clinical trials will be separately regulated in their respective territories. Pfizer has substantially completed its
preparations for Brexit, having made the changes necessary to meet relevant regulatory requirements in the EU and the U.K., through the transition period and
afterwards, especially in the regulatory, research, manufacturing and supply chain areas. Between 2018 and 2021, we expect to spend up to approximately $60
million in one-time costs to make these adaptations. For additional information on Brexit, see the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment,
Strategy and Outlook—The Global Economic Environment section in our 2019 Financial Report.
China Regulatory Changes. In an effort to encourage drug innovation and reduce backlogs for existing applications for drug approval, in recent years, the NMPA
has unveiled numerous reform initiatives for China’s drug approval system and engaged in significant efforts to build its capabilities. The NMPA divides drugs
into new drugs and generics, with the definition for new drugs changed from “China New” to “Global New.” This means that drugs previously approved in other
markets (such as the U.S. or Europe) are not considered new drugs under China’s regulatory regime. This change in definition creates more opportunities for
China’s domestic drug manufacturers than for multinational firms, because multinational firms have historically had significant competitive advantage in
successfully achieving regulatory approvals for drugs first approved outside of China. Revisions in 2019 made clear, however, that regulatory approval from the
FDA or the EMA would no longer be required for approval of imported drugs, though a notable exception persists for imported vaccines, which still require prior
approval from a reference regulatory agency such as the FDA. In 2019, China published a revision to its Drug Administration Law and introduced a “marketing
authorization holder” system, which grants the NMPA more authority over regulating manufacturers and provides manufacturers more flexibility in contract
manufacturing arrangements and manufacturing site transfers.
While challenges remain, a number of other policy changes are streamlining and accelerating approvals of domestic and imported drugs in China. These
reforms, along with China’s June 2018 elevation to the ICH Management Committee, are expected to pave the way for integration of Chinese regulations with
global practices. These changes include introducing more streamlined processes for maintaining renewal of product registrations, reduction in importing testing
requirements, and establishing an expedited registration pathway for drugs to treat rare diseases and serious, life-threatening illnesses with no effective
treatment. Though certain details on implementation are unclear (e.g., evolving list of qualified rare diseases and no guidance on what qualifies as serious, life
threatening), the NMPA aims to build expedited pathways for certain categories of products similar to the U.S. and European regulatory systems. Additionally,
the NMPA published changes to China’s registration requirements that align more with international practices, including a 60-day review timeline for clinical trial
authorizations and

TABLE OF CONTENTS
guidance for acceptance of foreign clinical data and the utilization of real world data in drug development and regulatory decision making.
Although a number of regulatory changes better support China’s inclusion in simultaneous global drug development, unique regulatory requirements continue to
pose challenges for multinational companies, including China’s Human Genetic Resources process for exporting clinical trial samples (which adds months to
starting a clinical trial in China); mismatched China Pharmacopoeia and manufacturing data requirements that require standards exceeding acceptable practices
in the U.S., EU, and Japan; and unpredictable and inconsistent clinical trial inspection practices.
Healthcare Provider Transparency and Disclosures. A number of countries have implemented laws requiring (or their industry associations have recommended)
disclosure of transfers of value made by pharmaceutical companies to healthcare providers. For example, the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries
and Associations’ disclosure code requires all members, including Pfizer, to disclose transfers of value to healthcare professionals and healthcare organizations.
Intellectual Property. The World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (WTO-TRIPS) required participant
countries to amend their intellectual property laws to provide patent protection for pharmaceutical products by 2005, with an extension until 2033 for least-
developed countries. While we still face patent grant, enforcement and other intellectual property challenges around the world, some countries have made
improvements. We include stronger patent protection among the factors we consider for continued business expansion in other participant countries.
While the global intellectual property environment has generally improved following WTO-TRIPS and bilateral/multilateral trade agreements, our future business
growth depends on further progress in intellectual property protection. In emerging market countries in particular, governments have used intellectual property
policies as a tool to force innovators to accept less than fair value for medicines, as well as to protect their local pharmaceutical industries. Considerable political
and economic pressure exists to weaken current intellectual property protection and resist implementation of any further protection, which has led to policies
such as more restrictive standards for obtaining patents and more difficult procedures for patenting biopharmaceutical inventions, restrictions on patenting
certain types of inventions (e.g., new medical treatment methods), revocation of patents, laws or regulations that promote or provide broad discretion to issue a
compulsory license, weak intellectual property enforcement and failure to implement effective regulatory data protection. Our industry advocacy efforts focus on
seeking a more balanced business environment for foreign manufacturers, as well as on underscoring the importance of strong intellectual property systems for
local innovative industries and helping improve patients’ access to innovative medicines. In developed countries as well, including the EU, we are facing an
increasingly challenging intellectual property environment.
As part of the Canada/EU Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement (CETA), Canada now provides sui generis protection, commonly referred to as patent
term restoration, for patent term extensions for basic patents; however, the extension is capped at two years, whereas the international norm is five years. In
addition, the implementing regulations may create obstacles for patentees applying for patent term restoration via a Certificate of Supplementary Protection
(CSP), and Canada’s proposed drug pricing reforms may negatively impact the benefit of a CSP. Furthermore, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
(USMCA) will, when implemented, require Canada and Mexico to make certain improvements to their current intellectual property regimes, including the
establishment of patent term adjustment for unreasonable delays in the grant of patents.
In China, the intellectual property environment has improved in recent years, although effective enforcement and adequate legal remedies remain areas of
concern. The government has taken steps to protect intellectual property rights in conformity with World Trade Organization provisions, although China remained
on the U.S. Trade Representative’s Priority Watch List for 2019 due to ongoing enforcement challenges and China’s failure to make certain structural reforms.
Further, the standards for patentability in China remain more restrictive than in other major markets, including the U.S., Europe and Japan. Also, while a
framework exists for protecting patents for 20 years, enforcement mechanisms are often lacking or inconsistent. For example, the absence of effective patent
linkage mechanisms and preliminary injunctions, impractical evidentiary burdens, and heightened sufficiency standards have been used to invalidate patents at
the enforcement stage. In 2019, the regulatory authority granted marketing approval to generic products while the reference product in each case are still subject
to patent protection, and there is no effective legal means to resolve patent disputes prior to the marketing of those infringing drugs. The U.S. and China recently
signed an initial agreement in which China has committed to address some patent-related concerns, and both governments have indicated that they will continue
bilateral discussions on implementation of these commitments and other intellectual property issues in 2020.
In Brazil and other Latin American countries, the role of health regulatory authorities in reviewing patents (e.g., National Health Surveillance Agency in Brazil),
restrictive patentability rules, ambiguity regarding the term of certain patents and backlogs at patent agencies may limit our ability to protect our products through
patents. The lack of regulatory data protection and difficulties in protecting certain types of inventions, such as new medical uses of drug products, may limit the
commercial lifespan of some pharmaceutical products. Additionally, an increased threat of issuance of compulsory licenses for biopharmaceutical products
exists, which adds to business uncertainty.
In India, we have seen some progress in terms of expediting patent approval processes to reduce pendency rates and implementing training programs to
enhance enforcement. Despite these positive steps, gaps remain in terms of addressing longstanding intellectual property concerns. For example, policies
favoring compulsory licensing of patents, the tendency of the

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Indian Patent Office to revoke pharmaceutical patents in opposition proceedings (both pre- and post-grant), and restrictive standards for patentability of
pharmaceutical products have made it difficult to safeguard many of our inventions and our investments in innovation. These policies heighten the risk of
additional patent challenges targeting innovative pharmaceutical products, especially in areas perceived as being important to the public health of the population.
Challenges against Pfizer patents in India are ongoing.
Data Privacy. Outside of the U.S., many countries where we conduct business, including the EU, have privacy and data security laws and regulations concerning
the collection and use of personal data, and we must comply with these laws and regulations as well. One applicable law is the EU’s General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR). The GDPR imposes detailed obligations on companies that collect, use, or otherwise process personal data and penalties for
noncompliance may include fines of up to 4 percent of the company’s global annual revenue. Additionally, the legislative and regulatory framework for privacy
and data protection issues worldwide is rapidly evolving as countries continue to adopt privacy and data security laws. Any inability to comply with applicable
laws, regulations, policies, industry standards or other legal obligations regarding data protection or privacy could result in additional costs and liability to Pfizer
as well as reputational harm and may adversely affect our business.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Most of our operations are affected by national, state and/or local environmental laws. We have made, and intend to continue to make, the expenditures
necessary for compliance with applicable laws. We also are cleaning up environmental contamination from past industrial activity at certain sites. See the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 16A3. Contingencies and Certain Commitments—Legal Proceedings––Commercial and Other Matters in our 2019
Financial Report. As a result, we incurred capital and operational expenditures in 2019 for environmental compliance purposes and for the clean-up of certain
past industrial activity as follows:
• environment-related capital expenditures— $31 million; and

• other environment-related expenses— $136 million.
While capital expenditures or operating costs for environmental compliance cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not currently anticipate they will have a
material effect on our capital expenditures or competitive position.
Climate change presents risks to our operations, including the potential for additional regulatory requirements and associated costs, and the potential for more
frequent and severe weather events and water availability challenges that may impact our facilities and those of our suppliers. For example, in 2017, our
manufacturing and commercial operations in Puerto Rico were impacted by hurricanes as our three manufacturing sites in Puerto Rico sustained damage and
became inoperable due to issues impacting Puerto Rico overall. All three sites resumed operations, and remediation activities were completed in 2018. We
cannot provide assurance that physical risks to our facilities and supply chain due to climate change will not occur in the future; however, we have a program for
reviewing our vulnerability to potential weather-related risks and other natural disasters and we update our assessments periodically. To date, we have
concluded that, because of our facility locations, our existing distribution networks and our controls, we do not anticipate that these risks will have a material
impact on Pfizer in the near term.
TAX MATTERS
The discussion of tax-related matters in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5. Tax Matters in our 2019 Financial Report is incorporated by
reference.
EMPLOYEES
In our innovation-intensive business, our employees are vital to our success. We generally believe we have good relationships with our employees. As of
December 31, 2019, we employed approximately 88,300 people in our operations throughout the world.
DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 219 OF THE IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND SYRIA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT OF 2012
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (ITRSHRA) requires disclosure by public companies of certain transactions
involving the Government of Iran, as well as entities and individuals designated under Executive Order 13382 and Executive Order 13224.
As a global biopharmaceutical company, we conduct business in multiple jurisdictions throughout the world. During 2019, our activities included supplying
medicine and medical products (Pfizer products) for patient and consumer use in Iran. We ship Pfizer products to Iran, and conduct related activities, in
accordance with licenses issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and other U.S. and non-U.S. governmental entities,
and in line with our corporate policies. We will continue our global activities to improve the health and well-being of patients and consumers in a manner
consistent with applicable laws and our corporate policies. To our knowledge, none of our activities during 2019 are required to be disclosed pursuant to
ITRSHRA.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The statements in this Section describe the major risks to our business and should be considered carefully. In addition, these statements constitute our
cautionary statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Our disclosure and analysis in this 2019 Form 10-K and in our 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders contain forward-looking statements. From time to time, we
also provide forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public, as well as oral forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements
involve substantial risks and uncertainties. We have tried, wherever possible, to identify such statements by using words such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “likely,”
“ongoing,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “assume,” “target,” “forecast,” “guidance,” “goal,” “objective,” “aim,” “seek” and
other words and terms of similar meaning or by using future dates in connection with any discussion of, among other things, our anticipated operating and
financial performance, business plans and prospects, expectations for our product pipeline, in-line products and product candidates, including anticipated
regulatory submissions, data read-outs, study starts, approvals, revenue contribution, growth, performance, timing of exclusivity and potential benefits, strategic
reviews, capital allocation objectives, plans for and prospects of our acquisitions and other business-development activities, benefits anticipated from the
reorganization of our commercial operations in 2019, sales efforts, expenses, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, the outcome of contingencies, such as legal
proceedings, government regulation, our ability to successfully capitalize on growth opportunities or prospects, manufacturing and product supply and plans
relating to share repurchases and dividends. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, including, among others, the expected timing,
benefits, charges and/or costs in connection with our agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan to create a new global pharmaceutical company, Viatris, set forth
in the Item 1. Business––About Pfizer and Item 1A. Risk Factors––Pending Combination of Upjohn with Mylan sections in this 2019 Form 10-K and the
Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our Business Development Initiatives and ––Our Strategy sections and the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1A. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies––Basis of Presentation in our 2019 Financial
Report; the expected impact of patent expiries on our business set forth in the Item 1. Business––Patents and Other Intellectual Property Rights section in this
2019 Form 10-K and in the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our Operating Environment––Industry-Specific
Challenges––Intellectual Property Rights and Collaboration/Licensing Rights section in our 2019 Financial Report; the expected competition from certain generic
manufacturers in China in the Item 1. Business––Competition––Generic Products and Item 1A. Risk Factors––Generic Competition sections in this 2019 Form
10-K; the anticipated costs related to our preparations for Brexit set forth in the Item 1. Business––Government Regulation and Price Constraints––Outside the
United States––Brexit section in this 2019 Form 10-K and the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––The Global
Economic Environment section in our 2019 Financial Report; the availability of raw materials for 2020 set forth in Item 1. Business––Raw Materials in this 2019
Form 10-K; the expected pricing pressures on our products in the U.S. and internationally and the anticipated impact to our business set forth in the Item 1.
Business––Government Regulation and Price Constraints and Item 1A. Risk Factors––Pricing and Reimbursement sections in this 2019 Form 10-K; the
anticipated impact of climate change on Pfizer set forth in Item 1. Business––Environmental Matters in this 2019 Form 10-K; the expected demerger of the GSK
Consumer Healthcare joint venture set forth in the Item 1A. Risk Factors––Consumer Healthcare Joint Venture with GSK section in this 2019 Form 10-K; the
benefits expected from the reorganization of our commercial operations in 2019 and our expectations regarding growth set forth in the Overview of Our
Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our Strategy––Organizing for Growth section in our 2019 Financial Report; our anticipated
liquidity position set forth in the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook—The Global Economic Environment and the
Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources sections in our 2019 Financial Report; the anticipated costs and savings from certain of our
initiatives, including Transforming to a More Focused Company initiative, set forth in the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and
Outlook—Transforming to a More Focused Company and Costs and Expenses—Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-
Reduction/Productivity Initiatives sections and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with
Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives in our 2019 Financial Report; our plans for increasing investment in the U.S. set forth in the Overview of
Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our Strategy––Capital Allocation and Expense Management––Increasing Investment in the
U.S. section in our 2019 Financial Report; the financial guidance set forth in the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and
Outlook—Our Financial Guidance for 2020 section in our 2019 Financial Report; the expected impact of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
recommendation for Prevnar 13 for adults 65 and older on Prevnar 13’s revenues set forth in the Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––
Revenues––Selected Product Discussion––Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 (Biopharma) section in our 2019 Financial Report; the expected impact of updates to the
prescribing information for Xeljanz on its growth set forth in the Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––Revenues––Selected Product
Discussion––Xeljanz (Biopharma) section in our 2019 Financial Report; the benefits expected from our business development transactions; the planned capital
spending set forth in the Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources—Selected Measures of Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual
Obligations section in our 2019 Financial Report; the expected payments to our unfunded U.S. supplemental (non-qualified) pension plans, postretirement plans
and deferred compensation plans and expected funding obligations set forth in the Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources—Selected
Measures of Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations section; and the voluntary contribution we expect to make during 2020 for the U.S.
qualified plans set forth in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 11. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined Contribution Plans
in our 2019 Financial Report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized. Achievement of anticipated results is subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and
inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could
vary materially from past results and those anticipated, estimated or projected. You should bear this in mind as you consider forward-looking statements, and
you are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required
by law or by the rules and regulations of the SEC. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects. Also note that we
provide the following cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and possibly inaccurate assumptions relevant to our businesses. These are factors that,
individually or in the aggregate, may cause our actual results to differ materially from expected, projected or historical results. We note these factors for investors
as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors.
Consequently, you should not consider the following to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS, INDUSTRY AND OPERATIONS:
MANAGED CARE TRENDS
Private third-party payers, such as health plans, and other managed care entities, such as PBMs, continue to take action to manage the utilization of drugs and
control the cost of drugs. Consolidation among MCOs has increased the negotiating power of MCOs and other private third-party payers. Private third-party
payers, as well as governments, increasingly employ formularies to control costs by taking into account discounts in connection with decisions about formulary
inclusion or favorable formulary placement. Failure to obtain or maintain timely or adequate pricing or favorable formulary placement for our products, or failure
to obtain such formulary placement at favorable pricing, could adversely impact revenue. Private third-party payers often implement formularies with copayment
tiers to encourage utilization of certain drugs and have also been raising co-payments required from beneficiaries, particularly for branded pharmaceuticals and
biotechnology products. Private third-party payers are also implementing new initiatives like so-called “copay accumulators” (policies that provide that the value
of copay assistance does not count as out-of-pocket costs that are applied toward deductibles) that can shift more of the cost burden to manufacturers and
patients. This cost shifting has increased consumer interest and input in medication choices, as they pay for a larger portion of their prescription costs and may
cause consumers to favor lower cost generic alternatives to branded pharmaceuticals. Third-party payers also use additional measures such as new-to-market
blocks, exclusion lists, indication-based pricing, and value-based pricing/contracting to improve their cost containment efforts, and are also increasingly imposing
utilization management tools, such as clinical protocols, requiring prior authorization for a branded product if a generic product is available or requiring the
patient to first fail on one or more generic products before permitting access to a branded medicine. As the U.S. private third-party payer market consolidates
further and as more drugs become available in generic form, biopharmaceutical companies may face greater pricing pressure from private third-party payers,
who will continue to drive more of their patients to use lower cost generic alternatives.
GENERIC COMPETITION
Competition from manufacturers of generic drugs is a major challenge for our branded products around the world, and the loss or expiration of intellectual
property rights can have a significant adverse effect on our revenues. In addition, our patented products may face generic competition before patent exclusivity
expires, including upon the “at-risk” launch (despite pending patent infringement litigation against the generic product) by a manufacturer of a generic version of
one of our patented products. Generic competition could lead to our loss of a major portion of revenues for that product in a very short period of time. A number
of our products have experienced significant generic competition over the last few years. For example, Lyrica (a product in our Upjohn business) lost patent
protection in the U.S. in June 2019 and multi-source generic competition began in July 2019. Also, the basic product patent for Chantix in the U.S. will expire in
November 2020. In China, we are expected to face further intensified competition by certain generic manufacturers, which may result in price cuts and volume
loss of some of our products.
Also, generic manufacturers have filed applications with the FDA seeking approval of product candidates that such companies claim do not infringe our patents
or that our patents are not valid; these include candidates that would compete with, among other products, Eliquis, Ibrance and Xeljanz. Our licensing and
collaboration partners also face challenges by generic drug manufacturers to patents covering products for which we have licenses or co-promotion rights. In
addition, our patent-protected products may face competition in the form of generic versions of competitors’ branded products that lose their market exclusivity.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
COMPETITIVE PRODUCTS
We cannot predict with accuracy the timing or impact of the introduction of competitive products, including new product entrants, in-line branded products,
generic products, private label products, biosimilars and product candidates that treat diseases and conditions similar to those treated by our in-line drugs and
drug candidates. The introduction of competitive products can result in erosion of the sales of our existing products and potential sales of products in
development, as well as unanticipated product obsolescence. Competitive product launches have occurred in recent years, and certain potentially competitive
products are in various stages of development. Some of these have been filed for approval with the FDA and with regulatory authorities in other countries.
We also produce generic and biosimilar pharmaceutical products that compete with products from competitors, including other generic and biosimilar
manufacturers. The ability to launch a generic or biosimilar pharmaceutical product at or before the anticipated formation of the generic or biosimilar marketplace
is important to that product’s profitability. With increasing competition in the generic or biosimilar product markets, our success will depend on our ability to bring
new products to market quickly. The FDA, along with other regulatory agencies around the world, has been experiencing a backlog of generic drug applications,
which may result in delayed approvals of new generic products over the next few years. Also, we may face access challenges for our biosimilar products where
our product may not receive appropriate coverage/reimbursement access or remains in a disadvantaged position relative to the innovator product. For example,
Inflectra has experienced access challenges among commercial payers. In September 2017, Pfizer filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) alleging that J&J’s exclusionary contracts and other anticompetitive practices concerning Remicade® (infliximab)
violate federal antitrust laws.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY IN-LINE PRODUCTS
We recorded direct product and/or alliance revenues of more than $1 billion for each of eight biopharmaceutical products in 2019: Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13,
Ibrance, Eliquis, Lyrica, Xeljanz, Lipitor, Enbrel and Chantix/Champix. Those products accounted for 49% of our total revenues in 2019. If these products or any
of our other major products were to become subject to problems such as loss of patent protection (if applicable), changes in prescription growth rates, material
product liability litigation, unexpected side effects, regulatory proceedings, publicity affecting doctor or patient confidence, pressure from existing competitive
products, changes in labeling, pricing and access pressures, supply shortages or, if a new, more effective treatment should be introduced, the adverse impact on
our revenues could be significant. A number of our products have experienced patent-based expirations or loss of regulatory exclusivity in certain markets in the
last few years, and patents covering a number of our best-selling medicines are, or have been, the subject of pending legal challenges. For example, as a result
of a patent litigation settlement, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. launched a generic version of Viagra (a product in our Upjohn business) in the U.S. in
December 2017. In addition, Lyrica (a product in our Upjohn business) lost patent protection in the U.S. in June 2019 and multi-source generic competition
began in July 2019. Also, the basic product patent for Chantix in the U.S. will expire in November 2020. In addition, our revenues could be significantly impacted
by the timing and rate of commercial acceptance of key new products. For additional information, see the Item 1. Business––Patents and Other Intellectual
Property Rights section in this 2019 Form 10-K. Further, our Alliance revenues will be adversely affected by the termination or expiration of collaboration and co-
promotion agreements that we have entered into and that we may enter into from time to time.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT
The discovery and development of safe, effective new products, as well as the development of additional uses for existing products, are necessary for the
continued strength of our businesses. Our product lines must be replenished over time in order to offset revenue losses when products lose their market
exclusivity, as well as to provide for earnings growth. Our growth potential depends in large part on our ability to identify and develop new products or new
indications for existing products that address unmet medical needs and receive reimbursement from payers, either through internal R&D or through
collaborations, acquisitions, joint ventures or licensing or other arrangements with third parties. However, balancing current growth, investment for future growth
and the delivery of shareholder return remains a major challenge. The average costs of product development continue to rise, as do the regulatory requirements
in many therapeutic areas, which may affect the number of candidates funded as well as the sustainability of the R&D portfolio. Our ongoing investments in new
product introductions and in R&D for new products and existing product extensions could exceed corresponding sales growth.
Additionally, our R&D investment plans and resources may not be correctly matched between science and markets, and failure to invest in the right technology
platforms, therapeutic segments, product classes, geographic markets and/or in-licensing and out-licensing opportunities could adversely impact the productivity
of our pipeline. Further, even if the areas with the greatest market attractiveness are identified, the scientific approach may not succeed for any given program
despite the significant investment required for R&D, and the commercial potential of the product may not be as competitive as expected because of the highly
dynamic market environment and the hurdles in terms of access and reimbursement.
We continue to strengthen our global R&D organization and pursue strategies intended to improve innovation and overall productivity in R&D to achieve a
sustainable pipeline that is positioned to deliver value in the near-term and over time. These strategies may not deliver the desired result, which could affect
growth and profitability in the future.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
BIOSIMILARS
Abbreviated legal pathways for the approval of biosimilars exist in many international markets and, since the passage of the ACA, a framework for such approval
exists in the U.S. If competitors are able to obtain marketing approval for biosimilars referencing our biologic products, our biologic products may become subject
to competition from these biosimilars, with attendant competitive pressure, and price reductions could follow. For example, Enbrel faces ongoing biosimilar
competition in most European markets. The loss of patent rights, due to patent expiration or litigation, could trigger competition.
We are developing and commercializing biosimilar medicines. Risks related to our commercialization of biosimilars include the potential for steeper than
anticipated price erosion due to increased competitive intensity, coupled with intellectual property challenges that may preclude timely commercialization of our
potential biosimilar products. There is also a risk of lower uptake for biosimilars due to various factors that may vary for different biosimilars (e.g., anti-
competitive practices, physician reluctance to prescribe biosimilars for existing patients taking the originator product, or misaligned financial incentives). See also
the Competitive Products risk factor above.
RESEARCH STUDIES
Decisions about research studies made early in the development process of a drug or vaccine candidate can have a substantial impact on the marketing
strategy and payer reimbursement possibilities if it receives regulatory approval. For example, a wider range of studies can lead to approval for a broader set of
indications that may impact the marketing and payer reimbursement process. However, each additional indication and its reimbursement potential must be
balanced against the time and resources required to demonstrate benefit, the increased complexity of development and manufacturing and the potential delays
to approval of the lead indication. We try to plan clinical trials prudently and to reasonably anticipate and address challenges, but there is no guarantee that an
optimal balance between trial conduct, speed and desired outcome will be achieved each time. The degree to which such potential challenges are foreseen and
adequately addressed could affect our future results.
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
Our international operations could be affected by currency fluctuations, capital and exchange controls, economic conditions, expropriation and other restrictive
government actions, changes in intellectual property legal protections and remedies, trade regulations and procedures and actions affecting approval,
production, pricing, and marketing of, reimbursement for and access to our products, as well as by political unrest, unstable governments and legal systems and
inter-governmental disputes. Any of these changes could adversely affect our business.
Many emerging markets have experienced growth rates in excess of developed markets, leading to an increased contribution to the industry’s global
performance. As a result, we have been employing strategies to grow in emerging markets. However, our strategies in emerging markets may not be successful
and these countries may not continue to sustain these growth rates. For example, even though China is growing faster than most emerging markets, we face
certain challenges in China due to government imposed pricing controls affecting certain Pfizer medicines. In addition, some emerging market countries may be
particularly vulnerable to periods of financial or political instability or significant currency fluctuations or may have limited resources for healthcare spending.
Even though we constantly monitor the evolving emerging markets for any unanticipated risk to Pfizer, certain financial or political events in such markets can
adversely affect our results.
SPECIALTY PHARMACEUTICALS
Specialty pharmaceuticals are medicines that treat rare or life-threatening conditions that typically have smaller patient populations. The growing availability and
use of innovative specialty pharmaceuticals, combined with their relative higher cost as compared to other types of pharmaceutical products, has generated
payer interest in developing cost-containment strategies targeted to this sector. The impact of payers’ efforts to control access to and pricing of specialty
pharmaceuticals is increasing. A number of factors create a more challenging paradigm for Pfizer given our growing specialty business portfolio such as
formulary restrictions and increasing use of utilization management tools such as step edits, which can lead to higher negotiated rebates or discounts to health
plans and PBMs in the U.S., as well as the increasing use of health technology assessments and government pressures in markets around the world.
PRODUCT MANUFACTURING, SALES AND MARKETING RISKS
Difficulties or delays in product manufacturing, sales or marketing could affect future results through regulatory actions, shut-downs, work stoppages or strikes,
approval delays, withdrawals, recalls, penalties, supply disruptions, shortages or stock-outs, reputational harm, product liability or unanticipated costs. Examples
of such difficulties or delays include, but are not limited to, the inability to increase production capacity commensurate with demand; the failure to predict market
demand for, or to gain market acceptance of, approved products; the possibility that the supply of component materials is delayed or unavailable and that the
quality of such materials are substandard and not detected; the possibility that we may fail to maintain appropriate quality standards throughout our internal and
external supply network and/or comply with cGMPs and other applicable regulations such as serialization (which allows for track and trace of products in the
supply chain to enhance patient safety);

TABLE OF CONTENTS
risks to supply chain continuity and commercial operations as a result of natural (including hurricanes, earthquakes and floods) or man-made disasters (including
arson or terrorist attacks) at our facilities or at a supplier or vendor, including those that may be related to climate change; failure to maintain the integrity of our
supply chains against economic adulteration, product diversion, product theft, counterfeit goods and cyberattacks. As an example, we have been experiencing
production issues with Genotropin that will decrease revenue from that product.
Regulatory agencies periodically inspect our drug manufacturing facilities to evaluate compliance with cGMP or other applicable requirements. Failure to comply
with these requirements may subject us to possible legal or regulatory actions, such as warning letters, suspension of manufacturing, seizure of product,
injunctions, debarment, recall of a product, delays or denials of product approvals, import bans or denials of import certifications, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In February 2017, for example, we received a warning letter from the FDA
communicating the FDA’s view that certain violations of cGMP regulations exist at Hospira’s manufacturing facility in McPherson, Kansas. We undertook
corrective actions to address the concerns raised by the FDA. In January 2018, the FDA upgraded the status of Pfizer’s McPherson manufacturing facility to VAI
based on an October 2017 inspection. The change to VAI status lifted the compliance hold that the FDA placed on approval of pending applications. In June
2018, the FDA informed us that it had completed an evaluation of corrective actions and closed out the February 2017 warning letter issued to our McPherson
manufacturing facility after determining that we had addressed the violations contained in the warning letter. In July-August 2018, the FDA conducted a follow-up
inspection of our McPherson facility and issued an inspection report noting several findings. Pfizer responded to the FDA’s findings, and is in the process of
implementing a corrective and preventive action plan to address the FDA’s concerns. On the basis of the July-August 2018 FDA inspection, the FDA changed
the inspection classification of the McPherson site to Official Action Indicated (OAI). Future FDA inspections and regulatory activities will further assess the
adequacy and sustainability of these corrections implemented at the site. Communication with the FDA on the status of the McPherson site is ongoing. As a
result of the current OAI classification, the FDA may refuse to grant premarket approval of applications and/or the FDA may refuse to grant export certificates
related to products manufactured at our McPherson site until the site status is upgraded, which upgrade would be based on a re-inspection by the FDA. We
have been experiencing shortages of products from the legacy Hospira portfolio, among others, largely driven by capacity constraints, technical issues, supplier
quality concerns or unanticipated increases in demand. We have made considerable progress in remediating issues at legacy Hospira facilities manufacturing
sterile injectables and have substantially improved supply from most of these sites. Continuing product shortage interruption at these manufacturing facilities
could negatively impact our financial results.
In addition, in September 2017, Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc., received a warning letter from the FDA asserting the FDA’s view
that certain violations of cGMP and Quality System Regulations exist at Meridian’s manufacturing sites in St. Louis, Missouri and classifying the site as OAI.
Meridian responded to the warning letter and committed to making improvements across the sites. We have made considerable progress addressing the
concerns raised by the FDA, and communication with the FDA is ongoing. Future FDA inspections and regulatory activities will further assess the adequacy and
sustainability of these corrections implemented at the site. As a result of the OAI classification, the FDA may refuse to grant premarket approval of applications
and/or the FDA may refuse to grant export certificates related to products manufactured at our St. Louis sites.
COLLABORATIONS AND OTHER RELATIONSHIPS WITH THIRD PARTIES
We depend on third-party collaborators, service providers, and others in the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization of our products and
product candidates and also enter into joint ventures and other business development transactions in connection with our business. To achieve expected longer
term benefits, we may make substantial upfront payments in such transactions, which may negatively impact our reported earnings. We rely heavily on these
parties for multiple aspects of our drug development, manufacturing and commercialization activities, but we do not control many aspects of those activities. We
also outsource certain services to other parties, including transaction processing, accounting, information technology, manufacturing, clinical trial recruitment and
execution, clinical lab services, non-clinical research, safety services, integrated facilities management and other areas. Failure by one or more of these third
parties to complete activities on schedule or in accordance with our expectations; failure by one or more of these parties to meet their contractual or other
obligations to Pfizer; failure of one or more of these parties to comply with applicable laws or regulations; or any disruption in the relationships between Pfizer
and one or more of these third parties, could delay or prevent the development, approval, manufacturing or commercialization of our products and product
candidates, could expose us to suboptimal quality of service delivery or deliverables, could result in repercussions such as missed deadlines or other timeliness
issues, erroneous data and supply disruptions, and could also result in non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements or industry standards or
reputational harm, all with potential negative implications for our product pipeline and business.
BIOPHARMACEUTICAL WHOLESALERS
In 2019, our largest biopharmaceutical wholesaler accounted for approximately 16% of our total revenues (and approximately 32% of our total U.S. revenues),
and our top three biopharmaceutical wholesalers accounted for approximately 37% of our total revenues (and approximately 79% of our total U.S. revenues). If
one of our significant biopharmaceutical wholesalers should encounter financial or other difficulties, such wholesaler might decrease the amount of business that
it does with us, and we might be unable to collect all the amounts that the wholesaler owes us on a timely basis or at all, which could negatively impact

TABLE OF CONTENTS
our results of operations. In addition, we expect that consolidation and integration of pharmacy chains and wholesalers will increase competitive and pricing
pressures on pharmaceutical manufacturers, including us.
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
We expect to continue to enhance our in-line products and product pipeline through various forms of business development, which can include alliances,
licenses, joint ventures, collaborations, equity- or debt-based investments, dispositions, divestments, mergers and acquisitions. However, these enhancement
plans are subject to the availability and cost of appropriate opportunities, competition from other pharmaceutical companies that are seeking similar opportunities
and our ability to successfully identify, structure and execute transactions, including the ability to satisfy the conditions to closing of announced transactions in
the anticipated timeframes or at all, and successfully integrate acquisitions. Pursuing these opportunities may require us to obtain additional equity or debt
financing, and could result in increased leverage and/or a downgrade of our credit ratings. Where we acquire debt or equity securities as all or part of the
consideration for business development activities, such as in connection with our contribution agreement entered into with Allogene Therapeutics, Inc., the value
of those securities will fluctuate, and may depreciate in value. We may not control the company in which we acquire securities, such as in connection with a
divestiture or collaborative arrangement, and as a result, we will have limited ability to determine its management, operational decisions and policies. Further,
while we seek to mitigate risks and liabilities of such transactions through, among other things, due diligence, there may be risks and liabilities that such due
diligence efforts fail to discover, that are not disclosed to us, or that we inadequately assess. Legal proceedings or regulatory issues often arise as a result of
activities that occurred at acquired companies, their partners and other third parties. In 2016, for example, we paid $784.6 million to resolve allegations related to
Wyeth’s reporting of prices to the government with respect to Protonix for activities that occurred prior to our acquisition of Wyeth. For these and other reasons,
we may not realize the anticipated benefits of such transactions, and expected synergies and accretion may not be realized within the expected timeframes, or
at all.
COUNTERFEIT PRODUCTS
A counterfeit medicine is one that has been deliberately and fraudulently mislabeled as to its identity and source. A counterfeit Pfizer medicine, therefore, is one
manufactured by someone other than Pfizer, but which appears to be the same as an authentic Pfizer medicine. The prevalence of counterfeit medicines is a
significant and growing industry-wide issue due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following: the widespread use of the Internet, which has
greatly facilitated the ease by which counterfeit medicines can be advertised, purchased and delivered to individual patients; the availability of sophisticated
technology that makes it easier for counterfeiters to make counterfeit medicines; the growing involvement in the medicine supply chain of under-regulated
wholesalers and repackagers; the lack of adequate inspection at certain international postal facilities as counterfeit medicines are increasingly delivered direct to
customers in small parcel packages; the tendency to misuse and abuse medicines; and the relatively modest risk of penalties faced by counterfeiters compared
to the large profits that can be earned by them from the sale of counterfeit medicines. Further, laws against pharmaceutical counterfeiting vary greatly from
country to country, and the enforcement of existing law varies greatly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For example, in some countries, pharmaceutical
counterfeiting is not a crime; in others, it may result in only minimal sanctions. In addition, those involved in the distribution of counterfeit medicines use complex
transport routes in order to evade customs controls by disguising the true source of their products.
Pfizer’s global reputation makes its medicines prime targets for counterfeiting organizations. Counterfeit medicines continue to pose a significant risk to patient
health and safety because of the conditions under which they are manufactured—often in unregulated, unlicensed, uninspected and unsanitary sites—as well as
the lack of regulation of their contents. Counterfeiters have been recently evolving to counterfeit life sustaining medications such as oncology medicines. This
shift significantly increases the risk to patients who, for instance, unsuspectingly purchase counterfeit oncology medications from illicit online “pharmacies”
operated by criminal counterfeiting organizations. Failure to mitigate this new threat posed by counterfeit biopharma medicines could adversely impact our
business, by, among other things, causing the loss of patient confidence in the Pfizer name and in the integrity of our medicines, potentially resulting in lost
sales, product recalls, and an increased threat of litigation.
We have an enterprise-wide strategy to counteract the threats associated with counterfeit medicines, and focused on educating patients and health care
providers to reduce demand through awareness; increasing engagement and education of global law enforcement, customs and regulatory agencies about the
growing prevalence of counterfeit life sustaining medicines; enhancing online identification and disruption efforts in partnership with pharmaceutical associations
to optimize resources and impact; educating legislators about the risk to the security of the international drug supply chain by illicit manufacturing and distribution
networks operated by transnational criminal organizations; supporting efforts by law enforcement authorities to prosecute counterfeiters; assessing new and
existing technologies to seek to make it more difficult for counterfeiters to copy our products and easier for patients and healthcare providers to distinguish
authentic from counterfeit medicines; and using data analytics and risk assessment tools to better target the factors that give rise to the counterfeiting problem in
the first place. However, our efforts and the efforts of others may not be entirely successful, and the presence of counterfeit medicines may continue to increase.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
RISKS RELATED TO GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS:
PRICING AND REIMBURSEMENT
U.S. and international governmental regulations that mandate price controls and limitations on patient access to our products or establish prices paid by
government entities or programs for our products impact our business, and our future results could be adversely affected by changes in such regulations or
policies.
In the U.S., many of our products are subject to increasing pricing pressures. Pharmaceutical product pricing is subject to enhanced government and public
scrutiny and calls for reform. Some states have implemented, and other states are considering, pharmaceutical price controls or patient access constraints under
the Medicaid program, and some states are considering price-control regimes that would apply to broader segments of their populations that are not Medicaid-
eligible. There have also been recent state legislative efforts to address drug costs, which generally have focused on increasing transparency around drug costs
or limiting drug prices. Efforts by government officials or legislators to implement measures to regulate prices or payment for pharmaceutical products, including
legislation on drug importation, could adversely affect our business if implemented. See the discussion regarding pricing and reimbursement in the Item 1.
Business—Government Regulation and Price Constraints—In the United States—Pricing and Reimbursement section in this 2019 Form 10-K.
We encounter similar regulatory and legislative issues in most other countries. In certain international markets, such as the different EU member states, the U.K.,
China, Japan, Canada and South Korea, governments have significant power as large single payers to regulate prices, access criteria (e.g., through public or
private health technology assessments), or other means of cost control, particularly under recent global financing pressures. As a result, we expect that
pressures on the pricing component of operating results will continue. For example, China, in 2013, began to implement a QCE process, under which numerous
local generics have officially been deemed bioequivalents of a qualified reference drug. China’s government subsequently initiated a pilot project for centralized
VBP in 2018, which included 25 molecules of drugs and covered 11 major Chinese cities. Under this procurement model, a tender process was established
whereby a certain portion of included molecule volumes were guaranteed to tender winners. This tender process was intended to contain healthcare costs by
driving utilization of generics and bioequivalents that had passed QCE, and has resulted in dramatic price cuts for off-patent medicines. China’s government
began nationwide expansion of the VBP pilot in December 2019. See the discussion regarding these government initiatives in China in the Item 1.
Business—Government Regulation and Price Constraints—Outside the United States—China Pricing Pressures section in this 2019 Form 10-K. We anticipate
that these initiatives will continue to increase pricing pressures on our drug products in China in the future.
The adoption of restrictive price controls in new jurisdictions or more restrictive ones in existing jurisdictions or the failure to obtain or maintain timely or adequate
pricing could also adversely impact revenue. In our vaccines business, we participate in a tender process in many countries for participation in national
immunization programs. Failure to secure participation in national immunization programs or to obtain acceptable pricing in the tender process could adversely
affect our business.
U.S. HEALTHCARE REFORM
The U.S. healthcare industry is highly regulated and subject to frequent and substantial changes. For example, the ACA was enacted by Congress in March
2010 and established a major expansion of healthcare coverage, financed in part by a number of new rebates, discounts, and taxes that had a significant effect
on our expenses and profitability. See the discussion in the Item 1. Business—Government Regulation and Price Constraints—In the United States section in
this 2019 Form 10-K. We face uncertainties due to federal legislative and administrative efforts to repeal, substantially modify or invalidate some or all of the
provisions of the ACA. There is additional uncertainty given the ruling in December 2019 by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Texas v. Azar
that the individual mandate, which is a significant provision of the ACA, is unconstitutional. The case has been remanded to a lower court to determine whether
the individual mandate is inseparable from the entire ACA, in which case the ACA as a whole would be rendered unconstitutional. In the meantime, the
remaining provisions of the law remain in effect. The revenues generated for Pfizer by the health insurance exchanges and Medicaid expansion under the ACA
are not material, so the impact of full invalidation of the law is expected to be limited. However, any future replacement of the ACA may adversely affect our
business and financial results, particularly if the legislation reduces incentives for employer-sponsored insurance coverage or dramatically increases industry
taxes and fees. Any future healthcare reform efforts may adversely affect our business and financial results.
Other U.S. federal or state legislative or regulatory action and/or policy efforts could adversely affect our business, including, among others, general budget
control actions, changes in patent laws, the importation of prescription drugs from outside the U.S. at prices that are regulated by governments of various foreign
countries (which is among the U.S. Presidential Administration’s policy proposals), revisions to reimbursement of biopharmaceuticals under government
programs (such as the implementation of international reference pricing for Medicare Part B drugs, or changes to protected class criteria for Part D drugs),
restrictions on U.S. direct-to-consumer advertising, limitations on interactions with healthcare professionals, or the use of comparative effectiveness
methodologies that could be implemented in a manner that focuses primarily on cost differences and minimizes the therapeutic differences among
pharmaceutical products and restricts access to innovative medicines.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
U.S. ENTITLEMENT REFORM
In the U.S., government action to reduce federal spending on entitlement programs including Medicare and Medicaid may affect payment for our products or
services provided using our products. The Congressional Budget Office routinely releases options for reducing federal spending, and the December 2018
release includes proposals to cap federal Medicaid payments to the states, and to require manufacturers to pay a minimum rebate on drugs covered under
Medicare Part D for low-income beneficiaries. Significant Medicare reductions could also result if, for example, Congress proceeds with certain proposals to
convert the Medicare fee-for-service program into a premium support program, or Congress chooses to implement the recommendations made annually by the
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, which are primarily intended to extend the fiscal solvency of the Medicare program. These and any other significant
spending reductions or cost controls affecting Medicare, Medicaid or other publicly funded or subsidized health programs that may be implemented could have
an adverse impact on our results of operations.
SUBSTANTIAL REGULATION
We are subject to extensive, complex, costly and evolving regulation by federal and state governmental authorities in the U.S., principally by the FDA and the
DEA, and foreign regulatory authorities. Failure to comply with all applicable regulatory requirements may subject us to operating restrictions and criminal
prosecution, monetary penalties and other disciplinary actions, including, sanctions, warning letters, product seizures, recalls, fines, injunctions, suspension,
revocation of approvals, corporate integrity or deferred prosecution agreements or exclusion from future participation in government healthcare programs, as
well as reputational harm.
DEVELOPMENT, REGULATORY APPROVAL AND MARKETING OF PRODUCTS
Innovation is critical to the success of our Company, and drug discovery and development are time-consuming, expensive and unpredictable. The outcome of
the lengthy and complex process of identifying new compounds and developing new products is inherently uncertain and involves a high degree of risk and cost.
The process from early discovery to design and adequate implementation of clinical trials to regulatory approval can take many years. Drug candidates can and
do fail at any stage of the process, including as the result of unfavorable pre-clinical and clinical trial results, or unfavorable new clinical data and further
analyses of existing clinical data, including results that may not support further clinical development of the applicable product candidate or indication. We may
not be able to meet anticipated pre-clinical or clinical endpoints, commencement and/or completion dates for our pre-clinical or clinical trials, regulatory
submission dates, regulatory approval dates and/or launch dates. Similarly, we may not be able to successfully address all of the comments received from
regulatory authorities such as the FDA and the EMA, or obtain approval from regulators. Regulatory approval of drug or biologic products depends on myriad
factors, including a regulator making a determination as to whether a product’s benefits outweigh its known risks and a determination of the product’s efficacy.
Additionally, clinical trial data are subject to differing interpretations and assessments by regulatory authorities. Even after a drug or biologic is approved, it could
be adversely affected by regulatory decisions impacting labeling, manufacturing processes, safety and/or other matters. We may not be able to receive or
maintain favorable recommendations by technical or advisory committees, such as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices that may impact the use
of our vaccines. Further, claims and concerns that may arise regarding the safety and efficacy of in-line products and product candidates can result in a negative
impact on product sales, product recalls or withdrawals, and/or consumer fraud, product liability and other litigation and claims. Increasing regulatory scrutiny of
drug safety and efficacy, with regulatory authorities increasingly focused on product safety and the risk/benefit profile of products as they relate to already-
approved products, has resulted in a more challenging, expensive and lengthy regulatory approval process due to requests for, among other things, additional or
more extensive clinical trials prior to granting approval or increased post-approval requirements. For these and other reasons discussed in Item 1A. Risk
Factors, we may not obtain the approvals we expect within the timeframe we anticipate, or at all.
POST-APPROVAL DATA
As a condition to granting marketing approval of a product, the FDA may require a company to conduct additional clinical trials. The results generated in these
Phase 4 trials could result in the loss of marketing approval, changes in product labeling, and/or new or increased concerns about the side effects or efficacy of a
product. Regulatory agencies in countries outside the U.S. often have similar authority and may impose comparable requirements. For example, in July and
December 2019, the FDA updated the U.S. prescribing information for Xeljanz to include three additional boxed warnings as well as changes to the indication
and dosing for ulcerative colitis. In January 2020, the EMA revised the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) for Xeljanz to include new warnings and
recommendations for use of Xeljanz due to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and, due to an increased risk of infections, revised warnings in
patients older than 65 years of age. These updates were based on the FDA’s and EMA’s review of data from the ongoing post-marketing requirement
rheumatoid arthritis study A3921133. Postmarketing studies, whether conducted by us or by others and whether mandated by regulatory agencies or voluntary,
and other emerging data about marketed products, such as adverse event reports, may also adversely affect the availability or commercial potential of our
products. Further, the discovery of significant problems with a product similar to one of our products could implicate the entire class of products; and this, in turn,
could have an adverse effect on the availability or commercial viability of our product(s) as well as other products in the class.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTERACTIONS WITH HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
Risks and uncertainties apply if we provide, offer, or promise something of value to a healthcare professional, other healthcare provider and/or government
official. Requirements or industry standards in the U.S. and certain jurisdictions abroad that require pharmaceutical manufacturers to track and disclose financial
interactions with healthcare professionals and healthcare providers increase government and public scrutiny of such financial interactions. If an interaction is
found to be improper, government enforcement actions and penalties could result. These risks may increase as both U.S. and foreign enforcement agencies
adopt or increase enforcement efforts in respect of existing and new laws and regulations governing product promotion, marketing, anti-bribery and kickbacks,
industry regulations, and codes of conduct.
CHANGES IN LAWS AND ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Our future results could be adversely affected by changes in interpretations of existing laws and regulations, or changes in laws and regulations, including,
among others, changes in accounting standards, taxation requirements (including tax rate changes, new tax laws, changes to existing tax laws and revised tax
law and regulatory clarifications and/or interpretations, including changes affecting the taxation by the U.S. of income earned outside the U.S. that may result
from pending and possible future proposals, including further clarifications and/or interpretations of or changes to the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017),
competition laws, privacy laws and environmental laws in the U.S. and other countries. For additional information, see the Provision/(Benefit) for Taxes on
Income—Changes in Tax Laws and New Accounting Standards sections, and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1B. Basis of Presentation
and Significant Accounting Policies: Adoption of New Accounting Standards in 2019 in our 2019 Financial Report.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We and certain of our subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings, including patent litigation, such as claims that our patents are invalid and/or do not
cover the product of the generic drug manufacturer or where one or more third parties seeks damages and/or injunctive relief to compensate for alleged
infringement of its patents by our commercial or other activities, product liability and other product-related litigation, including personal injury, consumer, off-label
promotion, securities, antitrust and breach of contract claims, commercial, environmental, government investigations, employment, tax litigation and other legal
proceedings, including various means for resolving asbestos litigation, that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. Litigation is inherently
unpredictable, and excessive verdicts do occur. Although we believe that our claims and defenses in matters in which we are a defendant are substantial, we
could in the future incur judgments, enter into settlements or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of certain matters, and such developments could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the amounts are accrued and/or our cash flows in the period in which the
amounts are paid.
Claims against our patents include challenges to the coverage and/or validity of our patents on various products or processes. Although we believe we have
substantial defenses to these challenges with respect to all of our material patents, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these matters, and a loss in
any of these cases could result in a loss of patent protection for the product at issue, which could lead to a significant loss of sales of that product and could
materially affect future results of operations.
Like other pharmaceutical companies, we are subject to extensive regulation by government agencies in the U.S., other developed markets and multiple
emerging markets in which we operate. Criminal charges, substantial fines and/or civil penalties, limitations on our ability to conduct business in applicable
jurisdictions, corporate integrity or deferred prosecution agreements, as well as reputational harm and increased public interest in the matter could result from
government investigations in the U.S. and other jurisdictions in which we do business. In addition, in a qui tam lawsuit in which the government declines to
intervene, the relator may still pursue a suit for the recovery of civil damages and penalties on behalf of the government.
Our activities relating to the sale and marketing and the pricing of our products are subject to extensive regulation under the FFDCA, the Medicaid Drug Rebate
Program, the FCPA and other federal and state statutes, including those discussed elsewhere in this 2019 Form 10-K, as well as anti-kickback and false claims
laws, and similar laws in international jurisdictions. Like many companies in our industry, we have from time to time received inquiries and subpoenas and other
types of information demands from government authorities, and been subject to claims and other actions related to our business activities brought by
governmental authorities, as well as by consumers and private payers. In some instances, we have incurred significant expense, civil payments, fines and other
adverse consequences as a result of these claims, actions and inquiries. For example, these claims, actions and inquiries may relate to alleged failures to
accurately interpret or identify or prevent non-compliance with the laws and regulations associated with the dissemination of product information (approved and
unapproved), potentially resulting in government enforcement and damage to our reputation. This risk may be heightened by digital marketing, including social
media, mobile applications and blogger outreach.
In connection with the resolution of a U.S. government investigation concerning independent copay assistance organizations that provide financial assistance to
Medicare patients, in May 2018, we entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) with the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, which is effective for a period of five

TABLE OF CONTENTS
years. In the CIA, we agreed to implement and/or maintain certain compliance program elements to promote compliance with federal healthcare program
requirements. Breaches of the CIA could result in severe sanctions against us.
For additional information, including information regarding certain legal proceedings in which we are involved in, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements—Note 16A. Contingencies and Certain Commitments—Legal Proceedings in our 2019 Financial Report.
ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS AND PROCEEDINGS
We and certain of our subsidiaries are subject to numerous contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business relating to environmental claims and
proceedings. Amounts recorded for legal and environmental contingencies can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties
and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. While we have accrued for worldwide environmental liabilities, there is no guarantee that additional costs
will not be incurred beyond the amounts accrued. If we fail to properly manage the safety of our facilities and the environmental risks associated therewith or if
we are required to increase our accruals for contingencies for environmental claims and proceedings in the future, it could potentially have an adverse effect on
our results of operations.
RISKS RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:
PATENT PROTECTION
Our long-term success largely depends on our ability to market technologically competitive products. We rely and expect to continue to rely on a combination of
intellectual property, including patent, trademark, trade dress, copyright, trade secret and domain name protection laws, as well as confidentiality and license
agreements, to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights. If we fail to obtain and maintain adequate intellectual property protection, we may not be
able to prevent third parties from launching generic or biosimilar versions of our branded products, using our proprietary technologies or from marketing products
that are very similar or identical to ours. Our currently pending or future patent applications may not result in issued patents, or be granted on a timely basis.
Similarly, any term extensions that we seek may not be granted on a timely basis, if at all. In addition, our issued patents may not contain claims sufficiently
broad to protect us against third parties with similar technologies or products or provide us with any competitive advantage, including exclusivity in a particular
product area. The scope of our patent claims also may vary between countries, as individual countries have distinct patent laws. We may be subject to
challenges by third parties regarding our intellectual property, including, among others, claims regarding validity, enforceability, scope and effective term.
Our ability to enforce our patents also depends on the laws of individual countries and each country’s practice with respect to enforcement of intellectual property
rights, and the extent to which certain sovereigns may seek to engage in policies or practices that may weaken its intellectual property framework (e.g., laws or
regulations that promote or provide broad discretion to issue a compulsory license). In countries that provide some form of regulatory exclusivity, mechanisms
exist permitting some form of challenge to our patents by competitors or generic drug marketers prior to or immediately following the expiration of such
regulatory exclusivity, and generic companies are increasingly employing aggressive strategies, such as “at risk” launches that challenge our patent rights. Most
of the suits involve claims by generic drug manufacturers that patents covering our products, processes or dosage forms are invalid and/or do not cover the
product of the generic drug manufacturer. Independent actions have been filed alleging that our assertions of, or attempts to enforce, patent rights with respect
to certain products constitute unfair competition and/or violations of antitrust laws. Such claims may also be brought as counterclaims to actions we bring to
enforce our patents. We are also party to other patent damages suits in various jurisdictions pursuant to which generic drug manufacturers, payers, governments
or other parties are seeking damages from us for alleged delay of generic entry. We also are often involved in other proceedings, such as inter partes review,
post-grant review, re-examination or opposition proceedings, before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the European Patent Office, or other foreign
counterparts relating to our intellectual property or the intellectual property rights of others. Also, if one of our patents is found to be invalid in such proceedings,
generic or competitive products could be introduced into the market resulting in the erosion of sales of our existing products. For example, several of the patents
in our pneumococcal vaccine portfolio were challenged in inter partes review and post-grant review proceedings in the U.S. In October 2017, the Patent Trial
and Appeal Board (PTAB) refused to initiate proceedings as to two patents. In June 2018, the PTAB ruled on another patent, holding that one claim was valid
and that all other claims were invalid. The party challenging that patent has appealed the decision. In November 2019, the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB’s
ruling and requested that the PTAB redecide the challenge. In March and June 2019, an additional patent was found invalid in separate proceedings by the
PTAB. We have appealed. Challenges to other patents remain pending in jurisdictions outside the U.S. The invalidation of all of these patents in our
pneumococcal portfolio could potentially allow a competitor pneumococcal vaccine into the marketplace. Further, if we are unable to maintain our existing
license agreements or other agreements pursuant to which third parties grant us rights to intellectual property, including because such agreements expire or are
terminated, our operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Likewise, in the U.S. and other countries, we currently hold issued trademark registrations and have trademark applications pending, any of which may be the
subject of a governmental or third-party objection, which could prevent the maintenance or issuance of the trademark. As our products mature, our reliance on
our trademarks and trade dress to differentiate us from our competitors increases and as a result, if we are unable to prevent third parties from adopting,
registering or using trademarks

TABLE OF CONTENTS
and trade dress that infringe, dilute or otherwise violate our trademark rights, our business could be materially adversely affected. We actively seek to protect our
proprietary information, including our trade secrets and proprietary know-how, by requiring our employees, consultants, other advisors and other third parties to
execute proprietary information and confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of their employment, engagement or other relationship. Despite these
efforts and precautions, we may be unable to prevent a third party from copying or otherwise obtaining and using our trade secrets or our other intellectual
property without authorization, and legal remedies in some countries may not adequately compensate us for the damages caused by such unauthorized use.
Further, others may independently and lawfully develop substantially similar or identical products that circumvent our intellectual property by means of alternative
designs or processes or otherwise.
THIRD PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CLAIMS
A properly functioning intellectual property regime is essential to our business model. We are committed to respecting the valid intellectual property rights of
other companies, but the patent granting process is imperfect. Accordingly, the pursuit of valid business opportunities may require us to challenge intellectual
property rights held by other companies that we believe were improperly granted. Such challenges may include negotiation and litigation, which may not always
be successful.
Part of our business depends upon successfully identifying generic pharmaceutical product and biosimilar opportunities and launching products to take
advantage of those opportunities, which may involve litigation, associated costs and time delays, and may ultimately not be successful. These opportunities may
arise in situations where patent protection of equivalent branded products has expired, where patents have been declared invalid, or where products do not
infringe the patents of others, and in some circumstances we may take action, such as litigation, asserting that our products do not infringe patents of existing
products or that those patents are invalid or unenforceable in order to achieve a “first-to-market” or early market position for our products.
Third parties may claim that our products infringe one or more patents owned or controlled by the third party. Claims of intellectual property infringement can be
costly and time-consuming to resolve, may delay or prevent product launches, and may result in significant damages. We are involved in patent-related disputes
with third parties over our attempts to market generic pharmaceutical products and biosimilars. Once we have final regulatory approval of the related generic
pharmaceuticals products or biosimilars, we may decide to commercially market these products even though associated legal proceedings (including any
appeals) have not been resolved (i.e., “at-risk” launch). If one of our marketed products is found to infringe valid patent rights of a third party, such third party
may be awarded significant damages, or we may be prevented from further sales of that product. Such damages may be enhanced as much as three-fold in the
event that we or one of our subsidiaries, like Hospira, is found to have willfully infringed valid patent rights of a third party. Any of these adverse consequences
could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and financial condition.
RISK RELATED TO TECHNOLOGY:
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SECURITY
Significant disruptions of information technology systems or breaches of information security could adversely affect our businesses. We rely to a large extent
upon sophisticated information technology systems to operate our businesses. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts
of confidential information (including, but not limited to, personal information and intellectual property), and we deploy and operate an array of technical and
procedural controls to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. We also have outsourced significant elements of our operations
to third parties, including significant elements of our information technology infrastructure and, as a result, we are managing many independent vendor
relationships with third parties who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our information technology and
information security systems, and those of our third-party vendors with whom we contract (and the large amounts of confidential information that is present on
them), make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or
vendors, or from attacks by malicious third parties. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups and individuals with a
wide range of motives (including, but not limited to, industrial espionage) and expertise, including organized criminal groups, “hacktivists,” nation states and
others. As a global pharmaceutical company, our systems are subject to frequent attacks. Due to the nature of some of these attacks, there is a risk that they
may remain undetected for a period of time. While we have invested in the protection of data and information technology, our efforts may not prevent service
interruptions or security breaches. Any such interruption or breach of our systems could adversely affect our business operations and/or result in the loss of
critical or sensitive confidential information or intellectual property, and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us. We maintain cyber
liability insurance; however, this insurance may not be sufficient to cover the financial, legal, business or reputational losses that may result from an interruption
or breach of our systems.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
RISKS RELATED TO OUR STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS:
STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS
The success of any of our strategic acquisitions will depend, in large part, on our ability to realize anticipated benefits from combining these businesses with
Pfizer. We, for example, may fail to achieve cost savings anticipated with certain of these acquisitions, or such cost savings within the expected time frame.
Similarly, the accretive impact anticipated from certain of these acquisitions may not be realized or may be delayed. Integration of these businesses may result
in the loss of key employees, the disruption of ongoing business, including third-party relationships, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and
policies. We also may fail to generate the revenue growth for the acquired business that we expected at the time of entering into the transaction. Expected
revenue from acquired products and product candidates also may be constrained by developments outside of our control. Unsuccessful clinical trials, regulatory
hurdles and commercialization challenges may adversely impact revenue and income contribution from products and product candidates, including those
acquired in these acquisitions. Hospira, for example, has experienced manufacturing disruptions and substantial regulatory scrutiny due to quality issues.
Manufacturing problems, as well as any corrective actions and their operational implementation, could adversely impact the revenue we generate from products
acquired from Hospira and result in substantial unanticipated costs. For additional information, see the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment,
Strategy and Outlook––Our Business Development Initiatives section in our 2019 Financial Report.
PENDING COMBINATION OF UPJOHN WITH MYLAN
Pfizer, Mylan and Upjohn may be unable to satisfy the conditions or obtain the approvals required to complete the combination of Upjohn with Mylan
(the Combination), and regulatory agencies may delay or impose conditions on approval of the Combination, which may diminish the anticipated
benefits of the Combination.
The consummation of the Combination is subject to numerous conditions, including the receipt by Pfizer of an Internal Revenue Service ruling and an opinion of
its tax counsel to the effect that, among other things, certain transactions related to the Combination and certain related transactions will constitute a tax-free
“reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code, the approval of the Combination by Mylan shareholders, and other
customary conditions, certain of which are dependent upon the actions of third parties. As a result of such conditions, Pfizer cannot make any assurances that
the Combination will be consummated on the terms or timeline currently contemplated, or at all.
Completion of the Combination is also conditioned upon the receipt of certain required government consents and approvals, including certain approvals required
from regulatory agencies. While Pfizer, Mylan and Upjohn intend to pursue vigorously all required governmental approvals, the requirement to receive these
approvals prior to the consummation of the Combination could delay the completion of the Combination, possibly for a significant period of time. Any delay in the
completion of the Combination could diminish the anticipated benefits of the Combination or result in additional transaction costs, loss of revenue or other effects
associated with uncertainty about the Combination, including delaying Pfizer’s ability to capitalize on its strategy of becoming a more focused, innovative
company as well as Upjohn’s ability to optimize the execution of its growth strategies.
Pfizer may be subject to shareholder lawsuit, or other actions filed in connection with or in opposition to the Combination or any related transactions. Such
litigation could have an adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of Pfizer and could prevent or delay the consummation of the
Combination.
Pfizer has expended and will continue to expend significant management time and resources and has incurred and will continue to incur significant expenses
due to legal, advisory, printing and financial services fees related to the Combination, including costs required to obtain the required government consents or
defend or settle actions noted above. We expect to incur costs of approximately $500 million in connection with fully separating Upjohn, inclusive of $145 million
incurred in 2019. Such charges will include costs and expenses related to separation of legal entities and anticipated transaction costs. Many of these expenses
must be paid regardless of whether the Combination is consummated, and even if the expected benefits of the Combination are not achieved. Additionally, the
completion of the Combination, including for example, obtaining regulatory approvals, will require significant time and attention from Pfizer management and
may divert attention from the day-to-day operations of our business.
Even if the Combination is completed as anticipated, Pfizer may not realize some or all of the expected benefits. Furthermore, Upjohn may
experience operational challenges in integrating the Upjohn and Mylan businesses, which may also diminish the anticipated benefits of the
Combination.
Even if the Combination is completed, the anticipated operational, financial, strategic and other benefits of the Combination may not be achieved. There are
many factors that could impact the anticipated benefits from the Combination, including, among others, strategic adjustments required to reflect the nature of our
business following the Combination, any negative reaction to the Combination by our customers and business partners, and increased risks resulting from Pfizer
becoming a company that is more focused on innovative medicines. In addition, Pfizer has agreed to provide certain transition services to the combined
company, generally for an initial period of 24 months following the completion of the Combination (with certain possibilities for extension). These obligations
under the transition agreements may result in additional expenses and may divert

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pfizer’s focus and resources that would otherwise be invested into maintaining or growing Pfizer’s business. An inability to realize the full extent of the
anticipated benefits of the Combination, as well as any delays encountered in the process, could have an adverse effect on the revenues, level of expenses and
operating results of our business.
Furthermore, the Combination is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. Even if Upjohn and Mylan successfully integrate, Pfizer, Upjohn and Mylan
cannot predict with certainty if or when the anticipated synergies, growth opportunities and benefits resulting from the Combination will occur, or the extent to
which they actually will be achieved. For example, the benefits from the Combination may be offset by costs incurred in integrating the companies or by required
capital expenditures related to the combined businesses. In addition, the quantification of synergies expected to result from the Combination is based on
significant estimates and assumptions that are subjective in nature and inherently uncertain. Realization of any benefits and synergies could be affected by a
number of factors beyond Pfizer’s, Mylan’s, Upjohn’s or the combined company’s control, including, without limitation, general economic conditions, increased
operating costs, regulatory developments and the other risks described in these risk factors. The amount of synergies actually realized in the Combination, if
any, and the time periods in which any such synergies are realized, could differ materially from the synergies anticipated to be realized, regardless of whether
the two business operations are combined successfully. If the integration is unsuccessful or if the combined company is unable to realize the anticipated
synergies and other benefits of the Combination, there could be a material adverse effect on the combined company’s share price, business, financial condition
and results of operations.
CONSUMER HEALTHCARE JOINT VENTURE WITH GSK
On July 31, 2019, we completed the transaction in which we and GSK combined our respective consumer healthcare businesses into a new consumer
healthcare joint venture that operates globally under the GSK Consumer Healthcare name. Following the integration of the combined business, GSK intends to
separate the joint venture as an independent company via a demerger of its equity interest to its shareholders and a listing of the combined business on the U.K.
equity market. In February 2020, GSK announced the initiation of a two-year program to prepare for the separation of GSK into two companies, including a
standalone Consumer Healthcare company. Until the fifth anniversary of the closing of the transaction, GSK will have the sole right to decide whether and when
to initiate a separation and listing, and may also sell all or part of its stake in the joint venture in a contemporaneous initial public offering. Should a separation
and listing occur during the first five years after closing, Pfizer has the option to participate through the distribution of some or all of its equity interest in the joint
venture to its shareholders. Following a separation or listing, and subject to customary lock-up or similar restrictions, Pfizer will also have the ability to sell its
equity interest in the joint venture through the capital markets. After the fifth anniversary of the closing of the transaction, both GSK and Pfizer will have the right
to decide whether and when to initiate a separation and public listing of the joint venture. The planned separation and public listing transactions may not be
initiated or completed within the expected time periods or at all, and both the timing and success of any separation and public listing transaction, as well as the
value generated for Pfizer or its shareholders in any such transaction, will be subject to prevailing market conditions and other factors at the time of such
transaction. Although Pfizer is entitled to participate in any separation and listing transaction initiated by GSK prior to the fifth anniversary of the closing, it is not
required to do so, and any future distribution or sale of Pfizer’s equity stake in the joint venture will similarly be subject to prevailing market conditions and other
factors at the time of such transaction. Pfizer’s ability to complete any such future distribution or sale may also be impacted by the size of Pfizer’s retained equity
stake at the time. The uncertainty relating to the separation and public listing transactions, their implementation, their timing and their yet to be determined
effects on the joint venture’s business may subject us and the joint venture to risks and uncertainties that may adversely affect our business and financial results.
Moreover, although we have certain consent, board representation and other governance rights with respect to the joint venture, Pfizer is a minority owner of the
joint venture. As a result, Pfizer does not have control over the joint venture, its management or its policies and we may have business interests, strategies and
goals that differ in certain respects from those of GSK or the joint venture.
In addition, the joint venture will be subject to the risks associated with the joint venture’s consumer healthcare business, and the business, financial condition
and results of operations of the joint venture may be affected by factors that are different from or in addition to those that previously affected the business,
financial condition and results of operations of Pfizer’s historical consumer healthcare business. Many of these factors are outside of our and the joint venture’s
control, and could materially impact the business, financial condition and results of operations of the joint venture.
The success of the transaction will also depend, in part, on the joint venture’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost synergies from the transaction.
These anticipated benefits and cost savings may not be realized or may not be realized within the expected time period. The joint venture’s integration of Pfizer’s
and GSK’s historic consumer healthcare businesses may result in material unanticipated problems, costs, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses, and loss
of customer and other business relationships. Any material unanticipated issues arising from the integration process could negatively impact our stock price and
our or the joint venture’s future business and financial results.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
OTHER RISKS:
THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
Like all businesses of our size, we are exposed to both global and industry-specific economic conditions. Governments, corporations, and insurance companies,
which provide insurance benefits to patients, have implemented increases in cost-sharing and restrictions on access to medicines, potentially causing patients to
switch to generic or biosimilar products, delay treatments, skip doses or use less effective treatments. As discussed above, government financing pressures can
lead to negative pricing pressure in various markets where governments take an active role in setting prices, access criteria (e.g., through public or private health
technology assessments), or other means of cost control.
The global economic environment has not had, nor do we anticipate that it will have, a material impact on our liquidity or capital resources. Due to our significant
operating cash flows, financial assets, access to capital markets and available lines of credit and revolving credit agreements, we continue to believe that we
have, and will maintain, the ability to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. We monitor our liquidity position continuously in the face of evolving
economic conditions, but there can be no guarantee that changes in global financial markets and global economic conditions will not affect our liquidity or capital
resources or impact our ability to obtain financing in the future.
We continue to monitor credit, capital restrictions and economic situations in volatile regions and markets, especially where the ability to obtain U.S. dollars for
local currency is unpredictable and challenging. We cannot predict the likelihood of future changes in these economic conditions, or what impact they may have
on our results of operations, financial condition or business.
In addition, given that a significant portion of our business is conducted in the EU, including the U.K., the formal change in the relationship between the U.K. and
the EU caused by Brexit may pose certain implications for our research, commercial and general business operations in the U.K. and the EU, including the
approval and supply of our products. Details on how Brexit will be finally executed and the impact on the remaining EU countries will dictate how and whether
the broader EU will be impacted and what the resulting impact on our business may be. For additional information, see the Overview of Our Performance,
Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––The Global Economic Environment section in our 2019 Financial Report.
Public health epidemics or outbreaks could adversely impact our business. In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan,
Hubei Province, China. While initially the outbreak was largely concentrated in China and caused significant disruptions to its economy, it has now spread to
several other countries and infections have been reported globally. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our operations will depend on future
developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the outbreak, new information which may emerge
concerning the severity of the coronavirus and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others. In particular, the continued spread of the
coronavirus globally could adversely impact our operations, including among others, our manufacturing and supply chain, sales and marketing and clinical trial
operations and could have an adverse impact on our business and our financial results.
We also continue to monitor the global trade environment and potential trade conflicts and impediments. If trade restrictions or tariffs reduce global economic
activity, or if other factors lead to a general economic downturn, potential impacts could include declining sales; increased costs; volatility in foreign exchange
rates; a decline in the value of our financial assets and pension plan investments; required increases of our pension funding obligations; increased government
cost control efforts; delays or failures in the performance of customers, suppliers, and other third parties on whom we may depend for the performance of our
business; and the risk that our allowance for doubtful accounts may not be adequate.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND INTEREST RATE RISK
Significant portions of our revenues, costs and expenses, as well as our substantial international net assets, are exposed to changes in foreign exchange rates.
54% of our total 2019 revenues were derived from international operations, including 21% from Europe and 24% from China, Japan and the rest of Asia. As we
operate in multiple foreign currencies, including the euro, the Chinese renminbi, the Japanese yen, the Canadian dollar, the U.K. pound and approximately 100
other currencies, changes in those currencies relative to the U.S. dollar will impact our revenues and expenses. If the U.S. dollar were to weaken against
another currency, assuming all other variables remained constant, our revenues would increase, having a positive impact on earnings, and our overall expenses
would increase, having a negative impact on earnings. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar were to strengthen against another currency, assuming all other variables
remained constant, our revenues would decrease, having a negative impact on earnings, and our overall expenses would decrease, having a positive impact on
earnings. Therefore, significant changes in foreign exchange rates can impact our results and our financial guidance.
The impact of possible currency devaluations in countries experiencing high inflation rates or significant exchange fluctuations, including Venezuela and
Argentina, can impact our results and financial guidance. For additional information about our exposure to foreign currency risk, see the Item 7A. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Exchange Risk section in this 2019 Form 10-K and the Overview of Our Performance, Operating
Environment, Strategy and

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Outlook––Our Financial Guidance for 2020 and Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources sections in our 2019 Financial Report.
In addition, our interest-bearing investments and borrowings, and our pension benefit obligations, net, and our postretirement benefit obligations, net, are subject
to risk from changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These risks related to interest-bearing investments and borrowings and the measures we have
taken to help contain them are discussed in the Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Financial Risk Management section in this
2019 Form 10-K. For additional details, see the Significant Accounting Policies and Application of Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions––Benefit
Plans section and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7F. Financial Instruments: Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities and
—Note 11. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined Contribution Plans in our 2019 Financial Report, which are incorporated by reference.
From time to time, we issue variable rate debt based on LIBOR, or undertake interest rate swaps that contain a variable element based on LIBOR. The U.K.
Financial Conduct Authority announced in July 2017 that it will no longer compel banks to submit rates that are currently used to calculate LIBOR after 2021.
Various governing parties, including government agencies, are working on a benchmark transition plan for LIBOR (and other interbank offered rates globally).
We are monitoring their progress, and we will likely amend contracts to accommodate any replacement rate where it is not already provided. As a result, our
interest expense could increase and our available cash flow for general corporate requirements may be adversely affected. Additionally, uncertainty as to the
nature of a potential discontinuance, modification, alternative reference rates or other reforms may materially adversely affect the trading market for securities
linked to such benchmarks. For additional information, see the Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources—Selected Measures of Liquidity
and Capital Resources—LIBOR section in our 2019 Financial Report.
Notwithstanding our efforts to foresee and mitigate the effects of changes in external fiscal circumstances, we cannot predict with certainty changes in currency
and interest rates, inflation or other related factors affecting our businesses.
MARKET FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR EQUITY INVESTMENTS
In 2018, we adopted a new accounting standard whereby certain equity investments are measured at fair value with changes in fair value now recognized in net
income. We expect the adoption of this new accounting standard may increase the volatility of our income in future periods due to changes in the fair value of
certain equity investments. For additional information, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions—Net in our
2019 Financial Report and the Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Financial Risk Management section in this 2019 Form 10-
K.
Our pension benefit obligations and postretirement benefit obligations, net of our plan assets, are subject to volatility from changes in fair value of equity
investments and other investment risk. For additional information, see the Significant Accounting Policies and Application of Critical Accounting Estimates and
Assumptions—Benefit Plans section and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 11. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined
Contribution Plans in our 2019 Financial Report.
COST AND EXPENSE CONTROL/UNUSUAL EVENTS/FAILURE TO REALIZE THE ANTICIPATED BENEFITS OF STRATEGIC INITIATIVES AND
ACQUISITIONS
Growth in costs and expenses, changes in product, segment and geographic mix and the impact of acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings, internal
reorganizations, product withdrawals, recalls and other unusual events that could result from evolving business strategies, evaluation of asset realization and
organizational restructuring could adversely affect future results. Such risks and uncertainties include, in particular, our ability to realize the projected benefits of
(i) our cost-reduction and productivity initiatives; (ii) the reorganization of our commercial operations in 2019; (iii) any other corporate strategic initiatives; and (iv)
any acquisitions, divestitures or other initiatives, such as our agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan, creating a new global pharmaceutical company, which is
anticipated to close in mid-2020, our acquisition of Array and the formation of the new consumer healthcare joint venture with GSK.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, GOODWILL AND EQUITY-METHOD INVESTMENTS
Our consolidated balance sheet contains significant amounts of intangible assets, including goodwill. For IPR&D assets, the risk of failure is significant, and
there can be no certainty that these assets ultimately will yield successful products. The nature of the biopharmaceutical business is high-risk and requires that
we invest in a large number of projects in an effort to achieve a successful portfolio of approved products. Our ability to realize value on these significant
investments is often contingent upon, among other things, regulatory approvals and market acceptance. As such, we expect that many of these IPR&D assets
will become impaired and be written off at some time in the future. If the associated R&D effort is abandoned, the related IPR&D assets will likely be written-off,
and we will record an impairment charge. For goodwill, all reporting units can confront events and circumstances that can lead to a goodwill impairment charge
(such as, among other things, unanticipated competition, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, a significant adverse change in legal matters or in the
business climate and/or a failure to replace the contributions of products that lose exclusivity). Any such charge may be significant. Our other intangible

TABLE OF CONTENTS
assets, including developed technology rights and brands, face similar risks for impairment and charges related to such assets may be significant as well. For
additional details, see the Significant Accounting Policies and Application of Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions section in our 2019 Financial
Report.
We also regularly review our equity-method investments for impairment. An impairment charge may result from the occurrence of unexpected adverse events or
management decisions that impact our estimates of expected cash flows to be generated from these investments. We may recognize impairment charges as a
result of a weak economic environment, events related to particular customers or asset types, challenging market conditions or decisions by management.
TERRORIST ACTIVITY
Our future results could be adversely affected by changes in business, political and economic conditions, including the cost and availability of insurance, due to
the threat of terrorist activity in the U.S. and other parts of the world and related U.S. military action overseas.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2019, we had 453 owned and leased properties, amounting to approximately 47 million square feet.
In 2019, we reduced the number of properties in our portfolio by 45 sites and 6 million square feet, which reflects the divestment of properties in connection with
the formation of the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture and the addition of properties in connection with the acquisition of Array.
Pfizer continues to own and lease space around the world for sales and marketing, customer service, regulatory compliance, R&D, manufacturing and
distribution, and administrative support functions. In many locations, business lines and operations are co-located to achieve synergy and operational
efficiencies.
Pfizer’s corporate headquarters are in New York City and Pfizer’s properties extend internationally to approximately 90 countries.
In April 2018, we entered an agreement to lease space at the Spiral, an office building in the Hudson Yards neighborhood of New York City. We will relocate our
global headquarters to this property with occupancy expected beginning in 2022. In July 2018, we completed the sale of our current headquarters in New York
City. We remain in a lease-back arrangement with the buyer while we complete our relocation. We continue to advance our global workplace strategy to provide
workplaces that enable collaboration and foster innovation.
We have numerous facilities across the world to support our R&D organizations, with a heavy concentration in North America. In 2019, we operationalized the
new R&D facilities in St. Louis, Missouri and Andover, Massachusetts. We also purchased an R&D property in Durham, North Carolina in 2019 and expect to
renovate and fit out the space over the next several years.
Our PGS division is headquartered in various locations, with leadership teams primarily in New York City, New York and in Peapack, New Jersey. As of
December 31, 2019, PGS had responsibility for 42 plants around the world, which manufacture products for our commercial divisions. Locations with major
manufacturing facilities include Belgium, China, Germany, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Singapore and the U.S. Our PGS division’s plant network strategy is
expected to result in the exit of two of these sites over the next several years. PGS also operates multiple distribution facilities around the world. In 2019, seven
manufacturing plants transferred from PGS’s responsibility to Upjohn’s responsibility, and an additional two plants are expected to be fully migrated from PGS’s
responsibility to Upjohn’s responsibility over the next several years.
In general, we believe that our properties are well-maintained, adequate and suitable for their current requirements and for our operations in the foreseeable
future. See the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 9. Property, Plant and Equipment in our 2019 Financial Report, which provides amounts
invested in land, buildings and equipment and which is incorporated by reference.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Certain legal proceedings in which we are involved are discussed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 16A. Contingencies and Certain
Commitments—Legal Proceedings in our 2019 Financial Report, which is incorporated by reference.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The executive officers of the Company are set forth in this table. Each holds the office or offices indicated until his or her successor is chosen and qualified at the
regular meeting of the Board of Directors to be held on the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or
removal. Each of the executive officers is a member of the Pfizer Executive Leadership Team.
Name Age Position

Albert Bourla 58 Chairman of the Board since January 2020 and Chief Executive Officer since January 2019. Chief Operating
Officer from January 2018 until December 2018; Group President, Pfizer Innovative Health from June 2016
until December 2017; Group President, Global Innovative Pharma Business (responsible for Vaccines,
Oncology and Consumer Healthcare since 2014) from February 2016 until June 2016. President and General
Manager of Established Products Business Unit from December 2010 until December 2013. Our Director since
February 2018. Board member of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). Board
member of the Pfizer Foundation, which promotes access to quality healthcare. Member of the Board of
Directors of the Partnership for New York City and Catalyst, a global non-profit organization accelerating
progress for the advancement of women into leadership.

Frank A. D’Amelio 62 Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Business Operations and Global Supply since November
2018. Executive Vice President, Business Operations and Chief Financial Officer from December 2010 until
October 2018. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from September 2007 until December 2010.
Director of Zoetis Inc. and Humana Inc. and Chair of the Humana Inc. Board of Directors’ Audit Committee.
Director of the Independent College Fund of New Jersey.

Mikael Dolsten 61 Chief Scientific Officer, President, Worldwide Research, Development and Medical since January 2019.
President of Worldwide Research and Development from December 2010 until December 2018. Senior Vice
President; President of Worldwide Research and Development from May 2010 until December 2010. Senior
Vice President; President of Pfizer BioTherapeutics Research & Development Group from October 2009 until
May 2010. He was Senior Vice President of Wyeth and President, Wyeth Research from June 2008 until
October 2009. Director of Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. Chairman of the Translational Advisory Board of Apple
Tree Partners from 2016 to 2017.

Lidia Fonseca 51 Chief Digital and Technology Officer, Executive Vice President since January 2019. Chief Information Officer
and Senior Vice President of Quest Diagnostics Incorporated from 2014 to 2018. Senior Vice President of
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings from 2008 until March 2013. Director of Tegna, Inc.

Angela Hwang 54 Group President, Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals Group since January 2019. Group President, Pfizer Essential
Health from January 2018 until December 2018. Global President, Pfizer Inflammation and Immunology from
January 2016 until December 2017. Regional Head, U.S. Vaccines from January 2014 until December 2015.
Vice President, Emerging Markets for the Primary Care business from September 2011 until December 2013.
Vice President, U.S. Brands business within Essential Health from October 2009 until August 2011.

Rady A. Johnson 58 Chief Compliance, Quality and Risk Officer, Executive Vice President since January 2019. Executive Vice
President, Chief Compliance and Risk Officer from December 2013 until December 2018. Senior Vice
President and Associate General Counsel from October 2006 until December 2013.

Douglas M. Lankler 54 General Counsel, Executive Vice President since December 2013. Corporate Secretary from January 2014
until February 2014. Executive Vice President, Chief Compliance and Risk Officer from February 2011 until
December 2013. Executive Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer from December 2010 until February 2011.
Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer from January 2010 until December 2010. Senior Vice
President, Deputy General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer from August 2009 until January 2010.


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Name Age Position

A. Rod MacKenzie 60 Chief Development Officer, Executive Vice President since June 2016. Senior Vice President, Chief
Development Officer from March 2016 until June 2016. Group Senior Vice President and Head, Pharma
Therapeutics Research and Development from 2010 until March 2016. Dr. MacKenzie represents Pfizer as a
member of the Board of Directors of ViiV Healthcare Limited, TransCelerate Biopharma Inc. and the National
Health Council.

Dawn Rogers 55 Chief Human Resources Officer, Executive Vice President since January 2019. Executive Vice President,
Worldwide Human Resources from June 2018 until December 2018. Senior Vice President, Human Resources
for the Chief Operating Officer from November 2017 until May 2018. Senior Vice President of Human
Resources for Pfizer Essential Health, Global Product Development, and the Legal and Compliance Divisions
from 2016 until November 2017. Senior Vice President of Human Resources for the Global Innovative Pharma
Business from 2013 until 2016. Senior Vice President of Human Resources for the Primary Care Business Unit
from 2011 until 2013. Senior Vice President of Human Resources for Worldwide Research and Development
from 2008 until 2011.

Sally Susman 58 Chief Corporate Affairs Officer, Executive Vice President since January 2019. Executive Vice President,
Corporate Affairs (formerly Policy, External Affairs and Communications) from December 2010 until December
2018. Senior Vice President, Policy, External Affairs and Communications from December 2009 until December
2010. Director of WPP plc.

John D. Young 55 Chief Business Officer, Group President since January 2019. Group President, Pfizer Innovative Health from
January 2018 until December 2018. Group President, Pfizer Essential Health from June 2016 until December
2017; Group President, Global Established Pharma Business from January 2014 until June 2016. President
and General Manager, Pfizer Primary Care from June 2012 until December 2013. Primary Care Business Unit’s
Regional President for Europe and Canada from 2009 until June 2012. Director of Johnson Controls
International plc. Mr. Young represents Pfizer as a member of the Board of Directors of the GSK Consumer
Healthcare joint venture.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
The principal market for our common stock is the NYSE. Our common stock currently trades on the NYSE under the symbol “PFE”. As of February 25, 2020,
there were 142,524 holders of record of our common stock. Additional information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the Selected Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited) and Peer Group Performance Graph sections in our 2019 Financial Report.
The following table provides certain information with respect to our purchases of shares of the Company’s common stock during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2019:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities(a)
Approximate Dollar Value

Total Number of of Shares
Total Number Average Price Shares Purchased as that May Yet Be
of Shares Paid per Part of Publicly Purchased
Period Purchased(b) Share(b) Announced Plan Under the Plan(a)
September 30, 2019 through October 27, 2019 32,848 $ 36.06 — $ 5,292,881,709
October 28, 2019 through November 30, 2019 13,399 $ 37.50 — $ 5,292,881,709
December 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 67,767 $ 38.86 — $ 5,292,881,709
Total 114,014 $ 37.89 —
(a)
For additional information, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 12. Equity in our 2019 Financial Report, which is incorporated by reference.
(b)
These columns represent (i) 108,367 shares of common stock surrendered to the Company to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of awards
under our long-term incentive programs and (ii) the open market purchase by the trustee of 5,647 shares of common stock in connection with the reinvestment of dividends
paid on common stock held in trust for employees who were granted performance share awards and who deferred receipt of such awards.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading Financial Summary in our 2019 Financial Report.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading Financial Review in our 2019 Financial Report.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Financial Risk Management
The objective of our financial risk management program is to minimize the impact of foreign exchange rate movements and interest rate movements on our
earnings. We manage these financial exposures through operational means and through the use of third-party instruments. These practices may change as
economic conditions change.
Foreign Exchange Risk
We operate globally and, as such, we are subject to foreign exchange risk in our commercial operations, as well as in our financial assets (investments) and
liabilities (borrowings). Our net investments in foreign subsidiaries are also subject to currency risk.
On the commercial side, a significant portion of our revenues and earnings is exposed to changes in foreign exchange rates. See the Overview of Our
Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook—The Global Economic Environment section in our 2019 Financial Report for the key currencies in
which we operate. We seek to manage our foreign exchange risk, in part, through operational means, including managing same-currency revenues in relation to
same-currency costs and same-currency assets in relation to same-currency liabilities. Where foreign exchange risk cannot be mitigated via operational means,
we may use foreign currency forward-exchange contracts and/or foreign currency swaps to manage that risk.
With respect to our financial assets and liabilities, our primary foreign exchange exposure arises predominantly from short-term and long-term intercompany
receivables and payables, and, to a lesser extent, from short-term and long-term investments and debt, where the assets and/or liabilities are denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency of the business entity.
We also hedge some forecasted intercompany sales denominated in euro, Japanese yen, Chinese renminbi, U.K. pound, Canadian dollar, and Australian dollar
to protect against longer-term movements.
In addition, under certain market conditions, we may seek to protect against possible declines in the reported net investments of our foreign business entities. In
these cases, we may use foreign currency swaps, foreign currency forward-exchange contracts and/or foreign currency debt.
For details about these and other financial instruments, including fair valuation methodologies, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7A.
Financial Instruments: Fair Value Measurements in our 2019 Financial Report.
The fair values of our financial instrument holdings are analyzed at year-end to determine their sensitivity to foreign exchange rate changes. In this sensitivity
analysis, holding all other assumptions constant and assuming that a change in one currency’s rate relative to the U.S. dollar would not have any effect on
another currency’s rates relative to the U.S. dollar, if the dollar were to appreciate against all other currencies by 10%, as of December 31, 2019, the expected
adverse impact on our net income would not be significant.
Interest Rate Risk
We are subject to interest rate risk on our investments and on our borrowings. We manage interest rate risk in the aggregate, while focusing on Pfizer’s
immediate and intermediate liquidity needs.
With respect to our investments, we strive to maintain a predominantly floating-rate basis position, but our strategy may change based on prevailing market
conditions. Our floating-rate assets are subject to the risk that short-term interest rates may fall and, as a result, the investments would generate less interest
income. Fixed-rate investments provide a known amount of interest income regardless of a change in interest rates. We sometimes use interest rate swaps in
our financial investment portfolio.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
We borrow primarily on a long-term, fixed-rate basis. From time to time, depending on market conditions, we will change the profile of our outstanding debt by
entering into derivative financial instruments like interest rate swaps.
For details about these and other financial instruments, including fair valuation methodologies, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7A.
Financial Instruments: Fair Value Measurements in our 2019 Financial Report.
The fair values of our financial instrument holdings are analyzed at year-end to determine their sensitivity to interest rate changes. In this sensitivity analysis,
holding all other assumptions constant and assuming a parallel shift in the interest rate curve for all maturities and for all instruments, if there were a one
hundred basis point increase in interest rates as of December 31, 2019, the expected adverse impact on our net income would not be significant.
Equity Price Risk
We hold equity securities with readily determinable fair values in life science companies as a result of certain business development transactions. While we are
holding such securities, we are subject to equity price risk, and this may increase the volatility of our income in future periods due to changes in the fair value of
equity investments. From time to time, we will sell such equity securities based on our business considerations, which may include limiting our price risk.
Our equity securities with readily determinable fair values are analyzed at year-end to determine their sensitivity to equity price rate changes. In this sensitivity
analysis, the expected adverse impact on our net income would not be significant.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in our 2019 Financial Report
and from the consolidated financial statements, related notes and supplementary data in our 2019 Financial Report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls
As of the end of the period covered by this 2019 Form 10-K, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to material information required to be disclosed in our
periodic reports filed with the SEC.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange
Act), and the related report of our independent registered public accounting firm, are included in our 2019 Financial Report under the headings Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,
respectively, and are incorporated by reference.
Changes in Internal Controls
During our most recent fiscal quarter, there has not been any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information about our Directors is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading Item 1—Election of Directors in our 2020 Proxy Statement.
Information about the Pfizer Policies on Business Conduct governing our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer, and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors, is incorporated by reference from the discussions
under the headings Governance—Pfizer Policies on Business Conduct and —Code of Conduct for Directors in our 2020 Proxy Statement. Information regarding
the procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the
headings Item 1—Election of Directors—Criteria for Board Membership and Submitting Proxy Proposals and Director Nominations for the 2021 Annual Meeting
in our 2020 Proxy Statement. Information about our Audit Committee, including the members of the Committee, and our Audit Committee financial experts, is
incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading Governance—Board Information—Board and Committee Information—Board Committees—
The Audit Committee in our 2020 Proxy Statement. The balance of the information required by this item is contained in the discussion entitled Information about
Our Executive Officers in Part I of this 2019 Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information about Director and executive compensation is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the headings Non-Employee Director
Compensation; Executive Compensation; and Governance—Board Information—Board and Committee Information—Board Committees—The Compensation
Committee—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in our 2020 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the headings Executive Compensation—Compensation Tables—Equity
Compensation Plan Information and Securities Ownership in our 2020 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information about certain relationships and transactions with related parties is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the headings Related Person
Transactions and Indemnification—Transactions with Related Persons in our 2020 Proxy Statement. Information about director independence is incorporated by
reference from the discussion under the heading Governance—Other Governance Practices and Policies—Director Independence in our 2020 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information about the fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm in 2019 and 2018 is incorporated by
reference from the discussion under the heading Item 2—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Audit and Non-Audit Fees
in our 2020 Proxy Statement. Our Audit Committee’s policy on pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services of our independent registered public
accounting firm is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading Item 2—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm—Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in
our 2020 Proxy Statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
15(a)(1) Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statements, related notes, report of independent registered public accounting firm and
supplementary data from our 2019 Financial Report are incorporated by reference into Item 8 of Part II of this 2019 Form 10-K:
• Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements
• Consolidated Statements of Income
• Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
• Consolidated Balance Sheets
• Consolidated Statements of Equity
• Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
• Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
• Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules. Schedules are omitted because they are not required or because the information is provided elsewhere in the
financial statements. The financial statements of unconsolidated subsidiaries are omitted because, considered in the aggregate, they would not constitute a
significant subsidiary.
15(a)(3) Exhibits. These exhibits are available upon request. Requests should be directed to our Corporate Secretary, Pfizer Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New
York, New York 10017. The exhibit numbers preceded by an asterisk (*) indicate exhibits filed with this 2019 Form 10-K. All other exhibit numbers indicate
exhibits filed by incorporation by reference. Exhibit numbers 10.1 through 10.38 are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

2.1 Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 19, 2018, by and among Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and GlaxoSmithKline
Consumer Healthcare Holdings Limited is incorporated by reference from our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).
(Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the registrant hereby agrees to supplementally furnish to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request any omitted schedule or exhibit to the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement.)

2.2 Business Combination Agreement, dated July 29, 2019, by and among Pfizer Inc., Upjohn Inc., Utah Acquisition Sub Inc., Mylan N.V., Mylan
I B.V. and Mylan II B.V. is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2019 (File No. 001-03619).
(Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the registrant hereby agrees to supplementally furnish to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request any omitted schedule or exhibit to the Business Combination Agreement.)

2.3 Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2019, by and between Pfizer Inc. and Upjohn Inc. is incorporated by reference
from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2019 (File No. 001-03619). (Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the
registrant hereby agrees to supplementally furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request any omitted schedule or
exhibit to the Separation and Distribution Agreement.)

*2.4 Amendment No. 1 to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2020, by and between Pfizer Inc. and Upjohn Inc.

3.1 Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated April 12, 2004, is incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 28, 2004 (File No. 001-03619).

3.2 Amendment dated May 1, 2006 to Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated April 12, 2004, is incorporated by reference from our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 2, 2006 (File No. 001-03619).

3.3 Our By-laws, as amended December 18, 2017, are incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21,
2017 (File No. 001-03619).

4.1 Indenture, dated as of January 30, 2001, between us and The Chase Manhattan Bank, is incorporated by reference from our Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2001 (File No. 001-03619).

4.2 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 24, 2009, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon (successor to JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. (formerly JPMorgan Chase Bank, formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank)), as trustee, to Indenture dated as of January 30, 2001,
is incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2009 (File No. 001-03619).


TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.3 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 2, 2009, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon (successor to JPMorgan Chase
is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2009 (File No. 001-03619).

4.4 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 3, 2013, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon (successor to JPMorgan Chase
is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2013 (File No. 001-03619).

4.5 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 15, 2014, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon (successor to JPMorgan Chase
is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K report filed on May 15, 2014 (File No. 001-03619).

4.6 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 5, 2015, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon (successor to JPMorgan Chase
is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K report filed on October 6, 2015 (File No. 001-03619).

4.7 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 3, 2016, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York
(successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly JPMorgan Chase Bank, formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association)))),
as trustee, to Indenture dated as of January 30, 2001, is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K report filed on June
3, 2016 (File No. 001-03619).

4.8 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2016, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of
New York (successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly JPMorgan Chase Bank, formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank (National
Association)))), as trustee, to Indenture dated as of January 30, 2001, is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K
report filed on November 21, 2016 (File No. 001-03619).

4.9 Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 17, 2017, among us, The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York
(successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly JPMorgan Chase Bank, formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank (successor to the Chase
Manhattan Bank (National Association)))), as trustee, and The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as paying agent, to Indenture
dated as of January 30, 2001, is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K report filed on March 17, 2017 (File No.
001-03619).

4.10 Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 6, 2017, among us, The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York
as trustee, and The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as paying agent and calculation agent, to Indenture dated as of January 30,
2001, is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K report filed on March 6, 2017 (File No. 001-03619).

4.11 Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 19, 2017, among us, The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York
as trustee, and The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as paying agent, to Indenture dated as of January 30, 2001, is incorporated
by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K report filed on December 19, 2017 (File No. 001-03619).

4.12 Indenture, dated as of April 10, 1992, between Wyeth (formerly American Home Products Corporation) and The Bank of New York Mellon
(as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), as trustee, is incorporated by reference from Wyeth’s Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File No. 33-57339), filed on January 18, 1995.

4.13 Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 13, 1992, between Wyeth and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A.), as trustee, is incorporated by reference from Wyeth’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-57339), filed on
January 18, 1995.

4.14 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 16, 2003, between Wyeth and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), as trustee, is incorporated by reference from Wyeth’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-
01225).
4.15 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 14, 2005, between Wyeth and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), as trustee, is incorporated by reference from Wyeth’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15,
2005 (File No. 001-01225).

4.16 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 27, 2007, between Wyeth and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), as trustee, is incorporated by reference from Wyeth’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2007
(File No. 001-01225).

4.17 Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2009, between Wyeth, us and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to
JPMorgan Chase Bank, formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, to Indenture dated as of April 10, 1992 (as amended on October
13, 1992), is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2009 (File No. 001-03619).

4.18 Indenture, dated as of September 7, 2018, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, is incorporated by reference from our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2018 (File No. 001-03619).


TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.19 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 7, 2018, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, is incorporated by
reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2018 (File No. 001-03619).

4.20 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 11, 2019, between us and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, is incorporated by
reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2019 (File No. 001-03619).

*4.21 Description of Pfizer’s Securities.

4.22 Except as set forth in Exhibits 4.1-21 above, the instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the Company and
its subsidiaries have been omitted.1

10.1 2001 Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (File No.
001-03619).

10.2 Pfizer Inc. 2004 Stock Plan, as Amended and Restated is incorporated by reference from our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
001-03619).

10.3 Pfizer Inc. 2014 Stock Plan is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (File No.
001-03619).

10.4 Form of Acknowledgment and Consent and Summary of Key Terms for Stock Option Grants, RSUs and TSRUs is incorporated by reference
from our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.5 Form of Executive Grant Letter is incorporated by reference from our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.6 Pfizer Consolidated Supplemental Pension Plan for United States and Puerto Rico Employees is incorporated by reference from our 2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.7 Amendment No. 1 to the Pfizer Consolidated Supplemental Pension Plan for United States and Puerto Rico Employees is incorporated by
reference from our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.8 Pfizer Supplemental Savings Plan is incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2016
(File No. 001-03619).

10.9 Amendment No. 1 to the Pfizer Supplemental Savings Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2016), is incorporated by reference
from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2017 (File No. 001-03619).

10.10 Amendment No. 2 to the Pfizer Supplemental Savings Plan is incorporated by reference from our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File
No. 001-03619).

10.11 Amendment No. 3 to the Pfizer Supplemental Savings Plan is incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2018 (File No. 001-03619).

No. 001-03619).

No. 001-03619).

10.14 Amendment No. 6 to the Pfizer Supplemental Savings Plan is incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2019 (File No. 001-03619).

*10.15 Amendment No. 7 to the Pfizer Supplemental Savings Plan.

10.16 Pfizer Inc. Global Performance Plan is incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1,
2017 (File No. 001-03619).

10.17 Executive Annual Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference from our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.18 Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan is incorporated by reference from our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
001-03619).

10.19 Amendment to Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, dated June 20, 2013, is incorporated by reference from our 2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.20 Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, dated April 27, 2016, is incorporated by reference from our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2016 (File No. 001-03619).

10.21 Wyeth 2005 (409A) Deferred Compensation Plan (frozen as of January 2012), together with all material Amendments, is incorporated by
reference from our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

1
We agree to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument with respect to issuances of long-term debt of the Company and
its subsidiaries.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
10.22 Amended and Restated Wyeth Supplemental Employee Savings Plan (effective as of January 1, 2005 and frozen as of January 2012),
together with all material Amendments is incorporated by reference from our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.23 Amendment to Amended and Restated Wyeth Supplemental Employee Savings Plan, dated June 20, 2013, is incorporated by reference
from our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.24 The form of Indemnification Agreement with each of our non-employee Directors is incorporated by reference from our 1996 Annual Report
on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.25 The form of Indemnification Agreement with each of the Named Executive Officers identified in our Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated by reference from our 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.26 Letter to Frank A. D’Amelio regarding replacement pension benefit dated August 22, 2007 is incorporated by reference from our Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2007 (File No. 001-03619).

10.27 Pfizer Inc. Executive Severance Plan is incorporated by referenced from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2009 (File
No. 001-03619).

10.28 Amendment No. 1 to the Pfizer Inc. Executive Severance Plan is incorporated by reference from our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File
No. 001-03619).

*10.29 Amendment No. 2 to the Pfizer Inc. Executive Severance Plan.

10.30 Annual Retainer Unit Award Plan (for Non-Employee Directors) (frozen as of March 1, 2006) as amended, is incorporated by reference from
our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.31 Nonfunded Deferred Compensation and Unit Award Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended, is incorporated by reference from our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2014 (File No. 001-03619).

10.32 Form of Special Award Letter Agreement is incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2009 (File
No. 001-03619).

10.33 Offer Letter to G. Mikael Dolsten, dated April 6, 2009, is incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended April 3, 2011 (File No. 001-03619).

10.34 Form of Special Performance-Based Incentive Award Letter is incorporated by reference from our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File
No. 001-03619).

10.35 Form of Special Performance-Based Incentive Grant Letter is incorporated by reference from our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File
No. 001-03619).

10.36 Pfizer Inc. 2019 Stock Plan is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (File No.
001-03619).
10.37 Time Sharing Agreement, dated December 17, 2018, by and between Pfizer Inc. and Ian C. Read is incorporated by reference from our
2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-03619).

10.38 Consulting Agreement, dated December 13, 2019, between Ian C. Read and Pfizer Inc. is incorporated by reference from our Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2019 (File No. 001-03619).

*13 Portions of the 2019 Financial Report, which, except for those sections incorporated by reference, are furnished solely for the information of
the SEC and are not to be deemed “filed.”

*21 Subsidiaries of the Company.

*23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

*24 Power of Attorney (included as part of signature page).

*31.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*31.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.

*32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.

Exhibit 101:
*101.INS XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within
the Inline XBRL document.

*101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

*101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

TABLE OF CONTENTS

*101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

*101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

*101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are
embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
A Form 10-K summary is provided at the beginning of this 2019 Form 10-K, with hyperlinked cross-references. This allows users to easily locate the
corresponding items in this 2019 Form 10-K, where the disclosure is fully presented. The summary does not include certain Part III information that is
incorporated by reference from our 2020 Proxy Statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SIGNATURES
Under the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report was signed on behalf of the Registrant by the
authorized person named below.
Pfizer Inc.

Dated: February 27, 2020 By: /S/ MARGARET M. MADDEN
Margaret M. Madden
Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary
Chief Governance Counsel
We, the undersigned directors and officers of Pfizer Inc., hereby severally constitute Douglas M. Lankler and Margaret M. Madden, and each of them singly, our
true and lawful attorneys with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, in our names in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Under the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report was signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities
and on the date indicated.
Signature Title Date

/S/ ALBERT BOURLA Chairman and Chief Executive Officer February 25, 2020
Albert Bourla (Principal Executive Officer)

/S/ FRANK A. D’AMELIO Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Business Operations and Global
Frank A. D’Amelio Supply (Principal Financial Officer) February 25, 2020

/S/ LORETTA V. CANGIALOSI Senior Vice President—Controller

Loretta V. Cangialosi (Principal Accounting Officer) February 25, 2020

/S/ RONALD E. BLAYLOCK Director
Ronald E. Blaylock February 25, 2020

/S/ W. DON CORNWELL Director
W. Don Cornwell February 25, 2020

/S/ JOSEPH J. ECHEVARRIA Director
Joseph J. Echevarria February 25, 2020

/S/ SCOTT GOTTLIEB Director
Scott Gottlieb February 25, 2020

/S/ HELEN H. HOBBS Director
Helen H. Hobbs February 25, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Signature Title Date

/S/ JAMES M. KILTS Director
James M. Kilts February 25, 2020

/S/ DAN R. LITTMAN Director
Dan R. Littman February 25, 2020

/S/ SHANTANU NARAYEN Director
Shantanu Narayen February 25, 2020

/S/ SUZANNE NORA JOHNSON Director
Suzanne Nora Johnson February 25, 2020

/S/ JAMES C. SMITH Director
James C. Smith February 25, 2020

Exhibit 2.4
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2019 (the “Agreement”), is
made as of February 18, 2020, by and between Pfizer Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Pfizer”), and Upjohn Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
Subsidiary of Pfizer (“Upjohn”, and together with Pfizer, the “Parties”, and each, a “Party”).
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the Agreement on July 29, 2019;
WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the Parties now wish to amend the Agreement in the manner set
forth in this Amendment; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 10.03 of the Agreement, the Parties have obtained the prior written consent of Mylan N.V., a public
company with limited liability incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands, to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each Party, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to
them in the Agreement.
SECTION 2. Amendment to the Agreement. Section 1.01 of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace the definition of the term
“Closing Working Capital Target” with the following:
“Closing Working Capital Target” means $902,000,000.
SECTION 3. Limited Amendment. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that this Amendment constitutes an instrument in writing duly
signed by the Parties under Section 10.03 of the Agreement. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in
accordance with the provisions thereof as in existence on the date hereof. From and after the date hereof, all references to the Agreement, and each reference
in the Agreement to “this Agreement,” “hereof,” “herein,” “hereby,” “hereto,” “herewith,” “hereunder” and derivative or similar words, shall refer to the Agreement
as amended hereby. Each reference in the Agreement, as amended hereby, to “the date of this Agreement” or any similar reference, shall continue to refer to
July 29, 2019.
SECTION 4. Miscellaneous. The provisions of Article VII and Article X of the Agreement shall apply to this Amendment, mutatis
mutandis, and are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
[Signature page follows]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this Amendment, all as of the day and year first above written.
PFIZER INC.
By:
/s/ DOUGLAS E. GIORDANO
Name: Douglas E. Giordano
Title: Senior Vice President, Worldwide Business Development

UPJOHN INC.
By:
/s/ BRYAN A. SUPRAN
Name: Bryan A. Supran
Title: Vice President
Exhibit 4.21
DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
As of February 27, 2020, Pfizer Inc. has common stock, the 0.000% Notes due 2020 (the 2020 notes), the 0.250% Notes due 2022 (the 2022 notes)
and the 1.000% Notes due 2027 (the 2027 notes and together with the 2020 notes and the 2022 notes, the notes) registered under Section 12 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The following descriptions of our common stock and the notes are summaries and do not purport to
be complete. The description of our common stock is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our restated certificate of incorporation, as
amended (the Certificate of Incorporation), and our bylaws, as amended (the Bylaws), and the description of the notes is subject to and qualified in
its entirety by reference to the base indenture (as defined below) and the ninth supplemental indenture (as defined below), each of which are
incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit 4.21 is a part. We encourage you to read our
Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws, the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL), the base indenture and the
ninth supplemental indenture for additional information. References in this section to “Pfizer,” “we,” “us” and “our” are to Pfizer Inc., unless otherwise
stated or the context so requires.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
Common Stock
Under the Certificate of Incorporation, we are authorized to issue up to 12 billion shares of common stock, par value $0.05 per share. The common
stock is not redeemable, does not have any conversion rights and is not subject to call. Holders of shares of common stock have no preemptive
rights to maintain their percentage of ownership in future offerings or sales of our stock. Holders of shares of common stock have one vote per share
in all elections of Directors and on all other matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. The holders of common stock are entitled to receive
dividends, if any, as and when may be declared from time to time by our Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefor. Upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of our affairs, the holders of common stock will be entitled to participate equally and ratably, in proportion to the number of
shares held, in our net assets available for distribution to holders of common stock. The shares of common stock currently outstanding are fully paid
and nonassessable. The common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “PFE.”
Preferred Stock
Under the Certificate of Incorporation, we are authorized to issue up to 27 million shares of preferred stock, without par value, of which 7,500 shares
of preferred stock have been designated Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series,
and the Board of Directors of Pfizer is expressly authorized (i) to fix the descriptions, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations, and
restrictions with respect to any series of preferred stock and (ii) to specify the number of shares of any series of preferred stock.
Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock. Our Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock is held by an Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(Preferred ESOP) Trust and provides dividends in an amount not
to exceed 6.25% of the stated value, which are paid quarterly. The stated value is $40,300 per share, and the Series A convertible perpetual
preferred stock ranks senior to our common stock and junior to all other preferred stock as to dividends and liquidation rights, unless designated as
ranking senior or on a parity with the new preferred stock. Each share is convertible, at the holder’s option, at a conversion rate initially equivalent to
2,574.8685 shares of our common stock for each preferred share converted, subject to adjustment. Each share of Series A convertible perpetual
preferred stock is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such convertible perpetual preferred stock
could be converted on the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to vote in any matter submitted to the stockholders to vote. The
holders of Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock are entitled to vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, voting together
with the holders of common stock as one class. The conversion option is indexed to our common stock and requires share settlement, and,
therefore, is reported at the fair value at the date of issuance. We may redeem the Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock at any time or
upon termination of the Preferred ESOP, at our option, in cash, in shares of common stock, or a combination of both at a price of $40,300 per share,
plus any accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date. We will also redeem the Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock in cash, or at
our election, in shares of common stock, or a combination of any shares of common stock to be valued at their fair market value, at a price of
$40,300 per share, upon certification of the holder to us of certain events. Holders of Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock have no
preemptive rights to maintain their percentage of ownership in future offerings or sales of our stock.
Anti-takeover Effects of the Certificate of Incorporation, By-laws and Delaware Law
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. Various provisions contained in the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws could delay or discourage
some transactions involving an actual or potential change in control of us or a change in our management and may limit the ability of our
stockholders to remove current management or approve transactions that our stockholders may deem to be in their best interests. Among other
things, these provisions:
• limit the right of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders to holders of at least 10% of the total number of shares of stock
entitled to vote on the matter to be brought before the proposed special meeting;
• authorize our Board of Directors to establish one or more series of preferred stock without stockholder approval;
• authorize the Board to issue dividends in the form of stock purchase or similar rights, including rights that would have the effect of
making an attempt to acquire us more costly;
• grant to the Board of Directors, and not to the stockholders, the sole power to set the number of Directors;
• require that any action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting
of stockholders and may not be effected by any consent in writing; and
• subject to the rights of the holders of any one or more series of preferred stock then outstanding, allow our Directors, and not our
stockholders, to fill vacancies on our Board of
Directors, including vacancies resulting from the removal of one or more Directors or an increase in the number of Directors constituting
the whole Board of Directors.
Delaware Law. We are a Delaware corporation and consequently are also subject to certain anti-takeover provisions of the DGCL. Subject to certain
exceptions, Section 203 of the DGCL prevents a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with any “interested
stockholder” for three years following the date that the person became an interested stockholder, unless (a) the interested stockholder attained such
status with the approval of the corporation’s board of directors, (b) upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming
an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the
transaction commenced, exclusive of shares owned by directors who are also officers and by certain employee stock plans or (c) at or subsequent to
such time, the business combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized by the affirmative vote at a stockholders’ meeting, and not
by written consent, of at least 66-2/3% of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder. A “business combination”
includes, among other things, a merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the “interested stockholder” and the sale of more than 10% of
the corporation’s assets. In general, an “interested stockholder” is any entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the corporation’s
outstanding voting stock, and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by such entity or person. Section 203 makes it more
difficult for an interested stockholder to effect various business combinations with a corporation for a three-year period. This statute could prohibit or
delay mergers or other takeover or change in control attempts not approved in advance by our Board of Directors, and, as a result, could discourage
attempts to acquire us, which could depress the market price of our common stock.
DESCRIPTION OF DEBT SECURITIES
Reference should be made to the indenture dated as of January 30, 2001, between Pfizer and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as
The Bank of New York), as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, which we refer to as
the “base indenture,” as supplemented by the ninth supplemental indenture dated as of March 6, 2017, among Pfizer Inc., The Bank of New York
Mellon, as trustee, and The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as paying agent, which we refer to as the “ninth supplemental indenture.”
When we refer to the “indenture,” we mean the base indenture, as supplemented by the ninth supplemental indenture. The following description is a
summary of selected portions of the base indenture and the ninth supplemental indenture. It does not restate the base indenture or the ninth
supplemental indenture, and those documents, not this description, define the rights of a holder of the notes.
Principal, Maturity and Interest
The 2020 notes were limited to €1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount, the 2022 notes were limited to €1,000,000,000 aggregate principal
amount and the 2027 notes were limited to €750,000,000 aggregate principal amount. The 2020 Notes will mature on March 6, 2020, the 2022 notes
will mature on March 6, 2022 and the 2027 notes will mature on March 6, 2027. We issued the notes in denominations of €100,000 and in integral
multiples of €1,000 in excess thereof.
Interest on the 2020 notes accrues at the annual rate of 0.000%, interest on the 2022 notes accrues at the annual rate of 0.250% and interest on the
2027 notes accrues at the annual rate of 1.000%. Interest on the notes is payable on March 6 of each year. Interest on the notes is computed on the
basis of the
actual number of days in the period for which interest is being calculated and the actual number of days from and including the last date on which
interest was paid on the notes to, but excluding, the next scheduled interest payment date. This payment convention is referred to as
ACTUAL/ACTUAL (ICMA) (as defined in the rulebook of the International Capital Market Association).
We make each interest payment to the holders of record of the notes at the close of business on the 15th calendar day (whether or not a business
day) preceding the relevant interest payment date.
The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, acts as our paying agent with respect to the notes. Upon notice to the trustee, we may change any
paying agent. Payments of principal, interest and premium, if any, will be made by us through the paying agent to Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V. (the
“Euroclear Operator”), as operator of the Euroclear System (“Euroclear”) and/or Clearstream Banking, Société Anonyme, Luxembourg
(“Clearstream”) as described under “—Book-Entry.”
Issuance in Euros
Principal, premium, if any, and interest payments and additional amounts, if any, in respect of the notes are payable in euros.
If the euro is unavailable to us due to the imposition of exchange controls or other circumstances beyond our control or the euro is no longer used by
the then member states of the European Monetary Union that have adopted the euro as their currency or for the settlement of transactions by public
institutions within the international banking community, then all payments in respect of the notes will be made in U.S. dollars until the euro is again
available to us or so used. In such circumstances, the amount payable on any date in euros will be converted to U.S. dollars on the basis of the most
recently available market exchange rate for euros, as determined by us in our sole discretion. Any payment in respect of the notes so made in U.S.
dollars does not constitute an event of default under the indenture or the notes. Neither the trustee nor the paying agent is responsible for obtaining
exchange rates, effecting conversions or otherwise handling redenominations.
Payment of Additional Amounts
All payments in respect of the notes are made by or on behalf of us without withholding or deduction for, or on account of, any present or future
taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of whatever nature, imposed or levied by the United States or any taxing authority thereof or
therein, unless such withholding or deduction is required by law. If such withholding or deduction is required by law, we pay to a beneficial owner
who is not a United States person such additional amounts on the notes as are necessary in order that the net payment of the principal of, and
premium or redemption price, if any, and interest on, such notes to such beneficial owner, after such withholding or deduction (including any
withholding or deduction on such additional amounts), will not be less than the amount provided in such notes to be then due and payable; provided,
however, that the foregoing obligation to pay additional amounts will not apply:
(a) to any tax, assessment or other governmental charge that would not have been imposed but for the beneficial owner, or a
fiduciary, settlor, beneficiary, member or shareholder of the beneficial owner if the beneficial owner is an estate, trust, partnership or corporation, or
a person holding a power over an estate or trust administered by a fiduciary holder, being considered as (i) having a current or former connection
with the United States (other than a connection arising solely as a result of the
ownership of such notes, the receipt of any payment or the enforcement of any rights thereunder), including being or having been a citizen or
resident of the United States, or being or having been engaged in a trade or business in the United States or having or having had a permanent
establishment in the United States; (ii) being a controlled foreign corporation related to Pfizer directly, indirectly or constructively through stock
ownership for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (iii) being an owner of a 10% or greater interest in voting stock of Pfizer within the meaning of
Section 871(h)(3) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) or any successor provision; or (iv) being a bank receiving
payments on an extension of credit made pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business;
(b) to any holder that is not the sole beneficial owner of such notes, or a portion of such notes, or that is a fiduciary, partnership or limited
liability company, but only to the extent that a beneficiary or settlor with respect to the fiduciary, a beneficial owner or a member of the partnership or
limited liability company would not have been entitled to the payment of an additional amount had the beneficiary, settlor, beneficial owner or
member received directly from Pfizer its beneficial or distributive share of the payment;
(c) to any tax, assessment or other governmental charge imposed by reason of the holder’s or beneficial owner’s past or present status as
a passive foreign investment company, a controlled foreign corporation, a foreign tax exempt organization or a personal holding company with
respect to the United States or as a corporation that accumulates earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax;
(d) to any tax, assessment or other governmental charge that would not have been imposed but for the failure of the holder or beneficial
owner of the applicable notes to comply with any applicable certification, identification or information reporting requirements concerning the
nationality, residence, identity or connection with the United States of the holder or beneficial owner of such notes, if compliance is timely requested
by Pfizer and required by statute, by regulation of the United States or any taxing authority therein or by an applicable income tax treaty to which the
United States is a party as a precondition to exemption from such tax, assessment or other governmental charge;
(e) to any tax, assessment or other governmental charge that is imposed otherwise than by withholding or deducting from the payment;
(f) to any estate, inheritance, gift, sales, transfer, wealth, capital gains or personal property tax or similar tax, assessment or other
governmental charge;
(g) to any tax, assessment or other governmental charge required to be withheld by any paying agent from any payment of principal of or
interest on any such note, if such payment can be made without such withholding by at least one other paying agent in a Member State of the
European Union;
(h) to any tax, assessment or other governmental charge that is imposed or withheld solely by reason of a change in law, regulation, or
administrative or judicial interpretation that becomes effective more than 15 days after the payment becomes due or is duly provided for, whichever
occurs later;
(i) to any tax, assessment or other governmental charge that would not have been imposed but for the presentation by the holder of any
note, where presentation is required, for payment on a date more than 30 days after the date on which payment became due and payable or the
date on which payment thereof is duly provided for, whichever occurs later, except to the extent that the holder or
beneficial owner thereof would have been entitled to additional amounts had the note been presented for payment on the last day of such 30 day
period;
(j) to any withholding or deduction that is imposed on a payment pursuant to Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code and related
Treasury regulations and pronouncements or any successor provisions thereto (that are substantively comparable and not materially more onerous
to comply with) and any regulations or official law, agreement or interpretations thereof in any jurisdiction implementing an intergovernmental
approach thereto; or
(k) in the case of any combination of the above listed items.
Except as specifically provided under this heading “—Payment of Additional Amounts,” we are not required to make any payment for any tax, duty,
assessment or governmental charge of whatever nature imposed by any government or a political subdivision or taxing authority of or in any
government or political subdivision.
As used under this heading “—Payment of Additional Amounts” and under the heading “—Optional Redemption of 2022 Notes and 2027 Notes;
Redemption for Tax Reasons; No Sinking Fund,” the term “United States” means the United States of America, any state thereof, and the District of
Columbia, and the term “United States person” means (i) any individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, (ii) a corporation, partnership or other entity created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District
of Columbia (other than a partnership that is not treated as a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes), (iii) any estate the income
of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) any trust if a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the
administration of the trust and one or more United States persons can control all substantial trust decisions, or if a valid election is in place to treat
the trust as a United States person.
Ranking
The notes are unsecured general obligations of Pfizer and rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Pfizer from
time to time outstanding.
Listing
The notes are listed on the NYSE. We have no obligation to maintain such listing, and we may delist the notes at any time.
Covenants
The indenture contains a provision that restricts our ability to consolidate with or merge into any other person or convey or transfer our properties
and assets as an entirety or substantially as an entirety to any other person. The indenture does not restrict our ability to convey or transfer our
properties and assets other than as an entirety or substantially as an entirety to any other person. See “Article VIII - Consolidation, Merger,
Conveyance or Transfer” in the base indenture. The indenture contains no other restrictive covenants, including those that would afford holders of
the notes protection in the event of a highly-leveraged transaction involving Pfizer or any of its affiliates or other events involving us that may
adversely affect our creditworthiness or the value of the notes. The indenture also does not contain any
covenants relating to total indebtedness, interest coverage, stock repurchases, recapitalizations, dividends and distributions to shareholders, current
ratios or acquisitions and divestitures. The notes do not have the benefit of covenants that relate to subsidiary guarantees, liens and sale leaseback
transactions that apply to other of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated notes.
Pfizer may, without the consent of the holders of notes of any series, issue additional notes having the same ranking and the same interest rate,
maturity and other terms as the notes of any series (except for the issue date and the public offering price). Any additional notes having such similar
terms, together with the notes of the applicable series, will constitute a single series of debt securities under the indenture. No additional notes of
any series may be issued if an event of default has occurred with respect to the notes of that series. Pfizer will not issue any additional notes
intended to form a single series with the notes of any series, unless such further notes will be fungible with all notes of the same series for U.S.
federal income tax purposes.
Optional Redemption of 2022 Notes and 2027 Notes; Redemption for Tax Reasons; No Sinking Fund
At our option, we may redeem the 2022 notes or the 2027 notes (together, the redemption notes), in whole, at any time, or in part, from time to time,
prior to February 6, 2022 (one month prior to the maturity date) with respect to the 2022 notes and December 6, 2026 (three months prior to the
maturity date) with respect to the 2027 notes. The redemption price will be equal to the greater of the following amounts:
• 100% of the principal amount of the redemption notes being redeemed on the redemption date; and
• the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the redemption notes being redeemed
on that redemption date (not including the amount, if any, of accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date)
discounted to the redemption date on an annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Comparable Government Bond Rate plus (a) 15
basis points in the case of the 2022 notes and (b) 15 basis points in the case of the 2027 notes;
plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the redemption notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date.
At any time on or after February 6, 2022 (one month prior to the maturity date) with respect to the 2022 notes and December 6, 2026 (three months
prior to the maturity date) with respect to the 2027 notes, we may redeem such series of redemption notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption price
equal to 100% of the principal amount of the redemption notes to be redeemed, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the redemption
notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, installments of interest on the applicable redemption notes that are due and payable on interest payment dates falling
on or prior to a redemption date will be payable on the interest payment date to the registered holders as of the close of business on the relevant
record date according to the applicable redemption notes and the indenture. The redemption prices for the redemption notes will be calculated on
the basis of a 365-day year or a 366-day year, as applicable, and the actual number of days elapsed.
We will mail notice of any redemption at least 10 days, but not more than 60 days, before the redemption date to each registered holder of the
redemption notes to be redeemed. Once notice of redemption is mailed, the redemption notes called for redemption will become due and payable on
the redemption date at the applicable redemption price, plus accrued and unpaid interest applicable to such redemption notes to, but excluding, the
redemption date.
“Comparable Government Bond” means, in relation to any Comparable Government Bond Rate calculation, at the discretion of an Independent
Investment Banker, a German government bond whose maturity is closest to the maturity of the redemption notes to be redeemed, or if such
independent investment bank in its discretion determines that such similar bond is not in issue, such other German government bond as such
Independent Investment Banker may, with the advice of three brokers of, and/or market makers in, German government bonds selected by us,
determine to be appropriate for determining the Comparable Government Bond Rate.
“Comparable Government Bond Rate” means the price, expressed as a percentage (rounded to three decimal places, with 0.0005 being rounded
upwards), at which the gross redemption yield on the fixed rate notes to be redeemed, if they were to be purchased at such price on the third
business day prior to the date fixed for redemption, would be equal to the gross redemption yield on such business day of the Comparable
Government Bond on the basis of the middle market price of the Comparable Government Bond prevailing at 11:00 a.m. (London time) on such
business day as determined by an Independent Investment Banker.
“Independent Investment Banker” means one of the Reference Treasury Dealers appointed by us to act as the “Independent Investment Banker.”
“Reference Treasury Dealer” means each of Barclays Bank PLC, BNP Paribas, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities plc (or their
respective affiliates that are Primary Treasury Dealers), and their respective successors; provided, however, that if any of the foregoing shall cease
to be a broker or dealer of, and/or market maker in, German government bonds (a “Primary Treasury Dealer”), we will substitute therefor another
Primary Treasury Dealer.
On and after the redemption date, interest will cease to accrue on the redemption notes or any portion of the redemption notes called for redemption
(unless we default in the payment of the redemption price and accrued and unpaid interest). On or before the redemption date, we will deposit with a
paying agent (or the trustee) money sufficient to pay the redemption price of and accrued and unpaid interest on the redemption notes to be
redeemed on that date. If fewer than all of the redemption notes of any series are to be redeemed, the redemption notes to be redeemed shall be
selected by Euroclear and/or Clearstream, in the case of redemption notes represented by a global security, or by the trustee by a method the
trustee deems to be fair and appropriate, in the case of redemption notes that are not represented by a global security.
The notes are not entitled to the benefit of a sinking fund.
Redemption for Tax Reasons
If, as a result of any change in, or amendment to, the laws (or any regulations or rulings promulgated under the laws) of the United States (or any
taxing authority thereof or therein), or any change in, or amendments to, an official position regarding the application or interpretation of such laws,
regulations or
rulings, which change or amendment is announced or becomes effective on or after February 28, 2017, we become or, based upon a written opinion
of independent tax counsel of recognized standing selected by us, will become obligated to pay additional amounts as described herein under the
heading “—Payment of Additional Amounts” with respect to any series of the notes, then we may at our option, having given not less than 10 nor
more than 60 days prior notice to holders, redeem, in whole, but not in part, the applicable series of notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest (including any additional amounts) on such notes to, but excluding, the redemption date.
Book-Entry
Global Clearance and Settlement
The notes of each series were issued in the form of one or more global notes in fully registered form, without coupons, and are deposited with, or on
behalf of, a common depositary, and registered in the name of the nominee of the common depositary, for, and in respect of interests held through,
Euroclear and Clearstream. Except as described herein, certificates will not be issued in exchange for beneficial interests in the global notes
representing the notes.
Except as set forth below, the global notes representing the notes may be transferred, in whole and not in part, only to Euroclear or Clearstream or
their respective nominees.
Beneficial interests in the global notes representing the notes are represented, and transfers of such beneficial interests are effected, through
accounts of financial institutions acting on behalf of beneficial owners as direct or indirect participants in Euroclear or Clearstream. Those beneficial
interests are in denominations of €100,000 and integral multiples of €1,000 in excess thereof. Investors may hold the notes directly through
Euroclear or Clearstream, if they are participants in such systems, or indirectly through organizations that are participants in such systems.
For so long as any series of the notes is represented by a global note deposited with, and registered in the name of a nominee for, a common
depositary for Euroclear and/or Clearstream, each person (other than Euroclear or Clearstream) who is for the time being shown in the records of
Euroclear or of Clearstream as the holder of a particular nominal amount of the notes (in which regard any certificate or other document issued by
Euroclear or Clearstream as to the nominal amount of the notes standing to the account of any person shall be conclusive and binding for all
purposes save in the case of manifest error) shall upon their receipt of a certificate or other document be treated by Pfizer and the trustee as the
holder of such nominal amount of the notes and the registered holder of the global note representing such notes shall be deemed not to be the
holder for all purposes other than with respect to the payment of principal or interest on such nominal amount of the notes, for which purpose the
registered holder of the relevant global note shall be treated by Pfizer and the trustee as the holder of such nominal amount of notes in accordance
with and subject to the terms of the global note representing the notes, and the expressions “noteholder” and “holder of notes” and related
expressions shall be construed accordingly.
The information in this section concerning Euroclear and Clearstream Banking and their book-entry systems and procedures has been obtained from
sources that we believe to be reliable. We are not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of this information.
We have been advised by Clearstream and Euroclear, respectively, as follows:

Clearstream has advised that:
• It is incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg and licensed as a bank and professional depositary. Clearstream holds securities for its
participating organizations and facilitates the clearance and settlement of securities transactions among its participants through
electronic book-entry changes in accounts of its participants, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates.
• Clearstream provides to its participants, among other things, services for safekeeping, administration, clearance and settlement of
internationally traded securities and securities lending and borrowing. Clearstream interfaces with domestic markets in several
countries.
• Clearstream has established an electronic bridge with the Euroclear Operator to facilitate the settlement of trades between the
nominees of Clearstream and Euroclear.
• As a registered bank in Luxembourg, Clearstream is subject to regulation by the Luxembourg Commission for the Supervision of the
Financial Sector.
• Clearstream customers are recognized financial institutions around the world, including underwriters, securities brokers and dealers,
banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations and may include the underwriters. Indirect access to
Clearstream is also available to others, such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through, or maintain a custodial
relationship with, a Clearstream participant, either directly or indirectly.
Distributions with respect to the notes held beneficially through Clearstream will be credited to cash accounts of Clearstream participants in
accordance with its rules and procedures.
Euroclear has advised that:
• It was created in 1968 to hold securities for its participants and to clear and settle transactions between Euroclear participants through
simultaneous electronic book-entry delivery against payment, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates and
any risk from lack of simultaneous transfers of securities and cash.
• Euroclear includes various other services, including securities lending and borrowing and interfaces with domestic markets in several
countries.
• Euroclear is operated by the Euroclear Operator. All operations are conducted by the Euroclear Operator, and all Euroclear securities
clearance accounts and Euroclear cash accounts are accounts with the Euroclear Operator.
• Securities clearance accounts and cash accounts with the Euroclear Operator are governed by the Terms and Conditions Governing
Use of Euroclear and the related operating procedures of Euroclear, and applicable Belgian law (collectively, the “Terms and
Conditions”). The Terms and Conditions govern transfers of securities and cash within Euroclear, withdrawals of securities and cash
from Euroclear, and receipts of payments with respect to securities in Euroclear. All securities in Euroclear are held on a fungible basis
without attribution of specific certificates to specific securities clearance accounts. The
Euroclear Operator acts under the Terms and Conditions only on behalf of Euroclear participants, and has no records of or relationship
with persons holding through Euroclear participants.
• Euroclear participants include banks (including central banks), securities brokers and dealers and other professional financial
intermediaries and may include the underwriters. Indirect access to Euroclear is also available to other firms that clear through or
maintain a custodial relationship with a Euroclear participant, either directly or indirectly.
Distributions with respect to the notes held beneficially through Euroclear will be credited to the cash accounts of Euroclear participants in
accordance with the Terms and Conditions.
Euroclear and Clearstream Arrangements
So long as Euroclear or Clearstream or their nominee or their common depositary is the registered holder of the global notes representing the notes,
Euroclear, Clearstream or such nominee, as the case may be, will be considered the sole owner or holder of the notes represented by such global
notes for all purposes under the indenture and the notes. Payments of principal, interest and additional amounts, if any, in respect of the global notes
representing the notes are made to Euroclear, Clearstream, such nominee or such common depositary, as the case may be, as registered holder
thereof. Neither Pfizer nor the trustee, or any affiliate of any of the above or any person by whom any of the above is controlled (as such term is
defined in the Securities Act) has any responsibility or liability for any records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial ownership
interests in the global notes representing the notes or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial ownership
interests.
Distributions of principal, premium, if any, and interest with respect to the global notes representing the notes are credited in euros to the extent
received by Euroclear or Clearstream from the paying agent to the cash accounts of Euroclear or Clearstream customers in accordance with the
relevant system’s rules and procedures.
Because Euroclear and Clearstream can only act on behalf of participants, who in turn act on behalf of indirect participants, the ability of a person
having an interest in the global notes representing the notes to pledge such interest to persons or entities which do not participate in the relevant
clearing system, or otherwise take actions in respect of such interest, may be affected by the lack of a physical certificate in respect of such interest.
Secondary Market Trading
Because the purchaser determines the place of delivery, it is important to establish at the time of trading of any notes where both the purchaser’s
and seller’s accounts are located to ensure that settlement can be made on the desired value date.
We understand that secondary market trading between Clearstream and/or Euroclear participants occurs in the ordinary way following the applicable
rules and operating procedures of Clearstream and Euroclear. Secondary market trading is settled using procedures applicable to conventional
eurobonds in global registered form.
The holder of the notes should be aware that investors are only able to make and receive deliveries, payments and other communications involving
the notes through Clearstream and Euroclear on days when those systems are open for business. Those systems may not be open for business on
days when banks, brokers and other institutions are open for business in the United States.
In addition, because of time-zone differences, there may be problems with completing transactions involving Clearstream and Euroclear on the same
business day as in the United States. U.S. investors who wish to transfer their interests in the notes, or to make or receive a payment or delivery of
the notes, on a particular day, may find that the transactions are not performed until the next business day in Luxembourg or Brussels, depending on
whether Clearstream or Euroclear is used.
Clearstream or Euroclear credits payments to the cash accounts of Clearstream customers or Euroclear participants, as applicable, in accordance
with the relevant system’s rules and procedures, to the extent received by its depositary. Clearstream or the Euroclear Operator, as the case may
be, takes any other action permitted to be taken by a holder under the indenture on behalf of a Clearstream customer or Euroclear participant only in
accordance with its relevant rules and procedures.
Clearstream and Euroclear have agreed to the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of the notes among participants of Clearstream
and Euroclear. However, they are under no obligation to perform or continue to perform those procedures, and they may discontinue those
procedures at any time.
Exchange of Global Notes for Certificated Notes
Subject to certain conditions, the notes represented by the global notes are exchangeable for certificated notes in definitive form of like tenor in
minimum denominations of €100,000 principal amount and multiples of €1,000 in excess thereof if:
• the common depositary notifies us that it is no longer willing or able to act as a depositary for such global notes or ceases to be a
clearing agency registered under the Exchange Act and we fail to appoint a successor common depositary within 90 days;
• an event of default has occurred and is continuing and the common depositary requests the issuance of certificated notes; or
• we determine not to have the notes represented by a global note.
In all cases, certificated notes delivered in exchange for any global note or beneficial interest therein will be registered in the names, and issued in
any approved denominations, requested by or on behalf of the common depositary (in accordance with its customary procedures).
Payments (including principal, premium and interest) and transfers with respect to the notes in certificated form may be executed at the office or
agency maintained for such purpose in London (initially the corporate trust office of the paying agent) or, at our option, by check mailed to the
holders thereof at the respective addresses set forth in the register of holders of the notes (maintained by the registrar), provided that all payments
(including principal, premium and interest) on the notes in certificated form, for which the holders thereof have given wire transfer instructions, are
required to be made by wire transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts specified by the holders thereof. No service charge is
made for any registration of transfer, but payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or governmental charge payable in connection with such
registration may be required.
Modification of Indenture
Under the indenture, the rights of the holders of the notes may be modified through a supplemental indenture if the holders of a majority in aggregate
principal amount of the outstanding notes of all series affected by the modification (voting as one class) consent to it. No modification of the maturity
date or principal or interest payment terms, no modification of the currency for payment, no impairment of the right to sue for the enforcement of
payment at the maturity of the debt security, no modification of any conversion rights, no modification reducing the percentage required for any such
supplemental indenture or the percentage required for the waiver of certain defaults, and no modification of the foregoing provisions or any other
provisions relating to the waiver of past defaults or the waiver of certain covenants, is effective against any holder without its consent.
Events of Default
Each of the following will constitute an Event of Default under the indenture with respect to the notes of the applicable series:
• we fail to make the principal or any premium payment on any note of such series when due;
• we fail to make any sinking fund payment for 60 days after payment was due by the terms of any note of such series;
• we fail to pay interest on any note of such series for 60 days after payment was due;
• we fail to perform any other covenant in the indenture and this failure continues for 90 days after we receive written notice of it; or
• we, or a court, take certain actions relating to the bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of our company.
A default under our other indebtedness will not be a default under the indenture for the notes, and a default under one series of the notes will not
necessarily be a default under another series. The trustee may withhold notice to the holders of notes of the applicable series of any default (except
for defaults that involve our failure to pay principal or interest) if it considers such withholding of notice to be in the best interests of the holders.
If an Event of Default with respect to outstanding notes of any series occurs and is continuing, then the trustee or the holders of at least 33% in
principal amount of outstanding notes of that series may declare, in a written notice, the principal amount (or, if any of the notes of that series are
original issue discount securities, such portion of the principal amount of such notes) plus accrued and unpaid interest on all notes of that series to
be immediately due and payable. At any time after a declaration of acceleration with respect to notes of any series has been made, the holders of a
majority in principal amount of the outstanding notes of such series may rescind and annul the acceleration if:
• the holders act before the trustee has obtained a judgment or decree for payment of the money due;
• we have paid or deposited with the trustee a sum sufficient to pay overdue interest and overdue principal other than the accelerated
interest and principal; and
• we have cured or the holders have waived all Events of Default, other than the non-payment of accelerated principal and interest with
respect to notes of that series, as provided in the indenture.
If a default in the performance or breach of the indenture shall have occurred and be continuing, the holders of not less than a majority in principal
amount of the outstanding notes of all series affected thereby, by notice to the trustee, may waive any past Event of Default or its consequences
under the indenture. However, an Event of Default cannot be waived with respect to any series of notes in the following two circumstances:
• a failure to pay the principal of, and premium, if any, or interest on any security or in the payment of any sinking fund installment; or
• a covenant or provision that cannot be modified or amended without the consent of each holder of outstanding notes of that series.
Other than its duties in case of a default, the trustee is not obligated to exercise any of its rights or powers under the indenture at the request, order
or direction of any holders, unless the holders offer the trustee reasonable indemnity. Holders of a majority in principal amount outstanding of any
series of notes may, subject to certain limitations, direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding or any remedy available to the
trustee, or exercising any power conferred upon the trustee, for such applicable series of notes.
We are required to deliver an annual officers’ certificate to the trustee, stating whether we are in default in the performance and observance of any of
the terms, provisions and conditions of the indenture, and, if we are in default, specifying all such defaults and the nature and status thereof.
Defeasance
When we use the term defeasance, we mean discharge from some or all of our obligations under the indenture. Subject to certain additional
conditions, if we irrevocably deposit with the trustee sufficient cash or government securities to pay the principal, interest, any premium and any
other sums due to the stated maturity date or a redemption date of the notes of a particular series, then at our option:
• we will be discharged from our obligations with respect to the notes of such series; or
• we will no longer be under any obligation to comply with certain restrictive covenants under the indenture, and certain events of default will
no longer apply to us.
To exercise our defeasance option, we must deliver to the trustee an officer’s certificate and an opinion of counsel, each stating that all conditions
precedent related to the defeasance have been complied with.
Exhibit 10.15
Amendment No. 7
Pfizer Supplemental Savings Plan (the “PSSP”)
(Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2016)
***
(New material underlined; deletions crossed out)
1. Section 3.3 shall be amended to read as follows:
3.3 Amendment or Suspension of Election. Except as otherwise provided in this Section
3.3, once made, a Member may not change his or her existing Excess Regular Earnings Deferrals election under this Plan during the Plan
Year until the next Annual Enrollment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Member receives a hardship withdrawal under the Qualified Plan,
incurs a Disability or obtains a distribution under Section 6.4 on account of an Unforeseeable Emergency during a year, his or her Excess
Regular Earnings Deferral election shall be cancelled.
Exhibit 10.29
Amendment No.2 to the
Pfizer Inc. Executive Severance Plan
***
(New material underlined; deletions crossed out)
Section 2.1(c) of Appendix A of the Pfizer Inc. Executive Severance Plan is amended to read as follows:
(c) His or her Official Notification Date is on or after December 21, 2018 and on or before October 25, 2019 October 23, 2020. “Official Notification Date”
means the date an eligible employee’s Notice Period begins.
1
EXHIBIT 13
Pfizer Inc. 2019 Financial Report

Financial Review
Pfizer Inc. and Subsidiary Companies

GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “Pfizer,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” in this 2019 Financial Report (defined below) refer to Pfizer Inc. and its
subsidiaries. We also have used several other terms in this 2019 Financial Report, most of which are explained or defined below:
2018 Financial Report Financial Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, which was filed as Exhibit 13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2018
2019 Financial Report This Financial Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, which was filed as Exhibit 13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2019
2019 Form 10-K Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
ABO Accumulated benefit obligation
ACA (Also referred to as U.S. Healthcare U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act
Legislation)
ACIP Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase
Allergan Allergan plc
Alliance revenues Revenues from alliance agreements under which we co-promote products discovered or developed by other companies or us
Allogene Allogene Therapeutics, Inc.
Akcea Akcea Therapeutics, Inc.
AMPA α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
Anacor Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
AOCI Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Array Array BioPharma Inc.
Astellas Astellas Pharma Inc., Astellas US LLC and Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
ATM-AVI aztreonam-avibactam
Bain Capital Bain Capital Private Equity and Bain Capital Life Sciences
Bamboo Bamboo Therapeutics, Inc.
Biogen Biogen Inc.
Biopharma Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals Group
BMS Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
BRCA BReast CAncer susceptibility gene
CAR T chimeric antigen receptor T cell
CDC U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Cellectis Cellectis S.A.
Cerevel Cerevel Therapeutics, LLC
CHMP Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use
CIAS cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia
Citibank Citibank, N.A.
CML chronic myelogenous leukemia
Developed Markets U.S., Western Europe, Japan, Canada, South Korea, Australia, Scandinavian countries, Finland and New Zealand
EC European Commission
EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor
EH Essential Health
EMA European Medicines Agency
Emerging Markets Includes, but is not limited to, the following markets: Asia (excluding Japan and South Korea), Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa, the Middle
East, Central Europe and Turkey
EPS earnings per share
EU European Union
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration
GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GIST gastrointestinal stromal tumors
GPD Global Product Development organization
GSK GlaxoSmithKline plc
GS&Co. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC
HER2- human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative
human growth hormone
hGH-CTP
HIS Hospira Infusion Systems
Hisun Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
Hisun Pfizer Hisun Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Company Limited
Hospira Hospira, Inc.
HR+ hormone receptor-positive
IBT Income before tax
ICU Medical ICU Medical, Inc.
IH Innovative Health
2019 Financial Report i

Financial Review
Ionis Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

InnoPharma InnoPharma, Inc.
IPR&D in-process research and development
IRC Internal Revenue Code
IRS U.S. Internal Revenue Service
IV intravenous
Janssen Janssen Biotech, Inc.
J&J Johnson & Johnson
JV joint venture
King King Pharmaceuticals LLC (formerly King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)
LDL low density lipoprotein
LEP Legacy Established Products
LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate
Lilly Eli Lilly and Company
LOE loss of exclusivity
MCC Merkel Cell Carcinoma
MCO Managed Care Organization
mCRC metastatic colorectal cancer
Medivation Medivation, Inc.
Merck Merck & Co., Inc.
Meridian Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.
Moody’s Moody’s Investors Service
Mylan Mylan N.V.
NAV Net asset value
NDA new drug application
NovaQuest NovaQuest Co-Investment Fund II, L.P. or NovaQuest Co-Investment Fund V, L.P., as applicable
NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer
NYSE New York Stock Exchange
OPKO OPKO Health, Inc.
OTC over-the-counter
PARP poly ADP ribose polymerase
PBM Pharmacy Benefit Manager
PBO Projected benefit obligation
Pharmacia Pharmacia Corporation
PPS Portfolio Performance Shares
PP&E Property, plant & equipment
PSAs Performance Share Awards
PsA psoriatic arthritis
PTSRUs Performance Total Shareholder Return Units
PTUs Profit Units
RA rheumatoid arthritis
RCC renal cell carcinoma
R&D research and development
ROU right of use
RPI RPI Finance Trust
RSUs Restricted Stock Units
Sandoz Sandoz, Inc., a division of Novartis AG
SEC U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Servier Les Laboratoires Servier SAS
SFJ SFJ Pharmaceuticals
Shire Shire International GmbH
SI&A Selling, informational and administrative
S&P Standard and Poor’s
SIP Sterile Injectable Pharmaceuticals
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act or TCJA Legislation commonly referred to as the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
Teuto Laboratório Teuto Brasileiro S.A.
Therachon Therachon Holding AG
TSR Total Shareholder Return
TSRUs Total Shareholder Return Units
UC ulcerative colitis
U.K. United Kingdom
U.S. United States
VBP volume-based procurement in China
ViiV ViiV Healthcare Limited
WRDM Worldwide Research, Development and Medical
ii 2019 Financial Report

Financial Review

INTRODUCTION
See the Glossary of Defined Terms at the beginning of this 2019 Financial Report for terms used throughout this Financial Review. Our Financial Review is provided to assist
readers in understanding the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company). It should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The discussion in this Financial Review contains forward-looking statements that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, such as
those discussed in Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2019 Form 10-K and in the “Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results”, “Our Operating
Environment”, "The Global Economic Environment" and “Our Strategy” sections of this Financial Review.
All trademarks in this Financial Report are the property of their respective owners.
The Financial Review is organized as follows:
● Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook

Beginning on page 2
This section provides information about the following: Financial Highlights; Our Business; Our Business Development Initiatives; Our 2019
Performance; Our Operating Environment; The Global Economic Environment; Our Strategy; and Our Financial Guidance for 2020.
● Significant Accounting Policies and Application of Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
Beginning on page 12
This section discusses those accounting policies and estimates that we consider important in understanding our consolidated financial
statements. For additional discussion of our accounting policies, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1. Basis of
Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies.
● Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income
This section includes the following sub-sections:
○ Revenues—Overview
This sub-section provides a high-level summary of our revenues, including revenue deductions.
○ Revenues by Operating Segment and Geography
This sub-section provides an overview of revenues by segment and geography.
○ Revenues––Selected Product Discussion
This sub-section provides an overview of several of our biopharmaceutical products.
○ Product Developments––Biopharmaceutical
This sub-section provides an overview of important biopharmaceutical product developments.
○ Costs and Expenses
This sub-section provides a discussion about our costs and expenses.
○ Provision/(Benefit) for Taxes on Income
This sub-section provides a discussion of items impacting our tax provisions.
○ Non-GAAP Financial Measure (Adjusted Income)
This sub-section provides a discussion of an alternative view of performance used by management.
● Analysis of Operating Segment Information
This section provides a discussion of the performance of each of our operating segments.
● Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
This section provides an analysis of our consolidated cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2019.
● Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
This section provides an analysis of selected measures of our liquidity and of our capital resources as of December 31, 2019 and December 31,
2018, as well as a discussion of our outstanding debt and other commitments that existed as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Included in the discussion of outstanding debt is a discussion of the amount of financial capacity available to help fund Pfizer’s future activities.
● New Accounting Standards
This section discusses accounting standards that we have recently adopted, as well as those that recently have been issued, but not yet
adopted.
● Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results
This section provides a description of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in
forward-looking statements presented in this Financial Review.
Certain amounts in our Financial Review may not add due to rounding. All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts.
2019 Financial Report 1

Financial Review

OVERVIEW OF OUR PERFORMANCE, OPERATING ENVIRONMENT, STRATEGY AND OUTLOOK
Financial Highlights
The following charts provide a summary of certain financial performance (in billions, except per share data):
2019 Total Revenues––$51.8 billion 2019 Net Cash Flow from Operations––$12.6 billion
A decrease of 4% compared to 2018 A decrease of 20% compared to 2018
2019 Reported Diluted EPS––$2.87 2019 Adjusted Diluted EPS (Non-GAAP)––$2.95*

An increase of 54% compared to 2018 An increase of 1% compared to 2018

* For additional information regarding Adjusted diluted EPS (which is a non-GAAP financial measure), including reconciliations of certain GAAP reported to non-GAAP adjusted information, see the “Non-GAAP
Financial Measure (Adjusted Income)” section of this Financial Review. We have revised 2018 and 2017 Adjusted diluted EPS to conform with our 2019 presentation (see the “Non-GAAP Financial Measure
(Adjusted Income)––Certain Significant Items)” section of this Financial Review).
Our Business
We apply science and our global resources to bring therapies to people that extend and significantly improve their lives through the discovery, development, manufacture and
distribution of healthcare products, including innovative medicines and vaccines. We work across developed and emerging markets to advance wellness, prevention,
treatments and cures that challenge the most feared diseases of our time. We collaborate with healthcare providers, governments and local communities to support and
expand access to reliable, affordable healthcare around the world. Our revenues are derived from the sale of our products and, to a much lesser extent, from alliance
agreements, under which we co-promote products discovered or developed by other companies or us (Alliance revenues).
At the beginning of our 2019 fiscal year, we began to manage our commercial operations through a new global structure consisting of three business segments––Pfizer
Biopharmaceuticals Group (Biopharma), Upjohn and, through July 31, 2019, Consumer Healthcare. Biopharma and Upjohn are the only reportable segments. For additional
information about this operating structure, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 17A. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information: Segment
Information. See the “Our Strategy––Organizing for Growth” section of this Financial Review below and the “Commercial Operations” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business” of our
2019 Form 10-K for additional information.
The majority of our revenues come from the manufacture and sale of biopharmaceutical products. The biopharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and highly regulated.
As a result, we face a number of industry-specific factors and challenges, which can significantly impact our results. These factors include, among others: the loss or expiration
of intellectual property rights and the expiration of co-promotion and licensing rights, the ability to replenish innovative biopharmaceutical products, healthcare legislation,
pipeline productivity, the regulatory environment, pricing and access pressures and competition. We also face challenges as a result of the global economic environment. For
additional information about these factors and challenges, see the “Our Operating Environment” and “The Global Economic Environment” sections of this Financial Review and
Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2019 Form 10-K.
The financial information included in our consolidated financial statements for our subsidiaries operating outside the U.S. is as of and for the year ended November 30 for each
year presented. Pfizer's fiscal year-end for U.S. subsidiaries is as of and for the year ended December 31 for each year presented.
2 2019 Financial Report

Financial Review
References to developed and emerging markets in this Financial Review include:

Developed markets U.S., Western Europe, Japan, Canada, South Korea, Australia, Scandinavian
countries, Finland and New Zealand

Emerging markets (include, but are not limited to) Asia (excluding Japan and South Korea), Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa,
the Middle East, Central Europe and Turkey
References to operational variances in this Financial Review pertain to period-over-period growth rates that exclude the impact of foreign exchange. The operational variances
are determined by multiplying or dividing, as appropriate, our current year U.S. dollar results by the current year average foreign exchange rates and then multiplying or
dividing, as appropriate, those amounts by the prior-year period average foreign exchange rates. Although exchange rate changes are part of our business, they are not within
our control. Exchange rate changes, however, can mask positive or negative trends in the business; therefore, we believe presenting operational variances provides useful
information to evaluate the results of our business.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted significant changes to U.S. tax law following the passage and signing of the TCJA. The TCJA is complex and significantly changes
the U.S. corporate income tax system by, among other things, reducing the U.S. Federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, transitioning U.S. international taxation from a
worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system and imposing a repatriation tax on deemed repatriated accumulated post-1986 earnings of foreign subsidiaries. For information
on the TCJA, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from Continuing Operations.
Our Business Development Initiatives

We are committed to capitalizing on growth opportunities by advancing our own pipeline and maximizing the value of our in-line products, as well as through various forms of
business development, which can include alliances, licenses, joint ventures, collaborations, equity- or debt-based investments, dispositions, mergers and acquisitions. We view
our business development activity as an enabler of our strategies, and we seek to generate earnings growth and enhance shareholder value by pursuing a disciplined, strategic
and financial approach to evaluating business development opportunities. We continue to evaluate business development transactions that have the potential to strengthen our
businesses and their capabilities, such as our acquisitions of Array, Therachon, Hospira, Medivation, Anacor and AstraZeneca’s small molecule anti-infectives business, as
well as collaborations, and alliance and license agreements with other companies. We assess our businesses, assets and scientific capabilities/portfolio as part of our regular,
ongoing portfolio review process and also continue to consider business development activities that will advance our businesses.
Our significant recent business development activities include:

• License Agreement with Akcea Therapeutics, Inc.––In October 2019, we entered into a worldwide exclusive licensing agreement for AKCEA-ANGPTL3-LRx, an
investigational antisense therapy being developed to treat patients with certain cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, with Akcea, a majority-owned affiliate of Ionis. The
transaction closed in November 2019 and we made an upfront payment of $250 million to Akcea and Ionis, which was recorded in Research and development expenses in
our fiscal fourth quarter of 2019.
• Formation of a New Consumer Healthcare Joint Venture––On July 31, 2019, we completed the transaction in which we and GSK combined our respective consumer
healthcare businesses into a new consumer healthcare joint venture that operates globally under the GSK Consumer Healthcare name. The joint venture is a category
leader in pain relief, respiratory and vitamins, minerals and supplements, and therapeutic oral health and is the largest global OTC consumer healthcare business. In
accordance with our domestic and international reporting periods, our financial results, and our Consumer Healthcare segment’s operating results, for 2019 reflect seven
months of Consumer Healthcare segment domestic operations and eight months of Consumer Healthcare segment international operations. Assets and liabilities associated
with our Consumer Healthcare business were reclassified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. See Note 1A. Basis of Presentation
and Significant Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation.
• Acquisition of Array BioPharma Inc.––On July 30, 2019, we acquired Array for $48 per share in cash. The total fair value of the consideration transferred for Array was
approximately $11.2 billion ($10.9 billion, net of cash acquired). Our financial statements for 2019 reflect the assets, liabilities, operating results and cash flows of Array,
commencing from the acquisition date.
• Agreement to Combine Upjohn with Mylan N.V.––On July 29, 2019, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan, creating a
new global pharmaceutical company, Viatris. Under the terms of the agreement, which is structured as an all-stock, Reverse Morris Trust transaction, Upjohn is expected to
be spun off or split off to Pfizer’s shareholders and, immediately thereafter, combined with Mylan. Pfizer shareholders would own 57% of the combined new company, and
former Mylan shareholders would own 43%. The transaction is expected to be tax free to Pfizer and Pfizer shareholders. The transaction is anticipated to close in mid-2020,
subject to Mylan shareholder approval and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals. We expect to incur costs of
approximately $500 million in connection with fully separating Upjohn, inclusive of $145 million incurred in 2019. Such charges will include costs and expenses related to
separation of legal entities and anticipated transaction costs.
• Acquisition of Therachon Holding AG––On July 1, 2019, we acquired all the remaining shares of Therachon for $340 million upfront, plus potential milestone payments of up
to $470 million, contingent on the achievement of key milestones in the development and commercialization of the lead asset. The total fair value of the consideration
transferred for Therachon was approximately $322 million. Our financial statements for 2019 reflect the assets, liabilities, operating results and cash flows of Therachon,
commencing from the acquisition date and, in accordance with our international reporting period, reflect five months of Therachon operations and cash flows.
• Sale of Hospira Infusion Systems Net Assets to ICU Medical, Inc.––On February 3, 2017, we completed the sale of Pfizer’s global infusion systems net assets, HIS, to ICU
Medical for up to approximately $900 million, composed of cash and contingent cash consideration, ICU Medical common stock (all of which we sold during 2018) and seller
financing. The operating results of HIS are included in our consolidated statement of income through February 2, 2017 and, therefore, our financial results for 2017 reflect
one month of HIS domestic operations and two months of HIS international operations. Our financial results for 2019 and 2018 do not reflect any contribution from HIS global
operations.
• Acquisition of AstraZeneca’s Small Molecule Anti-Infectives Business––On December 22, 2016, which fell in the first fiscal quarter of 2017 for our international operations,
we acquired the development and commercialization rights to AstraZeneca’s small molecule anti-infectives

Financial Review

business, primarily outside the U.S. for approximately $1.0 billion, composed of cash and contingent consideration. Our financial statements reflect the assets, liabilities,
operating results and cash flows of this business, commencing from the acquisition date and, in accordance with our international reporting period, for 2017 reflect
approximately 11 months of the small molecule anti-infectives business operations and cash flows acquired from AstraZeneca.
For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for
Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements.
Our 2019 Performance

Revenues––2019
Revenues decreased $1.9 billion, or 4%, to $51.8 billion in 2019 from $53.6 billion in 2018, reflecting an operational decrease of $545 million, or 1%, and an unfavorable impact
of foreign exchange of $1.4 billion, or 3%.
The following graph illustrates the components of the net decrease in revenues in 2019:
* LOE generally pertains to period-over-period revenue impacts for products across our portfolios experiencing patent expirations or loss of regulatory exclusivity in certain developed markets.
** On July 31, 2019, we completed the transaction in which we and GSK combined our respective consumer healthcare businesses into a new consumer healthcare joint venture that operates globally under the
GSK Consumer Healthcare name. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for
Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements.
The following provides an analysis of the changes in revenues in 2019:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
2018 Revenues $ 53,647
Operational growth/(decline):
Continued growth from certain key brands(a) 2,495
Higher revenues from continued growth of anti-infective products in China, driven by increased demand for Sulperazon and new launches,
the 2018 U.S. launches of immune globulin intravenous products (Panzyga and Octagam) and certain anti-infective launches in
international developed and other emerging markets, all in the Hospital products business, higher revenues primarily in the U.S. for Inlyta,
Biosimilars, and rare disease products driven by Vyndaqel/Vyndamax and volume-driven growth from Celebrex and Effexor, primarily in
Japan and China 1,067
Declines from Lyrica, primarily in the U.S., reflecting significantly lower volume associated with multi-source generic competition that began
in July 2019, other Hospital products, Enbrel internationally, Viagra and Upjohn’s authorized generic for Viagra primarily in the U.S.,
Revatio and Relpax primarily in the U.S., and Norvasc and Lipitor primarily in China and Japan (2,728)
Decline from Consumer Healthcare reflecting the July 31, 2019 completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction with GSK (1,436)
Other operational factors, net 57
Operational decline, net (545)

Operational revenues 53,102
Unfavorable impact of foreign exchange (1,352)
2019 Revenues $ 51,750
(a) Certain key brands represent Ibrance, Eliquis, Xeljanz and Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13. See the “Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––Revenues––Selected Product Discussion" section of this
Financial Review for product analysis information.
For worldwide revenues and revenues by geography, for selected products, see the discussion in the “Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––Revenues––
Selected Product Discussion” section of this Financial Review. For additional information regarding the primary indications or class of certain products, see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 17C. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information: Other Revenue Information.

Financial Review

See the “Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––Revenues––Overview” and “––Revenues by Operating Segment and Geography” sections of this Financial
Review for more information, including a discussion of key drivers of our revenue performance.
Income from Continuing Operations Before Provision/(Benefit) for Taxes on Income––2019
The following provides an analysis of the increase in Income from continuing operations before provision/benefit) for taxes on income for 2019:
Income from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for taxes on income for the year ended December 31, 2018 $ 11,885
Unfavorable change in revenues (1,897)

Favorable/(Unfavorable) changes:
Gain on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction 8,086
Lower Cost of sales (a) 1,029
Lower Selling, information and administrative expenses(b) 105
Higher Research and development expenses (c) (644)
Lower Amortization of intangible assets(d) 283
Lower Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs(e) 296
Lower certain asset impairments (f) 272
Higher royalty-related income(f) 154
Favorable change in the fair value of contingent consideration(f) 153
Non-recurrences of net realized losses on sales of investments in debt securities (f) 141
Income from insurance recoveries related to Hurricane Maria(f) 50
Higher charges for certain legal matters (f) (397)
Higher net interest expense(f) (365)
Impact of net periodic benefit costs/(credits) other than service costs(f) (352)
Non-recurrence of gain on equity investment in Cerevel (f) (343)
Lower income from collaborations, out-licensing arrangements and sales of compound/product rights (f) (320)
Higher business and legal entity alignment costs(f) (275)
Higher net losses on early retirement of debt (f) (134)
Lower net gains recognized during the period on equity securities(f) (132)
Non-recurrence of gain on the contribution of Pfizer’s CAR T assets (f) (50)
All other items, net 138
Income from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for taxes on income for the year ended December 31, 2019 $ 17,682
(a) See the “Costs and Expenses––Cost of Sales” section of this Financial Review.
(b) See the “Costs and Expenses––Selling, Informational and Administrative (SI&A) Expenses” section of this Financial Review.
(c) See the “Costs and Expenses––Research and Development (R&D) Expenses” section of this Financial Review.
(d) See the “Costs and Expenses––Amortization of Intangible Assets” section of this Financial Review.
(e) See the “Costs and Expenses––Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives” and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 3.
Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.
(f) See the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions—Net.
For information on our tax provision and effective tax rate see the “Provision/(Benefit) for Taxes on Income” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements––Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from Continuing Operations.
Our Operating Environment

Industry-Specific Challenges
Intellectual Property Rights and Collaboration/Licensing Rights

The loss, expiration or invalidation of intellectual property rights, patent litigation settlements with manufacturers and the expiration of co-promotion and licensing rights can
have a significant adverse effect on our revenues. Certain of our current products have experienced patent-based expirations or loss of regulatory exclusivity in certain markets
in the last few years, and we expect certain products to face significantly increased generic competition over the next few years. For example, Lyrica lost patent protection in
the U.S. in June 2019 and multi-source generic competition began in July 2019. Also, the basic product patent for Chantix in the U.S. will expire in November 2020. We expect
the impact of reduced revenues due to patent expiries will be significant in 2020, then moderating downward to a much lower level from 2021 through 2025.
For additional information, including the patent rights we consider most significant in relation to our business as a whole, together with the year in which the basic product
patent expires and recent and expected losses of product exclusivity, see the “Patents and Other Intellectual Property Rights” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business” of our 2019
Form 10-K.

Financial Review

We will continue to aggressively defend our patent rights whenever we deem appropriate. For a discussion of certain recent developments with respect to patent litigation, see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 16A1. Contingencies and Certain Commitments: Legal Proceedings––Patent Litigation.
Regulatory Environment/Pricing and Access––U.S. Healthcare Legislation
In March 2010, the ACA was enacted in the U.S. For additional information, see the “Government Regulation and Price Constraints” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business”, of our
2019 Form 10-K.
We recorded the following amounts as a result of the U.S. Healthcare Legislation:

Year Ended December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 2017
Reduction to Revenues, related to the Medicare “coverage gap” discount provision $ 934 $ 674 $ 450
Selling, informational and administrative expenses, related to the fee payable to the federal government (which is not
deductible for U.S. income tax purposes), based on our prior-calendar-year share relative to other companies of
branded prescription drug sales to specified government programs. 2018 reflected a favorable true-up associated with
the updated 2017 invoice received from the federal government, which reflected a lower expense than what was
previously estimated for invoiced periods. 247 184 307
Regulatory Environment/Pricing and Access––Government and Other Payer Group Pressures
The pricing of medicines by pharmaceutical manufacturers and the cost of healthcare, which includes medicines, medical services and hospital services, continues to be
important to payers, governments, patients, and other stakeholders. Governments, MCOs and other payor groups continue to seek increasing discounts on our products
through a variety of means and could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. We believe that medicines are amongst the most powerful tools for patients in
curing, treating and preventing illness and disability, and that all patients should have appropriate access to the medicines their doctors prescribe. We may consider a number
of factors when determining a medicine’s price, including, for example, its impact on patients and their disease, other available treatments, the medicine’s potential to reduce
other healthcare costs (such as hospital stays), and affordability. Within the U.S., in particular, we may also engage with patients, doctors and healthcare plans regarding their
views. We also negotiate with insurers, including PBMs and MCOs, often providing significant discounts to them from the list price. The price that patients pay in the U.S. for
the medicines their physicians prescribe is ultimately set by healthcare providers and insurers. On average, in the U.S., insurers impose a of higher out-of-pocket burden on
patients for prescription medicines than for comparably-priced medical services. We will continue to work with insurance providers, governments and others to improve access
to today’s innovative treatments. Certain governments, including the different EU member states, the U.K., China, Japan, Canada, South Korea and some other international
markets, provide healthcare at low-to-zero direct cost to consumers at the point of care and have significant power as large single payers to regulate pharmaceutical prices or
patient reimbursement levels to control costs for the government-sponsored healthcare system, particularly under recent global financing pressures. Governments may use a
variety of cost-containment measures for our pharmaceutical products, including price cuts, mandatory rebates, health technology assessments, forced localization as a
condition of market access, “international reference pricing” (i.e., the practice of a country linking its regulated medicine prices to those of other countries), quality consistency
evaluation processes and volume-based procurement. For additional information, see the “Government Regulation and Price Constrains” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business” of
our 2019 Form 10-K.
Regulatory Environment––Pipeline Productivity
The discovery and development of safe, effective new products, as well as the development of additional uses for existing products, are necessary for the continued strength of
our businesses. We have encountered increasing regulatory scrutiny of drug safety and efficacy, even as we continue to gather safety and other data on our products, before
and after the products have been launched. Our product lines must be replenished over time in order to offset revenue losses when products lose their market exclusivity, as
well as to provide for earnings growth. We devote considerable resources to R&D activities. These activities involve a high degree of risk and cost and may take many years,
and with respect to any specific R&D project, there can be no assurance that the development of any particular product candidate or new indication for an in-line product will
achieve the desired clinical endpoints and safety profile, will be approved by regulators or will be successful commercially.
During the development of a product, we conduct clinical trials to provide data on the drug’s safety and efficacy to support the evaluation of its overall benefit-risk profile for a
particular patient population. In addition, after a product has been approved and launched, we continue to monitor its safety as long as it is available to patients, and
postmarketing trials may be conducted, including trials requested by regulators and trials that we do voluntarily to gain additional medical knowledge. For the entire life of the
product, we collect safety data and report safety information to the FDA and other regulatory authorities. The FDA and regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions may evaluate
potential safety concerns related to a product or a class of products and take regulatory actions in response, such as updating a product’s labeling, restricting the use of a
product, communicating new safety information to the public, or, in rare cases, removing a product from the market.
Product Manufacturing
We periodically encounter difficulties or delays in manufacturing, including due to suspension of manufacturing or recall of a product, or legal or regulatory actions such as
warning letters. For example, Hospira’s manufacturing facility in McPherson, Kansas is currently under the FDA inspection classification of Official Action Indicated (OAI). As a
result of this classification, the FDA may refuse to grant premarket approval of applications and/or the FDA may refuse to grant export certificates related to products
manufactured at our McPherson site until the site status is upgraded, which upgrade would be based on a re-inspection by the FDA. Future FDA inspections and regulatory
activities will further assess the adequacy and sustainability of corrections implemented at the site. Communication with the FDA on the status of the McPherson site is

Financial Review

ongoing. For additional information regarding the FDA inspection of the McPherson site, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors––Product Manufacturing, Sales and Marketing
Risks” of our 2019 Form 10-K.
We have been experiencing product shortages for products from the legacy Hospira portfolio, among others, largely driven by capacity constraints, technical issues, supplier
quality concerns or unanticipated demand. We have made considerable progress remediating issues at legacy Hospira facilities manufacturing sterile injectables and have
substantially improved supply from most of these sites. Continuing product shortage interruption at these and other manufacturing facilities could negatively impact our financial
results.
Competition
Many of our prescription pharmaceutical products face competition in the form of branded or generic drugs or biosimilars that treat similar diseases or indications. For
additional information, see the “Competition” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business” of our 2019 Form 10-K.
The Global Economic Environment

In addition to the industry-specific factors discussed above, we, like other businesses of our size, are exposed to the economic cycle, which impacts our biopharmaceutical
operations globally.
• Governments, corporations, and insurance companies, which provide insurance benefits to patients, have implemented increases in cost-sharing and restrictions on access
to medicines, potentially causing patients to switch to generic or biosimilar products, delay treatments, skip doses or use less effective treatments. As discussed above,
government financing pressures can lead to negative pricing pressure in various markets where governments take an active role in setting prices, access criteria (e.g.,
through public or private health technology assessments), or other means of cost control.
• Significant portions of our revenues, costs and expenses, as well as our substantial international net assets, are exposed to changes in foreign exchange rates. We seek to
manage our foreign exchange risk in part through operational means, including managing same-currency revenues in relation to same-currency costs and same-currency
assets in relation to same-currency liabilities. Depending on market conditions, foreign exchange risk also is managed through the use of derivative financial instruments and
foreign currency debt. As we operate in multiple foreign currencies, including the euro, the Chinese renminbi, the Japanese yen, the Canadian dollar, the U.K. pound and
approximately 100 other currencies, changes in those currencies relative to the U.S. dollar will impact our revenues and expenses. If the U.S. dollar were to weaken against
another currency, assuming all other variables remained constant, our revenues would increase, having a positive impact on earnings, and our overall expenses would
increase, having a negative impact on earnings. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar were to strengthen against another currency, assuming all other variables remained constant,
our revenues would decrease, having a negative impact on earnings, and our overall expenses would decrease, having a positive impact on earnings. Therefore, significant
changes in foreign exchange rates can impact our results and our financial guidance.
The impact of possible currency devaluations in countries experiencing high inflation rates or significant exchange fluctuations, including Venezuela and Argentina, can
impact our results and financial guidance. For additional information about our exposure to foreign currency risk, see the “Our Financial Guidance for 2020” and the “Analysis
of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” sections of this Financial Review.
• In June 2016, the U.K. electorate voted in a referendum to leave the EU, which is commonly referred to as “Brexit”. In March 2017, the U.K. government formally notified the
European Council of its intention to leave the EU after it triggered Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty to begin the two-year negotiation process establishing the terms of the exit
and outlining the future relationship between the U.K. and the EU. Formal negotiations officially started in June 2017. Following the General Election in December 2019, the
new U.K. parliament approved the negotiated withdrawal agreement and the U.K. left the EU on January 31, 2020 with status quo arrangements through a transition period
scheduled to end on December 31, 2020. The transition period will be used to negotiate future trade arrangements between the U.K. and the EU. The consequences of the
U.K. leaving the EU and the terms of the future trading relationship continue to be highly uncertain, which may pose certain implications to our research, commercial and
general business operations in the U.K. and the EU, including the approval and supply of our products. At present, it is still unclear whether and to what extent the U.K. will
remain within or aligned to the EU system of medicines regulation, after the end of the transition period. However, both the U.K. and the EU have issued detailed guidance
for the industry on how medicines, medical devices and clinical trials will be separately regulated in their respective territories. Pfizer has substantially completed its
preparations for Brexit, having made the changes necessary to meet relevant regulatory requirements in the EU and the U.K., through the transition period and afterwards,
especially in the regulatory, research, manufacturing and supply chain areas. Between 2018 and 2021, we expect to spend up to approximately $60 million in one-time costs
to make these adaptations.
We generated approximately 2% of our worldwide revenues from the U.K. in 2019 including the foreign currency exchange impact from the weakening U.K. pound relative to
the U.S. dollar to date.
• Public health epidemics or outbreaks could adversely impact our business. In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province,
China. While initially the outbreak was largely concentrated in China and caused significant disruptions to its economy, it has now spread to several other countries and
infections have been reported globally. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and
cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the outbreak, new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus and the actions to
contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others. In particular, the continued spread of the coronavirus globally could adversely impact our operations, including
among others, our manufacturing and supply chain, sales and marketing and clinical trial operations and could have an adverse impact on our business and our financial
results.
Pfizer maintains a strong financial position while operating in a complex global environment. Due to our significant operating cash flows, financial assets, access to capital
markets and available lines of credit and revolving credit agreements, we continue to believe that we have, and will maintain, the ability to meet our liquidity needs for the
foreseeable future. Our long-term debt is rated high quality by both S&P and Moody’s. As market conditions change, we continue to monitor our liquidity position. We have
taken and will continue to take a conservative approach to our financial investments. Both short-term and long-term investments consist primarily of high-quality, highly liquid,
well-diversified,

Financial Review

available-for-sale debt securities. For further discussion of our financial condition and credit ratings, see the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources”
section of this Financial Review.
These and other industry-wide factors that may affect our businesses should be considered along with information presented in the “Forward-Looking Information and Factors
That May Affect Future Results” section of this Financial Review and in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2019 Form 10-K.
Our Strategy
We believe that our medicines provide significant value for both healthcare providers and patients, not only from the improved treatment of diseases but also from a reduction
in other healthcare costs, such as emergency room or hospitalization costs, as well as improvements in health, wellness and productivity. We continue to actively engage in
dialogues about the value of our medicines and how we can best work with patients, physicians and payers to prevent and treat disease and improve outcomes. We continue
to work within the current legal and pricing structures, as well as continue to review our pricing arrangements and contracting methods with payers, to maximize patient access
and minimize any adverse impact on our revenues. We remain firmly committed to fulfilling our Company’s purpose: Breakthroughs that change patients’ lives. By doing so, we
expect to create value for the patients we serve and for our colleagues and shareholders.
Organizing for Growth

We believe we have one of the strongest pipelines we have had in over a decade, and believe we are well positioned for future growth. Additional patent expiries will continue
over several years, and we expect the impact of reduced revenues due to patent expiries will be significant in 2020, then moderating downward to a much lower level from
2021 through 2025. This confluence of events has provided us an opportunity to look at and refine how we organize our business to best achieve sustainable growth and to
deliver our medicines and vaccines to the maximum number of people who need them.
At the beginning of our fiscal year 2019, we began to manage our commercial operations through a new global structure consisting of three businesses, each led by a single
manager—Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals Group (Biopharma), Upjohn and, through July 31, 2019, Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare business. We designed this new global structure
to take advantage of new growth opportunities driven by the evolving and unique dynamics of relevant markets.
For additional information about each business, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 17A. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information: Segment
Information.
We also reorganized our R&D operations as part of our Organizing for Growth reorganization:
• The former Worldwide Research and Development organization is renamed Worldwide Research, Development and Medical (WRDM) as we have created a new Worldwide
Medical & Safety organization in WRDM that incorporates the former Chief Medical Office as well as the Worldwide Safety function;
• The R&D organization within our former Essential Health business has been integrated into the WRDM, GPD and Upjohn organizations, including moving biosimilars into
WRDM and GPD and realigning them with the relevant therapeutic areas (e.g., Oncology and Inflammation & Immunology);
• The Regulatory function has been moved from the WRDM organization into the GPD organization; and
• Late-stage portfolio spend has been moved from our former Innovative Health business to GPD and from our former Essential Health business to GPD and Upjohn.
We re-aligned our commercial operations in 2019 for a number of reasons, including:
• Bringing biosimilars into our Oncology and Inflammation & Immunology therapeutic categories gives us the potential to leverage our R&D, regulatory and commercial
infrastructure within the Biopharma business to more efficiently bring those assets to market;
• Creating a business unit (i.e., the Hospital unit within Biopharma) that is solely focused on medicines that are used in hospitals can potentially bring greater focus and
attention to serving those customers and developing those relationships;
• Giving Upjohn more autonomy with a focus on maximizing the value of its products, particularly in emerging markets, provides it the opportunity to operate as a standalone
business within Pfizer with the potential for sustainable modest growth; and
• We believe this new structure better positions each business to achieve its growth potential as we transition to a period post-2020 where we expect higher and more
sustained revenue growth due to declining LOEs and the potential of our late-stage pipeline.
Biopharma seeks to leverage a strong pipeline, organize around operational growth drivers, and capitalize on trends creating long-term growth opportunities, including:
• an aging global population that is generating increased demand for innovative medicines that address patients’ unmet needs;
• advances in both biological science and digital technology that are enhancing the delivery of breakthrough new medicines; and
• the increasingly significant role of hospitals in healthcare systems.
Urbanization and the rise of the middle class in emerging markets, particularly in Asia, provide growth opportunities for the Upjohn business. Our ability to work collaboratively
within local markets and to be fast, focused and flexible is intended to position this business to seize these opportunities. Upjohn has distinct and dedicated manufacturing,
marketing, regulatory and, subject to limited exceptions, enabling functions that report directly into the business providing autonomy and positioning Upjohn to operate as a true
stand-alone division. We created this new structure to, among other things, position Upjohn to optimize its distinct growth potential and provide us with the flexibility to access
further opportunities to enhance value.
Subsequent to the re-alignment of our commercial operations in 2019, on July 29, 2019, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to combine Upjohn with
Mylan, creating a new global pharmaceutical company, Viatris. For additional information, see the “Our Business Development Initiatives” section above in this Financial
Review. We believe the new company will transform and accelerate Upjohn’s

Financial Review
and Mylan’s ability to serve patients’ needs and expand their capabilities across more than 165 markets. The combination will drive a sustainable, diverse and differentiated
portfolio of prescription medicines, complex generics, over-the-counter products and biosimilars supported by commercial and regulatory expertise, established infrastructure,
R&D capabilities and manufacturing and supply chain excellence.
As we prepare for expected growth, we are focused on creating a simpler, more efficient organization by streamlining structures, processes and governance within each
business and the functions that support them. As our innovative pipeline matures based on anticipated progression of current trials and the initiation of new pivotal trials,
including new trials for medicines we may acquire or in-license, we will need to increase our R&D investments. In addition, as our pipeline potentially delivers new
commercialization opportunities, we will need to increase our investments in new-market-creation activities. We have initiated an enterprise-wide digital effort to accelerate drug
development, enhance experiences (patient and physician) and access and leverage technology and robotics to simplify and automate our processes.
In the fourth quarter of 2018, we took steps to simplify the organization, increase spans of control and reduce organizational layers, which impacted some managerial roles and
responsibilities. We also offered enhancements to certain employee benefits for a short period of time. The expenses related to these enhancements for certain employee
benefits did not have a material impact on our 2018 and 2019 results of operations.
Transforming to a More Focused Company

With the formation of the GSK Consumer Healthcare venture and the pending combination of Upjohn with Mylan, Pfizer is transforming itself into a more focused, global leader
in science-based innovative medicines. As a result, we began, in the fourth quarter of 2019, to identify and undertake efforts to ensure our cost base aligns appropriately with
our Biopharmaceutical revenue base, which is expected to be 20% less (based on the midpoint of the range for 2020 New Pfizer revenue guidance (see the “Our Financial
Guidance for 2020” section of this Financial Review), compared to 2019 total company reported revenue) as a result of both the completed Consumer Healthcare and expected
Upjohn transactions. While certain direct costs have transferred or will transfer to the Consumer Healthcare joint venture and to the Upjohn entities, there are indirect costs
which are not expected to transfer. In addition, we are taking steps to restructure our organizations to appropriately support and drive the purpose of the three core functions of
our focused innovative medicines business: R&D, Manufacturing and Commercial. For additional information, see the “Costs and Expenses–– Restructuring Charges and
Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives” section of this Financial Review.
Commercial Operations
As discussed under “Organizing for Growth”, at the beginning of our 2019 fiscal year, we began to manage our commercial operations through a new global structure
consisting of three business segments––Biopharma, Upjohn and, through July 31, 2019, Consumer Healthcare, each led by a single manager. Each operating segment has
responsibility for its commercial activities. Upjohn, and through July 31, 2019, Consumer Healthcare are responsible for their own R&D activities while Biopharma receives its
R&D services from GPD and WRDM. These services include IPR&D projects for new investigational products and additional indications for in-line products. Each business has
a geographic footprint across developed and emerging markets. For additional information on our Commercial Operations, see the “Commercial Operations” section in Part I,
Item 1, “Business” of our 2019 Form 10-K. For additional information about our operating structure, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 17A. Segment,
Geographic and Other Revenue Information: Segment Information. For additional information about the 2019 performance of each of our operating segments, see the
“Analysis of Operating Segment Information” section of this Financial Review.
Description of Research and Development Operations

Innovation is critical to the success of our Company, and drug discovery and development are time-consuming, expensive and unpredictable. Pfizer’s purpose is to deliver
breakthroughs that change patients’ lives. R&D is at the heart of fulfilling Pfizer’s purpose as we work to translate advanced science and technologies into the therapies that
matter most.
Our R&D priorities include:

• delivering a pipeline of highly differentiated medicines and vaccines where Pfizer has a unique opportunity to bring the most important new therapies to patients in need;
• advancing our capabilities that can position Pfizer for long-term R&D leadership; and
• advancing new models for partnerships with creativity, flexibility and urgency to deliver innovation to patients as quickly as possible.
To that end, our R&D primarily focuses on:

• Oncology;
• Inflammation and Immunology;
• Vaccines;
• Internal Medicine;
• Rare Diseases; and
• Hospital.
For additional information about R&D, see the “Research and Development” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business” of our 2019 Form 10-K. For additional information about R&D
by operating segment, see the “Analysis of Operating Segment Information” section of this Financial Review.
For additional information about our pending new drug applications and supplemental filings, see the “Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––Product
Developments––Biopharmaceutical” section of this Financial Review.
For additional information about recent transactions and strategic investments that we believe have the potential to advance our pipeline, see the “Our Business Development
Initiatives” section of this Financial Review above.

Financial Review

Intellectual Property Rights
We continue to vigorously defend our patent rights against increasingly aggressive infringement, and we will continue to support efforts that strengthen worldwide recognition of
patent rights while taking necessary steps to ensure appropriate patient access. In addition, we will continue to employ innovative approaches designed to prevent counterfeit
pharmaceuticals from entering the supply chain and to achieve greater control over the distribution of our products, and we will continue to participate in the generics market
whenever appropriate. Also, the pursuit of valid business opportunities may require us to challenge intellectual property rights held by other companies that we believe were
improperly granted. Such challenges may include negotiation and litigation, which may not always be successful. For additional information about our current efforts to enforce
our intellectual property rights and certain other patent proceedings, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 16A1. Contingencies and Certain Commitments:
Legal Proceedings––Patent Litigation. For information on risks related to patent protection and intellectual property claims by third parties, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors––
Risks Related to Intellectual Property” in our 2019 Form 10-K.
Capital Allocation and Expense Management

We seek to maintain a strong balance sheet and robust liquidity so that we continue to have the financial resources necessary to take advantage of prudent commercial,
research and business development opportunities and to directly enhance shareholder value through share repurchases and dividends. For additional information about our
financial condition, liquidity, capital resources, share repurchases (including accelerated share repurchases) and dividends, see the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity
and Capital Resources” section of this Financial Review. For additional information about our recent business development activities, see the “Our Business Development
Initiatives” section of this Financial Review above.
In December 2019, our Board of Directors declared a first-quarter 2020 dividend of $0.38 per share, an increase from the $0.36 per-share quarterly dividend paid during 2019.
For additional information, see the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this Financial Review.
We remain focused on achieving an appropriate cost structure for our company. For additional information about our various initiatives, see the “Our Strategy––Transforming to
a More Focused Company” and “Costs and Expenses––Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives”
sections of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-
Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.
Increasing Investment in the U.S.––After evaluating the expected positive net impact the TCJA will have on us, in early 2018, we decided to take several actions:
• Over the five-year period from 2018 through 2022, we plan to invest approximately $5.0 billion in capital projects in the U.S., including the strengthening of our manufacturing
presence in the U.S. As part of this plan:
◦ in July 2018, we announced that we will increase our commitment to U.S. manufacturing with a $465 million investment to build one of the most technically advanced
sterile injectable pharmaceutical production facilities in the world in Portage, Michigan. This U.S. investment will strengthen our capability to produce and supply critical,
life-saving injectable medicines for patients around the world, creating an estimated 450 new jobs over the next several years; and
◦ in August 2019, we announced an additional half billion dollar investment for the construction of a state-of-the-art gene therapy manufacturing facility in Sanford, North
Carolina. This facility is anticipated to support our continuing investment in gene therapy R&D, similar to Pfizer’s Chapel Hill and Kit Creek, North Carolina R&D sites. This
facility would expand our presence in North Carolina. The expanded facility is projected to add approximately 300 new jobs.
• We made a $500 million voluntary contribution to the U.S. Pfizer Consolidated Pension Plan in February 2018.
• In the first quarter of 2018, we paid a special, one-time bonus to virtually all Pfizer colleagues, excluding executives, of $119 million in the aggregate.
Our Business Development Initiatives
As part of our strategy, we are also committed to capitalizing on growth opportunities by advancing our own pipeline and maximizing the value of our in-line products, as well as
through various forms of business development, which can include alliances, licenses, joint ventures, collaborations, equity- or debt-based investments, dispositions, mergers
and acquisitions. For additional information see the “Our Business Development Initiatives” section of this Financial Review above and Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements––Note 2. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development
and Collaborative Arrangements.

Financial Review
Our Financial Guidance for 2020

2020 Financial Guidance for Total Company
2020 financial guidance for Total Company is presented below(a), (b):

Revenues $48.5 to $50.5 billion
Adjusted cost of sales as a percentage of revenues 19.9% to 20.9%
Adjusted selling, informational and administrative expenses $12.0 to $13.0 billion
Adjusted research and development expenses $8.1 to $8.5 billion
Adjusted other (income)/deductions Approximately $800 million of income
Effective tax rate on adjusted income Approximately 15.0%
Adjusted diluted EPS $2.82 to $2.92
(a) The 2020 financial guidance for Total Company reflects the following:
• Reflects a full year of revenue and expense contributions from Biopharma and Upjohn, and excludes any impact from the pending Upjohn combination with Mylan.
• Does not assume the completion of any business development transactions not completed as of December 31, 2019, including any one-time upfront payments associated with such transactions.
• Includes Pfizer’s pro rata share of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture anticipated earnings, which is recorded in Adjusted other (income)/deductions on a one-quarter lag. Therefore, 2020 financial guidance
for Adjusted other (income)/deductions and Adjusted diluted EPS reflects Pfizer’s share of the joint venture’s earnings that were generated in the fourth quarter of 2019 (to be recorded by Pfizer in the first
quarter of 2020) as well as Pfizer’s share of the joint venture’s projected earnings during the first three quarters of 2020.
• Reflects an anticipated negative revenue impact of $2.4 billion due to recent and expected generic and biosimilar competition for certain products that have recently lost or are anticipated to soon lose patent
protection.
• Exchange rates assumed are as of mid-January 2020. Reflects the anticipated unfavorable impact of approximately $0.2 billion on revenues and approximately $0.01 on adjusted diluted EPS as a result of
changes in foreign exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar compared to foreign exchange rates from 2019.
• Guidance for adjusted diluted EPS assumes diluted weighted-average shares outstanding of approximately 5.65 billion shares, which assumes no share repurchases in 2020.
(b) For additional information regarding an understanding of Adjusted income and its components and Adjusted diluted EPS (all of which are non-GAAP financial measures), see the “Non-GAAP Financial Measure
(Adjusted Income)” section of this Financial Review.
Beginning in 2020, Upjohn began managing Pfizer’s Meridian subsidiary, the manufacturer of EpiPen and other auto-injector products, and the Mylan-Japan collaboration for
generic drugs in Japan (established in 2012) (Mylan-Japan). As a result, revenues and expenses associated with Meridian and Mylan-Japan will be reported in Pfizer’s Upjohn
business beginning in the first quarter of 2020. In 2019, revenues from Meridian and Mylan-Japan were recorded in Pfizer’s Biopharma business and totaled $598 million, flat
operationally, compared with full-year 2018.
Pfizer, Upjohn and Mylan are in the process of negotiating the terms on which Pfizer would transfer the Meridian business and/or certain Pfizer assets that currently form part
of the Mylan-Japan collaboration to Viatris following the completion of the proposed combination of Upjohn and Mylan. There can be no assurance that any agreement or
transaction will result from these negotiations and if the parties are unsuccessful in their efforts to negotiate the terms of such potential transactions, the Meridian business
and/or the Pfizer assets that currently form part of the Mylan-Japan collaboration will remain with Pfizer.
2020 Financial Guidance for New Pfizer
2020 financial guidance for New Pfizer is presented below(a), (b):

Adjusted IBT Margin(c) Approximately 37.0%
Adjusted Diluted EPS $2.25 to $2.35
Operating Cash Flow(d) $11.0 to $12.0 billion
(a) Financial guidance for New Pfizer reflects a full-year 2020 pro-forma view of the company assuming the pending Upjohn combination with Mylan was completed at the beginning of 2020. Therefore, New Pfizer
reflects contributions from the Biopharma business as it is presently being managed, which excludes contributions from Pfizer’s Meridian subsidiary and the Pfizer-Mylan strategic collaboration in Japan (Mylan-
Japan). Pfizer’s Meridian subsidiary and Mylan-Japan were managed by Pfizer’s Biopharma business in 2019. Financial guidance for New Pfizer also includes the full-year effect of the following items that assume
the completion of the Upjohn combination with Mylan: (i) $12 billion of net proceeds from Upjohn to be retained by Pfizer, which Pfizer will use to repay its own existing indebtedness; and (ii) other transaction-
related items, such as income from transition services agreements between Pfizer and Viatris. In addition, 2020 financial guidance for New Pfizer Adjusted IBT Margin and Adjusted diluted EPS reflects Pfizer’s
share of the earnings generated by the Consumer Healthcare joint venture in fourth-quarter 2019 (to be recorded by Pfizer in first-quarter 2020) as well as Pfizer’s share of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture’s
projected earnings during the first three quarters of 2020.
(b) For additional information regarding an understanding of Adjusted income and its components and Adjusted diluted EPS (all of which are non-GAAP financial measures), see the “Non-GAAP Financial Measure
(Adjusted Income)” section of this Financial Review.
(c) Adjusted income before tax margin (Adjusted IBT margin) is defined as revenue less the sum of Adjusted cost of sales, Adjusted SI&A expenses, Adjusted R&D expenses, Adjusted amortization of intangible
assets and Adjusted other (income)/deductions as a percentage of revenue. Adjusted IBT Margin is presented because management believes this performance measure supplements investors’ and other readers’
understanding and assessment of the financial performance of New Pfizer. Adjusted IBT margin is not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for U.S. GAAP income before tax margin.
(d) Does not include our planned $1.25 billion voluntary contribution to the U.S. qualified pension plans in the second half of 2020.
2020 Financial Guidance for Upjohn
2020 financial guidance for Upjohn now reflects the inclusion of revenues and expenses associated with Meridian and Mylan-Japan, which were previously recorded in Pfizer’s
Biopharma business. Except for the shift of Meridian and Mylan-Japan from Biopharma to Upjohn, there are no operational changes to Upjohn’s 2020 financial guidance
compared with the preliminary financial targets that were provided in July 2019.

Financial Review
2020 financial guidance for Upjohn is presented below(a):

Adjusted EBITDA(b) $3.8 to $4.2 billion
(a) Financial guidance for Upjohn assumes a full-year 2020 contribution from the Upjohn business as it is presently being managed, which includes contributions from Pfizer’s Meridian subsidiary and Mylan-Japan.
(b) Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) is defined as reported U.S. GAAP net income/(loss), and its components, adjusted for interest expense, provision/(benefit) for
taxes on income/(loss) and depreciation and amortization, further adjusted to exclude purchase accounting adjustments, acquisition-related costs, discontinued operations and certain significant items (some of
which may recur, such as gains on the completion of joint venture transactions, restructuring charges, legal charges or net gains and losses on equity securities, but which management does not believe are
reflective of ongoing core operations). Adjusted EBITDA is presented because management believes this performance measure supplements investors’ and other readers’ understanding and assessment of the
financial performance of Upjohn. Adjusted EBITDA as defined is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income/(loss) or cash flow from
operations determined in accordance with GAAP.
Pfizer does not provide guidance for GAAP Reported financial measures (other than revenues) or a reconciliation of forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to the most
directly comparable GAAP Reported financial measures on a forward-looking basis because it is unable to predict with reasonable certainty the ultimate outcome of pending
litigation, unusual gains and losses, acquisition-related expenses, net gains or losses on investments in equity securities and potential future asset impairments without
unreasonable effort. These items are uncertain, depend on various factors, and could have a material impact on GAAP Reported results for the guidance period.
For information about our actual costs and anticipated costs and cost savings associated with our various initiatives, see the “Costs and Expenses––Restructuring Charges
and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements––Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.
Our 2020 financial guidance is subject to a number of factors and uncertainties as described in the “Our Operating Environment”, “The Global Economic Environment”, “Our
Strategy” and “Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results” sections of this Financial Review; and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2019
Form 10-K.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND

ASSUMPTIONS
For a description of our significant accounting policies, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies. Of
these policies, the following are considered critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements as they require the application of the most subjective and the
most complex judgments: Acquisitions (Note 1D); Fair Value (Note 1E); Revenues (Note 1G); Asset Impairments (Note 1L); Tax Assets and Liabilities and Income Tax
Contingencies (Note 1P); Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans (Note 1Q); and Legal and Environmental Contingencies (Note 1R).
Following is a discussion about the critical accounting estimates and assumptions impacting our consolidated financial statements. See also Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements––Note 1C. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Estimates and Assumptions for a discussion about the risks associated with estimates and
assumptions.
Acquisitions and Fair Value

For a discussion about the application of fair value to our recent acquisitions, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2A. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-
Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Acquisitions.
For a discussion about the application of fair value to our investments, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7A. Financial Instruments: Fair Value
Measurements.
For a discussion about the application of fair value to our benefit plan assets, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 11D. Pension and Postretirement Benefit
Plans and Defined Contribution Plans: Plan Assets.
For a discussion about the application of fair value to our asset impairment reviews, see “Asset Impairment Reviews” below.
Revenues
Our gross product revenues are subject to a variety of deductions, which generally are estimated and recorded in the same period that the revenues are recognized. Such
variable consideration represents chargebacks, rebates, sales allowances and sales returns. These deductions represent estimates of the related obligations and, as such,
knowledge and judgment are required when estimating the impact of these revenue deductions on gross sales for a reporting period.
Historically, our adjustments of estimates, to reflect actual results or updated expectations, have not been material to our overall business. On a quarterly basis, our
adjustments of estimates to reflect actual results generally have been less than 1% of revenues, and have resulted in either a net increase or a net decrease in revenues.
Product-specific rebates, however, can have a significant impact on year-over-year individual product growth trends. If any of our ratios, factors, assessments, experiences or
judgments are not indicative or accurate predictors of our future experience, our results could be materially affected. The sensitivity of our estimates can vary by program, type
of customer and geographic location. However, estimates associated with U.S. Medicare, Medicaid and performance-based contract rebates are most at risk for material
adjustment because of the extensive time delay between the recording of the accrual and its ultimate settlement, an interval that can generally range up to one year. Because
of this time lag, in any given quarter, our adjustments to actual can incorporate revisions of several prior quarters.

Financial Review

Asset Impairment Reviews
We review all of our long-lived assets for impairment indicators throughout the year. We perform impairment testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill at least
annually and for all other long-lived assets whenever impairment indicators are present. When necessary, we record charges for impairments of long-lived assets for the
amount by which the fair value is less than the carrying value of these assets. Our impairment review processes are described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements––Note 1L. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Amortization of Intangible Assets, Depreciation and Certain Long-Lived Assets.
Examples of events or circumstances that may be indicative of impairment include:
• A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of the asset. For example, a successful challenge of our patent rights would
likely result in generic competition earlier than expected.
• A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used. For example, restrictions imposed by the FDA or other regulatory authorities could affect our
ability to manufacture or sell a product.
• A projection or forecast that indicates losses or reduced profits associated with an asset. This could result, for example, from a change in a government reimbursement
program that results in an inability to sustain projected product revenues and profitability. This also could result from the introduction of a competitor’s product that results in
a significant loss of market share or the inability to achieve the previously projected revenue growth, as well as the lack of acceptance of a product by patients, physicians
and payers. For IPR&D projects, this could result from, among other things, a change in outlook based on clinical trial data, a delay in the projected launch date or additional
expenditures to commercialize the product.
Identifiable Intangible Assets
As a result of our identifiable intangible asset impairment review work, we recognized a number of impairments of identifiable intangible assets for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions—Net.
When we are required to determine the fair value of intangible assets other than goodwill, we use an income approach, specifically the discounted cash flow method. We start
with a forecast of all the expected net cash flows associated with the asset, which includes the application of a terminal value for indefinite-lived assets, and then we apply an
asset-specific discount rate to arrive at a net present value amount. Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions inherent in this approach include: the amount and
timing of the projected net cash flows, which includes the expected impact of competitive, legal and/or regulatory forces on the projections and the impact of technological risk
associated with IPR&D assets, as well as the selection of a long-term growth rate; the discount rate, which seeks to reflect the various risks inherent in the projected cash
flows; and the tax rate, which seeks to incorporate the geographic diversity of the projected cash flows.
While all intangible assets other than goodwill can face events and circumstances that can lead to impairment, in general, intangible assets other than goodwill that are most at
risk of impairment include IPR&D assets (approximately $5.9 billion as of December 31, 2019) and newly acquired or recently impaired indefinite-lived brand assets. IPR&D
assets are high-risk assets, as R&D is an inherently risky activity. Newly acquired and recently impaired indefinite-lived assets are more vulnerable to impairment as the assets
are recorded at fair value and are then subsequently measured at the lower of fair value or carrying value at the end of each reporting period. As such, immediately after
acquisition or impairment, even small declines in the outlook for these assets can negatively impact our ability to recover the carrying value and can result in an impairment
charge.
Goodwill
As a result of our goodwill impairment review work, we concluded that none of our goodwill was impaired as of December 31, 2019, and we do not believe the risk of
impairment is significant at this time.
We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Qualitative factors that we
consider include, for example, macroeconomic and industry conditions, overall financial performance and other relevant entity-specific events. If we conclude that it is more
likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we then perform a quantitative fair value test.
When we are required to determine the fair value of a reporting unit, as appropriate for the individual reporting unit, we mainly use the income approach but we may also use
the market approach, or a weighted-average combination of both approaches.
• The income approach is a forward-looking approach to estimating fair value and relies primarily on internal forecasts. Within the income approach, the method that we use is
the discounted cash flow method. We start with a forecast of all the expected net cash flows associated with the reporting unit, which includes the application of a terminal
value, and then we apply a reporting unit-specific discount rate to arrive at a net present value amount. Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions inherent in
this approach include: the amount and timing of the projected net cash flows, which includes the expected impact of technological risk and competitive, legal and/or
regulatory forces on the projections, as well as the selection of a long-term growth rate; the discount rate, which seeks to reflect the various risks inherent in the projected
cash flows; and the tax rate, which seeks to incorporate the geographic diversity of the projected cash flows.
• The market approach is a historical approach to estimating fair value and relies primarily on external information. Within the market approach are two methods that we may
use:
◦ Guideline public company method—this method employs market multiples derived from market prices of stocks of companies that are engaged in the same or similar lines
of business and that are actively traded on a free and open market and the application of the identified multiples to the corresponding measure of our reporting unit’s
financial performance.

Financial Review

◦ Guideline transaction method—this method relies on pricing multiples derived from transactions of significant interests in companies engaged in the same or similar lines
of business and the application of the identified multiples to the corresponding measure of our reporting unit’s financial performance.
The market approach is only appropriate when the available external information is robust and deemed to be a reliable proxy for the specific reporting unit being valued;
however, these assessments may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate. Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions inherent in this approach include: the
selection of appropriate guideline companies and transactions and the determination of applicable premiums and discounts based on any differences in ownership
percentages, ownership rights, business ownership forms or marketability between the reporting unit and the guideline companies and transactions.
For all of our reporting units, there are a number of future events and factors that may impact future results and that could potentially have an impact on the outcome of
subsequent goodwill impairment testing. For a list of these factors, see the “Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results” section of this Financial
Review and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our 2019 Form 10-K.
Benefit Plans
The majority of our employees worldwide are covered by defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution plans or both. In the U.S., we sponsor both IRC-qualified and
supplemental (non-qualified) defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans, as well as other postretirement benefit plans consisting primarily of medical insurance for
retirees and their eligible dependents.
The accounting for benefit plans is highly dependent on actuarial estimates, assumptions and calculations, which can result from a complex series of judgments about future
events and uncertainties. The assumptions and actuarial estimates required to estimate the net employee benefit obligations for the defined benefit and postretirement plans
include the discount rate; expected salary increases; certain employee-related factors, such as turnover, retirement age and mortality (life expectancy); and healthcare cost
trend rates.
Effective January 1, 2018, accruals for future benefits under the Pfizer Consolidated Pension Plan (our largest U.S. defined benefit plan) and the defined benefit section of the
Pfizer Group Pension Scheme (our largest pension plan in the U.K.) were frozen and resulted in elimination of future service costs for the plans. The Pfizer defined contribution
savings plan provides additional annual contributions to those previously accruing benefits under the Pfizer Consolidated Pension Plan and active members of the Pfizer Group
Pension Scheme started accruing benefits under the defined contribution section of that plan.
As of December 31, 2019, the noncurrent portion of our pension benefit obligations, net, increased by approximately $326 million, compared to December 31, 2018. The
increase reflects, among other things, a decrease in the discount rate used in the measurement of plan obligations, partially offset by an increase in the actual returns on plan
assets. As of December 31, 2019, the noncurrent portion of our postretirement benefit obligations, net decreased by approximately $247 million, compared to December 31,
2018. The decrease reflects, among other things, plan amendments related to the prescription drug coverage in our U.S. and Puerto Rico Postretirement Plans and changes to
the claim cost assumptions, partially offset by the decrease in discount rate. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 11C. Pension
and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined Contribution Plans: Obligations and Funded Status.
Our assumptions reflect our historical experiences and our judgment regarding future expectations that have been deemed reasonable by management. The judgments made
in determining the costs of our benefit plans can materially impact our results of operations.
The following table provides (i) at the end of each year, the expected annual rate of return on plan assets for the following year, (ii) the actual annual rate of return on plan
assets achieved in each year, and (iii) the weighted-average discount rate used to measure the benefit obligations at the end of each year for our U.S. qualified pension plans
and our international pension plans(a):
2019 2018 2017
U.S. Qualified Pension Plans
Expected annual rate of return on plan assets 7.0% 7.2 % 7.5%
Actual annual rate of return on plan assets 22.6 (5.3) 16.2
Discount rate used to measure the plan obligations 3.3 4.4 3.8
International Pension Plans
Expected annual rate of return on plan assets 3.4 3.9 4.4
Actual annual rate of return on plan assets 10.7 (0.9) 10.3
Discount rate used to measure the plan obligations 1.7 2.5 2.3
(a) For detailed assumptions associated with our benefit plans, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 11B. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined Contribution Plans: Actuarial
Assumptions.
Expected Annual Rate of Return on Plan Assets
The assumptions for the expected annual rate of return on all of our plan assets reflect our actual historical return experience and our long-term assessment of forward-looking
return expectations by asset classes, which is used to develop a weighted-average expected return based on the implementation of our targeted asset allocation in our
respective plans.
The expected annual rate of return on plan assets for our U.S. plans and the majority of our international plans is applied to the fair value of plan assets at each year-end and
the resulting amount is reflected in our net periodic benefit costs in the following year.

Financial Review
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of net periodic benefit costs to a 50 basis point decline in our assumption for the expected annual rate of return on plan assets,
holding all other assumptions constant (in millions, pre-tax):
Increase in 2020 Net Periodic
Assumption Change Benefit Costs
Expected annual rate of return on plan assets 50 basis point decline $110
The actual return on plan assets was approximately $3.7 billion during 2019.
Discount Rate Used to Measure Plan Obligations
The weighted-average discount rate used to measure the plan obligations for our U.S. defined benefit plans is determined at least annually and evaluated and modified, as
required, to reflect the prevailing market rate of a portfolio of high-quality fixed income investments, rated AA/Aa or better, that reflect the rates at which the pension benefits
could be effectively settled. The discount rate used to measure the plan obligations for our international plans is determined at least annually by reference to investment grade
corporate bonds, rated AA/Aa or better, including, when there is sufficient data, a yield-curve approach. These discount rate determinations are made in consideration of local
requirements.
The measurement of the plan obligations at the end of the year will affect the amount of service cost, interest cost and amortization expense reflected in our net periodic benefit
costs in the following year.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of net periodic benefit costs and benefit obligations to a 10 basis point decline in our assumption for the discount rate, holding all
other assumptions constant (in millions, pre-tax):
Increase in 2020 Net 2019 Benefit
Assumption Change Periodic Benefit Costs Obligations
Increase Increase
Discount rate 10 basis point decline $4 $461
The change in the discount rates used in measuring our plan obligations as of December 31, 2019 resulted in an increase in the measurement of our aggregate plan
obligations by approximately $3.2 billion.
Income Tax Assets and Liabilities

In the fourth quarter of 2017, we recorded an estimate of certain tax effects of the TCJA, including (i) the impact on deferred tax assets and liabilities from the reduction in the
U.S. Federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, (ii) the impact on valuation allowances and other state income tax considerations, (iii) a repatriation tax liability on
accumulated post-1986 foreign earnings for which we elected, with the filing of our 2018 U.S. Federal Consolidated Income Tax Return, payment over eight years through
2026, and (iv) deferred taxes on basis differences expected to give rise to future taxes on global intangible low-taxed income. In addition, we had provided deferred tax
liabilities in the past on foreign earnings that were not indefinitely reinvested. As a result of the TCJA, in the fourth quarter of 2017, we reversed an estimate of the deferred
taxes that are no longer expected to be needed due to the change to the territorial tax system.
The TCJA subjects a U.S. shareholder to current tax on global intangible low-taxed income earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740, No. 5,
Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that we are permitted to make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary basis
differences expected to reverse as global intangible low-taxed income in future years or provide for the tax expense related to such income in the year the tax is incurred. We
elected to recognize deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to reverse as global intangible low-taxed income in future years. We were able to make a reasonable
estimate of the deferred taxes on the temporary differences expected to reverse in the future and provided a provisional deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2017.
In 2018, we finalized our provisional accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA based on our best estimates of available information and data, and reported and disclosed the
impacts within the applicable measurement period, in accordance with guidance issued by the SEC. We believe that there may be additional interpretations, clarifications and
guidance from the U.S. Department of Treasury. Any change to our calculations resulting from such additional interpretations, clarifications and guidance would be reflected in
the period of issuance. In addition, our obligations may vary as a result of changes in our uncertain tax positions and/or availability of attributes such as foreign tax and other
credit carryforwards. The current portion of the aforementioned repatriation tax liability is reported in current Income taxes payable in our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2019 (approximately $600 million due in April 2020) and the remaining liability is reported in noncurrent Other taxes payable in our consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2019. The first installment of $750 million was paid in April 2019.
Income tax assets and liabilities also include income tax valuation allowances and accruals for uncertain tax positions. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements—Note 1C. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Estimates and Assumptions; Note 1P. Basis of Presentation and Significant
Accounting Policies: Tax Assets and Liabilities and Income Tax Contingencies and Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from Continuing Operations, as well as the
“Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources––Selected Measures of Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations” section of this Financial
Review.

Financial Review
Contingencies
We and certain of our subsidiaries are subject to numerous contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business, such as patent litigation, product liability and other
product-related litigation, commercial litigation, environmental claims and proceedings, government investigations, and guarantees and indemnifications, as well as for tax
matters. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1P. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Tax Assets and
Liabilities and Income Tax Contingencies, Note 1R. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Legal and Environmental Contingencies, Note 5D. Tax Matters:
Tax Contingencies and Note 16. Contingencies and Certain Commitments.
ANALYSIS OF THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

The following table provides the components of the consolidated statements of income:
Year Ended December 31, % Change
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 2017 19/18 18/17
Revenues $ 51,750 $ 53,647 $ 52,546 (4) 2
Cost of sales (a) 10,219 11,248 11,228 (9) —
% of revenues 19.7% 21.0% 21.4 %
Selling, informational and administrative expenses(a) 14,350 14,455 14,804 (1) (2)
% of revenues 27.7% 26.9% 28.2 %
Research and development expenses(a) 8,650 8,006 7,683 8 4
% of revenues 16.7% 14.9% 14.6 %
Amortization of intangible assets 4,610 4,893 4,758 (6) 3
% of revenues 8.9% 9.1% 9.1 %
Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs 747 1,044 351 (28) *
% of revenues 1.4% 1.9% 0.7 %
(Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction (8,086) — — * —
% of revenues 15.6% — —
Other (income)/deductions—net 3,578 2,116 1,416 69 49
Income from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for
taxes on income 17,682 11,885 12,305 49 (3)
% of revenues 34.2% 22.2% 23.4 %
Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income 1,384 706 (9,049) 96 *
Effective tax rate 7.8% 5.9% (73.5)%
Income from continuing operations 16,298 11,179 21,353 46 (48)
% of revenues 31.5% 20.8% 40.6 %
Discontinued operations—net of tax 4 10 2 (61) *
Net income before allocation to noncontrolling interests 16,302 11,188 21,355 46 (48)
% of revenues 31.5% 20.9% 40.6 %
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 29 36 47 (18) (24)
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. $ 16,273 $ 11,153 $ 21,308 46 (48)
% of revenues 31.4% 20.8% 40.6 %
* Indicates calculation not meaningful or result is equal to or greater than 100%.
(a) Excludes amortization of intangible assets, except as disclosed in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 10A. Identifiable Intangible Assets and Goodwill: Identifiable Intangible Assets.
Revenues—Overview
Total revenues in 2019 compared to 2018 reflects an operational decline of $545 million, or 1%, and an unfavorable impact of foreign exchange of $1.4 billion, or 3% in 2019
compared to 2018.
Total revenues in 2018 compared to 2017 reflects an operational increase of $791 million, or 2%, and the favorable impact of foreign exchange of $310 million, or less than
1%, in 2018 compared to 2017.
See the “Revenues by Segment and Geography” and “Revenues—Selected Product Discussion” sections of this Financial Review for additional analyses.
Certain of our current products have experienced patent-based expirations or loss of regulatory exclusivity in certain markets in the last few years, and we expect certain
products to face significantly increased generic competition over the next few years. For additional information, see the “Patents and Other Intellectual Property Rights” section
in Part I, Item 1, “Business” of our 2019 Form 10-K.
We have significant operations outside the U.S., with revenues exceeding $500 million in eleven countries in each of 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Financial Review

By total revenues, the U.S., China and Japan are our three largest national markets:
Inventory Stocking
Our policy relating to the supply of pharmaceutical inventory at domestic wholesalers, and in major international markets, is to generally maintain stocking levels under one
month on average and to keep monthly levels consistent from year to year based on patterns of utilization. We historically have been able to closely monitor these customer
stocking levels by purchasing information from our customers directly or by obtaining other third-party information. We believe our data sources to be directionally reliable but
cannot verify their accuracy. Further, as we do not control this third-party data, we cannot be assured of continuing access. Unusual buying patterns and utilization are promptly
investigated.
Revenue Deductions
Our gross product revenues are subject to a variety of deductions, which generally are estimated and recorded in the same period that the revenues are recognized. Such
variable consideration represents chargebacks, rebates, sales allowances and sales returns. These deductions represent estimates of related obligations and, as such,
knowledge and judgment are required when estimating the impact of these revenue deductions on gross sales for a reporting period. Historically, our adjustments of estimates,
to reflect actual results or updated expectations, have not been material to our overall business. On a quarterly basis, our adjustments of estimates to reflect actual results
generally have been less than 1% of revenues, and have resulted in either a net increase or a net decrease in revenues. Product-specific rebates, however, can have a
significant impact on year-over-year individual product growth trends.
The following table provides information about revenue deductions:

Medicare rebates(a) $ 1,306 $ 1,706 $ 1,316
Medicaid and related state program rebates(a) 1,936 1,969 1,860
Performance-based contract rebates (a), (b) 3,767 3,377 3,245
Chargebacks(c) 5,588 6,461 6,047
Sales allowances (d) 5,678 5,592 5,165
Sales returns and cash discounts 1,315 1,522 1,493
Total(e) $ 19,589 $ 20,627 $ 19,126
(a) Rebates are product-specific and, therefore, for any given year are impacted by the mix of products sold.
(b) Performance-based contract rebates include contract rebates with MCOs within the U.S., including health maintenance organizations and PBMs, who receive rebates based on the achievement of contracted
performance terms and claims under these contracts. Outside the U.S., performance-based contract rebates include rebates to wholesalers/distributors based on achievement of contracted performance for
specific products or sales milestones.
(c) Chargebacks primarily represent reimbursements to U.S. wholesalers for honoring contracted prices to third parties.
(d) Sales allowances primarily represent price reductions that are contractual or legislatively mandated outside the U.S., discounts and distribution fees.
(e) For 2019, associated with the following segments: Biopharma ($12.0 billion), Upjohn ($7.2 billion) and Other ($0.4 billion). For 2018, associated with the following segments: Biopharma ($10.2 billion), Upjohn
($9.7 billion) and Other ($0.7 billion). For 2017, associated with the following segments: Biopharma ($9.2 billion), Upjohn ($9.2 billion) and Other ($0.7 billion).
Total revenue deductions for 2019 decreased 5% compared to 2018, primarily as a result of:
• a decrease in chargebacks primarily related to Upjohn products, including Viagra and Lyrica; and
• a decrease in Medicare rebates, driven by a significant decrease in Lyrica sales in the U.S. due to multi-source generic competition that began in July 2019,
partially offset by:
• an increase in performance-based contract rebates, primarily in the U.S. due to increased sales of certain Biopharma products, slightly offset by decreased Lyrica sales.
For information on our accruals for Medicare rebates, Medicaid and related state program rebates, performance-based contract rebates, chargebacks, sales allowances and
sales returns and cash discounts, including the balance sheet classification of these accruals, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 1G. Basis of
Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Revenues and Trade Accounts Receivable.

Financial Review
Revenues by Operating Segment and Geography
The following graphs show revenues by operating segment and geography:
2019 Revenues by Geography % of Total

U.S. 46%
International 54%

U.S. 47%
International 53%

U.S. 50%
International 50%

Financial Review
The following table provides worldwide revenues by operating segment and geography:
Worldwide U.S. International Worldwide U.S. International
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 19/18 18/17 19/18 18/17 19/18 18/17
Operating Segments(a):
Biopharma $ 39,419 $ 37,558 $ 35,530 $ 19,605 $ 18,243 $ 17,961 $ 19,814 $ 19,315 $ 17,569 5 6 7 2 3 10
Upjohn 10,233 12,484 13,447 3,259 5,209 6,150 6,974 7,275 7,297 (18) (7) (37) (15) (4) —
Consumer Healthcare 2,098 3,605 3,472 988 1,877 1,851 1,110 1,728 1,621 (42) 4 (47) 1 (36) 7
Other(b) — — 97 — — 64 — — 33 — * — * — *
Total revenues $ 51,750 $ 53,647 $ 52,546 $ 23,852 $ 25,329 $ 26,026 $ 27,898 $ 28,318 $ 26,519 (4) 2 (6) (3) (1) 7
* Indicates the calculation is not meaningful or results are equal to or greater than 100%.
(a) For additional information about each operating segment, see the “Commercial Operations” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business” of our 2019 Form 10-K, the “Analysis of Operating Segment Information” section of
this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 17A. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information: Segment Information.
(b) Represents HIS revenues through February 2, 2017. On February 3, 2017, we completed the sale of HIS to ICU Medical. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1A.
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation.
We recorded direct product and/or alliance revenues of more than $1 billion for each of: eight products in 2019, ten products in 2018 and nine products in 2017.
Direct Product And/Or Alliance Revenues of More Than $1 Billion

2019 2018 2017
Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13
Ibrance Lyrica Lyrica
Eliquis* Ibrance Ibrance
Lyrica Eliquis* Eliquis*
Xeljanz Enbrel Enbrel
Lipitor Lipitor Lipitor
Enbrel Xeljanz Xeljanz
Chantix/Champix Chantix/Champix Viagra
Sutent Sutent
Norvasc
* Eliquis includes alliance revenues and direct sales in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
These direct product sales and/or alliance product revenues represent 49% of our revenues in 2019, 51% of our revenues in 2018 and 46% of our revenues in 2017. See the
“Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income—Revenues—Selected Product Discussion” section of this Financial Review for additional information.

Financial Review

2019 v. 2018
The following provides an analysis of the change in worldwide revenues by geographic areas in 2019:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Worldwide U.S. International

Continued growth from certain key brands(a) $ 2,495 $ 914 $ 1,581
Higher revenue from continued growth of anti-infective products in China, driven by increased demand for
Sulperazon and new launches, the 2018 U.S. launches of our immune globulin intravenous products
(Panzyga and Octagam) and the launches of certain anti-infectives products (Zavicefta, Zinforo and
Cresemba) in international developed and emerging markets, all in the Hospital products business 472 174 298
Higher revenues for Inlyta, primarily in the U.S. driven by increased demand resulting from the second
quarter of 2019 U.S. FDA approvals for the combinations of certain immune checkpoint inhibitors plus Inlyta
for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC 190 175 14
Higher revenues for Biosimilars, primarily in the U.S. 168 185 (17)
Higher revenues for rare disease products driven by the U.S. launches in May 2019 of Vyndaqel and in
September 2019 of Vyndamax, for the treatment of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM); and
in international markets, primarily driven by continued uptake for the transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy
indication, primarily in developed Europe, as well as the March 2019 launch of the ATTR-CM indication in
Japan, partially offset by lower revenues for certain rare disease products, including the hemophilia
franchises (Refacto AF/Xyntha and BeneFIX), primarily due to competitive pressures, and Genotropin in
developed markets, mainly due to unfavorable channel mix in the U.S. 159 108 51
Volume-driven growth from Celebrex and Effexor, primarily in Japan and China 78 (8) 87
Lower worldwide revenues for Lyrica, primarily in the U.S., reflecting the expected significantly lower volumes
associated with multi-source generic competition that began in July 2019 (1,628) (1,582) (46)
Lower revenues for Consumer Healthcare reflecting the July 31, 2019 completion of the Consumer
Healthcare joint venture transaction with GSK. As a result, 2019 revenues reflect seven months of
Consumer Healthcare segment domestic operations and eight months of Consumer Healthcare segment
international operations (1,436) (889) (547)
Lower revenues from other Hospital products, primarily reflecting declines in developed markets, mostly due
to the continued expected negative impact from generic competition for products that have previously lost
marketing exclusivity (447) (200) (247)
Lower revenues for Enbrel internationally, reflecting continued biosimilar competition in most developed
Europe markets (292) — (292)
Lower revenues for Viagra and Upjohn's authorized generic for Viagra in the U.S. resulting from increased
generic competition following Viagra's December 2017 patent expiration, partially offset by increased retail
demand growth in China (171) (193) 21
Decline in revenues for Revatio driven by lower U.S. Oral Suspension formulation sales and pricing
pressures due to a recent generic entry, and for Relpax, driven by continued generic competition across
developed markets (149) (110) (39)
Decline in Norvasc and Lipitor due to pricing pressures from the implementation of the VBP in certain cities in
China and lower volumes in Japan, partially offset by overall increased demand in China in the first quarter
of 2019 and continued geographic expansion in China during the second half of 2019 in provinces where
the VBP had not yet been implemented (40) (4) (36)
Other operational factors, net 57 (47) 104
Operational growth/(decline), net (545) (1,477) 932

Unfavorable impact of foreign exchange (1,352) — (1,352)
Revenues decrease $ (1,897) $ (1,477) $ (420)
Emerging markets revenues increased $82 million, or 1%, in 2019 to $12.7 billion, reflecting an operational increase of $877 million, or 7%. Foreign exchange had an
unfavorable impact of approximately 6% on emerging markets revenues. The operational increase in emerging markets was primarily driven by Prevenar 13, Ibrance and
Eliquis in our Biopharma segment and Zoloft, Viagra, Celebrex and Lipitor in our Upjohn segment.

Financial Review

2018 v. 2017
The following provides an analysis of the change in worldwide revenues by geographic areas in 2018:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Worldwide U.S. International

Continued growth from certain key brands(a) $ 2,715 $ 1,019 $ 1,696
Growth from Biosimilars, primarily from Inflectra in certain channels in the U.S. and developed Europe
markets 217 147 69
Growth from recently launched products, including Eucrisa in the U.S., as well as Besponsa and Bavencio,
primarily in the U.S. and developed Europe 195 158 37
Higher revenues for Lipitor and Norvasc primarily due to increased demand in China, partially offset by
pricing pressures in China and lower volumes in Japan for Lipitor and Norvasc and the non-recurrence of
favorable U.S. rebates for Lipitor that occurred in 2017 182 (52) 234
Growth in our Consumer Healthcare business across all markets 107 26 81
Lower revenues for Viagra in the U.S. resulting from the loss of exclusivity in December 2017 (572) (572) —
Decline in the Hospital products business, driven by lower revenues in developed markets, primarily due to
increased competition across the portfolio and continued legacy Hospira product shortages in the U.S.,
partially offset by an increase in emerging markets, primarily in China (482) (703) 221
Lower revenues for Enbrel, primarily in most developed Europe markets due to continued biosimilar
competition (350) — (350)
Decline in Greenstone, Upjohn's solid oral dose generics subsidiary, due to additional generic competition in
the U.S. and decline in Relpax, primarily due to loss of exclusivity in the U.S. (318) (310) (8)
Lower revenues for the Premarin family of products and Pristiq primarily driven by generic competition in the
U.S. (241) (201) (40)
Decline in revenues for Lyrica, primarily driven by losses of exclusivity in developed Europe markets and
Australia, partially offset by growth in the U.S. and growth in the orally dissolving tablet formulation in Japan (115) 131 (246)
Lower revenues from the hemophilia portfolio (BeneFIX and Refacto AF/Xyntha), primarily in developed
Europe (100) (13) (88)
Decline in revenues for Celebrex, primarily driven by the non-recurrence of favorable U.S. rebates that
occurred in 2017 and lower volumes in the U.S. (99) (99) —
Impact on financial results from the sale of HIS in February 2017. 2018 does not reflect any contribution from
HIS global operations, compared to approximately one month of HIS domestic operations and
approximately two months of HIS international operations in the same period in 2017 (97) (64) (33)
Other operational factors, net (251) (166) (84)
Operational growth/(decline), net 791 (698) 1,489

Favorable impact of foreign exchange 310 — 310
Revenues increase/(decrease) $ 1,101 $ (698) $ 1,799
(a) Certain key brands represent Ibrance, Eliquis, Xeljanz, Prevnar/Prevenar 13, Xtandi and Chantix/Champix. See the “Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––Revenues––Selected Product
Discussion" section of this Financial Review for product analysis information.
Emerging markets revenues increased $1.3 billion, or 11%, in 2018 to $12.7 billion, from $11.4 billion in 2017, reflecting an operational increase of $1.5 billion, or 13%. Foreign
exchange had an unfavorable impact of approximately 2% on emerging markets revenues. The operational increase in emerging markets was primarily driven by Prevenar 13,
Sulperazon, Ibrance and Eliquis in our Biopharma segment and Lipitor and Norvasc in our Upjohn segment.
For additional information about operating segment revenues, see the “Analysis of Operating Segment Information” section of this Financial Review.
Revenues—Selected Product Discussion

The tables below provide worldwide revenues and revenues by geography, for selected products. References to total change pertain to period-over-period growth rates that
include foreign exchange. The difference between the total change and operational change represents the impact of foreign exchange. Amounts may not add due to rounding.
All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts. An asterisk (*) indicates the calculation is not meaningful or results are equal to or greater than 100%.

Financial Review

• Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 (Biopharma):

% Change
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 Total Oper.
U.S. $ 3,209 $ 3,360 (4)
International 2,638 2,443 8 12
Worldwide revenues $ 5,847 $ 5,802 1 3
The decline in 2019 in the U.S. primarily reflects the continued decline in revenues for the adult indication due to a high initial capture rate of the eligible population following
its successful fourth-quarter 2014 launch, which resulted in a smaller remaining “catch up” opportunity (i.e., the opportunity to reach adults aged 65 years and older who
have not been previously vaccinated with Prevnar 13) as well as lower government purchases for the pediatric indication.
The operational growth in 2019 internationally was primarily driven by the pediatric indication due to higher volumes reflecting continued uptake in China, favorable impact
of timing and increased volumes associated with government purchases for the pediatric indication in certain emerging markets and higher volumes resulting from
increased shipments associated with Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
In 2014, the ACIP voted to recommend Prevnar 13 for routine use to help protect adults aged 65 years and older against pneumococcal disease, which for adults includes
pneumonia caused by the 13 pneumococcal serotypes included in the vaccine. These ACIP recommendations were subsequently approved by the directors at the CDC
and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and were published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report in September 2014 by the CDC. The CDC regularly
monitors the impact of vaccination and reviews the recommendations. During the February 2019 ACIP meeting, the CDC presented a formal evaluation of evidence to the
recommendation framework (grading) for ACIP’s input. On June 26, 2019, the ACIP voted to revise the pneumococcal vaccination guidelines and recommend Prevnar 13
for adults 65 and older based on the shared clinical decision making of the provider and patient, which means the decision to vaccinate should be made at the individual
level between health care providers and their patients, maintaining reimbursement. The recommendation reaffirms that there remains vaccine preventable pneumococcal
disease in the population of adults 65 years or older, which may be prevented through direct vaccination. The ACIP’s recommendation was approved by the directors at the
CDC and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and published by the CDC in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report in the fourth quarter of 2019. While the
ACIP’s latest recommendation did not have an impact on Prevnar 13 revenues in 2019, due to timing of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report publication, we expect
Prevnar 13 revenues from the adult indication to continue to decline in 2020 and beyond.
• Ibrance (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 3,250 $ 2,922 11
The operational growth in 2019 in international markets reflects the continued strong uptake in developed Europe and Japan as well as in certain emerging markets
following launches, partially offset by pricing pressure primarily in certain developed Europe markets beginning in the fourth quarter of 2019. The growth in 2019 in the U.S.
was mainly driven by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) class share growth and Ibrance’s continued CDK class share leadership in its approved metastatic breast cancer
indications.
• Eliquis alliance revenues and direct sales (Biopharma): Eliquis has been jointly developed and is commercialized by Pfizer and BMS. Pfizer funds between 50% and
60% of all development costs depending on the study. Profits and losses are shared equally on a global basis, except in certain countries where Pfizer commercializes
Eliquis and pays BMS compensation based on a percentage of net sales. We have full commercialization rights in certain smaller markets. BMS supplies the product to us
at cost plus a percentage of the net sales to end-customers in these markets. Eliquis is part of the Novel Oral Anticoagulant market; the agents in this class were developed
as alternative treatment options to warfarin in appropriate patients.

% Change
U.S. $ 2,343 $ 1,849 27
The worldwide operational growth in 2019 was mostly driven by continued increased adoption in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, as well as oral anti-coagulant market share
gains, partially offset by a higher Medicare “coverage gap” discount provision on U.S. revenues compared to the prior year.

Financial Review

• Lyrica (Upjohn):

% Change
U.S. $ 2,012 $ 3,594 (44)
International 1,308 1,375 (5) (3)
Worldwide revenues $ 3,321 $ 4,970 (33) (33)
The declines in 2019 in the U.S. were due to the expected significantly lower volumes driven by multi-source generic competition which began in July 2019.
The operational decline internationally in 2019 was primarily due to generic competition in developed Europe markets and pricing pressures across international markets,
partially offset by increased volumes in Japan attributable to growth in the orally dissolving tablet formulation, and increased volumes in Russia and China.
• Xeljanz (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 1,636 $ 1,394 17
International 606 380 59 70
The growth in the U.S. in 2019 was primarily due to continued growth in the RA indication driven by access improvements, and by volume growth from the launches of the
UC and PsA indications in 2018, partially offset by higher rebating from new commercial contracts.
The operational growth internationally in 2019 was mainly driven by continued uptake in the RA indication in developed Europe, emerging markets, Japan and Canada as
well as from the recent launch of the UC indication in certain developed markets.
In July and December 2019, the FDA updated the U.S. prescribing information for Xeljanz to include three additional boxed warnings as well as changes to the indication
and dosing for UC. In January 2020, the EC revised the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) for Xeljanz to include new warnings and recommendations for use of
Xeljanz due to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism, and, due to an increased risk of infections, revised warnings in patients older than 65 years of age. These
updates were based on the FDA’s and EMA’s review of 10 mg data from the ongoing post-marketing requirement RA study A3921133. We expect these updates to
moderate growth. See the “Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Income—Product Development—Biopharmaceuticals” section of this Financial Review.
• Lipitor (Upjohn):

% Change
U.S. $ 104 $ 110 (6)
International 1,870 1,952 (4) —
Worldwide revenues $ 1,973 $ 2,062 (4) —
The worldwide operational revenue was flat in 2019 mostly due to overall increased demand in China in the first quarter of 2019 and continued geographic expansion
during the second half of 2019 in provinces where the VBP program had not yet been implemented, offset by pricing pressures in China resulting from the VBP
implementation in certain cities, discontinued sales in Saudi Arabia and lower volumes in Japan.
• Enbrel (Biopharma, outside the U.S. and Canada):

% Change
U.S. $ — $ — —
International 1,699 2,112 (20) (14)
Worldwide revenues $ 1,699 $ 2,112 (20) (14)
The worldwide operational decline in 2019 was primarily due to ongoing biosimilar competition in most developed Europe markets, which is expected to continue.

Financial Review

• Chantix/Champix (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 899 $ 838 7
International 208 247 (16) (12)
The growth in the U.S. in 2019 was primarily due to stronger demand. The operational decline internationally in 2019 was mainly driven by generic entry in South Korea and
Canada.
• Norvasc (Upjohn):

% Change
U.S. $ 39 $ 36 6
Worldwide revenues $ 950 $ 1,029 (8) (4)
The worldwide operational decline in 2019 was primarily due to pricing pressures in China resulting from the VBP implementation in certain cities and lower volumes in
Japan, partially offset by overall increased demand in China in the first quarter of 2019 and continued geographic expansion during the second half of 2019 in provinces
where the VBP had not yet been implemented.
• Sutent (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 283 $ 357 (21)
International 653 692 (6) 1
Worldwide revenues $ 936 $ 1,049 (11) (7)
The worldwide operational decline in 2019 reflects continued erosion as a result of increased competition in the U.S. and key developed markets, partially offset by growth
in certain emerging markets.
• Xtandi alliance revenues (Biopharma): Xtandi is being developed and commercialized through a collaboration with Astellas. The two companies share equally in the gross
profits (losses) related to U.S. net sales of Xtandi. Subject to certain exceptions, Pfizer and Astellas also share equally all Xtandi commercialization costs attributable to the
U.S. market. Pfizer and Astellas also share certain development and other collaboration expenses, and Pfizer receives tiered royalties as a percentage of international
Xtandi net sales (recorded in Other (income)/deductions—net).

% Change
U.S. $ 838 $ 699 20
International — — — —
Worldwide revenues $ 838 $ 699 20 20
The growth in the U.S. in 2019 was primarily driven by increased demand for Xtandi in metastatic (mCRPC) and non-metastatic (nmCRPC) castration-resistant prostate
cancer. Revenues continue to be unfavorably impacted by patient assistance programs (PAP) utilization.
• The Premarin family of products (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 690 $ 783 (12)
Worldwide revenues $ 734 $ 832 (12) (12)
The worldwide operational decline in 2019 was primarily driven by continued competitive pressures in the U.S., which is expected to continue.

Financial Review

• Celebrex (Upjohn):

% Change
U.S. $ 58 $ 65 (11)
The worldwide operational growth in 2019 was mainly due to higher volumes in China, driven by investments in geographic expansion, and higher volumes in Japan,
partially offset by pricing pressures in certain emerging markets.
• Sulperazon (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ — $ — —
The international operational growth in 2019 was mostly due to increased demand in China.
• Inflectra/Remsima (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 300 $ 259 16
Worldwide revenues $ 625 $ 642 (3) —
Worldwide operational revenues were relatively flat in 2019 due to continued volume growth in the U.S., as well as in certain developed markets in Europe and Canada,
offset by pricing pressures globally as well as competitive pressures internationally.
The growth in the U.S. in 2019 was primarily driven by demand in open systems, partially offset by price erosion. While Inflectra has achieved parity access to Remicade ®
(infliximab) in Medicare Part B, nearly half of all commercial patients are not able to access Inflectra due to exclusionary contracting practices by J&J. In September 2017,
Pfizer filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against J&J alleging that J&J’s exclusionary contracts and other anticompetitive practices
concerning Remicade violate federal antitrust laws. In June 2019, Pfizer received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) seeking
documents and information relating to the alleged conduct and market conditions at issue in Pfizer’s lawsuit against J&J. Pfizer understands that the FTC’s investigation is
focused on J&J’s alleged conduct at issue in Pfizer’s lawsuit against J&J.
• Xalkori (Biopharma):

% Change

U.S. $ 149 $ 158 (5)
The worldwide operational growth in 2019 primarily resulted from growth in China, following the impact of inclusion of Xalkori in the 2019 National Reimbursement Drug
Listing, partially offset by erosion due to competition in developed Europe and in the U.S.
• Viagra (Upjohn)

% Change
U.S. $ 75 $ 217 (65)
The decline in the U.S. in 2019 was driven by the loss of exclusivity in December 2017. The operational growth internationally in 2019 was mostly due to increased retail
demand growth in China, partially offset by pricing pressures in China and lower volumes across certain developed and certain emerging markets.

Financial Review

• Inlyta (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 295 $ 119 *
The worldwide operational growth in 2019 was primarily due to increased demand in the U.S. as a result of the FDA approvals in the second quarter of 2019 for
combinations of certain immune checkpoint inhibitors plus Inlyta for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC.
• Vyndaqel/Vyndamax (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 191 $ — *
Worldwide revenues $ 473 $ 148 * *
The growth in the U.S. was driven by the launches in May 2019 of Vyndaqel and in September 2019 of Vyndamax, for the treatment of transthyretin amyloid
cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). The operational growth in international markets was primarily driven by continued uptake for the transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy
indication, primarily in developed Europe, as well as the March 2019 launch of the ATTR-CM indication in Japan.
• Eucrisa (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 134 $ 147 (9)
International 3 — * *
The decline in the U.S. in 2019 was primarily driven by higher rebating and unfavorable channel mix, in addition to favorable rebate adjustments in 2018, partially offset by
volume growth.
• Alliance revenues (Biopharma):

% Change
U.S. $ 3,208 $ 2,576 25
The worldwide operational growth in 2019 was mainly due to increases in Eliquis and Xtandi alliance revenues included in the above discussion.
◦ Bavencio (Biopharma) is being developed and commercialized in collaboration with Merck KGaA. Both companies jointly fund the majority of development and
commercialization costs, and split equally any profits related to net sales generated from selling any products containing avelumab from this collaboration. Bavencio is
currently approved in metastatic MCC in the U.S., the EU, Japan and select other markets; the second-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial
carcinoma in the U.S. and select other markets; and first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC in combination with Inlyta in the U.S., the EU, Japan and select
other markets.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 17C. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information: Other Revenue Information for additional information
regarding the primary indications or class of the selected products discussed above.
See the “Patents and Other Intellectual Property Rights” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business” of our 2019 Form 10-K for information regarding the expiration of various patent
rights.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 16. Contingencies and Certain Commitments for a discussion of recent developments concerning patent and product
litigation relating to certain of the products discussed above.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTS—BIOPHARMACEUTICAL
We continue to invest in R&D to provide potential future sources of revenues through the development of new products, as well as through additional uses for in-line and
alliance products. Notwithstanding our efforts, there are no assurances as to when, or if, we will receive regulatory approval for additional indications for existing products or
any of our other products in development.

Financial Review

We continue to strengthen our global R&D organization and pursue strategies intended to improve innovation and overall productivity in R&D to achieve a sustainable pipeline
that will deliver value in the near term and over time.
For additional information about our R&D organization, see the “Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook—Our Strategy—Organizing for
Growth” and “—Description of Research and Development Operations” sections of this Financial Review.
A comprehensive update of Pfizer’s development pipeline was published as of January 28, 2020 and is available at www.pfizer.com/science/drug-product-pipeline. It includes
an overview of our research and a list of compounds in development with targeted indication and phase of development, as well as mechanism of action for some candidates in
Phase 1 and all candidates from Phase 2 through registration.
The following series of tables provides information about significant regulatory actions by, and filings pending with, the FDA and regulatory authorities in the EU and Japan, as
well as additional indications and new drug candidates in late-stage development.
RECENT FDA APPROVALS

PRODUCT INDICATION DATE APPROVED
Xtandi (enzalutamide) Treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, which is being developed through a collaboration with December 2019
Astellas
Abrilada (adalimumab-afzb)(a) A biosimilar to Humira® (adalimumab) for the treatment of certain patients with rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic November 2019
arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, adult Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and plaque psoriasis
Ruxience (rituximab-pvvr)(b) A biosimilar to Rituxan® (rituximab) for the treatment of adult patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic July 2019
leukemia, and granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis
Zirabev (bevacizumab-bvzr)(c) A biosimilar to Avastin® (bevacizumab) for the treatment of mCRC; unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic June 2019
NSCLC; recurrent glioblastoma; metastatic RCC; and persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer
Bavencio (avelumab) Bavencio (avelumab) in combination with Inlyta (axitinib) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC, which is May 2019
being developed in collaboration with Merck KGaA, Germany
Vyndaqel (tafamidis meglumine) Treatment of the cardiomyopathy of wild-type or hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (ATTR-CM) in adults to May 2019
reduce cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular-related hospitalization
Vyndamax (tafamidis) Treatment of the cardiomyopathy of wild-type or hereditary ATTR-CM in adults to reduce cardiovascular mortality and May 2019
cardiovascular-related hospitalization
Trazimera (trastuzumab-qyyp)(d) A biosimilar to Herceptin® (trastuzumab) for all eligible indications of the reference product March 2019
Daurismo (glasdegib) Treatment of newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in adult patients who are 75 years or older or who have November 2018
comorbidities that preclude use of intensive induction chemotherapy
Lorbrena (lorlatinib) Treatment of patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC whose disease has progressed on crizotinib and at least one November 2018
other ALK inhibitor for metastatic disease; or whose disease has progressed on alectinib or ceritinib as the first ALK
inhibitor therapy for metastatic disease
(a) Humira® is a registered trademark of AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd. Pfizer is working to make Abrilada available to U.S. patients as soon as feasible based on the terms of its agreement with AbbVie. Current plans
are to launch Abrilada in 2023.
(b) Rituxan® is a registered trademark of Biogen MA Inc.
(c) Avastin® is a registered trademark of Genentech, Inc.
(d) Herceptin® is a registered trademark of Genentech, Inc.
PENDING U.S. NDAs AND SUPPLEMENTAL FILINGS

PRODUCT PROPOSED INDICATION DATE FILED*
Braftovi (encorafenib)(a) Braftovi (encorafenib) in combination with Erbitux® (cetuximab) for the treatment of BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic December 2019
colorectal cancer after prior therapy
PF-06881894(b) A potential biosimilar to Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim) August 2019
Vyndaqel (tafamidis meglumine)(c) Treatment of transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy February 2012
* The dates set forth in this column are the dates on which the FDA accepted our submissions.
(a) Erbitux® is a registered trademark of ImClone LLC.
(b) Neulasta® is a registered U.S. trademark of Amgen Inc.
(c) In May 2012, the FDA’s Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee voted that the tafamidis meglumine data provide substantial evidence of efficacy for a surrogate endpoint that is
reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit. In June 2012, the FDA issued a “complete response” letter with respect to this tafamidis NDA. The FDA has requested the completion of a second efficacy study, and
also has asked for additional information on the data within the current tafamidis NDA. Pfizer has completed study B3461028, a global Phase 3 study to support the new indication of transthyretin amyloid
cardiomyopathy, which includes patients with wild type and variant transthyretin. We are working with the FDA to identify next steps.

Financial Review
REGULATORY APPROVALS AND FILINGS IN THE EU AND JAPAN

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION OF EVENT DATE APPROVED DATE FILED*
Vyndaqel (tafamidis free acid) Application approved in the EU for a once-daily 61 mg oral capsule, for the treatment of wild-type or February 2020 —
hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis in adult patients with cardiomyopathy
Amsparity (adalimumab)(a) Application approved in the EU for a biosimilar to Humira® (adalimumab) for the treatment of certain patients February 2020 —
with rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis,
hidradenitis suppurativa, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, uveitis, and pediatric plaque psoriasis
Xeljanz (tofacitinib) Application approved in the EU for Xeljanz (tofacitinib) 11 mg prolonged release tablets in combination with December 2019 —
methotrexate for the treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis in adult patients who have
responded inadequately to, or who are intolerant to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
Bavencio (avelumab) Application approved in Japan for Bavencio (avelumab) in combination with Inlyta (axitinib) for the first-line December 2019 —
treatment of advanced RCC, which is being developed in collaboration with Merck KGaA, Germany
Braftovi (encorafenib) and Mektovi Application filed in the EU for second-or-third-line treatment of BRAF-mutant mCRC in patients who have — November 2019
(binimetinib) received prior systemic therapy, which is being developed in collaboration with the Pierre Fabre Group
Bavencio (avelumab) Application approved in the EU for Bavencio (avelumab) in combination with Inlyta (axitinib) for the first-line October 2019 —
treatment of advanced RCC, which is being developed in collaboration with Merck KGaA, Germany
PF-06881894(b) Application filed in the EU for a potential biosimilar to Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim) — October 2019
Rituximab Pfizer (rituximab)(c) Application approved in Japan for a biosimilar to Rituxan® (rituximab) for the treatment of CD20-positive, B- September 2019 —
cell non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, CD20-positive, B-cell lymphoproliferative disease under
immunosuppression, and Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and microscopic polyangiitis
Bosulif (bosutinib) Application filed in Japan for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), which is being — July 2019
developed in collaboration with Avillion LLP
Xtandi (enzalutamide) Application filed in the EU for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, which is being — July 2019
developed through a collaboration with Astellas
Talzenna (talazoparib) Application approved in the EU for monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with germline breast June 2019 —
cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA)1/2-mutations, who have HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast
cancer
Bevacizumab Pfizer (bevacizumab)(d) Application approved in Japan for a biosimilar to Avastin® (bevacizumab) for the treatment of metastatic June 2019 —
colorectal cancer
Daurismo (glasdegib) Application filed in the EU for treatment of newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in adult patients who — May 2019
are 75 years or older or who have co-morbidities that preclude use of intensive induction chemotherapy
Lorviqua (lorlatinib) Application approved in the EU as monotherapy, for the treatment of adult patients with ALK- positive May 2019
advanced non-small cell lung cancer whose disease has progressed after:
—
• alectinib or ceritinib as the first ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy; or
• crizotinib and at least one other ALK TKI
Vizimpro (dacomitinib) Application approved in the EU as monotherapy for the first-line treatment of adult patients with locally April 2019
advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR activating mutations, which is being —
developed in collaboration with SFJ
Vyndaqel (tafamidis meglumine) Application approved in Japan for treatment of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy March 2019 —
Zirabev(d) Application approved in the EU for a biosimilar to Avastin® (bevacizumab) for the treatment of metastatic February 2019 —
carcinoma of the colon or rectum, metastatic breast cancer, unresectable advanced, metastatic or recurrent
NSCLC, advanced and/or metastatic renal cell cancer and persistent, recurrent, or metastatic carcinoma of
the cervix
Vizimpro (dacomitinib) Application approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small January 2019 —
cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations, which is being developed in collaboration with SFJ
PF-05280586(e) Application filed in the EU for a potential biosimilar to MabThera® (rituximab) — August 2018
crisaborole(f) Application filed in the EU for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in adults and pediatric — May 2018
patients from 2 years of age with ≤ 40% body surface area (BSA) affected
* For applications in the EU, the dates set forth in this column are the dates on which the EMA validated our submissions.
(a) Humira® is a registered trademark of AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd. Pfizer does not currently plan to commercialize Amsparity in the EU due to unfavorable market conditions.
(b) Neulasta® is a registered trademark of Amgen Inc.
(c) Rituxan® is a registered trademark of Biogen MA Inc.
(d) Avastin® is a registered trademark of Genentech, Inc.
(e) MabThera® is a registered trademark of Roche, Inc. In January 2020, the EMA’s CHMP adopted a positive opinion recommending the approval of PF-05280586 as a potential biosimilar to MabThera® (rituximab)
for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, RA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis, and pemphigus vulgaris.
(f) In January 2020, the EMA’s CHMP adopted a positive opinion recommending the approval of Staquis (crisaborole) for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in adults and pediatric patients from 2
years of age with ≤ 40% BSA affected.

Financial Review
LATE-STAGE CLINICAL PROGRAMS FOR ADDITIONAL USES AND DOSAGE FORMS

FOR IN-LINE AND IN-REGISTRATION PRODUCTS
PRODUCT PROPOSED INDICATION
Bavencio (avelumab) A monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 for the first-line treatment of stage IIIb/IV non-small cell lung cancer, which is being developed in collaboration with Merck
KGaA, Germany
Bavencio (avelumab) A monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 for maintenance treatment, in the first-line setting, for patients with urothelial cancer, which is being developed in
collaboration with Merck KGaA, Germany
Bavencio (avelumab) A monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 for treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, which is being developed in
collaboration with Merck KGaA, Germany
Daurismo (glasdegib) A smoothened inhibitor, in combination with azacitidine, for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia
Ibrance (palbociclib) Treatment of HER2+ advanced breast cancer, in collaboration with the Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC
Ibrance (palbociclib) Treatment of high-risk early breast cancer, in collaboration with the German Breast Group
Ibrance (palbociclib) Treatment of HR+ early breast cancer, in collaboration with the Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC, and the Austrian Breast Colorectal Cancer Study Group
Lorbrena (lorlatinib) Treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer whose tumors are ALK-positive as detected by an FDA-approved test
Xeljanz (tofacitinib) Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis
Xtandi (enzalutamide) Treatment of non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, which is being developed through a collaboration with Astellas
Talzenna (talazoparib) An oral PARP inhibitor, in combination with Xtandi (enzalutamide), for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
In November 2019, we and our partner Merck KGaA, Germany, announced the topline results of the Phase III JAVELIN Gastric 100 study evaluating avelumab as first-line
maintenance therapy following induction chemotherapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction
cancer versus continuation of chemotherapy or best supportive care. While the study showed clinical activity for avelumab in this setting, it did not meet the primary endpoints
of superior overall survival compared with the standard of care in the overall intent-to-treat population. No new safety signals were observed, and the safety profile for
avelumab in this trial was consistent with that observed in the overall JAVELIN clinical development program.
In February 2019, the company took steps to transition rheumatoid arthritis study patients who were on tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily in the ongoing
FDA post-marketing requirement study A3921133, a study performed in patients considered to be at high risk for certain side effects. This action was taken as the result of
notification from the tofacitinib Rheumatology Data Safety Monitoring Board of a safety signal regarding the tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily treatment arm in study A3921133. The
5 mg twice daily dose is the FDA approved dose in the U.S. for adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. In July 2019, the FDA updated the U.S. prescribing
information for Xeljanz to include two additional boxed warnings as well as changes to the indication and dosing for UC. These updates were based on the FDA’s review of
data from the ongoing post-marketing requirement RA study A3921133. In January 2020, the EC revised the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) for Xeljanz to include
new warnings and recommendations for use of Xeljanz due to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and, due to an increased risk of infections, revised warnings in
patients older than 65 years of age. These updates were based on the FDA’s and EMA’s review of data from the ongoing post-marketing requirement rheumatoid arthritis study
A3921133.
NEW DRUG CANDIDATES IN LATE-STAGE DEVELOPMENT

CANDIDATE PROPOSED INDICATION
aztreonam-avibactam A beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitor for the treatment of patients with infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, including those that produce metallo-beta-
(PF-06947387) lactamases, for which there are limited or no treatment options
fidanacogene elaparvovec (PF-06838435) An investigational gene therapy for the treatment of hemophilia B
PF-06482077 A 20-Valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease and pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes
covered by the vaccine in adults 18 years of age and older
PF-06651600 A selective dual Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) and Tyrosine kinase Expressed in hepatocellular Carcinoma (TEC) family inhibitor for the treatment of patients with moderate
to severe alopecia areata
abrocitinib (PF-04965842) A Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis
PF-06425090
A prophylactic vaccine for prevention of primary clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in individuals
PF-07265803 An oral inhibitor of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase for the treatment of patients with symptomatic dilated cardiomyopathy due to a Lamin A/C gene mutation
PF-06801591 A monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-1, in combination with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
somatrogon (PF-06836922) A long-acting hGH-CTP for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children, which is being developed in collaboration with OPKO
somatrogon (PF-06836922) A long-acting hGH-CTP for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency in adults, which is being developed in collaboration with OPKO
tanezumab An anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody for the treatment of pain, which is being developed in collaboration with Lilly
In August 2019, we announced that the Phase 3 Rivipansel (GMI-1070): Evaluating Safety, Efficacy and Time to Discharge (RESET) pivotal study did not meet its primary or
key secondary efficacy endpoints. The objective of the trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivipansel in patients aged six and older with sickle cell disease (SCD)
who were hospitalized for a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and required treatment with IV opioids. We plan to share the study data in a publication or scientific meeting
presentation in the near future, as we want to ensure the learnings from this trial help inform future sickle cell programs that aim to improve care for SCD disease patients
experiencing a

Financial Review
VOC. In February 2020, we notified GlycoMimetics, Inc. that we were discontinuing further development of rivipansel and will transfer the program back to them.
Additional product-related programs are in various stages of discovery and development.
COSTS AND EXPENSES

The changes in expenses below reflect, among other things, a decline in expenses resulting from the July 31, 2019 completion of the Consumer Healthcare JV transaction with
GSK. Our financial results, and our Consumer Healthcare segment’s operating results, for 2019 reflect seven months of Consumer Healthcare segment domestic operations
and eight months of Consumer Healthcare segment international operations. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1A. Basis of
Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales $ 10,219 $ 11,248 $ 11,228 (9) —
As a percentage of Revenues 19.7% 21.0% 21.4%
2019 v. 2018
Cost of sales decreased $1.0 billion, or 9% in 2019, compared to 2018, primarily due to:
• the favorable impact of the July 31, 2019 completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction with GSK;
• the favorable impact of foreign exchange of $279 million;
• the favorable impact of hedging activity on intercompany inventory of $261 million; and
• lower royalty expense for Lyrica due to the patent expiration,
• an unfavorable change in product mix.
The decrease in Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues in 2019, compared to 2018, was primarily due to all of the factors discussed above, as well an increase in alliance
revenues, which have no associated cost of sales, partially offset by lower Lyrica revenues in developed markets, due to U.S. multi-source generic competition that began in
July 2019.
2018 v. 2017
Cost of sales increased $21 million, or were relatively flat, in 2018, compared to 2017, primarily due to:
• increased sales volumes mostly related to key products within our product portfolio;
• higher costs across the legacy SIP portfolio, as a result of the complexity of high quality product manufacture across the legacy Hospira plants, which was partially offset by
decreases in other costs across various markets;
• an increase in royalty expenses based on the mix of products sold; and
• the unfavorable impact of hedging activity on intercompany inventory of $65 million,
• lower volumes from the legacy SIP portfolio, in developed markets, primarily due to increased competition across the legacy SIP portfolio and continued legacy Hospira
product shortages in the U.S.;
• the non-recurrence of $195 million in inventory losses, overhead costs, and incremental costs related to the period in 2017 during which our Puerto Rico plants were not
operational due to hurricanes;
• the favorable impact of foreign exchange of $153 million;
• the non-recurrence of charges related to a product recall that occurred in 2017; and
• the favorable impact of the sale of HIS of $35 million.
The decrease in Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues in 2018, compared to 2017, was mainly due to all of the factors discussed above, as well as an increase in alliance
revenues, which have no associated cost of sales.
Selling, Informational and Administrative (SI&A) Expenses

Selling, informational and administrative expenses $ 14,350 $ 14,455 $ 14,804 (1) (2)
2019 v. 2018
SI&A expenses decreased $105 million, or 1%, in 2019, compared to 2018, mostly due to:
• the favorable impact of the July 31, 2019 completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture with GSK;

Financial Review

• reduction in field force expense as well as advertising and promotion expenses in developed markets, primarily related to Lyrica in the U.S.; and
• the favorable impact of foreign exchange of $291 million,
• additional Biopharma investment in emerging markets;
• separation costs of $127 million associated with our planned Upjohn transaction with Mylan;
• additional investment in the Oncology portfolio in developed markets;
• increased employee deferred compensation as a result of savings plan gains;
• an increase due to the timing of expenses (i.e., insurance recoveries and product donations);
• marketing and promotional expenses associated with the U.S. launches of Vyndaqel in May 2019 and Vyndamax in September 2019;
• costs to separate Consumer Healthcare;
• increased healthcare reform expenses; and
• Upjohn investments in China across key brands.
2018 v. 2017
SI&A expenses decreased $350 million, or 2%, in 2018, compared to 2017, mainly due to:
• lower advertising, promotional and field force expenses, as well as general and administrative expenses, reflecting the benefits of cost-reduction and productivity initiatives;
• the non-recurrence of a $200 million charitable contribution to the Pfizer Foundation;
• decreased investment across several of our key products, primarily Viagra and Enbrel; and
• lower healthcare reform expenses as a result of a true up of the prior year amount,
• additional investment across several of our key products, primarily, Xeljanz, Ibrance, Eucrisa and Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13;
• additional investments in China; and
• a special, one-time bonus paid to virtually all Pfizer colleagues, excluding executives, of $119 million, in the aggregate, in the first quarter of 2018.
Research and Development (R&D) Expenses

Research and development expenses $ 8,650 $ 8,006 $ 7,683 8 4
2019 v. 2018
R&D expenses increased $644 million, or 8%, in 2019, compared to 2018, mainly due to:
• upfront payments to Therachon and Akcea (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and
Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements);
• increased investments towards building new capabilities and driving automation;
• increased spending on our Inflammation & Immunology and Rare Disease portfolios due to several Phase 3 programs and
investment in gene therapy;
• increased spending related to assets acquired from Array; and
• increased medical spend for new and growing products,
• decreased spending across the Oncology, Vaccines and Internal Medicine portfolios, as select programs have reached completion;
• a decrease in the value of the portfolio performance share grants reflecting changes in the price of Pfizer’s common stock, as well as management’s assessment of the
probability that the specified performance criteria will be achieved;
• the discontinuation of the Staphylococcus aureus vaccine trial;
• the favorable impact of the July 31, 2019 completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture with GSK; and
• the favorable impact of foreign exchange.
2018 v. 2017
R&D expenses increased $322 million, or 4%, in 2018, compared to 2017, mainly due to:
• increased costs associated with our Phase 3 clinical trials related to our JAK1 inhibitor (which was initiated in December 2017) and the C. difficile vaccine program (which
was initiated in March 2017) as well as increased spending for our 20 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine candidate;
• increased costs associated with the Bavencio program; and

Financial Review

• an increase in the value of the portfolio performance share grants reflecting changes in the price of Pfizer’s common stock, as well as management’s assessment of the
probability that the specified performance criteria will be achieved,
• decreased spending for biosimilars as several programs have reached completion; and
• the impact of our decision to end internal neuroscience discovery and early development efforts.
For additional information on Cost of sales, SI&A and R&D expenses by operating segment, see the “Analysis of Operating Segment Information” section of this Financial
Review.
Amortization of Intangible Assets

Amortization of intangible assets $ 4,610 $ 4,893 $ 4,758 (6) 3
Amortization of intangible assets decreased $283 million, or 6%, in 2019, compared to 2018, mainly due to the non-recurrence of amortization expense as a result of the
impairment of sterile injectable products in the fourth quarter of 2018 (recorded in Other (income)/deductions––net), fully amortized assets and the contribution of our
Consumer Healthcare business to the Consumer Healthcare joint venture with GSK, partially offset by an increase in amortization expense related to assets recorded as a
result of the approval of Xtandi in the U.S. for the treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in July of 2018 and amortization of intangible assets as a
result of our acquisition of Array.
Amortization of intangible assets increased $135 million, or 3%, in 2018, compared to 2017, primarily due to amortization expense of approximately $151 million (pre-tax) in
2018 associated with the approval of Xtandi in the U.S. for the treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The U.S. approval resulted in the transfer of
$2.7 billion from an indefinite-lived IPR&D intangible asset to a finite-lived Developed technology rights intangible asset.
For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2A. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for
Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Acquisitions, —Note 2C. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method
Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Equity-Method Investment
and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale and —Note 10A. Identifiable Intangible Assets and Goodwill: Identifiable Intangible Assets.
Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives
Restructuring charges/(credits)––acquisition-related costs(a) $ (192) $ 37 $ 105 * (64)
Restructuring charges/(credits)––cost reduction initiatives(b) 565 745 (75) (24) *
Restructuring charges 373 782 30 (52) *
Transaction costs(c) 63 1 4 * (62)
Integration costs and other(c) 311 260 317 20 (18)

Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs 747 1,044 351 (28) *
Net periodic benefit costs(c) 23 146 136 (84) 8
Total additional depreciation––asset restructuring 38 50 91 (24) (45)
Total implementation costs
158 194 227 (18) (15)
Costs associated with acquisitions and cost-reduction/productivity
initiatives(d) $ 967 $ 1,434 $ 805 (33) 78
(a) Restructuring charges/(credits)––acquisition-related costs include employee termination costs, asset impairments and other exit costs associated with business combinations. Credits for 2019 were mostly due to
the reversal of certain accruals related to our acquisition of Wyeth upon the effective favorable settlement of an IRS audit for multiple tax years. See Notes Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5D. Tax
Matters: Tax Contingencies. Charges for 2018 were mainly due to asset write downs, partially offset by the reversal of previously recorded accruals for employee termination costs related to our acquisition of
Hospira. Restructuring charges for 2017 mainly related to our acquisitions of Hospira and Medivation and were primarily due to asset write-downs, partially offset by the reversal of previously recorded accruals for
employee termination costs.
(b) Restructuring charges/(credits)––cost reduction initiatives relate to employee termination costs, asset impairments and other exit costs not associated with acquisitions. For 2019, the charges were mostly related
to employee termination costs. For 2018, the charges were mostly related to employee termination costs and asset write downs. The employee termination costs for 2019 and 2018 were primarily associated with
our improvements to operational effectiveness as part of the realignment of our organizational structure, and for 2019, also includes employee termination costs associated with the Transforming to a More
Focused Company initiative. For 2017, the credits were mostly related to the reversal of previously recorded accruals for employee termination costs, partially offset by asset write downs.
(c) For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.
(d) Comprises Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs as well as costs associated with our cost-reduction/productivity initiatives included in Cost of sales, Research and development expenses,
Selling, informational and administrative expenses and/or Other (income)/deductions––net as appropriate. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 3. Restructuring
Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.

Financial Review

2017-2019 Initiatives and Organizing for Growth
During 2018, we determined that at the start of our 2019 fiscal year, we would begin operating under our new commercial structure, which reorganized our operations into three
businesses––Biopharma, a science-based innovative medicines business; Upjohn, a global, primarily off-patent branded and generic established medicines business; and
through July 31, 2019, a Consumer Healthcare business. To operate effectively in this structure and position ourselves for future growth, we focused on creating a simpler,
more efficient operating structure within each business as well as the functions that support them. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018, we reviewed previously planned
initiatives and new initiatives to ensure that there was alignment around our new structure and combined the 2017-2019 initiatives with our current Organizing for Growth
initiatives to form one cohesive plan. For the combined programs, we achieved savings of approximately $1.6 billion and incurred approximately $2.1 billion in costs over the
three-year period 2017-2019. Savings of approximately $500 million were reinvested in our R&D pipeline and in selling and marketing to support our current and recently
launched products and indications.
in science-based innovative medicines. As a result, we began, in the fourth quarter of 2019, to identify and undertake efforts to ensure our cost base aligns appropriately with
our Biopharmaceutical revenue base, which is expected to be 20% less (based on the midpoint of the range for 2020 New Pfizer revenue guidance (see the “Our Financial
Guidance for 2020” section of this Financial Review), compared to 2019 total company reported revenue) as a result of both the completed Consumer Healthcare and expected
Upjohn transactions. While certain direct costs have transferred or will transfer to the Consumer Healthcare joint venture and to the Upjohn entities, there are indirect costs
which are not expected to transfer. In addition, we are taking steps to restructure our organizations to appropriately support and drive the purpose of the three core functions of
our focused innovative medicines business: R&D, Manufacturing and Commercial. We expect the costs associated with this multi-year effort to continue through 2022 and to
total approximately $1.4 billion on a pre-tax basis and approximately 10% of this to be non-cash. Actions may include, among others, changes in location of certain activities,
expanded use and co-location of centers of excellence and shared services, and increased use of digital technologies. The associated actions and the specific costs are
currently in development but will include severance and benefit plan impacts, exit costs as well as associated implementation costs.
We expect net cost savings of about $1.0 billion to be achieved over the three-year period 2020-2022. Certain qualifying costs associated with this program were recorded in
the fourth quarter of 2019 and are reflected as Certain Significant Items and excluded from our non-GAAP measure of Adjusted Income. See the “Non-GAAP Financial
Measure (Adjusted Income)” section of this Financial Review for additional information. These savings are expected to be realized primarily in procurement and in enabling
functions (as described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 17A. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information: Segment Information).
For additional information about this program and expected and actual total costs, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other
Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.
In addition to these major initiatives, we continuously monitor our operations for cost reduction and/or productivity opportunities, especially in light of the losses of exclusivity
and the expiration of collaborative arrangements for various products.
Other (Income)/Deductions––Net
Other (income)/deductions—net $ 3,578 $ 2,116 $ 1,416 69 49
For information about the components of Other (income)/deductions—net, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions—Net.
See also the “Analysis of Operating Segment Information” section of this Financial Review.
PROVISION/(BENEFIT) FOR TAXES ON INCOME

Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income $ 1,384 $ 706 $ (9,049) 96 *
Effective tax rate on continuing operations 7.8% 5.9% (73.5)%
2019 v. 2018
The higher effective tax rate in 2019 compared to 2018 was mainly the result of:
• the tax expense of approximately $2.7 billion associated with the gain related to the completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction with GSK; and
• the non-recurrence of certain tax initiatives and favorable adjustments to the provisional estimate of the TCJA,

Financial Review

• an increase in tax benefits associated with the resolution of certain tax positions pertaining to prior years, primarily due to a benefit of $1.4 billion, representing tax and
interest, resulting from the favorable settlement of a U.S. IRS audit;
• benefits related to certain tax initiatives associated with the implementation of our new organizational structure;
• the tax benefit recorded as a result of additional guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury related to the enactment of the TCJA; and
• the favorable change in the jurisdictional mix of earnings as a result of operating fluctuations in the normal course of business.
2018 v. 2017
The higher effective tax rate in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily the result of:
• the non-recurrence of a $10.7 billion tax benefit recorded in 2017 to reflect the enactment of the TCJA,
• tax benefits related to the TCJA, including certain 2018 tax initiatives as well as favorable adjustments to the provisional estimate of the impact of the legislation, reported
and disclosed within the applicable measurement period, in accordance with guidance issued by the SEC;
• the favorable change in the jurisdictional mix of earnings as a result of operating fluctuations in the normal course of business; as well as
• an increase in tax benefits associated with the resolution of certain tax positions pertaining to prior years primarily with various foreign tax authorities, and the expiration of
certain statutes of limitations.
For details about discrete elements that impacted our tax provisions, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from
Continuing Operations.
Changes in Tax Laws
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted significant changes to U.S. tax law following the passage and signing of the TCJA. The TCJA is complex and significantly changes
the U.S. corporate income tax system by, among other things, reducing the U.S. Federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, transitioning U.S. international taxation from a
worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system and imposing a repatriation tax on deemed repatriated accumulated post-1986 earnings of foreign subsidiaries. In accordance
with guidance issued by the SEC we recorded provisional estimates of the legislation in the fourth-quarter 2017. In 2018, we finalized our provisional accounting for the tax
effects of the TCJA based on our best estimates of available information and data, and have reported and disclosed the impacts within the applicable measurement period, in
accordance with guidance issued by the SEC. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from
Continuing Operations and the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources––Selected Measures of Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual
Obligations” section of this Financial Review.
On January 23, 2017, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law Act No. 3-2017, amending Section 2101 of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, which imposes
an excise tax that was effective beginning in 2011 (Act 154). The excise tax is imposed on the purchase of products by multinational corporations and their affiliates from their
Puerto Rico affiliates. As originally adopted, the excise tax was to be in effect from 2011 through 2016 and the tax rate was to decline over time from 4% in 2011 to 1% in 2016.
Act No. 2-2013 extended the excise tax through 2017 and, effective July 1, 2013, increased the tax rate to 4% for all years through 2017. Act No. 3-2017 further extended the
excise tax for all years through 2027 at a rate of 4%. The excise tax has been recorded in Cost of sales and Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income, as appropriate. All
expected impacts in 2020 have been reflected in our financial guidance for 2020.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE (ADJUSTED INCOME)

General Description of Non-GAAP Financial Measure (Adjusted Income)
Adjusted income is an alternative view of performance used by management. We measure the performance of the overall Company on this basis in conjunction with other
performance metrics. Because Adjusted income is an important internal measurement for Pfizer, we believe that investors’ understanding of our performance is enhanced by
disclosing this performance measure. We report Adjusted income, certain components of Adjusted income, and Adjusted diluted earnings per share in order to portray the
results of our major operations––the discovery, development, manufacture, marketing and sale of prescription medicines and vaccines––prior to considering certain income
statement elements. We have defined Adjusted income as Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. before the impact of purchase accounting for acquisitions, acquisition-related
costs, discontinued operations and certain significant items, which are described below. Similarly, we have defined the Adjusted income components as Cost of sales, Selling,
informational and administrative expenses, Research and development expenses, Amortization of intangible assets and Other (income)/deductions––net each before the
impact of purchase accounting for acquisitions, acquisition-related costs and certain significant items. We have defined Adjusted diluted earnings per share as Earnings per
common share attributable to Pfizer Inc.––diluted before the impact of purchase accounting for acquisitions, acquisition-related costs, discontinued operations and certain
significant items. The Adjusted income measure, the Adjusted income component measures and the Adjusted diluted earnings per share measure are not, and should not be
viewed as, substitutes for U.S. GAAP net income, U.S. GAAP net income components or U.S. GAAP diluted earnings per share.
The following are examples of how the Adjusted income and Adjusted diluted earnings per share measures are utilized:
• senior management receives a monthly analysis of our operating results that is prepared on an Adjusted income and Adjusted diluted earnings per share basis;
• our annual budgets are prepared on an Adjusted income and Adjusted diluted earnings per share basis; and
• senior management’s annual compensation is derived, in part, using Adjusted income and Adjusted diluted earnings per share measures. The bonus plans for virtually all
bonus-eligible, non-sales-force employees worldwide, including the Executive Leadership Team members

Financial Review
and other members of senior management, are funded from a pool based on the performance measured by three financial metrics, including Adjusted diluted earnings per
share, which is derived from Adjusted income. This metric accounts for 40% of the bonus pool funding. In addition, effective in 2019, Adjusted net income, which is derived
from Adjusted income, is one of the measures utilized to determine payout for PSAs and is used for performance years starting in 2019, except for the 2017 PSA grant that
used the previous metric, Adjusted operating income.
Adjusted income and its components and Adjusted diluted earnings per share are non-GAAP financial measures that have no standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP
and, therefore, are limited in their usefulness to investors. Because of their non-standardized definitions, Adjusted income and its components (unlike U.S. GAAP net income
and its components) and Adjusted diluted earnings per share (unlike U.S. GAAP diluted earnings per share) may not be comparable to the calculation of similar measures of
other companies. Adjusted income and its components and Adjusted diluted earnings per share are presented solely to permit investors to more fully understand how
management assesses performance.
We also recognize that, as internal measures of performance, the Adjusted income and its components and Adjusted diluted earnings per share measures have limitations,
and we do not restrict our performance-management process solely to these metrics. A limitation of these measures is that they provide a view of our operations without
including all events during a period, such as the effects of an acquisition or amortization of purchased intangibles, and do not provide a comparable view of our performance to
other companies in the biopharmaceutical industry. We also use other specifically tailored tools designed to achieve the highest levels of performance. For example, our R&D
organization has productivity targets, upon which its effectiveness is measured. In addition, total shareholder return, both on an absolute basis and relative to a publicly traded
pharmaceutical index, plays a significant role in determining payouts under certain of Pfizer’s long-term incentive compensation plans.
See the accompanying reconciliations of certain GAAP reported to non-GAAP adjusted information for 2019, 2018 and 2017 below.
Purchase Accounting Adjustments
Adjusted income is calculated prior to considering certain significant purchase accounting impacts resulting from business combinations and net asset acquisitions. These
impacts, primarily associated with Wyeth (acquired in 2009), Hospira (acquired in 2015), Anacor (acquired in 2016) and Medivation (acquired in 2016), can include the
incremental charge to cost of sales from the sale of acquired inventory that was written up to fair value, amortization related to the increase in fair value of the acquired finite-
lived intangible assets, and to a much lesser extent, depreciation related to the increase/decrease in fair value of the acquired fixed assets (primarily manufacturing facilities),
amortization related to the increase in fair value of acquired debt, and the fair value changes associated with contingent consideration. Therefore, the Adjusted income
measure includes the revenues earned upon the sale of the acquired products without considering the acquisition cost of those products.
Certain of the purchase accounting adjustments can occur through 20 or more years, but this presentation provides an alternative view of our performance that is used by
management to internally assess business performance. We believe the elimination of amortization attributable to acquired intangible assets provides management and
investors an alternative view of our business results by trying to provide a degree of parity to internally developed intangible assets for which R&D costs previously have been
expensed.
However, a completely accurate comparison of internally developed intangible assets and acquired intangible assets cannot be achieved through Adjusted income. This
component of Adjusted income is derived solely from the impacts of the items listed in the first paragraph of this section. We have not factored in the impacts of any other
differences in experience that might have occurred if we had discovered and developed those intangible assets on our own, and this approach does not intend to be
representative of the results that would have occurred in those circumstances. For example, our R&D costs in total, and in the periods presented, may have been different; our
speed to commercialization and resulting sales, if any, may have been different; or our costs to manufacture may have been different. In addition, our marketing efforts may
have been received differently by our customers. As such, in total, there can be no assurance that our Adjusted income amounts would have been the same as presented had
we discovered and developed the acquired intangible assets.
Acquisition-Related Costs
Adjusted income is calculated prior to considering transaction, integration, restructuring charges and additional depreciation costs associated with business combinations
because these costs are unique to each transaction and represent costs that were incurred to restructure and integrate two businesses as a result of the acquisition decision.
For additional clarity, only transaction costs, additional depreciation and restructuring and integration activities that are associated with a business combination or a net-asset
acquisition are included in acquisition-related costs. We have made no adjustments for the resulting synergies.
We believe that viewing income prior to considering these charges provides investors with a useful additional perspective because the significant costs incurred in connection
with a business combination result primarily from the need to eliminate duplicate assets, activities or employees––a natural result of acquiring a fully integrated set of activities.
For this reason, we believe that the costs incurred to convert disparate systems, to close duplicative facilities or to eliminate duplicate positions (for example, in the context of a
business combination) can be viewed differently from those costs incurred in other, more normal, business contexts.
The integration and restructuring costs associated with a business combination may occur over several years, with the more significant impacts typically ending within three
years of the transaction. Because of the need for certain external approvals for some actions, the span of time needed to achieve certain restructuring and integration activities
can be lengthy. For example, due to the highly regulated nature of the pharmaceutical business, the closure of excess facilities can take several years, as all manufacturing
changes are subject to extensive validation and testing and must be approved by the FDA and/or other global regulatory authorities.

Financial Review

Discontinued Operations
Adjusted income is calculated prior to considering the results of operations included in discontinued operations, as well as any related gains or losses on the disposal of such
operations. We believe that this presentation is meaningful to investors because, while we review our businesses and product lines for strategic fit with our operations, we do
not build or run our businesses with the intent to sell them. Restatements due to discontinued operations do not impact compensation or change the Adjusted income measure
for the compensation in respect of the restated periods, but are presented for consistency across all periods.
Certain Significant Items
Adjusted income is calculated prior to considering certain significant items. Certain significant items represent substantive and/or unusual items that are evaluated on an
individual basis. Such evaluation considers both the quantitative and the qualitative aspects of their nature. Certain significant items may be highly variable and difficult to
predict. Furthermore, in some cases it is reasonably possible that they could reoccur in future periods. For example, major non-acquisition-related cost-reduction programs
stand on their own as they are specific to an event or goal with a defined term, but we may have subsequent programs based on reorganizations of the business, cost
productivity or in response to loss of exclusivity or economic conditions. Legal charges to resolve litigation are also related to specific cases, which are facts and circumstances
specific and, in some cases, may also be the result of litigation matters at acquired companies that were inestimable, not probable or unresolved at the date of acquisition.
Unusual items may represent items that are not part of our ongoing business; items that, either as a result of their nature or size, we would not expect to occur as part of our
normal business on a regular basis; items that would be non-recurring; or items that relate to products we no longer sell. While not all-inclusive, examples of items that could be
included as certain significant items would be gains on the completion of joint venture transactions such as the gain on the completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint
venture transaction discussed in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2C. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held
for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Equity-Method Investment and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, a
major non-acquisition-related restructuring charge and associated implementation costs; amounts related to certain disposals of businesses, products or facilities that do not
qualify as discontinued operations under U.S. GAAP; certain intangible asset impairments; adjustments related to the resolution of certain tax positions; the impact of adopting
certain significant, event-driven tax legislation, such as the TCJA discussed in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from
Continuing Operations or charges related to certain legal matters, such as certain of those discussed in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 16A. Contingencies
and Certain Commitments: Legal Proceedings and in Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings” in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Normal, ongoing defense costs of the
Company or settlements of and accruals for legal matters made in the normal course of our business would not be considered certain significant items.
Beginning in 2019, we exclude the gains and losses from equity securities from our measure of Adjusted income because of their inherent volatility, which we do not control
and cannot predict with any level of certainty and because we do not believe that including these gains and losses assists investors in understanding our business or is
reflective of our core operations and business. For example, in 2018, we contributed assets related to our allogeneic CAR T therapy to Allogene and received equity securities.
We have revised Adjusted income and Adjusted diluted EPS for prior periods for consistency with our 2019 presentation.
Reconciliation of GAAP Reported to Non-GAAP Adjusted Information––Certain Line Items
2019
Purchase Certain
GAAP Accounting Acquisition- Discontinued Significant Non-GAAP
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER COMMON SHARE DATA Reported Adjustments(a) Related Costs(a) Operations(a) Items(a) Adjusted
Revenues $ 51,750 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 51,750
Cost of sales 10,219 19 — — (208) 10,030
Selling, informational and administrative
expenses 14,350 2 (2) — (309) 14,041
Research and development expenses 8,650 4 — — (666) 7,988
Amortization of intangible assets 4,610 (4,339) — — — 271
Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-
related costs 747 — (183) — (565) —
(Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare
JV transaction (8,086) — — — 8,086 —
Other (income)/deductions––net 3,578 (21) — — (3,858) (300)
Income from continuing operations before
provision/(benefit) for taxes on income 17,682 4,333 185 — (2,481) 19,720
Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income(b) 1,384 848 59 — 667 2,958
Income from continuing operations 16,298 3,485 126 — (3,148) 16,762
Discontinued operations––net of tax 4 — — (4) — —
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests 29 — — — — 29
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. 16,273 3,485 126 (4) (3,148) 16,733
Earnings per common share attributable to
Pfizer Inc.––diluted 2.87 0.61 0.02 — (0.55) 2.95
See end of tables for notes (a) and (b).

Financial Review
2018
Purchase Certain
Revenues $ 53,647 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 53,647
Cost of sales 11,248 3 (10) — (110) 11,130
expenses 14,455 2 (2) — (222) 14,232
related costs 1,044 — (299) — (745) —
JV transaction — — — — — —
Other (income)/deductions––net 2,116 (182) (7) — (2,595) (667)
provision/(benefit) for taxes on income 11,885 4,786 318 — 3,719 20,709
Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income(b) 706 915 54 — 1,520 3,196
Income from continuing operations 11,179 3,871 264 — 2,199 17,513
interests 36 — — — — 36
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. 11,153 3,871 264 (10) 2,199 17,477
Pfizer Inc.––diluted 1.87 0.65 0.04 — 0.37 2.92
2017
Purchase Certain
Revenues $ 52,546 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 52,546
Cost of sales 11,228 (47) (39) — (363) 10,778
expenses 14,804 (16) — — (299) 14,489
related costs 351 — (426) — 75 —
JV transaction — — — — — —
Other (income)/deductions––net 1,416 (138) 9 — (1,796) (509)
provision/(benefit) for taxes on income 12,305 4,758 456 — 2,423 19,941
Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income (b)
(9,049) 1,331 173 — 11,506 3,962
Income from continuing operations 21,353 3,426 283 — (9,083) 15,980
interests 47 — — — — 47
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. 21,308 3,426 283 (2) (9,083) 15,933
Pfizer Inc.––diluted 3.52 0.57 0.05 — (1.50) 2.63
(a) For details of adjustments, see “Details of Income Statement Items Included in GAAP Reported but Excluded from Non-GAAP Adjusted Income” below.
(b) The effective tax rate on Non-GAAP Adjusted income was 15.0% in 2019, 15.4% in 2018 and 19.9% in 2017. The decrease in the effective tax rate on Non-GAAP Adjusted income for 2019, compared with 2018,
was primarily due to a favorable change in the jurisdictional mix of earnings as a result of operating fluctuations in the normal course of business, partially offset by a decrease in tax benefits associated with the
resolution of certain tax positions pertaining to prior years primarily with various foreign tax authorities. The decrease in the effective tax rate on Non-GAAP Adjusted income for 2018 compared with 2017 was
primarily due to tax benefits associated with the December 2017 enactment of the TCJA, a favorable change in the jurisdictional mix of earnings as a result of operating fluctuations in the normal course of
business, as well as an increase in benefits associated with the resolution of certain tax positions pertaining to prior years primarily with various foreign tax authorities, and the expiration of certain statutes of
limitations.

Financial Review

Details of Income Statement Items Included in GAAP Reported but Excluded from Non-GAAP Adjusted Income
Adjusted income, as shown above, excludes the following items:

Purchase accounting adjustments
Amortization, depreciation and other(a) $ 4,353 $ 4,789 $ 4,711
Cost of sales (19) (3) 47
Total purchase accounting adjustments—pre-tax 4,333 4,786 4,758
Income taxes(b) (848) (915) (1,331)
Total purchase accounting adjustments—net of tax 3,485 3,871 3,426

Acquisition-related costs
Restructuring charges/(credits)(c) (192) 37 105
Transaction costs(c) 63 1 4
Integration costs and other (c) 311 260 317
Net periodic benefit costs/(credits) other than service costs(d) — 7 (9)
Additional depreciation—asset restructuring(e) 3 12 39
Total acquisition-related costs—pre-tax 185 318 456
Income taxes(f) (59) (54) (173)
Total acquisition-related costs—net of tax 126 264 283

Discontinued operations
Total discontinued operations—net of tax, attributable to Pfizer Inc.(g) (4) (10) (2)

Certain significant items
Restructuring charges/(credits)––cost reduction initiatives(h) 565 745 (75)
Implementation costs and additional depreciation—asset restructuring (i) 194 232 279
Certain legal matters, net(j) 543 157 237
Certain asset impairments (j) 2,798 3,101 379
Business and legal entity alignment costs(k) 495 63 71
Net gains recognized during the period on equity securities(j) (415) (586) (224)
(Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction(l) (8,086) — —
Net losses on early retirement of debt (j) 138 3 999
Other(m) 1,289 4 756
Total certain significant items—pre-tax (2,481) 3,719 2,423
Income taxes(n) (667) (1,520) (11,506)
Total certain significant items—net of tax (3,148) 2,199 (9,083)
Total purchase accounting adjustments, acquisition-related costs, discontinued operations and
certain significant items—net of tax, attributable to Pfizer Inc. $ 460 $ 6,324 $ (5,376)
(a) Included primarily in Amortization of intangible assets.
(b) Included in Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income. Income taxes includes the tax effect of the associated pre-tax amounts, calculated by determining the jurisdictional location of the pre-tax amounts and applying
that jurisdiction’s applicable tax rate. Income taxes recorded in 2017 do not reflect any changes associated with the enactment of the TCJA. These changes resulting from the TCJA have been reflected in the line
item, Certain significant items “Income taxes”.
(c) Included in Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs. Restructuring charges/(credits) include employee termination costs, asset impairments and other exit costs associated with business
combinations. Transaction costs represent external costs for banking, legal, accounting and other similar services. Integration costs and other represent external, incremental costs directly related to integrating
acquired businesses, such as expenditures for consulting and the integration of systems and processes and certain other qualifying costs. For additional information, see the “Costs and Expenses—Restructuring
Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 3. Restructuring
Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.
(d) Included in Other (income)/deductions—net. The credits in 2017 included a net settlement gain, partially offset by accelerated amortization of actuarial losses and prior service costs upon the settlement of the
remaining obligation associated with the Hospira U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 11. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined
Contribution Plans.
(e) In 2019, primarily included in Selling, informational and administrative expenses. In 2018 and 2017, primarily included in Cost of sales. Represents the impact of changes in estimated useful lives of assets
involved in restructuring actions related to acquisitions.
(f) Included in Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income. Income taxes includes the tax effect of the associated pre-tax amounts, calculated by determining the jurisdictional location of the pre-tax amounts and applying
that jurisdiction’s applicable tax rate. 2019 includes the impact of the non-taxable reversal of certain accruals related to our acquisition of Wyeth upon the effective favorable settlement of a U.S. IRS audit for
multiple tax years. Income taxes recorded in 2017 do not reflect any changes associated with the December 2017 enactment of the TCJA. These changes resulting from the TCJA have been reflected in Certain
significant items “Income taxes”.
(g) Included in Discontinued operations––net of tax. For all years presented, represents post-close adjustments.

Financial Review

(h) Amounts relate to employee termination costs, asset impairments and other exit costs not associated with acquisitions, which are included in Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs (see the
“Costs and Expenses—Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements—Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives).
(i) Amounts relate to our cost-reduction/productivity initiatives not related to acquisitions (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with
Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives). For 2019, included in Cost of sales ($90 million), Selling, informational and administrative expenses ($74 million) and Research and development
expenses ($30 million). For 2018, included in Cost of sales ($121 million), Selling, informational and administrative expenses ($72 million) and Research and development expenses ($39 million). For 2017,
included in Cost of sales ($170 million), Selling, informational and administrative expenses ($71 million) and Research and development expenses ($38 million).
(j) Included in Other (income)/deductions—net (see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions—Net).
(k) In 2019, primarily included in Cost of sales ($15 million), Selling, informational and administrative expenses ($139 million) and Other (income)/deductions––net ($338 million) and represents (i) incremental costs
of $350 million associated with the design, planning and implementation of our new organizational structure, effective in the beginning of 2019, and primarily includes consulting, legal, tax and advisory services
and (ii) separation costs of $145 million associated with our planned Upjohn transaction with Mylan and mainly includes consulting, legal, tax and advisory services. In full-year 2018, primarily included in Other
(income)/deductions––net and mainly represents incremental costs associated with the design, planning and implementation of our new organizational structure, effective in the beginning of 2019, and primarily
includes consulting, legal, tax and advisory services.
(l) Included in (Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction (see notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2C. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and
Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale).
(m) For 2019, included in Cost of sales ($103 million), Selling, informational and administrative expenses ($96 million), Research and development expenses ($632 million) and Other (income)/deductions––net ($457
million). For 2018, included in Cost of sales ($10 million income), Selling, informational and administrative expenses ($151 million), Research and development expenses ($8 million) and Other
(income)/deductions––net ($143 million income). For 2017, included in Cost of sales ($193 million), Selling, informational and administrative expenses ($229 million) and Other (income)/deductions––net ($334
million). For 2019 includes, among other things, (i) an upfront license fee payment of $250 million to Akcea, which was recorded in Research and development expenses, (ii) charges of $112 million recorded in
Other (income)/deductions––net representing our pro rata share of primarily restructuring and business combination accounting charges recorded by the Consumer Healthcare joint venture, (iii) a $337 million
charge in Research and development expenses related to our acquisition of Therachon, (iv) a $99 million charge in Cost of sales related to rivipansel, primarily for inventory manufactured for expected future sale
and (v) charges of $240 million, primarily in Selling, informational and administrative expenses ($87 million) and Other (income)/deductions––net ($152 million), for external incremental costs, such as transaction
costs and costs to separate our Consumer Healthcare business into a separate legal entity associated with the formation of the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture. For 2018, includes, among other things,
(i) a non-cash $343 million pre-tax gain in Other (income)/deductions––net associated with our transaction with Bain Capital to create a new biopharmaceutical company, Cerevel, to continue development of a
portfolio of clinical and preclinical stage neuroscience assets primarily targeting disorders of the central nervous system, (ii) a $119 million charge, in the aggregate, in Selling, informational and administrative
expenses for a special, one-time bonus paid to virtually all Pfizer colleagues, excluding executives, which was one of several actions taken by us after evaluating the expected positive net impact of the December
2017 enactment of the legislation commonly referred to as the TCJA and (iii) a non-cash $50 million pre-tax gain in Other (income)/deductions––net as a result of the contribution of our allogeneic chimeric
antigen receptor T cell therapy development program assets in connection with our contribution agreement entered into with Allogene (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2B. Acquisitions,
Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Divestitures). For 2017, includes,
among other things, (i) a charitable contribution to the Pfizer Foundation of $200 million, which is included in Selling, informational and administrative expenses; (ii) $195 million in inventory losses, overhead costs
related to the period in which our Puerto Rico plants were not operational, and incremental costs, all of which resulted from hurricanes in Puerto Rico in 2017 and are included in Cost of sales; (iii) an $81 million
loss related to the sale of our former 49% equity share in Hisun Pfizer, which is included in Other (income)/deductions––net; (iv) charges of $55 million in Other (income)/deductions––net representing
adjustments to amounts previously recorded to write down the HIS net assets to fair value less costs to sell and (v) a net loss of $30 million related to the sale of our former 40% ownership investment in Teuto,
including the extinguishment of a put option for the remaining 60% ownership interest, which is included in Other (income)/deductions––net.
(n) Included in Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income. Income taxes includes the tax effect of the associated pre-tax amounts, calculated by determining the jurisdictional location of the pre-tax amounts and applying
that jurisdiction’s applicable tax rate. Also included is the effect of certain U.S. tax consequences. The amount in 2019 was favorably impacted by a benefit of $1.4 billion, representing tax and interest, resulting
from the favorable settlement of a U.S. IRS audit for multiple tax years, the benefits related to certain tax initiatives associated with the implementation of our new organizational structure, as well as the tax benefit
recorded as a result of additional guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury related to the TCJA and unfavorably impacted by the tax expense of approximately $2.7 billion associated with the gain
related to the completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction with GSK. The amount in 2018 was favorably impacted primarily by tax benefits related to the TCJA, including certain 2018 tax
initiatives as well as adjustments to the provisional estimate of the legislation, reported and disclosed within the applicable measurement period, in accordance with guidance issued by the SEC. The amount in
2017 was favorably impacted by tax benefits primarily associated with the remeasurement of deferred tax liabilities, which includes the repatriation tax on deemed repatriated accumulated post-1986 earnings of
foreign subsidiaries associated with the TCJA. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from Continuing Operations.
ANALYSIS OF OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION

The following tables and associated notes provide additional information about the performance of each of our two reportable operating segments for the periods presented—
Biopharma and Upjohn, and our Consumer Healthcare operating segment through July 31, 2019. For additional information about each operating segment, see the “Overview
of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook—Our Strategy—Organizing for Growth” section of this Financial Review, Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements—Note 17. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information and the “Commercial Operations” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business” of our 2019 Form 10-K.
As described in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1A. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation, acquisitions impacted
our results of operations in 2019 and 2017, the contribution of our Consumer Healthcare business to the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture impacted our results of
operations in 2019 and divestitures impacted our results of operations in 2017.

Financial Review
The following tables provide revenue and cost information by reportable operating segment and a reconciliation of that information to our consolidated statements of income:
2019
Non-GAAP Reconciling GAAP
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Biopharma(a) Upjohn(a) Other(b) Adjusted(c) Items(d) Reported
Revenues $ 39,419 $ 10,233 $ 2,098 $ 51,750 $ — $ 51,750
Cost of sales 7,579 1,724 727 10,030 189 10,219
% of revenue 19.2% 16.8% * 19.4% * 19.7%
expenses 7,000 1,492 5,549 14,041 309 14,350
Research and development expenses 1,047 236 6,705 7,988 661 8,650
Amortization of intangible assets 271 1 — 271 4,339 4,610
related costs — — — — 747 747
(Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV
transaction — — — — (8,086) (8,086)
Other (income)/deductions––net (993) (5) 698 (300) 3,878 3,578
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before
provision/(benefit) for taxes on income 24,517 6,785 (11,582) 19,720 (2,037) 17,682
See end of tables for notes (a) through (d).
2018
Revenues $ 37,558 $ 12,484 $ 3,605 $ 53,647 $ — $ 53,647
Cost of sales 7,147 1,964 2,018 11,130 118 11,248
% of revenue 19.0% 15.7% * 20.7% * 21.0%
expenses 6,678 1,668 5,886 14,232 223 14,455
Research and development expenses 907 233 6,822 7,962 43 8,006
Amortization of intangible assets 235 1 45 281 4,612 4,893
related costs — — — — 1,044 1,044
transaction — — — — — —
Other (income)/deductions––net (1,148) (18) 499 (667) 2,784 2,116
2017
Revenues $ 35,530 $ 13,447 $ 3,569 $ 52,546 $ — $ 52,546
Cost of sales 7,012 1,919 1,847 10,778 449 11,228
% of revenue 19.7% 14.3% * 20.5% * 21.4%
expenses 6,487 1,913 6,089 14,489 316 14,804
Research and development expenses 847 275 6,531 7,653 31 7,683
Amortization of intangible assets 149 1 44 193 4,565 4,758
related costs — — — — 351 351
transaction — — — — — —
Other (income)/deductions––net (1,159) (8) 658 (509) 1,925 1,416
(a) Amounts represent the revenues and costs managed by each of the Biopharma and Upjohn reportable operating segments for the periods presented. The expenses generally include only those costs directly
attributable to the operating segment.

Financial Review

(b) Other comprises the revenues and costs included in our Adjusted income components (see footnote (c) below) that are managed outside Biopharma and Upjohn and includes the following:
2019
Other Business Activities
Corporate and Other
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) WRDM(i) GPD(ii) Other(iii) Unallocated(iv) Total
Revenues $ — $ — $ 2,098 $ — $ 2,098
Cost of sales — 2 663 62 727
Selling, informational and administrative expenses 146 — 1,218 4,185 5,549
Research and development expenses 2,398 3,311 89 908 6,705
Amortization of intangible assets — — — — —
Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs — — — — —
(Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction — — — — —
Other (income)/deductions––net (6) — — 704 698
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before provision/(benefit)
for taxes on income (2,538) (3,313) 128 (5,859) (11,582)
2018
Corporate and Other
Revenues $ — $ — $ 3,605 $ — $ 3,605
Cost of sales — — 1,211 807 2,018
Selling, informational and administrative expenses 159 — 1,753 3,974 5,886
Amortization of intangible assets — — 45 — 45
Other (income)/deductions––net (127) (18) 7 637 499
2017
Corporate and Other
Revenues $ — $ — $ 3,472 $ 97 $ 3,569
Cost of sales — 2 1,192 653 1,847
Selling, informational and administrative expenses 143 1 1,741 4,204 6,089
Amortization of intangible assets — — 44 — 44
Other (income)/deductions––net (49) (6) 15 698 658
(i) WRDM—the R&D and Medical expenses managed by our WRDM organization, which is generally responsible for research projects for our Biopharma portfolio until proof-of-concept is achieved and then for
transitioning those projects to the GPD organization for possible clinical and commercial development. R&D spending may include upfront and milestone payments for intellectual property rights. The WRDM
organization also has responsibility for certain science-based and other platform-services organizations, which provide end-to-end technical expertise and other services to the various R&D projects, as well as
the Worldwide Medical and Safety group, which ensures that Pfizer provides all stakeholders––including patients, healthcare providers, pharmacists, payers and health authorities––with complete and up-to-
date information on the risks and benefits associated with Pfizer products so that they can make appropriate decisions on how and when to use Pfizer’s medicines.

Financial Review

(ii) GPD––the costs associated with our GPD organization, which is generally responsible for clinical trials from WRDM in the Biopharma portfolio, including late stage portfolio spend. GPD also provides technical
support and other services to Pfizer R&D projects. GPD is responsible for facilitating all regulatory submissions and interactions with regulatory agencies.
(iii) Other—the operating results of our Consumer Healthcare business, through July 31, 2019, and costs associated with other commercial activities not managed as part of Biopharma or Upjohn, including all
strategy, business development, portfolio management and valuation capabilities, which previously had been reported in various parts of the organization.
(iv) Corporate and Other Unallocated—the costs associated with platform functions (such as worldwide technology, global real estate operations, legal, finance, human resources, worldwide public affairs,
compliance and worldwide procurement), patient advocacy activities and certain compensation and other corporate costs, such as interest income and expense, and gains and losses on investments, as well
as overhead expenses associated with our manufacturing (which include manufacturing variances associated with production) and commercial operations that are not directly assessed to an operating
segment, as business unit (segment) management does not manage these costs.
We recognized the following amounts in Cost of sales related to forward-exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges of a portion of our foreign exchange-denominated forecasted intercompany
inventory sales:
• a $247 million net gain in 2019;
• a $13 million net loss in 2018; and
• a $52 million net gain in 2017.
For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 7F. Financial Instruments: Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities.
For information purposes only, the following tables present reconciliations of the Biopharma segment operating results and Upjohn segment operating results to Biopharma and
Upjohn operating results including estimated Other costs generally associated with the Biopharma and Upjohn operating segments for 2019. While we do not manage our
segments or have performance goals under such an allocated manner, we believe that some investors may find this information useful in their analyses.
The estimated Other costs generally associated with our operating segments do not purport to reflect the additional amounts that each of our operating segments would have
incurred had each segment operated as a standalone company during the period presented.
For information purposes only, for 2019, we estimate that Other costs attributable to our Biopharma and Upjohn segments, as described above, for combined WRDM, GPD
and other business activities costs are $6.4 billion, and combined Corporate and Other Unallocated costs are $4.8 billion, which excludes income and costs associated with our
Consumer Healthcare business. The combined Corporate and Other Unallocated costs also exclude (i) net interest-related expense not attributable to an operating segment
included in Corporate (approximately $1.4 billion in Other (income)/deductions––net); and (ii) net income from investments and other assets not attributable to an operating
segment included in Corporate (approximately $318 million in Other (income)/deductions––net). The remaining costs have been attributed to our Biopharma and Upjohn
operating segments, as follows:
2019
Estimated Other Costs Associated with Biopharma(ii)
Biopharma with Estimated
Biopharma Non- Other Costs Associated with
GAAP Adjusted(i), Estimated WRDM/GPD/Other Estimated Corporate/Other Biopharma
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) (iii) Business Activities(ii) Unallocated(ii) Non-GAAP Adjusted(ii), (iii)
Revenues $ 39,419 $ — $ — $ 39,419
Cost of sales 7,579 2 55 7,635
Selling, informational and administrative expenses 7,000 611 3,268 10,879
Research and development expenses 1,047 5,721 873 7,640
Amortization of intangible assets 271 — — 271
Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related
costs — — — —
transaction — — — —
Other (income)/deductions––net (993) (5) (275) (1,273)
provision/(benefit) for taxes on income 24,517 (6,329) (3,921) 14,267

Financial Review
2019
Estimated Other Costs Associated with Upjohn(ii)
Upjohn with Estimated Other
Upjohn Costs Associated with
Non-GAAP Estimated WRDM/GPD/Other Estimated Corporate/Other Upjohn
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Adjusted(i), (iii) Business Activities(ii) Unallocated(ii) Non-GAAP Adjusted(ii), (iii)
Revenues $ 10,233 $ — $ — $ 10,233
Cost of sales 1,724 — (14) 1,710
Selling, informational and administrative expenses 1,492 34 753 2,280
Research and development expenses 236 5 21 262
Amortization of intangible assets 1 — — 1
Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related
costs — — — —
transaction — — — —
Other (income)/deductions––net (5) — (46) (51)
provision/(benefit) for taxes on income 6,785 (39) (714) 6,031
(i) Amount represents the revenues and costs managed by each of our operating segments. The expenses generally include only those costs directly attributable to the operating segment. See note (a) above for
more information.
(ii) Represents costs not assessed to an operating segment, as business unit (segment) management does not manage these costs. For a description of these other costs and business activities, see note (b)
above.
• WRDM/GPD/Other Business Activities––The information provided for WRDM, GPD and Other Business Activities was substantially all derived from our estimates of the costs incurred in connection with the
R&D projects associated with the Biopharma and Upjohn operating segment.
• Corporate/Other Unallocated––The information provided for Corporate and Other Unallocated was derived mainly using proportional allocation methods based on global, regional or country revenues or
global, regional or country headcount, as well as certain cost metrics, as appropriate, such as those derived from R&D and manufacturing costs, and, to a lesser extent, specific identification and estimates.
Management believes that the allocations of Corporate and Other Unallocated costs are reasonable.
The estimated Other costs generally associated with our Biopharma and Upjohn operating segments do not purport to reflect the additional amounts that each of our operating segments would have incurred
had each segment operated as a standalone company during the period presented.
(iii) See note (c) below for an explanation of our Non-GAAP Adjusted financial measure.
(c) See the “Non-GAAP Financial Measure (Adjusted Income)” section of this Financial Review for a definition of these “Adjusted Income” components.
(d) Includes costs associated with (i) purchase accounting adjustments; (ii) acquisition-related costs; and (iii) certain significant items, which are substantive and/or unusual, and in some cases recurring, items (such
as gains on the completion of joint venture transactions, restructuring charges, legal charges or net gains and losses on investment in equity securities), that are evaluated on an individual basis by management.
For additional information about these reconciling items and/or our Non-GAAP adjusted measure of performance, see the “Non-GAAP Financial Measure (Adjusted Income)” section of this Financial Review.
Biopharma Operating Segment
2019 vs. 2018

Biopharma Revenues increased $1.9 billion, or 5%, to $39.4 billion in 2019 from $37.6 billion in 2018, reflecting an operational increase of $2.9 billion, or 8%, and an
unfavorable impact of foreign exchange of $1.0 billion, or 3%.
The following graph illustrates the components of the net increase in Biopharma Revenues:

Financial Review
The following provides an analysis of the increase in Biopharma worldwide Revenues:
Biopharma Revenues, 2018 $ 37,558

Higher revenue from continued growth of anti-infective products in China, driven by increased demand for Sulperazon and new launches, the 2018
U.S. launches of our immune globulin intravenous products (Panzyga and Octagam) and the launches of certain anti-infectives products
(Zavicefta, Zinforo and Cresemba) in international developed and emerging markets, all in the Hospital products business 472
Higher revenues for Inlyta, primarily in the U.S. driven by increased demand resulting from the second quarter of 2019 U.S. FDA approvals for the
combinations of certain immune checkpoint inhibitors plus Inlyta for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC 190
Growth from Biosimilars, primarily in the U.S. 168
Higher revenues for rare disease products driven by the U.S. launches in May 2019 of Vyndaqel and in September 2019 of Vyndamax, for the
treatment of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM); and in international markets, primarily driven by continued uptake for the
transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy indication, primarily in developed Europe, as well as the March 2019 launch of the ATTR-CM indication in
Japan, partially offset by lower revenues for certain rare disease products, including the hemophilia franchises (Refacto AF/Xyntha and BeneFIX),
primarily due to competitive pressures, and Genotropin in developed markets, mainly due to unfavorable channel mix in the U.S. 159
Lower revenues from other Hospital products, primarily reflecting declines in developed markets, mostly due to the continued expected negative
impact from generic competition for products that have previously lost marketing exclusivity (447)
Lower revenues for Enbrel internationally, reflecting continued biosimilar competition in most developed Europe markets (292)
Other operational factors, net 150
Operational growth, net 2,894

Unfavorable impact of foreign exchange (1,033)
Biopharma Revenues increase 1,862
Total Biopharma revenues from emerging markets increased $539 million, or 7%, to $8.2 billion in 2019 from $7.7 billion in 2018, reflecting a 14% operational increase. Foreign
exchange had an unfavorable impact of 7% on total Biopharma revenues from emerging markets. The operational increase in emerging markets was primarily driven by
Prevenar 13, Ibrance and Eliquis.
Costs and Expenses
• Cost of sales as a percentage of Revenues was relatively flat.
• The increase in Cost of sales of 6% was mainly driven by an unfavorable change in product mix, an increase in royalty expenses based on the mix of products sold, and an
increase in sales volumes for various products within our product portfolio, partially offset by a favorable impact of foreign exchange.
• The increase in Selling, informational and administrative expenses of 5% was mostly driven by additional investment in emerging markets, the Oncology portfolio in
developed markets, and for marketing and promotional expenses associated with the U.S. launches of Vyndaqel in May 2019 and Vyndamax in September 2019, as well as
an increase in healthcare reform expenses, partially offset by a favorable impact of foreign exchange.
• The increase in Research and development expenses of 15% was mainly related to the Array acquisition, as well as an increase in medical spend for new and growing
products.
• The unfavorable change in Other (income)/deductions––net primarily reflects a $246 million decrease in income from collaborations, out-licensing arrangements and sales of
compound/product rights and a $33 million decrease in dividend income from our investment in ViiV, partially offset by an increase in royalty-related income mainly due to a
one-time favorable resolution in the second quarter of 2019 of a legal dispute for $82 million, as well as a favorable impact of foreign exchange.
2018 vs. 2017
Biopharma Revenues increased $2.0 billion, or 6%, to $37.6 billion in 2018 from $35.5 billion in 2017, reflecting an operational increase of $1.9 billion, or 5%, and a favorable
impact of foreign exchange of $168 million, or 1%.

Financial Review

The following graph illustrates the components of the net increase in Biopharma Revenues:
The following provides an analysis of the increase in Biopharma Revenues:

Growth from Biosimilars, primarily from Inflectra in certain channels in the U.S. and developed Europe markets 217
Growth from recently launched products, including Eucrisa in the U.S., as well as Besponsa and Bavencio, primarily in the U.S. and developed
Europe 195
Decline in the Hospital products business, driven by lower revenues in developed markets, primarily due to increased competition across the
portfolio and continued legacy Hospira product shortages in the U.S., partially offset by an increase in emerging markets, primarily in China (482)
Lower revenues for Enbrel, primarily in most developed Europe markets due to continued biosimilar competition (350)
Lower revenues for the Premarin family of products and Pristiq primarily driven by generic competition in the U.S. (241)
Lower revenues from the hemophilia portfolio (BeneFIX and Refacto AF/Xyntha), primarily in developed Europe (100)
Other operational factors, net (93)
Operational growth, net 1,860

Favorable impact of foreign exchange 168
Biopharma Revenues increase 2,028
(a) Certain key brands represent Ibrance, Eliquis, Xeljanz, Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13, Xtandi and Chantix/Champix.
Total Biopharma revenues from emerging markets increased $878 million, or 13%, to $7.7 billion in 2018 from $6.8 billion in 2017, reflecting a 16% operational increase.
Foreign exchange had an unfavorable impact of 3% on total Biopharma revenues from emerging markets. The operational increase in emerging markets was primarily driven
by Prevenar 13, Sulperazon, Ibrance and Eliquis.
Costs and Expenses
• Cost of sales as a percentage of Revenues decreased 0.7 percentage points mainly driven by a favorable change in product mix, which includes an increase in alliance
revenue which has no associated cost of sales, and a favorable impact of foreign exchange, partially offset by an increase in royalty expenses based on the mix of products
sold.
• The increase in Cost of sales of 2% was mostly driven by an increase in royalty expenses based on the mix of products sold, an unfavorable change in product mix, and an
increase in sales volumes for various products within our product portfolio, partially offset by a favorable impact of foreign exchange.
• The increase in Selling, informational and administrative expenses of 3% was mainly driven by additional investment across several of our products, primarily Xeljanz,
Ibrance, Eucrisa and Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 (pediatric indication), partially offset by lower marketing, advertising and promotion expenses, reflecting the benefits of cost-
reduction and productivity initiatives.
• The increase in Research and development expenses of 7% was driven by an increase in medical spend, mostly in Oncology (including Ibrance, as well as investments for
new global capabilities) and expenses associated with the creation of new business units, as well as support for recently launched assets (including Talzenna), partially
offset by a decrease in spend on products transferred from EH to Internal Medicine and on Hospital products.
• Other (income)/deductions––net was relatively unchanged.

Financial Review
Upjohn Operating Segment

2019 vs. 2018
Upjohn Revenues decreased $2.3 billion, or 18%, to $10.2 billion in 2019 from $12.5 billion in 2018, reflecting an operational decrease of $2.0 billion, or 16%, and an
unfavorable impact of foreign exchange of $249 million, or 2%.
The following graph illustrates the components of the decrease in Upjohn Revenues:
The following provides an analysis of the decrease in worldwide Upjohn Revenues:
Upjohn Revenues, 2018 $ 12,484

Lower worldwide revenues for Lyrica, primarily in the U.S., reflecting the expected significantly lower volumes associated with multi-source generic
competition that began in July 2019 (1,628)
Lower revenues for Viagra and Upjohn's authorized generic for Viagra in the U.S. resulting from increased generic competition following Viagra's
December 2017 patent expiration, partially offset by increased retail demand growth in China (171)
Decline in revenues for Revatio driven by lower U.S. Oral Suspension formulation sales and pricing pressures due to a recent generic entry, and
for Relpax, driven by continued generic competition across developed markets (149)
Decline in Norvasc and Lipitor due to pricing pressures from the implementation of the VBP in certain cities in China and lower volumes in Japan,
partially offset by overall increased demand in China in the first quarter of 2019 and continued geographic expansion in China during the second
half of 2019 in provinces where the VBP had not yet been implemented (40)
Volume-driven growth from Celebrex and Effexor, primarily in Japan and China 78
Operational decline, net (2,002)

Unfavorable impact of foreign exchange (249)
Upjohn Revenues decrease (2,251)
Total Upjohn revenues from emerging markets decreased $128 million, or 3%, to $3.9 billion in 2019 from $4.0 billion in 2018, reflecting 1% operational growth more than
offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange of 5% on total Upjohn revenues from emerging markets. The operational increase in emerging markets was primarily
driven by Zoloft, Viagra, Celebrex and Lipitor.
Costs and Expenses
• Cost of sales as a percentage of Revenues increased 1.1 percentage points, driven by lower Lyrica revenues in developed markets, primarily in the U.S. due to multi-source
generic competition that began in July 2019, partially offset by lower royalty expense for Lyrica due to the patent expiration.
• The decrease in Cost of sales of 12% was mainly driven by lower royalty expense due to the Lyrica patent expiration and multi-source generic competition that began in July
2019, as well as a favorable impact of foreign exchange.
• Selling, informational and administrative expenses decreased 11% driven by a reduction in field force expense as well as advertising and promotion expenses in developed
markets, primarily related to Lyrica in the U.S., as well as a favorable impact of foreign exchange, partially offset by the non-recurrence of one-time general and
administrative expense reversals in the second and third quarters of 2018, and investments in China across key brands.
• Research and development expenses and Other (income)/deductions––net were relatively unchanged.
2018 vs. 2017
Upjohn Revenues decreased $963 million, or 7%, to $12.5 billion in 2018 from $13.4 billion in 2017, reflecting an operational decrease of $1.1 billion, or 8%, and a favorable
impact from foreign exchange of $116 million, or 1%.

Financial Review
The following graph illustrates the components of the net decrease in Upjohn Revenues:
The following provides an analysis of the decrease in Upjohn Revenues:

Lower revenues for Viagra in the U.S. resulting from the loss of exclusivity in December 2017 (572)
Decline in Greenstone, Upjohn's solid oral dose generics subsidiary, due to additional generic competition in the U.S. and decline in Relpax,
primarily due to loss of exclusivity in the U.S. (318)
Decline in revenues for Lyrica, primarily driven by losses of exclusivity in developed Europe markets and Australia, partially offset by growth in the
U.S. and growth in the orally dissolving tablet formulation in Japan (115)
Decline in revenues for Celebrex, primarily driven by the non-recurrence of favorable U.S. rebates that occurred in 2017 and lower volumes in the
U.S. (99)
Higher revenues for Lipitor and Norvasc primarily due to increased demand in China, partially offset by pricing pressures in China and lower
volumes in Japan for Lipitor and Norvasc and the non-recurrence of favorable U.S. rebates for Lipitor that occurred in 2017 182
Operational decline, net (1,079)

Favorable impact of foreign exchange 116
Upjohn Revenues decrease (963)
Total Upjohn revenues from emerging markets increased $352 million, or 10%, to $4.0 billion in 2018 from $3.7 billion in 2017, reflecting a 9% operational increase. Foreign
exchange had a favorable impact of 1%. The operational increase in emerging markets was primarily driven by Lipitor and Norvasc growth in China.
Costs and Expenses
• Cost of sales as a percentage of Revenues increased 1.5 percentage points driven by lower revenues for Viagra in the U.S. resulting from the loss of exclusivity in
December 2017, as well as increased manufacturing plant costs in Puerto Rico due to hurricane-related recovery expenses, partially offset by a favorable impact of foreign
exchange.
• The increase in Cost of sales of 2% was mostly driven by higher sales volume of Lyrica in the U.S. and Japan, as well as key products in China, partially offset by a
favorable impact of foreign exchange.
• Selling, informational and administrative expenses decreased 13%, primarily driven by a reduction in field force expense as well as advertising and promotion expenses in
developed markets, mainly related to Viagra and Lyrica in the U.S., as well as one-time general and administrative expense reversals in the second and third quarters of
2018, partially offset by additional investments in China across key brands.
• Research and development expenses decreased 15% mostly due to decreased spending for post-approval commitment activities for Lyrica and Celebrex.
• Other (income)/deductions––net were relatively unchanged.

Financial Review
ANALYSIS OF THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Cash provided by/(used in):
Operating activities $ 12,588 $ 15,827 $ 16,802 (20) (6)
Investing activities (3,945) 4,525 (4,740) * *
Financing activities (8,485) (20,441) (13,350) (58) 53
Effect of exchange-rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and restricted
cash and cash equivalents (32) (116) 53 (73) *
Net increase/(decrease) in Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and
cash equivalents $ 125 $ (205) $ (1,235) * (83)
In the consolidated statements of cash flows, the line item, Other changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures, is presented excluding the effects of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates, as these changes do not reflect actual cash inflows or outflows, and excluding any other significant non-cash movements.
Accordingly, the amounts shown will not necessarily agree with the changes in the assets and liabilities that are presented in our consolidated balance sheets.
Operating Activities
2019 v. 2018
Our net cash provided by operating activities was $12.6 billion in 2019, compared to $15.8 billion in 2018. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities reflects the
timing of receipts from customers and payments to vendors in the ordinary course of business, the upfront cash payment associated with our acquisition of Therachon, and the
upfront cash payment associated with our licensing agreement with Akcea (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2A. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-
Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Acquisitions), partially
offset by an increase in net income and a decrease in benefit plan contributions.
In 2019, the change in the line item Other adjustments, net primarily reflects, among other items:
• the non-recurrence of a non-cash gain associated with our transaction with Bain Capital to create a new biopharmaceutical company, Cerevel, to continue development of a
portfolio of clinical and pre-clinical stage neuroscience assets in 2018 (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2A. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method
Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Acquisitions); and
• the non-recurrence of a non-cash gain on the contribution of Pfizer’s allogeneic CAR T developmental program assets, in connection with our contribution agreement with
Allogene in 2018 (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2B. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale,
Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Divestitures),
• net gains on foreign exchange contracts hedging a portion of our forecasted intercompany inventory sales (that fixes the cost of inventory sold later to customers).
In 2019 and 2018, the line item Other changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures, primarily reflects changes, in the normal course of business, in trade
accounts receivable, inventories, other current assets, other noncurrent assets, trade accounts payable, accrued compensation, other current and noncurrent liabilities, as well
as in 2019, the adjustment necessary to reflect the non-cash nature of a favorable settlement of a U.S. IRS audit for multiple tax years (see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements––Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from Continuing Operations).
2018 v. 2017
Our net cash provided by operating activities was $15.8 billion in 2018, compared to $16.8 billion in 2017. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities reflects a
decrease in net cash generated from net income. The net cash generated reflects the timing of receipts from customers and payments to vendors in the ordinary course of
business.
In 2018, the change in the line item Other adjustments, net primarily reflects, among other items:
• the non-recurrence of a non-cash net loss on early retirement of debt under an exchange offer in 2017;
• unrealized net gains on equity securities resulting from the adoption of a new accounting standard on January 1, 2018, related to the recognition and measurement of
financial assets and liabilities;
• a decrease in debt extinguishment costs in 2018 related to early retirement of debt under an exchange offer in 2017, which had been reclassified from operating to financing
activities in 2018 and 2017 in accordance with our implementation of a new accounting standard on January 1, 2018 related to the classification of debt prepayment and
extinguishment costs;
• a non-cash gain associated with our transaction with Bain Capital to create a new biopharmaceutical company to continue development of a portfolio of clinical and
preclinical stage neuroscience assets (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2B. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and
Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Divestitures); and

Financial Review

• a non-cash gain on the contribution of Pfizer’s allogeneic CAR T developmental program assets, in connection with our contribution agreement with Allogene (see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2B. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and
Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Divestitures),
• decreases in net realized gains on sales of investments in debt and equity securities;
• net losses on foreign exchange contracts hedging a portion of our forecasted intercompany inventory sales (that fixes the cost of inventory later sold to customers); and
• a decrease in gains on the sale of property, plant and equipment.
In 2018 and 2017, the line item Other changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures, primarily reflects changes, in the normal course of business, in trade
accounts receivable, inventories, other current assets, other noncurrent assets, trade accounts payable, accrued compensation and other current and noncurrent liabilities.
Investing Activities
2019 v. 2018
Our net cash used in investing activities was $3.9 billion in 2019, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $4.5 billion in 2018. The change in net cash used
in/provided by investing activities was primarily attributable to:
• cash used for the acquisition of Array, net of cash acquired, of $10.9 billion in 2019,
• an increase in net proceeds generated from the sale of investments of $2.9 billion for cash needs, including financing the acquisition of Array (see Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements––Note 2A. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and
Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Acquisitions).
2018 v. 2017
Our net cash provided by investing activities was $4.5 billion in 2018, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $4.7 billion in 2017. The change in net cash provided
by/(used in) investing activities was primarily attributable to:
• an increase in net proceeds generated from the sale of investments of $8.6 billion in 2018 for cash needs; and
• a decrease in cash used for acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $1.0 billion due to the acquisition of the development and commercialization rights to AstraZeneca’s small
molecule anti-infectives business and substantially all of the remaining consideration for the Medivation acquisition in 2017 (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
—Note 2A. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development and
Collaborative Arrangements: Acquisitions).
Financing Activities
2019 v. 2018
Our net cash used in financing activities was $8.5 billion in 2019, compared to $20.4 billion in 2018. The decrease in net cash used in financing activities was primarily
attributable to:
• $10.6 billion net proceeds raised from short-term borrowings in 2019, primarily in connection with the acquisition of Array, compared to net payments on short-term
borrowings of $2.3 billion in 2018; and
• lower purchases of common stock of $3.3 billion,
• higher repayments on long-term debt of $3.2 billion; and
• lower proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $864 million.
2018 v. 2017
Our net cash used in financing activities was $20.4 billion in 2018, compared to $13.3 billion in 2017. The increase in net cash used in financing activities was primarily
attributable to:
• $2.3 billion less proceeds raised from short-term borrowings in 2018, compared to 2017; and
• higher purchases of common stock of $7.2 billion,
• lower repayments on long-term debt of $2.6 billion.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We rely largely on operating cash flows, short-term investments, short-term commercial paper borrowings and long-term debt to provide for our liquidity requirements. We
continue our efforts to improve cash inflows through working capital efficiencies. We target specific areas of focus including accounts receivable, inventories, accounts payable,
and other working capital, which allows us to optimize our operating cash flows.

Financial Review
Due to our significant operating cash flows as well as our financial assets, access to capital markets and available lines of credit and revolving credit agreements, we believe
that we have, and will maintain, the ability to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future, which include:
• the working capital requirements of our operations, including our R&D activities;
• investments in our business;
• dividend payments and potential increases in the dividend rate;
• share repurchases;
• the cash requirements associated with our cost-reduction/productivity initiatives;
• paying down outstanding debt;
• contributions to our pension and postretirement plans; and
• business-development activities.
Our long-term debt is rated high-quality by both S&P and Moody’s. See the “Credit Ratings” section below. As market conditions change, we continue to monitor our liquidity
position. We have taken and will continue to take a conservative approach to our financial investments. Both short-term and long-term investments consist primarily of high-
quality, highly liquid, well-diversified available-for-sale debt securities.
Selected Measures of Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table provides certain relevant measures of our liquidity and capital resources:
As of December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT RATIOS AND PER COMMON SHARE DATA) 2019 2018
Selected financial assets : (a)
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,305 $ 1,139
Short-term investments 8,525 17,694
Long-term investments, excluding private equity securities at cost 2,258 1,823
12,088 20,656
Debt:
Short-term borrowings, including current portion of long-term debt 16,195 8,831
Long-term debt 35,955 32,909
52,150 41,740
Selected net financial liabilities(b) $ (40,062) $ (21,084)

Working capital(c) $ (4,501) $ 18,068
Ratio of current assets to current liabilities 0.88:1 1.57:1
Total Pfizer Inc. shareholders’ equity per common share(d) $ 11.41 $ 11.09
(a) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 7. Financial Instruments for a description of certain assets held and for a description of credit risk related to our financial instruments held.
(b) The increase in selected net financial liabilities was primarily driven by a decrease in short-term investments and net increase in short-term debt, mainly as a result of cash paid for the acquisition of Array (see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2A. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and Development
and Collaborative Arrangements: Acquisitions). We retain a strong financial liquidity position as a result of our net cash provided by operating activities, our high-quality financial asset portfolio and access to
capital markets. For additional information, see the “Credit Ratings” section of this Financial Review.
(c)
The decrease in working capital was primarily due to:
• financing requirements for the acquisition of Array, share repurchase activities, dividend payments, capital expenditures and debt repayment, partially offset by operating cash flow generation, cash from
employee stock option exercises and the March 2019 long-term debt issuance discussed below;
• the impact of the deconsolidation of the Consumer Healthcare business as a result of the completion of the joint venture transaction; and
• the net impact of foreign currency exchange,
• the timing of accruals, cash receipts and payments in the ordinary course of business; and
• an increase in inventory for certain products, including inventory build for new product launches, supply recovery, and market demand, partially offset by a charge related to rivipansel, primarily for inventory
manufactured for expected future sale (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2E. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing
Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements for additional information).
(d) Represents total Pfizer Inc. shareholders’ equity divided by the actual number of common shares outstanding (which excludes treasury stock).
On February 11, 2020, we issued a notice for the redemption in full of all $1.065 billion principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2047. The notes will be redeemed on
March 17, 2020 at par as set forth in the indenture agreement. We do not expect this redemption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2019, we completed a public offering of $5.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes with a weighted average effective interest rate of 3.57%
(see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 7D. Financial Instruments: Long-Term Debt).
For additional information about the sources and uses of our funds, see the “Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows” section of this Financial Review.

Financial Review

Domestic and International Selected Financial Assets
Many of our operations are conducted outside the U.S., and significant portions of our selected financial assets are held internationally. The amount of funds held in U.S. tax
jurisdictions can fluctuate due to the timing of receipts and payments in the ordinary course of business and due to other reasons, such as business-development activities. As
part of our ongoing liquidity assessments, we regularly monitor the mix of domestic and international cash flows (both inflows and outflows). The changes in tax law under the
TCJA, which includes transitioning U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system, will also allow us to more easily access our selected
financial assets globally. The majority of our cash we held internationally as of year-end 2017 was repatriated in 2018.
Agreement to Combine Upjohn with Mylan

In connection with the recently-announced agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan discussed in the “Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and
Outlook––Our Business Development Initiatives” section of this Financial Review, Upjohn will incur approximately $12 billion of debt prior to the closing of the transaction.
Immediately prior to the separation, Upjohn will make a cash distribution of $12 billion to Pfizer, which will be funded by the proceeds of such debt. Following the separation,
Upjohn will remain the obligor with respect to the debt.
Credit Ratings
Two major corporate debt-rating organizations, Moody’s and S&P, assign ratings to our short-term and long-term debt. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or
hold securities and the rating is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
In June 2019, S&P placed Pfizer on “CreditWatch Negative” following the announcement of Pfizer’s intention to acquire Array. The CreditWatch placement was resolved with a
one-notch downgrade of Pfizer’s debt rating to ‘AA-’ upon the consummation of the transaction. In July 2019, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to
combine Upjohn with Mylan, which resulted in actions from both Moody’s and S&P. Moody’s placed Pfizer’s long-term rating under review for downgrade (limited to one-notch,
or ‘A2’ upon close of the Mylan transaction) while S&P lowered Pfizer’s rating to ‘AA-’ (as a result of the Array transaction) and confirmed it will still remain on CreditWatch
Negative (with the expectation the rating will be lowered one additional notch to ‘A+’ upon close of the Mylan transaction).
The following table provides the current ratings assigned by these rating agencies to our commercial paper and senior unsecured long-term debt:
Pfizer Pfizer
Commercial Paper Long-Term Debt
NAME OF RATING AGENCY Rating Rating Outlook Date of Last Rating Change
Under Review for
Moody’s P-1 A1 Downgrade October 2009
S&P A-1+ AA- CreditWatch Negative July 2019
Debt Capacity––Lines of Credit

We have available lines of credit and revolving credit agreements with a group of banks and other financial intermediaries. We typically maintain cash and cash equivalent
balances and short-term investments which, together with our available revolving credit facilities, are in excess of our commercial paper and other short-term borrowings. As of
December 31, 2019, we had access to a total of $15 billion in U.S. revolving credit facilities consisting of a $7 billion facility expiring in 2024 and an $8 billion facility expiring in
September 2020, which may be used to support our commercial paper borrowings. In addition to the U.S. revolving credit facilities, our lenders have provided us an additional
$537 million in lines of credit, of which $508 million expire within one year. Of these total lines of credit, $15.5 billion were unused on December 31, 2019. In connection with
the recently-announced agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan discussed in the “Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our
Business Development Initiatives” section of this Financial Review, Upjohn entered into a fully underwritten, 364-day senior unsecured bridge facility for up to $12 billion. This
bridge facility is expected to terminate upon the issuance of approximately $12 billion of debt securities, loans or a combination of the two by Upjohn prior to the transaction
close.
LIBOR
From time to time, we issue variable rate debt based on LIBOR, or undertake interest rate swaps that contain a variable element based on LIBOR. The U.K. Financial Conduct
Authority announced in July 2017 that it will no longer compel banks to submit rates that are currently used to calculate LIBOR after 2021. Various governing parties, including
government agencies, are working on a benchmark transition plan for LIBOR (and other interbank offered rates globally). We are monitoring their progress, and we will likely
amend contracts to accommodate any replacement rate where it is not already provided. We do not expect the transition to an alternative rate to have a material impact on our
liquidity or financial resources.
Global Economic Conditions––General

The global economic environment has not had, nor do we anticipate it will have, a material impact on our liquidity or capital resources. Due to our significant operating cash
flows, financial assets, access to capital markets and available lines of credit and revolving credit agreements, we continue to believe that we have, and will maintain, the ability
to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. We monitor our liquidity position continuously in the face of evolving economic conditions. For additional information see
the “Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––The Global Economic Environment” section in this Financial Review.

Financial Review
Global Economic Conditions––Venezuela Operations and Argentina Operations

Our Venezuela and Argentina operations function in hyperinflationary economies. The impact to Pfizer is not considered material.
Contractual Obligations
Payments due under contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019, mature as follows:
Years
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Total 2020 2021-2022 2023-2024 Thereafter
Long-term debt, including current portion(a) $ 37,417 $ 1,462 $ 4,769 $ 5,274 $ 25,912
Interest payments on long-term debt obligations (b) 21,612 1,403 2,701 2,436 15,073
Other long-term liabilities(c) 2,521 427 534 483 1,078
Operating leases(d) 3,280 323 512 433 2,012
Purchase obligations and other (e) 2,534 711 994 485 344
Other taxes payable—deemed repatriated accumulated post-1986 earnings
of foreign subsidiaries(f) 9,650 600 1,700 2,400 4,950
Uncertain tax positions (g) 130 130 — — —
(a) Long-term debt consists of senior unsecured notes (including fixed and floating rate, foreign currency denominated, and other notes), carried at historical proceeds, as adjusted (see Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements—Note 7. Financial Instruments). Commitments under financing leases are not significant.
(b) Our calculations of expected interest payments incorporate only current period assumptions for interest rates, foreign currency translation rates and hedging strategies (see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements—Note 7. Financial Instruments), and assume that interest is accrued through the maturity date or expiration of the related instrument.
(c) Includes expected payments relating to our unfunded U.S. supplemental (non-qualified) pension plans, postretirement plans and deferred compensation plans. Excludes amounts relating to our U.S. qualified
pension plans and international pension plans, all of which have a substantial amount of plan assets, because the required funding obligations are not expected to be material and/or because such liabilities do not
necessarily reflect future cash payments, as the impact of changes in economic conditions on the fair value of the pension plan assets and/or liabilities can be significant. Also, excludes $3.9 billion of liabilities
related to the fair value of derivative financial instruments, legal matters and employee terminations, among other liabilities, most of which do not represent contractual obligations. See also our liquidity discussion
above in this “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” section, as well as the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated
with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives, Note 7A. Financial Instruments: Fair Value Measurements, Note 11E. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined Contribution Plans: Cash
Flows, and Note 16. Contingencies and Certain Commitments.
(d) Includes future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases. These amounts include an agreement we entered in April 2018 to lease space in an office building in New York City. We
expect to take control of the property in 2021 and relocate our global headquarters to this new office building in 2022. Our future minimum rental commitment under this 20-year lease is approximately $1.7 billion.
(e) Includes agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding and includes amounts relating to advertising, information technology services, employee benefit administration
services, and potential milestone payments deemed reasonably likely to occur. Also includes obligations to make guaranteed fixed annual payments over the next 7 years in connection with the U.S. and EU
approvals for Besponsa ($412 million) and an obligation to make guaranteed fixed annual payments over the next 8 years for Bosulif ($217 million), both associated with R&D arrangements. For additional
information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7E. Financial Instruments: Other Noncurrent Liabilities and —Note 16C. Contingencies and Certain Commitments: Certain Commitments.
(f) Represents estimated cash payments related to the TCJA repatriation tax for which we elected with the filing of our 2018 U.S. Federal Consolidated Income Tax Return to pay in annual installments over eight
years through 2026 (with the next installment due in April 2020). Our obligations may vary as a result of changes in our uncertain tax positions and/or availability of attributes such as foreign tax and other credit
carryforwards. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from Continuing Operations and Note 5C. Tax Matters: Deferred Taxes.
(g) Includes only income tax amounts currently payable. We are unable to predict the timing of tax settlements related to our noncurrent obligations for uncertain tax positions as tax audits can involve complex issues
and the resolution of those issues may span multiple years, particularly if subject to negotiation or litigation.
The above table includes amounts for potential milestone payments under collaboration, licensing or other arrangements, if the payments are deemed reasonably likely to
occur. Payments under these agreements generally become due and payable only upon the achievement of certain development, regulatory and/or commercialization
milestones, which may span several years and which may never occur.
In 2020, we expect to spend approximately $2.4 billion on property, plant and equipment. We rely largely on operating cash flows to fund our capital investment needs. Due to
our significant operating cash flows, we believe we have the ability to meet our capital investment needs and anticipate no delays to planned capital expenditures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business and in connection with the sale of assets and businesses and other transactions, we often indemnify our counterparties against certain
liabilities that may arise in connection with a transaction or that are related to events and activities prior to or following a transaction. If the indemnified party were to make a
successful claim pursuant to the terms of the indemnification, we may be required to reimburse the loss. These indemnification obligations generally are subject to various
restrictions and limitations. Historically, we have not paid significant amounts under these provisions and, as of December 31, 2019, the estimated fair value of our
indemnification obligations was not significant.
Certain of our co-promotion or license agreements give our licensors or partners the rights to negotiate for, or in some cases to obtain under certain financial conditions, co-
promotion or other rights in specified countries with respect to certain of our products.

Financial Review
Share-Purchase Plans and Accelerated Share Repurchase Agreements

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 12. Equity for information on the shares of our common stock purchased and the cost of purchases under our publicly
announced share-purchase plans, including our accelerated share repurchase agreements. At December 31, 2019, our remaining share-purchase authorization was
approximately $5.3 billion, with no repurchases currently planned in 2020.
Dividends on Common Stock
We paid dividends on our common stock of $8.0 billion in 2019, $8.0 billion in 2018 and $7.7 billion in 2017. In December 2019, our Board of Directors declared a first-quarter
2020 dividend of $0.38 per share, payable on March 6, 2020, to shareholders of record at the close of business on January 31, 2020. The first-quarter 2020 cash dividend will
be our 325th consecutive quarterly dividend.
Our current and projected dividends provide a return to shareholders while maintaining sufficient capital to invest in growing our businesses. Our dividends are not restricted by
debt covenants. While the dividend level remains a decision of Pfizer’s Board of Directors and will continue to be evaluated in the context of future business performance, we
currently believe that we can support future annual dividend increases, barring significant unforeseen events. Pfizer also expects that immediately following the closing of the
proposed transaction to combine Upjohn with Mylan, the combined dividend dollar amount received by Pfizer shareholders in the event the equity distribution is structured as a
spinoff, based upon the combination of continued Pfizer ownership and an expected 0.12 shares of the new company granted for each Pfizer share, will equate to Pfizer’s
dividend amount in effect immediately prior to closing.

Financial Review
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1B. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Adoption of New Accounting Standards in 2019.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards, Not Adopted as of December 31, 2019
Standard/Description Effective Date Effect on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
In June 2016, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for January 1, 2020. This standard includes our financial instruments, such as accounts
credit losses of financial instruments. The new guidance and receivable, and investments that are generally of high credit quality.
related amendments replace the probable initial recognition Previously, when credit losses were measured under GAAP, an entity
threshold for incurred loss estimates in current GAAP with a generally only considered past events and current conditions in
methodology that reflects expected credit loss estimates. measuring the incurred loss.
The new guidance requires us to identify, analyze, document and
support new methodologies for quantifying expected credit loss
estimates for our financial instruments, using information such as
historical experience and current economic conditions, plus the use of
reasonable supportable forecast information. We do not expect this
new guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued new guidance for goodwill January 1, 2020. We do not expect this new guidance to have a material impact on our
impairment testing. The new guidance eliminates the consolidated financial statements.
requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to
measure goodwill impairment. Under the new guidance the
goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value
of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, and recognizing an
impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount
of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, although it cannot
exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting
unit.
In August 2018, the FASB issued new guidance related to January 1, 2020. We do not expect this new guidance to have a material impact on our
customers’ accounting for implementation costs incurred in consolidated financial statements.
a cloud computing arrangement that is considered a service
contract. The new guidance aligns the requirements for
capitalizing implementation costs in such arrangements with the
requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to
develop or obtain internal-use software. The new guidance can
be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively.
In November 2018, the FASB issued new guidance clarifying the January 1, 2020. We do not expect this new guidance to have a material impact on our
interaction between the accounting guidance for collaboration consolidated financial statements.
agreements and revenue from contracts with customers.
In December 2019, the FASB issued new guidance that simplifies January 1, 2021. Early adoption We are assessing the impact of the provisions of this new guidance on
the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain is permitted. our consolidated financial statements.
exceptions to the guidance related to the approach for intraperiod
tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an
interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for
outside basis differences. The new guidance also simplifies
aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted
changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for
transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill.

Financial Review

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
This report and other written or oral statements that we make from time to time contain forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve substantial risks
and uncertainties. We have tried, wherever possible, to identify such statements by using words such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “likely,” “ongoing,” “anticipate,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “assume,” “target,” “forecast,” “guidance,” “goal,” “objective,” “aim,” “seek” and other words and terms of similar meaning or by
using future dates in connection with any discussion of, among other things, our anticipated operating and financial performance, business plans and prospects, expectations
for our product pipeline, in-line products and product candidates, including anticipated regulatory submissions, data read-outs, study starts, approvals, revenue contribution,
growth, performance, timing of exclusivity and potential benefits, strategic reviews, capital allocation objectives, plans for and prospects of our acquisitions and other business-
development activities, benefits anticipated from the reorganization of our commercial operations in 2019, sales efforts, expenses, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, the
outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings, government regulation, our ability to successfully capitalize on growth opportunities or prospects, manufacturing and
product supply and plans relating to share repurchases and dividends. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, including, among others, the expected
timing, benefits, charges and/or costs in connection with our agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan to create a new global pharmaceutical company, Viatris, set forth in the
“Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our Business Development Initiatives” and “––Our Strategy” sections and the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1A. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies––Basis of Presentation of this Financial Review, the expected impact
of patent expiries on our business set forth in the “Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our Operating Environment––Industry-
Specific Challenges––Intellectual Property Rights and Collaboration/Licensing Rights” section of this Financial Review, the benefits expected from the reorganization of our
commercial operations in 2019 and our expectations regarding growth set forth in the “Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our
Strategy––Organizing for Growth” section of this Financial Review, the anticipated costs related to our preparations for Brexit set forth in the “Overview of Our Performance,
Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––The Global Economic Environment” section of this Financial Review, our anticipated liquidity position set forth in the “Overview
of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––The Global Economic Environment” and the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital
Resources” sections of this Financial Review, the anticipated costs and savings from certain of our initiatives, including the Transforming to a More Focused Company
initiative, set forth in the “Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook—Transforming to a More Focused Company” and “Costs and
Expenses—Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives” sections of this Financial Review and in the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives, our plans for
increasing investment in the U.S. set forth in the “Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our Strategy––Capital Allocation and
Expense Management––Increasing Investment in the U.S.” section of this Financial Review, the financial guidance set forth in the “Overview of Our Performance, Operating
Environment, Strategy and Outlook––Our Financial Guidance for 2020” section of this Financial Review, the expected impact of ACIP’s recommendation for Prevnar 13 for
adults 65 and older on Prevnar 13’s revenues set forth in the “Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––Revenues––Selected Product Discussion––Prevnar
13/Prevenar 13 (Biopharma)” section of this Financial Review, the expected impact of updates to the prescribing information for Xeljanz on its growth set forth in the “Analysis
of the Consolidated Statements of Income––Revenues––Selected Product Discussion––Xeljanz (Biopharma)” section of this Financial Review, the benefits expected from our
business development transactions, the planned capital spending set forth in the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources––Selected Measures of
Liquidity and Capital Resources––Contractual Obligations” section of this Financial Review, the expected payments to our unfunded U.S. supplemental (non-qualified) pension
plans, postretirement plans and deferred compensation plans and expected funding obligations set forth in the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital
Resources––Selected Measures of Liquidity and Capital Resources––Contractual Obligations” section of this Financial Review, and the voluntary contribution we expect to
make during 2020 for the U.S. qualified plans set forth in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 11. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined
Contribution Plans. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from past results and future plans and projected future results are the following:
• the outcome of R&D activities, including, without limitation, the ability to meet anticipated pre-clinical or clinical endpoints, commencement and/or completion dates for our
pre-clinical or clinical trials, regulatory submission dates, regulatory approval dates and/or launch dates, as well as the possibility of unfavorable pre-clinical and clinical trial
results, including the possibility of unfavorable new clinical data and further analyses of existing clinical data;
• the risk we may not be able to successfully address all of the comments received from regulatory authorities such as the FDA or the EMA, or obtain approval from regulators,
which will depend on myriad factors, including such regulator making a determination as to whether a product’s benefits outweigh its known risks and a determination of the
product’s efficacy; regulatory decisions impacting labeling, manufacturing processes, safety and/or other matters; and recommendations by technical or advisory
committees, such as ACIP, that may impact the use of our vaccines;
• the speed with which regulatory authorizations, pricing approvals and product launches may be achieved;
• claims and concerns that may arise regarding the safety or efficacy of in-line products and product candidates, including claims and concerns that may arise from the
outcome of post-approval clinical trials, which could result in the loss of marketing approval, changes in product labeling, and/or new or increased concerns about the side
effects or efficacy of, a product that could affect its availability or commercial potential, such as the update to the U.S. and EU prescribing information for Xeljanz;
• the success of external business-development activities, including the ability to identify and execute on potential business development opportunities, the ability to satisfy the
conditions to closing of announced transactions in the anticipated time frame or at all, the ability to realize the anticipated benefits of any such transactions, and the potential
need to obtain additional equity or debt financing to pursue these opportunities, which could result in increased leverage and impact our credit ratings;
• competitive developments, including the impact on our competitive position of new product entrants, in-line branded products, generic products, private label products,
biosimilars and product candidates that treat diseases and conditions similar to those treated by our in-line drugs and drug candidates;

Financial Review

• the implementation by the FDA and regulatory authorities in certain countries of an abbreviated legal pathway to approve biosimilar products, which could subject our
biologic products to competition from biosimilar products, with attendant competitive pressures, after the expiration of any applicable exclusivity period and patent rights;
• risks related to our ability to develop and commercialize biosimilars, including risks associated with “at risk” launches, defined as the marketing of a product by Pfizer before
the final resolution of litigation (including any appeals) brought by a third party alleging that such marketing would infringe one or more patents owned or controlled by the
third party, and access challenges for our biosimilar products where our product may not receive appropriate formulary access or remains in a disadvantaged position
relative to the innovator product;
• the ability to meet competition from generic, branded and biosimilar products after the loss or expiration of patent protection for our products or competitor products;
• the ability to successfully market both new and existing products domestically and internationally;
• difficulties or delays in manufacturing, sales or marketing, including delays caused by natural events, such as hurricanes; supply disruptions, shortages or stock-outs at our
facilities; and legal or regulatory actions, such as warning letters, suspension of manufacturing, seizure of product, injunctions, debarment, recall of a product, delays or
denials of product approvals, import bans or denial of import certifications;
• the impact of public health epidemics or outbreaks on our operations (such as the novel strain of coronavirus impacting China and several other countries);
• trade buying patterns;
• the impact of existing and future legislation and regulatory provisions on product exclusivity;
• trends toward managed care and healthcare cost containment, and our ability to obtain or maintain timely or adequate pricing or favorable formulary placement for our
products;
• the impact of any significant spending reductions or cost controls affecting Medicare, Medicaid or other publicly funded or subsidized health programs or changes in the tax
treatment of employer-sponsored health insurance that may be implemented;
• the impact of any U.S. healthcare reform or legislation, including any replacement, repeal, modification or invalidation of some or all of the provisions of the U.S. Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act;
• U.S. federal or state legislation or regulatory action and/or policy efforts affecting, among other things, pharmaceutical product pricing, intellectual property, reimbursement or
access, including under Medicaid, Medicare and other publicly funded or subsidized health programs; patient out-of-pocket costs for medicines, manufacturer prices and/or
price increases that could result in new mandatory rebates and discounts or other pricing restrictions; general budget control actions; the importation of prescription drugs
from outside the U.S. at prices that are regulated by governments of various foreign countries; revisions to reimbursement of biopharmaceuticals under government
programs; restrictions on U.S. direct-to-consumer advertising; limitations on interactions with healthcare professionals; or the use of comparative effectiveness
methodologies that could be implemented in a manner that focuses primarily on the cost differences and minimizes the therapeutic differences among pharmaceutical
products and restricts access to innovative medicines; as well as pricing pressures for our products as a result of highly competitive insurance markets;
• legislation or regulatory action in markets outside the U.S., including China, affecting pharmaceutical product pricing, intellectual property, reimbursement or access,
including, in particular, continued government-mandated reductions in prices and access restrictions for certain biopharmaceutical products to control costs in those markets;
• the exposure of our operations outside the U.S. to possible capital and exchange controls, economic conditions, expropriation and other restrictive government actions,
changes in intellectual property legal protections and remedies, as well as political unrest, unstable governments and legal systems and inter-governmental disputes;
• contingencies related to actual or alleged environmental contamination;
• any significant breakdown, infiltration or interruption of our information technology systems and infrastructure;
• legal defense costs, insurance expenses and settlement costs;
• the risk of an adverse decision or settlement and the adequacy of reserves related to legal proceedings, including patent litigation, such as claims that our patents are invalid
and/or do not cover the product of the generic drug manufacturer or where one or more third parties seeks damages and/or injunctive relief to compensate for alleged
infringement of its patents by our commercial or other activities, product liability and other product-related litigation, including personal injury, consumer, off-label promotion,
securities, antitrust and breach of contract claims, commercial, environmental, government investigations, employment and other legal proceedings, including various means
for resolving asbestos litigation, as well as tax issues;
• the risk that our currently pending or future patent applications may not result in issued patents, or be granted on a timely basis, or any patent-term extensions that we seek
may not be granted on a timely basis, if at all;
• our ability to protect our patents and other intellectual property, both domestically and internationally;
• interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, including the impact of possible currency devaluations in countries experiencing high inflation rates;
• governmental laws and regulations affecting domestic and foreign operations, including, without limitation, tax obligations and changes affecting the tax treatment by the
U.S. of income earned outside the U.S. that may result from pending and possible future proposals, including further clarifications and/or interpretations of or changes to the
TCJA enacted in 2017;
• any significant issues involving our largest wholesale distributors, which account for a substantial portion of our revenues;
• the possible impact of the increased presence of counterfeit medicines in the pharmaceutical supply chain on our revenues and on patient confidence in the integrity of our
medicines;

Financial Review

• uncertainties based on the formal change in relationship between the U.K. government and the EU, which could have implications on our research, commercial and general
business operations in the U.K. and the EU, including the approval and supply of our products;
• any significant issues that may arise related to the outsourcing of certain operational and staff functions to third parties, including with regard to quality, timeliness and
compliance with applicable legal or regulatory requirements and industry standards;
• any significant issues that may arise related to our joint ventures and other third-party business arrangements;
• further clarifications and/or changes in interpretations of existing laws and regulations, or changes in laws and regulations, in the U.S. and other countries, including changes
in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles;
• uncertainties related to general economic, political, business, industry, regulatory and market conditions including, without limitation, uncertainties related to the impact on
us, our customers, suppliers and lenders and counterparties to our foreign-exchange and interest-rate agreements of challenging global economic conditions and recent and
possible future changes in global financial markets; the related risk that our allowance for doubtful accounts may not be adequate; and the risks related to volatility of our
income due to changes in the market value of equity investments;
• any changes in business, political and economic conditions due to actual or threatened terrorist activity in the U.S. and other parts of the world, and related U.S. military
action overseas;
• growth in costs and expenses;
• changes in our product, segment and geographic mix;
• the impact of purchase accounting adjustments, acquisition-related costs, discontinued operations and certain significant items;
• the impact of product recalls, withdrawals and other unusual items;
• the risk of an impairment charge related to our intangible assets, goodwill or equity-method investments;
• the impact of, and risks and uncertainties related to, acquisitions and divestitures, such as the acquisition of Array, our transaction with GSK which combined our respective
consumer healthcare businesses into a new consumer healthcare joint venture and our agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan to create a new global pharmaceutical
company, Viatris, including, among other things, risks related to the satisfaction of the conditions to closing to any pending transaction (including the failure to obtain any
necessary shareholder and regulatory approvals) in the anticipated timeframe or at all and the possibility that such transaction does not close; the ability to realize the
anticipated benefits of those transactions, including the possibility that the expected cost savings and/or accretion from certain of those transactions will not be realized or will
not be realized within the expected time frame; the risk that the businesses will not be integrated successfully; negative effects of the announcement or the consummation of
the transaction on the market price of Pfizer’s common stock, Pfizer’s credit ratings and/or Pfizer’s operating results; disruption from the transactions making it more difficult
to maintain business and operational relationships; risks related to our ability to grow revenues for certain acquired products; significant transaction costs; unknown liabilities;
the risk of litigation and/or regulatory actions related to the transaction, other business effects, including the effects of industry, market, economic, political or regulatory
conditions, future exchange and interest rates, changes in tax and other laws, regulations, rates and policies, future business combinations or disposals; competitive
developments; and as it relates to the Consumer Healthcare JV with GSK, the possibility that a future separation of the joint venture as an independent company via a
demerger of GSK’s equity interest to GSK’s shareholders and a listing of the joint venture on the U.K. equity market may not occur; and
• the impact of, and risks and uncertainties related to, restructurings and internal reorganizations, including the reorganization of our commercial operations in 2019, as well as
any other corporate strategic initiatives, and cost-reduction and productivity initiatives, each of which requires upfront costs but may fail to yield anticipated benefits and may
result in unexpected costs or organizational disruption.
We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized. Achievement of anticipated results is subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and inaccurate
assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary materially from past
results and those anticipated, estimated or projected. Investors should bear this in mind as they consider forward-looking statements, and are cautioned not to put undue
reliance on forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law or by
the rules and regulations of the SEC. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects.
Certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions are discussed here and under the heading entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A. of our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2019. We note these factors for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should understand that it is not possible to
predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not consider any such list to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties.
The operating segment information provided in this report does not purport to represent the revenues, costs and income from continuing operations before provision for taxes
on income that each of our operating segments would have recorded had each segment operated as a standalone company during the periods presented.
This report includes discussion of certain clinical studies relating to various in-line products and/or product candidates. These studies typically are part of a larger body of
clinical data relating to such products or product candidates, and the discussion herein should be considered in the context of the larger body of data. In addition, clinical trial
data are subject to differing interpretations, and, even when we view data as sufficient to support the safety and/or effectiveness of a product candidate or a new indication for
an in-line product, regulatory authorities may not share our views and may require additional data or may deny approval altogether.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management’s Report
We prepared and are responsible for the financial statements that appear in our 2019 Financial Report. These financial statements are in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and, therefore, include amounts based on informed judgments and estimates. We also accept responsibility for the
preparation of other financial information that is included in this document.
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate. Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based
on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.
The Company’s independent auditors have issued their auditors’ report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. That report appears in our 2019 Financial
Report under the heading, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Albert Bourla
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Frank D’Amelio Loretta Cangialosi

Principal Financial Officer Principal Accounting Officer

February 27, 2020

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee reviews Pfizer’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements
and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls.
The Committee met and held discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm regarding the fair and complete presentation of Pfizer’s
results and the assessment of Pfizer’s internal control over financial reporting. We discussed significant accounting policies applied in Pfizer’s financial statements, as well as,
when applicable, alternative accounting treatments, and critical audit matters addressed during the audit. Management represented to the Committee that the consolidated
financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the Committee reviewed and discussed
the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The Committee discussed with the independent registered
public accounting firm matters required to be discussed under applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission standards.
In addition, the Committee reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the auditor’s independence from Pfizer and its management. As part
of that review, we received the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting
firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Committee discussed the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence
from Pfizer.
We also considered whether the independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit services to Pfizer is compatible with the auditor’s independence. The
Committee concluded that the independent registered public accounting firm is independent from Pfizer and its management.
As part of our responsibilities for oversight of Pfizer’s Enterprise Risk Management process, we reviewed and discussed company policies with respect to risk assessment and
risk management, including discussions of individual risk areas, as well as an annual summary of the overall process.
The Committee discussed with Pfizer’s Internal Audit Department and independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope of and plans for their respective audits.
The Committee meets with the Chief Internal Auditor, Chief Compliance, Quality and Risk Officer and representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm, in
regular and executive sessions, to discuss the results of their examinations, the evaluations of Pfizer’s internal controls, and the overall quality of Pfizer’s financial reporting and
compliance programs.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the audited
financial statements be included in Pfizer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, for filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Committee has selected, and the Board of Directors has ratified, the selection of Pfizer’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020.
The Audit Committee

Suzanne Nora Johnson, Chair
Ronald E. Blaylock
Joseph J. Echevarria
James C. Smith

February 27, 2020
The Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material, and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any Company filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the Audit Committee
Report by reference therein.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Pfizer Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pfizer Inc. and Subsidiary Companies (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related
notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019,
in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 27, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance
with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to
be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially
challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements,
taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures
to which they relate.
Evaluation of certain assumptions impacting the U.S. Medicare, Medicaid, and performance-based contract rebates accrual
As discussed in Note 1G to the consolidated financial statements, the Company records estimated deductions for Medicare, Medicaid, and performance-based contract
rebates (collectively, U.S. rebates) as a reduction to gross product revenues. The accrual for U.S. rebates is recorded in the same period that the corresponding revenues
are recognized. The length of time between when a sale is made and when the U.S. rebate is paid by the Company can be as long as one year, which increases the need
for significant management judgment and knowledge of market conditions and practices in estimating the accrual.
We identified the evaluation of the U.S. rebates accrual as a critical audit matter because evaluating the product-specific experience ratio assumption underlying the estimate
of the accrual involved especially challenging auditor judgment. The product-specific experience ratio assumption relates to estimating which of the Company’s revenue
transactions will ultimately be subject to a related rebate.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s U.S. rebate accrual
process, including controls related to the development of the product-specific experience ratio assumptions. We recalculated the U.S. rebates accrual for a selection of
products, based on a combination of Company internal data, historical actual information, and executed third-party contracts. We performed a sensitivity analysis of the
Company’s accrual by recalculating the accrual using our independent assumptions. We evaluated the Company’s ability to accurately estimate the accrual for U.S. rebates
by comparing historically recorded accruals to the actual amount that was ultimately paid by the Company.
Evaluation of gross unrecognized tax benefits
As of December 31, 2019 the Company has recorded gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding associated interest, of $5.4 billion. As discussed in Notes 5D and 1P, the
Company’s tax positions are subject to audit by local taxing authorities in each respective tax jurisdiction, and the resolution of such audits may span multiple years. Since
tax law is complex and often subject to varied interpretations and judgments, it is uncertain whether some of the Company’s tax positions will be sustained upon audit.
We identified the evaluation of the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits as a critical audit matter because complex auditor judgment is required in evaluating the
Company’s interpretation of tax law and its estimate of the ultimate resolution of its tax positions.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s liability for
unrecognized tax position process, including (1) interpretation of tax law, (2) evaluation of which of the Company’s tax positions may not be sustained upon audit, and (3)
estimation and recording of the gross unrecognized tax benefits. We involved tax and valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge. We evaluated the
Company’s interpretation of tax laws, including the assessment of transfer pricing practices in accordance with applicable tax laws and regulations. We inspected
settlements with applicable taxing authorities, including assessing the expiration of statutes of limitations. We tested the calculation of the liability for uncertain tax positions,
including an evaluation of the Company’s assessment of the technical merits of tax positions and estimates of the amount of tax benefits expected to be sustained.
Evaluation of product and other product-related litigation
As discussed in Notes 1R and 16 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is involved in product liability and other product-related litigation, which can include
personal injury, consumer, off-label promotion, securities, antitrust and breach of contract claims, among others. Certain of these pending product and other product-related
legal proceedings could result in losses that could be substantial. The accrued liability and/or disclosure for the pending product and other product-related legal proceedings
requires a complex series of judgments by the Company about future events, which involves a number of uncertainties.
We identified the evaluation of the accrued liability and/or related disclosures for these legal proceedings as a critical audit matter because the nature of the estimates and
assumptions, including judgments about uncertainties and future events, requires challenging auditor judgment.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s product liability and
other product-related litigation processes, including (1) the evaluation of information from external and internal legal counsel, (2) forward-looking expectations, and (3) new
legal proceedings, or other legal proceedings not currently reserved or disclosed. We read letters received directly from the Company’s external and internal legal counsel
that described the Company’s probable or reasonably possible legal contingency to pending product and other product-related legal proceedings. We inspected the
Company’s minutes from meetings of the Audit Committee, which included the status of key litigation matters. We evaluated the Company’s ability to estimate its monetary
exposure to pending product and other product-related legal proceedings by comparing historically recorded liabilities to actual monetary amounts incurred upon resolution
of prior legal matters. We analyzed relevant publicly available information about the Company, its competitors, and the industry.
KPMG LLP

We have not been able to determine the specific year that KPMG and our predecessor firms began serving as the Company’s auditor, however, we are aware that KPMG and
our predecessor firms have served as the Company’s auditor since at least 1942.

New York, New York

February 27, 2020

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Pfizer Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Pfizer Inc. and Subsidiary Companies’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained,
in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of
Pfizer Inc. and Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated
February 27, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.
Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could
have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
KPMG LLP
New York, New York

February 27, 2020

Consolidated Statements of Income

(MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER COMMON SHARE DATA) 2019 2018 2017
Revenues $ 51,750 $ 53,647 $ 52,546
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (a) 10,219 11,248 11,228
Selling, informational and administrative expenses(a) 14,350 14,455 14,804
Research and development expenses (a) 8,650 8,006 7,683
Amortization of intangible assets 4,610 4,893 4,758
Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs 747 1,044 351
(Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction (8,086) — —
Other (income)/deductions––net 3,578 2,116 1,416
Income from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for taxes on income 17,682 11,885 12,305
Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income 1,384 706 (9,049)
Income from continuing operations 16,298 11,179 21,353
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operations––net of tax 4 10 (1)
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations––net of tax — — 3
Discontinued operations––net of tax 4 10 2
Net income before allocation to noncontrolling interests 16,302 11,188 21,355
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 29 36 47
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. $ 16,273 $ 11,153 $ 21,308

Earnings per common share––basic:
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 2.92 $ 1.90 $ 3.57
Discontinued operations––net of tax — — —
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 2.92 $ 1.90 $ 3.57
Earnings per common share––diluted:
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 2.87 $ 1.86 $ 3.52
Discontinued operations––net of tax — — —
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 2.87 $ 1.87 $ 3.52

Weighted-average shares––basic 5,569 5,872 5,970
Weighted-average shares––diluted 5,675 5,977 6,058
(a)
Exclusive of amortization of intangible assets, except as disclosed in Note 1L.
Amounts may not add due to rounding.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which are an integral part of these statements.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(MILLIONS) 2019 2018 2017
Net income before allocation to noncontrolling interests $ 16,302 $ 11,188 $ 21,355

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net(a) $ 654 $ (799) $ 1,116
Reclassification adjustments (b) (288) (22) 162
366 (821) 1,278
Unrealized holding gains/(losses) on derivative financial instruments, net 476 220 (10)
Reclassification adjustments for (gains)/losses included in net income (c) (664) 27 (520)
(188) 247 (530)
Unrealized holding gains/(losses) on available-for-sale securities, net (1) (185) 818
Reclassification adjustments for (gains)/losses included in net income(c) 39 124 (244)
Reclassification adjustments for unrealized gains included in Retained earnings(d) — (462) —
38 (522) 574
Benefit plans: actuarial losses, net (826) (649) (212)
Reclassification adjustments related to amortization 241 242 588
Reclassification adjustments related to settlements, net 274 142 117
Other 22 112 (145)
(289) (153) 348
Benefit plans: prior service costs and other, net (7) (9) (2)
Reclassification adjustments related to amortization of prior service costs and other, net (181) (181) (184)
Reclassification adjustments related to curtailments of prior service costs and other, net (2) (19) (18)
Other 1 2 —
(189) (207) (203)
Other comprehensive income/(loss), before tax (262) (1,457) 1,468
Tax provision/(benefit) on other comprehensive income/(loss)(e) 115 518 (262)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before allocation to noncontrolling interests $ (376) $ (1,975) $ 1,730

Comprehensive income before allocation to noncontrolling interests $ 15,926 $ 9,214 $ 23,085
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests 18 16 62
Comprehensive income attributable to Pfizer Inc. $ 15,908 $ 9,198 $ 23,023
(a) Amounts in 2019 include a gain of approximately $1.3 billion pre-tax ($978 million after-tax) related to foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to our equity method investment in the GSK Consumer
Healthcare joint venture (see Note 2C), partially offset by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and the Australian dollar, and the results of our net investment hedging program. In 2018, Foreign
currency translation adjustments, net, primarily reflects the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro, U.K. pound and Chinese renminbi, In 2017, Foreign currency translation adjustments, net, primarily
reflects the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro, U.K. pound and the Canadian dollar.
(b) For the year ended December 31, 2019, the foreign currency translation adjustments are primarily reclassified into (Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction in the consolidated statement of
income as a result of the contribution of our Consumer Healthcare business to the Consumer Healthcare joint venture with GSK. See Note 2C. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the foreign currency
translation adjustments reclassified into Other (income)/deductions—net in the consolidated statement of income primarily result from the sale of our former 40% ownership investment in Teuto and the sale of our
former 49%-owned equity method investment in Hisun Pfizer. See Note 2C.
(c) Reclassified into Other (income)/deductions—net and Cost of sales in the consolidated statements of income. For additional information on amounts reclassified into Other (income)/deductions—net and Cost of
sales, see Note 7F.
(d) For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1B. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Adoption of New Accounting Standards in 2018 in our 2018
Financial Report.
(e) For additional information. see Note 5E.

Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31,
(MILLIONS, EXCEPT PREFERRED STOCK ISSUED AND PER COMMON SHARE DATA) 2019 2018

Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,305 $ 1,139
Short-term investments 8,525 17,694
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts: 2019—$527; 2018—$541 8,724 8,025
Inventories 8,283 7,508
Current tax assets 3,344 3,374
Other current assets 2,600 2,461
Assets held for sale 21 9,725
Total current assets 32,803 49,926
Equity-method investments 17,133 181
Long-term investments 3,014 2,586
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation 13,967 13,385
Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization 35,370 35,211
Goodwill 58,653 53,411
Noncurrent deferred tax assets and other noncurrent tax assets 2,099 1,924
Other noncurrent assets 4,450 2,799
Total assets $ 167,489 $ 159,422

Liabilities and Equity
Short-term borrowings, including current portion of long-term debt: 2019—$1,462; 2018—$4,776 $ 16,195 $ 8,831
Trade accounts payable 4,220 4,674
Dividends payable 2,104 2,047
Income taxes payable 980 1,265
Accrued compensation and related items 2,720 2,397
Other current liabilities 11,083 10,753
Liabilities held for sale — 1,890
Total current liabilities 37,304 31,858

Long-term debt 35,955 32,909
Pension benefit obligations, net 5,638 5,272
Postretirement benefit obligations, net 1,124 1,338
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities 5,578 3,700
Other taxes payable 12,126 14,737
Other noncurrent liabilities 6,317 5,850
Total liabilities 104,042 95,664

Commitments and Contingencies

Preferred stock, no par value, at stated value; 27 shares authorized; issued: 2019—431; 2018—478 17 19
Common stock, $0.05 par value; 12,000 shares authorized; issued: 2019—9,369; 2018—9,332 468 467
Additional paid-in capital 87,428 86,253
Treasury stock, shares at cost: 2019—3,835; 2018—3,615 (110,801) (101,610)
Retained earnings 97,670 89,554
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (11,640) (11,275)
Total Pfizer Inc. shareholders’ equity 63,143 63,407
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests 303 351
Total equity 63,447 63,758
Total liabilities and equity $ 167,489 $ 159,422

Consolidated Statements of Equity
PFIZER INC. SHAREHOLDERS

Preferred Stock Common Stock Treasury Stock
Accum.
Add’l Other Share - Non-
Stated Par Paid-In Retained Comp. holders’ controlling Total
(MILLIONS, EXCEPT PREFERRED SHARES) Shares Value Shares Value Capital Shares Cost Earnings Loss Equity Interests Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017 597 $ 24 9,230 $ 461 $ 82,685 (3,160) $ (84,364) $ 71,774 $ (11,036) $ 59,544 $ 296 $ 59,840
Net income 21,308 21,308 47 21,355
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax 1,715 1,715 14 1,730
Cash dividends declared:

Common stock (7,789) (7,789) (7,789)
Preferred stock (1) (1) (1)
Noncontrolling interests — (9) (9)
Share-based payment transactions(a) 45 2 1,597 15 (63) 1,536 1,536
Purchases of common stock (150) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000)
Preferred stock conversions and redemptions (73) (3) (3) — 1 (5) (5)
Other — — — — — —
Balance, December 31, 2017 524 21 9,275 464 84,278 (3,296) (89,425) 85,291 (9,321) 71,308 348 71,656
Net income 11,153 11,153 36 11,188
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax (1,955) (1,955) (20) (1,975)

Common stock (8,060) (8,060) (8,060)
Share-based payment transactions 57 3 1,977 (12) 13 1,993 1,993
Preferred stock conversions and redemptions (46) (2) (3) — — (4) (4)
Other (b) — — 1,172 1,172 — 1,172
Balance, December 31, 2018 478 19 9,332 467 86,253 (3,615) (101,610) 89,554 (11,275) 63,407 351 63,758
Net income 16,273 16,273 29 16,302
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax (365) (365) (11) (376)

Common stock (8,174) (8,174) (8,174)
Share-based payment transactions 37 2 1,219 (8) (326) 894 894
Preferred stock conversions and redemptions (47) (2) (3) — 1 (4) (4)
Other (c) (40) — 19 (21) (60) (81)
Balance, December 31, 2019 431 $ 17 9,369 $ 468 $ 87,428 (3,835) $ (110,801) $ 97,670 $ (11,640) $ 63,143 $ 303 $ 63,447
(a) 2017 treasury shares include the effect of the modification for a commitment to pay 15.2 million common-share equivalents that were scheduled for near-term settlement. These common share equivalents were
paid in the first quarter of 2018.
(b) Primarily represents the cumulative effect of the adoption of new accounting standards in the first quarter of 2018 for revenues, financial assets and liabilities, income tax accounting, and the reclassification of
certain tax effects from Accumulated other comprehensive income. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 1B. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting
Policies: Adoption of New Accounting Standards in 2018 in our 2018 Financial Report.
(c) The increase to Retained earnings in 2019 includes the cumulative effect of the adoption of a new accounting standard for leases in the first quarter of 2019. For additional information, see Note 1B. The decrease
in Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests resulted from the deconsolidation of our Consumer Healthcare business in connection with the formation of the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture. For
additional information, see Note 2C. The decrease in Additional paid in capital relates to our buyout of the remaining 50% of noncontrolling interests in an oncology vaccines start up, which has historically been
consolidated by us.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(MILLIONS) 2019 2018 2017

Operating Activities
Net income before allocation to noncontrolling interests $ 16,302 $ 11,188 $ 21,355
Adjustments to reconcile net income before allocation to noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 6,010 6,384 6,269
Asset write-offs and impairments 2,953 3,398 634
TCJA impact(a) (323) (596) (10,660)
Gain on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction, net of cash conveyed(b) (8,233) — —
Deferred taxes from continuing operations(c) 614 (2,205) (2,410)
Share-based compensation expense 718 949 840
Benefit plan contributions in excess of expense/income (336) (1,095) (961)
Other adjustments, net (1,086) (1,269) 399
Other changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures:

Trade accounts receivable (742) (644) 259
Inventories (1,050) (717) (357)
Other assets 795 (16) 7
Trade accounts payable (564) 431 46
Other liabilities 267 98 (67)
Other tax accounts, net (2,737) (78) 1,446
Net cash provided by operating activities 12,588 15,827 16,802

Investing Activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (2,176) (2,042) (1,956)
Purchases of short-term investments (6,835) (11,677) (14,596)
Proceeds from redemptions/sales of short-term investments 9,183 17,581 10,302
Net (purchases of)/proceeds from redemptions/sales of short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less 6,925 (3,917) 2,058
Purchases of long-term investments (201) (1,797) (3,537)

Proceeds from redemptions/sales of long-term investments 232 6,244 3,579
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired (10,861) — (1,000)
Acquisitions of intangible assets (418) (154) (261)
Other investing activities, net(b), (d) 205 288 671
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities (3,945) 4,525 (4,740)

Financing Activities
Proceeds from short-term borrowings 16,455 3,711 8,464
Principal payments on short-term borrowings (8,378) (4,437) (9,947)
Net (payments on)/proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturities of three months or less 2,551 (1,617) 1,422
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 4,942 4,974 5,274
Principal payments on long-term debt (6,806) (3,566) (6,154)
Purchases of common stock (8,865) (12,198) (5,000)
Cash dividends paid (8,043) (7,978) (7,659)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 394 1,259 862
Other financing activities, net (736) (588) (611)
Net cash used in financing activities (8,485) (20,441) (13,350)
Effect of exchange-rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents (32) (116) 53
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents 125 (205) (1,235)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period 1,225 1,431 2,666
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents, at end of period $ 1,350 $ 1,225 $ 1,431

- Continued -


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


2019 2018 2017
Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Non-cash transactions:
32% equity-method investment in GSK Consumer Healthcare JV in exchange for contributing Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare business(b) $ 15,711 $ — $ —
Equity investment in Cerevel Therapeutics, Inc. in exchange for Pfizer’s portfolio of clinical and preclinical neuroscience assets(d) — 343 —
Equity investment in Allogene received in exchange for Pfizer's allogeneic CAR T developmental program assets(d) — 92 —
Exchange of $1.1 billion net book value 6.50% U.K. pound-denominated bonds maturing in 2038 for $1.8 billion of new 2.735% U.K.
pound-denominated bonds maturing in 2043, resulting in a debt extinguishment loss of $747 million(e) — — 1,848
Receipt of ICU Medical common stock(d) — — 428

Promissory note from ICU Medical(d) — — 75
Cash paid (received) during the period for:

Income taxes $ 3,664 $ 3,655 $ 2,489
Interest 1,587 1,311 1,518
Interest rate hedges (42) (38) (199)
(a) As a result of the enactment of the TCJA in December 2017, Pfizer’s Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income (i) for the year ended December 31, 2017 was favorably impacted by approximately $10.7 billion,
primarily reflecting the remeasurement of U.S. deferred tax liabilities, which includes the repatriation tax on deemed repatriated accumulated post-1986 earnings of foreign subsidiaries, (ii) for the year ended
December 31, 2018 was favorably impacted by approximately $600 million, primarily related to certain tax initiatives associated with the TCJA, as well as favorable adjustments to the provisional estimates of the
legislation and (iii) for the year ended December 31, 2019 was favorably impacted by approximately $323 million, primarily as a result of additional guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury. See Note
5A.
(b) The $8.2 billion Gain on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction, net of cash conveyed reflects the receipt of a 32% equity-method investment in the new company initially valued at $15.7 billion in
exchange for net assets contributed of $7.6 billion and is presented in operating activities net of $146 million cash conveyed that is reflected in Other investing activities, net. For additional information, see Note
2C.
(c) Includes tax expense of approximately $2.7 billion associated with the gain related to the completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction with GSK. For additional information, see Note 2C and
Note 5A.
(d) For additional information, see Note 2B.
(e) The $747 million is included in the net loss of $846 million upon the exchange and early retirement of the U.K. pound-denominated debt. See Note 7D.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

A. Basis of Presentation
See the Glossary of Defined Terms at the beginning of this 2019 Financial Report for terms used throughout the consolidated financial statements and related notes in this
2019 Financial Report.
The consolidated financial statements include our parent company and all subsidiaries, and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The decision of whether or not to consolidate an entity requires consideration of majority voting interests, as well as effective economic
or other control over the entity. Typically, we do not seek control by means other than voting interests. For subsidiaries operating outside the U.S., the financial information is
included as of and for the year ended November 30 for each year presented. Pfizer's fiscal year-end for U.S. subsidiaries is as of and for the year ended December 31 for each
year presented. Substantially all unremitted earnings of international subsidiaries are free of legal and contractual restrictions. All significant transactions among our businesses
have been eliminated. Beginning on January 1, 2018, only taxes paid on intercompany inventory sales transactions are deferred until recognized upon the sale of the inventory
to a third party, reflecting the adoption of a new accounting standard in the first quarter of 2018. Prior to the adoption of this new accounting standard in the first quarter of
2018, taxes paid on intercompany sales transactions were deferred until recognized upon sale of the asset to a third party.
From the second quarter of our 2016 fiscal year until the end of 2018, we managed our commercial operations through two distinct business segments: Pfizer Innovative
Health (IH) and Pfizer Essential Health (EH). At the beginning of our 2019 fiscal year, we began to manage our commercial operations through a new global structure
consisting of three business segments––Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals Group (Biopharma), Upjohn and through July 31, 2019, Consumer Healthcare. Biopharma and Upjohn are
the only reportable segments. We have revised prior-period segment information to reflect the reorganization. For additional information, see Note 17. In addition, certain
amounts within Long-term investments in the December 31, 2018 consolidated balance sheet have been reclassified to Equity-method investments to conform to the current
presentation. For additional information, see Note 2C.
Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements and associated notes may not add due to rounding. All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts.
In the first quarter of 2019, as of January 1, 2019, we adopted four new accounting standards. See Note 1B for further information.
Our recent significant business development activities include:

• License Agreement with Akcea Therapeutics, Inc.––In October 2019, we entered into a worldwide exclusive licensing agreement for AKCEA-ANGPTL3-LRx, an
investigational antisense therapy being developed to treat patients with certain cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, with Akcea, a majority-owned affiliate of Ionis. The
transaction closed in November 2019 and we made an upfront payment of $250 million to Akcea and Ionis, which was recorded in Research and development expenses in
our fiscal fourth quarter of 2019.
• Formation of a New Consumer Healthcare Joint Venture––On July 31, 2019, we completed the transaction in which we and GSK combined our respective consumer
healthcare businesses into a new consumer healthcare joint venture that operates globally under the GSK Consumer Healthcare name. In accordance with our domestic and
international reporting periods, our financial results, and our Consumer Healthcare segment’s operating results, for 2019 reflect seven months of Consumer Healthcare
segment domestic operations and eight months of Consumer Healthcare segment international operations. Assets and liabilities associated with our Consumer Healthcare
business were reclassified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018.
• Acquisition of Array BioPharma Inc.––On July 30, 2019, we acquired Array for $48 per share in cash. The total fair value of the consideration transferred for Array was
approximately $11.2 billion ($10.9 billion, net of cash acquired). Our financial statements for 2019 reflect the assets, liabilities, operating results and cash flows of Array,
commencing from the acquisition date.
• Agreement to Combine Upjohn with Mylan N.V.––On July 29, 2019, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan, creating a
new global pharmaceutical company, Viatris. Under the terms of the agreement, which is structured as an all-stock, Reverse Morris Trust transaction, Upjohn is expected to
be spun off or split off to Pfizer’s shareholders and, immediately thereafter, combined with Mylan. Pfizer shareholders would own 57% of the combined new company, and
former Mylan shareholders would own 43%. Closing of the transaction is subject to Mylan shareholder approval and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions,
including receipt of regulatory approvals.
• Acquisition of Therachon Holding AG––On July 1, 2019, we acquired all the remaining shares of Therachon for $340 million upfront, plus potential milestone payments of up
to $470 million, contingent on the achievement of key milestones in the development and commercialization of the lead asset. The total fair value of the consideration
transferred for Therachon was approximately $322 million. Our financial statements for 2019 reflect the assets, liabilities, operating results and cash flows of Therachon,
commencing from the acquisition date and, in accordance with our international reporting period, reflect five months of Therachon operations and cash flows.
• Sale of Hospira Infusion Systems Net Assets to ICU Medical, Inc.––On February 3, 2017, we completed the sale of our global infusion systems net assets, HIS, to ICU
Medical for up to approximately $900 million, composed of cash and contingent cash consideration, ICU Medical common stock (all of which we sold during 2018) and seller
financing. HIS includes IV pumps, solutions and devices. The operating results of HIS are included in our consolidated statement of income through February 2, 2017 and,
therefore, our financial results for 2017 reflect one month of HIS domestic operations and two months of HIS international operations. Our financial results for 2019 and 2018
do not reflect any contribution from HIS global operations.


• Acquisition of AstraZeneca’s Small Molecule Anti-Infectives Business––On December 22, 2016, which fell in the first fiscal quarter of 2017 for our international operations,
we acquired the development and commercialization rights to AstraZeneca’s small molecule anti-infectives business, primarily outside the U.S. for approximately $1.0
billion, composed of cash and contingent consideration. Our financial statements reflect the assets, liabilities, operating results and cash flows of this business,
commencing from the acquisition date and, in accordance with our international reporting period, for 2017 reflect approximately 11 months of the small molecule anti-
infectives business operations and cash flows acquired from AstraZeneca.
For additional information, see Note 2.
B. Adoption of New Accounting Standards in 2019
On January 1, 2019, we adopted four new accounting standards.
Leases––On January 1, 2019, we adopted a new accounting standard for leases and changed our lease policies accordingly. Under the new standard, the most significant
change is the requirement of balance sheet recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases. We adopted the new
accounting standard utilizing the modified retrospective method using a simplified transition approach, and, therefore, no adjustments were made to our prior period financial
statements. We have elected the package of practical expedients for transition which are permitted in the new standard. Accordingly, we did not reassess whether (i) any
expired or existing contracts are or contain leases under the new standard, (ii) classification of leases as operating leases or capital leases would be different under the new
standard, or (iii) any initial direct costs would have met the definition of initial direct costs under the new standard. Additionally, we did not elect to use hindsight in determining
the lease term for existing leases as of January 1, 2019. We recorded noncurrent ROU assets of $1.4 billion and current and noncurrent operating lease liabilities of $1.4 billion
as of January 1, 2019. We also recorded the cumulative effect of adopting the standard as an adjustment to increase the opening balance of Retained earnings by $30 million
on a pre-tax basis ($20 million after-tax), relating to previously deferred sale-leaseback gains that can be recognized under the new rules.
Adopting the standard related to leases impacted our prior period consolidated balance sheet as follows:
As Previously Reported
Balance at Effect of Change Balance at
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) December 31, 2018 Higher/(Lower) January 1, 2019
Other current assets $ 2,461 $ (1) $ 2,460
Noncurrent deferred tax assets and other noncurrent tax assets 1,924 (11) 1,913
Other noncurrent assets 2,799 1,351 4,149
Other current liabilities 10,753 258 11,011
Other noncurrent liabilities 5,850 1,060 6,910
Retained earnings 89,554 20 89,574
Adoption of the standard related to leases did not have a material impact on our consolidated statements of income or consolidated statements of cash flows in 2019. For
additional information, see Note 1T.
Amortization Period for Certain Callable Debt Securities Held at a Premium––We prospectively adopted the standard, which shortens the amortization period for certain
callable debt securities held at a premium. The new guidance requires the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. We do not have any investments with features
subject to this standard and, therefore, there was no impact to our consolidated financial statements from the adoption of this new standard.
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Liabilities and Equity and Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features––We
prospectively adopted the standard, which changes the accounting for warrants or convertible instruments that include a down round feature. We do not have any financial
instruments with features subject to this standard and, therefore, there was no impact to our consolidated financial statements from the adoption of this new standard.
Accounting for Share-Based Payments to Nonemployees––We prospectively adopted the standard, which simplifies the accounting for share-based payments to
nonemployees by aligning it with the accounting for share-based payments to employees, with certain exceptions. Under the guidance, the measurement of equity-classified
nonemployee awards will be fixed at the grant date. We do not have any share-based awards issued to nonemployees and, therefore, there was no impact to our consolidated
financial statements from the adoption of this new standard.
C. Estimates and Assumptions
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, we use certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures, including amounts recorded and
disclosed in connection with acquisitions. These estimates and underlying assumptions can impact all elements of our financial statements. For example, in the consolidated
statements of income, estimates are used when accounting for deductions from revenues (such as rebates, chargebacks, sales allowances and sales returns), determining the
cost of inventory that is sold, allocating cost in the form of depreciation and amortization, and estimating restructuring charges and the impact of contingencies, as well as
determining provisions for taxes on income. On the consolidated balance sheets, estimates are used in determining the valuation and recoverability of assets, such as
accounts receivable, investments, inventories, deferred tax assets, fixed assets and intangible assets (including acquired IPR&D assets), and estimates are used in
determining the reported amounts of liabilities, such as taxes payable, benefit obligations, accruals for contingencies, rebates, chargebacks, sales allowances and sales
returns, and restructuring reserves, all of which also impact the consolidated statements of income.


Our estimates are often based on complex judgments and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, but that can be inherently uncertain and unpredictable. If our
estimates and assumptions are not representative of actual outcomes, our results could be materially impacted.
As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, our estimates and assumptions may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, or unanticipated events and
circumstances may occur that might cause us to change those estimates and assumptions. We are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ
from estimated amounts, such as changes in the healthcare environment, competition, litigation, legislation and regulations. We regularly evaluate our estimates and
assumptions using historical experience and expectations about the future. We adjust our estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances indicate the need for
change.
For information on estimates and assumptions in connection with the TCJA, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from
Continuing Operations.
D. Acquisitions
Our consolidated financial statements include the operations of acquired businesses after the completion of the acquisitions. We account for acquired businesses using the
acquisition method of accounting, which requires, among other things, that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their estimated fair values as of the
acquisition date and that the fair value of acquired IPR&D be recorded on the balance sheet. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred. Any excess of the consideration
transferred over the assigned values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. When we acquire net assets that do not constitute a business, as defined in U.S.
GAAP, no goodwill is recognized and acquired IPR&D is expensed.
Contingent consideration in a business combination is included as part of the acquisition cost and is recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. Fair value is generally
estimated by using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow approach. See Note 16D. Any liability resulting from contingent consideration is remeasured to fair value at
each reporting date until the contingency is resolved. These changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in Other (income)/deductions––net.
Amounts recorded in connection with an acquisition can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and
assumptions. For information about the risks associated with estimates and assumptions, see Note 1C.
E. Fair Value
We are often required to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value, either upon initial recognition or for subsequent accounting or reporting. For example, we use fair
value extensively in the initial recognition of net assets acquired in a business combination, when measuring certain impairment losses and when accounting for and reporting
of certain financial instruments. We estimate fair value using an exit price approach, which requires, among other things, that we determine the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly market. The determination of an exit price is considered from the perspective of market participants, considering the
highest and best use of non-financial assets and, for liabilities, assuming that the risk of non-performance will be the same before and after the transfer.
When estimating fair value, depending on the nature and complexity of the asset or liability, we may use one or all of the following techniques:
• Income approach, which is based on the present value of a future stream of net cash flows.
• Market approach, which is based on market prices and other information from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
• Cost approach, which is based on the cost to acquire or construct comparable assets, less an allowance for functional and/or economic obsolescence.
Our fair value methodologies depend on the following types of inputs:
• Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets (Level 1 inputs).
• Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than
quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable, or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means
(Level 2 inputs).
• Unobservable inputs that reflect estimates and assumptions (Level 3 inputs).
A single estimate of fair value can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. For
information about the risks associated with estimates and assumptions, see Note 1C.
F. Foreign Currency Translation
For most of our international operations, local currencies have been determined to be the functional currencies. We translate functional currency assets and liabilities to their
U.S. dollar equivalents at exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date and we translate functional currency income and expense amounts to their U.S. dollar
equivalents at average exchange rates for the period. The U.S. dollar effects that arise from changing translation rates are recorded in Other comprehensive income/(loss). The
effects of converting non-functional currency monetary assets and liabilities into the functional currency are recorded in Other (income)/deductions––net. For operations in
highly inflationary economies, we translate monetary items at rates in effect as of the balance sheet date, with translation adjustments recorded in Other (income)/deductions––
net, and we translate non-monetary items at historical rates.


G. Revenues and Trade Accounts Receivable
We recorded direct product sales and/or alliance revenues of more than $1 billion for each of eight products in 2019, for each of ten products in 2018 and for each of nine
products in 2017. In the aggregate, these direct products sales and/or alliance product revenues represent 49% of our revenues in 2019, 51% of our revenues in 2018 and
46% of our revenues in 2017. See Note 17C for additional information. The loss or expiration of intellectual property rights can have a significant adverse effect on our
revenues as our contracts with customers will generally be at lower selling prices due to added competition and we generally provide for higher sales returns during the period
in which individual markets begin to near the loss or expiration of intellectual property rights. Our Consumer Healthcare business, which was combined with GSK’s Consumer
Healthcare business into a new consumer healthcare joint venture that operates globally under the GSK Consumer Healthcare name on July 31, 2019, included OTC brands
with a focus on dietary supplements, pain management, gastrointestinal and respiratory and personal care. We sell biopharmaceutical products after patent expiration, and
under patent, and, to a much lesser extent, through July 31, 2019, we sold consumer healthcare products worldwide to developed and emerging market countries.
Revenue Recognition––We record revenues from product sales when there is a transfer of control of the product from us to the customer. We determine transfer of control
based on when the product is shipped or delivered and title passes to the customer.
• Customers––Our biopharmaceutical products are sold principally to wholesalers but we also sell directly to retailers, hospitals, clinics, government agencies and pharmacies,
and, in the case of our vaccine products in the U.S., we primarily sell directly to the CDC, wholesalers, individual provider offices, retail pharmacies and integrated delivery
networks. Customers for our consumer healthcare business, which were part of the business that was combined with GSK’s Consumer Healthcare business into a new
consumer healthcare joint venture on July 31, 2019, included retailers and, to a lesser extent, wholesalers and distributors.
Biopharmaceutical products that ultimately are used by patients are generally covered under governmental programs, managed care programs and insurance programs,
including those managed through PBMs, and are subject to sales allowances and/or rebates payable directly to those programs. Those sales allowances and rebates are
generally negotiated, but government programs may have legislated amounts by type of product (e.g., patented or unpatented).
• Our Sales Contracts––Sales on credit are typically under short-term contracts. Collections are based on market payment cycles common in various markets, with shorter
cycles in the U.S. Sales are adjusted for sales allowances, chargebacks, rebates and sales returns and cash discounts. Sales returns occur due to loss of exclusivity,
product recalls or a changing competitive environment.
• Deductions from Revenues––Our gross product revenues are subject to a variety of deductions, which generally are estimated and recorded in the same period that the
revenues are recognized. Such variable consideration represents chargebacks, rebates, sales allowances and sales returns. These deductions represent estimates of the
related obligations and, as such, knowledge and judgment is required when estimating the impact of these revenue deductions on gross sales for a reporting period.
Specifically:
• In the U.S., we sell our products to distributors and hospitals under our sales contracts. However, we also have contracts with managed care or pharmacy benefit managers
and legislatively mandated contracts with the federal and state governments under which we provide rebates to them based on medicines utilized by the lives they cover. We
record provisions for Medicare, Medicaid, and performance-based contract pharmaceutical rebates based upon our experience ratio of rebates paid and actual prescriptions
written during prior quarters. We apply the experience ratio to the respective period’s sales to determine the rebate accrual and related expense. This experience ratio is
evaluated regularly to ensure that the historical trends are as current as practicable. We estimate discounts on branded prescription drug sales to Medicare Part D
participants in the Medicare “coverage gap,” also known as the “doughnut hole,” based on the historical experience of beneficiary prescriptions and consideration of the
utilization that is expected to result from the discount in the coverage gap. We evaluate this estimate regularly to ensure that the historical trends and future expectations are
as current as practicable. For performance-based contract rebates, we also consider current contract terms, such as changes in formulary status and rebate rates.
• Outside the U.S., the majority of our pharmaceutical sales allowances are contractual or legislatively mandated and our estimates are based on actual invoiced sales within
each period, which reduces the risk of variations in the estimation process. In certain European countries, rebates are calculated on the government’s total unbudgeted
pharmaceutical spending or on specific product sales thresholds and we apply an estimated allocation factor against our actual invoiced sales to project the expected level of
reimbursement. We obtain third-party information that helps us to monitor the adequacy of these accruals.
• Provisions for pharmaceutical chargebacks (primarily reimbursements to U.S. wholesalers for honoring contracted prices to third parties) closely approximate actual amounts
incurred, as we settle these deductions generally within two to five weeks of incurring the liability.
• Provisions for pharmaceutical sales returns are based on a calculation for each market that incorporates the following, as appropriate: local returns policies and practices;
historical returns as a percentage of sales; an understanding of the reasons for past returns; estimated shelf life by product; an estimate of the amount of time between
shipment and return or lag time; and any other factors that could impact the estimate of future returns, such as loss of exclusivity, product recalls or a changing competitive
environment. Generally, returned products are destroyed, and customers are refunded the sales price in the form of a credit.
• We record sales incentives as a reduction of revenues at the time the related revenues are recorded or when the incentive is offered, whichever is later. We estimate the
cost of our sales incentives based on our historical experience with similar incentives programs to predict customer behavior.


Our accruals for Medicare rebates, Medicaid and related state program rebates, performance-based contract rebates, chargebacks, sales allowances and sales returns and
cash discounts totaled $5.7 billion as of December 31, 2019 and $5.4 billion as of December 31, 2018.
The following table provides information about the balance sheet classification of these accruals:
As of December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018
Reserve against Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts $ 1,257 $ 1,288

Other current liabilities:
Accrued rebates 3,285 3,208
Other accruals 581 531

Other noncurrent liabilities 565 399
Total accrued rebates and other accruals $ 5,689 $ 5,426
Amounts recorded for revenue deductions can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and
Taxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from Revenues.
Trade Accounts Receivable—Trade accounts receivable are stated at their net realizable value. The allowance against gross trade accounts receivable reflects the best
estimate of probable losses inherent in the receivables portfolio determined on the basis of historical experience, specific allowances for known troubled accounts and other
current information. Trade accounts receivable are written off after all reasonable means to collect the full amount (including litigation, where appropriate) have been
exhausted.
H. Collaborative Arrangements
Payments to and from our collaboration partners are presented in our consolidated statements of income based on the nature of the arrangement (including its contractual
terms), the nature of the payments and applicable accounting guidance. Under co-promotion agreements, we record the amounts received from our collaboration partners as
alliance revenues, a component of Revenues, when our collaboration partners are the principal in the transaction and we receive a share of their net sales or profits. Alliance
revenues are recorded as we perform co-promotion services for the collaboration and the collaboration partners sell the products to their customers within the applicable
period. The related expenses for selling and marketing these products are included in Selling, informational and administrative expenses. In collaborative arrangements where
we manufacture a product for our collaboration partners, we record revenues when we transfer control of the product to our collaboration partners. In collaboration
arrangements where we are the principal in the transaction, we record amounts paid to collaboration partners for their share of net sales or profits earned, and all royalty
payments to collaboration partners as Cost of sales. Royalty payments received from collaboration partners are included in Other (income)/deductions—net.
Reimbursements to or from our collaboration partners for development costs are recorded net in Research and development expenses. Upfront payments and pre-approval
milestone payments due from us to our collaboration partners in development stage collaborations are recorded as Research and development expenses. Milestone payments
due from us to our collaboration partners after regulatory approval has been attained for a medicine are recorded in Identifiable intangible assets—Developed technology
rights. Upfront and pre-approval milestone payments earned from our collaboration partners by us are recognized in Other (income)/deductions—net over the development
period for the collaboration products, when our performance obligations include providing R&D services to our collaboration partners. Upfront, pre-approval and post-approval
milestone payments earned by us may be recognized in Other (income)/deductions—net immediately when earned or over other periods depending upon the nature of our
performance obligations in the applicable collaboration. Where the milestone event is regulatory approval for a medicine, we generally recognize milestone payments due to us
in the transaction price when regulatory approval in the applicable jurisdiction has been attained. We may recognize milestone payments due to us in the transaction price
earlier than the milestone event in certain circumstances when recognition of the income would not be probable of a significant reversal.
I. Cost of Sales and Inventories

We carry inventories at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The cost of finished goods, work in process and raw materials is determined using average actual cost. We
regularly review our inventories for impairment and reserves are established when necessary.
J. Selling, Informational and Administrative Expenses

Selling, informational and administrative costs are expensed as incurred. Among other things, these expenses include the internal and external costs of marketing, advertising,
shipping and handling, information technology and legal defense. Advertising expenses totaled approximately $2.6 billion in 2019, $3.1 billion in 2018 and $3.1 billion in 2017.
Production costs are expensed as incurred and the costs of radio time, television time and space in publications are expensed when the related advertising occurs.
K. Research and Development Expenses

R&D costs are expensed as incurred. These expenses include the costs of our proprietary R&D efforts, as well as costs incurred in connection with certain licensing
arrangements. Before a compound receives regulatory approval, we record upfront and milestone payments made by us to third parties under licensing arrangements as
expense. Upfront payments are recorded when incurred, and milestone payments are recorded when the specific milestone has been achieved. Once a compound receives
regulatory approval, we record any milestone payments in Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization and, unless the asset is determined to have an
indefinite life, we amortize the payments on a straight-line basis over the remaining agreement term or the expected product life cycle, whichever is shorter.


L. Amortization of Intangible Assets, Depreciation and Certain Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include:
• Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation—These assets are recorded at cost and are increased by the cost of any significant improvements after
purchase. Property, plant and equipment assets, other than land and construction in progress, are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the
individual assets. Depreciation begins when the asset is ready for its intended use. For tax purposes, accelerated depreciation methods are used as allowed by tax laws.
• Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization—These acquired assets are recorded at fair value. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a straight-
line basis over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite lives that are associated with marketed products are not amortized until a useful life can be
determined.
• Goodwill—Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred for an acquired business over the assigned values of its net assets. Goodwill is not amortized.
Amortization expense related to finite-lived acquired intangible assets that contribute to our ability to sell, manufacture, research, market and distribute products, compounds
and intellectual property is included in Amortization of intangible assets as these intangible assets benefit multiple business functions. Amortization expense related to
intangible assets that are associated with a single function and depreciation of property, plant and equipment are included in Cost of sales, Selling, informational and
administrative expenses and/or Research and development expenses, as appropriate.
We review all of our long-lived assets for impairment indicators throughout the year. We perform impairment testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill at least
annually and for all other long-lived assets whenever impairment indicators are present. When necessary, we record charges for impairments of long-lived assets for the
amount by which the fair value is less than the carrying value of these assets.
Specifically:
• For finite-lived intangible assets, such as developed technology rights, and for other long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment, whenever impairment
indicators are present, we calculate the undiscounted value of the projected cash flows associated with the asset, or asset group, and compare this estimated amount to the
carrying amount. If the carrying amount is found to be greater, we record an impairment loss for the excess of book value over fair value. In addition, in all cases of an
impairment review, we reevaluate the remaining useful lives of the assets and modify them, as appropriate.
• For indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as Brands and IPR&D assets, when necessary, we determine the fair value of the asset and record an impairment loss, if any, for
the excess of book value over fair value. In addition, in all cases of an impairment review other than for IPR&D assets, we re-evaluate whether continuing to characterize the
asset as indefinite-lived is appropriate.
• For goodwill, when necessary, we determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare that value to its book value. If the carrying amount is found to be greater, we
then determine the implied fair value of goodwill by subtracting the fair value of all the identifiable net assets other than goodwill from the fair value of the reporting unit and
record an impairment loss, if any, for the excess of the book value of goodwill over the implied fair value.
Impairment reviews can involve a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. For information about
the risks associated with estimates and assumptions, see Note 1C.
M. Restructuring Charges and Certain Acquisition-Related Costs

We may incur restructuring charges in connection with acquisitions when we implement plans to restructure and integrate the acquired operations or in connection with our
cost-reduction and productivity initiatives. Included in Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs are all restructuring charges, as well as certain other costs
associated with acquiring and integrating an acquired business. If the restructuring action results in a change in the estimated useful life of an asset, that incremental impact is
classified in Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses and/or Research and development expenses, as appropriate. Termination costs are generally
recorded when the actions are probable and estimable. Transaction costs, such as banking, legal, accounting and other similar costs incurred in connection with a business
acquisition are expensed as incurred.
Amounts recorded for restructuring charges and other associated costs can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely
heavily on estimates and assumptions. For information about the risks associated with estimates and assumptions, see Note 1C.
N. Cash Equivalents and Statement of Cash Flows

Cash equivalents include items almost as liquid as cash, such as certificates of deposit and time deposits with maturity periods of three months or less when purchased. If
items meeting this definition are part of a larger investment pool, we classify them as Short-term investments.
Cash flows associated with financial instruments designated as fair value or cash flow hedges may be included in operating, investing or financing activities, depending on the
classification of the items being hedged. Cash flows associated with financial instruments designated as net investment hedges are classified according to the nature of the
hedge instrument. Cash flows associated with financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment are classified according to their purpose and accounting
nature.
O. Investments and Derivative Financial Instruments

Our investments are comprised of the following: public equity securities with readily determinable fair values, available-for-sale debt securities, held-to-maturity debt securities
(when we have both the positive intent and ability to hold the investment to maturity), private equity securities


without readily determinable fair values and equity-method investments. The classification of an investment can depend on the nature of the investment, our intent and ability to
hold the investment, and the degree to which we may exercise influence.
• Public equity securities with readily determinable fair values are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in Other (income)/deductions—net.
• Available-for-sale debt securities are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in Other comprehensive income/(loss) until realized.
• Held-to-maturity debt securities are carried at amortized cost.
• Private equity securities without readily determinable fair values and where we have no significant influence are measured at cost minus any impairment and plus or minus
changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer.
• For equity investments in common stock or in-substance common stock where we have significant influence over the financial and operating policies of the investee, we use
the equity-method of accounting. Under the equity-method, we record our share of the investee’s income and expenses in Other (income)/deductions—net. The excess of
the cost of the investment over our share of the underlying equity in the net assets of the investee as of the acquisition date is allocated to the identifiable assets and
liabilities of the investee, with any remaining excess amount allocated to goodwill. Such investments are initially recorded at cost, which is the fair value of consideration paid
and typically does not include contingent consideration.
Realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined by using the specific identification cost method.
We regularly evaluate all of our financial assets for impairment. For investments in debt and equity, when a decline in fair value, if any, is determined, an impairment charge is
recorded and a new cost basis in the investment is established.
Derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value in various balance sheet categories (see Note 7A), with changes in fair value reported in Net income or, for derivative
financial instruments in certain qualifying hedging relationships, in Other comprehensive income/(loss) (see Note 7F).
A single estimate of fair value and impairment reviews can involve a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and
P. Tax Assets and Liabilities and Income Tax Contingencies

Tax Assets and Liabilities
Current tax assets primarily includes (i) tax effects associated with intercompany transfers of inventory within our combined group, which are recognized in the consolidated
statements of income when the inventory is sold to a third party, as well as (ii) income tax receivables that are expected to be recovered either as refunds from taxing
authorities or as a reduction to future tax obligations.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates and laws, including the impact of the TCJA enacted in December 2017. We provide a valuation allowance when we believe that our deferred tax assets
are not recoverable based on an assessment of estimated future taxable income that incorporates ongoing, prudent and feasible tax-planning strategies, that would be
implemented, if necessary, to realize the deferred tax assets. All deferred tax assets and liabilities within the same tax jurisdiction are presented as a net amount in the
noncurrent section of our consolidated balance sheet. Amounts recorded for valuation allowances can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and
uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. For information about the risks associated with estimates and assumptions, see Note 1C.
Other non-current tax assets primarily represent our estimate of the potential tax benefits in one tax jurisdiction that could result from the payment of income taxes in another
tax jurisdiction. These potential benefits generally result from cooperative efforts among taxing authorities, as required by tax treaties to minimize double taxation, commonly
referred to as the competent authority process. The recoverability of these assets, which we believe to be more likely than not, is dependent upon the actual payment of taxes
in one tax jurisdiction and, in some cases, the successful petition for recovery in another tax jurisdiction.
Other taxes payable in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 includes liabilities for uncertain tax positions and the noncurrent portion of the repatriation tax
liability on the deemed repatriated accumulated post-1986 foreign earnings recorded in connection with the TCJA for which we elected, with the filing of our 2018 U.S. Federal
Consolidated Income Tax Return, payment over eight years through 2026. For additional information, see Note 5D for uncertain tax positions and Note 5A for the repatriation
tax liability.
Income Tax Contingencies
We account for income tax contingencies using a benefit recognition model. If we consider that a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, based solely on
the technical merits of the position, we recognize the benefit. We measure the benefit by determining the amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon
settlement, presuming that the tax position is examined by the appropriate taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information.
Under the benefit recognition model, if our initial assessment fails to result in the recognition of a tax benefit, we regularly monitor our position and subsequently recognize the
tax benefit: (i) if there are changes in tax law, analogous case law or there is new information that sufficiently raise the likelihood of prevailing on the technical merits of the
position to “more likely than not”; (ii) if the statute of limitations expires; or (iii) if there is a completion of an audit resulting in a favorable settlement of that tax year with the
appropriate agency. We regularly re-evaluate our tax positions based on the results of audits of federal, state and local and foreign income tax filings, statute of limitations
expirations, changes and clarification in tax law or receipt of new information that would either increase or decrease the technical merits of a position relative to the


more-likely-than-not standard. Liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions are classified as current only when we expect to pay cash within the next 12 months. Interest
and penalties, if any, are recorded in Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income and are classified on our consolidated balance sheet with the related tax liability.
Our assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but our estimates of unrecognized tax benefits and potential
tax benefits may not be representative of actual outcomes, and variation from such estimates could materially affect our financial statements in the period of settlement or when
the statutes of limitations expire, as we treat these events as discrete items in the period of resolution. Finalizing audits with the relevant taxing authorities can include formal
administrative and legal proceedings, and, as a result, it is difficult to estimate the timing and range of possible changes related to our uncertain tax positions, and such
changes could be significant. For information about the risks associated with estimates and assumptions, see Note 1C.
Q. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans

The majority of our employees worldwide are covered by defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution plans or both. In the U.S., we have both IRC-qualified and
supplemental (non-qualified) defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans, as well as other postretirement benefit plans consisting primarily of medical insurance for
retirees and their eligible dependents. We recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of each of our defined benefit plans as an asset or liability on our consolidated
balance sheet. The obligations are generally measured at the actuarial present value of all benefits attributable to employee service rendered, as provided by the applicable
benefit formula. Our pension and other postretirement obligations may include assumptions such as expected employee turnover and participant mortality. For our pension
plans, the obligation may also include assumptions as to future compensation levels. For our other postretirement benefit plans, the obligation may include assumptions as to
the expected cost of providing medical insurance benefits, as well as the extent to which those costs are shared with the employee or others (such as governmental programs).
Plan assets are measured at fair value. Net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs other than the service costs are recognized in Other (income)/deductions—net.
Amounts recorded for pension and postretirement benefit plans can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on
estimates and assumptions. For information about the risks associated with estimates and assumptions, see Note 1C.
R. Legal and Environmental Contingencies

We and certain of our subsidiaries are subject to numerous contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business, such as patent litigation, product liability and other
product-related litigation, commercial litigation, environmental claims and proceedings, government investigations and guarantees and indemnifications. We record accruals for
these contingencies to the extent that we conclude that a loss is both probable and reasonably estimable. If some amount within a range of loss appears to be a better estimate
than any other amount within the range, we accrue that amount. Alternatively, when no amount within a range of loss appears to be a better estimate than any other amount,
we accrue the lowest amount in the range. We record anticipated recoveries under existing insurance contracts when recovery is assured.
Amounts recorded for contingencies can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions.
For information about the risks associated with estimates and assumptions, see Note 1C.
S. Share-Based Payments
Our compensation programs can include share-based payments. Generally, grants under share-based payment programs are accounted for at fair value and these fair values
are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting terms into Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses and/or Research and development
expenses, as appropriate.
Amounts recorded for share-based compensation can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and
T. Leases
On January 1, 2019, we adopted a new accounting standard for leases. For further information, see Note 1B.
We lease real estate, fleet, and equipment for use in our operations. Our leases generally have lease terms of 1 to 30 years, some of which include options to terminate or
extend leases for up to 5 to 10 years or on a month-to-month basis. We include options that are reasonably certain to be exercised as part of the determination of lease terms.
We may negotiate termination clauses in anticipation of any changes in market conditions, but generally these termination options are not exercised. Residual value
guarantees are generally not included within our operating leases with the exception of some fleet leases. In addition to base rent payments, the leases may require us to pay
directly for taxes and other non-lease components, such as insurance, maintenance and other operating expenses, which may be dependent on usage or vary month-to-
month. Variable lease payments amounted to $328 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. We have elected the practical expedient in the new standard to not separate
non-lease components from lease components in calculating the amounts of ROU assets and lease liabilities for all underlying asset classes.
We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception of the contract in accordance with guidance detailed in the new standard and we perform the lease classification test as
of the lease commencement date. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease
payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the
lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our estimated incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date
in determining the present value of future payments.

For operating leases, the ROU assets and liabilities are presented in our consolidated balance sheet as follows:
Balance at
December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Balance Sheet Classification 2019
ROU assets Other noncurrent assets $ 1,313
Lease liabilities (short-term) Other current liabilities 276
Lease liabilities (long-term) Other noncurrent liabilities 1,048
Our total lease costs are as follows:

Year Ended
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) December 31, 2019
Operating lease cost $ 416
Variable lease cost 328
Sublease income (45)
Total lease cost $ 700
Other supplemental information includes the following:

Weighted-Average Remaining
Contractual Lease Term (Years) Weighted-Average Discount
as of Rate as of Year Ended
December 31, December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2019 December 31, 2019
Operating leases 6.8 3.5%
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases $ 346
(Gains)/losses on sale and leaseback transactions, net (29)
ROU assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities 326
The table below reconciles the undiscounted cash flows for the first five years and total of the remaining years to the operating lease liabilities recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2019:
Period Operating Lease Liabilities
Next one year(a) $ 323
1-2 years 286
2-3 years 220
3-4 years 180
4-5 years 97
Thereafter 424
Total undiscounted lease payments 1,530
Less: Imputed interest 206
Present value of minimum lease payments 1,324
Less: Current portion 276
Noncurrent portion $ 1,048
(a) Reflects lease payments due within 12 months subsequent to the balance sheet date.
In April 2018, we entered an agreement to lease space in an office building in New York City. We expect to take control of the property in 2021 and relocate our global
headquarters to this new office building in 2022. Our future minimum rental commitment under this 20-year lease is approximately $1.7 billion.
Prior to our adoption of the new lease standard, rental expense, net of sublease income, was $301 million in 2018 and $314 million in 2017.
As of December 31, 2018, the future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases follow:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 After 2023
Lease commitments $ 300 $ 252 $ 210 $ 267 $ 248 $ 2,040

Note 2. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing
Arrangements and Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements
A. Acquisitions
Array BioPharma Inc.
On July 30, 2019, we acquired Array, a commercial stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of targeted small
molecule medicines to treat cancer and other diseases of high unmet need, for $48 per share in cash. The total fair value of the consideration transferred for Array was
approximately $11.2 billion ($10.9 billion, net of cash acquired). In addition, approximately $157 million in payments to Array employees for the fair value of previously unvested
stock options was recognized as post-closing compensation expense and recorded in Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs in the consolidated statement
of income in the third quarter of 2019 (see Note 3). We financed the majority of the transaction with debt and the balance with existing cash.
Array’s portfolio includes the approved combined use of Braftovi (encorafenib) and Mektovi (binimetinib) for the treatment of BRAF V600E- or BRAFV600K-mutant unresectable or
metastatic melanoma. The combination therapy has significant potential for long-term growth via expansion into additional areas of unmet need and is currently being
investigated in over 30 clinical trials across several solid tumor indications, including in BRAF-mutant mCRC, through collaborations with third parties. In December 2019, the
FDA accepted and granted priority review to our supplemental new drug application for Braftovi in combination with Erbitux (cetuximab) (Braftovi Doublet) in BRAF-mutant
mCRC. Pfizer has exclusive rights to commercialize Braftovi and Mektovi in the U.S. and Canada. In addition to the combination therapy for BRAF-mutant metastatic
melanoma, Array brings a broad pipeline of targeted cancer medicines in different stages of R&D, as well as a portfolio of out-licensed medicines, which may generate
milestones and royalties over time.
In connection with this acquisition, we provisionally recorded: (i) $7.2 billion in Identifiable intangible assets, consisting of $1.8 billion of Developed technology rights with a
useful life of 16 years, $4.0 billion of IPR&D and $1.4 billion for Licensing agreements ($1.1 billion for technology in development––indefinite-lived licensing agreements and
$340 million for developed technology––finite-lived licensing agreements with a useful life of 10 years), (ii) $5.4 billion of Goodwill, (iii) $1.3 billion of net deferred tax liabilities
and (iv) $451 million of assumed long-term debt, which was paid in full in the third quarter of 2019. The allocation of the consideration transferred to the assets acquired and
the liabilities assumed has not yet been finalized.
Therachon Holding AG
On July 1, 2019, we acquired all the remaining shares of Therachon, a privately-held clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on rare diseases, with assets in
development for the treatment of achondroplasia, a genetic condition and the most common form of short-limb dwarfism, for $340 million upfront, plus potential milestone
payments of up to $470 million contingent on the achievement of key milestones in the development and commercialization of the lead asset. In 2018, we acquired
approximately 3% of Therachon’s outstanding shares for $5 million. We accounted for the transaction as an asset acquisition since the lead asset represented substantially all
the fair value of the gross assets acquired. The total fair value of the consideration transferred for Therachon was approximately $322 million, which consisted of $317 million of
cash and our previous $5 million investment in Therachon. Therachon is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pfizer. In connection with this asset acquisition, we recorded a charge of
$337 million in Research and development expenses.
AstraZeneca’s Small Molecule Anti-Infectives Business
On December 22, 2016, which fell in the first fiscal quarter of 2017 for our international operations, we acquired the development and commercialization rights to AstraZeneca’s
small molecule anti-infectives business, primarily outside the U.S., including the commercialization and development rights to the marketed products Zavicefta™ (ceftazidime-
avibactam), Merrem™/Meronem™ (meropenem) and Zinforo™ (ceftaroline fosamil), and the clinical development assets ATM-AVI and CXL (ceftaroline fosamil-AVI). In 2017,
under the terms of the agreement, we made payments of approximately $605 million to AstraZeneca related to the transaction. We made an additional milestone payment of
$125 million in our first fiscal quarter of 2018, we made a deferred payment of $175 million to AstraZeneca in January 2019, and we made an additional milestone payment of
$75 million in our third fiscal quarter of 2019. We may make payments of up to $600 million to AstraZeneca if sales of Zavicefta™ exceed certain thresholds prior to January 1,
2026, as well as tiered royalties on sales of Zavicefta™ and ATM-AVI in certain markets for a period ending on the later of 10 years from first commercial sale or the loss of
patent protection or loss of regulatory exclusivity. The total royalty payments are unlimited during the royalty term and the undiscounted payments are expected to be in the
range of approximately $315 million to $542 million. The total fair value of consideration transferred for AstraZeneca’s small molecule anti-infectives business was
approximately $1.0 billion inclusive of cash paid of $555 million and the fair value of contingent consideration of $485 million (which is composed of the fair values of the
deferred payment, the $50 million milestone payment made in the second quarter of 2017, the $125 million milestone payment made in our first fiscal quarter of 2018, the $75
million milestone payment made in the third quarter of 2019, and the future expected milestone and royalty payments). In connection with this acquisition, we recorded $894
million in Identifiable intangible assets, consisting of $728 million in Developed technology rights and $166 million in IPR&D. We also recorded $92 million in Other current
assets related to the economic value of inventory which was retained by AstraZeneca for sale on our behalf, $73 million in Goodwill and $19 million of net deferred tax
liabilities. The final allocation of the consideration transferred to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed has been completed.
Medivation, Inc.
On September 28, 2016, we acquired Medivation for $81.50 per share. The total fair value of consideration transferred for Medivation was approximately $14.3 billion in cash
($13.9 billion, net of cash acquired). Of this consideration, approximately $365 million was not paid as of December 31, 2016, and was recorded in Other current liabilities. The
remaining consideration was paid as of December 31, 2017. Medivation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pfizer. Medivation is focused on developing and commercializing small
molecules for oncology. Medivation’s portfolio includes Xtandi (enzalutamide). Xtandi is FDA-approved for the treatment of non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant

prostate cancer as well as metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer. Xtandi is being developed and commercialized through a collaboration with Astellas. Astellas has
exclusive commercialization rights for Xtandi outside the U.S. The Medivation portfolio also includes talazoparib, which was approved by the FDA in October 2018, under the
trade name Talzenna, for the treatment of adults with germline BRCA-mutated HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and is currently in development for
other types of cancer. In connection with this acquisition, we recorded $12.2 billion in Identifiable intangible assets, primarily consisting of $8.1 billion of Developed technology
rights with an average useful life of approximately 12 years and $4.1 billion of IPR&D, and recorded $6.1 billion of Goodwill, $4.0 billion of net income tax liabilities, and $259
million of assumed contingent consideration of which $51 million has been paid through December 31, 2019. In 2017 and 2016, we recorded measurement period adjustments
to the estimated fair values initially recorded in 2016, which resulted in a reduction in Identifiable intangible assets of approximately $1.0 billion with a corresponding change to
Goodwill and net income tax liabilities. The measurement period adjustments were recorded to better reflect market participant assumptions about facts and circumstances
existing as of the acquisition date. The 2017 results included a decrease of approximately $38 million to Amortization of intangible assets which reflected the cumulative pre-tax
impact of the measurement period adjustments to Identifiable intangible assets that were amortized to the income statement since the acquisition date. The measurement
period adjustments did not result from intervening events subsequent to the acquisition date. The final allocation of the consideration transferred to the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed has been completed.
B. Divestitures
Sale of Hospira Infusion Systems Net Assets to ICU Medical, Inc.
On October 6, 2016, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement under which ICU Medical, a global device manufacturer, agreed to acquire all of our global
infusion systems net assets, HIS, for approximately $1 billion in cash and ICU Medical common stock. HIS includes IV pumps, solutions, and devices. As a result of the
performance of HIS relative to ICU Medical’s expectations, on January 5, 2017 we entered into a revised agreement with ICU Medical under which ICU Medical would acquire
HIS for up to approximately $900 million, composed of cash and contingent cash consideration, ICU Medical common stock and seller financing.
The revised transaction closed on February 3, 2017. At closing, we received 3.2 million newly issued shares of ICU Medical common stock (as originally agreed), which we
initially valued at approximately $428 million (based upon the closing price of ICU Medical common stock on the closing date less a discount for lack of marketability) and which
were reported as equity securities at fair value in Long-term investments on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. Upon the sale of these shares in 2018,
we realized a full gain of $302 million on these securities, although our income statement only reflects a gain of $47 million as the balance of the previously unrealized gain was
recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment upon the adoption of a new accounting standard. We also received a promissory note in the amount of $75 million, which was
repaid in full as of December 31, 2017, and net cash of approximately $200 million before customary adjustments for net working capital, which was reported in Other investing
activities, net on the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year-ended December 31, 2017. In addition, we are entitled to receive a contingent amount of up to an
additional $225 million in cash based on ICU Medical’s achievement of certain cumulative performance targets for the combined company through December 31, 2019. The
amount of contingent payment we will receive, if any, will be determined during the first half of 2020. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $1 million in 2018 and a pre-tax loss of
$55 million in 2017 in Other (income)/deductions––net, representing adjustments to amounts previously recorded in 2016 to write down the HIS net assets to fair value less
costs to sell.
The sale of the HIS net assets was fully completed in all jurisdictions as of year-end 2018.
In connection with the sale transaction, we entered into certain transitional agreements designed to facilitate the orderly transition of the HIS net assets to ICU Medical. These
agreements primarily related to administrative services, and were provided for a period of 24 months after the closing date. We will also manufacture and supply certain HIS
products for ICU Medical and ICU Medical will manufacture and supply certain retained Pfizer products for us after closing, generally for a term of five years. These
agreements are not material to Pfizer and none confers upon us the ability to influence the operating and/or financial policies of ICU Medical subsequent to the sale.
Contribution Agreement Between Pfizer and Allogene Therapeutics, Inc.
In April 2018, Pfizer and Allogene announced that the two companies entered into a contribution agreement for Pfizer’s portfolio of assets related to allogeneic CAR T therapy,
an investigational immune cell therapy approach to treating cancer. Under this agreement, Allogene received from Pfizer rights to pre-clinical and clinical CAR T assets, all of
which were previously licensed to Pfizer from French cell therapy company, Cellectis, beginning in 2014 and French pharmaceutical company, Servier, beginning in 2015.
Allogene assumed responsibility for all potential financial obligations to both Cellectis and Servier. Pfizer continues to participate financially in the development of the CAR T
portfolio through an ownership stake in Allogene. Separately, Pfizer continues to maintain its approximate 7% ownership stake in Cellectis that was obtained in 2014 as part of
the licensing agreement in which Pfizer obtained exclusive rights to pursue the development and commercialization of certain Cellectis CAR T therapies in exchange for an
upfront payment of $80 million, as well as potential future development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments and royalties. In connection with the Allogene
transaction, Pfizer recognized a non-cash $50 million pre-tax gain in Other (income)/deductions––net in the second quarter of 2018, representing the difference between the
$127 million fair value of the equity investment received and the book value of assets transferred (including an allocation of goodwill) (see Note 4).
In October 2018, Allogene consummated an initial public offering of new shares of its common stock, which resulted in Pfizer’s preferred stock converting into common stock
and a decrease in our ownership percentage from approximately 25% to approximately 18% as of December 31, 2018. The closing price on the day of the initial public offering
was $25 per share. Beginning as of the date of the initial public offering, our investment in Allogene is being measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net
income (see Note 4).

Sale of Phase 2b Ready AMPA Receptor Potentiator for CIAS to Biogen Inc.
In April 2018, we sold our Phase 2b ready AMPA receptor potentiator for CIAS to Biogen. We received $75 million upfront and have the opportunity to receive up to $515
million in total development and commercialization milestones, as well as tiered royalties in the low-to-mid-teen percentages. We recognized the $75 million upfront payment in
Other (income)/deductions––net in the second quarter of 2018 (see Note 4). In the fourth quarter of 2018, we recognized an additional $10 million milestone in Other
(income)/deductions––net (see Note 4). We will record the other milestones and royalties to Other (income)/deductions––net when due, or earlier if we have sufficient
experience to determine such amounts are not probable of significant reversal.
Divestiture of Neuroscience Assets
In September 2018, we and Bain Capital entered into a transaction to create a new biopharmaceutical company, Cerevel, to continue development of a portfolio of clinical and
preclinical stage neuroscience assets primarily targeting disorders of the central nervous system including Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia
and addiction. These assets were part of the neuroscience discovery and early development efforts, which we announced we were ending in January 2018. In connection with
this transaction, we out-licensed the portfolio to Cerevel in exchange for a 25% ownership stake in Cerevel’s parent company, Cerevel Therapeutics, Inc., and potential future
regulatory and commercial milestone payments and royalties. Bain Capital has committed to invest $350 million to develop the portfolio, with the potential for additional funding
as the assets advance. In connection with the transaction, we recognized a non-cash $343 million pre-tax gain in Other (income)/deductions––net in the third quarter of 2018,
representing the fair value of the equity investment received as the assets transferred had a book value of $0 (see Note 4). Our investment in Cerevel Therapeutics, Inc. is
reported in Long-term investments on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
C. Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale

Formation of a New Consumer Healthcare Joint Venture
On July 31, 2019, we completed the transaction in which we and GSK combined our respective consumer healthcare businesses into a new consumer healthcare joint venture
that operates globally under the GSK Consumer Healthcare name. In exchange for contributing our Consumer Healthcare business to the joint venture, we received a 32%
equity stake in the new company and GSK owns the remaining 68%. Upon the closing of the transaction, we deconsolidated our Consumer Healthcare business and
recognized a pre-tax gain of $8.1 billion ($5.4 billion, net of tax) in our fiscal third quarter of 2019 in (Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction for the
difference in the fair value of our 32% equity stake in the new company and the carrying value of our Consumer Healthcare business. We may record additional adjustments to
the gain in future periods, which we do not expect to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In valuing our investment in GSK Consumer Healthcare, we used discounted cash flow techniques. Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions inherent in this
approach include: the amount and timing of the projected net cash flows, which include the expected impact of competitive, legal or regulatory forces on the products; the long-
term growth rate, which seeks to project the sustainable growth rate over the long term; the discount rate, which seeks to reflect our best estimate of the various risks inherent
in the projected cash flows; and the tax rate, which seeks to incorporate the geographic diversity of the projected cash flows. As part of the joint venture transaction, we agreed
to indemnify GSK with respect to certain tax matters related to periods prior to closing of the transaction as well as certain potential environmental or other legal liabilities
associated with the previous operation of our Consumer Healthcare business. We recognized a liability of $45 million with respect to the tax matters indemnification. The value
of the environmental and legal indemnifications was not considered to be material.
We are accounting for our interest in GSK Consumer Healthcare as an equity-method investment. The carrying value of our investment in GSK Consumer Healthcare is
approximately $17.0 billion and it is reported as a private equity investment in the Equity-method investments line in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019.
Our consolidated statement of income for 2019 includes revenues and expenses associated with Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare business through July 31, 2019. We record our
share of earnings from the Consumer Healthcare joint venture on a quarterly basis on a one-quarter lag in Other (income)/deductions––net commencing from August 1, 2019.
Therefore, we recorded our share of two months of the joint venture’s earnings generated in the third quarter of 2019 totaling $47 million in our operating results in the fourth
quarter of 2019. As of the July 31, 2019 closing date, we estimated that the fair value of our investment in GSK Consumer Healthcare was approximately $15.7 billion and 32%
of the underlying equity in the carrying value of the net assets of GSK Consumer Healthcare was approximately $11.2 billion resulting in an initial basis difference of
approximately $4.5 billion. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we preliminarily completed the allocation of the basis difference, which resulted from the excess of the initial fair value
of our investment over the underlying equity in the carrying value of the net assets of the joint venture, primarily to inventory, definite-lived intangible assets, indefinite-lived
intangible assets, related deferred tax liabilities and equity method goodwill within the investment account. We recorded the amortization of basis differences allocated to
inventory, definite-lived intangible assets and related deferred tax liabilities in Other (income)/deductions––net commencing August 1, 2019. The amortization of these basis
differences for two months of the third quarter of 2019 totaling approximately $31 million is included in our operating results in the fourth quarter of 2019. Amortization of basis
differences on inventory and related deferred tax liabilities will be completely recognized by the first quarter of 2020. Basis differences on definite-lived intangible assets and
related deferred tax liabilities are being amortized over approximately 17 years. The increase in the value of our investment from the closing date to December 31, 2019 is
primarily due to foreign currency translation adjustments (see Note 6).
While we have received our full 32% interest in GSK Consumer Healthcare as of the July 31, 2019 closing and transferred control of our Consumer Healthcare business to
GSK Consumer Healthcare, the contribution of the business was not completed in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions due to temporary regulatory or operational constraints. In these
jurisdictions, we have continued to operate the business for the net economic benefit of GSK Consumer Healthcare, and we are indemnified by GSK Consumer Healthcare
against risks associated with such operations during the interim period, subject to our obligations under the definitive transaction agreements. We expect the contribution of our

Consumer Healthcare business in these jurisdictions to be fully completed by the first half of 2021. As such, and as we and GSK Consumer Healthcare are contractually
obligated to complete the transaction, we have treated these jurisdictions as sold for accounting purposes.
In connection with the contribution of our Consumer Healthcare business, we entered into certain transitional agreements designed to facilitate the orderly transition of the
business to GSK Consumer Healthcare. These agreements primarily relate to administrative services, which are generally to be provided for a period of up to 24 months after
the closing date. We will also manufacture and supply certain consumer products for GSK Consumer Healthcare and GSK Consumer Healthcare will manufacture and supply
certain retained Pfizer products for us after closing, generally for a term of up to six years. These agreements are not material to Pfizer.
Assets and liabilities associated with our Consumer Healthcare business were reclassified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. The
Consumer Healthcare business assets held for sale are reported in Assets held for sale and Consumer Healthcare business liabilities held for sale are reported in Liabilities
held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. This includes the Consumer Healthcare business tax assets and liabilities related to fully dedicated
consumer healthcare subsidiaries.
The amounts associated with the Consumer Healthcare business, as well as other assets classified as held for sale consisted of the following:
December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2018
Assets Held for Sale
Cash and cash equivalents $ 32
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts 532
Inventories 538
Other current assets 56
PP&E 675
Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization 5,763
Goodwill 1,972
Noncurrent deferred tax assets and other noncurrent tax assets 54
Other noncurrent assets 57
Total Consumer Healthcare assets held for sale 9,678
Other assets held for sale(a) 46
Assets held for sale $ 9,725

Liabilities Held for Sale

Trade accounts payable $ 406
Income taxes payable 39
Accrued compensation and related items 93
Other current liabilities 353
Pension benefit obligations, net 39
Postretirement benefit obligations, net 33
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities 870
Other noncurrent liabilities 56
Total Consumer Healthcare liabilities held for sale $ 1,890
(a) Other assets held for sale consist of PP&E.
As a part of Pfizer, pre-tax income on a management business unit basis for the Consumer Healthcare business was $654 million through July 31, 2019, $977 million in 2018
and $863 million in 2017.

Summarized financial information for our equity method investee, GSK Consumer Healthcare, as of and for the two months ending September 30, 2019, the most recent
period available, is as follows:
September 30,
Current assets $ 7,505
Noncurrent assets 38,575
Total assets $ 46,081

Current liabilities $ 5,241
Noncurrent liabilities 5,536
Total liabilities $ 10,776

Equity attributable to shareholders $ 35,199
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests 105
Total net equity $ 35,304
For the Two Months Ending

September 30,
Net Sales $ 2,161
Cost of sales (803)
Gross profit $ 1,358
Income from continuing operations 152
Net income 152
Income attributable to shareholders 148
Investment in ViiV Healthcare Limited
In 2009, we and GSK created ViiV, which is focused on research, development and commercialization of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) medicines. We own
approximately 11.7% of ViiV, and we have historically accounted for our investment in ViiV under the equity method due to the significant influence that we have over the
operations of ViiV through our board representation and minority veto rights. We suspended application of the equity method to our investment in ViiV in 2016 when the
carrying value of our investment was reduced to zero due to the recognition of cumulative equity method losses and dividends. Since 2016, we have recognized dividends from
ViiV as income in Other (income)/deductions––net when earned, including dividends of $220 million in 2019, $253 million in 2018 and $266 million in 2017 (see Note 4).
Summarized financial information for our equity method investee, ViiV, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and for the years ending December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 is as
follows:
As of December 31,
Current assets $ 3,839 $ 3,381
Noncurrent assets 3,437 3,664
Total assets 7,276 7,045

Current liabilities 2,904 2,725
Noncurrent liabilities 5,860 6,636
Total liabilities 8,765 9,361

Total net equity/(deficit) attributable to shareholders $ (1,489) $ (2,316)

Net Sales $ 6,139 $ 6,219 $ 5,504
Cost of sales (516) (462) (381)
Gross profit $ 5,623 $ 5,757 $ 5,123
Income from continuing operations 3,398 2,154 1,867
Net income 3,398 2,154 1,867
Income attributable to shareholders 3,398 2,154 1,867

Investment in Hisun Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Company Limited
In September 2012, we and Hisun, a leading pharmaceutical company in China, formed a new company, Hisun Pfizer, to develop, manufacture, market and sell
pharmaceutical products, primarily branded generic products, predominately in China. Hisun Pfizer was established with registered capital of $250 million, of which our portion
was $122.5 million. As a result of the contributions from both parties, Hisun Pfizer holds a broad portfolio of branded generics covering cardiovascular disease, infectious
disease, oncology, mental health and other therapeutic areas.
We accounted for our interest in Hisun Pfizer as an equity-method investment, due to the significant influence we had over the operations of Hisun Pfizer through our board
representation, minority veto rights and 49% voting interest. Our investment in Hisun Pfizer was reported in Long-term investments, and our share of Hisun Pfizer’s net income
was recorded in Other (income)/deductions––net.
On November 10, 2017, we sold our 49% equity share in Hisun Pfizer to Sapphire I (HK) Holdings Limited, an investment fund managed by Hillhouse Capital, for a total of
$286 million in cash which included our carrying value of $270 million in cash plus $16 million to cover certain taxes incurred on the transaction. As a result of the sale
transaction, we recognized a loss of $81 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 for the recognition in earnings of the currency translation adjustment associated with our
investment. After the sale transaction, Hisun Pfizer changed its name but retained its current rights to manufacture, sell and distribute all of Hisun Pfizer’s currently marketed
and pipeline products in China. We are providing technical, manufacturing and regulatory services in connection with a technology transfer process being run by Hisun Pfizer to
support Hisun Pfizer’s objective that the products that we had previously licensed to Hisun Pfizer, will in the future, be manufactured locally in China. We continue to supply
certain products to Hisun Pfizer for a period of time, after the sale transaction, to facilitate a smooth transition.
Investment in Laboratório Teuto Brasileiro S.A.
We entered into an agreement on June 30, 2017 to exit our investment in Teuto, a 40%-owned generics company in Brazil, and sell our 40% interest in Teuto to the majority
shareholders. As part of the agreement, we waived our option to acquire the remaining 60% of Teuto, and Teuto’s other shareholders have waived their option to sell their 60%
stake in the company to us. As a result, in the second quarter of 2017, we recognized a net loss of approximately $30 million in Other (income)/deductions––net (see Note 4),
which included the impairment of our equity-method investment in Teuto, the reversal of a contingent liability associated with the majority shareholders’ option to sell their 60%
stake in the company to us, and the recognition in earnings of the currency translation adjustment associated with the Teuto investment. The transaction closed on August 16,
2017.
D. Licensing Arrangements
Akcea Therapeutics, Inc.
In October 2019, we entered into a worldwide exclusive licensing agreement for AKCEA-ANGPTL3-LRx, an investigational antisense therapy being developed to treat patients
with certain cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, with Akcea, a majority-owned affiliate of Ionis. The transaction closed in November 2019 and we made an upfront payment
of $250 million to Akcea and Ionis, which was recorded in Research and development expenses in our fiscal fourth quarter of 2019. Under the terms of the agreement, Akcea
and Ionis will split equally the $250 million upfront license fee. We may be required to make development, regulatory and sales milestone payments of up to $1.3 billion and
tiered, double-digit royalties on annual worldwide net sales upon marketing approval of AKCEA-ANGPTL3-LRx and these payments will also be split equally between Akcea
and Ionis. Pfizer is responsible for all development and regulatory activities and costs beyond those associated with the ongoing Phase 2 study.
Shire International GmbH
In 2016, we out-licensed PF-00547659, an investigational biologic being evaluated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative
colitis and Crohn’s disease, to Shire for an upfront payment of $90 million, up to $460 million in development and sales-based milestone payments and potential future royalty
payments on commercialized products. The $90 million upfront payment was initially deferred and recognized in Other (income)/deductions––net ratably through December
2017. In the first quarter of 2018, we recognized $75 million in Other (income)/deductions––net for a milestone payment received from Shire related to their first dosing of a
patient in a Phase 3 clinical trial of the compound for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, and in the third quarter of 2018, we recognized $35 million in Other
(income)/deductions––net for a milestone payment received from Shire related to their first dosing of a patient in a Phase 3 clinical trial of the compound for the treatment of
Crohn’s disease (see Note 4).
BionTech AG
In August 2018, a multi-year R&D arrangement went into effect between BionTech AG (BionTech), a privately held company, and Pfizer to develop mRNA-based vaccines for
prevention of influenza (flu). In September 2018, we made an upfront payment of $50 million to BionTech, which was recorded in Research and development expenses, and
BionTech became eligible to receive up to an additional $325 million in future development and sales based milestones and future royalty payments associated with worldwide
sales. As part of the transaction, we also purchased 169,670 newly-issued ordinary shares of BionTech for $50 million in the third quarter of 2018, which are reported in Long-
term investments in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
E. Research and Development and Collaborative Arrangements

Research and Development Arrangement with NovaQuest Co-Investment Fund V, L.P.
In April 2016, Pfizer entered into an agreement with NovaQuest under which NovaQuest would fund up to $200 million in development costs related to certain Phase 3 clinical
trials of Pfizer’s rivipansel compound and Pfizer would use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and obtain regulatory approvals for such compound. NovaQuest’s
development funding was expected to cover up to 100% of the development

costs and was received over approximately 13 quarters from 2016 through the second quarter of 2019 after which Pfizer would be responsible for the remaining development
costs. As there was a substantive and genuine transfer of risk to NovaQuest, the development funding was recognized by us as an obligation to perform contractual services
and therefore a reduction of Research and development expenses as incurred. The funding cap was reached in 2019. The reduction to Research and Development expenses
totaled $24 million for 2019, $58 million for 2018 and $72 million for 2017.
In August 2019, we announced that the Phase 3 RESET (Rivipansel Evaluating Safety, Efficacy and Time to Discharge) pivotal study did not meet its primary or key secondary
efficacy endpoints. The objective of the trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivipansel in patients aged six and older with sickle cell disease who were hospitalized for
a vaso-occlusive crisis and required treatment with IV opioids. As a result, in 2019, we recorded a $99 million charge in Cost of sales related to rivipansel, primarily for
inventory manufactured for expected future sale, as well as $15 million of anticipated clinical development program close-out costs, which were recorded in Research and
development costs in the consolidated statement of income. In January 2020, we discontinued development of rivipansel resulting in the termination of the R&D arrangement
with NovaQuest. No payments have been or are expected to be received from or paid to NovaQuest as part of the termination of the arrangement.
Research and Development Arrangement with RPI Finance Trust
In January 2016, Pfizer entered into an agreement with RPI, a subsidiary of Royalty Pharma, under which RPI would fund up to $300 million in development costs related to
certain Phase 3 clinical trials of Pfizer’s Ibrance (palbociclib) product primarily for adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor positive early breast cancer (the Indication). RPI’s
development funding is expected to cover up to 100% of the costs primarily for the applicable clinical trials until the first quarter of 2020 after which Pfizer will be responsible for
the remaining cost of the trials. As there is a substantive and genuine transfer of risk to RPI, the development funding is recognized by us as an obligation to perform
contractual services and therefore is a reduction of Research and development expenses as incurred. The reduction to Research and development expenses totaled $63
million for 2019, $99 million for 2018 and $76 million for 2017. If successful and upon approval of Ibrance in the U.S. or certain major markets in the EU for the Indication based
on the applicable clinical trials, RPI will be eligible to receive a combination of approval-based fixed milestone payments of up to $250 million dependent upon results of the
clinical trials and royalties on certain Ibrance sales over approximately seven years. Fixed milestone payments due upon approval will be recorded as intangible assets and
amortized to Amortization of intangible assets over the estimated commercial life of the Ibrance product and sales-based royalties will be recorded as Cost of sales when
incurred.
Collaborative Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we enter into collaborative arrangements with respect to in-line medicines, as well as medicines in development that require completion of
research and regulatory approval. Collaborative arrangements are contractual agreements with third parties that involve a joint operating activity, typically a research and/or
commercialization effort, where both we and our partner are active participants in the activity and are exposed to the significant risks and rewards of the activity. Our rights and
obligations under our collaborative arrangements vary. For example, we have agreements to co-promote pharmaceutical products discovered by us or other companies, and
we have agreements where we partner to co-develop and/or participate together in commercializing, marketing, promoting, manufacturing and/or distributing a drug product.
The following table provides the amounts and classification of payments (income/(expense)) between us and our collaboration partners:
Revenues—Revenues (a) $ 664 $ 571 $ 606
Revenues—Alliance revenues(b) 4,648 3,838 2,927
Total revenues from collaborative arrangements $ 5,313 $ 4,409 $ 3,533
Cost of sales (c) $ (351) $ (296) $ (329)
Selling, informational and administrative expenses(d) (173) (90) (54)
Research and development expenses (e) 99 162 222
Other income/(deductions)—net(f) 362 281 249
(a) Represents sales to our partners of products manufactured by us.
(b) Substantially all relates to amounts earned from our partners under co-promotion agreements. The increases in each of the periods presented reflect increases in alliance revenues from Eliquis and Xtandi.
(c) Primarily relates to amounts paid to collaboration partners for their share of net sales or profits earned in collaboration arrangements where we are the principal in the transaction, and cost of sales associated with
inventory purchased from our partners.
(d) Represents net reimbursements to our partners for selling, informational and administrative expenses incurred.
(e) Primarily relates to upfront payments and pre-approval milestone payments earned by our partners as well as net reimbursements. The upfront and milestone payments were as follows: $50 million in 2018 and
$15 million in 2017. There were no upfront and milestone payments in 2019. Our collaboration with Lilly (see below) also includes reimbursements of $67 million in 2019, $98 million in 2018 and $147 million in
2017.
(f) Primarily relates to royalties from our collaboration partners.
The amounts disclosed in the above table do not include transactions with third parties other than our collaboration partners, or other costs associated with the products under
the collaborative arrangements.
In addition, in connection with our collaborative arrangements, we paid post-approval milestones of $80 million in 2019 and $140 million in 2017 related to our collaboration
with Merck KGaA (see below). These payments were recorded in Identifiable intangible assets––Developed technology rights. We did not pay post-approval milestones to
collaboration partners in 2018. We also recorded milestones earned related to (i) our collaboration with Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. related to the FDA’s approval and launch of
Wixela Inhub®, a generic of Advair Diskus® (fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhalation powder) of $78 million in 2019 in Other (income)/deductions––net (see Note 4)
and (ii) our

collaboration with Merck (see below) of $40 million in 2018 in Other (income)/deductions––net and $150 million in 2017, substantially all of which was included in the
adjustment to increase the opening balance of Retained earnings upon the adoption of a new accounting standard for revenue recognition, effective January 1, 2018.
Collaboration with Merck & Co., Inc.
Under a worldwide collaboration agreement, except for Japan, we collaborated with Merck on the clinical development of ertugliflozin and ertugliflozin-containing fixed-dose
combinations with metformin and Januvia (sitagliptin) tablets, which were approved by the FDA in December 2017 and the EC in March 2018 as Steglatro, Segluromet and
Steglujan. Merck exclusively promotes Steglatro and the two fixed-dose combination products and we share revenues and certain costs with Merck on a 60%/40% basis, with
Pfizer having the 40% share.
In the first quarter of 2017, we received a $90 million milestone payment from Merck upon the FDA’s acceptance for review of the NDAs for ertugliflozin and two fixed-dose
combinations (ertugliflozin plus Januvia (sitagliptin) and ertugliflozin plus metformin), which, as of December 31, 2017, was deferred and primarily reported in Other noncurrent
liabilities, and through December 31, 2017, was being recognized in Other (income)/deductions––net over a multi-year period. As of December 31, 2017, we were due a $60
million milestone payment from Merck, which we received in the first quarter of 2018, in conjunction with the approval of ertugliflozin by the FDA. As of December 31, 2017, the
$60 million due from Merck was deferred and primarily reported in Other noncurrent liabilities. In the first quarter of 2018, in connection with the approval of ertugliflozin in the
EU, we recognized a $40 million milestone payment from Merck in Other (income)/deductions––net (see Note 4). We are eligible for additional payments associated with the
achievement of future commercial milestones. In the first quarter of 2018, in connection with the adoption of a new accounting standard for revenue recognition, as of January
1, 2018, the $60 million of deferred income and approximately $85 million of the $90 million of deferred income associated with the above-mentioned milestone payments were
recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment to Retained earnings.
Collaboration with Eli Lilly & Company
In 2013, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Lilly to jointly develop and globally commercialize Pfizer’s tanezumab, which provides that Pfizer and Lilly will equally
share product-development expenses as well as potential revenues and certain product-related costs. We received a $200 million upfront payment from Lilly in accordance
with the collaboration agreement between Pfizer and Lilly, which was deferred and primarily reported in Other noncurrent liabilities, and through December 31, 2017, was
being recognized in Other (income)/deductions––net over a multi-year period beginning in the second quarter of 2015. Pfizer and Lilly resumed the Phase 3 chronic pain
program for tanezumab in July 2015. Under the collaboration agreement with Lilly, we are eligible to receive additional payments from Lilly upon the achievement of specified
regulatory and commercial milestones. In the first quarter of 2018, in connection with the adoption of a new accounting standard for revenue recognition, as of January 1,
2018, approximately $107 million of deferred income associated with the above-mentioned upfront payment was recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment to Retained
earnings. Approximately $9 million of the upfront payment continues to be deferred, and is reported in Other current liabilities as of December 31, 2019. This amount is being
recognized in Other (income)/deductions––net over the remaining development period for the product in 2020.
Collaboration with Merck KGaA
In November 2014, we entered into a collaborative arrangement with Merck KGaA, to jointly develop and commercialize avelumab, currently approved as Bavencio for
metastatic MCC in the U.S., the EU, Japan and select other markets, in combination with Inlyta for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC in the U.S., the EU,
Japan and select other markets, as well as for the second-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the U.S. and select other
markets. Avelumab is also in development as a potential treatment for multiple other types of cancer. We and Merck KGaA are exploring the therapeutic potential of this novel
anti-PD-L1 antibody as a single agent as well as in various combinations with our and Merck KGaA’s broad portfolio of approved and investigational oncology therapies. Also,
as part of the agreement, we gave Merck KGaA certain co-promotion rights for Xalkori in the U.S. and several other key markets. Under the terms of the agreement, in the
fourth quarter of 2014, we made an upfront payment of $850 million to Merck KGaA and Merck KGaA is eligible to receive regulatory and commercial milestone payments of up
to approximately $2.0 billion. During 2017, we made $140 million in milestone payments to Merck KGaA, which were recorded in Identifiable intangible assets––Developed
technology rights, for approvals of avelumab received in 2017 for the MCC indication in the U.S., the EU and Japan, and for the metastatic urothelial carcinoma indication in the
U.S. Both companies jointly fund the majority of development and commercialization costs, and split equally any profits related to net sales generated from selling any products
containing avelumab from this collaboration. In December 2018, both companies amended the collaborative agreement such that Pfizer will be solely responsible for the
development and commercialization of its anti PD-1 antibody. Under the terms of the amended agreement, we paid Merck KGaA an up-front payment and we will make a
potential milestone and tiered royalty payments should the Pfizer anti PD-1 antibody achieve regulatory and commercial success. We made $80 million in milestone payments
to Merck KGaA, which were recorded in Identifiable intangible assets––Developed technology rights, for the U.S. and the EU approvals received in 2019 related to the use of
Bavencio in combination with Inlyta for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC.
Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity
Initiatives
We incur significant costs in connection with acquiring, integrating and restructuring businesses and in connection with our global cost-reduction/productivity initiatives. For
example:
• In connection with acquisition activity, we typically incur costs associated with executing the transactions, integrating the acquired operations (which may include
expenditures for consulting and the integration of systems and processes), and restructuring the combined company (which may include charges related to employees,
assets and activities that will not continue in the combined company); and
• In connection with our cost-reduction/productivity initiatives, we typically incur costs and charges associated with site closings and other facility rationalization actions,
workforce reductions and the expansion of shared services, including the development of global systems.

All of our businesses and functions may be impacted by these actions, including sales and marketing, manufacturing and R&D, as well as groups such as information
technology, shared services and corporate operations.
2017-2019 Initiatives and Organizing for Growth

During 2018, we determined that at the start of our 2019 fiscal year, we would begin operating under our new commercial structure, which reorganized our operations into three
businesses––Biopharma, a science-based innovative medicines business; Upjohn, a global, primarily off-patent branded and generic established medicines business; and
through July 31, 2019, a Consumer Healthcare business (See Note 17). To operate effectively in this structure and position ourselves for future growth, we focused on creating
a simpler, more efficient operating structure within each business as well as the functions that support them. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018, we reviewed previously
planned initiatives and new initiatives to ensure that there was alignment around our new structure and combined the 2017-2019 initiatives with our Organizing for Growth
initiatives to form one cohesive plan. Initiatives for the combined program included activities related to the optimization of our manufacturing plant network, the centralization of
our corporate and platform functions, and the simplification and optimization of our operating business structure and functions that support them. From 2017 through December
31, 2019, we incurred approximately $921 million associated with manufacturing optimization, approximately $1.2 billion associated with other activities, and have substantially
completed this program.

in science-based innovative medicines. As a result, we began in the fourth quarter of 2019, to identify and undertake efforts to ensure our cost base aligns appropriately with
our Biopharmaceutical revenue base as a result of both the completed Consumer Healthcare and expected Upjohn transactions. While certain direct costs have transferred or
will transfer to the Consumer Healthcare joint venture and to the Upjohn entities, there are indirect costs which are not expected to transfer. In addition, we are taking steps to
restructure our organizations to appropriately support and drive the purpose of the three core functions of our focused innovative medicines business: R&D, Manufacturing and
Commercial.
We expect the costs associated with this multi-year effort to continue through 2022 and to total approximately $1.4 billion on a pre-tax basis and approximately 10% of this to
be non-cash. Actions may include, among others, changes in location of certain activities, expanded use and co-location of centers of excellence and shared services, and
increased use of digital technologies. The associated actions and the specific costs are currently in development but will include severance and benefit plan impacts, exit costs
as well as associated implementation costs.
Current-Period Key Activities
In 2019, we incurred costs of $967 million composed of $695 million associated with 2017-2019 Initiatives and Organizing for Growth, $288 million associated with the
integration of Array, $94 million associated with the integration of Hospira, and $87 million associated with the Transforming to a More Focused Company initiative, partially
offset by income of $197 million, primarily due to the reversal of certain accruals upon the effective favorable settlement of a U.S. IRS audit for multiple tax years and other
acquisition-related initiatives.
The following table provides the components of costs associated with acquisitions and cost-reduction/productivity initiatives:
Restructuring charges/(credits):
Employee terminations $ 239 $ 459 $ (181)
Asset impairments (a) 81 290 190
Exit costs 53 33 21
Restructuring charges (b) 373 782 30
Transaction costs(c) 63 1 4
Integration costs and other (d) 311 260 317
Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs 747 1,044 351
Net periodic benefit costs recorded in Other (income)/deductions––net(e) 23 146 136
Additional depreciation––asset restructuring recorded in our consolidated statements of income as follows : (f)
Cost of sales 27 48 91
Selling, informational and administrative expenses 3 2 —
Research and development expenses 8 — —
Total additional depreciation––asset restructuring 38 50 91
Implementation costs recorded in our consolidated statements of income as follows(g):
Cost of sales 63 83 118
Selling, informational and administrative expenses 73 72 71
Research and development expenses 22 39 38
Total implementation costs 158 194 227
Total costs associated with acquisitions and cost-reduction/productivity initiatives $ 967 $ 1,434 $ 805
(a) The asset impairment charges for 2018 are largely associated with cost reduction initiatives not associated with acquisitions. The asset impairment charges for 2017 are largely associated with our acquisitions of
Hospira and Medivation. The asset impairment charges included in restructuring charges for 2017 are primarily associated with abandoned assets. See (b) below for additional information.


(b) In 2019, restructuring charges mainly represent employee termination costs associated with cost-reduction and productivity initiatives, partially offset by the reversal of certain accruals related to our acquisition of
Wyeth upon the effective favorable settlement of a U.S. IRS audit for multiple tax years (see Note 5B). In 2018, restructuring charges were primarily related to employee termination costs and asset write downs.
The employee termination costs for 2019 and 2018 were primarily associated with our improvements to operational effectiveness as part of the realignment of our organizational structure, and for 2019, also
includes employee termination costs associated with the Transforming to a More Focused Company initiative. In 2017, restructuring charges were primarily associated with our acquisitions of Hospira and
Medivation, partially offset by credits associated with cost-reduction and productivity initiatives not associated with acquisitions that mostly related to the reversal of previously recorded accruals for employee
termination costs resulting from revisions of our severance benefit estimates. Employee termination costs are generally recorded when the actions are probable and estimable and include accrued severance
benefits, pension and postretirement benefits, many of which may be paid out during periods after termination.
The restructuring activities in 2019 are associated with the following:
• Biopharma ($118 million charge); Upjohn ($75 million charge); and Other ($180 million charge).
At the beginning of fiscal 2019, we revised our operating segments and are unable to directly associate 2018 and 2017 restructuring charges with the new individual segments.
The restructuring activities for 2018 are associated with the following:
• Total reportable segments ($207 million charge); and Other ($575 million charge).
The restructuring activities for 2017 are associated with the following:
• Total reportable segments ($89 million credit); and Other ($119 million charge).
(c) Transaction costs represent external costs for banking, legal, accounting and other similar services. In 2019, transaction costs relate to our acquisition of Array. In 2017, transaction costs were directly related to
our acquisitions of Hospira, Anacor and Medivation.
(d) Integration costs and other represent external, incremental costs directly related to integrating acquired businesses, such as expenditures for consulting and the integration of systems and processes, and certain
other qualifying costs. In 2019, integration costs and other mainly related to our acquisitions of Array (including $157 million in payments to Array employees for the fair value of previously unvested stock options
that was recognized as post-closing compensation expense (see Note 2A)) and Hospira. In 2018, integration costs and other mostly related to our acquisition of Hospira. In 2017, integration costs primarily related
to our acquisitions of Hospira and Medivation, as well as a net gain of $12 million related to the settlement of the Hospira U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan (see Note 11).
(e) In 2018, primarily represents the net pension curtailments and settlements included in Other (income)/deductions––net upon the adoption of a new accounting standard in the first quarter of 2018. In 2017, mainly
represents the net pension curtailments and settlements, partially offset by net periodic benefit credits, excluding service costs, related to our acquisition of Hospira, both of which were reclassified to Other
(income)/deductions––net as a result of the retrospective adoption of a new accounting standard in the first quarter of 2018. These credits included a net settlement gain, partially offset by accelerated
amortization of actuarial losses and prior service costs upon the settlement of the remaining obligation associated with the Hospira U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan. For additional information, see Note
11.
(f) Additional depreciation––asset restructuring represents the impact of changes in the estimated useful lives of assets involved in restructuring actions.
(g) Implementation costs represent external, incremental costs directly related to implementing our non-acquisition-related cost-reduction/productivity initiatives.
The following table provides the components of and changes in our restructuring accruals:
Employee Asset
Termination Impairment
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Costs Charges Exit Costs Accrual
Balance, January 1, 2018 $ 1,039 $ — $ 66 $ 1,105
Provision 459 290 33 782
Utilization and other (a) (295) (290) (51) (636)
Balance, December 31, 2018(b) 1,203 — 49 1,252
Provision(c) 239 81 53 373
Utilization and other (a) (555) (81) (55) (691)
Balance, December 31, 2019(d) $ 887 $ — $ 46 $ 933
(a) Includes adjustments for foreign currency translation.
(b) Included in Other current liabilities ($823 million) and Other noncurrent liabilities ($428 million).
(c) Includes the reversal of certain accruals related to our acquisition of Wyeth upon the effective favorable settlement of a U.S. IRS audit for multiple tax years. See Note 5D for additional information.
(d) Included in Other current liabilities ($714 million) and Other noncurrent liabilities ($219 million).

Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions—Net

The following table provides components of Other (income)/deductions––net:
Interest income (a) $ (226) $ (333) $ (391)
Interest expense(a) 1,574 1,316 1,270
Net interest expense 1,348 983 879
Royalty-related income (b) (648) (495) (499)
Net (gains)/losses on asset disposals(c) (31) (71) 45
Net gains recognized during the period on equity securities (d) (454) (586) (224)
Net realized (gains)/losses on sales of investments in debt securities(e) — 141 (45)
Income from collaborations, out-licensing arrangements and sales of compound/product rights (f) (168) (488) (217)
Net periodic benefit costs/(credits) other than service costs(g) 64 (288) 101
Certain legal matters, net(h) 554 157 240
Certain asset impairments (i) 2,843 3,115 395
Business and legal entity alignment costs(j) 338 63 71
Net losses on early retirement of debt (k) 138 3 999
GSK Consumer Healthcare JV equity method (income)/loss(l) (17) — —
Other, net(m) (388) (417) (328)
Other (income)/deductions––net $ 3,578 $ 2,116 $ 1,416
(a) 2019 v. 2018––Interest income decreased primarily driven by a lower investment balance. Interest expense increased mainly as a result of an increased commercial paper balance due to the acquisition of Array,
as well as the retirement of lower-coupon debt and the issuance of new debt with a higher coupon than the debt outstanding for the comparative prior year period. 2018 v. 2017––Interest income decreased
primarily driven by a lower investment balance. Interest expense increased primarily as a result of higher short-term interest rates, offset, in part, by refinancing activity that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2017.
Capitalized interest expense totaled $88 million in 2019, $73 million in 2018 and $72 million in 2017.
(b) Royalty-related income increased in 2019, primarily due to a one-time favorable resolution in the second quarter of 2019 of a legal dispute for $82 million.
(c) In 2018, primarily included a realized gain on sale of property of $60 million. In 2017, primarily included an $81 million realized loss related to the sale of our former 49%-owned equity-method investment in Hisun
Pfizer and a realized net loss of $30 million related to the sale of our former 40% ownership investment in Teuto, including the extinguishment of a put option for the then remaining 60% ownership interest,
partially offset by a realized gain on sale of property of $52 million.
(d) The gains in 2019 include, among other things, unrealized gains of $295 million related to investments in Cortexyme, Inc. and SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc. The gains in 2018 included unrealized gains on
equity securities of $477 million, reflecting the adoption of a new accounting standard in the first quarter of 2018 and were primarily driven by unrealized gains of $466 million related to our investment in Allogene.
For additional information, see Note 2B and Note 7B.
(e) In 2018, primarily includes gross realized losses on sales of available-for-sale debt securities of $402 million and a net loss of $18 million from derivative financial instruments used to hedge the foreign exchange
component of the matured available-for-sale debt securities, partially offset by gross realized gains on sales of available-for-sale debt securities of $280 million. Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale debt
securities were $5.7 billion in 2018. In 2017, primarily includes gross realized gains on sales of available-for-sale debt securities of $451 million, partially offset by gross realized losses on sales of available-for-
sale debt securities of $281 million and a net loss of $120 million from derivative financial instruments used to hedge the foreign exchange component of the matured available-for-sale debt securities. Proceeds
from the sale of available-for-sale debt securities were $5.1 billion in 2017.
(f) Includes income from upfront and milestone payments from our collaboration partners and income from out-licensing arrangements and sales of compound/product rights. In 2019, mainly includes, among other
things, $78 million in milestone income from Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. related to the FDA’s approval and launch of Wixela Inhub®, a generic of Advair Diskus®(fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhalation
powder) and $52 million in milestone income from multiple licensees. In 2018, primarily includes, among other things, (i) approximately $118 million in milestone income from multiple licensees, (ii) $110 million in
milestone payments received from Shire, of which $75 million was received in the first quarter of 2018 related to their first dosing of a patient in a Phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and $35
million was received from Shire in the third quarter of 2018 related to their first dosing of a patient in a Phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of Crohn’s disease, (iii) an upfront payment to us and a recognized
milestone totaling $85 million for the sale of an AMPA receptor potentiator for CIAS to Biogen, (iv) $62 million in gains related to sales of compound/product rights and (v) a $40 million milestone payment from
Merck in conjunction with the approval of ertugliflozin in the EU. For additional information, see Note 2B, Note 2D and Note 2E. In 2017, primarily includes, among other things, $101 million in milestone payments
received from multiple licensees and an $85 million gain related to sales of compound/product rights.
(g) In 2019, primarily includes settlement losses within the U.S. Pfizer Consolidated Pension Plan related to special restructuring initiatives, a small annuity buyout program and regular lump sum activity. Effective
January 1, 2018, the U.S. Pfizer Consolidated Pension Plan was frozen to future benefit accruals and for 2018, resulted in the recognition of lower net periodic benefit costs due to the extension of the amortization
period for the actuarial losses. There was also a greater than expected gain on plan assets due to a higher plan asset base compared to 2017. For additional information, see Note 11.
(h) In 2019, mostly includes legal reserves for certain pending legal matters. In 2018, primarily includes legal reserves for certain pending legal matters, partially offset by the reversal of a legal accrual where a loss
was no longer deemed probable. In 2017, primarily includes a $94 million charge to resolve a class action lawsuit filed by direct purchasers relating to Celebrex, which was approved by the court in April 2018, and
a $79 million charge to reflect damages awarded by a jury in a patent matter.
(i) In 2019, primarily includes intangible asset impairment charges of $2.8 billion, mainly composed of: (i) $2.6 billion, related to Eucrisa, a Biopharma finite-lived developed technology right acquired in connection
with our acquisition of Anacor, and reflects updated commercial forecasts mainly reflecting competitive pressures; (ii) $90 million related to WRDM IPR&D, for a pre-clinical stage asset from our acquisition of
Bamboo for gene therapies for the potential treatment of patients with certain rare diseases which was the result of a determination to not use certain Bamboo IPR&D acquired in future rare disease development;
(iii) $40 million related to a Biopharma developed technology right, acquired in connection with our acquisition of King, for government defense products and reflects, among other things, updated commercial
forecasts including manufacturing cost assumptions; (iv) $31 million related to a Biopharma IPR&D asset, acquired in connection with our acquisition of AstraZeneca’s anti-infectives business, which reflects
updated commercial forecasts; (v) $10 million related to a Biopharma finite-lived developed technology right, acquired in connection with our acquisition of Anacor, for the treatment for toenail fungus marketed in
the


U.S. market only, and reflects, among other things, updated commercial forecasts; and (vi) $10 million of other IPR&D assets acquired in connection with our acquisition of Innopharma.
In 2018, primarily includes intangible asset impairment charges of $3.1 billion, mainly composed of (i) $2.6 billion related to Biopharma developed technology rights, $242 million related to Biopharma licensing
agreements and $80 million related to Biopharma IPR&D, all of which relate to our acquisition of Hospira, for generic sterile injectable products associated with various indications; (ii) $117 million related to a
multi-antigen vaccine IPR&D program for adults undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery; (iii) $31 million related to an Biopharma developed technology right, acquired in connection with our acquisition of
Anacor, for the treatment for toenail fungus market marketed in the U.S. market only; and (iv) $17 million of other IPR&D assets acquired in connection with our acquisition of Innopharma. In 2018, the intangible
asset impairment charges associated with the generic sterile injectable products reflect, among other things, updated commercial forecasts, reflecting an increased competitive environment as well as higher
manufacturing costs, largely stemming from manufacturing and supply issues. The intangible asset impairment charge for the multi-antigen vaccine IPR&D program was the result of the Phase 2b trial reaching
futility at a pre-planned interim analysis. The intangible asset impairment charge related to the Biopharma developed technology right reflects, among other things, updated commercial forecasts. .
In 2017, primarily includes intangible asset impairment charges of $337 million, reflecting (i) $127 million related to developed technology rights, acquired in connection with our acquisition of Hospira, for a generic
sterile injectable product for the treatment of edema associated with certain conditions; (ii) $124 million related to developed technology rights, acquired in connection with our acquisition of Hospira, for a sterile
injectable pain reliever; (iii) $39 million related to developed technology rights, acquired in connection with our acquisition of NextWave, for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; (iv) $26 million
related to developed technology rights, acquired in connection with our acquisition of Hospira, for a generic injectable antibiotic product for the treatment of bacterial infections; and (v) $20 million related to other
developed technology rights. The intangible asset impairment charges for 2017 are associated with Biopharma and reflect, among other things, updated commercial forecasts and an increased competitive
environment. In addition, 2017 includes a loss of $43 million for an impairment of our AM-Pharma B.V. long-term investment.
(j) In 2019 and 2018, mainly represents incremental costs associated with the design, planning and implementation of our new organizational structure, effective in the beginning of 2019, and primarily includes
consulting, legal, tax and advisory services. In 2017, represents expenses for changes to our infrastructure to align our commercial operations that existed through December 31, 2018, including costs to internally
separate our businesses into distinct legal entities, as well as to streamline our intercompany supply operations to better support each business.
(k) In 2019 and 2017, represents net losses due to the early retirement of debt, inclusive of the related termination of cross currency swaps.
(l) See Note 2C for additional information.
(m) In 2019, includes, among other things, (i) dividend income of $220 million from our investment in ViiV, (ii) charges of $152 million for external incremental costs, such as transaction costs and costs to separate
our Consumer Healthcare business into a separate legal entity, associated with the formation of the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture and (iii) $50 million of income from insurance recoveries related to
Hurricane Maria. In 2018, includes, among other things, (i) a non-cash $343 million pre-tax gain associated with our transaction with Bain Capital to create a new biopharmaceutical company, Cerevel, to continue
development of a portfolio of clinical and preclinical stage neuroscience assets primarily targeting disorders of the central nervous system (see Note 2B), (ii) dividend income of $253 million from our investment in
ViiV, (iii) a non-cash $50 million pre-tax gain on the contribution of Pfizer’s allogeneic CAR T therapy development program assets obtained from Cellectis and Servier in connection with our contribution
agreement entered into with Allogene in which Pfizer obtained an ownership stake in Allogene (see Note 2B), (iv) a non-cash $17 million pre-tax gain on the cash settlement of a liability that we incurred in April
2018 upon the EU approval of Mylotarg (see Note 7E), (v) charges of $207 million, reflecting the change in the fair value of contingent consideration. and (vi) charges of $112 million for external incremental costs,
such as transaction costs and costs to separate our Consumer Healthcare business into a separate legal entity, associated with the formation of the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture. In 2017, includes,
among other things, dividend income of $266 million from our investment in ViiV, and income of $62 million from resolution of a contract disagreement.
The asset impairment charges included in Other (income)/deductions––net are based on estimates of fair value.
The following table provides additional information about the intangible assets that were impaired during 2019 in Other (income)/deductions––net:
Year Ended December
31,
Fair Value(a) 2019
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Amount Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Impairment

Intangible assets––Developed technology rights (b) $ 1,213 $ — $ — $ 1,213 $ 2,639
Intangible assets––IPR&D(b) 16 — — 16 131
Total $ 1,229 $ — $ — $ 1,229 $ 2,770
(a) The fair value amount is presented as of the date of impairment, as these assets are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis. See also Note 1E.
(b) Reflects intangible assets written down to fair value in 2019. Fair value was determined using the income approach, specifically the multi-period excess earnings method, also known as the discounted cash flow
method. We started with a forecast of all the expected net cash flows associated with the asset and then applied an asset-specific discount rate to arrive at a net present value amount. Some of the more
significant estimates and assumptions inherent in this approach include: the amount and timing of the projected net cash flows, which includes the expected impact of competitive, legal and/or regulatory forces on
the product; the discount rate, which seeks to reflect the various risks inherent in the projected cash flows; and the tax rate, which seeks to incorporate the geographic diversity of the projected cash flows.
Note 5. Tax Matters

A. Taxes on Income from Continuing Operations
The following table provides the components of Income from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for taxes on income:
United States $ 7,931 $ (4,403) $ (6,879)
International 9,751 16,288 19,184
Income from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for taxes on income(a), (b) $ 17,682 $ 11,885 $ 12,305
(a) 2019 v. 2018––The domestic income in 2019 versus domestic loss in 2018 was mainly related to the completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction with GSK as well as lower certain asset
impairments, partially offset by reduced Lyrica revenues in the U.S., higher business and legal entity


alignment costs as well as increased costs related to certain legal matters. The decrease in the international income was primarily related to higher certain asset impairments as well as the write off of assets
contributed to the Consumer Healthcare joint venture with GSK.
(b) 2018 v. 2017––The decrease in the domestic loss was primarily due to lower interest expense paid to certain foreign subsidiaries, lower net losses on the retirement of debt, higher net gains on equity securities
and increased revenue related to Eliquis, partially offset by higher certain asset impairments and lower revenue for Viagra and the legacy SIP portfolio. The decrease in international income was primarily related
to lower interest income received primarily from intercompany borrowings from Pfizer Inc. and higher charges related to certain cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by increased revenue related to Ibrance and
Eliquis.
The following table provides the components of Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income based on the location of the taxing authorities:
United States
Current income taxes:
Federal $ (1,641) $ 668 $ 1,267
State and local (166) 9 45
Deferred income taxes:
Federal 1,258 (1,663) (2,064)
State and local 275 16 (304)
Total U.S. tax benefit (274) (970) (1,055)
TCJA(a)
Current income taxes (135) (3,035) 13,135
Deferred Income taxes (187) 2,439 (23,795)
Total TCJA tax benefit (323) (596) (10,660)
International
Current income taxes 2,900 2,831 2,709
Deferred income taxes (919) (558) (42)
Total international tax provision 1,981 2,273 2,667
Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income $ 1,384 $ 706 $ (9,049)
(a) The 2018 current tax benefit and deferred tax expense primarily relate to the utilization of tax credit carryforwards against the repatriation tax liability associated with the enactment of the TCJA. See discussion
below and Note 5C.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, we recorded an estimate of certain tax effects of the TCJA, including (i) the impact on deferred tax assets and liabilities from the reduction in the
U.S. Federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, (ii) the impact on valuation allowances and other state income tax considerations, (iii) the $15.2 billion repatriation tax liability
on accumulated post-1986 foreign earnings for which we elected, with the filing of our 2018 U.S. Federal Consolidated Income Tax Return, payment over eight years through
2026 and (iv) deferred taxes on basis differences expected to give rise to future taxes on global intangible low-taxed income. In addition, we had provided deferred tax liabilities
in the past on foreign earnings that were not indefinitely reinvested. As a result of the TCJA, in the fourth quarter of 2017, we reversed an estimate of the deferred taxes that
are no longer expected to be needed due to the change to the territorial tax system.
In 2018, we finalized our provisional accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA, based on our best estimates of available information and data, and reported and disclosed the
impacts within the applicable measurement period, in accordance with guidance issued by the SEC, and recorded a favorable adjustment of approximately $100 million to
Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income. We believe that there may be additional interpretations, clarifications and guidance from the U.S. Department of Treasury. Any change
to our calculations resulting from such additional interpretations, clarifications and guidance would be reflected in the period of issuance. In addition, our obligations may vary
as a result of changes in our uncertain tax positions and/or availability of attributes such as foreign tax and other credit carryforwards.
With respect to the aforementioned repatriation tax liability, our revised estimate is approximately $15 billion, which is reported in current Income taxes payable (approximately
$600 million) and the remaining liability is reported in noncurrent Other taxes payable in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. The first installment of $750
million was paid in April 2019.
The TCJA subjects a U.S. shareholder to current tax on global intangible low-taxed income earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740, No. 5,
Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that we are permitted to make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary basis
differences expected to reverse as global intangible low-taxed income in future years or provide for the tax expense related to such income in the year the tax is incurred. We
elected to recognize deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to reverse as global intangible low-taxed income in future years. In 2017, we provided a provisional
deferred tax liability of approximately $1.0 billion based on the evaluation of certain temporary differences inside each of our foreign subsidiaries that are expected to reverse
as global intangible low-taxed income. In 2018, this estimate was finalized and we provided for an additional deferred tax liability of approximately $200 million, resulting in a
deferred tax liability of approximately $1.2 billion.
In 2019, the Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income was impacted by the following:
• tax expense of approximately $2.7 billion associated with the gain related to the completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction with GSK;
• tax benefits of approximately $1.6 billion, representing tax and interest resulting from the resolution of certain tax positions pertaining to prior years, primarily resulting from a
favorable settlement with the IRS (see Note 5D below);
• tax benefits of approximately $400 million related to certain tax initiatives associated with the implementation of our new organizational structure;


• tax benefits of approximately $325 million recorded as a result of additional guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury related to the enactment of the TCJA; and
• tax benefits of approximately $620 million related to certain asset impairments.
• estimated U.S. net tax benefits of approximately $600 million associated with the enactment of the TCJA (see discussion above), primarily reflecting:
◦ approximately $500 million of tax benefits associated primarily with certain 2018 tax initiatives;
◦ approximately $100 million of tax benefits associated with adjustments to our provisional accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA, reported and disclosed within the
applicable measurement period, in accordance with guidance issued by the SEC, mainly consisting of:
◦ $160 million of tax benefits related to the repatriation tax on deemed repatriated accumulated earnings of foreign subsidiaries; and
◦ $140 million of tax benefits associated with the remeasurement of other U.S. deferred tax liabilities,
◦ $200 million of tax expense related to future taxes on global intangible low-taxed income;
• tax benefits of approximately $700 million representing tax and interest resulting from the resolution of certain tax positions pertaining to prior years mostly with various
foreign tax authorities, and the expiration of certain statutes of limitations; and
• tax benefits of approximately $740 million related to certain asset impairments.
• estimated U.S. net tax benefits of $10.7 billion associated with the enactment of the TCJA (see discussion above), primarily reflecting:
◦ $22.8 billion of tax benefits associated with the remeasurement of U.S. deferred tax liabilities on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries (see Note 5C);
◦ $1.6 billion of tax benefits associated with the remeasurement of other U.S. deferred tax liabilities, mainly associated with intangibles (see Note 5C);
◦ $12.9 billion of tax expense related to the repatriation tax on deemed repatriated accumulated pre-2017 post-1986 earnings of foreign subsidiaries;
◦ $1.0 billion of tax expense related to future taxes on global intangible low-taxed income (see Note 5C); and
◦ approximately $100 million of tax benefits mostly associated with certain tax initiatives;
• U.S. tax expense of approximately $1.3 billion related to the repatriation tax on deemed repatriated current year earnings of foreign subsidiaries;
• tax benefits of approximately $370 million related to net losses on early retirement of debt;
• tax benefits of approximately $150 million representing tax and interest resulting from the resolution of certain tax positions pertaining to prior years primarily with various
foreign tax authorities, and the expiration of certain statutes of limitations; and
• the non-deductibility of a $307 million fee payable to the federal government as a result of the U.S. Healthcare Legislation.
In all years, federal, state and international net tax liabilities assumed or established as part of a business acquisition are not included in Provision/(benefit) for taxes on
income (see Note 2A).
B. Tax Rate Reconciliation
The reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to our effective tax rate for Income from continuing operations follows:
2019 2018 2017
U.S. statutory income tax rate 21.0 % 21.0 % 35.0 %
TCJA impact (a) (1.8) (5.0) (86.6)
Taxation of non-U.S. operations (b), (c) (5.7) (6.1) (17.0)
Tax settlements and resolution of certain tax positions(d) (9.0) (5.8) (1.2)
Completion of Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction (d) 5.3 — —
U.S. Healthcare Legislation(d), (e) — (0.4) 0.9
U.S. R&D tax credit and manufacturing deduction (0.5) (0.7) (0.7)
Certain legal settlements and charges — (0.1) 0.1
All other, net(f) (1.5) 3.1 (3.9)
Effective tax rate for income from continuing operations 7.8 % 5.9 % (73.5)%
(a) For a discussion about the enactment of the TCJA, see Note 5A.
(b) For taxation of non-U.S. operations, this rate impact reflects the income tax rates and relative earnings in the locations where we do business outside the U.S., together with the cost of repatriation decisions,
which, for 2017, includes the repatriation tax on deemed repatriated 2017 earnings of foreign subsidiaries discussed in Note 5A, changes in uncertain tax positions not included in the reconciling item called “Tax
settlements and resolution of certain tax positions,” as well as changes in valuation allowances. Specifically: (i) the jurisdictional location of earnings is a significant component of our effective tax rate each year,
and the rate impact of this component is influenced by the specific location of non-U.S. earnings and the level of such earnings as compared to our total earnings; (ii) the cost of repatriation decisions, and other
U.S. tax implications of our foreign operations, is a significant component of our effective tax rate each year and generally offsets some of the reduction to our effective tax rate each year resulting from the
jurisdictional location of earnings; (iii)


certain tax initiatives; and (iv) the impact of changes in uncertain tax positions not included in the reconciling item called “Tax settlements and resolution of certain tax positions” is a component of our effective tax
rate each year that can result in either an increase or decrease to our effective tax rate. The jurisdictional mix of earnings, which includes the impact of the location of earnings as well as repatriation costs, can
vary as a result of the repatriation decisions, as a result of operating fluctuations in the normal course of business and as a result of the extent and location of other income and expense items, such as
restructuring charges, asset impairments and gains and losses on strategic business decisions. See also Note 5A for the components of pre-tax income and Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income, which is based
on the location of the taxing authorities, and for information about settlements and other items impacting Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income.
(c) In all periods presented, the reduction in our effective tax rate resulting from the jurisdictional location of earnings is largely due to lower tax rates in certain jurisdictions, as well as manufacturing and other
incentives associated with our subsidiaries in Puerto Rico and Singapore. We benefit from a Puerto Rican incentive grant that expires in 2029. Under the grant, we are partially exempt from income, property and
municipal taxes. In Singapore, we benefit from incentive tax rates effective through 2045 on income from manufacturing and other operations.
(d) For a discussion about tax settlements and resolution of certain tax positions, the impact of the gain on the completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction and the impact of U.S. Healthcare
Legislation, see Note 5A.
(e) The favorable rate impact in 2018 is a result of the updated 2017 invoice received from the federal government, which reflected a lower expense than what was previously estimated for invoiced periods, as well
as certain tax initiatives.
(f) All other, net in 2019 is primarily due to routine business operations. 2018 is primarily due to routine business operations and the non-recurrence of tax benefits associated with certain tax initiatives. 2017 primarily
relates to tax benefits associated with certain tax initiatives in the normal course of business.
C. Deferred Taxes
Deferred taxes arise as a result of basis differentials between financial statement accounting and tax amounts.
The components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, shown before jurisdictional netting, follow:
2019 Deferred Tax* 2018 Deferred Tax*
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Assets (Liabilities) Assets (Liabilities)
Prepaid/deferred items (a) $ 2,195 $ (204) $ 1,655 $ (325)
Inventories 373 (14) 280 (10)
Intangible assets (b) 743 (7,099) 532 (7,620)
Property, plant and equipment 179 (1,226) 160 (1,011)
Employee benefits 2,217 (39) 2,292 (134)
Restructurings and other charges 225 — 266 —
Legal and product liability reserves 496 — 415 —
Net operating loss/tax credit carryforwards (c) 2,427 — 2,512 —
Unremitted earnings — (79) — (83)
State and local tax adjustments 152 — 264 —
Investments (d) 11 (3,318) 18 (162)
All other 196 (9) 182 (112)
9,215 (11,988) 8,576 (9,456)
Valuation allowances (1,927) — (2,068) —
Total deferred taxes $ 7,288 $ (11,988) $ 6,508 $ (9,456)
Net deferred tax liability(e) $ (4,700) $ (2,948)
* The deferred tax assets and liabilities associated with global intangible low-taxed income are included in the relevant categories above. See Note 5A.
(a) The increase in 2019 is primarily related to the capitalization of certain R&D-related expenses.
(b) The decrease in 2019 is primarily the result of amortization of intangible assets and certain impairment charges, mainly offset by deferred tax liabilities established on intangible assets from the acquisition of
Array.
(c) The amounts in 2019 and 2018 are reduced for unrecognized tax benefits of $2.9 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively, where we have net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses, and/or tax credit
carryforwards that are available, under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction, to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position.
(d) The increase in 2019 is primarily related to the Consumer Healthcare joint venture with GSK. See Note 2C for additional information.
(e) In 2019, Noncurrent deferred tax assets and other noncurrent tax assets ($0.9 billion), and Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities ($5.6 billion). In 2018, Noncurrent deferred tax assets and other noncurrent tax assets
($0.8 billion), and Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities ($3.7 billion).
We have carryforwards, primarily related to net operating and capital losses, general business credits and charitable contributions, which are available to reduce future U.S.
federal and/or state, as well as international, income taxes payable with either an indefinite life or expiring at various times from 2020 to 2039. Certain of our U.S. net operating
losses and general business credits are subject to limitations under IRC Section 382.
Valuation allowances are provided when we believe that our deferred tax assets are not recoverable based on an assessment of estimated future taxable income that
incorporates ongoing, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, that would be implemented, if necessary, to realize the deferred tax assets.
As of December 31, 2019, we have not made a U.S. tax provision on approximately $29.0 billion of unremitted earnings of our international subsidiaries. As these earnings are
intended to be indefinitely reinvested overseas, the determination of a hypothetical unrecognized deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2019 is not practicable.


D. Tax Contingencies
We are subject to income tax in many jurisdictions, and a certain degree of estimation is required in recording the assets and liabilities related to income taxes. All of our tax
positions are subject to audit by the local taxing authorities in each tax jurisdiction. These tax audits can involve complex issues, interpretations and judgments and the
resolution of matters may span multiple years, particularly if subject to negotiation or litigation. Our assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been
deemed reasonable by management, but our estimates of unrecognized tax benefits and potential tax benefits may not be representative of actual outcomes, and variation
from such estimates could materially affect our financial statements in the period of settlement or when the statutes of limitations expire, as we treat these events as discrete
items in the period of resolution.
For a description of our accounting policies associated with accounting for income tax contingencies, see Note 1P. For a description of the risks associated with estimates and
assumptions, see Note 1C.
Uncertain Tax Positions
As tax law is complex and often subject to varied interpretations, it is uncertain whether some of our tax positions will be sustained upon audit. As of December 31, 2019, we
had approximately $4.2 billion in net unrecognized tax benefits, excluding associated interest and as of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $5.1 billion in net
unrecognized tax benefits, excluding associated interest.
• Tax assets associated with uncertain tax positions primarily represent our estimate of the potential tax benefits in one tax jurisdiction that could result from the payment of
income taxes in another tax jurisdiction. These potential benefits generally result from cooperative efforts among taxing authorities, as required by tax treaties to minimize
double taxation, commonly referred to as the competent authority process. The recoverability of these assets, which we believe to be more likely than not, is dependent upon
the actual payment of taxes in one tax jurisdiction and, in some cases, the successful petition for recovery in another tax jurisdiction. As of December 31, 2019, we had
approximately $1.2 billion in assets associated with uncertain tax positions. These amounts were included in Noncurrent deferred tax assets and other noncurrent tax assets
($1.0 billion) and Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities ($109 million). As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $1.1 billion in assets associated with uncertain tax
positions. These amounts were included in Noncurrent deferred tax assets and other noncurrent tax assets ($1.0 billion) and Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities ($128 million).
• Tax liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions represent unrecognized tax benefits, which arise when the estimated benefit recorded in our financial statements differs
from the amounts taken or expected to be taken in a tax return because of the uncertainties described above. These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to issues
common among multinational corporations. Substantially all of these unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would impact our effective income tax rate.
The reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits follows:
Balance, beginning $ (6,259) $ (6,558) $ (5,826)
Acquisitions(a) (44) — 10
Increases based on tax positions taken during a prior period(b) (36) (192) (49)
Decreases based on tax positions taken during a prior period(b), (c) 1,109 561 28
Decreases based on settlements for a prior period (d) 100 123 35
Increases based on tax positions taken during the current period(b) (383) (370) (753)
Impact of foreign exchange 25 56 (121)
Other, net (b), (e) 107 121 118
Balance, ending(f) $ (5,381) $ (6,259) $ (6,558)
(a) For 2019, primarily related to the acquisition of Array. For 2017, primarily related to the acquisitions of Medivation and Anacor. See also Note 2A.
(b) Primarily included in Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income.
(c) Primarily related to effectively settling certain issues with the U.S. and foreign tax authorities. See also Note 5A.
(d) Primarily related to cash payments and reductions of tax attributes.
(e) Primarily related to decreases as a result of a lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.
(f) In 2019, included in Income taxes payable ($108 million), Current tax assets ($2 million), Noncurrent deferred tax assets and other noncurrent tax assets ($51 million), Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities ($2.8
billion) and Other taxes payable ($2.4 billion). In 2018, included in Income taxes payable ($11 million), Current tax assets ($1 million) Noncurrent deferred tax assets and other noncurrent tax assets ($47
million), Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities ($3.2 billion) and Other taxes payable ($3.0 billion).
• Interest related to our unrecognized tax benefits is recorded in accordance with the laws of each jurisdiction and is recorded primarily in Provision/(benefit) for taxes on
income in our consolidated statements of income. In 2019, we recorded a net decrease in interest of $564 million, resulting primarily from a settlement with the IRS. In 2018,
we recorded a net increase in interest of $103 million; and in 2017, we recorded a net increase in interest of $208 million. Gross accrued interest totaled $485 million as of
December 31, 2019 (reflecting a decrease of approximately $13 million as a result of cash payments) and gross accrued interest totaled $1.1 billion as of December 31,
2018 (reflecting a decrease of approximately $16 million as a result of cash payments). In 2019, this amount was included in Income taxes payable ($20 million) and Other
taxes payable ($465 million). In 2018, this amount was included in Income taxes payable ($6 million) and Other taxes payable ($1.1 billion). Accrued penalties are not
significant. See also Note 5A.
Status of Tax Audits and Potential Impact on Accruals for Uncertain Tax Positions
The U.S. is one of our major tax jurisdictions, and we are regularly audited by the IRS:
• During the second quarter of 2019, Pfizer reached settlement of disputed issues at the IRS Office of Appeals, thereby settling all issues related to U.S. tax returns of Pfizer
for the years 2009-2010. As a result of settling these years, in the second quarter of 2019 we recorded a benefit of approximately $1.4 billion, representing tax and interest.


• With respect to Pfizer, tax years 2011-2015 are currently under audit. Tax years 2016-2019 are open, but not under audit. All other tax years are closed.
In addition to the open audit years in the U.S., we have open audit years in other major tax jurisdictions, such as Canada (2013-2019), Japan (2017-2019), Europe (2011-2019,
primarily reflecting Ireland, the U.K., France, Italy, Spain and Germany), Latin America (1998-2019, primarily reflecting Brazil) and Puerto Rico (2015-2019).
Any settlements or statutes of limitations expirations could result in a significant decrease in our uncertain tax positions. We estimate that it is reasonably possible that within
the next 12 months, our gross unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest, could decrease by as much as $200 million, as a result of settlements with taxing authorities or
the expiration of the statutes of limitations. Our assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but our estimates
of unrecognized tax benefits and potential tax benefits may not be representative of actual outcomes, and variation from such estimates could materially affect our financial
statements in the period of settlement or when the statutes of limitations expire, as we treat these events as discrete items in the period of resolution. Finalizing audits with the
relevant taxing authorities can include formal administrative and legal proceedings, and, as a result, it is difficult to estimate the timing and range of possible changes related to
our uncertain tax positions, and such changes could be significant.
E. Tax Provision/(Benefit) on Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
The following table provides the components of the Tax provision/(benefit) on other comprehensive income/(loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net (a) $ 254 $ 94 $ (215)

Unrealized holding gains/(losses) on derivative financial instruments, net 83 21 72
Reclassification adjustments for (gains)/losses included in net income (125) 27 (224)
Reclassification adjustments of certain tax effects from AOCI to Retained earnings(b) — 1 —
(42) 50 (152)
Unrealized holding gains/(losses) on available-for-sale securities, net — (23) 102
Reclassification adjustments for (gains)/losses included in net income 5 16 (60)
Reclassification adjustments for tax on unrealized gains from AOCI to Retained earnings(c) — (45) —
5 (53) 42
Benefit plans: actuarial losses, net (169) (141) (59)
Reclassification adjustments related to amortization 55 55 192
Reclassification adjustments related to settlements, net 65 33 42
Reclassification adjustments of certain tax effects from AOCI to Retained earnings(b) — 637 —
Other (10) 29 (39)
(58) 612 137
Benefit plans: prior service costs and other, net (1) 2 —
Reclassification adjustments related to amortization of prior service costs and other, net (43) (39) (67)
Reclassification adjustments related to curtailments of prior service costs and other, net (1) (4) (7)
Reclassification adjustments of certain tax effects from AOCI to Retained earnings(b) — (144) —
Other — — —
(45) (185) (74)
Tax provision/(benefit) on other comprehensive income/(loss) $ 115 $ 518 $ (262)
(a) Taxes are not provided for foreign currency translation adjustments relating to investments in international subsidiaries that will be held indefinitely.
(b) For additional information on the adoption of a new accounting standard related to reclassification of certain tax effects from AOCI, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 1B. Basis of
Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Adoption of New Accounting Standards in 2018 in our 2018 Financial Report.
(c) For additional information on the adoption of a new accounting standard related to financial assets and liabilities, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 1B. Basis of Presentation and Significant
Accounting Policies: Adoption of New Accounting Standards in 2018 in our 2018 Financial Report.


Note 6. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Excluding Noncontrolling Interests
The following table provides the changes, net of tax, in Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Net Unrealized Gain/(Losses) Benefit Plans
Foreign
Currency Prior Service Accumulated Other
Translation Derivative Financial Available-For- Actuarial (Costs)/ Credits Comprehensive
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Adjustments Instruments Sale Securities Gains/(Losses) and Other Income/(Loss)
Balance, January 1, 2017 $ (6,659) $ 348 $ (131) $ (5,473) $ 879 $ (11,036)
Other comprehensive income/(loss)(a) 1,479 (378) 532 211 (129) 1,715
Balance, December 31, 2017 (5,180) (30) 401 (5,262) 750 (9,321)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) due to the
adoption of new accounting standards(b) (2) (1) (416) (637) 144 (913)
Other comprehensive income/(loss)(a) (893) 198 (53) (128) (166) (1,041)
Balance, December 31, 2018 (6,075) 167 (68) (6,027) 728 (11,275)
Other comprehensive income/(loss)(a) 123 (146) 33 (231) (144) (365)
Balance, December 31, 2019 $ (5,952) $ 20 $ (35) $ (6,257) $ 584 $ (11,640)

(a) Amounts do not include foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests of $11 million loss in 2019, $20 million loss in 2018 and $14 million income in 2017. Amounts in 2019
include after-tax gains of approximately $978 million related to foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to our equity method investment in GSK Consumer Healthcare (see Note 2C), partially offset by
the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and the Australian dollar, and the results of our net investment hedging program.
(b) Amounts represent the cumulative effect adjustments as of January 1, 2018 from the adoption of new accounting standards related to (i) financial assets and liabilities and (ii) the reclassification of certain tax
effects from AOCI. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 1B. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Adoption of New Accounting Standards in
2018 in our 2018 Financial Report.
As of December 31, 2019, we estimate that we will reclassify into 2020 income the following pre-tax amounts currently held in Accumulated other comprehensive loss: $179
million of unrealized pre-tax net gains on derivative financial instruments (which are expected to be offset primarily by net losses from foreign currency exchange-denominated
forecasted intercompany inventory sales upon the sale of the inventory to a third party); $265 million of actuarial losses related to benefit plan obligations and plan assets and
other benefit plan items; and $178 million of prior service credits, primarily related to benefit plan amendments.

Note 7. Financial Instruments
A. Fair Value Measurements

Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value using a market approach on a recurring basis by balance sheet categories and fair value hierarchy level
as defined in Note 1E:
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Total Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2
Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Short-term investments
Classified as equity securities with readily determinable fair values:
Money market funds $ 705 $ — $ 705 $ 1,571 $ — $ 1,571
Equity(a) — — — 29 17 11
705 — 705 1,600 17 1,583
Classified as available-for-sale debt securities:

Government and agency—non-U.S. 4,863 — 4,863 9,609 — 9,609
Government and agency—U.S. 811 — 811 3,437 — 3,437
Corporate and other 1,013 — 1,013 2,045 — 2,045
6,687 — 6,687 15,091 — 15,091
Total short-term investments 7,392 — 7,392 16,691 17 16,674
Other current assets

Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts 53 — 53 97 — 97
Foreign exchange contracts 413 — 413 477 — 477
Total other current assets 465 — 465 574 — 574
Long-term investments
Classified as equity securities with readily determinable fair values(a) 1,902 1,863 39 1,273 1,243 30
Classified as available-for-sale debt securities:

Government and agency—non-U.S. — — — 94 — 94
Government and agency—U.S. 303 — 303 345 — 345
Corporate and other 11 — 11 52 — 52

315 — 315 491 — 491
Total long-term investments 2,216 1,863 354 1,764 1,243 521
Other noncurrent assets

Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts 266 — 266 335 — 335
Total derivative assets 526 — 526 566 — 566
Insurance contracts(b) 575 — 575 515 — 515
Total other noncurrent assets 1,102 — 1,102 1,082 — 1,082
Total assets $ 11,176 $ 1,863 $ 9,313 $ 20,110 $ 1,260 $ 18,850

Financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Other current liabilities
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts $ — $ — $ — $ 5 $ — $ 5
Total other current liabilities 114 — 114 82 — 82
Other noncurrent liabilities

Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts — — — 378 — 378
Total other noncurrent liabilities 604 — 604 942 — 942
Total liabilities $ 718 $ — $ 718 $ 1,024 $ — $ 1,024

(a) As of December 31, 2019, long-term equity securities of $176 million are held in restricted trusts for benefits attributable to various U.S. non-qualified employee benefit plans. As of December 31, 2018, short-term
equity securities of $11 million and long-term equity securities of $132 million are held in restricted trusts for benefits attributable to various U.S. non-qualified employee benefit plans.
(b) Other noncurrent assets include life insurance policies held in restricted trusts attributable to the funding of various U.S. non-qualified employee benefit plans. The underlying invested assets in these insurance
contracts are marketable securities, which are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in Other (income)/deductions––net in the consolidated statements of income (see Note 4).

Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the financial liabilities not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including the carrying values and estimated fair values using a market
approach:
Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Total Level 2 Total Level 2
Financial Liabilities
Long-term debt, excluding the current portion $ 35,955 $ 40,842 $ 40,842 $ 32,909 $ 35,260 $ 35,260
The differences between the estimated fair values and carrying values of held-to-maturity debt securities, restricted stock and private equity securities, and short-term
borrowings not measured at fair value on a recurring basis were not significant as of December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018. The fair value measurements of our held-to-
maturity debt securities and our short-term borrowings are based on Level 2 inputs. The fair value measurements of our private equity securities, which represent investments
in the life sciences sector, are based on Level 3 inputs using a market approach.
In addition, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had long-term receivables whose fair value is based on Level 3 inputs. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the differences
between the estimated fair values and carrying values of these receivables were not significant.
Total Short-Term and Long-Term Investments and Equity-Method Investments
The following table represents our investments by classification type:

As of December 31,
Short-term investments
Equity securities with readily determinable fair values(a) $ 705 $ 1,600
Available-for-sale debt securities 6,687 15,091
Held-to-maturity debt securities 1,133 1,003
Total Short-term investments $ 8,525 $ 17,694

Long-term investments
Equity securities with readily determinable fair values $ 1,902 $ 1,273
Available-for-sale debt securities 315 491
Held-to-maturity debt securities 42 59
Private equity securities at cost 756 763
Total Long-term investments $ 3,014 $ 2,586
Equity-method investments 17,133 181
Total long-term investments and equity-method investments $ 20,147 $ 2,767
Held-to-maturity cash equivalents $ 163 $ 199
(a) As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, equity securities with readily determinable fair values included money market funds primarily invested in U.S. Treasury and government debt.
Fair Value Methodology
The following inputs and valuation techniques were used to estimate the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities:
• Available-for-sale debt securities—third-party matrix-pricing model that uses significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data and credit-adjusted
interest rate yield curves.
• Equity securities with readily determinable fair values—quoted market prices and observable net asset value prices.
• Derivative assets and liabilities—third-party matrix-pricing model that uses significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. Where applicable,
these models discount future cash flow amounts using market-based observable inputs, including interest rate yield curves, and forward and spot prices for currencies. The
credit risk impact to our derivative financial instruments was not significant.
• Money market funds—observable net asset value prices.
We periodically review the methodologies, inputs and outputs of third-party pricing services for reasonableness. Our procedures can include, for example, referencing other
third-party pricing models, monitoring key observable inputs (like LIBOR interest rates) and selectively performing test-comparisons of values with actual sales of financial
instruments.


B. Investments
Debt Securities
At December 31, 2019, the investment securities portfolio consisted of debt securities that were virtually all investment-grade. Information on investments in debt securities at
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is as follows, including, as of December 31, 2019, the contractual maturities, or as necessary, the estimated maturities, of the
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities:
Gross Unrealized Maturities (in Years) Gross Unrealized

Amortized Fair Over 1 Amortized Fair
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Cost Gains Losses Value Within 1 to 5 Over 5 Cost Gains Losses Value
Available-for-sale debt securities

Government and agency––non-U.S. $ 4,895 $ 6 $ (38) $ 4,863 $ 4,863 $ — $ — $ 9,754 $ 7 $ (58) $ 9,703
Government and agency––U.S. 1,120 — (6) 1,114 811 303 — 3,804 — (23) 3,782
Corporate and other(a) 1,027 — (2) 1,025 1,014 11 — 2,101 — (4) 2,097
Held-to-maturity debt securities
Time deposits and other 535 — — 535 498 7 30 668 — — 668
Government and agency––non-U.S. 803 — — 803 798 — 4 592 — — 592
Total debt securities $ 8,380 $ 6 $ (47) $ 8,340 $ 7,984 $ 322 $ 35 $ 16,920 $ 8 $ (85) $ 16,842
(a) Primarily issued by a diverse group of corporations.
Equity Securities
The following table presents the net unrealized (gains) and losses for the period that relate to equity securities, excluding equity method investments, still held at the reporting
date, calculated as follows:
December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) December 31, 2019 2018
Net gains recognized during the period on equity securities(a) $ (454) $ (586)
Less: Net gains recognized during the period on equity securities sold during the period (25) (109)
Net unrealized gains during the reporting period on equity securities still held at the reporting date $ (429) $ (477)
(a) The net gains on equity securities are reported in Other (income)/deductions––net. For additional information, see Note 4.
C. Short-Term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings include:

As of December 31,
Commercial paper $ 13,915 $ 3,100
Current portion of long-term debt, principal amount(a) 1,458 4,781
Other short-term borrowings, principal amount(b) 860 966
Total short-term borrowings, principal amount 16,233 8,847
Net fair value adjustments related to hedging and purchase accounting 5 (5)
Net unamortized discounts, premiums and debt issuance costs (43) (11)
Total Short-term borrowings, including current portion of long-term debt, carried at historical proceeds, as adjusted $ 16,195 $ 8,831
(a) For additional information, see Note 7D.
(b) Other short-term borrowings primarily include cash collateral. For additional information, see Note 7F.
The weighted-average effective interest rate on commercial paper outstanding was approximately 1.92% as of December 31, 2019 and 2.42% as of December 31, 2018.
As of December 31, 2019, we had access to a total of $15 billion in U.S. revolving credit facilities consisting of a $7 billion facility expiring in 2024 and an $8 billion facility
expiring in September 2020, which may be used to support our commercial paper borrowings. In addition to the U.S. revolving credit facilities, our lenders have provided us an
additional $537 million in lines of credit, of which $508 million expire within one year. Of these total lines of credit, $15.5 billion were unused as of December 31, 2019.

D. Long-Term Debt
New Issuances
In the first quarter of 2019, we issued the following senior unsecured notes:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Principal
Interest Rate Maturity Date As of December 31, 2019
2.800% notes(a) March 11, 2022 $ 500
2.950% notes (a) March 15, 2024 750
3.450% notes(a) March 15, 2029 1,750
3.900% notes(a) March 15, 2039 750
4.000% notes (a) March 15, 2049 1,250
Total long-term debt issued in the first quarter of 2019(b) $ 5,000
(a) Fixed rate notes may be redeemed by us at any time, in whole, or in part, at varying redemption prices plus accrued and unpaid interest.
(b) The weighted-average effective interest rate for the notes at issuance was 3.57%.
In September 2018, we completed a public offering of $5.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes with a weighted-average effective interest rate of
3.56%.
In March 2017, we completed a public offering of $1.065 billion principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2047 with an interest rate of 4.20%, and also in March 2017,
we completed a public offering of €4.0 billion principal amount of senior unsecured notes with a weighted-average effective interest rate of 0.23%.
Retirements
In January 2019, we repurchased all €1.1 billion ($1.3 billion, at exchange rates on settlement) principal amount outstanding of the 5.75% euro-denominated debt that was due
June 2021 before the maturity date at a redemption value of €1.3 billion ($1.5 billion, at exchange rates on settlement). As a result, in the first quarter of 2019, we recorded a
net loss of approximately $138 million, which included the related termination of cross-currency swaps, and is reported in Other (income)/deductions––net in the consolidated
statements of income (see Note 4).
In December 2017, we exchanged approximately £833 million and repurchased £197 million principal amount of the outstanding 6.50% debt before the maturity date at a
redemption value of £1.7 billion, leaving £470 million principal amount of the 6.50% debt due 2038 outstanding. Also, in December 2017, we repurchased approximately €834
million principal amount of the outstanding 5.75% debt before the maturity date at a redemption value of €1.0 billion, leaving approximately €1.2 billion of the 5.75% euro-
denominated debt due 2021 outstanding as of December 31, 2017. As a result, we recorded a net loss of approximately $846 million and $153 million upon the exchange and
early retirement of the U.K. pound-denominated debt and the early retirement of the euro-denominated debt, respectively, for a net loss on early retirement of debt of $999
million, which included the related termination of cross-currency swaps, and that were recorded in Other (income)/deductions––net in the consolidated statement of income
(see Note 4).
The following table provides the components of our senior unsecured long-term debt, including the weighted-average stated interest rate for 2019 and 2018 by maturity:
As of December 31,
Notes due 2020 (1.2%) (a) $ — $ 1,474
Notes due 2021 (0.7% and 3.4%) 3,153 4,459
Notes due 2022 (1.0% and 0.3%) 1,624 1,145
Notes due 2023 (3.7% and 3.8%) 2,892 2,892
Notes due 2024 (3.9% and 4.4%) 2,250 1,500
Notes due 2026-2029 (3.3%) 7,453 5,718
Notes due 2034 (6.5%) 750 750
Notes due 2036-2040 (5.8% and 6.0%) 8,566 7,796
Notes due 2043-2044 (3.5%) 3,568 3,509
Notes due 2046-2049 (4.1% and 4.2%) 4,565 3,315
Total long-term debt, principal amount 34,820 32,558
Net fair value adjustments related to hedging and purchase accounting 1,305 479
Net unamortized discounts, premiums and debt issuance costs (176) (136)
Other long-term debt 5 7
Total long-term debt, carried at historical proceeds, as adjusted $ 35,955 $ 32,909
Current portion of long-term debt, carried at historical proceeds (not included above (1.2% and 1.3%)) $ 1,462 $ 4,776
(a)
At December 31, 2019, the debt issuances have been reclassified to the current portion of long-term debt.
Our long-term debt, provided in the above table, is generally redeemable by us at any time at varying redemption prices plus accrued and unpaid interest.

E. Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin)

In April 2018, the EU approved Mylotarg for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. In connection with the EU approval, we incurred an obligation to make guaranteed fixed
annual payments over a ten-year period aggregating $301 million related to an R&D arrangement. We recorded the estimated net present value of $240 million as a liability
and an intangible asset in Developed technology rights as of the approval date. In June 2018, we entered into a transaction with the obligee to buyout the remaining liability for
the fixed annual payments for a lump sum payment of $224 million. As a result of the buyout transaction, the liability was extinguished and we recognized a non-cash
$17 million pre-tax gain in Other (income)/deductions––net in the second quarter of 2018 (see Note 4).
Bosulif (bosutinib)
In December 2017, the FDA approved Bosulif for the treatment of patients with newly-diagnosed chronic-phase Ph+ CML. In connection with the U.S. approval, we incurred an
obligation to make guaranteed fixed annual payments over a ten-year period aggregating $416 million related to an R&D arrangement. We recorded the estimated net present
value of $364 million as of the approval date as an intangible asset in Developed technology rights. In August 2018, we entered into a transaction with the obligee to buyout a
portion of the remaining liability for the fixed annual payments for a lump sum payment of $71 million. As a result of the buyout transaction, the liability was reduced and we
recognized a non-cash $9 million pre-tax gain in Other (income)/deductions––net in the third quarter of 2018. The present value of the remaining future payments as of
December 31, 2019 is $191 million, of which $22 million is recorded in Other current liabilities and $169 million is recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities.
Besponsa (inotuzumab ozogamicin)
In August 2017, the FDA approved Besponsa and in June 2017, the EU approved Besponsa as monotherapy for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory CD22-
positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In connection with the U.S. approval, we incurred an obligation to make guaranteed fixed annual payments over a nine-
year period aggregating $296 million related to an R&D arrangement. We recorded the estimated net present value of $248 million as of the approval date as an intangible
asset in Developed technology rights. The present value of the remaining future payments as of December 31, 2019 is $242 million, of which $7 million is recorded in Other
current liabilities and $235 million is recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities. In connection with the EU approval, we incurred an obligation to make guaranteed fixed annual
payments over a nine-year period aggregating $148 million related to an R&D arrangement. We recorded the estimated net present value of $123 million as of the approval
date as an intangible asset in Developed technology rights. The present value of the remaining future payments as of December 31, 2019 is $122 million, of which $3 million is
recorded in Other current liabilities and $119 million is recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the differences between the estimated fair values, using a market approach in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy, and carrying values of
these obligations were not significant.
F. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

Foreign Exchange Risk
A significant portion of our revenues, earnings and net investments in foreign affiliates is exposed to changes in foreign exchange rates. We manage our foreign exchange risk,
in part, through operational means, including managing same-currency revenues in relation to same-currency costs and same-currency assets in relation to same-currency
liabilities. We also manage our foreign exchange risk, depending on market conditions, through fair value, cash flow, and net investment hedging programs through the use of
derivative financial instruments and foreign currency debt. These financial instruments serve to protect net income against the impact of remeasurement into another currency,
or against the impact of translation into U.S. dollars of certain foreign exchange-denominated transactions.
All derivative financial instruments used to manage foreign currency risk are measured at fair value and are reported as assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
The derivative financial instruments primarily hedge or offset exposures in the euro, U.K. pound, Japanese yen, Chinese renminbi and Swedish krona. Changes in fair value
are reported in earnings or in Other comprehensive income/(loss), depending on the nature and purpose of the financial instrument (hedge or offset relationship) and the
effectiveness of the hedge relationships, as follows:
• Generally, we recognize the gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts that are designated as fair value hedges in earnings upon the recognition of the change in fair
value of the hedged risk. For certain foreign exchange contracts, we exclude an amount from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and recognize that excluded amount
through an amortization approach. We also recognize the offsetting foreign exchange impact attributable to the hedged item in earnings.
• Generally, we record in Other comprehensive income/(loss) gains or losses on foreign exchange contracts that are designated as cash flow hedges and reclassify those
amounts, as appropriate, into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. For certain foreign exchange contracts, we
exclude an amount from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and recognize that excluded amount through an amortization approach.
• We record in Other comprehensive income/(loss) the foreign exchange gains and losses related to foreign exchange-denominated debt and foreign exchange contracts
designated as a hedge of our net investments in foreign subsidiaries and reclassify those amounts into earnings upon the sale or substantial liquidation of our net
investments. For foreign exchange contracts, we exclude an amount from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and recognize that excluded amount through an
amortization approach.
• For certain foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments, we recognize the gains and losses on foreign currency exchange contracts that are used to
offset the same foreign currency assets or liabilities immediately into earnings along with the earnings impact of the items they generally offset. These contracts essentially
take the opposite currency position of that reflected in the month-end balance sheet to counterbalance the effect of any currency movement.


As a part of our cash flow hedging program, we designate foreign exchange contracts to hedge a portion of our forecasted euro, Japanese yen, Chinese renminbi, Canadian
dollar, U.K. pound and Australian dollar-denominated intercompany inventory sales expected to occur no more than two years from the date of each hedge.
For 2017, any ineffectiveness was recognized immediately into earnings. There was no significant ineffectiveness for 2017.
Interest Rate Risk
Our interest-bearing investments and borrowings are subject to interest rate risk. With respect to our investments, we strive to maintain a predominantly floating-rate basis
position, but our strategy may change based on prevailing market conditions. We currently borrow primarily on a long-term, fixed-rate basis. From time to time, depending on
market conditions, we will change the profile of our outstanding debt by entering into derivative financial instruments like interest rate swaps. We entered into derivative
financial instruments to hedge or offset the fixed interest rates on the hedged item, matching the amount and timing of the hedged item. The derivative financial instruments
primarily hedge U.S. dollar fixed-rate debt.
All derivative contracts used to manage interest rate risk are measured at fair value and reported as assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Changes in fair
value are reported in earnings, as follows:
• We recognize the gains and losses on interest rate contracts that are designated as fair value hedges in earnings upon the recognition of the change in fair value of the
hedged risk. We also recognize the offsetting earnings impact of fixed-rate debt attributable to the hedged risk in earnings.
For 2017, any ineffectiveness was recognized immediately into earnings. There was no significant ineffectiveness for 2017.
The following table provides the fair value of the derivative financial instruments and the related notional amounts presented between those derivatives that are designated as
hedging instruments and those that are not designated as hedging instruments:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Fair Value Fair Value
Notional Asset Liability Notional Asset Liability
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange contracts(a) $ 25,193 $ 591 $ 662 $ 22,984 $ 654 $ 586
Interest rate contracts 6,645 318 — 11,145 432 383
909 662 1,085 968

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange contracts $ 19,623 82 55 $ 15,154 55 55

Total $ 992 $ 718 $ 1,140 $ 1,024
(a) The notional amount of outstanding foreign currency forward-exchange contracts hedging our intercompany forecasted inventory sales was $5.9 billion as of December 31, 2019 and $5.8 billion as of December
31, 2018.

The following table provides information about the gains/(losses) incurred to hedge or offset operational foreign exchange or interest rate risk:
Amount of Amount of Gains/(Losses)
Gains/(Losses) Amount of Gains/(Losses) Reclassified from
Recognized in OID(a) Recognized in OCI(a), (b) OCI into OID and COS(a), (b)
As of December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018

Derivative Financial Instruments in Cash Flow Hedge
Relationships:
Foreign exchange contracts (c) $ — $ — $ 339 $ 80 $ 525 $ (182)
Amount excluded from effectiveness testing recognized
in earnings based on an amortization approach(d) — — 136 140 140 153

Derivative Financial Instruments in Fair Value Hedge
Relationships:
Interest rate contracts 900 (348) — — — —
Hedged item (900) 348 — — — —
Foreign exchange contracts — 5 — — — —
Hedged item — (5) — — — —

Derivative Financial Instruments in Net Investment Hedge
Relationships:
Foreign exchange contracts — — (313) 175 — —
The portion on foreign exchange contracts excluded
from the assessment of hedge effectiveness(d) — — 188 77 144 68

Non-Derivative Financial Instruments in Net Investment
Hedge Relationships:
Foreign currency short-term borrowings(e) — — 34 68 — —
Foreign currency long-term debt (e) — — 36 149 — —

Derivative Financial Instruments Not Designated as
Hedges:
Foreign exchange contracts (172) 136 — — — —
All other net (d) — — — (1) (1) 2
$ (172) $ 136 $ 421 $ 688 $ 808 $ 41
(a) OID = Other (income)/deductions—net, included in Other (income)/deductions—net in the consolidated statements of income. COS = Cost of Sales, included in Cost of sales in the consolidated statements of
income. OCI = Other comprehensive income/(loss), included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
(b) For derivative financial instruments in cash flow hedge relationships, the gains and losses are included in Other comprehensive income/(loss)––Unrealized holding gains/(losses) on derivative financial
instruments, net. For derivative financial instruments in net investment hedge relationships and for foreign currency debt designated as hedging instruments, the gains and losses are included in Other
comprehensive income/(loss)––Foreign currency translation adjustments, net.
(c) The amounts reclassified from OCI into COS were a net gain of $247 million in 2019 and a net loss of $13 million in 2018. The remaining amounts were reclassified from OCI into OID. Based on year-end foreign
exchange rates that are subject to change, we expect to reclassify a pre-tax gain of $145 million within the next 12 months into Cost of sales. The maximum length of time over which we are hedging future foreign
exchange cash flow relates to our $1.8 billion U.K. pound debt maturing in 2043.
(d) These amounts were reclassified from OCI into OID.
(e) Short-term borrowings include foreign currency short-term borrowings with carrying values of $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2019, which are used as hedging instruments in net investment hedges. Long-term
debt includes foreign currency long-term borrowings with carrying values of $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2019, which are used as hedging instruments in net investment hedges.

The following table provides the amounts recorded in our consolidated balance sheet related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges:
Cumulative Amount of Fair
Value Hedging Adjustment Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging
Increase/(Decrease) to Adjustment Increase/(Decrease) to
Carrying Amount Carrying Amount
Carrying Amount of Active Discontinued Carrying Amount of Discontinued
Hedged Hedging Hedging Hedged Active Hedging Hedging
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Assets/Liabilities(a) Relationships Relationships Assets/Liabilities(a) Relationships Relationships
Long-term investments $ 45 $ — $ — $ 45 $ (1) $ —
Short-term borrowings,
including current portion of
long-term debt — — — 1,499 (5) —
Long-term debt 7,092 266 690 9,952 (45) 129
(a) Carrying amounts exclude the cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments.
Certain of our derivative financial instruments are covered by associated credit-support agreements that have credit-risk-related contingent features designed to reduce both
counterparties’ exposure to risk of defaulting on amounts owed by the other party. As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate fair value of these derivative financial instruments
that are in a net liability position was $449 million, for which we have posted collateral of $470 million in the normal course of business. If there had been a downgrade to below
an A rating by S&P or the equivalent rating by Moody’s, we would not have been required to post any additional collateral to our counterparties.
As of December 31, 2019, we received cash collateral of $835 million from various counterparties. The collateral primarily supports the approximate fair value of our derivative
contracts. With respect to the collateral received, the obligations are reported in Short-term borrowings, including current portion of long-term debt.
G. Credit Risk
On an ongoing basis, we review the creditworthiness of counterparties to our foreign exchange and interest rate agreements and do not expect to incur a significant loss from
failure of any counterparties to perform under the agreements. There are no significant concentrations of credit risk related to our financial instruments with any individual
counterparty. For additional information about concentrations of credit risk related to certain significant customers, see Note 17C. As of December 31, 2019, we had amounts
due from a well-diversified, high quality group of banks ($1.4 billion) from around the world. For details about our investments, see Note 7B above.
In general, there is no requirement for collateral from customers. However, derivative financial instruments are executed under credit-support agreements that provide for the
ability to request to receive cash collateral, depending on levels of exposure, our credit rating and the credit rating of the counterparty, see Note 7F above.
Note 8. Inventories
The following table provides the components of Inventories:
As of December 31,
Finished goods $ 2,750 $ 2,262
Work in process 4,743 4,701
Raw materials and supplies 790 546
Inventories(a) $ 8,283 $ 7,508
Noncurrent inventories not included above(b) $ 714 $ 618
(a) The change from December 31, 2018 reflects increases for certain products, including inventory build for new product launches, supply recovery and market demand, partially offset by a decrease due to foreign
exchange and the write off of rivipansel inventory previously expected to be sold (see Note 2E).
(b) Included in Other noncurrent assets. There are no recoverability issues associated with these amounts.

Note 9. Property, Plant and Equipment

The following table provides the components of Property, plant and equipment:
Useful Lives As of December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) (Years) 2019 2018
Land - $ 516 $ 500
Buildings 33-50 10,068 9,920
Machinery and equipment 8-20 12,281 11,871
Furniture, fixtures and other 3-12 1/2 4,930 4,693
Construction in progress - 2,960 2,992
30,756 29,977
Less: Accumulated depreciation 16,789 16,591
Property, plant and equipment (a) $ 13,967 $ 13,385
(a) The increase in total property, plant and equipment is mainly due to capital additions, partially offset by depreciation, reductions due to asset impairments largely associated with cost reduction initiatives not
associated with acquisitions (see Note 3), and the impact of foreign exchange.
Note 10. Identifiable Intangible Assets and Goodwill

A. Identifiable Intangible Assets
Balance Sheet Information
The following table provides the components of Identifiable intangible assets:

Identifiable Identifiable
Intangible Intangible
Gross Assets, less Gross Assets, less
Carrying Accumulated Accumulated Carrying Accumulated Accumulated
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Amount Amortization Amortization Amount Amortization Amortization
Finite-lived intangible assets
Developed technology rights (a) $ 88,730 $ (63,106) $ 25,625 $ 89,430 $ (58,895) $ 30,535
Brands 922 (741) 181 923 (708) 215
Licensing agreements and other(a) 1,772 (1,191) 582 1,436 (1,140) 296
91,425 (65,037) 26,387 91,788 (60,743) 31,045
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Brands 1,991 1,991 1,991 1,991
IPR&D (a) 5,919 5,919 2,171 2,171
Licensing agreements and other(a), (b) 1,073 1,073 3 3
8,983 8,983 4,165 4,165
Identifiable intangible assets(a), (c) $ 100,408 $ (65,037) $ 35,370 $ 95,954 $ (60,743) $ 35,211
(a) The increase in the gross carrying amount of Identifiable intangible assets mainly reflects the impact of the acquisition of Array, including the addition of $1.8 billion of Developed technology rights, $340 million of
finite-lived Licensing agreements, $4.0 billion of IPR&D and $1.1 billion of indefinite-lived Licensing agreements (see Note 2A), partially offset by intangible asset impairment charges, primarily for Eucrisa in
Developed technology rights. See Note 4 for additional information on intangible asset impairments.
(b) Reflects acquired licensing agreements for technology in development.
(c) The increase in Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization, is mostly due to the additions noted in (a) above, partially offset by amortization and intangible asset impairment charges, primarily for
Eucrisa in Developed technology rights. See Note 4 for additional information on intangible asset impairments.
Our identifiable intangible assets are associated with the following, as a percentage of total identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization:
December 31, 2019
Biopharma Upjohn WRDM
Developed technology rights 99% 1% —
Brands, finite-lived 100% — —
Brands, indefinite-lived 42% 58% —
IPR&D 95% — 5%
Licensing agreements and other, finite-lived 98% — 1%
Licensing agreements and other, indefinite-lived 100% — —

Developed Technology Rights
Developed technology rights represent the amortized cost associated with developed technology, which has been acquired from third parties and which can include the right to
develop, use, market, sell and/or offer for sale the product, compounds and intellectual property that we have acquired with respect to products, compounds and/or processes
that have been completed. We possess a well-diversified portfolio of hundreds of developed technology rights across therapeutic categories, representing the commercialized
products included in our biopharmaceutical businesses. The more significant components of developed technology rights are the following (in order of significance): Xtandi,
Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 Infant, Braftovi/Mektovi, Eucrisa, Premarin, Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 Adult, and, to a lesser extent Tygacil, Zavicefta, Pristiq, Refacto AF and Bosulif.
Also included in this category are the post-approval milestone payments made under our alliance agreements for certain biopharmaceutical products.
Brands
Brands represent the amortized or unamortized cost associated with tradenames and know-how, as the products themselves do not receive patent protection. The more
significant components of indefinite-lived brands are the following (in order of significance): Xanax, Medrol and Depo-Medrol. The more significant components of finite-lived
brands are the following (in order of significance): Depo-Provera and Zavedos.
IPR&D
IPR&D assets represent R&D assets that have not yet received regulatory approval in a major market. The significant components of IPR&D at December 31, 2019 include
IPR&D assets acquired in connection with the Array acquisition and the program for the oral PARP inhibitor for the treatment of patients with germline BRCA-mutated
advanced breast cancer acquired as part of the Medivation acquisition. IPR&D assets are required to be classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or
the abandonment of the associated R&D effort. Accordingly, during the development period after the date of acquisition, these assets will not be amortized until approval is
obtained in a major market, typically either the U.S. or the EU, or in a series of other countries, subject to certain specified conditions and management judgment. At that time,
we will determine the useful life of the asset, reclassify the asset out of IPR&D and begin amortization. If the associated R&D effort is abandoned, the related IPR&D assets will
likely be written-off, and we will record an impairment charge.
For IPR&D assets, the risk of failure is significant and there can be no certainty that these assets ultimately will yield successful products. The nature of the biopharmaceutical
business is high-risk and, as such, we expect that many of these IPR&D assets will become impaired and be written off at some time in the future.
Licensing Agreements
Licensing agreements for developed technology and licensing agreements for technology in development primarily relate to out-licensing arrangements acquired from third
parties, including the Array acquisition. These intangible assets represent the amortized or unamortized cost associated with the license, where Pfizer has acquired the right to
future royalties and/or milestones upon development or commercialization by the licensing partner. A significant component of the licensing arrangements at December 31,
2019 are for out-licensing arrangements with a number of partners for oncology technology in varying stages of development that have not yet received regulatory approval in a
major market. Accordingly, during the development period after the date of acquisition, each of these assets is classified as indefinite-lived intangible assets and will not be
amortized until approval is obtained in a major market. At that time we will determine the useful life of the asset, reclassify the respective licensing arrangement asset to finite-
lived intangible asset and begin amortization. If the development effort is abandoned, the related licensing asset will likely be written-off, and we will record an impairment
charge.
Amortization
The weighted-average life for each of our total finite-lived intangible assets and the largest component, developed technology rights, is approximately 9 years. Total
amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets was $4.7 billion in 2019, $5.0 billion in 2018 and $4.8 billion in 2017.
The following table provides the annual amortization expense expected for the years 2020 through 2024:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Amortization expense $ 3,477 $ 3,391 $ 3,151 $ 2,851 $ 2,602
B. Goodwill
Prior to 2019, we managed our commercial operations through two distinct business segments: Pfizer Innovative Health (IH) and Pfizer Essential Health (EH). At the beginning
of our 2019 fiscal year, we reorganized our commercial operations and our businesses have been managed through three different operating segments––Biopharma, Upjohn
and through July 31, 2019, Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare business (see Note 17 for further information). Our Consumer Healthcare business was classified as held for sale as
of December 31, 2018 (see Note 2C for further information). Additionally, upon closing of the transaction during the third quarter of 2019, we deconsolidated our Consumer
Healthcare business and derecognized Consumer Healthcare goodwill.
As a result of the reorganization of our commercial operations, our remaining goodwill was required to be reallocated amongst the then new Biopharma and Upjohn operating
segments by determining the fair value of each reporting unit under our old and new management structure and the portions being transferred. We completed this re-allocation
based on relative fair value in the second quarter of 2019 and have retrospectively presented goodwill according to the new operating structure.

The following table provides the components of and changes in the carrying amount of Goodwill:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Biopharma Upjohn Consumer Healthcare Total
Balance, January 1, 2018 $ 43,359 $ 10,600 $ 1,993 $ 55,952
Other(a) (432) (116) (1,993) (2,541)
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,927 10,484 — 53,411
Additions(b) 5,411 — — 5,411
Other(c) (136) (33) — (169)
Balance, December 31, 2019 $ 48,202 $ 10,451 $ — $ 58,653
(a) Primarily reflects the reclassification of our Consumer Healthcare business as held for sale (see Note 2C), the impact of foreign exchange and the contribution of the allogeneic CAR T developmental program
assets and operations to Allogene that constituted a business for accounting purposes (see Note 2B).
(b) Biopharma additions relate to our acquisition of Array (see Note 2A).
(c) Primarily reflects the impact of foreign exchange.
Note 11. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined Contribution Plans
The majority of our employees worldwide are eligible for retirement benefits provided through defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution plans or both. In the U.S., we
sponsor both IRC-qualified and supplemental (non-qualified) defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans. A qualified plan meets the requirements of certain sections of
the IRC, and, generally, contributions to qualified plans are tax deductible. A qualified plan typically provides benefits to a broad group of employees with restrictions on
discriminating in favor of highly compensated employees with regard to coverage, benefits and contributions. A supplemental (non-qualified) plan provides additional benefits to
certain employees. In addition, we provide medical insurance benefits to certain retirees and their eligible dependents through our postretirement plans.
A. Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs and Changes in Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
The following table provides the annual (credit)/cost and changes in Other comprehensive income/(loss) for our benefit plans:
Pension Plans
U.S.
U.S. Supplemental Postretirement
Qualified(a) (Non-Qualified) International Plans
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Service cost (b) $ — $ — $ 269 $ — $ — $ 24 $ 125 $ 136 $ 171 $ 37 $ 39 $ 42
Interest cost 629 598 634 47 55 54 215 212 204 75 72 90
Expected return on plan assets (890) (1,040) (1,005) — — — (317) (360) (345) (33) (37) (36)
Amortization of:
Actuarial losses(b) 147 120 393 11 13 50 80 101 116 3 7 31
Prior service cost/(credit) (3) 2 3 (1) (1) (1) (4) (4) (4) (173) (178) (182)
Curtailments — 12 13 — 1 1 (1) (4) — (47) (17) (19)
Settlements 230 113 75 27 26 39 16 4 4 (10) — —
Special termination benefits 4 6 — 17 10 — — — 1 2 2 —
Net periodic benefit cost/(credit)
reported in income(c) 116 (189) 382 100 103 166 115 84 147 (146) (111) (75)
(Credit)/cost reported in Other
comprehensive income/(loss) (246) 361 141 115 (189) 23 570 84 (301) 38 105 (8)
(Credit)/cost recognized in
Comprehensive income $ (129) $ 171 $ 523 $ 215 $ (86) $ 189 $ 685 $ 168 $ (154) $ (107) $ (6) $ (83)
(a) In the second quarter of 2017, we settled the remaining obligation associated with the Hospira U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan. We purchased a group annuity contract on behalf of the remaining plan
participants with a third-party insurance provider. As a result, we were relieved of the $156 million net pension benefit obligation and recorded a pretax settlement gain of $41 million, partially offset by the
recognition of actuarial losses and prior service costs upon plan settlement of approximately $30 million in Other (income)/deductions—net (see Note 3).
(b) Effective January 1, 2018, we froze two significant defined benefit pension plans to future benefit accruals in the U.S. and U.K. and as a result, service costs for those plans are eliminated. In addition, due to the
plan freeze, the average amortization period for the U.S. qualified plans and U.S. supplemental (non-qualified) plans was extended to the expected life expectancy of the plan participants, whereas the average
amortization period in prior years utilized the expected future service period of plan participants.
(c) We adopted an accounting standard on January 1, 2018 that requires the net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs other than service costs be presented in Other (income)/deductions––net on the
consolidated statements of income. For additional information, see Note 4.

The following table provides the amounts in Accumulated other comprehensive loss expected to be amortized into 2020 net periodic benefit costs:
Pension Plans
U.S. U.S. Supplemental
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Qualified (Non-Qualified) International Postretirement Plans
Actuarial (losses)/gains (a) $ (127) $ (14) $ (124) $ 1
Prior service credits and other 3 1 3 172
Total $ (124) $ (14) $ (121) $ 172
(a) Due to the U.S. Pfizer Consolidated Pension Plan freeze effective for January 1, 2018, the average amortization period for the U.S. qualified plans and U.S. supplemental (non-qualified) plans reflect the expected
life expectancy of the plan participants, whereas prior years utilized the expected future service period of plan participants. The average amortization periods to be utilized for 2020 are 24.9 years for our U.S.
qualified plans, 24.5 years for our U.S. supplemental (non-qualified) plans, 19.4 years for our international plans, and 9.2 years for our postretirement plans.
B. Actuarial Assumptions
The following table provides the weighted-average actuarial assumptions of our benefit plans:
(PERCENTAGES) 2019 2018 2017
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations
Discount rate:
U.S. qualified pension plans 3.3% 4.4% 3.8%
U.S. non-qualified pension plans 3.2% 4.3% 3.7%
International pension plans 1.7% 2.5% 2.3%
Postretirement plans 3.2% 4.3% 3.7%
Rate of compensation increase:
U.S. qualified pension plans(a) — — 2.8%
U.S. non-qualified pension plans (a) — — 2.8%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost
Discount rate:
U.S. non-qualified pension plans 4.3% 3.7% 4.2%
International pension plans interest cost 2.2% 2.0% 2.1%
International pension plans service cost 2.4% 2.3% 2.3%
Expected return on plan assets:
Rate of compensation increase:
U.S. qualified pension plans(a) — 2.8% 2.8%
U.S. non-qualified pension plans (a) — 2.8% 2.8%
(a) Effective January 1, 2018, we froze the defined benefit plans to future benefit accruals in the U.S. and members’ accrued benefits to that date no longer increase in line with future compensation increases. The
rate of compensation increase is therefore no longer an assumption used to determine the benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost.
The assumptions above are used to develop the benefit obligations at fiscal year-end and to develop the net periodic benefit cost for the subsequent fiscal year. Therefore, the
assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for each year are established at the end of each previous fiscal year, while the assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations are established at each fiscal year-end.
The net periodic benefit cost and the benefit obligations are based on actuarial assumptions that are reviewed on at least an annual basis. We revise these assumptions based
on an annual evaluation of long-term trends, as well as market conditions that may have an impact on the cost of providing retirement benefits.
The weighted-average discount rate for our U.S. defined benefit plans is determined annually and evaluated and modified to reflect at year-end the prevailing market rate of a
portfolio of high-quality fixed income investments, rated AA/Aa or better that reflect the rates at which the pension benefits could be effectively settled. For our international
plans, the discount rates are set by benchmarking against investment grade corporate bonds rated AA/Aa or better, including, when there is sufficient data, a yield curve
approach. These rate determinations are made consistent with local requirements. Overall, the yield curves used to measure the benefit obligations at year-end 2019 resulted
in lower discount rates as compared to the prior year.

The following table provides the healthcare cost trend rate assumptions for our U.S. postretirement benefit plans:
2019 2018
Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year (up to age 65) 5.6% 5.8%
Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year (age 65 and older) 6.0% 6.5%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline 4.5% 4.5%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate 2037 2037
The following table provides the effects as of December 31, 2019 of a one-percentage-point increase or decrease in the healthcare cost trend rate assumed for postretirement
benefits:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Increase Decrease
Effect on total service and interest cost components $ 2 $ (2)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation 38 (27)
Actuarial and other assumptions for pension and postretirement plans can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily
on estimates and assumptions. For a description of the risks associated with estimates and assumptions, see Note 1C.
C. Obligations and Funded Status
The following table provides an analysis of the changes in our benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status of our benefit plans:
Pension Plans
U.S. Qualified (Non-Qualified) International Plans
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Change in benefit obligation(a)

Benefit obligation, beginning $ 15,141 $ 16,702 $ 1,280 $ 1,495 $ 9,952 $ 10,607 $ 1,870 $ 2,028
Service cost — — — — 125 136 37 39
Interest cost 629 598 47 55 215 212 75 72
Employee contributions — — — — 7 7 84 102
Plan amendments — (22) — — 18 29 (56) 2
Changes in actuarial assumptions and other 2,001 (1,219) 152 (152) 1,224 (169) (87) (122)
Foreign exchange impact — — — — (33) (457) (1) (4)
Acquisitions/divestitures/other, net (4) — (1) — (55) (2) (36) —
Curtailments — 11 — 1 (2) (3) — (1)
Settlements (692) (391) (70) (72) (34) (34) — —
Special termination benefits 4 6 17 10 — — 2 2
Benefits paid (544) (546) (74) (58) (360) (373) (221) (249)
Benefit obligation, ending(a) 16,535 15,141 1,351 1,280 11,059 9,952 1,667 1,870

Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets, beginning 13,051 14,284 — — 8,215 8,863 469 494
Actual gain/(loss) on plan assets 2,760 (796) — — 873 (77) 50 (22)
Company contributions 11 500 144 129 230 209 137 145
Employee contributions — — — — 7 7 84 102
Foreign exchange impact — — — — 42 (380) — —
Acquisitions/divestitures, net — — — — (16) — — —
Settlements (692) (391) (70) (72) (34) (34) — —
Benefits paid (544) (546) (74) (58) (360) (373) (221) (249)
Fair value of plan assets, ending 14,586 13,051 — — 8,956 8,215 519 469
Funded status—Plan assets less than benefit
obligation $ (1,949) $ (2,089) $ (1,351) $ (1,280) $ (2,103) $ (1,738) $ (1,148) $ (1,401)
(a) The PBO represents the present value of the benefit obligation earned through the end of the year and factors in future compensation increases. The ABO is similar to the PBO but does not factor in future
compensation increases. For the U.S. qualified and supplemental (non-qualified) pension plans, the benefit obligation is the PBO, which is also equal to the ABO. Effective January 1, 2018, we froze the defined
benefit plans to future benefit accruals in the U.S. and members’ accrued benefits to that date no longer increase in line with future compensation increases. The rate of compensation increase is therefore no
longer an assumption used to determine the benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost. For the international pension plans, the benefit obligation is the PBO. The ABO for our international pension plans was
$10.6 billion in 2019 and $9.5 billion in 2018. For the postretirement plans, the benefit obligation is the ABO.

The following table provides information as to how the funded status is recognized in our consolidated balance sheets:
As of December 31,
Pension Plans
Noncurrent assets (a) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 453 $ 401 $ — $ —
Current liabilities(b) — (1) (189) (167) (30) (28) (24) (29)
Noncurrent liabilities(c) (1,949) (2,088) (1,162) (1,113) (2,526) (2,111) (1,124) (1,371)
Funded status $ (1,949) $ (2,089) $ (1,351) $ (1,280) $ (2,103) $ (1,738) $ (1,148) $ (1,401)
(a) Included in Other noncurrent assets.
(b) Included in Accrued compensation and related items.
(c) As of December 31, 2019, included in Pension benefit obligations, net and Postretirement benefit obligations, net, as appropriate. In 2018, included in Pension benefit obligations, net and Postretirement benefit
obligations, net, as well as in Liabilities held for sale (see Note 2C), as appropriate.
The following table provides the pre-tax components of cumulative amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
As of December 31,
Pension Plans
Actuarial losses(a) $ (4,812) $ (5,061) $ (484) $ (370) $ (2,921) $ (2,372) $ (76) $ (202)
Prior service (costs)/credits (2) 1 — 1 (21) — 830 994
Total $ (4,814) $ (5,060) $ (485) $ (370) $ (2,942) $ (2,372) $ 754 $ 792
(a) The accumulated actuarial losses primarily represent the impact of changes in discount rates and other assumptions that result in cumulative changes in our PBO, as well as the cumulative difference between the
expected return and actual return on plan assets. These accumulated actuarial losses are recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss and are amortized into net periodic benefit costs primarily over the
average remaining service period for active participants for plans that are not frozen or the average life expectancy of plan participants for frozen plans, primarily using the corridor approach.
The following table provides information related to the funded status of selected benefit plans:
As of December 31,
Pension Plans
U.S. Supplemental (Non-
U.S. Qualified Qualified) International
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Pension plans with an ABO in excess of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets $ 14,586 $ 13,051 $ — $ — $ 5,843 $ 4,514
ABO 16,535 15,141 1,351 1,280 7,960 6,286
Pension plans with a PBO in excess of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets 14,586 13,051 — — 5,947 5,432
PBO 16,535 15,141 1,351 1,280 8,503 7,571
All of our U.S. plans and many of our international plans were underfunded as of December 31, 2019.


D. Plan Assets
The following table provides the components of plan assets:

Fair Value(a) Fair Value(a)
As of Assets As of Assets
December 31, Measured at December 31, Measured at
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 NAV(b) 2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 NAV(b)
U.S. qualified pension plans

Cash and cash equivalents $ 363 $ 80 $ 284 $ — $ — $ 443 $ 53 $ 390 $ — $ —
Equity securities:
Global equity securities 3,464 3,406 57 — — 3,156 3,119 37 — —
Equity commingled funds 1,179 — 819 — 360 933 — 634 — 299
Fixed income securities:

Corporate debt securities 5,292 10 5,281 1 — 4,654 1 4,650 3 —
Government and agency
obligations 1,799 — 1,799 — — 1,391 — 1,391 — —
Fixed income commingled funds 6 — 6 — — 96 — — — 96
Other investments:
Partnership investments(c) 1,212 — — — 1,212 1,165 — — — 1,165
Insurance contracts 196 — 196 — — 192 — 192 — —
Other commingled funds(d) 1,075 — 9 — 1,066 1,021 — — — 1,021
Total $ 14,586 $ 3,496 $ 8,451 $ 1 $ 2,638 $ 13,051 $ 3,173 $ 7,294 $ 3 $ 2,581
International pension plans

Cash and cash equivalents $ 221 $ 33 $ 187 $ — $ — $ 246 $ 39 $ 208 $ — $ —
Equity securities:
Global equity securities — — — — — 2 2 — — —
Equity commingled funds 1,922 — 1,548 — 374 1,876 — 1,413 — 463
Fixed income securities:

Corporate debt securities 796 — 796 — — 727 — 727 — —
Government and agency
obligations(e) 1,200 — 1,200 — — 1,305 — 1,305 — —
Fixed income commingled funds 2,201 — 1,031 — 1,171 1,770 — 1,007 — 762
Other investments:
Partnership investments(c) 66 — 3 — 63 57 — 4 — 53
Insurance contracts(f) 1,027 — 82 944 1 759 — 74 684 1
Other(d), (f) 1,524 — 82 398 1,043 1,473 — 71 382 1,020
Total $ 8,956 $ 33 $ 4,929 $ 1,342 $ 2,652 $ 8,215 $ 40 $ 4,809 $ 1,065 $ 2,300
U.S. postretirement plans(g)

Insurance contracts $ 519 $ — $ 519 $ — $ — $ 469 $ — $ 469 $ — $ —
(a) Fair values are determined based on valuation inputs categorized as Level 1, 2 or 3 (see Note 1E).
(b) Certain investments that are measured at NAV per share (or its equivalent) have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The NAV amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the
fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented for the total pension benefits plan assets.
(c) Mainly includes investments in private equity, private debt, public equity limited partnerships, and, to a lesser extent, real estate and venture capital.
(d) Mostly includes, for U.S. plan assets, investments in hedge funds and, to a lesser extent, real estate and, for international plan assets, investments in real estate and hedge funds.
(e) Government and agency obligations are inclusive of repurchase agreements.
(f) See below for a tabular analysis of the changes in Level 3 investments valued using significant unobservable inputs.
(g) Reflects postretirement plan assets, which support a portion of our U.S. retiree medical plans.

The following table provides an analysis of the changes in our more significant investments valued using significant unobservable inputs:
International Pension Plans
Insurance contracts Other
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Fair value, beginning $ 684 $ 420 $ 382 $ 468

Actual return on plan assets:
Assets held, ending 50 1 6 15
Purchases, sales, and settlements, net (40) 188 6 (31)
Transfer into/(out of) Level 3 247 107 — (51)
Exchange rate changes 2 (31) 4 (20)
Fair value, ending $ 944 $ 684 $ 398 $ 382
A single estimate of fair value can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. For a
description of our general accounting policies associated with developing fair value estimates, see Note 1E. For a description of the risks associated with estimates and
assumptions, see Note 1C.
Equity securities, Fixed income securities and Other investments may each be combined into commingled funds. Most commingled funds are valued to reflect the interest in
the fund based on the reported year-end NAV. Partnership and Other investments are valued based on year-end reported NAV (or its equivalent), with adjustments as
appropriate for lagged reporting of up to three months.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of our pension and postretirement plans’ assets:
• Cash and cash equivalents: Level 1 investments may include cash, cash equivalents and foreign currency valued using exchange rates. Level 2 investments may include
short-term investment funds which are commingled funds priced at a stable NAV by the administrator of the funds.
• Equity securities: Level 1 investments may include individual securities that are valued at the closing price or last trade reported on the major market on which they are
traded. Level 1 and Level 2 investments may include commingled funds that have a readily determinable fair value based on quoted prices on an exchange or a published
NAV derived from the quoted prices in active markets of the underlying securities. Level 3 investments may include individual securities that are unlisted, delisted,
suspended, or illiquid and are typically valued using their last available price.
• Fixed income securities: Level 1 investments may include individual securities that are valued at the closing price or last trade reported on the major market on which they
are traded. Level 2 investments may include commingled funds that have a readily determinable fair value based on observable prices of the underlying securities. Level 2
investments may include corporate bonds, government and government agency obligations and other fixed income securities valued using bid evaluation pricing models or
quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. Level 3 investments may include securities that are valued using alternative pricing sources, such as investment
managers or brokers, which use proprietary pricing models that incorporate unobservable inputs.
• Other investments: Level 1 investments may include individual securities that are valued at the closing price or last trade reported on the major market on which they are
traded. Level 2 investments may include Insurance contracts which invest in interest bearing cash, U.S. government securities and corporate debt instruments.
Certain investments are authorized to include derivatives, such as equity or bond futures, swaps, options and currency futures or forwards for managing risks and exposures.

The following table provides the long-term target asset allocations ranges and the percentage of the fair value of plan assets for benefit plans:
As of December 31,
Target
Allocation Percentage Percentage of Plan Assets
(PERCENTAGES) 2019 2019 2018
U.S. qualified pension plans
Cash and cash equivalents 0-10% 2.5% 3.4%
Equity securities 35-55% 31.8% 31.3%
Fixed income securities 28-53% 48.7% 47.1%
Other investments 5-20% 17.0% 18.2%
Total 100% 100% 100%
International pension plans

Cash and cash equivalents 0-10% 2.5% 3.0%
Equity securities 20-40% 21.5% 22.9%
Fixed income securities 35-60% 46.9% 46.3%
Other investments 10-35% 29.2% 27.9%
Total 100% 100% 100%
U.S. postretirement plans

Cash and cash equivalents 0-5% — —
Other investments 95-100% 100% 100%
Total 100% 100% 100%
Global plan assets are managed with the objective of generating returns that will enable the plans to meet their future obligations, while seeking to manage net periodic benefit
costs and cash contributions over the long-term. We utilize long-term asset allocation ranges in the management of our plans’ invested assets. Our long-term return
expectations are developed based on a diversified, global investment strategy that takes into account historical experience, as well as the impact of portfolio diversification,
active portfolio management, and our view of current and future economic and financial market conditions. As market conditions and other factors change, we may adjust our
targets accordingly and our asset allocations may vary from the target allocations.
Our long-term asset allocation ranges reflect our asset class return expectations and tolerance for investment risk within the context of the respective plans’ long-term benefit
obligations. These ranges are supported by analysis that incorporates historical and expected returns by asset class, as well as volatilities and correlations across asset
classes and our liability profile.
Each pension plan is overseen by a local committee or board that is responsible for the overall investment of the pension plan assets. In determining investment policies and
associated target allocations, each committee or board considers a wide variety of factors. As such, the target asset allocation for each of our international pension plans is set
on a standalone basis by the relevant board or committee. The target asset allocation ranges shown for the international pension plans seek to reflect the combined target
allocations across all such plans, while also showing the range within which the target allocations for each plan typically falls.
The investment managers of certain separately managed accounts, commingled funds and private equity funds may be permitted to use repurchase agreements and derivative
securities, including U.S. Treasury and equity futures contracts as described in each respective investment management, subscription, partnership or other governing
agreement.
E. Cash Flows
It is our practice to fund amounts for our qualified pension plans that are at least sufficient to meet the minimum requirements set forth in applicable employee benefit laws and
local tax laws.

The following table provides the expected future cash flow information related to our benefit plans:
Pension Plans
U.S. Supplemental
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) U.S. Qualified (Non-Qualified) International Postretirement Plans
Expected employer contributions:
2020(a) $ 1,276 $ 189 $ 172 $ 147
Expected benefit payments:

2020 $ 1,477 $ 189 $ 355 $ 153
2021 1,089 113 358 137
2022 1,048 115 364 137
2023 1,046 110 366 136
2024 1,028 103 375 134
2025–2029 4,759 435 1,992 642
(a) For the U.S. qualified plans, we plan to make a $1.25 billion voluntary contribution in the second half of 2020.
The above table reflects the total U.S. and international plan benefits projected to be paid from the plans or from our general assets under the current actuarial assumptions
used for the calculation of the benefit obligation and, therefore, actual benefit payments may differ from projected benefit payments.
F. Defined Contribution Plans
We have defined contribution plans in the U.S. and several other countries. For the majority of the U.S. defined contribution plans, employees may contribute a portion of their
salaries and bonuses to the plans, and we match, in cash, a portion of the employee contributions. Beginning on January 1, 2011, for newly hired non-union employees, rehires
and transfers to the U.S. or Puerto Rico, we no longer offer a defined benefit pension plan and, instead, offer a Retirement Savings Contribution (RSC) in the defined
contribution plan. The RSC is an annual non-contributory employer contribution (that is not dependent upon the participant making a contribution) determined based on each
employee’s eligible compensation, age and years of service. Beginning on January 1, 2018, all non-union employees in the U.S. and Puerto Rico defined benefit plans
transitioned to the RSC in the defined contribution plans. We recorded charges related to the employer contributions to global defined contribution plans of $659 million in
2019, $622 million in 2018 and $380 million in 2017.
Note 12. Equity

A. Common Stock
We purchase our common stock through privately negotiated transactions or in open market purchases as circumstances and prices warrant. Purchased shares under each of
the share-purchase plans, which are authorized by our Board of Directors, are available for general corporate purposes. On October 23, 2014, we announced that the Board of
Directors had authorized an $11 billion share repurchase program, which was exhausted in the first quarter of 2017. In December 2015, the Board of Directors authorized a
new $11 billion share repurchase program, which was exhausted in the third quarter of 2018. In December 2017, the Board of Directors authorized an additional $10 billion
share repurchase program, which was exhausted in the first quarter of 2019. In December 2018, the Board of Directors authorized a new $10 billion share repurchase program
to be utilized over time and share repurchases commenced thereunder in the first quarter of 2019.
On February 2, 2017, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement with Citibank to repurchase $5 billion of our common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the
agreement, on February 6, 2017, we paid $5 billion to Citibank and received an initial delivery of approximately 126 million shares of our common stock from Citibank at a price
of $31.73 per share, which represented, based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 2, 2017, approximately 80% of the notional amount of the
accelerated share repurchase agreement. On May 16, 2017, the accelerated share repurchase agreement with Citibank was completed, which, per the terms of the
agreement, resulted in Citibank owing us a certain number of shares of Pfizer common stock. Pursuant to the agreement’s settlement terms, we received an additional 24
million shares of our common stock from Citibank on May 19, 2017. The average price paid for all of the shares delivered under the accelerated share repurchase agreement
was $33.31 per share. The common stock received is included in Treasury Stock. This agreement was entered into pursuant to our previously announced share repurchase
authorization.
On March 12, 2018, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement with Citibank to repurchase $4 billion of our common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the
agreement, on March 14, 2018, we paid $4 billion to Citibank and received an initial delivery of approximately 87 million shares of our common stock from Citibank at a price of
$36.61 per share, which represented, based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on March 12, 2018, approximately 80% of the notional amount of the
accelerated share repurchase agreement. On September 5, 2018, the accelerated share repurchase agreement with Citibank was completed, which, per the terms of the
agreement, resulted in Citibank owing us a certain number of shares of Pfizer common stock. Pursuant to the agreement’s settlement terms, we received an additional 21
million shares of our common stock from Citibank on September 7, 2018. The average price paid for all of the shares delivered under the accelerated share repurchase
agreement was $36.86 per share. The common stock received is included in Treasury stock. This agreement was entered into pursuant to our previously announced share
repurchase authorization.
On February 7, 2019, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement with GS&Co. to repurchase approximately $6.8 billion of our common stock. Pursuant to the
terms of the agreement, on February 12, 2019, we paid approximately $6.8 billion to GS&Co. and received an initial delivery of approximately 130 million shares of our
common stock from GS&Co., which represented, based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 7, 2019, approximately 80% of the notional
amount of the accelerated share repurchase agreement.

On August 1, 2019, the accelerated share repurchase agreement with GS&Co. was completed, which, per the terms of the agreement, resulted in GS&Co. owing us a certain
number of shares of Pfizer common stock. Pursuant to the agreement’s settlement terms, we received an additional 33.5 million shares of our common stock from GS&Co. on
August 5, 2019. The average price paid for all of the shares delivered under the accelerated share repurchase agreement was $41.42 per share. The common stock received
is included in Treasury stock. This agreement was entered into pursuant to our previously announced share repurchase authorization.
Open market purchases totaled $2.1 billion in 2019 and $8.2 billion in 2018 under our publicly announced share-purchase plans.
The following table provides the number of shares of our common stock purchased and the cost of purchases under our publicly announced share purchase plans, including
our accelerated share repurchase agreements:
(SHARES IN MILLIONS, DOLLARS IN BILLIONS) 2019(a) 2018(b) 2017c)
Shares of common stock purchased 213 307 150
Cost of purchase $ 8.9 $ 12.2 $ 5.0
(a) Represents shares purchased pursuant to the accelerated share repurchase agreement with GS&Co. entered into on February 7, 2019, as well as other share repurchases. See above for additional information.
(b) Represents shares purchased pursuant to the accelerated share repurchase agreement with Citibank entered into on March 12, 2018, as well as other share repurchases. See above for additional information.
(c) Represents shares purchased pursuant to the accelerated share repurchase agreement with Citibank entered into on February 2, 2017. See above for additional information.
After giving effect to the accelerated share repurchase agreement, as well as other share repurchases through December 31, 2019, our remaining share-purchase
authorization was approximately $5.3 billion at December 31, 2019.
B. Preferred Stock
The Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock (7,500 shares designated) is held by an employee stock ownership plan (Preferred ESOP) Trust and provides dividends at
the rate of 6.25%, which are accumulated and paid quarterly. The per-share stated value is $40,300 and the preferred stock ranks senior to our common stock as to dividends
and liquidation rights. Each share is convertible, at the holder’s option, into 2,574.87 shares of our common stock with equal voting rights. The conversion option is indexed to
our common stock and requires share settlement, and, therefore, is reported at the fair value at the date of issuance. We may redeem the preferred stock at any time or upon
termination of the Preferred ESOP, at our option, in cash, in shares of common stock, or a combination of both at a price of $40,300 per share.
C. Employee Stock Ownership Plans
We have two employee stock ownership plans (collectively, the ESOPs), the Preferred ESOP and another that holds common stock of the Company (Common ESOP).
Allocated shares held by the Common ESOP, including reinvested dividends, are considered outstanding for EPS calculations and the eventual conversion of allocated
preferred shares held by the Preferred ESOP are assumed in the diluted EPS calculation. As of December 31, 2019, the Preferred ESOP held preferred shares convertible into
approximately 1 million shares of our common stock, and the Common ESOP held approximately 47 million shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2019, all shares
of preferred and common stock held by the ESOPs have been allocated to the Pfizer U.S. defined contribution plan participants. The compensation cost related to the Common
ESOP was $20 million in 2019, $19 million in 2018 and $11 million in 2017.
Note 13. Share-Based Payments

Our compensation programs can include share-based payments. The award value is determined by reference to the fair value of share-based awards to similar employees in
competitive survey data or industry peer groups used for compensation purposes; and is allocated between different long-term incentive vehicles, in the form of TSRUs,
PTSRUs, PTUs, RSUs, PPSs, PSAs and stock options, as determined by the Compensation Committee.
The 2019 Stock Plan (2019 Plan) replaced and superseded the 2014 Plan. The 2019 Plan provides for 400 million shares to be authorized for grants, plus any shares
remaining available for grant under the 2014 Plan as of April 25, 2019 (the carryforward shares). In addition, the 2019 Plan provides that the number of stock options, Stock
Appreciation Rights (known as TSRUs and PTSRUs), RSUs, or other performance-based awards that may be granted to any one individual during any 36-month period is
limited to 20 million shares, and that RSUs, PPSs and PSAs count as three shares, while TSRUs, PTSRUs and stock options count as one share, toward the maximum shares
available under the 2019 plan. As of December 31, 2019, 518 million shares were available for award.
Although not required to do so, we have used authorized and unissued shares and, to a lesser extent, treasury stock to satisfy our obligations under these programs.

A. Impact on Net Income
The following table provides the components of share-based compensation expense and the associated tax benefit:
TSRUs(a) $ 294 $ 302 $ 221
RSUs 275 286 301
PPSs 114 276 209
PSAs 28 62 47
Stock options 7 12 55
Directors’ compensation — 10 7
Share-based payment expense 718 949 840
Tax benefit for share-based compensation expense (137) (180) (163)
Share-based payment expense, net of tax $ 581 $ 769 $ 677
(a) Includes expense for PTSRUs, described in Note 13C below, which is not significant for all years presented.
The table above excludes total expense due to the modification for share-based awards in connection with our Organizing for Growth initiative. The total expense was not
significant for 2019 and 2018, the year in which the Organization for Growth Initiative began and is recorded in Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs (see
Note 3).
Amounts capitalized as part of inventory cost were not significant for any period presented.
B. Total Shareholder Return Units
TSRUs are awarded to senior and other key management, and to certain other employees. TSRUs entitle the holders to receive a number of shares of our common stock with
a value equal to the difference between the defined settlement price and the grant price, plus the dividends accumulated during the five-year or seven-year term, if and to the
extent the total value is positive. The settlement price is the average closing price of our common stock during the 20 trading days ending on the fifth or seventh anniversary of
the grant, as applicable; the grant price is the closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant. The TSRUs are automatically settled on the fifth or seventh
anniversary of the grant but vest on the third anniversary of the grant, after which time there is no longer a substantial risk of forfeiture.
Retiree eligible holders (at least age 55 with at least ten years of service) can elect to exercise and convert his/her TSRUs, when vested, into PTUs. The value received upon
the election and conversion is calculated by taking the change in stock price (20 trading day average ending on the exercise date (Election Price) less the grant price) plus
accumulated dividends from the grant date, times the number of TSRUs exercised. This value is divided by the Election Price to determine the number of PTUs. The PTUs will
be entitled to earn Dividend Equivalent Units (DEUs), and the PTUs and DEUs will be settled in our common stock on the TSRUs’ original settlement date (i.e., the fifth or
seventh anniversary of grant), and will be subject to all of the terms and conditions of the original grant including forfeiture provisions. We measure the value of TSRU grants as
of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The values determined through this fair value methodology generally are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
vesting term into Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses, and/or Research and development expenses, as appropriate.
The following table provides the weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation of TSRUs:
2019 2018 2017
Expected dividend yield (a) 3.27% 3.73% 3.69%
Risk-free interest rate(b) 2.55% 2.60% 1.98%
Expected stock price volatility (c) 18.34% 20.00% 18.39%
Contractual term (years) 5.13 5.12 5.11
(a) Determined using a constant dividend yield during the expected term of the TSRU.
(b) Determined using the interpolated yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues.
(c) Determined using implied volatility, after consideration of historical volatility.
The following table summarizes all TSRU activity during 2019:

Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Weighted-Average
TSRUs Fair Value Grant Price
(Thousands) Per TSRU Per TSRU
Nonvested, December 31, 2018 138,945 $ 6.48 $ 33.44
Granted 39,246 8.52 43.35
Vested (47,710) 5.92 30.70
Forfeited (7,826) 7.63 38.90
Nonvested, December 31, 2019 122,654 $ 7.53 $ 38.01

The following table summarizes TSRU and PTU information as of December 31, 2019(a), (b):
Weighted- Weighted-Average Aggregate
Average Remaining Intrinsic
TSRUs PTUs Grant Price Contractual Term Value
(Thousands) (Thousands) Per TSRU (Years) (Millions)
TSRUs Outstanding 179,999 — $ 35.33 2.6 $ 1,415
TSRUs Vested 57,345 — 31.04 1.3 775
TSRUs Expected to vest(c) 118,618 — 37.23 3.2 1,096
TSRUs exercised and converted to PTUs — 1,299 $ — 0.7 $ 51
(a) In 2019, we settled 7,953,671 TSRUs with a weighted-average grant price of $27.33 per unit.
(b) In 2019, 2,173,131 TSRUs with a weighted-average grant price of $30.68 per unit were converted into 844,871 PTUs.
(c) The number of TSRUs expected to vest takes into account an estimate of expected forfeitures.
The following table provides data related to all TSRU activity:

(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER TSRU AMOUNTS) 2019 2018 2017
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per TSRU $ 8.52 $ 7.42 $ 6.23
Total compensation cost related to nonvested TSRU grants not yet recognized, pre-tax $ 229 $ 246 $ 232
Weighted-average period over which TSRU cost is expected to be recognized (years) 1.6 1.6 1.7
C. Performance Total Shareholder Return Units
On December 29, 2017, in connection with the Board’s succession planning,1,372,213 PTSRUs were awarded to the then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and 343,053
PTSRUs were awarded to the Group President, Chief Business Officer (former role Group President, Pfizer Innovative Health) at a grant price of $36.22 and at a grant-date fair
value of $5.83 per TSRU. In addition to having the same characteristics of TSRUs, PTSRU grants require special service and performance conditions.
We measure the value of PTSRU grants as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The values determined through this fair value methodology generally are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting term into Selling, informational and administrative expenses as appropriate.
D. Restricted Stock Units
RSUs are awarded to select employees and, when vested, entitle the holder to receive a specified number of shares of our common stock, including shares resulting from
dividend equivalents paid on such RSUs. For RSUs granted during the periods presented, in virtually all instances, the units vest after three years of continuous service from
the grant date.
We measure the value of RSU grants as of the grant date using the closing price of our common stock. The values determined through this fair value methodology generally
are amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting term into Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses, and/or Research and development expenses,
as appropriate.
The following table summarizes all RSU activity during 2019:

Weighted-Average
Shares Grant-Date Fair Value
(Thousands) Per Share
Nonvested, December 31, 2018 27,276 $ 33.70
Granted 7,478 43.17
Vested (10,644) 31.66
Reinvested dividend equivalents 911 39.64
Forfeited (1,614) 38.82
The following table provides data related to all RSU activity:

Total fair value of shares vested (a) $ 454 $ 146 $ 584
Total compensation cost related to nonvested RSU awards not yet recognized, pre-tax $ 241 $ 256 $ 254
Weighted-average period over which RSU cost is expected to be recognized (years) 1.7 1.7 1.7
(a) 2017 includes the modification for a commitment to pay approximately 6.4 million RSUs to approximately 9,900 employees, including senior and key management employees, for 6.6 million RSUs. These shares
were paid in the first quarter of 2018.

E. Portfolio Performance Shares
PPSs are awards granted to select employees which, when vested, entitle the holder to receive, at the end of the performance period, a number of shares within a possible
range of shares of our common stock, including shares resulting from dividend equivalents paid on such shares. For PPSs granted during the period presented, the awards
vest after three years of continuous service from the grant date and the number of shares paid, if any, depends on the achievement of predetermined goals related to Pfizer’s
long-term product portfolio during a five-year performance period from the year of the grant date. The number of shares that may be earned over the performance period
ranges from 0% to 200% of the initial award.
We measure the value of PPS grants as of the grant date using the intrinsic value method, for which we use the closing price of our common stock. The values are amortized
on a straight-line basis over the probable vesting term into Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses and/or Research and development expenses, as
appropriate, and adjusted each reporting period, as necessary, to reflect changes in the price of Pfizer’s common stock, changes in the number of shares that are probable of
being earned and changes in management’s assessment of the probability that the specified performance criteria will be achieved and/or changes in management’s
assessment of the probable vesting term.
The following table summarizes all PPS activity during 2019, with the shares representing the maximum award that could be achieved:
Weighted-Average
Shares Intrinsic Value
Granted 6,212 43.35
Vested (6,882) 42.89
Forfeited (897) 39.93
Nonvested, December 31, 2019(a) 17,694 $ 39.18
(a) Vested and non-vested shares outstanding, but not paid as of December 31, 2019 were 32.0 million.
The following table provides data related to all PPS activity:

Total fair value of shares vested $ 136 $ 169 $ 131
Total compensation cost related to nonvested PPS awards not yet recognized, pre-tax $ 87 $ 102 $ 94
Weighted-average period over which PPS cost is expected to be recognized (years) 1.8 1.8 1.7
F. Performance Share Awards
PSAs are awarded to senior and other key management. PSAs vest after three years of continuous service from the grant date. The number of shares paid, if any, including
shares resulting from dividend equivalents, for awards granted in 2015 and later, depends upon the achievement of predetermined goals related to two measures: (i) adjusted
operating income (for performance years through 2018) or adjusted net income (for 2019 and later years, except for the 2017 PSAs) over three one-year periods; and (ii) TSR
as compared to the NYSE ARCA Pharmaceutical Index (DRG Index) over the three-year performance period. The number of shares that are earned over the performance
period ranges from 0% to 200% of the initial award.
We measure the value of PSA grants as of the grant date using the intrinsic value method, for which we use the closing price of our common stock. The values are amortized
on a straight-line basis over the probable vesting term into Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses, and/or Research and development expenses, as
appropriate, and adjusted each reporting period, as necessary, to reflect changes in the price of Pfizer’s common stock, changes in the number of shares that are probable of
being earned and changes in management’s assessment of the probability that the specified performance criteria will be achieved.
The following table summarizes all PSA activity during 2019, with the shares granted representing the maximum award that could be achieved:
Weighted-Average
Shares Intrinsic Value
Granted 1,716 43.35
Vested (1,481) 42.89

The following table provides data related to all PSA activity:

Total fair value of shares vested(a) $ 64 $ 4 $ 58
Total compensation cost related to nonvested PSA grants not yet recognized, pre-tax $ 34 $ 41 $ 34
Weighted-average period over which PSA cost is expected to be recognized (years) 1.8 1.8 1.8
(a) 2017 includes the modification for a commitment to pay 1.1 million PSAs to approximately 90 employees, including senior and key management employees, for 1.1 million PSAs. These shares
were paid in the first quarter of 2018.
G. Stock Options
Stock options are awarded to select employees and, when vested, entitle the holder to purchase a specified number of shares of our common stock at a price per share equal
to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant.
Beginning in 2016, only a limited set of overseas employees received stock option grants. No stock options were awarded to senior and other key management in any period
presented; however, stock options were awarded to certain other employees. In virtually all instances, stock options granted vest after three years of continuous service from
the grant date and have a contractual term of 10 years. In most cases, stock options must be held for at least one year from the grant date before any vesting may occur. In the
event of a sale of business or plant closing or restructuring, options held by employees are immediately vested and are exercisable for a period of 3 months following the date
employment is terminated or through their remaining term, depending on various conditions.
We measure the value of stock option grants as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The values determined through this fair value
methodology generally are amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting term into Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses, and/or Research and
development expenses, as appropriate.
The following table provides the weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation of stock options:
2019 2018 2017
Expected dividend yield (a) 3.27% 3.73% 3.69%
Risk-free interest rate(b) 2.66% 2.85% 2.23%
Expected stock price volatility(c) 18.34% 20.02% 18.39%
Expected term (years)(d) 6.75 6.75 6.75
(a) Determined using a constant dividend yield during the expected term of the option.
(b) Determined using the interpolated yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues.
(c) Determined using implied volatility, after consideration of historical volatility.
(d) Determined using historical exercise and post-vesting termination patterns.
The following table summarizes all stock option activity during 2019:
Weighted-Average
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Aggregate
Shares Exercise Price Term Intrinsic Value(a)
(Thousands) Per Share (Years) (Millions)
Outstanding, December 31, 2018 103,791 $ 27.69
Granted 1,181 43.35
Exercised (15,964) 24.84
Expired (353) 31.12
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 88,600 28.39 3.6 $ 960
Vested and expected to vest, December 31, 2019(b) 88,469 28.37 3.6 960
Exercisable, December 31, 2019 85,372 $ 28.04 3.4 $ 951
(a) Market price of our underlying common stock less exercise price.
(b) The number of options expected to vest takes into account an estimate of expected forfeitures.

The following table summarizes data related to all stock option activity:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER STOCK OPTION AMOUNTS) 2019 2018 2017
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per stock option $ 5.98 $ 5.06 $ 4.01
Aggregate intrinsic value on exercise $ 261 $ 625 $ 331
Cash received upon exercise $ 394 $ 1,259 $ 862
Tax benefits realized related to exercise $ 47 $ 115 $ 95
Total compensation cost related to nonvested stock options not yet recognized, pre-tax $ 5 $ 5 $ 10
Weighted-average period over which stock option compensation cost is expected to be recognized (years) 1.6 1.7 0.8
Note 14. Earnings Per Common Share Attributable to Pfizer Inc. Common Shareholders
The following table provides the detailed calculation of Earnings per common share (EPS):
(IN MILLIONS) 2019 2018 2017
EPS Numerator––Basic
Income from continuing operations $ 16,298 $ 11,179 $ 21,353
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 29 36 47
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc. 16,269 11,143 21,306
Less: Preferred stock dividends––net of tax 1 1 1
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders 16,268 11,142 21,305
Discontinued operations––net of tax 4 10 2
Less: Discontinued operations––net of tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests — — —
Discontinued operations––net of tax, attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders 4 10 2
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 16,272 $ 11,152 $ 21,307
EPS Numerator––Diluted
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders and assumed conversions $ 16,269 $ 11,143 $ 21,306
Discontinued operations––net of tax, attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders and assumed conversions 4 10 2
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders and assumed conversions $ 16,273 $ 11,153 $ 21,308
EPS Denominator
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding––Basic(a) 5,569 5,872 5,970
Common-share equivalents: stock options, stock issuable under employee compensation plans, convertible
preferred stock and accelerated share repurchase agreements(a) 106 105 89
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding––Diluted 5,675 5,977 6,058
Stock options that had exercise prices greater than the average market price of our common stock issuable
under employee compensation plans(b) 2 2 36
Cash dividends declared per share $ 1.46 $ 1.38 $ 1.30
(a) 2017 includes the effect of the modification for a commitment to pay 15.2 million common-share equivalents that were scheduled for near-term settlement. These common share equivalents were paid in the first
quarter of 2018.
(b) These common stock equivalents were outstanding for the periods presented, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for those periods because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive
effect.
Note 15. Insurance

Our insurance coverage reflects market conditions (including cost and availability) existing at the time it is written, and our decision to obtain insurance coverage or to self-
insure varies accordingly. Depending upon the cost and availability of insurance and the nature of the risk involved, the amount of self-insurance may be significant. The cost
and availability of coverage have resulted in self-insuring certain exposures, including product liability. If we incur substantial liabilities that are not covered by insurance or
substantially exceed insurance coverage and that are in excess of existing accruals, there could be a material adverse effect on our cash flows or results of operations in the
period in which the amounts are paid and/or accrued (see Note 16).
Note 16. Contingencies and Certain Commitments

We and certain of our subsidiaries are subject to numerous contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business, including tax and legal contingencies. For a discussion of
our tax contingencies, see Note 5D. For a discussion of our legal contingencies, see below.


A. Legal Proceedings
Our legal contingencies include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Patent litigation, which typically involves challenges to the coverage and/or validity of patents on various products, processes or dosage forms. We are the plaintiff in the
majority of these actions. An adverse outcome in actions in which we are the plaintiff could result in loss of patent protection for a drug, a significant loss of revenues from
that drug or impairment of the value of associated assets.
• Product liability and other product-related litigation, which can include personal injury, consumer, off-label promotion, securities, antitrust and breach of contract claims,
among others, often involves highly complex issues relating to medical causation, label warnings and reliance on those warnings, scientific evidence and findings, actual,
provable injury and other matters.
• Commercial and other matters, which can include merger-related and product-pricing claims and environmental claims and proceedings, can involve complexities that will
vary from matter to matter.
• Government investigations, which often are related to the extensive regulation of pharmaceutical companies by national, state and local government agencies in the U.S.
and in other jurisdictions.
Certain of these contingencies could result in losses, including damages, fines and/or civil penalties, which could be substantial, and/or criminal charges.
We believe that our claims and defenses in matters in which we are a defendant are substantial, but litigation is inherently unpredictable and excessive verdicts do occur. We
do not believe that any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. However, we could incur judgments, enter into settlements or revise our
expectations regarding the outcome of certain matters, and such developments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the
amounts are accrued and/or our cash flows in the period in which the amounts are paid.
We have accrued for losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable. Substantially all of our contingencies are subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore,
determining the likelihood of a loss and/or the measurement of any loss can be complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss in
excess of amounts accrued. Our assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process
relies heavily on estimates and assumptions that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to
change those estimates and assumptions.
Amounts recorded for legal and environmental contingencies can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on
estimates and assumptions.
The principal pending matters to which we are a party are discussed below. In determining whether a pending matter is a principal matter, we consider both quantitative and
qualitative factors in order to assess materiality, such as, among other things, the amount of damages and the nature of any other relief sought in the proceeding, if such
damages and other relief are specified; our view of the merits of the claims and of the strength of our defenses; whether the action purports to be, or is, a class action and, if
not certified, our view of the likelihood that a class will be certified by the court; the jurisdiction in which the proceeding is pending; whether related actions have been
transferred to multidistrict litigation; any experience that we or, to our knowledge, other companies have had in similar proceedings; whether disclosure of the action would be
important to a reader of our financial statements, including whether disclosure might change a reader’s judgment about our financial statements in light of all of the information
that is available to the reader; the potential impact of the proceeding on our reputation; and the extent of public interest in the matter. In addition, with respect to patent matters
in which we are the plaintiff, we consider, among other things, the financial significance of the product protected by the patent(s) at issue. As a result of considering qualitative
factors in our determination of principal matters, there are some matters discussed below with respect to which management believes that the likelihood of possible loss in
excess of amounts accrued is remote.
A1. Legal Proceedings––Patent Litigation

Like other pharmaceutical companies, we are involved in numerous suits relating to our patents, including but not limited to, those discussed below. Most of the suits involve
claims by generic drug manufacturers that patents covering our products, processes or dosage forms are invalid and/or do not cover the product of the generic drug
manufacturer. Also, counterclaims, as well as various independent actions, have been filed alleging that our assertions of, or attempts to enforce, patent rights with respect to
certain products constitute unfair competition and/or violations of antitrust laws. In addition to the challenges to the U.S. patents on a number of our products that are discussed
below, patent rights to certain of our products are being challenged in various other jurisdictions. We are also party to patent damages suits in various jurisdictions pursuant to
which generic drug manufacturers, payers, governments or other parties are seeking damages from us for allegedly causing delay of generic entry. Additionally, our licensing
and collaboration partners face challenges by generic drug manufacturers to patents covering products for which we have licenses or co-promotion rights. We also are often
involved in other proceedings, such as inter partes review, post-grant review, re-examination or opposition proceedings, before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the
European Patent Office, or other foreign counterparts relating to our intellectual property or the intellectual property rights of others. Also, if one of our patents is found to be
invalid by such proceedings, generic or competitive products could be introduced into the market resulting in the erosion of sales of our existing products. For example, several
of the patents in our pneumococcal vaccine portfolio were challenged in inter partes review and post-grant review proceedings in the U.S. In October 2017, the Patent Trial and
Appeal Board (PTAB) refused to initiate proceedings as to two patents. In June 2018, the PTAB ruled on another patent, holding that one claim was valid and that all other
claims were invalid. The party challenging that patent has appealed the decision. In November 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB’s
ruling and requested that the PTAB redecide the challenge. In March and June 2019, an additional patent was found invalid in separate proceedings by the PTAB. We have
appealed. Challenges to other patents remain pending in jurisdictions outside the U.S. The invalidation of all of the patents in our pneumococcal portfolio could potentially allow
a competitor pneumococcal vaccine into the marketplace. In the event that any of the patents are found valid and infringed, a competitor pneumococcal vaccine might be
prohibited from entering the market or required to pay Pfizer a royalty. We are also subject to patent litigation pursuant to which one or more third parties seeks damages
and/or


injunctive relief to compensate for alleged infringement of its patents by our commercial or other activities. For example, our Hospira subsidiaries are involved in patent and
patent-related disputes over their attempts to bring generic pharmaceutical and biosimilar products to market. If one of our marketed products is found to infringe valid patent
rights of a third party, such third party may be awarded significant damages, or we may be prevented from further sales of that product. Such damages may be enhanced as
much as three-fold in the event that we or one of our subsidiaries, like Hospira, is found to have willfully infringed valid patent rights of a third party.
Actions In Which We Are The Plaintiff

EpiPen
In July 2010, King, which we acquired in 2011 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary, brought a patent-infringement action against Sandoz in the U.S. District Court for the District of
New Jersey in connection with Sandoz’s abbreviated new drug application filed with the FDA seeking approval to market an epinephrine injectable product. Sandoz is
challenging patents, which expire in 2025, covering the next-generation autoinjector for use with epinephrine that is sold under the EpiPen brand name.
Precedex Premix
Beginning in 2014, several generic manufacturers filed separate abbreviated new drug applications with the FDA, seeking approval to market their generic versions of our
subsidiary Hospira’s premix version of Precedex prior to the expiration of one or more patents covering the product. One of those patents expired in March 2019, while others
do not expire until 2032. Beginning in 2014, Hospira brought suit against these generic manufacturers, in some cases joined by Orion Corporation (co-owner of certain of our
Precedex premix patents). To date, two of the actions have been settled or dismissed on terms not material to Pfizer: (i) the action filed against Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc.,
which was sued along with Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC (together, succeeded by Eurohealth International Sarl) and West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp (collectively, the Ben
Venue case); and (ii) the action filed against Baxter Healthcare Corporation. The remaining actions continue as described below.
In August 2015, Hospira filed suit against Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Amneal) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware asserting the validity and infringement of
four patents relating to the Precedex premix formulations and their use, all of which expire in 2032. In January 2018, the District Court ruled that one of the four patents was
valid and infringed, and that the other three patents were invalid. In February and March 2018, respectively, each of Amneal and Hospira appealed the District Court decision to
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In January 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision.
In December 2015, Fresenius Kabi USA LLC (Fresenius) notified Hospira that it had filed an abbreviated new drug application with the FDA seeking approval to market a
generic version of Hospira’s premix version of Precedex and containing allegations that certain patents relating to the Precedex premix formulations and their use, all of which
expire in 2032, were invalid or not infringed. In January 2016, Hospira filed suit against Fresenius in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, asserting the
validity and infringement of those patents. In December 2018, the District Court ruled that the asserted claims of two patents were invalid. Hospira appealed the District Court’s
decision as to one of the patents to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In January 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District
Court’s decision.
Separate actions in which Hospira sued Par Sterile Products LLC, Gland Pharma Limited, and Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd., each in response to such generic
manufacturer’s filing of a separate abbreviated new drug application with the FDA, seeking approval to market their generic versions of our subsidiary Hospira’s premix version
of Precedex prior to the expiration of one or more patents covering the product, were stayed pending the outcome of the case against Fresenius described above.
Xeljanz (tofacitinib)
Beginning in 2017, we brought patent-infringement actions against several generic manufacturers that filed separate abbreviated new drug applications with the FDA, seeking
approval to market their generic versions of tofacitinib tablets in one or both of 5 mg and 10 mg dosage strengths, and in both immediate and extended release forms. To date,
actions against the following generic manufacturers have been settled on terms not material to Pfizer: (i) MicroLabs USA Inc. and MicroLabs Ltd.; (ii) Sun Pharmaceutical
Industries Ltd.; (iii) Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc., Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Huahai US Inc. and Solco Healthcare US, LLC; and (iv) Breckenridge
Pharmaceutical Inc., Pensa Pharma S.A. and Laboratorios Del Dr. Esteve, S.A. The remaining actions continue as described below.
In March 2017, we brought a patent-infringement action against Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Cadila Healthcare Ltd. (collectively, Zydus) in the U.S. District Court for
the District of Delaware asserting the infringement and validity of three patents: the patent covering the active ingredient expiring in December 2025, the patent covering an
enantiomer of tofacitinib expiring in 2022, and the patent covering a polymorphic form of tofacitinib expiring in 2023, which Zydus challenged in its abbreviated new drug
application seeking approval to market a generic version of tofacitinib 5 mg tablets.
In December 2018, we brought a separate patent infringement action against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Teva) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
asserting the infringement and validity of our patent covering extended release formulations of tofacitinib that was challenged by Teva in its abbreviated new drug application
seeking approval to market a generic version of tofacitinib 11 mg extended release tablets.
In March 2019, we brought a separate patent infringement action against Ajanta Pharma Ltd. and Ajanta Pharma USA Inc. (collectively, Ajanta) in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Delaware asserting the infringement and validity of two patents: the patent covering the active ingredient that expires in December 2025 and the patent covering a
polymorphic form of tofacitinib that expires in 2023, each of which Ajanta challenged in its abbreviated new drug application seeking approval to market a generic version of
tofacitinib 5 mg tablets. In August 2019, in response to a similar challenge by Ajanta relating the tofacitinib 10 mg tablets, we brought another patent infringement action against
Ajanta in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
Inlyta (axitinib)
In April 2018, Apotex Inc. notified us that it had filed an abbreviated new drug application with the FDA seeking approval to market a generic version of Inlyta. Apotex Inc.
asserts the invalidity and non-infringement of the crystalline form patent for Inlyta that expires in 2030. In May


2018, we filed suit against Apotex Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, asserting the validity and infringement of the crystalline form patent for Inlyta.
In May 2019, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited (Glenmark) notified us that it had filed an abbreviated new drug application with the FDA seeking approval to market a generic
version of Inlyta. Glenmark asserts the invalidity and non-infringement of the crystalline form patent for Inlyta that expires in 2030. In June 2019, we filed suit against Glenmark
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, asserting the validity and infringement of the crystalline form patent for Inlyta.
Kerydin (tavaborole)
In September 2018, several generic companies notified us that they had filed abbreviated new drug applications with the FDA seeking approval to market generic versions of
Kerydin. The generic companies assert the invalidity and non-infringement of methods of use and formulation patents for tavaborole that expire in 2026 and 2027, including
pediatric exclusivity. In October 2018, Anacor, our wholly-owned subsidiary, filed infringement lawsuits against each of the generic filers in the U.S. District Court for the District
of Delaware and the U.S. District Court for the District of West Virginia.
Ibrance (palbociclib)
In March 2019, several generic companies notified us that they had filed abbreviated new drug applications with the FDA seeking approval to market generic versions of
Ibrance. The generic companies assert the invalidity and non-infringement of two composition of matter patents and a method of use patent covering palbociclib, each of which
expire in 2023. In April 2019, we brought patent infringement actions against each of the generic filers in various federal courts, asserting the validity and infringement of the
patents challenged by the generic companies.
Chantix (varenicline)
In January 2020, we brought a patent infringement action against Viwit Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Viwit) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, asserting the
validity and infringement of three patents challenged by Viwit in its abbreviated new drug application seeking approval to market a generic version of varenicline, 0.5 mg and
1.0 mg tablets.
Matter Involving Our Collaboration/Licensing Partners

Eliquis
In February, March, and April 2017, twenty-five generic companies sent BMS Paragraph-IV certification letters informing BMS that they had filed abbreviated new drug
applications seeking approval of generic versions of Eliquis, challenging the validity and infringement of one or more of the three patents listed in the Orange Book for Eliquis.
One of the patents expired in December 2019 and the remaining patents currently are set to expire in 2026 and 2031. Eliquis has been jointly developed and is being
commercialized by BMS and Pfizer. In April 2017, BMS and Pfizer filed patent-infringement actions against all generic filers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
and the U.S. District Court for the District of West Virginia, asserting that each of the generic companies’ proposed products would infringe each of the patent(s) that each
generic filer challenged. Some generic filers challenged only the 2031 patent, some challenged both the 2031 and 2026 patent, and one generic company challenged all three
patents. We and BMS have settled with certain of the generic companies on terms not material to Pfizer, and we and BMS may settle with other generic companies in the
future.
Action In Which We Are The Defendant

Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb)
In March 2015, Janssen and New York University, together, brought a patent-infringement action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against Hospira,
Celltrion Healthcare Co. Ltd. and Celltrion Inc. alleging that infliximab-dyyb, to be marketed by Hospira in the U.S. under the brand name Inflectra, would infringe six patents
relating to infliximab, its manufacture and use. Claims with respect to four of the patents were dismissed by the plaintiffs, leaving two patents at issue: the infliximab antibody
patent and a patent relating to cell culture media. In January 2018, the antibody patent was declared invalid by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In July 2018, the
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and ruled that the patent relating to cell culture media was not infringed.
Janssen appealed the District Court’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
A2. Legal Proceedings––Product Litigation

Like other pharmaceutical companies, we are defendants in numerous cases, including but not limited to those discussed below, related to our pharmaceutical and other
products. Plaintiffs in these cases seek damages and other relief on various grounds for alleged personal injury and economic loss.
Asbestos
Between 1967 and 1982, Warner-Lambert owned American Optical Corporation (American Optical), which manufactured and sold respiratory protective devices and asbestos
safety clothing. In connection with the sale of American Optical in 1982, Warner-Lambert agreed to indemnify the purchaser for certain liabilities, including certain asbestos-
related and other claims. Claims against American Optical and numerous other defendants are pending in various federal and state courts seeking damages for alleged
personal injury from exposure to asbestos and other allegedly hazardous materials. Warner-Lambert was acquired by Pfizer in 2000 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer.
Warner-Lambert is actively engaged in the defense of, and will continue to explore various means of resolving, these claims.
Numerous lawsuits are pending against Pfizer in various federal and state courts seeking damages for alleged personal injury from exposure to products allegedly containing
asbestos and other allegedly hazardous materials sold by Pfizer and certain of its previously owned subsidiaries.
There also are a small number of lawsuits pending in various federal and state courts seeking damages for alleged exposure to asbestos in facilities owned or formerly owned
by Pfizer or its subsidiaries.

Effexor
Beginning in May 2011, actions, including purported class actions, were filed in various federal courts against Wyeth and, in certain of the actions, affiliates of Wyeth and
certain other defendants relating to Effexor XR, which is the extended-release formulation of Effexor. The plaintiffs in each of the class actions seek to represent a class
consisting of all persons in the U.S. and its territories who directly purchased, indirectly purchased or reimbursed patients for the purchase of Effexor XR or generic Effexor XR
from any of the defendants from June 14, 2008 until the time the defendants’ allegedly unlawful conduct ceased. The plaintiffs in all of the actions allege delay in the launch of
generic Effexor XR in the U.S. and its territories, in violation of federal antitrust laws and, in certain of the actions, the antitrust, consumer protection and various other laws of
certain states, as the result of Wyeth fraudulently obtaining and improperly listing certain patents for Effexor XR in the Orange Book, enforcing certain patents for Effexor XR
and entering into a litigation settlement agreement with a generic drug manufacturer with respect to Effexor XR. Each of the plaintiffs seeks treble damages (for itself in the
individual actions or on behalf of the putative class in the purported class actions) for alleged price overcharges for Effexor XR or generic Effexor XR in the U.S. and its
territories since June 14, 2008. All of these actions have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
In October 2014, the District Court dismissed the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ claims based on the litigation settlement agreement, but declined to dismiss the other direct
purchaser plaintiff claims. In January 2015, the District Court entered partial final judgments as to all settlement agreement claims, including those asserted by direct
purchasers and end-payer plaintiffs, which plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In August 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
reversed the District Court’s decisions and remanded the claims to the District Court.
Lipitor
• Antitrust Actions
Beginning in November 2011, purported class actions relating to Lipitor were filed in various federal courts against, among others, Pfizer, certain affiliates of Pfizer, and, in
most of the actions, Ranbaxy, Inc. (Ranbaxy) and certain affiliates of Ranbaxy. The plaintiffs in these various actions seek to represent nationwide, multi-state or statewide
classes consisting of persons or entities who directly purchased, indirectly purchased or reimbursed patients for the purchase of Lipitor (or, in certain of the actions, generic
Lipitor) from any of the defendants from March 2010 until the cessation of the defendants’ allegedly unlawful conduct (the Class Period). The plaintiffs allege delay in the
launch of generic Lipitor, in violation of federal antitrust laws and/or state antitrust, consumer protection and various other laws, resulting from (i) the 2008 agreement pursuant
to which Pfizer and Ranbaxy settled certain patent litigation involving Lipitor, and Pfizer granted Ranbaxy a license to sell a generic version of Lipitor in various markets
beginning on varying dates, and (ii) in certain of the actions, the procurement and/or enforcement of certain patents for Lipitor. Each of the actions seeks, among other things,
treble damages on behalf of the putative class for alleged price overcharges for Lipitor (or, in certain of the actions, generic Lipitor) during the Class Period. In addition,
individual actions have been filed against Pfizer, Ranbaxy and certain of their affiliates, among others, that assert claims and seek relief for the plaintiffs that are substantially
similar to the claims asserted and the relief sought in the purported class actions described above. These various actions have been consolidated for pre-trial proceedings in a
Multi-District Litigation (In re Lipitor Antitrust Litigation MDL-2332) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
In September 2013 and 2014, the District Court dismissed with prejudice the claims by direct purchasers. In October and November 2014, the District Court dismissed with
prejudice the claims of all other Multi-District Litigation plaintiffs. All plaintiffs have appealed the District Court’s orders dismissing their claims with prejudice to the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit. In addition, the direct purchaser class plaintiffs appealed the order denying their motion to amend the judgment and for leave to amend their
complaint to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In August 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the District Court’s decisions and remanded
the claims to the District Court.
Also, in January 2013, the State of West Virginia filed an action in West Virginia state court against Pfizer and Ranbaxy, among others, that asserts claims and seeks relief on
behalf of the State of West Virginia and residents of that state that are substantially similar to the claims asserted and the relief sought in the purported class actions described
above.
• Personal Injury Actions
A number of individual and multi-plaintiff lawsuits have been filed against us in various federal and state courts alleging that the plaintiffs developed type 2 diabetes purportedly
as a result of the ingestion of Lipitor. Plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages.
In February 2014, the federal actions were transferred for consolidated pre-trial proceedings to a Multi-District Litigation (In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales
Practices and Products Liability Litigation (No. II) MDL-2502) in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina. Since 2016, certain cases in the Multi-District Litigation
were remanded to certain state courts. In January 2017, the District Court granted our motion for summary judgment, dismissing substantially all of the remaining cases
pending in the Multi-District Litigation. In January 2017, the plaintiffs appealed the District Court’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. In June 2018, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision.
Viagra
Since April 2016, a Multi-District Litigation has been pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (In Re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability
Litigation, MDL-2691), in which plaintiffs allege that they developed melanoma and/or the exacerbation of melanoma purportedly as a result of the ingestion of Viagra.
Additional cases filed against Lilly with respect to Cialis have also been consolidated in the Multi-District Litigation (In re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) and Cialis (Tadalafil)
Products Liability Litigation, MDL-2691). In January 2020, the District Court granted our and Lilly’s motion to exclude all of plaintiffs’ general causation opinions.
Intravenous Solutions
Beginning in November 2016, purported class actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against Hospira, Hospira Worldwide, Inc. and
certain other defendants relating to intravenous saline solution. Plaintiffs seek to represent a class consisting of all persons and entities in the U.S. who directly purchased
intravenous saline solution sold by any of the defendants from January 1, 2013 until the time the defendants’ allegedly unlawful conduct ceases. Plaintiffs allege that the
defendants’ conduct restricts output and artificially fixes, raises, maintains and/or stabilizes the prices of intravenous saline solution sold throughout the U.S. in violation of
federal antitrust laws.


Plaintiffs seek treble damages (for themselves and on behalf of the putative classes) and an injunction against defendants for alleged price overcharges for intravenous saline
solution in the U.S. since January 1, 2013. All of these actions have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In July 2018, the District
Court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint without prejudice. Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint in September 2018. On
February 3, 2017, we completed the sale of our global infusion systems net assets, HIS, which includes intravenous saline solution, to ICU Medical. The litigation is the subject
of cross-claims for indemnification by both Pfizer and ICU Medical under the purchase agreement.
Hormone Therapy Consumer Class Action
A certified consumer class action is pending against Wyeth in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California based on the alleged off-label marketing of its
hormone therapy products. The case was originally filed in December 2003. The class consists of California consumers who purchased Wyeth’s hormone-replacement
products between January 1995 and January 2003 and who do not seek personal injury damages therefrom. The class seeks compensatory and punitive damages, including a
full refund of the purchase price.
EpiPen
Beginning in February 2017, purported class actions were filed in various federal courts by indirect purchasers of EpiPen against Pfizer, and/or its affiliates King and Meridian,
and/or various entities affiliated with Mylan, and Mylan Chief Executive Officer, Heather Bresch. The plaintiffs in these actions seek to represent U.S. nationwide classes
comprising persons or entities who paid for any portion of the end-user purchase price of an EpiPen between 2009 until the cessation of the defendants’ allegedly unlawful
conduct. In August 2017, a similar lawsuit brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of a purported class of direct purchaser plaintiffs against
Pfizer, King, Meridian and Mylan was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. In February 2020, a similar lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas
against Pfizer, King, Meridian and the Mylan entities on behalf of a purported U.S. nationwide class of direct purchaser plaintiffs who purchased EpiPen devices directly from
the defendants (the 2020 lawsuit). Against Pfizer and/or its affiliates, plaintiffs in these actions generally allege that Pfizer’s and/or its affiliates’ settlement of patent litigation
regarding EpiPen delayed market entry of generic EpiPen in violation of federal antitrust laws and various state antitrust laws. At least one lawsuit also alleges that Pfizer
and/or Mylan violated the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Plaintiffs also filed various federal antitrust, state consumer protection and unjust
enrichment claims against, and relating to conduct attributable solely to, Mylan and/or its affiliates regarding EpiPen. Plaintiffs seek treble damages for alleged overcharges for
EpiPen since 2009. In August 2017, all of these actions, except for the 2020 lawsuit, were consolidated for coordinated pre-trial proceedings in a Multi-District Litigation (In re:
EpiPen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation, MDL-2785) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas with other EpiPen-
related actions against Mylan and/or its affiliates to which Pfizer, King and Meridian are not parties.
Nexium 24HR and Protonix
A number of individual and multi-plaintiff lawsuits have been filed against Pfizer, certain of its subsidiaries and/or other pharmaceutical manufacturers in various federal and
state courts alleging that the plaintiffs developed kidney-related injuries purportedly as a result of the ingestion of certain proton pump inhibitors. The cases against Pfizer
involve Protonix and/or Nexium 24HR and seek compensatory and punitive damages and, in some cases, treble damages, restitution or disgorgement. In August 2017, the
federal actions were ordered transferred for coordinated pre-trial proceedings to a Multi-District Litigation (In re: Proton-Pump Inhibitor Products Liability Litigation (No. II)) in the
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. On July 31, 2019, we completed the transaction in which we and GSK combined our respective consumer healthcare
businesses into a new consumer healthcare joint venture that operates globally under the GSK Consumer Healthcare name. As part of the joint venture transaction, the joint
venture has agreed to assume, and to indemnify Pfizer for, liabilities arising out of such litigation to the extent related to Nexium 24HR.
Docetaxel
• Personal Injury Actions
A number of lawsuits have been filed against Hospira and Pfizer in various federal and state courts alleging that plaintiffs who were treated with Docetaxel developed
permanent hair loss. The significant majority of the cases also name other defendants, including the manufacturer of the branded product, Taxotere. Plaintiffs seek
compensatory and punitive damages.
In October 2016, the federal cases were transferred for coordinated pre-trial proceedings to a Multi-District Litigation (In re Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products Liability Litigation,
MDL-2740) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
• Mississippi Attorney General Government Investigation
In October 2018, the Attorney General of Mississippi filed a complaint in Mississippi state court against the manufacturer of the branded product and eight other manufacturers
including Pfizer and Hospira, alleging, with respect to Pfizer and Hospira, a failure to warn about a risk of permanent hair loss in violation of the Mississippi Consumer
Protection Act. The action seeks civil penalties and injunctive relief.
Array Securities Litigation
In November 2017, two purported class actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado alleging that Array, which we acquired in July 2019 and is our
wholly owned subsidiary, and certain of its former officers violated federal securities laws in connection with certain disclosures made, or omitted, by Array regarding the NRAS-
mutant melanoma program. In March 2018, the actions were consolidated into a single proceeding.
Zantac
A number of lawsuits have been filed against Pfizer in various federal courts alleging that plaintiffs developed various types of cancer, or face an increased risk of developing
cancer, purportedly as a result of the ingestion of Zantac. The significant majority of these cases also name other defendants that have historically manufactured and sold
Zantac. Pfizer has not sold Zantac since 2006. Plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages and, in some cases, treble damages, restitution or disgorgement.
In February 2020, these federal actions were transferred for coordinated pre-trial proceedings to a Multi-District Litigation (In re Zantac/Ranitidine NDMA Litigation, MDL-2924)
in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

A3. Legal Proceedings––Commercial and Other Matters

Monsanto-Related Matters
In 1997, Monsanto Company (Former Monsanto) contributed certain chemical manufacturing operations and facilities to a newly formed corporation, Solutia Inc. (Solutia), and
spun off the shares of Solutia. In 2000, Former Monsanto merged with Pharmacia & Upjohn Company to form Pharmacia. Pharmacia then transferred its agricultural operations
to a newly created subsidiary, named Monsanto Company (New Monsanto), which it spun off in a two-stage process that was completed in 2002. Pharmacia was acquired by
Pfizer in 2003 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer.
In connection with its spin-off that was completed in 2002, New Monsanto assumed, and agreed to indemnify Pharmacia for, any liabilities related to Pharmacia’s former
agricultural business. New Monsanto has defended and/or is defending Pharmacia in connection with various claims and litigation arising out of, or related to, the agricultural
business, and has been indemnifying Pharmacia when liability has been imposed or settlement has been reached regarding such claims and litigation.
In connection with its spin-off in 1997, Solutia assumed, and agreed to indemnify Pharmacia for, liabilities related to Former Monsanto’s chemical businesses. As the result of
its reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, Solutia’s indemnification obligations relating to Former Monsanto’s chemical businesses are primarily limited
to sites that Solutia has owned or operated. In addition, in connection with its spinoff that was completed in 2002, New Monsanto assumed, and agreed to indemnify Pharmacia
for, any liabilities primarily related to Former Monsanto’s chemical businesses, including, but not limited to, any such liabilities that Solutia assumed. Solutia’s and New
Monsanto’s assumption of, and agreement to indemnify Pharmacia for, these liabilities apply to pending actions and any future actions related to Former Monsanto’s chemical
businesses in which Pharmacia is named as a defendant, including, without limitation, actions asserting environmental claims, including alleged exposure to polychlorinated
biphenyls. Solutia and/or New Monsanto are defending Pharmacia in connection with various claims and litigation arising out of, or related to, Former Monsanto’s chemical
businesses, and have been indemnifying Pharmacia when liability has been imposed or settlement has been reached regarding such claims and litigation.
Environmental Matters
In 2009, we submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a corrective measures study report with regard to Pharmacia’s discontinued industrial chemical
facility in North Haven, Connecticut. In September 2010, our corrective measures study report was approved by the EPA, and we commenced construction of the site remedy
in late 2011 under an Updated Administrative Order on Consent with the EPA. In September 2019, the EPA acknowledged that construction of the site remedy has been
completed.
Also, in 2009, we submitted a revised site-wide feasibility study with regard to Wyeth Holdings Corporation’s (formerly, American Cyanamid Company) discontinued industrial
chemical facility in Bound Brook, New Jersey. In July 2011, Wyeth Holdings Corporation finalized an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal
Action (the 2011 Administrative Settlement Agreement) with the EPA with regard to the Bound Brook facility. In May 2012, we completed construction of an interim remedy to
address the discharge of impacted groundwater from that facility to the Raritan River. In September 2012, the EPA issued a final remediation plan for the Bound Brook facility’s
main plant area, which is generally in accordance with one of the remedies evaluated in our revised site-wide feasibility study. In March 2013, Wyeth Holdings Corporation
(now Wyeth Holdings LLC) entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent with the EPA to allow us to undertake detailed engineering design of
the remedy for the main plant area and to perform a focused feasibility study for two adjacent lagoons. In September 2015, the U.S., on behalf of the EPA, filed a complaint and
consent decree with the federal District Court for the District of New Jersey that allows Wyeth Holdings LLC to complete the design and to implement the remedy for the main
plant area. In December 2015, the consent decree (which supersedes the 2011 Administrative Settlement Agreement) was entered by the District Court. In September 2018,
the EPA issued a final remediation plan for the two adjacent lagoons, which is generally in accordance with one of the remedies evaluated in our focused feasibility study, and
in September 2019, Wyeth Holdings LLC entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent with the EPA to allow us to undertake detailed
engineering design of the remedy for the lagoons.
We have accrued for the estimated costs of the site remedies for the North Haven and Bound Brook facilities.
We are a party to a number of other proceedings brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, and other
state, local or foreign laws in which the primary relief sought is the cost of past and/or future remediation.
Contracts with Iraqi Ministry of Health
In October 2017, a number of United States service members, civilians, and their families brought a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against a
number of pharmaceutical and medical devices companies, including Pfizer and certain of its subsidiaries, alleging that the defendants violated the United States Anti-
Terrorism Act. The complaint alleges that the defendants provided funding for terrorist organizations through their sales practices pursuant to pharmaceutical and medical
device contracts with the Iraqi Ministry of Health, and seeks monetary relief. In July 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice requested documents related to this matter, which are
being provided.
Allergan Complaint for Indemnity
In August 2018, Pfizer was named as a defendant in a third-party complaint for indemnity, along with King, filed by Allergan Finance LLC (Allergan) in a Multi-District Litigation
(In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation MDL 2804) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The lawsuit asserted claims for indemnity related to Kadian,
which was owned for a short period by King in 2008, prior to Pfizer's acquisition of King in 2010. In December 2018, the District Court dismissed the lawsuit. In February 2019,
Allergan filed a similar complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, asserting claims for indemnity related to Kadian.
Breach of Contract––Xalkori
Pfizer is a defendant in a breach of contract action brought by New York University (NYU) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (Supreme Court). NYU alleges that it
is entitled to royalties on Pfizer’s sales of Xalkori under the terms of a Research and License Agreement between NYU and Sugen, Inc. Sugen, Inc. was acquired by
Pharmacia in August 1999, and Pharmacia was acquired by Pfizer in 2003 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer. The action was originally filed in 2013. In December
2015, the Supreme Court dismissed the action and in May 2017, the New York State Appellate Division reversed the decision and remanded the proceedings to the Supreme
Court. In January 2020, the Supreme Court denied both parties’ summary judgment motions.

A4. Legal Proceedings––Government Investigations

Like other pharmaceutical companies, we are subject to extensive regulation by government agencies in the U.S., other developed markets and multiple emerging markets in
which we operate. Criminal charges, substantial fines and/or civil penalties, limitations on our ability to conduct business in applicable jurisdictions, corporate integrity or
deferred prosecution agreements, as well as reputational harm and increased public interest in the matter could result from government investigations in the U.S. and other
jurisdictions in which we do business. In addition, in a qui tam lawsuit in which the government declines to intervene, the relator may still pursue a suit for the recovery of civil
damages and penalties on behalf of the government. Among the investigations by government agencies are the matters discussed below.
Phenytoin Sodium Capsules
In 2012, Pfizer sold the U.K. Marketing Authorisation for phenytoin sodium capsules to a third party, but retained the right to supply the finished product to that third party. In
May 2013, the U.K. Competition & Markets Authority (CMA) informed us that it had launched an investigation into the supply of phenytoin sodium capsules in the U.K. market.
In August 2015, the CMA issued a Statement of Objections alleging that Pfizer and Pfizer Limited, a U.K. subsidiary, engaged in conduct that violates U.K. and EU antitrust
laws. In December 2016, the CMA imposed a £84.2 million fine on Pfizer and Pfizer Limited. Pfizer appealed the CMA decision to The Competition Appeal Tribunal in February
2017. On June 7, 2018, the Competition Appeal Tribunal overturned the CMA decision as well as the associated fine. The CMA appealed the judgment to the Court of Appeal.
Greenstone Investigations
• U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division Investigation
Since July 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division has been investigating our Greenstone generics business. We believe this is related to an ongoing broader
antitrust investigation of the generic pharmaceutical industry. The government has been obtaining information from Greenstone.
• State Attorneys General Generics Antitrust Litigation
In April 2018, Greenstone received requests for information from the Antitrust Department of the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General. In May 2019, Attorneys General of
more than 40 states plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico filed a complaint against a number of pharmaceutical companies, including Greenstone and Pfizer. The
matter has been consolidated with a Multi-District Litigation (In re: Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation MDL No. 2724) in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
As to Greenstone and Pfizer, the complaint alleges anticompetitive conduct in violation of federal and state antitrust laws and state consumer protection laws.
Subpoena relating to Manufacturing of Quillivant XR
In October 2018, we received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) seeking records relating to our relationship with another
drug manufacturer and its production and manufacturing of drugs including, but not limited to, Quillivant XR. We have produced records pursuant to the subpoena.
Government Inquiries relating to Meridian Medical Technologies
In February 2019, we received a civil investigative demand from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the SDNY. The civil investigative demand seeks records and information related
to alleged quality issues involving the manufacture of auto-injectors at our Meridian site. In August 2019, we received a HIPAA subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the
Eastern District of Missouri seeking similar records and information. We are producing records in response to these requests.
U.S. Department of Justice/SEC Inquiry relating to Russian Operations
In June 2019, we received an informal request from the U.S. Department of Justice’s FCPA Unit seeking documents relating to our operations in Russia. In September 2019,
we received a similar request from the SEC’s FCPA unit. We are producing records pursuant to these requests.
Contracts with Iraqi Ministry of Health
See Note 16A3. Contingencies and Certain Commitments: Legal Proceedings––Commercial and Other Matters––Contracts with Iraqi Ministry of Health above for information
regarding U.S. government investigations related to contracts with the Iraqi Ministry of Health.
Docetaxel––Mississippi Attorney General Government Investigation
See Note 16A2. Contingencies and Certain Commitments: Legal Proceedings––Product Litigation––Docetaxel––Mississippi Attorney General Government Investigation above
for information regarding a government investigation related to Docetaxel marketing practices.
B. Guarantees and Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business and in connection with the sale of assets and businesses and other transactions, we often indemnify our counterparties against certain
liabilities that may arise in connection with the transaction or that are related to events and activities prior to or following a transaction. If the indemnified party were to make a
successful claim pursuant to the terms of the indemnification, we may be required to reimburse the loss. These indemnifications are generally subject to various restrictions
and limitations. Historically, we have not paid significant amounts under these provisions and, as of December 31, 2019, the estimated fair value of these indemnification
obligations was not significant.
In addition, in connection with our entry into certain agreements, our counterparties agree to indemnify us. For example, our collaboration agreement with EMD Serono, Inc. to
co-promote Rebif in the U.S. expired at the end of 2015 and included certain indemnity provisions. Patent litigation brought by Biogen Idec MA Inc. against EMD Serono Inc.
and Pfizer is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. EMD Serono Inc. has
acknowledged that it is obligated to satisfy any award of damages.
Pfizer Inc. has also guaranteed the long-term debt of certain companies that it acquired and that now are subsidiaries of Pfizer.

C. Certain Commitments
• As of December 31, 2019, we had agreements totaling $2.5 billion to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding and include amounts relating to
advertising, information technology services, employee benefit administration services, and potential milestone payments deemed reasonably likely to occur, as well as
obligations to make guaranteed fixed annual payments over a seven-year period in connection with the U.S. and EU approvals for Besponsa ($412 million) and an obligation
to make guaranteed fixed annual payments over an eight-year period for Bosulif ($217 million), both associated with R&D arrangements.
• As of December 31, 2019, in connection with the TCJA, we have an estimated $15 billion repatriation tax liability on accumulated post-1986 earnings of foreign subsidiaries
for which we elected, with the filing of our 2018 U.S. Federal Consolidated Income Tax Return, payment over eight years through 2026. With respect to the aforementioned
repatriation tax liability, it is reported in current Income taxes payable (approximately $600 million due in April 2020) and the remaining liability is reported in noncurrent Other
taxes payable in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. The first installment of $750 million was paid in April 2019. Our obligations may vary as a result of
changes in our uncertain tax positions and/or availability of attributes such as foreign tax and other credit carryforwards. See Note 5A for additional information.
D. Contingent Consideration for Acquisitions
We may be required to make contingent consideration payments to sellers for certain prior business combinations. See Note 1D. The estimated fair value of contingent
consideration as of December 31, 2019 is $711 million, of which $160 million is recorded in Other current liabilities and $551 million is recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities.
The estimated fair value of contingent consideration as of December 31, 2018 is $988 million, of which $280 million is recorded in Other current liabilities and $708 million is
recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities. The decrease in the contingent consideration balance from prior year is primarily due to payments made upon the achievement of
certain milestones.
Note 17. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information

A. Segment Information
We regularly review our segments and the approach used by management to evaluate performance and allocate resources. Prior to January 1, 2019, we managed our
commercial operations through two distinct business segments: Pfizer Innovative Health (IH) and Pfizer Essential Health (EH). At the beginning of our fiscal year 2019, we
reorganized our commercial operations and began to manage our commercial operations through a new global structure consisting of three distinct business segments: Pfizer
Biopharmaceuticals Group (Biopharma), Upjohn and, through July 31, 2019, Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare business (Consumer Healthcare), each led by a single manager.
Each operating segment has responsibility for its commercial activities. Upjohn and through July 31, 2019, Consumer Healthcare, are responsible for their own R&D activities
while Biopharma receives its R&D services from GPD and WRDM. These services include IPR&D projects for new investigational products and additional indications for in-line
products. Each business has a geographic footprint across developed and emerging markets. Our chief operating decision maker uses the revenues and earnings of the
operating segments, among other factors, for performance evaluation and resource allocation. Biopharma and Upjohn are the only reportable segments. We have revised
prior-period information (Revenues and Earnings, as defined by management) to conform to the current management structure. As our operations were not managed under the
new structure until the beginning of fiscal 2019, certain costs and expenses could not be directly attributed to one of the then new operating segments. As a result, our
operating segment results for 2018 and 2017 include allocations, which management believes are reasonable. As described in Note 1A, acquisitions impacted our results of
operations in 2019 and 2017, the contribution of our Consumer Healthcare business to the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture impacted our results of operations in 2019
and divestitures impacted our results of operations in 2017.


Operating Segments
Some additional information about our Biopharma and Upjohn business segments follows:
Pfizer
Biopharmaceuticals
Group

Biopharma is a science-based medicines business that includes six business units – Upjohn is a global, primarily off-patent branded and generic medicines business, which
Oncology, Inflammation & Immunology, Rare Disease, Hospital, Vaccines and includes a portfolio of 20 globally recognized solid oral dose brands, as well as a U.S.-
Internal Medicine. The Hospital unit commercializes our global portfolio of sterile based generics platform, Greenstone.
injectable and anti-infective medicines and includes Pfizer’s contract manufacturing
operation, Pfizer CentreOne. At the beginning of our 2019 fiscal year, we also
incorporated our biosimilar portfolio into the Oncology and Inflammation &
Immunology business units and certain legacy established products into the Internal
Medicine business unit. Each business unit is committed to delivering breakthroughs
that change patients’ lives.
Select products include: Select products include:
- Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 - Lyrica
- Ibrance - Lipitor
- Eliquis - Norvasc
- Xeljanz - Celebrex
- Enbrel (outside the U.S. and Canada) - Viagra
- Chantix/Champix - Certain generic medicines
- Sutent
- Xtandi
- Vyndaqel/Vyndamax
On July 29, 2019, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan, creating a new global pharmaceutical company. For additional
information, see Note 1A.
On July 31, 2019, Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare business, an over-the-counter medicines business, was combined with GSK’s consumer healthcare business to form a new
consumer healthcare joint venture. See Note 1A and Note 2C for additional information.
Other Costs and Business Activities
Certain pre-tax costs are not allocated to our operating segment results, such as costs associated with the following:
• WRDM––the R&D and Medical expenses managed by our WRDM organization, which is generally responsible for research projects for our Biopharma portfolio until proof-
of-concept is achieved and then for transitioning those projects to the GPD organization for possible clinical and commercial development. R&D spending may include
upfront and milestone payments for intellectual property rights. The WRDM organization also has responsibility for certain science-based and other platform-services
organizations, which provide end-to-end technical expertise and other services to the various R&D projects, as well as the Worldwide Medical and Safety group, which
ensures that Pfizer provides all stakeholders––including patients, healthcare providers, pharmacists, payers and health authorities––with complete and up-to-date
information on the risks and benefits associated with Pfizer products so that they can make appropriate decisions on how and when to use Pfizer’s medicines.
• GPD––the costs associated with our GPD organization, which is generally responsible for clinical trials from WRDM in the Biopharma portfolio, including late stage portfolio
spend. GPD also provides technical support and other services to Pfizer R&D projects. GPD is responsible for facilitating all regulatory submissions and interactions with
regulatory agencies.
• Other––the operating results of our Consumer Healthcare business, through July 31, 2019, and costs associated with other commercial activities not managed as part of
Biopharma or Upjohn, including all strategy, business development, portfolio management and valuation capabilities, which previously had been reported in various parts of
the organization.
• Corporate and Other Unallocated––the costs associated with platform functions (such as worldwide technology, global real estate operations, legal, finance, human
resources, worldwide public affairs, compliance, and worldwide procurement), patient advocacy activities and certain compensation and other corporate costs, such as
interest income and expense, and gains and losses on investments, as well as overhead expenses associated with our manufacturing (which include manufacturing
variances associated with production) and commercial operations that are not directly assessed to an operating segment, as business unit (segment) management does not
manage these costs.
• Certain transactions and events such as (i) purchase accounting adjustments, where we incur expenses associated with the amortization of fair value adjustments to
inventory, intangible assets and PP&E; (ii) acquisition-related costs, where we incur costs for executing the transaction, integrating the acquired operations and restructuring
the combined company; and (iii) certain significant items, representing substantive and/or unusual, and in some cases recurring, items (such as gains on the completion of
joint venture transactions, restructuring charges, legal charges or net gains and losses on investments in equity securities) that are evaluated on an individual basis by
management and that, either as a result of their nature or size, would not be expected to occur as part of our normal business on a regular


basis. Such items can include, but are not limited to, non-acquisition-related restructuring costs, as well as costs incurred for legal settlements, asset impairments and
disposals of assets or businesses, including, as applicable, any associated transition activities.
Segment Assets
We manage our assets on a total company basis, not by operating segment, as many of our operating assets are shared or commingled (such as accounts receivable, as
many of our customers are served by multiple operating segments). Therefore, our chief operating decision maker does not regularly review any asset information by operating
segment and, accordingly, we do not report asset information by operating segment. Total assets were approximately $167 billion as of December 31, 2019 and approximately
$159 billion as of December 31, 2018.
Selected Income Statement Information
The following table provides selected income statement information by reportable segment:
Revenues Earnings(a) Depreciation and Amortization(b)
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Reportable Segments:
Biopharma $ 39,419 $ 37,558 $ 35,530 $ 24,517 $ 23,738 $ 22,194 $ 958 $ 953 $ 881
Upjohn 10,233 12,484 13,447 6,785 8,636 9,348 105 112 125
Total reportable segments 49,653 50,042 48,977 31,301 32,374 31,542 1,063 1,065 1,006
Other business activities 2,098 3,605 3,472 (5,723) (5,283) (5,302) 108 146 142
Reconciling Items:
Corporate and other unallocated — — 97 (5,859) (6,383) (6,299) 453 503 465
Purchase accounting adjustments — — — (4,333) (4,786) (4,758) 4,347 4,620 4,565
Acquisition-related costs — — — (185) (318) (456) 3 12 39
Certain significant items(c) — — — 2,481 (3,719) (2,423) 36 38 52

$ 51,750 $ 53,647 $ 52,546 $ 17,682 $ 11,885 $ 12,305 $ 6,010 $ 6,384 $ 6,269
(a) Income from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for taxes on income. Biopharma’s earnings include dividend income from our investment in ViiV of $220 million in 2019, $253 million in 2018 and $266
million in 2017. For additional information, see Note 4.
(b) Certain production facilities are shared. Depreciation is allocated based on estimates of physical production. Amounts here relate solely to the depreciation and amortization associated with continuing operations.
(c) Certain significant items are substantive and/or unusual, and in some cases recurring, items (as noted above) that, either as a result of their nature or size, would not be expected to occur as part of our normal
business on a regular basis.
For Earnings in 2019, certain significant items includes: (i) restructuring charges and implementation costs associated with our cost-reduction initiatives that are not associated with an acquisition of $758 million,
(ii) charges for certain legal matters of $543 million, (iii) certain asset impairment charges of $2.8 billion, (iv) charges for business and legal entity alignment of $495 million, (v) net gains of $415 million recognized
during the period on equity securities, (vi) a pre-tax gain of $8.1 billion associated with the completion of the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture transaction, (vii) net losses on early retirement of debt of $138
million and (viii) other charges of $1.3 billion, which includes, among other things: an upfront license fee payment of $250 million to Akcea, which was recorded in Research and development expenses, charges of
$112 million recorded in Other (income)/deductions––net representing our pro rata share of primarily restructuring and business combination accounting charges recorded by the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint
venture, a $337 million charge in Research and development expenses related to our acquisition of Therachon, a $99 million charge in Cost of sales related to rivipansel, primarily for inventory manufactured for
expected future sale and charges of $240 million, primarily in Selling, informational and administrative expenses and Other (income)/deductions––net, for external incremental costs, such as transaction costs and
costs to separate our Consumer Healthcare business into a separate legal entity associated with the formation of the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture. For additional information, see Note 1A, Note 2A,
Note 2C, Note 2D, Note 3 and Note 4.
(ii) net charges for certain legal matters of $157 million, (iii) certain asset impairment charges of $3.1 billion, (iv) charges for business and legal entity alignment of $63 million, (v) net gains of $586 million
recognized during the period on equity securities, (vi) net losses on early retirement of debt of $3 million and (vii) other charges of $4 million, which includes, among other things: a non-cash $343 million pre-tax
gain in Other (income)/deductions––net associated with our transaction with Bain Capital to create a new biopharmaceutical company, Cerevel, to continue development of a portfolio of clinical and pre-clinical
stage neuroscience assets primarily targeting disorders of the central nervous system, a $119 million charge, in the aggregate, in Selling, informational and administrative expenses for a special, one-time bonus
paid to virtually all Pfizer colleagues, excluding executives, which was one of several actions taken by us after evaluating the expected positive net impact of the December 2017 enactment of the TCJA, and a
non-cash $50 million pre-tax gain in Other (income)/deductions––net as a result of the contribution of our allogeneic CAR T cell therapy development program assets in connection with our contribution agreement
entered into with Allogene. For additional information, see Note 2B, Note 3 and Note 4.
(ii) charges for certain legal matters of $237 million, (iii) certain asset impairment charges of $379 million, (iv) charges for business and legal entity alignment of $71 million, (v) net gains of $224 million recognized
during the period on equity securities, (vi) net losses on early retirement of debt of $999 million and (vii) other charges of $756 million, which includes, among other things: a charitable contribution to the Pfizer
Foundation of $200 million, which is included in Selling, informational and administrative expenses, $195 million in inventory losses, overhead costs related to the period in which our Puerto Rico plants were not
operational, and incremental costs, all of which resulted from hurricanes in Puerto Rico in 2017 and are included in Cost of sales, an $81 million loss related to the sale of our former 49% equity share in Hisun
Pfizer, which is included in Other (income)/deductions––net, charges of $55 million in Other (income)/deductions––net representing adjustments to amounts previously recorded to write down the HIS net assets
to fair value less costs to sell and a net loss of $30 million related to the sale of our former 40% ownership investment in Teuto, including the extinguishment of a put option for the remaining 60% ownership
interest, which is included in Other (income)/deductions––net. For additional information, see Note 2B, Note 2C, Note 3 and Note 4.
Equity in the net income of investees accounted for by the equity-method is not significant for any of our operating segments.
The operating segment information does not purport to represent the revenues, costs and Income from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for taxes on income that
each of our operating segments would have recorded had each segment operated as a standalone company during the periods presented.

B. Geographic Information
As described in Note 1A, acquisitions impacted our results of operations in 2019 and 2017, the contribution of our Consumer Healthcare business to the GSK Consumer
Healthcare joint venture impacted our results of operations in 2019 and divestitures impacted our results of operations in 2017.
The following table provides revenues by geographic area:

United States $ 23,852 $ 25,329 $ 26,026
Developed Europe(a) 8,701 9,116 8,508
Developed Rest of World (b) 6,465 6,551 6,612
Emerging Markets(c) 12,733 12,651 11,399
Revenues $ 51,750 $ 53,647 $ 52,546
(a) Developed Europe region includes the following markets: Western Europe, Scandinavian countries and Finland. Revenues denominated in euros were $7.0 billion in 2019, $7.3 billion in 2018 and $6.8 billion in
2017.
(b) Developed Rest of World region includes the following markets: Japan, Canada, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand.
(c) Emerging Markets region includes, but is not limited to, the following markets: Asia (excluding Japan and South Korea), Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Central Europe and Turkey.
Revenues exceeded $500 million in each of 11 countries outside the U.S. in 2019, 2018 and 2017. The U.S. is the only country to contribute more than 10% of total revenue in
2019, 2018 and 2017. As a percentage of revenues, our two largest national markets outside the U.S. were China, which contributed 9% of total revenue in 2019, 8% of total
revenue in 2018 and 7% of total revenues in 2017, and Japan, which contributed 8% of total revenue in each of 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The following table provides long-lived assets by geographic area:

As of December 31,
Property, plant and equipment, net
United States $ 7,606 $ 7,089 $ 6,971
Developed Europe(a) 4,304 4,204 4,345
Developed Rest of World (b) 453 490 632
Emerging Markets(c) 1,603 1,602 1,917
Property, plant and equipment, net $ 13,967 $ 13,385 $ 13,865
(a) Developed Europe region includes the following markets: Western Europe, Scandinavian countries and Finland.
(b) Developed Rest of World region includes the following markets: Japan, Canada, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand.
(c) Emerging Markets region includes, but is not limited to, the following markets: Asia (excluding Japan and South Korea), Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Central Europe and Turkey.
C. Other Revenue Information

Significant Customers
We sell our biopharmaceutical products primarily to customers in the wholesale sector. In all years presented, our three largest U.S. wholesaler customers are McKesson, Inc.,
AmerisourceBergen Corporation and Cardinal Health, Inc. In 2019, sales to our three largest U.S. wholesaler customers represented approximately 16%, 12% and 10% of total
revenues, respectively, and, collectively, represented approximately 25% of total trade accounts receivable as of December 31, 2019. In 2018, sales to our three largest U.S.
wholesaler customers represented approximately 15%, 11% and 10% of total revenues, respectively, and, collectively, represented approximately 34% of total trade accounts
receivable as of December 31, 2018. In 2017, sales to our three largest U.S. wholesaler customers represented approximately 16%, 12% and 10% of total revenues,
respectively, and, collectively, represented approximately 36% of total trade accounts receivable as of December 31, 2017. For all years presented, these sales and related
trade accounts receivable were concentrated in our biopharmaceutical businesses.
Significant Product Revenues

As described in Note 1A, acquisitions impacted our results of operations in 2019 and 2017, the contribution of our Consumer Healthcare business to the GSK Consumer
Healthcare joint venture impacted our results of operations in 2019 and divestitures impacted our results of operations in 2017.


The following table provides detailed revenue information for several of our major products:
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Year Ended December 31,
PRODUCT PRIMARY INDICATION OR CLASS 2019 2018 2017
TOTAL REVENUES $ 51,750 $ 53,647 $ 52,546
PFIZER BIOPHARMACEUTICALS GROUP (BIOPHARMA) $ 39,419 $ 37,558 $ 35,530
Internal Medicine(a) $ 9,119 $ 8,869 $ 8,229

Eliquis alliance revenues and direct sales Nonvalvular Atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism
4,220 3,434 2,523
Chantix/Champix An aid to smoking cessation treatment in adults 18 years of age or older 1,107 1,085 997
Premarin family Symptoms of menopause 734 832 977
BMP2 Development of bone and cartilage 287 279 261
Toviaz Overactive bladder 250 271 257
All other Internal Medicine Various 2,521 2,969 3,213
Oncology(b) $ 9,014 $ 7,471 $ 6,304
Metastatic breast cancer

Ibrance 4,961 4,118 3,126
Sutent Advanced and/or metastatic RCC, adjuvant RCC, refractory GIST (after disease progression
on, or intolerance to, imatinib mesylate) and advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor
936 1,049 1,081
Non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and non-metastatic
Xtandi alliance revenues castration-sensitive prostate cancer 838 699 590
Xalkori ALK-positive and ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC 530 524 594
Inlyta Advanced RCC 477 298 339
Bosulif Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myelogenous leukemia 365 296 233
Retacrit(c) Anemia 225 82 67

Mektovi In combination with Braftovi for metastatic melanoma for patients who test positive for a
BRAF genetic mutation 49 — —
Braftovi In combination with Mektovi for metastatic melanoma for patients who test positive for a
BRAF genetic mutation 48 — —
All other Oncology Various 585 406 274
Hospital(d) $ 7,772 $ 7,955 $ 8,369
Sulperazon Bacterial infections 684 613 471
Medrol(e) Anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid 469 493 540
Vfend Fungal infections 346 392 421
Zithromax(e) Bacterial infections 336 326 299
EpiPen Epinephrine injection used in treatment of life-threatening allergic reactions 303 303 290
Fragmin Treatment/prevention of venous thromboembolism 253 293 306
Zyvox Bacterial infections 251 236 281
Zosyn/Tazocin Bacterial infections 200 230 195
Tygacil Bacterial infections 197 249 260
Diflucan Fungal infections 190 189 180
Panzyga Primary humoral immunodeficiency 183 39 —
Pfizer CentreOne(f) Various 810 755 706
All other Anti-infectives Various 1,114 1,041 1,237
All other Hospital(d) Various 2,436 2,797 3,182
Vaccines $ 6,504 $ 6,332 $ 6,001
Pneumococcal disease
Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 5,847 5,802 5,601
Nimenrix Meningococcal disease 230 140 86
Tick-borne encephalitis disease

FSME/IMMUN-TicoVac 220 184 134
Trumenba Meningococcal disease 135 116 88
All other Vaccines Various 73 90 91
Inflammation & Immunology (I&I)(g) $ 4,733 $ 4,720 $ 4,386

Xeljanz RA, PsA, UC
2,242 1,774 1,345
Enbrel (Outside the U.S. and Canada) RA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, PsA, plaque psoriasis, pediatric plaque psoriasis, ankylosing
spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis
1,699 2,112 2,452
Inflectra/Remsima(c), (g) Crohn’s Disease, Pediatric Crohn’s Disease, UC, Pediatric UC, RA in combination with
methotrexate, Ankylosing Spondylitis, PsA and Plaque Psoriasis
625 642 419
Eucrisa Mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (eczema) in adults and children 2 years of age and older 138 147 67
All other I&I Various 29 45 103

(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Year Ended December 31,
PRODUCT PRIMARY INDICATION OR CLASS 2019 2018 2017
Rare Disease $ 2,278 $ 2,211 $ 2,240
Genotropin Replacement of human growth hormone 498 558 532
BeneFIX Hemophilia B 488 554 604

ATTR-Cardiomyopathy and Polyneuropathy
Vyndaqel/Vyndamax 473 148 124
Refacto AF/Xyntha Hemophilia A 426 514 551
Somavert Acromegaly 264 267 254
All other Rare Disease Various 129 170 176
Upjohn(a) $ 10,233 $ 12,484 $ 13,447

Lyrica Epilepsy, post-herepetic neuralgia and diabetic peripheral neuropathy, fibromyalgia,
neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury
3,321 4,970 5,065
Lipitor Reduction of LDL cholesterol 1,973 2,062 1,915
Norvasc Hypertension 950 1,029 932
Celebrex Arthritis pain and inflammation, acute pain 719 686 775
Viagra Erectile dysfunction 497 636 1,204
Effexor Depression and certain anxiety disorders 336 311 297
Zoloft Depression and certain anxiety disorders 294 298 291
Xalatan/Xalacom Glaucoma and ocular hypertension 281 318 335
Xanax Anxiety disorders 198 223 225
Revatio Pulmonary arterial hypertension 144 227 252
All other Upjohn Various 1,519 1,725 2,158
Consumer Healthcare Business(h) $ 2,098 $ 3,605 $ 3,472
Other(i) Various $ — $ — $ 97
Total Alliance revenues
Various $ 4,648 $ 3,838 $ 2,927
Total Biosimilars(c) Various $ 911 $ 769 $ 531
Total Sterile Injectable Pharmaceuticals(j)
$ 5,035 $ 5,214 $ 5,673
(a) We reclassified certain products from the LEP category, including Premarin family products, and certain other products from the legacy Peri-LOE category, including Pristiq, to the Internal Medicine category and
reclassified Lyrica from the Internal Medicine category to the Upjohn business to conform 2018 and 2017 product revenues to the current presentation.
(b) We performed certain reclassifications in the All other Oncology category to conform 2018 and 2017 product revenues to the current presentation.
(c) Biosimilars are highly similar versions of approved and authorized biological medicines and primarily include revenues from Inflectra/Remsima and Retacrit.
(d) Hospital is a business unit that commercializes our global portfolio of sterile injectable and anti-infective medicines. We performed certain reclassifications, primarily from the legacy SIP category (Sulperazon,
Medrol, Fragmin, Tygacil, Zosyn/Tazocin and Precedex, among other products), the LEP category (Epipen and Zithromax), and the legacy Peri-LOE category (Vfend and Zyvox) to the Hospital category to
conform 2018 and 2017 product revenues to the current presentation. Hospital also includes Pfizer CentreOne(f). All other Hospital primarily includes revenues from legacy SIP products (that are not anti-infective
products) and, to a much lesser extent, solid oral dose products (that are not anti-infective products). SIP anti-infective products that are not individually listed above are recorded in “All other Anti-infectives”.
(e) 2018 and 2017 revenues for Medrol and Zithromax may not agree to previously disclosed revenues because revenues for those products were previously split between LEP and the legacy SIP categories. All
revenues for these products are currently reported in the Hospital category.
(f) Pfizer CentreOne includes revenues from our contract manufacturing and active pharmaceutical ingredient sales operation, including sterile injectables contract manufacturing, and revenues related to our
manufacturing and supply agreements, including with Zoetis Inc. In the fourth quarter of 2017, we sold our equity share in Hisun Pfizer. As a result, effective in the first quarter of 2018, Hisun Pfizer-related
revenues, previously reported in emerging markets within legacy All Other LEP and legacy All Other SIP, are reported in emerging markets within Pfizer CentreOne.
(g) We reclassified Inflectra/Remsima from the legacy Biosimilars category to the Inflammation & Immunology category to conform 2018 and 2017 product revenues to the current presentation.
(h) On July 31, 2019, Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare business, an over-the-counter medicines business, was combined with GSK’s consumer healthcare business to form a new consumer healthcare joint venture. For
additional information, see Note 1A and Note 2C.
(i) Represents HIS revenues through February 2, 2017, which includes Medication Management Systems products composed of infusion pumps and related software and services, as well as IV Infusion Products,
including large volume IV solutions and their associated administration sets. On February 3, 2017, we completed the sale of HIS to ICU Medical. For additional information, see Note 1A and Note 2B.
(j) Sterile Injectable Pharmaceuticals represents the total of all branded and generic injectable products in the Hospital business, including anti-infective sterile injectable pharmaceuticals.

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarter
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER COMMON SHARE DATA) First Second Third Fourth
2019 (a)
Revenues $ 13,118 $ 13,264 $ 12,680 $ 12,688
Costs and expenses(b) 8,749 9,239 9,676 13,743
Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs (c), (d) 46 (115) 365 452
(Gain) on completion of Consumer Healthcare JV transaction(d) — — (8,087) 1
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for taxes on income/(loss) 4,323 4,141 10,727 (1,508)
Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income/(loss)(e) 433 (915) 3,047 (1,181)
Income/(loss) from continuing operations 3,889 5,056 7,680 (326)
Discontinued operations—net of tax — — 4 —
Net income/(loss) before allocation to noncontrolling interests 3,889 5,056 7,684 (326)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 6 10 4 10
Net income/(loss) attributable to Pfizer Inc. $ 3,884 $ 5,046 $ 7,680 $ (337)
Earnings/(loss) per common share—basic:

Income/(loss) from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 0.69 $ 0.91 $ 1.38 $ (0.06)
Discontinued operations—net of tax — — — —
Net income/(loss) attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 0.69 $ 0.91 $ 1.38 $ (0.06)
Earnings/(loss) per common share—diluted:

(a) As described in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1A. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation, acquisitions and the contribution of our Consumer
Healthcare business to the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture impacted our results of operations in 2019.
(b) The fourth quarter historically reflects higher costs in Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses and Research and development expenses. The fourth quarter of 2019 includes $2.8 billion in
certain asset impairments recorded in Other (income)/deductions—net. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions—Net.
(c) The second quarter of 2019 includes the reversal of certain accruals related to our acquisition of Wyeth upon the effective favorable settlement of a U.S. IRS audit from multiple tax years (see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5D. Tax Matters: Tax Contingencies). The third quarter of 2019 includes $217 million of integration costs and other, primarily including $157 million in payments to Array
employees for the fair value of previously unvested stock options that was recognized as post-closing compensation expense. The fourth quarter of 2019 primarily includes employee termination costs, asset
impairments and other exit costs associated with cost reduction initiatives. The employee termination costs are mostly associated with (i) our improvements to operational effectiveness as part of the realignment
of our organizational structure effective at the beginning of 2019 and (ii) our initiatives in connection with transforming to a more focused company. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements—Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.
(d) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2C. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Licensing Arrangements and Research and
Development and Collaborative Arrangements: Equity-Method Investments and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale.
(e) During the second quarter of 2019, Pfizer reached settlement of disputed issues at the IRS Office of Appeals, thereby settling all issues related to U.S. tax returns of Pfizer for the years 2009-2010. As a result of
settling these years, in the second quarter of 2019 we recorded a benefit of approximately $1.4 billion, representing tax and interest. The third quarter of 2019 reflects tax expense of approximately $2.7 billion
associated with the gain related to the completion of the Consumer Healthcare joint venture with GSK.
Basic and diluted EPS are computed independently for each of the periods presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly EPS amounts may not agree to the total for the
year.

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarter
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER COMMON SHARE DATA) First Second Third Fourth
2018
Revenues $ 12,906 $ 13,466 $ 13,298 $ 13,976
Costs and expenses(a) 8,736 8,895 9,035 14,051
Restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs (b) 43 44 85 872
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before provision/(benefit) for taxes on income/(loss) 4,127 4,527 4,177 (946)
Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income/(loss)(c) 556 648 66 (563)
Income/(loss) from continuing operations 3,571 3,879 4,111 (383)
Discontinued operations—net of tax (1) — 11 —
Net income/(loss) before allocation to noncontrolling interests 3,570 3,879 4,122 (383)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 9 7 8 11
Net income/(loss) attributable to Pfizer Inc. $ 3,561 $ 3,872 $ 4,114 $ (394)
Earnings/(loss) per common share—basic:

Earnings/(loss) per common share—diluted:

(a) The fourth quarter historically reflects higher costs in Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses and Research and development expenses. The fourth quarter of 2018 included $3.1 billion in
certain asset impairments recorded in Other (income)/deductions––net. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions—Net.
(b) The fourth quarter of 2018 included restructuring charges that were primarily related to employee termination costs and asset write downs. The employee termination costs were associated with our improvements
to operational effectiveness as part of the realignment of our organizational structure effective at the beginning of 2019. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 3.
Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.
(c)
The third and fourth quarters of 2018 reflect the impact of the TCJA on the Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income/(loss). For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5A.
Tax Matters: Taxes on Income from Continuing Operations.
Basic and diluted EPS are computed independently for each of the periods presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly EPS amounts may not agree to the total for the
year.

Financial Summary
Year Ended/As of December 31,(a)

(MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER COMMON SHARE DATA) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Revenues $ 51,750 $ 53,647 $ 52,546 $ 52,824 $ 48,851
Income from continuing operations 16,298 11,179 21,353 7,229 6,975
Total assets 167,489 159,422 171,797 171,615 167,381
Long-term obligations(b) 66,739 63,807 69,714 80,660 72,985
Earnings per common share—basic(c)
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 2.92 $ 1.90 $ 3.57 $ 1.18 $ 1.13
Discontinued operations—net of tax — — — — —
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 2.92 $ 1.90 $ 3.57 $ 1.18 $ 1.13
Earnings per common share—diluted(c)

Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 2.87 $ 1.86 $ 3.52 $ 1.17 $ 1.11
Discontinued operations—net of tax — — — — —
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders $ 2.87 $ 1.87 $ 3.52 $ 1.17 $ 1.11

Cash dividends declared per common share $ 1.46 $ 1.38 $ 1.30 $ 1.22 $ 1.14
(a) As described in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1A. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation, acquisitions impacted our results of operations in 2019 and
2017, the contribution of our Consumer Healthcare business to the GSK Consumer Healthcare joint venture impacted our results of operations in 2019 and divestitures impacted our results of operations in 2017.
2016 reflects the acquisition of Medivation on September 28, 2016 and the acquisition of Anacor on June 24, 2016, and 2015 reflects the acquisition of Hospira on September 3, 2015.
(b) Defined as Long-term debt, Pension benefit obligations, net, Postretirement benefit obligations, net, Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, Other taxes payable and Other noncurrent liabilities.
(c) 2019, 2018 and 2017 reflect the impact of the TCJA on the Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5A. Tax Matters: Taxes on
Income from Continuing Operations.

Peer Group Performance Graph

The following graph assumes a $100 investment on December 31, 2014, and reinvestment of all dividends, in each of the Company’s Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index, and
a composite peer group of the major U.S. and European-based pharmaceutical companies, which are: AbbVie Inc., Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca plc, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Company, Eli Lilly & Co., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Johnson & Johnson, Merck and Co., Inc., Novartis AG, Roche Holding AG and Sanofi SA.
Five Year Performance
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

PFIZER $100.0 $107.1 $111.9 $129.5 $161.7 $150.5
PEER GROUP $100.0 $101.6 $102.4 $120.0 $129.8 $157.7
S&P 500 $100.0 $101.4 $113.5 $138.3 $132.2 $173.8

Exhibit 21
The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2019 omitting some subsidiaries which, considered in the aggregate,
would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
Company Name Where Incorporated or Organized

Agouron Pharmaceuticals, LLC California
AH Robins LLC Delaware
AHP Holdings B.V. Netherlands
AHP Manufacturing B.V. Netherlands
Alpharma Pharmaceuticals LLC Delaware
Alpharma Specialty Pharma LLC Delaware
American Food Industries LLC Delaware
Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Delaware
Array BioPharma Inc. Delaware
Array BioPharma Limited Ireland
Array BioPharma Ltd. United Kingdom
Bamboo Therapeutics, Inc. Delaware
BINESA 2002, S.L. Spain
Bioren, LLC Delaware
Blue Whale Re Ltd. Vermont
C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. Netherlands
CICL Corporation Delaware
COC I Corporation Delaware
Coley Pharmaceutical GmbH Germany
Coley Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. Delaware
Continental Pharma, Inc. Delaware
Covx Technologies Ireland Limited Ireland
Cyanamid de Argentina S.A. Delaware
Cyanamid de Colombia, S.A. Delaware
Distribuidora Mercantil Centro Americana, S.A. Delaware
Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. Delaware
Excaliard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Delaware
Farminova Produtos Farmaceuticos de Inovacao, Lda. Portugal
Farmogene Productos Farmaceuticos Lda Portugal
FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Delaware
Fort Dodge Manufatura Ltda. Brazil
G. D. Searle & Co. Limited United Kingdom
G. D. Searle International Capital LLC Delaware
G. D. Searle LLC Delaware
Genetics Institute, LLC Delaware
GenTrac, Inc. Wisconsin
GI Europe, Inc. Delaware
GI Japan, Inc. Delaware
Greenstone LLC Delaware
-1-
Hospira Adelaide Pty Ltd Australia
Hospira Australia Pty Ltd Australia
Hospira Benelux BVBA Belgium
Hospira Enterprises B.V. Netherlands
Hospira France SAS France
Hospira Holdings (S.A.) Pty Ltd Australia
Hospira Invicta, S.A. Spain
Hospira Ireland Holdings Unlimited Company Ireland
Hospira Limited Hong Kong
Hospira Malaysia Sdn Bhd Malaysia
Hospira Nordic AB Sweden
Hospira Philippines, Inc. Philippines
Hospira Pte. Ltd. Singapore
Hospira Pty Limited Australia
Hospira Puerto Rico, LLC Delaware
Hospira Singapore Pte Ltd Singapore
Hospira UK Limited United Kingdom
Hospira Worldwide, LLC Delaware
Hospira Zagreb d.o.o. Croatia
Hospira, Inc. Delaware
Ignite Immunotherapy, Inc. Delaware
Industrial Santa Agape, S.A. Guatemala
InnoPharma, Inc. Delaware
International Affiliated Corporation LLC Delaware
IP Pharmaceuticals India Private Limited India
JMI-Daniels Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Florida
John Wyeth & Brother Limited United Kingdom
Kiinteistö oy Espoon Pellavaniementie 14 Finland
King Pharmaceuticals Holdings LLC Delaware
King Pharmaceuticals LLC Delaware
King Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, LLC Delaware
Korea Pharma Holding Company Limited Hong Kong
Laboratoires Pfizer, S.A. Morocco
Laboratorios Parke Davis, S.L. Spain
Laboratorios Pfizer Ltda. Brazil
Laboratórios Pfizer, Lda. Portugal
Laboratorios Wyeth LLC Pennsylvania
Laboratorios Wyeth S.A. Venezuela
Mayne Pharma IP Holdings (Euro) Pty Ltd Australia
Medivation Field Solutions LLC Delaware
Medivation LLC Delaware
Medivation Neurology LLC Delaware
Medivation Prostate Therapeutics LLC Delaware
Medivation Services LLC Delaware
Medivation Technologies LLC Delaware
Meridian Medical Technologies Limited United Kingdom
-2-
Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. Delaware
Monarch Pharmaceuticals, LLC Tennessee
MTG Divestitures LLC Delaware
Neusentis Limited United Kingdom
PAH USA IN8 LLC Delaware
Parke Davis Limited Hong Kong
Parke Davis Productos Farmaceuticos Lda Portugal
Parke, Davis & Company LLC Michigan
Parkedale Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Michigan
PBG Puerto Rico LLC Puerto Rico
PCH SpinCo B.V. Netherlands
P-D Co., LLC Delaware
Peak Enterprises LLC Delaware
PEMB OFG Spain Holding, S.L. Spain
PF Asia Manufacturing B.V. Netherlands
PF Consumer Healthcare Austria GmbH Austria
PF Consumer Healthcare Holdings LLC Delaware
PF Consumer Healthcare Holdings US Inc. Delaware
PF Consumer Healthcare Poland sp. z.o.o. Poland
PF Consumer Taiwan LLC Delaware
PF Czech Republic Holdings B.V. Netherlands
PF Finland Holdings B.V. Netherlands
PF OFG Ireland 1 B.V. Netherlands
PF OFG Ireland 2 B.V. Netherlands
PF OFG Mexico B.V. Netherlands
PF OFG Philippines B.V. Netherlands
PF OFG Philippines, Inc. Philippines
PF OFG Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia
PF OFG South Korea 1 B.V. Netherlands
PF OFG South Korea 2 B.V. Netherlands
PF OFG Spain B.V. Netherlands
PF PR Holdings C.V. Netherlands
PF PRISM C.V. Netherlands
PF PRISM Holdings B.V. Netherlands
PF PRISM IMB B.V. Netherlands
PF Prism S.á.r.l. Luxembourg
PFE Holdings G.K. Japan
PFE Pfizer Holdings 1 LLC Delaware
PFE PHAC Holdings 1 LLC Delaware
PFE Wyeth Holdings LLC Delaware
PFE Wyeth-Ayerst (Asia) LLC Delaware
Pfizer France
Pfizer (China) Research and Development Co. Ltd. People's Republic of China
Pfizer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd Malaysia
Pfizer (Perth) Pty Ltd Australia
Pfizer (Thailand) Limited Thailand
-3-
Pfizer (Wuhan) Research and Development Co. Ltd. People's Republic of China
Pfizer AB Sweden
Pfizer Advanced Pharmaceutical Company Limited Taiwan
Pfizer Africa & Middle East for Pharmaceuticals, Veterinarian Products & Egypt
Chemicals S.A.E.
Pfizer Afrique de L'Ouest Senegal
Pfizer AG Switzerland
Pfizer Anti-Infectives AB Sweden
Pfizer ApS Denmark
Pfizer AS Norway
Pfizer Asia Manufacturing Pte. Ltd. Singapore
Pfizer Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. Singapore
Pfizer Australia Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Australia Holdings Pty Limited Australia
Pfizer Australia Investments Pty Ltd Australia
Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd Australia
Pfizer B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer BH D.o.o. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Pfizer Biofarmacêutica, Sociedade Unipessoal Lda Portugal
Pfizer Biologics (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd People's Republic of China
Pfizer Biologics Ireland Holdings Limited Ireland
Pfizer Biopharma Egypt Import LLC Egypt
Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals Egypt LLC Egypt
Pfizer Biotech Corporation Taiwan
Pfizer Bolivia S.A. Bolivia
Pfizer Canada ULC / Pfizer Canada SRI Canada
Pfizer CentreSource Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Singapore
Pfizer Chile S.A. Chile
Pfizer Cia. Ltda. Ecuador
Pfizer Colombia Spinco I LLC Pennsylvania
Pfizer Commercial Holdings TRAE Kft. Hungary
Pfizer Commercial TRAE Trading Kft. Hungary
Pfizer Consumer Healthcare United Kingdom
Pfizer Corporation Austria Gesellschaft m.b.H. Austria
Pfizer Corporation Hong Kong Limited Hong Kong
Pfizer Corporation S. de R.L. Panama
Pfizer Croatia d.o.o. Croatia
Pfizer Deutschland GmbH Germany
Pfizer Development B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Development LLC Delaware
Pfizer Development LP United Kingdom
Pfizer Development Services (UK) Limited United Kingdom
Pfizer Dominicana, S.R.L Dominican Republic
Pfizer East India B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Eastern Investments B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Egypt S.A.E. Egypt
-4-
Pfizer Enterprise Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Enterprises LLC Delaware
Pfizer Enterprises SARL Luxembourg
Pfizer ESP Pty. Ltd. Australia
Pfizer Established Medicine Italy S.r.l. Italy
Pfizer Europe Finance B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Export B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Export Company Ireland
Pfizer Export Holding Company B.V Netherlands
Pfizer Finance Share Service (Dalian) Co., Ltd. People's Republic of China
Pfizer Financial Services Belgium
Pfizer France International Investments France
Pfizer Free Zone Panama, S. de R.L. Panama
Pfizer GEP, S.L. Spain
Pfizer Global Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Global Supply Japan Inc. Japan
Pfizer Global Trading Ireland
Pfizer Group Luxembourg SARL Luxembourg
Pfizer Gulf FZ-LLC United Arab Emirates
Pfizer H.C.P. Corporation New York
Pfizer Health AB Sweden
Pfizer Health Solutions Inc. Delaware
Pfizer Healthcare India Private Limited India
Pfizer Healthcare Ireland Ireland
Pfizer Hellas, A.E. Greece
Pfizer Himalaya Holdings Coöperatief U.A. Netherlands
Pfizer Holding France France
Pfizer Holding Ventures Ireland
Pfizer Holdings Corporation Delaware
Pfizer Holdings Europe Unlimited Company Ireland
Pfizer Holdings G.K. Japan
Pfizer Holdings International Corporation Delaware
Pfizer Holdings International Luxembourg (PHIL) SARL Luxembourg
Pfizer Hungary Holdings TRAE Kft. Hungary
Pfizer Ilaclari Limited Sirketi Turkey
Pfizer Innovations AB Sweden
Pfizer Innovations LLC Russia
Pfizer Innovative Supply Point International BVBA Belgium
Pfizer International LLC New York
Pfizer International Markets B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer International Operations France
Pfizer International S. de R.L. Panama
Pfizer International Trading (Shanghai) Limited People's Republic of China
Pfizer Investment Capital Unlimited Company Ireland
Pfizer Investment Co. Ltd. People's Republic of China
Pfizer Investment Holdings S.a.r.l. Luxembourg
-5-
Pfizer Ireland Investments Limited Ireland
Pfizer Ireland PFE Holding 1 LLC Delaware
Pfizer Ireland PFE Holding 2 LLC Delaware
Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals Ireland
Pfizer Ireland Ventures Unlimited Company Ireland
Pfizer Italia S.r.l. Italy
Pfizer Italy Group Holding S.r.l. Italy
Pfizer Japan Inc. Japan
Pfizer Laboratories (Pty) Limited South Africa
Pfizer Laboratories Limited Kenya
Pfizer Leasing Ireland Limited Ireland
Pfizer Leasing UK Limited United Kingdom
Pfizer Limited India
Pfizer Limited Taiwan
Pfizer Limited United Kingdom
Pfizer LLC Russia
Pfizer Luxco Holdings SARL Luxembourg
Pfizer Luxembourg Global Holdings S.à r.l. Luxembourg
Pfizer Luxembourg SARL Luxembourg
Pfizer Manufacturing Austria G.m.b.H. Austria
Pfizer Manufacturing Belgium N.V. Belgium
Pfizer Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH Germany
Pfizer Manufacturing Deutschland Grundbesitz GmbH & Co. KG Germany
Pfizer Manufacturing Holdings LLC Delaware
Pfizer Manufacturing Ireland Unlimited Company Ireland
Pfizer Manufacturing LLC Delaware
Pfizer Manufacturing Services Ireland
Pfizer MAP Holding, Inc. Delaware
Pfizer Medical Technology Group (Belgium) N.V. Belgium
Pfizer Medicamentos Genericos e Participacoes Ltda. Brazil
Pfizer Mexico Holding 2 B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Mexico Holding B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Mexico
Pfizer Middle East for Pharmaceuticals, Animal Health and Chemicals S.A.E. Egypt
Pfizer New Zealand Limited New Zealand
Pfizer Norge AS Norway
Pfizer North America Services LLC Delaware
Pfizer OFG Germany GmbH Germany
Pfizer OTC B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Overseas LLC Delaware
Pfizer Oy Finland
Pfizer Pakistan Limited Pakistan
Pfizer Parke Davis (Thailand) Ltd. Thailand
Pfizer Parke Davis Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia
-6-
Pfizer PFE ApS Denmark
Pfizer PFE AsiaPac Holding B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE Australia Holding B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE Australia Pty Ltd Australia
Pfizer PFE Belgium SPRL Belgium
Pfizer PFE CIA. Ltda. Ecuador
Pfizer PFE Colombia Holding LLC Delaware
Pfizer PFE Croatia Holding B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE Eastern Investments B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE Finland Oy Finland
Pfizer PFE France France
Pfizer PFE Global Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE İlaçları Anonim Şirketi Turkey
Pfizer PFE Ireland Pharmaceuticals Holding 1 B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE Limited Taiwan
Pfizer PFE Norway Holding S.à r.l. Luxembourg
Pfizer PFE Peru S.R.L. Peru
Pfizer PFE Pharmaceuticals Israel Holding LLC Delaware
Pfizer PFE Pharmaceuticals Israel Ltd. Israel
Pfizer PFE PILSA Holdco S.à r.l. Luxembourg
Pfizer PFE Private Limited Singapore
Pfizer PFE Service Company Holding B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE Singapore Holding B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE Singapore Pte. Ltd. Singapore
Pfizer PFE Spain B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE Spain Holding, S.L. Spain
Pfizer PFE Switzerland GmbH Switzerland
Pfizer PFE Turkey Holding 1 B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE Turkey Holding 2 B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer PFE UK Holding 4 LP United Kingdom
Pfizer PFE US Holdings 4 LLC Delaware
Pfizer PFE US Holdings 5 LLC Delaware
Pfizer PFE, spol. s r.o. Czech Republic
Pfizer Pharm Algerie Algeria
Pfizer Pharma GmbH Germany
Pfizer Pharma PFE GmbH Germany
Pfizer Pharmaceutical (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. People's Republic of China
Pfizer Pharmaceutical Trading Limited Liability Company (a/k/a Pfizer Kft. or Pfizer Hungary
LLC)
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Global B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Israel Ltd. Israel
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals K.K. Japan
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Korea Limited Korea
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC Delaware
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Ltd. People's Republic of China
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Science and Technology Co., Ltd. People's Republic of China
-7-
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Tunisie Sarl Tunisia
Pfizer Pigments Inc. Delaware
Pfizer Polska Sp. z.o.o. Poland
Pfizer Private Limited Singapore
Pfizer Production LLC Delaware
Pfizer Products Inc. Connecticut
Pfizer Products India Private Limited India
Pfizer R&D Holding B.V. Netherlands
Pfizer R&D Japan G.K. Japan
Pfizer R&D UK Limited United Kingdom
Pfizer Research (NC), Inc. Delaware
Pfizer Romania SRL Romania
Pfizer S.A. Peru
Pfizer S.A. (Belgium) Belgium
Pfizer S.A.S. Colombia
Pfizer S.G.P.S. Lda. Portugal
Pfizer S.r.l. Italy
Pfizer S.R.L. Argentina
Pfizer Saidal Manufacturing Algeria
Pfizer Saudi Limited Saudi Arabia
Pfizer Service Company BVBA Belgium
Pfizer Service Company Ireland Unlimited Company Ireland
Pfizer Services 1 France
Pfizer Services LLC Delaware
Pfizer Shared Services Unlimited Company Ireland
Pfizer Shareholdings Intermediate SARL Luxembourg
Pfizer Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd. Singapore
Pfizer Specialties Limited Nigeria
Pfizer SRB d.o.o. Serbia
Pfizer Strategic Investment Holdings LLC Delaware
Pfizer Trading Polska sp.z.o.o. Poland
Pfizer TRAE Holdings Kft. Hungary
Pfizer Transactions Ireland Unlimited Company Ireland
Pfizer Transactions LLC Delaware
Pfizer Tunisie SA Tunisia
Pfizer UPJ G.K. Japan
Pfizer Upjohn Hong Kong Limited Hong Kong
Pfizer Upjohn Korea Limited Korea
Pfizer Upjohn Management Co., Ltd. People's Republic of China
Pfizer Upjohn Medical Trading Co., Ltd. People's Republic of China
Pfizer Vaccines LLC Delaware
Pfizer Venezuela, S.A. Venezuela
Pfizer Venture Investments LLC Delaware
Pfizer Ventures (US) LLC Delaware
Pfizer Ventures LLC Delaware
Pfizer Worldwide Services Unlimited Company Ireland
-8-
Pfizer Zona Franca, S.A. Costa Rica
Pfizer, Inc. Philippines
Pfizer, S.A. Costa Rica
Pfizer, S.A. de C.V. Mexico
Pfizer, S.L. Spain
Pfizer, spol. s r.o. Czech Republic
Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC Delaware
Pharmacia & Upjohn LLC Delaware
Pharmacia & Upjohn, S.A. de C.V. Mexico
Pharmacia Brasil Ltda. Brazil
Pharmacia Hepar LLC Delaware
Pharmacia Holding AB Sweden
Pharmacia Inter-American LLC Pennsylvania
Pharmacia International B.V. Netherlands
Pharmacia Limited United Kingdom
Pharmacia LLC Delaware
Pharmacia Nostrum, S.A. Spain
PHIVCO Corp. Delaware
PHIVCO Holdco S.à r.l. Luxembourg
PHIVCO Luxembourg S.à r.l. Luxembourg
PIMB OFG Spain Holding, S.L. Spain
PRISM Holdings B.V. Netherlands
PT. Pfizer Indonesia Indonesia
PT. Pfizer Parke Davis Indonesia
Purepac Pharmaceutical Holdings LLC Delaware
Renrall LLC Wyoming
Rinat Neuroscience Corp. Delaware
Roerig Produtos Farmaceuticos, Lda. Portugal
Roerig S.A. Chile
Searle Laboratorios, Lda. Portugal
Servicios P&U, S. de R.L. de C.V. Mexico
Shiley LLC California
Sinergis Farma-Produtos Farmaceuticos, Lda. Portugal
Solinor LLC Delaware
Sugen LLC Delaware
Tabor LLC Delaware
The Pfizer Incubator LLC Delaware
Therachon France
Therachon Holding GmbH Switzerland
Upjohn (Thailand) Limited Thailand
Upjohn Australia Pty Ltd. Australia
Upjohn Belgium B.V. Netherlands
Upjohn Canada ULC Canada
Upjohn Europe Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Upjohn Export B.V. Netherlands
Upjohn Global Holdings B.V. Netherlands
-9-
Upjohn Group Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Upjohn Hellas Pharmaceutical Limited Liability Company Greece
Upjohn Inc. Delaware
Upjohn Intermediate Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Upjohn International Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Upjohn Laboratorios Lda. Portugal
Upjohn Manufacturing Ireland Unlimited Company Ireland
Upjohn Middle East FZ-LLC United Arab Emirates
Upjohn Netherlands B.V. Netherlands
Upjohn New Zealand ULC New Zealand
Upjohn Pharma Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. Mexico
Upjohn Pharmaceuticals Inc. Delaware
Upjohn PR Holdings C.V. Netherlands
Upjohn PRISM B.V. Netherlands
Upjohn South Africa South Africa
Upjohn UK 2 Ltd. United Kingdom
Upjohn UK Limited United Kingdom
Upjohn US 1 LLC Delaware
Upjohn US 2 LLC Delaware
Upjohn US Employment Inc. Delaware
Upjohn US Holdings Inc. Delaware
Upjohn Worldwide Holdings Inc. Delaware
Utah Acquisition Holdco Inc. Delaware
Utah Acquisition Sub Inc. Delaware
Vicuron Holdings LLC Delaware
Vinci Farma, S.A. Spain
Warner Lambert del Uruguay S.A. Uruguay
Warner Lambert Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi Turkey
Warner-Lambert (Thailand) Limited Thailand
Warner-Lambert Company AG Switzerland
Warner-Lambert Company LLC Delaware
Whitehall Laboratories Inc. Delaware
W-L LLC Delaware
Wyeth (Thailand) Ltd. Thailand
Wyeth AB Sweden
Wyeth Ayerst Inc. Delaware
Wyeth Ayerst S.à r.l. Luxembourg
Wyeth Europa Limited United Kingdom
Wyeth Farma, S.A. Spain
Wyeth Holdings LLC Maine
Wyeth Industria Farmaceutica Ltda. Brazil
Wyeth KFT. Hungary
Wyeth Lederle S.r.l. Italy
Wyeth Lederle Vaccines S.A. Belgium
Wyeth LLC Delaware
Wyeth Pakistan Limited Pakistan
- 10 -
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals FZ-LLC United Arab Emirates
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals India Private Limited India
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals LLC Delaware
Wyeth Subsidiary Illinois Corporation Illinois
Wyeth Whitehall Export GmbH Austria
Wyeth-Ayerst (Asia) LLC Delaware
Wyeth-Ayerst International LLC Delaware
Wyeth-Ayerst Promotions Limited Delaware
Yarra Therapeutics, LLC Delaware
- 11 -
EXHIBIT 23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and the Shareholders of Pfizer Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pfizer Inc. of our reports dated February 27, 2020, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Pfizer Inc. and Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2019, which reports appear in the 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pfizer Inc.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports in the following Registration Statements:
-Form S-8 dated October 27, 1983 (File No. 2-87473),

-Form S-8 dated March 22, 1990 (File No. 33-34139),
-Form S-8 dated January 24, 1991 (File No. 33-38708),
-Form S-8 dated November 18, 1991 (File No. 33-44053),
-Form S-8 dated May 27, 1993 (File No. 33-49631),
-Form S-8 dated May 19, 1994 (File No. 33-53713),
-Form S-8 dated December 20, 1994 (File No. 33-56979),
-Form S-8 dated September 25, 1997 (File No. 333-36371),
-Form S-8 dated June 19, 2000 (File No. 333-39606),
-Form S-8 dated April 27, 2001 (File No. 333-59660),
-Form S-8 dated November 18, 2003 (File No. 333-110571),
-Form S-8 dated December 18, 2003 (File No. 333-111333),
-Form S-4 dated September 3, 2015 (File No. 333-206758),
-Form S-3 ASR dated February 26, 2018 (File No. 333-223221), and
-Form S-8 dated August 8, 2019 (File No. 333-233166).
/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York February 27, 2020
EXHIBIT 31.1
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Albert Bourla, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pfizer Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
Date: February 27, 2020
/s/ ALBERT BOURLA

Albert Bourla
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
I, Frank A. D'Amelio, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pfizer Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
Date: February 27, 2020
/s/ FRANK A. D'AMELIO

Frank A. D'Amelio
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
Business Operations and Global Supply
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Albert Bourla, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pfizer Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pfizer Inc.
/s/ ALBERT BOURLA

Albert Bourla

February 27, 2020
This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 32.2
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Frank A. D'Amelio, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pfizer
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pfizer Inc.
/s/ FRANK A. D'AMELIO

Frank A. D'Amelio
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
Business Operations and Global Supply

February 27, 2020
This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

Pfizer Inc.: United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pfizer Inc.: United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K i

2019 Financial Report Exhibit 13 to this 2019 Form 10-K

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K ii

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K iii

8 Products with Direct Product and/or Alliance Revenues of

6 Primary Therapeutic Areas in Biopharma —

20 Globally Recognized Brands and the Greenstone generics

>125 Countries Where We Sell Our Products

95 Projects in Clinical Research & Development**

~$8.7 Billion 2019 R&D Expense

~88,300 Employees Globally

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K iv

Our significant recent business development activities include:

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 1

AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND PFIZER WEBSITE

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 2

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 3

PFIZER BIOPHARMACEUTICALS GROUP (BIOPHARMA)

Therapeutic Area Description Key Products

Biopharma $1 Billion+ Products

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 4

• Cardiovascular (Lipitor, Norvasc and Revatio);

Upjohn $1 Billion+ Products

COLLABORATION AND CO-PROMOTION AGREEMENTS

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 5

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Our R&D Priorities and Strategy

Our R&D priorities include:

To that end, our R&D primarily focuses on:

Our R&D Operations

Our R&D spending is conducted through a number of matrix organizations:

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 6

Our R&D Pipeline and Competition

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 7

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 8

% of 2019 Total Revenues and U.S. Revenues from

PATENTS AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 9

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 10

Recent Losses and Expected Losses of Product Exclusivity

(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Product Revenues in Markets Impacted

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 11

Managed Care Organizations

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 12

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 13

GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND PRICE CONSTRAINTS

In the United States

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 14

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 15

Outside the United States

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 16

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 17

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 18

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 19

• environment-related capital expenditures— $31 million; and

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 20

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Pfizer Inc. 2019 Form 10-K 21