INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: ERNANI M. FLORENDO JR. Name of Rater: DR. ALICIA F. APRECIO
Position: TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL IV
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED Date of Review: APRIL 26,2019
Rating Period: 2018-2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable Showed knowledge 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services Knowledge and knowledge of evidence was of content and its
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge shown integration within and
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its across subject areas
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within as shown in MOV 1
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject with a rating of 7
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was lessons using MOV 1
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown and supported by any
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other 1 of the other given
given MOV given MOV given MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was Facilitated using
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown different teaching
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading strategies that
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or promote reading
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as writing and/or
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 numeracy skills as
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7
7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of the Submitted at least 4
and supported by and supported by and supported by other given MOV learner-centered
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other lessons as evidently
MOV given MOV given MOV given shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of
the other MOV given
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was teaching strategies
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown that develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative thinking
and creative thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or skills and/or other
thinking, as well other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as HOTS as shown in
as other higher shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 with a rating
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 of 7
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted at least 4
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was lessons as evidenced
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown by MOV 1 and
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV supported by any 1 of
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other the other given MOV
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable Used classroom 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom evidence was management
management management management management
and Diversity of structure to shown strategies that
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies thatstrategies that engage learners in
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as
groups, in shown in MOV 1 with
meanigful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 a rating of 7
exploration, 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted at least 4
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on supported by any of evidence was lessons supported by
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a the acceptable shown MOV 1 and any 1 of
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical MOV the other acceptable
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services learner behavior management management management management evidence was management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive and
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent non-violent discipline
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown as shown in MOV
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted submitted with a
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 rating of 7
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson observed in at least 4
4 lessons lessons lessons lessons
 Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson observed in at least 4
4 lessons lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable Applied differentiated 5 4 4.500 0.337
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated evidence was teaching strategies to
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown address learner
teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner to address learner to address learner diversity as shown in
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown MOV 1 with a rating
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a of 7
in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
gender, needs, rating of 6
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 4
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown teaching strategies in
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as at least 2 lessons as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in evidenced by MOV 1
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the and supported by any
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV 1 of the other
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Planned and 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown developmentally
developmentally sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
sequenced and learning and learning and learning and learning and learning process
teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown process as shown as shown in MOV 1
learning in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a with a rating of 7
processes to meet rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 4
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally
contexts. sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown sequenced teaching
and learning and learning and learning and learning and learning process
process as process as process as process as as evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given supported by any 1 of
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV the other given MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable Consistently 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was participated in
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown LACs/FGDs/meetings
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner to discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV instruction as shown
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable Participated in at

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was least 4
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown LACs/FGDs/meetings
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the given as evidently shown in
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV MOV any 1 of the given
the given MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and used 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was varied teaching and
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown learning resources,
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, including ICT, to
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to address learning
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning goals as shown in
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of 7
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable Submitted at least 4
7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was varied teaching and
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown learning resources,
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the MOV 1 and
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV supported by any 1 of
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable the acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable Designed, selected, 5 5 5 0.375
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was organized and used
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown diagnostic, formative
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and and summative
formative and summative summative summative summative assessment
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment strategies consistent
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies with curriculum
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with requirements as
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum shown in MOV 1 with
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as a rating of 6
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3 varied
varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was assessment tools as
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown evidently shown in
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the any 1 of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable Consistently 5 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was monitored and
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown evaluated learner
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement progress and
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner achievement using
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV data as shown in the
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was combination of 3 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV were
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was distributed across 4
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown quarters
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable Consistently showed 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was prompt and clear
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown communication of the
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/ guardians as shown guardians as shown
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV in the MOV submitted
7.5% in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted a

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was combination of 3 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV were
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was distributed across 3
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown quarters
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Consistently 5 5 5.000 0.500
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was performed various
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown related work/activities
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the that contribute to the
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning teaching learning
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown process as shown in
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV the MOV submitted
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown acceptable MOV
Timeliness 5
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
OUTSTANDING 4.660
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
 RATING FOR OVER-ALL
OUTSTANDING 4.660
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory ERNANI M. FLORENDO JR. NELSON G. LADIA DR. ALICIA F. APRECIO
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: ERNANI M. FLORENDO JR. Name of Rater: SHEILA M.POSADAS

Position: T-I Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: LA UNION Date of Review: APRIL 26,2019
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 3 7.5% 4 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 4 7.5% 4 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4 5.000 0.375
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4 5.000 0.375
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 5.000 0.375
Objective 9 7.5% 5 4 5.000 0.375
Objective 10 7.5% 5 4 5.000 0.375
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 4 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 12 7.5% 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating OUTSTANDING
Adjectival Rating 4.66

ERNANI M. FLORENDO JR. SHEILA M. POSADAS ALICIA F. APRECIO, Ed.D.

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: CHERRY M. DE GUZMAN Name of Rater: DR. ALICIA F. APRECIO

Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL IV
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018-2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of applications of shown
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues colleagues and
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by supported by any 1
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given MOV given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues colleagues shown
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable 5 4 4.500 0.337
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher-
thinking skills. order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
more lessons as lessons as evidently lessons as evidently as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and and supported by and supported by supported by any of
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other the other MOV
of the other MOV MOV given MOV given given
given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and
Modeled and evidence was
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective shared effective
shared effective shown
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom classroomclassroom
management of management management management
management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different done in different
done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning physical learning
physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as environments as
environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
with a rating of 5
environments.environme Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
nts. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior behavior shown
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable
the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies given strategies as evidence was
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable evidence of sharing
MOV MOV MOV with others
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing shown
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
developmentally and learning and learning and learning and learning
sequenced teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown process as shown
learning processes to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
meet curriculum rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
 evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
learner feedback to plan, LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
facilitate and enrich gs to discuss and learner and learner and learner
teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner and learner and learner learner feedback as
feedback as feedback as feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown
development and use of organization, organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources
goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed collaboratively reviewed collaboratively evidence was
colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively assessment tools shown
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools with colleagues as
organization and use of with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as shown in the MOV
a range of effective shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
diagnostic, formative submitted submitted
 colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively assessment tools shown
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools with colleagues as
organization and use of with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as shown in the MOV
a range of effective shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
curriculum requirements. as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable 5 5 5 0.375
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of assessment data as
attainment data to assessment data as assessment data as assessment data as shown in the MOV
support learner progress shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
7.5%
and achievement. submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of the MOV evidence was
MOV MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services effective communication skills in the effective skills in the effective applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
of learner needs, communication of communication of effective communication of shown
progress and learner needs and learner needs and communication of learner needs and
achievement to key progress to parents/ progress to parents/ learner needs and progress to parents/
stakeholders, including guardians as shown guardians as shown progress to parents/ guardians as shown
parents/guardians. in the MOV in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1

of the acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.500
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or assignments as shown
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as shown in the MOV
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
10% submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Outstanding 4.848
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
 ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory CHERRY M. DE GUZMAN DR. ALICIA F. APRECIO DR. MARCIANO U. SORIANO JR.
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: CHERRY M. DE GUZMAN Name of Rater: DR. ALICIA F. APRECIO

Position: MASTER TEACHER 1 Position: PRINCIPAL IV
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: ELEMENTARY EDUCATION Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 5 0 4.500 0.337
Objective 3 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 4 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 6 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 7 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 9 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 10 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 12 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating 4.848
Adjectival Rating OUTSTANDING

CHERRY M. DE GUZMAN DR. ALICIA F. APRECIO DR. MARCIANO U. SORIANO JR.

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
ORIANO JR.
AUTHORITY
hority