ARGE Guideline Part 2
ARGE Guideline Part 2
List of Contents
1. GENERAL ............................................................................................................................... 3
1.1. PREFACE ........................................................................................................................ 3
1.2. OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................... 3
1.3. ACCEPTANCE ................................................................................................................. 4
1.4. SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 4
1.5. VALIDITY ........................................................................................................................ 6
2. SYSTEM SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN ............................................................................. 7
3. ASSESSMENT SPECIFICATIONS ........................................................................................ 8
3.1. INDEPENDENT EVALUATION ............................................................................................. 9
3.2. FIRE SUPPRESSION IN PASSENGER AND STAFF AREAS ...................................................... 9
3.2.1. Principle .............................................................................................................. 9
3.2.2. Recommendation ............................................................................................... 9
3.2.3. Basic test conditions ........................................................................................... 9
3.2.4. Fire location ...................................................................................................... 13
3.2.5. Test criteria ....................................................................................................... 13
3.3. FIRE EXTINGUISHING IN AREAS WITH TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT ........................................... 14
3.3.1. Principle ............................................................................................................ 14
3.3.2. Recommendation ............................................................................................. 14
3.3.3. Basic test conditions ......................................................................................... 15
3.3.4. Test criteria ....................................................................................................... 16
4. REVISIONS OF THE GUIDELINE........................................................................................ 18
ABBREVIATIONS, DEFINTIONS AND TERMS........................................................ 20
INFORMATION ON REFERENCE FIRE LOAD “LUGGAGE“ ................................. 23
ROOM CONDITIONS TO BE ENSURED .................................................................. 27
TEMPLATE F-1 “TEST DOCUMENTATION – EXTINGUISHING
TECHNOLOGY”......................................................................................................... 28
TEMPLATE F-2.1 “TEST DOCUMENTATION – COMMON AREA” ........................ 29
TEMPLATE F-2.2 “TEST DOCUMENTATION – AREAS WITH
TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT” ....................................................................................... 32
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 35
SPECIFICATION FOR POSITIONING FIRE EXTINGUISHING
EQUIPMENT IN ENCLOSED PLACES OF
INSTALLATION/TECHNICAL CABINETS ................................................................ 36
MEMBERS (ARGE) .................................................................................................... 37
1. General
The purpose of the Guideline is the specification of a fire suppression or fire extinguishing
system with regard to the different vehicle types or places of installation. In addition, it
specifies the functional assessment of fire suppression systems in passenger areas and
fire extinguishing systems in electrical cabinets regarding possible fire incidents in
railway vehicles.
The assessment focuses on the efficiency of fire suppression and fire extinguishing
systems and the selection of the fire extinguishing medium.
This Guideline represents minimum requirements for fire suppression and fire
extinguishing systems. The vehicle manufacturer can define advanced protective aims
based on requirements of the vehicle operator.
The rules and standards in the present document are valid in their latest version.
1.1. Preface
The Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI), the current state of the art and the
European Standard EN 45545-6 include requirements for the installation of fire
suppression and fire extinguishing systems. Few requirements for the assessment
procedure are included in Standard EN 50553. The purpose of Standard EN 50553 is to
define requirements for railway vehicles in terms of running capability in case of fire,
whereas the ARGE Guideline focuses on the aim “to protect passengers and staff“. Thus,
the assessment procedures are more conservative than the requirements in Standard
EN 50553.
To guarantee the design and the assessment for the installation of fire suppression and
fire extinguishing systems in railway vehicles, system specific requirements for design,
construction and type tests are needed.
This Guideline identifies the required criteria for the practical assessment.
1.2. Objectives
With respect to the protective aims defined in laws, regulations and state of the art a fire
incident must be detected already during the formation phase (e. g. smoldering fire) or
after the inflammation (e. g. liquid fire in a technical cabinet).
The requirement is to protect passengers and staff in railway vehicles. The objective is
to ensure health conditions acceptable for a safe evacuation, which is also intended by
TSI and the Standards EN 45545.
To provide a place of relative safety – stay in a passenger area during a defined time
with no danger for health, the following values shown in the table below must be fulfilled:
Table 1: Evaluation data and reference values for quantitative protective aims
The values consider the information from the engineering guide for fire prevention
methods review 4 of vfdb (11-2013) and the guideline “Design fire” VdS 2827 (05-2000),
VdS Schadenverhütung, Cologne.
Measurements were performed in areas affected by fire in a height of approx. 1.6 m and
approx. 2.0 m away from the ignition source.
The objective is a general and acceptable definition of repeatable assessment
processes, which are already taken into account for the system design.
The processes defined in the Guideline shall already be applied on prototype tests,
existing vehicles or 1:1 models based on design definition. These tests are the basis for
final type tests or the acceptance of the fire suppression and fire extinguishing systems.
The assessment of fire suppression and extinguishing systems focuses on the ignition
scenarios/ignition models according to EN 45545-1, Appendix A. It doesn’t focus on other
models e. g. based on natural influences or terrorism.
1.3. Acceptance
Since its release the ARGE Guideline is accepted as state of the art regarding to
accreditation of railway vehicles.
1.4. Scope
The purpose of the Guideline is to design and assess the efficiency and practical use of
fire suppression and fire extinguishing systems in railway vehicles and track guided
vehicles.
Figure 1: General fire development (fire incident without and with fire suppression /extinguishing)
For assessing the efficiency of the system technology, this guideline has to be applied
as follows:
• for gas extinguishing systems on the first production vehicle and
• for other fire extinguishing systems by using a 1:1 model, with the possibility of
simplifications in case of similar location or equipment conditions via evaluation of
conformity.
The assessment of efficiency and/or the evaluation of conformity must be acknowledged
by officially recognized railway assessors/experts in collaboration with the manufacturer
and supplier, so that an assessment is available for the approval of vehicle operation and
for other certification processes (e. g. within the scope of the Technical Specifications of
Interoperability – TSI).
1.5. Validity
This Guideline applies to the use in railway vehicles and other track guided systems
equipped with fire suppression and fire extinguishing systems.
As necessary the Guideline can be applied to comparable technical systems (e. g.
buses).
The assessment processes must be applied on the evaluation in terms of fire protection
of passenger, staff and technical areas.
3. Assessment specifications
The specifications exclusively focus on the assessment of fire suppression and fire
extinguishing effects regarding the basic conditions in potential fire areas.
The areas which have to be protected are classified as:
Figure 3: Example for the interior area with the position of the fire objects (approximate values)
Determining the pre-burn time (after ignition of the paper cushion until start of the fire
suppression system):
By means of the pre-burn time the possible fire development until the fire detection is
simulated by the fire detection system (reference to ARGE Guideline - Part 1). During
this time, the construction materials in direct surrounding area of the fire object are
thermally affected by the fire.
Regarding the definition of the factor of safety, the area conditions (ventilation specific
for vehicles and technical cabinets), the development of fire ignited by easily inflammable
materials and the technical response time of the fire detection system are taken into
account. This is a common process for fire protection technology.
The pre-burn time is defined for the following basic conditions:
Due to the characteristics of the fire development, the use of the fire object paper cushion
results in a higher energy release compared to the design fire “luggage”.
• Considerating the maximum response time of the smoke detection system in the
affected area the pre-burn time is at least 75 seconds by using a paper cushion
(60 seconds, plus system response time e. g. 15 seconds).
• The pre-burn time is at least 135 seconds by using luggage [see Appendix 2] (120
seconds, plus system response time e. g. 15 seconds).
For the tests a verified system reliability and system safety is presumed, assessed by
the recognized tools of RAMS-considerations (Reliability, Availability, Maintainability,
Safety), (see also ARGE Guideline - Part 3).
3.3.2. Recommendation
For fire extinguishing in areas with technical equipment, water-based extinguishing
media (with or without additives which improve extinguishing parameters), extinguishing
gases and fine grained powder or aerosols are recommended according to the present
fire loads (liquids and solids).
The selection of the fire extinguishing medium requires aspects of object safety. In case
of fire release, the impacts from the extinguishing medium must be limited, so that
corrective maintenance can be performed with reasonable effort or that technical failures
are minimized.
The protection against freezing must be taken into account to guarantee full availability.
In an area with electrical equipment (in general electrical containers and electrical
cabinets), a determination of the simulating fire area is not relevant. The complete filling
of the area with the extinguishing medium is determined over a defined period of release.
For example the thermal lift in the affected area results in “suction” of water mist by the
fire. There must not be separations between the potential fire location and the nozzle
installation, as shown in the fire risk analysis.
In an area with combustion engines, the potential development of accumulations (e. g.
fuel, oil) or the leakage of coolant, considerating the possible evaporation on hot
surfaces, has to be taken into account for the design and installation of extinguishing
nozzles.
The assessment for fire performance or the required application time with extinguishing
media bases generally on 1:1 fire tests. Here, the real fire situation can be simulated
in a fire model with corresponding equipment (obstructions).
Test results from projects with similar geometrical and design conditions can be used
based on an evaluation of conformity. This agreement on results (“Cross Acceptance”)
must be verified by officially recognized railway assessors/experts. This concerns e. g.
diesel engines at locomotives from one product family as well, which have amongst
others only different lengths but similar obstructions.
Editorial TÜV SÜD Rail GmbH TÜV NORD Systems GmbH & Co.KG
Work: Schützenstraße 15-17 Große Bahnstraße 31
10117 Berlin 22525 Hamburg
Germany Germany
TÜV Rheinland AG
Am Grauen Stein
51105 Cologne
Germany
List of appendixes
Abbreviations, defintions and terms 20
Information on reference fire load “luggage“ 23
Room conditions to be ensured 27
Template F-1 “Test documentation – extinguishing technology” 28
Template F-2.1 “Test documentation – common area” 29
Template F-2.2 “Test documentation – areas with technical
equipment” 32
Requirements for the assessment 35
Specification for positioning fire fighting equipment in enclosed
places of installation/technical cabinets 36
Members (ARGE) 37
UIC paper cushion For railway technology, it is a common available ignition source
with a burning time between 2 and 3 minutes. The mass is 100 g
in the form of seven paper wads kept together by means of a
paper sheet are taken. The grammage is approximately 50 g/m².
For the fire object “luggage” the design fire is defined as follows, based on tests:
• continuously increasing heat release rate up to at least 120 kW after 5 min
• minimum fire load of the bag of 136 MJ with a calorific value of at least
21 MJ/kg
• ignition source is 100 g of newspaper (acc. to. UIC 564-2) placed on top of
the bag
travel bag foam blocks without cotton foam blocks with cotton
cover cover
Q(bag - V7)=23 MJ Q(cushion without CC - V16)= 20 – 26 Q(cushio with CC – V6)= 33 – 36 MJ
MJ
The design fire “luggage” is a realistic fire scenario in a passenger train and meets the
requirements in EN 45545-1, Appendix A “Ignition models”.
Ignition model 1:
This represents a typical ignition source due to arson and vandalism, for example
newspaper or rubbish.
The ignition model is a flaming source of 3 min duration and average power output of
7 kW generating a flux of 25 kWm−2 to 30 kWm−2.
Ignition model 2:
This represents the effect of an early developing fire on surfaces near to the fire, for
example horizontal surfaces of seats and floors. The ignition model is a radiant flux
nominal value 25 kWm−2 applied to an area of 0.1 m2.
Ignition model 3:
This represents the effect of a more developed fire than ignition model 2 or the effect
of a developing fire on surfaces above or alongside the fire, for example wall and
ceiling surfaces. The ignition model is a radiant flux of nominal value 50 kWm−2 applied
to an area of 0.1 m2.
Ignition model 4:
This represents the effects of arcing, for example resulting from the normal operation
of high power electrical equipment (where Type A arc barriers would be required as
set out EN 45545-5) and low power electronic equipment faults. The ignition model is
a flaming source of power 1 kW and 30 s duration.
Ignition model 5:
This represents fires which are more severe than ignition models 1 to 4, for example
luggage fires, and arson. For these fires the ignition model is a flaming source
generating a radiant flux of nominal value in the range of 20 kWm-2 to 25 kWm-2 applied
to an area of 0.7 m2 with an average power output of 75 kW for a period of 2 min
followed immediately by a flux of nominal value in the range 40 kWm-2 to 50 kWm-2
applied to the same 0.7 m2 area with an average power output of 150 kW for a period
of 8 min.
According the values shown in Table 1, the measuring points must have a horizontal
distance of 2 m to the ignition source and must be set in the middle of the escape in a
height of approx. 1.6 m (position of the respiratory system in dependence on DIN EN 547
regarding the situation of the European population).
Parameters Specifications
Vehicle type e. g. electric locomotive
Vehicle design type e. g. RE 484
Vehicle no.
Operation category, design category BSS X, category
Fire fighting system (type) gas extinguishing system
Fire extinguishing medium (type) type x
Manufacturer/type of system company x/type y
Objection direct safety of indirect safety of object safety
passengers and staff passengers and staff
Comments on the test, note, established deficits
“punctual fluid accumulation“
“system fault, cause is determined and corrected, include in maintenance manual”
yes in parts no
Requirement fulfilled
Additional tests are required
yes in parts no
Requirement fulfilled
Additional tests are required
yes in parts no
Requirement fulfilled
Additional tests are required
Recommendations:
• In the area affected by the fire, the discharge of extinguishing media should be
possible without any obstructions.
• The discharge of extinguishing media should be near the potential fire risk.
• The nozzles must be fixed in a sufficient distance to mounting
holes/bushings/position holes.
• The discharge of extinguishing media is pressurized and must not negatively
influence the area or its content.
Members (ARGE)
AQUASYS Technik GmbH
Diehl Aviation Gilching GmbH
Fritz Rensmann GmbH & Co. KG
FOGTEC Brandschutz GmbH & Co. KG
IFAB GmbH
IME Elektrotechnik GmbH
KIDDE-DEUGRA Brandschutzsysteme GmbH
TÜV NORD Systems GmbH & Co. KG
TÜV Rheinland AG
TÜV SÜD Rail GmbH
WAGNER Rail GmbH / Schweiz AG