Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, vs.

IAC, ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF LUCENA


G.R. No. 75042, November 29, 1988

FACTS
Roman Catholic Bishop of Lucena filed an application for confirmation of title to 4 parcels of land. Requirements of
publication and posting were duly complied with.

The Director of Lands opposed to such application, alleging that, the applicant have an imperfect title or title in fee simple
to the parcel of land being applied for.

As for lots 1-3, it was said to have been acquired by the private respondent by purchase. Also, Records of burial of the Roman
Catholic Church of Candelaria, Quezon showed that even as early as November 1918, Lot 3 has already been utilized by the
Roman Catholic Church as its cemetery.

Petitioner argued that being a juridical entity, private respondent cannot avail of the benefits of Sec. 48(b) of the public land law
which applies to FILIPINO citizens or NATURAL persons. And that, since the application for registration was filed only on February
2, 1979, long after the 1973 Constitution took effect on January 17, 1973, the application for registration and confirmation of title is
ineffectual because at the time it was filed, private corporation had been declared ineligible to acquire alienable lands of the public
domain pursuant to Art. XIV, Sec. 11 of 1973 Constitution.

ISSUE
Whether the Roman Catholic Bishop of Lucena, as a corporation sole is qualified to apply for confirmation of its title to the four (4)
parcels of land subject of this case.

RULING
The determination of the character of lands at the time of institution of registration proceedings must be made. If they
were then still part of the public domain, it must be answered in the negative. However, if they already private lands, the
constitutional prohibition against their acquisition by private corporation or association obviously does not apply.

As evidenced by the facts on record, private respondent has been in continuous possession and enjoyment of the subject land for a
period of more than 52 years.
A corporation sole, however, is not treated like an ordinary private corporation. It is by nature of its Incorporation is vested with the
right to purchase and hold real estate and personal property. It need not therefore be treated as an ordinary private corporation
because whether or not it be so treated as such, the Constitutional provision involved will, nevertheless, be not applicable.

You might also like