148 - Lumanlan v. Cura
148 - Lumanlan v. Cura
As Lumanlan had only paid P1,500 of the P15,000, par value of the stock for which he
subscribed, the receiver filed a suit against him for the collection of P15,109, P13,500 of
which was the amount he owed for unpaid stock and P1,609 for loans and advances by
the corporation to Lumanlan. In that case, Lumanlan was sentenced to pay the
corporation the above-mentioned sum of P15,109.
Pending this appeal, the creditors, some of the directors and the majority of the
stockholders held several meetings in which it was agreed in substance that subscribers
for the capital stock who were in default should pay the creditors; Lumanlan was
designated to pay the debt of the corporation to Valenzuela.
Lumanlan agreed to assume this obligation and in turn the corporation agreed that if
Lumanlan would dismiss his appeal, the corporation would collect only 50 percent of
the amount subscribed by him for stock, provided that in case the 50 percent was
insufficient to pay Valenzuela he should pay an additional amount which should not
exceed the amount of the judgment against him in that case. Lumanlan withdrew his
appeal.
Further, the Corporation Law clearly recognizes that a stock subscription is a subsisting
liability from the time the subscription is made, since it requires the subscriber to pay
interest quarterly from that date unless he is relieved from such liability by the by-laws
of the corporation. The subscriber is as much bound to pay the amount of the share
subscribed by him as he would be to pay any other debt, and the right of the company
to demand payment is no less incontestable.