Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Haynes Docs
Haynes Docs
DILLON HAYNES, charging violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1), (2), and (4), 18 U.S.C. §
1512 (c)(2) and 2, 18 U.S.C. § 1363, and 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D), (F), and (G).
BACKGROUND OF AFFIANT
currently assigned to FBI Washington Field Office (WFO). Currently, I am tasked with
investigating criminal activity in and around the Capitol grounds on January 6, 2021. As a
known to me, has been provided to me by other individuals, or is based on a review of various
documents, records, and reports. Because this Affidavit is submitted for the limited purpose of
establishing probable cause to support an application for an arrest warrant, it does not contain
every fact known by me or the United States. The dates listed in this Affidavit should be read as
4. The U.S. Capitol is secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions
around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by
U.S. Capitol Police. Only authorized people with appropriate identification are allowed access
inside the U.S. Capitol. On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was also
5. On January 6, 2021, a joint session of the United States Congress convened at the
United States Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C. During the joint
session, elected members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States
Senate were meeting in separate chambers of the United States Capitol to certify the vote count
of the Electoral College of the 2020 Presidential Election, which had taken place on November
3, 2020. The joint session began at approximately 1:00 p.m. Shortly thereafter, by approximately
1:30 p.m., the House and Senate adjourned to separate chambers to resolve a particular objection.
Vice President Mike Pence was present and presiding, first in the joint session, and then in the
Senate chamber.
6. As the proceedings continued in both the House and the Senate, and with Vice
President Mike Pence present and presiding over the Senate, a large crowd gathered outside the
U.S. Capitol. As noted above, temporary and permanent barricades were in place around the
exterior of the U.S. Capitol building, and U.S. Capitol Police were present and attempting to
keep the crowd away from the Capitol building and the proceedings underway inside.
7. At such time, the certification proceedings were still underway and the exterior
doors and windows of the U.S. Capitol were locked or otherwise secured. Members of the U.S.
Capitol Police attempted to maintain order and keep the crowd from entering the Capitol;
however, shortly after 2:00 p.m., individuals in the crowd forced entry into the U.S. Capitol,
including by breaking windows and by assaulting members of the U.S. Capitol Police, as others
2
8. Shortly thereafter, at approximately 2:20 p.m., members of the United States
House of Representatives and United States Senate, including the President of the Senate, Vice
President Mike Pence, were instructed to—and did—evacuate the chambers. Accordingly, the
joint session of the United States Congress was effectively suspended until shortly after 8:00
p.m. Vice President Pence remained in the United States Capitol from the time he was evacuated
9. After the U.S. Capitol was breached, United States Capitol Police (USCP)
requested assistance from law enforcement agencies in the area to protect the Capitol, keep
people from entering the Capitol, and expel the crowd that was inside the Capitol. Multiple
officers with the Metropolitan Police Department and other law enforcement officers came to
assist.
10. During national news coverage of the aforementioned events, video footage
which appeared to be captured on mobile devices of persons present on the scene depicted
evidence of violations of local and federal law, including scores of individuals inside the U.S.
on members of the news media who were present to cover the events at, around, and in the U.S.
Capitol building. These included reports of members of the news media being harassed,
threatened, robbed, and assaulted based on their perceived roles as journalists, and equipment
12. At approximately 4:50 p.m., on January 6, 2021, a large crowd made its way to
and/or past a media staging area that was set up outside the northeast corner of the U.S. Capitol,
3
on U.S. Capitol grounds. As individuals moved past metal barricades that had been set up
around the staging area, media members were forced to flee the area before recovering all their
cameras and associated equipment. Numerous members of the crowd began to destroy the
equipment, including cameras, tripods, lights, shades, and remote broadcasting equipment that
belonged to various media outlets. Numerous members of the crowd yelled inflammatory
rhetoric against the members of the media. One member of the media who was forced to flee the
scene estimated that the equipment from his particular news organization that was destroyed was
valued at between $30,000 and $34,000. The image in Figure 1 depicts the staging area after the
Figure 1
13. -
4
17. A publicly available video, located at https://vimeo.com/498179103, depicts the
subject later identified as HAYNES assisting two other individuals in forcibly removing an air-
conditioning unit from a building outside the United States Capitol and dropping the air-
conditioning unit to the ground. Still photos from that video are depicted in Figures 4A and 4B,
below.
Figures 4A and 4B
18. -
. Your affiant was not able to access the Parler profile as of the date of
19. A database query for the name JOSHUA DILLON HAYNES produced one
creation date of November 13, 2020, as well as a phone number associated with the profile, a
7
Yahoo email address associated with the profile, and a signup IP address which resolves to
21. Subscriber records from Verizon for the phone number associated with the Parler
profile
22. Subscriber records from Yahoo for the email address associated with the Parler
number associated with the Parler profile. The most recent logon IP address for the Yahoo
account
23. According to records obtained through a search warrant, the cell phone associated
with HAYNES traveled from Covington, Virginia on January 5, 2021, to the greater
Washington, D.C. area. Specifically, the cell phone associated with HAYNES left Covington,
Virginia sometime before 12:00 p.m. EST and arrived in the greater Washington, D.C. area by
approximately 3:15 p.m. EST on January 5, 2021. The cell phone associated with HAYNES
then traveled to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and at or about the time the man depicted in
Photographs -AOM A-D was captured on video inside the U.S. Capitol as described above.
The cell phone associated with HAYNES was identified as having utilized a cell site consistent
with providing service to the geographic area that includes the interior of the U.S. Capitol
building.
24. Further analysis of the search warrant records showed that HAYNES used the cell
phone described above throughout the day on January 6, 2021, to send text messages and take
pictures. Specifically, HAYNES took several “selfies” inside the U.S. Capitol and at the media
staging area and sent the images via text messages to his associates. HAYNES sent a text message
8
on January 6, 2021 to an associate (“ASSOCIATE 1”) and stated, “I’m inside Congress he stormed
inside.” A short time later, HAYNES sent the text, “we *”. HAYNES then sent the below image
(Figure 5) to ASSOCIATE 1, depicting himself inside the office of a United States Senator.
Figure 5
25. HAYNES then sent the below images (Figures 6A and 6B) to another associate
(“ASSOCIATE 2”) along with the text, “We are inside the Congress the Senate we stormed
inside.”
9
Figures 6A and 6B
ASSOCIATE 1 exchanged texts about what was being reported by the live news about the events
occurring at the U.S. Capitol. HAYNES sent ASSOCIATE 1 the text, "I'm inside."
ASSOCIATE 1 sent HAYNES the text messages, "Breaking windows to get in" and "The People
did." HAYNES replied, "I know I crawled through the window." ASSOCIATE 1 replied,
"Erase this." Later that day, HAYNES asked ASSOCIATE 1, "What did Congress do did they
certify Joe Biden?" and ASSOCIATE 1 responded "a Fri [sic] said he gave a speech all I know."
HAYNES then sent ASSOCIATE 1 the text, "No because we storm inside they stop debating
27. Later on January 6, 2021, after the equipment at the media staging area was
destroyed as described above, ASSOCATE 2 sent HAYNES a text indicating another individual
had “said dont [sic] be like antifa tearing stuff up.” HAYNES replied to ASSOCIATE 2, “ahhhh
tooooo late,” “broke lotsa stuff,” “lol.” HAYNES then sent the below image (Figure 7) via text
with the message, “We attacked the CNN reporters and the fake news and destroyed tens of
10
thousands of dollars of their video and television equipment here's a picture behind me of the pile
we made out of it.” This image shows HAYNES standing in front of the destroyed equipment at
the media staging area as described above, wearing clothing matching the man depicted in
Figure 7
28. Following the text with the above image attached, HAYNES sent the following
texts to ASSOCIATE 2: “They had to run away from us and leave all their equipment so we
destroyed it” “i Kicked the fake news ass.” ASSOCIATE 2 replied, “Lmfao.” HAYNES then
sent the texts: “ahhhhh I liked it too I have already seen a report of it and I am in the video
destroying the stuff but I’m wearing a mask,” “I had to keep my face covered,” “I want to get
busted for tearing up the nations capital [sic] and the fake news.” HAYNES continued with the
following texts to ASSOCIATE 2: “Well back God we fucking stood up today that she will go
down in history for thousands of years no one is ever storm the capital [sic] like that,” “I mean
11
we broke down the doors and windows and just went the fuck in,” “fight the cops push them
29. On February 14, 2021, HAYNES sent the below image (Figure 8) to ASSOCIATE
2 via text, showing the FBI images of Photographs -AOM A-D that were posted on February
4, 2021. HAYNES followed the image with the following texts: “erase immediately,” “aom =
assault on media.”
Figure 8
ASSOCIATE 2 replied, “Damn.” Then HAYNES sent the below image (Figure 9) by text to
ASSOCIATE 2. Your affiant understands this emoji to be commonly used to express frustration,
12
Figure 9
30. On June 14, 2021, law enforcement officers interviewed HAYNES at his
residence located in Covington, Virginia. HAYNES was advised at the outset of the interview of
the purpose and subject matter to be discussed during the interview, that he was not under arrest,
31. HAYNES verbally confirmed his name, DOB, SSN, address, and cell phone
number. HAYNES stated that he was willing to cooperate with the investigation in answering
questions asked by the interviewing Agents. However, HAYNES was only willing to answer
those questions that he felt comfortable answering and that there may be some questions asked
by the interviewing Agents that HAYNES would choose not to answer prior to obtaining legal
representation.
32. HAYNES was asked to share the specifics about his participation in the U.S.
Capitol riot on January 6, 2021. Additionally, HAYNES was asked to describe what he was
wearing that day. HAYNES advised that he was not comfortable talking about the events at the
U.S. Capitol or the clothing worn by him that day. HAYNES stated that he was deeply upset
with the contrast between how the events that occurred on January 6, 2021 at the U.S. Capitol
were being handled and how the Black Lives Matter (BLM) riots that occurred in Washington
13
D.C. and elsewhere in 2020 were being handled. HAYNES told the interviewing Agents that he
believes that those who participated in the unlawful events at the U.S. Capitol were being treated
unfairly, and that those involved with the rioting and vandalism related to the BLM movement
33. HAYNES stated that he disagrees with the force used by law enforcement officers
on January 6, 2021, to prevent Trump supporters from stopping the presidential election from
being stolen. HAYNES stated that he observed that some law enforcement officers were just
waiving people into the U.S. Capitol. HAYNES stated that he did not personally participate in
using force against law enforcement officers or in assaulting law enforcement officers, but he
believes that those who did use force against law enforcement officers that day to stop the
election from being stolen are “heroes.” HAYNES stated that he respects those individuals for
“having the balls” to do something about the election being stolen by fraud.
34. When asked what HAYNES believed the purpose of the actions taken by those
who stormed the U.S. Capitol was, he replied that he cannot speak for people individually, but he
believed that the crowd of Trump supporters were trying to keep the country from being stolen
by delaying the process of certifying the votes. HAYNES believes that those who engaged cops
physically that day or assaulted law enforcement deserve to be punished, but HAYNES believes
that a population can only be pushed so far before people begin to push back and act, which is
what happened on January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol. HAYNES does not believe anyone
traveled to the U.S. Capitol that day with the intent to commit acts of violence.
35. HAYNES stated that if the country continues to go in the direction that it is now
going, then what happened on January 6, 2021 would not be an isolated event. HAYNES does
not believe in some of the conspiracy theories that have followed the events on January 6, 2021.
14
HAYNES stated that he does not believe that anyone had firearms, and further stated that there
were no premeditated plans of an insurrection. HAYNES stated that he has not seen evidence of
gun charges on anyone and believes that some who have been arrested are being wrongfully
36. HAYNES told the interviewing Agents that most people at the U.S. Capitol on
January 6, 2021 who committed illegal acts did things they would never normally do, but in the
anger of the moment people trespassed, fought with cops, and some destroyed property. Haynes
37. HAYNES was asked if he took part in attacking the media or destroying
equipment belonging to media at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. HAYNES stated that he
was not comfortable answering that question. When asked what consequences should be faced
by someone who did attack and/or destroy media equipment, HAYNES acknowledged that those
acts were illegal and that it would be up to the courts to determine what should be done.
38. HAYNES stated that he was not aware of any plots to attack the U.S. Capitol on
January 6, 2021, or of any plots/plans of future attacks there or elsewhere. HAYNES provided
consent for the interviewing Agents to search his phone and his personal residence for evidence
of HAYNES’ participation in the riots at the U.S. Capitol and for the clothing worn by the
jacket and black Nike sneakers with neon yellow/green detailing. HAYNES stated that the
Agents would not find anything on his phone or in his home, but that the Agents were welcome
to search both. HAYNES signed the FD-26 Consent to Search form authorizing the search.
39. HAYNES unlocked his phone and handed it to the interviewing Agents to search.
A search of the phone contents was conducted in HAYNES’ presence. The text messages,
15
photos, videos and other images were searched. There were no text messages and/or text history
on HAYNES’ phone. There were no images or photos of HAYNES at the U.S. Capitol on the
phone. There were no videos of HAYNES participating in the riots at the U.S. Capitol on the
phone. HAYNES was asked if he destroyed and/or deleted anything evidentiary on his phone
regarding his participation in unlawful activity at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. HAYNES
stated that he did not. The phone was subsequently returned to HAYNES.
40. HAYNES escorted the interviewing Agents around his home to search for the
that he had never owned a leather Harley Davidson jacket. HAYNES was advised that Agents
had reviewed contents from a search warrant served on the carrier of his phone and found
evidence that he once purchased a leather Harley Davidson jacket. HAYNES told the
interviewing Agents that he may have once owned a leather Harley Davidson jacket but that he
had not owned one in a long time. When asked to elaborate on what he meant by a long time,
HAYNES advised that he once owned a Harley Davidson motorcycle but laid it down on the
road in front of his home years ago and totaled it. He has not owned any Harley Davidson
clothing since that time. When asked what he did with the jacket, HAYNES stated that he did not
41. HAYNES was asked if he had seen his FBI Photograph from the U.S. Capitol.
HAYNES stated that he had not. While accompanying the interviewing Agents on the search of
shoes like the ones on the male pictured in the photographs. HAYNES stated that he did not, nor
had he ever owned a pair like them. HAYNES was asked if there was a leather Harley Davidson
jacket or pair of shoes that resembled the jacket and shoes worn by the male in FBI Photograph
16
203-AOM A-D in the home currently. HAYNES stated that they were not in the home.
HAYNES was asked if he purposely destroyed and/or disposed of the jacket or the clothing and
HAYNES stated that he did not wish to answer the question. HAYNES was asked if he, through
an attorney, was asked to produce a jacket and shoes that resembled those worn by FBI
42. HAYNES was asked if he was a member of the Proud Boys and replied that he
was not. HAYNES attended a Proud Boys meeting in Fredericksburg, Virginia in November or
December 2020 and had dinner with members from that chapter. HAYNES would have joined
the chapter, but it was too far away and there were no members of the Proud Boys in his local
area. HAYNES was in Washington D.C. for both Trump rallies in November and December
2020. He remained near groups of Proud Boys for protection in numbers and safety since there
43. The interviewing Agents continued with a consensual search of the residence for
the items of clothing. Clothing items that resembled the clothing worn by P -
AOM A-D were not located. Upon completion of the search, HAYNES signed the secondary
page supplemental to the FD-26 Consent to Search form stating that the interviewing Agents had
conducted the search of both his phone and his residence and had seized nothing.
44. At the conclusion of the interview and search, HAYNES was advised that an
arrest warrant would likely be forthcoming. HAYNES was advised that any attempt to flee or
destroy evidence related to the investigation with his knowledge of the investigation would
constitute obstruction of justice and may result in additional charges. HAYNES stated that he
17
intended to comply with any legal action taken against him including being cooperative with a
45. As of the date of this affidavit, the FBI received at least four other E-Tips from
individuals who identified the person depicted in Photographs -AOM A-D as someone other
than HAYNES. One lead supplied insufficient information to make a match of Photographs
-AOM A-D to the person the tipster believed to be the identity of Photographs -AOM
A-D or a full name of the suspected identity was not supplied. In other cases, digital media and
video and/or other open-source/social media photos along with physical descriptions were
46. Based on all of the foregoing information, as well as my training and experience, I
respectfully submit that there is probable cause to believe that HAYNES violated Title 18 U.S.C.
§ 1752(a)(1), (2), and (4), which makes it a crime to (1) knowingly enter or remain in any
restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so; (2) knowingly, and with intent to
impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engage in
disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or
grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of
Government business or official functions; and (4) knowingly engage in any act of physical
violence against any person or property in any restricted building or grounds. For purposes of
Section 1752 of Title 18, a “restricted building” includes a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise
restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the
Secret Service, including the Vice President, is or will be temporarily visiting; or any building or
18
grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national
significance.
47. I also respectfully submit that there is probable cause to believe that HAYNES
violated Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (c)(2) and § 2, which makes it a crime to corruptly obstruct,
influence, or impede any official proceeding, or attempt to do so, and aid and abet in doing so.
48. I also respectfully submit that there is probable cause to believe that HAYNES
violated Title 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D), (F), and (G), which makes it a crime to (D) utter loud,
the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb the
orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the orderly conduct in
that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of Congress or either
House of Congress; (F) engage in an act of physical violence in the United States Capitol
Grounds; and (G) parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.
49. Finally, I respectfully submit that there is probable cause to believe that HAYNES
violated Title 18 U.S.C. § 1363, which makes it a crime to, within the special maritime and
territorial jurisdiction of the United States, willfully and maliciously destroy or injure any
structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property, or attempt or conspire to do so. The
U.S. Capitol and the U.S. Capitol grounds are federal property within the special maritime or
19
Attested to by the applicant in accordance with the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 4.1 by
telephone, this 22ND day of June 2021.
___________________________________
ROBIN M. MERIWEATHER
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20