Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Insecticide Use in Cabbage Pest Management in Cameron Highlands
Insecticide Use in Cabbage Pest Management in Cameron Highlands
Abstract
This study investigated Cameron Highlands cabbage farmers’ knowledge and practice of pest management, particularly the
use of pesticides against Plutella xylostella. A survey of 99 cabbage farmers was conducted in five different zones in the
Cameron Highlands. This survey and others conducted by previous researchers showed little change in farming systems
over the past decade. P. xylostella remains the major pest in cabbage and more than 90% of farmers use pesticides for
control. There are 11 types of insecticides used to control this pest and each farmer usually uses 3–4 types of insecticide to
control the pest over a season. Both high and low toxicity pesticides are commonly used. There is a significant difference in
pesticide spray frequency during wet and dry seasons, with more frequent sprays during the wet season. The study also revealed
that more than 50% of farmers observe 10–14 day pre-harvest intervals, while 4% observe a pre-harvest interval of only 1–4 days.
Wholesale markets still play an important role in marketing of fresh produce despite the increasing role of supermarkets in
the food chain. Current regulations on pesticide residue monitoring were only applied at the farm gate and any penalties are directed
at the growers. The origin of fresh produce could only be traced up to the wholesaler. Therefore, it is less effective to impose
pesticide monitoring at the retailer level, as the origin of the produce could not be traced, nor could feedback to producers be
achieved.
r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cabbage; Plutella xylostella; Pesticides; Toxicity; IPM; Food chain; Malaysia
0261-2194/$ - see front matter r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2004.06.005
ARTICLE IN PRESS
32 N. Mazlan, J. Mumford / Crop Protection 24 (2005) 31–39
2. Methods
zones on the basis of spatial proximity to one another the Cameron Highlands were ethnic Chinese (63%),
and similar altitude ranges. followed by Indian (32%) and Malay (4%). The racial
distribution was not even ðPo0:001; sp ¼ 0:0001Þ, the
2.2. Classification of the environmental impact of majority of Indian farmers were situated in Zone 5
pesticides (60%), while Chinese farmers dominated the other
zones. The farmers’ median age is between 40 and 49
Cabbage cultivation in the Cameron Highlands varies years (43% in this class) in all zones and few farmers
widely between farmers. Some use integrated pest are more than 60 years old (4%). A 1992 survey
management, whilst others depend solely on scheduled (Mohayidin et al., 1994) found that Cameron Highlands
applications of pesticides. There are reports of undesir- farmers had a median age of 31–40 years of age;
able effects of pesticides on humans that include acute therefore it appears that there are relatively few new
and chronic health problems, on wild birds, mammals, entrants to farming in the area for the past 10 years. The
fish, bees, beneficial organisms and through contami- median age in Zone 2 is younger, 30–39, while older
nated soil and water. There are numerous pesticide farmers are in Zone 3, with the median age between 50
active ingredients and each has a different impact on and 59 years. The most common education level was
human health and the environment, and a different primary education (42%), followed by 37% with
mechanism of pest control (Fernandez-Cornejo and secondary education. Farmers in Zones 1 and 2 have a
Jans, 1995). Hence, the potential impact of the specific higher percentage reaching higher education levels, with
pesticides used by farmers in the survey on human 64% and 77%, respectively.
health and the environment were approximately quanti- The farmers rarely have formal education in farm
fied using the environmental impact quotient (EIQ) management, only 1% received training from the
concept developed by Kovach et al. (1992). The EIQ Department of Agriculture (DoA); for others, their
values are based on the potential effects of the active knowledge is mostly gained from experience with their
ingredients on farm workers, consumers and the parents, work on other farms or by asking other
environment. The scores for the potential risk for farmers. The respondents included 65% with more than
pesticides are based on measures of toxicity (LD50 or 15 years of experience, the highest percentage with this
LC50 ), measures of potential exposure (such as the half- level of experience (94%) being from Zone 3. Most
life, runoff or leaching potential) and pattern of use. farmers (67%) grow one or two different vegetable
Toxicity and indices of exposure were assessed by species at the same time. The most popular vegetables
scoring from 1 to 5 (as done by Kovach et al., 1992). grown, after English cabbage (Brassica olearacea var.
The total potential impact could be calculated by capitata, 100%), are lettuce (Lactuca sativum, 35%),
summing EIQ values for all applications. In this study, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, 49%), Chinese cab-
EIQ values are shown for each individual application, bage (Brassica pekinensis, 28%), mustard (Brassica
and are divided into three categories: low impact (0–20), juncea, 20%) and other crops such as onion (Allium
medium impact (21–40) and high impact (41–60) of the cepa), French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), Capsicum spp.,
pesticides on humans and the environment. and radish (Raphanus sativus). In Zone 5, tomatoes,
French beans, lettuce and Chinese cabbage are usually
planted in crop rotation or grown at the same time as
3. Results cabbage, while in Zone 3 tomatoes are the crop most
grown after cabbage with 52%.
3.1. Farmers’ background
3.2. Farmer knowledge of insect pest and integrated pest
The farming system sampled in the Cameron High- management
lands typically consists of smallholder farmers growing a
few crops in areas with average farm size ranging from The most prominent pests of cabbage are P.
0.81 to 1.20 ha (Table 1). This exceeds the average farm xylostella, black cutworm (Agrotis ipsilon), armyworms
size of 0.55 ha in the Cameron Highlands reported by (which together affect the early and middle of growing
Dumsday et al. (1991) but is in line with the average stages) and diseases at the end of planting season as
farm size of 0.85 ha reported by Taylor et al. (1993). The shown in Fig. 2. The farmers interviewed usually know
farms in Zones 5 and 3 are below average in size, and in how to identify the pest damage because these pests
Zone 1 above average size. Most farmers’ tenure occur frequently and are easily visible in the field.
arrangement consists of a temporary ownership licence Farmers rank P. xylostella as the main pest throughout
(TOL) from the local government (83%) and land the growing period (100%). A. ipsilon is recognised
renting (14%). In TOL land tenure, farmers usually hold during the early growing period by 80% and diseases
the land for 5–15 years, carrying nominal fees from such as Xanthomonas campestris and Plamodiospora
RM300/ha/year (US$79). Most farmers interviewed in brassicae were encountered by 52% during the late
ARTICLE IN PRESS
34 N. Mazlan, J. Mumford / Crop Protection 24 (2005) 31–39
Table 1
Comparative demographics from the survey of respondents among regions in the Cameron Highlands
Race
Chinese 15 15 12 9 12 64
Indian 1 1 5 5 20 32
Malay 1 2 0 0 1 4
Age
20–29 2 2 2 3 4 13
30–39 4 6 2 1 5 18
40–49 8 6 6 7 16 43
50–59 3 4 7 1 6 21
460 0 0 0 2 2 4
Education attainment
None 0 0 0 1 2 3
Primary 6 4 9 6 17 42
Lower secondary 7 9 6 5 10 37
Higher secondary 4 5 2 2 4 17
Table 2
EIQ range of pesticide used by the Cameron Highlands cabbage farmers
EIQ Pesticide Active EIQ Zone 1 (%) Zone 2 (%) Zone 3 (%) Zone 4 (%) Zone 5 (%)
range formulation ingredients value ðn ¼ 17Þ ðn ¼ 18Þ ðn ¼ 17Þ ðn ¼ 14Þ ðn ¼ 33Þ
40
3.3. Insecticides and toxicity 7-8
30
20
From the survey a total of 21 different insecticides
10
were found to be used by respondents on cabbage,
0
however, some products have the same active ingredient 1 2 3 4 5
(a.i) but were marketed under different trade names. In
Zone
Table 2, only the most commonly used a.i and trade
names of insecticides are listed, those used infrequently Fig. 3. Median values for number of insecticide products used for each
such as Matchs (lufenuron), Impacts (acephate) and zone ðn ¼ 99Þ.
Dipterexs (trichlorfon) that were only reported by one
or two farmers are classified under others. Farmers
usually applied several types of insecticide during a crop Low Medium High
season. The greatest group (50%) of farmers answered
that they used 3–4 types of insecticides either within that 100
crop season or within the previous crop season (Fig. 3). 80
% of farmers
likely to have used several types of insecticide during a the wet season are in Zone 5 (13%) and Zone 3 (11%).
crop season and they may have used both low and high In a 1992 survey (Mohayidin et al., 1994), reported 58%
EIQ value insecticides in the same crop. The high of farmers found that during the wet season insects,
toxicity insecticides were most common in Zone 4 particularly P. xylostella, require more effort to control.
(93%), Zone 5 (91%) and Zone 2 (77%) as shown in That report was consistent with those reported earlier by
Fig. 4. When the total EIQ value of all insecticides used Lim (1970) for vegetables in the Cameron Highlands.
by growers in a Zone was calculated, Zones 1 and 2 The most common reason for the increased use of
showed the lowest mean total EIQ value, while Zone 3 pesticide during the wet season was that the pesticide
had the highest mean total EIQ value (55% higher than was washed off more quickly, hence pest infestation is
Zone 1 and 2), as shown in Table 3. This may be due to higher. The most common pre-harvest interval (PHI)
differences in the levels of education, since there is a practised on cabbage was 10–14 days, by 44% of the
higher percentage of high education farmers in Zones 1 farmers. Another 24% of farmers harvest after more
and 2 compared to other zones. There is a significant than 14 days and 27% harvest between 5 and 9 days
difference in w2 value for level of education with low after they sprayed. A very small percentage of farmers
toxicity pesticide use ðP ¼ 0:365; sp ¼ 0:001Þ and level (4%) harvest the crop between 1 and 4 days after
of education with high toxicity used spraying.
ðP ¼ 0:354; sp ¼ 0:001Þ.
3.5. Production cost
3.4. Spraying pattern and pre-harvest interval
The production cost of the cabbage includes the land
The majority of farmers (96%) depend on pesticide rental, manure, fertiliser, pesticides, irrigation, tractor
applications to control pests. While 65% of growers do use and labour. The growers were reluctant to give
spot checks for pests before spraying, the frequency of detailed information on each individual factor cost.
spraying still indicated a calendar spray pattern with Therefore, the cost is estimated only as the total cost of
spraying every 7–9 days in most cases (64%). However, production on their farms. The reported production
there is a significant difference ðPo0:0001Þ in spraying costs varied from US$526 to 3947/Ha, with the average
frequency between the wet and dry seasons (Fig. 5). cost US$1549/Ha. Production costs reduced with
During the wet season, farmers sprayed more fre- increased total farm size (Fig. 6). This may have been
quently, with 4–6 days between each spraying. The due to high fixed cost factors such as tractor use, giving
highest percentages of 1–3 day interval spraying during greater efficiency on larger farms.
EIQ Mean Min Max SD Growers were asked where or to whom they usually
sell their produce. There was usually more than one
Zone 1 82.59 0 191.67 48.98 answer to this question. The study shows that 95% of
Zone 2 83.67 0 191.18 49.61 growers sent their produce to a wholesaler, 35% of them
Zone 3 128.44 13.5 235.68 49.92
Zone 4 105.69 38 159.11 35.58
have a contract, and 5% went to local markets. Small
Zone 5 109.44 13.5 191.66 44.64 truck operators collect the produce from farms, and
then send it to collection centres, usually located beside
a main road or in towns. Growers who sell their produce
Dry season
70 Wet season 4500
60 4000
3500
% of farmers
50
Cost (US$/Ha)
3000
40
2500
30 2000
20 1500
10 1000
0 500
1-3 4-6 7-9 >10 0
Spray frequency (days) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00
Area (Ha)
Fig. 5. Frequency of mean number of pesticide sprays applied during
the dry and wet seasons ðn ¼ 95Þ. Fig. 6. Cabbage production cost (US$/Ha) ðn ¼ 72Þ.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
N. Mazlan, J. Mumford / Crop Protection 24 (2005) 31–39 37
to wholesalers usually sell on a consignment basis via and Wright, 2001). Increased pressure to maintain high
transport operators and the price would be known 2 to 3 levels of cabbage production with high physical quality
days later. The price of transport is usually divided for both domestic consumption and export has resulted
between the farmer and wholesaler. Normally, the in increased use of pesticides on fresh produce. The
operators sell the produce to three major wholesale continued high use of pesticides is a problem for
markets, at Ipoh, Kuala Lumpur or Johor Bahru. The farmers’ health and the environment (Waibel and
wholesale markets are suppliers for a wide range of Schmidt, 2000). In order to minimise further damage,
retailers, including hypermarkets (Carrefour, Makro, alternative or redesigned methods of pest control and
Tesco and Giant), supermarkets, groceries, restaurants, stricter food safety regulations must be implemented.
hotels and also exports to Singapore. It is not To reduce the use of pesticide and thus improve food
compulsory for growers to label their produce except quality there is a need to look at the flow of pesticide
for export purposes, but 60% of the growers put labels residues through the fresh produce supply chain.
on their produce. The other 40% only write their code Currently, this task is the responsibility of DoA and
number on the packages for the wholesalers’ records. the Food Quality Control Division (FQCD) under the
Ministry of Health. The upstream responsibility resides
solely with DoA, which conducts pesticide residue
4. Discussion monitoring on a sample of farms monthly (Yeoh, N.
S., Assistant Director, Pesticide Control Division,
The results from this study show that most growers Department of Agriculture, Kuala Lumpur, pers.
have been working with vegetable cultivation since they comm.), while downstream in the chain, pesticide
were young and rarely with formal training. Generally residues are monitored by FQCD by collecting samples
their experience was gained through working with their at the farm gate. At this point, if the samples were found
parents and friends, thus the cultivation and pest control to breach the MRL, the grower can be charged under
methods are almost the same as found by Ding et al. the Food Regulations 1985 with a penalty of RM5000
(1981). However, new methods of cultivation under (US$1316) or jail for 6 months (Malaysia Ministry of
plastic were being practised by some growers, but not in Health, 2004). Labelling of produce is not compulsory
cabbage farming. About 7% of growers can be for the local market, while for export markets, whole-
considered newcomers (with experience of 1–5 years), salers usually use their own labels, thus the origin of the
these were either workers in other vegetable farms or tea produce can only be traced until it reaches the whole-
plantations, ex-army or young farmers who start salers.
independently from their parents. Despite high costs of To achieve the objective of safer food through
farm management and competition from imported fresh reduced use of pesticides, produce must be able to be
produce, there are still opportunities in vegetable traced at any point in the supply chain. This could only
production in the Cameron Highlands. be achieved by labelling of the produce from source
In pest control, farmers rely on pesticides, with through to sale. When a traceability programme is
quantities applied often being independent of infestation established, the responsibilities of pesticide residue
levels. The use of IPM methods was low, with only 16% monitoring should include wholesalers and retailers
of the respondents following these methods. However, and not just the DoA and FQCD. The monitoring could
the results show an increased use of IPM compared to then be performed at a later stage in the food chain. This
the survey conducted by Midmore et al. (1996), who would be more efficient in comparison with the current
found less than 10% of farmers following an IPM practice. As produce goes through the food chain,
programme. cleaning occurs which reduces residues (Soliman, 2001),
Many growers have actually adopted IPM strategies thus when pesticide residues are monitored at later
without being part of any IPM programme. Some stages, the residues may be lower than in farm gate
perform larvae counts, use crop rotation and phero- samples, avoiding unnecessary rejections. Also, for
mone traps and know the incidence of parasitoids. fairness, the grower should not be the only party
However, the practices they follow are not thorough. penalised when produce is detected with pesticide
Even though they follow a crop rotation, the types of residues over the MRLs. The retailer could also be
crop they use are often from the same families which are made partially responsible by using the ‘name and
also hosts for P. xylostella. Many of them either apply shame’ method. Consumers depend on retailers to
more pesticides or switch to new pesticides when P. provide them with safe produce, and retailers could
xylostella develops resistance to the older types of fulfil their responsibility through stricter contracts with
pesticide. Nevertheless, this practice could not sustain suppliers or greater selectivity in choosing suppliers (Hu
the effectiveness of the latest products as P. xylostella et al., 2004). In the UK, publicising MRL breaches by
will build up resistance to these technologies, as retailers has been practised by the Department for
happened on Bt and other synthetic pesticides (Sayyed Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
38 N. Mazlan, J. Mumford / Crop Protection 24 (2005) 31–39
Pesticide Residue Committee for the last five years Malaysia. Malaysia Agriculture Research and Development
(PRC, 2004) and this has increased the participation of Institute, Serdang, Malaysia, 139 pp.
retailers in tightening their contract rules with growers. Dumsday, R.G., Midmore, D.J., Fuad, N., Samah, A., 1991. Project
establishment and survey pre-testing. Background Paper No. 1,
The role of retailers such as supermarkets and Economics of Erosion Control in Vegetable Production Systems in
hypermarkets supplying fresh produce in Malaysia is Cameron Highlands of Malaysia Project, AVRDC, Taiwan, 41 pp.
increasing, as in other parts of Asia (Hu et al., 2004). FAMA, 2003. http://agrolink.moa.my/fama/bdc/potensi/kobis.html
This is due to changing demand from consumers with (last accessed on 27/5/04).
higher incomes and health awareness. This retail trend is Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Jans, S., 1995. Quality-adjusted price and
quantity indices for pesticides. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 77, 645–659.
especially seen in highly urbanised areas such as Kuala
Government of Malaysia, 1996. Seventh Malaysia Plan 1996–2000.
Lumpur, Selangor, Penang and Johor, with the number Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhand, Kuala Lumpur, 770 pp.
of hypermarkets and supermarkets increased by 9% Hu, D., Reardon, T., Rozelle, S., Timmer, P., Wang, H., 2004. The
during the period 1990–1995 (Government of Malaysia, emergence of supermarkets with Chinese characteristics: challenges
1996). The share of the fresh food market served by and opportunities for China’s agricultural development. Dev.
supermarkets is now around 15–20% in South-East Asia Policy Rev., in press.
Iqbal, M., Verkerk, R.H.J., Furlong, M.J., Ong, P.C., Syed, A.R.,
(Reardon et al., 2003). This shows that supermarkets Wright, D.J., 1996. Evidence for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis
could play an important role by imposing own their (Bt) subsp. Kurstaki HD-1, Bt subsp. Aizawai and Abamectin in
standards and grades of fresh produce by buying on field populations of Plutella xylostella from Malaysia. Pestic. Sci.
contract directly from known growers. At present, the 48, 89–97.
demand for local pesticide-free produce is beginning to Kovach, J., Petzoldt, J., Degni, J., Tette, J., 1992. A method to
measure the environmental impact of pesticides. NY Food Life Sci.
increase in Asian cities (Midmore and Jansen, 2003),
Bull. 139, 1–8.
including those in Malaysia. Communities with higher Lim, K.P., 1970. Economics of vegetables market gardening in
incomes and education are more concerned about the Cameron Highlands. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Malaya, Kuala
effects of pesticide residues, thus they are willing to pay Lumpur, Malaysia, 192 pp.
a higher price for safer food. Malaysia Ministry of Health, 2004. http://www.moh.gov.my/fqc/
With the increased role of supermarkets and hyper- reference/Food%20Regulations/Regulation397.htm (last accessed
on 27/5/04).
markets in the food supply chain, a traceability Midmore, D.J., Jansen, H.G.P., 2003. Supplying vegetables to Asian
programme could be enforced throughout the supply cities: is there a case for peri-urban production?. Food Policy 28,
chain cycle. Pesticide residues could be monitored not 13–27.
only at the farm gate, but also at the selling point and Midmore, D.J., Jansen, H.G.P., Dumsday, R.G., 1996. Soil erosion
supermarkets would take greater responsibility. The and environmental impact of vegetable production in the Cameron
Highlands, Malaysia. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ. 60, 29–46.
grower would be forced indirectly to grow safer produce
Mohayidin, M.G., Shamsudin, M.N., Chiew, E.F.C., Mohamed, Z.A.,
for their markets. Eventually, the objectives of reducing Taylor, D.C., 1994. Sustainability of English cabbage production
the use of pesticides and improving food quality can be practices in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Universiti Putra
achieved if there is involvement of all participants in the Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia, 99 pp.
food chain and transparency of residue test results. Monconduit, H., Mauchamp, B., 1998. Effects of ultralow doses of
fenoxycarb on juvenile hormone-regulated physiological parameter
in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 37,
178–189.
Ooi, P.A.C., 1986. Diamondback moth in Malaysia. In: Talekar, N.S.,
Acknowledgements
Griggs, T.D. (Eds.), Diamondback Moth Management: Proceed-
ings of the First International Workshop, AVRDC. Shanhua,
This study was carried out with financial support Taiwan, pp. 25–34.
from the Natural Resource International Foundation, Ooi, P.A.C., 1992. Role of parasitoids in managing diamond-back
United Kingdom and the Malaysian Ministry of Science moth in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. In: Talekar, N.S. (Ed.),
and Technology (MOSTE). The authors are grateful to Management of DBM and other Crusiferous Pests. Diamondback
moth and Other Crucifer Pests: Proceedings of the Second
Madam Ong Pek Choo from the Malaysian Agricultural International Workshop, Tainan, Taiwan, AVRDC. Shanhua,
Research and Development Institute for advice and Taiwan, pp. 255–262.
comments on questionnaires, for introductions to the Ooi, P.A.C., Lim, G.S., 1983. Introduction of exotic parasitoids to
cabbage farms and for background information in the control the diamondback moth in Malaysia. J. Plant Prot. Tropics
Cameron Highlands. 6, 103–111.
Paramanathan, S., 1977. Soil genesis on igneous and metamorphic
rocks in Malaysia. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of Ghent,
Belgium, 302 pp.
References Pesticide Residues Committee (PRC), United Kingdom Pesticide
Safety Directorate, 2004. http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/prc_home.
Department of Agriculture, Malaysia, 2003. http://agrolink.moa.my/ asp (last accessed on 27/5/04).
doa/indexBI.html (last accessed on 27/5/04). Reardon, T., Timmer, C.P., Barrett, C.B., Berdegue, J., 2003. The rise
Ding, T.P.H., Vimala, P., Yusof, S., 1981. A Special Report on an of supermarkets in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Am. J. Agr.
Agro-economic Survey of Vegetable Farming in Peninsular Econ. 85, 1140–1146.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
N. Mazlan, J. Mumford / Crop Protection 24 (2005) 31–39 39
Sayyed, A.H., Wright, D.J., 2001. Cross-resistance and inheritance of practices in Cameron Highlands. Mimeo Report, Jabatan Ekonomi
resistance to Bacillus thuriengiensis toxin Cry1AC in diamondback Pertanian, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia,
moth (Plutella xylostella L) from lowland Malaysia. Pest Manage. 121 pp.
Sci. 57, 413–421. Waibel, H., Schmidt, E., 2000. Feeding Asian cities: food production
Soliman, K.M., 2001. Changes in concentration of pesticide residues in and processing issues. Paper presented at the AFMA/FAO
potatoes during washing and home preparation. Food Chem. Regional Seminar ‘Feeding Asian Cities’, 26–30 November,
Toxicol. 39, 887–891. Bangkok. http://www.fao.org/fcit/mark.asp (accessed on 27/5/04).
Syed, A.R., 1992. Insecticide resistance in diamondback moth in
Malaysia. In: Talekar, N.S. (Ed.), Management of DBM and other
Cruciferous Pests. Diamondback moth and Other Crucifer Pests:
Proceedings of the Second International Workshop, Tainan,
Taiwan, AVRDC. Shanhua, Taiwan, pp. 437–442.
Tabashnik, B.E., 1994. Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuriengien- Further Reading
sis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39, 47–79.
Taylor, D.C., Mohamed, Z.A., Shamsudin, M.N., Mohayidin M.G., Berg, H., 2001. Pesticide use in rice and rice-fish farms in Mekong
Chiew, E.F.C., 1993. Sustainability of English cabbage production Delta, Vietnam. Crop Prot. 20, 897–905.