Philippine Interpretations Committee (Pic) Questions and Answers (Q&As)
Philippine Interpretations Committee (Pic) Questions and Answers (Q&As)
Issues
2. Does an entity adjust earnings per share calculation for the cross holdings?
Background
Entity B, in turn, has a 20% ownership in Entity A, where Entity B exercises significant
influence. Entity B accounts for Entity A as an associate.
Both Entity A’s and Entity B’s share capital is 100,000 shares at Php1 unit each.
Entity A’s profit, excluding its share in Entity B, is Php100; Entity B’s profit, excluding its
share in Entity A, is also Php100.
Thus, the economic reality that Entity A’s profit (a) is dependent on Entity B’s profit (b)
and vice versa is solved by simultaneous equations as follows:
a = Php100 + 0.2b
b = Php100 + 0.2a
1 of 4
Consensus
1. In applying Paragraph 27 of PAS 28, Entity A should recognize its share of Entity
B’s profits, including Entity B’s share in the profits of Entity A. However, in the
case of reciprocal holdings, this approach results in a portion of Entity A’s profits
being double-counted. Therefore, the net approach, which simply accounts for
20% of the associate’s profit (before the reciprocal profit is added), is more
appropriate in this case. In this fact pattern, the net approach results in Entity A
and Entity B both recognizing profit in the amount of Php120. The difference of
Php5 represents the equity effect of the reciprocal holdings and therefore, is not
recognized in profit.
This view is supported by the fact that the equity method of accounting employs
consolidation-type procedures such as the elimination of unrealized profits.
Under paragraph B86(c) of PFRS 10, income arising on an investment held by a
subsidiary in its parent company is eliminated. Therefore, in applying
consolidation procedures in equity accounting, income arising from the
associate’s investment in its investor is also eliminated.
2. The number of ordinary shares on issue is adjusted for the same reasons that
profit is determined using the net approach – namely, that the equity method is
required to be applied using consolidation procedures and this includes the
elimination of intragroup balances such as the associate’s investment in the
investor.
It should be noted, however, that the associate is not part of the group and
therefore, the shares held in the investor are not ‘treasury shares’ as defined.
This consensus, however, does not rely on viewing the associate’s holding as
treasury shares. Rather, it relies on the fact that paragraph 26 of PAS 28 states
that many of the procedures that are appropriate for the application of the equity
method are similar to the consolidation procedures described in PFRS 10. If a
subsidiary holds shares in its parent company, these are eliminated under B86(c)
of PFRS 10. The same procedure should, therefore, apply to equity accounting.
This will result in a similar treatment of treasury shares that are eliminated from
equity and, accordingly, excluded in determining earnings per share.
2 of 4
Relevant guidance
“Many of the procedures that are appropriate for the application of the equity method
are similar to the consolidation procedures described in PFRS 10. Furthermore, the
concepts underlying the procedures used in accounting for the acquisition of a
subsidiary are also adopted in accounting for the acquisition of an investment in an
associate or a joint venture.”
The consensus in this Q&A is effective from the date of approval by the FRSC.
3 of 4
(Original signed)
PIC Members
4 of 4