Astudillo v. Quebec - Formal Notice of Intent To Sue & Press Charges - July 25 2021

FORMAL NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE & LAY CRIMINAL CHARGES
From: Alan de Astudillo

Montréal, Québec
July 25th, 2021
Parties Formally Put On Notice:

a) Ville de Montréal inc. – SPVM inc.
b) Quebec inc. (Attorney General)
c) DPCP (Crown Prosecution Service) inc.
d) Déontologie Policière du Québec inc.
e) Batshaw Youth & Family Centres inc.
f) Ordre des Psychologues du Québèc inc.
g) Françoise Maheu, Psychologue
h) US Department of Justice - Federal Bureau of Investigation
Intent to sue for damages sustained in:

1. 500-01-186621-196 (acquitted July 12th 2021)
4. 500-01-195388-191 (acquitted March 4th 2021)
5. 500-01-195191-199 (acquitted March 4th 2021)
For the following violations of the following Charter Rights:

1. Section 7 – Life, liberty and security of the person
2. Section 8 – Search and seizure
3. Section 9 – Arbitrary detention more than 24 hours
4. Section 10(b,c) – General Detention Rights – Right to Counsel & Habeas
Corpus
5. Section 11(d) – Presumption of innocence
Furthermore I intend to add the following information to the Criminal Indictments, which
are applicable to both what your Social Workers do for a living, and your Government
Anti-Covid circus, which I have been informed of by Law-Abiding US Citizens who hate
both German Government Nazis & the Big Pharma Mafia mentality:
Examples of Medical Fraud:

1. False and intentionally misleading statements to patients.
2. Submitting false bills or claims for service.
3. Falsifying medical records or reports.
4. Lying about credentials or qualifications.
5. Unnecessary medical treatment or drug prescription.
https://www.health.ny.gov/professionals/doctors/conduct/fraud.htm
Racketeering is a genre of organized crime in which the perpetrators set up a coercive,
fraudulent, extortionary, or otherwise illegal coordinated scheme or operation (a racket)
to repeatedly or consistently collect money or other profit.
Originally and often still specifically, racketeering may refer to an organized criminal act
in which the perpetrators offer a service that will not be put into effect, offer a service to
solve a nonexistent problem, or offer a service that solves a problem that would not
exist without the racket. In many other cases, however, traditional racketeering may
also involve perpetrators or racketeers offering an ostensibly effectual service (such as
protection from other criminals) that may in fact solve an actual existing problem, with
the racketeers offering to protect and actually protecting a business from robbery or
vandalism; however, these racketeers will themselves coerce or threaten the business
into accepting this service, often with the threat (implicit or otherwise) that failure to
acquire the offered services will lead to the racketeers themselves contributing to the
existing problem. Particularly, in many cases, the potential problem may be caused by
the same party that offers to solve it, but that fact may be concealed, with the specific
intent to engender continual patronage for this party.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeering
18 U.S. Code § 1961 – Definitions
(4) “enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other

legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal
entity;
(5) “pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity,
one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which
occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission
of a prior act of racketeering activity;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1961
The issue of damages awarded during criminal trials is more complicated. As issuing
declaratory relief and awarding damages do not traditionally fall within the power of
criminal courts, and as such courts are not typically staffed to make the determinations
necessary to award such remedies, the superior courts’ use of their inherent section
24(1) power to consider damage remedies for Charter violations in the context of
criminal proceedings is heavily disfavoured (Mills, supra, at page 894).
https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art241.html
Date: July 25th 2021 Signature: ____________________

Astudillo v. Quebec - Formal Notice of Intent To Sue & Press Charges - July 25 2021

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Astudillo v. Quebec - Formal Notice of Intent To Sue & Press Charges - July 25 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FORMAL NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE & LAY CRIMINAL CHARGES

From: Alan de Astudillo

Parties Formally Put On Notice:

Intent to sue for damages sustained in:

For the following violations of the following Charter Rights:

Examples of Medical Fraud:

18 U.S. Code § 1961 – Definitions

(4) “enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other

Date: July 25th 2021 Signature: ____________________

You might also like