Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Competence and Compellability of

Witnesses
The basic rule is that all persons are competent and compellable to give evidence in
criminal and civil cases. However this general rule is of course subject to exceptions.

Criminal Proceedings

Under the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 s.53 (1) (YJCEA) all,
persons, whatever age, are competent apart from those that are not able to understand
individual questions put to them and give answers that are understood, (s53 (3)).

Under section 53(4) of the Act a person charged in criminal proceedings is not
competent to give evidence for the prosecution. In regards to co accused they can be
several situations where they are competent, including if they have been acquitted or
have pleaded guilty. Section 53(1) and s 1(1) of the Criminal Evidence Act stipulates
that the accused is competent for the Defence but is not compellable however.

Several exceptions exist as regards to a spouse of the accused under section 80 of the
Police and Criminal Act 1984 (PACE) and section 53 of the YJCEA. Section 53 states
that the spouse is not competent to give evidence for the prosecution if the spouse is
charged with an offence in the proceedings. If they are not charged with an offence in
the proceedings then they will only be compellable In a number of circumstances as
set out by PACE s 80(3), they will be compellable, including if the accused is charged
with a sexual offence against a person under the age of 16 and if there has been an
assault on the spouse or a person aged under 16.

Under s53 of the YCJEA the spouse is competent to give evidence for the defence but
only compellable if the offence is one that comes under section 80 (3) of PACE (see
above). An ex-spouse is competent and compellable as if they had never been
married, by virtue of section 80(5) of PACE.

Section 55 of the YCJEA 1999 states that persons under the age of 14 cannot give
sworn evidence in criminal proceedings, and cannot give sworn evidence, even if they
are over this age if they do not appreciate the solemnity of the occasion and the
responsibly of telling the truth under oath.

Civil Proceedings

In the case of R v Bellamy it was stated that a person that does not sufficiently
appreciate the seriousness of the occasion or does not realise that giving evidence
under oath involves more than an everyday duty of telling the truth then he will not be
competent.

Under the Children Act 1989 s 105, persons under the age of 18 can be competent to
give sworn testimony under the same rule. S 96 provides that if this is not the case
then the child can still give unsworn testimony if the child both understands that he is
under a duty to speak the truth and has sufficient understanding to justify the
reception of his evidence.

You might also like