Module A Financial Reporting - Part 1
Module A Financial Reporting - Part 1
Module A Financial Reporting - Part 1
Qualification Programme
Qualification Programme
4th EDITION F O U RT H E D I T I O N
LEARNING PACK
Qualification Programme
Module A
Financial Reporting
First edition 2010
Fourth edition 2013
Published by
www.bpp.com/learningmedia
©
HKICPA and BPP Learning Media Ltd
2013
ii
Contents
Page
Director's message v
Introduction vi
Module structure vii
Chapter features viii
Learning outcomes ix
Introduction iii
Page
III Disclosure and reporting
20 Related party disclosures 475
21 Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors; events
after the reporting period 487
22 Earnings per share 505
23 Operating segments 527
24 Interim financial reporting 539
25 Presentation of financial statements 553
iv Financial Reporting
Director's message
Welcome to the Qualification Programme (QP) of the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (HKICPA).
You have made the decision to complete the HKICPA's QP which entails completing the training
programme, passing professional examinations and acquiring practical experience under an
authorized employer or supervisor. This marks a further step on your pathway to a successful
business career as a CPA and becoming a valued member of the HKICPA.
The QP comprising four core modules and a final examination will provide you with a foundation for
life-long learning and assist you in developing your technical, intellectual, interpersonal and
communication skills. You will find this programme challenging with great satisfaction that will open
a wide variety of career opportunities bringing in attractive financial rewards.
A module of the QP involves approximately 120 hours of self-study over fourteen weeks,
participation in two full-day workshops and a three-hour open-book module examination at the
module end. We encourage you to read this Learning Pack which is a valuable resource to guide
you through the QP.
The four core modules of the QP are as follows:
Module A: Financial Reporting
Module B: Corporate Financing
Module C: Business Assurance
Module D: Taxation
Should you require any assistance at any time, please feel free to contact us on (852) 2287 7228.
May I wish you every success in your QP!
Jonathan Ng
Executive Director
Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Introduction v
Introduction
This is the fourth edition of the Learning Pack for Module A Financial Reporting of the HKICPA
Qualification Programme.
The Institute is committed to updating the content of the Learning Pack on an annual basis to keep
abreast of the latest developments. This edition has been developed after having consulted and
taken on board the feedback received from different users of the previous edition. Some of the
examples and self-test questions have been rewritten to better reflect current working practices in
industry and facilitate the learning process for users of the Learning Pack.
The Learning Pack has been written specifically to provide a complete and comprehensive
coverage of the learning outcomes devised by HKICPA, and has been reviewed and approved by
the HKICPA Qualification and Examinations Board for use by those studying for the qualification.
The HKICPA Qualification Programme comprises two elements: the examinations and the
workshops. The Learning Pack has been structured so that the order of the topics in which you
study is the order in which you will encounter them in the workshops. There is a very close inter-
relationship between the module structure, the Learning Pack and the workshops. It is important
that you have studied the chapters of the Learning Pack relevant to the workshops before you
attend the workshops, so that you can derive the maximum benefit from them.
On page (ix) you will see the HKICPA learning outcomes. Each learning outcome is mapped to the
chapter in the Learning Pack in which the topic is covered. You will find that your diligent study of
the Learning Pack chapters and your active participation in the workshops will prepare you to
tackle the examination with confidence.
One of the key elements in examination success is practice. It is important that not only you fully
understand the topics by reading carefully the information contained in the chapters of the Learning
Pack, but it is also vital that you take the necessary steps to practise the techniques and apply the
principles that you have learned.
In order to do this, you should:
work through all the examples provided within the chapters and review the solutions,
ensuring that you understand them;
complete the self-test questions within each chapter, and then compare your answer with the
solution provided at the end of the chapter; and
attempt the exam practice questions that you will find at the end of the chapter. Many of
these are HKICPA past examination questions, which will give an ideal indication of the
standard and type of question that you are likely to encounter in the examination itself. You
will find the solutions to exam practice questions at the end of the book.
In addition, you will find at the end of the Learning Pack a bank of past HKICPA case-study style
questions. These are past ‘Section A’ examination questions, which present a case study testing a
number of different topics within the syllabus. These questions will provide you with excellent
examination practice when you are in the revision phase of your studies, bringing together, as they
do, the application of a variety of different topics to a scenario.
Please note that the Learning Pack is not intended to be a 'know-it-all' resource. You are required
to undertake background reading including standards, legislations and recommended texts for the
preparation for workshop and examination.
vi Financial Reporting
Module Structure
This module will enable you to exercise judgment in selecting and applying accounting policies to
prepare financial statements (both at individual company and group levels) in compliance with the
relevant Hong Kong Financial Reporting Framework and Hong Kong Accounting Standards
('HKFRSs'). Please refer to the QP Learning Centre for the six-month rule and examinable
standards.
Overall Structure of Module A (Financial Reporting)
Introduction vii
Chapter features
Each chapter contains a number of helpful features to guide you through each topic.
Topic list Tells you what you will be studying in the chapter. The topic items form the
numbered headings within the chapter.
Learning focus Puts the chapter topic into perspective and explains why it is important, both
within your studies and within your practical working life.
Learning The list of Learning Outcomes issued for the Module by HKICPA,
Outcomes referenced to the chapter in the Learning Pack within which coverage will be
found.
Topic highlights Summarise the key content of the particular section that you are about to
start. They are also found within sections, when an important issue is
introduced other than at the start of the section.
Key terms Definitions of important concepts. You really need to know and understand
these before the examination, and understanding will be useful at the
workshops too.
Case study An example or illustration not requiring a solution, designed to enrich your
understanding of a topic and add practical emphasis. Often based on real
world scenarios and contemporary issues.
Self-test questions These are questions that enable you to practise a technique or test your
understanding. You will find the answer at the end of the chapter.
Formula to learn You may be required to apply financial management formulae in Module B,
Corporate Financing.
Topic recap Reviews and recaps on the key areas covered in the chapter.
Exam practice A question at the end of the chapter to enable you to practise the
techniques that you have learned. In most cases this will be a past HKICPA
examination question, updated as appropriate. You will find the answers in a
bank at the end of the Learning Pack entitled Answers to Exam Practice
Questions.
Further reading In Modules B and D you will find references to further reading that will help
you to understand the topics and put them into the practical context. The
reading suggested may be books, websites or technical articles.
Bold text Throughout the Learning Pack you will see that some of the text is in bold
type. This is to add emphasis and to help you to grasp the key elements
within a sentence or paragraph.
HKICPA's learning outcomes for the Module are set out below. They are cross-referenced to the
chapter in the Learning Pack where they are covered.
Fields of competency
The items listed in this section are shown with an indicator of the minimum acceptable level of
competency, based on a three-point scale as follows:
1 Awareness
To have a general professional awareness of the field with a basic understanding of relevant
knowledge and related concepts.
2 Knowledge
The ability to use knowledge to perform professional tasks competently without assistance in
straightforward situations or applications.
3 Application
The ability to apply comprehensive knowledge and a broad range of professional skills in a
practical setting to solve most problems generally encountered in practice.
Topics
Chapter
where
Competency covered
Introduction ix
Chapter
where
Competency covered
x Financial Reporting
Chapter
where
Competency covered
Introduction xi
Chapter
where
Competency covered
3.01.02 Account for a change in accounting policy 21
3.01.03 Account for a change in accounting estimate 21
3.01.04 Correct a prior period error 21
LO3.02 Revenue: 3
3.02.01 Define revenue and identify revenue within the 14
scope of HKAS 18
3.02.02 Measure revenue at the fair value of 14
consideration received
3.02.03 Identify revenue transaction including multiple 14
element arrangements
Introduction xiii
Chapter
where
Competency covered
Introduction xv
Chapter
where
Competency covered
LO3.14 Leases: 3
3.14.01 Identify the types of lease within the scope of 9
HKAS 17 and define the terminology used in
relation to leases
3.14.02 Classify leases as operating or finance leases by 9
looking at the substance of the transaction
3.14.03 Account for operating leases from the perspective 9
of both the lessee and the lessor
3.14.04 Disclose the relevant information relating to 9
operating leases in the accounts of both the
lessee and the lessor
3.14.05 Account for finance leases from the perspective
9
of both the lessee and the lessor
3.14.06 Disclose the relevant information relating to
9
finance leases in the accounts of both the lessee
and the lessor
3.14.07 Account for manufacturer/dealer leases
9
3.14.08 Account for sale and leaseback transactions
9
3.14.09 Explain the term off-balance sheet finance and
9
the importance of substance over form
3.14.10 Explain how to determine whether an
9
arrangement contains a lease
LO3.15 Events after the reporting period: 3
3.15.01 Explain the period during which there is 21
responsibility for reporting events in accordance
with HKAS 10
3.15.02 Define adjusting and non-adjusting events 21
3.15.03 Explain when the financial statements should be 21
prepared on a basis other than going concern
LO3.16 Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets: 3
3.16.01 Define provisions, contingent liabilities and 11
contingent assets within the scope of HKAS 37
3.16.02 Distinguish provisions from other types of 11
liabilities
3.16.03 Explain the criteria for recognition of provisions 11
and apply them to specific circumstances
3.16.04 Apply the appropriate accounting treatment for 11
contingent assets and liabilities
3.16.05 Disclose the relevant information relating to 11
contingent liabilities in the financial statements
3.16.06 Account for decommissioning, restoration and 11
similar liabilities and their changes
3.16.07 Disclose the relevant information relating to 11
contingent assets in the financial statements
Introduction xvii
Chapter
where
Competency covered
Introduction xix
Chapter
where
Competency covered
xx Financial Reporting
Chapter
where
Competency covered
Prepare the financial statements for a group in accordance with
Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards and statutory
reporting requirements
LO4.03 Principles of consolidation: 3
4.03.01 Identify and describe the concept of a group as a 26
single economic entity
4.03.02 Define a subsidiary and when a group should 26
start and stop consolidating a subsidiary
4.03.03 Explain what constitutes control and the impact of 26
potential voting rights
4.03.04 Describe the reasons why the directors of a 26
company may not want to consolidate a
subsidiary and the circumstances in which non-
consolidation is permitted
4.03.05 Explain the purpose of consolidated financial 26
statements
4.03.06 Explain the importance of eliminating intra-group 26
transactions
4.03.07 Explain the importance of uniform accounting 26
policies and coterminous year ends in the
preparation of consolidated accounts
4.03.08 Apply the appropriate accounting treatment of 26
consolidated goodwill
4.03.09 Explain how to account for changes in parent's 29
ownership interest in a subsidiary without losing
control
LO4.04 Acquisition of subsidiaries: 3
4.04.01 Prepare a consolidated statement of financial 27
position for a simple/complex group structure
including pre and post acquisition profits, non-
controlling interests and goodwill
4.04.02 Prepare a consolidated statement of profit or loss 27
and other comprehensive income for a
simple/complex group structure, dealing with an
acquisition and the non-controlling interest
LO4.05 Disposal of subsidiaries: 3
4.05.01 Account for the disposal of a subsidiary by a 29
group
4.05.02 Account for the change of ownership in 29
subsidiaries without loss of control
Introduction xxi
Chapter
where
Competency covered
Introduction xxiii
xxiv Financial Reporting
Part A
Legal environment
The emphasis in this section is on the legal environment in Hong Kong. The purpose of this
section is to develop your understanding of the Hong Kong legal environment, including the
legal framework and the related implications for business activities. This is considered as the
basic knowledge and foundation for a future certified public accountant.
1
Financial Reporting
2
chapter 1
Legal environment
Topic list
Learning focus
This chapter is partly background knowledge to set the scene about the legal environment
before you look at financial reporting standards. It also discusses the legal framework and
related implications for business activities. It is important that you are aware of these both for
exam purposes and in practice.
3
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Describe the Hong Kong legal framework and related implications for
business activities
1.01 Types and relative advantage of alternative forms of 2
organisation
1.01.01 Identify the types and relative advantages of alternative forms of
organisation
1.02 Legal procedures for establishment and governance of 2
companies
1.02.01 Describe the legal procedures for the establishment and
governance of companies
1.03 Powers, duties and obligations of directors and company 2
secretaries
1.03.01 Describe the powers, duties and obligations of company directors
1.03.02 Describe the powers, duties and obligations of the company
secretary
1.04 Share issues and prospectus requirements 2
1.04.01 Describe the procedure for issuing shares and the requirement for a
prospectus
1.05 Debt instruments and registration of charges 2
1.05.01 Describe the procedure for the issue of debt instruments
1.05.02 Describe the procedure for the registration of charges over
company debt
1.06 Statutory reporting and documentation requirements 3
1.06.01 Explain the statutory registers that must be kept by a company
1.06.02 Identify the financial statements that a company must prepare
1.07 Appointment and removal of auditors 3
1.07.01 Describe the procedures for the appointment, removal and
resignation of company auditors
1.08 Restructuring, including appointment of receivers and 1
liquidators
1.08.01 Identify the reasons for which a company may restructure, including
the appointment of receivers and liquidators
4
1: Legal environment | Part A Legal environment
The liability of the members of companies can be unlimited or limited. We are mainly concerned
with limited companies in this section.
5
Financial Reporting
However, if this business entity fails to register with the Registrar of Companies, then it becomes a
general partnership as a default.
In a general partnership all partners are general partners so each one is liable for all debts and
obligations of the firm.
In a limited partnership the general partners are liable for all debts and obligations of the firm
while the limited partners are liable only for the capital they contributed to the firm.
In a limited partnership the general partners manage the firm while the limited partners may not
and should limited partners do so then they become personally liable for the debts of obligations of
the firm in the same manner as a general partner.
Unless a partnership agreement between the partners demand otherwise, (1) a majority of the
general partners decide ordinary business matters, (2) a limited partner may assign his partnership
interests, (3) a limited partner cannot dissolve a partnership, (4) the introduction of a new partner
does not require the consent of the existing limited partners.
A partnership business, in common with a sole trader business, is not required to make accounts
and other documents public. It also has the additional advantages of:
greater access to capital since more individuals contribute to the business
potentially a greater spread of skills provided by the partners
shared risk
The disadvantages of a partnership include the issue of disputes in the running of the business,
and unlimited liability. Additionally, partners are jointly and severally liable for their partners,
meaning that any one may be held responsible for losses of the business.
1.1.3 Companies
A company is bound by applicable rules and regulations. This regulated formal structure is a
reason why companies are such a popular business structure. It is a comparatively safe and stable
system for different groups of people to join together in business activities.
The liabilities of the shareholders of companies in Hong Kong can be either limited or unlimited.
Extracts from Part 1 Division 3 Subdivision 1 of the new Companies Ordinance explain the
differences between unlimited companies and companies limited by shares or guarantee:
(a) Limited by shares – the members of the company are liable to pay the company's debts
only to the extent of the nominal value of their shares.
(b) Limited by guarantee – the members of the company are liable to pay the company's
debts only to the extent of a stated guarantee. This structure is often used by non-profit
organisations which do not want to have share capital, but want the benefits of using the
structure of a company.
(c) Unlimited – the members of the company are personally responsible for the debts of the
company. This type is less common but may suit partnerships who want to
use the more formal company structure for their business operation but are restricted by
some professional organisation from limiting their liability. In Hong Kong, sole proprietors
operating small businesses may also use this form of company.
Advantages of operating as a limited liability company
Advantages of a limited liability company include the following:
(a) The liability of the members is limited so reducing their personal exposure to debts should
the company fail.
(b) The separation of ownership and management may result in the smoother running of the
business and easier resolution of problems.
(c) A company may have better access to finance than unincorporated businesses and can
create a floating charge by the way of security.
6
1: Legal environment | Part A Legal environment
(d) The ownership of the business is easily achieved through the transfer of shares.
Drawbacks of operating as a limited liability company
Drawbacks of a limited liability company include the following:
(a) The regulated formal operating structure comes at the cost of registration, secretarial and
audit fees.
(b) The stringent reporting requirements mean that details of the operation of the business are
made public and this increases the accountability of management.
(c) The process of operating is governed and sometimes inhibited by legal requirements. For
example, all limited companies are bound to compile accounts and to have their accounts
audited annually.
For these reasons, small business operators may prefer to operate as a sole trader or as a
partnership.
1.1.4 Joint ventures
A joint venture is a legal entity formed by two or more parties to undertake an economic activity
together. The entity formed (the joint venture) may be any type of legal structure including a
partnership or limited liability company.
Joint ventures are often the preferred, or required, method of entry into a new market. By forming a
joint venture with another company, entities can reduce the risks associated with accessing new
geographical or product markets. In certain jurisdictions, including Saudi Arabia, a foreign entity
cannot legally carry out business without forming an alliance with a national entity.
7
Financial Reporting
Capital and initial shareholdings (for companies with a share capital) (section 85(1) and
section 8 of Part 5 of Schedule 2 to the new CO)
For an association to be incorporated with a licence granted under section 103 or a limited
company granted with such a licence, its AA must state the company’s objects whilst the
licence remains in force (section 82).
The new CO adopts a mandatory system of no-par value for all local companies with a share
capital and retires the par value of shares, in line with international trends and to provide
companies with greater flexibilities in structuring their share capital.
Par value (also known as "nominal value") is the minimum price at which shares can generally be
issued. Before the implementation of the new CO, companies incorporated in Hong Kong and
having a share capital were required to have a par value ascribed to their shares. The
Administration has legislated for the migration to mandatory no-par. Relevant concepts such as
nominal value, share premium, and requirement for authorised capital will no longer be necessary
and will be abolished.
Schedule 11 part 4 Division 2 of the new CO contains transitional provisions in relation to the
abolition of par value. These state that at the beginning of the commencement date of the new
legislation, any amount standing to the credit of the company’s share premium account and capital
redemption reserve becomes part of the company’s share capital. Additionally, any amount that
would be required by a continuing provision to be transferred to a company’s share premium
account or capital redemption reserve on or after the commencement date of section 135 becomes
part of the company’s share capital.
Once registered with the Registrar of Companies, a company is issued with a certificate of
incorporation as evidence that all the requirements of the new CO have been met with respect to
the registration.
The most common form of business structure in Hong Kong is the limited liability company. Limited
companies can be private limited companies or public limited companies. Any company that
cannot meet the legal requirements to remain a private company must register as a public
company.
Private companies are devised for the small business and are intended for situations where the
members are also the managers of the company.
A private company is defined by new CO Part One Division 3 Subdivision 2 section 11 as a
company which by its articles:
(a) restricts the right to transfer its shares; and
(b) limits the number of members to 50, not including employees of the company and former
employees who were members of the company whilst employed and who have continued to
be members; and
(c) prohibits any invitation to the public to subscribe for any shares or debentures in the
company.
For the purposes of this section, two or more persons holding one share jointly are treated as one
member.
If a company's articles fail to satisfy the requirements of s.11, it is a public company, although the
term "public company" is not actually used in or defined by the new CO.
The main advantage of private companies is that they need not file accounts with their annual
return and, subject to a number of exceptions, they may waive compliance with certain
requirements as to the content of their accounts (s.359). When a private company sends its annual
return to the Registrar of Companies they are signed by a director or the secretary, stating that the
company has complied with s.11.
If a company alters its articles so that it no longer satisfies s.11, from the date of alteration the
company will cease to be a private company and within 14 days it must deliver to the Registrar a
8
1: Legal environment | Part A Legal environment
prospectus or a statement in lieu of a prospectus in the form and containing the particulars
specified in the Companies (Winding up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance, which is the
revised name for the remaining provisions of the old Companies Ordinance. These documents are
also required before a company which is formed as a public company may allot any of its shares or
debentures.
Under the new CO s.94, the company must, within 15 days after the date on which the alteration takes
effect, deliver to the Registrar for registration:
(a) a notice of the change of the company’s status in the specified form; and
(b) a copy (certified by an officer of the company to be true) of the company’s annual financial
statements that are:
(i) prepared in accordance with section 379; and
(ii) prepared for the financial year immediately before the financial year in which the alteration
takes effect.
Under the new CO, the annual return of a public company or a guarantee company will no longer be
filed with reference to the date of Annual General Meeting ("AGM") as an AGM may be dispensed with
under s.612 of the new CO. The requirement is to deliver the annual return in respect of every financial
year of the company instead of in each calendar year.
Pursuant to sections 662(3) and (4) of the new CO, the annual return of a public company or a
guarantee company should be filed (together with certified true copies of the relevant financial
statements, directors' report and auditor's report) within 42 days after the company's return date.
The return date for a public company is 6 months after the end of the company's accounting reference
period while the return date for a guarantee company is 9 months after the end of the company's
accounting reference period.
The accounting reference period is the period by reference to which the company's annual financial
statements are to be prepared. For example, if a company prepares its financial statements up to 31
December every year, the accounting reference period is from the 1 January of a year to 31 December
of the same year.
There is no change in the requirement to file annual returns of private companies. Pursuant to sections
662(1) and (2) of the new CO, the annual return of a private company must be delivered for registration
within 42 days after the anniversary of the date of incorporation of the company.
Key term
Corporate governance is the system by which companies are directed and controlled.
(Cadbury Report)
Corporate governance may be defined as the system and processes by which companies are
directed and controlled in response to the rights and expectations of shareholders and other
stakeholders. Corporate governance therefore covers a very wide range of issues and disciplines
from the appointment and the remuneration of directors, the procedures of the directors' meetings
and the role of non-executive directors, to the company's objectives, business strategy and risk
management, and to investor relations, employee relations and social responsibilities and so on.
9
Financial Reporting
Corporate governance has been the subject of much debate in the business world in recent
years. The trigger for this debate was the collapse of major international companies during the
1980s, including Maxwell, BCCI and Polly Peck. These collapses were often unexpected, and
dubious (or even fraudulent) activities were sometimes attributed to their owners and managers.
These events represented a nasty shock for countries, such as the UK and the USA, that felt they
had well-regulated markets and strong company legislation. It became obvious, however, that part
of the problem was the way in which regulation was spread between different national
authorities for these global conglomerates, so that no one national authority had the whole picture
of the affairs of such companies, nor full powers over the whole of the business.
Individual countries began to develop better guidelines for the corporate governance, and efforts
have been made to produce an international standard on corporate governance.
Since 1995, the Corporate Governance Committee of the Hong Kong Institute of CPAs has made a
series of recommendations for enhanced corporate governance disclosure in Hong Kong. In the
committee's latest report, Corporate Governance Disclosure in Annual Reports – A Guide to
Current Requirements and Recommendations for Enhancement, which was published in March
2001, the Committee repeated certain of those recommendations which have not yet been adopted
in the Listing Rules and made further recommendations for enhancement.
Some of the recommendations are extracted as follows:
(a) To communicate to shareholders the strength of their corporate governance structure,
policies and practices, listed companies and public corporation are encouraged to include in
their annual report a statement of corporate governance;
(b) To enhance comparability and transparency of the way directors are compensated, directors'
remuneration should be analysed between "performance based" and "non-performance
based";
(c) Disclosure requirements in respect of directors' share options should be extended to include
disclosure by individual director of the aggregate value realised. Aggregate value realised is
calculated as the excess of the market price on the day of exercise of the option over the
exercise price multiplied by the number of shares acquired as a result of the exercise of the
option;
(d) To aid communication with the reader of the financial statements, the directors should set
out in a separate statement their responsibilities in connection with the preparation of the
financial statements; and
(e) To increase transparency regarding auditors' independence, disclosure of non-audit fees
paid to auditors should be made.
The new CO in Hong Kong has introduced some measures for enhancing corporate governance, in
particular in the following areas:
(a) Strengthening the accountability of directors by requiring every private company to have
at least one natural person acting as director (rather than a corporate director, ie a company
acting as director) in order to enhance transparency and accountability.
(b) Enhancing shareholder engagement in the decision making process by:
introducing detailed and comprehensive rules for the passing of written resolutions,
thus making it easier for shareholders to vote and companies to pass resolutions;
by requiring companies to bear the expenses of circulating members’ statements
relating to AGMs, thus avoiding members being deterred from doing this by the cost;
educing the threshold requirement for members to demand a poll from 10% to 5% of
the total voting rights
(c) Improving the disclosure of company information by requiring public companies and
large private companies (i.e. those that do not qualify for simplified reporting to prepare a
more comprehensive directors’ report, including a ‘business review’. This will include
10
1: Legal environment | Part A Legal environment
information relating to environmental and employee matters, thus promoting corporate social
responsibility
(d) Fostering shareholder protection by:
introducing rules to deal with directors’ conflicts of interests;
requiring the approval of disinterested shareholders where shareholder approval is
required for transactions of public companies and their subsidiaries;
introducing stricter rules for the ratification of the conduct of directors to prevent
conflicts of interest and abuse of power;
extending the scope of the ‘unfair prejudice’ remedy
(e) Strengthening auditors’ rights by empowering auditors to require information or
explanations from a wider range of persons than was previously the case.
11
Financial Reporting
5 duty to avoid conflicts between personal interests and interests of the company
6 duty not to enter into transactions in which the directors have an interest except in
compliance with the requirements of the law
7 duty not to gain advantage from use of position as a director
8 duty not to make unauthorised use of the company’s property or information
9 duty not to accept personal benefit from third parties conferred because of position as a
director
10 duty to observe the company's memorandum and articles of association and resolutions
11 duty to keep proper books of account
These general principles involving duties and operation requirements are summarised further as
duties and powers below.
(a) Fiduciary duties
Directors must act honestly and in good faith for the benefit of the company.
In particular, directors must act in good faith in what they believe to be the best interests of
the company. Generally speaking, the interests of the company are to be equated with the
interests of its members as a whole. Directors must not act just for the economic advantage
of the majority of shareholders disregarding the interests of the minority. The position and
interests of creditors must be considered in any case where the company is not fully solvent.
The interests of the company's employees must also be taken into account.
Directors must act for a proper purpose. That is, directors must not abuse the powers
given to them by using those powers for purposes other than those for which they were
granted.
Directors must not obtain a personal profit from transactions entered into by the
company without the prior approval of the shareholders; otherwise such profits will be
regarded as being held in trust for the company and they may have to account for them.
Directors must not agree to fetter their discretion. As the powers delegated to directors
by the memorandum and articles are held in trust by them for the company, they must not
restrict their exercise of future discretion.
Directors must act in such a way that there is no possibility of conflict between
personal interests and company interests. Directors should also avoid any conflict of
interest by not using corporate property, information or opportunity for any purpose other
than in the company's interests.
(b) Duty to exercise skill and care
Directors must exercise reasonable care and skill in the performance of their duties.
The wide range of skills required of directors has meant that there have been no precise
standards of skill and care established in case law. In the past the courts have required that
directors display the degree of skill and care which may reasonably be expected from a
person with that director's knowledge and experience. If employed as having particular skills,
for example, as being a certified public accountant, a director should display the skill or
ability expected from a person of that profession. A certified public accountant may,
depending on the circumstances, be held professionally responsible if he or she should be
found negligent in the discharge of his or her duties as a director.
However, the new CO has introduced a statutory responsibility on directors to
exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence (s 465) which should make it easier for
courts to determine whether the duty of care has been exercised.
Statutory duty – various company law statutes impose a number of duties on
directors, such as the preparation of annual accounts and duties in relation to auditors.
12
1: Legal environment | Part A Legal environment
13
Financial Reporting
The term "officer" is a generic one that can be applied to directors, the secretary and some other
senior managers. Officers are usually accountable in law for certain actions specified in legislation.
Furthermore, they may be accountable under the principles established in decided cases.
The secretary is the chief administrative officer of the company as regards relations with members
and the Companies Registry.
Every company must have a secretary. The position may be filled by an individual or a company.
It is permitted to have more than one secretary. Details of the secretary must be registered in
Chinese and English.
The secretary can be a director of the company unless the company has only one member who is
also the only director (section 154, Companies Ordinance). Listed companies must segregate the
roles of chairman and secretary under the Listing Rules.
2.2.1 The role of the secretary
The secretary is the vital link between the company and the Companies Registry, and the company
and its members.
The secretary receives all formal communications from the Registry. The secretary is responsible
for submitting returns and registration of documents such as charges over assets, special
resolutions, loans to directors and so on (though it is the directors who are accountable for these
actions).
2.2.2 Powers and duties of the company secretary
The secretary:
makes arrangements for meetings of the board of directors
makes arrangements for annual and extraordinary general meetings
records the formal minutes of meetings and makes these available for signature
maintains the company's records, including the register of members
14
1: Legal environment | Part A Legal environment
The issued share capital is made up of the shares already held by members. It is sometimes called
subscribed share capital.
A company does not have to issue all of its authorised share capital at once, or even at all if it
chooses not to do so. Share capital not issued is called unissued share capital.
15
Financial Reporting
relegate the obligation to the level of an unsecured creditor. Therefore, the charge remains valid
against the company. Irrespective of the terms of the debenture, failure to register makes the whole
debt immediately repayable. This will normally result in insolvency within a short period of time.
Any fixed charge on land and buildings must be registered in the Land Office within one month of
being executed. This also applies if any floating charge that includes land or buildings crystallises.
The requirement to register is set out in Part 8 Divisions 2 and 3 of the Companies Ordinance. Not
all charges have to be registered, but the exclusions generally fall outside the Module A syllabus.
Charges must be registered by the debtor company, though the creditor can perform this function
(Division 2 section 335). Registration secures the position of the creditor and also serves as an
indication of the obligation to prospective future lenders if they choose to search the register.
Once registration has occurred, a non-current asset that secures a fixed charge can only be sold
with the consent of the secured lender. Some debentures are issued under a trust deed so that
only one registration is necessary. Also, if the directors seek release from the charge they need
only approach the trustees instead of potentially many lenders.
As we have seen, the creation of a floating charge does not prevent dealing in the asset.
On liquidation, charges are prioritised using the following principles:
Fixed charges rank ahead of floating charges
Charges of the same kind are ranked in order of their date of creation
The security to the lender is the value of the asset at disposal and not the debt. Therefore, if a
company is liquidated and an asset is sold for $50,000 with a loan outstanding of $70,000, the
difference will rank as unsecured.
Some lenders reinforce their position by including a negative pledge clause in their floating charge
documents. This is a condition that states that the company will not create any later legal or
equitable charges over specific assets ranking in priority to a floating charge.
16
1: Legal environment | Part A Legal environment
17
Financial Reporting
Capital restructuring involves reallocating assets to improve liquidity. Certain assets are sold and
replaced with alternative assets which can be better utilised to earn revenue and profits.
The overall motives of restructuring are reduced risk, reduced cost of capital and increased
liquidity.
3.5.2 Liquidation
Key term
Liquidation is the "end of the road" for the company. It occurs when it is certain that the life of the
company will come to an end. The process by which this occurs is called winding up. You can use
the terms "liquidation" and "winding up" to mean broadly the same thing. However, the company
does not have to be in financial difficulties to be wound up. The members of the company may
decide at any time to take such action, and in some cases are obliged to do so (for example, if the
company were set up to achieve a specific purpose and this has been fully achieved, there is no
reason for the company to go on trading).
The liquidator is the person appointed to wind up the company and is an insolvency practitioner
(usually an accountant or solicitor) with expertise in such matters. Where a company is insolvent,
the liquidator is appointed by the Official Receiver, a civil servant acting on instructions from the
court. The Official Receiver is sometimes called the provisional liquidator.
3.5.3 Receivership
A receiver is different to both a liquidator and the Official Receiver. A receiver is a person or firm
appointed by creditors to act if a company has broken the conditions of a debenture, such as not
making payments when contractually obliged to do so. The job of the receiver is to get the money
back for the creditor. If he does so and the company can still survive, it does not mean that the
receiver's actions will bring an end to the company.
The receiver is appointed under the provisions of the debenture. A receiver may also be appointed
by the court or on the statutory basis provided by the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance:
"... there shall be implied in any legal charge or equitable mortgage by deed, where the
money has become due, a power exercisable in writing by the mortgagee and any person
entitled to give a receipt for the mortgage money on its repayment to appoint a receiver... to
remove any receiver... and appoint another in his place."
The court appoints a receiver if the security is in jeopardy.
When a receiver is appointed it is necessary to inform the Companies Registry within seven days
of appointment. From this time, the company's letterhead must make specific reference to the
receiver.
s.379 - a company's directors must prepare for each financial year financial statements that
comply with the ordinance requirements, and directors must instead prepare for the financial
year consolidated statements if the company is a holding company and not a wholly owned
subsidiary of another corporate
s.380(1) - the annual financial statements must give a true and fair view of the financial
position of the company as at the end of the financial year and the financial performance of
the company for the financial year
18
1: Legal environment | Part A Legal environment
s.380(2) - the annual consolidated statements must give a true and fair view of the financial
position of the company and all the subsidiary undertakings as a whole as at the end of the
financial year, and the financial performance of the company and all the subsidiary
undertakings as a whole for the financial year
s.380(3) – the financial statements for a financial year must comply with Part 1 and 2 of
Schedule 4, depending on reporting exemption
s.380(4) – the financial statements for a financial year must comply with any other
requirements of the Ordinance in relation to the financial statements and the accounting
standards applicable to the financial statements
s.380(5) - the financial statements must contain all additional information necessary to give a
true and fair view
s.380(6) – the financial statements must contain the reasons for, and the particulars and
effect of, the departure from the Ordinance requirements to give a true and fair view
s.381 – the annual consolidated financial statements for a financial year must include all the
subsidiary undertakings of the company, exclusion of one or more subsidiaries may be
possible subject to reporting exemption or materiality
s.387 - a statement of financial position that forms part of any financial statements must be
approved by the directors and signed by 2 directors on the directors' behalf
The new CO defines accounting standards as statements of standard accounting practice issued or
specified by a body prescribed by its Regulations. However, the definition of a true and fair view
again is not provided.
19
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
Legal environment
HongHong
KongKong
LegalLegal Hong
Directors
Kong and
Legal
officers of a company Hong Legal
Kong requirements
Legal
Framework Framework Framework
A company is established
under the provisions of the
Companies Ordinance.
Limited liability companies The company secretary is the chief Statutory reporting
are private or public. administrative officer. They: A company must:
Those which do not meet arrange board meetings maintain statutory registers
the conditions to remain arrange general meetings prepare statements of
private must register as record meeting minutes financial position and
public. maintain company records comprehensive income.
liaise with members
deal with formal
communications with the
Companies Registry
Corporate governance is Auditors
the system by which New auditors appointed at
companies are directed and AGM
controlled. Removal of auditors by
ordinary resolution
Resignation at any time in
writing
Restructuring
Debt restructuring
(renegotiate debts to
improve liquidity)
Capital restructuring
(reallocate assets to
improve liquidity)
Liquidation (winding
up the company)
Receivership
(recovery of money for
creditors)
20
1: Legal environment | Part A Legal environment
Exam practice
21
Financial Reporting
22
Part B
Financial reporting
framework
23
Financial Reporting
24
chapter 2
Financial reporting
framework
Topic list 7.2 Advantages and disadvantages of a conceptual
framework
7.3 Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
1 Regulatory bodies and their impact on
(GAAP)
accounting
1.1 The role of the Hong Kong Institute of 8 The HKICPA’s Conceptual Framework
CPAs (HKICPA) 8.1 Preface
1.2 The role of the Stock Exchange of Hong 8.2 Introduction
Kong (SEHK) Ltd 8.3 Purpose and status
1.3 Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) 8.4 Scope
1.4 Financial Reporting Council (FRC) 8.5 Users and their information needs
1.5 Hong Kong Insurance Authority (HKIA) 8.6 The objective of financial statements
1.6 Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) 8.7 Information about economic resources, claims
and changes in resources and claims
2 Financial reporting requirements under
8.8 The reporting entity
HKFRS
9 Qualitative characteristics of financial information
3 Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards
9.1 Fundamental qualitative characteristics
3.1 The setting of HKFRS and due process
9.2 Enhancing qualitative characteristics
3.2 Current Hong Kong FRS
9.3 The cost constraint on useful financial reporting
3.3 Scope of HKFRS
9.4 Underlying assumption
3.4 Accounting standards and choice
10 The elements of financial statements
4 Other sources of financial reporting guidance
10.1 Financial position
4.1 HK(IFRIC) Interpretations, Hong Kong
10.2 Performance
Interpretations and HK(SIC) Interpretations
10.3 Capital maintenance
4.2 Conceptual Framework for Financial
10.4 Section summary
Reporting (the Conceptual Framework)
4.3 Accounting Guidelines and implementation 11 Recognition of the elements of financial
guidance statements
4.4 Accounting Bulletins 11.1 Probability of future economic benefits
11.2 Reliability of measurement
5 Additional requirements for listed companies
11.3 Recognition of items
5.1 Companies listed on the Main Board
5.2 Companies listed on GEM 12 Measurement of the elements of financial
5.3 Acceptance of Mainland Accounting and statements
Auditing Standards
13 Fair presentation and compliance with HKFRS
6 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants 13.1 Extreme case disclosures
6.1 Fundamental principles 13.2 Break-up basis accounts
6.2 Obligation to comply with the Code of
Ethics 14 Management commentary
6.3 Revision to Code of Ethics 14.1 Purpose
14.2 Contents
7 Conceptual Framework and GAAP
7.1 A conceptual framework 15 Current developments
15.1 Conceptual Framework
15.2 Other IASB Projects
25
Financial Reporting
Learning focus
The content of the HKICPA's Conceptual Framework is vital as it underpins all HKFRS. Both in
exams and in practice, when an accounting standard does not appear to provide guidance on
a particular topic, you may be required to fall back on the basic principles of the Conceptual
Framework.
Learning outcomes
26
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
1.2 The role of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong (SEHK) Ltd
The principal function of the SEHK is to provide a fair, orderly and efficient market for the trading of
securities, under the Stock Exchange Unification Ordinance.
To enhance the competitiveness of the Hong Kong securities market so as to meet the challenge of
an increasingly globalised market, there was a comprehensive market reform of the securities and
futures market in March 2000, under which the SEHK, the Hong Kong Futures Exchange Ltd
(HKFE) and the Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Ltd (HKSCC) were amalgamated under
a holding company, Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd (HKEx).
Currently, there are two established exchanges under the SEHK, the Main Board and the Growth
Enterprise Market (GEM) Board, on which companies are listed in Hong Kong.
Companies listed on the Main Board are required to comply with the Listing Rules whereas
companies listed on the GEM Board are required to comply with the GEM Rules.
The SEHK regulates the financial reporting compliance of listed companies through a Regulatory
Affairs Group and a GEM Department for companies listed on the Main Board and the GEM Board
respectively.
27
Financial Reporting
The SFC is responsible for administering the laws governing the securities and futures markets in
Hong Kong and facilitating and encouraging the development of these markets.
The statutory regulatory objectives as set out in the SFO are to:
maintain and promote the fairness, efficiency, competitiveness, transparency and orderliness
of the securities and futures industry;
promote understanding by the public of the operation and functioning of the securities and
futures industry;
provide protection for members of the public investing in or holding financial products;
minimise crime and misconduct in the securities and futures industry;
reduce systemic risks in the securities and futures industry; and
assist the Financial Secretary in maintaining the financial stability of Hong Kong by taking
appropriate steps in relation to the securities and futures industry.
In carrying out their mission, the SFC aims to ensure Hong Kong's continued success and
development as an international financial centre.
The SFC is divided into four operational divisions: Corporate Finance, Intermediaries and
Investment Products, Enforcement, and Supervision of Markets. The Commission is supported by
the Legal Services Division and Corporate Affairs Division.
1.3.1 Whom, what and how: SFC regulation
Areas of regulation Methods
Licensed corporations and Set licensing standards to ensure that all practitioners are
individuals carrying out the fit and proper
following regulated activities:
Approve licenses and maintain a public register of
Dealing in securities licensees
Dealing in futures contracts Issue codes and guidelines to inform the industry of its
Leveraged foreign exchange expected standard of conduct
trading Monitor licensees' financial soundness and compliance
Advising on securities with the Ordinance, codes, guidelines, rules and
regulations
Advising on futures contracts
Handle misconduct complaints against licensees
Advising on corporate
finance Investigate and take action against misconduct
28
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
Investment products offered Set standards for the authorisation and regulation of
to the public investment products
Authorise investment products offered to the public and
their promotion (including advertisements and marketing
materials)
Listed companies Approve changes to the Listing Rules
Monitor announcements and vet listing application
materials under the Dual Filing regime
Administer the Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and
Share Repurchases
Consider requests for exemptions from prospectus
requirements under the Companies Ordinance
Enquire into listed companies' suspected prejudicial or
fraudulent transactions or provision of false or misleading
information to the public
Hong Kong Exchanges and Oversee the performance of its role as the frontline
Clearing Limited (HKEx) regulator of listing related matters
Approve the creation of new markets, new products and
changes to its rules and regulations
Monitor HKEx's own compliance with the Listing Rules
Monitor the trading of shares, options and futures on its
markets
Oversee its systems and technology
Approved share registrars Approve the Federation of Share Registrars as an
association whose members shall be approved share
registrars
Require approved share registrars to comply with the
requirements of the Code of Conduct for Share Registrars
Investor Compensation Recognise the ICC as an independent compensation
Company Limited (ICC) company
Approve the rules and any amendment of rules of the ICC
Require the ICC to prepare and regularly submit financial
statements, auditors' report and other documents to the
SFC
All participants in trading Monitor unusual market movements and direct trade
activities suspension of related stocks to maintain an informed and
orderly market
Investigate and take action against market misconduct
and other breaches of the law
29
Financial Reporting
30
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
and Futures Commission or The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited for follow-up action. The
FRC is not empowered to discipline or prosecute.
31
Financial Reporting
The HKMA is the government authority in Hong Kong responsible for maintaining monetary and
banking stability. Its main functions are:
maintaining currency stability within the framework of the Linked Exchange Rate system
promoting the stability and integrity of the financial system, including the banking system
helping to maintain Hong Kong's status as an international financial centre, including the
maintenance and development of Hong Kong's financial infrastructure
managing the Exchange Fund.
The financial reporting regulations and requirements currently in place in Hong Kong applicable to
limited liability companies are derived from a number of sources, including those bodies mentioned
above. Some are mandatory and some are advisory.
Those sources which are mandatory include:
(a) Legal requirements set out in the Companies Ordinance.
(b) Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards (HKFRS, taken for the purpose of this Learning
Pack to include both HKAS and HKFRS) and HKAS Interpretations (HKAS-lnt) issued by the
Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (Hong Kong Institute of CPAs).
(c) For companies listed in Hong Kong, the requirements set out in the Rules Governing the
Listing of Securities (the Listing Rules) and the Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on
the Growth Enterprise Market (the GEM Rules), both issued by The Stock Exchange of Hong
Kong Ltd (SEHK) pursuant to section 34 (1) of the Stock Exchanges Unification Ordinance
(Cap. 361).
Those sources which are advisory in nature include:
(a) Accounting Guidelines (AGs) issued by the Hong Kong Institute of CPAs.
(b) Accounting Bulletins (ABs) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Committee (FASC)
of the Hong Kong Institute of CPAs.
(c) Pronouncements of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), formerly known as
International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC), and leading national standard setting
bodies such as those from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the
United States of America.
32
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
For the purpose of this Learning Pack, the terms accounting standards, Standards and
Interpretations, Hong Kong Accounting Standards and Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards
are used interchangeably and include all Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards (HKFRS),
Hong Kong Accounting Standards (HKAS) and HKAS Interpretations (HKAS-Int) approved by the
Council and currently in issue unless otherwise specified.
Within this remit, the HKICPA Council permits the FRSC to work in whatever way it considers most
effective and efficient and this may include forming advisory subcommittees or other forms of
specialist advisory groups to give advice in preparing new and revised HKFRS. The process for the
development of an HKFRS normally involves the following steps:
(a) Identifying and reviewing all the issues associated with an Exposure Draft or a draft
Interpretation issued by the IASB for possible adoption in Hong Kong or any other topics and
considering the application of the Conceptual Framework to the issues, if needed.
(b) Studying pronouncements of the IASB and other standard-setting bodies and accepted
industry practices about the issues.
(c) Consulting the Standard Setting Steering Board of the HKICPA (SSSB) about the advisability
of adding the topic to the FRSC's agenda.
(d) Forming an advisory group to give advice to the FRSC on the project.
(e) Publishing for public comment a discussion document. (In the case of the IASB issuing a
discussion document, also issuing an invitation to comment in Hong Kong with an earlier
deadline than that imposed by the IASB, so as to allow the FRSC a reasonable time to
consider the comments before the Council makes a submission to the IASB.)
(f) Publishing for public comment an Exposure Draft or a draft Interpretation. (In the case of the
IASB issuing an Exposure Draft or a draft Interpretation, issuing an invitation to comment in
Hong Kong on that Exposure Draft or draft Interpretation with a request for comment before
the comment deadline imposed by the IASB so as to allow the FRSC a reasonable time to
consider the comments before the Council makes a submission to the IASB.)
(g) Publishing within an Exposure Draft a basis for conclusions.
(h) Considering all the comments received within the comment period on Discussion Papers and
Documents, Exposure Drafts and draft Interpretations and those received in response to the
Hong Kong invitation to comment on the IASB documents and, when appropriate, preparing
a comment letter to the IASB.
(i) Following publication of the finalised IFRS or Interpretation of IFRS, considering the changes
made, if any, by the IASB and adopting the finalised IFRS or Interpretation of IFRS in Hong
Kong with the same effective date.
(j) Approving a standard or an Interpretation, including those converged with the equivalent
IFRS or Interpretation of IFRS, by the Council.
(k) Publishing within a standard a basis for conclusions, if appropriate, explaining how the
conclusions were reached and giving background information that may help users of HKFRS
to apply them in practice or, in the case of a standard that is converged with IFRS, publishing
within the standard the IASB Basis for Conclusions with an explanation of the extent to which
33
Financial Reporting
the Council agrees with the IASB Basis for Conclusions so as to enable users to understand
any changes made to the IFRS.
HKAS 1
Presentation of Financial Statements
(Revised)
HKAS 2 Inventories
HKAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows
HKAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors
HKAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period
HKAS 11 Construction Contracts
HKAS 12 Income Taxes
HKAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment
HKAS 17 Leases
HKAS 18 Revenue
HKAS 19
Employee Benefits
(Revised)
HKAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance
HKAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
HKAS 23
Borrowing Costs
(Revised)
HKAS 24
Related Party Disclosures
(Revised)
HKAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans
HKAS 27
Separate Financial Statements
(2011)
HKAS 28
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures
(2011)
HKAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies
HKAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation
HKAS 33 Earnings Per Share
HKAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting
HKAS 36 Impairment of Assets
HKAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
HKAS 38 Intangible Assets
HKAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
34
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
You need to keep yourself up to date with Hong Kong Accounting Standards as they are issued or
reviewed.
Various Exposure Drafts and Discussion Papers are currently at different stages within the HKFRS
process, and by the end of your financial reporting studies, you should know all the Standards,
Exposure Drafts and Discussion Papers.
35
Financial Reporting
(e) They have obliged companies to disclose more accounting information than they would
otherwise have done if accounting standards did not exist, for example HKAS 33 Earnings
Per Share.
Many companies are reluctant to disclose information which is not required by national legislation.
However, the following arguments may be put forward against standardisation and in favour of
choice:
(a) A set of rules which give backing to one method of preparing accounts might be
inappropriate in some circumstances. For example, HKAS 16 on depreciation is
inappropriate for investment properties (properties not occupied by the entity but held solely
for investment), which are covered by HKAS 40 on investment property.
(b) Standards may be subject to lobbying or government pressure (in the case of national
standards). For example, in the USA, the accounting standard FAS 19 on the accounts of oil
and gas companies led to a powerful lobby of oil companies, which persuaded the SEC
(Securities and Exchange Commission) to step in. FAS 19 was then suspended.
(c) Many national standards are not based on a conceptual framework of accounting,
although HKFRS are.
(d) There may be a trend towards rigidity, and away from flexibility in applying the rules.
You should be able to discuss:
due process of the HKICPA
use and application of HKFRS
future work of the HKICPA
One of the competencies you are required to demonstrate is to recognise and apply the external
legal and professional framework and regulations to financial reporting. The information in this
chapter will give you knowledge to help you demonstrate this competence.
36
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
(b) assist preparers of financial statements in applying accounting standards and guidelines and
in dealing with topics that have yet to form the subject of an accounting standard or
guideline;
(c) assist auditors in forming an opinion as to whether financial statements conform with
accounting standards;
(d) assist users of financial statements in interpreting the information contained in financial
statements prepared in conformity with accounting standards and guidelines; and
(e) provide those who are interested in the work of the Council with information about its
approach to the formulation of accounting standards and guidelines.
The Conceptual Framework is discussed in more detail in sections 8 to 12 of this chapter.
37
Financial Reporting
38
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
Companies listed on the GEM are subject to tighter reporting requirements. For example, they are
required to publish annual reports within three months; and half-yearly reports and quarterly reports
within 45 days after the end of each relevant financial period.
The disclosure requirements for annual reporting under the GEM Rules are in many ways similar to
the Listing Rules though there are some specific disclosures which are only applicable under the
GEM Rules. For instance, companies listed on GEM are subject to the following additional
disclosure requirements:
(a) A comparison of actual business progress with business objectives stated in listing
documents (for a few reporting periods after the year of listing only).
(b) Extension of the disclosure of directors' emoluments by showing the amount of emoluments
by director on an anonymous basis.
(c) The interests (if any) of the sponsor, and its directors, employees and associates, and of the
interests of the management shareholders of the issuer.
(d) As regards the compliance with corporate governance disclosure, specification of work
undertaken by the audit committee and number of meetings held, and so on.
For companies listed on GEM, the principal means of information dissemination on GEM is
publication on the Internet website operated by the SEHK. Companies listed on GEM are not
generally required to issue paid announcements in the press.
A GEM issuer that does not have its own website will be in breach of the Listing Rules.
Certified public accountants in business owe certain legal duties towards their employers.
Additionally, they have ethical duties towards the HKICPA. The Council of HKICPA requires
members of the Institute (and therefore certified public accountants) to comply with the Code of
Ethics for Professional Accountants (the Code). Apparent failures by certified public accountants to
comply with the Code are liable to be enquired into by the appropriate committee established under
the authority of the Institute, and disciplinary action may result. Disciplinary action may include an
order that the name of the certified public accountant be removed from the Institute's membership
register.
39
Financial Reporting
The Code of Ethics is likely to be taken into account when the work of a certified public accountant
is being considered in a court of law or in other contested situations.
40
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
41
Financial Reporting
42
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
Prior to a review of the HKICPA's attempt to bring forth the conceptual framework, it is important to
consider the generally accepted accounting principles (or practice) or GAAP.
43
Financial Reporting
(c) Listing Rules. The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (SEHK) has adopted rules
governing the listing of securities on its Main Board (the Listing Rules) and on its Growth
Enterprise Market (the GEM Rules). These include some accounting and disclosure
requirements.
Other sources of GAAP
Hong Kong Accounting Standard 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and
Errors (HKAS 8, which is identical to IAS 8) states:
10. In the absence of a HKFRS that specifically applies to a transaction, other event or
condition, management shall use its judgment in developing and applying an accounting
policy that results in information that is:
(a) relevant to the economic decision-making needs of users; and
(b) reliable, in that the financial statements:
(i) represent faithfully the financial position, financial performance and cash flows
of the entity;
(ii) reflect the economic substance of transactions, other events and conditions,
and not merely the legal form;
(iii) are neutral, i.e. free from bias;
(iv) are prudent; and
(v) are complete in all material respects.
11. In making the judgment described in paragraph 10, management shall refer to, and
consider the applicability of, the following sources in descending order:
(a) the requirements and guidance in HKFRS dealing with similar and related issues; and
(b) the definitions, recognition criteria and measurement concepts for assets, liabilities,
income and expenses in the Conceptual Framework.
12. In making the judgment described in paragraph 10, management may also consider the
most recent pronouncements of other standard-setting bodies that use a similar conceptual
framework to develop accounting standards, other accounting literature* and accepted
industry practices, to the extent that these do not conflict with the sources in paragraph 11.
*In the context of Hong Kong, other accounting literature includes Accounting Guidelines and
Accounting Bulletins.
The Accounting Guidelines and Accounting Bulletins referred to in the footnote to paragraph 12 of
HKAS 8 (above) are "best practice" guidance documents that have been published by the HKICPA
to assist its members in applying HKFRS. Accounting Guidelines, and Industry Accounting
Guidelines, are persuasive in intent and, while not mandatory, should normally be followed.
Accounting Bulletins are intended to assist members of the HKICPA in dealing with accounting
issues and to stimulate debate on subjects of topical interest.
TechWatch is a monthly publication prepared by the HKICPA to alert HKICPA members to topics
and issues that impact on accountants and their working environment. It is intended for general
guidance only.
7.3.2 GAAP for Small and Medium-sized Entities
The HKICPA released its own Small and Medium-sized Entity Financial Reporting Framework and
Financial Reporting Standard (SME-FRF & FRS) in August 2005. The SME-FRF and FRS became
effective for optional use by a qualifying entity's first financial statements that cover a period
beginning on or after 1 January 2005. Entities that qualify include Hong Kong incorporated
companies that meet certain legal requirements and overseas companies that have no public
accountability, meet size requirements and where the owners agree to use the SME-FRF and FRS.
Those entities which do not meet the criteria to use the SME-FRF and FRS may be able to use the
HKFRS for Private Entities, issued in 2010. Both of these options are discussed in more detail in
the next chapter.
44
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
In June 1997 the HKICPA produced a document, Framework for the Preparation and Presentation
of Financial Statements (the Framework). This is, in effect, the conceptual framework upon which
all HKFRS are based and hence it determines how financial statements are prepared and the
information they contain.
The Framework is currently being revised with the project taking place in several stages and
Exposure Drafts being issued as each progress stage approaches completion. The first
amendments to the Framework were issued in October 2010, and the HKICPA has decided to
amend the Framework on a piecemeal basis, so the revised parts of the Framework sit alongside
the old Framework. The Framework has been renamed the Conceptual Framework for Financial
Reporting.
The revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting consists of several sections or
chapters, following on after a preface and introduction. These chapters are as follows:
The objective of general purpose financial reporting (issued October 2010)
The reporting entity (not yet issued)
Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information (issued October 2010)
The Framework (1997): The Remaining Text
– Underlying assumption
– The elements of financial statements
– Recognition of the elements of financial statements
– Measurement of the elements of financial statements
– Concepts of capital and capital maintenance
Much of the content of the chapters is also included in HKAS 1 (revised), and covered in sections
10 to 12 of this chapter. As you read through them, think about the impact the Conceptual
Framework has had on HKFRS, particularly the definitions.
8.1 Preface
Financial statements are prepared and presented for external users worldwide, and although they
may appear similar, differences are caused by social, economic and legal circumstances.
The HKICPA wishes to narrow these differences by harmonising all aspects of financial
statements, including the regulations governing their accounting standards and their preparation
and presentation.
The HKICPA believes that financial statements prepared for the purpose of providing information
that is useful in making economic decisions meet the common needs of most users. The types of
economic decisions for which financial statements are likely to be used include the following:
Decisions to buy, hold or sell equity investments
Assessment of management stewardship and accountability
Assessment of the entity's ability to pay employees
Assessment of the security of amounts lent to the entity
Determination of taxation policies
Determination of distributable profits and dividends
Inclusion in national income statistics
Regulations of the activities of entities
45
Financial Reporting
Any additional requirements imposed by national governments for their own purposes should not
affect financial statements produced for the benefit of other users.
The Conceptual Framework recognises that financial statements can be prepared using a variety
of models. Although the most common is based on historical cost and a nominal unit of currency
(such as the Hong Kong dollar), the Conceptual Framework can be applied to financial statements
prepared under a range of models.
8.2 Introduction
The introduction to the Conceptual Framework lays out the purpose, status and scope of the
document. It then looks at different users of financial statements and their information needs.
8.4 Scope
The Conceptual Framework deals with the following:
(a) The objective of financial reporting.
(b) The qualitative characteristics of useful information.
(c) The definition, recognition and measurement of the elements from which financial
statements are constructed.
(d) Concepts of capital and capital maintenance.
The Conceptual Framework is concerned with "general purpose" financial statements (that is, a
normal set of annual statements), but it can be applied to other types of accounts. A complete set
of financial statements includes:
(a) a statement of financial position
(b) a statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
(c) a statement of changes in financial position (e.g. a statement of cash flows)
(d) notes, other statements and explanatory material
46
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
Supplementary information may be included, but some items are not included in the financial
statements themselves, namely commentaries and reports by the directors, the chairman,
management and so on.
All types of financial reporting entities are included whether commercial, industrial, business;
public or private sector.
Key term
A reporting entity is an entity for which there are users who rely on the financial statements as
their major source of financial information about the entity. (Conceptual Framework)
Self-test question 1
What are the information needs of the users of financial information? Your answer should not be
restricted to the groups of users identified by the Conceptual Framework as the primary users.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
This section of the Conceptual Framework was amended in September 2010. As a result of the
amendments, there is a new emphasis on specific users of accounts, namely investors, potential
investors, lenders and creditors. They require information which is useful in making decisions about
buying, selling or holding equity and debt instruments, and providing or settling loans and other
forms of credit.
The type of information required by investors, creditors and lenders is that which provides an
indication of potential future net cash inflows. Such information includes that relating to:
the resources of the entity
claims against the entity
how efficiently and effectively the management have used the entity’s resources, protected
the entity’s resources from the unfavourable effects of factors such as price changes and
ensured that the entity complies with applicable laws and regulations.
Most investors, creditors and lenders cannot require entities to provide information directly to them,
and therefore rely on general purpose financial statements. Although such financial statements do
include a large amount of information, the Conceptual Framework states that general purpose
financial statements do not and they cannot provide all of the information that investors, lenders
47
Financial Reporting
and other creditors need. Therefore, these users must also consider information from other
sources, such as general economic conditions and expectations, political events and political
climate, and industry and company outlooks.
This section of the Conceptual Framework also clarifies that:
general purpose financial statements are not designed to show the value of an entity,
although information contained within them may aid a valuation
the management of an entity need not rely on general purpose financial statements as they
can obtain necessary financial information internally
other parties such as regulators and members of the public may also find general purpose
financial reports useful, however, these reports are not primarily directed to these groups.
48
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
This section of the Conceptual Framework was revised in September 2010 and as a result, two
fundamental and four enhancing qualitative characteristics replace the previous qualitative
characteristics of relevance, reliability, comparability and understandability.
The two fundamental qualitative characteristics are relevance and faithful representation; the four
enhancing characteristics are comparability, verifiability, timeliness and understandability.
If financial information is to be useful, it must be relevant and faithfully represent what it purports to
represent. The usefulness of financial information is enhanced if it is comparable, verifiable, timely
and understandable.
The revised Conceptual Framework states that the qualitative characteristics of useful financial
information apply not only to financial information provided in financial statements, but also to
financial information provided in other ways.
49
Financial Reporting
report. It is impossible to specify a quantitative threshold for materiality or predetermine what could
be material in a particular situation as it depends on the individual entity.
9.1.2 Faithful representation
To be useful, in addition to being relevant, financial information must also faithfully represent the
phenomena that it purports to represent. To be a perfectly faithful representation, a depiction would
have three characteristics – it would be complete, neutral and free from error.
Faithful representation does not mean accurate in all respects. Information that is complete means
all necessary information is included for the user to understand the item being depicted. Neutral
information is prepared without bias in the selection or presentation of the information. Free from
error means there are no errors or omissions in the description of the item, and the process used to
produce the reported information has been selected and applied with no errors in the process.
CF.QC17-18 9.1.3 Application of the fundamental qualitative characteristics
Useful information must be both relevant and faithfully represented; neither a faithful representation
of an irrelevant phenomenon nor an unfaithful representation of a relevant phenomenon helps
users to make good decisions.
The most efficient and effective process for applying the fundamental qualitative characteristics
would usually be as follows:
(a) Identify an economic phenomenon that has the potential to be useful to users of an entity’s
financial information
(b) Identify the type of information about that phenomenon that would be most relevant, if
available and can be faithfully represented
(c) Determine whether that information is available and can be faithfully represented
(d) If so, the process of satisfying the fundamental qualitative characteristics ends; if not, the
process is repeated with the next most relevant type of information.
50
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
9.2.3 Timeliness
Timeliness means having information available to decision-makers in time to be capable of
influencing their decisions. Generally, the older the information is the less useful it is. However,
some information may continue to be timely long after the end of a reporting period because, for
example, some users may need to identify and assess trends.
9.2.4 Understandability
Classifying, characterising and presenting information clearly and concisely makes it
understandable.
Some transactions are inherently complex and cannot be made easy to understand. While
excluding information about those transactions from financial reports might make the information in
those financial reports easier to understand, this may mean that information would be incomplete
and therefore potentially misleading.
The revised Conceptual Framework states that financial reports are prepared for users who have a
reasonable knowledge of business and economic activities and who review and analyse the
information diligently. At times, even the well-informed, diligent users may need to seek the aid of
an adviser to understand information about complex economic phenomena.
CF.QC33-34 9.2.5 Application of the enhancing qualitative characteristics
Enhancing qualitative characteristics should be maximised to the extent possible. However, the
enhancing qualitative characteristics, either individually or as a group, cannot make information
useful if that information is irrelevant or not faithfully represented.
51
Financial Reporting
This chapter of the Conceptual Framework is taken from the 1997 Framework. It lays out these
elements as follows:
Elements of
financial statements
n Assets n Income
n Liabilities n Expenses
n Equity
A process of sub-classification then takes place for presentation in the financial statements, e.g.
assets are classified by their nature or function in the business to show information in the best way
for users to take economic decisions.
Key terms
Asset. A resource controlled by an entity as a result of past events and from which future
economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity.
Liability. A present obligation of the entity arising from past events, the settlement of which is
expected to result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying economic benefits.
Equity. The residual interest in the assets of the entity after deducting all its liabilities.
(Conceptual Framework)
These definitions are important, but they do not cover the criteria for recognition of any of these
items, which are discussed in the next section of this chapter. This means that the definitions may
include items which would not actually be recognised in the statement of financial position because
they fail to satisfy recognition criteria particularly, as we will see below, the probable flow of any
economic benefit to or from the business.
Whether an item satisfies any of the definitions above will depend on the substance and
economic reality of the transaction, not merely its legal form. For example, consider finance
leases (see Chapter 9).
CF.4.8-4.14 10.1.1 Assets
Key term
Future economic benefit. The potential to contribute, directly or indirectly, to the flow of cash and
cash equivalents to the entity. The potential may be a productive one that is part of the operating
activities of the entity. It may also take the form of convertibility into cash or cash equivalents or a
capability to reduce cash outflows, such as when an alternative manufacturing process lowers the
cost of production. (Conceptual Framework)
Assets are usually employed to produce goods or services for customers; customers will then pay
for these and so contribute to the cash flow of the entity.
The existence of an asset is not reliant on:
physical form or
legal ownership
52
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
Non-physical items such as patents are assets provided that they are controlled and provide
probable future economic benefits; similarly non-owned items, such as machinery obtained under a
finance lease are assets, provided that they are controlled and provide probable future economic
benefits.
Transactions or events in the past give rise to assets; those expected to occur in the future do not
in themselves give rise to assets. For example, an intention to purchase a non-current asset does
not, in itself, meet the definition of an asset.
CF.4.15-4.18 10.1.2 Liabilities
An essential characteristic of a liability is that the entity has a present obligation.
Key term
Obligation. A duty or responsibility to act or perform in a certain way. Obligations may be legally
enforceable as a consequence of a binding contract or statutory requirement. Obligations also
arise, however, from normal business practice, custom and a desire to maintain good business
relations or act in an equitable manner. (Conceptual Framework)
Key term
Provision. A present obligation which satisfies the rest of the definition of a liability, even if the
amount of the obligation has to be estimated. (Conceptual Framework)
Self-test question 2
Consider the following situations. In each case, do we have an asset or liability within the
definitions given by the Conceptual Framework? Give reasons for your answer.
(a) Manu Co. has purchased a patent for $20,000. The patent gives the company sole use of a
particular manufacturing process which will save $3,000 a year for the next five years.
(b) Hirecar Co. paid Michael Wood $10,000 to set up a car repair shop, on condition that priority
treatment is given to cars from the company's fleet.
(c) Sellcar Co. provides a warranty with every car sold.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
CF.4.20-4.23
10.1.4 Equity
Equity is defined above as a residual, but it may be sub-classified in the statement of financial
position. This is relevant to the decision-making needs of the users as it will indicate legal or other
restrictions on the ability of the entity to distribute or otherwise apply its equity. Some reserves are
required by statute or other law, e.g. for the future protection of creditors. The amount shown for
53
Financial Reporting
equity depends on the measurement of assets and liabilities. It has nothing to do with the
market value of the entity's shares.
Key terms
Income. Increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or
enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in increases in equity, other than
those relating to contributions from equity participants.
Expenses. Decreases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of
outflows or depletions of assets or incurrences of liabilities that result in decreases in equity,
other than those relating to distributions to equity participants. (Conceptual Framework)
Income and expenses can be presented in different ways in the statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income, to provide information relevant for economic decision-making. For
example, distinguish between income and expenses which relate to continuing operations and
those which do not.
Items of income and expense can be distinguished from each other or combined with each other.
CF.4.29-4.32 10.2.1 Income
Both revenue and gains are included in the definition of income. Revenue arises in the course of
ordinary activities of an entity and may be referred to by names including sales, fees, interest,
dividends rent or royalties.
Key term
Gains. Increases in economic benefits. As such they are no different in nature from revenue.
(Conceptual Framework)
Gains include those arising on the disposal of non-current assets. The definition of income also
includes unrealised gains, for example, on revaluation of marketable securities.
CF.4.33-4.35 10.2.2 Expenses
As with income, the definition of expenses includes losses as well as those expenses that arise in
the course of ordinary activities of an entity.
Key term
Losses. Decreases in economic benefits. As such they are no different in nature from other
expenses. (Conceptual Framework)
Losses will include those arising on the disposal of non-current assets. The definition of expenses
will also include unrealised losses, for example, exchange rate effects on borrowings.
54
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
period. The concept is commonly separated into two types: physical and financial capital
maintenance.
Under the physical capital maintenance concept, a profit is earned only when the operating
capability of an organisation at the end of a period exceeds the operating capability at the start of
the period.
Under the financial capital maintenance concept, a profit is earned when the money value of net
assets at the end of a period exceeds their money value at the start of the period.
CF.4.36 10.3.1 Capital maintenance adjustments
A revaluation gives rise to an increase or decrease in equity.
Key term
Revaluation. Restatement of assets and liabilities. (Conceptual Framework)
These increases and decreases meet the definitions of income and expenses. They are not
included in the statement of profit or loss under certain concepts of capital maintenance, however,
but rather in equity.
Key term
Recognition. The process of incorporating in the statement of financial position or statement of
profit or loss and other comprehensive income an item that meets the definition of an element and
satisfies the following criteria for recognition:
(a) It is probable that any future economic benefit associated with the item will flow to or from the
entity.
(b) The item has a cost or value that can be measured with reliability. (Conceptual Framework)
55
Financial Reporting
CF.4.40
11.1 Probability of future economic benefits
Probability here means the degree of uncertainty that the future economic benefits associated
with an item will flow to or from the entity. This must be judged on the basis of the characteristics
of the entity's environment and the evidence available when the financial statements are
prepared.
Key term
Measurement. The process of determining the monetary amounts at which the elements of the
financial statements are to be recognised and carried in the statement of financial position and
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. (Conceptual Framework)
56
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
This involves the selection of a particular basis of measurement. A number of these are used to
different degrees and in varying combinations in financial statements. They include the following:
Key terms
Historical cost. Assets are recorded at the amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair
value of the consideration given to acquire them at the time of their acquisition. Liabilities are
recorded at the amount of proceeds received in exchange for the obligation, or in some
circumstances (for example, income taxes), at the amounts of cash or cash equivalents expected
to be paid to satisfy the liability in the normal course of business.
Current cost. Assets are carried at the amount of cash or cash equivalents that would have to be
paid if the same or an equivalent asset was acquired currently.
Liabilities are carried at the undiscounted amount of cash or cash equivalents that would be
required to settle the obligation currently.
Realisable (settlement) value.
Realisable value. The amount of cash or cash equivalents that could currently be obtained by
selling an asset in an orderly disposal.
Settlement value. The undiscounted amounts of cash or cash equivalents expected to be
paid to satisfy the liabilities in the normal course of business.
Present value. The present discounted value of the future net cash flows in the normal course of
business. (Conceptual Framework)
Historical cost is the most commonly adopted measurement basis, but this is usually combined
with other bases, e.g. inventory is carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Most importantly, financial statements should present a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of an entity. Compliance with HKFRS is presumed to result
in financial statements that achieve a fair presentation and true and fair view.
The following points made by HKAS 1 expand on this principle:
(a) Financial statements should be prepared using the accrual basis, i.e. income and expenses
are recognised as they arise rather than when the related cash is received or paid.
(b) Financial statements should be prepared on a going concern basis unless it is planned for
the entity to cease trading.
(c) Compliance with HKFRS should be disclosed.
(d) All relevant HKFRS must be followed if compliance with HKFRS is disclosed.
(e) Use of an inappropriate accounting treatment cannot be rectified either by disclosure of
accounting policies or notes/explanatory material.
There may be (very rare) circumstances when management decides that compliance with a
requirement of an HKFRS would be misleading. Departure from the HKFRS is therefore required
to achieve a fair presentation.
57
Financial Reporting
58
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
Assets
(a) Non-current assets should be assessed for impairment, and written down to their
recoverable amount if this is less than their carrying amount.
As we shall see later in the Learning Pack, recoverable amount is the higher of net realisable
value and value in use.
Realisable value was defined in section 12 as the amount of cash or cash equivalents
that could currently be obtained by selling the asset.
Value in use is the present value of the future cash flows associated with the asset.
It should be remembered that the value in use is likely to be lower than previously expected
since the time frame for use will be shorter than if the company were a going concern.
Therefore, realisable value will often be taken as the recoverable amount.
(b) In addition, inventories will continue to be measured at the lower of cost and net realisable
value, however when an entity is not a going concern, it becomes more likely that cost will
exceed net realisable value.
(c) Amounts receivable are stated at their realisable value i.e. the cash expected to be
recovered. Practically this will be equal to gross receivables net of irrecoverable debts and
an allowance for receivables as usual, however in the context of a company which is not a
going concern the identification of irrecoverable debts and calculation of an allowance may
require additional consideration.
(d) Monetary items, such as cash are stated at their face value.
(e) It is sometimes said that all non-current assets should be reclassified as current assets in
break-up basis accounts. This would only be the case, however, if their use had changed.
If they were still held for use within the business (if only for a short time) then they are still
non-current assets.
Liabilities
(a) Liabilities are normally only recognised where an obligation exists at the reporting date and
the normal rules in HKAS 37 have been met. Therefore, legal and other costs related to an
insolvency are only recognised when incurred.
(b) Some non-current liabilities will be reclassified as current. A common example of this is
where the company is in breach of loan covenants at the year end meaning that the loan
facility will be withdrawn and so repayment is required in the short term.
13.2.2 Disclosure
When management is aware of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast
significant doubt upon an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, the entity should disclose
those uncertainties.
Where an entity does not prepare financial statements on a going concern basis, it must disclose
that fact together with the basis on which it prepared the financial statements and the reason why
the entity is not regarded as a going concern.
14 Management commentary
A management commentary (known as management discussion and analysis in Hong Kong) is a
narrative report that accompanies financial statements as part of an entity's financial reporting.
It explains the main trends and factors underlying the development, performance and position of the
entity's business during the period covered by the financial statements. It also explains the main
trends and factors that are likely to affect the entity's future development, performance and position.
59
Financial Reporting
An IFRS Practice Statement was issued on Management Commentary in December 2010. This is
a broad, non-binding framework for the presentation of narrative reporting to accompany financial
statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The Practice Statement is not an IFRS. Therefore, entities applying IFRS are not required to
comply with the Practice Statement, unless specifically required by their jurisdiction.
14.1 Purpose
The purpose of management commentary is to help investors to:
(a) interpret and assess the related financial statements in the context of the environment in
which the entity operates.
(b) assess what management views as the most important issues facing the entity and how it
intends to manage those issues.
(c) assess the strategies adopted by the entity and the potential for those strategies to succeed.
14.2 Contents
A number of principles and qualitative characteristics should underlie the preparation and
presentation of the management commentary.
In particular, the management commentary should:
supplement and complement financial statement information.
provide an analysis of the entity through the eyes of management.
have an orientation to the future.
possess the fundamental characteristics of relevance and faithful representation and
maximise the enhancing characteristics of comparability, verifiability, timeliness and
understandability.
15 Current developments
15.1 Conceptual Framework
As we saw earlier in this chapter, the IASB and FASB completed the first phase of their joint project
to develop a common Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting in 2010. As a result, they
have issued a Conceptual Framework which includes new chapters on the objective of financial
statements and qualitative characteristics together with the remaining chapters from the old
Framework. This revised Conceptual Framework has been adopted by the HKICPA.
The remaining phases of the project relate to:
elements and recognition
measurement
the reporting entity
presentation and disclosure
Subsequent to the completion of phase 1 of the project in 2010, remaining work was deferred. In
late 2012, however, the project was reactivated as an IASB-only project. The IASB is currently
working towards a discussion paper covering all remaining phases of the project and this is
expected to be issued during the course of 2013. The IASB aims to complete the project by 2015.
60
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
Topic recap
Hong
Financial
Kong Legal
Reporting
Framework
Hong Regulatory
Kong Legalbodies HongFinancial
Kong Legal
Reporting CodeLegal
Hong Kong of Ethics
Framework Framework
requirements Framework
HKICPA regulates the HKFRS set out recognition, Professional accountants must
accounting profession. The FR measurement, presentation comply with the Code
Standards Committee within and disclosure
the HKICPA issues HKFRS. requirements. They should
be observed to achieve a
true and fair view.
61
Financial Reporting
Conceptual Framework
Measure at:
historical cost realisable (settlement)
current cost value
PV of future cash flows
Fair presentation
Presumed to be achieved by compliance with HKFRS
Departure from HKFRS is allowed if necessary to achieve fair presentation
“True and fair override” disclosures are necessary in the case of a departure
62
2: Financial reporting framework | Part B Financial reporting framework
Answer 1
(a) Investors are the providers of risk capital.
(i) Information is required to help make a decision about buying or selling shares, taking
up a rights issue and voting.
(ii) Investors must have information about the level of dividend, past, present and future
and any changes in share price.
(iii) Investors will also need to know whether the management has been running the
company efficiently.
(iv) As well as the position indicated by the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income, statement of financial position and earnings per share (EPS),
investors will want to know about the liquidity position of the company, the company's
future prospects, and how the company's shares compare with those of its
competitors.
(b) Employees need information about the security of employment and future prospects for jobs
in the company, and to help with collective pay bargaining.
(c) Lenders need information to help them decide whether to lend to a company. They will also
need to check that the value of any security remains adequate, that the interest repayments
are secure, that the cash is available for redemption at the appropriate time and that any
financial restrictions (such as maximum debt/equity ratios) have not been breached.
(d) Suppliers need to know whether the company will be a good customer and pay its debts.
(e) Customers need to know whether the company will be able to continue producing and
supplying goods.
(f) Government's interest in a company may be one of creditor or customer, as well as being
specifically concerned with compliance with tax and company law, ability to pay tax and the
general contribution of the company to the economy.
(g) The public at large would wish to have information for all the reasons mentioned above, but
it could be suggested that it would be impossible to provide general purpose accounting
information which was specifically designed for the needs of the public.
Answer 2
(a) This is an asset, albeit an intangible one. There is a past event, control and future economic
benefit (through cost savings).
(b) This cannot be classified as an asset. Hirecar Co. has no control over the car repair shop
and it is difficult to argue that there are "future economic benefits".
(c) The warranty claims in total constitute a liability; the business has taken on an obligation.
It would be recognised when the warranty is issued rather than when a claim is made.
63
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
64
chapter 3
Topic list
1 Background
2 Financial reporting in Hong Kong
2.1 Three financial reporting options
3 SME-FRF and SME-FRS
3.1 Companies which qualify for reporting under the SME-FRF and SME-FRS
3.2 The requirements of the SME-FRF and SME-FRS
4 Introduction to the HKFRS for Private Entities
4.1 Development of the HKFRS for Private Entities
4.2 Eligibility to use the HKFRS for Private Entities
5 Contents of the HKFRS for Private Entities
5.1 Overview
5.2 Simplified accounting
5.3 Simplified presentation
5.4 Omitted topics
5.5 Examples of options in full HKFRS not included in the HKFRS for Private Entities
5.6 Simplified disclosure
5.7 Updates and amendments to the HKFRS for Private Entities
6 Impact of the HKFRS for Private Entities
6.1 Key concerns
6.2 Comparison with full HKFRS
Learning focus
The HKFRS for Private Entities was issued in April 2010. It provides an option for non-publicly
accountable entities which do not qualify for the SME-FRS to use simplified accounting and
disclosure rules.
65
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
LO2.03 Small and Medium-sized Entity Financial Reporting Framework 2
and Financial Reporting Standard:
2.03.01 Identify the conditions under which an entity may adopt the
SME Financial Reporting Framework and Financial
Reporting Standard
2.03.02 Describe the requirements of the SME Financial Reporting
Framework and Financial Reporting Standard
LO2.04 Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standard for Private Entities 2
2.04.01 Identify the conditions under which an entity may adopt the
HKFRS for Private Entities
2.04.02 Describe the requirements of the HKFRS for Private
Entities
66
3: Small company reporting | Part B Financial reporting framework
1 Background
Topic highlights
The SME-FRF and SME-FRS provide a framework for simplified reporting for smaller companies in
Hong Kong.
The HKFRS for Private Entities was issued in April 2010 and is based on the IASB’s International
Financial Reporting Standard for Small and Medium-sized Entities (IFRS for SMEs).
The objective of financial statements is to provide information about the financial position and
performance of an entity that is useful to users of such information. Financial statements show the
results of management's stewardship of, and accountability for, the resources entrusted to it.
For small and medium-sized entities (SMEs), the most significant users are likely to be owners,
government and creditors, who may have the power to obtain information additional to that
contained in the financial statements. These users do not generally require the detailed
disclosures required by full HKFRS, and indeed the preparing entities generally find the provision of
such disclosures onerous in terms of the time and cost of preparation.
In Hong Kong, there are therefore two options for simplified reporting for smaller, non-listed
entities:
1 the SME-FRF and SME-FRS
2 the new HKFRS for Private Entities.
This chapter considers each of these options, including who can use them and what simplifications
are made compared to the use of full HKFRS.
67
Financial Reporting
The options available to each type of entity are summarised in the following table:
Can apply:
SME-FRF sets out the conceptual basis and qualifying criteria for the preparation of financial
statements in accordance with the Small and Medium-sized Entity Financial Reporting Standard
(SME-FRS).
SME-FRS sets out the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements for an
entity that prepares and presents the financial statements in accordance with the SME-FRS.
SME-FRS 16 3.1 Companies which qualify for reporting under the SME-FRF
and SME-FRS
Both Hong Kong incorporated and overseas unlisted companies may qualify for reporting under the
SME-FRF and preparing financial statements in accordance with the SME-FRS.
3.1.1 Qualifying Hong Kong companies
Those companies which satisfy the criteria set out in Part 9 Division 2 section 359 of the new CO
qualify for reporting under the SME-FRF and so can apply the SME-FRS in preparing their financial
statements. Reporting under this regime is not, however, a requirement for such companies, but a
choice.
A company applying s.359 above should obtain agreement from all of the shareholders of the
company in writing that the financial statements are properly prepared. Thus the interests of the
minority shareholders are protected.
Section 359 does not apply to:
a private company which is itself a holding company of subsidiaries
a private company which is a subsidiary of another company formed and registered under
the Companies Ordinance.
A Hong Kong company which has a controlled investment in the PRC which does not meet the
legal definition of a subsidiary does, however, satisfy the criteria for reporting under s.359 and
therefore can apply the SME-FRS.
68
3: Small company reporting | Part B Financial reporting framework
Part 9 (“Accounts and Audit”) of the new CO, contains the accounting and auditing provisions in
relation to the keeping of accounting records, the preparation and circulation of annual financial
statements, directors’ and auditor’s reports and the appointment and rights of auditors.
New provisions are introduced to make it easier and more efficient for SMEs to be able to use
simplified accounting and reporting requirements, to require public and large companies to include
an analytical business review in directors’ reports, and to enhance auditors’ right to information.
This Part also introduces new sanctions relating to the contents of auditor’s reports.
3.1.2 Facilitating Simplified Reporting
It becomes easier for SMEs to prepare simplified financial and directors’ reports in the following
ways:
a private company (with the exception of a bank/deposit-taking company, an insurance
company or a stockbroker) will automatically qualify for simplified reporting if it qualifies as a
“small private company”.
Small private company (defined in new CO Schedule 3 section 1)
If it meets any two of the following size criteria for two consecutive periods:
annual revenue ≤ HK$100 million
total assets ≤ HK$100 million
employees ≤ 100 employees
For example, a company with a property valued at more than HK$100 million can still apply to use
the SME-FRS if its annual revenue is less than HK$100 million and it has less than 100 employees.
the holding company of a group of companies that qualifies as a “group of small private
companies” will also qualify for simplified reporting (Part 9 Division 2 section 365).
a private company that is not a member of a corporate group may adopt simplified reporting
with the agreement of all the members.
Allowing small guarantee companies and groups of small guarantee companies, which have a total
annual revenue of not more than $25 million, to qualify for simplified reporting (Part 9 Division 2
sections 363 and 366).
A private company or a group of private companies which is not qualified as a “small private
company” or a “group of small private companies” respectively may prepare simplified reports if it
meets a higher size criteria and if the members holding 75% of the voting rights so resolve and no
member objects.
Making the summary financial reporting provisions more user-friendly and extending their
application to companies in general (rather than confining them to listed companies, as in the
current Companies Ordinance).
SME-FRS 17, 3.1.3 Overseas companies
22-24
A company incorporated outside Hong Kong is not bound by the new CO and should prepare its
separate financial statements in accordance with the requirements imposed by the law in its place
of incorporation. Provided that the specific requirements of the place of incorporation are met,
these companies may report under the SME-FRF and apply the SME-FRS if:
1 They have no public accountability. An entity has public accountability for the purposes of
the SME-FRF if:
(a) at any time during the current or preceding reporting period, the entity (whether in the
public or private sector) is an issuer of securities, that is, its equity or debt securities
are publicly traded or it is in the process of issuing publicly traded equity or debt
securities;
(b) the entity is an institution authorised under the Banking Ordinance;
(c) the entity is an insurer authorised under the Insurance Companies Ordinance; or
69
Financial Reporting
(d) the entity is a corporation which is granted a licence under the Securities and Futures
Ordinance to carry on business in a regulated activity in Hong Kong.
2 They meet any two of the following size criteria for two consecutive periods:
annual revenue ≤ HK$50 million
total assets ≤ HK$50 million
employees ≤ 50 employees
For example, a company with a property valued at more than HK$50 million can still apply to
use the SME-FRS if its annual revenue is less than HK$50 million and it has less than 50
employees. (Note that the size criteria for overseas companies are different from the
requirement applicable to Hong Kong companies as stated in Section 3.1.1 of this Learning
Pack.)
3 All owners agree to apply the SME-FRS. (A shareholder agreement should be signed every year.)
These qualifying conditions are applicable to all overseas companies, including a subsidiary or an
intermediate holding company of a listed entity.
SME-FRS 20 When a company has not been considered to be an SME in terms of its size under section 3.1.2
point 2 above and subsequently becomes an SME, the company will not qualify for reporting under
the SME-FRF until the company has been determined to be an SME for two consecutive reporting
periods.
Now the Companies Ordinance, Part 16 (“Non-Hong Kong Companies”) deals with companies
incorporated outside Hong Kong which have established a place of business in Hong Kong.
There is no fundamental change to the current rules.
Example
An overseas company meets the size criteria for reporting under the SME-FRF as follows:
SME-FRS 21 Where a company has previously qualified for reporting under the SME-FRF in terms of section
3.1.2, the company will no longer qualify for reporting under the SME-FRF in terms of size criteria
set in section 3.1.2 point 2 above until the company is no longer an SME for two consecutive
reporting periods.
70
3: Small company reporting | Part B Financial reporting framework
Example
An overseas company, Company B, previously qualified as an SME and reported under the SME-
FRF with the following changes:
For an entity that qualifies for reporting under the SME-FRF, the appropriate application of the
SME-FRS, with additional disclosure when necessary, would result in financial statements that
achieve a proper presentation appropriate for SMEs.
For a company applying s.141D of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance, compliance with the
SME-FRF and SME-FRS is necessary in order for financial statements to give a true and correct
view.
71
Financial Reporting
(g) Entities can decide whether or not to use a discounting technique in the impairment test and
in estimating any provisions (FRS 9.8 and 10.3).
(h) The SME-FRS does not have specific section dealing with employee benefits, and therefore
does not have specific requirements covering the matters within the scope of HKAS 19,
Employee benefits, and HKFRS 2, Share based payment . Instead, example 5 of Appendix
1 to the SME-FRS indicates that provisions for long service pay and for other post
employment retirement schemes would fall under section 10 "Provisions, contingent liabilities
and contingent assets" of the SME-FRS.
(i) The rules on accounting for speculative and non-speculative forward foreign exchange
contracts (FRS 15.6-15.8) appear to have been drafted based on SSAP 11, Foreign
currency translation , and therefore still refer to calculating "discounts and premiums" on the
contracts, as well as "gains and losses"
72
3: Small company reporting | Part B Financial reporting framework
(c) The measurement of deferred tax liabilities associated with an investment property
measured at fair value is capped at the amount of tax that would be payable on its sale to an
unrelated market participant at fair value at the end of the reporting period
This amendment will restrict the amount of deferred taxation recognised in relation to
revaluation gains of investment properties as such tax is in practice never paid in Hong
Kong. This provision removes an anomaly currently in HKAS 12 Income Taxes.
4.2.3 Subsidiaries
A subsidiary of a group which applies full HKFRS may use the HKFRS for Private Entities provided
that the subsidiary itself meets the eligibility criteria.
73
Financial Reporting
It includes simplifications that reflect the needs of users of private companies' financial statements
and the cost-benefit considerations of preparers. It facilitates financial reporting by unlisted entities
by:
simplifying requirements for recognition and measurement;
eliminating topics and disclosure requirements that are not generally applicable to private
entities;
removing certain accounting treatments permitted under full HKFRS.
Note that entities are not permitted to mix and match the requirements of the HKFRS for Private
Entities and full HKFRS, except for the option to apply the recognition and measurement rules of
HKAS 39 (HKFRS 9) with regard to financial instruments.
The HKFRS for Private Entities became effective immediately upon its issuance on 30 April 2010.
Eligible entities are permitted to use HKFRS for Private Entities to prepare financial statements for
prior period(s) where the relevant financial statements have not been finalised and approved.
5.1.1 Cost-benefit considerations
In order to provide additional relief to preparers of financial statements under the HKFRS for
Private Entities, an "undue cost or effort" principle has been introduced in some sections of the
standard to replace the "impracticability" relief criterion in the full HKFRS (a requirement is
considered "impracticable" if an entity cannot apply it after making every reasonable effort to do
so).
Although the notion of "undue cost or effort" is not defined, it focuses on the concept of balancing
costs and benefits, which might in turn require management's judgment of when a cost is
considered excessive. In other words, the "undue cost or effort" principle implies that cost is always
considered.
74
3: Small company reporting | Part B Financial reporting framework
75
Financial Reporting
* Note. Entities are permitted to choose to apply HKAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement in its entirety rather than the financial instruments section of the HKFRS for Private
Entities. Note also that full HKFRS no longer allow these categories (HKFRS 9) and no longer
allows deferred recognition (HKAS 19).
76
3: Small company reporting | Part B Financial reporting framework
77
Financial Reporting
78
3: Small company reporting | Part B Financial reporting framework
79
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
80
3: Small company reporting | Part B Financial reporting framework
Exam practice
81
Financial Reporting
82
Part C
83
Financial Reporting
84
chapter 4
Learning focus
The measurement requirements for non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale are
particularly important both for exam and practical purposes.
85
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.21 Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations 3
3.21.01 Define non-current assets (or disposal groups) held for sale or held
for distribution to owners and discontinued operations within the
scope of HKFRS 5
3.21.02 Explain what assets are within the measurement provision of
HKFRS 5
3.21.03 Determine when a sale is highly probable
3.21.04 Measure non-current assets held for sale and discontinued
operations including initial measurement, subsequent measurement
and change of plan
3.21.05 How to account for impairment loss and subsequent reversals
3.21.06 Present the non-current asset held for sale and discontinued
operation in the financial statements (including the prior year
restatement)
86
4: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKFRS 5,
Appendix A
1.1 Introduction and definitions
HKFRS 5 requires assets and groups of assets ("disposal groups") that are "held for sale" to be
presented separately in the statement of financial position.
It also requires that the results of discontinued operations are presented separately in the
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
These requirements ensure that users of financial statements are better able to make projections
about the financial position, profits and cash flows of the entity.
Key terms
Disposal group. A group of assets to be disposed of, by sale or otherwise, together as a group in
a single transaction, and liabilities directly associated with those assets that will be transferred in
the transaction. (In practice, a disposal group could be a subsidiary, a cash-generating unit or a
single operation within an entity.)
Discontinued operation. A component of an entity that either has been disposed of or is classified
as held for sale and:
(a) represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations
(b) is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or
geographical area of operations or
(c) is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.
(HKFRS 5)
87
Financial Reporting
Where a non-current asset forms part of a disposal group, the measurement requirements of
HKFRS 5 are applied to the group as a whole rather than to each asset within it on an individual
basis.
The classification, presentation and measurement requirements in this HKFRS applicable to a non-
current asset (or disposal group) that is classified as held for sale apply also to a non-current asset
(or disposal group) that is classified as held for distribution to owners acting in their capacity as
owners (held for distribution to owners).
Topic highlights
A non-current asset (or disposal group) should be classified as held for sale if its carrying amount
will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use.
In order for this to be the case:
(a) the asset must be available for immediate sale in its present condition, and
(b) its sale must be highly probable (i.e., significantly more likely than not).
88
4: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations | Part C Accounting for business transactions
89
Financial Reporting
Sold
No
Available for sale in present
condition?
Yes
No
Sale expected within one year?
Yes
Yes
Self-test question 1
Should the following be classified as held for sale at a 31 December 20X1 year end?
1 Lawnmo is committed to a plan to sell a manufacturing facility in its present condition and
classifies the facility as held for sale at 31 March 20X1. After a firm purchase commitment is
obtained, the buyer's inspection of the property identifies environmental damage not
previously known to exist. Lawnmo is required by the buyer to make good the damage, and
this is likely to mean that the sale will not be completed until the end of August 20X2.
Lawnmo has initiated actions to make good the damage, and satisfactory rectification of the
damage is highly probable.
90
4: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations | Part C Accounting for business transactions
2 Ficus is committed to a plan to sell its head office building and has engaged the services of
an agent to locate a buyer. Ficus will use the building until the completion of its new
premises, currently under construction. The existing head office will not be transferred to a
buyer until such time as Ficus vacates the property.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Key terms
Fair value. The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
HKFRS 5
Appendix A
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Costs to sell. The incremental costs directly attributable to the disposal of an asset (or disposal
group), excluding finance costs and income tax expense.
Recoverable amount. The higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and its value in use.
Value in use. The present value of estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the
continuing use of an asset and from its disposal at the end of its useful life. (HKFRS 5)
HKFRS
5.15,15A
3.1 Initial measurement
On transfer to the held for sale category, a non-current asset (or the net assets of a disposal group)
should be measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
An entity shall measure a non-current asset (or disposal group) classified as held for distribution to
owners at the lower of its carrying amount and fair value less costs to distribute.
HKFRS 5.16 3.1.1 Carrying amount
HKFRS 5 clarifies that the carrying amount is that amount at which the asset or disposal group
would have been included in the financial statements had the classification to the held for sale
category not occurred. This carrying amount is measured in accordance with applicable HKFRS.
HKFRS 5.17 3.1.2 Fair value less costs to sell
Fair value less costs to sell is equivalent to net realisable value. When the sale is expected to occur
beyond one year, the standard specifies that costs to sell should be measured at present value.
Any increase in the present value arising from the passage of time is recognised in profit or loss as
a financing cost.
HKFRS
5.19,25
3.2 Subsequent measurement
Once classified as held for sale (or part of a disposal group held for sale), a non-current asset is
not depreciated or amortised. Interest attributable to the liabilities of a disposal group does however
continue to be recognised.
On subsequent measurement of a disposal group, the carrying amount of those assets which are
part of the disposal group but individually outside the scope of HKFRS 5 (see section 1.2) should
be re-measured in accordance with the relevant HKFRS before the fair value less costs to sell of
the disposal group is re-measured.
91
Financial Reporting
Where fair value less costs to sell is lower than carrying amount, the asset or disposal group held
for sale is impaired, and the difference between carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell
must be recognised as an impairment loss.
The fair value of the disposal group is $5.4 million and costs to sell are $290,000.
An impairment loss is therefore recognised on transfer of the disposal group to held for sale of
$540,000, and this is allocated to the non-current assets which fall within the scope of the
92
4: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKFRS 5.27 3.5 Measurement where assets are no longer classified as held
for sale
A non-current asset (or disposal group) that is no longer classified as held for sale (for example,
because the sale has not taken place within one year) is measured at the lower of:
(a) its carrying amount before it was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation,
amortisation or revaluations that would have been charged had the asset not been classified
as held for sale
(b) its recoverable amount at the date of the decision not to sell.
93
Financial Reporting
Equity X X
Non-current liabilities X X
Current liabilities X X
Liabilities associated with non-current assets classified as
held for sale 260 X
Total equity and liabilities X X
HKFRS
5.41,42
4.2 Additional disclosures
The following disclosures are required when a non-current asset (or disposal group) is either
classified as held for sale or sold during a reporting period:
(a) A description of the non-current asset (or disposal group)
(b) A description of the facts and circumstances of the disposal
(c) Any gain or loss recognised when the item was classified as held for sale
(d) If applicable, the reportable segment in which the non-current asset (or disposal group) is
presented in accordance with HKFRS 8 Operating Segments
When an entity reclassifies an asset as no longer held for sale, it should disclose the facts and
circumstances leading to the decision and its resultant effect.
5 Discontinued operations
HKFRS 5.32 5.1 Definition of discontinued operations
A discontinued operation was defined at the start of this chapter as a component of an entity that
has either been disposed of, or is classified as held for sale, and:
(a) represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations
(b) is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or
geographical area of operations, or
(c) is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale
A component of an entity comprises operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished
from the rest of the entity, both operationally and for financial reporting purposes.
94
4: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKFRS 5 requires that the results of a discontinued operation are disclosed separately in order to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the financial effects of discontinued operations.
Self-test question 2
Discuss whether these situations meet the definition of discontinued operations in HKFRS 5.
(i) Wong Co. had used two factories to manufacture office equipment. A general slump in the
economy has resulted in a reduced demand for such equipment and the company has
decided to move all the production facilities to one of the factories but keep the now empty
factory in the hope that there will be an upturn in demand and require the return to two
factory output.
(ii) In addition to the manufacture of office equipment, Wong Co. supplied office stationery to
private education establishments. In order to raise much needed cash the office stationery
supply business was sold. The office stationery supply business was operated separately
from the manufacturing activities.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
HKFRS 5.33-
35,37
5.2 Presentation of discontinued operations
An entity should disclose a single amount in the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income comprising the total of:
(a) the post-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations and
(b) the post-tax gain or loss recognised on the measurement to fair value less costs to sell or
on the disposal of the assets or disposal group(s) constituting the discontinued operation.
An entity should also disclose an analysis of the above single amount into:
(a) the revenue, expenses and pre-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations
(b) the related income tax expense
(c) the gain or loss recognised on the measurement to fair value less costs to sell or on the
disposal of the assets or the discontinued operation
(d) the related income tax expense
The analysis may be shown separately from continuing operations, in a section identified as
discontinued operations, in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. As an
alternative, it may also be presented in the notes to the financial statements. Such disclosure is not
necessary where the discontinued operation relates to a newly acquired subsidiary that has been
classified as held for sale.
Disclosures relating to the net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing and financing
activities of the discontinued operations may be presented on the face of the statement of cash
flows. Alternatively, they may be shown in the notes.
The required disclosures must be re-presented for prior periods presented in the financial
statements so that the disclosures relate to all operations that have been discontinued by the most
recent reporting date.
Any current year adjustments made to amounts previously presented in discontinued operations
and directly related to the disposal of a discontinued operation in a prior period are classified
separately in discontinued operations.
The gains or losses arising from the reassessment of a disposal group, which is held for sale and is
not a discontinued operation, should be incorporated in the profit or loss from continuing
operations.
95
Financial Reporting
Illustration
The following illustration is taken from the implementation guidance to HKFRS 5. Profit for the year
from discontinued operations would be analysed in the notes.
Smart Group
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X9
20X9 20X8
$'000 $'000
Continuing operations
Revenue X X
Cost of sales (X) (X)
Gross profit X X
Other income X X
Distribution costs (X) (X)
Administrative expenses (X) (X)
Other expenses (X) (X)
Finance costs (X) (X)
Share of profit of associates X X
Profit before tax X X
Income tax expense (X) (X)
Profit for the year from continuing operations X X
Discontinued operations
Profit for the year from discontinued operations X X
Profit for the year X X
Period attributable to:
Owners of the parent X X
Non-controlling interest X X
X X
The analysis of the profit from discontinued operations may also be presented in a separate
column in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
96
4: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 3
A&Z
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X1
20X1 20X0
$'000 $'000
Revenue 3,000 2,200
Cost of sales (1,000) (700)
Gross profit 2,000 1,500
Distribution costs (400) (300)
Administrative expenses (900) (800)
Profit before tax 700 400
Income tax expense (210) (120)
Profit for the year 490 280
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 40 30
Total comprehensive income for the year 530 310
During the year the company ran down a material business operation with all activities ceasing on
26 December 20X1. The results of the operation for 20X0 and 20X1 were as follows:
20X1 20X0
$'000 $'000
Revenue 320 400
Cost of sales (150) (190)
Gross profit 170 210
Distribution costs (120) (130)
Administrative expenses (100) (90)
Loss before tax (50) (10)
Income tax expense 15 3
Loss for the year (35) (7)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 5 4
Total comprehensive income for the year (30) (3)
The company recognised a loss of $30,000 on initial classification of the assets of the discontinued
operation as held for sale, followed by a subsequent gain of $120,000 on their disposal in 20X1.
These have been netted against administrative expenses. The income tax rate applicable to profits
on continuing operations and tax savings on the discontinued operation's losses is 30%.
Required
Prepare the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 31
December 20X1 for A&Z complying with the provisions of HKFRS 5.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
97
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
Measurement Disclosure
Lower of carrying amount and fair value Disclose single amount in statement of profit
less costs to sell. or
comprehensive
loss and otherincome
comprehensive
comprising:income
Post tax profit or loss of the
comprising:
postdiscontinued
tax profit or loss
operations
of the discontinued
and
operations
Post taxandgain or loss on
If FV less costs to sell < carrying amount postdisposal/measurement
tax gain or loss on to fair
recognise impairment loss. In disposal disposal/measurement
value less costs to sell.
to fair value less
group set against: costs to sell.
1. goodwill
2. other assets on pro rata basis
Disclosure
98
4: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 1
1 The manufacturing facility should be classified as held for sale. Although the sale will not be
completed within 12 months of classification, the delay is caused by circumstances beyond
Lawnmo’s control and Lawnmo is clearly committed to the sale.
2 The building should not be classified as held for sale. The delay in transferring the building to
a buyer demonstrates that it is not available for immediate sale. This is the case even if a
firm purchase commitment were obtained.
Answer 2
(i) The closure of the factory does not result in the disposal of a separate major line of business
or geographical area of operation nor is the factory being held for sale. The closure therefore
does not appear to result in a need to classify any of the performance of Wong Co. as
discontinued in these circumstances. Nothing has been discontinued, merely production
reduced to a more competitive level until demand returns.
(ii) The office stationery supply business will probably be considered to represent a separate
major line of business and should therefore be classified as a discontinued operation with
separate disclosure of its activities in the statement of profit or loss as required by HKFRS 5.
Its disposal will probably have been a single co-ordinated plan, further confirming the
business as a discontinued operation.
Answer 3
A&Z
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X1
20X1 20X0
$'000 $'000
Revenue (3,000 – 320)/(2,200 – 400) 2,680 1,800
Cost of sales (1,000 – 150)/(700 – 190) (850) (510)
Gross profit 1,830 1,290
Distribution costs (400 – 120)/(300 – 130) (280) (170)
Administrative expenses (900 – 100)/(800 – 90) (800) (710)
Profit before tax 750 410
Income tax expense (210 + 15)/(120 + 3) (225) (123)
Profit for the year from continuing operations 525 287
Loss for the year from discontinued operations (35) (7)
Profit for the year 490 280
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 40 30
Total comprehensive income for the year 530 310
99
Financial Reporting
100
4: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Exam practice
Taking into consideration the range of the price offered by the potential buyer, the management
estimates that the fair value less costs to sell of the group of assets of RR amounts to
HK$85,000,000.
Almost all of the property, plant and equipment of SW are leasehold improvement of retailing shops
located at premises rented under operating leases which would be abandoned upon the early
termination of the lease terms. No proceeds are expected to be received even upon disposal.
SW would continue to sell its inventories but at an estimated discount of 40% of the cost. The
trade receivables are expected to be fully recovered.
Required
Explain and calculate the impairment loss to be made to each of the assets of RR and SW.
(12 marks)
HKICPA February 2010
101
Financial Reporting
102
chapter 5
Learning focus
Non-current assets form a large part of many entities' statements of financial position.
Accounting for them is not necessarily straightforward and you may need to think critically and
deal with controversial issues. This chapter deals with property, plant and equipment; how to
account for transactions involving them, and the principles and methods of depreciation.
103
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.08 Property, plant and equipment 3
3.08.01 Identify the non-current assets which fall within or outside the scope
of HKAS 16
3.08.02 State and apply the recognition rules in respect of property, plant
and equipment
3.08.03 Determine the initial measurement of property, plant and
equipment, including assets acquired by exchange or transfer
3.08.04 Determine the accounting treatment of subsequent expenditure on
property, plant and equipment
3.08.05 Determine the available methods to measure property, plant and
equipment subsequent to initial recognition
3.08.06 Account for the revaluation of property, plant and equipment
3.08.07 Define "useful life" and allocate an appropriate useful life for an
asset in a straightforward scenario
3.08.08 Explain the different methods of depreciation: straight line and
diminishing balance, and calculate the depreciation amount in
respect of different types of asset
3.08.09 Account for the disposal of property, plant and equipment
3.08.10 Disclose relevant information relating to property, plant and
equipment in the financial statements
104
5: Property, plant and equipment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Key terms
Property, plant and equipment are tangible items that are:
held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others, or for
administrative purposes
expected to be used during more than one period
Cost is the amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair value of other consideration given to
acquire an asset at the time of its acquisition or construction.
Residual value is the estimated amount that an entity would currently obtain from disposal of the
asset, after deducting the estimated costs of disposal, if the asset were already of the age and in
the condition expected at the end of its useful life.
Entity specific value is the present value of the cash flows an entity expects to arise from the
continuing use of an asset and from its disposal at the end of its useful life, or expects to incur
when settling a liability.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Carrying amount is the amount at which an asset is recognised after deducting any accumulated
depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.
An impairment loss is the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its
recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and its value in use.
(HKAS 16)
105
Financial Reporting
106
5: Property, plant and equipment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
1.4 Measurement
HKAS 16.15- 1.4.1 Initial measurement
22
Once an item of property, plant and equipment qualifies for recognition as an asset, it will initially
be measured at cost.
The standard lists the components of the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment.
(a) Purchase price, less any trade discount or rebate
(b) Import duties and non-refundable purchase taxes
(c) Directly attributable costs of bringing the asset to working condition for its intended use,
for example:
(i) The cost of site preparation
(ii) Initial delivery and handling costs
(iii) Installation costs
(iv) Testing
(v) Professional fees (architects, engineers)
(d) Initial estimate of the unavoidable cost of dismantling and removing the asset and restoring the
site on which it is located (HKAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets).
(e) Any borrowing costs incurred related to building the asset may be capitalised within the
assets too (HKAS 23 Borrowing Costs).
Additional guidance is provided on directly attributable costs included in the cost of an item of
property, plant and equipment.
(a) These costs bring the asset to the location and working conditions necessary for it to be
capable of operating in the manner intended by management, including those costs to test
whether the asset is functioning properly.
(b) They are determined after deducting the net proceeds from selling any items produced when
bringing the asset to its location and condition.
The standard also states that income and related expenses of operations that are incidental to the
construction or development of an item of property, plant and equipment should be recognised in
profit or loss. These include:
costs of opening a new facility
costs of introducing a new product or service
costs of conducting business in a new location or with a new class of customer
administration and other general overhead costs
In addition, the capitalisation of costs must cease when an asset is in the location and condition
necessary for it to be capable of normal operation. Therefore, the following may not be capitalised:
Costs incurred when an item is capable of normal use however is operating at less than full
capacity
Initial operating losses
The costs of relocating or reorganising the entity's operations.
All of these will be recognised as an expense rather than an asset.
In the case of self-constructed assets, the same principles are applied as for acquired assets.
If the entity makes similar assets during the normal course of business for sale externally, then the
cost of the asset will be the cost of its production under HKAS 2 Inventories. This also means that
abnormal costs (wasted material, labour or other resources) are excluded from the cost of the asset.
An example of a self-constructed asset is when a building company builds its own head office.
107
Financial Reporting
Solution
The ship owner shall capitalise the ship at a value of $20m. The properties are deemed to be
disposed of at $15m ($20m – $5m), thus a gain of $5m ($15m – $10m) is recognised on disposal
of the properties.
Expressed as journal entries, we can see:
$m $m
DEBIT Property, plant and equipment (Ship) 20
CREDIT Gain on disposal 5
Property, plant and equipment (Properties) 10
Cash 5
1.5 Depreciation
Topic highlights
Where assets held by an entity have a limited useful life to that entity it is necessary to apportion
the value of an asset over its useful life.
With the exception of land held on freehold or very long leasehold, every non-current asset
eventually wears out over time. Machines, cars and other vehicles, fixtures and fittings, and even
buildings do not last for ever. When a business acquires a non-current asset, it will have some idea
about how long its useful life will be, and it might decide what to do with it.
(a) Keep on using the non-current asset until it becomes completely worn out, useless, and
worthless.
108
5: Property, plant and equipment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
(b) Sell off the non-current asset at the end of its useful life, either by selling it as a
second-hand item or as scrap.
Since a non-current asset has a cost, and a limited useful life, and its value eventually declines, it
follows that a charge should be made in profit or loss to reflect the use that is made of the asset by
the business. This charge is called depreciation.
Depreciation must be charged even where an asset appears to be increasing in value over time.
Other than assets classified as held for sale, to which HKFRS 5 applies, the only type of asset for
which non-depreciation is permissible is freehold land.
Key terms
Depreciation is the systematic allocation of the depreciable amount of an asset over its useful life.
HKAS 16.6
Depreciable assets are assets which:
are expected to be used during more than one accounting period
have a limited useful life
are held by an entity for use in the production or supply of goods and services, for rental to
others, or for administrative purposes.
Useful life is one of two things:
The period over which an asset is expected to be available for use by an entity.
The number of production or similar units expected to be obtained from the asset by an entity.
Depreciable amount is the cost of an asset, or other amount substituted for cost, less its residual
value.
109
Financial Reporting
The judgment on useful life is based on the entity's past experience with similar assets or classes
of assets. The task of estimating the useful life will be much more onerous when an entirely new
type of asset is acquired (i.e. through technological advancement or through use in producing a
brand new product or service).
It is indicated in the standard that the useful life of an asset might be shorter than its physical life.
The physical wear and tear the asset is likely to endure is one of the key factors that we need to
look at. It is affected by circumstances such as the entity's repair and maintenance programme and
number of shifts for which the asset will be used, and so on. Other factors such as obsolescence
(due to technological advance, improvements in production, reduction in demand for the product or
service produced by the asset) and legal restrictions, for example, the length of a related lease,
also play a role in determining the useful life of an asset.
HKAS 16.53 1.5.3 Residual value
The residual value of an asset is likely to be immaterial in most instances. However, if the
residual value is expected to be significant, it must then be estimated at the date of acquisition or at
any subsequent revaluation. The residual value should be estimated based on the current situation
with other similar assets, used in the same way, which are now at the end of their useful lives. Any
future cost relating to the disposal should be netted off against the gross residual value.
HKAS 1.5.4 Depreciation methods
16.60,62
HKAS 16 requires the depreciation method used to reflect the pattern in which the asset's future
economic benefits are expected to be consumed by the entity. A variety of methods are available
and these include the straight line method, the diminishing balance method and the units of
production method.
Straight line depreciation results in a constant annual depreciation charge. This method simply
spreads the depreciable amount evenly over the useful life.
Diminishing balance depreciation results in a higher depreciation charge in the earlier years of
an asset's useful life and a lower charge in later years. It is calculated as a constant percentage of
an asset's carrying amount.
The units of production method results in a charge based on expected output. The charge is
therefore higher in periods of higher output and lower when there is a lower output.
Consistency is important. The depreciation method selected should be applied consistently from
period to period unless altered circumstances justify a change. When the method is changed, the
effect should be quantified and disclosed and the reason for the change should be stated. Change
of policy is not allowed simply because of the profitability situation of the entity.
Self-test question 1
A computer system cost $20,000 and is being depreciated at 10% using the diminishing balance
method. How does this asset appear in the statement of financial position in the first and second
year of ownership?
Why is the diminishing balance method more appropriate for such an asset?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Self-test question 2
DSyne Co acquired an item of plant for $1.8m on 1 January 20X1. It identified that the asset had
three major components as follows:
Component Useful life Cost
$'000
1 15 years 900
2 5 years 650
3 10 years 250
110
5: Property, plant and equipment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Under the terms of the 15-year licence agreement for the use of the plant, component 1 (but not
the other components) was to be dismantled at the end of the licence period.
Dismantling costs were initially estimated at a total cost of $280,000 payable in 15 years' time.
DSyne’s discount rate appropriate to the risk specific to this liability is 7% per annum.
Component 1 developed a fault on 1 January 20X2 and had to be sold for scrap for $140,000.
A replacement was purchased at a cost of $910,000 on 1 January 20X2, for use until the end of the
licence period, when dismantling costs on this component estimated at $250,000 would be
payable.
At a rate of 7% per annum the present value of $1 payable in 15 years' time is 0.3624 and of $1
payable in 14 years' time is 0.3878.
Required
Calculate
(a) the carrying amount of the machinery at 31 December 20X1
(b) the profit/loss on the disposal of the faulty component
(c) the carrying amount of the machinery at 31 December 20X2
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Solution
$
Original cost 100,000
Depreciation 20X7 – 20X8 (100,000 2/10) (20,000)
Carrying amount at 1 January 20X9 80,000
Remaining life = 5 years
80,000
Depreciation charge years 20X9 – 20Y3 = $16,000
5
111
Financial Reporting
HKFRS 13, issued in May 2011, amended the definition of fair value contained within HKAS 16 to
"the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date".
HKFRS 13 also deleted the HKAS 16 guidance on establishing fair value and replaced this with a
requirement to instead refer to the requirements of HKFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement.
This standard requires that the following are considered in determining fair value:
1 The asset being measured.
2 The principal market (i.e. that where the most activity takes place) or where there is no
principal market, the most advantageous market (i.e. that in which the best price could be
achieved) in which an orderly transaction would take place for the asset.
3 The highest and best use of the asset and whether it is used on a standalone basis or in
conjunction with other assets.
4 Assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset.
Having considered these factors, HKFRS 13 provides a hierarchy of inputs for arriving at fair value.
It requires that level 1 inputs are used where possible:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the entity can access at the
measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset.
HKAS 16.34 1.6.2 Frequency of revaluations
Valuations must be kept up to date so that the carrying amount of a revalued asset does not differ
materially from its fair value. In some cases annual revaluation is necessary, whereas in others it
may be necessary to revalue the item only every three or five years.
HKAS 1.6.3 Consistency of revaluation
16.36,38
When an item of property, plant and equipment is revalued, the whole class of assets to which it
belongs should be revalued.
All items within a class should be revalued simultaneously. In this way, selective revaluation of
certain assets and disclosure of a mixture of costs and values from different dates in the financial
statements can be avoided. Entities are permitted to have revaluation on a rolling basis if the
112
5: Property, plant and equipment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
revaluations are kept up to date and the revaluation of the entire class is accomplished in a short
period of time.
HKAS 1.6.4 Accounting for a revaluation
16.39,40
How should any increase in value be treated when a revaluation takes place? The debit will be
the increase in value in the statement of financial position, but what about the credit? HKAS 16
requires the increase to be credited to other comprehensive income and accumulated in a
revaluation surplus (i.e. part of owners' equity), unless the increase is reversing a previous
decrease which was recognised as an expense. Where this is the case, the increase is recognised
as income to the extent of the previous expense; any excess is then taken to the revaluation
surplus.
A decrease in value is recognised in the same way as an impairment loss (see section 1.7 below).
Example: Revaluation
Paddington has acquired numerous buildings and accounts for these using the revaluation model.
One particular piece of land is carried in Paddington’s statement of financial position at $560,000 at
1 January 20X1. At 31 December 20X1, further to a revaluation exercise, a fair value of $710,000
is identified in respect of this building.
How is this revaluation accounted for assuming that
(a) the buildings have only ever risen in value
(b) further to an economic downturn, at the time of the last revaluation exercise, an impairment
of $80,000 was identified and recognised in profit.
Ignore depreciation.
Solution
(a) The double entry is:
$ $
DEBIT Buildings 150,000
CREDIT Other comprehensive income (revaluation surplus) 150,000
The case is similar for a decrease in value on revaluation. Any decrease should be recognised as
an expense, except where it offsets a previous increase taken as a revaluation surplus in owners'
equity. Any decrease greater than the previous upwards increase in value must be taken as an
expense in profit or loss.
113
Financial Reporting
Solution
The double entry is:
$ $
DEBIT Other comprehensive income (revaluation surplus) 300,000
Administrative expenses (profit or loss) 500,000
CREDIT Building 800,000
Solution
(a) On 1 January 20X6 the carrying value of the property is $9m – (5 $9m 50) = $8.1m.
For the revaluation:
$ $
DEBIT Asset value 400,000
CREDIT Other comprehensive income (revaluation surplus) 400,000
(b) The depreciation for the year ended 31 December 20X6 will be $8.5m 45 = $188,889,
compared to depreciation on cost of $9m 50 = $180,000. So each year, the extra $8,889
can be treated as part of the surplus which has become realised:
$ $
DEBIT Revaluation surplus 8,889
CREDIT Retained earnings 8,889
This is a movement on owners' equity only, disclosed in the statement of changes in equity.
1.7 Impairment
An impairment loss should be treated in the same way as a revaluation decrease i.e. the
decrease should be recognised as an expense. However, a revaluation decrease (or impairment
loss) should be charged directly against any related revaluation surplus to the extent that the
decrease does not exceed the amount held in the revaluation surplus in respect of that same asset.
114
5: Property, plant and equipment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
A reversal of an impairment loss should be treated in the same way as a revaluation increase,
i.e. a revaluation increase should be recognised as income to the extent that it reverses a
revaluation decrease or an impairment loss of the same asset previously recognised as an
expense.
115
Financial Reporting
$m
With revaluation of the asset
Gain on disposal (as above) 4.0
Revaluation surplus transferred to retained profits 23.2
27.2
Self-test question 3
A business purchased two rivet making machines on 1 January 20X5 at a cost of $15,000 each.
Each had an estimated life of five years and a nil residual value. The straight line method of
depreciation is used.
Owing to an unforeseen slump in market demand for rivets, the business decided to reduce its
output of rivets, and switch to making other products instead. On 31 March 20X7, one rivet making
machine was sold (on credit) to a buyer for $8,000.
Later in the year, however, it was decided to abandon production of rivets altogether, and the
second machine was sold on 1 December 20X7 for $2,500 cash.
Required
Prepare the machinery account, provision for depreciation of machinery account and disposal of
machinery account for the accounting year to 31 December 20X7.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
HKAS
16.73,74,77,
1.9 Disclosure
79 The standard has a long list of disclosure requirements, for each class of property, plant and
equipment.
(a) Measurement bases for determining the gross carrying amount (if more than one, the gross
carrying amount for that basis in each category).
(b) Depreciation methods used.
(c) Useful lives or depreciation rates used.
116
5: Property, plant and equipment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
(d) Gross carrying amount and accumulated depreciation (aggregated with accumulated
impairment losses) at the beginning and end of the period.
(e) Reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period showing:
(i) Additions
(ii) Disposals
(iii) Acquisitions through business combinations (see Chapter 27)
(iv) Increases/decreases during the period from revaluations and from impairment losses
(v) Impairment losses recognised in profit or loss
(vi) Impairment losses reversed in profit or loss
(vii) Depreciation
(viii) Net exchange differences (from translation of statements of foreign entity)
(ix) Any other movements.
The financial statements should also disclose the following:
(a) Any recoverable amounts of property, plant and equipment
(b) Existence and amounts of restrictions on title, and items pledged as security for liabilities
(c) Accounting policy for the estimated costs of restoring the site
(d) Amount of expenditures on account of items in the course of construction
(e) Amount of commitments to acquisitions
Revalued assets require further disclosures, in addition to those required by HKFRS 13 Fair Value
Measurement:
(a) Basis used to revalue the assets
(b) Effective date of the revaluation
(c) Whether an independent valuer was involved
(d) Carrying amount of each class of property, plant and equipment that would have been
included in the financial statements had the assets been carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation and accumulated impairment losses
(e) Revaluation surplus, indicating the movement for the period and any restrictions on the
distribution of the balance to shareholders
The standard also encourages disclosure of additional information, which the users of financial
statements may find useful.
(a) The carrying amount of temporarily idle property, plant and equipment
(b) The gross carrying amount of any fully depreciated property, plant and equipment that is still
in use
(c) The carrying amount of property, plant and equipment retired from active use and held for
disposal
(d) The fair value of property, plant and equipment when this is materially different from the
carrying amount
117
Financial Reporting
The following format (with notional figures) is commonly used to disclose non-current assets
movements:
Land and Plant and
buildings equipment Total
$ $ $
Cost or valuation
At 1 January 20X8 40,000 10,000 50,000
Revaluation surplus 12,000 – 12,000
Additions in year – 4,000 4,000
Disposals in year – (1,000) (1,000)
At 31 December 20X8 52,000 13,000 65,000
Depreciation
At 1 January 20X8 10,000 6,000 16,000
Charge for year 1,000 3,000 4,000
Eliminated on disposals – (500) (500)
At 31 December 20X8 11,000 8,500 19,500
Carrying amount
At 31 December 20X8 41,000 4,500 45,500
At 1 January 20X8 30,000 4,000 34,000
118
5: Property, plant and equipment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Topic recap
HEADING
HKAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment
Upwards revaluation
Carrying amount = Downwards
Carrying amount =
recognised as other
cost – accumulated revaluation
revalued amount –
comprehensive
depreciation – charged to
accumulated
income in revaluation
accumulated revaluation
depreciationsurplus
– to
surplus.
impairment losses. the extent it exists in
accumulated
respect of the
impairment asset
losses.
then as an expense.
Disclosure requirements:
Measurement bases Recoverable amounts
Depreciation methods and Restrictions on title
estimations Estimated costs of restoring site
Reconciliation of cost/revalued Expenditure on assets under
amount and accumulated construction
depreciation b/f to the same Capital commitments
amounts c/f Additional disclosure for revalued
assets
119
Financial Reporting
Answer 1
First year Second year
$ $
Cost 20,000 20,000
Accumulated depreciation
Yr 1 ($20,000 10%) (2,000) (2,000)
Yr 2 ($18,000 10%) – (1,800)
Carrying amount 18,000 16,200
The diminishing balance method of depreciation is used instead of the straight line method when it
is considered fair to allocate a greater proportion of the total depreciable amount to the earlier
years and a lower proportion to the later years on the assumption that the benefits obtained by the
business from using the asset decline over time.
It may be argued that this method links the depreciation charge to the costs of maintaining and
running the computer system. In the early years these costs are low and the depreciation charge is
high, while in later years this is reversed.
Answer 2
(a)
Cost Depreciation Carrying amount
$ $ $
Component 1
Cost 900,000
Dismantling 101,472
($280,000 1,001,472 66,765 934,707
0.3624)
Component 2 650,000 130,000 520,000
Component 3 250,000 25,000 225,000
1,679,707
(b) Proceeds 140,000
CV at disposal (934,707)
Loss on disposal (794,707)
(c)
Cost Depreciation Carrying amount
$ $ $
Component 1
Cost 910,000
Dismantling 96,950
($250,000 1,006,950 71,925 935,025
0.3878)
Component 2 650,000 260,000 390,000
Component 3 250,000 50,000 200,000
1,525,025
120
5: Property, plant and equipment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 3
20X7
$ $
31 Mar DEBIT Loss on disposal 250
Accumulated depreciation* 6,750
Account receivable (sale price) 8,000
CREDIT Non-current asset (cost) 15,000
Being recording sales proceeds for disposal
31 Dec DEBIT Loss on disposal 3,750
Accumulated depreciation** 8,750
Cash (sale proceeds) 2,500
CREDIT Non-current asset (cost) 15,000
Being recording sales proceeds for disposal
* Depreciation at date of disposal = $6,000 + $750
** Depreciation at date of disposal = $6,000 + $2,750
You should be able to calculate that there was a loss on the first disposal of $250, and on the
second disposal of $3,750, giving a total loss of $4,000.
WORKINGS
1 At 1 January 20X7, accumulated depreciation on the machines will be:
$15,000
2 machines 2 years per machine pa = $12,000, or $6,000 per machine
5
$3,000
2 Monthly depreciation is = $250 per machine per month
12
3 The machines are disposed of in 20X7.
(a) On 31 March – after 3 months of the year.
Depreciation for the year on the machine = 3 months $250 = $750
(b) On 1 December – after 11 months of the year.
Depreciation for the year on the machine = 11 months $250 = $2,750
121
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
RMB'000 RMB'000
Cost of land use right 45,000 48,000
Cost of construction (excluding the right 303,000 267,000
amortisation of land use right)
Fair value of land use right at 31 December 60,000 100,000
20X5
Fair value of the building at existing status as at 560,000 340,000
31 December 20X5
Date of purchase of land use right 1 July 20X3 1 October 20X3
Term of land use right of the property 75 years 60 years
Estimated useful life of the property 50 years 40 years
Completion of construction of the building December 20X4 June 20X5
Phoenix has adopted the cost model under HKAS 16 for property, plant and equipment and the fair
value model under HKAS 40 for investment property (buildings only). Depreciation is provided to
write off the cost of property, plant and equipment using the straight line method. The land use right
is considered as a lease and accounted for in accordance with the requirements under HKAS 17.
Amortisation of the cost of the land during the construction period is capitalised as part of the
development cost of the property.
Required
Calculate the amount of (1) land use right and (2) carrying amount of the building for each property
to be reflected in Phoenix's statement of financial position as at 31 December 20X5. (9 marks)
HKICPA September 2006 (amended)
122
chapter 6
Investment property
Topic list
Learning focus
Some entities own land or buildings and treat them as an investment, i.e. in order to generate
income and cash flows independently of the other assets held by the entity. It is important that
you understand the difference between investment properties and other classes of assets,
and how to account for them.
123
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.10 Investment property 3
3.10.1 Identify an investment property within the scope of HKAS 40 and
situation when a property can be transferred in and out of the
investment property category
3.10.2 Distinguish investment property from other categories of property
holdings and describe the difference in accounting treatment
3.10.3 Apply the recognition and measurement rules relating to investment
property
3.10.4 Account for investment property
3.10.5 Disclose relevant information, including an accounting policy note,
for investment property
124
6: Investment property | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS 40 Investment Property was published in March 2000 with the objective of regulating the
accounting treatment for investment property and related disclosure requirements.
HKAS 40 does not deal with issues covered in HKAS 17. It includes investment property held
under a finance lease or leased out under an operating lease.
HKAS 40.5
1.1 Definitions
Key terms
Investment property is property (land or a building – or part of a building – or both) held (by the
owner or by the lessee under a finance lease) to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both,
rather than for:
(a) use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes
(b) sale in the ordinary course of business.
Owner-occupied property is property held by the owner (or by the lessee under a finance lease) for
use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Cost is the amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair value of other consideration given to
acquire an asset at the time of its acquisition or construction.
Carrying amount is the amount at which an asset is recognised in the statement of financial
position.
A property interest that is held by a lessee under an operating lease may be classified and
accounted for as an investment property, if and only if the property would otherwise meet the
definition of an investment property and the lessee uses the HKAS 40 fair value model. This
classification is available on a property-by-property basis. (HKAS 40.5)
HKAS 40.8- The standard provides the following examples of investment properties:
12,
15 (a) Land held for long-term capital appreciation rather than for short-term sale in the ordinary
course of business.
(b) Land held for a currently undetermined future use.
(c) A building owned by the reporting entity (or held by the entity under a finance lease) and
leased out under an operating lease.
(d) A building that is vacant but held to be leased out under one or more operating leases.
(e) Property that is being constructed or developed for future use as investment property.
(f) A building held by an entity and leased to a parent or another subsidiary. Note, however,
that while this is regarded as an investment property in the individual entity's financial
statements, in the consolidated financial statements this property will be regarded as
owner-occupied (because it is occupied by the group) and will therefore be treated in
accordance with HKAS 16.
125
Financial Reporting
The standard also clarifies that the following are not investment properties, but are instead within
the scope of the named standards:
(a) Property intended for sale in the ordinary course of business (HKAS 2)
(b) Property being constructed or developed for sale in the ordinary course of business
(HKAS 2)
(c) Property being constructed or developed on behalf of third parties (HKAS 11)
(d) Owner occupied property (HKAS 16), which includes:
(i) property held for future owner-occupation
(ii) property held for future development before owner-occupation
(iii) property occupied by employees regardless of whether they pay market rent
(iv) owner-occupied property awaiting disposal
(e) Property leased to another entity under a finance lease.
Where a property is partly owner-occupied and partly held to earn rentals or for capital
appreciation, its treatment depends on whether or not the portions of the property could be sold
separately. If they could not be sold separately, the property is only treated as investment property
if an insignificant portion is held for owner-occupier use.
Where an entity provides ancillary services to the occupants of a property it holds:
The property is treated as investment property where those ancillary services are
insignificant to the arrangement as a whole
The property is treated as owner-occupied where the ancillary services are significant, for
example the services provided to a hotel guest by the owner of the hotel indicate that a hotel
is owner-occupied.
Self-test question 1
Propex had the following properties but is unsure how to account for them:
1 Tennant House which cost $150,000 five years ago. The property is freehold and is let out to
private individuals for six-monthly periods. The current market value of the property is
$175,000.
2 Stowe Place which cost $75,000. This is used by Propex as its headquarters. The building
was acquired 10 years ago.
3 Crocket Square is a recently started development which is two-thirds complete. Propex
intends to let this out to a company called Speedex in which it has a controlling interest.
4 Smith Tower is an office complex let out to a number of commercial tenants. Propex
provides these tenants with security and maintenance services in the building.
Propex depreciates its buildings at 2% per annum on cost.
Required
Describe the most appropriate accounting treatment for each of these properties.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
126
6: Investment property | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Below is the decision tree showing which HKFRS should be applied to various kinds of property:
No
Is the asset being constructed Yes Asset is accounted for as
or developed on behalf of construction contract
third parties? (HKAS 11)
No
Is the asset partly owner Can the part which is owner
occupied? occupied be sold or leased
Yes
under a finance lease in a
separate transaction?
No
Is the asset leased out under Yes Asset is accounted for
a finance lease? under HKAS 17
No Yes
No
Asset should be recognised Yes Is the part of the asset Asset should be
as an investment property which is owner occupied separated into
under HKAS 40 insignificant? component parts. The
portion which is not
No
owner occupied is
Asset is recognised as investment property
property, plant and (HKAS 40); the portion
equipment under HKAS 16 which is owner occupied
is PPE (HKAS 16)
127
Financial Reporting
HKAS
40.20,25
1.3 Initial measurement
An investment property should be measured initially at its cost, including transaction costs.
A property interest held under a lease and classified as an investment property shall be accounted
for as if it were a finance lease. The asset is recognised at the lower of the fair value of the property
and the present value of the minimum lease payments. An equivalent amount is recognised as a
liability.
HKAS
40.30,34
1.4 Measurement subsequent to initial recognition
Topic highlights
Entities can choose between:
Fair value model, with changes in fair value being measured
Cost model – the treatment most commonly used under HKAS 16
128
6: Investment property | Part C Accounting for business transactions
This standard requires that the following are considered in determining fair value:
1 The asset being measured
2 The principal market (i.e. that where the most activity takes place) or where there is no
principal market, the most advantageous market (i.e. that in which the best price could be
achieved) in which an orderly transaction would take place for the asset
3 The highest and best use of the asset and whether it is used on a standalone basis or in
conjunction with other assets
4 Assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset.
Having considered these factors, HKFRS 13 provides a hierarchy of inputs for arriving at fair value.
It requires that level 1 inputs are used where possible:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the entity can access at the
measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset.
The guidance which remains in HKAS 40 is as follows:
(a) Double counting should be prevented in deciding on the fair value of the assets. For
example, elevators or air conditioning, which form an integral part of a building should be
incorporated in the investment property rather than recognised separately.
(b) According to the definition in HKAS 36 Impairment of Assets, fair value is not the same as
"value in use". The latter reflects factors and knowledge as relating solely to the entity, while
the former reflects factors and knowledge applicable to the market.
(c) In those uncommon cases in which the fair value of an investment property cannot be
determined reliably by an entity, the cost model in HKAS 16 must be employed until the
investment property is disposed of. The residual value must be assumed to be zero.
1.4.2 Operating lease and investment property
In respect of leased property that qualifies as an operating lease, the lessee has the option to
classify the leased property as investment property provided that the lessee uses the fair value
model of HKAS 40 and the relevant criteria are met and all of the investment property must only be
accounted for under the fair value model. This means that the components of land and buildings of
the lease need not be split in order to calculate whether it is a finance lease or operating lease.
HKAS 40.57-
65
1.5 Transfers
Transfers to or from investment property are justified only when there is a change in the use of
the property.
129
Financial Reporting
Note. Any resulting decrease in the carrying amount of the property is recognised in profit or loss.
However, to the extent that an amount is included in revaluation surplus for that property, the
decrease is recognised in other comprehensive income and reduces the revaluation surplus within
equity.
130
6: Investment property | Part C Accounting for business transactions
131
Financial Reporting
132
6: Investment property | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Topic recap
Disclose
Land, building
singleoramount
part ofinbuilding
statement
heldofby Whichsingle
Disclose measurement
amount inmodel
statement
is applied
of
comprehensive
the owner (or lessee
incomeunder
comprising:
finance lease) Criteria for classification
comprehensive income comprising:
as investment property
Post
to earn rentals/for
tax profit
capital
or loss
appreciation
of the rather UsePost
of independent
tax profit or valuer
loss of the
than fordiscontinued
use/sale in the
operations
ordinaryand course of Amounts
discontinued
recognised
operations
in profitand
or loss
Post
business. Includes:
tax gain or loss on Restrictions
Post tax gain
or obligations
or loss onassociated with the
Land disposal/measurement
held for undeterminedtofuturefair use property.
disposal/measurement to fair
Property
value being
less costs
constructed
to sell. for use as an value less costs to sell.
investment property
133
Financial Reporting
Answer 1
1 Tennant House
Held for its investment potential and not for use by Propex
Treat as investment property in accordance with HKAS 40
Rental income to profit or loss
If following fair value model – revalue to market value of $175,000. The difference of
$25,000 credited to profit or loss
If following cost model – depreciate based on cost and do not revalue. Depreciation for
current period is $3,000 and net book value is $135,000 (150,000 – (5 3,000))
Need to be consistent and use either fair value or cost model for all investment
properties.
2 Stowe Place
Held for use by Propex
Considered as owner-occupied property and accounted for in accordance with
HKAS 16
Depreciate over useful life 75,000 2% = 1,500 per annum to profit or loss
Carrying value of $75,000 – ($1,500 10) = 60,000 to be shown in statement of
financial position.
3 Crocket Square
Not yet complete so accounting treatment relates to the cost incurred to date
Propex is constructing the property to let out to another company, Speedex. During
construction, and after completion, the property is therefore within the scope of
HKAS 40 and should be accounted for as an investment property in Propex’s
individual accounts
As Speedex is a subsidiary of Propex, the property will be owner-occupied from a
group perspective and therefore HKAS 16 is applied at a consolidation level.
4 Smith Tower
The service and maintenance services provided by Propex to its tenants would be
deemed insignificant to the arrangement as a whole. Therefore, Propex should treat
Smith Tower as an investment property and apply the provisions of HKAS 40.
134
6: Investment property | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Exam practice
In the board meeting held on 30 September 20X7, the management of CLL determined to sell
Buildings B and C. A property agency was appointed in the following month to identify potential
buyers. In addition, CLL moved the storage of its inventories in Building A to a new production plant
in Shenzhen. At 31 December 20X7, all three buildings were vacant.
CLL has accounted for (i) the building under property, plant and equipment at cost basis and
depreciated the cost with the estimated useful life of 30 years, (ii) the investment property at fair
value model, and (iii) the land cost as operating lease under HKAS 17. Cost and fair value of the
land are assumed to be zero. Cost to sell the buildings is estimated at 0.5% of the disposal value of
the asset.
Required
Determine the statement of financial position classification of these three buildings and calculate
the respective amounts to be recognised on the statement of financial position as at 31 December
20X7. (15 marks)
HKICPA February 2008 (amended)
135
Financial Reporting
136
chapter 7
Government grants
Topic list
Learning focus
Entities in many different countries receive government grants for all sorts of reasons, very
often to encourage growth and industry in certain areas, or to help them overcome external
difficulties, such as economic difficulties. This chapter covers how to account for government
grants.
137
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.03 Government grants and assistance 3
3.03.01 Accounting and presentation of government grants
3.03.02 Disclosure of government grants and assistance in accordance with
HKAS 20
138
7: Government grants | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Key terms
Government. Government, government agencies and similar bodies whether local, national or
international.
Government assistance. Action by government designed to provide an economic benefit specific
to an entity or range of entities qualifying under certain criteria.
Government grants. Assistance by government in the form of transfers of resources to an entity in
return for past or future compliance with certain conditions relating to the operating activities of the
entity. They exclude those forms of government assistance which cannot reasonably have a value
placed upon them and transactions with government which cannot be distinguished from the
normal trading transactions of the entity.
Grants related to assets. Government grants whose primary condition is that an entity qualifying
for them should purchase, construct or otherwise acquire non-current assets. Subsidiary conditions
may also be attached restricting the type or location of the assets or the periods during which they
are to be acquired or held.
Grants related to income. Government grants other than those related to assets.
Forgivable loans. Loans which the lender undertakes to waive repayment of under certain
prescribed conditions.
Fair value. This is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
(HKAS 20.3)
Government assistance can be of various forms since both the type of assistance and the
conditions related to it may differ. It may have the impact of encouraging an entity to undertake
something it otherwise would not have done.
139
Financial Reporting
How will the financial statements be affected by the receipt of government assistance?
(a) Any resources transferred to an entity must be accounted for using an appropriate method.
(b) Disclosure in the notes to the accounts is required to show the magnitude to which an entity
has benefited from such assistance.
HKAS 20.7-
11
1.3 Government grants
Government grants (including non-monetary grants at fair value) should only be recorded when the
entity has reasonable assurance that:
the entity will comply with any conditions attached to the grant
the entity will actually receive the grant
The receipt of the grant does not mean that the conditions attached to it have been or will be
fulfilled.
The manner of receipt of the grant, whether it is in cash or as a reduction in a liability to the
government, is irrelevant in the treatment of the grant.
Once a grant has been recognised, any contingency associated with it should be accounted for
under HKAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
When a forgivable loan (as given in the key terms above) is received from the government and it
is reasonably assured that the entity will meet the appropriate terms for forgiveness, it should be
treated in the same way as a government grant. In addition, a loan at a below-market rate of
interest is to be dealt with as a government grant.
A benefit of a government loan at a below-market rate of interest is treated as a government
grant. The loan shall be recognised and measured in accordance with HKFRS 9 Financial
Instruments. The benefit of the below-market rate of interest shall be measured as the difference
between the initial carrying value of the loan determined in accordance with HKFRS 9 and the
proceeds received. The benefit is accounted for in accordance with this standard. The entity shall
consider the conditions and obligations that have been, or must be, met when identifying the costs
for which the benefit of the loan is intended to compensate.
Self-test question 1
What are the different arguments used in support of each method?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
HKAS 20 requires that the income approach should be adopted in the recognition of grants. In
other words, grants received should be recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the
relevant accounting periods in which the entity recognises as expenses the related costs.
A systematic basis of matching should be used to avoid a violation of the accrual assumption to
treat grants in profit or loss on a receipts basis. This latter basis would only be acceptable when no
other basis was available.
The related cost to a government grant can easily be identified and thereby the period(s) in which
the grant should be recognised in profit or loss, i.e. when the costs are incurred by the entity.
Grants received relating to a depreciating asset will be recognised, in the same proportion, over the
periods in which the asset is depreciated.
140
7: Government grants | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 2
On 1 January 20X8, Xenon Co. purchased a non-current asset for cash of $100,000 and received
a grant of $20,000 towards the cost of the asset. Xenon Co.'s accounting policy is to treat the grant
as deferred income. The asset has a useful life of five years.
Required
Show the accounting entries to record the asset and the grant in the year ended 31 December
20X8.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Certain obligations may have to be fulfilled for grants relating to non-depreciable assets. In such
a case, the grant should be recognised in profit or loss over the periods in which the cost of
meeting the obligation is incurred. For example, if a piece of land is granted on the condition that a
building is erected on it, then the grant should be recognised in profit or loss over the building's life.
If a series of conditions, in the form of a package of financial aid, are attached to the grant, then
the entity must be careful in identifying precisely those conditions which give rise to costs which in
turn determine the periods in which the grant will be earned. The grant may also be split into parts
and allocated on different bases.
Grants received as compensation for expenses or losses which an entity has already incurred
and grants given merely to provide immediate financial support where there are no foreseeable
related costs, should be recognised in profit or loss of the period in which they become receivable.
141
Financial Reporting
Solution
The results of the company would be as follows:
(a) Reducing the cost of the asset
20X8 20X9 20Y0
$ $ $
Profits
Profit before depreciation 250,000 280,000 315,000
Depreciation* 12,000 12,000 12,000
Profit 238,000 268,000 303,000
*The depreciation charge on a straight line basis, for each year, is 2% × ($700,000
$100,000) = $12,000.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT YEAR END (EXTRACT)
$ $ $
Non-current asset at cost 600,000 600,000 600,000
Depreciation 12,000 24,000 36,000
Carrying amount 588,000 576,000 564,000
(b) Treating the government grant as deferred income
20X8 20X9 20Y0
$ $ $
Profits
Profit before grant
and depreciation 250,000 280,000 315,000
Depreciation (14,000) (14,000) (14,000)
Government grant 2,000 2,000 2,000
Profit 238,000 268,000 303,000
Whichever of these methods is used, the cash flows in relation to the purchase of the asset and
the receipt of the grant are often disclosed separately because of the significance of the
movements in cash flow.
HKAS 20.29- 1.3.4 Presentation of grants related to income
31
Grants related to income are a credit in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income. There are two alternative methods of disclosure.
(a) Present as a separate credit or under a general heading, e.g. "other income".
(b) Deduct from the related expense.
The disclosure has been a subject of controversy. Some would argue that it is not good practice to
offset income and expenses in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income,
others would say that offsetting is acceptable since the expenses would not have been incurred
had the grant not been available. A proper understanding of the financial statements is required
142
7: Government grants | Part C Accounting for business transactions
for the disclosure of the grant, particularly the effect on any item of income or expense which is to
be separately disclosed.
HKAS 20.32- 1.3.5 Repayment of government grants
33
If a grant must be repaid it should be accounted for as a change in an accounting estimate.
In other words, the revision is accounted for prospectively. HKAS 8 requires that the nature and
amount of such a change in an accounting estimate is disclosed.
(a) Repayment of a grant related to income: apply first against any unamortised deferred income
set up in respect of the grant; any excess should be recognised immediately as an expense.
(b) Repayment of a grant related to an asset: increase the carrying amount of the asset or
reduce the deferred income balance by the amount repayable. The cumulative additional
depreciation that would have been recognised to date in the absence of the grant should be
immediately recognised as an expense.
The circumstances relating to repayment may entail a reassessment of the asset value and an
impairment of the new carrying amount of the asset.
HKAS 20.34-
36
1.4 Excluded government assistance
The definition of government grants does not include some forms of government assistance.
(a) Some forms of government assistance cannot reasonably have a value placed on them,
e.g. free technical or marketing advice, provision of guarantees.
(b) There are transactions with government which cannot be distinguished from the entity's
normal trading transactions, e.g. government procurement policy resulting in a portion of
the entity's sales. Any segregation would be arbitrary.
The government assistance may have to be disclosed because of its significance; nature, extent
and duration.
143
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
Transfer of
Disclose single
resources
amount from
in statement
government of Outside definition
Disclose single amount
of grants:
in statement of
comprehensive
to an entity in return
incomefor comprising:
compliance comprehensive
1. Government income
assistance
comprising:
without
with certain
Post conditions.
tax profit or loss of the Post
valuetax
e.g.
profit or loss of the
discontinued operations and discontinued operations
Free technical adviceand
Post tax gain or loss on
Includes: Post
tax gain or
Provision of loss on
guarantees
forgivable
disposal/measurement
loans to fair disposal/measurement to fair
below value less interest
market costs to loans
sell. 2. Transactions
value less costs
withtogovernment
sell.
non-monetary assets (grant = fair value of that cannot be distinguished
asset) from normal trading
Excludes government assistance without transactions.
value.
Disclose single
Recognise when amount
there in statement of
is reasonable Disclose if significant
comprehensive
assurance that: income comprising:
the
1. Postentity
tax profit or loss with
will comply of the
conditions
discontinued
attached to theoperations
grant and
Post tax gain or loss on
disposal/measurement
2. the entity will receive the to fair
value less costs to sell.
grant.
Presentation
144
7: Government grants | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 1
The standard gives the following arguments in support of each method.
Capital approach
(a) The grants are a financing device, so should go through the statement of financial position.
In the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income they would simply offset
the expenses which they are financing. No repayment is expected by the government, so the
grants should be recognised outside profit or loss.
(b) Grants are not earned, they are incentives without related costs, so it would be wrong to
take them to profit or loss.
Income approach
(a) The grants are not received from shareholders so should not be recognised directly in
equity, but should be recognised in profit or loss in appropriate periods.
(b) Grants are not given or received for nothing. They are earned by compliance with
conditions and by meeting obligations. They should therefore be recognised in profit or loss
over the periods in which the entity recognises as expenses the related costs for which the
grant is intended to compensate.
(c) Grants are an extension of fiscal policies and so as income taxes and other taxes are
expenses, so grants should be recognised in profit or loss.
Answer 2
Acquisition of the asset and receipt of the grant on 1 January 20X8:
$ $
DEBIT Non current assets 100,000
CREDIT Cash 100,000
To record the asset at its cost
DEBIT Cash 20,000
CREDIT Deferred income 20,000
To record the receipt of the grant
In the year ended 31 December 20X8 the asset is depreciated and a portion of the grant is
released to the statement of profit or loss:
DEBIT Depreciation expense ($100,000 / 5 years) 20,000
CREDIT Accumulated depreciation 20,000
145
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
146
chapter 8
Learning focus
Impairment of assets is particularly relevant in the current economic climate and several
companies are now having to apply the requirements with regard to accounting for impairment
for the first time.
147
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.09 Intangible assets 3
3.09.01 Define an intangible asset and scope of HKAS 38
3.09.02 Apply the definition of an intangible asset to both internally-
generated and purchased intangibles
3.09.03 Account for the recognition and measurement of intangible assets
in accordance with HKAS 38
3.09.04 Describe the subsequent accounting treatment of intangible assets
including amortisation
3.09.05 Distinguish between research and development and describe the
accounting treatment of each
3.09.06 Explain how goodwill arises
3.09.07 Account for goodwill
3.09.08 Disclose relevant information in respect of intangible assets under
HKAS 38
3.13 Impairment of assets 3
3.13.01 Identify assets that are within the scope of HKAS 36
3.13.02 Identify an asset that may be impaired by reference to common
external and internal indicators
3.13.03 Identify the cash generating unit an asset belongs to
3.13.04 Calculate the recoverable amount with reference to value-in-use
and fair value less cost to sell
3.13.05 Calculate the impairment loss, including the loss relating to cash-
generating units
3.13.06 Allocate impairment loss and account for subsequent reversal
3.13.07 Disclose relevant information with regard to impairment loss,
including critical judgment and estimate
148
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS 38 Intangible Assets was issued in August 2004 and revised in May 2009 to reflect changes
introduced by HKFRS 3 (revised) Business Combinations.
HKAS 38.8-
10
1.3 Definition of an intangible asset
Key terms
An intangible asset is an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance.
An asset is a resource which is:
(a) controlled by the entity as a result of events in the past
(b) something from which the entity expects future economic benefits to flow
Examples of items that might be considered as intangible assets therefore include computer
software, patents, copyrights, motion picture films, customer lists, franchises, brands and fishing
rights.
149
Financial Reporting
An item should not be recognised as an intangible asset, however, unless it meets this definition in
full. In other words it is:
(a) identifiable
(b) controlled by the entity as a result of past events, and
(c) expected to result in future economic benefits.
Each of these elements of the definition is considered in turn below.
HKAS 1.3.1 Identifiable
38.11,12
An asset is identifiable if it:
(a) is separable, i.e. if it could be rented or sold either individually or together with a related
contract or asset, or
(b) arises from contractual or other legal rights regardless of whether those rights are separable.
Goodwill, whether purchased or internally generated, is not identifiable and is therefore not
considered to be an intangible asset within the scope of HKAS 38.
Other internally generated intangible items, such as brands and customer lists do, however,
meet these criteria, however, they may not meet the remaining two criteria within the definition of
an intangible asset, or the recognition criteria (section 1.4).
Purchased intangible assets, such as a purchased patent or brand are normally identifiable.
HKAS 38.13- 1.3.2 Control by the entity
16
An entity controls an asset if the entity has the power to obtain the future economic benefits flowing
from the underlying resource and to restrict the access of others to those benefits.
Whereas the application of the control criteria to purchased assets is relatively simple, it is less
straightforward in the case of internally generated assets. Therefore, additional guidance is
provided as follows:
Market and technical knowledge
The following provide evidence that an entity can control access to the future economic benefits
arising from expenditure to develop market and technical knowledge:
The existence of copyrights
A legal duty of employees to maintain confidentiality with regard to the knowledge
If such a legal right exists, and provided that the knowledge is identifiable and is expected to result
in future economic benefits, it qualifies as an intangible asset.
Skilled staff
Expenditure on training results in more skilled staff, and often increased revenues and better
efficiency. The costs of such training, however, are very unlikely to qualify as an intangible asset
because an entity does not control the future actions of its staff. These staff may leave the
organisation at any time.
Market share/customer base
Expenditure on advertising and building customer relationships results in the growth of market
share and a loyal customer base. However, unless relationships with customers are protected by
legal rights, the entity can not control the actions of its customers, and they may change to a
different supplier. Therefore, such expenditure on creating market share does not qualify as an
intangible asset.
150
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS 38.21-
23
1.4 Recognition of an intangible asset
An intangible asset meeting the definition above should be recognised if, and only if, both the
following apply:
(a) It is probable that the future economic benefits that are attributable to the asset will flow to
the entity.
(b) The cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
Management has to exercise its judgment in assessing the degree of certainty attached to the flow
of economic benefits to the entity. External evidence is best.
HKAS 38.25 1.4.1 Separately acquired intangible assets
Normally, the fact that an entity purchases an intangible asset indicates an expectation that the
expected future economic benefits embodied in the asset will flow to the entity. In addition, the cost
can clearly be measured reliably.
Therefore, purchased intangible assets are normally recognised in the financial statements.
HKAS 38.33- 1.4.2 Intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination
34
In accordance with HKFRS 3 (revised), any intangible asset for which a fair value can be reliably
determined should be recognised separately. This is the case even where the purchased entity
does not recognise the asset in its own statement of financial position.
Sufficient information exists to measure the fair value of an asset reliably where it is separable or
arises from contractual or other legal rights.
HKAS 1.4.3 Internally generated assets
38.48,51,52,
63 Internally generated goodwill does not meet the definition of an intangible asset and therefore is
never recognised in the financial statements.
Other internally generated assets may meet the recognition criteria, however due to the difficulty of
assessing future economic benefits and determining a reliable cost of an internally generated
asset, HKAS 38 requires that all internal expenditure that may result in an intangible asset is
classified as research or development, and provides more detailed recognition guidance which is
applicable. This is considered in greater detail in section 2 of the chapter.
In any case, internally-generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and
items similar in substance shall not be recognised as intangible assets.
151
Financial Reporting
Directly attributable costs may include professional fees and testing costs, but not advertising and
promotional expenditure or administration and general overhead costs.
HKAS 38.33 1.5.2 Intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination
When an intangible asset is acquired as part of a business combination (where one company
has acquired the shares of another company), the cost of the intangible asset is its fair value at the
date of the acquisition.
For example, if company A has acquired company B, and company B owns a drilling licence with a
fair value of $2m at the date of acquisition, then the cost of the licence in the consolidated accounts
will be $2m.
HKAS 38.44 1.5.3 Intangible assets acquired by way of government grant
According to HKAS 38, intangible assets acquired by way of government grant and the grant itself
may be recorded initially either at cost (which may be zero) or fair value.
HKAS 38.45 1.5.4 Exchanges of assets
Fair value is used to measure the cost of the intangible asset acquired if one intangible asset is
exchanged for another unless:
(a) the exchange lacks commercial substance, or
(b) the fair values of both the asset received and the asset given up cannot be measured
reliably.
In such cases, the cost of the intangible asset acquired is measured at the carrying amount of the
asset given up.
1.5.5 Internally generated assets
Internally generated intangible assets are recognised at cost. The elements of this are discussed in
more detail in section 2.
HKAS
38.72,74,75
1.6 Subsequent measurement of an intangible asset
After recognition, an entity may choose to apply either the cost model or revaluation model.
Intangible assets are therefore carried at either:
cost less accumulated amortisation less accumulated impairment losses, or
fair value at date of revaluation less subsequent accumulated amortisation and subsequent
accumulated impairment losses.
The detailed rules with regard to revaluation and amortisation are considered in more detail later in
this chapter after the recognition rules and initial measurement rules for research and development
costs are discussed.
HKAS 38 requires that internally generated assets are classified into research and development
phases.
152
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
2.1 Definitions
Key terms
Research is original and planned investigation undertaken with the prospect of gaining new
scientific or technical knowledge and understanding.
Development is the application of research findings or other knowledge to a plan or design for the
production of new or substantially improved materials, devices, products, processes, systems or
services before the start of commercial production or use.
153
Financial Reporting
(d) How the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits. Among other
things, the entity should demonstrate the existence of a market for the output of the
intangible asset or the intangible asset itself or, if it is to be used internally, the usefulness of
the intangible asset.
(e) Its ability to measure the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its
development reliably.
When these criteria are not met, development costs should be written off as an expense as incurred.
HKAS 38.65-
66, 71
2.3 Initial measurement
Topic highlights
Internally generated intangible assets are initially measured at cost
The costs allocated to an internally generated intangible asset should only be those costs that can
be directly attributed or allocated on a reasonable and consistent basis to creating, producing or
preparing the asset for its intended use. The principle here is similar to that applied to the cost of
non-current assets and inventory.
The cost of an internally operated intangible asset is the sum of the expenditure incurred from
the date when the intangible asset first meets the recognition criteria. If, as often happens,
considerable costs have already been recognised as expenses before management could
demonstrate that the criteria have been met, this earlier expenditure should not be retrospectively
recognised at a later date as part of the cost of an intangible asset.
Self-test question 1
Mountain Co. is developing a new production process. During 20X1, expenditure incurred was
$500,000, of which $310,000 was incurred before 1 December 20X1 and $190,000 between
1 December 20X1 and 31 December 20X1. Mountain can demonstrate that, at 1 December 20X1,
the production process met the criteria for recognition as an intangible asset. How should the
expenditure be treated?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
At this stage it may be useful to summarise the rules seen for the recognition and initial
measurement of separately purchased intangibles, intangibles acquired as part of a business
acquisition and internally generated development expenditure.
Summary of the recognition and initial measurement requirements of HKAS 38
154
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS
38.72,74,75,81
2.5 Measurement of intangible assets subsequent to initial
recognition
HKAS 38 allows two methods of measuring for intangible assets after they have been first
recognised:
1 Cost model: an intangible asset is carried at its cost, less any accumulated amortisation
and less any accumulated impairment losses.
2 Revaluation model: an intangible asset is carried at a revalued amount, which is its fair
value at the date of revaluation, less any subsequent accumulated amortisation and any
subsequent accumulated impairment losses.
The rules with regard to the application of the revaluation model are as follows:
(a) The fair value must be measured reliably with reference to an active market in that type of
asset.
155
Financial Reporting
(b) The entire class of intangible assets of that type must be revalued at the same time (to
prevent a business from choosing to revalue only those particular assets that have enjoyed
favourable price movements, and retaining the others at cost).
(c) If an intangible asset in a class of revalued intangible assets cannot be revalued because
there is no active market for this asset, the asset should be carried at its cost less any
accumulated amortisation and impairment losses.
(d) Revaluations should be made with such regularity that the carrying amount does not differ
from that which would be determined using fair value at the end of the reporting period.
HKAS 2.5.1 Active market
38.8,78
Key term
An active market is a market in which all the following conditions exist:
(a) The items traded in the market are homogenous
(b) Willing buyers and sellers can normally be found at any time; and
(c) Prices are available to the public.
Since an active market for an intangible asset will not usually exist, the revaluation model will
usually not be available. For example, intangible assets such as copyrights, publishing rights and
film rights are each sold at unique sale value, so a continuous active market is not accessible.
A revaluation to fair value would therefore be inappropriate. However, a fair value might be
obtainable for assets such as fishing rights, quotas or taxi cab licences.
HKAS 38.85- 2.5.2 Accounting for a revaluation
87
Where the carrying amount of an intangible asset is revalued upwards to its fair value, the amount
of the revaluation should be credited to other comprehensive income and accumulated in a
revaluation surplus in equity.
However, a revaluation surplus resulting from a reversal of a previous revaluation decrease that
has been charged to profit or loss can be recognised as income.
On the other hand, the amount of a downward revaluation on an intangible asset should be
charged as an expense against income, unless an upward revaluation has previously been
recorded on the same intangible asset. In such case, the revaluation loss should be first debited to
other comprehensive income against any previous revaluation surplus recorded for the asset.
Self-test question 2
A non-current asset with a carrying value of $160m was impaired and written down to its
recoverable value of $120m two years ago.
After an upturn in business, the asset has a market value of $135m. Had the impairment not taken
place, the carrying value of the asset would have been $130m.
Required
Consider how this impairment is reversed.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
When the revaluation model is adopted, the cumulative revaluation surplus of an intangible asset
may be transferred to retained earnings when the asset is disposed of and the surplus is
eventually realised. However, the surplus may also be realised over the period in which the
intangible asset is being used by the entity. The amount of the surplus realised each year is
calculated as the difference in amortisation charges based on the revalued amount of the asset
and the historical cost of the asset. The realised surplus should not be included in profit or loss,
156
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
instead it should be transferred from revaluation surplus directly to retained earnings and disclosed
in the statement of changes in equity.
157
Financial Reporting
Self-test question 3
It can be difficult to establish the useful life of an intangible asset in practice. Write brief notes on
factors to consider when determining the useful life of a purchased brand name and how to provide
evidence that its useful life might, in fact, exceed 20 years.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
HKAS
38.118,122,
2.8 Disclosure requirements
124,126 Extensive disclosure is required for intangible assets as listed in the standard. The accounting
policies for intangible assets that have been adopted are to be disclosed in the financial
statements.
158
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
159
Financial Reporting
systems and e-commerce systems, including encryption software, and interfaces with other
IT systems used by the entity).
(c) Content costs – expenditure incurred on preparing, accumulating and posting the website
content.
(d) Operating costs.
The issue arises as to how these costs should be treated within the financial statements.
2.9.1 HK(SIC) Int-32 treatment
HK(SIC) Int-32 resolves that a website developed by an entity and funded by internal expenditure
is viewed as an internally generated intangible asset that is subject to the requirements of HKAS 38
Intangible Assets. This is the case whether the website is for internal or external access.
Specifically, the treatment is as follows:
(a) Website planning costs are an expense charged to profit or loss.
(b) Application and infrastructure development costs. Expenditure which can be directly
attributed, or allocated on a reasonable and consistent basis, to preparing the website for its
intended use is to be included in the cost of the website and recognised as an intangible
asset. Examples include expenditure on purchasing or creating content (other than content
for marketing an entity's own products and services) solely for a website, and expenditure to
enable use of the content (such as acquisition fee of a licence to reproduce) on the website.
These expenditures should be included in the cost of development when the condition is
met. However, HKAS 38 does not allow the recognition of an expenditure as part of the cost
of an intangible asset at a later date if the expenditure was initially recognised as an expense
in previous financial statements (for instance, when the content of a fully amortised copyright
is subsequently provided on a website).
(c) Content development. According to HKAS 38, expenditure incurred in the content
development stage to advertise and promote an entity's own products and services (such as
digital photographs of products) should be recognised as an expense when incurred. For
example, expenditure on professional services for taking digital photographs of an entity's
products and for enhancing their display should be recorded as an expense when the
professional services are received, not when the digital photographs are displayed on the
website.
(d) Operating. The operating stage commences when the development of a website is
complete. Unless expenditure meets the criteria in HKAS 38, it should be recognised as an
expense when it is incurred.
A website which is recognised as an intangible asset under HK(SIC) Int-32 should be measured
after initial recognition by applying the requirements as stated in HKAS 38. The useful life of a
website is best estimated to be short.
160
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 4
Stauffer is a public listed company reporting under HKFRS. It has asked for your opinion on the
accounting treatment of the following items:
(a) The Stauffer brand has become well known and has developed a lot of customer loyalty
since the company was set up eight years ago. Recently, valuation consultants valued the
brand for sale purposes at $14.6m. Stauffer's directors are delighted and plan to recognise
the brand as an intangible asset in the financial statements. They plan to report the gain in
the revaluation surplus as they feel that crediting it to profit or loss would be imprudent.
(b) On 1 October 20X5 the company was awarded one of six licences issued by the government
to operate a production facility for five years. A "nominal" sum of $1m was paid for the
licence, but its fair value is actually $3m.
(c) The company undertook an expensive, but successful advertising campaign during the year
to promote a new product. The campaign cost $1m, but the directors believe that the extra
sales generated by the campaign will be well in excess of that over its four year expected
useful life.
(d) Stauffer owns a 30-year patent which it acquired two years ago for $8m which is being
amortised over its remaining useful life of 16 years from acquisition. The product sold is
performing much better than expected. Stauffer's valuation consultants have valued its
current market price at $14m.
(e) On 1 August 20X6, Stauffer acquired a smaller company in the same line of business.
Included in the company's statement of financial position was an in-process research and
development project, which showed promising results (and was the main reason why
Stauffer purchased the other company), but was awaiting government approval. The project
was included in the company's own books at $3m at the acquisition date, while the
company's net assets were valued at a fair value of $12m (excluding the project).
Stauffer paid $18m for 100% of the company and the research and development project was
valued at $5m by Stauffer's valuation consultants at that date. Government approval has
now been received, making the project worth $8m at Stauffer's year end.
Required
Explain how the directors should treat the above items in the financial statements for the year
ended 30 September 20X6.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
161
Financial Reporting
Goodwill is a type of intangible asset, however as we have seen in the earlier sections of this
chapter, it does not fall within the scope of HKAS 38. Instead, HKFRS 3 applies, providing
guidance on the calculation and accounting treatment of goodwill.
The detailed calculation of goodwill, and accounting treatment is considered in more detail in the
chapters of the Learning Pack which cover group accounting. Here we introduce the concept of
goodwill and its treatment in the accounts.
Whereas a business which builds up internally generated goodwill over time cannot objectively
value this goodwill, at such time as that business is sold, its goodwill becomes measurable. This is
because the price paid to purchase an existing business will generally exceed the sum of the
values of the individual assets within the business. The excess represents payment for the goodwill
of the business.
3.2.1 Measurement of purchased goodwill
When a business is sold, the selling price is likely to include a premium for goodwill.
162
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The calculation of this premium is not really a problem for accountants, who must simply record the
goodwill in the accounts of the new business. The value of the goodwill is a matter for the
purchaser and seller to agree upon in fixing the purchase/sale price. Two approaches may be
taken to this issue:
1 The selling price of the business is agreed by the seller and the buyer without specifically
considering the value of goodwill. The purchased goodwill will then be the excess of the
purchase consideration over the value of the identifiable net assets of the new business.
2 Negotiation is a major element in the computation of goodwill. There are various ways of
valuing goodwill and a majority of them are related to the profit record of the acquired
business.
It does not matter how goodwill is calculated, the amount recorded by the buyer will be the
difference between the purchase consideration and his own valuation of the net assets acquired.
If A values his net assets at $40,000, goodwill is agreed at $21,000 and B agrees to pay $61,000
for the business when the net assets are valued at only $38,000, then the goodwill recorded by B
will be $23,000 ($61,000 – $38,000).
HKFRS 3 (revised) deals with the accounting treatment of goodwill obtained through a business
combination, in other words goodwill arising when one company (the parent) acquires a controlling
interest in another company (the subsidiary).
Various definitions for goodwill are possible. HKFRS 3 (revised) defines goodwill differently from
the traditional definition and places much emphasis on benefits, rather than the method of
computation.
Key term
Goodwill. Future economic benefits arising from assets that are not capable of being individually
identified and separately recognised. (HKFRS 3 (revised))
163
Financial Reporting
Self-test question 5
What are the characteristics of goodwill which separate it from other types of intangible assets?
Should these differing characteristics affect the accounting treatment of goodwill?
State your reasons.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
4.1 Introduction
The fundamental principle of HKAS 36 is relatively simple. If an asset's carrying value is higher
than its "recoverable amount", then the asset is said to have suffered an impairment loss. Its value
should therefore be reduced by the amount of the impairment loss.
HKAS 36 provides guidance on:
(a) when an asset should be tested for a possible impairment
(b) how the impairment test is carried out
(c) how any resulting impairment loss is accounted for and disclosed
Before we consider each of these in turn, the next two sections explain the scope of HKAS 36 and
provide a list of important definitions within it.
164
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Key terms
Impairment loss. The amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable
amount.
Carrying amount. The amount at which an asset is recognised after deducting any accumulated
depreciation (amortisation) and accumulated impairment losses thereon.
Recoverable amount of an asset is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in
use.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Value in use is the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from an asset.
(HKAS 36)
165
Financial Reporting
Where there are indications of impairment, or for those assets which require testing annually, an
impairment test must be performed. This involves comparing the carrying amount of the asset with
its recoverable amount.
We have already defined recoverable amount as the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value
in use.
HKAS 36.28 4.5.1 Fair value less costs to sell
Fair value is established in accordance with the requirements of HKFRS 13 Fair Value
Measurement. As we have already seen, it is defined as the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date.
While HKAS 36 provides no guidance on establishing fair value, it does clarify that costs of
disposal may include legal costs, stamp duty and similar transaction taxes, costs of removing the
asset, and direct incremental costs to bring an asset into condition for its sale. They do not,
however, include termination benefits (as defined in HKAS 19) and costs associated with reducing
or reorganising a business following the disposal of an asset are not direct incremental costs to
dispose of the asset.
HKAS 4.5.2 Value in use
36.30,33,39,
44,54-56 Value in use is the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from an asset.
166
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The pre-tax cash flows and a pre-tax discount rate should be employed to calculate the present
value.
The calculation of value in use must reflect the following:
(a) An estimate of the future cash flows the entity expects to derive from the asset
(b) Expectations about possible variations in the amount and timing of future cash flows
(c) The time value of money
(d) The price for bearing the uncertainty inherent in the asset
(e) Other factors that would be reflected in pricing future cash flows from the asset
The standard provides further guidance in the assessment of cash flows and choice of discount rate.
Cash flows
The HKAS states the following:
(a) Cash flow projections should be based on "reasonable and supportable" assumptions.
(b) Projections of cash flows, normally up to a maximum period of five years, should be based
on the most recent budgets or financial forecasts.
(c) A steady or declining growth rate for each subsequent year (unless a rising growth rate
can be justified) can be used in extrapolating short-term projections of cash flows beyond
this period. Unless a higher growth rate can be justified, the long-term growth rate employed
should not be higher than the average long-term growth rate for the product, market, industry
or country.
HKAS 36 further states that future cash flows may include:
(a) Projections of cash inflows from continuing use of the asset.
(b) Projections of cash outflows necessarily incurred to generate the cash inflows from
continuing use of the asset.
(c) Net cash flows received/paid on disposal of the asset at the end of its useful life assuming
an arm's length transaction.
An asset's current condition is the basis for estimating future cash flows. It should be noted that
future cash flows associated with restructurings to which the entity is not yet committed, or to future
costs to add to, replace part of, or service the asset are excluded.
Estimates of future cash flows should exclude the following:
(a) Cash inflows/outflows from financing activities.
(b) Income tax receipts/payments.
Foreign currency future cash flows should initially be prepared in the currency in which they will
arise and will be discounted using an appropriate rate. Translation of the resulting figure into the
reporting currency should then be based on the spot rate at the year end.
Discount rate
The discount rate should be a current pre-tax rate (or rates) that reflects:
the current assessment of the time value of money, and
the risks specific to the asset.
A rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to
the asset is the return that investors would require if they were to choose an investment that
would generate cash flows of amounts, timing and risk profile equivalent to those that the
entity expects to derive from the asset.
This rate is estimated from:
the rate implicit in current market transactions for similar assets, or
167
Financial Reporting
the weighted average cost of capital of a listed entity that has a single asset which is similar
to that under review in terms of service potential and risks
The discount should not include a risk weighting if the underlying cash flows have already been
adjusted for risk.
Solution
The fair value less costs to sell is given as $550,000
The value in use is calculated as $638,000:
Year Future cash PV factor at Discounted
flows 15% future cash flows
$'000 $'000
1 230 0.86957 200
2 211 0.75614 160
3 157 0.65752 103
4 104 0.57175 59
5 233 0.49718 116
638
The recoverable amount is the higher of $550,000 and $638,000, thus $638,000.
168
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
169
Financial Reporting
170
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
The recoverable amount is $45,000, being the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value
in use.
The carrying amount of the machine is $66,667 ($75,000 8/9).
Therefore an impairment loss of $21,667 must be recognised.
The revaluation surplus at the year end in relation to the machine is $8,867 ($10,400 –
($75,000/9 – $68,000/10) being the depreciation reserves transfer).
Therefore $8,867 is charged to other comprehensive income against the revaluation surplus
and the remaining $12,800 is charged to profit or loss.
HKAS
36.63,110,114,
4.7 Subsequent accounting for an impaired asset
117,119 After reducing an asset to its recoverable amount, the depreciation charge on the asset should
then be based on its new carrying amount, its estimated residual value (if any) and its estimated
remaining useful life.
The annual review of assets to determine whether there may have been some impairment should
be applied to all assets, including assets that have already been impaired in the past.
4.7.1 Reversal of impairment losses
In some cases, the recoverable amount of an asset that has previously been impaired might turn
out to be higher than the asset's current carrying value. An impairment loss recognised previously
for an asset should be reversed if, and only if, there has been a change in the estimates used to
determine the asset's recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised.
(a) The reversal of the impairment loss should be recognised immediately as income in profit
or loss for the year.
(b) The carrying amount of the asset should be increased to its new recoverable amount.
The asset cannot be revalued to a carrying amount that is higher than its value would have been if
the asset had not been impaired originally, i.e. its depreciated carrying value had the impairment
not taken place. Depreciation of the asset should now be based on its new revalued amount, its
estimated residual value (if any) and its estimated remaining useful life.
HKAS
36.6,66
4.8 Cash generating units
Topic highlights
When it is not possible to calculate the recoverable amount of a single asset, then that of its cash
generating unit (CGU) should be measured instead.
HKAS 36 explains the important concept of cash generating units. As a basic rule, the recoverable
amount of an asset should be calculated for the asset individually. However, there will be
occasions when it is not possible to estimate such a value for an individual asset, particularly in the
calculation of value in use. This is because cash inflows and outflows cannot be attributed to the
individual asset.
If it is not possible to calculate the recoverable amount for an individual asset, the recoverable
amount of the asset's cash generating unit should be measured instead.
171
Financial Reporting
Key term
A cash generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets for which independent cash
flows can be identified and measured.
HKAS 4.8.1 Identifying the cash generating unit to which an asset belongs
36.69,72
If the recoverable amount cannot be determined for an individual asset, an entity should identify
the smallest aggregation of assets that generate largely independent cash inflows.
As part of the identification process, an entity may take into account:
How management monitors the entity's operations (for example, by product line, business or
location)
How management makes decisions about continuing or disposing of the entity's operations
and assets.
An asset or a group of assets is identified as a cash generating unit when an active market exists
for the output produced by the asset or the group. This is so even if some or all of the output is
used internally.
Unless a change is justified, it is necessary to identify consistently from period to period, the cash
generating units for the same type of asset.
The group of net assets (less liabilities) considered for impairment and those considered in the
computation of the recoverable amount should be alike. (For the treatment of goodwill and
corporate assets see below.)
Self-test question 6
Shrub is a retail store belonging to Forest, a chain of such stores. Shrub makes all its retail
purchases through Forest's purchasing centre. Pricing, marketing, advertising and human
resources policies (except for hiring Shrub's cashiers and salesmen) are decided by Forest. Forest
also owns five other stores in the same city as Shrub (although in different neighbourhoods) and 20
other stores in other cities. All stores are managed in the same way as Shrub. Shrub and four other
stores were purchased five years ago and goodwill was recognised.
What is the cash generating unit for Shrub?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Self-test question 7
Motorbike Publishing Co. owns 100 magazine titles of which 40 were purchased and 60 were self-
created. The price paid for a purchased magazine title is recognised as an intangible asset. The
costs of creating magazine titles and maintaining the existing titles are recognised as an expense
when incurred. Cash inflows from direct sales and advertising are identifiable for each magazine
title. Titles are managed by customer segments. The level of advertising income for a magazine
title depends on the range of titles in the customer segment to which the magazine title relates.
Management has a policy to abandon old titles before the end of their economic lives and replace
them immediately with new titles for the same customer segment.
What is the cash generating unit for the company?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
172
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
173
Financial Reporting
Solution
At 31 December 20X9 the cash generating unit consists of the subsidiary's identifiable net assets
(carrying amount $1,600,000) and goodwill of $1,050,000 (2,400,000 + (25% 1,800,000) –
1,800,000). Goodwill is grossed up to reflect the 25% non-controlling interest.
At 31 December 20X9: Goodwill Net assets Total
$'000 $'000 $'000
Carrying amount 1,050 1,600 2,650
Unrecognised non-controlling interest 350 – 350
1,400 1,600 3,000
Recoverable amount (1,400)
Impairment loss 1,600
Allocation of impairment loss
– unrecognised (goodwill) (350) –
– recognised (goodwill / net assets) (1,050) (200)
Carrying value – 1,400
174
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
CV of assets HO allocation Total Recoverable Impairment
amount loss
$ $ $ $ $
CGU 1 640,000 312,958 952,958 980,000 -
CGU 2 2,150,000 1,051,345 3,201,345 3,145,000 56,345
CGU 3 1,300,000 635,697 1,935,697 1,800,000 135,697
4,090,000 2,000,000 6,090,000 192,042
HKAS
36.104,105
4.11 Allocating an impairment loss to the assets of a cash
generating unit
An impairment loss should be recognised for a cash generating unit if the recoverable amount for
the cash generating unit is less than the carrying amount in the statement of financial position for
all the assets in the unit.
When an impairment loss is recognised for a cash generating unit, the loss should be allocated
between the assets in the unit in the following order:
(a) First, to the goodwill allocated to the cash generating unit (if any).
(b) Then, to all other assets in the cash generating unit within the scope of HKAS 36 (see
section 4.2), on a pro rata basis.
In allocating an impairment loss, the carrying amount of an asset should not be reduced below the
highest of:
(a) its fair value less costs to sell,
(b) its value in use (if determinable), or
(c) zero.
Any remaining amount of an impairment loss should be recognised as a liability if required by other
HKAS.
175
Financial Reporting
MH made a loss in year ended 31 December 20X2 and at 31 December 20X2 the net assets of MH
– based on fair values at 1 January 20X2 – were as follows:
$'000
Property, plant and equipment 1,300
Capitalised development expenditure 200
Net current assets 250
1,750
An impairment review on 31 December 20X2 indicated that the recoverable amount of MH at that
date was $1.5 million. The capitalised development expenditure has no ascertainable external
market value and the current fair value less costs to sell of the property, plant and equipment is
$1,120,000. Value in use could not be determined separately for these two items.
Required
Calculate the impairment loss that would arise in the consolidated financial statements of Invest as
a result of the impairment review of MH at 31 December 20X2 and show how the impairment loss
would be allocated.
Solution
Asset values Allocation of Carrying
at 31 Dec impairment value after
20X2 before loss impairment
impairment (W1)/(W2) loss
$'000 $'000 $'000
Goodwill (2,000 – 1,800) 200 (200) –
Property, plant and equipment 1,300 (180) 1,120
Development expenditure 200 (70) 130
Net current assets 250 – 250
1,950 (450) 1,500
WORKINGS
1 Impairment loss
Carrying value 1,950
Recoverable amount 1,500
Impairment loss 450
176
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Hence the development expenditure is reduced by a further 37 (217 – 180), making the total
impairment 70 (33 + 37).
The net current assets are not included when pro-rating the impairment loss as they are outside the
scope of HKAS 36.
Solution
Where there are multiple cash generating units, HKAS 36 Impairment of Assets requires two levels
of tests to be performed to ensure that all impairment losses are identified and fairly allocated.
First Divisions A and B are tested individually for impairment. In this instance, both are impaired
and the impairment losses are allocated first to any goodwill allocated to that unit and second to
other non-current assets (within the scope of HKAS 36) on a pro-rata basis. This results in an
impairment of the goodwill of both divisions and an impairment of the property, plant and
equipment in Division B only.
A second test is then performed over the whole business including unallocated goodwill and
unallocated corporate assets (the Head office) to identify if those items which are not a cash
generating unit in their own right (and therefore cannot be tested individually) have been impaired.
The additional impairment loss of (W2) $15m is allocated first against the unallocated goodwill of
$10m, eliminating it and then to the unallocated head office assets reducing them to $85m.
Divisions A and B have already been tested for impairment so no further impairment loss is
allocated to them or their goodwill as that would result in reporting them at below their recoverable
amount.
177
Financial Reporting
WORKINGS
1 Test of individual CGUs:
Division A Division B
$m $m
Carrying value 1,020 760
Recoverable amount (1,000) (720)
Impairment loss 20 40
Allocated to:
Goodwill 20 30
Other assets in the scope of HKAS 36 - 10
20 40
Allocated to:
Unallocated goodwill 10
Other unallocated assets 5
15
HKAS
36.122,123, 4.12 Reversal of an impairment loss
124
Topic highlights
Impairment of goodwill may never be reversed.
Where a cash generating unit has been impaired in the past, this impairment can be reversed. The
reversal of the loss is allocated to the assets of the unit, except for goodwill pro rata with the
carrying amounts of those assets. The increases in carrying amounts are treated in the same way
as reversals of individual asset impairment, in other words, the carrying amount of an asset cannot
increase above the lower of:
(a) its recoverable amount
(b) the carrying amount of the asset net of depreciation had no impairment been recognised
previously.
178
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 8
Cannon Co. operates in a number of countries, with its operations in each being classified as
separate cash generating units. In one of the countries of operation, Adascus, legislation was
passed two years ago restricting exports, and as a result management of Cannon expected
production to decrease by 30% in their Adascan operation. Accordingly the Adascan CGU was
tested for impairment and an impairment of $1.473 million recognised in profit:
Goodwill Assets
$'000 $'000
Cost at 1 January 20X1 1,000 2,000
Depreciation – (167)
1,000 1,833
The average remaining useful life of assets remained unchanged after the impairment, at 11 years.
Two years later at 31 December 20X3, it is thought that the effect of the legislation is less drastic
than expected, and production is expected to increase by 25%. The recoverable amount of the
Adascan CGU is now $1.91 million.
Required
Calculate the reversal of the impairment loss.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
179
Financial Reporting
180
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Topic recap
Research Development
Investigation Application of
undertaken to gain research findings for
new knowledge the production of
new or improved
materials, processes
etc
Expense to profit or
loss
Subsequent measurement
Goodwill
181
Financial Reporting
HKAS 36 Impairment
Impairment loss
arises where
Higher of
Disclosure requirements:
Impairment losses/reversals recognised in period on assets held at cost & assets at revalued amount
Additional disclosures for material impairment losses/reversals
182
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 1
At the end of 20X1, the production process is recognised as an intangible asset at a cost of
$190,000. This is the expenditure incurred since the date when the recognition criteria were met,
that is 1 December 20X1. The $310,000 expenditure incurred before 1 December 20X1 is
expensed, because the recognition criteria were not met. It will never form part of the cost of the
production process recognised in the statement of financial position.
Answer 2
The reversal of the impairment loss is recognised to the extent it increases the carrying amount of
the non-current asset to what it would have been had the impairment not taken place.
This means that the reversal of the impairment loss can only be recognised at $10m. The asset is
recognised at $130m and a reversal of the impairment loss of $10m is recognised in the statement
of profit or loss.
Answer 3
Factors to consider would include the following:
(a) Legal protection of the brand name and the control of the entity over the (illegal) use by
others of the brand name (i.e. control over piracy).
(b) Age of the brand name.
(c) Status or position of the brand in its particular market.
(d) Ability of the management of the entity to manage the brand name and to measure activities
that support the brand name (e.g. advertising and PR activities).
(e) Stability and geographical spread of the market in which the branded products are sold.
(f) Pattern of benefits that the brand name is expected to generate over time.
(g) Intention of the entity to use and promote the brand name over time (as evidenced perhaps
by a business plan in which there will be substantial expenditure to promote the brand
name).
Answer 4
Stauffer brand
The Stauffer brand is an "internally generated" intangible asset rather than a purchased one.
HKAS 38 specifically prohibits the recognition of internally generated brands, on the grounds that
they cannot be reliably measured in the absence of a commercial transaction. Stauffer will not
therefore be able to recognise the brand in its statement of financial position.
183
Financial Reporting
Licence
The licence is an intangible asset acquired by a government grant. It can be accounted for in one
of two ways:
The asset is recorded at the nominal price (cash paid) of $1m and depreciated at $200,000
per annum of its five year life, or
The asset is recorded at its fair value of $3m and a government grant is shown as deferred
income at $2m. The asset is depreciated over the five years at an annual rate of $600,000
per annum. The grant is amortised as income through profit or loss over the same period at
a rate of $400,000 per annum. This results in the same net cost of $200,000 in profit or loss
per annum as the first method.
Advertising campaign
The advertising campaign is treated as an expense. Advertising expenditure cannot be capitalised
under HKAS 38, as the economic benefits it generates cannot be clearly identified so no intangible
asset is created.
Patent
The patent is amortised to a nil residual value at $500,000 per annum based on its acquisition cost
of $8m and remaining useful life of 16 years.
The patent cannot be revalued under the HKAS 38 rules as there is no active market as a patent is
unique. HKAS 38 does not permit revaluation without an active market as the value cannot be
reliably measured in the absence of a commercial transaction.
Acquisition
The difference between the price that Stauffer paid and the fair value of the net assets of the
acquired company will represent goodwill. The research and development project must also be
valued at fair value in a business combination to ensure the goodwill is stated accurately, while in
the acquiree's own financial statements it would not be revalued as there is no active market
because it is unique. Consequently, in a business combination HKAS 38/HKFRS 3 (revised) permit
intangible assets that do not have an active market to be valued on an "arm's length" basis.
The values attributed in the group financial statements on the acquisition date are therefore:
$m
Net assets (excluding R&D project) 12
R&D project 5
Goodwill (remainder) 1
Purchase price 18
The fair value of the research and development project is measured at the acquisition date, not at
the year end and so it is not recorded at $8m. The project will be amortised over the expected
useful life of the product developed once the product is available for production.
Answer 5
Goodwill may be distinguished from other intangible non-current assets by reference to the
following characteristics.
(a) It is incapable of realisation separately from the business as a whole.
(b) Its value has no reliable or predictable relationship to any costs which may have been
incurred.
(c) Its value arises from various intangible factors such as skilled employees, effective
advertising or a strategic location. These indirect factors cannot be valued.
184
8: Intangible assets and impairment of assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
(d) The value of goodwill may fluctuate widely according to internal and external circumstances
over relatively short periods of time.
(e) The assessment of the value of goodwill is highly subjective.
It could be argued that, because goodwill is so different from other intangible non-current assets it
does not make sense to account for it in the same way. Thus the capitalisation and amortisation
treatment would not be acceptable. Furthermore, because goodwill is so difficult to value, any
valuation may be misleading, and it is best eliminated from the statement of financial position
altogether. However, there are strong arguments for treating it like any other intangible non-current
asset. This issue remains controversial.
Answer 6
In identifying Shrub's cash generating unit, an entity considers whether, for example:
(a) Internal management reporting is organised to measure performance on a store-by-store
basis.
(b) The business is run on a store-by-store profit basis or on a region/city basis.
All Forest's stores are in different neighbourhoods and probably have different customer bases.
So, although Shrub is managed at a corporate level, Shrub generates cash inflows that are largely
independent from those of Forest's other stores. Therefore, it is likely that Shrub is a cash
generating unit.
Answer 7
It is likely that the recoverable amount of an individual magazine title can be assessed. Even
though the level of advertising income for a title is influenced, to a certain extent, by the other titles
in the customer segment, cash inflows from direct sales and advertising are identifiable for each
title. In addition, although titles are managed by customer segments, decisions to abandon titles
are made on an individual title basis.
Therefore, it is likely that individual magazine titles generate cash inflows that are largely
independent one from another and that each magazine title is a separate cash generating unit.
Answer 8
At 31 December 20X3, the carrying amount of the assets are:
$'000
CV at 31 December 20X1 1,360
Depreciation X2 (1,360/11) (124)
Depreciation X3 (124)
1,112
Recoverable amount is $1.91 million and the excess over carrying amount is therefore
$798,000.
The impairment of goodwill cannot be reversed.
The impairment of assets can be reversed provided that the new carrying amount is not in
excess of the carrying amount had no impairment arisen ie $1.5 million ($1.833m 9/11
years).
Therefore, a reversal of $388,000 ($1.5m – $1.112m) is recognised in profit or loss.
185
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
186
chapter 9
Leases
Topic list
Learning focus
Leasing transactions are extremely common in business and you will often come across
them in both your business and personal capacity. It is important for the accountant to be able
to advise from the perspective of both the lessor and the lessee. Off-balance sheet finance
and substance over form are both vital issues of which the accountant should be aware.
187
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.14 Leases 3
3.14.01 Identify the types of lease within the scope of HKAS 17 and define
the terminology used in relation to leases
3.14.02 Classify leases as operating or finance leases by looking at the
substance of the transaction
3.14.03 Account for operating leases from the perspective of both the
lessee and the lessor
3.14.04 Disclose the relevant information relating to operating leases in the
accounts of both the lessee and the lessor
3.14.05 Account for finance leases from the perspective of both the lessee
and the lessor
3.14.06 Disclose the relevant information relating to finance leases in the
accounts of both the lessee and the lessor
3.14.07 Account for manufacturer/dealer leases
3.14.08 Account for sale and leaseback transactions
3.14.09 Explain the term off-balance sheet finance and the importance of
substance over form
3.14.10 Explain how to determine whether an arrangement contains a lease
188
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
1 HKAS 17 Leases
Topic highlights
HKAS 17 covers the accounting for lease transactions by both lessees and lessors. A lease is a
contract for the hire of a specific asset.
A lease is a contract between a lessee and lessor for the hire of a specific asset. The lessor retains
ownership of the asset but conveys the right of the use of the asset to the lessee for an agreed
period of time in return for the payment of specified rentals.
189
Financial Reporting
Key terms
Lease. An agreement whereby the lessor conveys to the lessee in return for a payment or series of
payments the right to use an asset for an agreed period of time.
Finance lease. A lease that transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership
of an asset. Title may or may not eventually be transferred.
Operating lease. A lease other than a finance lease. (HKAS 17)
The classification of a lease as either finance or operating is therefore largely dependent upon the
transfer of risks and rewards. The next section explains what is meant by this term.
HKAS 17.7- 1.2.2 Risks and rewards
11
Risks are the risks of ownership, not other types of risk. These include:
possibility of losses from idle capacity
possibility of losses from technological obsolescence
variations in return due to changing economic conditions.
Rewards are represented by:
the expectation of profitable operation over the asset's economic life
unrestricted access to the asset
any gain from appreciation in value or realisation of a residual value.
HKAS 17 applies the same definitions and accounting principles to both lessees and lessors, but
the different circumstances of each may lead each to classify the same lease differently.
An assessment of risks and rewards may be inconclusive in deciding what type of lease a
particular arrangement is. In this instance, the standard provides examples of situations which
indicate an arrangement is a finance lease.
HKAS 17 provides the following examples of finance lease:
(a) The lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term.
(b) The lessee has the option to purchase the asset at a price which is expected to be
sufficiently lower than the fair value at the date the option becomes exercisable such that, at
the inception of the lease, it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised.
(c) The lease term is for the major part of the economic life of the asset even if title is not
transferred.
(d) At the inception of the lease the present value of the minimum lease payments amounts to at
least substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset.
(e) The leased assets are of a specialised nature such that only the lessee can use them
without major modifications being made.
There are also some indicators of situations which individually or in combination could also lead to
a lease being classified as a finance lease.
(a) If the lessee can cancel the lease, the lessor's losses associated with the cancellation are
borne by the lessee.
(b) Gains or losses from the fluctuation in the fair value of the residual fall to the lessee (e.g. in
the form of a rent rebate equalling most of the sales proceeds at the end of the lease).
(c) The lessee has the ability to continue the lease for a secondary period at a rent which is
substantially lower than market rent.
190
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Key terms
Minimum lease payments. The payments over the lease term that the lessee is or can be
required to make, excluding contingent rent, costs for services and taxes to be paid by and be
reimbursable to the lessor, together with:
(a) For a lessee, any amounts guaranteed by the lessee or by a party related to the lessee.
(b) For a lessor, any residual value guaranteed to the lessor by one of the following:
(i) The lessee
(ii) A party related to the lessee
(iii) An independent third party financially capable of meeting this guarantee.
However, if the lessee has the option to purchase the asset at a price which is expected to be
sufficiently lower than fair value at the date the option becomes exercisable for it to be reasonably
certain, at the inception of the lease, that the option will be exercised, the minimum lease payments
comprise the minimum payments payable over the lease term to the expected date of exercise of
this purchase option and the payment required to exercise it.
Interest rate implicit in the lease. The discount rate that, at the inception of the lease, causes the
aggregate present value of the:
(a) minimum lease payments, and
(b) unguaranteed residual value
to be equal to the sum of:
(a) the fair value of the leased asset
(b) any initial direct costs
Initial direct costs are incremental costs that are directly attributable to negotiating and
arranging a lease, except for such costs incurred by manufacturer or dealer lessors. Examples of
initial direct costs include amounts such as commissions, legal fees and relevant internal costs.
Lease term. The non-cancellable period for which the lessee has contracted to lease the asset
together with any further terms for which the lessee has the option to continue to lease the asset,
with or without further payment, when at the inception of the lease it is reasonably certain that the
lessee will exercise the option.
191
Financial Reporting
192
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Some of these definitions are only of relevance when we look at lessor accounting in section 3.
No
No
2 Lessee accounting
Topic highlights
Lessee accounting:
Operating leases: recognise rental expense on a straight line basis.
Finance leases: record an asset in the statement of financial position and a liability to pay
for it (at the lower of fair value of the asset or present value of minimum lease payments);
apportion the finance charge to give a constant periodic rate of return.
193
Financial Reporting
should be made annually in arrears for each of the three years of the lease in addition to an initial
non-refundable deposit of $1,500.
What expense is recognised in Flora Co.'s financial statements for the year ended 31 December
20X9?
Solution
Total amount payable $1,500 + (3 $2,500) = $9,000
Annual expense $9,000/3 years = $3,000
Expense for y/e 31 Dec 20X9 $3,000 3/12 = $750
Solution
Total amount payable ($5,000 4) – $2,000 = $18,000
Annual expense $18,000/4 years = $4,500
Expense for y/e 31 Dec 20X8 $4,500 5/12 = $1,875
194
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
A general description of the lessee's significant leasing arrangements including, but not
limited to, the following:
– Basis on which contingent rent payments are determined
– Existence and terms of renewal or purchase options and escalation clauses
Restrictions imposed by lease arrangements, such as those concerning dividends, additional debt,
and further leasing.
195
Financial Reporting
196
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
Interest is calculated as 15% of the outstanding capital balance at the beginning of each year. The
outstanding capital balance reduces each year by the capital element comprised in each instalment. The
outstanding capital balance at 1 January 20X5 is $5,710 ($7,710 fair value less $2,000 deposit).
Capital at Interest Capital at
Year 1 Jan 15% Instalment 31 Dec
$ $ $ $
20X5 5,710 856 2,000 4,566
20X6 4,566 685 2,000 3,251
20X7 3,251 488 2,000 1,739
20X8 1,739 261 2,000 –
2,290 8,000
In the above examples, repayments are made at the end of each reporting period i.e. in arrears. It
may be that repayments are made at the start of a reporting period, i.e. in advance, and in this
case the lease obligation table takes a slightly different format. The following example illustrates
this.
Example: Finance lease with payments in advance
Jesmond acquired an asset by way of a five-year term finance lease on 1 July 20X0. The asset had
a fair value of $102,500 and a useful life of five years and the lease contract required five equal
payments in advance of $25,000 each. The interest rate implicit in the lease is 11%. Jesmond’s
year end is 30 June.
Draw up the lease liability table for Jesmond for the whole five-year period, identifying amounts for
inclusion in the statement of profit or loss for the year ended 30 June 20X1.
Solution
B/f Repayment C/f Interest at C/f
11%
$ $ $ $ $
30.6.X1 102,500 (25,000) 77,500 8,525 86,025
30.6.X2 86,025 (25,000) 61,025 6,713 67,738
30.6.X3 67,738 (25,000) 42,738 4,701 47,439
30.6.X4 47,439 (25,000) 22,439 2,468 24,907
30.6.X5 24,907 (25,000)*
* There is a rounding difference of $93.
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 20X1 $
Depreciation ($102,500/5 years) 20,500
Finance cost 8,525
Note that in this example, interest is calculated after the repayment ie it is based on the amount
owed throughout a period. Therefore, the table includes items in a different order to that seen
previously.
197
Financial Reporting
Solution
The company's accounts for the first year of the lease, the year ended 31 December 20X0, would
include the information given below.
198
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 1
Potter leases an asset (as lessee) on 1 January 20X1, incurring $20,000 of costs in setting up the
agreement. Potter agrees to pay a non-refundable deposit of $58,000 on inception together with six
annual instalments of $160,000, payable in arrears.
Potter also guaranteed to the lessor that the lessor would receive at least $80,000 when the asset
is sold in the general market at the end of the lease term.
The fair value of the asset (equivalent to the present value of minimum lease payments) on
1 January 20X1 is $800,000. Its useful life to the company is five years.
The interest rate implicit in the lease has been calculated as 10%.
Required
(a) Prepare the relevant extracts from the financial statements of Potter in respect of the above
lease for the year ended 31 December 20X1.
(b) Explain what would happen at the end of the lease if the asset could be sold by the lessor:
(i) For $80,000
(ii) For only $60,000
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
199
Financial Reporting
Capitalising leases also raises the question of whether other executory contracts should be
treated similarly, for example contracts of employment.
(b) Complexity. Many small businesses will find that they do not have the expertise necessary
for carrying out the calculations required for capitalisation.
(c) Subjectivity. To some extent, capitalisation is a somewhat arbitrary process and this may
lead to a lack of consistency between companies.
(d) Presentation. The impact of leasing can be more usefully described in the notes to financial
statements. These can be made readily comprehensible to users who may not understand
the underlying calculations.
2.3 Recap
The following diagram gives a useful summary of the accounting treatment for a finance lease
by a lessee.
Accounting for a finance lease by a lessee
200
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
3 Lessor accounting
Topic highlights
Lessor accounting:
Operating leases: record as long-term asset and depreciate over useful life, record income
on a straight line basis over the lease term.
Finance leases: record the amount due from the lessee in the statement of financial position
at the net investment in the lease, recognise finance income to give a constant periodic rate
of return.
To a certain extent at least, the accounting treatment of leases adopted by lessors will be a mirror
image of that used by lessees.
HKAS 17.49-
53
3.1 Operating leases
3.1.1 Accounting treatment
Statement of financial position
An asset held by a lessor under an operating lease is treated as a long-term asset and
depreciation is recorded over its useful life. The depreciation basis should be the same as the
lessor's policy on similar non-lease assets which shall follow the guidance in HKAS 16.
In determining whether there is an impairment of the leased asset, the lessor should refer to the
issues discussed in HKAS 36.
Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
Income under an operating lease, excluding charges for services such as insurance and
maintenance, should be recognised over the period of the lease on a straight line basis. This is
so even if the receipts are not on such a basis, unless another systematic and rational basis is
identified as more representative of the time pattern in which the benefit from the leased asset is
receivable.
In accordance with HK(SIC)Int-15 Operating Leases – Incentives (see section 2.1.1), the lessor
should recognise the aggregate cost of incentives as a reduction of rental income over the lease
term, generally on a straight line basis.
Initial direct costs incurred by lessors in negotiating and arranging an operating lease should be
capitalised and amortised over the lease term. These costs are included in the carrying amount of
the leased asset and recognised as an expense over the lease term on the same basis as lease
income.
201
Financial Reporting
202
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
This net investment reduces over the period of the lease due to payments received; it will also
increase due to interest receivable. In other words, the movement is the direct opposite of the
movement seen in the finance lease obligation of a lessee:
$
Balance 1 January 20X8 60,000
Instalment 1 January 20X8 (11,000)
Balance c/f 49,000
Interest at 12.8% 6,272
Balance at 31 December 20X8 55,272
Instalment 1 January 20X9 (11,000)
Balance c/f 44,272
Therefore, in the statement of financial position of Hire Co., a current and non-current asset is
recognised.
Non-current asset: Net investment in finance lease $44,272
Current asset: Net investment in finance lease (55,272 – 44,272) $11,000
Interest receivable of $6,272 is recognised in the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income.
203
Financial Reporting
204
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
At the date of sale/inception of the lease
$ $
On the sale of the asset:
DEBIT Cash 1,320,000
CREDIT Asset 840,000
Deferred income 480,000
Solution
Agreement 1 Sale is for fair value and therefore a profit of $10,000 is recognised immediately
in profit or loss.
Agreement 2 Sale is for less than fair value however the loss is not compensated for by low
future rentals. Therefore, the loss of $5,000 is recognised immediately.
Agreement 3 Sale is for less than fair value and the loss is compensated for by low future
rentals. Therefore, the loss of $30,000 is recognised in the statement of financial
position and released to profit or loss over the lease term.
205
Financial Reporting
Agreement 4 Sale is for more than fair value. Therefore, a profit of $10,000 being the
difference between the fair value and carrying amount is recognised in profit or
loss immediately and the excess profit of $20,000 is recognised in the statement
of financial position and released to profit over the lease term.
Key term
Off-balance sheet finance is the funding or refinancing of a company's operations in such a way
that, under legal requirements and traditional accounting conventions, some or all of the finance
may not be shown in its statement of financial position.
"Off-balance sheet transactions" are transactions which meet the above objective. These
transactions may involve the removal of assets from the statement of financial position, as well as
liabilities, and they are also likely to have a significant impact on profit or loss.
206
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
sheet. Unfortunately, the position of the company is then misstated and the user of the accounts is
misled.
You must understand that not all forms of 'off-balance sheet finance' are undertaken for cosmetic
or accounting reasons. Some transactions are carried out to limit or isolate risk, to reduce interest
costs and so on. In other words, these transactions are in the best interests of the company, not
merely a cosmetic repackaging of figures which would normally appear in the statement of financial
position.
207
Financial Reporting
HK(SIC) Int-27 includes a list of indicators that collectively demonstrate that, in substance,
a separate investment account and lease payment obligations do not meet the definitions
of an asset and a liability and should not be recognised by the entity.
Other obligations of an arrangement, including any guarantees provided and obligations
incurred upon early termination, should be accounted for under HKAS 37 or HKAS
39/HKFRS 9, depending on the terms. Further, it agreed that the criteria in HKAS 18.20
should be applied to the facts and circumstances of each arrangement in determining when
to recognise a fee as income that an entity might receive.
(c) A series of transactions that involve the legal form of a lease is linked, and therefore should
be accounted for as one transaction, when the overall economic effect cannot be
understood without reference to the series of transactions as a whole.
208
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
7 Current developments
In August 2010, the IASB and American standards board, FASB, issued an Exposure Draft of a
new standard which is intended to replace IAS 17. It is highly likely that such a new standard will in
turn be adopted by the HKICPA and so replace HKAS 17.
The Exposure Draft proposes that there is no distinction between operating and finance leases,
and instead all leases are accounted for in the same way. A "right of use" approach is suggested
for both lessees and lessors; this would result in the recognition of a liability for payments and an
asset, being the right to use the underlying asset.
The IASB intends to re-expose the topic of leases during the course of 2013 and as yet there is no
target date for the issue of a new IFRS, and hence HKFRS.
209
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
HKAS 17 Leases
A lease that transfers substantially all of the A lease other than a finance lease
risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an
asset. Legal title may or may not pass at the
end of the lease term
Record asset and Record amount due Recognise rental Recognise non-
corresponding liability at from lessee at net expenditure on a current asset and
lower of fair value and investment in lease. straight line basis. depreciate.
PV of minimum lease
payments. Recognise finance Record income on
income to give constant a straight line basis
Depreciate asset over periodic rate of return. over the lease
shorter of lease term term.
and UL of asset. Manufacturers / dealers
recognise the difference
Allocate finance charge between cost of the
to give constant periodic asset and fair value as
rate of return (actuarial an outright sale.
method).
Profit or loss deferred and amortised over the lease Sale at FV Recognise profit/loss
term immediately
Sale > FV Defer excess profit
If substance is a secured loan record proceeds as a Sale < FV Recognise profit/loss
financial liability (HK(SIC)Int 27) immediately but defer any
loss where compensated
for by low future lease
payments
210
9: Leases | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 1
(a) Financial statement extracts
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X1
$
Depreciation [(800,000 + 20,000 – 80,000)/5)] 148,000
Finance costs (Working) 74,200
(ii) If the lessor is unable to sell the asset for the value guaranteed by the lessee, the
lessee has a liability to make up the difference of $80,000 – $60,000 = $20,000:
Recognise impairment loss on asset (as soon as known during the lease term):
$ $
DEBIT Profit or loss 20,000
CREDIT Leased asset 20,000
Make guaranteed payment to lessor and derecognise the asset and lease liability:
$ $
DEBIT Finance lease liability 80,000
CREDIT Cash 20,000
CREDIT Leased asset 60,000
211
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
212
chapter 10
Inventories
Topic list
Learning focus
Inventory and short-term work-in-progress valuation has a direct impact on a company's gross
profit and it is usually a material item in any company's accounts. This is therefore an
important subject area as far as the statement of profit or loss is concerned as there are
different accounting treatments for inventories.
213
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.06 Inventories 3
3.06.01 Scope and definition of HKAS 2 Inventories
3.06.02 Calculate the cost of inventories in accordance with HKAS 2
3.06.03 Use accepted methods of assigning costs including the allocation of
overheads to inventories
3.06.04 Explain the potential impact of net realisable value falling below
cost and make the required adjustments
3.06.05 Calculate and analyse variances in a standard costing system and
advise on the appropriate accounting treatment to be adopted in
respect of inventories
3.06.06 Prepare a relevant accounting policy note and other required
disclosures in respect of inventories
214
10: Inventories | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The inventory balance is significant to many companies both as an asset and due to its impact on
profits. The measurement of inventory, however, remains a highly subjective area and a number of
different methods may be used in practice.
HKAS 2 provides guidance on the measurement of inventory and its recognition as an expense.
Key terms
Inventories are assets:
held for sale in the ordinary course of business
in the process of production for such sale
in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the production process or in the
rendering of services
Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the
estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. (HKAS 2)
215
Financial Reporting
Key terms
Fixed production overheads are defined by the standard as those indirect costs of production
that remain relatively constant regardless of the volume of production such as depreciation and
maintenance of factory buildings and equipment and the cost of factory management and
administration.
Variable production overheads are defined as those indirect costs of production that vary
directly, or nearly directly, with the volume of production, such as indirect materials and labour.
216
10: Inventories | Part C Accounting for business transactions
When a production process results in the simultaneous production of more than one product, and
the costs of conversion are not separately identifiable, they should be allocated between products
on a rational and consistent basis. An example of an appropriate basis given in the standard is the
sales value of each product when complete.
HKAS 2.15- 1.4.3 Other costs
17
Other costs are included in the cost of inventories if they are incurred in bringing the inventories to
their present location and condition. Examples of such costs are non-production overheads and
the costs of designing products for specific customers. In limited circumstances, as identified by
HKAS 23, borrowing costs are also included in the cost of inventories.
The standard lists types of cost which would not be included in cost of inventories but should be
recognised as an expense in the period they are incurred:
(a) Abnormal amounts of wasted materials, labour or other production costs.
(b) Storage costs (except costs which are necessary in the production process before a further
production stage).
(c) Administrative overheads not incurred to bring inventories to their present location and
conditions.
(d) Selling costs.
217
Financial Reporting
218
10: Inventories | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS
2.23,25-27
1.6 Cost formulae
Topic highlights
Where inventory is not interchangeable, cost should be specifically identified. Where inventories
consist of interchangeable items, cost is assigned using the First in, First out (FIFO) or weighted
average formula.
Where items of inventory are not normally interchangeable or goods or services are produced and
segregated for specific projects, the cost of inventories should be specifically identified.
Where inventories consist of a number of interchangeable items, cost is assigned by using the
First In, First Out (FIFO) or weighted average cost formulae. Last In, First Out (LIFO) is not
permitted.
Under the weighted average cost method, a recalculation can be made after each purchase, or
alternatively only at the period end.
HKAS 2 requires that an entity should use the same cost formula for all inventories having
similar nature and use to the entity. For inventories with different nature or use (for example,
certain commodities used in one business segment and the same type of commodities used in
another business segment), different cost formulae may be justified. A difference in geographical
location of inventories (and in the respective tax rules), by itself, is not sufficient to justify the use of
different cost formulae.
219
Financial Reporting
Solution
FIFO
Sales
Opening stock 100 $2.00 5 September 75 units
18 September 25 units
3.9 Purchase 100 $2.30 18 September 55 units
29 September 45 units
10.9 Purchase 50 $2.35 29 September 50 units
25.9 Purchase 80 $2.40 29 September 5 units
Closing stock 75 units
Sales are matched to the earliest purchases such that closing stock is made up of 75 units
purchased on 25 September. Closing stock is therefore measured at $180 (75 units $2.40).
Weighted average (period end)
The weighted average cost of stocks during September is:
100 units $2.00 200.00
100 units $2.30 230.00
50 units $2.35 117.50
80 units $2.40 192.00
330 units 739.50
therefore weighted average cost per unit $2.24
Closing stock is therefore measured at $168 (75 units $2.24)
Weighted average (continuous)
Date Purchases Sales Balance Weighted average price
1.9 100 $2 100 $2
3.9 100 $2.30 200 100 $2 100 $2.30
$2.15
100 100
5.9 75 125 $2.15
10.9 50 $2.35 175 50 $2.35 125 $2.15
$2.21
50 125
18.9 80 95 $2.21
25.9 80 $2.40 175 80 $2.40 95 $2.21
$2.30
80 95
29.9 100 75 $2.30
Therefore, closing stock is measured at $172.50 (75 units × $2.30)
Topic highlights
NRV is the estimated selling price of an item of inventory less estimated costs to complete and sell
it.
Prudence requires that assets are not overstated. In the case of inventories, this means that they
should not be measured at an amount greater than the price that is expected to be realised from
their sale.
220
10: Inventories | Part C Accounting for business transactions
In some cases the cost of inventory may be greater than the amount for which it can be sold, for
example where:
goods are damaged or obsolete
the costs to completion have increased
the selling price has fallen
the goods are to be sold at a loss as part of a marketing strategy
production errors have led to increased costs.
In these cases, inventory is carried at the NRV which is less than cost.
Inventory is normally written down on an item by item basis, but sometimes it may be appropriate
to group similar or related items together. This grouping together is acceptable for, say, items in
the same product line, but it is not acceptable to write down inventories based on a whole
classification (e.g. finished goods) or a whole business.
The assessment of NRV should be based on the most reliable evidence available and should take
place at the same time as estimates are made of selling price. Fluctuations of price or cost should
be taken into account if they relate directly to events after the reporting period, which confirm
conditions existing at the end of the period.
The reasons why inventory is held should also be taken into account. For example, where
inventory is held to satisfy a firm contract, its NRV will be the contract price. Any additional
inventory of the same type held at the period end will, in contrast, be assessed according to
general sales prices when NRV is estimated.
At each period end, NRV must be reassessed and compared with cost. Where circumstances have
changed since the end of the previous period and there is a clear increase in NRV, then the
previous write down must be reversed to the extent that the inventory is then valued at the lower of
cost and the new NRV. This situation may arise when selling prices have fallen in the past and then
risen again.
On occasion a write down to NRV may be of such size, incidence or nature that it must be
disclosed separately.
221
Financial Reporting
Inventory must be valued line by line rather than as a whole, taking lower of cost and NRV in each
case:
$m
Product A (Cost) 4.0
Product B (NRV) 9.5
Product C (Cost) 8.0
Product D (NRV) 13.0
34.5
Self-test question 1
Ramsbottom Co. is a manufacturer of components used in the motor industry. It makes two
products, XX1 and ZZ2.
Certain parts of the production process give rise to indirect costs specifically identifiable with only
one of these products, although other costs are not separately identifiable.
Budgeted cost information for March 20X1 is as follows:
XX1 ZZ2 Total
Budgeted output 1,000 units 1,200 units
$ $ $
Direct cost 365,000 380,000 745,000
Indirect production overheads
Identifiable 65,000 55,000 120,000
Other 80,000
During the month, costs were incurred in line with the budget, but due to a failure of calibration to a
vital part of the process, only 1,050 units of ZZ2 could be taken into inventory. The remainder
produced had to be scrapped, for zero proceeds.
Ramsbottom allocates indirect costs which are not specifically identifiable to an individual product
by reference to relative selling prices. This results in 55% being allocated to XX1 and 45% to ZZ2.
Required
Calculate the cost attributable to each product.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
HKAS 2.36-
39
1.9 Disclosure requirements
HKAS 2 requires the financial statements to disclose the following:
(a) The accounting policies adopted in measuring inventories, including the cost formula used
(b) The total carrying amount of inventories and the carrying amount in classifications
appropriate to the entity
(c) The carrying amount of inventories carried at fair value less costs to sell
(d) The amount of inventories recognised as an expense during the period
(e) The amount of any write down of inventories to net realisable value recognised as expense
and in the period
(f) The amount of any reversal of any write down of inventories to net realisable value
recognised as reduction in “the amount of inventories recognised as an expense in the
period”
(g) The circumstance or events that led to the reversal of a write down of inventories
(h) The carrying amount of inventories pledged as security for liabilities.
222
10: Inventories | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Information about the carrying amounts held in different classifications of inventories and the extent
of the changes in these assets is useful to financial statement users. Common classifications of
inventories are merchandise, production supplies, materials, work in progress and finished goods.
The inventories of a service provider may be described as work in progress.
Some entities adopt a format for profit or loss that results in amounts being disclosed other than the
cost of inventories recognised as an expense during the period. Under this format, an entity
presents an analysis of expenses using a classification based on the nature of expenses. In this
case, the entity discloses the costs recognised as an expense for raw materials and consumables,
labour costs and other costs together with the amount of the net change in inventories for the
period.
223
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
HKAS 2 Inventories
Finished goods
Work in progress
Raw materials
Disclosures:
Accounting policies and cost formulae used
Carrying amount of inventories classified by type
Carrying amount of inventories measured at fair value less costs to sell
Inventories recognised as an expense in the period
Inventory write downs / reversal of write downs recognised in the period and circumstances that led to the
write down / reversal.
Carrying amount of inventories pledged as security
224
10: Inventories | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 1
The total cost attributable to XX1 is calculated as:
$365,000 + $65,000 + (55% $80,000) = $474,000
The cost per unit therefore being $474,000 / 1,000 = $474 each.
The total cost $474,000 attributable to XX1 can all be allocated to the inventories of XX1.
The total cost attributable to ZZ2 is:
$380,000 + $55,000 + (45% $80,000) = $471,000
The cost per unit therefore being $471,000 / 1,200 = $392.50 each.
The allocation of the cost for ZZ2 is therefore:
$392.50 1,050 = $412,125 as inventories
$392.50 150 = $58,875 as an expense
The indirect costs not specifically identifiable with either product which are allocated to the
scrapped ZZ2 cannot be recovered into the cost of XX1.
225
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
Lotto 9 minutes
After its end of year physical inventory count and valuation, the accounts staff of Lotto have
reached a valuation of $153,699 at cost for total inventories held at the year end.
However, on checking the figures, the chief bookkeeper has come across the following additional
facts.
(a) The count includes damaged goods which originally cost $2,885. These could be repaired at
a cost of $921 and sold for $3,600.
(b) The count excludes 300 units of item 730052 which were sold to a customer SC on a sale or
return basis, at a price of $8 each. The original cost of the units was $5 each. SC has not yet
indicated to Lotto whether these goods have been accepted, or whether they will eventually
be returned.
(c) The count includes 648 units of item 702422. These cost $7.30 each originally but because
of dumping on the market by overseas suppliers, a price war has flared up and the unit cost
price of the item has fallen to $6.50. The price reduction is expected to be temporary, lasting
less than a year or so, although some observers of the market predict that the change might
be permanent. Lotto has already decided that if the price reduction lasts longer than six
months, it will reduce its resale price of the item from $10.90 to about $10.
Required
Calculate the closing inventory figure for inclusion in the annual accounts of Lotto, making
whatever adjustments you consider necessary in view of items (a) to (c). Explain your treatment of
each item. (5 marks)
226
chapter 11
Provisions, contingent
liabilities and contingent
assets
Topic list
Learning focus
Accounting for uncertainty and contingencies requires some judgment and supporting
evidence in applying the accounting standards. You must learn the recognition criteria for
provisions and be able to apply them. You should also be able to advise the directors on the
implications for the financial statements of the changes proposed.
227
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.16 Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets 3
3.16.01 Define provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets within
the scope of HKAS 37
3.16.02 Distinguish provisions from other types of liabilities
3.16.03 Explain the criteria for recognition of provisions and apply them to
specific circumstances
3.16.04 Apply the appropriate accounting treatment for contingent assets
and liabilities
3.16.05 Disclose the relevant information relating to contingent liabilities in
the financial statements
3.16.06 Account for decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities and
their changes
3.16.07 Disclose the relevant information relating to contingent assets in the
financial statements
228
11: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
1.1 Objective
HKAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets aims to make sure that
provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets are being dealt with based on appropriate
recognition criteria and measurement bases. In addition, sufficient information should be
disclosed in the notes to the financial statements to enable users to understand their nature, timing
and amount.
Key terms
A provision is a liability of uncertain timing or amount.
A liability is a present obligation of the entity arising from past events, the settlement of which is
expected to result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying economic benefits.
A contingent liability is:
(a) a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only
by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly
within the control of the entity, or
(b) a present obligation that arises from past events but is not recognised because:
(i) it is not probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be
required to settle the obligation; or
(ii) the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.
A contingent asset is a possible asset that arises from past events and whose existence will be
confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not
wholly within the control of the entity.
(HKAS 37.10)
We shall meet more definitions as we consider the accounting treatment of provisions and
contingencies.
229
Financial Reporting
2 Provisions
Provisions are differentiated from other liabilities such as trade payables and accruals by the
HKICPA. The main difference is that there is uncertainty about the timing or amount of the future
expenditure for a provision. For certain accruals, uncertainty, though it exists, is generally much
less than for provisions.
HKAS 37 includes the criteria for recognising a provision as a liability in the statement of financial
position and also provides guidance for measuring such a provision. In addition, and due to the
subjective nature of the topic matter, it gives examples of common situations in which a provision
can be made.
HKAS 37 states that a provision should be recognised as a liability in the financial statements when:
an entity has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event;
it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required
to settle the obligation; and
a reliable estimate can be made of the obligation.
Some of these terms require further explanation, and this is given in the next two sections of the
chapter.
HKAS 37.17- 2.1.1 Obligation
22
A legal obligation is a fairly easy idea to understand: it is a duty to act in a certain way deriving from
a contract, legislation, or some other operation of the law.
You should note that an event which does not currently give rise to a legal obligation may do so at
a later date due to changes in the law. In this case the obligation arises when new legislation is
virtually certain to be enacted as drafted; in many cases this is impossible to ascertain before
actual enactment.
You may not know what a constructive obligation is.
Key term
HKAS 37 defines a constructive obligation as:
"An obligation that derives from an entity's actions where:
By an established pattern of past practice, published policies or a sufficiently specific current
statement, the entity has indicated to other parties that it will accept certain responsibilities,
and
As a result, the entity has created a valid expectation on the part of those other parties that it
will discharge those responsibilities."
The following question shows how this definition is applied and will help your understanding of a
constructive obligation.
230
11: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 1
(a) Black Gold Oil Co. drills for oil in locations worldwide. Mindful of the public perception of
such oil companies after recent disasters involving oil spills, Black Gold Oil Co. has recently
used press and television advertisements to promote its green credentials, and in particular,
has pledged to clean up any contamination that it causes.
In the year ended 31 December 2010, Black Gold Oil Co. causes extensive contamination in
a country in which there is no environmental legislation.
Does a constructive obligation exist at 31 December 2010?
(b) A well-known retailer is under legal obligation to refund money to customers who return
unwanted goods within a 28-day period. The retailer has announced a policy of extending
this return period to 60 days, and accordingly has printed this promise on its carrier bags.
Does the retailer have a present obligation as a result of a past event?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
In some instances, for example when a court case is underway, it is not clear whether there is a
present obligation. In these cases, all available evidence should be considered, and if it is more
likely than not that a present obligation exists at the reporting date, then a present obligation as a
result of a past event is deemed to exist.
HKAS 37.36-
38, 41
2.2 Measuring a provision
Topic highlights
The amount recognised as a provision should be the best estimate of the expenditure required to
settle the present obligation at the year end. This may be calculated using expected values when
the provision involves a large population of items.
The third criterion which must be met in order to recognise a provision is that a reliable estimate
can be made of the obligation.
HKAS 37 provides detailed guidance on how this estimate should be made. The overriding
requirement is that the amount recognised as a provision shall be the best estimate of the
expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period.
231
Financial Reporting
The standard goes on to say that this is the amount that an entity would pay to settle the obligation
or transfer it to a third party at the reporting date, even though a settlement or transfer at this time
will often be impossible or prohibitively expensive.
The estimates will be determined by the judgment of the entity's management supplemented by
the experience of similar transactions, and in some cases the reports from independent experts.
A provision should be measured before any related tax effect.
HKAS 37.40 2.2.1 Most likely outcome
Where a single obligation is being measured, the most likely outcome may be the best estimate of
the liability. HKAS 37 does, however, stipulate that all possible outcomes are considered and
where these are mostly higher (or mostly lower) than the expected outcome, the best estimate will
be higher (or lower).
Self-test question 2
Alice Co. sells goods with a warranty under which customers are covered for the cost of repairs of
any manufacturing defect that becomes apparent within the first six months of purchase. The
company's past experience and future expectations indicate the following pattern of likely repairs.
% of goods sold Defects Cost of repairs if all goods
suffered from the defect
$m
75 None –
20 Minor 1.0
5 Major 4.0
What is the expected cost of repairs?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
232
11: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS 37.53-
57
2.3 Reimbursements
Some or all of the expenditure needed to settle a provision may be expected to be recovered from
a third party through insurance contracts, indemnity clauses or supplier’s warranties. These
amounts may be reimbursed to the entity or paid directly to the party to who the amount is due.
If so, the reimbursement shall be recognised when, and only when, it is virtually certain that
reimbursement will be received if the entity settles the obligation.
Generally, however, the entity will remain liable for the amount due, and would be required to pay
all of this if the third party failed to pay. This is reflected in the accounting treatment:
A provision is recognised for the full amount of the liability.
The reimbursement should be treated as a separate asset, and the amount recognised
should not be greater than the provision itself.
The provision and the amount recognised for reimbursement may be netted off in the
statement of profit or loss.
In some cases the entity will not be liable for the costs if the third party fails to pay. In this case
these costs are not included in the provision.
HKAS 37.59-
60
2.4 Changes in provisions
Provisions should be reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted to reflect the current
best estimate. If it is no longer probable that a transfer of economic benefits will be required to
settle the obligation, the provision should be reversed.
Where the effect of the time value of money is significant, so that a provision has been measured
at present value, the discount is unwound each year with a resulting increase to the provision. This
increase is recognised as a finance cost in profit or loss.
HKAS 37.61-
62
2.5 Use of provisions
A provision should be used only to set off expenditure for which the provision was originally recognised.
It is not permitted to set off expenditure against a provision formerly organised for another purpose
since this would conceal the impact of two different events.
HKAS 37.63-
65
2.6 Common scenarios
2.6.1 Future operating losses
No provisions should be recognised for future operating losses which do not meet the definition of
a liability and the general recognition criteria stated in the standard.
Expected future operating losses may, however, be indication of the impairment of assets related
to that operation.
Key term
An onerous contract is a contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under
the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it. The unavoidable costs
under a contract reflect the least net cost of exiting from the contract, which is the lower of the cost
of fulfilling it and any compensation or penalties arising from failure to fulfil it. (HKAS 37.10)
233
Financial Reporting
If an entity has a contract that is onerous, the present obligation under the contract should be
recognised and measured as a provision.
A common example would be leasehold property which is vacated before the lease term ends. For
the remaining years of the lease, the cost of the property (future lease payments) exceeds the
benefits derived from the property (likely to amount to nil if it is to be left vacant). In this case,
provision should be made for the future unavoidable lease payments as at the date on which the
property is vacated. The provision is released as these payments are made in future years.
The provision is disclosed as current/non-current in accordance with HKAS 1. Practically this is
likely to mean that the total provision is split between the amount payable within one year and the
amount payable thereafter.
There is no obligation where cancellation of a contract does not result in the need to pay
compensation to another party.
HKAS 37.70- 2.6.3 Provisions for restructuring
83
One of the main purposes of HKAS 37 was to target abuses of provisions for restructuring.
Accordingly, HKAS 37 lays down strict criteria to determine when such a provision can be made.
Key term
HKAS 37 defines a restructuring as:
A programme that is planned and controlled by management and materially changes either:
the scope of a business undertaken by an entity, or
the manner in which that business is conducted
(HKAS 37.10)
The HKAS gives the following examples of events that may fall under the definition of
restructuring.
The sale or termination of a line of business
The closure of business locations in a country or region or the relocation of business
activities from one country or region to another
Changes in management structure, for example, the elimination of a layer of management
Fundamental reorganisations that have a material effect on the nature and focus of the
entity's operations
The question is whether or not an entity has an obligation at the year end. In respect of
restructuring, the standard states that there is a constructive obligation if:
the entity has a detailed formal plan for the restructuring, and
the entity has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the
restructuring by starting to implement that plan or announcing its main features to those
affected by it.
A mere management decision is not normally sufficient. Management decisions may
sometimes trigger off recognition, but only if earlier events such as negotiations with employee
representatives and other interested parties have been concluded subject only to management
approval.
When the sale of an operation is involved in the restructuring, HKAS 37 states that no obligation is
to be recognised until the entity has entered into a binding sale agreement. Until then, the entity
will be able to alter its decision and withdraw from the sale even if its intentions have been
announced publicly.
234
11: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The HKAS states that a restructuring provision should include only the direct expenditures arising
from the restructuring that are both:
necessarily entailed by the restructuring, and
not associated with the ongoing activities of the entity.
The following costs should specifically not be included within a restructuring provision:
Retraining or relocating continuing staff
Marketing
Investment in new systems and distribution networks
Future operating losses
Losses or gains on the expected disposal of assets
HKAS
37.84,85,92
2.7 Disclosure of provisions
Disclosures for provisions fall into two parts.
Disclosure of details of the change in carrying value of a provision from the beginning to
the end of the year, including:
– carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period
– additional provisions made in the period
– amounts incurred and charged against the provision in the period
– unused amounts reversed in the period
235
Financial Reporting
– the increase in the period in the discounted amount arising from the passage of time
and effect of any change in the discount rate
Note that comparative information is not required.
Disclosure of the background to the making of the provision and the uncertainties affecting
its outcome, including for each class of provision:
– a brief description of the nature of the obligation and expected timing of any resulting
outflows of economic benefits
– an indication of the uncertainties about the amount or timing of outflows
– the amount of any expected reimbursement stating the amount of any asset that has
been recognised for the expected reimbursement.
In very rare circumstances, such disclosure may prejudice seriously the position of the entity in a
dispute with other parties on the subject matter of the provision. In this case disclosure of the
above information is not required, however the following should be disclosed:
the general nature of the dispute
the fact that, and reason why, the information has not been disclosed.
Now you understand provisions it will be easier to understand contingent assets and liabilities.
236
11: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
In addition, the following should be provided for each class of contingent liability, where practicable:
An estimate of their financial effect
Details of any uncertainties relating to the amount or timing of the outflow
The possibility of any reimbursement
When determining classes of contingent liability, an entity should consider whether the nature of
items is sufficiently similar for aggregated amounts to fulfil the disclosure requirements.
Where a provision and contingent liability result from the same circumstances, an entity should
indicate the link between the provision and contingent liability.
In very rare circumstances, such disclosure may prejudice seriously the position of the entity in a
dispute with other parties on the subject matter of the contingent liability. In this case disclosure of
the above information is not required, however the following should be disclosed:
The general nature of the dispute
The fact that, and reason why, the information has not been disclosed.
3.3 Summary
The objective of HKAS 37 is to ensure that appropriate recognition criteria and measurement
bases are applied to provisions and contingencies and that sufficient information is disclosed.
The HKAS seeks to ensure that provisions are only recognised when a measurable
obligation exists. It includes detailed rules that can be used to ascertain when an obligation
exists and how to measure the obligation.
The standard attempts to eliminate the "profit smoothing" which has gone on before it was
issued.
237
Financial Reporting
Self-test question 3
Explain the accounting treatment required in the following scenarios at 31 December 20X0:
(a) Rango Co., a healthcare provider, has been informed that due to upcoming legislation, it is
required to fit carbon monoxide detectors in all of its properties at a cost of HK$40,000. Any
failure to do so by 30 September 20X1 will result in penalties of $5,000. Rango has not
undertaken the work by 31 December 20X0.
(b) Greenfingers Co. specialises in the sale of gardening equipment. As part of a strategy to
streamline operations, the company has decided to divest its plant division. A probable
purchaser has been identified, although no agreement has been reached by 31 December
20X0. Until an agreement has been formalised, the directors of Greenfingers will not advise
their employees of the divestment. Redundancy costs associated with the restructuring are
expected to be $120,000, and a further $50,000 will be spent on retraining certain staff
members to work in the furniture division of the company.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
You may wish to study the flow chart below, taken from HKAS 37, which is a good summary of its
requirements.
Self-test question 4
Cobo Co. manufactures goods which are sold with a one year warranty against defects.
(a) Should a provision be recognised for the cost of repairing faulty goods?
(b) Cobo Co.'s sales for the year are $40m. They anticipate that 60% of goods will not be faulty,
30% will need minor repairs that would cost $2m if all items were affected and 10% of goods
will need major repairs that would cost $4m if all items were affected. How much should be
provided for repairs?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
238
11: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
239
Financial Reporting
5 Current developments
The IASB and FASB added a project on Liabilities to their active agenda in 2002 and issued an
Exposure Draft in 2005; the topic was re-exposed in 2010.
The ED proposed the following:
The "probable" recognition criterion is removed, and instead uncertainty is reflected in the
measurement of a liability i.e. through use of a probability-weighted average of the outflows
for the range of possible outcomes.
A liability is measured at the amount an entity would pay at the end of a reporting period to
be relieved of the present obligation. This should be determined as:
– the present value of the resources required to fulfil the obligation, or
– the amount an entity would have to pay to cancel the obligation, or
– the amount an entity would have to pay to transfer the obligation to a third party.
If the liability is to pay cash to a counterparty, the outflows would be any expected cash
payments plus associated costs.
If the liability is to undertake a service at a future date, the outflows would be the amounts
that the entity estimates it would pay a contractor at the future date to undertake the service
on its behalf.
The effects of these proposals would include the recognition of far more provisions than at present,
and where these are measured by reference to third party payment, a profit margin would be
included so increasing the amount of the provision.
The project was deferred in 2010 and added to the IASB’s research programme in 2012. The
issues will now be considered in conjunction with the Conceptual Framework work on elements
and measurement and a discussion paper is expected on this during the course of 2013.
240
11: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Topic recap
HKAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets
Provisions Contingencies
Liability of uncertain timing and/or amount Liability of uncertain timing and/or amount Contingent asset
Recognise if: Possible obligation that arises from past Possible asset arising from past events
present obligation (legal or events and whose existence will be whose existence will be confirmed by
constructive) as the result of a past confirmed by uncertain future events uncertain future events
event Or
probable outflow of economic benefits Present obligation arising from past
reliable estimate can be made of the events which is not recognised because:
obligation (i) outflow is not probable
(ii) amount can't be reliably
measured
Measure at:
best estimate of expenditure Do not recognise unless virtually certain
use expected values for a large (in which case not a contingent asset)
Do not recognise
population of items
discount if the time value of money is
material
Disclose: Disclose the following unless the outflow Disclose where probable inflow:
Reconciliation of the carrying value of of resources is remote: description of contingency
provisions at the start of the period to Description of contingency estimate of financial effect
that at the end Estimate of financial effect
Background to the provision Details of uncertainties
Possibility of reimbursement
241
Financial Reporting
Answer 1
(a) Black Gold Oil Co. has a constructive obligation, as the advertising campaign has created a
valid expectation on the part of those affected by it that the entity will clean up the
contamination it has caused.
(b) The retailer has a legal obligation to refund money for unwanted goods within a 28-day
period after the sale, and a constructive obligation to provide refunds for 32 days beyond
this.
The past event is the sale, and therefore the retailer has a present obligation as a result of a
past event.
Answer 2
The cost is found using "expected values" (75% $NIL) + (20% $1.0m) + (5% $4.0m) =
$400,000
Answer 3
(a) At 31 December 20X0, there is no legal obligation to fit the carbon monoxide detectors, and
therefore Rango should not make a provision for either the cost of doing so or the fines
which would be incurred if it were in breach of the legislation.
If Rango has still not fitted the detectors at the 20X1 year end (i.e. when the legislation is in
force), then it should make a provision for the penalty of $5,000 for which it is liable (rather
than the $40,000 cost of fitting the detectors). This is because there is still no obligation for
the costs of fitting detectors because no obligating event has occurred (the fitting of the
detectors). However, an obligation might arise to pay fines or penalties under the legislation
because the obligating event has occurred (the non-compliant operation of Rango).
(b) Greenfingers is planning a restructuring of its business. A provision in respect of
restructuring can only be made when a year-end obligation is evidenced by a detailed formal
plan and an expectation on the part of those affected that the restructuring will happen. As at
31 December 20X0, the employees of Greenfingers are unaware of the plan and therefore
this criterion is not met. Therefore, no provision can be made.
If a provision could be made (i.e. if the sale had been announced to employees, so giving
rise to a valid expectation that the restructuring will occur and thus creating a constructive
obligation) then provision would be for the $120,000 redundancy costs but not the $50,000
retraining costs.
Answer 4
(a) Yes. Cobo Co. cannot avoid the expenditure on repairing faulty goods.
A provision should be made for the estimated cost of repairs.
(b) The cost of the provision is found using expected values: (60% $0m) + (30% $2m) +
(10% $4) = $1m.
242
11: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Exam practice
243
Financial Reporting
244
chapter 12
Construction contracts
Topic list
Learning focus
Long-term contracts are an everyday part of business in many industry sectors, particularly
construction. You should be able to advise a client how this type of contract is accounted for
and why.
245
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.07 Construction contracts 3
3.07.01 Define a construction contract
3.07.02 Explain when contract revenue and costs should be recognised in
accordance with HKAS 11
3.07.03 Explain how contract revenue and costs should be measured and
apply these principles
3.07.04 Account for the expected loss and changes in estimates
3.07.05 Disclose information related to construction contracts in the
financial statements
246
12: Construction contracts | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
(a) If profits are deferred until the completion of the contract in 20X2, the revenue and profit
recognised on the contract in 20X1 would be nil, and the value of work in progress on
31 December 20X1 would be the costs incurred of $800,000.
$'000 $'000
DEBIT Work-in-progress 800
CREDIT Cash 800
HKAS 11 takes the view that this policy is unreasonable, because in 20X2, the total profit of
$400,000 would be recorded. Since the contract revenues are earned throughout 20X1 and
20X2, a profit of nil in 20X1 and $400,000 in 20X2 would be contrary to the accruals concept
of accounting.
247
Financial Reporting
(b) It is fairer to recognise revenue and profit throughout the duration of the contract.
As at 31 December 20X1 revenue of $1,000,000 should be matched with cost of sales of
$800,000 in the statement of profit or loss, leaving an attributable profit for 20X1 of
$200,000.
$'000 $'000
DEBIT Account receivable 1,000
Cost of sales 800
CREDIT Sales 1,000
Cash 800
The only entry in the statement of financial position as at 31 December 20X1 is a receivable
of $1,000,000 recognising that the company is owed this amount for work done to date. No
balance remains for work in progress, the whole $800,000 having been recognised in cost of
sales.
Key terms
Construction contract. A contract specifically negotiated for the construction of an asset or a
combination of assets that are closely interrelated or interdependent in terms of their design,
technology and function or their ultimate purpose or use.
A fixed price contract is a construction contract in which the contractor agrees to a fixed contract
price, or a fixed rate per unit of output, which in some cases is subject to cost escalation clauses.
A cost plus contract is a construction contract in which the contractor is reimbursed for allowable
or otherwise defined costs, plus a percentage of these costs or a fixed fee.
(HKAS 11)
248
12: Construction contracts | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
Year 1 $9 million
Year 2 $9.5 million
Year 3 $9.5 million
249
Financial Reporting
250
12: Construction contracts | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
$'000
Surveyors’ fees 12
Direct labour costs 134
Overheads (35% $134,000) 46.9
Materials (250,000 – 76,000) 174
Transport of heavy plant to site 10
Depreciation of heavy plant (5/12 10% $90,000) 3.75
380.65
251
Financial Reporting
One of the criteria listed above which indicates that the outcome of a fixed price contract can be
estimated reliably is that the stage of contract completion can be reliably measured.
How should you decide on the stage of completion of any contract? The standard lists several
methods:
Proportion of contract costs incurred for work carried out to date
Surveys of work carried out
Physical proportion of the contract work completed
The proportion that contract costs incurred for work performed to date bear to the estimated total
contract costs:
Costs incurred to date WIP inventories
% on total costs = 100%
Total costs variation
Surveys of work performed, or physical proportion of the contract work completed:
Work certified
% on work performed = 100%
Total revenue variation
252
12: Construction contracts | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
$
Costs incurred to date (389 – 10) 379,000
Estimated future costs (150 + 10) 160,000
Total estimated costs 539,000
The contract is therefore 70.3% (379,000/539,000) complete
Revenue to be recognised: $890,000 70.3% = $625,670
The profit earned to date is therefore $246,670 ($625,670 – $379,000)
What amounts should be included in Discovery Construction’s financial statements for each of
these years?
Solution
1 Calculate expected profit
20X3 20X4 20X5
$'000 $'000 $'000
Contract price – estimated 800 700 700
total costs
2 Calculate percentage of completion
Costs incurred/total costs 37.5% 75% 100%
3 Calculate cumulative statement of profit or loss amounts
Revenue (% complete 1,500 3,000 4,000
revenue)
Cost of sales (costs incurred) (1,200) (2,475) (3,300)
Profit (% complete 300 525 700
expected profit)
253
Financial Reporting
4 Calculate statement of profit or loss amounts for each year (cumulative amounts minus
amounts previously recognised)
$'000 $'000 $'000
Revenue 1,500 1,500 1,000
Cost of sales (1,200) (1,275) (825)
Profit 300 225 175
It is evident from the first example above that when the contract costs incurred to date is used to
determine the stage of completion, then only the contract costs reflecting the work to date should
be incorporated in costs incurred to date.
Costs relating to future activity, e.g. cost of materials delivered but not yet used, are to be
excluded.
Payments in advance made to subcontractors are to be excluded.
Topic highlights
When the outcome of a contract can be reliably estimated and the project is loss-making, the loss
must be recognised in the current year in full.
Any loss on a contract should be recognised as soon as it is foreseen. The loss will be the
amount by which total expected contract revenue is exceeded by total expected contract costs.
The amount of the loss is not affected by:
whether work has started on the contract
the stage of completion of the work
profits on other contracts (unless they are related contracts treated as a single contract).
Solution
The expected loss of $100,000 must be recognised in full, and forms part of cost of sales.
Therefore:
$'000
Revenue (balancing figure) 1,988
Cost of sales (28% $7.1m) + $100,000 (2,088)
Loss (100)
254
12: Construction contracts | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS 11.32-
34
2.3 Accounting treatment: outcome cannot be reliably estimated
Topic highlights
When the outcome of a contract cannot be reliably estimated no profit or loss is recognised;
revenue is recognised to the extent that recognised costs incurred are recoverable.
When the contract's outcome cannot be reliably estimated the following treatment should be
followed:
1 Contract costs are recognised as an expense as incurred
2 Revenue is recognised to the extent that contract costs are recoverable
This no profit/no loss approach reflects the situation near the beginning of a contract, i.e. the
outcome cannot be reliably estimated, but it is likely that costs will be recovered.
Contract costs which cannot be recovered should be recognised as an expense straight away.
HKAS 11 lists the following situations where this might occur:
The contract is not fully enforceable, i.e. its validity is seriously in question
The completion of the contract is subject to the outcome of pending litigation or legislation
The contract relates to properties which will probably be expropriated or condemned
The customer is unable to meet its obligations under the contract
The contractor cannot complete the contract or in any other way meet its obligations under
the contract
Where these uncertainties cease to exist, contract revenue and costs should be recognised as
normal, i.e. by reference to the stage of completion.
255
Financial Reporting
Yes
Yes
Yes
256
12: Construction contracts | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS
11.43,44
2.5 Construction contracts in the statement of financial
position
The accounting treatment of construction contracts is profit or loss driven. Any amount included in
the statement of financial position is a balancing amount, calculated as:
Contract costs incurred X
Recognised profits less recognised losses X/(X)
Progress billings (X)
Amounts due from/to customers X/(X)
Where an amount due from customers is calculated, this is normally shown within inventories.
Where an amount due to customers is calculated, this is normally shown as ''payments on
account'' within payables.
Any amount invoiced but unpaid is shown as a receivable.
(W) $'000
Contract costs incurred 1,988
Recognised profits less recognised losses (100)
Progress billings (1,500)
Amounts due from customers 388
257
Financial Reporting
The 20X6 contract costs incurred to date include $200,000 which relates to additional work
required for unforeseen extras. In 20X6 the contractor negotiated with the customer to recover the
cost of this additional work, but it was not until 20X7 that it became probable that the customer
would accept this contract variation.
Required
What amounts should be recognised in profit or loss in each of the three years?
Solution
$'000
20X5 25% expected profit of $148,000 37
$'000
20X7 Overall actual profit 80
Add: cumulative loss previously recognised 100
Profit recognised in 20X7 180
258
12: Construction contracts | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 1
At the start of 20X1 Globalle Company negotiated a fixed price contract of $14.0 million with
Oceanic for the construction of a container port. Globalle had estimated the costs of the contract to
be $13.3 million. Globalle estimates the stage of completion on its construction contracts by
reference to the physical proportion of the work completed.
During 20X1 the contract suffered protracted delays and difficulties, such that Globalle concluded
that there would be material cost overruns. It negotiated with Oceanic to try to get some
recompense for these unexpected difficulties in the form of contract variations, but without success.
At 31 December 20X1 when the contract was 30% physically complete, the costs incurred
amounted to $4.9 million and the costs to complete were estimated at $11.2 million.
Throughout 20X2 Globalle continued to try to win recompense from Oceanic, but without success. At 31
December 20X2 when the contract was 80% physically complete, the costs incurred amounted to $12.6
million and the costs to complete were estimated at $3.5 million. On that day and after these figures had
been drafted, Oceanic suddenly agreed in principle to a contract variation of $3.5 million, provided that
Globalle agreed to pay Oceanic a penalty for late completion of $280,000. Globalle agreed to these
terms and the relevant adjustments were made to the draft figures.
Required
Determine the following amounts in respect of the container port contract in Globalle’s financial
statements according to HKAS 11 Construction Contracts.
(a) The profit or loss to be recognised in the year ended 31 December 20X1
(b) The revenue to be recognised in the year to 31 December 20X2
(c) The profit or loss to be recognised in the year ended 31 December 20X2
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
259
Financial Reporting
Self-test question 2
Aero Company has the following information in respect of a construction contract:
Total contract price $100,000
Cost incurred to date $48,000
Estimated cost to completion $32,000
Progress billings
(of which $50,000 has been received) $58,000
Percentage complete (cost basis) 60%
Required
(a) Prepare relevant extracts from the statement of profit or loss and statement of financial
position.
(b) Show how the statement of financial position would differ if progress billings were $64,000
(of which $50,000 received).
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
3 Current developments
The IASB and FASB issued an Exposure Draft in relation to revenue recognition in June 2010. It is
proposed that the resulting standard will replace both IAS 18 Revenue and IAS 11 Construction
Contracts (and so their HKAS equivalents).
A revised exposure draft on the topic of revenue from contracts with customers was issued in
November 2011, which simplifies a number of the original proposals. A final standard is expected during
the course of 2013.
This project is considered in more detail in Chapter 14.
260
12: Construction contracts | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Topic recap
Cost plus contract: contract in Contract specifically negotiated for the Fixed price contract: contract with
which the contractor is reimbursed construction of an asset or combination of a fixed price sometimes subject to
for costs plus a percentage of costs interrelated assets cost escalation clauses
or fixed fee
For a cost plus contract: Accounting treatment depends on whether For a fixed price contract:
Probable economic benefits will the outcome of the contract can be Contract revenue can be
flow to the entity reliably estimated reliably measured
Contract costs can be clearly Probable economic benefits
identified and measured will flow to entity
Stage of completion of contract
reliably measured
Costs to complete reliably
measured
Contract costs can be clearly
identified and measured
Disclose:
Revenue recognised in period
Methods to determine revenue recognised
Methods to determine stage of completion
Costs incurred plus recognised profits (less recognised losses) to date
Advances received
Retentions
Amounts due from/to customers:
Costs incurred x
Recognised profits/losses x/(x)
Progress billings (x)
x/(x)
261
Financial Reporting
Answer 1
(a) $(2,100,000)
(b) $9,576,000
(c) $2,996,000
Profit / loss on contract 20X1 20X2
$'000 $'000
Contract price 14,000 14,000
Variation – 3,500
Penalty – (280)
14,000 17,220
Costs incurred to date (4,900) (12,600)
Estimated costs to completion (11,200) (3,500)
Profit / loss on contract (2,100) 1,120
262
12: Construction contracts | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 2
(a) STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS (EXTRACTS) $
Profit 12,000
WORKING
Current assets
Trade receivables
Progress billings to date 64,000
Less: cash received (50,000)
14,000
Current liabilities
Gross amounts due to customers
Contract costs incurred to date 48,000
Recognised profits 12,000
60,000
Less: progress billings to date (64,000)
(4,000)
263
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
264
chapter 13
Share-based payment
Topic list
Learning focus
265
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.05 Share-based payment 2
3.05.01 Identify and recognise share-based payment transactions in
accordance with HKFRS 2
3.05.02 Account for equity-settled and cash-settled share-based payment
transactions
3.05.03 Account for share-based payment transactions with cash
alternatives
3.05.04 Account for unidentified goods or services in a share-based
payment transaction
3.05.05 Account for group and treasury share transactions
3.05.06 Disclosure requirement of share option
266
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
1.1 Introduction
It is increasingly common for entities to issue shares or share options to other parties, such as
suppliers or employees, in return for goods or services received. In some instances neither shares
nor share options are issued, but cash consideration is promised at a later date, measured in
relation to share price. All of these transactions are examples of share-based payments.
Share option schemes are a common feature of directors’ remuneration packages and many
organisations also use such schemes to reward other employees. Share-based payments are also
a very common form of consideration for internet businesses which are notoriously loss making in
early years and therefore cash poor.
1.1.1 The accounting problem
Prior to the issue of HKFRS 2, no accounting guidance existed in relation to share-based
payments. This resulted in inconsistent treatment of expenses: those paid in cash were recognised
in profit or loss while those involving a share-based payment were not, because share options
initially had no value (since the exercise price is generally more than the market price of the share
on the date the option is granted).
As we shall see in this chapter, the issue of HKFRS 2 meant that companies were required to
recognise an expense in relation to share-based payments. As a result those companies which
made share-based payments saw a reduction in earnings, in some cases of a significant amount.
For this reason, HKFRS 2 remains controversial in practice.
267
Financial Reporting
(b) The issue of equity instruments in exchange for control of another entity in a business
combination, or business under common control or the contribution of a business on the
formation of a joint venture.
HKFRS 2,
Appendix A
1.3 Definitions
The standard provides the following definitions.
Key terms
Share-based payment transaction is a transaction in which the entity:
(a) receives goods or services from the supplier of those goods or services (including an
employee) in a share-based payment arrangement, or
(b) incurs an obligation to settle the transaction with the supplier in a share-based payment
arrangement when another group entity receives those goods or services.
Share-based payment arrangement is an agreement between the entity (or another group entity)
and another party (including an employee) that entitles the other party to receive:
(a) cash or other assets of the entity for amounts that are based on the price (or value) of equity
instruments (including shares or share options) of the entity or another group entity, or
(b) equity instruments (including shares or share options) of the entity or another group entity
provided the specified vesting conditions are met.
Equity instrument is a contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after
deducting all of its liabilities.
Equity instrument granted is the right (conditional or unconditional) to an equity instrument of the
entity conferred by the entity on another party, under a share-based payment arrangement.
Share option is a contract that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to subscribe to the
entity's shares at a fixed or determinable price for a specified period of time.
Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, a liability settled, or an equity
instrument granted could be exchanged, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length
transaction.
Grant date is the date at which the entity and another party (including an employee) agree to a
share-based payment arrangement, being when the entity and the other party have a shared
understanding of the terms and conditions of the arrangement. At the grant date the entity confers
on the other party (the counterparty) the right to cash, other assets, or equity instruments of the
entity, provided the specified vesting conditions, if any, are met. If that agreement is subject to an
approval process (for example, by shareholders), the grant date is the date when that approval is
obtained.
Intrinsic value is the difference between the fair value of the shares to which the counterparty has
the (conditional or unconditional) right to subscribe or which it has the right to receive, and the price
(if any) the other party is (or will be) required to pay for those shares. For example, a share option
with an exercise price of $15 on a share with a fair value of $20, has an intrinsic value of $5.
268
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Note that the definition of fair value within HKFRS 2 differs from that within HKFRS 13 Fair Value
Measurement. When applying HKFRS 2, the definition contained within that standard should be
used rather than HKFRS 13.
269
Financial Reporting
Solution
Equity-settled transactions with employees are measured by reference to the fair value of the
equity instruments granted on the grant date.
Therefore 100 options 1,000 employees $8 = $800,000
270
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
As we saw earlier, the total fair value for the share options issued at grant date is:
$8 1,000 employees 100 options = $800,000
(a) In this situation the options vest immediately i.e. the employees are immediately entitled to
them. It is therefore assumed that Barbar has already benefited from the services provided
by the employees in exchange for the options. Barbar Co. should therefore charge $800,000
to profit or loss as employee remuneration on 1 July 20X1 and the same amount will be
recognised as part of equity on that date.
(b) In the second situation, the options do not vest until two years have passed, and they only
vest for those employees who continue to work for Barbar at this date.
It is assumed that all employees will continue to work for Barbar.
271
Financial Reporting
Therefore in this case the $800,000 is spread over the two years ended 30 June 20X2 and
20X3 with $400,000 recognised as an expense and in equity in each year:
20X2 20X3
$ $
Remuneration expense in profit or loss 400,000 400,000
Equity 400,000 800,000
This ensures that the expense associated with the share-based payment is matched to the
period in which Barbar benefits from the employees’ services.
We shall consider in later examples how this might differ if some employees left Barbar Co.
before the vesting date.
Solution
The total expense to be recognised over the three-year vesting period is:
200 500 $8 = $800,000
Note that the changes in the value of the options after grant date do not affect the charge to profit
or loss for equity-settled transactions.
The remuneration expense should be recognised over the vesting period of three years. An amount
of $266,667 should be recognised for each of the three years 20X1, 20X2 and 20X3 in profit or loss
with a corresponding credit to equity.
272
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
The expense to be recognised in each year in relation to the share options over the vesting period
is based on the estimated number of shares expected to vest. As options held by employees who
leave the company will not vest, these must be excluded from the amount recognised. Therefore:
Total expense
20X1 200 managers 90% 500 options $8 fair value $720,000
This is divided by the three-year vesting period to give an annual expense in 20X1 of $240,000
20X2 200 managers 86% 500 options $8 fair value $688,000
To date two years of expense should have been recognised i.e. $688,000 2/3 $458,667
As $240,000 was recognised in 20X1, the 20X2 expense is $458,667 – $240,000 $218,667
20X3 200 managers 80% 500 options $8 fair value $640,000
All expense should now have been recognised as the vesting period is complete.
Therefore in 20X3 the expense is $640,000 – $240,000 – $218,667 $181,333
Self-test question 1
Armley Co. issues 10,000 options to each of the 50 directors and senior managers on 1 July 20X1.
The exercise price of the options is $4.50 per share. The scheme participants have to stay with the
company for four more years before being able to exercise their options.
At 31 December 20X1, it is estimated that 75% of the current directors and senior managers will
remain with the company for four years or more. The estimated figure is 70% by 31 December
20X2.
The fair value of an option is $3 at the grant date.
Required
Show how the option scheme would be reflected in the financial statements for the years ended
31 December 20X1 and 31 December 20X2.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Self-test question 2
An entity grants 100 share options on its $1 shares to each of its 500 employees on 1 January
20X5. Each grant is conditional upon the employee working for the entity over the next three years.
The fair value of each share option as at 1 January 20X5 is $15.
On the basis of a weighted average probability, the entity estimates on 1 January that 20% of
employees will leave during the three-year period and therefore forfeit their rights to share options.
Required
Show the accounting entries which will be required over the three-year period in the event of the
following:
20 employees leave during 20X5 and the estimate of total employee departures over the
three-year period is revised to 15% (75 employees)
22 employees leave during 20X6 and the estimate of total employee departures over the
three-year period is revised to 12% (60 employees)
273
Financial Reporting
15 employees leave during 20X7, so a total of 57 employees left and forfeited their rights to
share options. A total of 44,300 share options (443 employees 100 options) are vested at
the end of 20X7.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
274
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKFRS
2.31,32
2.2 Cash-settled share-based payment transactions
Topic highlights
Cash-settled share-based payment transactions are recognised as a liability and measured at the
fair value of that liability. They are remeasured at the end of each reporting period.
275
Financial Reporting
Each scheme issued will result in payment, subject to the conditions outlined, equal to the value of
10 shares at the end of the three-year period if the conditions are satisfied. The payments, once
earned, are irrevocable.
The Chief Operating Officer has been issued 20 such schemes.
The share prices over the next three years were as follows:
31 December 20X1 $4.20
31 December 20X2 $3.80
31 December 20X3 $4.40
Required
(a) Prepare the journal entries for the transactions of the share incentives issued to the Chief
Operating Officer.
(b) Assuming that on 1 January 20X1 four other individuals were also granted equivalent rights
to the Chief Operating Officer and that on 1 January 20X2, two of those individuals left the
company, prepare the journal entries for the transactions relating to the incentive schemes.
Solution
(a) Journal entries for transactions: Chief Operating Officer
The transactions are settled in cash and hence liabilities are created.
31 December 20X1 $ $
DEBIT Remuneration expense 280
CREDIT Remuneration liability 280
It is assumed that the current share price is the best estimate of the final share price.
(calculation note: 20 10 $4.20 1/3 = $280)
31 December 20X2
DEBIT Remuneration liability 280
CREDIT Remuneration expense 280
Reverses entries for 20X1 as share price is less than minimum
31 December 20X3
DEBIT Remuneration expense 880
CREDIT Remuneration liability 880
DEBIT Remuneration liability 880
CREDIT Cash 880
(calculation note: 20 10 $4.40 3/3 = $880)
(b) Journal entries for transactions: all individuals
31 December 20X1 $ $
DEBIT Remuneration expense 1,400
CREDIT Remuneration liability 1,400
(calculation note: 20 10 5 $4.20 1/3 = $1,400)
31 December 20X2:
DEBIT Remuneration liability 1,400
CREDIT Remuneration expense 1,400
31 December 20X3
DEBIT Remuneration expense 2,640
CREDIT Remuneration liability 2,640
DEBIT Remuneration liability 2,640
CREDIT Cash 2,640
(calculation note: 20 10 3 $4.40 3/3 = $2,640)
276
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Accounting for share-based transactions with a choice of settlement depends on which party has
the choice.
Where the counterparty has a choice of settlement, the entity is deemed to have granted a
compound instrument, and a liability component and an equity component are identified.
Where the entity has a choice of settlement, the whole transaction is treated either, as cash-
settled or as equity-settled, depending on whether the entity has an obligation to settle in
cash.
HKFRS 2.3.1 Counterparty has choice of settlement
2.35,36,38
Where the counterparty to the transaction has a choice of settlement, a compound instrument has
been granted i.e. a debt and equity component must be identified.
Where the transaction is with parties other than employees and the fair value of the goods or
services received is measured directly, the entity shall measure the equity component of the
compound financial instrument as the difference between the fair value of the goods or
services received and the fair value of the debt component, at the date when the goods or
services are received.
Where the transaction is with employees, the fair value of the compound instrument is estimated as
a whole. The debt and equity components must then be valued separately. Normally transactions
are structured in such a way that the fair value of each alternative settlement is the same.
The entity is required to account separately for the goods or services received or acquired in
respect of each component of the compound financial instrument. The debt component is
accounted for in the same way as a cash-settled share-based payment. The equity component is
recognised in the same way as an equity-settled share-based payment.
HKFRS 2.41- 2.3.2 Entity has choice of settlement
43
Where the entity chooses what form the settlement will take, a liability should be recognised to the
extent that there is a present obligation to deliver cash.
This is the case where, for example, the entity is prohibited from issuing shares or where it has a
stated policy, or past practice, of issuing cash rather than shares.
Where a present obligation exists, the entity should record the transaction as if it is a cash-settled
share-based payment transaction.
If no present obligation exists, the entity should treat the transaction as if it was purely an equity-
settled transaction. On settlement, if the transaction was treated as an equity-settled transaction
and cash was paid, the cash should be treated as if it was a repurchase of the equity instrument by
a deduction against equity.
277
Financial Reporting
The market price of the entity's shares is $310 at the date of grant, $370 at the end of 20X7, $430
at the end of 20X8 and $520 at the end of 20X9, at which time the employee elects to receive the
shares. The entity estimates the fair value of the share route to be $290. Show the accounting
treatment.
Solution
This arrangement results in a compound financial instrument.
The fair value of the cash route is:
9,000 $310 = $2.79m
The fair value of the share route is:
10,000 $290 = $2.90m
The fair value of the equity component is therefore:
$110,000 ($2,900,000 less $2,790,000)
The share-based payment is recognised as follows:
Liability Equity Expense
$ $ $
20X7 1/3 9,000 $370 1,110,000 1,110,000
$110,000 1/3 36,667 36,667
20X8 2/3 9,000 $430 2,580,000 1,470,000
$110,000 1/3 36,667 36,667
20X9 9,000 $520 4,680,000 2,100,000
$110,000 1/3 36,666 36,666
As the employee elects to receive shares rather than cash, $4,680,000 is transferred from liabilities
to equity at the end of 20X9. The balance on equity is $4,790,000.
278
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Classification
Obligation to
Entity settle share- Subsidiary's
receiving based individual Consolidated
goods and payment financial financial
services transaction How is it settled? statements statements
279
Financial Reporting
Classification
Obligation to
Entity settle share- Subsidiary's
receiving based individual Consolidated
goods and payment financial financial
services transaction How is it settled? statements statements
*The same classification will result if the settlement obligation lies with the shareholders or another
group entity (e.g. a fellow subsidiary).
As the classification may be different at the subsidiary and parent level, the amount recognised by
the entity receiving the goods or services may differ from the amount recognised by the entity
settling the transaction and in the consolidated financial statements.
Intragroup repayment arrangements will not affect the application of the principles described above
for the classification of group-settled share-based payment transactions.
Example: group cash-settled share-based transaction
On 1 January 20X1, Principal Co. implemented a share incentive scheme for the five members of
senior management at its subsidiary Sublime Co..
Principal will make a cash payment to the senior managers on 31 December 20X2 based on the
price of Sublime’s shares at that date, provided that the managers remain in service.
Ten share appreciation rights (SARs) are granted to each senior manager on 1 January 20X1,
each with a fair value of $80. The fair value of each SAR at 31 December 20X1 is $70 and at
31 December 20X2 is $90.
All five senior managers are expected to remain in employment until the settlement date.
Required
What entries are required to record this transaction in the financial statements of Principal, Sublime
and the Group?
Solution
Principal
Principal is the entity responsible for settling the transaction. As the transaction will not be settled in
Principal’s own equity instruments it must be recognised as a cash-settled share-based payment
transaction.
On initial recognition of the liability based on the fair value of the SARs at the grant date, a debit is
made to the cost of investment in Sublime. Remeasurements of the liability due to subsequent
movements in the fair value of the SARs are recognised in profit or loss. The reason for this will
become apparent shortly.
$ $
20X1 DEBIT Cost of investment in Sublime 2,000
(5 10 SARs $80)/2 years
CREDIT Remuneration liability 2,000
To record the liability after one year’s service based on initial fair value of the SARs.
DEBIT Remuneration liability 250
$2,000 – (5 10 SARs $70)/2 years
CREDIT Profit or loss 250
To remeasure the liability based on the period end fair value of the SARs.
280
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
$ $
20X2 DEBIT Cost of investment in Sublime
(5 10 SARs $80) – 2,000 2,000
CREDIT Remuneration liability 2,000
To record the liability after two years’ service based on initial fair value of the SARs.
$ $
DEBIT Profit or loss 750
(5 10 SARs $90) – $3,750
CREDIT Remuneration liability 750
To remeasure the liability prior to settlement based on the period end fair value of the
SARs.
DEBIT Remuneration liability 4,500
CREDIT Cash 4,500
To record the settlement of the transaction.
Sublime
Sublime is the entity receiving the services of the five senior managers. It has no obligation to settle
the transaction itself and therefore it must be recognised as an equity-settled share-based payment
transaction:
$ $
20X1 DEBIT Remuneration expense 2,000
(5 10 SARs $80)/2 years
CREDIT Equity 2,000
To record the first year’s service expense and corresponding increase in equity.
20X2 DEBIT Remuneration expense 2,000
(5 10 SARs $80) – $2,000
CREDIT Equity 2,000
To record the second year's service expense and corresponding increase in equity.
281
Financial Reporting
$ $
DEBIT Remuneration liability 4,500
CREDIT Cash 4,500
To record the settlement of the transaction.
It should now be apparent why the entries in Principal’s records are split between amounts related
to the initial fair value of the SARs (debited to Cost of Investment) and subsequent
remeasurements (debited/credited to profit or loss).
On consolidation the cost of investment in Principal must be cancelled against the equity and
reserves in Sublime. As HKFRS 2 requires that the movement in equity in Sublime’s accounts is
based on the $80 fair value at the grant date, and not remeasured, it follows that the movement in
the cost of investment in Principal’s accounts must be based on the same amount. Therefore, any
remeasurements must be dealt with separately through profit or loss.
282
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
(d) For share options outstanding at the end of the period, the range of exercise prices and
weighted average remaining contractual life.
HKFRS 2.47-
49
4.2 Determination of fair value
Information which enables an understanding of how fair value is determined includes the
disclosures below:
(a) If the entity has measured directly the fair value of goods or services received during the
period, the entity shall disclose how that fair value was determined.
(b) If the entity has rebutted the presumption that goods or services from parties other than
employees can be measured reliably, it shall disclose that fact, and give an explanation of
why the presumption was rebutted.
(c) If the entity has measured the fair value of goods or services received as consideration for
equity instruments of the entity indirectly, by reference to the fair value of the equity
instruments granted:
– For share options granted during the period, the weighted average fair value of those
options at the measurement date and information on how that fair value was
measured.
– For other equity instruments granted during the period (i.e. other than share options),
the number and weighted average fair value of those equity instruments at the
measurement date, and information on how that fair value was measured.
HKFRS
2.50,51
4.3 Effect on profit or loss and financial position
Information which enables an understanding of the effect of share-based payment transactions on
profit or loss and financial position includes the following:
(a) The total expense recognised for the period arising from share-based payment
transactions in which the goods or services received did not qualify for recognition as
assets and hence were recognised immediately as an expense, including separate
disclosure of that portion of the total expense that arises from transactions accounted for as
equity-settled share-based payment transactions.
(b) The total carrying amount of liabilities arising from share-based payment transactions at the
end of the period and the total intrinsic value at the end of the period of liabilities for which
the counterparty’s right to cash or other assets had vested by the end of the period.
HKAS As we have seen, an entity is required to recognise an expense in relation to share options over
12.68A-C the vesting period. The related tax deduction is not, however, received until the options are
exercised. In addition, the accounting expense is based on the fair value of the options at the grant
date, whereas the tax allowable expense is based on the share price at the exercise date.
There is therefore a deferred tax implication. This is also true of other forms of share-based
payments where the tax deduction differs from the cumulative remuneration expense.
283
Financial Reporting
284
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The cumulative remuneration expense is $25,000, which is less than the estimated tax deduction of
$37,500. Therefore:
a deferred tax asset of $6,000 is recognised in the statement of financial position
there is deferred tax income of $4,000 (25,000 16%)
the excess of $2,000 goes to equity
Year to 31 December 20X1
Deferred tax asset:
$
Fair value
(20,000 $7.50) 150,000
(90,000 $7 1/3) 210,000
360,000
Exercise price of options
(20,000 $3.75) (75,000)
(90,000 $4.50 1/3) (135,000)
Intrinsic value (estimated tax deduction) 150,000
Tax at 16% 24,000
Less: previously recognised (6,000)
18,000
The cumulative remuneration expense is $110,000, which is less than the estimated tax deduction
of $150,000. Therefore:
a deferred tax asset of $24,000 is recognised in the statement of financial position at
31 December 20X1
there is potential deferred tax income of $18,000 for the year ended 31 December 20X1
of this, $13,600 (16% ($110,000 – $25,000)) is recognised in the statement of profit or loss
the remainder ($4,400) is recognised in equity.
For example, it might reduce the exercise price of options granted to employees (i.e. reprice the
options), which increases the fair value of those options. The requirements to account for the
effects of modifications are expressed in the context of share-based payment transactions with
employees. However, the requirements shall also be applied to share-based payment transactions
with parties other than employees that are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity
instruments granted.
HKFRS 2.27-
29
6.1 Measurement in modification
The entity shall recognise, as a minimum, the services received measured at the grant date fair
value of the equity instruments granted, unless those equity instruments do not vest because of
failure to satisfy a vesting condition (other than a market condition) that was specified at grant date.
285
Financial Reporting
This applies irrespective of any modifications to the terms and conditions on which the equity
instruments were granted, or a cancellation or settlement of that grant of equity instruments. In
addition, the entity shall recognise the effects of modifications that increase the total fair value of
the share-based payment arrangement or are otherwise beneficial to the employee.
If a grant of equity instruments is cancelled or settled during the vesting period (other than a grant
cancelled by forfeiture when the vesting conditions are not satisfied):
(a) Cancellation
The entity shall account for the cancellation or settlement as an acceleration of vesting, and
shall therefore recognise immediately the amount that otherwise would have been
recognised for services received over the remainder of the vesting period.
(b) Payment made
Any payment made to the employee on the cancellation or settlement of the grant shall be
accounted for as the repurchase of an equity interest, i.e. as a deduction from equity,
except to the extent that the payment exceeds the fair value of the equity instruments
granted measured at the repurchase date. Any such excess shall be recognised as an
expense. However, if the share-based payment arrangement included liability components,
the entity shall remeasure the fair value of the liability at the date of cancellation or
settlement. Any payment made to settle the liability component shall be accounted for as an
extinguishment of the liability.
(c) New equity instruments are granted
If new equity instruments are granted to the employee and, on the date when those new
equity instruments are granted, the entity identifies the new equity instruments granted as
replacement equity instruments for the cancelled equity instruments, the entity shall account
for the granting of replacement equity instruments in the same way as a modification of the
original grant of equity instruments. The incremental fair value granted is the difference
between the fair value of the replacement equity instruments and the net fair value of the
cancelled equity instruments, at the date the replacement equity instruments are granted.
The net fair value of the cancelled equity instruments is their fair value, immediately before
the cancellation, less the amount of any payment made to the employee on cancellation of
the equity instruments that is accounted for as a deduction from equity.
If the entity does not identify new equity instruments granted as replacement equity
instruments for the cancelled equity instruments, the entity shall account for those new
equity instruments as a new grant of equity instruments.
If an entity or counterparty can choose whether to meet a non-vesting condition, the entity
shall treat the entity’s or counterparty’s failure to meet that non-vesting condition during the
vesting period as a cancellation.
If an entity repurchases vested equity instruments, the payment made to the employee shall
be accounted for as a deduction from equity, except to the extent that the payment exceeds
the fair value of the equity instruments repurchased, measured at the repurchase date. Any
such excess shall be recognised as an expense.
Example: Cancellation
Flummery Co. granted 3,000 share options to each of its 50 managers on 1 January 20X1. The
options only vest if the managers are still employed by the entity on 31 December 20X3.
The fair value of the options was estimated at $12 on the grant date and the entity estimated that
the options would vest with 48 managers.
In 20X2 the entity decided to base all incentive schemes around the achievement of performance
targets and as a result the existing share option scheme was cancelled on 30 June 20X2 when the
fair value of the options was $28 and the market price of the entity’s shares was $45.
Compensation was paid to the 49 managers in employment at that date, at the rate of $36 per
option.
286
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Required
How should the entity recognise the cancellation?
Solution
The original cost to the entity for the share option scheme was:
3,000 shares 48 managers $12 = $1,728,000
This was being recognised at the rate of $576,000 in each of the three years.
At 30 June 20X2 the entity should recognise a cost based on the amount of options it had vested
on that date. The total cost is:
3,000 49 managers $12 = $1,764,000
After deducting the amount recognised in 20X1, the 20X2 charge to profit or loss is $1,188,000.
The compensation paid is:
3,000 49 $36 = $5,292,000
Of this, the amount attributable to the fair value of the options cancelled is:
3,000 49 $28 (the fair value of the option, not of the underlying share) = $4,116,000
This is deducted from equity as a share buyback. The remaining $1,176,000 ($5,292,000 less
$4,116,000) is charged to profit or loss.
287
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
Where one group entity receives goods or services and another group
company settles the transaction the recipient company must still apply
the provisions of HKFRS 2
Transaction with Transaction with other Recognise as a liability Counterparty has Entity has choice
employees party measured at fair value choice
of the liability
Measure at fair value Measure at fair value of Identify debt and equity Recognise liability
of equity instrument goods/services Remeasure liability at component and to the extent there
on grant date received each reporting date account for each is an obligation to
until settlement and at separately deliver cash
settlement date
Recognise as Recognise as an
expense/in equity asset/expense and in
over the vesting equity, normally
period immediately
Modifications
On cancellation or settlement the amount that would have been recognised over the remainder of the vesting period is measured
immediately
If payment is made to the other party on cancellation or settlement this is accounted for as the repurchase of an equity interest (and
expense where the payment exceeds fair value of the equity instruments)/extinguishment of liability.
Disclosures:
Information about the nature and extent of share-based payment arrangements
Information to enable users to understand how fair values were determined
Information to enable users to determine the effect on profit or loss and financial position
288
13: Share-based payment | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 1
The remuneration expense in respect of the options for the year ended 31 December 20X1 is
calculated as follows:
Fair value of options expected to vest at grant date:
(75% 50 employees) 10,000 options $3 =$1,125,000
Annual charge to profit or loss therefore $1,125,000 / 4 years = $281,250
Charge to profit or loss for y/e 31 December 20X1 = $281,250 6/12 months = $140,625
The accounting entry for the year ending 31 December 20X1 is:
$ $
DEBIT Remuneration expense 140,625
CREDIT Equity 140,625
In 20X2 the remuneration charge is for the whole year, and is calculated as:
(70% 50 employees) 10,000 options $3 = $1,050,000
Charge to date is $1,050,000 1.5/4 years = $393,750
Therefore charge for the year is $393,750 – $140,625 = $253,125
The accounting entry is:
Answer 2
20X5 $
Equity c/d and P/L expense ((500 – 75) 100 $15 1/3) 212,500
$ $
DEBIT Expenses 212,500
CREDIT Equity 212,500
20X6 $
Equity b/d 212,500
Profit or loss expense 227,500
Equity c/d ((500 – 60) 100 $15 2/3) = 440,000
$ $
DEBIT Expenses 227,500
CREDIT Equity 227,500
20X7 $
Equity b/d 440,000
Profit or loss expense 224,500
Equity c/d (443 100 $15) = 664,500
$ $
DEBIT Expenses 224,500
CREDIT Equity 224,500
289
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
290
chapter 14
Revenue
Topic list
1 Revenue recognition
1.1 Accrual accounting
1.2 Recognition at point of sale
1.3 Recognition at other times
2 HKAS 18 Revenue
2.1 Scope
2.2 Definitions
2.3 Measurement of revenue
2.4 Identification of the transaction
2.5 Recognition: sale of goods
2.6 Recognition: rendering of services
2.7 Recognition: interest, royalties and dividends
2.8 Determining whether an entity is an agent or principal
2.9 Revenue recognition: examples
2.10 Disclosure
3 Interpretations relating to revenue recognition
3.1 HK(IFRIC) Int-12 Service Concession Arrangements
3.2 HK(IFRIC) Int-13 Customer Loyalty Programmes
3.3 HK(IFRIC) Int-15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate
4 Current developments
Learning focus
291
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.02 Revenue 3
3.02.01 Define revenue and identify revenue within the scope of HKAS 18
3.02.02 Measure revenue at the fair value of consideration received
3.02.03 Identify revenue transaction including multiple element
arrangements
3.02.04 Determine the recognition criteria for specified types of revenue
items including sales of goods, rendering of services and interest,
royalties and dividends
3.02.05 Disclose revenue as appropriate in the financial statements
3.02.06 Explain the recognition and measurement principles
292
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
1 Revenue recognition
Topic highlights
Revenue recognition is straightforward in most business transactions, but can be complicated in
some situations.
293
Financial Reporting
(a) Owing to the length of time taken to complete such contracts, to defer taking profit into
account until completion may result in the statement of profit or loss reflecting, not so much a
fair presentation of the activity of the company during the year, but rather the results relating
to contracts which have been completed by the year end.
(b) Revenue in this case is recognised when production on, say, a section of the total contract is
complete, even though no sale can be made until the whole is complete.
2 HKAS 18 Revenue
Topic highlights
HKAS 18 Revenue is concerned with the recognition of revenues arising from fairly common
transactions.
The sale of goods
The rendering of services
The use by others of entity assets yielding interest, royalties and dividends
Income, as defined by the HKICPA's Framework document, includes both revenues and gains.
Revenue is income arising in the ordinary course of an entity's activities and it may be called
different names, such as sales, fees, interest, dividends or royalties.
HKAS 18 governs the recognition of revenue in specific (common) types of transaction, being:
the sale of goods
the rendering of services
interest income
royalty income
dividend income
The standard also includes an appendix which provides examples of the measurement and
recognition rules in particular circumstances.
294
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Key terms
Revenue is the gross inflow of economic benefits during the period arising in the course of the
ordinary activities of an entity when those inflows result in increases in equity, other than increases
relating to contributions from equity participants.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. (HKAS 18)
Revenue does not include items which do not represent a flow of economic benefit into the entity,
e.g. sales taxes, value added taxes or goods and service taxes which are only collected for third
parties. The same should apply to revenues collected by an agent on behalf of a principal.
Revenue for the agent is only the commission earned from the principal for acting as an agent.
Topic highlights
Revenue is measured at the fair value of consideration received or receivable.
Revenue shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable,
taking into account the amount of any trade discounts and volume rebates allowed by the
entity.
This is usually decided by agreement between the buyer and seller.
HKAS 18.11 2.3.1 Deferred consideration
When consideration is deferred, the fair value of the amount receivable may be less than the
nominal amount of cash receivable.
In this case, the arrangement effectively constitutes a financing transaction resulting in both
revenue (sales) income and interest income. The fair value of sales consideration is determined by
discounting all amounts receivable using an imputed rate of interest. This is the more clearly
determinable of either:
the prevailing rate for a similar instrument of an issuer with a similar credit rating; or
a rate of interest that discounts the nominal amount of the instrument to the current cash
sales price of the goods or services.
The difference between the fair value and nominal amount of consideration is recognised as
interest revenue.
295
Financial Reporting
Solution
Sofa Co. must discount the $790,000 before recording revenue in respect of the sales:
2
$790,000 1/1.06 = $703,097
This discounted amount is recognised as revenue in the year ended 31 March 20X9 and as a
receivable:
$ $
DEBIT Receivable 703,097
CREDIT Revenue 703,097
In the year ended 31 March 20Y0, the discount is unwound and the receivable increased by
$42,186 (6% $703,097) to $745,283. This amount is also recognised as interest income:
296
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
The revenue must be broken down into that relating to the provision of the computer system and
that relating to the three years of support and maintenance.
The revenue relating to the support and maintenance is calculated based on the profit mark-up of
50%:
3 years $50,000 150% = $225,000
Therefore, the revenue relating to the supply of the system is the balance of $800,000 – $225,000
= $575,000.
Revenue recognised in the year ended 31 December 20X4 is $637,500 ($575,000 + 10/36
$225,000).
Conversely, seemingly separate transactions must be considered together if apart they lose
their commercial meaning. An example would be to sell an asset and at the same time enter into
an agreement to buy it back at a later date. The second transaction negates the substance of the
first and so both must be considered together. This sale and repurchase situation is considered in
more detail in section 2.9 of this chapter.
All of the following five conditions have to be fulfilled before revenue from the sale of goods can be
recognised:
(a) The entity has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods
(b) The entity retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually
associated with ownership, nor effective control over the goods sold
(c) The amount of revenue can be measured reliably
(d) It is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity
(e) The costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably
HKAS 18.15- 2.5.1 Transfer of risks and rewards
17
The transfer of risks and rewards can only be decided by examining each transaction. Usually, the
transfer occurs at the same time as either the transfer of legal title, or the passing of
possession to the buyer. This is what happens when you buy something in a shop – both title and
possession pass from the seller to the purchaser when the purchaser buys the goods and leaves
the shop with them.
If significant risks and rewards remain with the seller, then the transaction is not a sale and
revenue cannot be recognised yet, for example if the receipt of the revenue from a particular sale
depends on the buyer receiving revenue from his own sale of the goods.
It is possible for the seller to retain only an "insignificant" risk of ownership and for the sale and
revenue to be recognised. The main example here is where the seller retains title only to ensure
collection of what is owed on the goods. This is a common commercial situation, and when it arises
the revenue should be recognised on the date of sale.
297
Financial Reporting
298
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
299
Financial Reporting
HKAS 18,
Illustrative
2.8 Determining whether an entity is an agent or principal
Guidance 21
Rules for determining whether an entity is acting as an agent were amended in 2009. In an agency
relationship, the gross inflows of economic benefits include amounts collected on behalf of the
principal and which do not result in increases in equity for the entity. The amounts collected on
behalf of the principal are not revenue. Instead, revenue is the amount of commission.
An entity is acting as a principal when it has exposure to the significant risks and rewards
associated with the sale of goods or the rendering of services. Features that indicate that an entity
is acting as a principal include:
(a) the entity has the primary responsibility for providing the goods or services to the customer
or for fulfilling the order, for example by being responsible for the acceptability of the
products or services ordered or purchased by the customer;
(b) the entity has inventory risk before or after the customer order, during shipping or on return;
(c) the entity has latitude in establishing prices, either directly or indirectly, for example by
providing additional goods or services; and
(d) the entity bears the customer’s credit risk for the amount receivable from the customer.
An entity is acting as an agent when it does not have exposure to the significant risks and rewards
associated with the sale of goods or the rendering of services. One feature indicating that an entity
is acting as an agent is that the amount the entity earns is predetermined, being either a fixed fee
per transaction or a stated percentage of the amount billed to the customer.
HKAS
18,Illustrative
2.9 Revenue recognition: examples
examples
The appendix to HKAS 18 provides a number of examples of the application of the recognition
criteria. These examples assume that the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, it is
probable that economic benefits will flow to the entity and costs can be measured reliably.
The following transactions are common in practice.
2.9.1 Consignment sales
Consignment sales are transactions whereby one entity (the seller) sells goods to another (the
buyer) and that entity undertakes to sell the goods to a third party on behalf of the seller. The
goods which are transferred are often referred to as consignment inventory. The seller normally
retains legal title to the goods until such time as they are sold on to a third party.
This form of arrangement is common in the motor trade whereby a manufacturer sells cars to a
dealer who sells them on to the ultimate customer. Often where an onward sale is not achieved,
the dealer can return the cars to the manufacturer.
In this situation, the risks and rewards are not deemed to have passed from the seller (the
manufacturer) to the buyer (the dealer) until such time as an onward sale is made. Therefore, the
manufacturer does not record a sale until a car is sold to a third party. In the meantime, although
the cars are in the dealer’s showroom, they remain the inventory of the manufacturer.
2.9.2 Bill and hold sales
Bill and hold sales refer to those sales where the buyer requests that delivery of goods purchased
is delayed, however in the meantime accepts legal title and billing.
In these circumstances, revenue is recognised when the buyer takes title, provided that:
(a) it is probable that delivery will be made
(b) the goods are available for delivery
(c) the buyer acknowledges the delayed delivery
(d) normal payment terms apply
300
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 1
Consider the following scenarios and discuss how HKAS 18 should be applied to each
(a) Bradley Co. owns an office building which cost $5m and has a market value of $7m. On
1 April 20X2, Bradley Co. sold the building to Beck Co., a finance company, for $5.5m.
Bradley Co. has entered into an agreement to repurchase the building in three years' time for
$7m and Bradley Co. will continue to occupy the building after sale.
(b) Marianne Alltraders entered into a six-month contract to undertake accountancy training for a
customer over the period 1 September 20X2 to 28 February 20X3. The value of services
performed to the year end amounts to $45,000 out of a total contract value of $60,000.
All costs are expected to be recoverable.
(c) Maximum Velocity sold some bicycles to a customer for $15,000 on 1 October 20X2.
The customer has the right to return any unsold bikes before 30 April 20X3 for a full refund.
(d) Admen performed advertising services for a customer costing $4,450 relating to a fixed price
$20,000 contract covering the period 1 December 20X2 to 31 March 20X3. Due to
fluctuating advertising costs, the expected total cost cannot be reliably measured at the year
end, but Admen is certain that the customer will pay the costs incurred to date.
The year end in all cases is 31 December 20X2.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
301
Financial Reporting
Key term
Service concession arrangements are arrangements whereby a government or other body
grants contracts for the supply of public services – such as roads, energy distribution, prisons or
hospitals – to private operators. The objective of this project of the HK(IFRIC) is to clarify how
certain aspects of existing HKICPA literature are to be applied to service concession
arrangements. (HK(IFRIC) Int-12)
302
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
The transaction illustrates certain characteristics of a service concession arrangement that falls
within the scope of HK(IFRIC) 12:
The arrangement is between a public sector entity (the government) and an entity from the
private sector (Electricity Co.);
An infrastructure asset is constructed by Electricity Co. for the purpose of the arrangement,
and is used to supply electricity to public;
The government (the grantor) has control over the use of the power plant through the
following means:
– The government specifies the goods to be delivered (electricity) and to whom the
electricity should be provided (the public in the specified district); and
– The income that Electricity Co. needs to generate to cover both its operating costs and
the initial capital outlay from constructing the facility is wholly dependent on the user’s
demand for the electricity, the demand risk borne by Electricity Co.. However, the
arrangement still falls within the scope of HK(IFRIC) 12 as the government controls
the pricing through a capping mechanism (provided the cap is considered to be
substantive) and controls the residual interest in the facility, through the agreement
specifying that the facility must revert to government at the end of the concession
period.
Electricity Co. provides construction services to the grantor by constructing the facility. However,
instead of receiving an unconditional right to receive cash, it has obtained a right to charge the
public for electricity usage, i.e. it has obtained an intangible asset.
As stated in HK(IFRIC) 12, Electricity Co. does not recognise the facility as its own property, plant
and equipment, even though it is fully exposed to demand risk in respect of the electricity users.
303
Financial Reporting
304
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The deferred amount is recognised as revenue only when the entity has fulfilled its obligations by
supplying the awards itself or paying a third party to do so.
HK(IFRIC) Int-13 gives a choice as to whether the amount allocated to the award credits should be:
(a) Equal to their fair value (irrespective of the fair values of the other components); or
(b) A proportion of the total consideration based on the fair value of the award credits relative to
the fair values of the other components of the sale.
In developing the HK(IFRIC) Int-13, it was decided that it should not be more prescriptive than
HKAS 18 Revenue, which does not specify which of the above should be used.
If at any time the expected costs of meeting the obligation exceed the consideration received, the
entity has an onerous contract for which HKAS 37 would require recognition of a liability.
If HK(IFRIC) Int-13 causes an entity to change its accounting policy for customer loyalty awards,
HKAS 8 applies.
305
Financial Reporting
(ii) recognise this net amount as revenue when the third party becomes obliged to
supply the awards and entitled to receive consideration for doing so. These
events may occur as soon as the award credits are granted. Alternatively, if the
customer can choose to claim awards from either the entity or a third party,
these events may occur only when the customer chooses to claim awards from
the third party.
(b) If the entity is collecting the consideration on its own account, it shall measure its
revenue as the gross consideration allocated to the award credits and recognise the
revenue when it fulfils its obligations in respect of the awards.
In paragraph 8(a)(i) and (ii) of the Interpretation the entity supplying the award credits is acting as
an agent of the third party supplying the awards, which may be the case with airline loyalty
programmes where retailers or other service firms pay the airline a cost per mile for using their
loyalty programmes. However in case (b) the reference is to a similar programme but where the
retailer acts as a principal on their own account.
Look first at the accounting entries in the situation of Paragraph 8(a). Say that a retailer has a
loyalty programme arrangement with an airline such that, for every $10 that the customer spends
with the retailer, he is awarded one point which can be redeemed for one mile.
The face value of each point is $1. For each point issued, the retailer will pay $0.8 to the airline.
If the retailer makes a sale of $200 the accounting entries would be:
$ $
DEBIT Cash/credit card receivables 200
CREDIT Commission income (20 $0.2) 4
Liability to airline (20 $0.8) 16
Revenue 180
The retailer acts as an agent of the airline and earns commission of $0.2 per point issued. A sale of
$200 leads to the issue of 20 points and commission income of 20 $0.2 = $4.
The benefits of such a scheme to the retailer are that they do not have to incur resources to
administer the scheme (the airline administers the redemptions) and they can exit the scheme at
any time with no obligation for the outstanding points.
If the retailer has collected the consideration allocated to the points on its own account, i.e. acting
as a principal rather than as an agent, then it is entitled to measure its income from the points as
the gross $20 in the example above, but must separately recognise the $16 payable to the airline
as an expense. In either case the net income of $4 is ultimately recognised from the transaction.
$ $
DEBIT Cash/credit card receivables 200
CREDIT Income from loyalty programme (20 x $1) 20
Revenue 180
And
DEBIT Loyalty programme expense (20 x $0.8) 16
CREDIT Liability to airline 16
306
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
additional guidance on how to account for revenue in HKAS 18, the Hong Kong Financial Reporting
Interpretations Committee (HK(IFRIC)) provides guidance on the following two issues in HK(IFRIC)
Int-15:
Determining whether an agreement for the construction of real estate is within the scope of
HKAS 11 or HKAS 18
When revenue from the construction of real estate should be recognised
The Interpretation standardises accounting practice across jurisdictions for the recognition of
revenue among real estate developers for sales of units, such as apartments or houses, "off plan",
that is, before construction is complete.
3.3.2 Main features of HK(IFRIC) Int-15
The detailed guidance in HK(IFRIC) Int-15 assumes that the entity has previously analysed the
agreement for the construction of real estate and any related agreements and concluded that it will
retain neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership
nor effective control over the constructed real estate to an extent that would preclude recognition of
some or all of the consideration as revenue. If recognition of some of the consideration as revenue
is precluded, the following discussion applies only to the part of the agreement for which revenue
will be recognised.
In some circumstances, agreements may need to be split into separately identifiable components,
with each such component being accounted for separately and the fair value of the total
consideration received or receivable for the agreement allocated to each component. The seller
then applies the requirements of HK(IFRIC) Int-15 to any components for the construction of real
estate in order to determine whether each component is within the scope of HKAS 11 or HKAS 18.
3.3.3 Determining whether the agreement is within the scope of HKAS 11 or
HKAS 18
HKAS 11 applies when the agreement meets the definition of a construction contract set out in
paragraph 3 of HKAS 11. An agreement for the construction of real estate meets the definition of a
construction contract when the buyer is able to specify:
(a) the major structural elements of the design of the real estate before construction begins,
and/or
(b) major structural changes once construction is in progress (whether or not it exercises that
ability).
In contrast, if construction could take place independently of the agreement and buyers have only
limited ability to influence the design of the real estate, the agreement will be for the sale of goods
or the rendering of services and within the scope of HKAS 18.
3.3.4 Accounting for revenue from construction of real estate
Construction contracts (within the scope of HKAS 11)
Where the agreement is a construction contract under HKAS 11, and the outcome of the contract
can be estimated reliably, revenue is recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the
contract activity in accordance with HKAS 11. HK (IFRIC) Int-15 has not introduced any new
requirements or guidance that will affect such contracts.
Agreements for the rendering of services (HKAS 18)
Where the agreement falls within the scope of HKAS 18, and the entity is not required to acquire
and supply construction materials, it may be only an agreement for the rendering of services. This
may arise, for example, in arrangements where the customer acts in essence as its own general
contractor and enters into agreements with individual suppliers for specific goods and services.
Where the entity is responsible only for assembling materials supplied by others (i.e. it has no
inventory risk for the construction materials), the agreement is an agreement for the rendering of
services.
307
Financial Reporting
In such circumstances, if the criteria in HKAS 18 are met, revenue is recognised by reference to
the stage of completion of the transaction using the percentage of completion method.
The requirements of HKAS 11 are generally applicable to the recognition of revenue and the
associated expenses for such a transaction.
Agreements for the sale of goods (HKAS 18)
An agreement for the construction of real estate will be an agreement for the sale of goods under
HKAS 18 if it involves the provision of services together with construction materials. For such
contracts, the applicable recognition criteria are those set out in HKAS 18.
The Interpretation focuses on the criteria that revenue can only be recognised when the entity has
transferred to the buyer control and the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods,
and distinguishes between circumstances in which these criteria are met "at a single point in time"
and "continuously as construction progresses".
If transfer of control and the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the real estate in its
entirety occurs at a single point of time (e.g. at completion, upon or after delivery), revenue is
recognised only when all the criteria in HKAS 18 are satisfied. Assuming that all of the other criteria
in HKAS 18 are met, this will be upon the occurrence of that single critical transfer of control and
the significant risks and rewards of ownership.
The Interpretation also envisages that the entity may transfer to the buyer control and the
significant risks and rewards of ownership of the work in progress in its current state as
construction progresses. In this case, if all of the criteria in HKAS 18 are met continuously as
construction progresses, revenue is recognised by reference to the stage of completion using the
percentage of completion method. The requirements of HKAS 11 are generally applicable to the
recognition of revenue and the associated expenses for such a transaction.
3.3.5 Disclosures
When an entity recognises revenue using the percentage of completion method for agreements
that meet all the criteria in HKAS 18 continuously as construction progresses (see above), the
following disclosures are required:
How the entity determines which agreements meet all the criteria in HKAS 18 continuously
as construction progresses
The amount of revenue arising from such agreements in the period
The methods used to determine the stage of completion of agreements in progress
For any such agreements that are in progress at the reporting date, the following disclosures are
also required:
The aggregate amount of costs incurred and recognised profits (less recognised losses) to
date
The amount of advances received
Consequential amendments to the Appendix in HKAS 18
HK(IFRIC) Int-15 superseded the real estate guidance (Example 9) in HKAS 18.
Additional guidance
HK(IFRIC) Int-15 is accompanied by an information note which, although not part of the
Interpretation, summarises its requirements in the form of two flowcharts, which are reproduced in
the Appendix.
In addition, three illustrative examples designed to assist in the application of the Interpretation
accompany HK(IFRIC) Int-15.
308
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
In this transaction, the terms of the agreement and all the surrounding facts and circumstances
indicate that the agreement is not a construction contract. The agreement is a forward contract that
gives the buyer an asset in the form of a right to acquire, use and sell the completed real estate at
a later date and an obligation to pay the purchase price in accordance with its terms.
Although the buyer might be able to transfer its interest in the forward contract to another party, the
entity retains control and the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the work in progress in
its current state until the completed real estate is transferred. Therefore, revenue should be
recognised only when all the criteria of HKAS 18 are met (at completion in this example).
Alternatively, assume that, in the jurisdiction, the law requires the entity to transfer immediately to
the buyer ownership of the real estate in its current state of completion and that any additional
construction becomes the property of the buyer as construction progresses.
The entity would need to consider all the terms of the agreement to determine whether this change
in the timing of the transfer of ownership means that the entity transfers to the buyer control and
the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the work in progress in its current state as
construction progresses. For example, the fact that if the agreement is terminated before
construction is complete, the buyer retains the work in progress and the entity has the right to be
paid for the work performed, might indicate that control is transferred along with ownership. If it
does, and if all the criteria in HKAS 18 are met continuously as construction progresses, the entity
recognises revenue by reference to the stage of completion using the percentage of completion
method taking into account the stage of completion of the whole building and the agreements
signed with individual buyers.
309
Financial Reporting
Self-test question 2
(a) Realbuild operates in the house building sector and currently does not report under HKFRS.
In the market in which Realbuild operates, the custom is to sign a contract which includes a
completion date when funds are transferred and the keys passed to the buyer. Realbuild's
accounting policy is to recognise revenue on signing the contract. Where there is still
building work to be completed after the keys are passed to the buyer, Realbuild delays
revenue recognition until the completion of the work.
(b) BCN Productions is a film production house. The company licenses one of its new films to a
distributor in a foreign country over which BCN Productions has no control. The film is
expected to appear before the public over a period of six months and BCN Productions
intends to recognise the revenue over this period.
(c) KSoft is a start-up company that will develop bespoke software systems for corporate clients.
The company's policy is to invoice fixed amounts which include the software development
and fees for ongoing post-delivery support while the new software system is implemented.
KSoft intends to recognise the revenue for both elements on installation of the software.
Required
Advise the directors as to the acceptability of the above accounting policies for revenue recognition
under HKAS 18 Revenue.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
310
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Yes
Separate components
Component(s) for the delivery of other Component for the construction of real estate
goods or services and directly related services (in accordance A
with HKAS 18)
Apply HKAS 18
Does the agreement or Yes The agreement or component is Revenue and costs are
A component meet the definition a construction contract within recognised by reference to the
of a construction contract? the scope of HKAS 11* stage of completion
No
Is the agreement or component Yes The agreement or component is Revenue and costs are
only for the rendering of for the rendering of services recognised by reference to the
services? within the scope of HKAS 18 stage of completion
No
The agreement or component is Are the criteria for recognising Revenue and costs are
for the sale of goods within the revenue from the sale of goods Yes recognised by reference to the
scope of HKAS 18 ** met on a continuous basis? stage of completion
* The construction contract may need to be segmented in accordance with paragraph 8 of HKAS 11
** Directly related services may need to be separated in accordance with paragraph 13 of HKAS 18
311
Financial Reporting
4 Current developments
The IASB and FASB issued an Exposure Draft (ED) in relation to revenue recognition in June
2010. A revised exposure draft on the topic of revenue from contracts with customers was issued in
November 2011, which simplifies a number of the original proposals. A new standard is expected
during the course of 2013 and this will replace both IAS 18 Revenue and IAS 11 Construction
Contracts (and so their HKAS equivalents).
The proposals would require an entity to:
1 Identify a contract with a customer.
2 Identify separate performance obligations in the contract (such that if more than one good or
service is promised, each is accounted for separately only if it could be sold separately or the
customer could benefit from the good or service either alone or together with resources
which are readily available).
3 Determine the transaction price as the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to
be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding
amounts collected on behalf of third parties.
4 Allocate the transaction price to the separate performance obligations in proportion to the
standalone selling price of the goods or services underlying each performance obligation.
5 Recognise revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied by the transfer of the
promised good or service to the customer.
The ED also proposes that the costs of obtaining a contract are recognised as an asset if the entity
expects to recover those costs.
Costs of fulfilling a contract which are not eligible for capitalisation in accordance with another
standard would be capitalised only if they:
relate directly to a contract
generate or enhance resources which will be used to satisfy future performance obligations,
and
are expected to be recovered.
For many companies this new approach will not result in a significant change to the amount or
timing of revenue recognised. In other cases there will be a change, for example, when a mobile
phone contract is sold and a handset is provided free of charge, the standard would now require
separate up front recognition of revenue relating to the handset.
312
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Topic recap
Examples:
Consignment sales recognised as revenue
when goods sold on to third party
Bill and hold sales revenue recognised when
buyer takes title provided that the goods are
available, payment terms are normal, delayed
delivery is acknowledged and delivery is
probable.
Sale and repurchase agreements may in
substance be secured loans.
Disclose:
Accounting policies
The amount of each significant category of revenue
The amount of revenue arising from exchanges of goods or services in each category.
HKAS
HK (IFRIC)
18 Revenue
Interpretations
Recognition
313
Financial Reporting
Answer 1
(a) There are a number of factors that suggest the substance of this transaction is different to its
legal form. First, the building has a market value of $7m and is being sold for less than
market value, which immediately looks odd. Second, there is an agreement for Bradley Co.
to repurchase the assets in the future. If it were a genuine sale, this would be an unlikely
clause. Third, Bradley Co. retains occupancy of the building – again, if this were a genuine
sale it would be very unlikely that an asset would be sold and not occupied or used by the
purchaser.
Therefore, it seems obvious that the substance of this transaction is a secured loan. Bradley
Co. should continue to recognise the building in the statement of financial position as they
have the risks and rewards of ownership. The cash received from Beck Co. should be
recorded as a non-current liability and the finance on the loan should be charged in the
statement of profit or loss over the three-year period. The finance charge could be calculated
as the difference between the "sale" proceeds and the repurchase amount.
(b) Revenue should be accrued by Marianne Alltraders based on value of work performed rather
than accrued on a time apportioned basis in accordance with HKAS 18. Revenue recognised
is therefore $45,000.
(c) Maximum Velocity should not recognise any revenue in respect of the bicycles as the
significant risks and rewards of ownership have not been transferred at the year end. The
bikes remain in Maximum Velocity’s inventories until confirmation has been received from
the customer that they have been sold on and any money received from him is treated as a
payment in advance.
(d) Since the outcome of the service transaction cannot be reliably measured at the year end,
only $4,450 is recognised as revenue by Admen rather than on a time apportioned basis.
This matches with the costs recognised ensuring that no profit is recorded until the outcome
can be reliably measured.
Answer 2
(a) The general rule under HKAS 18 Revenue is that revenue is recognised when the significant
risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred and there is no continuing managerial
involvement or effective control.
HK(IFRIC) 15 provides additional guidance regarding real estate sales and states that
revenue is recognised when the entity transfers control as well as the risks and rewards of
ownership, i.e. when the legal completion occurs and the keys are handed over in this case.
Realbuild's current policy recognises the revenue before this is the case: revenue should be
recognised on the contract completion date rather than on signing the contract.
Where there is continuing building work to be undertaken, revenue can be recognised
provided the property has been delivered, so Realbuild's policy needs to be amended here
as well. However, a provision is also required to be recognised for the cost of work yet to be
performed and this is charged to profit or loss at the same time as the revenue is recognised,
i.e. on delivery of the property.
Note. A house-builder such as Realbuild selling to the general public is entering into
contracts to sell goods rather than a construction contract, as the buyer is not able to specify
the major structural elements of the design, which would be an indication of a construction
contract.
314
14: Revenue | Part C Accounting for business transactions
(b) Licence fees (and royalty income) are normally recognised straight line over the life of the
agreement. However, where the licensee has no remaining obligations to perform, or, as in
this case, no control over the use of the images once licensed, the substance of the
transaction is a sale, and revenue should be recognised at the time of sale, so BCN
Productions' policy is not appropriate.
(c) HKAS 18 provides guidance on the recognition of revenue from the development of
customised software: it should be recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the
development including completion of the services provided for post-delivery support.
Consequently, it is not appropriate to recognise the revenue on installation: it should be
recognised over the period of development and support (although not necessarily straight
line as can be matched to the level of work done in each period).
315
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
316
chapter 15
Income taxes
Learning focus
Tax in one form or another is relevant to all organisations. You should therefore ensure that
you fully understand its operation in the financial statements. Hence this topic may appear with
other topics. You must study it and understand its relationship with other assets and liabilities.
Of course, in a business situation, the deferred tax consideration is always an important topic
as it may change the investment decision.
317
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.18 Income taxes 2
3.18.01 Account for current tax liabilities in accordance with HKAS 12
3.18.02 Record entries relating to income tax in the accounting records
3.18.03 Identify temporary differences (both inside and outside difference)
and calculate deferred tax amounts
3.18.04 Account for tax losses and tax credits
3.18.05 Identify initial recognition exemption for assets and liabilities
3.18.06 Account for deferred tax relating to investments in subsidiaries,
associates and joint ventures
3.18.07 Determine when tax assets and liabilities can be offset
3.18.08 Disclose relevant information with regard to income taxes
318
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
1 Current tax
Topic highlights
Taxation consists of two components:
Current tax
Deferred tax
Key terms
Accounting profit. Profit or loss for a period before deducting tax expense.
Taxable profit/(tax loss). The profit (loss) for a period, determined in accordance with the rules
established by the taxation authorities, upon which income taxes are payable (recoverable).
Tax expense/(tax income). The aggregate amount included in the determination of profit or loss
for the period in respect of current tax and deferred tax.
Current tax. The amount of income taxes payable (recoverable) in respect of the taxable profit (tax
loss) for a period. (HKAS 12)
HKAS
12.12,13
1.2 Recognition of current tax liabilities and assets
Topic highlights
Current tax is the amount payable to the tax authorities in relation to the trading activities during
the period. It is generally straightforward.
The amount of tax payable (or receivable) must be calculated and then charged (or credited) to
profit or loss for the period and shown in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income.
Any unpaid tax in respect of the current or prior periods must be recognised as a liability.
Conversely, any excess tax paid in respect of current or prior periods over what is due should be
recognised as an asset.
1.2.1 Over and underprovisions
The year end tax liability (or asset) is generally an estimated amount, not settled until a later date.
It is often the case, therefore, that the liability (or asset) recognised is not equal to the amount
eventually paid (or recovered):
319
Financial Reporting
Where the estimated tax liability exceeds the tax later paid to the authorities, tax has been
overprovided.
Where the estimated tax liability is less than the tax later paid to the authorities, tax has been
underprovided.
This under- or over-provision must be adjusted for in the following year’s tax charged to profit or loss:
$
Estimated current year tax charge X
Under/over provision in respect of prior year X/(X)
Income tax charge for the year X
Self-test question 1
Moorland operates in Hong Kong and is subject to a 16.5% tax rate. In the year ended
31 December 20X1, the company had tax-adjusted profits of $760,000. In the year ended
31 December 20X0, a current year tax liability of $130,000 was recognised; tax subsequently paid
in respect of the year was $126,700.
(a) What amounts are recognised in Moorland’s financial statements in respect of tax in the year
ended 31 December 20X1?
(b) How does your answer change if the tax paid in respect of 20X0 was $131,000?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Solution
Tax due on profits in 20X1 is $25,200 ($126,000 20%)
Tax repayment due on losses in 20X2 is $9,200 ($46,000 20%)
The taxable profits of 20X1 are sufficient to absorb the losses of 20X2 and therefore a repayment
for the full $9,200 can be claimed.
The double entry will be:
$ $
DEBIT Tax receivable (statement of financial position) 9,200
CREDIT Tax repayable (statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income) 9,200
The tax receivable will be shown as an asset until the repayment is received from the tax
authorities.
320
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS
12.58,61A
1.4 Recognition of current tax
Current tax payable or repayable is recognised in profit or loss in the period to which it relates.
There are three exceptions to this rule:
(a) Tax arising from a business combination which is an acquisition (refer to sections 10 and
10.4 of this chapter).
(b) Tax arising from a transaction or event recognised in other comprehensive income
(c) Tax arising from a transaction or event recognised directly in equity
If a transaction or event is charged or credited to other comprehensive income or directly to equity,
it is logical to show its related tax in other comprehensive income or equity.
An example of this is where, under HKAS 8, a change in accounting policy that is applied
retrospectively, or a correction of a material prior period error is adjusted to the opening balance of
the retained earnings.
Deferred tax is an accounting measure which recognises the future tax impact of assets and
liabilities currently held in the statement of financial position. It is important to realise that deferred
321
Financial Reporting
tax is not an amount currently payable to the tax authorities, or relevant to tax practitioners; it is
quite simply an accounting adjustment.
For example, if an entity holds an asset in its statement of financial position, it is reasonable to
assume that at some point in the future that asset will be realised (for example, an amount owed
will be received). At such a time as the asset is realised, tax will be payable on the related income
(assuming that tax arises on the cash receipt rather than when the asset is recognised for
accounting purposes). This tax payable at some point in the future is referred to as a deferred tax
liability.
Solution
To date Lightning Co. has claimed tax depreciation on the asset of $180, and so received tax relief
for this amount.
In the future, as Lightning Co. continues to use the asset, it will recover the $200 carrying amount
of the asset (i.e. it will earn that $200 in revenue – and probably more besides).
Also in the future Lightning Co. will be able to claim a further $120 of tax depreciation ($300 original
cost less the $180 tax relief already claimed). This value for tax purposes is known as the "tax
base".
The net effect in the future is $80 taxable income ($200 carrying amount – $120 tax base). This is
known as a "taxable temporary difference".
When applying a tax rate of 16.5%, tax payable in the future on the net taxable income amounts to
$13.20.
Lightning Co. therefore recognises a deferred tax liability of $13.20.
Equally, if an entity has a liability, and tax relief is provided when payment is actually made to settle
the liability (rather than when the liability is recognised for accounting purposes), then there is a
future tax benefit, known as a deferred tax asset.
Solution
In 20X1, Monarchy recognises a provision for a bad debt (a liability balance and
corresponding accounting expense) of $200,000.
When the balance is certified as a bad debt (e.g. because the client’s company is liquidated)
Monarchy will be able to reduce taxable profits by the $200,000. This is not expected to
happen until 20X3.
322
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
When the $200,000 is included as an allowable expense within taxable profits, it will result in
a reduction in tax payable of $33,000 ($200,000 16.5%).
The $33,000 is not recognised as a current tax asset (i.e. a receivable) as the benefit is not
yet virtually certain.
Instead, a deferred tax asset of $33,000 may be recognised in respect of the doubtful debt.
This asset is only recognised if Monarchy Co. expects to have sufficient profits in two years'
time against which the bad debt expense may be relieved.
The remainder of this section of the chapter provides an overview of the process to recognise and
measure deferred tax. Later sections then consider each of the stages in the process in more
detail.
1 What is the carrying value of the item in the $200 asset ($200,000)
statement of financial position? provision
Note that for the purposes of this exercise, liabilities
should be regarded as negative amounts.
2 What is the "tax base" of the item? $120 asset Nil
Tax base is defined in the next section, but in (there is no liability
simple terms think of it as the carrying value of the / expense from the
item in a tax version of the statement of financial tax perspective
position. until the case is
certified as bad
debt)
3 What is the difference between carrying value and $80 ($200,000)
tax base – known as temporary difference?
4 What type of temporary difference?
A taxable temporary difference arises where Taxable Deductible
carrying value > tax base.
A deductible temporary difference arises where
tax base > carrying value
5 Apply tax rate to the temporary difference $13.20 $33,000
6 Deferred tax asset or liability?
A deferred tax liability arises from a taxable Liability Asset
temporary difference.
A deferred tax asset arises from a deductible
temporary difference.
The table above includes a number of new terms such as tax base and temporary difference. The
next section considers the HKAS 12 definitions of each of them.
323
Financial Reporting
Key terms
Deferred tax liabilities are the amounts of income taxes payable in future periods in respect of
taxable temporary differences.
Deferred tax assets are the amounts of income taxes recoverable in future periods in respect of:
Deductible temporary differences
The carry forward of unused tax losses
The carry forward of unused tax credits
Temporary differences are differences between the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the
statement of financial position and its tax base. Temporary differences may be either:
Taxable temporary differences, which are temporary differences that will result in taxable
amounts in determining taxable profit (tax loss) of future periods when the carrying amount
of the asset or liability is recovered or settled; or
Deductible temporary differences, which are temporary differences that will result in
amounts that are deductible in determining taxable profit (tax loss) of future periods when the
carrying amount of the asset or liability is recovered or settled.
The tax base of an asset or liability is the amount attributed to that asset or liability for tax
purposes. (HKAS 12)
HKAS 12 provides further guidance on some of the definitions seen above, and sections 2.2.1 to
2.2.3 below consider tax base, temporary differences and deferred tax asset/liability in turn.
HKAS 12.7 2.2.1 Tax base
The tax base of an asset is the amount that will be deductible for tax purposes against any
taxable economic benefits that will flow to the entity when it recovers the carrying amount of the
asset.
Where those economic benefits are not taxable, the tax base of the asset is the same as its
carrying amount.
Make sure that you understand this idea by attempting the following self-test question.
Self-test question 2
State the tax base of each of the following assets:
(a) Interest receivable has a carrying amount of $1,000. The related interest revenue is not
taxable.
(b) Dividends receivable from a subsidiary have a carrying amount of $5,000. The dividends are
not taxable.
(c) A machine cost $10,000. For tax purposes, depreciation of $3,000 has already been
deducted in the current and prior periods and the remaining cost will be deductible in future
periods, either as depreciation or through a deduction on disposal. Revenue generated by
using the machine is taxable, any gain on disposal of the machine will be taxable and any
loss on disposal will be deductible for tax purposes.
(d) Trade receivables have a carrying amount of $10,000. The related revenue has already
been included in taxable profit (tax loss).
(e) A loan receivable has a carrying amount of $1 million. There are no tax consequences for
repayment of the loan.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
324
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS 12.8 The tax base of a liability is its carrying amount, less any amount that will be deductible for tax
purposes in relation to the liability in future periods.
For revenue received in advance, the tax base of the resulting liability is its carrying amount, less
any amount of the revenue that will not be taxable in future periods.
Self-test question 3
State the tax base of each of the following liabilities:
(a) Current liabilities include accrued expenses with a carrying amount of $1,000. The related
expense will be deducted for tax purposes on an accrual basis.
(b) Current liabilities include revenue received in advance, with a carrying amount of $1,000.
The related revenue was taxed on an accrual basis.
(c) Current liabilities include accrued fines and penalties with a carrying amount of $100. Fines
and penalties are not deductible for tax purposes.
(d) A loan payable has a carrying amount of $1 million. There are no tax consequences for
repayment of the loan.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
HKAS 12, HKAS 12 gives the following examples of circumstances in which the carrying amount of an asset
Illustrative or liability will be equal to its tax base.
Examples
Accrued expenses have already been deducted in determining an entity's current tax
liability for the current or earlier periods.
A loan payable is measured at the amount originally received and this amount is the same
as the amount repayable on final maturity of the loan.
Accrued expenses will never be deductible for tax purposes.
Accrued income will never be taxable.
325
Financial Reporting
In the long run, there is no difference between total taxable profits and total accounting profits
(except for permanent differences) so that temporary differences originate in one period and will be
reversed in one or more subsequent periods. Deferred tax is caused by temporary differences.
Sections 3 and 4 of this chapter consider taxable and deductible temporary differences in more detail.
2.2.3 Deferred tax assets and liabilities
Temporary differences give rise to deferred tax liabilities and assets:
A taxable temporary difference results in a deferred tax liability.
A deductible temporary difference results in a deferred tax asset.
Deferred tax assets also arise from unused tax losses that tax law allows to be carried forward.
326
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
First, the deferred tax asset or liability must be considered for each of the items separately:
Non-current assets
Carrying amount (780,000 – 210,000) $570,000
Tax base (780,000 – 320,000) $460,000
Temporary difference $110,000
Taxable or deductible? Taxable since CA > TB
Deferred tax liability (110,000 16.5%) $18,150
Interest receivable
Carrying amount $160,000
Tax base $nil *
Temporary difference $160,000
Taxable or deductible? Taxable since CA > TB
Deferred tax liability (160,000 16.5%) $26,400
*The tax base of an asset is the amount that will be deductible for tax purposes in the future. Here
nothing will be deductible – instead an amount will be taxable.
Provision
Carrying amount ($98,000)
Tax base $nil **
Temporary difference $98,000
Taxable or deductible? Deductible since CA < TB
Deferred tax asset (98,000 16.5%) $16,170
** The tax base of a liability is its carrying amount ($98,000) less any amount deductible for tax
purposes in the future ($98,000).
In summary therefore:
$
Deferred tax liability 1 18,150
Deferred tax liability 2 26,400
Deferred tax asset (16,170)
Net deferred tax liability 28,380
The increase in deferred tax liability since 31 December 20X0 is $5,950 (28,380 – 22,430) and this
is accounted for by:
$ $
DEBIT Tax charge 5,950
CREDIT Deferred tax liability 5,950
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR CASARES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X1
$
Tax charge – deferred tax 5,950
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION FOR CASARES AT 31 DECEMBER 20X1
$
Deferred tax liability 28,380
327
Financial Reporting
Remember the basic rule that a taxable temporary difference arises where the carrying amount of
an item in the statement of financial position exceeds its tax base, and this taxable temporary
difference results in a deferred tax liability.
Try to understand the reasoning behind the recognition of deferred tax liabilities on taxable
temporary differences.
(a) When an asset is recognised, it is expected that its carrying amount will be recovered in
the form of economic benefits that flow to the entity in future periods.
(b) If the carrying amount of the asset is greater than its tax base, then taxable economic benefits
will also be greater than the amount that will be allowed as a deduction for tax purposes.
(c) The difference is therefore a taxable temporary difference and the obligation to pay the
resulting income taxes in future periods is a deferred tax liability.
(d) As the entity recovers the carrying amount of the asset, the taxable temporary difference will
reverse and the entity will have taxable profit.
(e) It is then probable that economic benefits will flow from the entity in the form of tax
payments, and so the recognition of all deferred tax liabilities (except those excluded below)
is required by HKAS 12.
The following are examples of circumstances that give rise to taxable temporary differences.
328
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
*The tax base of an asset is the amount that will be deductible for tax purposes in the future. Here
nothing will be deductible in the future as tax relief has already been given.
HKAS 12, 3.1.2 Transactions that affect the statement of financial position
Illustrative
Examples (a) Depreciation of an asset is not deductible for tax purposes. No deduction will be available
for tax purposes when the asset is sold/scrapped.
(b) A borrower records a loan at proceeds received (amount due at maturity) less transaction
costs. The carrying amount of the loan is subsequently increased by amortisation of the
transaction costs against accounting profit. The transaction costs were, however, deducted
for tax purposes in the period when the loan was first recognised.
(c) A loan payable is measured on initial recognition at net proceeds (net of transaction costs).
The transaction costs are amortised to accounting profit over the life of the loan. Those
transaction costs are not deductible in determining the taxable profit of future, current or prior
periods.
(d) The liability component of a compound financial instrument (e.g. a convertible bond) is
measured at a discount to the amount repayable on maturity, after assigning a portion of the
cash proceeds to the equity component (see HKAS 32). The discount is not deductible in
determining taxable profit.
(e) Development costs may be capitalised and amortised over future periods in determining
accounting profit but deducted in determining taxable profit in the period in which they are
incurred. Such development costs have a tax base of nil as they have already been
deducted from taxable profit. The temporary difference is the difference between the carrying
amount of the development costs and their tax base of nil.
Solution
Carrying amount $120,000
Tax base (200,000 – 90,000) $110,000
Temporary difference $10,000
Taxable or deductible? Taxable since CA > TB
Therefore deferred tax liability (10,000 16.5%) $1,650
The logic behind this liability is as follows: In order to recover the carrying amount of $120,000, the
entity must earn taxable income of $120,000, but it will only be able to deduct $110,000 as a
taxable expense. The entity must therefore pay income tax of $10,000 16.5% = $1,650 when the
carrying amount of the asset is recovered.
329
Financial Reporting
Example: Revaluation
During the year ended 31 December 20X1, Marshall revalues a non-current asset to $8,000,000.
The asset cost $6,000,000 three years ago and was being depreciated at 2% straight line. Capital
allowances were available at 4% straight line. Marshall’s rate of tax is 16.5%.
What deferred tax arises on the revaluation in 20X1, assuming that the revaluation gain is not
taxable in 20X1?
Solution
$'000
Carrying value of non-current asset prior to revaluation
($6,000,000 94%) 5,640
Revalued amount 8,000
Taxable temporary difference = revaluation gain 2,360
Therefore deferred tax liability (16.5% 2.36m) 389.4
HKAS
12.21,22
3.2 Taxable temporary differences which do not result in deferred
tax liabilities
There are two circumstances given in the standard where a taxable temporary difference does
not result in a deferred tax liability:
(a) The deferred tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill.
(b) The deferred tax liability arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a
transaction which:
(i) is not a business combination (see section 8)
(ii) at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit (tax
loss).
HKAS 12.22 3.2.1 Initial recognition of an asset or liability
A temporary difference can arise on initial recognition of an asset or liability, e.g. if part or all of the
cost of an asset will not be deductible for tax purposes. The nature of the transaction which led to
the initial recognition of the asset is important in determining the method of accounting for such
temporary differences.
If the transaction affects either accounting profit or taxable profit, an entity will recognise any
deferred tax liability or asset. The resulting deferred tax expense or income will be recognised in
profit or loss.
Where a transaction affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit it would be normal for an
entity to recognise a deferred tax liability or asset and adjust the carrying amount of the asset or
liability by the same amount. However, HKAS 12 does not permit this recognition of a deferred tax
asset or liability as it would make the financial statements less transparent. This will be the case
both on initial recognition and subsequently, nor should any subsequent changes in the
unrecognised deferred tax liability or asset as the asset is depreciated be made.
330
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
An example of the initial recognition of an asset in a transaction which does not affect either
accounting or taxable profit at the time of the transaction is an intangible asset with a finite life
which attracts no tax allowances. In this case, taxable profit is never affected, and amortisation is
only charged to accounting profit after the transaction.
Solution
As at 20X7, as it recovers the carrying amount of the asset, Perris Co. will earn taxable income of
$10,000 and pay tax of $1,650. The resulting deferred tax liability of $1,650 would not be
recognised because it results from the initial recognition of the asset.
As at 20X8, the carrying value of the asset is now $8,000. In earning taxable income of $8,000, the
entity will pay tax of $1,320. Again, the resulting deferred tax liability of $1,320 is not recognised,
because it results from the initial recognition of the asset.
The following question on accelerated depreciation should clarify some of the issues and introduce
you to the calculations.
Self-test question 4
Jojo Co. buys equipment for $50,000 on 1 January 20X1 and depreciates it on a straight line basis
over its expected useful life of five years. For tax purposes, the equipment is depreciated at 25%
per annum on a straight line basis. The tax rate is 15%.
Required
Show the current and deferred tax impact in years 20X1 to 20X5 of the acquisition of the
equipment.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Remember the basic rule that a deductible temporary difference arises where the carrying amount
of an asset or liability is less than its tax base, and this deductible temporary difference normally
results in a deferred tax asset.
Try to understand the reasoning behind the recognition of deferred tax assets on taxable
temporary differences:
(a) When a liability is recognised, it is assumed that its carrying amount will be settled in the
form of outflows of economic benefits from the entity in future periods.
331
Financial Reporting
(b) When these resources flow from the entity, part or all may be deductible in determining
taxable profits of a period later than that in which the liability is recognised.
(c) A temporary tax difference then exists between the carrying amount of the liability and its
tax base.
(d) A deferred tax asset therefore arises, representing the income taxes that will be
recoverable in future periods when that part of the liability is allowed as a deduction from
taxable profit.
(e) Similarly, when the carrying amount of an asset is less than its tax base, the difference
gives rise to a deferred tax asset in respect of the income taxes that will be recoverable in
future periods.
The following are common examples of situations that result in a deductible temporary difference.
HKAS 12,
Illustrative
4.1 Examples of deductible temporary differences
Examples HKAS 12 provides a number of examples of deductible temporary differences.
4.1.1 Transactions affecting the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income
(a) Retirement benefit costs (pension costs) are deducted from accounting profit as service is
provided by the employee. They are not deducted in determining taxable profit until the entity
pays either retirement benefits or contributions to a fund. (This may also apply to similar
expenses.)
(b) Accumulated depreciation of an asset in the financial statements is greater than the
accumulated depreciation allowed for tax purposes up to the end of the reporting period.
(c) The net realisable value of inventory, or the recoverable amount of an item of property,
plant and equipment falls and the carrying value is therefore reduced, but that reduction is
ignored for tax purposes until the asset is sold.
(d) Research costs (or organisation/other start-up costs) are recognised as an expense for
accounting purposes but are not deductible against taxable profits until a later period.
(e) Income is deferred in the statement of financial position, but has already been included in
taxable profit in current/prior periods.
A non-taxable government grant related to an asset is deducted in arriving at the carrying amount
of the asset but, for tax purpose, is not deducted from the asset’s depreciable amount (in other
words its tax base); the carrying amount of the asset is less than its tax base and this gives rise to
a deductible temporary difference. Government grants may also be set up as deferred income in
which case the difference between the deferred income and its tax base of nil is a deductible
temporary difference. (Note. Whichever method of presentation an entity adopts, a deferred tax
asset may not be recognised here according to the standard.)
332
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
Carrying amount (recoverable amount) $2,600,000
Tax base (4,000,000 – 1,000,000) $3,000,000
Temporary difference $400,000
Taxable or deductible? Deductible since CA < TB
Therefore deferred tax asset (400,000 16.5%) $66,000
HKAS 12.27-
30
4.2 Recognition of deferred tax assets
Although the circumstances listed above will result in a deductible temporary difference, they will
not necessarily result in a deferred tax asset.
This is because the recognition criteria of HKAS 12 state that a deferred tax asset can only be
recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which it can
be utilised.
4.2.1 Sufficient taxable profit
When can we be sure that sufficient taxable profit will be available against which a deductible
temporary difference can be utilised? HKAS 12 states that this will be assumed when sufficient
taxable temporary differences exist which relate to the same taxation authority and the same
taxable entity. These should be expected to reverse as follows:
(a) In the same period as the expected reversal of the deductible temporary difference.
(b) In periods into which a tax loss arising from the deferred tax asset can be carried back
or forward.
Only in these circumstances is the deferred tax asset recognised, in the period in which the
deductible temporary differences arise.
4.2.2 Insufficient taxable profit
What happens when there are insufficient taxable temporary differences (relating to the same
taxation authority and the same taxable entity)? It may still be possible to recognise the deferred
tax asset, but only to the following extent.
(a) Taxable profits are sufficient in the same period as the reversal of the deductible temporary
difference (or in the periods into which a tax loss arising from the deferred tax asset can be
carried forward or backward), ignoring taxable amounts arising from deductible temporary
differences arising in future periods.
(b) Tax planning opportunities exist that will allow the entity to create taxable profit in the
appropriate periods.
With reference to (b), tax planning opportunities are actions that an entity would take in order to
create or increase taxable income in a particular period before the expiry of a tax loss or tax credit
carry forward. For example, in some countries it may be possible to increase or create taxable
profit by electing to have interest income taxed on either a received or receivable basis, or
deferring the claim for certain deductions from taxable profit.
In any case, where tax planning opportunities advance taxable profit from a later period to an
earlier period, the utilisation of a tax loss or a tax credit carry forward will still depend on the
existence of future taxable profit from sources other than future originating temporary differences.
333
Financial Reporting
If an entity has a history of recent losses, then this is evidence that future taxable profit may not
be available.
Solution
Carrying amount ($75,000)
Tax base $nil *
Temporary difference $75,000
Taxable or deductible? Deductible since CA < TB
Therefore deferred tax asset (75,000 16.5%) $12,375
*The tax base of the liability is nil (carrying amount of $75,000 less the $75,000 that will be
deductible for tax purposes when the warranty costs are paid).
The logic behind this is as follows: when the liability is settled for its carrying amount, the entity's
future taxable profit will be reduced by $75,000 and so its future tax payments by $75,000 16.5%
= $12,375.
HKAS 12.34-
36
4.4 Tax losses and credits carried forward
HKAS 12 states that a deferred tax asset may be recognised by an entity which has unused tax
losses or credits (i.e. which it can offset against taxable profits) at the end of a period, to the extent
that it is probable future taxable profits will be available to set off the unused tax losses/credits.
The recognition criteria for deferred tax assets here is identical to the recognition criteria for
deferred tax assets arising from deductible differences. The fact that future taxable profits may not
be available is confirmed by the existence of unused tax losses. For an entity with a past record of
recent tax losses, a deferred tax asset arising from unused tax losses or credits should be
recognised only to the extent that it has adequate taxable temporary differences or where it is
certain that taxable profit will be available to set off the unused losses/credits.
334
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The following are important criteria for assessing the probability that taxable profit will be available
against which unused tax losses/credits can be utilised:
Availability of sufficient taxable temporary differences (same tax authority/taxable entity)
against which unused tax losses/credits can be utilised before they expire
The likelihood that the entity will have taxable profits before the expiry of the unused tax
losses/credits
The unlikely recurrence of unused tax losses resulting from identifiable causes
Availability of tax planning opportunities (see above)
Deferred tax asset is not recognised if it is probable that taxable profit will not be available.
335
Financial Reporting
Solution
(a) A deferred tax liability is recognised of $(100,000 – 60,000) 18% = $7,200.
(b) A deferred tax liability is recognised of $(100,000 – 60,000) 25% = $10,000.
HKAS 12.51C In 2010, HKAS 12 was amended to include a rebuttable presumption that deferred tax on
investment properties carried at fair value under HKAS 40 should be measured based on recovery
through sale rather than use. The amendment was intended to avoid any subjective assessment in
trying to decide whether the carrying amount of an investment property will be recovered through
use or through sale.
As there is no capital gains tax in Hong Kong, this amendment will generally result in the deferred
tax liability on such investment properties being limited to the tax effect of any claw back on sale of
any depreciation allowances previously given. No deferred tax arises in respect of the excess of
fair value over cost.
336
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Example
A company based in Hong Kong owns an investment property with a fair value carrying amount of
$10 million. The property cost $9 million. The tax base of the property is $8 million and the tax rate
on income is 16.5%.
Prior to the amendment to HKAS 12, if it were presumed that the carrying value of the property
would be recovered through use, the deferred tax liability would have been $330,000 (16.5%
($10 million – $8 million)).
The amendment, however, means that it is presumed that the carrying value will be recovered
through sale. Therefore, the deferred tax liability is restricted to the excess of allowances given
i.e. $165,000 (16.5% ($9million – $8million)).
The presumption is rebutted where the investment property is depreciable and is held with the
intention of consuming substantially all the economic benefits of the property through use rather
than sale, in other words, where the entity expects the asset’s income-generating ability to wear out
while the asset is still owned by the entity.
Self-test question 5
Crescent Co. owns a building with an original cost of $10m. In 20X1, the carrying value was $8m
and the asset was revalued to $15m. No equivalent adjustment was made for tax purposes. Total
depreciation allowance for tax purposes is $3m and the tax rate is 30%. If the asset is sold for more
than cost, the total tax depreciation allowance of $3m will be included in taxable income but sale
proceeds in excess of cost will not be taxable.
Required
State the deferred tax consequences if the entity:
(a) expects to recover the carrying value through use,
(b) expects to sell the building.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Self-test question 6
The facts are as in Self-test question 5 above, except that if the building is sold for more than cost,
the total tax depreciation allowance will be included in taxable income (taxed at 30%) and the sale
proceeds will be taxed at 40% after deducting an inflation-adjusted cost of $11m.
Required
State the deferred tax consequences if the entity:
(a) expects to recover the carrying value through use,
(b) expects to sell the building.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
If the tax base is not immediately apparent in Self-test question 6 above, it may be helpful to
consider the fundamental principle of HKAS 12: that an entity should recognise a deferred tax
liability (asset) whenever recovery or settlement of the carrying amount of an asset or liability would
make future tax payments larger (smaller) than they would be if such recovery or settlement would
have no consequences.
337
Financial Reporting
HKAS
12.53,54
5.3 Discounting
The standard does not allow deferred tax assets and liabilities to be discounted. This is because
the complexities and difficulties involved will affect reliability.
Discounting would require detailed scheduling of the timing of the reversal of each temporary
difference, but this is often impracticable. In addition, if discounting were permitted, it would affect
comparability.
It is, however the case that some temporary differences are based on discounted amounts e.g.
retirement benefit obligations.
338
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
8 Summary flowchart
The following flowchart will help to summarise the approach to deferred tax that we have seen
throughout sections 2 to 7 of the chapter.
Is the item’s tax base different from its No No deferred tax implications
carrying value in the statement of
financial position?
Yes
Yes No
Apply the relevant tax rate to the A deferred tax asset is not
temporary difference. recognised in the financial
statements but the related
deductible temporary
difference should be disclosed.
339
Financial Reporting
9.1 Reconciliation
Disclosure point number (4) listed above refers to a reconciliation between tax expense and
accounting profit. Two possible forms are suggested. The following example shows both possible
forms:
340
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Example: Reconciliation
Rugby Co. reports a profit before tax for the year ended 31 December 20X3 of $8.775m and a tax
expense of $3.977m. The tax rate applicable to the jurisdiction in which Rugby operates is 40%
(38% 20X2). Included in Rugby’s statement of profit or loss are the following items:
Charitable donations of $500,000
Fines for environmental pollution of $700,000
A gain on disposal of machinery of $125,000
Net taxable temporary differences at 1 January 20X3 were $1,850,000.
Required
Draft the tax reconciliation as required by HKAS 12 in the two forms allowed.
Solution
The first form allowed reconciles between the product of accounting profit multiplied by the
applicable tax rate(s) and tax expense:
$'000 $'000
Profit before tax 8,775
Tax at applicable rate of 40% 3,510
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible in determining
taxable profit:
Charitable donations (40% 500,000) 200
Fines for environmental pollution (40% 700,000) 280
480
Tax effect of income that is not taxable in determining taxable
profit:
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment (40% (50)
125,000)
Increase in opening deferred tax resulting from an increase in 37
tax rate (1,850,000 2%)
Tax expense 3,977
The alternative form of the required disclosure reconciles the applicable tax rate to the average
effective tax rate:
%
Applicable tax rate 40.0
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes:
Charitable donations (200/8,775 100%) 2.3
Fines for environmental pollution (280/8,775 100%) 3.2
Tax effect of income that is not taxable in determining taxable profit:
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment (50/8,775 100%)) (0.6)
Effect on opening deferred taxes of reduction in tax rate (37/8,775 100%) 0.4
Average effective tax rate 45.3
341
Financial Reporting
There are a number of deferred tax implications of a business combination. Everything that
HKAS 12 states in relation to deferred tax and business combinations is brought together in this
section. Please note that accounting for business combinations is covered in the final section of
this book, Part D on group financial statements (chapters 26 to 30).
342
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 7
On 31 December 20X1, Basil Co. acquired a 60% stake in Lemongrass Co.. Among Lemongrass’s
identifiable assets at that date was inventory with a carrying amount of $8,000 and a fair value of
$12,000. The tax base of the inventory was the same as the carrying amount.
The consideration given by Basil Co. resulted in the recognition of goodwill acquired in the
business combination.
Income tax is payable by Basil Co. at 25% and by Lemongrass at 20%.
Required
What is the deferred tax impact of this transaction in the Basil group financial statements?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Self-test question 8
Oregano Co. owns 70% of Thyme Co.. During 20X1 Thyme sold goods to Oregano for $120,000 at
a mark-up of 20% above cost. Half of these goods are held in Oregano’s inventories at the year
end. The rate of income tax is 30%.
Required
What is the deferred tax impact of this transaction in the Oregano group financial statements?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
343
Financial Reporting
(a) The parent/investor/venturer is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary
difference.
(b) It is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
HKAS 12.44 10.2.2 Recognition of deferred tax asset
HKAS 12 requires that a deferred tax asset should be recognised for all deductible temporary
differences arising from investments in subsidiaries, branches and associates, and interests in joint
ventures, to the extent that (and only to the extent that) both these are probable that:
(a) the temporary difference will reverse in the foreseeable future
(b) taxable profit will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilised
The prudence principle discussed above for the recognition of deferred tax assets should be
considered.
HKFRS 3.24,
HKAS
10.4 Recognition of deferred tax arising from business
12.15,66-68 combinations
HKFRS 3 Business Combinations requires an entity to recognise any deferred tax assets (to the
extent that they meet the relevant recognition criteria) or deferred tax liabilities resulting from
temporary differences on a business combination as identifiable assets and liabilities at the date of
acquisition.
These deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, consequently, will affect the amount of
goodwill or the bargain purchase gain the entity recognises.
344
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
An entity will not, however, recognise deferred tax liabilities arising from the initial recognition of
goodwill.
A business combination may result in a change in the probability of realising a pre-acquisition
deferred tax asset of the acquirer. There is a chance that the acquirer will recover its own deferred
tax asset that was not recognised before the combination of the businesses, e.g. by setting off
unused tax losses against the future taxable profit of the acquiree.
Alternatively, as a result of the business combination it might no longer be probable that future
taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered. The acquirer should recognise a
change in the deferred tax asset in the period of the business combination, but does not take it into
account in calculating the goodwill or bargain purchase gain it recognises in the business
combination.
The potential benefit of the acquiree's income tax loss carry forwards or other deferred tax assets
might not satisfy the criteria for separate recognition when a business combination is initially
accounted for but might be realised subsequently. An entity shall recognise acquired deferred tax
benefits that it realises after the business combination as follows:
(a) Acquired deferred tax benefits recognised within the measurement period that result from
new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date shall be
applied to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill related to that acquisition. If the
carrying amount of that goodwill is zero, any remaining deferred tax benefits shall be
recognised in profit or loss.
(b) All other acquired deferred tax benefits realised shall be recognised in profit or loss (or, if this
standard so requires, outside profit or loss).
Self-test question 9
On 1 September 20X1, Orchid acquired 90% of the ordinary share capital of Daffodil for
consideration totalling $1.75million. At the date of acquisition, Daffodil’s statement of financial
position showed net assets of $1.8million, although the fair value of inventory was assessed to be
$100,000 above its carrying amount.
Required
Explain the deferred tax implications, assuming a tax rate of 16.5%.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Self-test question 10
Dandelion purchased 75% of the ordinary share capital of Bluebell for $1.1m when the net assets
of Bluebell were $1m, giving rise to goodwill of $350,000. At 31 December 20X1 the following is
relevant:
1 Goodwill has not been impaired
2 The net assets of Bluebell amount to $1.2m
Required
What temporary difference arises on this investment at 31 December 20X1?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
345
Financial Reporting
On 1 July 20X6 it acquired the whole of the share capital of Snowdrop for $6 million. At this
date the fair value of the net assets of Snowdrop was $4.5 million and their tax base was
$4 million.
The following information is relevant to Lily Group’s year ended 31 December 20X6:
Blossom
1 Blossom has made a provision amounting to $1.8 million in its accounts in respect of
litigation. This is tax allowable only when the cost is actually incurred. The case is expected
to be settled within 12 months.
2 Blossom has a number of investments classified as at fair value through profit or loss in
accordance with HKFRS 9. The remeasurement gains and losses recognised in profit or loss
for accounting purposes are not taxable/tax allowable until such date as the investments are
sold. To date the cumulative unrealised gain is $2.5 million.
3 Blossom has sold goods to Lily in the year making a profit of $1 million. A quarter of these
goods remain in Lily’s inventory at the year end.
Snowdrop
1 At its acquisition date, Snowdrop had unrelieved brought forward tax losses of $0.4 million.
It was initially believed that Snowdrop would have sufficient taxable profits to utilise these
losses and a deferred tax asset was recognised in Snowdrop’s financial statements at
acquisition. Subsequent events have proven that the future taxable profits will not be
sufficient to utilise the full brought forward loss.
2 At acquisition Snowdrop’s retained earnings amounted to $3.5 million. The directors of Lily
Group have decided that in each of the next four years to the intended listing date of the
group, they will realise earnings through dividend payments from the subsidiary amounting to
$600,000 per annum. Snowdrop has not declared a dividend for the current year. Tax is
payable on remittance of dividends.
3 $300,000 of the purchase price of Snowdrop has been allocated to intangible assets. The
recognition and measurement criteria of HKFRS 3 and HKAS 38 do not appear to have been
met, however the directors believe that the amount is allowable for tax and have calculated
the tax charge accordingly. It is believed that this may be challenged by the tax authorities.
Required
What are the deferred tax implications of the above issues for the Lily Group?
Solution
Acquisitions
Any fair value adjustments made for consolidation purposes will affect the group deferred tax
charge for the year.
A taxable temporary difference will arise where the fair value of an asset exceeds its carrying
value, and the resulting deferred tax liability should be recorded against goodwill.
A deductible temporary difference will arise where the fair value of a liability exceeds its carrying
value, or an asset is revalued downwards. Again, the resulting deferred tax amount (an asset)
should be recognised in goodwill.
In addition, it may be possible to recognise deferred tax assets in a group which could not be
recognised by an individual company. This is the case where tax losses brought forward, but not
considered to be an asset, due to lack of available taxable profits to set them against, can now be
used by another group company.
Goodwill
Goodwill arose on both acquisitions. According to HKAS 12, however, no provision should be made
for the temporary difference arising on this.
346
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Blossom
1 A deductible temporary difference arises when the provision is first recognised. This results
in a deferred tax asset calculated as $540,000 (30% $1.8m). The asset may, however,
only be recognised where it is probable that there will be future taxable profits against which
the future tax allowable expense may be set. There is no indication that this is not the case
for Blossom.
2 A taxable temporary difference arises where investments are revalued upwards for
accounting purposes but the uplift is not taxable until disposal. In this case the carrying
value of the investments has increased by $2.5 million, and this has been recognised in
profit or loss. The tax base has not, however changed. Therefore, a deferred tax liability
should be recognised on the $2.5 million, and in line with the recognition of the underlying
revaluation, this should be recognised in profit or loss.
3 This intra-group transaction results in unrealised profits of $250,000 which will be eliminated
on consolidation. The tax on this $250,000 will, however, be included within the group tax
charge (which comprises the sum of the individual group companies' tax charges). From the
perspective of the group there is a temporary difference. Deferred tax should be provided on
this difference using the tax rate of Lily (the recipient company).
Snowdrop
1 Unrelieved tax losses give rise to a deferred tax asset only where the losses are regarded as
recoverable. They should be regarded as recoverable only where it is probable that there
will be future taxable profits against which they may be used. It is indicated that the future
profits of Snowdrop will not be sufficient to realise all of the brought forward loss, and
therefore the deferred tax asset is calculated only on that amount expected to be recovered.
2 Deferred tax is recognised on the unremitted earnings of investments, except where:
(a) the parent is able to control the payment of dividends
(b) it is unlikely that the earnings will be paid out in the foreseeable future
Lily controls Snowdrop and is therefore able to control its dividend payments, however it is
indicated that $2.4million will be paid as dividends in the next four years. Therefore, a
deferred tax liability related to this amount should be recognised.
3 The directors have assumed that the $300,000 relating to intangible assets will be tax
allowable, and the tax provision has been calculated based on this assumption. However,
this is not certain, and extra tax may have to be paid if this amount is not allowable.
Therefore, a liability for the additional tax amount should be recognised.
347
Financial Reporting
348
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Topic recap
Current
Currenttaxtax Current
Deferred
taxtax
CA > TB CA < TB
Taxable Deductible
temporary temporary
difference difference
Recognise only if
profits available
in future
349
Financial Reporting
Answer 1
(a) $
Current year tax liability ($760,000 16.5%) 125,400
Overprovision in 20X0 ($130,000 – $126,700) 3,300
Therefore
$125,400 is recognised as a current tax liability in the statement of financial position at
31 December 20X1
$122,100 ($125,400 – $3,300) is recognised as tax charge in the statement of profit or
loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 20X1
(b) If the previous year’s tax was settled at $131,000, tax was underprovided. Therefore the
underprovision of $1,000 is added to the 20X1 tax charge to make it $126,400. The liability in
the statement of financial position remains unchanged at $125,400.
Answer 2
(a) The tax base of the interest receivable is $1,000.
(b) The tax base of the dividend is $5,000.
(c) The tax base of the machine is $7,000.
(d) The tax base of the trade receivables is $10,000.
(e) The tax base of the loan is $1 million.
In the case of (b), in substance the entire carrying amount of the asset is deductible against the
economic benefits. There is no taxable temporary difference. An alternative analysis is that the
accrued dividends receivable have a tax base of nil and a tax rate of nil is applied to the resulting
taxable temporary difference ($5,000). Under both analyses, there is no deferred tax liability.
Answer 3
(a) The tax base of the accrued expenses is $1,000.
(b) The tax base of the revenue received in advance is $1,000.
(c) The tax base of the accrued fines and penalties is $100.
(d) The tax base of the loan is $1 million.
Answer 4
The temporary differences associated with the equipment are as follows:
Year
20X1 20X2 20X3 20X4 20X5
$ $ $ $ $
Carrying amount 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 –
Tax base 37,500 25,000 12,500 – –
Taxable temporary difference 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 –
Opening deferred tax liability – 375 750 1,125 1,500
Deferred tax expense (income): bal fig 375 375 375 375 (1,500)
Closing deferred tax liability @ 15% 375 750 1,125 1,500 –
350
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 5
The tax base of the building is $7m ($10m – $3m).
(a) If the entity expects to recover the carrying amount by using the building, it must generate
taxable income of $15m, but will only be able to deduct depreciation of $7m. On this basis
there is a deferred tax liability of $2.4m (($15m – $7m) 30%).
(b) If the entity expects to recover the carrying amount by selling the building immediately for
proceeds of $15m the deferred tax liability will be computed as follows:
Taxable temporary Deferred
difference Tax rate tax liability
$'000 $'000
Total tax depreciation allowance 3,000 30% 900
Proceeds in excess of cost 5,000 Nil –
Total 8,000 900
Note. The additional deferred tax that arises on the revaluation is charged directly to equity:
see Answer 6 below.
Answer 6
(a) If the entity expects to recover the carrying amount by using the building, the situation is as
in answer 5 (a) in the same circumstances.
(b) If the entity expects to recover the carrying amount by selling the building immediately for
proceeds of $15m, the entity will be able to deduct the indexed costs of $11m. The net profit
of $4m will be taxed at 40%. In addition, the total tax depreciation allowance of $3m will be
included in taxable income and taxed at 30%. On this basis, the tax base is $8m ($11m –
$3m), there is a taxable temporary difference of $7m and there is a deferred tax liability of
$2.5m ($4m 40% plus $3m 30%).
Answer 7
The excess of an asset’s fair value over its tax base at the time of a business combination results
in a deferred tax liability. As it arises in Lemongrass, the tax rate used is 20% and the liability is
$800 (($12,000 – $8,000) 20%).
The recognition of a deferred tax liability in relation to the initial recognition of goodwill is
specifically prohibited by HKAS 12.
Answer 8
There is an unrealised profit relating to inventories still held within the group of ½ $20,000 =
$10,000, which must be eliminated on consolidation. But the tax base of the inventories is
unchanged, so it is higher than the carrying amount in the consolidated statement of financial
position and there is a deductible temporary difference of $10,000.
Answer 9
The carrying amount of the inventory in the group accounts is $100,000 more than its tax
base (being carrying amount in Daffodil’s own accounts).
Deferred tax on this temporary difference is 16.5% $100,000 = $16,500.
A deferred tax liability of $16,500 is recognised in the group statement of financial position.
Goodwill is increased by ($16,500 90%) = $14,850.
351
Financial Reporting
Answer 10
The tax base of the investment in Bluebell is the cost of $1.1m. The carrying value is the
share of net assets (75% $1.2m) + goodwill of $350,000 = $1.25m
The temporary difference is therefore $1.25m – $1.1m = $150,000.
This is equal to the group share of post acquisition profits: 75% $200,000 change in net
assets since acquisition.
352
15: Income taxes | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Exam practice
353
Financial Reporting
354
chapter 16
Employee benefits
Topic list
Learning focus
An increasing number of companies and other entities now provide a pension and other
employee benefits as part of their employees' remuneration package. In view of this trend, it is
important that there is standard best practice for the way in which employee benefit costs are
recognised, measured, presented and disclosed in the sponsoring entities' accounts. You
must ensure that you understand and can apply the rules of HKAS 19 as amended in 2011.
355
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.04 Employee benefits 2
3.04.01 Identify short-term employee benefits in accordance with HKAS 19
and apply the recognition and measurement principles in respect of
short-term employee benefits
3.04.02 Distinguish between defined contribution plans and defined benefit
plans
3.04.03 Account for defined contribution plans
3.04.04 Identify termination benefits in accordance with HKAS 19 and apply
the recognition and measurement principles in respect of
termination benefits
356
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Before we look at HKAS 19, we should consider the nature of employee benefit costs and why
there is an accounting problem which must be addressed by a standard.
357
Financial Reporting
Key terms
358
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
359
Financial Reporting
360
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS
19.13-18
2.2 Short-term paid absences
Short-term paid absences include paid holiday leave, sick leave, maternity or paternity leave and
jury service leave. These are classified by the standard as either:
accumulating compensated absences, or
non-accumulating compensated absences.
Accumulating absences are those that can be carried forward and used in future periods if the
current period’s entitlement is not used in full; non-accumulating absences are those which cannot
be carried forward and lapse if the current year entitlement is not used.
2.2.1 Accounting treatment
The cost of accumulating absences should be recognised as an expense when the employee
provides the service which results in entitlement to such absences. Where there is an unused
entitlement at the reporting date, a liability is recognised, based on an estimated amount.
The cost of non-accumulating absences should be recognised as an expense when the absences
occur.
Solution
A liability must be recognised in the statement of financial position to the extent that the entity
expects to have to pay sick leave next year as a result of the entitlement that has accumulated at
31 December 20X8:
2 employees 2 days $60 = $240
$ $
DEBIT Employee expense 240
CREDIT Liability 240
Being sick leave entitlement at 31 December 20X8 expected to be paid next year
HKAS
19.19-24
2.3 Profit-sharing schemes and bonus plans
HKAS 19 requires that an entity recognises the expected cost of profit-sharing and bonus
payments only when:
the entity has a present legal or constructive obligation to make such payments as a result of
past events, and
a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made.
In this case an expense and liability should be recognised.
Often conditions are attached to bonus payments, for example an employee must still be in the
entity's employment when the bonus becomes payable.
361
Financial Reporting
Therefore, an estimate should be made based on the expectation of the level of bonuses that will
ultimately be paid. A reliable estimate can only be made when:
the formal terms of the plan include a formula to determine the amount of the benefit;
the entity determines the amount payable before the financial statements are authorised for
issue; or
past practice provides clear evidence of the amount of a constructive obligation.
Solution
An expense should be recognised for the year in which the profits were made and therefore the
employees' services were provided, for:
$2m 5% = $100,000
Each of the 40 employees remaining with the entity at the year end is entitled to $2,500. A liability
of $100,000 should be recognised if the bonuses remain unpaid at the year end.
3 Post-employment benefits
Topic highlights
There are two types of retirement benefit plan:
Defined contribution plans
Defined benefit plans
362
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS
19.32-39
3.2 Multi-employer plans
Multi-employer plans were defined above in section 1.3. They are retirement benefit plans in which
various entities contribute assets to a pool. These pooled assets are then used to provide benefits
to employees of the various contributing entities.
HKAS 19 requires that an entity should classify such a plan as a defined contribution plan or a
defined benefit plan, under the terms of the plan (including any constructive obligation that exceeds
the formal terms of the plan).
If the multi-employer plan is a defined contribution plan, it is accounted for as normal, by
recognising the contributions made to the plan as an expense.
If, on the other hand, the multi-employer plan is a defined benefit plan, then HKAS 19 requires the
entity to account for it as a defined benefit plan. However, it should do so only on a proportional
basis. In other words it recognises its proportionate share of the obligation, assets and cost
associated with the plan. It should also make all of the normal disclosures for defined benefit plans.
However, determining the extent to which an entity participates in a defined benefit multi-employer
plan may be problematic. Therefore, it may be difficult to determine reliably the appropriate
proportionate share of the relevant data. In this case, where there is insufficient information to
determine the relevant amounts to use defined benefit accounting, then the entity should recognise
the plan as a defined contribution plan. However, it should also make as many additional
disclosures as possible to enable users to understand the nature of the plan. For example, an
entity should disclose that the plan is, in fact, a defined benefit plan and information about any
known surplus or deficit.
363
Financial Reporting
HKAS
19.51-52
4.1 Recognition and measurement
Accounting for defined contribution plans is relatively straightforward:
1 Contributions to a defined contribution plan should be recognised as an expense in the
period they are payable (except to the extent that labour costs may be included within the
cost of assets).
2 Any liability for unpaid contributions that are due as at the end of the period should be
recognised as a liability (accrued expense).
3 Any excess contributions paid should be recognised as an asset (prepaid expense), but
only to the extent that the prepayment will lead to, for example, a reduction in future
payments or a cash refund.
Where contributions are not payable during the period (or within 12 months of the end of the
period) in which the employee provides the services to which they relate, the amount recognised
should be discounted, to reflect the time value of money.
Solution
$
Salaries 16,000,000
Bonus 4,000,000
20,000,000 4% = $800,000
$ $
DEBIT Staff costs expense 800,000
CREDIT Cash 760,000
Accrual 40,000
364
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
1 Determine the deficit or surplus (i) Use an actuarial technique in order to make a reliable
estimate of the cost to the entity of providing the post-
employment benefit that employees have earned in
current and past periods
(ii) discount that benefit to determine the present value of
the defined benefit obligation
(iii) deduct the fair value of plan assets from the present
value of the defined benefit obligation
2 Determine the amount of the The amount of deficit or surplus calculated in step 1 may
net defined benefit liability require adjustment for the effect of limiting a net defined
(asset) benefit asset to the asset ceiling.
3 Determine amounts to be These may include:
recognised in profit or loss (i) current service cost
(ii) past service cost and gain or loss on settlement
(iii) net interest on the defined benefit liability (asset)
365
Financial Reporting
Each of these steps is considered in more detail in the following sections of the chapter.
HKAS
19.58-59
5.3 Step 1 – Determine the deficit or surplus
Measurement of the deficit or surplus is not required at every period end. However, it must be
made sufficiently regularly such that reported amounts are not materially different from the actual
value at the reporting date.
HKAS 19 encourages, but does not require, the use of a qualified actuary.
The cost of providing future benefits in respect of current and past services should be estimated
using an actuarial technique, the projected unit credit method.
HKAS 5.3.1 Estimation of future cost using the projected unit credit method
19.67-68,75-80
The projected unit credit method assumes that each period of an employee’s service gives rise to
an additional "unit" of future benefit. Each of these units is measured separately and they are
added together to calculate the total obligation.
In measuring the obligation, the actuary must make a number of actuarial assumptions, both
demographic and financial, for example:
What the defined benefits will be (this depends upon factors such as length of service and
final salary)
When benefits will be paid (this depends upon retirement age)
How many employees will draw a pension (this depends upon factors such as mortality rate)
The standard requires actuarial assumptions to be unbiased and mutually compatible. They should
also be based on "market expectations" at the year end, over the period during which the
obligations will be settled.
HKAS 5.3.2 Discount the future benefit to present value
19.83-86
After the future cost of the defined benefit obligation has been measured, it must be discounted to
present value using an appropriate discount rate.
The standard requires that this is determined by reference to market yields at the end of the
reporting period on high quality corporate bonds.
In the absence of a "deep" market in such bonds, the yields on comparable government bonds
should be used as reference instead.
The corporate bonds that are used to determine a discount rate should have a term to maturity that
is consistent with the expected maturity of the post-employment benefit obligations, although a
single weighted average discount rate is sufficient.
HKAS 5.3.3 Fair value of plan assets
19.8,113-115
In order to determine the deficit or surplus, the fair value of plan assets must be deducted from the
present value of the defined benefit obligation.
Plan assets are:
(a) assets such as stocks and shares, held by a fund that is legally separate from the reporting
entity, which exists solely to pay employee benefits.
(b) insurance policies, issued by an insurer that is not a related party, the proceeds of which can
only be used to pay employee benefits.
Investments which may be used for purposes other than to pay employee benefits are not plan
assets.
366
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The standard requires that the plan assets are measured at fair value, defined as the amount for
which an asset could be exchanged or a liability settled between knowledgeable, willing parties in
an arm’s length transaction. HKAS 19 includes the following specific requirements:
(a) The plan assets should exclude any contributions due from the employer but not yet paid.
(b) Plan assets are reduced by any liabilities of the fund that do not relate to employee benefits,
such as trade and other payables.
HKAS 5.4 Step 2 – Determine the amount of the net defined benefit
19.63-64
liability (asset)
In the statement of financial position, the amount recognised as a defined benefit liability (or
asset) should be the following.
(a) The present value of the defined obligation at the year end, minus
(b) The fair value of the assets of the plan as at the year end (if there are any) out of which
the future obligations to current and past employees will be directly settled.
Where there is a net defined benefit asset, the amount of this may be limited by the "asset ceiling".
We shall discuss this in more detail later in the chapter.
367
Financial Reporting
The current service cost increases the plan obligation and is charged to operating expenses in
profit or loss.
HKAS 5.5.2 Net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset)
19.83, 123
Annual interest arises in respect of both the defined benefit obligation and the plan assets:
(i) An interest charge arises on the unwinding of the discount on the defined benefit obligation
as time passes, and
(ii) Interest income is recognised on the plan assets.
HKAS 19 requires that these two interest elements are calculated on a net basis as:
Net defined benefit liability (asset) discount rate
The net defined benefit liability (asset) should be determined as at the start of the
accounting period, taking account of changes during the period as a result of contributions
paid into the scheme and benefits paid out.
The discount rate is that determined by reference to market yields (at the year end) on
high quality fixed-rate corporate bonds.
The net interest cost is charged to finance costs in profit or loss.
HKAS
19.122, 127
5.6 Step 4 – Determine amounts to be recognised in other
comprehensive income
The third component of changes in a net defined benefit liability (asset) is remeasurements. These
are recognised in other comprehensive income and are never reclassified to profit or loss.
Remeasurements may include:
(a) actuarial gains and losses;
(b) the return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in net interest on the net defined
benefit liability (asset)); and
(c) any change in the effect of the asset ceiling (excluding amounts included in net interest on
the net defined benefit liability (asset)).
The asset ceiling is a complication that is not relevant in every case, so it is dealt with separately,
later in the chapter.
HKAS 19.128 5.6.1 Actuarial gains and losses
We have already seen, in section 5.3.1, that in measuring the defined benefit obligation, the
actuary must make a number of actuarial assumptions regarding issues such as mortality and
salary increases.
Actuarial gains and losses arise from changes to the defined benefit obligation because of changes
in actuarial assumptions and experience adjustments:
(a) Actual events: The calculation of the plan obligation and the current service cost is based
on estimates of numbers of employees remaining in the plan during the current year as well
as estimates about salary changes during the current year. Where staff leave or salaries are
increased by amounts different from those expected, the year end obligation will be different
from that previously expected.
(b) Actuarial assumptions are revised: The valuation of the plan obligation depends upon a
number of what are called actuarial assumptions. These include the discount rate, estimates
of staff remaining in the plan until retirement, projected salaries on retirement, mortality rates
and the length of time over which benefits need to be paid. These estimates can be changed
as the entity, or its actuaries, reassess the future.
368
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
(c) Actual returns on plan assets: The valuation of the plan assets includes an estimated rate
of return for the current year. At the year end the plan assets may have grown by an amount
different from that expected.
Such actuarial gains and losses are recognised in other comprehensive income.
5.6.2 Return on plan assets
A new valuation of the plan assets is carried out at each period end, using current fair values. Any
difference between the new value, and what has been recognised up to that date (normally the
opening balance, interest, and any cash payments into or out of the plan) is treated as a
"remeasurement" and recognised in other comprehensive income.
Solution
Net defined
Obligation Assets benefit liability
$m $m $m
At 1 January 20X1 100 60 40
Current service cost 18
Contributions 12
Payments (15) (15)
Interest (5% 100m)/(5% 60m) 5 3
108 60
Remeasurements (β) 12 (5)
At 31 December 20X1 120 55 65
In the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, the following amounts will
be recognised:
In profit or loss $m
Current service cost 18
Net interest on net defined benefit liability (5 – 3) 2
In other comprehensive income
Remeasurement losses on defined benefit liability (12 + 5) 17
[Note that the remeasurement in relation to both the asset and liability is a loss as it decreases the
asset and increases the liability.]
In the statement of financial position, the net defined benefit liability of $65m (120 – 55) will be
recognised.
369
Financial Reporting
Self-test question 1
JSX, a listed entity, has a defined benefits pension scheme. The following information relates to the
pension scheme for the year ended 31 October 20X8:
$
Current service cost 362,600
Contributions to scheme 550,700
Benefits paid 662,400
Fair value of scheme assets at 1 November 20X7 10,660,000
Fair value of scheme assets at 31 October 20X8 11,204,000
Present value of defined benefit obligation at 1 November 20X7 13,290,000
Present value of defined benefit obligation at 31 October 20X8 14,210,000
The yield on a high quality corporate bond was 4%.
Calculate the amount to be recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of the pension
scheme for the year ended 31 October 20X8.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Although we have now met the most common items which reconcile the plan surplus or deficit at
the start and end of a period, there are two further complications which you must be able to deal
with:
Past service cost
Settlements
HKAS 5.7.1 Past service cost
19.102-106
Past service costs arise as a result of the amendment or curtailment of a defined benefits plan.
A plan amendment arises when an entity introduces a new defined benefits plan, withdraws an
existing plan, or changes the benefits payable under an existing plan.
A curtailment occurs when an entity significantly reduces the number of employees covered by a
plan.
In either case, the past service cost is the resulting change in the present value of the defined
benefit plan. The past service cost may be positive where new benefits are introduced or negative
where existing benefits are withdrawn. The amount is advised by an actuary.
Past service costs are recognised as an expense in profit or loss at the earlier of the following
dates:
(a) when the plan amendment or curtailment occurs
(b) when the entity recognises related restructuring costs in accordance with HKAS 37 or
termination benefits in accordance with HKAS 19 (see section 6).
370
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 2
A defined benefit plan provides for retirement benefits at the rate of 1% of salary per annum for all
employees from the commencement of their employment. On 31 December 20X1, the defined
benefit obligation is measured at $18 million and the plan assets have a fair value of $15.5 million.
Corresponding amounts at 31 December 20X2 are $22.5 million and $16 million.
On 1 January 20X2, the rules of the plan are changed to provide for benefit at the rate of 2% of
salary for employees with 15 or more years' service and the defined benefit obligation on the new
basis is $20 million. Other relevant information is as follows:
Current service cost is $3 million for the year ended 31 December 20X2
Market yields on high quality corporate bonds were 4% at 1 January 20X2 and
4.5% at 31 December 20X2
An overall remeasurement loss of $1.2 million was identified.
Required
What amount is recognised in profit or loss in respect of the defined benefit plan in the year ended
31 December 20X2?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
HKAS
19.64-65, 83
5.8 Further issues – the asset ceiling
In section 5.4 we said that a net defined benefit asset is limited by the "asset ceiling". This term
relates to a threshold established by HKAS 19 to ensure that any pension surplus is carried at no
more than its recoverable amount. In other words, the net defined benefit asset is restricted to the
amount of cash savings available to the entity in the future.
HKAS 19 defines the asset ceiling as: "the present value of any economic benefits available in the
form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan".
The standard further requires that the discount rate used to calculate the present value of future
economic benefits is the same as that used to calculate the net interest on the net defined benefit
liability (asset) i.e. a rate determined by reference to market yields at the end of the reporting
period on high quality corporate bonds.
Where the net defined benefit asset is reduced to the asset ceiling threshold, the related write
down is treated as a remeasurement and recognised in other comprehensive income.
371
Financial Reporting
Solution
Net defined
Obligation Assets benefit asset
$'000 $'000 $'000
At 1 January 20X1 5,000 5,700 700
Current service cost 1,500
Contributions 2,000
Payments (800) (800)
Interest (3% 5m)/(3% 5.7m) 150 171
5,850 7,071
Remeasurements (β) 90 29
At 31 December 20X1 5,940 7,100 1,160
Remeasurement due to asset ceiling (60)
Asset ceiling 1,100
Therefore, the total remeasurement amount recognised in other comprehensive income is:
$'000
Remeasurement loss on obligation 90
Remeasurement gain on assets (29)
Remeasurement loss due to asset ceiling 60
Net remeasurement loss 121
372
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Current service Increase in plan obligation as a result DEBIT Operating expense (profit or loss)
cost of one extra year’s service. CREDIT Plan obligation
As advised by actuary
Past service cost Change in plan obligation as a result Improvement of benefits:
of improvement or withdrawal of DEBIT Operating expense (profit or loss)
benefits. CREDIT Plan obligation
Withdrawal of benefits:
DEBIT Plan obligation
CREDIT Operating expense (profit or
loss)
Gains or losses Difference between the present value Loss on settlement:
on settlement of the obligation on settlement date DEBIT Operating expense (profit or loss)
and the settlement amount. CREDIT Plan obligation
Gain on settlement:
DEBIT Plan obligation
CREDIT Operating expense (profit or
loss)
Net interest on Based on high quality corporate bond DEBIT Finance cost (profit or loss)
net defined yield at end of period and net defined CREDIT Plan obligation
benefit liability benefit liability (asset) at start of And
(asset) period.
DEBIT Plan assets
Discount rate % net defined benefit
CREDIT Finance cost (profit or loss)
liability (asset) b/f
Remeasurements Due to actuarial differences, the actual DEBIT Other comprehensive income
return on plan assets differing from the CREDIT Plan obligation / assets
return calculated within net interest Or
and change in the effect of the asset
DEBIT Plan obligation / assets
ceiling. Calculated as a balancing
figure CREDIT Other comprehensive income
HKAS
19.63-64
5.10 Disclosure of defined benefit plans
5.10.1 The statement of financial position
In the statement of financial position, the amount recognised as a net defined benefit liability
should be calculated as:
$
Present value of defined benefit obligation at year end X
Fair value of plan assets at year end (X)
Net defined benefit liability X/(X)
If this total is a negative amount, there is a net defined benefit asset and this should be shown in
the statement of financial position as the lower of (a) and (b) below.
(a) The net defined benefit asset as calculated above
(b) The asset ceiling (see section 5.8)
373
Financial Reporting
HKAS 19.120 5.10.2 The statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
The following amounts should be recognised in profit or loss:
Current service cost
Past service cost
Gain or loss on settlement
Net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset)
Remeasurements should be recognised in other comprehensive income.
Self-test question 3
Lewis, a public limited company, has a defined benefit plan for its employees. The present value of
the future benefit obligations at 1 January 20X7 was $890m and fair value of the plan assets was
$1,000 million. Further data concerning the year ended 31 December 20X7 is as follows:
$m
Current service cost 127
Benefits paid to former employees 150
Contributions paid to plan 104
6 Termination benefits
Topic highlights
Termination benefits are recognised as a liability and expense when an entity is demonstrably
committed to them.
Termination benefits are those employee benefits provided in exchange for the termination of an
employee's employment as a result of either:
an entity's decision to terminate an employee's employment before the normal retirement
date; or
an employee's decision to accept an offer of benefits in exchange for the termination of
employment.
374
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
These benefits are dealt with separately in HKAS 19 as unlike other benefits, the event which gives
rise to an obligation is the termination rather than the service of the employee.
7 Current developments
The IASB issued an exposure draft in March 2013 which proposes to amend IAS 19 (and so HKAS
19 which is aligned with IAS 19). The proposed amendments specify that contributions from
employees or third parties set out in the terms of a defined benefit plan are recognised as a
reduction in the service cost in the same period in which they are paid, provided that the
contributions are linked solely to the employees' service rendered in that period. This is the case
where, for example, the contributions are a fixed percentage of salary and the percentage does not
change from year to year.
375
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
HKAS 19 Employee
Benefits
376
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 1
Assets Obligation
$ $
At 1 November 20X7 10,660,000 13,290,000
Current service cost 362,600
Contributions 550,700
Benefits paid (662,400) (662,400)
Net interest (4% b/f assets/obligation) 426,400 531,600
Remeasurement loss on plan obligation (β) 688,200
Remeasurement gain on plan assets (β) 229,300
At 31 October 20X8 11,204,000 14,210,000
The remeasurement loss recognised in other comprehensive income is $458,900 (688,200 –
229,300)
Answer 2
The past service cost measured as the increase in the defined benefit obligation is $20m – $18m =
$2 million.
Net interest is calculated using the year-end market rate on a high quality corporate bond. This
rate is applied to the net defined benefit liability at the start of the year.
Therefore the total charge to profit or loss is:
$
Current service cost 3,000,000
Past service cost 2,000,000
Net interest 4.5% (18m – 15.5m) 112,500
5,112,500
Answer 3
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
$m
Net defined benefit asset 1 120
377
Financial Reporting
WORKINGS
Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation
$m
Opening defined benefit obligation 890
Current service cost 127
Past service cost 30
Interest cost 10% 890m 89
Benefits paid (150)
Remeasurement loss (β) 114
Closing defined benefit obligation 1,100
Changes in the fair value of plan assets
$m
Opening fair value of plan assets 1,000
Interest 10% 1,000 100
Contributions 104
Benefits paid (150)
Remeasurement gain (β) 176
Closing fair value of plan assets 1,230
Asset ceiling test
$m
Closing fair value of plan assets 1,230
Closing defined benefit obligation (1,100)
Closing net defined benefit asset 130
Asset ceiling (120)
Remeasurement loss 10
378
16: Employee benefits | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Exam practice
20X8 20X9
$'000 $'000
Current service cost 1,250 1,430
Benefits paid out 987 1,100
Contributions paid by entity 1,000 1,100
Present value of obligation at end of the year 23,000 20,400
Market value of plan assets at end of the year 21,500 17,840
Yield on corporate bonds at end of year 8% 9%
During 20X8, the benefits available under the plan were improved. The resulting increase in
the present value of the defined benefit obligation was $1 million.
On the final day of 20X9, Rhodes Co. divested of part of its business, and as part of the sale
agreement, transferred the relevant part of its pension fund to the buyer. The present value
of the defined benefit obligation transferred was $5.7 million and the fair value of plan assets
transferred was $5.4 million. Rhodes also made a cash payment of $200,000 to the buyer in
respect of the plan.
Assume that all transactions occur at the end of the year.
Required
(i) Calculate the net defined benefit liability as at the start and end of 20X8 and 20X9
showing clearly any remeasurement gain or loss on the plan each year. (6 marks)
(ii) Show amounts to be recognised in the financial statements in each of the years 20X8
and 20X9 in respect of the plan. (6 marks)
(Total = 16 marks)
379
Financial Reporting
380
chapter 17
Borrowing costs
Topic list
Learning focus
Borrowing costs may be considered in the context of non-current assets or may be considered
in isolation. HKAS 23 concentrates particularly on the situation where the related borrowings
are applied to the construction of certain assets.
381
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.12 Borrowing costs 3
3.12.01 Identify the expenses which constitute borrowing costs in
accordance with HKAS 23
3.12.02 Identify the assets which are qualifying assets
3.12.03 Determine when the capitalisation of borrowing costs shall
commence, be suspended and cease
3.12.04 Calculate the amount of borrowing costs to be capitalised from
specific borrowing and general borrowing
3.12.05 Prepare journal entries for borrowing costs, including expensed and
capitalised borrowing costs
3.12.06 Disclose relevant information with regard to borrowing costs
382
17: Borrowing costs | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Key terms
Borrowing costs. Interest and other costs incurred by an entity in connection with the borrowing of
funds.
Qualifying asset. An asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its
intended use or sale. (HKAS 23)
383
Financial Reporting
Self-test question 1
On 1 January 20X9 Vitality Co. borrowed $1.5 million to finance the production of two assets, both
of which were expected to take a year to build. Work started at the beginning of 20X9. Expenditure
was as follows, with the remaining funds invested temporarily.
Asset A Asset B
$'000 $'000
1 January 20X9 250 500
1 July 20X9 250 500
The loan rate was 8% and Vitality Co. can invest surplus funds at 5%.
Required
Ignoring compound interest, calculate the borrowing costs which may be capitalised for each of the
assets and consequently the cost of each asset as at 31 December 20X9. Show the relevant
journal entries with regard to borrowing costs.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
In a situation where general borrowings are acquired and applied in part to finance a qualifying
asset, then the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation is arrived at by applying the
“capitalisation rate” to the capital expenditure on the asset.
The capitalisation rate is computed as the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to
the entity's outstanding borrowings during the period, excluding specific borrowings made to obtain
a qualifying asset. However, the amount of these borrowing costs must not exceed actual
borrowing costs incurred.
It may be more appropriate to compute a weighted average for borrowing costs for individual
parts of the group or entity, though an overall weighted average can be used for a group or entity
sometimes.
384
17: Borrowing costs | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
The weighted average cost of borrowing is:
5% 2m/(2m + 6m) + 8% 6m/(2m + 6m) = 7.25%
Therefore, interest to be capitalised is calculated as:
7.25% $500,000 12/12 = $36,250
Self-test question 2
Tumble Co. had the following loans in place at the beginning and end of 20X8.
1 January 31 December
20X8 20X8
$m $m
9% Bank loan repayable 20Y0 150 150
8% Bank loan repayable 20Y1 90 90
7.5% debenture repayable 20Y2 – 200
The 7.5% debenture was issued to fund the construction of a qualifying asset (a piece of mining
equipment), construction of which began on 1 July 20X8.
On 1 January 20X8, Tumble Co. began construction of a qualifying asset, a piece of machinery for
a hydro-electric plant, using existing borrowings. Expenditure drawn down for the construction was:
$25 million on 1 January 20X8, $30 million on 1 October 20X8.
Required
Calculate the borrowing costs that can be capitalised for the hydro-electric plant machine.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
385
Financial Reporting
Solution
Total borrowing costs incurred in the year are $10 million 8% = $800,000
Capitalisation of borrowing costs commences on 15 February when building work
commences and both expenditure and borrowing costs are being incurred.
Capitalisation ceases on 30 November when the physical construction of the property is
complete. Decoration and finishing qualify as minor modifications not construction.
Capitalisation does not cease during the temporary suspension of work for inclement
weather in May.
386
17: Borrowing costs | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Self-test question 3
On 1 January 20X8 Allan Lee Co. borrowed $20 million to finance the production of two assets,
both of which were expected to take a year to build. Production started at the beginning of 20X8.
The loan facility was drawn down on 1 January 20X8, and was utilised as follows, with the
remaining funds invested temporarily:
Asset X Asset Y
$m $m
1 January 20X8 4.0 6.0
1 July 20X8 7.0 3.0
The loan rate was 10% and Allan Lee can invest surplus funds at 8%.
Required
Ignoring compound interest, calculate the borrowing costs which may be capitalised for each of the
assets and consequently the cost of each asset as at 31 December 20X8.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Self-test question 4
Autofact, a car manufacturer, prepares its accounts to 30 June each year. On 1 July 20X8, it
purchased for $20million a leasehold interest in a site on which it began to construct a factory with
an estimated useful life of 30 years. The building cost $7million to construct and the plant and
equipment cost $5million. The construction of the factory was complete on 31 March 20X9 and it
was brought into use on 1 July 20X9.
To finance this project, Autofact borrowed $32million on 1 July 20X8. The rate of interest on the
loan was 5% per annum and it was repaid on 31 December 20X9.
Required
Calculate the total amount to be included at cost in property, plant and equipment in respect of this
project at 30 June 20X9.
387
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
Interest and other costs Directly attributable to the An asset that necessarily
incurred by an entity in acquisition, construction or takes a substantial period of
connection with the production of a qualifying time to get ready for its
borrowing of funds. asset. intended use or sale.
Cease capitalisation when the activities to prepare the asset for use or sale are substantially complete.
Disclose:
Amount of borrowing costs capitalised in period
Capitalisation rate used to determine the borrowing costs
eligible for capitalisation.
388
17: Borrowing costs | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 1
Asset A Asset B
$ $
Borrowing costs
To 31 December 20X9 ($0.5m, $1m) 8% 40,000 80,000
Less: investment income
To 30 June 20X9 ($0.25m, $0.5m) 5% 6/12 (6,250) (12,500)
33,750 67,500
Cost of assets
Expenditure incurred 500,000 1,000,000
Borrowing costs 33,750 67,500
533,750 1,067,500
Answer 2
150 90
Capitalisation rate = weighted average rate = 9% + 8% = 8.625%
150 90 150 90
3
Borrowing costs = ($25m 8.625%) + ($30m 8.625% /12)
= $2.803m
Answer 3
Asset X Asset Y
$'000 $'000
Borrowing costs
6
To 30 June 20X8 $4.0m/$6.0m 10% /12 200 300
6
To 31 December 20X8 $11.0m/$9.0m 10% /12 550 450
750 750
Less: investment income
6
To 30 June 20X8 $7.0m/$3.0m 8% /12 (280) (120)
470 630
Cost of assets
Expenditure incurred 11,000 9,000
Borrowing costs 470 630
11,470 9,630
389
Financial Reporting
Answer 4
The total amount to be included in property, plant and equipment at 30 June 20X9 is as follows:
$'000
Lease 20,000
Building 7,000
Plant and equipment 5,000
Interest capitalised ($32,000 5% 9/12) 1,200
33,200
HKAS 23 states that capitalisation of borrowing costs must cease when substantially all the
activities necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are complete. Accordingly,
only nine months' interest (1 July 20X8 to 31 March 20X9) can be capitalised.
390
17: Borrowing costs | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Exam practice
391
Financial Reporting
392
chapter 18
Financial instruments
Topic list 4.4 Trade date v settlement date accounting
4.5 Reclassification
1 Financial instruments 4.6 Section summary
1.1 Background
5 HKFRS 9: Embedded derivatives
1.2 Definitions
5.1 Examples of embedded derivatives
2 HKAS 32: Presentation of financial 5.2 Accounting treatment of embedded
instruments derivatives
2.1 Objective 5.3 Reassessment of embedded derivatives
2.2 Scope
6 HKAS 39: Hedging
2.3 Classification of financial instruments as
6.1 Introduction
financial assets, financial liabilities and
6.2 Definitions
equity
6.3 Types of hedge
2.4 Specific classification rules
6.4 Conditions for hedge accounting
2.5 Offsetting a financial asset and a
6.5 Accounting treatment
financial liability
6.6 Exposures qualifying for hedge
2.6 Interest, dividends, losses and gains
accounting
2.7 Section summary
6.7 Recap
3 HKFRS 9: Recognition of financial
7 HKFRS 7: Disclosure of financial
instruments
instruments
3.1 Scope
7.1 Objective
3.2 Initial recognition
7.2 Classes of financial instruments and
3.3 Reclassification of financial assets
levels of disclosure
3.4 Derecognition
7.3 Statement of financial position
3.5 Section summary
disclosures
4 HKFRS 9: Measurement of financial 7.4 Statement of profit or loss and other
instruments comprehensive income disclosures
4.1 Initial measurement 7.5 Other disclosures
4.2 Subsequent measurement of financial 7.6 Nature and extent of risks arising from
assets financial instruments
4.3 Subsequent measurement of financial 7.7 Capital disclosures
liabilities
8 Current developments
Learning focus
This is a highly controversial and very complex topic. You should concentrate on the essential
points. It is also the subject of ongoing change, as over a period of time HKAS 39 is being
replaced by HKFRS 9.
You need plenty of practice on the topics in this chapter in order to familiarise yourself with this
difficult area.
393
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Account for transactions in accordance with Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards
3.11 Financial assets, financial liabilities and equity instruments 2
3.11.01 Discuss and apply the criteria for the recognition and de-recognition
of a financial asset or financial liability
3.11.02 Discuss and apply the rules for the classification of a financial
asset, financial liability and equity, and their measurement
(including compound instrument)
3.11.03 Discuss and apply the treatment of gains and losses arising on
financial assets or financial liabilities
3.11.04 Discuss the circumstances that give rise to and apply the
appropriate treatment for the impairment of financial assets
3.11.05 Account for derivative financial instruments and simple embedded
derivatives, including the application of own-use exemption
3.11.06 Disclose relevant information with regard to financial assets,
financial liabilities and equity instruments
3.17 Hedge accounting 2
3.17.01 Identify fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and hedges for net
investment in accordance with HKAS 39
3.17.02 Account for fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and hedges for net
investment
394
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
1 Financial instruments
Topic highlights
Accounting guidance on financial instruments is provided in four standards:
HKAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation
HKAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
HKFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures
HKFRS 9 Financial Instruments
1.1 Background
Financial instruments have, in recent years, become increasingly complex. They vary from
straightforward, traditional instruments, such as loan stock or shares through to complex "derivative
instruments".
The emergence of more complex instruments towards the end of the 20th century created a
problem in that existing accounting guidance was insufficient. Accounting standards boards
worldwide were forced to address this through the development of lengthy and detailed standards.
In Hong Kong the relevant standards were:
HKAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation, issued in 2004, which originally dealt with:
– the classification of financial instruments between liabilities and equity
– presentation of certain compound instruments
– disclosure of financial instruments
HKAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, issued in 2006, which dealt
with:
– recognition and derecognition of financial instruments
– the measurement of financial instruments
– hedge accounting
Both of these standards have, subsequent to their original issue, been amended numerous times
as the topic to which they relate continually evolves. In addition, two new standards have been
issued:
HKFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, issued in 2005 replaced the part of HKAS 32
dealing with disclosure. In doing so, it revised, simplified and added to financial instrument
disclosure requirements.
HKFRS 9 Financial Instruments, originally issued in 2009 replaced certain parts of HKAS 39,
in particular with respect to the classification of financial assets. HKFRS 9 was expanded in
2010 to include guidance on the classification and measurement of financial liabilities and
the derecognition of financial assets and liabilities. This standard continues to be a work in
progress and in due course will be developed further to replace HKAS 39 in its entirety.
This chapter is based on those parts of all four standards in issue at 31 May 2013. The HKICPA
operates a six-month rule, meaning that new or revised standards which have been issued by the
cut-off date (31 May 2013 for December 2013 exams and 30 November 2013 for June 2014
exams) are only examined where they have been effective or will become effective within 13
months from the first day of the month in which the examination takes place. In the case of HKFRS
9, the effective date is January 2015 so it is examinable. Any subsequent amendments made to
HKFRS 9 will be examined according to the six-month rule as stated above.
395
Financial Reporting
HKAS 32.11,
HKFRS 9,
1.2 Definitions
Appendix A
A number of definitions are common to all four standards.
Key terms
Financial instrument. Any contract that gives rise to both a financial asset of one entity and a
financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
Financial asset. Any asset that is:
(a) cash;
(b) an equity instrument of another entity;
(c) a contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset from another entity; or to
exchange financial instruments with another entity under conditions that are potentially
favourable to the entity; or
(d) a contract that will or may be settled in the entity's own equity instruments and is a:
(i) non-derivative for which the entity is or may be obliged to receive a variable number of
the entity's own equity instruments
(ii) derivative that will or may be settled other than by the exchange of a fixed amount of
cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of the entity's own equity
instruments
Financial liability. Any liability that is a:
(a) contractual obligation to:
(i) deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity
(ii) exchange financial instruments with another entity under conditions that are potentially
unfavourable
(b) contract that will or may be settled in the entity's own equity instruments and is a:
(i) non-derivative for which the entity is or may be obliged to deliver a variable number of
the entity's own equity instruments
(ii) derivative that will or may be settled other than by the exchange of a fixed amount of
cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of the entity's own equity
instruments
Equity instrument. Any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after
deducting all of its liabilities.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Derivative. A financial instrument or other contract with all three of the following characteristics:
(a) Its value changes in response to the change in a specified interest rate, financial instrument
price, commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, credit rating or credit
index, or other variable (sometimes called the "underlying")
(b) It requires no initial net investment or an initial net investment that is smaller than would be
required for other types of contracts that would be expected to have a similar response to
changes in market factors
(c) It is settled at a future date (HKAS 32 and HKFRS 9)
396
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS 32.13- Some of the terms used within the definitions themselves need defining:
14
(a) A "contract" need not be in writing, but it must comprise an agreement that has "clear
economic consequences" and which the parties to it cannot avoid, usually because the
agreement is enforceable in law.
(b) An "entity" here could be an individual, partnership, incorporated body or government
agency.
HKAS 32 makes it clear that the following items are not financial assets or liabilities:
Physical assets, e.g. inventories, property, plant and equipment, leased assets and
intangible assets (patents, trademarks etc.)
Prepaid expenses, deferred revenue and most warranty obligations
Liabilities or assets that are not contractual in nature
Contractual rights/obligations that do not involve transfer of a financial asset, e.g.
commodity futures contracts, operating leases
Self-test question 1
Why do you think that physical assets and prepaid expenses do not qualify as financial
instruments?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Contingent rights and obligations meet the definition of financial assets and financial liabilities
respectively, even though many do not qualify for recognition in financial statements. This is
because the contractual rights or obligations exist because of a past transaction or event (e.g.
assumption of a guarantee).
HKAS 1.2.2 Primary and derivative instruments
32.AG15
The examples of financial assets and liabilities given in the previous section may be referred to as
"primary instruments". You should also be aware of derivative financial instruments.
A derivative is a financial instrument that derives its value from the price or rate of an underlying
item. Common examples of derivatives include the following:
Forward contracts which are agreements to buy or sell an asset at a fixed price at a fixed
future date.
Futures contracts, which are similar to forward contracts except that contracts are
standardised and traded on an exchange.
Options, which are rights (but not obligations) for the option holder to exercise at a pre-
determined price; the option writer loses out if the option is exercised.
Swaps, which are agreements to swap one set of cash flows for another (normally interest
rate or currency swaps).
397
Financial Reporting
A simple example of a forward contract may help you to understand how it derives its value from an
underlying item. Say a forward contract exists to sell an asset for $8 on a given date. At today's
date the market price of the asset is $5 and therefore it would be fair to say that the contract is
worth $3. This value cannot, however, be established without reference to the price of the
underlying item, being the market price of the asset. If the underlying item is volatile, then the
settlement of the derivative can lead to a very different result from the one originally envisaged.
Derivatives usually have no, or very little, initial cost. Therefore, before the development of
HKAS 32 and HKAS 39, they may not have been recognised in the financial statements at all, or
recognised at a value bearing no relation to the current value. This is obviously misleading and
leaves users of the accounts unaware of the uncertainty and risk to which a company holding
derivatives is exposed.
Part of the reason why HKAS 32 and HKAS 39 were developed was in order to correct this
situation.
398
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKAS 32 requires that the issuer of a financial instrument classifies it, or its component parts, as a
financial asset, financial liability or equity based on:
the substance of the contractual arrangement on initial recognition
the definitions in the Key terms provided in section 1.2 above
The classification of the financial instrument is made when it is first recognised and this
classification will continue until the financial instrument is removed from the entity's statement of
financial position.
HKAS 32.16 2.3.1 Distinguishing financial liabilities and equity
Distinguishing a financial liability from equity may not be straightforward and therefore HKAS 32
provides additional guidance. The underlying principle is that of substance over form. Although
substance and legal form are often consistent with each other, this is not always the case.
An instrument is an equity instrument only if there is no contractual obligation to deliver cash or
another financial asset to another entity or to exchange another financial instrument with the
holder under potentially unfavourable conditions to the issuer.
Therefore, for example, a redeemable preference share is classified as a liability, rather than
equity, as there is an obligation to deliver cash at the redemption date. On the other hand, ordinary
shares are classified as equity as, although the holder of an equity instrument may be entitled to a
pro rata share of any distributions out of equity, the issuer does not have a contractual obligation to
make such a distribution.
A financial liability exists regardless of the way in which the contractual obligation to deliver
cash or a financial asset will be settled. The issuer's ability to satisfy an obligation may be
restricted, e.g. by lack of access to foreign currency, but this is irrelevant as it does not remove the
issuer's obligation or the holder's right under the instrument.
Self-test question 2
During the financial year ended 31 December 20X5, Kim issued the financial instrument described
below. Identify whether it should be classified as liability or equity, explaining in not more than 40
words the reason for your choice. You should refer to the relevant Hong Kong Accounting
Standards.
Redeemable preference shares with a coupon rate 5%. The shares are redeemable on
31 December 20X9 at premium of 20%.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
399
Financial Reporting
Classification Classification
under HKAS 32 under amended
Issued financial instrument before amendment HKAS 32
400
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Even though the amendments permit certain instruments that were previously presented as
financial liabilities to now be presented as equity, derivatives over such equity instruments may not
be presented as equity.
Puttable instruments and instruments puttable only on liquidation that are classified as equity in the
separate or individual financial statements of the issuing entity and represent non-controlling
interests should be classified as financial liabilities in the consolidated financial statements of the
group.
HKAS 32.25 2.4.2 Financial instruments with contingent settlement provisions
The settlement of some financial instruments depends on events which are beyond the control of
both the holder and issuer of the instrument:
(a) The occurrence or non-occurrence of uncertain future events
(b) The outcome of uncertain circumstances
For example, an entity might have to deliver cash instead of issuing equity shares. In this situation
it is not immediately clear whether the entity has an equity instrument or a financial liability.
Such financial instruments should be classified as financial liabilities unless the possibility of
settlement is remote.
HKAS 32.26 2.4.3 Financial instruments with settlement options
When a derivative financial instrument gives one party a choice over how it is settled (e.g., the
issuer can choose whether to settle in cash or by issuing shares) the instrument is a financial
asset or a financial liability unless all the alternative choices would result in it being an equity
instrument.
HKAS 2.4.4 Compound financial instruments
32.28,29,32
Topic highlights
Compound instruments are split into equity and liability parts and presented accordingly in the
statement of financial position.
Where a financial instrument contains both a liability and an equity element, HKAS 32 requires that
these component parts are classified separately according to the substance of the contractual
arrangement and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument.
A common type of compound instrument is convertible debt. On the issue of such debt, the holder
is granted an option to convert it into an equity instrument (usually ordinary shares) of the issuer
rather than redeem it. This is the economic equivalent of the issue of conventional debt plus a
warrant to acquire shares in the future.
In this case the instrument is presented as part liability, part equity, and the usual way to calculate
the split is to:
(a) calculate the value for the liability component based on similar instruments with no
conversions rights, and
(b) deduct this from the instrument as a whole to leave a residual value for the equity component.
The reasoning behind this approach is that an entity's equity is its residual interest in its assets
amount after deducting all its liabilities.
The sum of the carrying amounts assigned to liability and equity will always be equal to the
carrying amount that would be ascribed to the instrument as a whole.
The following example should make this split clearer.
401
Financial Reporting
Solution
The liability component is valued first, and the difference between the proceeds of the bond issue
and the fair value of the liability is assigned to the equity component. The present value of the
liability component is calculated using a discount rate of 8%, the market interest rate for similar
bonds having no conversion rights, as shown.
$
Present value of the principal: $2,500,000 payable at the end of three years
($2.5m 1/1.083)* 1,985,000
Present value of the interest: $125,000 payable annually in arrears for three
years ($125,000 (1/1.08 + 1/1.082 + 1/1.083) 322,137
Total liability component 2,307,137
Equity component (balancing figure) 192,863
Proceeds of the bond issue 2,500,000
* Note. Both the present value figures can be found using tables using an 8% discount factor for
the principal of 0.794 and for the interest of 2.577. In the case of the second (present value of the
interest), if tables are used, the present value is $322,125, giving an equity component balancing
figure of $192,875. The difference is due to rounding.
The split between the liability and equity components remains the same throughout the term of the
instrument, even if there are changes in the likelihood of the option being exercised. This is
because it is not always possible to predict how a holder will behave. The issuer continues to have
an obligation to make future payments until conversion, maturity of the instrument or some other
relevant transaction takes place.
Self-test question 3
On 1 January 20X1, an entity issued 100,000 6% convertible bonds at their par value of $20 each.
The bonds will be redeemed on 1 January 20X6. Each bond is convertible at the option of the
holder at any time during the five-year period. Interest on the bond will be paid annually in arrears.
The prevailing market interest rate for similar debt without conversion options at the date of issue
was 8%.
Required
At what value should the equity element of the hybrid financial instrument be recognised in the
financial statements of the entity at the date of issue?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
402
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Convertible debt instruments where conversion is at the option of the issuing entity are not
compound instruments and do not require the split-accounting approach described above. Instead,
such instruments are accounted for as a liability in their entirety.
403
Financial Reporting
The HKAS 32 guidance considered so far all relates to the classification of financial instruments for
presentation in the statement of financial position. The standard also considers how financial
instruments are presented in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and
statement of changes in equity:
You should look at the requirements of HKAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements for further
details of disclosure, and HKAS 12 Income Taxes for disclosure of tax effects.
404
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
3.1 Scope
All entities are required to apply HKFRS 9 to all types of financial instruments with the exception of
the following:
(a) Investments in subsidiaries, associates, and joint ventures that are accounted for under
HKASs 27, 28 and 31.
(b) Leases covered in HKAS 17.
(c) Employee benefit plans covered in HKAS 19.
(d) Insurance contracts.
(e) Equity instruments issued by the entity e.g. ordinary shares issued, or options and
warrants.
(f) Financial guarantee contracts.
(g) Contracts for contingent consideration in a business combination, covered in HKFRS 3.
(h) Contracts requiring payment based on climatic, geological or other physical variables.
(i) Loan commitments that cannot be settled net in cash or another financial instrument.
(j) Financial instruments, contracts and obligations under share-based payment transactions,
covered in HKFRS 2.
HKFRS 9,
3.1.1
3.2 Initial recognition
Topic highlights
Financial instruments are recognised when the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions
of the instrument.
Financial assets are classified as measured at amortised cost or fair value. Financial liabilities are
classified at fair value through profit or loss or amortised cost.
HKFRS 9 requires that financial instruments are recognised in the statement of financial position
when the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
405
Financial Reporting
Notice that this is different from the recognition criteria in the Conceptual Framework and in most
other standards. Items are normally recognised when there is a probable inflow or outflow of
resources and the item has a cost or value that can be measured reliably.
Yes
Do the contractual terms of the No
financial asset give rise to
cash flows on specified dates?
Yes
Are the cash flows solely No
payments of principal and
interest on the principal
outstanding?
Yes
Measure at amortised cost Measure at fair value
Note that the HKFRS 9 requirement to classify financial assets on recognition as one of two types
is a significant simplification of the previous HKAS 39 rules. These required financial assets to be
classified as one of four types, being:
at fair value through profit or loss
held to maturity
available for sale, and
loans and receivables
406
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKFRS 9,
4.4.1-4.4.2
3.3 Reclassification of financial assets
Topic highlights
Financial assets may be reclassified from one category to another in certain circumstances.
Although on initial recognition financial assets must be classified in accordance with the
requirements of HKFRS 9, in some cases they may be subsequently reclassified.
When an entity changes its business model for managing financial assets, it should reclassify all
affected financial assets. This reclassification applies only to debt instruments, as equity
instruments must be classified as measured at fair value.
HKFRS 9 prohibits the reclassification of financial liabilities.
HKFRS 9,
3.2.3-3.2.6
3.4 Derecognition
Topic highlights
Financial assets should be derecognised when the rights to the cash flows from the asset expire
or where substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to another party.
Financial liabilities should be de-recognised when they are extinguished.
HKFRS 9 now provides the rules with regard to derecognition. Derecognition refers to the removal of
a previously recognised financial instrument from an entity's statement of financial position.
3.4.1 Derecognition of financial assets
A financial asset should be derecognised by an entity when:
(a) the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire, or
(b) the entity transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial
asset to another party
HKFRS 9 includes the following examples of the transfer of substantially all risks and rewards of
ownership:
An unconditional sale of a financial asset
A sale of a financial asset together with an option to repurchase the financial asset at its fair
value at the time of repurchase
The standard also provides examples of situations where the risks and rewards of ownership have
not been transferred:
A sale and repurchase transaction where the repurchase price is a fixed price or the sale
price plus a lender's return
407
Financial Reporting
A sale of a financial asset together with a total return swap that transfers the market risk
exposure back to the entity
A sale of short-term receivables in which the entity guarantees to compensate the transferee
for credit losses that are likely to occur.
3.4.2 Derecognition of financial liabilities
A financial liability is derecognised when it is extinguished i.e. when the obligation specified in the
contract is discharged or cancelled or expires.
Where an existing borrower and lender of debt instruments exchange one financial instrument for
another with substantially different terms, this is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original
financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability.
Similarly, a substantial modification of the terms of an existing financial liability or a part of it should
be accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new
financial liability.
For this purpose, a modification is "substantial" where the discounted present value of cash flows
under the new terms, discounted using the original effective interest rate, is at least 10% different
from the discounted present value of the cash flows of the original financial liability.
The difference between the carrying amount of a financial liability (or part of a financial liability)
extinguished or transferred to another party and the consideration paid, including any non-cash
assets transferred or liabilities assumed, shall be recognised in profit or loss.
Example: Derecognition
A number of years ago Beijing Company issued loan stock with the following terms:
Interest to be paid annually in arrears at a rate of 5.5%
Loan to be repaid on 31 December 20X7
Taking into account the transaction costs, the effective interest rate was 6%. Beijing had paid all
interest and capital due up to 31 December 20X1, and at that date the carrying amount of the loan
was $10 million.
During 20X1, the worldwide economic recession caused Beijing to suffer financial difficulties, and
an agreement to revise the terms of the loan stock from 20X2 onwards was reached with lenders.
The revised terms included an extension to the term of the loan and an increase to the coupon
rate.
The effective interest rate of the revised terms, excluding transaction costs was 8% per annum.
The present value of the cash flows, excluding transaction costs, under the revised terms was
$10.5 million at 6% and $9.5 million at 8%.
Transaction costs of $700,000 were payable on 1 January 20X2 in respect of the negotiations for
the revised terms.
How should the revision to the terms of the loan be treated in Beijing’s financial statements?
Solution
The revised terms negotiated by Beijing are such that the original loan should be derecognised and
a new financial liability recognised.
Derecognition of the old loan and recognition of the new liability is required if the present value of
the cash flows under the new terms is 10% or more different from the present value of the original
loan. The cash flows under the new terms must be discounted at the 6% effective interest rate of
the original loan and include the $700,000 transaction costs.
HKFRS 9. With transaction costs payable at the start of the period of the revised terms, they are added on in
B3.3.6 full to the $10.5m present value, giving a total of $11.2m. This is 12% different from the $10.0m
408
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
present value of the old loan, so the original loan should be derecognised and the new financial
liability recognised.
Self-test question 4
Discuss whether the following financial instruments would be derecognised.
(a) ABC sells an investment in shares, but retains a call option to repurchase those shares at
any time at a price equal to their current market value at the date of repurchase.
(b) DEF enters into a stocklending agreement where an investment is lent to a third party for a
fixed period of time for a fee.
(c) XYZ sells title to some of its receivables to a debt factor for an immediate cash payment of
90% of their value. The terms of the agreement are that XYZ has to compensate the factor
for any amounts not recovered by the factor after six months.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
A financial liability which is extinguished i.e., when the obligation specified in the contract is
discharged or cancelled or expires, should be derecognised by an entity.
409
Financial Reporting
Financial assets should be derecognised when the rights to the cash flows from the asset
expire or where substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to
another party.
Financial liabilities should be derecognised when they are extinguished.
The classification of financial assets and financial liabilities is of particular importance in terms of
how they are measured throughout their life.
HKFRS 9,
5.2.1
4.2 Subsequent measurement of financial assets
Topic highlights
Financial assets are subsequently measured at:
fair value with changes in value normally recognised in profit or loss, or
amortised cost with interest recognised in profit or loss.
As the classifications suggest, financial assets are measured, subsequent to initial recognition at:
fair value, or
amortised cost.
410
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Level 1 inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that
the entity can access at the measurement date.
Level 2 inputs Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These may include quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for
identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3 inputs Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
Any changes in fair value are normally recognised in profit or loss. There is an exception to this rule
where the financial asset is an investment in an equity instrument not held for trading. In this case
the entity can make an irrevocable election to recognise changes in the fair value in other
comprehensive income.
Key terms
Amortised cost of a financial asset or financial liability is the amount at which the financial asset or
liability is measured at initial recognition minus principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative
amortisation using the effective interest method of any difference between that initial amount and
the maturity amount, and minus any reduction (directly or through the use of an allowance account)
for impairment or uncollectability.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial
instrument and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period. The
effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or
receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument to the net carrying amount of the
financial asset or liability. (HKAS 39)
411
Financial Reporting
Solution
ABC will receive interest of $5,900 (125,000 4.72%) each year and $125,000 when the
instrument matures.
ABC must allocate the discount of $25,000 and the interest receivable over the five-year term at a
constant rate on the carrying amount of the debt. To do this, it must apply the effective interest rate
of 10%.
The following table shows the allocation over the years:
Profit or loss: Interest received during
Amortised cost at Interest income year Amortised cost
Year beginning of year for year (@10%) (cash inflow) at end of year
$ $ $ $
20X5 100,000 10,000 (5,900) 104,100
20X6 104,100 10,410 (5,900) 108,610
20X7 108,610 10,861 (5,900) 113,571
20X8 113,571 11,357 (5,900) 119,028
20X9 119,028 11,872 (125,000 + 5,900) –
Each year the carrying amount of the financial asset is increased by the interest income for the
year and reduced by the interest actually received during the year.
Investments whose fair value cannot be reliably measured should be measured at cost.
Note that interest income is recognised in profit or loss each year, being the amount of interest
actually received plus the interest income related to the winding up of the financial asset to its
redemption value.
4.2.3 "Old" rules for subsequent measurement of financial assets
As we have already said, HKFRS 9 has superseded HKAS 39 in respect of providing guidance for
the accounting for financial assets. An understanding of the "old" rules with regard to subsequent
accounting for financial assets will help you to understand the reduction in complexity afforded by
the introduction of HKFRS 9.
While the treatment under HKAS 39 seems very similar to that under HKFRS 9, the initial
classification of each financial instrument was more complex as certain instruments could fall into
more than one category or indeed fall foul of strict classification rules after initial classification and
have to be reclassified.
The transition to HKFRS 9 must be applied retrospectively, although the business model
assessment need only be made on the date of initial application of the new standard.
Self-test question 5
St Ives purchased a $20 million 6% debenture at par on 1 January 20X1 when the market rate of
interest was 6%. Interest is paid annually on 31 December. The debenture is redeemable at par on
31 December 20X2.
The market rate of interest on debentures of equivalent term and risk changed to 7% on
31 December 20X1.
412
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Required
Show the charge or credit to profit or loss for each of the two years to 31 December 20X2 if the
debentures are classified as:
(a) financial assets at amortised cost.
(b) financial assets at fair value through profit or loss.
Fair value is to be calculated using discounted cash flow techniques.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Topic highlights
Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at fair value or amortised cost with gains and losses
recognised in profit or loss.
Except for financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss (including most derivatives), all
financial liabilities should be recognised and measured at amortised cost. The exceptions should
be measured at fair value. However, if the fair value cannot be measured reliably, they should then
be measured at cost.
4.3.1 Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
The definitions seen above in relation to financial assets at amortised cost remain relevant here.
Again, their application is best seen through examples.
Solution
The premium on redemption of the loan notes represents a finance cost. The effective rate of
interest must be applied so that the debt is measured at amortised cost.
At the time of issue, the loan notes are recognised at their net proceeds of:
$199,680 (200,000 – 320).
The finance cost for the year ended 31 December 20X6 is calculated as follows:
B/f Interest @ 10% C/f
$ $ $
20X5 199,680 19,968 219,648
20X6 219,648 21,965 241,613
Self-test question 6
On 1 January 20X2, an entity issued a debt instrument with a coupon rate of 5% at a par value of
$1,000,000. The directly attributable costs of issue were $30,000. The debt instrument is repayable
on 31 December 20X8 at a premium of $260,000.
413
Financial Reporting
Required
What is the total amount of the finance cost associated with the debt instrument?
A $294,000
B $318,000
C $514,000
D $640,000
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
Self-test question 7
Grumble Co. issues a bond for $839,619 on 1 January 20X2. No interest is payable on the bond,
but it will be held to maturity and redeemed on 31 December 20X4 for $1m. The bond has not been
designated as at fair value through profit or loss.
Required
Calculate the charge to profit or loss of Grumble Co. for the year ended 31 December 20X2 and
the balance outstanding at 31 December 20X2.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
HKFRS 9,
3.1.2-3.1.6,
4.4 Trade date v settlement date accounting
Appendix A A regular way purchase or sale of financial assets shall be recognised and derecognised using
trade date accounting or settlement date accounting.
Key terms
A regular way purchase or sale is a purchase or sale of a financial asset under a contract whose
terms require delivery of the asset within the time frame established generally by regulation or
convention in the marketplace concerned.
414
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKFRS 9 refers to two methods of accounting, being trade date and settlement date accounting.
An entity shall apply the same method consistently for all purchase and sales of financial assets
that are classified in the same way in accordance with HKFRS 9. For this purpose, assets that the
definition of held for trading form a separate classification from assets designated as measured at
fair value through profit or loss. In addition, investments in equity instruments accounted for using
the option provided in HKFRS 9 (irrevocable election to present in other comprehensive income
subsequent changes in the fair value of an investment in an equity instrument) form a separate
classification.
The trade date is the date on which an entity commits to purchase or sell an asset, and trade date
accounting results in:
the recognition of an asset to be received and liability to pay for it on the trade date, and
the derecognition of an asset to be sold and corresponding receivable on the trade date
(together with any gain or loss).
The settlement date is the date on which an asset is delivered to or by an entity, and settlement
date accounting results in:
the recognition of an asset on the settlement date and
the derecognition of an asset on the settlement date.
When trade date accounting is used interest does not start to accrue until the settlement date when
title passes.
When settlement date accounting is used:
(a) An asset subsequently measured at amortised cost is recognised initially at its fair value on
the trade date.
(b) Any change in the fair value of the asset to be received between the trade and settlement
date is not recognised for assets measured at amortised cost.
(c) Any change in the fair value of the asset to be received between the trade and settlement
date is recognised in profit or loss or other comprehensive income for assets measured at
fair value.
Solution
Trade date accounting
On 27 December 20X4, the entity should recognise the financial asset and the liability to the
counterparty at $1,000.
At 31 December 20X4, the financial asset should be remeasured to $1,005 and a gain of $5
recognised in profit or loss.
On 5 January 20X5, the liability to the counterparty of $1,000 will be paid in cash. The fair
value of the financial asset should be remeasured to $1,007 and a further gain of $2
recognised in profit or loss.
415
Financial Reporting
Topic highlights
Financial assets measured at amortised cost must be tested for impairment when there is objective
evidence of impairment. Any loss is recognised in profit or loss.
At each year end, an entity should assess whether there is any objective evidence that a financial
asset or group of assets is impaired. Although HKFRS 9 now applies to the recognition and
measurement of financial assets, HKAS 39 continues to provide the guidance on impairments.
Due to the reduced number of classifications of financial assets under HKFRS 9, this area is less
complex than it was prior to the issue of the new standard, and only those financial assets
classified as measured at amortised cost need be tested for impairment.
Self-test question 8
Can you think of three examples of indications that a financial asset or group of assets may be
impaired?
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
416
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
(i) Adverse changes in the payment status of borrowers in the group (e.g. an increased
number of delayed payments or an increased number of credit card borrowers who
have reached their credit limit and are paying the minimum monthly amount).
(ii) National or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults on the assets in the
group (e.g. an increase in the unemployment rate in the geographical area of the
borrowers, a decrease in property prices for mortgages in the relevant area, a
decrease in oil prices for loan assets to oil producers, or adverse changes in industry
conditions that affect the borrowers in the group).
The disappearance of an active market because an entity's financial instruments are no longer
publicly traded is not evidence of impairment. A downgrade of an entity's credit rating is not, of
itself, evidence of impairment, although it may be evidence of impairment when considered with
other available information. A decline in the fair value of a financial asset below its cost or
amortised cost is not necessarily evidence of impairment (for example, a decline in the fair value of
an investment in a debt instrument that results from an increase in the risk-free interest rate).
HKAS 39.63- 4.4.3 Impairment of financial assets carried at amortised cost
65
The impairment loss is the difference between the asset's carrying amount and its recoverable
amount. The asset's recoverable amount is the present value of estimated future cash flows,
discounted at the financial instrument's original effective interest rate.
The amount of the loss should be recognised in profit or loss.
If the impairment loss decreases at a later date (and the decrease relates to an event occurring
after the impairment was recognised) the reversal is recognised in profit or loss. The carrying
amount of the asset must not exceed the original amortised cost.
Example: Impairment
Floribunda has a 7% loan receivable of $1m. Interest is payable annually in arrears and the
principal is repayable in three years' time. The amortised cost of the loan is $1m. The original
effective rate of interest was 7% and the current effective interest rate is 8%.
The borrower is in financial difficulty and Floribunda has granted a concession in that no annual
interest is payable and the principal will be repaid in three years' time at a premium of 10%.
Required
Explain how the carrying amount of the loan should be calculated.
Solution
The financial difficulty of, and the granting of a concession to, the issuer are both objective
evidence of impairment.
The recoverable amount should be calculated as $839,185 by discounting the $1.1m agreed
repayment at the original effective interest rate of 7% over a four-year period.
An impairment loss of $160,815 is therefore recognised in profit or loss.
In Year 1, interest income of $58,743 (7% $839,185) should be recognised and the
carrying amount of the loan increased to $897,928. This process should be repeated through
Years 2 to 4, at which point the loan will be carried at $1.1m immediately prior to repayment.
HKFRS 9,
5.6.1-5.6.3 4.5 Reclassification
Earlier we saw that an entity may reclassify financial assets from one category to another.
Where financial assets are reclassified, that reclassification is applied prospectively from the
reclassification date. Previously recognised gains, losses or interest are not restated.
417
Financial Reporting
If an entity reclassifies a financial asset so that it is now measured at fair value, its fair value is
determined at the reclassification date. Any gain or loss arising from a difference between the
previous carrying amount and fair value is recognised in profit or loss.
If an entity reclassifies a financial asset so that it is now measured at amortised cost, its fair value
at the reclassification date becomes its new carrying amount.
Derivative contracts may be "embedded" in contracts that are not themselves derivatives (and may
not be financial instruments). These non-derivatives are known as host contracts, and may
comprise:
leases
sale or purchase contracts
insurance contracts
construction contracts
a debt or equity instrument
"Host"
Lease Accounted for as normal
contract
418
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
(c) An embedded derivative caused by changes in the foreign exchange can be found in a
construction contract which is priced in a foreign currency.
HKFRS 9,
4.3.2-4.3.4
5.2 Accounting treatment of embedded derivatives
Topic highlights
Where the host contract is within the scope of HKFRS 9 the hybrid contract is accounted for as one
instrument. Otherwise, HKFRS 9 requires that the embedded derivative is separated from the host
contract where certain conditions are met and accounted for separately.
HKFRS 9,
B4.3.1
5.3 Reassessment of embedded derivatives
As a result of the expansion of HKFRS 9, the contents of HK(IFRIC) Int-9 Reassessment of
Embedded Derivatives have been incorporated into the standard and the Interpretation itself has
been withdrawn.
The standard states that an entity is not permitted to reassess the treatment of an embedded
derivative throughout the life of a contract unless there is a significant change to the terms of the
contract.
6.1 Introduction
It is normal business practice for a company to engage in hedging activities in order to reduce their
exposure to risk and uncertainty, such as changes in prices, interest rates or foreign exchange
419
Financial Reporting
rates. For example, an entity may have a fixed amount of foreign currency to pay on a particular
date, and hedge against unfavourable exchange rate movements by taking out a forward contract
to purchase the currency it needs to meet its obligation from a third party at a particular exchange
rate.
In this instance the forward contract is a derivative and so measured at fair value with changes in
value recognised in profit or loss. An accounting hedge involves recognising these changes in
value at the same time as any opposite gain or loss on a year end revaluation and then settlement
of the payable so as to minimise the impact on profit or loss of the transaction. This is an example
of a hedge that happens automatically.
HKAS 39 provides the guidance relating to hedging and requires hedge accounting where there
is a designated hedging relationship between a hedging instrument and a hedged item. It is
prohibited otherwise.
Key terms
Hedging, for accounting purposes, means designating one or more hedging instruments so that
their change in fair value is an offset, in whole or in part, to the change in fair value or cash flows of
a hedged item.
A hedged item is an asset, liability, firm commitment, or forecasted future transaction that:
(a) exposes the entity to risk of changes in fair value or changes in future cash flows, and that
(b) is designated as being hedged.
A hedging instrument is a designated derivative or (in limited circumstances) another financial
asset or liability whose fair value or cash flows are expected to offset changes in the fair value or
cash flows of a designated hedged item. (A non-derivative financial asset or liability may be
designated as a hedging instrument for hedge accounting purposes only if it hedges the risk of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates.)
Hedge effectiveness is the degree to which changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged
item attributable to a hedged risk are offset by changes in the fair value or cash flows of the
hedging instrument. (HKAS 39)
Generally only assets, liabilities etc. that involve external parties can be designated as hedged
items. The foreign currency risk of an intragroup monetary item (e.g. payable/receivable between
two subsidiaries) may qualify as a hedged item in the group financial statements if it results in an
exposure to foreign exchange rate gains or losses that are not fully eliminated on consolidation.
This can happen (per HKAS 21) when the transaction is between entities with different functional
currencies.
In addition, the foreign currency risk of a highly probable group transaction may qualify as a
hedged item if it is in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity and the foreign
currency risk will affect profit or loss.
420
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
(b) Cash flow hedges, which involve hedging against a change in the value of future certain
cash flows (for example, where an entity is due to receive a payment in foreign currency),
and
(c) Net investment hedges, which involves hedging an investment in a foreign group company.
The formal definitions of each type of hedge are as follows:
Key terms
Fair value hedge. A hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognised asset or
liability, or an identified portion of such an asset or liability, that is attributable to a particular risk
and could affect profit or loss.
Cash flow hedge. A hedge of the exposure to variability in cash flows that:
(a) is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability (such as all or
some future interest payments on variable rate debt) or a highly probable forecast
transaction (such as an anticipated purchase or sale), and that
(b) could affect profit or loss.
Hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. HKAS 21 defines a net investment in a
foreign operation as the amount of the reporting entity's interest in the net assets of that operation.
(HKAS 39)
We shall consider each type of hedge in detail in a moment, but first it is important to understand
the conditions for hedge accounting.
Before a hedging relationship qualifies for hedge accounting, all of the following conditions must
be met:
(a) The hedging relationship must be formally documented (including the identification of the
hedged item, the hedging instrument, the nature of the hedged risk and the assessment of
the hedging instrument's effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the hedged
item's fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk). The hedging relationship must
also be designated at its inception as a hedge based on the entity's risk management
objective and strategy.
(b) There is an expectation that the hedge is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value or
cash flows ascribed to the hedged risk. (Note. The hedge does not have to be fully
effective.)
(c) For cash flow hedges, it must be highly probable that there is a forecast transaction since
such a transaction is the subject of the hedge. In addition, the transaction must present an
exposure to variations in cash flows that could eventually affect profit and loss.
(d) Reliable measurement of the effectiveness of the hedge.
(e) The assessment of the hedge is carried out on an ongoing basis (annually) and it has been
effective during the reporting period.
421
Financial Reporting
Effectiveness
Hedge effectiveness must be tested regularly and must fall within the range 80% to 125%. If it falls
outside e.g. 75% or 130%, then hedge accounting cannot be applied. Both the hedged item and
hedging instrument will be accounted for based on their respective accounting standard.
Change in hedging instrument
Hedge effectiveness =
Change in hedged item
Solution
The futures contract was intended to protect the company from a fall in oil prices (which would
have reduced the profit when the oil was eventually sold). However, oil prices have actually risen,
so that the company has made a loss on the contract.
Without hedge accounting
The futures contract is a derivative and therefore must be remeasured to fair value at 31 December
20X8 under HKAS 39. The loss on the futures contract is recognised in profit or loss:
$ $
DEBIT Profit or loss (30,000 (30 – 25)) 150,000
CREDIT Financial liability 150,000
422
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
423
Financial Reporting
Solution
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
1 January 31 December
20X3 20X3
$'000 $'000 $'000
Debt instrument (hedged item) 1,000 (40) 960
Derivative asset (hedging instrument) – 40 40
Cash (1,000)
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
$'000
Loss on debt instrument (40)
Gain on derivative 40
No ineffectiveness –
Gains and losses on hedged item and hedging instrument are both taken to the statement of profit
or loss.
Solution
Change in hedging instrument
Hedge effectiveness =
Change in hedged item
$45,000
=
$40,000
= 112.5%
Hedge effectiveness of 112.5% is still within the window of 80% – 125%. Thus, hedge accounting
may be applied.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
1 January 31 December
20X3 20X3
$'000 $'000 $'000
Debt instrument (hedged item) 1,000 (40) 960
Derivative asset (hedging instrument) – 45 45
Cash (1,000)
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
$'000
Loss on debt instrument (40)
Gain on derivative 45
Ineffective hedge 5
This results in an ineffective hedge of $5,000 gain recognised in profit or loss.
424
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The effect of the cash flow hedge is to lock in the price of Rand 20 million for the item of plant. The
other comprehensive income of $150,000 will either:
(i) be reclassified to profit or loss as the machine is depreciated, or
(ii) be deducted from the initial carrying amount of the machine.
425
Financial Reporting
Required
Explain how the above transactions would be treated in Sparkle's financial statements for the year
ended 30 September 20X2.
Solution
Sparkle is hedging the volatility of the future cash inflow from selling the gold jewellery. The futures
contracts can be accounted for as a cash flow hedge in respect of those inflows, providing the
criteria for hedge accounting are met.
The gain on the forward contract should be calculated as:
$
Forward value of contract at 31.10.X1 (24,000 $388) 9,312,000
Forward value of contract at 30.9.X2 (24,000 $352) 8,448,000
Gain on contract 864,000
The change in the fair value of the expected future cash flows on the hedged item (which is not
recognised in the financial statements) should be calculated as:
$
At 31.10.X1 9,938,000
At 30.9.X2 9,186,000
752,000
As this change in fair value is less than the gain on the forward contract, the hedge is not fully
effective and only $752,000 of the gain on the forward should be recognised in other
comprehensive income. The remainder should be recognised in profit or loss:
$ $
DEBIT Financial asset (Forward a/c) 864,000
CREDIT Other comprehensive income 752,000
Profit or loss 112,000
Note that the hedge is still highly effective (and hence hedge accounting should continue to be
used):
$864,000/$752,000 = 115% which is within the 80% – 125% range.
426
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
The fair value of the swap, determined by projecting future settlement amounts using the current
year's variable rate and discounting these to present value is:
31 December 20X1 $300,000
31 December 20X2 $125,000
31 December 20X3 nil
Solution
The purpose of the cash flow hedge is to fix the interest receivable at 9%. Interest receivable per
the terms of the loan agreement is:
31 December 20X1 $10m (7% + 2%) = $900,000
31 December 20X2 $10m (6% + 2%) = $800,000
31 December 20X3 $10m (5% + 2%) = $700,000
The net settlement in respect of the swap on each of these dates is:
Date Swap receipt at 7% Swap payment at Swap net
HIBOR
$ $ $
31 December 20X1 700,000 (700,000) Nil
31 December 20X2 700,000 (600,000) 100,000
31 December 20X3 700,000 (500,000) 200,000
Therefore, in each of the three years, the total amount of the interest income (i.e. loan interest
income + net position on the swap) is $900,000.
The journal entries are as follows:
1 January 20X1
$ $
DEBIT Loan receivable 10,000,000
CREDIT Cash 10,000,000
31 December 20X1
DEBIT Cash 900,000
CREDIT Interest income 900,000
427
Financial Reporting
31 December 20X2
DEBIT Cash 800,000
CREDIT Interest income 800,000
To record the cash received on net settlement of the interest rate swap.
To recycle into earnings amounts in OCI on account of the cash flow hedge, so that they are
matched with the relevant cash flow.
To reduce the carrying value of the interest rate swap from its initial fair value of $300,000 to
current fair value of $125,000.
31 December 20X3
DEBIT Cash 700,000
CREDIT Interest income 700,000
To record the cash received on net settlement of the interest rate swap.
To recycle into earnings amounts in OCI on account of the cash flow hedge, so that they are
matched with the relevant cash flow.
To adjust the carrying value of the interest rate swap to current fair value.
428
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
429
Financial Reporting
6.7 Recap
Hedge accounting means designating one or more instruments so that their change in fair
value is offset by the change in fair value or cash flows of another item.
Hedge accounting is permitted in certain circumstances, provided the hedging relationship
is clearly defined, measurable and actually effective.
There are three types of hedge: fair value hedge; cash flow hedge; hedge of a net
investment in a foreign operation.
The accounting treatment of a hedge depends on its type.
HKFRS 7 was issued in 2005 to replace the disclosure requirements of HKAS 32. In doing so it has
revised and enhanced disclosure requirements in response to new techniques and approaches to
measuring risk management. The standard requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures
about exposure to risks arising from financial instruments, and specifies minimum disclosures
about credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk.
The HKICPA maintains that users of financial instruments need information about an entity's
exposures to risks and how those risks are managed, as this information can influence a user's
assessment of the financial position and financial performance of an entity or of the amount,
timing and uncertainty of its future cash flows.
In June 2011 HKFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement was issued. As a result, disclosures in relation to
financial instruments measured at fair value were relocated from HKFRS 7 to HKFRS 13.
430
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
HKFRS 7.7-
19
7.3 Statement of financial position disclosures
The following must be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements:
(a) Carrying amount of financial assets and liabilities by HKAS 39 or HKFRS 9 category.
(b) Details of financial instruments designated as at fair value through profit or loss and financial
assets designated as at fair value through other comprehensive income.
(c) Reason for any reclassification between fair value and amortised cost (and vice versa).
(d) The carrying amount of financial assets the entity has pledged as collateral for liabilities
or contingent liabilities and the associated terms and conditions.
(e) When financial assets are impaired by credit losses and the entity records the impairment in
a separate account (e.g. an allowance account used to record individual impairments or a
similar account used to record a collective impairment of assets) rather than directly reducing
the carrying amount of the asset, it must disclose a reconciliation of changes in that
account during the period for each class of financial assets.
(f) The existence of multiple embedded derivatives, where compound instruments contain
these.
(g) Defaults and breaches.
HKFRS 7.13C The December 2011 amendment to HKFRS 7 in respect of offsetting financial assets and financial
liabilities requires an entity to disclose information about rights of offset and related arrangements.
As a minimum the following should be disclosed:
(a) The gross amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities under an enforceable master
netting agreement (i.e. an agreement whereby a single net settlement of all financial
instruments covered by the arrangement may be made) or similar;
(b) Amounts offset in accordance with the HKAS 32 criteria;
(c) Net amounts presented in the statement of financial position;
(d) Amounts subject to an enforceable master netting agreement not included in (b);
(e) The net amount after deducting (d) from (c).
HKFRS 7.20 7.4 Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
disclosures
The entity must disclose the following items of income, expense, gains or losses, either on the
face of the financial statements or in the notes:
(a) Net gains/losses by HKAS 39 or HKFRS 9 category (broken down as appropriate: for
example, interest, fair value changes, dividend income)
(b) Interest income/expense
(c) Impairment losses by class of financial asset.
431
Financial Reporting
432
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Credit risk The risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for
the other party by failing to discharge an obligation.
Currency risk The risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will
fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates.
Interest rate risk The risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will
fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates.
Liquidity risk The risk that an entity will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations
associated with financial liabilities.
Loans payable Loans payable are financial liabilities, other than short-term trade payables
on normal credit terms.
Market risk The risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will
fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Market risk comprises three
types of risk: currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk.
433
Financial Reporting
Other price risk The risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will
fluctuate because of changes in market prices (other than those arising from
interest rate risk or currency risk), whether those changes are caused by
factors specific to the individual financial instrument or its issuer, or factors
affecting all similar financial instruments traded in the market.
Past due A financial asset is past due when a counterparty has failed to make a
payment when contractually due.
434
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
No, the credit risk of financial guarantees should be included in the disclosures, as HKFRS 7
clarifies that the definition of credit risk includes that arising from financial guarantees.
Solution
All the financial instruments should be split across the maturity brackets in which the cash flows
occur. The requirement is to disclose each of the contractual payments in the period when they are
due (including principal and interest payments). The objective of this particular disclosure is to
show the liquidity risk of the entity.
Solution
Yes, HKFRS 7 requires a maturity analysis based on the remaining contractual maturity only for
financial liabilities. Management can choose to disclose the maturity analysis showing remaining
contractual maturity for financial assets also as one of the disclosures to comply with the
requirement in HKFRS 7. However, it is not obligatory.
435
Financial Reporting
In practice, an entity should disclose a maturity analysis of financial assets and financial liabilities
showing expected maturity if this is the information provided to key management personnel to
manage the business. However, a maturity analysis based on the remaining contractual maturity
for financial liabilities should be disclosed.
Interest
rate risk Yield curve of market interest rates
Other price
risk
Prepayment risk
436
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
8 Current developments
8.1 IFRS 9 development
The issue of IFRS 9 (HKFRS 9) and its subsequent expansion in 2010 represent the first stages of
the culmination of a long-standing project carried out by the IASB and FASB concerned with
reducing the complexity surrounding financial instruments.
HKICPA are following the lead of the IASB and it is intended that HKFRS 9 will ultimately replace
HKAS 39 in its entirety. The IASB continue to work on the replacement project and in response to
requests from interested parties that the accounting for financial instruments should be improved
quickly, the project to replace IAS 39 (and in turn HKAS 39) has been divided into phases.
As each phase is completed, the relevant portions of IAS 39 will be deleted and chapters in IFRS 9
will be created to replace the requirements in IAS 39. As the IASB issues new sections of IFRS 9,
HKICPA will adopt these to form HKFRS 9.
Phases 1 and 2 of the project relating to the classification and measurement of financial assets and
financial liabilities are now obviously complete.
Phase 3 of the project relates to impairment methodology. The Request for Information on the
feasibility of an expected loss model for the impairment of financial assets was published on
25 June 2009. This formed the basis of an Exposure Draft, Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost
and Impairment, published in November 2009. A supplement to the ED was issued in January
2011 and the topic was re-exposed in March 2013. The latest exposure draft builds upon previous
EDs to develop a more forward-looking provisioning model which recognises credit losses on a
more timely basis. IAS 39 currently applies an incurred loss model, requiring that credit losses
(impairments) are recognised only when a credit loss event has occurred; the ED proposes that
credit losses are recognised before a credit loss event occurs.
Phase 4 of the project relates to hedge accounting. Proposals in respect of general hedge
accounting have been exposed and final amendments to IFRS 9 are expected during the course of
2013. As a result of the proposed new hedge accounting requirements, companies will be able to
reflect their risk management activities better in the financial statements, and there will be
enhanced presentation and disclosure requirements.
437
Financial Reporting
Topic recap
Rights
issues/options/warrants are
equity where the entity offers
them pro rata to all existing
owners.
438
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Initially measured at transaction price/fair value. Initially measured at transaction price/fair value.
Transaction costs are added for assets measured at Transaction costs are deducted for liabilities
amortised cost. measured at amortised cost.
Embedded derivatives
Derivatives embedded within host contracts
such as leases or a debt instrument.
If host contract is a financial asset, HKFRS 9 rules If host contract is not a financial asset, split derivative
are applied to the whole hybrid contract. and host contract and account separately.
439
Financial Reporting
HKAS 39 Hedging
Hedged item (an asset or liability) is Hedged item is a future cash flow. Hedged item is the investment in a
remeasured to fair value at the period foreign subsidiary within consolidated
end and the gain or loss recognised in Hedging instrument (derivative) is accounts.
profit or loss. remeasured to fair value and the
effective gain or loss is recognised in Hedging instrument is the loan taken to
Hedging instrument (derivative) is also OCI. fund the acquisition of the subsidiary.
remeasured to fair value and the gain
or loss recognised in profit or loss. This is reclassified to profit or loss Gains and losses on both are matched
when the effect of the future cash flow in other comprehensive income.
is recognised in profit or loss.
Significance of financial instruments on Nature and extent of risks arising from financial
financial position and performance instruments and their management
440
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 1
Refer to the definitions of financial assets and liabilities given in section 1.2:
(a) Physical assets: control of these creates an opportunity to generate an inflow of cash or
other assets, but it does not give rise to a present right to receive cash or other financial
assets.
(b) Prepaid expenses, etc.: the future economic benefit is the receipt of goods/services rather
than the right to receive cash or other financial assets.
Answer 2
Liability. The preference shares require regular distributions to the holders but more importantly
have the debt characteristic of being redeemable. Therefore, according to HKAS 32 Financial
Instruments: Presentation they must be classified as liability.
Answer 3
Note. The method to use here is to find the present value of the principal value of the bond, $2m
(100,000 $20) and the interest payments of $120,000 annually (6% $2m) at the market rate for
non-convertible bonds of 8%, using the discount factor tables. The difference between this total
and the principal amount of $2m is the equity element.
$
Present value of principal $2m 0.681 1,362,000
Present value of interest $120,000 3.993 479,160
Liability value 1,841,160
Principal amount 2,000,000
Equity element 158,840
Answer 4
(a) ABC should derecognise the asset as its option to repurchase is at the prevailing market
value.
(b) DEF should not derecognise the asset as it has retained substantially all the risks and
rewards of ownership. The stock should be retained in its books even though legal title is
temporarily transferred.
(c) XYZ has received 90% of its transferred receivables in cash, but whether it can retain this
amount permanently is dependent on the performance of the factor in recovering all of the
receivables. XYZ may have to repay some of it and therefore retains the risks and rewards of
100% of the receivables amount. The receivables should not be derecognised. The cash
received should be treated as a loan.
The 10% of the receivables that XYZ will never receive in cash should be treated as interest
over the six-month period; it should be recognised as an expense in profit or loss and
increase the carrying amount of the loan.
At the end of the six months, the receivables should be derecognised by netting them
against the amount of the loan that does not need to be repaid to the factor. The amount
remaining is bad debts which should be recognised as an expense in profit or loss.
441
Financial Reporting
Answer 5
(a) Amortised cost (b) FV through P/L
20X1 20X2 20X1 20X2
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Profit or loss
Interest income (W1)/(W2) 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,387
Gain/(loss) due to change in
FV (W2) – – (187) –
1,200 1,200 1,013 1,387
Statement of financial
position
Financial asset (W1)/(W2) 20,000 – 19,813 –
WORKINGS
1 Amortised cost
$'000
Cash – 1.1.20X1 20,000
Effective interest at 6% (same as nominal as no discount on 1,200
issue/premium on redemption)
Coupon received (nominal interest 6% 20m) (1,200)
At 31.12.20X1 20,000
Effective interest at 6% 1,200
Coupon and capital received ((6% 20m) + 20m) (21,200)
At 31.12.20X2 –
2 Fair value
$'000
Cash 20,000
Effective interest (as above) 1,200
Coupon received (as above) (1,200)
Fair value loss (balancing figure) (187)
At 31.12.20X1 (W3) 19,813
Interest at 7% (7% 19,813) 1,387
Coupon and capital received ((6% 20m) + 20m) (21,200)
At 31.12.20X2 –
3 Fair value at 31.12.20X1
$'000
Interest and capital due on 31.12.20X2 at new market rate 19,813
(21.2m/1.07)
Answer 6
D $
Issue costs 30,000
Interest $1,000,000 5% 7 350,000
Premium on redemption 260,000
Total finance cost 640,000
442
18: Financial instruments | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Answer 7
The bond is a "deep discount" bond and is a financial liability of Grumble Co.. It is measured at
amortised cost. Although there is no interest as such, the difference between the initial cost of the
bond and the price at which it will be redeemed is a finance cost. This must be allocated over the
term of the bond at a constant rate on the carrying amount.
To calculate amortised cost we need to calculate the effective interest rate of the bond:
1,000,000
= 1.191 over three years
839,619
1/3
To calculate an annual rate, we take the cube root, (1.191) = 1.06, so the annual interest rate is
6%
The charge to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income is $50,377
($839,619 6%)
The balance outstanding at 31 December 20X2 is $889,996 ($839,619 + $50,377)
Answer 8
A financial asset or group of assets is impaired when its recoverable amount is less than its
carrying amount. Possible indications would be:
(a) a trade receivable balance where it is now learnt that the credit customer is in financial
difficulties
(b) a borrower not paying an interest payment on time
(c) an investment in shares where the underlying company has filed for bankruptcy protection
443
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
444
chapter 19
Topic list
Learning focus
Statements of cash flows are very relevant in practice. They are a required element of a set of
financial statements and often provide more useful information than that within the other
financial statements with regard to liquidity.
445
Financial Reporting
Learning outcomes
Competency
level
Prepare the financial statements for an individual entity in accordance
with Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards and statutory reporting
requirements
4.01 Primary financial statement preparation 3
4.01.01 Prepare the statement of cash flows of an entity in accordance with
Hong Kong accounting standards
4.09 Consolidated financial statement preparation 3
4.09.03 Prepare a consolidated statement of cash flows
446
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Cash is a key element of any business. It must be monitored and managed in order to maintain a
liquid position. While the statement of financial position provides a period end cash balance, this in
itself does not provide any indication of how an entity generates, uses and manages its cash.
Similarly, profit, while providing a good indication of the performance of an entity does not provide
any indication of the liquidity of a business, since it is calculated using the accrual basis.
The statement of cash flows is therefore required to form part of a set of financial statements by
HKAS 1. HKAS 1 does not, however, prescribe the format and content of a statement of cash
flows. This guidance is provided within HKAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows.
Before considering the standard, it is important to appreciate the advantages of cash flow
information.
447
Financial Reporting
(k) Variance statements, which compare actual cash flows against the forecast, can be used to
monitor forecasts.
Looking at the same question from a different angle, readers of accounts can be misled by the
profit figure.
(a) Shareholders might believe that if a company makes a profit after tax of, say $1 million then
this is the amount which it could afford to pay as a dividend. Unless the company has
sufficient cash available to stay in business and also to pay a dividend, the shareholders'
expectations would be wrong.
(b) Employees might believe that if a company makes profits, it can afford to pay higher wages
next year. This opinion may not be correct: the ability to pay wages depends on the
availability of cash.
(c) Creditors might consider that a profitable company is a going concern.
(i) If a company builds up large amounts of unsold inventories of goods, their cost
would not be chargeable against profits, but cash would have been used up in making
them, thus weakening the company's liquid resources.
(ii) A company might capitalise large development costs, having spent considerable
amounts of money on research and development, but only charge small amounts
against current profits. As a result, the company might show reasonable profits, but
get into severe difficulties with its liquidity position.
(d) Management might suppose that if their company makes a historical cost profit, and
reinvests some of those profits, then the company must be expanding. This is not the case:
in a period of inflation, a company might have a historical cost profit but a current cost
accounting loss, which means that the operating capability of the firm will be declining.
(e) Survival of a business entity depends not so much on profits as on its ability to pay its debts
when they fall due. Such payments might include "profit and loss" items such as material
purchases, wages, interest and taxation etc., but also capital payments for new non-current
assets and the repayment of loan capital when this falls due (e.g. on the redemption of
debentures).
1.2.1 Objective
The objective of this standard is to require the provision of information about the historical changes
in cash and cash equivalents of an entity by means of a statement of cash flows which classifies
cash flows during the period from operating, investing and financing activities.
1.2.2 Scope
Users of an entity's financial statements are interested in how the entity generates and uses cash
and cash equivalents. This is the case regardless of the nature of the entity's activities. Therefore,
all entities must provide a statement of cash flows as an integral part of an entity's financial
statements.
HKAS 7.6-9 1.2.3 Definitions
The standard gives the following definitions, the most important of which are cash and cash
equivalents.
448
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Key terms
Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits.
Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known
amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Cash flows are inflows and outflows of cash and cash equivalents.
Operating activities are the principal revenue-producing activities of the entity and other activities
that are not investing or financing activities.
Investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other investments not
included in cash equivalents.
Financing activities are activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the
contributed equity and borrowings of the entity. (HKAS 7)
The standard expands on the definition of cash equivalents: they are held to meet short-term cash
commitments rather than for investment or other long-term purposes. They are required to:
1 be readily convertible to a known amount of cash and therefore their maturity date should
normally be three months from its acquisition date
2 be subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Based on the definition, therefore:
Deposits available on demand are cash equivalents;
Deposits with a fixed maturity of more than three months are not cash equivalents;
Pledged deposits (amounts held by banks as security) are not cash equivalents;
Money market holdings, short-term government bonds and treasury bills are cash
equivalents;
Equity investments (i.e. holdings of ordinary shares in other companies) are not cash
equivalents;
Preference share investments are cash equivalents where acquired within a short period
of their maturity and with a specified redemption date;
Where bank overdrafts are repayable on demand and are treated as part of an entity's total
cash management system, an overdrawn balance is included in cash and cash equivalents;
Loans and other borrowings are not cash equivalents, but instead are classified as cash
flows from financing activities.
Movements between different types of cash and cash equivalents are not included in cash flows.
The investment of surplus cash in cash equivalents is part of cash management, not part of
operating, investing or financing activities.
449
Financial Reporting
HKAS
7.10,11
2.1 Presentation of a statement of cash flows
According to HKAS 7, reported cash flows during a period should be classified into operating,
investing and financing activities in a statement of cash flows.
The way of presenting cash flows under operating, investing and financing activities is dependent
on the nature of the reporting entity. The classification enables users to understand the impact of
each activity on cash and cash equivalents and their interrelationship.
450
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
451
Financial Reporting
452
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
It is important to understand why certain items are added and others subtracted. Note the
following points:
(a) Depreciation is not a cash expense, but is deducted in arriving at the profit figure in the
statement of profit or loss. It makes sense, therefore, to eliminate it by adding it back.
(b) By the same logic, a loss on a disposal of a non-current asset (arising through
underprovision of depreciation) needs to be added back and a profit deducted.
(c) An increase in inventories means less cash – you have spent cash on buying inventory.
(d) An increase in receivables means the company's debtors have not paid as much, and
therefore there is less cash.
(e) A decrease in payables means the company has paid more to suppliers and so has less
cash.
The illustration below shows a full statement of cash flows using the indirect method.
453
Financial Reporting
Example: Interest
Odile Co. reports the following amounts in its financial statements relating to interest:
$
Finance costs in the statement of profit or loss 8.7
Interest accrued at start of year 1.2
Interest accrued at end of year 3.1
What is Odile Co.’s interest paid?
Solution
Interest paid is calculated as 1.2m + 8.7m – 3.1m = $6.8 million.
454
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
455
Financial Reporting
Where non-current assets are disposed of, the cash proceeds is calculated by adding any profit on
disposal (or deducting any loss) to (from) the carrying value of the disposals (identified from the
non-current asset note).
Example: Cash flows associated with non-current assets
The following extracts are taken from the financial statements of Rooibus for the year ended
30 September 20X0:
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
20X0 20W9
$m $m
Cost of PPE 520 420
Accumulated depreciation 165 189
Solution
Cost $m Depreciation $m
b/f 420 b/f 189
Additions (balancing) 165 Charge 55
Revaluation 20 Disposals (balancing) (79)
Disposal (85) c/f 165
c/f 520
Cash paid to acquire non-current assets $165m
Proceeds of sale of non-current assets (85m – 79m – 5.5m) $0.5m
2.4 Disclosure
HKAS 7.43 2.4.1 Non cash transactions
Investing and financing transactions that do not require the use of cash or cash equivalents shall
be excluded from a statement of cash flows. Such transactions shall be disclosed elsewhere in the
financial statements in a way that provides all the relevant information about these investing and
financing activities.
HKAS 2.4.2 Components of cash and cash equivalents
7.45,46
The components of cash and cash equivalents should be disclosed and a reconciliation should be
presented, showing the amounts in the statement of cash flows reconciled with the equivalent
items reported in the statement of financial position.
456
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
It is also necessary to disclose the accounting policy used in deciding the items included in cash
and cash equivalents, in accordance with HKAS 1, but also because of the wide range of cash
management practices worldwide.
457
Financial Reporting
KOWLOON CO.
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X9
$'000
Revenue 2,553
Cost of sales (1,814)
Gross profit 739
Other income: interest received 25
Distribution costs (125)
Administrative expenses (264)
Finance costs (75)
Profit before tax 300
Income tax expense (140)
Profit for the year 160
KOWLOON CO.
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER
20X9 20X8
Assets $'000 $'000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 380 305
Intangible assets 250 200
Investments – 25
Current assets
Inventories 150 102
Receivables 390 315
Short-term investments 50 –
Cash at bank 2 1
Total assets 1,222 948
Equity and liabilities
Equity
Share capital 360 300
Revaluation surplus 100 91
Retained earnings 260 180
Non-current liabilities
Long-term loan 170 50
Current liabilities
Trade payables 127 119
Bank overdraft 85 98
Taxation 120 110
Total equity and liabilities 1,222 948
The following information is available:
(a) The proceeds of the sale of non-current asset investments amounted to $30,000.
(b) Fixtures and fittings, with an original cost of $85,000 and a net book value of $45,000, were
sold for $32,000 during the year.
(c) The following information relates to property, plant and equipment.
31.12.20X9 31.12.20X8
$'000 $'000
Cost 720 595
Accumulated depreciation (340) (290)
Net book value 380 305
(d) 50,000 $1 ordinary shares were issued during the year at a premium of 20 cents per share.
(e) The short-term investments are highly liquid and are close to maturity.
(f) Dividends of $80,000 were paid during the year.
458
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Required
Prepare a statement of cash flows for the year to 31 December 20X9 using the format laid out in
HKAS 7.
Solution
KOWLOON CO.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X9
$'000 $'000
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before tax 300
Depreciation charge (W1) 90
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment (45 – 32) 13
Profit on sale of non-current asset investments (30 – 25) (5)
Interest expense (net) (75 – 25) 50
(Increase)/decrease in inventories (102 – 150) (48)
(Increase)/decrease in receivables (315 – 390) (75)
Increase/(decrease) in payables (127 – 119) 8
333
Interest paid (75)
Dividends paid (80)
Tax paid (110 + 140 – 120) (130)
Net cash from operating activities 48
Cash flows from investing activities
Payments to acquire property, plant and equipment (W2) (201)
Payments to acquire intangible non-current assets (250 – 200) (50)
Receipts from sales of property, plant and equipment 32
Receipts from sale of non-current asset investments 30
Interest received 25
Net cash used in investing activities (164)
Cash flows from financing activities
Issue of share capital (360 – 300) 60
Long-term loan (170 – 50) 120
Net cash from financing activities 180
Increase in cash and cash equivalents 64
Cash and cash equivalents at 1.1.X9 (97)
Cash and cash equivalents at 31.12.X9 (33)
ANALYSIS OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
31.12.X9 31.12.X8
$'000 $'000
Cash at bank 2 1
Short-term investments 50 -
Overdraft (85) (98)
(33) (97)
459
Financial Reporting
WORKINGS
1 Depreciation charge
$'000
Accumulated depreciation at 31 December 20X8 290
Accumulated depreciation on assets sold (85 – 45) (40)
Accumulated depreciation 31 December 20X9 (340)
Charge for the year (90)
2 Purchase of property, plant and equipment
$'000
Cost at 31 December 20X8 595
Revaluation (100 – 91) 9
Cost on assets sold (85)
Cost 31 December 20X9 (720)
Purchase for the year (balancing fig) (201)
HKAS Consolidated statements of cash flows are prepared in the same way as a single company
7.37,39 statement of cash flows, however they include extra line items:
Acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries are reported as cash flows from investing activities
Dividends paid to the non-controlling interests are reported as cash flows from financing
activities
Dividends received from associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity
method are reported as cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows that are internal to the group should be eliminated in the preparation of a consolidated
statement of cash flows.
Example: Elimination of intra-group cash flows
Cann Co. disposed of property, plant and equipment with a carrying value of $215,000 in the year
ended 31 October. The company reported a profit on the combined disposals of $39,500. Included
within the disposal figures was a machine sold to Cann's subsidiary Wood Co. for $12,400.
During the year, Wood disposed of property, plant and equipment with a carrying value of $43,000,
recording a loss on disposal of $5,600. All disposals were made to companies outside the group.
What amount will be reported as proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment in the
consolidated statement of cash flows?
460
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Solution
Cann $'000 $'000
Carrying amount on disposal 215.0
Profit on disposal 39.5
254.5
Less: intercompany proceeds (12.4)
242.1
Wood
Carrying amount on disposal 43.0
Loss on disposal (5.6)
37.4
Consolidated proceeds on disposal 279.5
You should also remember that adjustments made to consolidated profit for non-cash items in the
reconciliation to cash flows from operating activities should reflect the amounts included within the
consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. Therefore, for example,
the amount of depreciation or profit on disposal should take into account any consolidation
adjustment.
Example: Consolidation adjustments
Landon Co. acquired 80% of Crowther Co. a number of years ago. In the year ended 31 December
20X1, Landon reported a depreciation charge of $560,000 and Crowther reported a depreciation
charge of $320,000. At the start of that year, Landon transferred a machine to Crowther with a
resulting increase in depreciation of $10,000 per annum.
The adjustment required to consolidated profit for the purposes of calculating cash flows from
operating activities is therefore:
$'000
Landon depreciation 560
Crowther depreciation 320
Consolidation adjustment (10)
Added back to profit in respect of depreciation 870
HKAS
7.39,42
3.1 Acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries
Where a subsidiary undertaking joins or leaves a group during a financial year the cash flows of
the group should include the cash flows of the subsidiary undertaking concerned for the same
period as that for which the group's statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
includes the results of the subsidiary undertaking.
If a subsidiary is acquired or disposed of during the accounting period the net cash effect of the
purchase or sale transaction should be shown separately under "Cash flows from investing
activities".
The net cash effect is the cash purchase price/cash disposal proceeds net of any cash or cash
equivalents acquired or disposed of:
461
Financial Reporting
As the cash effect of the acquisition/disposal of the subsidiary is dealt with in a single line item,
care must be taken not to double count the effects of the acquisition/disposal when looking at the
movements in individual asset balances.
Each of the individual assets and liabilities of a subsidiary acquired/disposed of during the period
must be excluded when comparing group statements of financial position for cash flow calculations
as follows:
Where a subsidiary is acquired in the period: property, plant and equipment, inventories,
payables, receivables etc. at the date of acquisition should be subtracted from the movement
on these items.
Where a subsidiary is disposed of in the period: property, plant and equipment,
inventories, payables, receivables etc. at the date of disposal should be added to the
movement on these items.
Example: Disposal of subsidiary
Extracts from the statements of financial position of the Burke Group at 31 December are as
follows:
20X2 20X1
$'000 $'000
Current assets
Inventory 664 791
Trade receivables 515 532
Cash 214 431
Current liabilities
Trade payables 590 645
During the year ended 31 December 20X2, the Burke Group sold its controlling interest in Bryan
Co. for $6.5 million in cash. On the disposal date, balances included in Bryan’s statement of
financial position were as follows:
$'000
Current assets
Inventory 103
Trade receivables 45
Cash 79
Current liabilities
Trade payables 67
(a) What adjustments are required to consolidated profit in respect of working capital in order to
calculate cash flows from operating activities?
(b) What is the cash flow reported in investing activities in respect of the disposal of Bryan Co.?
Solution
(a) Working capital adjustments must take account of the disposal of Bryan Co.
$'000
Inventory
b/f 791
c/f 664
Decrease 127
Less: amount attributable to disposal (103)
Decrease in inventory (added back to profit) 24
462
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Trade receivables
b/f 532
c/f 515
Decrease 17
Less: amount attributable to disposal (45)
Increase in receivables (deducted from profit) (28)
Trade payables
b/f 645
c/f 590
Decrease 55
Less: amount attributable to disposal (67)
Increase in payables (added back to profit) 12
463
Financial Reporting
Solution
The non-controlling interests share of profit after tax represents retained profit plus dividends paid.
NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
$'000
Balance as at 31 December 20X8 345
Profit for the period 42
464
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Where a group invests in or divests of an associate or joint venture in the year, the associated cash
flow is disclosed within the investing activities section of the statement of cash flows.
Example: Associate
The following are extracts of the consolidated results of Connie Company for the year ended
31 December 20X9.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS (EXTRACT)
$'000
Group profit before tax 224
Share of associate's profit after tax 36
260
Tax (group) 42
Profit after tax 218
Solution
The associate profit after tax represents retained profit plus dividend.
ASSOCIATE
$'000
Balance as at 31 December 20X8 306
Share of profit for the period 36
465
Financial Reporting
466
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
$'000
ZTY payables b/f –
ZTY payables c/f 100
Increase 100
Remove effect of exchange gain 20
Increase in trade payables (add back to profit in reconciliation) 120
Therefore, the net effect on cash flows from operating activities is nil ($100,000 expense – $20,000
gain + $120,000 increase in payables).
Self-test question 1
The draft consolidated accounts for Bestway Co. are shown below:
DRAFT CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31
DECEMBER 20X8
$'000
Operating profit 13,365
Share of profits after tax of associates 4,950
Finance cost (1,350)
Profit before taxation 16,965
Income tax (4,860)
Profit for the year 12,105
Attributable to: owners of the parent 11,205
non-controlling interest 900
12,105
DRAFT CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER
20X8 20X7
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Assets
Non-current assets
Buildings 18,675 19,800
Machinery 16,200 2,700
34,875 22,500
Goodwill 900 -
Investments in associates 13,590 12,690
49,365 35,190
Current assets
Inventories 17,775 9,000
Trade receivables 16,650 11,475
Cash 40,635 16,380
75,060 36,855
124,425 72,045
467
Financial Reporting
20X8 20X7
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Equity and liabilities
Equity
Share capital 61,407 36,855
Retained earnings 31,005 22,500
92,412 59,355
Non-controlling interest 1,035 –
93,447 59,355
Non-current liabilities
Loans 19,530 6,030
Deferred tax 270 117
19,800 6,147
Current liabilities
Trade payables 6,660 4,320
Income tax 4,158 1,953
Accrued finance charges 360 270
11,178 6,543
124,425 72,045
Notes
1 There had been no acquisitions or disposals of buildings during the year. The depreciation
charge for the year was $1,125,000 for buildings and $1,800,000 for machinery. Machinery
costing $3m was sold for $3m resulting in a profit of $900,000.
2 On 1 January 20X8 Bestway Co. acquired a 75% interest in Oneway Co.. The net assets at
acquisition were as follows:
$'000
Machinery 1,485
Inventories 288
Trade receivables 252
Cash 1,008
Trade payables (612)
Income tax (153)
2,268
Non-controlling interest (567)
1,701
Goodwill 900
2,601
7,920,000 shares issued as part consideration 2,475
Balance of consideration paid in cash 126
2,601
3 A dividend of $2,700,000 was paid during the year.
Required
Prepare a consolidated statement of cash flows for the Bestway Group for the year ended
31 December 20X8 as required by HKAS 7.
(The answer is at the end of the chapter)
468
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
Topic recap
Non-controlling interest
Cash flows from investing activities
Include dividends paid to the non-controlling
may include:
interest as a cash flow from financing
receipts from the sale of non-
activities.
current assets and investments
payments to acquire non-current
assets and investments
Associates/joint ventures
interest received
Eliminate share of profit or loss in
dividends received
calculation of cash generated from
operations
Include dividend received from
associate/JV as cash flow from operating
activities
469
Financial Reporting
Answer 1
BESTWAY CO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER
20X8
$'000 $'000
Cash flows from operating activities
Net profit before tax 16,965
Adjustments for:
Depreciation (1,125 + 1,800) 2,925
Profit on sale of plant (900)
Share of associate's profits (4,950)
Interest payable 1,350
Operating profit before working capital changes 15,390
Increase in trade and other receivables (16,650 – 11,475 – 252) (4,923)
Increase in inventories (17,775 – 9,000 – 288) (8,487)
Increase in trade payables (6,660 – 4,320 – 612) 1,728
Cash generated from operations 3,708
Interest paid (270 + 1,350 – 360) (1,260)
Income taxes paid (W1) (2,655)
Net cash used in operating activities (207)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of subsidiary undertaking (W2) 882
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (W3) (15,915)
Proceeds from sale of plant 3,000
Dividends from associate (W4) 4,050
Dividends paid to non-controlling interest (W5) (432)
Net cash used in investing activities (8,415)
Cash flows from financing activities
Issue of ordinary share capital (W6) 22,077
Issue of loan notes (19,530 – 6,030) 13,500
Dividends paid (2,700)
Net cash from financing activities 32,877
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 24,255
Cash at 1.1.X8 16,380
Cash at 31.12.X8 40,635
470
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
WORKINGS
1 Taxation
$'000 $'000
Opening balance
Income tax 1,953
Deferred tax 117
2,070
Statement of profit or loss expense 4,860
On acquisition of subsidiary 153
Closing balances
Income tax 4,158
Deferred tax 270
(4,428)
Cash outflow 2,655
2 Purchase of subsidiary
$'000
Cash received on acquisition 1,008
Less cash consideration (126)
Cash inflow 882
3 Purchase of tangible non-current assets: machinery
$'000
Carrying value at 1 Jan X8 2,700
Depreciation (1,800)
Disposal (3,000 – 900) (2,100)
On acquisition of subsidiary 1,485
285
Cash outflow on additions 15,915
Carrying value at 31 Dec 20X8 16,200
4 Dividends from associate
$'000
Opening balance 12,690
Share of profit after tax 4,950
17,640
Closing balance (13,590)
Cash inflow 4,050
5 Non-controlling interest
$'000
Opening balance –
Profit for year 900
On acquisition 567
1,467
Closing balance (1,035)
Cash outflow 432
6 Issue of ordinary share capital
$'000
Closing balance 61,407
Non-cash consideration (2,475)
Opening balance (36,855)
Cash inflow 22,077
471
Financial Reporting
Exam practice
1,408 1,104
472
19: Statements of cash flows | Part C Accounting for business transactions
473
Financial Reporting
474
chapter 20
Topic list
Learning focus
Related party transactions are a controversial area of accounting. They are, however,
relatively common in practice. You must be able to identify related parties and make the
necessary disclosures.
475