CBMSPovertyMaps Vol1 ADN
CBMSPovertyMaps Vol1 ADN
Poverty
The Many Faces of Poverty: Volume 1
Copyright © PEP-CBMS Network Coordinating Team, 2009
Acknowledgements
The publication of this volume has been made possible through the PEP-
CBMS Network Coordinating Team of the Angelo King Institute for Economic
and Business Studies of De La Salle University-Manila with the aid of a
grant from the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa,
Canada and the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
FOREWORD
FOREWORD
The official poverty monitoring system (PMS) in the Philippines relies mainly on family income and
expenditure sur veys. Information on other aspects of well-being is generally obtained from
representative health surveys, national population and housing censuses, and others. However these
sur veys and censuses are (i) too costly to be replicated frequently; (ii) conducted at different time
periods, making it impossible to get a comprehensive profile of the different socio-demographic
groups of interest at a specific point in time; and (iii) have sampling designs that do not usually
correspond to the geographical disaggregation needed by local government units (LGUs). In addition,
the implementation of the decentralization policy, which devolves to LGUs the function of delivering
basic services, creates greater demand for data at the local level.
The Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) seeks to address these gaps by providing
data at the local level appropriate for diagnosing the cause and extent of local poverty, formulating
appropriate policies and programs, identifying eligible beneficiaries, and assessing the impact of
policies and programs. It also supports the decentralization process by capacitating the LGUs to
collect, analyze, and use data in local planning, budgeting, and program implementation.
This volume of statistical tables and poverty maps of seven provinces generated through the
CBMS methodology represents part of what we hope will be a series of publications that will emerge
from the collaborations between the CBMS Network Coordinating Team and its partner-LGUs. These
par tnerships have been in place for several years now, and these partner-LGUs are finally enjoying
the fruits of their hard labor.
The CBMS poverty maps will identify who and where the poor are as they provide a comprehensive
picture of the different faces of poverty in different parts of the country. They will also aid in identifying
the most pressing needs of the community, assist in prioritizing interventions to address these
needs, and facilitate the targeting of programs for those who need the assistance most.
The provinces featured in this volume are Agusan del Nor te, Biliran, Camarines Norte, Eastern
Samar, Marinduque, Romblon, and Siquijor. The statistics presented in this repor t are based on the
CBMS sur veys conducted in these provinces during a 3-year period: 2005–2007.
The work leading to the publication of this book owes much to the unwavering support and
commitment of our partners both at the local and national levels. For so many months now, we have
worked hand-in-hand with them in consolidating databases and validating our sur vey findings. And
now, with their consent, we are sharing their data to a wide range of CBMS stakeholders all over the
country – indeed a glowing testament of their dedication to make their development planning processes
more efficient and effective! Tremendous thanks are therefore in order to all our partner LGUs,
national government agencies, non-government organizations, donors and other development partners
for making this possible.
It is hoped that this publication will provide the necessar y data to facilitate evidence-based
decision-making toward improving local governance and reducing poverty in the country.
CELIA M. REYES
Co-Director, Poverty and Economic Policy (PEP) Research Network
and CBMS Network Leader
Considered a foremost legislation that ushered in a new era of local governance, the Local Government
Code (LGC) of 1991 has paved the way not only for greater autonomy but also for increased expenditure
responsibility and revenue authority of local government units.
Since then, the local government units (LGUs) have assumed a greater role in local government
management and service delivery. The devolution is substantial not only in the magnitude of
responsibilities that were shifted to LGUs but also in the amount of resources now at their disposal
to effectively discharge the devolved functions. Today, LGUs have access to multiple revenue sources,
chief of which is their share in the national internal revenues—the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA).
For the period 2006–2009, the average IRA per year is P172.4 billion (see Table 1).
Amount
Year (in P billion)
2009 201.3
2008 169.9
2007 183.9
2006 134.5
TOTAL 689.6
Ave. per year 172.4
Source: DBM
While experts agree that local governments are not awash with cash, the P689.6 billion worth
of IRA that the LGUs have received over the 4-year period is certainly a big amount. This underscores
the importance of making sure that LGUs are equipped with the right tools, systems, and procedures
to ensure an effective use of these public financial resources. One way to do this is by providing
them access to comprehensive socioeconomic data, on the basis of which they can craft their
development plans and budgets.
With decentralization, the types of data demanded by a wide range of users—policymakers, program
implementers, civil society, and others—are changing. Data disaggregated to correspond to the
dif ferent levels of government are needed by LGUs to adequately assess local situation. Moreover,
longitudinal data are needed to track welfare changes over time. Household-level data are also
needed to identify eligible beneficiaries of different programs.
In 2005, 14 years after the LGC enactment, the ADB-WB released a report highlighting statistical
issues and concerns at the subnational level. It said: “The most comprehensive and consistent
comparative subnational data is at the regional level although this is simply an administrative level
of government that has no responsibilities for delivery of social services. More data is gradually
becoming available at the provincial level, but not at lower levels, which are at the frontline of efforts
to reduce poverty.”1
1
Decentralization in the Philippines: Strengthening Local Government Financing and Resource Management in the
Short-Term, 2005 (A joint document of the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank).
The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 1)
1
Local Pover ty Monitoring Systems Rise up to the Challenge
Owing to still unresolved statistical issues and concerns at the subnational level, an increasing
number of LGUs all over the country have taken the initiative to establish their own Community-
Based Monitoring System (CBMS). As of November 16, 2009, CBMS is being implemented in 59
provinces (31 of which are implementing the system province-wide), 667 municipalities, and 41
cities, covering a total of 17,244 barangays. Data generated by CBMS have so far been used in
diagnosing the nature and extent of poverty in their localities, identifying appropriate interventions,
identifying eligible beneficiaries of poverty reduction programs, and assessing the impact of some
of these programs.
National government agencies have likewise taken notice of the CBMS initiative. Today, CBMS
is recognized as a tool for (i) building the capacity of LGUs on pover ty diagnosis and planning, (ii)
localizing the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and (iii) generating local poverty statistics for
evidence-based development planning and budgeting.
Parallel with efforts to establish databanks at each geopolitical level, an initiative on building
the national repository of CBMS data has also been jumpstarted with the installation of the repository
at the National Anti-Pover ty Commission (NAPC) and at the Depar tment of the Interior and Local
Government (DILG). The national repository is envisioned to facilitate data sharing across government
agencies, private sector, donor agencies, and other relevant stakeholders. Specifically, the national
repository will (i) facilitate the access and use of the integrated CBMS database by national entities
in their advocacy work with key decisionmakers, (ii) support government and non-government funding
sources in strengthening evidence-based planning and monitoring and in aligning their interventions
to national priorities, and (ii) facilitate the implementation of targeted programs.
Concluding Remarks
Public statistics will increasingly shape public agenda at the local level as more and more LGUs
establish their own monitoring systems to make their development planning processes more efficient
and effective. In this scenario, local poverty monitoring systems such as the CBMS will have an
extremely important role to play.
The country’s experience with local-level pover ty monitoring systems clearly demonstrates
that there can be a comprehensive picture of the poverty situation. Very few, if any, national surveys
collect information on the different dimensions of poverty. There is a survey on income and
expenditure, another on health, another on education, another on employment, another on nutrition,
and others. As the samples and the reference periods are different, there is no comprehensive
picture of the poverty status of the population at any point in time. This is where CBMS can make
the difference as it addressess these gaps through its set of core indicators relating to the different
dimensions of pover ty.
The statistical tables and pover ty maps presented in this volume pertain to the CBMS Core
Indicators (also known as Core Local Poverty Indicators 1), which were generated using the
CBMS methodology.
The CBMS is an organized way of collecting ongoing or recurring information at the local
level to be used by local governments, national government agencies, non-government
organization (NGOs), and civil society for planning, budgeting, and implementing local
development programs, as well as for monitoring and evaluating their performance. It is a
tool for improved local governance and democratic decisionmaking that promotes greater
transparency and accountability in resource allocation.
The CBMS Core Indicators are a set of carefully selected indicators that capture the multiple
dimensions of poverty. They define the basic criteria for attaining a decent quality of life and
correspond to the minimum basic needs covering (a) health, (b) nutrition, (c) housing, (d)
water and sanitation, (e) basic education, (f) income, (g) employment, and (h) peace and
order. Together, these indicators provide information not only on how poor a community is,
but also on who in the community is poor, and where.
The CBMS Core Indicators are presented in Table 1. Meanwhile, the poverty and food
thresholds used are presented in Table 2.
1
The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) has issued Memorandum Circular 2003-92 (April 2003)
to set policy guidelines for the adoption of the 13 core local poverty indicators for planning and Memoradum Circular
2004-152 (November 2004) to encourage LGUs to intensify efforts toward the achievement of the millennium development
goals (MDGs). The latter circular also enjoins LGUs to use monitoring systems such as MBN-CBIS, CBMS, IRAP, etc.,
to monitor and diagnose the nature and extent of poverty. CBMS was adopted by the DILG as the data collection and
processing system for the CLPIMS which was the tool adopted to monitor the MDGs for LGUs.
A. Hea lth 1 Proportion of children Total number of children aged 0 to less than One (1) if the household has a
under 5 years old who 5 years old who died divided by (the sum of member under 5 years old who died;
died total number of children aged 0 to less than zero (0) otherwise.
5 years old plus the total number of child
deaths 0 to less than 5 years old)
2 Proportion of women who Total number of women who died due to One (1) if the household has a
died due to pregnancy pregnancy related causes divided by (the female member who died due to
related causes total number of children less than one year pregnancy-related causes; zero (0)
old plus total number of women who died otherwise.
due to pregnancy related causes)
B. Nutrition 3 Proportion of children 0-5 Total number of children 0-5 years old who One (1) if the household has a
years old who are are moderately or severely underweight over member 0-5 years old who is
malnourished total number of children 0-5 years old malnourished; zero (0) otherwise.
C. Housing 4 Proportion of households Total number of households living in housing One (1) if the household lives in
living in makeshift housing with makeshift roof and/or walls over total makeshift housing; zero (0)
number of households otherwise.
5 Proportion of households Total number of households occupying One (1) if the household is an
who are informal settlers house and/or lots without permission of informal settler; zero (0) otherwise.
owner over total number of households
D. Water a nd 6 Proportion of households Total number of households without access One (1) if the household does not
Sa nitation without access to safe to community water system, artesian deep have access to safe water supply;
water supply and shallow wells or bottled water over total zero (0) otherwise.
number of households
7 Proportion of households Total number of households without access One (1) if the household does not
without access to sanitary to water-sealed toilet or closed pit over total have access to sanitary toilet
toilet facilities number of households facilities; zero (0) otherwise.
E. Education 8 Proportion of children 6-12 Total number of children 6-12 years old who One (1) if the household has a
years old who are not are not attending elementary school over member 6-12 years old not
attending elementary total number of children 6-12 years old attending elementary school; zero
school (0) otherwise.
9 Proportion of children 13- Total number of children 13-16 years old One (1) if the household has a
16 years old who are not who are not attending secondary school over member 13-16 years old not
attending secondary total number of children 13-16 years old attending secondary school; zero
school (0) otherwise.
8-9 Proportion of children 6-16 Total number of children 6-16 years old who
years old who are not are not attending school over total number of
attending school children 6-16 years old
F. Income 10 Proportion of households Total number of households with income One (1) if the household has a per
with income below the below the poverty threshold over total capita income below poverty
poverty threshold number of households threshold; zero (0) otherwise.
11 Proportion of households Total number of households with income One (1) if the household has a per
with income below the below the food (subsistence) threshold over capita income below food threshold;
food threshold total number of households zero (0) otherwise.
12 Proportion of households Total number of households who One (1) if the household has
who experienced food experienced food shortage over total number experienced food shortage; zero (0)
shortage of households otherwise.
G. Employme nt 13 Proportion of persons in Total number of persons aged 15 and above One (1) if the household has
the labor force who are who are not working but actively seeking unemployed member/s; zero (0)
unemployed work over total number of labor force otherwise.
H. Pea ce and 14 Proportion of persons who Total number of persons who are victims of One (1) if the household has
Orde r are victims of crimes crimes over total population victim/s of crime; zero (0) otherwise.
CBMS Average number of unmet Sum of unmet needs of households over Sum of the scores (number of
Composite needs total number of households unmet needs) of the 14 indicators.
Indicator
The National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) has issued Resolution No. 6 (2005),
which recognizes and enjoins support to the CBMS as a tool for strengthening the statistical
system at the local level. It also directs the NSCB Technical Staff to initiate and coordinate
an advocacy program for the adoption of the CBMS by the LGUs, through the Regional
Statistical Coordination Committees (RSCCs), the technical arm of the NSCB Executive Board
in the regions.
The NSCB has also approved the CBMS Survey Instruments (NSCB Approval No. DILG-0903-
01)
All survey operations were undertaken under the supervision of the CBMS Technical Working
Groups (TWGs) at the provincial and municipal Levels. They identified the local personnel
who were trained as enumerators and field supervisors. Technical assistance was provided
by the PEP-CBMS Network Office, the Bureau of Local Government Development (BLGD) and
Regional Office IV-B of the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG), National
Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC), National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA)
Regional Office IV-B, and the Institute for Democratic Participation in Governance (IDPG).
Training is mainly conducted at two levels. The first level training (Training of Trainors) is
conducted for members of the TWGs. This is usually conducted by members of the research
staff of the PEP-CBMS Network Office and CBMS-accredited trainors from the DILG, NAPC
and NEDA. Meanwhile, a second level training (Training of Enumerators) is conducted for
enumerators--usually composed of barangay health workers and students. Members of the
TWG act as trainors in this training.
The CBMS Data Processing System includes the CBMS Data Encoding System, Statistics
Simulator (StatSim) and the CBMS-Natural Resources Database.
The CBMS Encoding System uses CSPro (Census and Sur vey Processing), a software
developed by the United States Bureau of Census for entering, editing, tabulating, and
disseminating data from censuses and surveys. The CSPro-based Encoding System converts
survey data into electronic data. It produces text files (ASCII) described by data dictionaries,
which adds flexibility to the output data. This feature facilitates the interface between the
CBMS data and other database systems and statistical softwares.
The CBMS-Natural Resources Database (NRDB) is capable of creating and storing spatial
(shapefiles) and non-spatial (texts and numbers) data as well as generating maps, reports
and graphs ideal for presentation and analysis of pover ty attributes in the community. This
has significantly addressed the need for a simple yet powerful and free geographically oriented
database.
The CBMS Mapping system employs the Natural Resources Database 2 (NRDB) for CBMS-
based pover ty mapping and for storing and displaying household- and individual-level
information. The CBMS-NRDB is capable of creating and storing spatial (shapefiles) and
non-spatial (texts and numbers) data as well as generating maps, reports, and graphs ideal
for presentation and analysis of poverty attributes in the community. This has significantly
addressed the need for a simple yet power ful and free geographically-oriented database.
The data presented through pover ty maps using the CBMS-NRDB are processed using the
CBMS StatSim which has been developed by the PEP-CBMS Network Office to address the
particular need of local government units (LGUs) to harness outputs from the CBMS Database
such as custom tables, reports, case lists and queries. The StatSim simulates simple
computations and tabulations usually done through statistical software or other tabulation
applications, and also exports indicators and statistics for use in dissemination, such as
tables and maps.
The poverty map for each indicator is prepared at two levels. First level is the provincial map
disaggregated by municipality while the second map is provincial map by barangay.
A simple color scheme is used for the poverty maps. Green, light green, pink and red
represents the four ranges of data for each indicator. Each indicator, however, used a different
range relative to the national data (Table 2). Color ranges used for the maps are common for
all the data of all the provinces in this publication for comparison purposes.
2
The NRDB was developed by Mr. Richard Alexander, a British volunteer who spent three years working for the
Bohol Environment Management Office through the assistance of the Voluntary Service Overseas (vso.org.uk).
5 Proportion of households
0-1 1.01-2 2.01-3 3.01-100
who are informal settlers
D. Water and 6 Proportion of households
Sanitation without access to safe 0-25 25.01-50 50.01-75 75.01-100
water supply
7 Proportion of households
without access to sanitary 0-25 25.01-50 50.01-75 75.01-100
toilet facilities
E. Education 8 Proportion of children aged
6-12 years old who are not
0-5 5.01-10 10.01-15 15.01-100
attending elementary
school
9 Proportion of children aged
13-16 years old who are
0-5 5.01-10 10.01-15 15.01-100
not attending secondary
school
8-9 Proportion of children aged
6-16 years old who are not 0-5 5.01-10 10.01-15 15.01-100
attending school
F. Income 10 Proportion of households
with income below the 0-10 10.01-20 20.01-30 30.01-100
poverty threshold
11 Proportion of households
with income below the food 0-10 10.01-20 20.01-30 30.01-100
threshold
12 Proportion of households
who experienced food 0-5 5.01-10 10.01-15 15.01-100
shortage
G. Employment 13 Proportion of persons in the
labor force who are 0-3 3.01-6 6.01-9 9.01-100
unemployed
H. Peace and 14 Proportion of persons who
0-4 3.01-7 6.01-10 9.01-101
Order are victims of crimes
While observations are taken from the entire population, the user of the data presented in this
report should bear in mind that the municipalities in two provinces (Eastern Samar and Biliran)
were not able to collect their data over the same period. For instance, CBMS was piloted in a
number of municipalities in Eastern Samar and Biliran in 2005 and was implemented province-
wide in 2006. Due to some difficulties, the CBMS census could not be carried out in 1 barangay
in Romblon, and 2 barangays each in Camarines Norte and Eastern Samar.
Estimates on poverty and subsistence incidence may also be affected by under- and/or over-
reporting of income or reluctance on the part of the respondents to reveal their true levels of
income. As in other surveys, the CBMS enumerators may also have encountered interview non-
response and item non-response.
Message
Albeit, the fact that the poverty figures documented herein are
gloomier than that of the National Statistical Coordination Board
(NSCB) official Agusan del Norte poverty incidence number, the somber statistics should not be a cause
for controversy, but must rather serve as a clarion call for charting our constituents’ progressive future.
I deem this document as the fruition of our collaborative effort with the National Anti-Poverty Commission
(NAPC). I know that this effective well-researched tool provides the Provincial Government of Agusan del
Norte (PGADN) with a “strategic framework” for its own poverty reduction program.
DEMOGRAPHY
Population 56262 276112
Average household size 5
Children 0-5 years old 39065
Children 6-12 years old 48351
Members 13-16 years old 26686
Members 6-16 years old 75037
Members 10 years old and above 208980
Members of the labor force 80857
HOUSING
households living in makeshift housing 2696 4.8
households who are informal settlers 2554 4.5
BASIC EDUCATION
children 6-12 years old not attending elementary school 10494 21.7
children 13-16 years old not attending high school 11344 42.5
children 6-16 years old not attending school 11349 15.1
BUENAVISTA 9971 47957 6639 324 4.9 5,464 66 1.2 948 10 1.0
CABADBARAN 11540 54216 7662 136 1.8 6,371 33 0.5 1247 5 0.4
CARMEN 3832 18177 2529 62 2.5 1,092 11 1.0 377 1 0.3
JABONGA 3682 18821 2707 27 1.0 2,239 32 1.4 402 2 0.5
KITCHARAO 3258 16196 2195 19 0.9 1,773 7 0.4 108 0 0.0
LAS NIEVES 4148 21993 3642 51 1.4 3,028 54 1.8 577 2 0.3
MAGALLANES 3428 17415 2413 261 10.8 1,992 21 1.0 232 1 0.4
NASIPIT 6561 30550 4115 61 1.5 3,415 19 0.6 341 1 0.3
SANTIAGO 3157 18431 2421 14 0.6 1,672 12 0.6 281 0 0.0
TUBAY 3995 19293 2753 164 6.0 1,997 9 0.4 387 0 0.0
REMEDIOS T. 2690 13068 1991 79 4.0 2,269 8 0.5 284 1 0.4
ROMUALDEZ
BUENAVISTA 8563 1710 20.0 4765 2118 44.4 13328 1961 14.7
CABADBARAN 8875 1664 18.7 4911 1852 37.7 13786 1813 13.2
CARMEN 3359 710 21.1 1826 808 44.2 5185 773 14.9
JABONGA 3435 811 23.6 1819 798 43.9 5254 824 15.7
KITCHARAO 2823 723 25.6 1575 745 47.3 4398 750 17.1
LAS NIEVES 4525 1022 22.6 2373 1106 46.6 6898 1124 16.3
MAGALLANES 2907 627 21.6 1594 579 36.3 4501 547 12.2
NASIPIT 4992 1308 26.2 2793 1105 39.6 7785 1249 16.0
SANTIAGO 3097 644 20.8 1916 814 42.5 5013 855 17.1
TUBAY 3363 732 21.8 1808 848 46.9 5171 892 17.3
REMEDIOS T. 2412 543 22.5 1309 572 43.7 3721 562 15.1
ROMUALDEZ
Map 1. Proportion of Children 0-4 Years Old who Died, by Municipality, 2007
KITCHARAO C hi l d d e a t hs ( 0 - 4 y ea r s o l d )
0.4 M ag ni t ud e Pro p o rt io n
M uni c i p a l i t y
JABONGA Las Nieves 54 1.8
1.4
Jabo ng a 32 1.4
Carmen 11 1.0
CABADBARAN Sant iag o 12 0 .6
0.5
Nasip it 19 0 .6
BUENAVISTA
1.2
LAS NIEVES
1.8
Map 2. Proportion of Children 0-4 Years Old who Died, by Barangay, 2007
KITCHARAO B o t t o m 12 B a r a ng a y s
0.4
B a r a ng a y M a g ni t ud e P r o p o r t i o n
JABONGA Kat ipunan 31 17.2
1.4
Guinabsan 53 9.7
Tao d-o y 10 6.2
SANTIAGO
TUBAY 0.6 Hinimb ang an 3 6.0
0.4 M alicat o 8 5.3
San Jo se 5 5.2
CABADBARAN M ab ini 5 3.5
0.5 La Paz 5 3.3
M ano lig ao 7 3.0
REMEDIOS T.
MAGALLANES Pob lacion (Jab onga) 10 2.9
1.0 ROMUALDEZ Jaguimit an 5 2.9
0.5 San Isidro 5 2.9
CARMEN
1.0
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
0.6
BUENAVISTA
1.2
LAS NIEVES
1.8
KITCHARAO
0.0 W o m e n d e a t h s d u e t o p r e g na n c y - r e l a t e d
c a us e s
JABONGA M uni c ip a li t y M a g ni t ud e Pro p o rt io n
0.5 B uenav ist a 10 1.0
Jab o ng a 2 0 .5
SANTIAGO
TUBAY 0.0 C ab ad b aran 5 0 .4
0.0 R emed io s T . R o muald ez 1 0 .4
M ag allanes 1 0 .4
CABADBARAN Las N ieves 2 0 .3
0.4
C ar men 1 0 .3
REMEDIOS T. N as ip it 1 0 .3
MAGALLANES
0.4 ROMUALDEZ T ub ay 0 0 .0
0.4 Kit c har ao 0 0 .0
CARMEN
0.3 Sant iag o 0 0 .0
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
0.3
BUENAVISTA
1.0
LAS NIEVES
0.3
JABONGA B a r a ng ay M ag ni t ud e P r o p o r t i o n
0.5 San Jo se 1 7.7
M alp o c 1 5.0
SANTIAGO Pob lacion 9 1 4 .8
TUBAY 0.0 Guinab san 5 4 .5
0.0
Kat ug asan 1 4 .5
Pob lacion 7 1 4 .2
CABADBARAN
0.4 A lubijid 2 3 .6
Cab inet 1 2 .8
REMEDIOS T. M alicat o 1 2 .8
MAGALLANES
0.4 ROMUALDEZ Ro jales 1 2 .8
0.4
CARMEN
0.3
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
0.3
BUENAVISTA
1.0
LAS NIEVES
0.3
KITCHARAO
0.9 M al no ur is he d C hi ld r en ( 0 - 5 ye a r s o ld )
JABONGA M un i c i p a l i t y M a g n i t ud e P r o p o r t io n
1.0
M ag allanes 261 10 .8
SANTIAGO Tub ay 16 4 6 .0
TUBAY 0.6 B uenavist a 324 4 .9
6.0
R emed io s T . R o muald ez 79 4 .0
CABADBARAN C ar men 62 2 .5
1.8 C ab ad b aran 13 6 1.8
N asip it 61 1.5
REMEDIOS T.
MAGALLANES Las N ieves 51 1.4
10.8 ROMUALDEZ
4.0 Jab o ng a 27 1.0
CARMEN Kit charao 19 0 .9
2.5
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY Sant iag o 14 0 .6
1.5
BUENAVISTA
4.9
LAS NIEVES
1.4
BUENAVISTA
4.9
LAS NIEVES
1.4
M u n i c ip a l i ty Barangay Nu m be r o f M a l n o u ri sh e d Nu m be r o f C h i l d d e a th s Nu m be r o f W om e n de a th s
C h i l d re n C h i l d re n C h i l d re n ( 0-4 ch ildren d u e to
( 0-5 ( 0-5 ye a rs o l d ) ( 0-4 ye a rs o l d ) ( 0-1 p r e g n a n c y -r e l a t e d
ye a rs o l d ) ye a rs o l d ) ye a r o l d ) causes
M a g ni t u de P ropor t ion M a g ni t u de P r opo r t i on M a g ni t u de Propor tion
M u n i c ip a l i ty Barangay Nu m be r o f M a l n o u ri sh e d Nu m be r o f C h i l d d e a th s Nu m be r o f W om e n de a th s
C h i l d re n C h i l d re n C h i l d re n ( 0-4 ye a rs o l d ) ch ildren d u e to
( 0-5 ( 0-5 ye a rs o l d ) ( 0-4 ( 0-1 p r e g n a n c y -r e l a t e d
ye a rs o l d ) ye a rs o l d ) ye a r o l d ) causes
M u n i c ip a l i ty Barangay Nu m be r o f M a l n o u ri sh e d Nu m be r o f C h i l d d e a th s Nu m be r o f W om e n de a th s
C h i l d re n C h i l d re n C h i l d re n ( 0-4 ye a rs o l d ) ch ildren d u e to
( 0-5 ( 0-5 ye a rs o l d ) ( 0-4 ( 0-1 p r e g n a n c y -r e l a t e d
ye a rs o l d ) ye a rs o l d ) ye a r o l d ) causes
H o u s e ho l d s l i v i ng i n ma k e s h i f t ho u s i ng
KITCHARAO
5.2 M un i c i p a l i t y M a g ni t ud e P ro p o r t io n
Sant iag o 3 19 10 .1
JABONGA
3.0 Las N i ev es 2 56 6 .2
N asi p it 396 6 .0
SANTIAGO T ub ay 228 5.7
TUBAY 10.1
5.7 B uenavi st a 53 0 5.3
Ki t char ao 16 9 5.2
CABADBARAN C ar men 13 9 3 .6
3.2 M ag all anes 117 3 .4
C ab ad b ar an 367 3 .2
REMEDIOS T.
MAGALLANES
3.4 ROMUALDEZ J ab o ng a 112 3 .0
BUENAVISTA
5.3
LAS NIEVES
6.2
KITCHARAO
5.2 Bott om 10 Barangays
BUENAVISTA
5.3
LAS NIEVES
6.2
KITCHARAO
8.2 H o u s e ho l d s w ho a r e i n f o r m a l s e t t l e r s
M a g n i t ud e P r o p o r t io n
JABONGA M un i c i p a l i t y
8.5 Jab o ng a 3 13 8 .5
Kit charao 2 65 8 .2
SANTIAGO
TUBAY 5.1 M ag allanes 204 6 .0
5.4 Tub ay 2 15 5.4
BUENAVISTA
2.6
LAS NIEVES
2.0
Map 10. Proportion of Households who are Informal Settlers, by Barangay, 2007
KITCHARAO
8.2
B o t t o m 10 B ar ang ay s
JABONGA
8.5 B a r a ng a y M a g ni t ud e P r o p o r t i o n
BUENAVISTA
2.6
LAS NIEVES
2.0
KITCHARAO H o u s e h o l d s w i t h o ut a c c e s s t o s a f e w a t e r
17.5 s up p l y
M uni c ip a li t y M a g ni t ud e Pro p o rt io n
JABONGA
13.5 M ag allanes 2 3 56 6 8 .7
B uenav ist a 14 2 6 14 .3
CABADBARAN C ar men 52 5 13 .7
4.4
Jab o ng a 497 13 .5
REMEDIOS T. T ub ay 511 12 .8
MAGALLANES
68.7 ROMUALDEZ N as ip it 402 6 .1
16.1 Sant iag o 155 4 .9
CARMEN
C ab ad b aran 50 3 4 .4
13.7
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
6.1
BUENAVISTA
14.3
LAS NIEVES
22.5
KITCHARAO
17.5 B o t t o m 10 B a r a ng ay s
JABONGA B a r a ng a y M a g ni t ud e P r o p o r t i o n
13.5 Lawan-lawan 70 100 .0
Sant o Rosario 56 6 9 6.9
SANTIAGO M arco s 66 9 95.4
TUBAY 4.9 Simb alan 50 0 9 0.6
12.8
San Ro que 91 8 9.2
BUENAVISTA
14.3
LAS NIEVES
22.5
KITCHARAO H o u s e ho l d s w i t ho ut a c c e s s t o s a ni t a r y t o i l e t
14.3 f a c i li t i e s
M uni c i p a l i t y M a g ni t ud e P r o p o r t io n
JABONGA
13.5 C ar men 110 3 2 8 .8
Las N i ev es 665 16 .0
CABADBARAN N as ip it 961 14 .6
11.1
Kit c har ao 467 14 .3
BUENAVISTA
20.4
LAS NIEVES
16.0
JABONGA B a r a ng a y M a g ni t ud e P r o p o r t i o n
13.5 M ano lig ao 24 2 68 .2
San Roq ue 67 65.7
SANTIAGO Lo wer Olave 179 6 1.1
TUBAY 19.4
12.2 Jaguimit an 155 59 .8
San A nt onio 2 19 58 .4
CABADBARAN V inap or 19 5 48 .5
11.1 Pob lacion 9 14 1 45.8
San Isid ro 16 9 44 .8
REMEDIOS T. B ang ayan 116 44 .6
MAGALLANES
10.8 ROMUALDEZ B asilisa 150 43 .7
20.6
CARMEN
28.8
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
14.6
BUENAVISTA
20.4
LAS NIEVES
16.0
Map 15. Proportion of Children 6-12 years old Not Attending Elementary
School, by Municipality, 2007
KITCHARAO
25.6 C hi l d r e n n o t a t t e n d i n g e l e m e n t a r y s c h o o l
( 6 - 12 y e a r s o l d )
JABONGA M un i c i p a l i t y M a g ni t u d e P r o p o r t io n
23.6
N asip it 13 0 8 2 6 .2
R emed io s T . R o muald ez 54 3 2 2 .5
CABADBARAN
18.7 Tub ay 73 2 2 1.8
BUENAVISTA
20.0
LAS NIEVES
22.6
Map 16. Proportion of Children 6-12 years old Not Attending Elementary
School, by Barangay, 2007
KITCHARAO
25.6
B o t t o m 10 B a r a ng a ys
JABONGA B a r a ng ay M a g ni t ud e P r o p o r t i o n
23.6
A t a-at aho n 123 56.4
BUENAVISTA
20.0
LAS NIEVES
22.6
Map 17. Proportion of Children 13-16 years old Not Attending High School,
by Municipality, 2007
KITCHARAO
47.3
C h i l d r e n n o t a t t e n d i ng h i g h s c ho o l
JABONGA ( 13 - 16 y e a r s o l d )
43.9 M un i c i p a l i t y M a g n i t ud e P r o p o r t io n
B uenavist a 2 118 4 4 .4
BUENAVISTA
44.4
LAS NIEVES
46.6
Map 18. Proportion of Children 13-16 years old Not Attending High School,
by Barangay, 2007
KITCHARAO
47.3 B o t t o m 10 B ar ang ay s
B a r a ng a y M a g ni t ud e P r o p o r t i o n
JABONGA
43.9 M alicat o 62 88 .6
Lawan-lawan 37 82 .2
SANTIAGO Jaguimit an 10 5 80 .2
TUBAY 42.5 San Roq ue 32 76 .2
46.9 Hinimb ang an 28 73 .7
B inuangan 67 71.3
CABADBARAN B onif acio 70 69 .3
37.7 A t a-at ahon 87 68 .0
Simb alan 2 53 66 .8
REMEDIOS T.
MAGALLANES Pinana-an 66 66 .7
36.3 ROMUALDEZ
43.7
CARMEN
44.2
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
39.6
BUENAVISTA
44.4
LAS NIEVES
46.6
Map 19. Proportion of Children 6-16 years old Not Attending School,
by Municipality, 2007
KITCHARAO
17.1 C hi l d r e n n o t a t t e nd i n g s c h o o l
( 6 - 16 y e a r s o l d )
JABONGA M unic i p a l it y M ag nit ud e P ro p o rt io n
15.7
T ub ay 892 17.3
N as ip i t 12 4 9 16 .0
CABADBARAN
13.2 Jab o ng a 824 15.7
BUENAVISTA
14.7
LAS NIEVES
16.3
Map 20. Proportion of Children 6-16 years old Not Attending School,
by Barangay, 2007
KITCHARAO B o t t o m 10 B a r a ng a ys
17.1
B a r ang ay M ag ni t ud e P r o p o r t i o n
JABONGA A t a-at ahon 16 3 4 7.1
15.7 M alicat o 82 3 5.2
Lawan-lawan 43 30 .9
SANTIAGO Camag ong 3 03 30 .2
TUBAY 17.1
17.3 Pinana-an 80 30 .0
Pob lacio n 2 14 3 28 .4
BUENAVISTA
14.7
LAS NIEVES
16.3
M u n i c ip a l i ty Barangay Nu m be r o f C h i l d re n n o t Nu m be r o f C h i l d re n n o t Nu m be r o f C h i l d re n n o t
C h i l d re n a tt e n d i n g C h i l d re n a tt e n d i n g h i g h C h i l d re n a tte n d i n g sc h o o l
( 6 - 1 2 year s e l e m e n ta r y sc h o o l (13- 16 sch oo l ( 6 - 1 6 year s ( 6-16 yea rs ol d )
ol d) ( 6-12 yea rs ol d ) years old) ( 13-16 ye ars ol d ) ol d)
M ag n i t u d e P r o p or t i o n M ag ni t ude P r o p or t i o n M ag ni t ude P r o p or t i o n
M ag n i t u d e P r o p or t i o n M ag ni t ude P r o p or t i o n M ag ni t ude P r o p or t i o n
M ag n i t u d e P r o p or t i o n M ag ni t ude P r o p or t i o n M ag ni t ude P r o p or t i o n
R EMEDI OS T. Balangbalang 330 71 21.5 225 114 50.7 555 101 18.2
R O M U AL DE Z Basilisa 324 62 19.1 150 75 50.0 474 80 16.9
Humilog 224 58 25.9 107 48 44.9 331 47 14.2
Panaytayon 156 37 23.7 86 29 33.7 242 34 14.0
Poblacion I (Agay) 399 87 21.8 215 53 24.7 614 55 9.0
Poblacion II 283 83 29.3 142 54 38.0 425 87 20.5
San Antonio 379 75 19.8 196 119 60.7 575 101 17.6
Tagbongabong 317 70 22.1 188 80 42.6 505 57 11.3
Map 21. Proportion of Households with Income Below the Poverty Threshold,
by Municipality, 2007
KITCHARAO
70.4 Ho useho ld s w it h inco me b elo w t he p o ver t y
t hr e s h o l d
JABONGA M un i c i p a l i t y M a g ni t ud e P ro p o r t io n
79.9
J ab o ng a 2941 79 .9
Las N i ev es 2633 6 3 .5
CABADBARAN
47.5 C ar men 2343 6 1.1
T ub ay 2388 59 .8
REMEDIOS T. M ag all anes 18 51 54 .0
MAGALLANES
54.0 ROMUALDEZ B uenavi st a 4 9 77 4 9 .9
70.2 C ab ad b ar an 54 78 4 7.5
CARMEN
61.1 N asi p it 3 10 9 4 7.4
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
47.4
BUENAVISTA
49.9
LAS NIEVES
63.5
Map 22. Proportion of Households with Income Below the Poverty Threshold,
by Barangay, 2007
KITCHARAO
70.4
B o t t o m 10 B a r a ng a y s
JABONGA
79.9 B a r a ng ay M ag ni t ud e P r o p o r t io n
Lawan-lawan 68 9 7.1
SANTIAGO Curva 3 03 94 .7
TUBAY 64.1 M araiging 70 9 0 .9
59.8 Ibuan 153 90 .5
M ahaba 19 6 88 .7
CABADBARAN
47.5 Tao d-o y 16 6 8 8 .3
B unga 121 8 8 .3
BUENAVISTA
49.9
LAS NIEVES
63.5
Map 23. Proportion of Households with Income Below the Food Threshold,
by Municipality, 2007
KITCHARAO
59.4 H o us e ho l d s w i t h i nc o me b e l o w t he f o o d
t hr e s ho l d
JABONGA M uni c ip a l i t y M a g ni t u d e P r o p o rt io n
71.6 Jab o ng a 2638 71.6
T ub ay 18 0 5 4 5.2
REMEDIOS T. M ag all anes 13 56 3 9 .6
MAGALLANES
39.6 ROMUALDEZ B uenavi st a 3433 3 4 .4
57.9
CARMEN N as ip it 2228 3 4 .0
47.2 C ab ad b ar an 3 9 10 3 3 .9
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
34.0
BUENAVISTA
34.4
LAS NIEVES
50.9
Map 24. Proportion of Households with Income Below the Food Threshold,
by Barangay, 2007
KITCHARAO
59.4
B o t t o m 10 B a r a ng a y s
JABONGA B a r a ng ay M ag ni t ud e P r o p o r t io n
71.6
Lawan-lawan 64 91.4
SANTIAGO Curva 2 89 9 0 .3
TUBAY 48.9 Ibuan 151 8 9 .3
45.2 M araiging 65 8 4 .4
B ango nay 3 79 8 3 .8
CABADBARAN B unga 114 8 3 .2
33.9 A . B elt ran (Camalig ) 12 9 80 .1
Hinimb ang an 46 79 .3
REMEDIOS T.
MAGALLANES San A nt o nio 2 96 78 .9
39.6 ROMUALDEZ M ahaba 174 78 .7
57.9
CARMEN
47.2
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
34.0
BUENAVISTA
34.4
LAS NIEVES
50.9
KITCHARAO
0.2 H o u s e ho l d s w ho e x p e r i e nc e d f o o d s ho r t a g e
Jab o ng a 4 51 12 .2
SANTIAGO
TUBAY 0.7 R emed io s T . R o muald ez 303 11.3
1.7 C ab ad b ar an 719 6 .2
B uenav is t a 52 5 5.3
CABADBARAN M ag allanes 14 7 4 .3
6.2
C ar men 10 5 2 .7
REMEDIOS T. T ub ay 67 1.7
MAGALLANES
4.3 ROMUALDEZ N asi p it 75 1.1
11.3 Sant iag o 21 0 .7
CARMEN
2.7 Kit char ao 6 0 .2
NASIPIT BUTUAN CITY
1.1
BUENAVISTA
5.3
LAS NIEVES
14.9
JABONGA B a r a ng ay M ag ni t ud e P r o p o r t io n
12.2 M alicat o 98 52 .7
M araiging 37 48 .1
SANTIAGO San Isid ro 97 45.8
TUBAY 0.7
1.7 M ahaba 98 4 4 .3
Kat ipunan 70 4 4 .3
BUENAVISTA
5.3
LAS NIEVES
14.9
Municipality Barangay Households with income below the Households with income below Households who experienced
pover ty threshold the food threshold food shor tage
M ag n i t u d e P r o p or t i o n M ag n i t u d e P r o p or t i o n M ag n i t u d e P r o p or t i o n
Map 27. Unemployment Rate (15 years old and above), by Municipality, 2007
KITCHARAO
0.2 U ne mp l o yme nt R a t e
( 15 y e a r s o l d a n d a b o v e )
JABONGA M a g ni t ud e Pro p o rt io n
4.2 M uni c ip a li t y
Sant iag o 579 10 .9
R emed io s T . R o muald ez 13 2 3 .4
CABADBARAN
1.9 T ub ay 12 8 2 .2
C ab ad b aran 3 16 1.9
REMEDIOS T. M ag allanes 77 1.7
MAGALLANES
1.7 ROMUALDEZ Las N ieves 42 0 .7
3.4 C ar men 35 0 .7
CARMEN
0.7 Kit c har ao 8 0 .2
BUENAVISTA
8.8
LAS NIEVES
0.7
Map 28. Unemployment Rate (15 years old and above), by Barangay, 2007
KITCHARAO
0.2
Bott om 10 Barangays
JABONGA Barangay M agnit ude Proportion
4.2
Poblacion 1(Buenavista) 220 39.9
Poblacion II (Santiago) 382 36.4
SANTIAGO
TUBAY 10.9 Poblacion 9 (Buenavista) 136 26.6
BUENAVISTA
8.8
LAS NIEVES
0.7
Map 29. Proportion of Persons who are Victims of Crime, by Municipality, 2007
KITCHARAO
0.0 Pe rso ns w ho a re v ict ims o f c rimes
M a g n i t ud e P r o p o rt io n
JABONGA M uni c i p a l i t y
0.3 B uenav is t a 635 1.3
C ab ad b ar an 571 1.1
SANTIAGO
TUBAY 0.0 R emed io s T . R o muald ez 14 5 1.1
0.0 C ar men 16 6 0 .9
N as ip it 2 58 0 .8
CABADBARAN M ag allanes 85 0 .5
1.1
J ab o ng a 53 0 .3
BUENAVISTA
1.3
LAS NIEVES
0.2
Map 30. Proportion of Persons who are Victims of Crime, by Barangay, 2007
KITCHARAO
0.0
B o t t o m 10 B ar ang ay s
JABONGA B a r a ng a y M a g ni t ud e P r o p o r t i o n
0.3
A t a-at ahon 16 6 12.8
BUENAVISTA
1.3
LAS NIEVES
0.2
BUENAVISTA
1.8
LAS NIEVES
2.2
BUENAVISTA
1.8
LAS NIEVES
2.2
M u n i c ip a l i ty Barangay C B M S C o m p o s i te M u n i c ip a l i ty Barangay C B M S C o m p o s i te
Indicator Indicator
M u n i c ip a l i ty Barangay C B M S C o m p o s i te
Indicator
NA S I PI T Aclan 2.0
Amontay 1.6
Ata-atahon 2.0
Barangay 1 (Pob.) 1.2
Barangay 2 (Pob.) 1.2
Barangay 3 (Pob.) 1.3
Barangay 4 (Pob.) 1.1
Barangay 5 (Pob.) 0.7
Barangay 6 (Pob.) 1.0
Barangay 7 (Pob.) 1.1
Camagong 2.3
Cubi-cubi 1.3
Culit 1.6
Jaguimitan 3.3
Kinabjangan 1.0
Punta 1.3
Santa Ana 1.8
Talisay 1.4
Triangulo 1.0
S AN T I AG O Curva 2.6
Estanislao Morgado 2.1
Jagupit 1.2
La Paz 3.0
Poblacion I 1.4
Poblacion II 2.5
San Isidro 2.0
Tagbuyacan 2.1
T U B AY Binuangan 2.2
Cabayawa 1.8
Doña Rosario 1.6
Doña Telesfora 1.9
La Fraternidad 1.6
Lawigan 2.2
Poblacion 1 2.2
Poblacion 2 1.2
Santa Ana 2.1
Tagmamarkay 1.8
Tagpangahoy 2.0
Tinigbasan 1.9
Victory 1.8