Professional Documents
Culture Documents
U.S. v. Lozman Complaint
U.S. v. Lozman Complaint
U.S. v. Lozman Complaint
Plaintiff,
FANE LOZMAN,
Defendant.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, United States of America (“United States”), through its undersigned attorneys,
by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States, and at the request of the Secretary
of the Army acting through the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”), files this
1. The United States brings this civil enforcement action under sections 12 and 17 of
the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 (“RHA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 406, 413, against
United States without authorization, in violation of RHA section 10, 33 U.S.C. § 403.
of a water of the United States without authorization, in violation of RHA section 10, 33 U.S.C.
§ 403.
4. The United States seeks injunctive and other relief as requested herein.
Case 9:21-cv-81119-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2021 Page 2 of 7
and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), because the unauthorized structures exist in this District and the events
THE PARTIES
7. Plaintiff in this action is the United States of America. Authority to bring this
action is vested in the United States Department of Justice. See 28 U.S.C. § 516; 33 U.S.C.
§ 413.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
A. The Site
9. Defendant owns a parcel of real estate in Palm Beach County, Florida, with parcel
10. For purposes of this Complaint, the parcel of real estate described in Paragraph 9
is the “Site.”
11. The address of the Site is 5101 North Ocean Drive, Riviera Beach, Florida 33408.
12. Part of the Site is submerged land within Lake Worth Lagoon.
13. Lake Worth Lagoon is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
14. Lake Worth Lagoon is used or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or
foreign commerce.
2
Case 9:21-cv-81119-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2021 Page 3 of 7
B. Defendant’s Conduct
15. On or before June 9, 2020, and continuing to the present, Defendant or persons
acting at his direction, built or installed structures in Lake Worth Lagoon adjacent to and in
17. Defendant arranged certain modules into four larger structures that measure
container on top of the module that measures approximately eighty feet in length.
19. Defendant connected certain modules to mangroves on the shore of the Site using
20. In or around January 2021, Defendant attempted to drive pilings into submerged
land in Lake Worth Lagoon and connect certain modules to those pilings.
21. Defendant built or installed the structures in a portion of Lake Worth Lagoon
22. At no time did Defendant or any person on Defendant’s behalf apply for or secure
authorization to build the structures alleged herein pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 403 or 33 C.F.R.
§ 322.3(a).
23. On or about January 12, 2021, the Corps issued a Notice of Violation to advise
Defendant that the unauthorized structures that Defendant built in Lake Worth Lagoon are
unlawful and to cease and desist conducting such activities in waters of the United States.
3
Case 9:21-cv-81119-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2021 Page 4 of 7
24. The structures, including the manner in which Defendant is securing the structures
unauthorized structures became unmoored and drifted into Lake Worth Lagoon. These incidents
the Site after the Corps issued the Notice of Violation. For example, Defendant rearranged the
structures after the Corps issued the Notice of Violation. Defendant built a staircase and affixed
the staircase and additional building materials to the top of the shipping container that Defendant
placed on one of the floating modules. And Defendant re-moored unauthorized structures that
drifted away from the Site and into Lake Worth Lagoon.
27. The United States repeats the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1–26.
28. RHA section 10 prohibits “[t]he creation of any obstruction not affirmatively
authorized by Congress, to the navigable capacity of any of the waters of the United States.” 33
U.S.C. § 403.
29. RHA section 10 also makes it unlawful “to build or commence the building of any
wharf, pier, dolphin, boom, weir, breakwater, bulkhead, jetty, or other structures in any port,
roadstead, haven, harbor, canal, navigable river, or other water of the United States, outside
established harbor lines, or where no harbor lines have been established, except on plans
recommended by the Chief of Engineers and authorized by the Secretary of the Army.” 33
U.S.C. § 403.
4
Case 9:21-cv-81119-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2021 Page 5 of 7
30. A Department of Army permit is required under RHA section 10 for structures or
31. “Navigable waters of the United States are those waters that are subject to the ebb
and flow of the tide and/or are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be
once made, applies laterally over the entire surface of the waterbody, and is not extinguished by
later actions or events which impede or destroy navigable capacity.” 33 C.F.R. § 329.4.
32. A “structure” includes, but is not limited to, “any pier, boat dock, boat ramp,
wharf, dolphin, weir, boom, breakwater, bulkhead, revetment, riprap, jetty, artificial island,
artificial reef, permanent mooring structure, power transmission line, permanently moored
floating vessel, piling, aid to navigation, or any other obstacle or obstruction.” 33 C.F.R.
§ 322.2(b).
33. Defendant, or persons acting at Defendant’s direction, built the structures alleged
herein.
34. The structures that Defendant built are “structures” within the meaning of the
RHA, and require authorization under RHA section 10 and the Corps’ implementing regulations.
35. Lake Worth Lagoon is a navigable water of the United States within the meaning
of the RHA.
36. The structures that Defendant built or installed in Lake Worth Lagoon are also
37. Defendant violated and continues to violate RHA section 10, 33 U.S.C. § 403, by
(a) building structures in Lake Worth Lagoon, as alleged herein, without a permit; and
5
Case 9:21-cv-81119-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2021 Page 6 of 7
(b) creating an obstruction to the navigable capacity of Lake Worth Lagoon, as alleged herein,
without a permit.
38. WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that the Court order the
following relief:
a. Enjoin Defendant from further building structures in waters of the United States,
c. Award the United States costs and disbursements in this action; and
d. Grant any such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
6
Case 9:21-cv-81119-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2021 Page 7 of 7
JEAN E. WILLIAMS
Acting Assistant Attorney General
7
Case 9:21-cv-81119-DMM Document
JS 44 (Rev. 10/20) FLSD Revised 02/12/2021 1-1 COVER
CIVIL Entered SHEET
on FLSD Docket 06/25/2021 Page 1 of 1
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided
by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating
the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-filed Cases Below.
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FANE LOZMAN
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff County of Residence of First Listed Defendant Palm Beach
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
Brandon N. Adkins and Sydney A. Menees
U.S. Dep't of Justice
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044
202-616-9174
(d) Check County Where Action Arose: MIAMI- DADE MONROE BROWARD PALM BEACH MARTIN ST. LUCIE INDIAN RIVER OKEECHOBEE HIGHLANDS
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff)
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)
■ 1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF
Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 4 4
of Business In This State
2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated and Principal Place 5 5
Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY : RECEIPT # AMOUNT IFP JUDGE MAG JUDGE
Case 9:21-cv-81119-DMM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2021 Page 1 of 1
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,
whose name and address are:
Brandon N. Adkins
United States Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk