Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lisa Barrett: N438 Assignment Marking Record For Discussion Paper Instructor: Mark: 58
Lisa Barrett: N438 Assignment Marking Record For Discussion Paper Instructor: Mark: 58
Lisa Barrett: N438 Assignment Marking Record For Discussion Paper Instructor: Mark: 58
N438 Assignment
Marking Record for Discussion Paper
Instructor: Lisa Barrett
Mark: 58/ 100
Marking Criteria Instructor Comments
Content 36/70 Some marking criteria were addressed in
sufficient detail. Please see comments below
and at the end. Please also download and
open your attached assignment to read
further comments and feedback.
Introduction 5/10
Briefly highlight the most salient points Succinct discussion of main points of topic
of your topic achieved to beginning level.
State your main thesis on the topic for Clear thesis on the topic achieved to a
discussion [your view on the issue or an beginning level.
assertion about your topic, something
you claim to be true]
Pushpinderjit Bedi
Athabasca University
Discussion Paper
In 2016 under criminal law C 14 Medical assistance in dying was legalized. It was a massive
change that took place after a lot of discussion and surveys of public opinion. Different physicians
together with their own will started giving aid in dying to patients coping with irremediable diseases.
There have been cases in the past where people had to leave Canada to opt for Medical assistance in
dying (MAiD). Legalization of MAiD came with a specific criterion for patients, and for physicians,
not everyone can request MAiD. Who so ever wanted MAiD has to get an approval from the court. It
impacted nurses in terms of their role and duties in this new procedure. Rural area's consideration
4
Running Head: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE IN DYING
raised many questions in terms of care and limited health care resources. It impacted the cancer
patient's life in dealing with end of life situations. There are specific criteria for patients to meet their
request for MAiD. Patients suffering from their irremediable conditions, end-of-life care should have
the choice to end their suffering. Legalizing MAiD means recognizing their suffering and respecting
their choice, but this should be an alternative to palliative care. Nurse's ethical dilemma is to choose
between their duty and their religious beliefs. Patients should have their full right to decide on their
health.
MAID was a considerable change in the law under bill C 14 released in 2016. There was a large
discussion initially about legalization of MAiD. Authors (Beuthin, R., Bruce, A., & Scaia, M.,2018,
para. 3) state MAiD had first legalized in Switzerland in 1942. There was polling data, and 79% of the
general public agreed and favored MAID, but only 45 % of physicians agreed with this decision. There
were many surveys, 60 % of nurses agreed to work alongside physicians for MAiD. Quebec was the
first province where MAID first legalized under act end of life care in 2015. As it had legalized, all
facilities offering it had to make sure new policies and guidelines had been in place for health care
professionals.
MAiD had affected health care workers and the general public as it involved patients and their
families as well. People suffering through end of life stage gives them that one option to make their
choice to end their suffering. It impacts everyone, and legalization should be available everywhere to
everyone for easy access. It is not possible to make it accessible to one region as everybody should
have equal right. It was a challenge for rural areas because there are already limited health care
facilities available in those areas. There are specific criteria for this procedure stated in (Health Canada.
(2020). Patient should be legal age over 18 and mentally competent for consent, irremediable disease
that impacts their lives or causing them to suffer, volunteer decisions without any pressure, and consent
to perform the MAiD procedure. Criteria for physicians, patients have to be assessed by two health care
5
Running Head: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE IN DYING
professionals regarding their diagnosis that it is irremediable, and both have to agree for MAiD. They
have to make sure they get a consent signed and, before administering medication, need to get verbal
consent from the client right before procedure to make sure they have not changed their mind. In this
whole process, nurses had their moral and ethical dilemmas. There are particular criteria for patients to
meet who choose MAiD. Author (Collins, A., & Leier, B.,2017, p.1) states that the palliative care
community is limited to meet the need of a large population. Scarcity of resources to meet the needs of
palliative care community legalization of MAiD was one step to fill that gap. There were many
questions raised by palliate care physicians, as there is little palliative care available, but MAiD was not
The only benefit to the health care system is that it decreases the burden to meet palliative needs
by just directly offering MAiD. As mentioned earlier, that MAiD fills in that gap, and the patients can
have an alternative option available. Nurse practitioners (NP) responsibility is higher as they were
eligible to carry out this procedure. They although face the dilemma but built up their courage to
provide end life care to suffering patients. Rural areas have limited physicians, and, in some facilities,
only nurse practitioners are available as the only source. According to MAiD criteria, there have to be
many health care professionals involved in providing support to the physician providing MAiD
assessment. Registered nurses did not have any specific education sessions regarding new changes, but
NP had mandatory education sessions as they were primary to carry out the procedure. It was a
reasonably new law, so initially, there were many challenges for nurses and the health care system.
Physicians and nurses were not clear about guidelines for separate roles. Nurses' challenges
were that there are no clear guidelines or policies for their expectations in this role. (Pesut, B., Thorne,
S., Greig, M., Fulton, A., Janke, R., & Vis-Dunbar, M. (2019). Talks about the workplace aspect of this
issue. Nurses were left in a blur as physicians had their guidelines, but nursing did not have specific
policies to follow. It was not clear that their role in this procedure was to be prepared and decide if they
6
Running Head: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE IN DYING
wanted to participate in their procedure. The moral dilemma was a massive concern as many catholic
nurses refused to participate in this because of their religious beliefs. Nurses now have the
responsibility to advocate for patients’ rights for MAiD. Author (Pesut, B., et al., (2019) talks about
different responsibilities of nurses. It includes assessing the patient, teaching, and providing
information about MAiD to the patient and family. Supporting patients and family during this time and
documentation is a huge part of this procedure. MAiD is not a standard process, and it does require
A group of nurses interviewed on MAiD to get their opinion on this process. Author (Beuthin,
R., et al., (2018). Talks about the nurse's opinion in this article. The interview process divides into three
aspects of the nursing profession: nursing, personal impact, and nursing practice. The professional
approach had to be nonjudgmental, respecting patient choice, and advocating for their rights under the
professional code of conduct. It was moral values for some, for it was like expanding their experience
in their field. For some, it was emotionally distressing because it was morally wrong, in their opinion.
Personal impact were there for some nurses were supporting MAiD as it is their right to choose, some
of them were in between they felt it was right but still not wholly agreed and some completely opposed
the whole process. Nursing practice was still involved in the process as there was the clinical approach
for insertions, basic care palliative approach, and emotional support to the family. A nurse can legally
say no if they do not morally support the process, but they have to conduct their duties until a
replacement is available as a professional. There should be new protocols and education sessions to get
It impacts not only the patient but its family and relatives also. MAiD is been legalized so
anyone can have access to it with their own will. It was a challenge for rural areas because there are
already limited health care facilities available in those areas. Rural areas have limited physicians, and,
in some facilities, only nurse practitioners are available as the only source. According to MAiD criteria,
7
Running Head: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE IN DYING
there have to be two health care professionals involved to carry out the MAiD assessment. There was
nothing specific in criteria or the law about telehealth and its usage in this process. Telehealth uses a
second person assessment by a health care professional. It was beneficial and worked out well for the
rural area because of the limited resources available for health care. It was also suitable because the
patient who requested MAiD would not travel long distances to different facilities where physicians
were available.
Advancing cancer symptoms can be challenging for patients; sometimes, the pain they live with
is not tolerable. Patients with active cancer or end-stage can submit up request for MAiD, then two
physicians or nurse practitioners would be involved for maid assessment criteria. (Wu, J. S. Y., Pinilla,
J., Watson, M., Verma, S., & Olivotto, I. A. (2018). Author explains in study five phases of this
process, which is as follows: 1) pre-contemplation in which the patient will go over all their end of life
options. 2) Contemplation is to go over the delated explanation of the end of life options, including
MAID. 3) Determination in this step government of Alberta form will be signed then two physicians, or
nurse practitioner. 4) action in this phase they will go over the specific of MAiD to talk about the
location route of medication. 5) Aftercare in this step, they will be transferring body and grieving
There should be an education session on MAiD, so everybody gets familiar with the process.
Nursing education should include detailed palliative care, in which MAiD should become part of the
education system. Employees should provide extra resources for nurses to refer back to educational
purposes and mandatory education sessions. Nurses should have someone available to talk to so they
can talk about their ethical dilemma. Collins & Leier (2017) explains that rural area has limited access
to palliative assistance due to this reason MAiD should not become the first choice. The health care
system investing in physicians training for MAiD should invest more in providing palliative assistance
in rural areas. Resources and funding should be available for local people that can train in nursing.
8
Running Head: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE IN DYING
Educating patients on palliative care so they know how much of symptom management palliative care
can benefit them. (McCarthy, R.I. N. G., & Seal, M. (2019) explain that there have been many requests
for this procedure, but a lot of them do not meet the criteria. It indicates a lack of knowledge among
patients for MAiD eligibility. Patients were not having enough knowledge about their condition and
treatment options.
It should be the responsibility of health organizations to make sure NP and physicians get
compensated. The family physician needs training for MAiD, so it is not just the responsibility of
specific physicians. It will also help in decreasing the burden on the health care system. Ministry of
health and local health integration system (LIHN) should work together to help plan better ways. So,
there is no unnecessary request due to a lack of knowledge. As literature shows, we need to improvise
on a system that should help educate patients on MAiD. If everybody is educated and aware of their
In this paper I have discussed how the legalization of MAiD has impacted everybody. Patients
who were suffering due to their prognosis required this freedom to have options available for them.
Nurses have a legal obligation to advocate for patients' rights. Scarcity of resources in rural areas has
been an issue, but authorizing nurse practitioners to perform MAiD is very beneficial. It indeed ends
much suffering in patients dealing with irremediable diseases and living life in such pain. Quality of
life matters because surviving daily and dealing with pain or other conditions is not life. Legalizing
MAiD means recognizing their suffering and respecting their choice, but this does not mean we should
not offer an alternative to improve their quality of life. MAiD is the patient choice, but palliative
assistance should always be their priority option given to patients. Educating patients on palliative care
and their prognosis can help the patient in making the right decision. Legalizing MAiD was freedom
for patients and end to their suffering. It was also a considerable responsibility of physicians and NP to
9
Running Head: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE IN DYING
make sure patients had alternative options. Ministry of health should encourage health organisations to
References
Beuthin, R., Bruce, A., & Scaia, M. (2018). Medical assistance in dying (MAiD): Canadian nurses’
Collins, A., & Leier, B. (2017). Can medical assistance in dying harm rural and remote palliative care
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/medical-assistance-dying.html#shr-pg0
McCarthy, R. N. G., & Seal, M. (2019). Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): the opinions of medical
Pesut, B., Thorne, S., Greig, M., Fulton, A., Janke, R., & Vis-Dunbar, M. (2019). Ethical, Policy, and
Pesut, B., Thorne, S., Stager, M. L., Schiller, C. J., Penney, C., Hoffman, C., Greig, M., & Roussel, J.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154419845407
org.aupac.lib.athabascau.ca/10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.07.017
Wu, J. S. Y., Pinilla, J., Watson, M., Verma, S., & Olivotto, I. A. (2018). Medical assistance
in dying for cancer patients one year after legalization: a collaborative approach at a
org.aupac.lib.athabascau.ca/10.3747/co.25.4118