Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Performance Task #1: Classroom Debate Debate

    Uploaded by

    Janela Beyong
    142 views2 pages
    This document outlines a classroom debate performance task. Students will take on the role of a student body representative to debate a topic and express their opinions and insights. They will be evaluated based on a rubric that assesses their verbal/non-verbal skills, use of evidence and rebuttals, organization, and understanding of the topic. The goal is for students to apply principles of effective argument formulation through an oral debate.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    PT1_DEBATE-RUBRIC

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines a classroom debate performance task. Students will take on the role of a student body representative to debate a topic and express their opinions and insights. They will be evaluated based on a rubric that assesses their verbal/non-verbal skills, use of evidence and rebuttals, organization, and understanding of the topic. The goal is for students to apply principles of effective argument formulation through an oral debate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    142 views2 pages

    Performance Task #1: Classroom Debate Debate

    Uploaded by

    Janela Beyong
    This document outlines a classroom debate performance task. Students will take on the role of a student body representative to debate a topic and express their opinions and insights. They will be evaluated based on a rubric that assesses their verbal/non-verbal skills, use of evidence and rebuttals, organization, and understanding of the topic. The goal is for students to apply principles of effective argument formulation through an oral debate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES

    PERFORMANCE TASK #1: CLASSROOM DEBATE


    Goal: The students must be able to apply the different principles of formulating effective arguments through a classroom
    debate.
    Role: You are a student body representative who needs to express your stand about a certain issue through an oral debate.
    Audience: The audience will be the subject teacher, classmates/student body and other people in the academe.
    Situation: You are tasked to express your opinions, stand and insights about a certain topic through an oral debate.
    Product/Performance: A well-reasoned set of arguments exemplified through an oral debate.
    Standard: See the rubric below
    Criteria 5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point Score
    Verbal and Exhibits confidence, - Exhibits - Appears -Lacks confidence -Demonstrates
    Non-verbal energy, and passion confidence and nervous, yet -Maintains little or no
    skills in the course of the energy in the somewhat respectful tone preparation
    debate course of the confident - Use of -Fails to maintain
    X2 - Maintains debate - Maintains preparation respectful tone
    respectful tone -Maintains respectful tone materials/notes
    - Accesses respectful tone - Use of distracts from
    preparation - Uses preparation preparation quality of
    materials/notes with materials/notes materials/notes performance
    ease effectively does not distract
    Evidences - All information - Most information - Most information - Some - Information had
    and Rebuttals presented in this presented in this presented in the information some major
    debate was clear, debate was clear, debate was clear was accurate, but inaccuracies OR
    X3 accurate and accurate and and accurate, but there were some was usually not
    thorough. thorough. was not usually minor clear.
    - Every major point - Every major point thorough. inaccuracies. - All points were
    was well supported was adequately - Every major - Some points not supported
    with several supported with point was were supported - Counter-
    relevant facts, relevant facts, supported with well, others were arguments
    statistics and/or statistics and/or facts, statistics not. were not accurate
    examples examples. and/or examples, - Some counter and/or relevant
    - All counter- - Most counter- but the relevance arguments were
    arguments were arguments of some was weak and
    accurate, relevant were accurate, questionable. irrelevant
    and strong relevant, and strong - Most counter-
    arguments were
    accurate and
    relevant, but
    several were
    weak.
    Organization - All arguments - Most arguments -Organized and -Somewhat -Arguments are
    were clearly tied to were clearly tied to generally organized unorganized,
    X3 an idea (premise) an idea (premise) complete presentation of incomplete, or
    and organized in a and organized in a presentation of arguments and completely lacking
    tight, logical fashion tight, logical arguments and evidence in evidence
    - Extremely fashion. evidence
    thorough, well- - Well-organized
    organized and complete
    presentation of presentation of
    arguments and arguments and
    evidence evidence
    Understanding The team clearly The team clearly The team seemed The team seemed The team did not
    of Topic understood the understood the to to understand the show an adequate
    topic in depth and topic in depth and understand the main points of the understanding of
    X2 presented their presented their main points of the topic, but didn’t the topic
    information information with topic and present with ease
    forcefully and ease presented those
    convincingly with ease

    NAME/STRAND AND SECTION: RATING:


    INSTRUCTOR’S NAME AND
    DATE:
    SIGNATURE:
    ADJUDICATOR’S NOTES
    Opposing Groups Group # ________ vs. Group # _________
    Motion

    SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS
    AFFIRMATIVE (PRO) NEGATIVE (CON)
    1st Speaker 1st Speaker

    2nd Speaker 2nd Speaker

    3rd Speaker 3rd Speaker

    4th Speaker 4th Speaker

    5th Speaker 5th Speaker

    You might also like