Factors Affecting The Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Romania
Factors Affecting The Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Romania
http://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.18
How to cite: Nastasia, S. C., Toma (Nastasia), D. E., & Vrînceanu, A. (2018).
Factors Affecting the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in
Romania. In T. Ciulei, G. Gorghiu (eds.), Communicative Action &
Transdisciplinarity in the Ethical Society (pp. 183-191). Iasi, Romania: LUMEN
Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.18
Abstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises, as a main element of any economic system, have a
significant influence on durable development of a state. Moreover, it becomes clearer that
SMEs have gained a significant role in terms of employment, development of innovation and
wealth creation. However, in many cases, enterprises face problems and, as a result, some
perform dismally and fail to grow while others end up to bankruptcy. Given the high failure
rate, it is of big interest to research the factors that may enable the SMEs to survive and
develop up to the point they perform. The growth of an economic entity is in dependence with
multiple factors, of which identification and evaluation is determinant for any proper
appreciations of enterprise’s future perspectives. The objective of this paper was to examine the
factors affecting business success of small and medium-sized enterprises listed in Romania such
as management experience, access to infrastructure, access to finance and access to relevant
information in affiliated sector of activity. Thus, the paper aimed to highlight the factors that
impact enterprise’s achievements and to stress out the importance of entrepreneur’s attitude
towards the influence of such factors on performance of the enterprise.
Introduction
Small and Medium scale Enterprises (SMEs) are defined [4] as
businesses which employ less than 250 staff and have an annual turnover
of less than €50 million, and/ or their balance sheet total is less than €43
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.18
Corresponding Author: Silviu Constantin NASTASIA
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference
Silviu Constantin NASTASIA, et. al. | LUMEN Proceedings 4 | CATES2017
184
Silviu Constantin NASTASIA, et. al. | LUMEN Proceedings 4 | CATES2017
Literature review
Although studies have been conducted about the relationship
between small-business development and economic growth in developed
countries, fewer researches of this kind where conducted for the
developing countries. The research in SMEs performance and
development are necessary in countries like Romania in order to
determine which factors are having the biggest weight in ensuring the
success of the enterprise.
It is also essential to understand how the factors are influencing
small-business performance in Romania considering they are, to some
extent, different from those facing Western Europe countries. Main
differences are highlighted for factors like: availability of business
information, access to finance, availability of managerial experience and
access to infrastructure.
In a study, Cragg and King [4] formulated a model involving the
relationships between different factors and SMEs financial performance.
The model explains that the main factors that are affecting the financial
performance are external factors, like markets in which the enterprise
operates and internal factors like managerial practices. According to the
study, the model is not quite accurate in terms of identifying all the
factors contributing to the growth of the SME, as a key role is played by
the characteristic of manager as antecedent variable.
In another study, Deakins and Freel [5] state that not much is
known about the growth process followed by an enterprise. On the
other hand, what can be asserted with certainty, with respect to the
approach that SMEs take, is the implementation of a management style
based on experience gained through daily operation, unplanned
management and the reactive approach instead of a proactive approach.
According to some other research [6], the performance of a
company is related to the attitude of the manager that may be
characterized as proactive, innovative or risk taker, last one showing a
tendency to challenge something, being an attitude that may be related to
commitment to deploy resources with the intention to register
appropriate results.
185
Silviu Constantin NASTASIA, et. al. | LUMEN Proceedings 4 | CATES2017
Government
Regulations
186
Silviu Constantin NASTASIA, et. al. | LUMEN Proceedings 4 | CATES2017
Access to finance
Limited access to instruments of financing is indicated frequently
as a key issue for SMEs. Financing restraints manifest in Romania in vary
ways, as the capital markets constrain the start-ups to manage only with
self-financing or loans granted by relatives or friends, the amounts
gathered not being enough in order to allow the enterprise to run its
business within optimal conditions.
Nevertheless, the absence of long term structured credit facilities
force enterprise managers to rely on short term credit facilities, which
may have higher costs attached and are not necessarily in line with
financing needs and optimal balance between short and long term debt.
187
Silviu Constantin NASTASIA, et. al. | LUMEN Proceedings 4 | CATES2017
Access to infrastructure
Developing countries are often missing appropriate physical
infrastructure, reason why their fast and substantial development is
essential in order to allow SMEs to perform. In countries like these,
excepting some major cities or capitals, most areas are missing modern
means of transportation and have limited access to water supplies and
electric power for agricultural and industrial use.
The improper development of the physical infrastructure is one of
the main causes of reduced level of investments and lame performance
of the SMEs. Lack of proper development of infrastructure, regardless
of its nature, makes difficult for an enterprise to function properly, thus,
some entrepreneurs may find it inappropriate to engage in some type of
business or engage at all.
188
Silviu Constantin NASTASIA, et. al. | LUMEN Proceedings 4 | CATES2017
189
Silviu Constantin NASTASIA, et. al. | LUMEN Proceedings 4 | CATES2017
Conclusion
Although all the factors have a strong relevance, management
quality may be the most important factor for an enterprise to be
successful, enabling group or business goals to be accomplished through
the functions of planning, staffing, directing, controlling activities,
coordination and directing.
In case of Romania, many of the SMEs have managers or
shareholders with gaps in terms of managerial capabilities due to lack of
experience or proper training, reference could be made including to their
level of professional and scholar education.
Given the particularities of the SMEs listed Romania, availability
of managerial experience represents the factor which may affect the most
the performance and future of an enterprise. The availability of
managerial experience has a positive impact, ensuring enterprise
innovation and reducing uncertainty about the future results, providing,
as well, knowledge about how the enterprise should deal with potential
unanticipated issued, like a financial crisis.
Improving the managerial competencies may have, in the future,
the most positive impact on SMEs success. It is therefore crucial for the
Romanian government and the small business sector alike to take note of
this challenge hindering small business success and realise that without
adequate managerial competencies, the small business sector will be
unable to achieve its full potential.
The heightened awareness of the effects of managerial
incompetence could result in Romania experiencing increased economic
growth, job creation and social stability for the country as a whole.
By asserting the way internal or external factors relate to the
performance of SMEs, this study is intended to provide useful insights
on the linkages between management quality and business success. These
considerations underline the importance of management skills to assure
enterprise existence, form survival to competitiveness and development.
To date, major factors affecting the performance of small and
medium enterprises listed in Romania or Eastern Europe countries have
not been sistematicaly investigated. Given that existing studies have little
focused their attention on SMEs, with emphasis on large companies,
therefore the chalanges faced by SMEs not being properly investigated,
the present work is aimed to bridge this gap.
190
Silviu Constantin NASTASIA, et. al. | LUMEN Proceedings 4 | CATES2017
References
[1] Pearce J. A., & Robinson R. B. Strategic management: formulation,
implementation, and control. 9th ed. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill. 2005
[2] ***. European Commission. Annual Report on European SMEs 2015/2016.
2016
[3] Cragg P. B., & King M. Organizational Characteristics and Small Firm’s
Performance Revisited, Enterprise Theory and Practice.
[4] ***. Commission recommendation concerning the definition of micro,
small, and medium-sized enterprises (2003/361/EC), Official Journal of
the European Union, L 124/36, 20 May 2003
[5] Deakins D., & Freel M. Entrepreneurial Education and the Growth Process in
SMEs 1998
[6] Hashim M. K. A Proposed strategic framework for SMEs' success, Malaysian
Management Review.2000
[7] Kotey, B, & Meredith, G. Relationship among owner/manager personal values,
business strategies, and enterprise performance, Journal of Small Business Management.
1997
[8] Purcarea, I., & Stancu, I. The influence of R&D Policy on Performance of the
Companies Listed with Bucharest Stoch Exchange (through Intangible Assets),
Theoretical and Applied Economics, AGER, Vol 11. 2008
[9] Moyi E. An analysis of the information-search process in micro and small
manufacturing enterprises. 2000
[10] King, Kenneth, Simon McGrath. Globalisation, Enterprise and Knowledge:
Educational Training and Development 2002
[11] Deadtick, D., Bennett, N. & Russell, C. Using hierarchical linear modelling to
examine dynamic performance criteria over time. 1997
[12] Larson C. M., & Clute C. R. (1979) The Failure Syndrome. American Journal of
Small Business 1979
[13] Martin G. & Staines H. Managerial competencies in small firm, Journal of
Management Development. 2008
191