Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bankruptcy Judge Routson
Bankruptcy Judge Routson
&
Rodney –Dale; Class
VS
NOW, COMES, The Petitioners David –Lee; Buess & Rodney –Dale; Class with
The Petitioner well reminds Judge Kennedy of Title 28 Judiciary & judicial
The petitioner's are going to address the 12 b 6 issue, every attorney that
represents any public office has always screamed 12 b 6. But yet they fail to define the
1
relief that they're looking for. These same attorneys that represent people like the
petitioners will never apply for 12 B6 on behalf of the people in the same court that the
petitioners and the defendants are in now. 12 B6 is granted whenever those who hold
public office uphold their obligation of contract and their constitutional oath when they
received their position and compensation for that public office. When they violate their
obligation of contract and they violate their oath of office they wave their 12 B 6. No
court has ever defined what a 12 B 6 is too which relief could ever have been granted.
The courts have failed and are reluctance to define what a12 B 6 is. This is proof of the
fraud when attorneys claimed this when they represent public officials and fail to claim
this on behalf of the people. This now is discrimination and a civil rights violation against
a class of people in this country that is being denied relief by people like the defendants
were the people like the petitioners are brought before them.
The defendants wanted 12 B6 then they are required to have upheld the obligation
of their contract to the people, their oath to the Constitution, to that position which they
hold. Their failure to uphold the integrity of that public office is a waiver to which relief
could have been granted. The petitioners have now defined the phrase 12 B 6.
and collection agencies of the Federal Reserve Bank has knowledge of the Congressional
2 The defendant /s and their Agents being educated in and knowledge of the law
and taxes codes also have knowledge of the Congressional records of 1913 -1993.
2
3. The defendants and their Agent had collected credit not real money as pointed
out in the congressional statements below. To which the Petitioner can produce as
4. The defendants and their Agents are aware that the UNITED STATES
the eleventh amendment. No judicial power. The parties are aware that it took an Act of
Congress to create the Eleventh Amendment. That why the defendants had it moved to
5. Judge Henry H. Kennedy also being aware of the Congressional Records from
1913 -1993 and is required to keep this “SECRET” that there is no money just internal
currency and only the credit off of the people labor allow the defendants to created a
National debt as report in the 1933 congressional records by Mr. Mc Fadden There is no
6 The defendants and their agents have committed fraud with intent to harm and
steal the identity of all America Citizens by stealing their credit under the Trading with
the Enemy Act combine with the fraudulent bankruptcy created in 1933. “Banking
Emergency Act”. This is done in violation of the Bill of Rights without so much as a
document signed from the Secretary of Treasury, a warrant, a Court order, A KISS MY
ASS or by my leave. The defendants have placed levy on the Bank accounts of the
Petitioners to with draw funds out of their accounts to create hardships and injuries.
7. The defendants and their agents know under the 1826 Bankrupt Bill that the
3
8. The comptroller of currency under Statute at Large Vol.48 pages 1-112 is
required to settle all debts and the defendants and agents have full understanding and full
knowledge of this. The comptroller of currency is the person the defendants need to
address instead of the Petitioners by placing levy on them as there is no real money.
9. The Federal Constitution under the 14th amendment section 4 allow a bounty to
be placed on those whom have created such public debt and they are held accountable to
repay such debt by freezing their assets under such debt is paid back and cleared. The
COLUMBIA to up hold the Act of Congress under the 14th amendment section 4 bounty
of the public debt against the defendants and their agents until such Nation debt is paid
10. Mr. JUSTIN M.FLINT point out 26 USC 6331(a) which is levy and distraint.
Mr. JUSTIN M.FLINT client JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON was aware of this Tax
Code when he allows the IRS agents to place a levy on the Petitioner David -L.; Buess
bank account with out a lawful court order. JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON did
willfully violate the Bill of Rights under the Article 4 or the 4th amendment of the Bill of
Rights when he cover up for the IRS agents and allowed this to happen.
4
belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the
payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any
officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia,
or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by
serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer,
employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such
tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made
by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy
shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.
The term "judge of the United States" includes judges of the courts of
appeals, district courts, Court of International Trade and any court
created by Act of Congress, the judges of which are entitled to hold
office during good behavior.
12. JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON being such a judge had full knowledge that
only those under 26 USC 6331 (a) being levy or distraint are for those who hold public
offices and not the people such as the Petitioners. JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON
had the duty to up hold the Petitioner David -L.; Buess claim against the IRS in that
5
hold the Supreme Law of the Law he also violate Title 10 Section 333 under the Army
13. Mr. JUSTIN M.FLINT made comments of the F.S.I.A of the defendants being
under foreign state. It’s a Congressional fact that the defendants and their agents come
under the International Organizations Immunities Act, December 9, 1945 (I.O.I.A) under
the United Nation jurisdiction. The defendants were required to give the same immunity
and 12 b 6 to the Petitioners as they now expect out of this Court. The defendants’ failure
to comply with this Act of Congress has waived the relief that could have been granted.
It is also an Act of Congress that the defendants and their agents hold a 14th
amendment citizenship as foreign agents to the Federal District of D.C .and not the
State of DC under the Reconstruction Act of 1867.To ware the People of this Country
6
5 U.S.C. § 556 : US Code - Section 556: Hearings; presiding employees; powers and
duties; burden of proof; evidence; record as basis of decision
(d) Except as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of a rule or order has the
burden of proof. Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the agency as a
matter of policy shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly
repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on
consideration of the whole record or those parts thereof cited by a party and supported by
and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.
The agency may, to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policy of the
underlying statutes administered by the agency, consider a violation of section 557(d) of
this title sufficient grounds for a decision adverse to a party who has knowingly
committed such violation or knowingly caused such violation to occur. A party is entitled
to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal
evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true
disclosure of the facts. In rule making or determining claims for money or benefits or
applications for initial licenses an agency may, when a party will not be prejudiced
thereby, adopt procedures for the submission of all or part of the evidence in written
form.
14. The defendants and their agents might have had jurisdiction at one time, but
they lost it when they denied the Petitioners due process. The defendants and their agents
have full knowledge the bankruptcy of 1933 and the Acts of Congress and the intent of
these Acts as placed on the floor of Congress. They willfully with intent failed to
disclosures this issue to the Petitioners to which the Petitioner could have receive relief..
Treasury point out that the Since the Federal Reserve Banks are, as I have
7
already stated, private corporations, just as are the national banks, the duty
of providing the necessary storage vaults and of assuming the custody and
2. In 1917 Mr. Lindbergh brought action before Congress against the Federal
3. In 1932 Mr. McFadden brought his claim before Congress showing was the
Federal Reserve took over 60 and half billion dollars in gold out of the united
States Treasury in or around 1928 before the Wall Street crash in 1929 and
before the Banking Emergency Act was declare to cause this Nation to
become Bankruptcy.
4. In 1932 Mr. McFadden on the floor of Congress stated that the Federal
Reserve was funding the Country of Germany just before World War II
started with the gold removed from the united States treasury.
5. In the March 1933 Congressional Record of the House It Quoted” the money
so issue will not have one penny of gold coverage behind it., because it is
really not needed. We do not need gold to back our internal currency” (end of
quote)
6. In the 1933 Congressional Record of the House; I Quote “The money will be
worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the CREDIT OF THE
NATION. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of
8
7. In 1993 MR, Traficant on the floor of Congress speech. Found under: united
States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303“ Mr.
hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a
8. The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of
sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the
international bankers used a "Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock
and naming it a "Joint Stock Trust." The U.S. Congress had passed a law
making it illegal for any legal "person" to duplicate a "Joint Stock Trust" in
1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although
post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3] The Federal
Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the
the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the
United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the
Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee)
9
was registered as a” beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In
1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future
properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S.
10. Congressional Record will show when The Bankruptcy Bill of 1826 and the
Federal Reserve Act 1913 was created it place all land under agriculture.
11. Congress just passed new agriculture law “Farm Bill” preventing the people
12. Congressional Record Shows the federal United States did have assets;
because the Federal Reserve stole 60 and half billion dollars in gold, before
1928. The federal United States has agrees to assign the private property of
the U.S. citizens as collateral against future debt from the Federal Reserve.
The federal United States also pledged the unincorporated federal territories,
CONCLUSION
The Petitioners will point out that Judge Henry H. Kennedy and the
defendants and their agents has failed to disprove any of the Petitioners Facts in
Regulation, Procedures and etc. Now the Petitioner are placing Congressional
10
Statements from 1913 to 1993 of the 1933 Bankruptcy as held on the floor of
Congress to be rebutted or be proven false by the defendants and their agents and
this Court when the Congressional record proves the Petitioners case. Judge
Henry H. Kennedy, the defendants and their agent’s failure to dispute or rebut
these Act of Congress or the Rules of Law when the defendants and their agents
had Judge Henry H. Kennedy dismisses this case in September 2nd of 2010. This
The Petitioners will also address that the Petitioners never receive
any such judge from the Clerk of Court of any order on September 2, 2010 of the
motions to dismiss. It was not until December 28th 2010 or their about were the
Petitioners notify of such ruling after the Court and the defendants new the
Petitioners Appeal time ran out, then the Petitioner were notified .
The Petitioners keep laying out the U.S.C., CFR, Congressional Records,
Petitioners has now proven that their no end to the corruption, to these public
The secret behind the 1933 Banking Emergency Act and the misuse of the
Trading with the Enemy Act is no longer a “SECRET” the cat is out of the bag
and it all over the international and nation internet. The C.R.IS. , C.U.I.SP, and
the private money laundering is now all out in the open of these courts and their
attorneys. These actions violate the compensation clause of these public offices in
the constitution and violate the Obligation of Contract to the people for honest
11
service. These actions violate the Bill of Rights 4, 5,6,7,8, 9 & 10 and it violates
The Petitioners come to this court with clean hands and in honor, which is
more then the defendants did. The Petitioners try to be fair, reasonability and all
we wanted was for the defendants to leave us alone and go to the comptroller of
currency and settle the dispute. The defendants knew, you as a federal judge know
this and the petitioners have known that there is just credit and not real value to
the money. This is why on the news that the United States is talking about getting
Declaratory judgment
As the defendants has giving this Court jurisdiction under 28 USC 1442 to make
ruling. The Court has only one choice and that choice is to declare fraud upon the
defendants and their agents, hold them accountability under the Act of Congress and the
federal constitution 14th amendment section 4 bounties against the public debt.
The defendants are now responsible for all public debt of this Nation now and
any future public debt created by this Nation. The Petitioners will now set the proper
jurisdiction under 28 USC 1346, 1343, 1652 to set this Court Hearing for trial date and
for a trial by jury and allow a jury to Rule on these issue. Judge Henry H. Kennedy has
shown to be bias and Prejudiced and the Petitioners Demand for Judge Henry H.
Kennedy to refusal himself off this case and for a New Title 5 USC 3105 Administrative
12
Law Judge to step and hear this case. The petitioners now demand for this hearing to take
place.
CURE
The petitioners now come in as the Creditors of our trust and demand an audit of
such trust. The Petitioners demands an accounting for any and all shortages of our trust,
and as the defendants are the Debtor and now can be held accountable for such shortages
To have the trust release over to the Petitioners as that trust is credit and not gold
backed
_______________________________
David- Lee; Buess
Private Attorney General
22014 Delaware Township Road 184
Arlington, Ohio [45814]
419 694 5796
_________________________
Private Attorney General Seal Rodney -Dale; Class
Private Attorney General
P.O. Box 435
High Shoals, North Carolina [28077]
704 742 3123
13
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, David- Lee; Buess & Rodney- Dale; Class come with, OBJECTION& AMENDMENT
JUSTIN M.FLINT FILING IS LATE. this being placed before the Clerk of Court of the
day of _____________ and month of_____________ in the year of our Lord 2011 AD.
Service will be delivered by U.S.P.S. certified mail with green card return.
_____________________________
David Lee; Buess
Private Attorney General
22014 Delaware Township Road 184
Arlington, Ohio [45814]
419 694 5796
_____________________________
Rodney Dale; Class
Private Attorney General
P. O. Box 435
High Shoals, North Carolina [28077]
704 742 3123
Cc:
Christopher Wright Sanders
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Tax Division
P.O. Box 227
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044
14
Franchise Corporation
STATE OF OHIO dba Corporation
LAW FIRM RICHARD CORDRAY
30 E. Broad Street, 17th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
Employee of Corporation
REGINALD J. ROUTSON
300 South Main Street
Findlay, Ohio 45840
Franchise Corporation
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA dba Corporation
LAW FIRM ROY COOPER
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-9001
Employee of Corporation
GASTON COUNTY dba Corporation
TAX DEPARTMENT
P.O. Box 1578 Gastonia, NC 28053-1578
Defendants
Secretary Janet Napolitano
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528
15