Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Reflectionpaper Cfa

    Uploaded by

    Sonam Choeki Wangmo
    16 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates reflection writing across four criteria: accuracy, argument, clarity, and presentation. For each criterion, performance is categorized as sophisticated, very competent, fairly competent, or not yet competent. Accurate representation of source ideas and conclusions, depth of analysis, unambiguous writing and effective use of evidence, and clean presentation determine the level of competency.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Reflectionpaper Cfa Converted

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This rubric evaluates reflection writing across four criteria: accuracy, argument, clarity, and presentation. For each criterion, performance is categorized as sophisticated, very competent, fairly competent, or not yet competent. Accurate representation of source ideas and conclusions, depth of analysis, unambiguous writing and effective use of evidence, and clean presentation determine the level of competency.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    16 views1 page

    Reflectionpaper Cfa

    Uploaded by

    Sonam Choeki Wangmo
    This rubric evaluates reflection writing across four criteria: accuracy, argument, clarity, and presentation. For each criterion, performance is categorized as sophisticated, very competent, fairly competent, or not yet competent. Accurate representation of source ideas and conclusions, depth of analysis, unambiguous writing and effective use of evidence, and clean presentation determine the level of competency.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Reflection Writing Rubric

    Sophisticated (A) Very Competent (B) Fairly Competent (C) Not Yet Competent (D)

    Accuracy Paper represents the Paper represents the Paper represents Paper misrepresents
    authors’ ideas, evidence author’s ideas, evidence the authors’ ideas, the authors’ ideas,
    (Grasp or conclusions accurately, and conclusions accurately. evidence and evidence and/or
    of fairly and eloquently. conclusions conclusions. Major
    readings) Shows a firm understanding accurately but inaccuracies. Or
    of the implications of each not sufficiently clearly. does not distinguish
    author’s argument(s). Minor inaccuracies. between major ideas
    and less relevant points.

    Argument Paper fully meets Paper fully meets the Paper does not Paper does not
    requirements of assignment. requirements but address some address the assignment
    (depth Explores implications of does not exceed aspects of the
    of chosen ideas for the arts in them. assignment. Selects minor rather
    analysis) classical Greece or today than key ideas,
    in thoughtful and/or original Makes good case for why Makes somewhat and/or does not show
    ways. Makes convincing selected key ideas unconvincing case why the selected ideas
    case for why selected key connect (or contradict) two for why selected connect (or contradict)
    ideas connect (or contradict) texts, and/or connect ideas connect texts, and/or connect
    two texts, and/or connect (contradict) texts and (contradict) two (contradict) texts
    (contradict) texts and lectures. texts, and/or and lectures.
    lectures.
    connect (contradict)
    texts and lectures.

    Clarity Consistently precise and Mostly precise and Imprecise or ambiguous Consistently imprecise
    unambiguous wording, unambiguous wording, wording. Confusing or ambiguous wording,
    clear and lucid sentence mostly clear sentence sentence structure. confusing sentence
    structure. All quotations structure. Mostly effective Poorly chosen quotations, structure. Quotations
    are well chosen, choice of quotation. or ineffective framing and contradict or confuse
    effectively framed in the Mostly effective framing explication of quotations. student’s text.
    text and and explication of Quotations used
    explicated where necessary. quotation where to replace student’s
    necessary. writing.

    Presentation Paper is clean, correctly Paper is clean, correctly Paper is clean, correctly Paper is sloppy or
    formatted (12-point font, formatted (12-point font, formatted (12-point font, incorrectly formatted,
    Times New Roman, normal Times New Roman, normal Times New Roman, not written in full
    margins), written in full margins), written in full normal margins), written sentences. Many
    sentences. Quotations are sentences. Quotations in full sentences. Some improperly attributed
    all properly attributed and are all properly attributed improperly attributed quotations or inconsistent
    cited in a consistent style. and cited in a consistent quotations and/or style of citation. Many
    Virtually no spelling or style. A few minor spelling inconsistent citation style. spelling or grammatical
    grammatical errors. or grammatical errors. A number of spelling or errors.
    grammatical errors.

    page 1 of 1

    You might also like