Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Republic of the Philippines

Office of the President


COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION
HEDC Bldg., CP Garcia Ave., cor. University Ave., U.P. Diliman, Quezon City

EXPANDED TERTIARY EDUCATION EQUIVALENCY AND ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (ETEEAP)

MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR DEPUTIZED HEIs

Name of HEI : _______________________________________________________________________ Region: __________________________


Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ Contact No.: ______________________
Name of President:____________________________________________________________________
ACCREDITING VALIDITY NO. OF
DEPUTIZED PROGRAM (S) ACCREDITED STATUS AGENCY PERIOD GRADUATES

I. CONSISTENCY OF ETEEAP WITH THE HEI’s VISION, DOCUMENTARY COMPLIED NOT REMARKS
MISSION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES EVIDENCE(S) COMPLIED

1. The recognition and valuing of learning from sources


outside of schools are integral part of the institution’s
vision, mission, goals and objectives (VMGO)
2. The institution’s VGMO embodies the development
and establishment of an alternative learning system for
higher education

Filename: revised monitoring instrument 2/9/2010


Glo/8/29/2021/2:24 AM
II. ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT FOR
IMPLEMENTING ETEEAP

1. The institution has established a unit specifically for the


purpose of implementing the ETEEAP.
2. The units established for implementing ETEEAP has the
following support personnel:
a. A head
b. A recruitment, selection, and admission person
c. A career guidance counselor
d. An alternative learning program person; and
e. A registration records management person
3. The unit has established the following systems and
procedures for:
a. Recruitment, selection and admissions;
b. Registration and records management;
c. Initial guidance and preliminary work experience
assessment;
d. Evaluation
e. Selecting and appointing members of the panel of
assessors both for internal and external assessment
4. The institution has adopted a reasonable transparent
schedule of fees and charges for assessment services.
5. The institution has provisions for the following:
f. Physical space for ETEEAP services
g. A space and requisite facilities for the conduct of
in-house assessment
h. Learning resources and support facilities for
implementing the alternative learning program
packages
i. Staff training services for counseling, assessment,
and alternative learning program packaging and
management
j. Regular monitoring and evaluation services to
ensure program quality and
k. Established linkages with industry representatives
of programs offered under ETEEAP

III. FUNDING FOR ETEEAP IMPLEMENTATION


Filename: revised monitoring instrument 2/9/2010
Glo/8/29/2021/2:24 AM
1. The institution has a regular annual budgetary
allocation for the implementation of ETEEAP and
institutionalization of alternative learning system for
higher education.

IV.ETEEAP ASSESSMENT PROCESSES AND


REQUIREMENTS

1. The institution has the following implementation


processes and requirements.
a. Alternative learning program packages with
specific curriculum and other degree-completion
requirements and processes;
b. The non-school based college-level learning
competencies in each ETEEAP program where
credit will be awarded.
c. Evidence(s) of competent performance(s) required
for minimum compliance to qualify for the
completion in each of the ETEEAP degrees offered.
d. Qualitative and quantitative performance
standards for non-school based learning
competencies.
e. Criteria and guidelines for judging levels of
competence.
f. Guidelines and procedures for translating learning
outcomes into college-level credits.
g. A pool of trained internal and external ETEEAP
assessors.
h. Appropriate assessment and accreditation
framework for different needs of diverse ETEEAP
clientele; and
i. Different assessment “menus” or appropriate
methods of assessing and competencies.

V. QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR SUSTAINING


FORMAL ACADEMIC PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE
LEARNING SYSTEM FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

1. The institution has devoted to ETEEAP and the

Filename: revised monitoring instrument 2/9/2010


Glo/8/29/2021/2:24 AM
Alternative Learning System for Higher Education,
well-defined operational support systems, namely :
a. Expertise pool (administration and management,
program packaging, assessors, counselors,
curriculum specialists, tutors, mentors, etc.)
b. Administrative (finance, budget and general
services)
c. Physical facilities and learning resource
d. Internal and external program linkages and
network with provider and user-sectors
e. Program planning, implementation, monitoring
and performance evaluation; and
f. Staff continuing professional capability
development program
2. The institution has budgetary support for the operations
of the different support systems for formal programs
and the Alternative Learning System for Higher
Education.

VI. PROGRAM CAPABILITY

1. The program intended to be offered via the ETEEAP has


the following requirements:
a. Curriculum of the resident program to be offered
via the ETEEAP
b. Competency Standards identified for the
concerned academic program
c. Assessment Instrument to be used in matching the
applicant’s KSAVs vis-à-vis the program
curriculum
d. List of Assessors (internal and external), their
qualifications and subject/competency assignment
in the ETEEAP
e. ETEEAP Assessment Procedures with timelines
f. Enrichment/supplementation/enhancement
programs to be provided
g. Proof of industry linkage
h. Policy on research requirement for the
undergraduate and graduate academic programs

Filename: revised monitoring instrument 2/9/2010


Glo/8/29/2021/2:24 AM
Comments :
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EVALUATED BY:

___________________________________________________________
Signature over printed Name of Evaluator
________________________________________
Date of Evaluation

Filename: revised monitoring instrument 2/9/2010


Glo/8/29/2021/2:24 AM

You might also like