Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region XII
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF COTABATO
Capitol Compound, Amas Kidapawan City
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Ratee:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF COTABATO Date of Interview:
Rating Period: OCTOBER 23, 2020-JULY 10, 2021
PLANNING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight per ACTUAL
MFQs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING
KRA RESULTS
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Basic Education 1. Facilitated the implementation and Year Round 10% Facilitate the Monitor, assess and Perform year-end Q E T AVE SCORE
Services contextualization of K to 12 curriculum that implementation of school evaluate the progress of assessment and
enhance teaching and learning under new normal learning continuity plan. school learning continuity evaluation of SLCP
situations. plan. relative to teaching-
learning.

2. Performed appropriate instructional supervision Ensure the non- F2F Provide technical Conduct instructional
in the new normal setting of basic education delivery mode of assistance and supervision quarterly as
services to achieved the desired learning instructional (online/offline supervision to all indicated in the
KRA 1
outcomes and performance standards. delivery, modular, TV, teachers and school performance
(20%) Year Round 5% radio, use of DepEd personnel relative to cycle/school learning
Instructional
Commons in accordance quality instructions. continuity plan.
Leadership
to LCP).

3. Ensured alignment of curriculum instruction, Ensure the alignment of Establish mechanism on Facilitate quarterly
resources and promoted varied assessment to curriculum instruction and the efficient and effective assessment and
measured learners performance. school resources based procurement of supplies evaluation of curriculum
Year Round 5% on the SIP- AIP. relative to curriculum instruction against the
instruction. utilization of school
resources.

KRA 2 (20%) 1. Applied principles of leadership and Year Round 10% Reconfigure the learning Ensure at least 80% of Facilitate and submit
Learning management (SBM) to the campus physical plant facilities and other support required facilities, quarterly report on the
Environment and support system (DRRM) to ensure safe and equipment assessment of
effective
 PLANNING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight per ACTUAL
MFQs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING
KRA RESULTS
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

learning environment in accordance to new system according to and resources of the school facilities
normal condition. SLCP. school. equipment and
resources.
2. Strengthen effective School Disaster Risk Year Round 10% Recalibrate all existing Ensure 100% zero Facilitate assessment
Reduction Management Plan (SDRRMP) to targets and plans and casualty during disaster. and review SDRRM
mitigate natural and man- made calamity align to new normal master plan every
including COVID 19 pandemic. conditions. quarter.

1. Implemented staff evaluation and development Year Round 10% Facilitate the Strengthen the maximum Submit summary of
system (PPST Based - RPMS) to improve the implementation of PPST utilization of PPST Based PPST Based – RPMS
performance of the school personnel. Based - RPMS. - RPMS in every cycle. reported at the end of
the complete cycle.

2. Selected and implemented appropriate models Provide opportunities for Ensure at least 80% Prepare and submit
for supervision and staff development and applied teaching and non - participation of school annual report of career
legal requirement for personnel management and teaching personnel for personnel in staff pathing and
promotion. their professional growth development program. development program of
KRA 3 (20%) Year Round 5% in terms of research, school personnel.
Human Resource studies, training,
Management promotions, and
reclassification, etc.

3. Developed needs – based master plan, training Facilitate the Ensure 100% Provide resource
design and resource package for identified priority implementation of Self- accomplishment of SAT package based on the
needs of teachers and non-teaching personnel. Assessment Tool (SAT) of to determine the strength approved AIP at the
Year Round 5% school personnel. and weaknesses of beginning of RPMS
school personnel. cycle.

KRA 4 (15%) 1. Created campus culture of shared governance Strengthen the level of Ensure at least 80% Prepare and submit an
Parent Involvement by facilitating the physical facilities development practice of School Based involvement of internal honest and transparent
and Community of the school that is shared and supported by the Management (SBM) that and external SBM report annually.
Partnership. school community. is shared and supported stakeholders.
Year Round 10% by internal and external
stakeholders.
 PLANNING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight per ACTUAL
MFQs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING
KRA RESULTS
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

2. Enhance the principle and practice of shared Advocate school Strengthen the maximum Provide opportunities
governance to support the stewardship of community partnership to collaboration of school awards and recognition
students learning outcome. Year Round 5% support the stewardship of and community in for active supporters
learners’ performance. support to learners’ during Foundation Day,
performance. etc.

1. Applied principles of effective Facilitate the Ensure the Submit Fiscal

leadership and management in relation to school effective, utilization of maximum utilization of all Management report and
budgeting, personnel, resource utilization, human, natural and school resources with full liquidation report.
financial management and technology use. financial resources of the accountability and
Year Round 10% school based on the transparency.
approved SIP- AID under
the new normal condition.
KRA 5 (15%)
School Leadership,
Management and
Operations 2. Strengthened the SBM level of practice from Facilitate the strong Ensure the improvement Submit validated SBM
Level 1 to 2 or 3 in accordance with IATF implementation of School of level of practice from Level of Practice Report
protocols and School Learning Continuity Plan. LCP with structured beginning to maturing. duly accredited by the
mechanism, processes SDO.
Year Round 5%
and practices anchored
on SBM Principles and
indicators.

KRA 6 1. Improved SBM Level of practice from Level 1 to Year Round 10%
(10%) 2 and Level 2 to Level 3.
Plus Factor
OVER ALL RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENT

Rater Ratee Approving Authority