IV. Focus Questions: Name: Dome, Jay Ann Processor:Atty. Jose T. Yayen Section: Bsa - 12
IV. Focus Questions: Name: Dome, Jay Ann Processor:Atty. Jose T. Yayen Section: Bsa - 12
YAYEN
SECTION: BSA – 12
6. Delegacion – Is when the debtor offers and the creditor accept a third
person to take place for the satisfaction of the original debtors
obligation. In this agreement they are called as a Delegante (debtor),
Delegatario (creditor) and delegado (third person).
B. Discussions:
1. When there is subrogation, what rights are acquired by the new creditor?
In Article 1303 stated that Subrogation transfers to the person
subrogated the credit with all the rights thereto appertaining, either
against the debtor or against third persons, be they guarantors or
possessors of mortgages, subject to stipulation in a conventional
subrogation. The effect of legal subrogation is to transfer to the new
creditor the credit and all the rights and actions that could have been
exercised by the former creditor either against the debtor or against
third persons, be they guarantors or mortgagors. Simply stated,
except only for the change in the person of the creditor, the obligation
subsists in all respects as before the novation. The effect of legal
subrogation as provided in Article 1303 may not be modified by
agreement. The effects of conventional subrogation are subject to the
stipulation of the parties.
2. Give the requisites of (a) novation. Article 1291. Obligations may be
modified by:
Changing their object or principal conditions;
Substituting the person of the debtor;
Subrogating a third person in the rights of the creditor.
3. May there be compensation although the things due are not consumable?
Explain.
There will be no compensation to the things due does not consumable.
Whereas, in Article 1279, gives us the requisites of how the
compensation will be proper mannered and it consists of some that
can prove all the things due are not for consumable, That both debts
consist in a sum of money, or if the things due are consumable, they
be of the same kind, and also of the same quality if the latter has been
stated and That over neither of them there be any retention or
controversy, commenced by third persons and communicated in due
time to the debtor.
C. Problems
3. T (THIRD PERSON) tells C (creditor) that T will the pay the debt of D
(debtor). C agrees. Is D released from his obligation to C? Why? (5 pts)
A. Problem Analysis:
1. Sarah had a deposit in a savings account with Filipino Universal Bank in
the amount of P5,000,000. To buy new car, she obtained a loan from the
same bank in the amount of P1,200,000, payable in twelve monthly
instalments. Sarah issued in favour of the bank post-dated checks, each
in the amount of P100,000 to cover the twelve monthly installment
payments. On the third, fourth and fifth months, the corresponding
checks bounced. The bank then declared the whole obligation due, and
proceeded to deduct the amount of one million from Sarah’s deposit after
notice to her that his a form of compensation allowed by law. Is the bank
correct? Why?
Yes, the bank is correct. Under the law when the person is deposited
from the bank, creditor/debtor relationship was created. Since the
bank and Sarah's in the given case was creditor and debtor with
respect to each other and considering that the debt are already due
and demandable, compensation takes place. To prove that
compensation takes place here's the Article 1278 that explains the
statement Compensation shall take place when two persons, in their
own right, are creditors and debtors of each other. Compensation is
the extinguishment to the concurrent amount of the debts of two
persons who, in their own right, are reciprocally principal debtors and
creditors of each other. It involves the simultaneous balancing of two
obligations in order to totally extinguish them if they are of the same
amount or to the extent in which the amount of one is covered by that
of the other, if of different amounts.
(2) A, B, and C are jointly liable to D in the amount of P15,000.
Subsequently, D assigned his credit to C in consideration for goods sold by C
to D. (a) Give the effect of the assignment. (b) What if the obligations of
the debtors is solidary, will your answer be the same? Why? (10 pts)
A. A and B still has to pay C, but C's debt will be deducted to the amount A
and B has to pay.
B. Since it is passively solidary, A and B may reason that C is also indebted
therefore A and B may not pay anymore.
(3) Mr. A is indebted to Mr B. Mr C is the guarantor of Mr A in the latter’s
obligation to Mr. B. Mr C is an heir of Mr B. When Mr B died, Mr C inherited
all the properties and credits of Mr B including his liability. What happens? Is
the obligation of Mr. B extinguished by confusion? Why? (5pts)
No, because according to article 1276, confusion which takes place in
the person of the guarantor does not extinguish the obligation. ART.
1276. Merger which takes place in the person of the principal debtor or
creditor benefits the guarantors. Confusion which takes place in the
person of any of the latter does not extinguish the obligation.