Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In The Court of Sessions Judge at Jodhpur District, Jodhpur
In The Court of Sessions Judge at Jodhpur District, Jodhpur
Birda Ram S/o Jora Ram, Aged 46 Yrs., R/o Dhadhu, P.S. Phalodi, District
Jodhpur.
- Accused/Applicant
Vs.
State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor
- Non Applicant
Counsel appeared:-
1. Shri B.R. Godara, Learned Advocate for the accused/applicant.
2. Shri Lada Ram Bishnoi, Learned Public Prosecutor for the State.
1. This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
by the applicant-accused Birda Ram S/o Jora Ram in this court on
31.08.2021. A copy of the bail application has been provided to the public
prosecutor.
2. Brief facts of the bail application are that an FIR No. 30/2018
had been filed by the complainant, Birbal Ram in police station Balesar,
District Jodhpur, which was registered under sections 143, 341, 323, 447,
427 & 379 IPC. The applicant-accused was produced before learned trial
court on 07/08/2021 in compliance of production warrant. Thereafter, he was
taken in judicial custody. The applicant-accused has filed the bail application
before this court under section 439 of Cr.P.C.
the applicant-accused has been wrongly implicated in this case. He was not
present at the time of incident. His name is not mentioned in the FIR. It is
further argued that the co-accused Bhenpa Ram, Budha Ram, Dinesh,
Pappa Ram & Siya Ram @ Shiv Lal have been enlarged on bail by this court
and the case of present applicant-accused is not different from the case of
co-accused. The applicant-accused is behind the bars since 07/08/2021.
Therefore, the bail application of the applicant-accused should be allowed.
4. I have heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the
case file. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant, Birbal Ram filed a
typed report before P.S. Balesar on 22/02/2018. It is mentioned in the report
that his son Anil and Sumera Ram, Ram Swaroop, Prema Ram went to
Bambor to purchase chili. As they were returning back, suddenly, Papa Ram,
Shiv Lal, Banshi Lal, Dinesh, Bhepa Ram, Budha Ram and other 10-15
persons attacked on Anil etc. with deadly weapons. Anil & Sumera Ram
received injuries in this incident. Thereafter, the accused persons fled away
from the place of incident. This FIR has been lodged under sections 143,
341, 323, 447, 427 & 379 IPC. The applicant-accused is behind the bars
since 07/08/2021. After completion of investigation, P.S. Balesar filed the
charge-sheet against the accused persons under sections 147, 323, 341,
427, 308, 325, 447/149 IPC. It is true that the name of present applicant-
accused has not been mentioned in the FIR and the bail application no.
552/2018 of co-accused Bhenpa Ram & Budha Ram has been allowed by
this court on 18/07/2018 and same like the bail application no. 432/2018 &
310/2018 of co-accused Dinesh and; Pappa Ram & Anr. have been allowed
by this court on 19/05/2018 & 17/04/2018 respectively. It cannot be said that
the case of present applicant-accused is different from these co-accused.
Therefore, looking at the facts and circumstances of the case, but without
(3)
(Raghavendra Kachawal)
Sessions Judge,
Jodhpur District, Jodhpur
(Raghavendra Kachawal)
Sessions Judge,
Jodhpur District, Jodhpur