Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Onion-Like Graphitic Particles: Pergamon
Onion-Like Graphitic Particles: Pergamon
989-993, 1995
Coovrieht 0 1995 Elsevier Science Ltd
Pergamon Printed’in &at Britain. All rights reserved
0008.6223/95 $9.50 + .OO
0008-6223(95)00027-5
D. UGARTE
Laboratbrio National de Luz Sincrotron (CNPq/MCT), Cx. Postal 6192,
1308 l-970 Campinas SP, Brazil;
Institut de Physique Experimentale, Ecole Polytechnique Ftderale de Lausanne,
1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
989
990 D. UGARTE
Fig. 1. High-resolution electron micrographs of graphitic particles: (a) as obtained from the electric arc
deposit, they display a well-defined faceted structure and a large inner hollow space, (b) the same parti-
cles after being subjected to intense electron irradiation (note the remarkable spherical shape and the dis-
appearance of the central empty space); dark lines represent graphitic layers.
is always very small, displaying a size very close to in the 0.2-I pm range, (b) small particles (<0.2 pm)
C6e (20.7-l nm) (see Fig. 2). also spherical in shape, but formed by concentric gra-
Onion-like graphitic clusters have also been gener- phitic layers. Unfortunately, no detailed HREM study
ated by other methods: (a) shock-wave treatment of of these particles was undertaken, but an apparent
carbon soot[l6]; (b) carbon deposits generated in a size effect connecting diamond and graphitic particles
plasma torch[l7], (c) laser melting of carbon within was insinuated. Recently, an interesting experiment
a high-pressure cell (50-300 kbar)[ 181. For these three also revealed a relation between ultradispersed dia-
cases, the reported graphitic particles display a sphe- monds (3-6 nm in diameter) and onion-like graphitic
roidal shape. particles. The nanometer diamond sample was obtained
In particular, the laser melting experiment produced by a chemical purification of detonation soot. The an-
two well-differentiated populations of carbon clusters: nealing treatment (1100-l 500°C) of nanodiamonds
(a) spheroidal diamond particles with a radial texture generates onion-like graphitic particles with a remark-
Onion-like graphitic particles 991
ions with a very small inner empty space, which con- 5 hexagons (non-planar structure with a bowl shape)
trasts with the polyhedral particles prepared by heat is a very floppy structure. This molecule is the basic
treatment of fullerene black[ 131. unit of CGO, and also the atomic arrangement present
at the corners of faceted giant fullerenes. It has been
observed by NMR that, at room temperature, it spon-
4. ENERGETIC!3
taneously presents a bowl inversion transition, with an
The elimination of the energetic dangling bonds energy barrier of only 440 meV[32]. Then, we may use
present at the edges of a tiny graphite sheet is supposed this value to get a bare estimation of the energy nec-
to be the driving force to induce curvature and closure essary to crash the 12 corners of a polyhedral graphitic
in fullerenes; this phenomenon is also associated with cage (containing the corannulene configuration) into
the formation of larger systems, such as nanotubes a spherical one, and it turns out to be of the same
and graphitic particles. order of magnitude that the gain in van der Waals
The remarkable stability of onion-like particles[l5] energy mentioned previously (~5 eV). This fact in-
suggests that single-shell graphitic molecules (giant ful- dicates that a global evaluation of multi-shell struc-
lerenes) containing thousands of atoms are unstable tures should be performed to answer the question of
and would collapse to form multi-layer particles; in the minimal energy structure of onion-like graphitic
this way the system is stabilized by the energy gain particles.
from the van der Waals interaction between shells From a different point of view, the sphericity of the
[15,26,27]. irradiation generated onion-like particles have also
Graphite is the most stable form of carbon at am- been attributed to imperfect shells with a large num-
bient conditions, and it is formed by the stacking of ber of defects[33].
planar layers. The extreme robustness of the concen- Concerning the possible arrangement of concentric
tric arrangement of spherical fullerenes led to the hy- defect-free graphitic cages, a polyhedral graphitic par-
pothesis that the quasi-spherical onion-like graphitic ticle has all the shells in the same orientation, so that
particles are the most stable form of carbon parti- all the corners (pentagons) are perfectly superimposed
cles[ 151. This controversy between planar configura- (see Fig. 4a). If the pentagons of the concentric shells
tion of the sp2 bonding in macroscopic graphite and are not aligned, the final shape of graphitic particles
the apparent spherical shape in nanometric system, has should be much closer to a sphere. In the spherical
attracted a great deal of interest[28]. Calculations of particles, an interesting issue is the fact that the shells
the structure of giant fullerenes are not able to give a may be rotating relative to each other[lS]. This behav-
definitive answer: (a) models based on elastic or em- ior has been predicted for C6,, in C240[30] and for
pirical potentials predict that the minimal energy struc- multi-shell tubes[34].
ture is a slightly relaxed icosahedron with planar
facets, the curvature being concentrated at the corner
5. SUMMARY AND PERSPECTIVES
of the polyhedron (pentagons)[26,29,30]; (b) ab ini-
tio calculations predict two local energy minima for The multi-shell fullerenes constitute the transition
C 240. One represents a faceted icosahedron, and the from fullerenes to macroscopic graphite. They present
second, a nearly spherical structure distributing the both the closed graphitic surface of fullerenes and the
strain over all atoms, is slightly more stable (binding stacked layers interacting by van der Waals forces, as
energy per atom -7.00 and -7.07 eV for polyhedral in graphite.
and spherical fullerenes)[3 I]. One of the main scientific issues of the discovery
When using these theoretical results to analyze of the bucky-onions is the unresolved question of min-
onion-like particles, we must take into account that imal energy configuration of carbon clusters (onion-
calculations are performed for single graphitic shells,
which are subsequently arranged concentrically and,
then, conclusions are obtained about the minimal en-
ergy configuration. This fact arises from the limited
number of atoms that may be included in a calcula-
tion due to present computational capabilities (the
smallest onion-like particles are formed by C,, in a
C,,, and this system represents 300 atoms).
The inter-layer interaction (EvdW, van der Waals
energy) is usually added at the end, and then it does
not participate in the energy minimization. Evaluating
inter-shell interaction by a simple Lennard-Jones pair
potential shows that concentrical spherical shells are
more stable than icosahedral ones (Ebdw between C240
and C540 is -17.7 and -12.3 eV for spherical and
Fig. 4. Onion-like graphitic particles formed by three con-
icosahedral shells, respectively). An interesting com- centric layers (C,,, Cz4,,, C&: polyhedral (marked P) and
parison may be performed by considering that coran- spherical (marked S) structures. For clarity, only a half part
nulene C,,H,o, which is a pentagon surrounded by of each shell is shown.
Onion-like graphitic particles 993
like particle: spherical or polyhedral) and the size 5. S. Iijima, J. Cryst. Growth 50, 675 (1980).
where the transition is between these closed surface 6. D. Ugarte, Chem. Phys. Lett. 198, 596 (1992).
I. Y. Saito, T. Yoshikawa, M. Inagaki, M. Tomita, and T.
particles and the macroscopic planar graphite. There
Hayashi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 204, 277 (1993).
are still several difficulties in answering this question: 8. R. S. Ruoff, D. C. Lorents, B. Chan, R. Malhotra, and
(a) from the theoretical point of view, the large number S. Subramoney, Science 259, 346 (1993).
of atoms to be considered renders the computational 9. M. Tomita. Y. Saito. and T. Havashi, Jmr. J. ADD/. ..
evaluation very difficult; (b) from the experimental Phys. 32, L280 (1993).
10. D. Ugarte, Chem. Phys. Lett. 209, 99 (1993).
point of view, the quasi-spherical structures have only
11. D. Ugarte, Nature 359, 707 (1992).
been synthesised in situ in an electron microscope. 12. T. W. Ebbesen, P. M. Ajayan, H. Hiura, and K. Tani-
At present, major efforts are being done to de- gaki, Nature 367, 519 (1994).
velop the production and purification of macroscopic 13. W. A. de Heer and D. Ugarte, Chem. Phys. Lett. 207,
480 (1993).
quantities of the quasi-spherical onion-like particles.
14. D. Ugarte, Carbon 32, 1245 (1994).
The understanding of the formation mechanism and 15. D. Ugarte, Europhys. Lett. 22, 45 (1993).
energetics involved would allow the development of 16. K. Yamada, H. Kunishige, and A. B. Sawaoka, Nafur-
efficient production methods. The annealing on wissenschuften 78, 450 (1991).
nanometer-sized diamonds reported by Kuznetsov 17. N. Hatta and K. Murata, Chem. Phys. Lett. 217, 398
(1994).
et al. [ 191 presents a promising way to generate compact
18. L. S. Weathers and W. A. Basset, Phys. Chem. Mner-
graphitic particles, if we are able to overcome the dif- als 15, 105 (1987).
ficulty of producing large quantities of nanodiamonds. 19. V. L. Kuznetsov, A. L. Chuvilin, Y. V. Butenko, I. Y.
We hope that macroscopic samples of quasi-spherical Mal’kov, and V. M. Titov, Chem. Phys. Left. 222, 343
(1994).
onion-like particles will soon become available, and
20. R. E. Smalley, Act. Chem. Res. 25, 98 (1992).
then we will be able to characterize these systems in 21. A. Oberlin, Carbon 22, 521 (1984).
detail. Probably a new generation of carbon materi- 22. R. E. Smalley, Muter. Sci. Eng. B 19, 1 (1992).
als can be generated by the three-dimensional pack- 23. Q. L. Zhang, S. C. O’Brien .I. R. Heath, Y. Liu, R. F.
ing of quasi-spherical multi-shell fullerenes. Curl, H. W. Kroto, and R. E. Smalley, J. Phys. Chem.
90, 525 (1986).
24. H. W. Kroto and K. McKay, Nature 331, 328 (1988).
Acknowledgements-The author is most grateful to W. de 25. D. Ugarte, Chem. Phys. Lett. 207, 473 (1993).
Heer for invaluable discussions and advice. We are indebted 26. A. Maiti, C. J. Bravbec, and J. Bernholc, Phys. Rev.
to R. Monot and A. Chatelain for several useful remarks. Left. 70, 3023 (1993).
We thank the Brazilian National Council of Science and 27. D. Tomanek, W. Zhong, and E. Krastev, Phys. Rev. B
Technology (CNPq) and Swiss National Science Foundation 48, 15461 (1993).
for financial support. 28. H. W. Kroto, Nature 359, 670 (1992).
29. K. G. McKay, H. W. Kroto, and D. J. Wales, J. Chem.
Sot. Faraday Trans. 88, 2815 (1992).
REFERENCES 30. M. Yoshida and E. Osawa, Ful. Sci. Tech. 1, 55 (1993).
31. D. York, J. P. Lu, and W. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 49, 8526
1. H. W. Kroto, J. R. Heath, S. C. O’Brien, R. F. Curl, and (1994).
R. E. Smalley, Nature 318, 162 (1985). 32. L. T. Scott, M. M. Hashemi, and M. S. Bratcher, J. Am.
2. W. Krltschmer, L. D. Lamb, K. Foristopoulos, and D. R. Chem. Sot. 114, 1920 (1992).
Huffman, Nature 347, 354 (1990). 33. A. Maiti, C. J. Brabec, and J. Bernholc, Modern Phys.
3. S. lijima, Nature 354, 56 (1991). Rev. Lett. B 7, 1883 (1993).
4. T. W. Ebbesen and P. M. Ajayan. Nature 358. 220 34. J.-C. Charlier and J.-P. Michenaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70,
(1992). 1858 (1993).
CAR 33-7-E