AC7114-2 Rev N Delta 1
AC7114-2 Rev N Delta 1
NΔ1
Issue Date 1997-07
Nadcap
AUDIT CRITERIA FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING FACILITY
MAGNETIC PARTICLE SURVEY
1. SCOPE
2. GENERAL INFORMATION
PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising there from, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI values your input. To provide feedback on this document, please contact the appropriate commodity staff engineer.
(Contact information is located at http://www.eauditnet.com under “Contact Us”.)
t-frm-1115 19-Mar-2021
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 -2-
The Auditor must verify the list of procedures provided by the Auditee at
the time of the audit. Any corrections or updates to the list must be
identified using notes, inserted at the applicable criterion.
The audit results shall not include any customer proprietary information.
Technical information on parts which have been designated “Export
Controlled – License Required” (EC-LR) cannot be input into eAuditNet.
If Auditors have any questions about this, they should contact the Staff
Engineer for directions.
2.1 References:
The Auditee shall complete and the Auditor shall review, the Auditee's ATTACHMENT
provided Materials and Equipment Listing, for adequacy, content, and
correctness. Attachments are for information only but shall be
completed fully. NCR’s shall not be written against attachments.
(Attachment AC7114/2-A).
3.2.1 If ready-to-use products are used is there evidence that they conform to YES NO NA
the applicable AMS?
Guidance: The Auditee shall have traceability to the manufacturer’s
certification.
[ ] AMS3045
[ ] AMS3046
3.2.2 Is the manufacturer’s certification available for the magnetic particles YES NO NA
used, as applicable, and is there evidence that they conform to the
applicable AMS?
Guidance: The Auditee shall have traceability to the manufacturer’s
certification.
[ ] AMS3044
3.2.3 Is the manufacturer’s certification available for the suspension carrier, YES NO NA
and/or conditioning agents used, as applicable, and is there evidence
that it conforms to the applicable standard? If so, identify the applicable
standard met.
Guidance: The Auditee shall have traceability to the manufacturer’s
certification. Suspension carriers not listed above shall require
documented customer approval.
AMS2641 (Type 1 or 2)
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 -4-
A-A-59230
Other (list)
AS4792
Other (list)
3.3.1 Is there evidence from the manufacturer that the lamp meets the YES NO
requirements of ASTM E3022?
Guidance: NA is only to be used where UV-A LED lamps are not used.
4. PROCEDURES
4.1.1 Is there a procedure, general or specific, for processing and inspection YES NO
using the magnetic particle method?
Guidance: The term, “procedure” may be synonymous with a
technique, traveler, or a route card, etc.
4.1.1.1 Does the procedure(s) have traceability to the name and address of the YES NO
facility performing inspection?
Guidance: In some cases, it may not be necessary for the actual
address if the facility is traceable to a unique identifier.
4.1.1.2 Does the procedure(s) indicate approval by the applicable Level 3? YES NO
Guidance: The applicable Level 3 may be the Nadcap Subscriber,
Nadcap Subscriber qualified or approved Level 3, internal Level 3,
and/or external Level 3.
4.1.1.3 Does the procedure(s) have an identification number and the date the YES NO
procedure was approved?
4.1.1.4 Does the procedure have a requirement that all personnel are qualified YES NO
and certified to the required level for the activity undertaken and the
applicable contract requirements?
4.1.1.5 Does the procedure define the type of records and describe the YES NO
method of identifying inspection status?
4.2.1 Does the technique, data card or instruction, contain the following
information as a minimum?
4.2.1.1 The identification of the part(s) to which the procedure applies, YES NO
including the material, alloy and dimensions of the part when used for
technique development?
Guidance. Material and alloy. Where the Auditee is working directly to a
maintenance manual or cannot ascertain the material type from the
customer the definition ‘ferromagnetic steel’ is an acceptable
alternative.
4.2.1.3 The type of magnetizing current (e.g., half wave rectified, three phase, YES NO
single phase, AC, etc.)?
4.2.1.4 The directions of magnetization to be used, the order in which they are YES NO
applied and any demagnetization procedures to be used between
shots?
4.2.1.7 The magnitude of current, direction of all magnetic fields, the magnetic YES NO
field strengths, the types of magnetic field strength indicators, ampere
turns, etc?
4.2.1.8 The method used to determine the magnetic field strength, which shall YES NO
be one or more of the following?
4.2.1.8.1 By testing parts having known or artificial discontinuities, of the type, YES NO NA
size and location specified in the acceptance requirements or use of
flexible laminated shims or AS5371 notched shim indicators?
4.2.1.8.2 By using a Hall-effect meter capable of measuring either the peak or YES NO NA
RMS values of the tangential field as required by the Customer?
4.2.1.8.3 By the use of the formulas in conjunction with another field strength YES NO NA
monitoring method defined in 4.2.1.8.1 or 4.2.1.8.2?
4.2.1.9 If notched shims or flexible laminated strips are used they shall be YES NO NA
available and in good condition?
Guidance: There shall be no damage that may affect their use e.g.,
cracks, wrinkles, or corrosion. If AS5371 notched shims are used the
protective coating shall have been removed prior to use and they shall
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 -6-
4.2.1.11 The method used to demonstrate correct field balance when using YES NO NA
multidirectional magnetization?
Guidance: This includes reference to verifying the correct field strength
and balance using the required test parts/AS5371 shims.
4.2.1.12 Directions for positioning the item with respect to the magnetizing YES NO
equipment?
4.2.1.15 Method of establishing the magnetization (e.g., head, coil, cable wrap, YES NO
etc.)?
4.2.1.17 Type of magnetic particle material (dry or wet, water based, oil based, YES NO
etc.)?
4.2.1.20 Reporting of arcing and actions taken to prevent overheating of the YES NO NA
parts?
Guidance: NA applies only when direct contact methods are not used.
4.2.1.21 Address inspection of hardware which has a coating or plating applied YES NO NA
in accordance with the standard (if applicable)?
4.2.1.22 The inspection is to be performed following all processes that could YES NO NA
adversely affect the part (Heat Treat, Forming, Machining, Welding,
etc)?
Guidance: NA for independent test facilities.
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 -7-
4.2.1.23 All parts shall be cleaned prior to inspection as applicable to remove YES NO
paint, scale, oil, dirt and other foreign materials that may interfere with
the inspection process?
5.1.1.1 The suspension’s wet particle concentration is to be tested at the start YES NO
of every shift and whenever the bath is changed or adjusted?
5.1.1.2 A centrifuge vessel with a stem graduated in 0.05ml increments shall YES NO
be used for the concentration check?
Guidance: Certification/calibration of the vessel is not required.
5.1.1.3 The suspension is agitated for at least 30 minutes prior to performing YES NO
the concentration check?
5.1.1.4 The suspension sample is demagnetized and allowed to settle for at YES NO
least 60 minutes for petroleum based suspension or 30 minutes for
conditioned water suspension, prior to performing the concentration
check?
5.1.1.6 If the settled particles appear to be loose agglomerates rather than a YES NO
solid layer, that the entire bath suspension is replaced and retested?
5.1.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate acceptable results?
Guidance: The actual concentration value shall be recorded; “OK” or
some other mark is not acceptable.
5.1.2.1 Did the facility properly demonstrate the required suspension YES NO
concentration check?
5.2.1.1 A reference sample of unused suspension shall be retained for the YES NO
contamination check?
5.2.1.2 The reference sample shall be stored in such a manner as to be free of YES NO
exposure to light?
Guidance: The sample of unused particle suspension shall only be
brought into the inspection area for comparison against the in-use
suspension.
5.2.1.3 The graduated portion of the tube shall be examined, under both UV-A YES NO
light and visible light, for striations or bands and a difference in color or
appearance compared to the reference sample?
5.2.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate acceptable results?
Guidance: The test results shall indicate a percentage or simply state
“acceptable” or some other term that denotes acceptance.
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 -9-
5.2.2.1 Did the facility properly demonstrate the required suspension YES NO
contamination checks?
5.3.1.1 The test shall be conducted on a clean part with a surface finish the YES NO
same as the parts to be examined or an actual production part?
5.3.1.2 The part is flooded with the detection media, and the appearance of the YES NO
surface is noted after flooding is stopped?
5.3.1.3 The visual observation shall be performed individually under both YES NO
visible light and UV-A light conditions?
5.3.1.4 If the film of suspension breaks, exposing bare surface, then insufficient YES NO
wetting agent is present or the part has not been cleaned adequately?
5.3.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate acceptable results?
Guidance: Records indicating “OK” or some other checkmark is
acceptable for this test.
5.4.1.1 A digital meter, with a spectral sensitivity from 320-400 nm, is utilized to YES NO
verify UV light intensity?
5.4.1.2 The minimum acceptable limit is 1200 µW/cm2 at 15 inches (380 mm)? YES NO
5.4.1.3 For borescopes the intensity shall be a minimum of 1000 µW/cm2 at the YES NO NA
inspection surface as measured from the inspection distance?
Guidance: NA when borescopes are not used.
5.4.1.4 The UV light intensity of the inspection light(s) is checked at least daily YES NO
or prior to use?
5.4.1.5 The UV light intensity of the inspection light(s) is checked after any YES NO
equipment maintenance?
5.4.1.6 The UV lights are kept clean and in good condition? YES NO
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 10 -
5.4.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate acceptable results?
Guidance: The actual light intensity shall be recorded for this check;
“OK” or some other mark is not acceptable.
5.5.1.1 A digital meter, with a spectral sensitivity from 320-400 nm, is utilized to YES NO
verify UV light intensity?
5.5.1.2 The minimum acceptable limit is 1200 µW/cm2 at 15 inches (380 mm)? YES NO
5.5.1.3 The UV light intensity of the inspection light(s) is checked at least daily YES NO
or prior to use?
5.5.1.4 The UV light intensity of the inspection light(s) is checked after any YES NO
equipment maintenance?
5.5.1.5 The UV lights are kept clean and in good condition? YES NO
Guidance: For UV-A LED lights, the light shall be fully functional per
manufacturer certification and in the condition as the manufacturer
intended and satisfy the process control checks.
5.5.1.7 Where battery powered UV-A LED lamps are being used, that the YES NO NA
procedure shall address the need to ensure the correct UV intensity is
maintained throughout period of use?
Guidance: This includes lamps that are battery powered but are
permanently connected to the mains.
5.5.1.8 UV-A LED flashlights (small battery powered UV-A sources) shall only YES NO NA
be utilized for localized inspections (e.g. weld repairs, bore inspections,
hard to reach areas)?
5.5.1.9 The repair of the system or replacement of a LED unit needs to be YES NO
carried out by the manufacturer or authorised distributor/repair center?
5.5.1.10 After repair or LED replacement the unit shall be recertified by the YES NO
manufacturer?
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 11 -
5.5.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate acceptable results?
Guidance: The actual light intensity shall be recorded for this check;
“OK” or some other mark is not acceptable.
5.6.1.1 A digital white light meter shall be utilized to verify white light values? YES NO
5.6.1.2 The ambient light level in the inspection area shall be controlled not to YES NO
exceed 2 ft candles (20 lux)?
5.6.1.3 The measurement shall be taken in the darkened inspection area to YES NO
include the examination surface with the UV-A lights operating at a
distance of 15 inches (38 cm)?
5.6.1.4 100 ft-candles/1000 lux, or more, shall be available at the part surface YES NO NA
for visual verification of magnetic particle indications?
Guidance: This question shall be applicable where accept/reject
decisions rely on the use of white light (otherwise NA)
5.6.1.5 The checks are to be performed at least weekly or prior to use? YES NO
5.6.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate acceptable results?
Guidance: The actual light intensity shall be recorded for this check,
“OK” or some other mark is not acceptable. Where the Auditee uses a
light level that exceeds the measurement capability of the meter and
the minimum customer light level requirement, the maximum readable
light level value can be recorded.
5.7.1.1 The device used to monitor the system performance? (Identify YES NO
applicable method used)
AS5282 Ring
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 12 -
TP 1-4
(List) _________________________________________
Guidance: One or more of the above devices shall be used to monitor
the system performance. Any other standard approved by the customer
shall have documented evidence of approval.
5.7.2.2 If a Ketos tool steel ring is used for the system performance test there YES NO
shall be documentation available which provides evidence that it is
certified to Ketos tool steel ring requirements?
5.7.2.3 The Ketos tool steel ring is to be free of damage or corrosion which YES NO
would affect its use?
5.7.2.4 The magnetic particle system performance is checked at least daily or YES NO
prior to use by testing the Ketos tool steel ring showing the required
holes per maximum allowable amperage setting?
Guidance: The maximum amperage values specified in the table shall
not be exceeded.
5.7.2.5 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate acceptable results?
Guidance: The Auditor shall verify that indications are discernible for
the required number of holes at each output value (amperage). Any
additional indications above the minimum requirement shall be
recorded as seen but detection of, or variation in detection of these
additional indications shall not be cause for a nonconformance. The
actual number of hole indications shall be recorded.
5.7.3.2 If an AS5282 steel ring is used for the system performance test, there YES NO
shall be documentation available that provides evidence that it is
properly certified to AS5282 requirements?
5.7.3.3 The AS5282 steel ring is free of damage or corrosion which would YES NO
affect its use?
5.7.3.4 The magnetic particle system performance is checked at least daily or YES NO
prior to use by testing the AS5282 steel ring showing the required holes
per maximum allowable amperage setting?
Guidance: The maximum amperage values specified in the table shall
not be exceeded.
Maximum Results # of
AS5282 Indicated
Amperage Holes
#3 Hole @ 500 Amps
#5 Hole @1000 Amps
#6 Hole @1500 Amps
#7 Hole @2500 Amps
#9 Hole @3500 Amps
5.7.4 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate acceptable results?
Guidance: The Auditor shall verify that indications are discernible for
the required number of holes at each output value (amperage). Any
additional indications above the minimum requirement shall be
recorded as seen but detection of, or variation in detection of these
additional indications shall not be cause for a nonconformance. The
actual number of hole indications shall be recorded.
5.7.5.2 That an alternate test device (TP 1-4, known defective part or other YES NO
standard listed in 5.7.1.1) is used to monitor the system performance?
Guidance: If a Ketos tool steel ring or AS5282 steel ring is not used to
monitor the system performance, then an alternative test device, such
as TP 1-4, known defective part or other standard listed in 5.7.1.1 shall
be used.
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 14 -
5.7.5.3 The magnetic particle system performance is checked at least daily or YES NO
prior to use?
5.7.5.4 The performance of the test device used shall meet or exceed the YES NO
original defined baseline?
Guidance: Test devices shall have pre-determined current values for
the indications/defects, acceptance criteria defined and approved by
customer.
5.7.5.5 The device used is free of damage or corrosion that would affect its YES NO
use?
5.7.6 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate acceptable results?
Guidance: The recording of the results of this test shall be in
accordance with customer requirements.
6. CALIBRATION
6.1.2.1 The Hall Effect meter is calibrated at a minimum of three points in each YES NO
dynamic range and each polarity in addition to zero?
6.1.3 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate that the calibration is current?
6.2.1.1 The residual field indicator is calibrated at a minimum of three points YES NO
within the range of use?
Guidance: For instruments measuring positive and negative values the
three points could be the maximum residual field level and zero. As an
example, +3, 0 and -3 Gauss.
6.2.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this test on file and do they indicate that the calibration is current?
6.3.1.4 No fewer than six measurements are to be carried out to demonstrate YES NO
repeatability?
6.3.1.5 The equipment is marked with the lowest useable output value YES NO
determined by the output repeatability check?
Guidance: The machine shall be checked to establish the lowest setting
that will repeatedly produce a stable (±10% or 50 amps whichever is
greater) output. Individual test values need not be recorded, but the
minimum usable value shall be marked on the equipment. No additional
test or calibration equipment is required to carry out this test. This test
is not required for secondary circuits, such as magnetic flux.
6.3.1.6 The magnetic particle machine ammeter and output stability are YES NO
calibrated / checked at least semi-annually?
6.3.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this calibration on file and do they indicate that the calibration is
current?
Guidance: The actual values shall be recorded for this check; “OK” or
some other mark is not acceptable.
6.4.1.1 The pulse duration of the magnetizing current flow is controlled so that YES NO
at least 0.5 seconds can be achieved?
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 16 -
6.4.1.2 The pulse timer is calibrated at least semi-annually to be within ± 0.1 YES NO
seconds?
6.4.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this calibration on file and do they indicate that the calibration is
current?
Guidance: The actual values shall be recorded for this check; “OK” or
some other mark is not acceptable.
6.5.1.1 The check may be performed using a suitable oscilloscope or other YES NO
applicable method as specified by the equipment manufacturer?
Guidance: This check is to be conducted in the coil.
6.5.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this check on file and do they indicate that the check is current?
Guidance: “OK” or a value is acceptable.
6.6.1.2 The light meter is accurate to within ± 5% of the standard reading? YES NO
Guidance: Note that the value of ±5% is in reference to a comparison of
the light meter being calibrated to another calibrated (traceable to NIST
or other National Standard) light meter. It is not meant to represent a
“true” ±5% calibration tolerance.
6.6.1.4 The calibration is being performed at least semi-annually or, with YES NO
adequate documentation, extended as allowed by the governing
standard but not to exceed 12 months when 4 consecutive acceptable
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 17 -
6.6.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this check on file and do they indicate that the calibration is current?
6.7.1.2 The light meter is accurate to within ± 5% of the standard reading? YES NO
Guidance: Note that the value of ±5% is in reference to a comparison of
the light meter being calibrated to another calibrated (traceable to NIST
or other National Standard) light meter. It is not meant to represent a
“true” ±5% calibration tolerance.
6.7.1.4 The calibration is being performed at least semi-annually or, with YES NO
adequate documentation, extended as allowed by the governing
standard but not to exceed 12 months when 4 consecutive acceptable
calibrations and adequate documentation is available to support the
decreased frequency?
6.7.2 Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure and are records of YES NO
this check on file and do they indicate that the calibration is current?
7. COMPLIANCE
Guidance: The Auditee shall perform representative inspections from
current production to determine compliance with these requirements.
These parts shall be selected to represent a variety of Nadcap
participating customer requirements and several different types of
processing equipment if more than one magnetic particle machine is in
use at this facility. Borrowing hardware from one company to another to
demonstrate compliance is not acceptable; unless there is objective
evidence the design authority has authorized movement of the
hardware to the company undergoing the audit. Investigate the
purchase order specifications to identify any customer unique
acceptance, process control, or procedure requirements applicable to
these parts. Witness the facility's ability to perform inspection of these
parts in accordance with the requirements.
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 18 -
7.1 Provide the following documentation for Auditor review for each of the
parts being tested during the compliance portion of the audit: Note: EC-
LR materials shall not leave the Auditee’s facility.
b.Copy of the applicable page from the completed shop traveler or work
order.
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 20 -
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 22 -
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 24 -
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
7.2 If applicable and in conjunction with the preceding, the Auditee shall SECTION NA
also provide an additional three paperwork compliance jobs across the
Nadcap Subscriber base. Provide the following documentation for
Auditor review for each of these jobs: Note: The goal is to provide at
least one set of compliance documentation for each of the Auditee’s
Nadcap Subscriber customer base. If all of the Auditee’s Nadcap
customers were represented in the actual compliance audits, then this
section is NA.
Paperwork compliance jobs up to two (2) years prior to the audit date
are considered acceptable. If none are available the Auditor shall place
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 25 -
a note in this section indicating this. Note: EC-LR materials shall not
leave the Auditee’s facility.
7.2. A.
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 27 -
7.2. B SECTION NA
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 28 -
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
7.2.C SECTION NA
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 30 -
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
7.3.1 Is the facility using the appropriate specification(s) and revision(s) as YES NO
required by the contract document?
Guidance: This shall be confirmed by the Auditor by reviewing the
customer P.O. and Subscriber/End User drawing if available.
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 31 -
7.3.2 If the facility is working to any deviations, have they been approved by YES NO NA
the customer?
Guidance: The Auditor shall confirm documented customer approval,
this may be in the form of a written communication, technique approval
or by a formal deviation from the Subscriber/End User.
7.3.4 If written procedures and/or techniques require review and/or approval YES NO NA
by the Cognizant Engineering Organization, is that approval evident?
Guidance: This shall be investigated and confirmed by the Auditor by
reviewing the last ten-part numbers shipped.
7.3.5 If applicable, are part specific drawing inspection and/or acceptance YES NO NA
notes being flowed down and followed by the inspectors?
7.3.6 Was there evidence of compliance to the document control procedure? YES NO
Guidance: This is looking to see if the correct procedure revisions are in
use.
7.3.7 If applicable, were any and all specification, drawing, procedure or YES NO NA
technique changes authorized?
Guidance: The Auditor shall review the documents for any unauthorized
changes.
7.5.2 Are parts being cleaned in accordance with applicable work YES NO
instructions/procedure prior to inspection?
Guidance: This may be addressed in the technique or a procedure
referenced from the technique.
7.5.6 Were parts properly magnetized in accordance with the procedure or YES NO
technique sheet?
7.5.8 Did the inspector(s) adhere to the requirement of not wearing YES NO
photochromatic eyeglasses or permanently darkened lenses?
Guidance: This is not intended to prohibit the use of eyeglasses with
lenses treated to absorb ultraviolet light.
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 33 -
7.5.9 Did the inspector(s) accustom their eyes to darkness for at least one YES NO
minute before performing any inspection requiring the use of UV light?
Guidance: On entering a darkened inspection area and each time the
general illumination in the inspection area is extinguished 1-minute dark
adaptation is required. Where specifications permit, local light sources
that do not interfere with the inspector’s vision may be used without
subsequent timed dark adaptation and where the evaluation process is
carried out independently of the inspection process no dark adaptation
is required during evaluation. A timing device is required for eye
adaptation monitoring, but evidence of calibration is not required.
7.5.11 If applicable, when current is passed directly through the part (direct YES NO NA
headshot) was care exercised to prevent burning/arcing of the part at
the contact areas?
Guidance: When current is passed directly through the part (direct
headshot), burning/arcing between the contact areas of the machine
and the part shall not occur.
7.6.1 Was the UV light intensity measured at the time of this survey, at least YES NO
1200 μW/cm2 at the inspection surface?
7.6.2 Were all areas of the part inspected per the technique sheet or YES NO
procedure?
7.6.3 If applicable, did the inspector(s) properly evaluate every relevant YES NO NA
indication in accordance with the customer standard?
7.6.4 Was the specific acceptance criteria properly understood by the YES NO
inspector(s)?
Guidance: The Auditor is expected to confirm understanding by
whatever means are required. This may be possible by observation or
in some cases may require the Auditor to ask the inspector(s) questions
regarding the criteria and how it is to be used.
Nadcap AC7114/2 Rev NΔ1 - 34 -
7.6.5 Were precautions taken when parts were handled during inspection not YES NO
to smear or obliterate indications?
7.6.6 If applicable, were indications not meeting the acceptance criteria YES NO NA
marked on the part and/or appropriately documented?
Guidance: The Auditor is expected to validate that the appropriate
marking materials are utilized in accordance with customer
requirements.
7.6.7 After evaluation, were all parts demagnetized and exhibit no more than YES NO
an absolute value of 3 gauss or 240 A/m as determined by the use of a
field indicator on the surface of the part?
7.7.1 Were parts properly cleaned after magnetic particle inspection to YES NO
remove magnetic particle residues from holes, crevices, passageways,
etc?
Guidance: Cleaning shall be done with a suitable solvent or by other
means with all plugs, masking, or other processing aids removed with
care as they may affect the intended use of the part.
7.7.2 After inspection and appropriate cleaning, were parts properly protected YES NO NA
from corrosion or damage?
7.8.1 Were the inspection personnel certified to the correct levels and YES NO
techniques for the work they were performing?
Guidance: This shall be verified by review of the certification records.
7.9.1 Were symbols and/or marking methods used to denote magnetic YES NO
particle inspection status?
7.9.2 Were all inspection results properly recorded and traceable to the YES NO
parts?