Sex and Love Notes 2
Sex and Love Notes 2
Sex and Love Notes 2
Phaedrus
● Love is a God, the eldest and noblest of the gods
● Love as a verb, not just a feeling: it will lead you to do certain things, die for the person
you love
● Eros god of love
Pausanias
● Eros is inseparable from Aphrodite,this there is more than one god of love
● There are two types of love: heavenly Aphrodite and common: Eros
Heavenly love - between a younger man and older man, with the end goal of knowledge and
bettering oneself
● Associated with men - intelligence, variance
● Associated with the daughter of uranus, aphrodite, does not have a mother, so it is
expeirenced only by men, not women.
● Does not necessarily signify a romantic relationship, almost a teacher/student
relationship
● Noble
● Love of mind rather than love of body
● A sharing of knowledge and wisdom
Common love - between a man and a women or man and a young boy, with the end goal of
sexual gratification
● About body, not soul
● Associated with the other ‘version’ of aphrodite, daughter of zeus and dionne, thus is
experienced by both men and women as she has a mother and father
● Lust driven
● Does not last
● Associates with women and youths
Relationship between boys and men - "love of boys"; refers to an asymmetrical and
hierarchical relation between an adult man and a pubescent boy; ideally the relationship, once
established, continued for a period of time during which the older man conferred on the boy the
benefits of his knowledge, wisdom, and experience in the polis and the boy granted his older
lover sexual favors. An intellectual love, a mentorship.
Honorable love
● open love, secret love is dishonorable
● Love of “the noblest and highest” is honorable love
● Hasty attachments are dishonorable
The physician
● Agrees that there are two kinds of love, but elaborates
● Love does not have to be between two humans, one can love music, animals can love,
plants etc.
● There are two kinds of love
○ Good love: Health, you body is harmonious
○ Bad Love: Disease, your body is disharmonious
Aristophanes
● Originally three sexes, two half’s of a man, two half’s of a women, and androgynous, one
half of a man and one half of a women
● Eventually zeus punished them for being too unruly and powerful
● Zeus cut them in two and rearranged them, they longed for their other halves, and
searched for them, if/when they found them, they wrapped themselves around them and
did not let go, a man sought out a man, a woman sought out a women, and andrognous
sought out the opposite sex. Eventually they began to die off.
● Zeus eventually took pity on them and made their genitals face front so they were able to
reproduce
● The desire and pursuit of human nature is love
● This is the origin of our desire for other human beings. Those of us who desire members
of the opposite sex were previously androgynous, whereas men who desire men and
women who desire women were previously male or female.
SYMPOSIUM PT. 2
Agathon
● We still get the idea that love is a god, but agathon believes eros is the youngest god
and never ages, not oldest
● Eros also spends his time with young people
● What love is
○ Always being fair and peaceful
○ Love is soft and tender
○ Love is not in the body, but in our minds and characters
○ Love can come, go, move about, it is intangible
○ Love never forces itself onto people, only engages with people who consent to
it/are open to it (relates to hooks “love is willful, it does not just come and sweep
you off your feet)
○ Love is braver than war
○ Love has an element of innovation and creativity
● Agathon and socrates have a dialogue, question and answer
Diotima
● Many scholars argue that diotima is not actually a real person, many argue that socrates
did not want to continue the dialogue with agathon, so in order for the dialogue to
continue, Plato created this figure diotima. Presumably, diotima is actually socrates
● Diotima believes love is
○ not a god, but a spirit
○ Love is an intermediate; not mortal or immortal
○ Love is a spirit
○ Love can convey messages between mortal and immortal
○ Spirits are intermediaries between humans and gods
○ Believes eros was born because: it was aphrodite's birthday party, the god of
resources got drunk and passed out, god of poverty shows up at part and takes
advantage of resources, nonconsenaul sex act--eros is born of this act.
○ Love is the child of resources and poverty (balance, contradiction)
○ Love has the potential to make the contradictory work together
○ Love is pursuing, not possessing wisdom, beauty, etc.
○ Love has both the properties of its mother and father; it is always in a state of
need, but always has the skill set to seek out what it needs
○ Diotima rejects the idea that love searches for another half, rejects zeus’s story of
cutting people in half
○ Rejects the idea of soulmates
○ Love is not in pursuit of a person; it is in pursuit of beauty or good as a theoretical
○ Not only is love in pursuit of beauty, but in pursuit of knowledge
○ Humans are mortal, but we have the resources to allow ourselves to live on
○ We live on through reproduction, it is almost a form of reincarnation
○ There are two kinds of reproduction
■ Physical reproduction/ of the body - men’s ability to reproduce, a man
seeking out a woman and creating a child which will continue their legacy,
miniature versions of yourselves
■ Reproduction of the mind - wisdom and virtue are brought into the world,
by way of creation. Writing a book, painting a painting. This creation lives
on.
■ Reproduction of the mind is superior/preferred, the body fades
○ The idea of the forms
○ For everything that exists in the world. There is a pure, perfect version which
exists outside of us. There are less perfect versions which we are able to see
■ Transcendence - beyond us
■ Ex. the form of red. There is a pure, theoretical notion of what red is. We
know what it is, but there are no exact physical manifestations of red.
None are the actual, pure form of red. Red exists whether I live or dont
live but my ability to see red is dependent on me
● Diotima suggests love operates in a similar context as the above forms
○ Diotima's ladder
■ Lowest level of love - associated with what we can see (beautiful bodies),
physical beauty, singular, a single body is beautiful and good, we love this
one body
■ Second level - a person is able to see bodies are similar, the beauty of the
body is not singular, beauty in lots of different bodies.
■ Third level - person's ability to love others minds rather than bodies, a
maturer version of love is love of the mind, not body. Body is less
important.
■ Fourth level - falling in love with beauty itself. Beauty is not associated
with body or mind, but the pure form of beauty. Love of beauty, wisdom,
etc. investment in the theoretical. You are able to pursue the theoretical
for of love, about an immortal constant pursuit.
■ This connects to the allegory of the cave: the highest level of knowledge
is forms. Ex. the sun, we cannot look at it exactly, it is omnipresent.
Socrates - How does Alcibiades speech position Socrates as “love”? Put differently, how
does his account of Socrates align with how
love is defined by others in the Symposium. Provide three examples.
● Declared the wisest person to exist because he knows he does not know everything, this
connected to the idea of love as a philosopher, an ongoing search of things (love is in
pursuit, not possessing)
● Socrates is in ongoing pursuit of love in its purest form--intelligence, intellect, which
situates him as love itself.
● Giving up your body is not a true form of love
● True mark of love is wisdom, willingness to share wisdom
● Socrates is love?
● Philosophy is love?
● The ongoing pursuit of knowledge which leads you to the forms is love? YOu would be a
thinking thing, almost superhuman? Transcendence of the body
POLYAMORY IS DEVIANT: BUT NOT FOR THE REASONS YOU THINK - ELISABETH
SCHEFF
● Polyamory - a form of consensual non-monogamy
○ Emphasizes emotional intimacy with multiple partners
○ Usually not associated with religion
○ Across all genders
○ Began as a form of CNM in the 70s, has gained popularity in the past decade
● Consensual non-monogamy - a category of relationships in which the participants
negotiate multiple sexual and/or romantic partners
○ The largest category is an open relationship - broad category of CNM: gives little
information about the specifics of the structure beyond the fact that the
participants have agreed on non-monogamy
○ Polyamory is one of these categories
○ Differs from infidelity because it is consensual
● Polygamy - a form of concenusal non monogamousrelationships
○ A form of marriage with multiple spouses
○ Usually associated with cultural or religious community
○ Polygyny - most common for fo polygamy i which one husband takes mutple
wives
● Swinging - a form of consensual non-monogamy
○ Heterosexual couoples swapping partner
○ Or having group sex w other partners in a semi-structuresd setting like a cruise,
house party, sex club
● Compulsory monogamy - the cultural and societal assumption that monogamy is the
default and only legitimate form of relationship
○ Fueled by the institution of marriage as almost a required social norm in western
cultures
○ Fueled by criminal statutes surrounding non monogamous relationships which
enforce monogamy
○ Associated with jealousy as a signal of love, supermonogamy (evryon has one
true love/soulmate), sociobiological phenomena of exclusive heterosexual
matings
● Polyamorus possibility - awareness to the fact that monogamy is not the only consensual
option in relationships
○ People typically react to this possibility in three ways
■ Blase - it has little effect on them, they have little reaction, tend to dismiss
polyamory as an oddity they would not consider taking part in
■ Delight - freedom and relief from compulsory monogamy
■ Abject terror - feel threatened and possessive to a maximum degree,
especially if their partner has expressed interest in some form of CNM
● This can be caused by past experiences with cheating, mistrust
● Monogamy and Polyamory as orientations - the idea that some people are naturally
monogamous (do not feel attraction for others when in a relationship) and others
naturally polyamorous (can feel attraction to multiple partners)
● MIsconceptions about why polyamory is deemed devant
○ Sex for pleasure
■ Stigma, seocifically against women, for havign sex without intention of
procreation
■ This stigma is not confined to polyamory, but found in our culture of se
and love as a whole
○ Multiple partners
■ Traditional monogamy of marrying and having sex with one person is not
longer relevant as our society has progressed
■ Most people have had multiple partners in their lives, just consecutively
rather than concurrently
■ Cheating and infidelity are also extremely common
● The real reasons there is so much stigma surrounding CNM
○ Honesty restructures power imbalance
■ Infidelity or non-consensual non-monogamy usually comes hand in hand
with a power imbalance within a relationship, in which both have agreed
to monogamy but only one practices it. The knowledge of the unfaithful
party, who knows is not actually monogamous despite what they had
agreed upon, holds a certain power. The secret of the cheater gives them
power in the relationship.
■ Further, the party with more power in the relationship to begin with is
more likely to cheat, and the less powerful party may put up with it for fear
of losing the relationship.
■ Polyamory promotes honest negotiation of non-monogamy, threatening
this power dynamic.
○ Women get multiple partners too
■ Within monogamy and even polygamy their has historically been ample
room for men to have multiple partners, through mistresses, multiple
wives, etc. (specifically for men of high status).
■ While typically non-monogamous women are slluthsmaed and ridiculed.
Polyamory threatens this double standard as polyamory allows for
freedom across genders.
○ Challenge to heterosexual nuclear families
■ Monogamy supports a socially accepted and instituted idea of a legitimate
family, typically a mother, father and kids. Polamaroy threatens this idea,
introduces other familial possibilities for those in consensually non
monogamous relationships.
HAS VIRGINITY LOST ITS VIRTUE? BY AMANDA N. GESSELMAN, GREGORY D. WEBSTER &
JUSTIN R. GARCIA
● Virginity until marriage has been historically valued, but in current society, sex is treated as
A norm in young adults
● Sociosexual norms have changed in the US
○ Most people engage in pre-marital sex
● Six decades of research show these changing trends, from 1939 to 1996
○ Chastity as a trait one looks for in a partner has decreased greatly in the past decades
○ 75% of people (currently) lose their virginity before the age of 20 (virginity in this context
referring to penal vaginal penetrative sex
● Stigma and discrimination associated with sexual inexperience
● Sexual experiences have become a standard part of late adolescence and early adulthood
● Interpersonal sexual scripts: how social norms sorrounding sex influence sexual activity
● Authors conducted three studies with six hypothesis to find relationship between sexual experiences
And stigma
● SIX HYPOTHESIS
○ Late adolescence as the age for onset of sexual experience SUPPORTED
○ Sexually inexperienced adults feel stigmatized SUPPORTED
○ Sexual inexperience limits dating options SUPPORTED
○ Older sexually inexperienced individuals face more stigmatization NOT SUPPORTED
○ Sexually inexperienced adults with prior romantic relationship would be perceived more
positively b/c it shows ability to be intimately connected with someone NOT SUPPORTED
○ The likelihood that single adults would enter into a relationship with an adult virgin
SOMEWHAT SUPPORTED
● Higher likelihood of sexually experienced individuals entering relationships with other
Sexually experienced individuals
● Virginity as a social construction - virginity is not a physical state of being, as it is often
associated with the presence of a hymen in women, which can be broken in many ways, not just
through pentrative sex. It is socially constructed because it is not based on any physical,
scientific reality, it also signals that one is ‘losing’ something when they have sex for the first time,
Which is a fabrication.
● The distinction between abstinence and virginity - abstinence is the choice to not actively have
Sex, one can have had sex in the past, but now be abstinent; it is voluntary celibacy. Virginity, on the
Other hand, is treated more so as an identity, not a state that one can enter in and out of.
● The virginity test - hymen testing is one method of virginity testing, performed on women in wich
Women's hymens are ‘checked’ to ensure they are in place, as this is seen as a marker of virginity
Despite its inaccuracy, as the hymen can be ruptured in a number of ways having nothing to do
With pentrative sex.
● How virginity upholds compulsive heterosexuality/heteronormativity
(impact on queerness/disability/sexual assault) - viriginity erases queerness as it is based on
The assumption that heterosexual sex is the only legitimate form of sex. This is simply untrue.
This assumption upholds heteronormativity. For people who have been sexually assaulted,
The idea of virginity as something lost, survivors often frame their assaults as when there first
Sexual experience or loss of virginity, this is incredibly harmful as they should be encouraged
To redefine and reclaim one's sexuality and relationship with their body. The social construct of virginity
Encourages over-emphasis on ones first sexual encounters despite the circumstances in which this
May have occurred.
● How definitions the value of virginity differ depending on one’s gender - virginity is often
Treated as a prize, or signal of innocence and purity in women, a woman who is sexullya active
Is often shamed, and a woman who is a virgin is often praised (some virgin women are labeled
prudes). Men, however, are oftens ahmed for being virgins, and praised for having sex.
‘‘I’M NOT GONNA FAKE IT’’: UNIVERSITY WOMEN’S ACCOUNTS OF RESISTING THE NORMATIVE
PRACTICE OF FAKING ORGASM BY MICHELLE N. LAFRANCE, MONIKA STELZL, AND
KRISTEN BULLOCK
● The relationship between one’s self and orgasming: the failure to bring one’s female partner to
orgasm can put one’s sense of self, specifically in relation to their sexual prowess in question.
It can also cause a questioning of a woman’s own sense of self if she cannot orgasm. This
pressure is largely due to social pressures to uphold male ego and accepted ideas that orgasm
is essential to sex, as well as signals the end of sex. Pressure to orgasm thus leads to pressure to
fake orgasm as they are awarded a social significance. If a women does not orgasm, their bodies
Are perceived as abnormal.
● The notion of emotion work: performing pleasure or feigning pleasure is a sort of emotion work,
As it is a means of pleasing their partner and protecting the emotions of their partner and
thus their relationship. It is a sort of emotional labor. More common in feminine subjects.
● Male orgasms as signaling the end of sex: male orgasms often signal the end of sex according to
A culturally pervasive reproductive model of sex, it is thus often priotized.
● Women faking orgasm is a common and widespread practice, especially in heterosexual sex
● Faking orgasm in heterosexual sex has become almost compulsary
● Female sexuality and pleasure
○ Often associated with sin, deviance, or marital duty
○ Have recently become more so associated with liberation, empowerment, and health
● Failure to experience pleasure can signal inadequacy in a woman, or trigger insecurity in her partner
● Most men claim they have never been with a woman who has faked and orgasm, however, most
Women report having faked an orgasm at some point, with many women faking consistently
● Two dominant reasons for faking orgasm
○ To end sex: due to exhaustion, boredom, knowing you are not going to orgasm etc.
■ Also to avoid hurting partners feelings, to please partner
○ The idea that a successful sex act ends in orgasm, specifically male orgasm,
shaped by a focus on reproduction (male orgasm/ejaculation is necessary for procreation,
also fosters an emphasis on male pleasure). Orgasm is considered an achievement, and not
Having one is a failure. This narrative has developed in response to pressure from partners
and society that orgasm are expected and considered the norm, demonstrating
confirmation of a male partner's sexual skills, serving his masculinity.
● How can women resist the normative practice of faking orgasm?
○ Three main reasons for not faking orgasm
■ Faking an orgasm reduces possibility of future orgasms
■ They did not want to offend or upset their partner by deception
■ Did not want to be dishonest
○ Faking an orgasm would not help their partner better learn how to give an orgasm
○ Being honest about not orgasming would allow for possibility of orgasm in the future
● Study - 15 female college students, ages 19 to 28, majority heterosexual
○ Conducted interview about 3 topics
■ Expeirneces taliing about sex
■ Feigning sexual pleasure
■ Resisting feigning sexual pleasure
○ Results
■ Future pleasure discourse
● Resisting faking pleasure or orgasm to open oneself to future pleasure,
the belief that not feigning pleasure would encourage authentic pleasure
in the future
● Faking pleasure leads to less ultimate sexual satisfaction
● counterproductive
■ Equal rights discourse
● Reciprocity: The notion that pleasure ought to be equally given and received
○ Fair exchange of sexual pleasure
○ Women's equal entitlement to pleasure
○ Fights the notion that men are inherently more sexual, and women
less sexual
○ Limits to equal rights discourse: this study’s subjects were primarily white
Heterosexual women attending a predomintaely female liberal arts
College which may have allowed for more exposure to feminist and
Equal rights discourses
● Feminist discoruse issue of gender and power:
○ Faking orgasm seen as a symptom of the patriarchy that prioritises
mens egos and pleasure over womens.
● 2 discursive strategies to resisting faking orgasm (common ways that women
Avoid faking orgasm or feeling the need to feign pleasure)
○ Deflecting blame: blaming oneself for not orgasming due to their
Own shortcomings rather than their partners inability to bring them to orgasm,
Specifically to protect masculinity of partners
● Gendered dynamics of blame:
● Expressing pain: tellings one’s partner, usually on’es make partner that sex
Is hurting them as a loophole to feigning pleasure. Pain as a justification for
Resisting sex
● This method of resistance to feigning pleasure still seems to feed
the male ego, it is still a form of dishonesty
● This can also go two ways, some women report faking pleasure
Due to pain
● Gendered dynamics of sexperts/sexpertise: heterosexual men are positioned as having innate,
natural sexpertise, “the masters of technique” in sexual encounters, thus their inability to produce
orgasms puts their masculinity in question.
● Feminist post-structuralism - attends to the ways in which knowledge claims are situated based on
Social and cultural ideals. Poststructural feminism is a branch of feminism that engages with
insights from post-structuralist thought, it unpacks patriarchal hierarchical constructs,
Poststructural feminism emphasizes "the contingent and
discursive nature of all identities", and in particular the social construction of gendered subjectivities.
● Attends to the ways in which knowledge claims are always situated in social, political, and
cultural contexts
● The ways in which patriarchy is mobilized, maintained, and resisted in our everyday
interactions through language
● Language as loaded