Petitioner Respondent: Marlon Dominguez Y Argana, People of The Philippines
Petitioner Respondent: Marlon Dominguez Y Argana, People of The Philippines
DECISION
CAGUIOA, J : p
The Facts
After trial on the merits, in its Decision 32 dated March 22, 2016, the
RTC convicted Dominguez of the crime charged. The RTC held that the
prosecution sufficiently established all the elements for illegal possession of
dangerous drugs, and that the integrity of the shabu seized from Dominguez
had been duly preserved. It further held that chain of custody has not been
broken. The dispositive portion of the said Decision reads:
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby
rendered finding accused Marlon Dominguez y Argana @ "OXO" guilty
beyond reasonable doubt of violation of Section 11, Article II of R.A.
No. 9165. Accordingly, the accused is hereby sentenced to suffer the
penalty of imprisonment of twelve (12) years and one (1) day as
minimum to fourteen (14) years as maximum to pay a fine in the
amount of Three Hundred Thousand Pesos (P300,000.00).
xxx xxx xxx
SO ORDERED. 33
Ruling of the CA
Issue
For resolution of the Court is the issue of whether the RTC and the CA
erred in convicting Dominguez of the crime charged.
The CA and the RTC concluded that Dominguez was caught in flagrante
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2021 cdasiaonline.com
delicto, declaring that he was caught in the act of actually committing a
crime or attempting to commit a crime in the presence of the apprehending
officers, when he was caught holding a sachet of shabu . Consequently, the
warrantless search was considered valid as it was deemed an incident to the
lawful arrest.
For an arrest of a suspect in flagrante delicto, two elements must
concur, namely: (a) the person to be arrested must execute an overt act
indicating that he has just committed, is actually committing, or is
attempting to commit a crime; and (b) such overt act is done in the presence
or within the view of the arresting officer. 51 The officer's personal
knowledge of the fact of the commission of an offense is absolutely required.
52 The officer himself must witness the crime. 53
Footnotes
6. Id. at 38.
7. Id.
8. Id.
9. Id.
10. Id.
12. Id.
13. Id.
14. Id.
15. Id.
16. Id.
17. Id.
18. Id.
21. Id.
22. Id.
23. Id.
24. Id.
25. Id.
26. Id.
27. Id.
28. Id.
29. Id.
30. Id.
31. Id.
38. Id.
39. People v. Bringcula, G.R. No. 226400, January 24, 2018, pp. 7-8, citing People
v. Bongalon, 425 Phil. 96 (2002).
40. Id. at 8.
41. Id.
42. 768 Phil. 195 (2015).
44. People v. Manago, 793 Phil. 505, 514-515 (2016) citing Comerciante v. People,
764 Phil. 627, 633-634 (2015).
45. Caballes v. CA, 424 Phil. 263, 277 (2002) citing People v. Figueroa , 319 Phil.
21, 25 (1995); Morfe v. Mutuc, et al., 130 Phil. 415 (1968); Davis v. United
States, 328 U.S. 582 (1946).
46. Id., citing Obra, et al. v. CA, et al., 375 Phil. 1052 (1999); People v. Bagista , 288
Phil. 828, 836 (1992); Padilla v. CA, et al., 336 Phil. 383, 401 (1997); People
v. Lo Ho Wing, et al., 271 Phil. 120, 128 (1991); Coolidge v. New Hampshire ,
403 U.S. 443 (1971).
47. Id., citing People v. Escaño, et al., 380 Phil. 719 (2000); Aniag, Jr. v. COMELEC ,
307 Phil. 437, 448 (1994); People v. Saycon , 306 Phil. 359, 366 (1994);
People vs. Exala , 293 Phil. 538 (1993); Valmonte v. de Villa, 258 Phil. 838
(1989); Carroll v. United States , 267 U.S. 132 (1925).
48. Id., citing People v. Montilla , 349 Phil. 640, 656 (1998); People v. Cuizon , 326
Phil. 345 (1996); Mustang Lumber v. CA, et al., 327 Phil. 214 (1996); People
v. Ramos, 294 Phil. 553, 574 (1993); People v. Omaweng, 288 Phil. 350, 359-
360 (1992).
49. Id., citing People v. Solayao, 330 Phil. 811, 818 (1996); Posadas v. CA, 266 Phil.
306, 312 (1990) further citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
50. Id., citing People v. de Gracia , 304 Phil. 118, 133 (1994) further citing People v.
Malmstedt, 275 Phil. 447 (1991) and Umil, et al. v. Ramos, et al., 265 Phil.
325, 336-337 (1990).
53. Id.
54. TSN, dated February 12, 2013, pp. 5-6.
62. Sec. 5. Arrest without warrant; when lawful . — A peace officer or a private
person may, without a warrant, arrest a person:
67. People v. Chi Chan Liu, 751 Phil. 146, 169 (2015).
72. Id.
75. Id.
76. Id., citing People v. Mangat , 369 Phil. 347, 359 (1999).
77. Id.
78. See id . at 261 and People v. Jugo , G.R. No. 231792, January 29, 2018, pp. 9-10.