Southwest Airlines Pilots Association v. Southwest Airlines Co., 3:21-cv-02065-M, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas (Dallas)
Southwest Airlines Pilots Association v. Southwest Airlines Co., 3:21-cv-02065-M, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas (Dallas)
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, Plaintiff Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (hereinafter
“SWAPA” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its President Casey Murray, and by and through its
attorneys, Gillespie Sanford LLP, hereby move the Court for a temporary restraining order and for
further preliminary injunctive relief against Defendant Southwest Airlines Co. (“Southwest
Airlines” or “Defendant”). The injunctive relief sought will restrain the Defendant from
interfering with the federal Railway Labor Act-protected rights of its pilot employees represented
by SWAPA.
Despite SWAPA filing its Original Complaint in this matter on August 30, 2021 and
complaining of Southwest Airlines’ violations of the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), Southwest
Airlines has repeatedly continued to take the position that its unilateral actions which violate the
Several times since August 30, 2021, Southwest Airlines has taken new unilateral actions
which violate the status quo between the parties in further violation of the Railway Labor Act.
Most recently, on October 4, 2021, Southwest Airlines unilaterally rolled out a new and non-
negotiated COVID vaccine mandate for all employees, including SWAPA pilots. The new vaccine
mandate unlawfully imposes new conditions of employment and the new policy threatens
termination of any pilot not fully vaccinated by December 8, 2021. Southwest Airlines’ additional
new and unilateral modification of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement is in clear violation
of the RLA. Because of Southwest Airlines’ continued unilateral actions, and its continued
violations of the RLA which harm SWAPA and its members, this motion is necessary and SWAPA
Counsel for SWAPA has conferred with counsel for Southwest Airlines in a good-faith
attempt to resolve this dispute by agreement. No agreement could be reached because Southwest
Airlines refuses to negotiate and denies its unilateral actions are interfering with the federal
It is essential that the Court issue temporary and preliminary injunctive relief to prevent
immediate and irreparable injury because, as explained more fully in the accompanying Brief:
1. Plaintiff’s members will suffer immediate, irreparable loss and damage to their
rights to collectively bargain through the labor organization of their choice guaranteed, inter alia,
by the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), 45 U.S.C. §151 et seq. and by Defendant’s continued violation
2. The RLA does not require proof of irreparable harm when a party is violating the
status quo, as irreparable harm is inferred. See, e.g., Bhd. of Ry. Trainmen v. Central of Georgia
Ry., 305 F.2d 605, 609 (5th Cir.1962); see also Consol. Rail Corp. v. Ry. Lab. Executives’ Ass’n,
491 U.S. 299, 303 (1989); Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co., 789 F.3d 681, 691 (6th Cir. 2015);
United Airlines v. Int’l. Ass’n of Machinists, 243 F.3d 349, 362 (7th Cir. 2001); Division No. 1,
Bhd. of Locomotive Engineers v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 844 F.2d 1218, 1220 (6th Cir. 1988).
4. While Plaintiff and its members would be irreparably harmed by Southwest Airlines
continuing to interfere with its and its members’ rights under the RLA, Southwest Airlines would
suffer no adverse consequences if required to comply with its obligations under the RLA; and
5. An injunction is in the public interest because the public has a strong interest in
vindicating the RLA’s public policy permitting employees to organize, choose their own
representatives and bargain collectively free from interference, influence, or coercion by carriers;
there is also a strong public interest in vindicating the RLA’s public policy that a employer not
violate the parties’ status quo during Section 6 negotiations; hence, the interests of the public are
the earliest convenience of the Court in order to stop Defendant’s unlawful actions to undermine
the Union and the pilots it represents in collective bargaining with Southwest Airlines.
Specifically, Southwest Airlines has overtly and unabashedly, repeatedly taken unilateral actions
which violate the parties’ status quo and which are contrary to the requirements under the RLA.
Defendant’s latest overt violation of the parties’ status quo threatens Pilots with termination and
This Motion is based upon this document, on the attached Brief in Support, the First
Amended Complaint, the Declarations, and evidence filed in support of this Motion, a Proposed
Order, and whatever argument and evidence may be presented at the hearing of this Motion.
Plaintiff SWAPA requests judgment against Defendant Southwest Airlines for the
A. That the Court grant immediate, preliminary injunctive relief enjoining Defendant
and its agents, employees, representatives, and successors and predecessors in interest from
unilaterally imposing new rates of pay, rules, and working conditions as they relate to the
Southwest Airline Pilots pending completion of the RLA’s “major” dispute resolution procedures;
B. That the Court grant immediate, preliminary injunctive relief enjoining Defendant
and its agents, employees, representatives, and successors and predecessors in interest from using
and enforcing the following policies as they relate to the Southwest Airline Pilots pending
C. That the Court order Defendant Southwest Airlines as it relates to the Pilots to
immediately revert to the status quo ante under the existing collective bargaining agreement
D. That the Court order Defendant Southwest Airlines to immediately stop using
and/or threatening to use an unbargained-for and unilaterally declared force majeure clause within
the parties’ CBA pending completion of the RLA’s “major” dispute resolution procedures.
E. That the Court order Defendant Southwest Airlines to “exert every reasonable
effort” to reach an agreement as to the following programs going forward pending completion of
F. That the Court issue a declaratory judgment that the Defendant’s conduct in taking
unilateral actions which impact the pay, rules, and working conditions of its Pilots has been in
G. That the Court order Defendant to conspicuously post copies of this Court’s order
at Defendants’ headquarters and at locations used by Pilots for a period of one-hundred eighty
(180) days.
H. That the Court award SWAPA its reasonable costs and attorney’s fees associated
I. That the Court grant SWAPA such other and further relief as the Court deems
J. That the Court set bond as required by the Norris-La Guardia Act at $1,000.
and
K. Helen Yu
[email protected]
Texas State Bar No. 24071565
Southwest Airlines Pilots Association
1450 Empire Central Drive,
Suite 737
Dallas, TX 75247
Phone: (214) 722-4256
Fax (214) 351-2504
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for SWAPA, Hal K. Gillespie, has conferred
with counsel for Southwest Airlines, Jonathan C. Fritts, on October 8, 2021 regarding the above
and foregoing motion and the relief sought by SWAPA and that this motion is opposed by
Southwest Airlines.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the forgoing document has been served
upon counsel of record for Southwest Airlines by and through the Court’s ECF system on October
6, 2021.