Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What To Say in Court
What To Say in Court
Your honor, I specifically asked in my pleading that this be a trial by jury, in a court of
record, under common law.
This certainly is NOT any of that.
I feel that I am not getting my due process. I would like to ask that the court produce a jury
of people today or reschedule.
The Supreme court has ruled that “Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be ‘assumed’, it
must be proved to exist.” - Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca2d 751.211 P2s 389;
Being the respondent failed in all of these areas, a Summery Judgment for Default is in order.
And thereby law requires that the inferior court abate at law; AND the release of both person
and property.
I can get that document written up for this court right away.
Prosecutor DOES show.
Opening Remarks:
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance
thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United
States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound
thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”
We are here because I have asked the respondent to show by what ‘CONSTITUTIONAL’
authority the inferior court acts, and why the violations or charges against me should not be
dismissed for lack of personam jurisdiction.
I would also like to remind the court of 2 case laws that apply here today.
The first one is Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, from the year 1985
• “All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not
human/creators in accordance with God’s laws. All codes, rules, and regulations are
unconstitutional and lacking due process….”Rodriques v. Ray Donavan (U.S.
Department of Labor) 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985).
Being the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law, and I am one of the people, and NOT a
government authority, I ask that the defendant use want applies to me.
I specifically asked in my pleading that the respondent prove according to the Constitution
Of The United States. Not some statute, code, or rule or interpretation of the constitution
that is already unconstitutional as brought out in Rodriques v. Ray Donavan
I will require that all of the respondents answers are sourced from the Constitution Of The
United States.
(If they try to explain their side using their statutes:) OBJECTION!! The defendant is
not using the U.S. Constitution as their source of answers. I specifically asked in my pleading
that the respondent prove according to the Constitution Of The United States. Not some
statute, code, or rule or interpretation of the constitution that is already unconstitutional as
brought out in Rodriques v. Ray Donavan
Social Security Act 1935 [Original Legislative Intent of the Congress not for CPS to
take kids]
The Supreme court has ruled that “Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be ‘assumed’, it
must be proved to exist.” - Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca2d 751.211 P2s 389;
Also,
“Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the
court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should
dismiss the action.” - Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026;
THEREFORE, I pray for an order that the inferior court abate at law, cease and desist from
all actions against petitioner and restore the petitioner to their original state for lack of
constitutional authority and personam jurisdiction. I ask for the release of both person and
property.