Ma As2
Ma As2
Department
Preparation Fabrication
Machine-hours 80,000 21,000
Direct labor-hours 35,000 65,000
Direct materials cost 190,000 400,000
Direct labor cost 280,000 530,000
Manufacturing overhead cost 416,000 720,000
Job 127 was started on April 1 and completed on May 12. The company’s cost records show the following information
concerning the job:
Department
Preparation Fabrication
Machine-hours 350 70
Direct labor-hours 80 130
Direct materials cost 940 1,200
Direct labor cost 710 980
Required:
1. Compute the predetermined overhead rate used during the year in the Preparation Department. Compute
the rate used in the Fabrication Department.
2. Compute the total overhead cost applied to Job 127.
3. What would be the total cost recorded for Job 127? If the job contained 25 units, what would be the unit
product cost?
4. At the end of the year, the records of WoodGrain Technology revealed the following actual cost and operating
data for all jobs worked on during the year:
Department
Preparation Fabrication
Machine-hours 73,000 24,000
Direct labor-hours 30,000 68,000
Direct materials cost 165,000 420,000
Manufacturing overhead cost 390,000 740,000
What was the amount of under-applied or over-applied overhead in each department at the end of the year?
Question 2
For the year ended December 31, 2011, the job cost sheets of Agler Company contained the following data.
Job Direct Direct Manufacturing Total
Explanation
Number Materials Labor Overhead Costs
7640 Balance 1/1 Current year’s costs 25,000 24,000 28,800 77,800
30,000 36,000 43,200 109,200
7641 Balance 1/1 Current year’s costs 11,000 18,000 21,600 50,600
43,000 48,000 57,600 148,600
7642 Current year’s costs 48,000 55,000 66,000 169,000
Other data:
Raw materials inventory totaled $15,000 on January 1. During the year, $140,000 of raw materials were
purchased on account.
Finished goods on January 1 consisted of Job No. 7638 for $87,000 and Job No. 7639 for $92,000.
Job No. 7640 and Job No. 7641 were completed during the year.
Job Nos. 7638, 7639, and 7641 were sold on account for $530,000.
Manufacturing overhead incurred on account totaled $120,000.
Other manufacturing overhead consisted of indirect materials $14,000, indirect labor $20,000, and
depreciation on factory machinery $8,000.
Instructions
1. Prove the agreement of Work in Process Inventory with job cost sheets pertaining to unfinished work. Hint:
Use a single T account for Work in Process Inventory. Calculate each of the following, then post each to the T
account:
a. Beginning balance,
b. Direct materials,
c. Direct labor,
d. Manufacturing overhead, and
e. Completed jobs.
2. Prepare the adjusting entry for manufacturing overhead, assuming the balance is allocated entirely to Cost of
Goods Sold.
3. Determine the gross profit to be reported for 2011.
Question 3
“Don’t tell me we’ve lost another bid!” exclaimed Janice Hudson, president of Prime Products Inc. “I’m afraid so,”
replied Doug Martin, the operations vice-president. “One of our competitors underbid us by about $10,000 on the
Hastings job.” “I just can’t figure it out,” said Hudson. “It seems we’re either too high to get the job or too low to make
any money on half the jobs we bid. What’s happened?”
Prime Products manufactures specialized goods to customers’ specifications and operates a job-order costing system.
Manufacturing overhead cost is applied to jobs on the basis of direct labor cost. The following estimates were made
at the beginning of the year:
Department
Cutting Machining Assembly Total Plant
Direct labor 300,000 200,000 400,000 900,000
Manufacturing overhead 540,000 800,000 100,000 1,440,000
Jobs require varying amounts of work in the three departments. The Hastings job, for example, would have required
manufacturing costs in the three departments as follows:
Department
Cutting Machining Assembly Total Plant
Direct material 12,000 900 5,600 18,500
Direct labor 6,500 1,700 13,000 21,200
Manufacturing overhead ? ? ? ?
The company uses a plantwide overhead rate to apply manufacturing overhead cost to jobs.
Required:
1. Assuming the use of a plantwide overhead rate:
a. Compute the rate for the current year.
b. Determine the amount of manufacturing overhead cost that would have been applied to the Hastings
job.
2. Suppose that instead of using a plantwide overhead rate, the company had used a separate predetermined
overhead rate in each department. Under these conditions:
a. Compute the rate for each department for the current year.
b. Determine the amount of manufacturing overhead cost that would have been applied to the Hastings
job.
3. Explain the difference between the manufacturing overhead that would have been applied to the Hastings job
using the plantwide rate in 1(b) above and using the departmental rates in 2(b).
4. Assume that it is customary in the industry to bid jobs at 150% of total manufacturing cost (direct materials,
direct labor, and applied overhead). What was the company’s bid price on the Hastings job? What would the
bid price have been if departmental overhead rates had been used to apply overhead cost?
5. At the end of the year, the company assembled the following actual cost data relating to all jobs worked on
during the year:
Department
Cutting Machining Assembly Total Plant
Direct material 760,000 90,000 410,000 1,260,000
Direct labor 320,000 210,000 340,000 870,000
Manufacturing overhead 560,000 830,000 92,000 1,482,000
Compute the under-applied or over-applied overhead for the year
The sales department is unhappy because fluctuating unit production costs significantly affect selling prices. Sales
personnel complain that this has caused excessive customer complaints and the loss of considerable orders for TC-1.
The production department maintains that each job order must be fully costed on the basis of the costs incurred during
the period in which the goods are produced. Production personnel maintain that the only real solution to the problem
is for the sales department to increase sales in the slack periods.
Regina Newell, president of the company, asks you as the company accountant to collect quarterly data for the past
year on TC-1. From the cost accounting system, you accumulate the following production quantity and cost data.
Quarter
Costs 1 2 3 4
Direct materials 100,000 220,000 80,000 200,000
Direct labor 60,000 132,000 48,000 120,000
Manufacturing overhead 105,000 123,000 97,000 125,000
Total 265,000 475,000 225,000 445,000
Production in batches 5 11 4 10
Unit cost (per batch) 53,000 43,182 56,250 44,500
Instructions:
Answer the following questions.
a. What manufacturing cost element is responsible for the fluctuating unit costs? Why?
b. What is your recommended solution to the problem of fluctuating unit cost?
c. Restate the quarterly data on the basis of your recommended solution.
Question 6
Alderberry Recording Inc. is a small audio recording studio. The company handles work for advertising agencies—
primarily for radio ads—and has a few singers and bands as clients. Alderberry Recording handles all aspects of
recording, from editing to making a digital master from which CDs can be copied. The competition in the audio
recording industry has always been tough, but it has been getting even tougher over the last several years. The studio
has been losing customers to newer studios that are equipped with more up-to-date equipment and are able to offer
very attractive prices and excellent service. Summary data concerning the last two years of operations follow:
2013 2014
Estimated hours of studio service 1,000 750
Estimated studio overhead cost 90,000 90,000
Actual hours of studio service provided 900 600
Actual studio overhead cost incurred 90,000 90,000
Hours of studio service at capacity 1,800 1,800
The company applies studio overhead to recording jobs on the basis of the hours of studio service provided. For
example, 30 hours of studio time were required to record, edit, and master the Fire music CD for a local band. All of
the studio overhead is fixed, and the actual overhead cost incurred was exactly as estimated at the beginning of the
year in both 2013 and 2014.
Required:
1. Alderberry Recording computes its predetermined overhead rate at the beginning of each year based on the
estimated studio overhead and the estimated hours of studio service for the year. How much overhead would
have been applied to the Fire job if it had been done in 2013? In 2014? By how much would overhead have
been under-applied or over-applied in 2013? In 2014?
2. The president of Alderberry Recording has heard that some companies in the industry have changed to a
system of computing the predetermined overhead rate at the beginning of each year based on the estimated
studio overhead for the year and the hours of studio service that could be provided at capacity. He would like
to know what effect this method would have on job costs. How much overhead would have been applied using
this method to the Fire job if it had been done in 2013? In 2014? By how much would overhead have been
under-applied or over-applied in 2013 using this method? In 2014?
3. How would you interpret the under-applied or over-applied overhead that results from using studio-hours at
capacity to compute the predetermined overhead rate?
4. What fundamental business problem is Alderberry Recording facing? Which method of computing the
predetermined overhead rate is likely to be more helpful in facing this problem? Explain.