[Exclusive] The Shocking Plan of the 6900

Series of Protocols.

Protocols For Economic Collapse In

America
Originally Published on 02/23/08 By Al Martin 

“They were ready in 2008 for the 6900 series of Protocols from
the U.S. Treasury Department if they could not revive the system.

 The Protocols will be used this time for the second and nal
phase of the nancial collapse” Jeffrey L. Klump

This is how the U.S. Treasury would handle an economic

collapse. It’s called the 6900 series of protocols. It would start
with declaring a force majeure, which would immediately be
interpreted by the marketplaces as a de facto repudiation of
debt.

Then the SEC and the various regulatory exchanges would

anticipate the market’s decline, hour by hour — when Japan’s
markets opened the next day, what would happen when the
European markets, and all the inter-linkages of the global
markets.

On the second day, US Special Forces would be dropped in by

parachute in the cities where the twelve Federal Reserve district
banks are located.

The origin of these protocols comes from the Department of

Defense. This is contingency planning for a variety of post-
collapse scenarios. Those scenarios would include, obviously,
military collapse, World War III, in other words, and its aftermath.
What we’re talking about now is the aftermath — how the
aftermath would be handled.

fi

fi
One does not necessarily know how the events would transpire
that would cause the collapse, whether it’s military collapse or
economic collapse. In World War III, it would become obvious —
when the mushroom cloud started to appear over cities.

Economic collapse scenarios were always premised on the basis

of a US declaration of force majeure on debt service. It’s a very
extensive scenario. The scenarios are all together, i.e., military,
economic, political, and social complete destabilization leading
to collapse. Then they break down individual scenarios.

In the economic collapse scenario, the starting point would be

the United States Treasury declaring a force majeure on debt
service, which is a de facto repudiation, and that’s how it would
be interpreted by the world’s capital marketplaces.

Click Here to Start Earning $4500 Per Week Or More!

Then the scenario goes on from there. The US Treasury would
obviously declare a force majeure sometime after the European

 markets had settled down. In other words, they had gone out on
the day, which means 11:38 a.m. EDT, our time. They’d wait until
the European markets closed, and the US markets had been
open for a couple of hours. That’s when they’d determine how to
begin the process of unwinding or controlling the collapse to
the best extent possible, mainly because they know that the
greatest hedge pressure would be people seeking to use other
markets to hedge their long exposure in the United States and
that the US would be the biggest seller in all the rest of the
world’s markets. Therefore you would want to declare the force
majeure when the rest of the world’s markets closed.

The declaration of force majeure would be precipitated by the

declaration that the United States is no longer able to service
its debt. That’s pretty simple.

Who makes that decision? The Treasury Department. The

President does not make that decision. The Secretary of the
Treasury does. He has that authority.

You might ask — wouldn’t he have his arm twisted not to do

that?

 The answer is that if there isn’t any money left to service the
debt, it doesn’t make any difference what the current regime
might want to do.

The day of reckoning is now coming. What has happened in the

interim, from 2001 to the present, is dynamic, global economic
deterioration. The economic deterioration visited upon the
United States is not a localized event. It is, in fact, global. We
have a planet now that is sinking into a sea of red ink.

The United States is consuming 80% of the planet’s savings rate

to nance its debt. The central banks of Germany, Japan, and
Saudi Arabia are no longer the powerhouses they used to be.
Their reserves have now been substantially depleted. They can,
therefore, no longer hide the fact that they own a certain
number, likely in the trillions of dollars, of U.S. Treasury debt that
isn’t being serviced, because they can’t hide it through
bookkeeping tricks anymore because their reserves are so
depleted.

Therefore somebody has covertly been putting demands on the

Bush-Cheney regime for payment. Why do you think 2900 metric
tons of gold is depleted from U.S. inventory since March of `01?
fi

Why do you think that $2 billion in currency seized from Iraq

last May is now unaccounted for?

Someone is putting demands on the Bush-Cheney regime.

Someone is saying to the Bushonian Cabal that — “You’ve got to
start servicing this debt because we, foreign central banks, are in
nations – European and Asian – whose reserves are now nearly
exhausted.”

Who could be putting that kind of pressure on them?

It has to be coming from whoever is organizing this thing at the

very top, which I would tend to think has got to be most likely a
cabal of people that would involve Henry Kissinger, James Baker,

George Schultz, possibly William Simon. It would be somebody

at the very top that is familiar with how to do this. It would have
to be someone familiar with nances.

So would this be one faction of a cabal blackmailing or forcing

another faction? No, it’s not really blackmailing. It’s being done
out of desperation. The German, Japanese, and Saudi central
banks are saying to the Bushonian cabal, “You’ve got to start
servicing this debt because we don’t have the reserves to cover
you anymore. We can no longer make it appear that the debt is
being serviced because our own reserves are so substantively
depleted. Therefore you must begin to cover this debt. If you
don’t, then, at some point, we will have to publicly admit–in
order to save our own necks — that we were the end buyers of a
lot of stealth debt, a lot of debt that your Treasury issued
illegally and has never serviced. That would then expose the
whole cabal.

The Kissinger-Baker faction are at the top of how this was done
on the economic side of the equation. They were not the original
insiders so much, but the managers of the conspiracy from the
U.S. Treasury to wit, the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve role-
play the part.

fi

 Take Henry Kissinger. It may not have occurred to anyone why in

the last 3 years Henry Kissinger has been back in Washington
more than he has in the last 30 years. And why are all these
quiet meetings in Washington with alleged senior Bush-Cheney
regime of cials, as foreign news services endlessly put it? It’s
because Kissinger is the point man. He’s the one that is telling
them the disposition of other foreign central banks.

Kissinger would probably also be involved in the transfer or

hypothecation of any assets from the cabal. In other words,
they’re being stolen from the American people by the Bush-
Cheney regime and the Bushonian Cabal, and they are being
used to hypothecate, transfer, service, or otherwise carry this
debt held by certain foreign central banks.

The process of unraveling has already begun because of ever-

spiraling Bushonian budget de cits. The Bush-Cheney regime,
even in its overt policies (now they’re overt political, economic,
social, and military policies) is generating a $600-billion-plus
de cit per year, which is consuming 80% of the planet’s net
savings rate.

It doesn’t have the slack. In other words, it can’t re nance

stealth debt by issuing more stealth debt anymore. Nor can they
bleed money out of the system like they could in the 1980s by
fi
fi

fi

fi

hiding it when the overt policies of the Bush-Cheney regime are

already producing a budget de cit of 6% of Gross Domestic
Product. There is no other mechanism that they could use
anymore to hide expansion of debt that could be used to service
said stealth debt, and they are, frankly, running out of assets that
they can steal from the American people.

So the proverbial day of reckoning is coming. The Bush-Cheney

regime (and I give them credit for this) are telling the American
people what’s coming, knowing the American people are too
stupid to understand. They are telling the American people
about the re-institution of the Gold Con scation Act and the
sudden scrapping of the Treasury’s emergency post-collapse
gold note scheme to maintain domestic liquidity.
fi
fi

The Human Body Heals Itself When in a Deep Sleep. Click Here to Get the Best
Night Sleep Ever!
David Walker, US Comptroller General and chief of the GAO have
said that the United States could no longer service its debt
beyond 2009. They’re not hiding it from anybody anymore. They
are telling you what’s happening.

Now, what does that mean? The key is in what Walker is saying
when he says the debt can no longer be serviced. I’ve been

 asked this on the radio shows. People have noticed what Walker
said because he’s out in the news more often than he used to be.
It’s unusual for the Comptroller General of the United States,
which is a rather arcane position, to be out in the news so much.

It simply means that when he says the United States “will no

longer be able to sustain budget de cits,” he means that by
2009,, the United States will be consuming 100% of the planet’s
savings rate to nance budget de cits.

Therefore, if the planet can no longer generate any more

liquidity to lend to the United States, one of three things have to
happen:

A) There has to be a sudden and dramatic reduction in federal

spending. There are only two places that can come from. There
would have to be an immediate $100-billion cut in defense
spending, which would end any hopes the Republicans had of
getting into of ce for years to come because it would destroy
any con dence the NFWCs (Naïve Flag Waving Crowd) had in
them. Or you would have to scrap the multi-trillion-dollar tax
cuts for the rich, something that’s equally unpalatable.

The other option, B, as Paul O’Neill mentioned, is a dramatic

increase in the rate of federal income taxation from the current
fi

fi
fi
fi
fi

 nominal rate of 28% to 65%, which is what the Treasury

Department estimated would be required post-2009 to provide
the U.S. Treasury with suf cient revenues to continue to service
debt.

Click Here to Donate to Our Blogging Community. We Need Your Support!

The third option, or C, becomes the declaration of a force
majeure on credit service of U.S. Treasury debt by the United
States Treasury, which is tantamount and would be accurately
construed as de facto debt repudiation by the United States of
America.

There are other signs to look for. some currency expatriation

control. See if that doesn’t come in the way Nixon tried it in
May-June of 1971.

In the second term, there will be some sort of currency

expatriation control in the United States, but there will also be
loopholes that will allow the large money to escape. The

fi

 restrictions will apply to the 10- and 20-thousand-dollar people.

It ain’t going to apply to the 10- and 20-million-dollar people. It
would be self-defeating to do that.

When that day comes, in other words, when the U.S. Treasury
declares a force majeure on debt, it wouldn’t be broadcast on
mainstream media. There’s no sense because the American
people don’t even understand what it means. But the
announcement would actually be put on the Federal Reserve
wire system, which would, of course, immediately be picked up
by all media outlets anyway.

The U.S. Treasury would declare a force majeure on debt after

the Asian and European markets closed, probably at 12:30 p.m.
EDT. The reason why that hour was always selected is that Asian
and European markets close. It’s also the lunch hour for the
markets. It’s when you’re going to have the fewest people on the
oor of the exchanges. That would be the ideal time to make
such an announcement.

A few seconds after that announcement was made, all United

States markets, both equities debt and commodities–i.e., stock,
bonds, commodities, that have trading collars or permissible
daily limits –would all be limit-offered with pools. “Limit-
fl

 offered” means that there are more sellers at the limit – i.e.,
limit down– than there are buyers.

So-called ‘pools’ would immediately begin to form, probably a

thousand contracts every few minutes. ‘Limit-offered with
pools’–this is trader language. Pools to sell–2,000 lots, 3,000
lots. That means the number of sellers over and above the
available buyers at the limit-offered price. That would begin to
build.

By 1:00, the news would begin to sink in – because it would take

a while before panic selling would arise from the public. This
news is being released at lunch hour.

A lot of the American people initially would not even

understand the temerity of the news. You would see professional
selling rst, and as that professional selling intensi ed over the
afternoon, the SEC, the CFTC, NASDAQ, and various market
regulatory authorities would begin to institute certain
emergency market protocols. This would be the installation of
the so-called ‘declaration of fast market conditions,’ for instance;
the declaration of ‘no more stop orders,’ the declaration of ‘ ll at
any price,’ etc.–in a desperate bid to maintain liquidity.

fi

fi

fi
 That rst day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and related
indices on a percentage basis would lose about 20% of their
value by the close of business that day. The real impact would
come overnight when the American people found out what this
was all about and when it was explained to them.

At 7:30 a.m. EDT, the Tokyo markets would open, and no price
would be af xed for probably three or four hours into the
session due to the avalanche of selling. Once prices were
established, the government of Japan would close all of its
nancial markets. Europe would not even open. All European
governments would close all capital exchanges the next day.

The United States would, in order to accommodate global

electronic trading, attempt to open the market on the second
day, which they would do, regardless of price, just to maintain
some liquidity. At the end of Day Two, the Dow Jones and related
indices would have lost two-thirds of their value, and prices
would be set accordingly.

On Day Three, the New York Stock Exchange, the SEC, and other
related agencies would recommend to the United States
Treasury and the Federal Reserve that all markets be closed.
That would be on the morning of Day Three. At eleven a.m., the
Federal Reserve would then order all domestic banks closed. All
fi
fi
fi

 of the twelve Federal Reserve district banks would (30 minutes

later) have special U.S. forces parachuted in and around them to
secure whatever gold bullion reserves they had left.

Day Three, 9:00 p.m., the President of the United States would
declare a state of martial law. All nancial transactions would
come to an end. The Treasury would act to formally de-monetize
the U.S. dollar and declare it worthless.

This would be totally unprecedented. In the past, collapses have

been temporary and have been brought back up. But what we’re
talking about now is the end.

These protocols that I’m referring to aren’t even all that secret.
They were publicly available all through the Clinton era. These
are Treasury protocols that were instituted mostly in the late
1970s when the Treasury and Federal Reserve began to feel that
it was important to have an emergency-collapse protocol in
place.

What precipitated the timing of this was the in ationary spiral

of the late 1970s. The U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve
were both concerned that this in ationary spiral, which was
occurring not only domestically but globally, might lead to a
global, uncontrollable hyper-in ation that the Federal Reserve

fl
fl
fi

fl

or major central banks could not stop by traditional means, i.e.,

by raising interest rates and contracting the money supply.

There was also the recognition, of course, that global central

reserve bank bullion inventories had been so depleted over the
previous 30 years that any re-institution of a species currency,
even on a temporary basis, and even within a regional or
individual nation-state basis, was no longer possible.

This is an analogy. In a military scenario, it’s like the President of

the United States pushing the nal red button — the commit
button. The Treasury Secretary of the United States has a similar
mechanism. It’s called the yellow button, the commit button. The
Secretary of Defense has the same system. This is what happens.
Computer program starts to institute these protocols. Imagine
the complexity of trying the manage all this. I think it’s going to
happen all simultaneously. There are hundreds of different
agencies involved, both domestically and internationally. In
order to maintain liquidity for as long as possible, it has to be
extremely well-coordinated, and there must be existing collapse
protocols that can be used.

The reason I was familiar with them was that I used to see the
U.S. Treasury 6900 Series Collapse Protocol, 6903, 6904–there’ll
be A, B, and so on–which keyed into the Department of Defense

fi

to be incorporated within the Department of Defense’s own

World War III scenario and various types of military/ political/
social instability/ war/ pestilence, chaos, etc. scenarios.

All federal agencies had individual collapse protocols that

ultimately got coordinated through the Department of Defense.
Obviously, the Department of Defense would be the ultimate
coordinator because it would need to have special forces
available, on a stand-by basis, ready, that could quickly
parachute into areas all over the country, into the cities
particularly, to secure federal properties and assets.

And that’s literally how it would begin. By the end of the third
day, it would be all over — a state of martial law. We’re not
talking about war, now; this is just economic collapse.

There’s no military implication here, no political, no social

implication or policy directive thereunto. This is strictly

economic collapse. By the end of Day Three, effectively, all banks

in the world will be shut down, all paper currencies will become
valueless. Martial law would be declared. There would be no
continuing transactions, at least for a period of time, of
commodities. All providers of fuels and foods would be shut
down automatically.

They have this in great detail too. U.S. Department of Defense

Special 117th Assault Unit would parachute in to seize control
of the cattle yards in Oklahoma City. This is how well it’s
planned. In other words, the economic collapse would
automatically involve expansive military action and control.

By the end of the third day, when you no longer have a domestic
medium of exchange, you have to have secured food and fuel
stocks. You’ve got to have troops that have secured distribution
points where there are food and fuel stocks, warehouses, tanks,
etc. Otherwise, people are just going to go get them, and the
people have to know that if they try to go break into that store
and steal that loaf of bread, they’re going to be shot.

Protocols for environmental disasters are called ‘scaling-circle

scenarios.’ ‘Scaling circles’ is a Department of Defense
euphemism. It’s also used in FEMA, OEM, and other emergency
management services. In environmental catastrophes, which are

 going to become national or global, it’s got to start someplace.

It’s going to start in one very small, speci c area. Therefore what
happens is that the immediate force containment is the greatest
in the rst circle, to try to contain the spread of the disaster and
keep it within that circle.

The environmental problem, to whatever extent it’s possible

before it spreads, will be neutralized or mitigated, in order to
keep that catastrophe within that circle, or, if it is likely that it is
to escape that circle, to attack whatever it is in such a fashion as
to mitigate its strength and its ability to contaminate or
otherwise affect other areas.

In the case of earthquakes, for instance, affecting the west coast,

beginning at Mt. Rainier and moving southward — that’s a
different type of scenario. That does not include as much
Department of Defense involvement. It includes separate
protocols, wherein mostly FEMA and OEM act as the senior
coordinating agencies between municipal, county, and state
disaster and containment, which is called Disaster and
Containment Units. Federal troops would only be brought in for
the purposes of maintaining control.

In a military or economic collapse situation, National Guard

units would provide any spare help they could in combating
fi

fi
whatever the problem is. Federal troops would be used in order
to have the speci c authority simply to shoot anyone. There are
plans for all sorts of scenarios. The economic-disaster scenario is
the one I always found the most intriguing because it is the one
that is least understood by the American people.

Military control would be necessary when lines begin to form at

the banks, people trying to access their money. But that wasn’t
even anticipated as a big problem. Lines would form at the
banks, but it was not even envisioned until sometime on Day
Three because the American people wouldn’t get it. It would be
announced that the stock markets are down 2000 or 3000
points, and since we’ve always been taught they’ll come back,
the people would still be buying stocks.

You could count on everybody remaining in ignorance all the

way down because the American people have never been taught
Economics 101.

The American people wouldn’t realize the full extent of it until

the markets were closed on the third day, or until the time when
they went down to cash a check and the bank was closed with
soldiers out in front. Then they would go down and see the gas
station’s closed. They see the local supermarket has been

fi

shuttered, and there are federal troops in front of it. Then they
might begin to catch on.

And remember — it’s not just federal troops. In emergency-

collapse protocols, even before the declaration of a formal state
of emergency or a state of martial law, the local military
authorities within any given county or jurisdiction have the
ability to essentially militarize anyone, that is, any civilian. This
would be more than just deputizing civilians. It’s federal. In
other words, they would have the ability to militarize and give
military authority to a civilian force.

This would include not only police and the sheriffs and state
police, but all local law enforcement that exists below the state
level would be immediately militarized.

They wouldn’t take just anybody – as they did in Iraq. It would

be like the military when they “call for volunteers.” Then they’d
have everybody and their brother-in-law volunteering, waving
around the American ag, and so on.

“And besides, if you do this, then you’re going to get to eat.”

In other words, this is how it would unfold over three days, but,
in fact, very few Americans would know what to do about it or
how to take any precautions. They wouldn’t have a clue because
fl

 they don’t understand enough about economics to know what is

happening.

So that’s what it is — Economic Armageddon.

In conclusion, since there is very little the people of the United

States can do to protect themselves. We’re not going to make
any suggestions of how to protect yourselves because there’s
very little you can do.

We could tell you to go out and buy gold coins and bury them in
the coffee can in the back yard and go to your nearest survivalist
store, but, frankly, that’s useless. In the last analysis, it’s a lot of
hype. There is very little the average US citizen could do.

The only thing that can prevent this, as the Comptroller alluded
to when he was asked by Barbara Walters, “How do we prevent
reaching the problem by 2009?” He said simply, “A change of
regimes.”

So how do you prevent it? Don’t vote for Bush and Cheney — and
hope that Bush does not use his emergency powers to cancel or
postpone the election by edict, powers which you, the ag-
waving citizens, have given him.

fl

 All ag-waving citizens, be warned. If you want to vote for Bush-

Cheney again, make sure you got plenty of Spam on hand.

Here’s an interesting and humorous aside. A couple of days ago,

Hormel Foods, which makes Spam, announced that in the last
six months there have been record sales of Spam in the United
States – the survivalists’ food of choice. After all, they pride
themselves on the fact, as the spokesman for Hormel said, “It is
the only food product you can buy with an expiration that’s 50
years.”
fl

The New Online Classi ed Ads Designed to Make You Money, Save You Money, and
Improve Your Life. Click Here to Learn More!
When everything goes to hell, when all that man has created
has turned to dust again, the nal legacy is going to be Spam. It
will be the last surviving item — when the anthropologists of 20
thousand years from now are digging sites and they see these
enormous mountains of unopened cans of Spam They’ll have
monuments to the past out of Spam.
fi
fi

 On April 13, 2004, Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary John

Boine talked about potential currency restrictions. He used the
word that’s going to fuel the ames of the survivalist and
gloom-and-doom collapse people.

It’s very, very telling that the U.S. Treasury may institute a
restriction on the amount of U.S. dollars that can be converted
into gold.

Furthermore, he intimated (and I suspected that this was

coming, although this wouldn’t actually become law until Bush-
Cheney was in of ce for second term one way or another) that
the Bush-Cheney regime determines that the Gold Con scation
Act gives to Treasury the power for so-called forced disclosure of
gold holdings.

I’m not quite sure of the language of the Gold Con scation Act
from 1933. It just says, “compelled,” as in citizens are lawfully
compelled to redeem gold for the script. I don’t think there was
any such provision, which he was inferring that there is. That
was FDR’s “Raw Deal” of 1934 when people were coerced into
giving up their gold. But nowhere in this act does it speci cally
authorize the Treasury to mandate citizens to report their gold
holdings. So if this gets any press at all, particularly within the
circles of gold bugs and so on, watch out.

fi
fl

fi
fi
fi
Furthermore, in Washington Journal they were talking about
how FEMA has recommended to the Of ce of Homeland Security
to have increased restrictions regarding citizen hoarding of
long-term food and fuel supplies. That’s pretty sinister too.

What they’re talking about is the purchase of long-term so-

called stores of survival food. FEMA was talking about some sort
of restriction preventing people from accumulating food stores;
putting it simply, that’s what it means. The second point was to
increase restrictions that already exist.

FEMA was recommending even tighter restrictions on citizens

building their own private property underground storage tanks
for the purposes of long-term storage of fuel. The real intent of
this is is threefold: a) to restrict citizens’ ability to hoard food; b)
restrict citizens’ ability to hoard long-term storage of fuel; c) the
forced identi cation of citizens to reveal food and fuel stocks
they may be hoarding.

And that, in my opinion, is the real essence. The Bush-Cheney

regime was scared of having the FEMA angle put into the
equation because they knew what it means and how people
would interpret it.
fi

fi

 They have tried to use environmental legislation to restrict

people’s ability to build fuel storage facilities on their own
property — to get around what the true intent of that was.

But the bigger picture is that if you start to limit citizens’ ability
to hoard fuel and food and shake them up by potential forced
identi cation of gold holdings or forced redemption…

In other words, what you don’t want is citizens who have the
ability to store a lot of food and fuel and to own gold because
they would be able to resist state control in the future.

You’ve got to have every citizen on a rationing card to control

the civilian population. You can’t have citizens out there
hoarding food and fuel because then people can say to the
government, “I ain’t taking a rationing card, baby, with my
national ID card. I don’t have to. You can’t control me through
food and fuel and ever-worthless paper currency.”

I used to make fun of these people. But now, things have come
full circle on this debate. The Bush-Cheney regime is making it
increasingly clear through their small changes in policy. Not a
lot of people monitor these decisions, but I do. And the pattern
is becoming increasingly clear.
fi

In fact, I would believe that those of the survivalist mentality

(the food, fuel, the gold coins in the coffee can in the back yard)
people who think that way will be ultimately vindicated.

People should quit making fun of them because they would be

vindicated – even though they were all burned out, twenty-
dollar to death, buying books and tapes, and discredited by
mainstream media. It may sound like a hollow victory, but it
won’t be a hollow victory for them – them that’s got the Spam… “