Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 1 Topic 3.1 Rule 130 Object Evidence
Module 1 Topic 3.1 Rule 130 Object Evidence
Prepared by:
Atty. Esperanza LM. Aggalao-Ticangan
IV. RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY
A. OBJECT EVIDENCE
Those addressed to the senses of the court. Object evidence, also known as real
evidence, demonstrative evidence, autoptic preference and physical evidence, is that
evidence which is addressed to the senses of the court 1. It is not limited to the view of an
object. It extends to the visual, auditory, tactile, gustatory, and olfactory. It is considered as
evidence of the highest order.
General rule: When object is relevant to the fact in issue, it may be exhibited to, examined
or viewed by the court.
Exceptions: Court may refuse introduction of object evidence and rely on testimonial alone
if:
1) Its exhibition is contrary to public policy, morals or decency; or
2) It would result in delays, inconvenience, unnecessary expenses, out of proportion to
the evidentiary value of such object2; or
3) The evidence would be confusing or misleading3 ; or
4) The testimonial or documentary evidence already presented clearly portrays the
object in question as to render a view thereof unnecessary.4
Note:
If a view of the object is necessary in the interest of justice, such repulsive or
indecent object may still be exhibited, but the court may exclude the public from such
1
Sec. 1 Rule 130, 2019 Rules of Evidence.
2
People v. Tavera (ocular inspection)
3
People v. Saavedra
4
Regalado, Vol. II, p. 716, 2008 ed.
Notes in Evidence
Prepared by:
Atty. Esperanza LM. Aggalao-Ticangan
view. Such view may not be refused if the indecent or immoral objects constitute the
very basis of the criminal or civil action (e.g. obscene pictures or exhibits).
1. Unique objects – those that have readily identifiable marks (e.g. a calibre 40 gun with serial
number XXX888)
2. Objects made unique – those that are readily identifiable (e.g. a bolo knife used to hack a
victim which could be identified by a witness in court)
3. Non-unique objects – those which have no identifying marks and cannot be marked (e.g.
footprints left at a crime scene)
DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE
Real Evidence Demonstrative Evidence
Tangible object that played some actual role Tangible evidence that merely illustrates a
in the matter that gave rise to the litigation matter of importance in the litigation.
Intends to prove that the object is used in the Intends to show that the demonstrative object
underlying event fairly represents or illustrates what it is
alleged to be illustrated
First, the seizure and marking of the confiscated drugs recovered from the accused;
Second, the turnover of the illegal drug seized by the apprehending officer to the
investigating officer;
Third, the turnover by the investigating officer of the illegal drug to the forensic chemist
for laboratory examination; and
5
Lopez v. People, G.R. No. 172953, Apr. 30, 2008
Notes in Evidence
Prepared by:
Atty. Esperanza LM. Aggalao-Ticangan
Fourth, the turnover and submission of the marked illegal drug by the forensic chemist to
the court.6
DNA evidence
It constitutes the totality of the DNA profiles, results and other genetic information
directly generated from DNA testing of biological samples.12
DNA testing
It means verified and credible scientific methods which include the extraction of DNA
from biological samples, the generation of DNA profiles and the comparison of the information
obtained from the DNA testing of biological samples for the purpose of determining, with
reasonable certainty, whether or not the DNA obtained from two or more distinct biological
samples originates from the same person (direct identification) or if the biological samples
originate from related persons (Kinship Analysis). 13
Before a suit or proceeding is commenced, DNA testing can be conducted absent a prior
court order at the behest of any party, including law enforcement agencies. 14However, in
pending actions, the appropriate court may, at any time issue a DNA testing order either motu
proprio or upon application of any person who has a legal interest in the matter in litigation after
due hearing and notice to the parties and upon showing of the following: E-Ns/s-St-Sp-E
6
People vs. Kamad, 610 SCRA 295
7
Riano, Evidence: A Restatement for the Bar, p. 149, 2009 ed.
8
Ibid.
9
Section 1, A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC Rule on DNA Evidence October 15, 20027.
10
Section 3, A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC Rule on DNA Evidence October 15, 20027.
11
People v. Umanito, G.R. No. 172607, Oct. 26, 2007
12
Section 3, A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC Rule on DNA Evidence October 15, 20027.
13
Ibid.
14
Section 4, A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC Rule on DNA Evidence October 15, 20027.
Notes in Evidence
Prepared by:
Atty. Esperanza LM. Aggalao-Ticangan
1. A biological sample exists that is relevant to the case;
2. The biological sample (i) was not previously subjected to the type of DNA testing now
requested; or (ii) was previously subjected to DNA testing, but the results may require
confirmation for good reasons; 3. The DNA testing uses a scientifically valid technique;
4. The DNA testing has the scientific potential to produce new information that is relevant to the
proper resolution of the case; and
5. The existence of other factors, if any, which the court may consider as potentially affecting
the accuracy or integrity of the DNA testing.15
1. The samples are similar, and could have originated from the same source (Rule of
Inclusion). In such a case, the analyst proceeds to determine the statistical significance of the
similarity.
2. The samples are different hence it must have originated from different sources (Rule of
Exclusion). This conclusion is absolute and requires no further analysis;
3. The test is inconclusive. This might occur due to degradation, contamination, failure of some
aspect of protocol, or some other reasons. Analysis might be repeated to obtain a more
conclusive result.16
15
Ibid.
16
People v. Vallejo, G.R. No. 144656, May 9, 2002.
17
Section 6, A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC Rule on DNA Evidence October 15, 20027.
18
Literally means "to bring the body", and in context it refers to an order issued by a court to a person detaining another, to produce
the body of the prisoner at a certain time and place, and to show sufficient cause for holding in custody the individual.
Notes in Evidence
Prepared by:
Atty. Esperanza LM. Aggalao-Ticangan
reverse or modify the judgment of conviction and order the release of the convict, unless
continued detention is justified for a lawful cause.19
19
Section 10, A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC Rule on DNA Evidence October 15, 20027.