Design & Analysis of Mullion & Steel BracketsREV - 01

..
��, SFD '( d,i.o.U1J ..,, .>g.,:w.t.11 JI g.uo.11

SourlJ fund f<>t Oeverooment �o Fll�O
OL---.1.
'-.II .;;.U 9 1M...JI,
•-.a£A.. ,.,_,.,.,,� •
••L,..;..U �t,..,.a.JI ..... ,.;.
s::O!t•t-vc,-�o
Date: 02 November 2021

Engineer's Comments KAMC-FTCO-CLC-SC-0058-00 (Design Calculation of the Curtain Walls Clinic building)
FTCO's informations provided are not complete as follows:
Adopted member is from the only approved Aluminum system ( Reynars ) of the whole project.
1) Contractor's proposal to adopt 150x50 member instead of 160x52 as mentioned in the IFC drawings is rejected.
There by contractor has to resubmit the design of curtain walls as per the sizes mentioned in the IFC drawings.
2) Provided information (SBC as per Contrcator submission) of Wind loading is inconsistent with the analysis (BS-
6399 as per Project specs.) submitted. Shall be Uniform code of practice for the Analysis and references. Revised &
Resubmitted
3) In addition to the design submission, contractor shall submit the following Structural Stability/calculations of
the system for the following items in relation with the following as a single system.
a) Mid Transom 3) a. Revised & Resubmitted
b) Head & Sill Transom 3) b. covered by above point
c) Steel sections brackets 3) c. Revised and re submitted.
3) d. As mentioned previously no structrual calculation to be done for
d) Gaskets
Gaskets, submitted previously the manifacturer recommendations
e) Glass Panels both fixed and openable panels. Covered by below point
f) Glass thickness analysis and design. Revised and Resubmitted
4) Design model shall consider the glass and ACP panels in the same profile system which might have differential
settlement of the members. Considered all panels with GLASS as it will be more critical in both deflection and
shear , while considering 85 % lighter ACP panels is not the most critical case.
5) FTCO shall submit Plan and elevation showing clearly all the members along with the design calculations.
6) FTCO shall submit the soft copy of the model along with the software to check the Structural Analysis.
7) FTCO shall coordinate with Arch/lFC drawings for levels and dimensions.
8) FTCO shall coordinate with RCC drawings for all anchorages and specific method statement for the same.
9) FTCO to incorporate the comments mentioned above and resubmit the calculations.
��
·1/
Mohammed lmran Khan Mohammed Zabiullah
Sr. Structural Engineer Structural Engineer
DATE : 10-11-2021
REV : 01
CONTENTS
1.0 Design loadings.
2.0 Reference drawings.
3.0 Wind Load analysis.
4.0 Analysis for Curtain wall Aluminum Profile (STAAD

PRO V8i).
5.0 Check on Aluminum Mullion / Transom.
6.0 Glass thickness Analysis & Design.
7.0 Design of Steel Bracket for Aluminum Mullion (IDEA

STATICA).
8.0 APPENDIX: Technical References.

1.0 OVERVIEW
This report is the preliminary structural calculation for the proposed curtain wall system (REYNAERS SYSTEM)
for KAMC, BAHRAIN. Calculation includes main aluminum frames mullion, transom and steel bracket for
CURATIAN WALLS # 08& 09 ( LOCATED @ ELEV 02 ( LEFT ELEVE ) GRID MARKS ( G -A`).
1.1 DESIGN STANDARDS AND REFERENCES

Aluminum Design Manual 2005 “Specifications and Guidelines for Aluminum Structures”
AAMA TIR-A11-04 “Maximum Allowable Deflection of Framing Systems for Building Cladding
Components” ASTM E-1330-02
BRITISH STANDARD: BS 6399-2 1997, for WIND LOAD DESIGN
AISC DESIGN MANUALS
STAAD PRO SOFTWARE
1.2 MATERIALS
1.2.1 ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS Mullion and Transom
MULLION
1.3 DEFLECTION CRITERIA TRANSOM

As per Code and Standard MULLION / TRANSOM
(Perpendicular to Wall Plane / Wind Load)
L/175 of the clear span up to L = 4.1 m or 19mm whichever is lesser
TRANSOM (Parallel to Wall Plane / Dead Load)
L/175 of the clear span For Aluminum
framing members of span for L > 4.1m
L/240 + 6.35mm
1.4 STRESS: GENERAL

For loads in combinations with wind or seismic loads, with the with the
following exceptions:
- Glass
- Fasteners in drilled holes in concrete and masonry
1.5 DESIGN LOADINGS
- DEAD LOAD
* Standard unit weights:
: Density of Steel = 78 kN/m3
: Density of Aluminum = 27 kN/m3
: Density of Glass = 25 kN/m3
• Self-Weight of structure are automatically generated in STAAD PRO
- LIVE LOAD
: Consider Live Load of 0.24 kN/m2 on Curtain Wall
- WIND LOAD
: Reference BS 6399-2 1997 - Wind Design
2
Wind Load on Curtain Wall = 1.60 kN/m
(Full Pressure applied on Curtain Wall)
1.5.5 LOAD COMBINATION (Auto Generated in Staad) as per ACI
Combination Load Cases

Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Primary L/C Name Factor
4 Generated ACI Table1 1 1 DL 1.40

2 LL 1.60
2 LL 1.00
3 WL 0.80
2 LL 1.00
3 WL 1.60
3 WL 1.60
1.5.6 Stresses of Steel

A36 Steel - fy = 36 ksi
2.0 Reference Drawings
Fig. 01 LEFT ELVATION (G TO A)
Fig. 02 PRESPECTIVE (CW 08 & 09)

KEY PLAN:
S1
N
S2 E4 KAMC-HB1-ARC-30-001
KAMC-HB1-ARC-30-001 KAMC-HB1-ARC-20-002 S7
KAMC-HB1-ARC-30-004 MAKKAH
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
WS1 WS2 WS13 WS11

KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-001 KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-001 KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-006 KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-006
STR6
KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-005
STR1 L2 12/13 12/13 L2 STR1

KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-001 KAMC-HB1-ARC-52-001KAMC-HB1-ARC-62-011 KAMC-HB1-ARC-62-011 KAMC-HB1-ARC-52-001 KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-001
A 12/13 A
KAMC-HB1-ARC-62-011
A' A'
B B
C C
15&16 12/13
KAMC-HB1-ARC-62-018 KAMC-HB1-ARC-62-011
D D
E 12&13 E
KAMC-HB1-ARC-62-011
12/13
KAMC-HB1-ARC-62-011
F F
STR6
KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-005
12/13 STR1
L1 L5
G G
12/13
KAMC-HB1-ARC-62-011
WS3
KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-002
H H
E1 E2
KAMC-HB1-ARC-20-001
STR2 KAMC-HB1-ARC-20-001
KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-002
J J
S3
KAMC-HB1-ARC-30-002
L6
STR2 KAMC-HB1-ARC-52-001
KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-002
K K
WS10
S5 KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-005
KAMC-HB1-ARC-30-003 TOI-19
KAMC-HB1-ARC-41-008
L L5 L
WS4 KAMC-HB1-ARC-52-001
KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-002
STR6
KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-005
WS8
KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-004
M TOI-25 M
TOI-22 KAMC-HB1-ARC-41-010
KAMC-HB1-ARC-41-009
S6 TOI-20
TOI-23 KAMC-HB1-ARC-41-008
KAMC-HB1-ARC-30-003
KAMC-HB1-ARC-41-009
N' N'
TOI-24 TOI-21
N L3 KAMC-HB1-ARC-41-009
TOI-22 N
KAMC-HB1-ARC-52-001
P P
TOI-21
KAMC-HB1-ARC-41-008
WS7
KAMC-HB
1-ARC-32 UP
-004 WS12
KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-006
WS9
KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-005
Q' Q FUNDING AGENCY:
STR4 S4
R' KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-003
KAMC-HB1-ARC-30-003
STR5
For Development
KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-004
R
S' L4 STR4 TOI-21

KAMC-HB1-ARC-52-001 KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-003 KAMC-HB1-ARC-41-008 STR6
KAMC-HB1-ARC-50-005
L4
University, Bahrain
KAMC-HB1-ARC-52-001
S
WS6 DESIGN OF KING ABDULLAH

KAMC-HB
1-ARC-32
-003 BIN ABDUL AZIZ MEDICAL
T
WS5
KAMC-HB1-ARC-32-003
U
MAIN CONSULTANT:
13
1 12
2 11
3 10 HEALTHCARE ARCHITECT AND MASTER PLANN
4 9
5 8
6 7 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
E3
KAMC-HB1-ARC-20-002
0m 5m 10m 15m 20m 25m
VISUAL SCALE 1:250 @ A0

Ir; c1lfc1tech
alumlnlum facade technique
ro�lU c..,.-il..!,.oJI ol..&.:;llg ci..!,.i.iu o,.i.10.o
3.) WIND LOAD DATA:

DESIGN PRESSURE APPLIED
: p = 1.60 (Kn/m2) COMPUTED as per BS 6399-2 1997
qs = Dynamic Pressure, Kn/M2

qs = 0.613 V e 2
Ve effective wind speed

Ve = V, xS b v. = Site wind speed (m/s)
Sb = Terrain & Building factor
V, = v b XS a xSd xSs xS P
vb Basic wind speed vb = 45m/s

Far the case where the topography
Sa altitude factor Sa = 1 + O.OOl�s is not significant
sd direction factor sd = 0.78
s, seasonal factor s, = 1.0
SP probability factor SP = 1.0
Lis Elevation to MSL Ve = V, xS b

Lis = 4.365m Ve = 35.25 xS b
Sa = 1 + 0.001(4.365)
Determine value of Sb by Table 4 - factor Sb by standard
Sa = 1.004365
method
Vs = 45 x 1.0044x0.78xlx1 = 31.6 m, closest distance to sea = 2 km

vs = 35.25 m/s
Table 4 - Factor Sb for standard method

Site in country Site in town. extending� 2 kilt upwind fro111 the site
Effective heig·ht Closest distance to sea Effective height Closest distance t.o sea
H. km H, km
Ill 0 2 10 ;,_ 100 Ill 2 10 ;,_ 100
S2 1.48 1.40 1.35 1.26 �2 1.18 1.15 1.07
5 1.65 1.6.2 1.57 1.45 5 1.50 1.45 1.36
10 1.78 1.78 1.73 1.62 10 1.73 1.69 1.58
15 1.85 1.85 1.82 1.71 15 1.85 1.82 1.71
20 1.90 1.90 1.89 1.77 20 1.90 1.89 1.77
30 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.85 30 1.96 1.96 1.85
50 2.04 2.04 2.04 1.95 50 2.04 2.04 1.95
100 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.07 100 2.12 2.12 2.07
NOTEl Interpolation may be used v...-ithin each table_
NOTE2 The fi gures in this table have been derived from reference [5]_
NOTE3 Values assume a diagonal dimen.sion a= 5 Ill..
NOTE4 If He > 100 m use the directional method of section 3.
Ir; c1lfc1tech
y = yl + (x - xl) (y2 - yl) yl = 1.96

(x2 - xl) y2 = 2.04
xl = 30
y = 1.9664 x2 = so
X = 31.6
Sb = 1.9664 Ve = 35.25 xS b
Ve = 69.3156
Substitute value of Ve
qs = 0.613 V e 2
qs = 2.95
External Pe = qsCpeCa
Internal Pi = qsCpiCa
Net Surface Pressure p = Pe - Pi
Table 5 -External pressure coefficients Cpc for vertical walls

Vertical wall face Span rntio of building Vertical wo LI fo E,-..-posu re ca}JC
DIHsl OIH;,. 4 Isolated li"unn�lling
Windwaxd (front) face +0.8 +0.6 Side face Zone A -1.3 -1.6
Le ward (1· at') face -0.3 -OJ Zon B -0.8 -0.9
ZoneC -0.4 -0.9
N01''E Interpolation may b used in the rane:e 1 < DIH < 4. Seo 2.4.1.4 for. interpolation h tw en isolated ancl fu.nncl1ing.
External Pressure Coefficient: cpe

D 34.5 D 34.5
0.791
H 43.6 H 43.6
(Y2 - Y 1 l yl 0.8
y = Y 1 + (x - x 1 ) *
(X2 - X 1 ) y2 0.6
(0.6-0.8) xl 1
Winward C P• = 0.8+(0.791-1)*
(4-1) x2 4
Winward C P• = 0.81 X 0.791
(-0.3-(-0.1)) yl -0.3
Leeward C pe = -0.3+(0.791-1)*
(4-1) y2 -0.1
Leeward C pe = -0.29 xl 1
x2 4
X 0.791
Ir; c1lfc1tech
Size Effect Factor: c.

Gable face: a = (34.52+43.62) 1'2 Gable face: a = 55.6
= 55.6
Side face: a = (34.52+43.62) 1'2 Side face: a = 55.6
= 55.6
H 43.6 m
Site in Country
Closest distance to sea = 2 km
Use Curve A from Fig. 4
For External:
Gable face: c. = 0.85
Side face: Ca = 0.85
For Internal:
lO*(internal volume)
113
For enclosed bldg. a
10*(44627) 1
1 3
a
a 354.58
Internal: c. = 0.74
Windward
P. q,xcp.xc. P; q,xCp ;xC.
Pe 2.95x0.81x0.85 P; 2.95x0.2x0.74
P. 2.031075 P; 0.4366
p P. - P; p = 1.594475 Max. pressure
Leeward
Pe q,xCpeXCa P; q,xCp ;XCa
Pe 2.95x-0.29x0.85 P; 2.95x0.2x0.74
P. -0.727175 P; 0.4366
p Pe - P; p = -1.163775
Ir: c1lfc1tE�ch
aluminium facade technique
rog ! ; ollU o,.-J4o.JI �l.£!;llg ci...µiu 6,,i.aa.o
Effec · e Heights in Towns
11- -.- Hr
w He
Ill Ill
.C3.6 31.6
Te in nd au- ing F C or
I !Tl
'*'"
31.6
,_,
auex
..
I I1.96a �---- --1
----
C::....---11) -llffl
.,
T- 4.. r-a:a. &II flDr
-� ..
-
--- -�
c--..--.,
·-
·-
Hetm
n n
,,_
IL 1 111 D.1 :,, ffl
1.48 1M IAI t.lS 1.l5 I tAI t 11 1.tS 1JJ7
, ....
1AI 1.Aa tAII 1.35 1.l5 tAI 1tl 1.tS 1.D7
us u,s U2 157 1.45 UIS 1.55 1.50 IAS 1.l5
. . -- ·� ._,.. ·�
1.n 1.7W 1.n 1.73 1.liZ 1.,.. 1.111 1.73 1.li!I
1.95 t..85 1.85 I.al 171 I 1.as I.IS I.IS 1.a:z 171
, .,,
- 1.9&
2.DI
..,.., ,.,..
15
2JM 2.DI
..,..,
1...95
,�
1.95
2JM
'1.11
1..15
1..95
t..S
2JM
1..91i
2.DI
t.95
2.1M
,,.,.
1..95
2.1M
1.15
1..95
----; 212 2.12 212 2.12 2m � 2.12 2.12 2.U 2.12 2JJ7
Ir: c1lfc1tE�ch
Size Effect Factor
UII
1195 +-+-+-+-�ci-t-+-t---11-+-+-'
ll.90 +--+-+--+--1-""'I�,---+--+--+--+--+--'
' ,:....�
a
I
...
I C 11.791 -....,...__
0.85
(UICI !
0.75
0.70 ..... �
0.65 bi...
l
0.60
Q.55 �
I '
o.s:,
I J..16 10 .lL6 1111 316 11111
lte(m)
100
n
A
--� A
� 1n
A
-�-
...__ • ·-· Sim eftRcl. ..... C. far SDlldad ..emd
Claial.._"'�llm
1nn
e
tte(m}
100
0
A
-�
�
2
A
D--
10
A
1111
e
511 A A A e so A A A e
30 A A A e 30 A A A e
211 A A 8 e ,D A A 8 8
15 A A 8 e 15 A A 8 8
..
10 A A 8 8 0 A A C C
.. ..
5 A 8 8 e A C C C
2 e 2
u "
A 8
D
B
D ., u "
A C C C
Size Effect Factor

,....,.� ..... .-ct...-ca
354
OJJS
1JIO
11.95
....... �, T-- - •-
·
0-678 �
0.6JO �
11..115
0..111)
..... :"°",, ......
""" ..... 11,,,._
Q.75
�... ......_
.....
s
0.7'0
Q.65
Q.60 I�
Q.55
D..50 I '
1 J..16 10 31.6 100 316 11111
-·� --- -- __
-•- _ _
-· ·- Sia e&ct ,_..,.,.C:. torsta..a.d method
.,
....
C - •IO-- .,
tw(m> ICIO lte(m)
"
0 2 10 0 111>
" " " " " .,
2 10
., n'.ID
50 A A A 8 so A A A 8
e
.. ......
30 A A A 8 311 A A A
20 A A e 8 20 A A 8 8
..
15 A A e
.,
8
..z
15 A
"
A 8 e
.. ..
,u D
"
I\ I\
,.
lU I\ <,;
...
" ., ., "
a a D
z <,;
D A e e 8 D A C C C
Ir: c1lfc1tE�ch
Direction Factor
.. .. ..
-.� ......,•-
1
a.:L
C
a.
...
a.
a.
... 4S"
a.
I Q5"
I
Z25"1
IV
ZIP
31S"
G.911
a.
Cl-
10 ,---,---...-----,---,r--,
u.
• m1"""---------�-�------1
a. �o•+----------::a�---�.,.------1
a.
CL
l •t��;;;��:=========��j
0
I
Cl. 11711+-
,.,
-a.
a. oeo+---------------
Soa+-----------------1
0�+---------------------
0
21 G.c74
a,
a
0
a.
- ·-
-
a.
a..
Ir; c1lfc1tech
Analysis for Curtain Wall Aluminum

Profile by Staad Pro software
Ir; c1lfc1tech
Software licensed to Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Part
alumlnlum facade technique Ref
ro�lU c..,.-il..!,.oJI ol..&.:;llg ci..!,.i.iu o,.i.10.o By Date13-Oct-21 Chd
Client File ELEVATION 02 CW-09.stdDate/Time 14-Oct-2021 10:03
Job Information
Engineer Checked Approved
Name:
Date: 13-Oct-21
Structure Type SPACE FRAME
Number of Nodes 304 Highest Node 354

Number of Elements 527 Highest Beam 1119
Number of Plates 225 Highest Plate 610
Number of Basic Load Cases 3

Number of Combination Load Cases 7
Included in this printout are data for:

All The Whole Structure
Included in this printout are results for load cases:

Type L/C Name
Primary 1 DL
Primary 2 LL
Primary 3 WL
Combination 4 Generated ACI Table1 1
Combination 10 Generated ACI Table1 7 3D Rendered View
Print Time/Date: 14/10/2021 10:43 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33

Ir; c1lfc1tech
2
Part
Materials
Mat Name E  Density 
(kN/mm2) (kg/m3) (/°C)
1 STEEL 205.000 0.300 7.83E+3 12E -6
2 GLASS 71.700 0.230 2.55E+3 0.000
3 STAINLESSSTEEL 197.930 0.300 7.83E+3 18E -6
4 ALUMINUM 68.948 0.330 2.71E+3 23E -6
5 CONCRETE 21.718 0.170 2.4E+3 10E -6
Section Properties
Prop Section Area Iyy Izz J Material
(cm2) (cm4) (cm4) (cm4)
2 MULL 12.123 46.039 403.000 137.249 ALUMINUM
Plate Thickness
Prop Node A Node B Node C Node D Material
(cm) (cm) (cm) (cm)
1 12.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 GLASS
Primary Load Cases

Number Name Type
1 DL Dead
2 LL Live
3 WL Wind
Combination Load Cases

Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Primary L/C Name Factor

2 LL 1.60
2 LL 1.00
3 WL 0.80
2 LL 1.00
3 WL 1.60
3 WL 1.60

Ir; c1lfc1tech
3
Part
Y
X
Z Load 1
Whole Structure
Supports
Node X Y Z rX rY rZ
(kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg)
1 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -

Ir; c1lfc1tech
4
Part
Supports Cont...
Node X Y Z rX rY rZ

Ir; c1lfc1tech
5
Part
Supports Cont...
Node X Y Z rX rY rZ
Beam Displacement Detail Summary

Displacements shown in italic indicate the presence of an offset
Beam L/C d X Y Z Resultant
(m) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
Max X 137 0.220
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 0.118 0.000 0.000 0.118
Min X 608 0.693
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 -0.117 -0.008 0.000 0.117
Max Y 1086 0.378
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 -0.000 0.135 0.000 0.135
Min Y 1086 1.512
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 0.000 -0.222 0.000 0.222
Max Z 600 0.791
5:Generated ACI Table1 2 0.002 -0.056 1.546 1.547
Min Z 600 0.791
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 0.001 -0.042 -10.310 10.310
Max Rst 600 0.791
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 0.001 -0.042 -10.310 10.310
Beam Force Detail Summary

Sign convention as diagrams:- positive above line, negative below line except Fx where positive is compression. Distance d is given from
beam end A.
Axial Shear Torsion Bending
Beam L/C d Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz
(m) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
Max Fx 598 0.896
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 6.103 -0.000 0.012 -0.000 0.000 -0.000
Min Fx 1039 0.000
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 -32.491 0.000 -0.535 0.000 -0.000 0.000
Max Fy 1039 0.000
Min Fy 1048 0.896
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 2.710 -13.668 0.004 0.026 -0.000 5.618
Max Fz 4 0.000
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 -13.398 0.000 0.683 0.000 0.005 0.000
Min Fz 1039 0.000
Max Mx 590 0.000
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 -0.892 7.278 0.053 0.046 -0.022 3.312
Min Mx 608 0.000
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 1.417 -3.635 -0.217 -0.056 0.094 -2.326
Max My 137 0.000
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 -0.012 0.000 -0.384 0.000 0.203 0.000
Min My 608 0.989
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 2.248 -0.000 -0.337 -0.000 -0.187 -0.000
Max Mz 1049 0.000
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 -0.475 12.703 -0.002 -0.004 0.005 5.926
Min Mz 598 0.000
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 3.897 -6.155 0.008 -0.000 -0.007 -6.542

Job No Sheet No Rev
6
Part
Job Title Ref
By Date13-Oct-21 Chd
Beam End Force Summary

The signs of the forces at end B of each beam have been reversed. For example: this means that the Min Fx entry gives the largest
tension value for an beam.
Axial Shear Torsion Bending
Beam Node L/C Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
Max Fx 598 81 4:Generated ACI Table1 1
6.103 -0.000 0.012 -0.000 0.000 -0.000
Min Fx 1039 349 4:Generated ACI Table1 1
-32.491 0.000 -0.535 0.000 -0.000 0.000
Max Fy 1039 349 -20.887
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 47.403 -0.344 0.026 -0.000 5.618
Min Fy 1048 349 2.710
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 -13.668 0.004 0.026 -0.000 5.618
Max Fz 4 2 -13.398
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 0.000 0.683 0.000 0.005 0.000
Min Fz 1039 349 -32.491
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 0.000 -0.535 0.000 -0.000 0.000
Max Mx 590 300 -0.892
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 7.278 0.053 0.046 -0.022 3.312
Min Mx 608 309 1.417
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 -3.635 -0.217 -0.056 0.094 -2.326
Max My 137 84 -0.012
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 0.000 -0.384 0.000 0.203 0.000
Min My 608 85 2.248
4:Generated ACI Table1 1 -0.000 -0.337 -0.000 -0.187 -0.000
Max Mz 1049 291 -0.475
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 12.703 -0.002 -0.004 0.005 5.926
Min Mz 598 304 3.897
9:Generated ACI Table1 6 -6.155 0.008 -0.000 -0.007 -6.542
Y
X
Z Load 1 : Torsion : Axial Force : Shear Z : Shear Y : Bending Z : Bending Y
Whole Structure My 0.1kNm:1m Mz 5e-005kNm:1m Fz 0.3kN:1m Fy 0.02kN:1m Fx 9kN:1m Mx 10kNm:1m 1 DL

Ir; c1lfc1tech
7
Part
X = 8.361 kN
X = 3.912YXkN= 6.286
-0.048kN
kN
X = -2.354
X = kN
Y -0.046Z
14.469YkN= -2.955
kN kN
2.461 kN
X = -0.820
Y kN
X = 14.987
-0.043 kN MX
kN = FREEkN
X = -0.472 Z
Y = -1.978
2.212 Z kN
kN= 14.893
X = kN
Y 17.103
-0.037
Z kN kN
kN
Y = -2.591
Z = kN
1.599
MX = FREE
19.247MY
MXkN= FREE
X = -0.293
X = kN
Y 18.374
-0.031
Z kN kN
kN
X = -0.160 Y = -2.659
Z = kN
1.353
MX = FREE
18.355
MX =kN MZ = FREE
X = kN
Y 19.206
-0.023
Z kNMXkN
kN
Y = -2.679
MY FREEMY
X = -0.046
X = kN
Y 19.713
-0.015 kN
kN Z = kN
1.206 = FREE
18.491
MY
MX =kN
FREE
MZ
MY = FREEMZ = FREE
X = 0.058 Z
Y = -2.688
1.111
MX kN
Z =kN
= FREE
18.538
MY =kN
X =kN
Y 19.948
-0.007
Z kNMXkN
kN
Y = -2.688
Z = kN
1.055 = FREE
18.556
MX FREE
MZ
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = 0.156
X =kN
Y 19.934
0.002
Y =kN
Z kNMXkN
-2.685
1.030 kN MX =kN
MY FREE
MZ
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = 0.248
Y kN Z = = FREE
18.548
MY
MX =kN
FREE
X = 19.669
0.010
Y =kN
Z kN kN
-2.683
1.032
MX
Z = kN
= FREE
18.536
MZ = FREE
MY MZ = FREE
X = 0.332
X =kN
Y 19.129
0.018
Y =kN
Z kN kN
-2.680 MX =kN
MY FREE
MZ
MY = FREE X = -0.017 kN
X = 0.400
X =kN
Y 18.268
0.025 kNMXkN Z = kN
1.061
MX = FREE
18.528
MX =kN
MY FREE MZ = FREE
X = 0.376 Y =kN
Z -2.678
Z = kN
1.116 = FREE
18.523 kN
MZ
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -0.037YkN= 12.968 kN
X =kN
Y 17.043
0.032
Z =kNkN
-2.668
Y 1.199 kN MY
MX = FREE
MZ
MY = FREE
X = -0.739
X = kN
Y 15.502
0.036 kNkN Z =kN
MX = FREE
18.523
MY
MX =kN
FREE
MZ
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -0.035
Y = kN
11.726Z kN
= 24.963 kN
X = -8.934 kN Z
Y = -2.648
1.308
MX
Z = kN
kN
= FREE
18.518
MY kN MZ = FREE X = -0.026
Y = kN
8.608 kN
Y = 14.399
X 0.040Y =kN
Z kN
-2.561
1.439 kN MX = FREE
MZ
MY = FREE Z = 35.152MXkN = FREE
Y
X = 4.205 Z =kN
MX = FREE
18.519
MX =kN
MY FREE MZ = FREE X = -0.018
Y = kN
6.967
Z =kN
Y =kN
0.040
Z -2.532
1.555 kN
Z =kN
MX = FREE
18.439
MX =kN
MZ
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -0.012
Y = kN
5.880
30.457
MX =kNFREEMY = FREE
Z
Y = -3.704
1.355 kN MY FREE
MZ
MY = FREE Z =kN
29.672
MX =kN
FREE
Z =kN
MX = FREE
18.513
MY kN
MX = FREE MZ = FREE X = -0.009 kN
Y = 5.170
Z =kN
29.444 MY = FREEMZ = FREE
MX
Z== FREE
14.483
MZ
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -0.006
Y = kN MX =kNFREE
MY = FREE
MX =kN
MY FREE
MZ
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -0.004
4.745
Z =kN
29.504
MX =kNFREE MZ = FREE
MY
MX = FREE
MZ
MY = FREE Y = kN
4.547
Z =kN
29.602 kN MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -0.002
Y = kN
4.545 MX = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -0.000 Z =kN
29.675
Y = kN
4.737
Z =kN
29.715
MX =kNFREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
MZ = FREE X = 0.004
Y =kN
5.149
Z =kN
29.733 MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = 0.011
Y =kN
5.832 kN MX =kNFREE
MY = FREE
Z = 29.741
MX =kNFREE MZ = FREE X = 0.008 kN
X = 0.023
Y =kN
6.845 MY = FREE
X = 0.043 Z =kN
29.745
X = 0.348YkN = 3.923 kN
Y =kN
8.163
Z =kN
29.796 MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = 0.047
Y =kN
9.314 MX =kNFREE
MY = FREE X = 0.172
Y =kN
23.596Z kN
= 8.449 kN
Z =kN
29.851
MX =kN
FREE MZ = FREE
X = 0.045 kN
Y = 7.495
Z =kN
30.241 MY = FREE
MZ = FREE Y = 14.948
Z = kN MX
61.072 kN = FREE
MX =kNFREE
MY = FREE X = -0.017
Y = kN
12.405 kNMX =kN
Z = 20.005
MX =kNFREE MZ = FREE X = -0.035 Z = 34.918 FREEMY = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE Y = kN
11.213 kN
Z = 32.272
Y MX = FREE
MY = FREE X = -0.026
Y = kN
10.504 kN MX =kNFREE
MY = FREE MZ = FREE
X MZ = FREE Z = 32.648 kN
MX = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -0.003
Y = kN
10.083 kNMX =kN
Z = 33.360 MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
Z X = 0.024
Y =kN FREE Load
MZ = FREE 9.896
Z =kN
33.899
MX =kNFREE MZ = 9
MY = FREE FREE
X = 0.046
Y =kN
9.926
Z =kN
34.219 kN MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = 0.056 kN
Y = 10.179 kNMX =kN MX = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = 0.047 Z = 34.374 FREE
Y =kN
10.672 kNMX =kN
Z = 34.421 FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = 0.009
Y =kN
11.442 kN MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -10.233 kN
X = -0.061 Z = 34.406
MX =kNFREE
Y = kN
12.538
Z = kN
34.378 kN MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -2.851YkN= 12.471 kN
X = -0.161
Y = kN
13.944 kNMX =kN MX = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = -0.437 Z = 34.464 FREE X = 3.070
Y =kN
13.416Z kN
= 11.258 kN
Y = kN
15.010 kN
Z = 34.833
MX =kN
FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE X = 0.959 kN
Y = 10.018 kNMX =kN MY = FREE
MZ = FREE Y = 15.292
Z = kN
18.241MXkN = FREE
Z = 36.116 FREE
MY = FREE X = 0.545
Y =kN
17.516 kN
Z = 23.265 MZ = FREE Z = 14.765
MX =kNFREEMY = FREE
MX =kNFREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = 0.350
Y =kN
18.650 kN
Z = 14.191 kN
MX = FREE X = 0.196 kN
Y = 19.326 kNMX =kN MX = FREE
MY = FREEMZ = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE Z = 14.034 FREE
MY = FREE X = 0.056
Y =kN
19.717 kNMX =kN
Z = 14.113 MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
MZ = FREE X = -0.077 FREE
MZ = FREE Y = kN
19.890
Z = kNMX =kN
14.234 FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = -0.204
Y = kN
19.873 kNMX =kN MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = -0.321 Z = 14.324 FREE
Y = kN
19.665 kN
Z = 14.368 MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = -0.417
Y = kN
19.248 kN MX =kNFREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = -0.471 Z = 14.370
MX =kNFREE
Y = kN
18.576 kN
Z = 14.338
MX =kNFREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = -0.430
Y = kN
17.582 kNMX =kN
Z = 14.283 MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
X = 0.533
Y =kN
16.248 kNMX =kN FREE
MY = FREE
Z = 14.253 FREE MZ = FREE
X = 9.341
Y =kN
15.230 kNMX =kN
Z = 14.349 MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
Y = 5.330 FREE
MY = FREE
Z =kN
15.281 kN
MX = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
Z = 9.443
MXkN= FREE MZ = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
MX = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
MY = FREE
MZ = FREE
Whole Structure
Reaction Summary
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment
Node L/C FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
Max FX 1 4:Generated ACI Table1 1
14.530 8.291 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min FX 85 4:Generated ACI Table1 1
-15.918 19.400 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max FY 349 0.541
Min FY 1 2:LL 0.000 0.000 -0.885 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max FZ 349 0.348
Min FZ 349 0.464
5:Generated ACI Table1 2 31.462 -9.161 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max MX 1 1:DL 10.379 5.922 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min MX 1 1:DL 10.379 5.922 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max MY 1 1:DL 10.379 5.922 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min MY 1 1:DL 10.379 5.922 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max MZ 1 1:DL 10.379 5.922 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min MZ 1 1:DL 10.379 5.922 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

4.1 ANALYSIS OF ALUMINUM MULLION
a. PROPERTIES OF ALUMINUM MULLION

2
Am = 1,212.30 mm
4
Ixm = 4,030,000.00 mm
4
Iym = 460,390.00 mm
Sxm min. = 43,456.00 mm
3
3
Sym = 18,415.00 mm
rx = 25.00 mm
ry = 92.74 mm
JTM = 1,372,494.07 mm
4
Dead Load Analysis:

μA = 2710 kg/m2 − unit weight of Aluminum
2
μG = 2600 kg/m − unit weight of Glass
2
μS = 7850 kg/m − unit weight of Steel
From attached STAAD report (LC # 09 )
We will use Maximum Fy ( Axial force in Mullions)

Fy max = 18.625 KN
A. Check Mullion for Tensile Stress due to Dead Load:

actual ft = Fy/Area
where:
Fy = 18625 N
Area = 1212.30 mm2
Ie. Actual ft = 15.36 Mpa
Check on Allowable Tensile Stress:

FT = 15 ksi
= 103.43 Mpa > Actual
refer to AAMA Design Manual ‐ Part VII, Table 2‐24:
Therefore OK!  (1)

STAAD analysis results
Maximum Moment at Support:
Ms Typ = 3.899 kN.m
= 3,899,000.00 N.mm
B. Check Mullion for Maximum Moment at Support:
Actual Stress due to Maximum Bending Moment at Support:
actual fbx sHC /

= Ms TYP Sx min
= 3899000.0/43,456.00
= 89.722 Mpa < 15 (1.33) ksi 1/3 allowable Stress increase is based on ADM and ASCE Manual
< 137.90 Mpa

C. Check Mullion for Maximum Moment bet. Transoms:
Maximum Moment Between Lateral Restraint:
M.lat Typ = 2061.0 kN.mm
= 2061000.0 N.mm
Check Allowable Lateral Torsional Buckling Stress:
Lb = 1225 mm ‐ maximum transom to transom distance

Sxmin = 43,456.00 mm
Iym = 460,390.00 mm
JTM = 1,372,494.07 mm
Slenderness Parameters
S = 2LbSx/(IyJ)1/2 = 133.9 ‐ slenderness ratio
= − slenderness limits
S1
130
S2 = 2400
Sa = (S)1/2
= = 11.57
Fbx = 16.7 ‐0.140(Sa)

= 15.0802 X (1.33) 1/3 allowable Stress increase is based on ADM and ASCE Manual
= 20.06 ksi
= 138.31 Mpa
Actual Stress due to Maximum Bending Moment
actual fbx = M. / Sx min =2061000/43456
= 47.42 Mpa < 138.31 Mpa
D. Check for Deflection: (Load combination # 9)
Actual Deflection between supports:
d ACT = 5.356 mm from STAAD PRO V8i Output − Maximum deflection between support along critical distance
Maximum Allowable Deflection: d ALLOW

Criteria = L / 240 + 6.35mm of the clear span
L = 5135 mm
d ALLOW = (L/240) + 6.35
d ALLOW = (5135/240) + 6.35
d ALLOW = 27.74 mm
d > d ACT  Therefore OK!  (4)
From (1, 2, 3 & 4) we conclude that the following profile from REYNAERS system with
as a Mullion is structurally satisfies the following criteria
1. Maximum Allowable tensile stress.
2. Maximum Allowable Flexural stress.
3. Maximum Allowable Lateral torsional buckling stress.
4. Maximum Allowable deflection

4.2 Structural Check for Continuous Span CW Reference Transom:
This analysis is for the transom for max. span = 2240 mm loaded with insulated 6mm (outside) +
6mm (inside) glass with height = 1225 mm. The design wind pressure is 1.6 Kpa
a. PROPERTIES OF ALUMINUM TRANSOM
AT 2
= 1,028.60 mm
IxT 4
= 454,710.00 mm
IyT 4
= 2,974,600.00 mm
SxT 3
= 18,196.00 mm
SyT 3
= 36,553.00 mm
rx = 81.12 mm
ry = 25.00 mm
JT 4
= 1,335,306.77 mm
A. Due to Windload:
a1. Check maximum bending stress: (see page Mid Transom ‐ 3)
fby = 42.86 Mpa ‐ Actual Bending Stress due to Wind Load
Allowable Lateral Buckling Stress: refer to AAMA Table 2‐24:
Lb = 2190 mm
Sy = 36,553.00 mm3
Ix = 454,710.00 mm4
JT = 1,335,306.77 mm4
1/2
S = LbSy/0.5(IxJ) = 205.47 ‐ slenderness ratio
S1 = 130 ‐ slenderness limits
S2 = 2400
Sa = (S)1/2
= 14.33
Allowable Stress (ksi)
S < S1 15
S1 < S < S2 16.7‐0.140(Sa)
S > S2 23600/(S)
Fby = 16.7 ‐0.140(Sa)
= 14.6938 x 1.33 1/3 allowable Stress increase is based on ADM and ASCE
= 19.54 ksi Manual
= 134.73 Mpa
Fballow > fbmax therefore OK!

F.S. = 3.14
a2. Check maximum deflection:
L = length 2190 mm
a = width panel a 1225 mm
b = width panel b 1225 mm
design wind pressure 1.6 kPa
E = modulus of elasticity 69600 Mpa
Wind Loadings:
area 1 1341375 mm2
area 2 1341375 mm2
wind load 1 2146.20 N
wind load 2 2146.20 N
Reactions at supports:
Ra = Rb = (W1 + W2)/2 2146.20 N
Maximum deflection (dmax) occurs @ mid‐span:
dmax = W1L3/60EI + W2L3/60EI
I supplied 2,974,600.00 mm4
dmax 3.6295 mm
dmax = 3.629 mm ‐ Actual Deflection due to Wind Load
dallow = L / 175 mm
= 2190/175 mm
= 12.51 mm
dallow > dmax therefore OK!

Maximum bending moment (Mmax) occurs @ mid‐span:
Mmax = W1L/6 + W2L/6 1566726 N.mm
Maximum bending stress (fby):
fbY = Mmax/ZY
Zsupplied 36,553.00 mm3
fbY = 42.86 Mpa
B. Due to Deadload:
note: mid‐transom were analyzed considering two‐point loading at L/4 from end.
b1. Check maximum bending stress: (see page Mid Transom ‐ 5)
fbx = 14.20 Mpa ‐ Actual Bending Stress due to DL
Allowable Lateral Buckling Stress: refer to AAMA Table 2‐24:
Lb = 2190 mm
Sx = 18,196.00 mm3
Iy = 2,974,600.00 mm4
JT = 1,335,306.77 mm4
1/2
S = LbSx/0.5(IyJ) = 39.99 ‐ slenderness ratio
S1 = 130 ‐ slenderness limits
S2 = 2400
Sa = (S)1/2
= 6.32
Allowable Stress (ksi)
S < S1 15
S1 < S < S2 16.7‐0.140(Sa)
S > S2 23600/(S)
Fbx = 15
= 15 x 1.33 1/3 allowable Stress increase is based on ADM and
= 19.95 ksi ASCE Manual
= 137.56 Mpa
Fballow > fbmax

F.S. = 9.69
therefore OK!
b2. Check maximum deflection:
L = length 2190 mm
H = Height of glass 1225 mm
t = thickness of Glass 12 mm
c = distance of load from support 547.5 mm
unit weight of Glass 25.51 kN/m3
E = modulus of elasticity 69600 Mpa
Wg = uniform distributed load (glass) 0.38 N/mm

WA = uniform distributed load (transom) 0.028 N/mm
W = 882.57 N
Reactions at supports:
R1 = R2 = P = W/2 441.285 N
Maximum deflection (dmax) occurs @ mid‐span:
I supplied ‐ Transom Section 454,710.00 mm4

dmax = Pc(3L2 ‐ 4c2)/24EI + 5WAL4/384EI 4.460 mm
dmax = 4.460 mm ‐ Actual Deflection due to Dead Load
dallow = L / 175 mm
= 2190/175 mm
= 12.51 mm
dallow > dmax therefore OK!

Maximum bending moment (Mmax) occurs @ mid‐span:
Mmax = Pc + WAL2/8 258389.8875 N.mm
Maximum bending stress (fby):
fbX = Mmax/ZX
Zsupplied 18,196.00 mm3
fbX = 14.20 Mpa
b2. Check for Combined Stress Ratio:
(fby/Fby)2 + (fbx/Fbx)2 = 0.112 < 1.0
therefore OK!
Analysis for Curtain Wall Glass
KAMC BAHRAIN, BAHRAIN
GL1-LEFT ELEV CLINICAL
H: 1225 mm / L: 1840 mm / Angle: 90° I Standard: ASTM E1300
Ir; c1lfc1tech
6 mm NS-30T on Float Clear - 16 mm Air 100% - 6 mm Float Clear ro�lU c..,.-il..!,.oJI ol..&.:;llg ci..!,.i.iu o,.i.10.o
71% 15%
SLS ULS
Ir; c1lfc1tech
ro�lU c..,.-il..!,.oJI ol..&.:;llg ci..!,.i.iu o,.i.10.o Generated by: Moustafa Al Khaleeji Generated on: 10/11/2021
Table of Contents
1. 1 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 5
1. 1.1 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 5
2. 1.2 Serviceability Limit State (SLS) - Calculation of deflection .......................................................................... 5
1. 1.2.1 List of all SLS loadcases ..................................................................................................................................... 5
2. 1.2.2 Most critical combination for SLS ........................................................................................................................... 7
3. 1.3 Ultimate Limit State (ULS) - Calculation of the stresses .............................................................................. 8

1. 1.3.1 List of all ULS loadcases ..................................................................................................................................... 8
2. 1.3.2 Most critical combination for ULS ........................................................................................................................... 10
2. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 11
1. 2.1 Capacity of the tool ...................................................................................................................................... 11
2. 2.2 Project information ....................................................................................................................................... 11
3. 2.3 Calculation methodology .............................................................................................................................. 11
3. 3 Loading assumptions ............................................................................................................................ 12

1. 3.1 Wind load ..................................................................................................................................................... 12
2. 3.2 Snow load .................................................................................................................................................... 12
3. 3.3 Barrier load ................................................................................................................................................... 12
4. 3.4 Cavity pressure variation .............................................................................................................................. 13
4. 4 Combination of actions ........................................................................................................................ 14

1. 4.1 Serviceability limit state ................................................................................................................................ 14
2. 4.2 Ultimate limit state ........................................................................................................................................ 14
3. 4.3 Load partial factors ....................................................................................................................................... 14
4. 4.4 Combination factors ..................................................................................................................................... 14
5. 4.5 Load duration ............................................................................................................................................... 15
5. 5 Glazing ........................................................................................................................................................ 16
1. 5.1 Definition of the glass considered ................................................................................................................ 16
1. 5.1.1 Outer Glass ..................................................................................................................................................... 16
2. 5.1.2 Inner Glass ...................................................................................................................................................... 16
2. 5.2 Supporting conditions ................................................................................................................................... 16

3. 5.3 Glass ............................................................................................................................................................ 16
1. 5.3.1 Design strength of the glass ................................................................................................................................. 16
4. 5.4 Silicone ......................................................................................................................................................... 17
6. 6 Results ........................................................................................................................................................ 18
1. 6.1 Results per load type (unfactored loads) ..................................................................................................... 18
1. Page 3 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
6. Generated by: Moustafa Al Khaleeji Generated on: 10/11/2021
1.
1. 6.1.1 Dead Load - stresses [MPa] and deflections [mm] ...................................................................................................... 18
2. 6.1.2 Wind pressure - stresses [MPa] and deflections [mm] .................................................................................................. 19
3. 6.1.3 Results summary .............................................................................................................................................. 20
2. 6.2 Secondary sealant of the insulating glass unit ............................................................................................. 21
Page 4 of 21
1.
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 1 Summary
1. 1.1 Conclusion
The report shows that the glazing satisfies all criteria.
2. 1.2 Serviceability Limit State (SLS) - Calculation of deflection

1. 1.2.1 List of all SLS loadcases
The following load cases have been considered.
Wind Snow Barrier Loading Summer Winter

Load
G Maint Other
Case Snow Point Line
+ - Snow UDL ΔH ΔP ΔT ΔH ΔP ΔT
Exc. Load Load
LC1 1.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LC2 1.00 0.60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LC3 1.00 - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - - -
LC4 0.60 - 0.60 - - - - - 1.00 0.75 0.75 - - - - -
LC5 0.60 - 0.60 - - - - - - - - 1.00 0.75 0.75 - -
Page 5 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
Load
Deflection and utility ratio (UR)
Case
Outer Central Inner
Deflection [mm] UR Deflection [mm] UR Deflection [mm] UR
LC1 0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00
LC2 7.99 0.65 - - 7.81 0.64
LC3 -3.00 0.24 - - 3.00 0.24
LC4 -8.37 0.68 - - -3.08 0.25
LC5 -2.81 0.23 - - -8.64 0.71
1. 1.2.2 Most critical combination for SLS Page 6 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 1.2.2 Most critical combination for SLS

Its utility ratio is 0.71
The position of the largest deflection is:
Horizontal coordinate [mm]: 612.00

Vertical coordinate [mm]: 920.00
Maximum deflection [mm]: -8.64
The deflection is function of the glazing thickness.
1. Page 7 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 1.3 Ultimate Limit State (ULS) - Calculation of the stresses

1. 1.3.1 List of all ULS loadcases
The following load cases have been considered.

Load
G Maint Other
Case Snow Point Line
Exc. Load Load
LC1 1.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LC2 1.00 0.60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LC3 1.00 - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - - -
LC4 0.60 - 0.60 - - - - - 1.00 0.75 0.75 - - - - -
LC5 0.60 - 0.60 - - - - - - - - 1.00 0.75 0.75 - -
Page 8 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
The glass sheet number follows the order from Glass Configurator from outside to inside.
Load
Stresses (S) and utility ratio (UR)
Case
Sheet 1 Sheet 2
Stress [MPa] UR Stress [MPa] UR
LC1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LC2 11.23 0.12 10.98 0.12
LC3 4.21 0.07 4.21 0.07
LC4 11.77 0.15 2.56 0.12
LC5 2.33 0.11 12.15 0.14
1. 1.3.2 Most critical combination for ULS Page 9 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 1.3.2 Most critical combination for ULS

Its utility ratio is 0.15
The position of the largest stress is:
ULSStressYPositionMm: 612.00
ULSStressZPositionMm: 920.00
ULSTotalStressMPa: 11.77
The resistance is function of the glazing thickness.
Page 10 of 21
1. 2 Introduction
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
Generated by: Moustafa Al Khaleeji Generated on: 10/11/2021
1. 2 Introduction
The interface permits to load a set of parameters by the user in order to make a structural (no thermal) calculation which is done through a calculator
provided by the engineering company Maffeis. The user is therefore explicitly requested to make sure he/she understands the input he/she provides and to
have the results of the calculation verified and approved, as the case might be, by the engineer/engineering company responsible for the project for which
the structural calculation is requested.
2.1 Capacity of the tool

1. The calculation of the glass panel is performed under the hypothesis of Linear material and Linear geometry. Stresses and deflections of the glass are
obtained by means of theoretical solutions when available and by finite difference method on the other cases. The gas in insulating glass units is considered
to be isothermal and the load sharing between insulating glass unit panels is calculated according to the standard adopted.
2.2 Project information

2.
1. Name: KAMC BAHRAIN

Client: FTCO
Location: BAHRAIN
Altitude: 19.00
Description: KING ABDULLAH MEDICAL COLLEGE BAHRAIN LEFT ELEV CLINICAL
3. 2.3 Calculation methodology

1. Design strength: ASTM E1300
Located in: BAHRAIN
Set of units: International system (mm, kg...)
Control methodology: ASTM E1300
Equivalent thickness calculation method: ASTM E1300
Methodology for the combination of loads - Serviceability (SLS): Characteristic
Methodology for the combination of loads - Sealant: Characteristic
Limit ratio regarding the allowable deflection (L/X): 100.00
Absolute limit value for deflection [mm]: 19.00
Page 11 of 21
1. 3 Loading assumptions
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 3 Loading assumptions
1. 3.1 Wind load
Note for the user: the wind load is typically defined in the specifications. The load should include all appropriate factors (external pressure coefficient due to
the shape of the building, internal pressure coefficient) to amplify the peak pressure. No load partial factor should be included at this stage
Loading [kPa] Type Duration [s] Temperature [°C]
Wind gust < 5 sec - Other

Wind pressure 1.60 3.00 50.00
zones
Wind gust < 5 sec - Other

Wind suction 1.16 3.00 50.00
zones
2. 3.2 Snow load

Note for the user: the amount of snow is typically defined in the specifications. The load should include all shape factors and accumulations. Some countries
are using exceptional snow loads.
Loading [kPa] Is Building Heated? Duration [days] Temperature [°C]
0.00
Snow load 0.00 Unheated 30.00
0.00
0.00
Exceptional snow load 0.00 Unheated 30.00
0.00
3. 3.3 Barrier load

Note for the user: The load magnitude varies depending on the category of use and the country. Those loads are defined in the specifications of the project.
The position of the loads is typically between 0.8 and 1.2m from the finished floor.
Temperature Size of Height Width From Inside

Category of use Loading Duration [s]
[°C] square [mm] [mm] [mm] /outside
Point Load B1 0.00 kN 600.00 30.00 100.00 1000.00 1000.00 Inside
Line Load B1 0.00 kN/m 600.00 30.00 - 1000.00 - Inside
Uniform
B1 0.00 kPa 600.00 30.00 - 1000.00 - Inside
Load (UDL)
Maintenance - 0.00 kN 600.00 40.00 100.00 1.00 1000.00 Outside
Other Balustrade duty 0.00 kPa 600.00 30.00 - - - Inside
1. Page 12 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 3.4 Cavity pressure variation

The cavity pressure variation is function of the parameters given below and the conditions of installation (presence of blinds, presence of ventilation…). The
largest effect usually occurs with small geometries, large cavities and stiff glazing.
Winter Summer
Factory Site Factory Site
Altitude [m] 0.00 600.00 0.00 -300.00
Temperature [°C] 20.00 -5.00 20.00 40.00
Atmospheric pressure [kPa] 101.00 105.00 101.00 99.00
Modification factors:
Absorption above 50%: 18.00

Unheated building: -12.00
Use of Glass:
Is there an internal shading next to the glass? ✕

Is the building heated? ✕
Is the glass located in a spandrel? ✕
Is the space between the glass and the internal shading ventilated? ✕
Page 13 of 21
1.
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 4 Combination of actions
1. 4.1 Serviceability limit state
The following equation is considered to make the combinations of forces acting on the glass.
EN1990 Permanent Action Leading Variable Accompanying variable actions
Characteristic G Q₁ ΣΨ₀Q₁
Frequent G Ψ₁Q₁ ΣΨ₂Q₁
Quasi-permanent G Ψ₂Q₁ ΣΨ₂Q₁
2. 4.2 Ultimate limit state

The following equation is considered to make the combinations of forces acting on the glass.
1 γG.fav/unfav G γQ.fav/unfav Q1 ΣγQfav/unfav Ψ₀Q₁
3. 4.3 Load partial factors

The following load partial factors have been considered.
Favorable Unfavorable
γG 0.60 1.00
γQ 0.00 1.00
4. 4.4 Combination factors

The following combination factors have been considered.
Ψ0 Ψ1 Ψ2
Wind pressure 1.00 0.75 0.00
Wind suction 1.00 0.75 0.00
Snow 1.00 0.75 0.00
Exceptional snow 1.00 0.75 0.00
Barrier – point load 1.00 0.75 0.00
Barrier – line load 1.00 0.75 0.00
Barrier – uniform load 1.00 0.75 0.00
Maintenance 1.00 0.75 0.00
Other distributed load 1.00 0.75 0.00
Delta T 1.00 0.75 0.00
Delta H 1.00 0.75 0.00
Delta P 1.00 0.75 0.00
5. Page 14 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
5. 4.5 Load duration

Dead Load: 50.00
Wind: 3.00
Snow – heated: 30.00
Snow – unheated: 30.00
Exceptional snow – heated: 30.00
Exceptional snow – unheated: 30.00
Barrier – point load: 600.00
Barrier – line load: 600.00
Barrier – uniform load: 600.00
Maintenance: 600.00
Other distributed load: 600.00
Delta T – winter: 12.00
Delta T – summer: 6.00
Delta H – winter: 12.00
Delta H – summer: 6.00
Delta P – winter: 12.00
Delta P – summer: 6.00
Page 15 of 21
1.
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech Generated by: Moustafa Al Khaleeji Generated on: 10/11/2021
1. 5 Glazing
1. 5.1 Definition of the glass considered
6 mm NS-30T on Clear Float - 16 mm Air 100% - 6 mm Float Clear
1. 5.1.1 Outer Glass

Sheet 1:
Thickness [mm]: 6.00

Type of glass: Float glass
Surface State: As produced
Treatment: Thermally toughened
Process for toughening: Horizontal toughening
Edge finishing type: Ground
2. 5.1.2 Inner Glass

Sheet 2:
Thickness [mm]: 6.00

Type of glass: Float glass
Surface State: As produced
Treatment: Thermally toughened
Process for toughening: Horizontal toughening
Edge finishing type: Ground
2. 5.2 Supporting conditions

Glass panel width [mm]: 1840.00
Glass panel height [mm]: 1225.00
Supported sides [mm]:
Four sides
Installation angle [°]: 90.00
3. 5.3 Glass
1. 5.3.1 Design strength of the glass

Design strength
G Maint Other
[MPa] Snow Point Line
Exc. Load Load
Min 47.83 73.00 73.00 - - - - - 47.83 60.55 60.55 47.83 59.67 59.67 - -
Sheet 1
Max 61.00 93.10 93.10 - - - - - 61.00 77.22 77.22 61.00 76.10 76.10 - -
Min 47.83 73.00 73.00 - - - - - 47.83 60.55 60.55 47.83 59.67 59.67 - -
Sheet 2
Max 61.00 93.10 93.10 - - - - - 61.00 77.22 77.22 61.00 76.10 76.10 - -
1. Page 16 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 5.4 Silicone
The secondary sealant of the insulating glazing should be dimensioned, especially for bonded glazing (Structurally Sealant Glazing) or units having large
cavity pressure variations.
The sealant design strength in tension considered by the user is: Characteristic
The following combinations have been considered for the dimensioning of the sealant height.
Characteristic G Q₁ ΣΨ₀Q₁
Frequent G Ψ₁Q₁ ΣΨ₂Q₁
Quasi-permanent G Ψ₂Q₁ ΣΨ₂Q₁
Page 17 of 21
1.
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech Generated by: Moustafa Al Khaleeji Generated on: 10/11/2021
1. 6 Results
1. 6.1 Results per load type (unfactored loads)
1. 6.1.1 Dead Load - stresses [MPa] and deflections [mm]

Outer glass
Glass Sheet 1
σEk 0.00 δ 0.00
σRd 47.83 δallowed 12.25
0.00 0.00
Inner glass
Glass Sheet 2
σEk 0.00 δ 0.00
0.00 0.00
1. Page 18 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 6.1.2 Wind pressure - stresses [MPa] and deflections [mm]

Outer glass
Glass Sheet 1
σEk 18.71 δ 13.31
0.20 1.09
Inner glass
Glass Sheet 2
σEk 18.29 δ 13.01
0.20 1.06
1. Page 19 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
1. 6.1.3 Results summary

Outer pane Middle pane Inner pane
Load Case
UR SLS UR ULS UR SLS UR ULS UR SLS UR ULS
Dead Load 0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00
Wind pressure 1.09 0.20 - - 1.06 0.20
Wind suction 0.79 0.15 - - 0.77 0.14
Delta H – summer 0.11 0.03 - - 0.11 0.03
Delta P – summer 0.06 0.01 - - 0.06 0.01
Delta T – summer 0.20 0.04 - - 0.20 0.04
Delta H – winter 0.05 0.02 - - 0.05 0.02
Delta P – winter 0.06 0.01 - - 0.06 0.01
Delta T – winter 0.19 0.04 - - 0.19 0.04
1. Page 20 of 21
POWERED BY
Ir; c1lfc1tech
alumlnlum facade technique Generated by: Moustafa Al Khaleeji Generated on: 10/11/2021
1. 6.2 Secondary sealant of the insulating glass unit

The calculation is valid for the secondary sealant of the insulating glazing unit.
Dimensioning of the outer sealant height:
Sealant design strength in tension considered [MPa]: 0.14

Most critical combination: -
Minimum height to apply [mm]: 0.00
Dimensioning of the inner sealant height:
Sealant design strength in tension considered [MPa]: 0.14

Most critical combination: -
Minimum height to apply [mm]: 0.00
Page 21 of 21
POWERED BY
Design of Steel Bracket for
Aluminum Curtain Wall
(IDEA STATICA).
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Project data
Project name KAMC
Project number
Author
Description
Date 10/13/2021
Design code AISC 360-16
Material
Steel A36
Concrete 4000 psi
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Project item Bracket for mullion (SHOE)
Design
Name Bracket for mullion (SHOE)
Description steel bracket on R.Concrete
Analysis Stress, strain/ loads in equilibrium
Design code AISC - LRFD 2016
Beams and columns

β – Direction γ - Pitch α - Rotation Offset ex Offset ey Offset ez X
Name Cross-section Forces in
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
COL 5 - Plate 6, 150 90.0 -90.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node 0
PL2 5 - Plate 6, 150 90.0 -90.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node 0
M3 4 - Mullion 0.0 -90.0 0.0 30 0 0 Bolts 40
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Cross-sections
Name Material
5 - Plate 6, 150 A36
4 - MULLION 034.2507.00 Aluminum
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
5 - Plate 6, 150 A36
4 - REYNARDS MULLION Aluminum

034.2507.00
Anchors / Bolts
Diameter fu Gross area
Name Bolt assembly
[mm] [MPa] [mm2]
12 A325M 12 A325M 12 830.0 113
16 A325M 16 A325M 16 830.0 201
Load effects (forces in equilibrium)

N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE1 COL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
PL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
M3 -36.7 14.5 61.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
LE2 COL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
PL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
M3 -31.5 -15.9 -9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Foundation block
Item Value Unit
CB 1
Dimensions 810 x 966 mm
Depth 600 mm
Anchor 12 A325M
Anchoring length 100 mm
Shear force transfer Friction
Check
Summary
Name Value Check status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 1.7 < 5.0% OK
Bolts 70.9 < 100% OK
Anchors 70.6 < 100% OK
Welds 75.6 < 100% OK
Concrete block 7.7 < 100% OK
Shear 96.8 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
Plates
Fy Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Loads Check status
[MPa] [mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
COL-bfl 1 248.2 6.0 LE1 224.3 0.5 0.7 OK
PL2-bfl 1 248.2 6.0 LE1 225.1 0.8 8.6 OK
M3 248.2 5.0 LE1 226.8 1.7 0.0 OK
BP1 248.2 10.0 LE1 223.6 0.1 0.0 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
A36 248.2 5.0
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Overall check, LE1
Strain check, LE1

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Equivalent stress, LE1

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Equivalent strain, LE1
Screenshot
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Stress in concrete, LE1

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
1 / 48
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Strain check, LE1

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Strain check, LE1

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Bolts
Ft V ϕRn,bearing Utt Uts Utts
Shape Item Grade Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [kN] [%] [%] [%]
B3 16 A325M - 1 LE1 2.5 39.8 57.6 2.7 70.9 - OK
Design data
ϕRn,tension ϕRn,shear
Grade
[kN] [kN]
16 A325M - 1 93.5 56.1
Detailed result for B3

Tension resistance check (AISC 360-16: J3-1)
ϕRn = ϕ ⋅ Fnt ⋅ Ab = 93.5 kN ≥ Ft = 2.5 kN

Where:
Fnt = 620.0 MPa – nominal tensile stress from AISC 360-16 Table J3.2
Ab = 201 mm2 – gross bolt cross-sectional area
ϕ = 0.75 – capacity factor
Shear resistance check (AISC 360-16: J3-1)
ϕRn = ϕ ⋅ Fnv ⋅ Ab = 56.1 kN ≥ V = 39.8 kN

Where:
Fnv = 372.0 MPa – nominal shear stress from AISC 360-16 Table J3.2
Bearing resistance check (AISC 360-16: J3-6)
Rn = 1.20 ⋅ lc ⋅ t ⋅ Fu ≤ 2.40 ⋅ d ⋅ t ⋅ Fu
ϕRn = 57.6 kN ≥ V = 38.6 kN

Where:
lc = 81 mm – clear distance, in the direction of the force, between the edge of the hole and the edge of the
adjacent hole or edge of the material
t = 5 mm – thickness of the plate
d = 16 mm – diameter of a bolt
Fu = 400.0 MPa – tensile strength of the connected material

ϕ = 0.75 – resistance factor for bearing at bolt holes
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Anchors
Nf V ϕNcbg ϕVcp Utt Uts Utts

Shape Item Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [%] [%] [%]
A1 LE1 23.3 0.0 49.7 111.5 70.6 0.0 56.0 OK
A2 LE1 11.8 0.0 49.7 111.5 70.6 0.0 56.0 OK
Design data
ϕNsa ϕVsa
Grade
[kN] [kN]
12 A325M - 2 49.0 27.3
Detailed result for A1

Anchor tensile resistance (ACI 318-14 – 17.4.1)
ϕNsa = ϕ ⋅ Ase,N ⋅ futa = 49.0 kN ≥ Nf = 23.3 kN

Where:
ϕ = 0.70 – resistance factor
Ase,N = 84 mm2 – tensile stress area
futa = 830.0 MPa – specified tensile strength of anchor steel:

futa = min(860 MPa, 1.9 ⋅ fya , fu ) , where:
fya = 660.0 MPa – specified yield strength of anchor steel
fu = 830.0 MPa – specified ultimate strength of anchor steel
16 /
48
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Concrete breakout resistance of anchor in tension (ACI 318-14 – 17.4.2)

The check is performed for group of anchors that form common tension breakout cone: A1, A2
AN c
ϕNcbg = ϕ ⋅ AN c0 ⋅ Ψed,N ⋅ Ψec,N ⋅ Ψc,N ⋅ Nb = 49.7 kN ≥ Nf g = 35.1 kN
Where:
Nf g = 35.1 kN – sum of tension forces of anchors with common concrete breakout cone area
AN c = 147000 mm2 – concrete breakout cone area for group of anchors

AN c0 = 90000 mm2 – concrete breakout cone area for single anchor not influenced by edges
Ψed,N = 1.00 – modification factor for edge distance:
Ψed,N = min(0.7 + 0.3⋅c

1.5⋅hef , 1) , where:
a,min
ca,min = 388 mm – minimum distance from the anchor to the edge

hef = min(hemb , max( ca,max s
1.5 , 3 )) = 90 mm – depth of embedment, where:
hemb = 100 mm – anchor length
ca,max = 405 mm – maximum distance from the anchor to one of the three closest edges
s = 190 mm – maximum spacing between anchors
Ψec,N = 0.83 – modification factor for eccentrically loaded group of anchors
Ψec,N = Ψecx,N ⋅ Ψecy,N , where:

Ψecx,N = 2⋅e1 x,N = 1.00 – modification factor that depends on eccentricity in x-direction
1+ 3⋅hef
ex,N = 0 mm – tension load eccentricity in x-direction

Ψecy,N = 2⋅e1 y,N = 0.83 – modification factor that depends on eccentricity in y-direction
1+ 3⋅hef
ey,N = 31 mm – tension load eccentricity in y-direction

hef = 90 mm – depth of embedment
Ψc,N = 1.00 – modification factor for concrete conditions
Nb = 52.5 kN – basic concrete breakout strength of a single anchor in tension:
Nb = kc ⋅ λa ⋅ fc′ ⋅ h1.5
ef , where:
kc = 10.0 – coefficient for cast-in anchors
λa = 1.00 – modification factor for lightweight concrete
fc′ = 27.6 MPa – concrete compressive strength
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Shear resistance (ACI 318-14 – 17.5.1)
ϕVsa = ϕ ⋅ 0.6 ⋅ Ase,V ⋅ futa = 27.3 kN ≥ V = 0.0 kN

Where:
Ase,V = 84 mm2 – tensile stress area

Concrete pryout resistance (ACI 318-14 – 17.5.3)

The check is performed for group of anchors on common base plate
ϕVcp = ϕ ⋅ kcp ⋅ Ncp = 111.5 kN ≥ Vg = 0.0 kN

Where:
kcp = 2.00 – concrete pry-out factor
Ncp = 85.8 kN – concrete cone tension break-out resistance in case all anchors are in tension
Vg = 0.0 kN – sum of shear forces of anchors on common base plate
Interaction of tensile and shear forces (ACI 318-14 – R17.6)
Utt 5/3 + Uts 5/3 = 0.56 ≤ 1.0

Where:
Utt = 0.71 – maximum ratio of factored tensile force and tensile resistance determined from all appropriate failure
modes
Uts = 0.00 – maximum ratio of factored shear force and shear resistance determined from all appropriate failure modes


Where:
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:

AN c
Where:

Ψed,N = min(0.7 + 0.3⋅c

1.5⋅hef , 1) , where:
a,min


1+ 3⋅hef

1+ 3⋅hef

Nb = kc ⋅ λa ⋅ fc′ ⋅ h1.5
ef , where:
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:

Where:



Where:
Utt 5/3 + Uts 5/3 = 0.56 ≤ 1.0

Where:
modes
Welds
Th Ls L Lc Fn ϕRn Ut
Item Edge Xu Loads Status
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [kN] [kN] [%]
BP1 COL-bfl 1 E70xx ◢4.9◣ ◢7.0◣ 150 19 LE1 19.5 25.9 75.4 OK
E70xx ◢4.9◣ ◢7.0◣ 150 19 LE1 19.8 26.3 75.4 OK
BP1 PL2-bfl 1 E70xx ◢4.9◣ ◢7.0◣ 150 19 LE1 19.5 25.9 75.1 OK
E70xx ◢4.9◣ ◢7.0◣ 150 19 LE1 21.1 27.9 75.6 OK
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Detailed result for BP1 / COL-bfl 1 - 1

Weld resistance check (AISC 360-16: J2-4)
ϕRn = ϕ ⋅ Fnw ⋅ Awe = 25.9 kN ≥ Fn = 19.5 kN

Where:
Fnw = 372.5 MPa – nominal stress of weld material:
Fnw = 0.6 ⋅ FEXX ⋅ (1 + 0.5 ⋅ sin1.5 θ) , where:

FEXX = 482.6 MPa – electrode classification number, i.e. minimum specified tensile strength
θ = 43.6° – angle of loading measured from the weld longitudinal axis
Awe = 93 mm2 – effective area of weld critical element

ϕ = 0.75 – resistance factor for welded connections


Where:


Detailed result for BP1 / PL2-bfl 1 - 1


Where:


Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:


Where:


Concrete block
A1 A2 σ Ut
Item Loads Status
[mm2] [mm2] [MPa] [%]
CB 1 LE1 32481 625220 2.4 7.7 OK
Detailed result for CB 1

Concrete block compressive resistance check (AISC 360-16 Section J8)
ϕc fp,max = 30.5 MPa ≥ σ = 2.4 MPa

Where:
fp,max = 46.9 MPa – concrete block design bearing strength:
fp,max = 0.85 ⋅ fc′ ⋅ A2

A1 ≤ 1.7 ⋅ fc′ , where:
A1 = 32481 mm2 – base plate area in contact with concrete surface
A2 = 625220 mm2 – concrete supporting surface
ϕc = 0.65 – resistance factor for concrete
Shear in contact plane

V ϕVr μ Ut
Item Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [-] [%]
BP1 LE1 62.8 64.8 0.40 96.8 OK
Detailed result for BP1

Base plate shear resistance check (ACI 349 – B.6.1.4)
ϕc Vr = ϕc ⋅ μ ⋅ C = 64.8 kN ≥ V = 62.8 kN
Where:
μ = 0.40 –coefficient of friction between base plate and concrete
C = 76.7 kN – compressive force
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Project item Bracket for mullion ( WALL)
Design
Name Bracket for mullion ( WALL)
Description steel bracket on R.Concrete
Analysis Stress, strain/ loads in equilibrium
Design code AISC - LRFD 2016
Beams and columns

β – Direction γ - Pitch α - Rotation Offset ex Offset ey Offset ez X
Name Cross-section Forces in
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
COL 5 - Plate 6, 150 90.0 -90.0 90.0 0 0 0 Bolts 100
PL2 5 - Plate 6, 150 90.0 -90.0 0.0 0 0 0 Bolts 100
M3 4 - MULLION 0.0 -90.0 0.0 -250 0 -100 Bolts 250
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Cross-sections
Name Material
5 - Plate 6, 150 A36
4 - MULLION 034.2507.00 Aluminum
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
5 - Plate 6, 150 A36
4 - REYNARDS MULLION Aluminum

034.2507.00
Anchors / Bolts
Diameter fu Gross area
Name Bolt assembly
[mm] [MPa] [mm2]
12 A325M 12 A325M 12 830.0 113
16 A325M 16 A325M 16 830.0 201
Load effects (forces in equilibrium)

N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE1 COL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
PL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
M3 -36.7 14.5 61.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
LE2 COL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
PL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
M3 -31.5 -15.9 -9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Foundation block
Item Value Unit
CB 1
Dimensions 810 x 856 mm
Depth 600 mm
Anchor 12 A325M
Anchoring length 125 mm
Shear force transfer Friction
Check
Summary
Name Value Check status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 2.8 < 5.0% OK
Bolts 84.8 < 100% OK
Anchors 98.3 < 100% OK
Welds 78.0 < 100% OK
Concrete block 11.1 < 100% OK
Shear 67.0 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
Plates
Fy Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Loads Check status
[MPa] [mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
COL-bfl 1 248.2 6.0 LE2 226.2 1.4 13.2 OK
PL2-bfl 1 248.2 6.0 LE1 227.0 1.8 9.5 OK
M3 248.2 5.0 LE1 229.0 2.8 0.0 OK
BP1 248.2 8.0 LE2 226.7 1.7 0.0 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
A36 248.2 5.0
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Overall check, LE1
Strain check, LE1

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Strain check, LE1

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Bolts
Ft V ϕRn,bearing Utt Uts Utts
Shape Item Grade Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [kN] [%] [%] [%]
B3 16 A325M - 1 LE1 2.7 47.6 57.6 2.8 84.8 - OK
Design data
ϕRn,tension ϕRn,shear
Grade
[kN] [kN]
16 A325M - 1 93.5 56.1
Detailed result for B3

Tension resistance check (AISC 360-16: J3-1)
ϕRn = ϕ ⋅ Fnt ⋅ Ab = 93.5 kN ≥ Ft = 2.7 kN

Where:
Fnt = 620.0 MPa – nominal tensile stress from AISC 360-16 Table J3.2
Shear resistance check (AISC 360-16: J3-1)
ϕRn = ϕ ⋅ Fnv ⋅ Ab = 56.1 kN ≥ V = 47.6 kN

Where:
Fnv = 372.0 MPa – nominal shear stress from AISC 360-16 Table J3.2
Bearing resistance check (AISC 360-16: J3-6)
Rn = 1.20 ⋅ lc ⋅ t ⋅ Fu ≤ 2.40 ⋅ d ⋅ t ⋅ Fu
ϕRn = 57.6 kN ≥ V = 43.9 kN

Where:
lc = 66 mm – clear distance, in the direction of the force, between the edge of the hole and the edge of the
adjacent hole or edge of the material
t = 5 mm – thickness of the plate
d = 16 mm – diameter of a bolt
Fu = 400.0 MPa – tensile strength of the connected material

ϕ = 0.75 – resistance factor for bearing at bolt holes
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Anchors
Nf V ϕNcbg ϕVcp Utt Uts Utts
Shape Item Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [%] [%] [%]
A1 LE2 25.7 0.0 66.2 133.3 98.3 0.0 97.2 OK
A2 LE2 39.4 0.0 66.2 133.3 98.3 0.0 97.2 OK
Design data
ϕNsa ϕVsa
Grade
[kN] [kN]
12 A325M - 2 49.0 27.3


Where:

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:

AN c
Where:
Ψed,N = min(0.7 + 0.3⋅c

1.5⋅hef , 1) , where:
a,min


1+ 3⋅hef

1+ 3⋅hef

Nb = kc ⋅ λa ⋅ fc′ ⋅ h1.5
ef , where:
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:

Where:



Where:
Utt 5/3 + Uts 5/3 = 0.97 ≤ 1.0

Where:
modes


Where:
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:

AN c
Where:
Ψed,N = min(0.7 + 0.3⋅c

1.5⋅hef , 1) , where:
a,min


1+ 3⋅hef

1+ 3⋅hef

Nb = kc ⋅ λa ⋅ fc′ ⋅ h1.5
ef , where:
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:

Where:



Where:
Utt 5/3 + Uts 5/3 = 0.97 ≤ 1.0

Where:
modes
Welds
Th Ls L Lc Fn ϕRn Ut
Item Edge Xu Loads Status
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [kN] [kN] [%]
BP1 COL-bfl 1 E70xx ◢4.9◣ ◢7.0◣ 150 17 LE2 18.7 23.9 78.0 OK
E70xx ◢4.9◣ ◢7.0◣ 150 17 LE2 17.3 22.7 76.2 OK
BP1 PL2-bfl 1 E70xx ◢4.9◣ ◢7.0◣ 150 17 LE2 17.1 22.4 76.1 OK
E70xx ◢4.9◣ ◢7.0◣ 150 17 LE2 17.8 23.5 75.7 OK
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:


Where:




Where:




Where:


Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:


Where:


Concrete block
A1 A2 σ Ut
Item Loads Status
[mm2] [mm2] [MPa] [%]
CB 1 LE2 18385 568502 3.4 11.1 OK
Detailed result for CB 1

Concrete block compressive resistance check (AISC 360-16 Section J8)
ϕc fp,max = 30.5 MPa ≥ σ = 3.4 MPa

Where:
fp,max = 46.9 MPa – concrete block design bearing strength:
fp,max = 0.85 ⋅ fc′ ⋅ A2

A1 ≤ 1.7 ⋅ fc′ , where:
A1 = 18385 mm2 – base plate area in contact with concrete surface
A2 = 568502 mm2 – concrete supporting surface
Shear in contact plane

V ϕVr μ Ut
Item Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [-] [%]
BP1 LE2 35.3 52.7 0.40 67.0 OK
Detailed result for BP1

Base plate shear resistance check (ACI 349 – B.6.1.4)
ϕc Vr = ϕc ⋅ μ ⋅ C = 52.7 kN ≥ V = 35.3 kN
Where:
μ = 0.40 coefficient
– of friction between base plate and concrete
C = 62.3 kN – compressive force

Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.
Symbol explanation
Symbol Symbol explanation
εPl Strain
fy Yield strength
εlim Limit of plastic strain
Ft Tension force
V Resultant of shear forces Vy, Vz in bolt
ϕRnBearing Plate bearing resistance AISC 360-16 J3.10
Ut Utilization
Uts Utilization in shear
Utts Utilization in tension and shear EN 1993-1-8 table 3.4
ϕRnBearing Bolt bearing resistance
ϕRnShear Bolt shear resistance AISC 360-16 – J3.8
Nf Tension force
ϕNcbg Concrete breakout strength in tension – ACI 318-14 – 17.4.2
ϕVcp Concrete pryout strength in shear – ACI 318-14 – 17.5.3
ϕNsa Steel strength in tension – ACI 318-14 – 17.4.1
φVsa Steel strength in shear – ACI 318-14 – 17.5.1
Th Throat thickness of weld
Ls Leg size of weld
L Length of weld
Lc Length of critical weld element
Fn Force in weld critical element
ϕRnw Weld resistance AISC 360-16 J2.4
A1 Loaded area
A2 Supporting area
σ Average stress in concrete
Vr Shear resistance
μ Coefficient of friction between base plate and concrete block
Code settings
Item Value Unit Reference
Friction coefficient - concrete 1.30 - ACI 349 – B.6.1.4
Friction coefficient in slip-resistance 0.30 - AISC 360-16 J3.8
Limit plastic strain 0.05 -
Plastic
Weld stress evaluation
redistribution
Detailing No
Distance between bolts [d] 2.66 - AISC 360-16 – J3.3
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Item Value Unit Reference

Distance between bolts and edge [d] 1.25 - AISC 360-16 – J.3.4
Concrete breakout resistance check Both
Base metal capacity check at weld fusion
No AISC 360-16: J2-2
face
Cracked concrete Yes ACI 318-14 – Chapter 17
Local deformation check No
Local deformation limit 0.03 - CIDECT DG 1, 3 - 1.1
Analysis with large deformations for hollow section
Geometrical nonlinearity (GMNA) Yes
joints
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Theoretical Background
CBFEM versus AISC 360
The weak point of standard design method is in analyzing of internal forces and stress in a joint. CBFEM replaces specific analysis
of internal forces in joint with general FEA.
Check methods of specific components like bolts or welds are done according to standard AISC 360.
For the fasteners – bolts and welds – special FEM components had to be developed to model the welds and bolts behaviour in the
connection. All parts of 1D members and all additional plates are modeled as plate/walls. These elements are made of steel (metal
in general) and the behaviour of this material is significantly nonlinear.
The real stress-strain diagram of steel is replaced by the ideal plastic material for design purposes in building practice. The
advantage of ideal plastic material is, that only yield strength and modulus of elasticity must be known to describe the material
curve. The yield strength is multiplied by resistance factor (LRFD) or divided by safety factor (ASD) – AISC 360, Appendix 1. The
granted ductility of construction steel is 15 %. The real usable value of limit plastic strain is 5% for ordinary design (EN 1993-1-5
appendix C paragraph C.8 note 1).
The stress in steel cannot exceed the yield strength when using the ideal elastic-plastic stress-strain diagram.
Real tension curve and the ideal elastic-plastic diagram of material
CBFEM method aims to model the real state precisely. Meshes of plates / walls are not merged, no intersections are generated
between them, unlike it is used to when modeling structures and buildings. Mesh of finite elements is generated on each individual
plate independently on mesh of other plates.
Between the meshes, special massless force interpolation constraints are added. They ensure the connection between the edge of
one plate and the surface or edge of the other plate.
This unique calculation model provides very good results – both for the point of view of precision and of the analysis speed. The
method is protected by patent.
The steel base plate is placed loosely on the concrete foundation. It is a contact element in the analysis model – the connection
resists compression fully, but does not resist tension.
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Stress-strain diagram of contact between the concrete block and the base plate
The concrete block in CBFEM is modeled using Winkler-Pasternak subsoil model. The stiffness of subsoil is determined using
modulus of elasticity of concrete and effective height of subsoil. The concrete block is not designed by CBFEM method.
Welds are modeled using a special elastoplastic element, which is added to the interpolation links between the plates. The element
respects the weld throat thickness, position and orientation. The plasticity state is controlled by stresses in the weld throat section.
The plastic redistribution of stress in welds allows for stress peaks to be redistributed along the longer part of the weld.
Bolted connection consists of two or more clasped plates and one or more bolts. Plates are placed loosely on each other.
A contact element is inserted between plates in the analysis model, which acts only in compression. No forces are carried in
tension.
Shear force is taken by bearing. Special model for its transferring in the force direction only is implemented. IDEA StatiCa
Connection can check bolts for interaction of shear and tension. The bolt behavior is implemented according to the following picture.
Bolt – tension
Symbols explanation:
K – linear stiffness of bolt,

Kp – stiffness of bolt at plastic branch,
Flt – limit force for linear behaviour of bolt,
Ft,Rd – limit bolt resistance,
ul – limit deformation of bolt.
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Bolt – interaction of shear and tension
Loads
End forces of member of the frame analysis model are transferred to the ends of member segments. Eccentricities of members
caused by the joint design are respected during load transfer.
The analysis model created by CBFEM method corresponds to the real joint very precisely, whereas the analysis of internal forces
is performed on very idealised 3D FEM bar model, where individual beams are modeled using centrelines and the joints are
modeled using immaterial nodes.
Joint of a vertical column and a horizontal beam
Internal forces are analysed using 1D members in 3D model. There is an example of courses of internal forces in the following
picture.
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Internal forces in horizontal beam. M and V are the end forces at joint.
The effects caused by member on the joint are important to design the connection. The effects are illustrated in the following
picture.
Effects of the member on the joint. CBFEM model is drawn in dark blue color.
Moment M and shear force V act in a theoretical joint. The point of theoretical joint does not exist in CBFEM model, thus the load
cannot be applied here. The model must be loaded by actions M and V, which have to be transferred to the end of segment in the
distance r.
Mc = M − V · r
Vc = V
In CBFEM model, the end section of segment is loaded by moment Mc and force Vc.
Welds
Fillet welds
The design strength, ϕRn and the allowable strength, Rn/Ω of welded joints are evaluated in connection weld check.
ϕ = 0.75 (LRFD)
Ω = 2.00 (ASD)
Available strength of welded joints is evaluated according to AISC 360 – J2.4:
Rn = FnwAwe
Fnw = 0.60 FEXX (1.0 + 0.50 sin1.5Θ)
where
F nw – nominal stress of weld material,

A we – effective area of the weld,
F EXX – electrode classification number, i.e., minimum specified tensile strength,
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
Θ – angle of loading measured from the weld longitudinal axis.
For long welds and welding to unstiffened flanges or webs of rectangular hollow sections, the weld material model is fine-tuned so
that no reduction factor is necessary. The weld resistance is governed by most stressed weld element.
CJP groove welds

AISC Specification Table J2.5 identifies four loading conditions that might be associated with JP groove welds, and shows that the
strength of the joint is either controlled by the base metal or that the loads need not be considered in the design of the welds
connecting the parts. Accordingly, when CJP groove welds are made with matching-strength filler metal, the strength of a
connection is governed or controlled by the base metal, and no checks on the weld strength are required.
Bolts
Tensile and shear strength of bolts
The design tensile or shear strength, ϕRn, and the allowable tensile or shear strength, Rn / Ω of a snug-tightened bolt is determined
according to the limit states of tension rupture and shear rupture as follows:
Rn = FnAb
ϕ = 0.75 (LRFD)
Ω = 2.00 (ASD)
where
A b – nominal unthreaded body area of bolt or threaded part,

F n – nominal tensile stress, Fnt, or shear stress, Fnv, from Table J3.2.
The tensile force, against which the required tensile strength is checked, includes any tension resulting from prying action produced
by deformation of the connected parts.
Combined Tension and shear in bearing type connection

The available tensile strength of a bolt subjected to combined tension and shear is determined according to the limit states of
tension and shear rupture as follows:
Rn = F'ntAb (AISC 360 J3-2)
ϕ = 0.75 (LRFD)
Ω = 2.00 (ASD)
F'nt = 1.3 Fnt − frvFnt / ϕFnv (AISC 360 J3-3a LRFD)
F'nt = 1.3 Fnt − frvΩ Fnt / Fnv (AISC 360 J3-3b ASD)
where
F' nt – nominal tensile stress modified to include the effects of shear stress,
F nt – nominal tensile stress from AISC 360 – Tab. J3.2,
F nv – nominal shear stress from AISC 360 – Tab. J3.2,
f rv – required shear stress using LRFD or ASD load combinations. The available shear stress of the fastener shall be equal
or exceed the required shear stress, frv.
Bearing strength in bolt holes

The available bearing strength, ϕRn and Rn/Ω at bolt holes is determined for the limit state of bearing as follows:
For a bolt in a connection with standard holes:
Rn = 1.2 lctFu ≤ 2.4 d t Fu (AISC 360 J3-6a, c)
For a bolt in a connection with slotted holes:
Rn = 1.0 lct Fu ≤ 2.0 d t Fu (AISC 360 J3-6e, f)
ϕ = 0.75 (LRFD)
Ω = 2.00 (ASD)
where
Project: KAMC
Project no:
Author:
F u – specified minimum tensile strength of the connected material,

d – nominal bolt diameter,
l c – clear distance, in the direction of the force, between the edge of the hole and the edge of the adjacent hole or edge of
the material,
t – thickness of connected material.
Preloaded bolts
The design slip resistance of a preloaded class A325 or A490 bolt with of effect of tensile force, Ft,Ed according to AISC 360 – J3.9.
Preloading force to be used AISC 360 – Tab. J3.1.
Tb = 0.7 fubAs
Design slip resistance per bolt AISC 360 – J3.8
Rn = 1.13 μ TbNs
Utilisation in shear [%]:
Uts = V / Rn
where
A s – tensile stress area of the bolt,

f ub – ultimate tensile strength,
μ – mean slip factor coefficient,
N s – number of the friction surfaces. Check is calculated for each friction surface separately,
V – shear force.
Anchors
The anchor bolt element is elastic-plastic with significant strain hardening. The maximum steel tensile resistance is expected at the
strain which equals to 0.25 × guaranteed elongation. The failure mode due to concrete cracking may occur before the anchor steel
tensile resistance is reached and is considered as a completely brittle failure.
Similarly, the steel components in shear (anchor bolt, base plate in bearing) are able to yield but failure modes connected with
concrete cracking may occur suddenly as a brittle failure.
All standards use Concrete Capacity Design method developed by prof. R. Eligehausen at University of Stuttgart. The theory is
based on vast experimental and numerical testing mostly on unreinforced concrete blocks and relatively short, often post-installed,
anchors.
Anchorage is designed according to ACI 318-14 – Chapter 17. The design is available only for LRFD. Some failure modes (e.g.
steel resistance) are evaluated for single anchors, others (e.g. concrete breakout) are checked for group of anchors.
Software info
Application IDEA StatiCa Connection
Version 21.0.3.746
Developed by IDEA StatiCa

Design & Analysis of Mullion & Steel BracketsREV - 01

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design & Analysis of Mullion & Steel BracketsREV - 01

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

..

��, SFD '( d,i.o.U1J ..,, .>g.,:w.t.11 JI g.uo.11

Date: 02 November 2021

1.0 Design loadings.

2.0 Reference drawings.

3.0 Wind Load analysis.

4.0 Analysis for Curtain wall Aluminum Profile (STAAD

5.0 Check on Aluminum Mullion / Transom.

6.0 Glass thickness Analysis & Design.

7.0 Design of Steel Bracket for Aluminum Mullion (IDEA

8.0 APPENDIX: Technical References.

1.1 DESIGN STANDARDS AND REFERENCES

1.3 DEFLECTION CRITERIA TRANSOM

1.4 STRESS: GENERAL

• Self-Weight of structure are automatically generated in STAAD PRO

Combination Load Cases

4 Generated ACI Table1 1 1 DL 1.40

1.5.6 Stresses of Steel

Fig. 02 PRESPECTIVE (CW 08 & 09)

WS1 WS2 WS13 WS11

STR1 L2 12/13 12/13 L2 STR1

S' L4 STR4 TOI-21

WS6 DESIGN OF KING ABDULLAH

VISUAL SCALE 1:250 @ A0

3.) WIND LOAD DATA:

qs = Dynamic Pressure, Kn/M2

Ve effective wind speed

vb Basic wind speed vb = 45m/s

Lis Elevation to MSL Ve = V, xS b

Vs = 45 x 1.0044x0.78xlx1 = 31.6 m, closest distance to sea = 2 km

Table 4 - Factor Sb for standard method

y = yl + (x - xl) (y2 - yl) yl = 1.96

Table 5 -External pressure coefficients Cpc for vertical walls

External Pressure Coefficient: cpe

Size Effect Factor: c.

p P. - P; p = 1.594475 Max. pressure

Effec · e Heights in Towns

rog ! ; ollU o,.-J4o.JI �l.£!;llg ci...µiu 6,,i.aa.o

Size Effect Factor

Size Effect Factor

Analysis for Curtain Wall Aluminum

alumlnlum facade technique Ref

ro�lU c..,.-il..!,.oJI ol..&.:;llg ci..!,.i.iu o,.i.10.o By Date13-Oct-21 Chd

Client File ELEVATION 02 CW-09.stdDate/Time 14-Oct-2021 10:03

Structure Type SPACE FRAME

Number of Nodes 304 Highest Node 354

Number of Basic Load Cases 3

Included in this printout are data for:

Included in this printout are results for load cases:

Print Time/Date: 14/10/2021 10:43 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33

alumlnlum facade technique Ref

ro�lU c..,.-il..!,.oJI ol..&.:;llg ci..!,.i.iu o,.i.10.o By Date13-Oct-21 Chd

Client File ELEVATION 02 CW-09.stdDate/Time 14-Oct-2021 10:03

Primary Load Cases

Combination Load Cases

4 Generated ACI Table1 1 1 DL 1.40

Print Time/Date: 14/10/2021 10:43 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33

alumlnlum facade technique Ref

ro�lU c..,.-il..!,.oJI ol..&.:;llg ci..!,.i.iu o,.i.10.o By Date13-Oct-21 Chd

Client File ELEVATION 02 CW-09.stdDate/Time 14-Oct-2021 10:03

Print Time/Date: 14/10/2021 10:43 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33

alumlnlum facade technique Ref