This rubric evaluates research proposals on a scale from Excellent to Incomplete in several categories including the introduction, problem statement, purpose of study, literature review, references, writing mechanics, presentation skills, visual aids, and overall presentation quality. Proposals are assessed based on how well they introduce and define the research topic, review relevant literature, cite references, are written and presented, and achieve the goals of an effective research proposal.
This rubric evaluates research proposals on a scale from Excellent to Incomplete in several categories including the introduction, problem statement, purpose of study, literature review, references, writing mechanics, presentation skills, visual aids, and overall presentation quality. Proposals are assessed based on how well they introduce and define the research topic, review relevant literature, cite references, are written and presented, and achieve the goals of an effective research proposal.
This rubric evaluates research proposals on a scale from Excellent to Incomplete in several categories including the introduction, problem statement, purpose of study, literature review, references, writing mechanics, presentation skills, visual aids, and overall presentation quality. Proposals are assessed based on how well they introduce and define the research topic, review relevant literature, cite references, are written and presented, and achieve the goals of an effective research proposal.
An intriguing introduction based on A fairly well formulated introduction Introduction is not well constructed, Lacks a proper introduction. _______________ facts leads clearly into the research with some evidence to support the topic uninteresting, or does not lead into the research proposal. leads into the research proposal. proposal.
Problem Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Incomplete
Statement Stated the research Fairly well posed statement of the Statement of the problem is not clearly stated Lacks a proper statement of the problem. problem clearly, and provided problem that provides evidence but the and/or lacks quality evidence to support the motivation for undertaking the evidence is not as strong as it could be. problem Evidence presented does not support the _______________ research. thesis or problem statement.
Purpose of Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Incomplete
Study Very clearly stated purpose of the Fairly well stated purpose of the study Purpose of the study is not clearly stated and/or Lacks a purpose of the study statement. study and demonstrated its potential but did not demonstrate its potential the value is not stated. _______________ value. value.
Literature Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Incomplete
Review Demonstrated basic knowledge of Demonstrated basic knowledge of Unclearly mentioned some previous work in the Did not mention any previous research, literature in the area, literature or previous research in the area. literature, or theories. _______________ and of prior work on the specific area, but did not mention any theories. research problem. Mentioned at least 1 theory.
References are given for more than 2 References are given for 2 relevant References are given for more than 1 relevant No references are provided, or they are _______________ relevant sources. Appropriate Harvard sources. Appropriate Harvard citation source. Appropriate Harvard citation style is not cited correctly. citation style is used. style is used. used.
Mechanics Very well written proposal with few Well written proposal with few Fairly written proposal that lacks clarity; has Poorly written paper that lacks grammatical errors. Adheres to all the grammatical errors. Adheres to most of poor transition sentences. There are several organization. There are multiple proposal writing format requirements the proposal writing format grammatical errors. Adheres to most of the grammatical errors. Fails to adhere to as presented in the guidelines. requirements as presented in the proposal writing format requirements as the proposal writing format requirements _______________ guidelines. presented in the guidelines. as presented in the guidelines.
Skill Excellent eye contact, no Good eye contact, no Inconsistent with eye Poor eye contact, distracting gestures, distracting gestures, contact, volume, and volume too low or loud, appropriate volume, clear and usually has appropriate enunciation. Obvious poor enunciation. consistent volume, overall clear distracting mannerism(s). _______________ enunciation. Creative and enunciation. charismatic.
Visual Aids Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Incomplete
The presentation includes appropriate The presentation includes appropriate The presentation includes appropriate visual The presentation includes no visual aids. and easily understood visual aids, and easily understood visual aids, aids, but these are too few, or are difficult to Or the visual aids do not complement the _______________ which complement and enhance the which complement and enhance the understand, or the presenter does not presented information. presented information. refer to or explain them. information.
Presentation Excellent use was made of the Good use was made of the student's Acceptable use was made of the student's The presentation was not timed Quality student's presentation time (4 presentation time (4 minutes). Each presentation time (4 minutes). Most sections of appropriate. Some portions of the minutes). Each section of the written section of the written proposal was the written proposal was mentioned. English proposal were ignored. English was proposal was mentioned. English mentioned. English quality was quality was inconsistent. difficult to understand. _______________ quality was advanced. acceptable.
Reading Proficiency of Fourth Year Manobo High School Students of Divine Word Manobo Cultural Development Academy Foundation, Inc., Bunawan, Agusan Del Sur