Professional Documents
Culture Documents
13 Hma
13 Hma
Versus
Through councel
XXXX
Advocate
Verification
Verified that the contents of the paras no. 1 to 23 of the petition
above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and
upon the information received and believed to be correct. Last
unnumbered relates to prayer clause.
petitioner
IN THE COURT OF SESSION JUDGE, AMRITSAR
………………………………………………….Petitioner
Versus
……………………………………respondent.
3. That at the time of the marriage parents of the petitioner had given
huge dowry articles in the shape of gifts to the respondent and to
his family members but the respondent and his family members
were not satisfied from the dowry articles which were given by the
parents of the petitioner to the respondent and his family members.
4. That since the very solemnization of the marriage, the respondent
has treated the petitioner with utmost mental as well as physical
cruelty. The cruelty caused by the respondent to the petitioner is of
such extreme that the petitioner has got reasonable apprehension
that it is not proper, rather injurious to live any more along with the
respondent as his wife. Accordingly petitioner is left with no other
alternative except to file the present petition seeking divorce of her
marriage from the respondent by way of filing the present divorce
petition.
5. That it is relevant fact to mention over here that the respondent
even at the time of performance of his marriage with petitioner was
in bad habits as he is habitual drunkard and takes intoxicants. The
respondent did not use to give money to petitioner for
spending, rather he used to ask petitioner to bring money from
her parents. Before the commencement of the marriage, it was
told by the parents of the respondent that petitioner is earning
Rs.10,000/- per month, but respondent never bothered to pay
any of the amount to the petitioner. Respondent used to ask to
petitioner to bring money from her parents and when
petitioner refused to bring money from her parents,
respondent used to beat petitioner in the presence of his family
members.
6. The behaviour of the respondent and his family members towards
petitioner was not so much good and soon after the marriage,
respondent and his family members started taunting to petitioner by
saying that her parents had not given much dowry articles as they
expected a lot and they also told to petitioner that the articles which
had been given by the parents of the petitioner to them is of inferior
quality and are not according to their status.
7. That respondent demanded from petitioner and her parental
relations to give cash amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with one
motor cycle and when petitioner refused to accept this demands of
the respondent, respondent used to beat petitioner. Later on one
more astonishing fact came into knowledge of the petitioner
that respondent is a habitual thief and one criminal case in the
shape of FIR no. 39 of 2007 under section 379 of Indian Penal
code has been registered against him by the police officials of
police station ‘E’ division, Amritsar and in that case
respondent was also arrested by police and the above
mentioned case is still pending against him.
8. That on_____________ a male child was born from the wedlock of
the petitioner and the respondent, and when the parents of the
petitioner had came to house of the petitioner to give gifts to the
child and to the respondent and his family members, the respondent
and his family members did not behave well with the parents of the
petitioner. The respondent and his family members told to
petitioner that they expected that parents of the petitioner will give
motor cycle at the time of birth of child and then respondent and
his family members had asked to petitioner to bring motor cycle
and also cash of Rs.1,00,000/- from her parents and when
petitioner told to respondent that her parents had already given a lot
beyond their status and now they are not in a position to give
motor cycle to respondent and after hearing these words from the
mouth of the petitioner , she was mercilessly beaten by the
respondent and his family members.
9. That it has become a matter of daily routine that the petitioner was
beaten black and blue by the respondent and his family members
for want of aforesaid Rs, 1,00,000/- and motor cycle. It is also
pertinent to mention over here that petitioner was not provided
with basic necessity of life by the respondent even during the days
of her pregnancy and she was often mentally as well as physically
tortured by the respondent and his family members as family
members of the respondent often says to petitioner that in case she
will not bring dowry articles as demanded by them then she will be
turned out of her matrimonial house and respondent will re marry
with the girl belonging to a rich family who could bring much
dowry articles.
10.That the parental relation of the petitioner managed to give Rs.
20,000/- to the respondent and they have requested not to maltreat
the petitioner but the respondent and the other parental relations
did not stop committing cruelty to the petitioner and they
constantly demanded a motor cycle and cash from the petitioner.
11.That the petitioner was also astonished to see that the respondent
was living in the company of various females who were not related
to him. The respondent was having illicit relationship with many
girls and even in the presence of petitioner, the respondent used to
develop physical relationship with such girls.
12.That ultimately on _-------------, the petitioner was beaten
mercilessly by the respondent and his family members and was
thrown out from the house of the respondent in three wearing
apparels. Respondent and his family members openly demanded
cash amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- and a motor cycle and openly told in
case petitioner wants to live with respondent, she will have to fulfil
the demands. Thereafter the petitioner and her parental relations
had tried to settle and reconcile the matter but on the account of
wrongful demand of motor cycle and cash, no rehabilitation could
be possible. Ultimately the petitioner had moved an application for
the registration of FIR against the respondent and his other family
members investigation of which is pending at this stage.
13. That the respondent has not stayed with the petitioner w.e.f.
23.08.2007,and respondent had refused to live with the petitioner
by declaring that he has no intention to live with the petitioner and
he is living apart from the with an intention to permanently
breakup marital ties with the petitioner. The respondent had also
told to the petitioner that he has left with the petitioner with an
intention of animus descarndi and now he will not live with the
petitioner so long as her parental relation will meet his wrongful
demands of motor cycle and cash.
14.That respondent is living separately from the petitioner since
23.08.2007 and during the recent period there has not been any
cohabitation between the petitioner and the respondent. The
respondent accordingly has deserted the petitioner without any
reasonable and sufficient cause.
15.That on account of the aforesaid facts and circumstances the
petitioner is left with no other alternative except to file the present
divorce petition against the respondent and the aforesaid acts of the
respondent are sufficient to hold that respondent has not only
deserted the petitioner, rather the respondent has also committed
gravest acts of cruelty upon the petitioner as defined under section
13 of Hindu Marriage act, 1955.Accordingly, the present petition is
required to be accepted.
16.That the petitioner has not condoned the wrongful acts of the
respondent as complained for.
17.That there is no other ground as to why the relief claimed for be
not granted to her.
18.That the petitioner has filed the present petition as the earliest
possible opportunity and there has not been any unexplained or
undesirable delay on the part of the petitioner to file the present
petition.
19.That there is no other reason as to why the relief claimed for be
not granted to her.
20. That the petitioner has not file the present petition in collusion
with the respondent.
21.That since the marriage between the parties was performed at
Amritsar, they had lastly lived and cohabited as husband and wife
within the jurisdiction of Amritsar, as such, this Hon`ble Court has
got the jurisdiction to try and entertain the present petition.
Deponent
Verification
I, the above named deponent, do hereby solemnly declare and affirm
that the contents of the affidavit above are true and correct to the best
of my knowledge and belief and upon the information received and
believed to be correct.
DEPONENT