125 Reply Kawaljit Kaur
125 Reply Kawaljit Kaur
…………..PETITIONER
VERSUS
………………………RESPONDENT
PETITIONERS
Sir,
Preliminary Objections:-
1
2. That the petitioner has no locas standai to file the
Hon`ble court.
5. That the petitioner has not come to the court with clean
2
respondent. Since the day of inception of marriage, it is
the petitioner with the hope that some better sense would
near her parental house for the petitioners but there was
3
the respondent and she left the house in that grudge. The
On Merits:-
4
articles or gift were taken by the respondent and his
and false.
5
given the disgrace, annoyance and maltreatment to the
parents but they did not feel satisfied with the same. The
6
true fact is that at the time of birth of daughters of the
from his own pocket as they were living separate from the
walls of the room and also denied that she was not
baseless.
7
such demands were ever raised by the respondent and
8
10. That the Para no. 10 of the petition is denied being
farm and selling buffalos and cows and also denied that
9
the Para is denied. It is further denied that petitioners
respondent. .
record.
10
…..……Respondent
Verifications:-
(Respondent)
11
IN THE COURT OF MS. SUREKHA RANI, JMIC, AMRITSAR
AFFIDAVIT
VERSUS
SUKHJINDER SINGH
PETITIONERS
AFFIDAVIT
Preliminary Objections:-
12
2. That the petitioner has no locas standai to file the
Hon`ble court.
5. That the petitioner has not come to the court with clean
13
respondent that she had committed a big mistake by
the petitioner with the hope that some better sense would
near her parental house for the petitioners but there was
the respondent and she left the house in that grudge. The
14
return to her matrimonial house. The petitioner has filed
On Merits:-
15
parties. A ll the allegations leveled in this Para are vague
and false.
16
5. That the Para no. 5 of the petition is stoutly denied being
parents but they did not feel satisfied with the same. The
from his own pocket as they were living separate from the
walls of the room and also denied that she was not
17
provided with the basic necessities of life. The entire
baseless.
18
fulfilled, the petitioner would not be allowed to enter into
farm and selling buffalos and cows and also denied that
19
deems to be denied. The present petition has been filed
respondent. .
record.
Deponent
Amritsar on 30 /10/2013.
Deponent
20
IN THE COURT OF MS SUREKHA RANI, JMIC, AMRITSAR
VERSUS
SUKHJINDER SINGH
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION:-
Reply on merits:-
21
2. That the Para no. 2 of the application s replied in this
deems to be denied.
22
5. That the para no.5 of the application is denied being
costs.
…………Respondent
23
IN THE COURT OF MS SUREKHA RANI, JMIC, AMRITSAR
AFFIDAVIT
VERSUS
SUKHJINDER SINGH
AFFIDAVIT
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION:-
facts.
24
Reply on merits:-
25
entitled to any maintenance. Otherwise she is also
Deponent
Amritsar on 30 /10/2013.
Deponent
26