Majed Khalil Lawsuit Against Fox News Lou Dobbs Sidney Powell
Majed Khalil Lawsuit Against Fox News Lou Dobbs Sidney Powell
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action and to serve
a copy of your answer, or, if the complaint is not served with this summons, to serve a notice of
appearance, on the Plaintiff’s attorneys within 20 days after the service of this summons,
exclusive of the day of service (or within 30 days after the service is complete if this summons is
not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case of your failure to
appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the
Complaint.
The basis for venue is CPLR § 503(a) and (c), because at least one of the parties resides in
New York County and a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims set
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 1 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 Page 3 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
RECEIVED
LOU DOBBS
74 Quarry Road
Sussex, New Jersey 07461
SIDNEY POWELL
3831 Turtle Creek Boulevard, Apartment 5B
Dallas, Texas 75219-4495
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to2 New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 2 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 Page 4 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
RECEIVED
Plaintiff Majed Khalil (“Mr. Khalil”), through his attorneys, Brown Rudnick LLP, hereby
brings this Complaint against D efendants Fox Corporation and Fox News Network LLC
(collectively, “Fox”), Lou D obbs (“D obbs”) and Sidney Powell (“Powell,” and with Fox and
INTRODUCTION
1. In the aftermath of Joe Biden winning the 2020 election for President of the United
States, D efendants undertook a concerted, fraudulent effort to overturn the demonstrable and
irrefutable fact that Donald Trump had lost the election, in which there had been no rigging or
manipulation of the election results. This fraudulent effort included, as a major component,
fabricated charges being leveled against two companies, D ominion and Smartmatic (and their
affiliates), along with an outrageous fabricated claim that Venezuela and certain Venezuelans,
including Plaintiff, were somehow involved in orchestrating this non-existent scheme to rig or fix
the results of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election to favor Joe Biden. As Smartmatic has noted in
1
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 3 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 Page 5 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
RECEIVED
its lawsuit pending in this Court, the fraudulent effort needed “to identify a villain.”1 Two of the
invented “villains” were D ominion and Smartmatic. When D ominion and Smartmatic
appropriately pushed back and provided detailed notice to Fox, Dobbs, and others that their serial
lies about the claimed election fraud and Venezuelan involvement were entirely bogus, Defendants
double-downed on their scheme and falsely identified Mr. Khalil, a Venezuelan businessman who,
as set forth below, had no involvement in, or connection to, any United States election and no
business dealings whatsoever with D ominion or Smartmatic, on D ecember 10, 2020 as having
been the “COO” of the alleged Venezuelan-Smartmatic-D ominion election scam, which
D efendants falsely characterized as a “cyber Pearl Harbor” and an “electoral 9-11 against the
United States.” Defendants even went so far as to bizarrely and falsely claim that Plaintiff was
involved in creation of Smartmatic election software and hardware that allegedly was used to
siphon off votes during the 2020 Presidential election, a lie totally devoid of reality, insofar as,
among other things, Plaintiff had no connection to Smartmatic and no familiarity with creation of
election computer software or hardware, and as Smartmatic has established, Smartmatic itself had
no involvement in any such election scheme. Thus, Mr. Khalil was identified as part of
Defendants’ manufactured effort to assign a further foreign name to their non-existent conspiracy
and became a fabricated “third villain” in this fictional and xenophobic conspiracy hatched and
promoted by Defendants.
this action seeks compensation for their outrageous, false claims. But Defendants’ conduct was
even more egregious and sinister than garden-variety defamation. Indeed, it was an exercise in
1
See Complaint ¶¶ 92-93 (“Compl.”), Smartmatic USA Corp., et al. v. Fox Corporation, et al.,
Index No. 151136/2021 (Supreme Court, New York Cnty.).
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to2 New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 4 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 Page 6 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
RECEIVED
private individual and foreign national with absolutely no connection to any United States election
intimately involved with United States election interference. These allegations, however, were
fabricated by D efendants out of thin air to xenophobically add another foreign “name” to the
officials and private citizens. In the false parallel reality that Defendants have concocted, a private
individual, simply by being a foreigner with a Venezuelan nationality and having a foreign-
non-existent U.S. election rigging conspiracy, it is necessary to review the sequence of events that
occurred after Joe Biden won the election for President, and the litany of false claims made by
Defendants against Smartmatic and Dominion before they falsely pilloried Plaintiff. Defendant
Lou D obbs, a then-prominent Fox personality, played a critical role in this conspiracy, as he
repeatedly hosted Sidney Powell to present and endorse her bogus claims of election fraud
orchestrated by Venezuela and Venezuelans, which culminated in the D ecember 10, 2020
broadcast (which was rebroadcast multiple times by Fox and Dobbs) and tweets, in which Plaintiff
was targeted by Defendants and ensnared in this fabricated charge of election fraud.
about D ominion, Smartmatic and others, despite being put on notice by both D ominion and
2
See, e.g., Sean Illing, “How Progaganda Works in the Digital Age” (Oct. 20, 2019),
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/10/18/20898584/fox-news-trump-propaganda-
jason-stanley (noting that propaganda “today” “is more about pushing conspiracy theories or
misleading spin than anything else” and identifying Fox News as active purveyor of propaganda).
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to3 New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 5 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 Page 7 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
RECEIVED
Smartmatic (and by others) of the falsity of their claims, before falsely accusing Plaintiff of
involvement with this non-existent election scheme. These outlandish, defamatory, and far-
fetched fictions included (but were not limited to) Defendants’ demonstrably false claims that: (i)
D ominion committed election fraud by rigging the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election; (ii)
D ominion’s software and algorithms manipulated vote counts in the 2020 U.S. Presidential
Election; (iii) Dominion is owned by Smartmatic, and Smartmatic and was founded in Venezuela
to rig elections for former Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez; (iv) D ominion paid kickbacks to
government officials who used its machines in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election; and (v)
Smartmatic was allegedly involved in an election rigging scheme in Venezuela and in the 2020
5. By December 10, 2020, Defendants knew full well that their “story” of a massive
election fraud orchestrated by Dominion, Smartmatic, and Venezuela(ns) was pure fiction. Faced
with compelling and uncontroverted evidence that the claims of election fraud were fabricated,
however, Defendants did not cease their false propaganda and deliberate disinformation campaign.
Instead, on December 10, 2020, Defendants dug an even deeper hole and threw Plaintiff, a private
involvement with administration of United States elections, into the ditch by falsely identifying
6. Each Defendant knew their claims about Plaintiff’s involvement in election fraud
were false, or at a minimum, recklessly disregarded the truth, the evidence of which was plainly
available to them. For example, Defendants knew the vote tallies from Dominion machines could
easily be confirmed by independent audits and hand recounts of paper ballots, as has been done
repeatedly since the election. D efendants also knew that these lies were being rebutted by an
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to4 New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 6 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 Page 8 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
RECEIVED
increasingly long list of bipartisan election officials, election security experts, judges, then-
Attorney General William P. Barr, then-United States D irector of the Cybersecurity and
Benjamin Hovland, Republican Georgia Governor Brian P. Kemp, Republican Georgia Secretary
of State Brad Raffensperger, and Republican former Colorado Secretary of State Wayne Williams,
7. D efendants likewise knew, as set forth in detail below, there was no evidence
whatsoever to support the Venezuela or “kickbacks” claims. Yet, even after Fox and Dobbs were
put on specific written notice by Dominion and Smartmatic of the facts, they stuck to the inherently
improbable and demonstrably false preconceived narrative and continued broadcasting the lies of
facially unreliable sources—which were embraced by Fox’s own on-air personalities such as
D obbs—because the lies were good for Fox’s and D obbs’ business. It is in that context that
Defendants falsely alleged that Mr. Khalil was the “COO” of the non-existent election plot.
8. Private individuals such as Mr. Khalil should not be subject to brazen, false
alleged association with a non-existent scheme to rig a United States Presidential election or
incendiary, false accusations of participating in a non-existent “cyber Pearl Harbor” and “electoral
9-11.” Today it is Mr. Khalil being falsely accused. Tomorrow it could be another individual of
foreign origin who is falsely accused simply because he or she is “foreign” or an “other.” The
Court should impose liability and severe sanctions for such deplorable and illegal conduct by a
purported “news” outlet, former anchor, and officer of the Court who carry ethical responsibilities
and should have known better. Defendants failed miserably to discharge those duties and seriously
damaged Plaintiff and intended collateral damage through their defamatory scheme and false
propaganda.
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to5 New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 7 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 Page 9 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
RECEIVED
PARTIES
referred to as “Khalil Majed Mazoud.” As alleged here, Mr. Khalil was referred to by Defendants
on D ecember 10, 2020 as “Khalil Majed Mazoud.” Plaintiff has at no time had any business
business in New York. Fox Corporation owns Foxcorp Holdings LLC (100% ownership), Foxcorp
Holdings LLC owns Fox Television Holdings LLC (100% ownership), Fox Holdings LLC owns
Fox Television Stations LLC (100% ownership), and Fox Television Stations LLC owns Fox News
10. Defendant Fox News Network LLC is a Delaware corporation that has its principal
place of business in New York. It is wholly owned by Defendant Fox Corporation (together with
Fox News Network LLC, “Fox”), a Delaware corporation also headquartered in New York. Fox
operates the Fox News Channel, the Fox Business Channel, Fox News Radio, and Fox News
Digital, which includes the fox.com, foxnews.com, and foxbusiness.com websites, Fox’s social
media accounts, and Fox’s digital subscription services, such as Fox Nation, which it refers to
collectively as “Fox News Media.” The Fox News and Fox Business Channels are available in
over 80 million American households,3 and Fox has boasted that Fox News Media reaches 200
million people each month. 4 Fox News also simulcasts its broadcasts, including through
SiriusXM. In 2020, the Fox News Channel averaged over 3.5 million viewers during its primetime
3
Fox Annual Report (2020), https://investor.foxcorporation.com/static-files/3cfbceb7-b29f-408a-
9666-7affafe3cfd0.
4
Fox News Digital Surpasses New York Times and Washington Post in Every Performance Metric,
Fox News, http://press.foxnews.com/2021/03/fox-news-digital-surpasses-new-york-times-and-
washington-post-in-every-key-performance-metric/.
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to6 New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 8 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 PageRECEIVED
10 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
evening news programming and nearly 2 million daytime viewers, while Fox News D igital
reported that its “digital network earned 24 billion multiplatform views” and “54 billion total
multiplatform minutes.”5 Fox repeatedly published defamatory falsehoods about Dominion and
Lou Dobbs’ show, and on other Fox shows, as well as by republishing those falsehoods across
Fox’s websites, social media accounts, and subscription service platforms. The defamatory
statements regarding Mr. Khalil were published and republished on a Fox social media account
and on Dobb’s show, and rebroadcast as alleged herein. In December 2020, Fox noted that, as a
result of its election coverage, it had reached more than 100 million unique visitors through its
digital platforms, including 51 million Facebook users and 23 million Instagram users.6
11. D efendant Lou D obbs is a Fox Business personality who hosted Lou Dobbs
Tonight, which Fox described as “the #1 program on any business network among total viewers.”7
Dobbs presented himself to readers and viewers as a provider of factual information – not opinion,
rhetoric or spin. However, contrary to his public persona, D obbs was one of the primary
proponents and speakers for the disinformation campaign against Dominion and Smartmatic, and
Plaintiff. During the relevant period, his show was broadcast from New York, New York. At all
relevant times, Dobbs also has been an agent for Fox, and even after Fox cancelled Lou Dobbs
Tonight on February 5, 2021, Dobbs remained under contract with Fox.8 At all relevant times,
5
Fox News Digital Network Delivers Record Year, Fox News (Jan. 25, 2021),
http://press.foxnews.com/2021/01/fox-news-digital-network-delivers-record-year (emphases
added unless otherwise noted).
6
Fox News Digital Scores Best November In its History, Fox News (D ec. 22, 2020),
https://press.foxnews.com/2020/12/fox-news-digital-scores-best-november-in-its-history.
7
Fox Annual Report (2020), https://investor.foxcorporation.com/static-files/3cfbceb7-b29f-408a-
9666-7affafe3cfd0.
8
Zeeshan Aleem, Fox Business Abruptly Canceled Lou Dobbs Tonight, Vox (Feb. 6, 2021),
https://www.vox.com/2021/2/6/22269780/lou-dobbs-cancel-fox-business-news.
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to7 New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 9 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 PageRECEIVED
11 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
Fox broadcast Lou Dobbs Tonight from its New York headquarters. Fox aired false statements
about Dominion, Smartmatic and Mr. Khalil on Lou Dobbs Tonight. Until at least February 5,
2021, Fox operated and exercised control over the Instagram account @loudobbstonight, the
Facebook account “Lou Dobbs” (which links to the @loudobbstonight Instagram account), and
the Twitter account, @LouD obbs, as the official social media accounts for the Fox show Lou
Dobbs Tonight, as evidenced by the fact that the @LouDobbs Twitter account’s description was,
until February 5, 2021, “Lou Dobbs Tonight, Fox Business Network, 5, 7 & 10 PM/ET,”9 and the
fact that tweets were posted to the account during live broadcasts (when Dobbs could not post
himself). 10 Fox frequently republished shows and segments from Lou Dobbs Tonight on the
@loudobbstonight Instagram, “Lou D obbs” Facebook, and @LouD obbs Twitter accounts. As
alleged here, Dobbs repeatedly advocated the bogus election fraud claim for nearly one month,
though put on actual notice by Dominion, Smartmatic and others that the basic factual points he
(and Fox) and guests such as Powell were advancing were objectively false. By the time Dobbs
hosted, advanced, and repeated Powell’s fabricated and false statements about Plaintiff, and
himself promoted such false statements about Plaintiff, Dobbs and Fox already had been warned
(and put on express notice) in great detail that the entire underlying hypothesis about Venezuela
and Venezuelans being involved in an effort to overturn the 2020 U.S. Presidential election was
pure fiction, disinformation and propaganda, as were all the other elements of this election fraud
9
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter (Jan. 31, 2021), https://web.archive.org/web/
20210131165537/https://twitter.com/LouDobbs.
10
See, e.g., Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter (D ec. 10, 2020, 5:51 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337168084541575171.
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to8 New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 10 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 PageRECEIVED
12 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
12. Defendant Sidney Powell is an attorney and the author of a self-published book that
purports to be a seminal work in “exposing ‘the Deep State.’”11 Powell briefly pursued spurious
litigation challenging the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, beginning on November 25, 2020, but
her cases had all been summarily dismissed by federal judges by December 9, 2020. One federal
judge thereafter sanctioned Powell for having filed an election fraud case that, according to the
judge, was filed in bad faith and for an improper purpose, and further expressed concern, in the
sanction ruling, that “Powell is profiting from the filing of this and other frivolous election-
challenge lawsuits.”12 Fox repeatedly hosted Powell on its programming in the weeks and months
following the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election to promote falsehoods about D ominion and
Smartmatic. Powell regularly appeared on Dobbs’ show, including on December 10, 2020, during
which she falsely accused Plaintiff of involvement with the non-existent election fraud. Powell
presented herself to readers and viewers as a provider of factual information – not opinion, rhetoric,
or spin. However, contrary to her public persona, she was one of the primary proponents and
speakers of the disinformation campaign against Dominion and Smartmatic, and Plaintiff.
13. Fox, D obbs and Powell are collectively referred to as “D efendants” in this
Complaint. Defendants agreed to use Fox News’ broadcasting base in New York, New York to
disseminate the disinformation campaign, which ensured the story would reach the broadest
audience possible.
14. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant Fox pursuant to CPLR § 301.
New York is the principal place of business of Fox Corporation and Fox News Network LLC. Fox
11
Sidney Powell, https://www.sidneypowell.com/shop.
12
See King, et al. v. Whitmer, et al., Civ. No. 20-13134, 2021 WL 3771875, at *41 n. 85 (E.D.
Mich. Aug. 25, 2021)
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to9 New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 11 of 82
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 Case 1:21-cv-10248 Document 1-1 Filed 12/02/21 PageRECEIVED
13 of 83 NYSCEF: 12/01/2021
News Network LLC broadcast the defamatory and disparaging statements (verbal and
written/posted) at issue in this Complaint from its operations in New York, New York. Fox News
Network LLC used the disinformation campaign to solicit views and readers in New York, New
York. New York was the largest television audience market in the United States at the time of the
15. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant Lou Dobbs pursuant to CPLR
§ 302. New York is D obbs’ principal place of business. D obbs made the defamatory and
disparaging statements at issue in the Complaint knowing and intending them to be broadcast
(verbal) and published (written/posted) from New York, New York. D obbs used the
disinformation campaign to solicit viewers and readers in New York, New York.
16. The Court has personal jurisdiction over D efendant Sidney Powell pursuant to
CPLR § 302 for at least five reasons: (i) Powell made the defamatory and disparaging statements
at issue in the Complaint knowing and intending for them to be broadcast (verbal) and published
(written/posted) from New York, New York by a New York-based organization; (ii) Powell
authorized and approved the broadcasting and publication of her statements to be made from New
York through a New York-based news organization; (iii) Powell coordinated with New York-
based reporters and employees of Fox News regarding the disinformation campaign and her
statements before appearing on the Fox News programs at issue in the Complaint; (iv) Powell used
the disinformation campaign she operated through and with Fox and Dobbs to solicit money from
individuals and corporations – including those located in New York, New York – for contributions
to her so-called “legal defense” fund and Super PAC; and (v) Powell intentionally took advantage
of New York’s unique resources, including serving as the headquarters and publication center for
Fox News, to disseminate the disinformation campaign and profit from the disinformation
campaign. The Court also has personal jurisdiction over Powell pursuant to CPLR § 302 as a co-
conspirator with Fox and Dobbs, both of whom committed tortious acts in New York.
17. Venue is proper in New York County pursuant to CPLR § 503(a) and (c). Further,
Defendants published and republished the defamatory and disparaging statements at issue in the
Complaint from Fox News’ operations in New York County. New York County is the county in
which a substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS13
18. Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (Dominion and its affiliates, unless other
indicated, are referred to herein as “Dominion”) procured its first U.S. contract in July 2009 to
provide voting machine technology to numerous counties in the state of New York. After
procuring that contract, D ominion established a New York office. For the next several years,
19. Although in June 2010, Dominion relocated its headquarters to Denver, Colorado,
Dominion continued to maintain an office and significant operations in New York to this day. As
of the 2020 election, Dominion had contracts to provide voting machine technology in numerous
counties in New York. Plaintiff has had no contact with, nor involvement with Dominion at any
time.
13
The factual allegations set forth herein regarding Defendants are drawn from the public record.
In addition, Plaintiff adopts, and incorporates as if alleged herein the factual allegations regarding
D efendants’ conduct and knowledge, and regarding Smartmatic and D ominion (and their
respective affiliates), to the extent not otherwise alleged herein, as set forth in Smartmatic’s and
Dominion’s pending Complaints (and exhibits submitted in such proceedings by Smartmatic and
D ominion), entitled Smartmatic USA Corp., et al. v. Fox Corporation, et al., Index No.
151136/21, Supreme Court, New York Cnty.; US Dominion, Inc., et al. v. Fox News Network,
LLC, Case No. N21C-03-257 (D el. Superior Court); and US Dominion, Inc., et al. v. Sidney
Powell, et al., Civ. Action No. 1:21-cv-00040 (D. Columbia)(CJN). Except as to the allegations
regarding Plaintiff, which are made on personal knowledge, the allegations herein are made on
information and belief.
20. Smartmatic (Smartmatic and its affiliates, unless otherwise indicated, are referred
to herein as “Smartmatic”) is an election technology and software company, which was founded
in Florida in 2000 to focus, initially, on the banking industry (offering secure online protocols
enabling hyper-secure interconnection between digital devices). Since 2003, Smartmatic’s election
technology has processed more than 5 billion secure votes worldwide without a single security
breach. During the 2020 U.S. election, Smartmatic successfully provided election technology and
software for Los Angeles County, and not for any other county or state in the 2020 U.S. election.
Smartmatic has provided election services for election commissions in more than 25 countries on
five continents.
21. In 2004, Smartmatic’s technology was used in the first automated election in
Venezuela. It was the first election in the world to have both an electronic record and a paper trail
of every vote made, which could be cross-checked and audited, thus ensuring the accuracy of
election totals. Smartmatic ceased participating in elections in Venezuela in 2017. Plaintiff has
had no business dealings or affiliation with Smartmatic at any time. Nor did Plaintiff have any
involvement in designing or creating any voting machines, election-related software or any other
election-related voting tabulation equipment in connection with the 2004 election in Venezuela or
22. Plaintiff is not a shareholder in either Smartmatic or Dominion and has never met
nor spoken to any of Smartmatic’s or Dominion’s owners, nor, to the best of his knowledge, has
23. For 19 years, Fox News has been the #1 rated cable news network and the go-to
24. In addition to distribution through its television networks, Fox distributes its news
content through digital media, including through the Fox News Mobile App, which has
approximately 7.5 million users, and through Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram accounts that
generate tens of millions of unique visitors each month. Tens of millions of people regularly view
Fox news content through those and other digital media platforms, such as YouTube, TikTok, and
Tubi. Fox recently announced that it has been “the most engaged news brand on social media” for
78 consecutive months, “with over 51 million Facebook and 20 million Instagram interactions.”16
Fox claims that the total audience for its news content exceeds 200 million people each month.17
14
Mark Joyella, ‘We Passed CNN … And Never Looked Back’: Fox News Hits Years At #1, Forbes
(Jan. 28, 2020), https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2020/01/28/fox-news-celebrates-18-
years-as-number-one-network-in-cable-news/?sh=fc6dccfle997.
15
Corporate Information, Fox News (last visited Nov.), http://press.foxnews.com/.
16
Fox News Digital Surpasses New York Times and Washington Post in Every
Performance Metric, Fox News (Mar. 17, 2021), http://press.foxnews.com/2021/03/fox-
news-digital-surpasses-new-york-times-and-washington-post-in-every-key-performance-metric/.
17
Id.
25. The Murdoch family plays a central and public role in the management and
oversight of Fox News. In addition to Lachlan Murdoch’s role as CEO, Rupert Murdoch is the
Chairman of Fox Corporation. 18 Both Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch, as Fox Corporation
26. President Trump’s support of Fox has been central to Fox maintaining its
dominance. Rupert Murdoch allied himself with President Trump early in Trump’s 2016
campaign, despite holding President Trump in relatively low esteem. 20 Reports surfaced that
President Trump’s son-in-law and White House adviser Jared Kushner helped broker a peace
between Murdoch and Trump during Trump’s 2016 campaign.21 President Trump began chatting
with Murdoch by phone,22 as often as daily23—calls which continued into Trump’s presidency.24
The relationship between President Trump and Fox was mutually beneficial. Trump received
support from a network with a huge following among his base. And Fox received the support of
the President of the United States — “something [Murdoch] had been after for years as well.” 25
18
Id.
19
Corporate Information, Fox News, http://press.foxnews.com/.
20
David Folkenflik, With Trump’s Loss, Murdoch’s Fox News Faces Wrath And Tough Choices,
NPR (Nov. 7, 2020), https://www.npr.org/2020/11/07/932203022/as-trumps-chances-fade-
murdoch-sfox-news-faces-wrath-and-tough-choices.
21
Tom Kludt, Frenemies with benefits: A brief history of the Trump-Murdoch relationship, CNN
Business (Jan. 17, 2020), https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/17/media/rupert-murdoch-donald-
trump/index.html.
22
Id.
23
Jane Mayer, The Making of the Fox News White House, The New Yorker (Nov. 3, 2019),
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/11/the-making-of-the-fox-news-white-house.
24
Tom Kludt, Frenemies with benefits: A brief history of the Trump-Murdoch relationship, CNN
Business (Jan. 17, 2020) https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/17/media/rupert-murdoch-donald-
trump/index.html.
25
Id.
Murdoch obtained “direct access to the person at the very top of the pyramid. . . . The person in
27. During Trump’s presidency, Murdoch relied on this direct access to the President
to obtain favorable business outcomes for his media empire, including Fox News and Fox
Business. For example, in June 2018, after only six months of deliberation, the Trump
Administration approved Fox’s bid to sell most of its entertainment assets to Disney for seventy-
one billion dollars.27 Murdoch reportedly had a hand in Trump’s nominee to lead the FCC as
well.28 As Murdoch himself put it, “it’s useful to have a friend who’s the President, particularly if
there are close regulatory calls, and a President who is untroubled by the rules and norms in that
regard.”29
28. In exchange for President Trump’s ear and his public support of Fox, Murdoch
offered the support of his media outlets and on-air personalities. As has been noted, “Fox Corp.’s
most-high-profile division is Fox News, which is in a symbiotic relationship with the president of
the United States.” 30 Over the course of Trump’s presidency, Fox and the Murdoch family
26
Tom Kludt, Frenemies with benefits: A brief history of the Trump-Murdoch relationship, CNN
Business (Jan. 17, 2020), https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/17/media/rupert-murdoch-donald-
trump/index.html.
27
Jane Mayer, The Making of the Fox News White House, The New Yorker (Nov. 3, 2019),
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/11/the-making-of-the-fox-news-white-house.
28
Tom Kludt, Frenemies with benefits: A brief history of the Trump-Murdoch relationship, CNN
Business (Jan. 17, 2020), https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/17/media/rupert-murdoch-donald-
trump/index.html.
29
Jane Mayer, The Making of the Fox News White House, The New Yorker (Nov. 3, 2019),
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/11/the-making-of-the-fox-news-white-house.
30
Sarah Ellison, Lachlan Murdoch takes control o Fox Corp. But how will he deal with President
Trump?, Wash. Post (Mar. 20, 2021), https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/lachlan-
murdoch-takes-control-of-fox-corp-but-how-will-he-deal-with-president-
trump/2019/03/20/abbb43d6-40ee-11e9-a0d3-1210e58a94cf_story.html.
remained among President Trump’s strongest sources of support. 31 Murdoch also honored
29. Given this history, it is not surprising that although Rupert Murdoch did not believe
perpetuate these baseless claims. Fox Corp. Executive Chairman and CEO Lachlan Murdoch
acknowledged that “our audience was disappointed with the election results.” 32 And when Fox
ratings dipped after the election, Rupert Murdoch stepped in “to call the shots directly,” according
to a number of reports.33
30. The Murdochs and Fox have perpetuated these false claims of election fraud despite
multiple reports that the Murdochs themselves do not believe the claims. Nevertheless, Fox
31. In the months leading up to the 2020 election, President Trump drew a line in the
sand: either he would win or the election would be fraudulently stolen from him. His supporters
31
David Folkenflik, With Trump’s Loss, Murdoch’s Fox News Faces Wrath And Tough Choices,
NPR (Nov. 7, 2020), https://www.npr.org/2020/11/07/932203022/as-trumps-chances-fade-
murdoch-s-fox-news-faces-wrath-and-tough-choices.
32
Transcript of Lachlan Murdoch at Fox Corp.’s ‘Investor Day’ at 4-5, Fox Corp. (Mar. 4, 2021),
https://investor.foxcorporation.com/static-files/96a7dbad-e5174bb7-af38-aeb1e83d2a20.
33
Margaret Sullivan, Fox News is a hazard to our democracy. It’s time to take the fight to the
Murdochs. Here’s how., Wash. Post (Jan. 24, 2021),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/media/fox-news-is-a-hazard-to-our-democracy-its-
time-to-take-the-fight-to-the-murdochs-heres-how/2021/01/22/1821f186-5cbe-11eb-b8bd-
ee36b1cd18bf_story.html.
must either agree with him or face his wrath. In his own words: “the only way we’re gonna lose
this election is if the election is rigged”34 and there “is massive fraud.”35
election officials were expecting record-shattering mail-in voting because of concerns over the
ongoing coronavirus pandemic. News organizations— again including Fox—also reported that
this mail-in voting was widely expected to be much more heavily weighted in favor of Democrats
than the overall electorate, in significant part because prominent Republicans, including President
Trump, were consistently encouraging supporters to avoid voting by mail and instead vote in
33. Not surprisingly, given these trends, the head of the Fox News D ecision D esk
correctly predicted that “on election night, we may be looking at states where it seems that
President Trump is in the lead, but there’s still 20 or 30 percent of the vote outstanding … so we’re
not [going to be] able to make the call in those states.”36 He correctly recognized—and Fox widely
and repeatedly reported before the election—that this would occur because President Trump had
criticized mail-in voting and encouraged Republicans to vote in person whereas Democrats had
34
Morgan Chalfant, President Donald Trump, Trump Campaign Rally at Oshkosh, WI, The Hill
(Aug. 17, 2020),
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/512424-
trump-the-only-way-we-are-going-to-lose-this-election-is-if-the.
35
President Donald Trump, Trump Campaign Rally at Allentown, PA, YouTube (Oct. 26, 2020),
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt6nCZRKChE.
36
Caleb Parke, Head of Fox News Decision Desk: Why Results in Swing States Likely Won’t Be
Known on Election Night, Fox News (Aug. 11, 2020), https://www.foxnews.com/politics/election-
trump-biden-when-will-results-known.
37
Id.
34. In other words, well before any false claim that Dominion machines had switched
votes, or that Plaintiff had acted as the “COO” of a “cyber Pearl Harbor,” Fox understood the
phenomenon the country would later experience come the first week of November: early vote
tallies would lean in favor of then-President Trump, whereas later vote tallies from mail-in voting
35. D espite this knowledge, Fox spent considerable airtime before the election
searching for and discussing voter fraud that might occur during the election. As one Fox
employee is reported to have stated at the time about one such endeavor, “it feels like [] an attempt
to push more baseless conspiracy theories and scare the viewers into thinking the election is being
‘stolen.’ It isn’t.”38 In other words, even prior to any claim about D ominion, Smartmatic or
Plaintiff, Fox News already had a preconceived storyline and was on the lookout for “baseless
conspiracy theories.” Fox was planting the seed in the minds of its viewers, without any valid
basis, that there would be wide-spread election fraud so that Fox could reap the benefits in the
event that then-President Trump lost the election, as many pollsters predicted he would.
36. On November 7, 2020, Fox projected that President Trump had lost the 2020
Presidential Election.
37. The very next morning – November 8 – Fox began by connecting Dominion with
the false election fraud narrative. Specifically, Fox invited D efendant Sidney Powell on the
38
See, e.g., Lloyd Grove, et al., Fox News Pushes ‘Brain Room’ to Find Evidence for Trump’s
Voter Fraud Claims, Insiders Say, The D aily Beast (October 13, 2020),
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-pushing-brain-room-to-lend-credibility-to-trumps-
voter-fraud-paranoia-insiders-say.
Sunday Morning Futures show. Powell declared that there was “a massive and coordinated effort
to steal this election from We the People of the United States of America, to delegitimize and
destroy votes for Donald Trump, to manufacture votes for Joe Biden.” In a few days, as set forth
below, Fox would expand its false claims to include Smartmatic, claiming falsely that Smartmatic
owned Dominion and itself was formed by three Venezuelans to fix elections.
38. And who was responsible for supposedly fixing the 2020 U.S. Presidential election,
according to this Fox broadcast? None other than Dominion. The Fox host of the Sunday Morning
Futures Show asked Powell: “Sidney, we talked about the Dominion software. I know that there
were voting irregularities. Tell me about that.” And Powell responded: “That’s putting it mildly.
. . . That is where the fraud took place, where they were flipping votes in the computer system or
adding votes that did not exist. . . . That’s when they had to stop the vote count and go in and
39. In the face of intense backlash over Fox having declared Joe Biden the winner of
the Presidential election and viewers beginning to flee to rival networks, Fox understood that it
needed to embrace and amplify the lies that had begun to circulate about Dominion.
40. Even though the lies about Dominion, followed by lies about Smartmatic, and lies
about Plaintiff were inherently implausible and verifiably false when first made, Fox elevated and
lent credibility to these lies on the airwaves of Fox, which in turn fueled the recirculation of those
lies through digital and social media. And Fox continued to promote, endorse, and republish
falsehoods about the election for weeks on the airwaves and its digital platforms, even after more
and more paper ballot recounts and sources across the political spectrum had repeatedly disproven
the lies about D ominion, Smartmatic, and the alleged Venezuelan ties to the so-called election
scheme.
41. To fan the flames, Fox turned increasingly to Sidney Powell, who was promoting a
baseless defamatory campaign against D ominion (and thereafter, also against Smartmatic),
claiming that the election had been stolen by vote-flipping algorithms in Dominion machines that
had been created in Venezuela to rig elections for Hugo Chávez. As Fox well knew, Powell’s
alleged sources were facially unreliable and their claims were ludicrous, inherently improbable,
and technologically impossible. Powell’s claims about this alleged Venezuelan voting scheme and
more generally the role of Dominion and Smartmatic were so inherently improbable and outlandish
that those very same lies resulted in Tucker Carlson publicly mocking her for failing to produce
evidence to support them. In private, Lou Dobbs himself is reported to have “raised questions
about Powell’s claims to others.”39 As one Republican official stated, “It’s an insane story.”40
Even the Trump Campaign publicly distanced itself from her, with Trump then-loyalist Chris
Christie calling her claims a “national embarrassment,” and Republican senators calling the White
House to say she seemed “unhinged.” Indeed, at the White House itself, officials stated that
Powell’s claims were “nonsense.”41 Those close to Trump said that Powell’s theories were “crazy”
and the White House Counsel was “pushing back” on any notion that Powell could be trusted.42
39
Seung Min Kim, Josh Dawsey & Toluse Olorunnipa, Republicans plunge into open battle over
attempts to overturn Trump’s loss to Biden, Wash. Post (D ec. 22, 2020),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-republicans-election-
fight/2020/12/22/fa0c2744-446b-11eb-b0e4-0f182923a025_story.html.
40
Phillip Rucker, Ashley Parker, Josh Dawsey & Amy Gardner, 20 days of fantasy and failure:
Inside Trump’s quest to overturn the election, Wash. Post (Nov. 28, 2020),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-election-overturn/2020/11/28/34f45226-2f47-
11eb-96c2-aac3f162215d_story.html.
41
Toluse Olorunnipa, Josh Dawsey, Rosalind S. Helderman & Emma Brown, Trump’s assembles
a ragtag crew of conspiracy-minded allies in flailing bid to reverse election loss, Wash. Post (Dec.
21, 2020), https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-assembles-a-ragtag-crew-of-
conspiracy-minded-allies-in-flailing-bid-to-reverse-election-loss/2020/12/21/d7674cd2-43b2-
11eb-b0e4-0f182923a025_story.html.
42
Seung Min Kim, Josh Dawsey & Toluse Olorunnipa, Republicans plunge into open battle over
attempts to overturn Trump’s loss to Biden, Wash. Post (D ec. 22, 2020),
For her part, Powell used her appearances on Fox and Dobbs’ show to advance her bogus election
conspiracy theories and solicit financial donations. Powell began asking for donations as early as
November 10, 2020, a week after the election, telling viewers on Lou Dobbs Tonight that she had
started a website called “defendingthrepublic,” where they could make donations. According to a
recent report, Powell’s organization, which apparently was not formed until weeks later, may
lie that was used as the platform on which to allege Plaintiff’s involvement as the COO of a non-
existent scheme, was based on a pyramid of verifiably false claims, such as that Dominion is owned
by Smartmatic—a completely separate company that competes against and does not own
Dominion, as was readily apparent from information in the public domain since well before the
43. Yet, with Fox’s ratings in freefall and Fox viewers fleeing to other networks such
as Newsmax and OAN at then-President Trump’s behest, Fox, through its most prominent on-air
personalities, cynically exploited these lies to lure viewers back. Fox decided to tell its current
and former viewers a false set of facts about the election, rather than the actual or true facts
regarding the outcome of the election. For example, from November 8-12, 2020, Lou D obbs
repeatedly hosted Powell on his Fox programs where Dobbs also endorsed and repeated guests’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-republicans-election-
fight/2020/12/22/fa0c2744-446b-11eb-b0e4-0f182923a025_story.html.
43
See Isaac Stanley-Becker, Emma Brown and Rosalind S. Helderman, Prosecutors demanded
records of Sidney Powell’s fundraising groups as part of criminal probe, Wash. Post, (Nov. 30,
2021), https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/11/30/sidney-powell-defend-the-republic-
criminal-probe/
44
Georgia Secretary of State, Elections Security Is Our Top Priority: Security Focused Tech
Company, Dominion Voting to Implement New Verified Paper Ballot System,
https://sos.ga.gov/securevoting/.
44. Before hosting Powell, Fox and Dobbs at a minimum recklessly disregarded the
fact—and indeed knew—that voters had used paper ballots that could be recounted by hand, and
that Dominion was not owned by Smartmatic, rendering the fantasy of a vote-flipping-machine
made for a deceased Venezuelan leader nonsensical and verifiably false. Despite all this, Fox,
through its on-air talent, misrepresented alleged “dumps” of Biden votes and prompted Powell to
falsely attribute those so-called “dumps” to “algorithms and the D ominion software” that
“flip[ped] votes in the computer system or add[ed] votes that did not exist.” 45 Again, Fox at a
minimum recklessly disregarded the fact—and indeed knew—that Powell was unreliable and that
those claims were false. In truth, Fox knew why the so-called “dumps” of Biden votes had
occurred: President Trump himself had previously told another Fox host on Fox’s airwaves that
he was encouraging Republicans to vote in-person rather than by mail, such that later-counted
mail-in ballots would lean heavily for Biden. And large metropolitan areas in several of the key
swing states historically had taken longer to tabulate results. Yet such other Fox host deliberately
omitted these facts during her interviews of Powell, so as not to undermine the false narrative that
the “dumps” of Biden votes were evidence of vote-flipping algorithms in Dominion machines.
November 12-15:
Dominion Sends Fox the Facts Further Disproving the Falsehoods, But Fox and Dobbs
Stick with their Lies, and Expand the Disinformation Campaign to Include Smartmatic
45. By November 12, 2020, The Trump Administration’s own Cybersecurity &
Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”) confirmed that there was “no evidence that any voting
45
Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo, Fox News (Nov. 8, 2020),
https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWSW_20201108_150000_Sunday_Morning_Fu
tures_With_Maria_Bartiromo/start/2501/end/2561.
system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”46 This widely-
reported public announcement from the Trump Administration’s own experts on election security
removed any conceivable remaining doubt and disproved the election-rigging lies.
46. Also on November 12, 2020, D ominion began circulating a regular email titled
“SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: FACTS & RUMORS.”47 The emails were complete
with links to independent sources disproving the false claims being made about the company,
including:
• CISA’s November 12 statement that there was “no evidence that any voting system
deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised;”48
• A link to the Michigan Secretary of State’s website “which debunks false or erroneous
claims about voting in Detroit, as well as a user-error incident in Antrim County;”49
• A link to the Georgia Secretary of State’s website with the statement from Republican
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger that “every legal vote was cast and accurately
counted” in Georgia;50 and
46
Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, Joint Statement From Elections Infrastructure
Government Coordinating Council & The Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive
Committees (Nov. 12, 2020), https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-
infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election.
47
According to Dominion, it maintained a distribution list of those who received these and other
emails from D ominion. As soon as a new individual was added to the distribution list, per
Dominion, that individual received all emails that had been previously sent to the list.
48
Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, Joint Statement From Elections Infrastructure
Government Coordinating Council & The Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive
Committees (Nov. 12, 2020), https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-
infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election.
49
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: FACTS & RUMORS (Nov. 12, 2020); Secretary of
State Jocelyn Benson, Fact Checks, https://www.michigan.go v/sos/0,4670,7-127-1633 100423
102534 102535---,00.html.
50
Georgia Secretary of State, With 8,197 Votes Out, Officials Focused on Getting it Right,
https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/with_8197_votes_out_officials_focused_on_getting_it_rig
ht.
• Links to the EAC and CISA websites noting that all U.S. voting systems, including
D ominion’s, “must provide assurance that they work accurately and reliably” under
EAC “and state certification and testing requirements.”51
47. D ominion sent the “SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT” emails to Fox’s
reporters and producers, including those who oversaw and managed content for Fox’s Lou Dobbs
Tonight and numerous other Fox shows, on November 12, 2020 and again on November 13 and
14, 2020, along with additional facts disproving the lies being promoted by Fox.52
The reality is that this was the most secure election we’ve ever had and it was one
of the most well run elections we’ve ever had. … [A]nd this is about facts, this is
about truth, this is about respecting our democracy, respecting elections, and
focusing on what has really occurred. The American people made their voice heard.
And when we spread conspiracy theories and we don’t back those up with facts, it
has an impact.53
49. Professor J. Alex Halderman, the Director of the University of Michigan’s Center
for Computer Security & Society, also told Fox explicitly, “There is absolutely no evidence, none,
50. Yet, on November 12, 2020, Dobbs hosted Rudy Giuliani on Lou Dobbs Tonight
to spread the disinformation campaign to millions of viewers. This appears to have been Fox
News’ first broadcast that falsely tied Smartmatic to Dominion, and falsely tied them both, via
Smartmatic, to Venezuela and Venezuelan leaders Chávez and Maduro. This Fox show was
broadcast and rebroadcast at least four times. Dobbs was in full alignment with the false story that
51
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: FACTS & RUMORS (Nov. 12, 2020).
52
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: FACTS & RUMORS (Nov. 12, 13, & 14, 2020).
53
Eric Shawn, Cuba, China, Venezuela …and those Dominion voting machines, Fox News (Nov.
14, 2020), https://video.foxnews.com/v/video-embed.html?video_id=6209856840001.
54
Id.
Giuliani and Powell wanted to spread. In response to Giuliani’s false statements – that Smartmatic
“was formed by three Venezuelans, who were very close to [] [former leader] Chávez, of
Venezuela,” that Smartmatic was formed “in order to fix elections,” that Smartmatic “owns
Dominion,” that “we are using a foreign company that is owned by Venezuelans who are close to,
were close to Chávez, are now close to Maduro, have a history, they were founded as a company
to fix elections,” and that “the votes actually go to Barcelona, Spain” – Dobbs embellished this
false narrative. Dobbs falsely stated that Smartmatic and Dominion sent votes out of the country
so the voting was not auditable. He had no evidence of this assertion, and Secretaries of State had
stated the opposite. Dobbs closed this broadcast with an endorsement of Giuliani’s statements
about the election being stolen by Smartmatic. He said: “And Rudy we’re glad you’re on the case
and pursuing what is the truth and straightening out what is a very complicated and difficult story.
And by the way, it’s not only difficult, it has the feeling of a cover up in certain places, you know,
putting the servers in foreign countries, private companies, we don’t have transparency with those
51. On November 14, D obbs tweeted: “Read all about D ominion and Smartmatic
voting companies and you’ll soon understand how pervasive this Democratic electoral fraud is,
and why there’s no way in the world the 2020 Presidential election was either free [or] fair.”
52. On the morning of November 15, one of Dominion’s representatives sent Fox host
Maria Bartiromo an email attaching and referencing Dominion’s November 14 “SETTING THE
RECORD STRAIGHT” email,55 which included the same facts from the earlier emails, along with
55
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: FACTS & RUMORS (Nov. 14, 2020).
• OAN had retracted a story about “the deletion of 2.7 million pro-Trump votes”
nationwide;56
• A link to the Associated Press’s November 12, 2020 Fact Check, reporting as false the
claim that Dominion “deleted” Trump votes or “switched” votes from Trump to Biden
and including a statement by Open Source Election Technology (OSET) Institute
voting technology expert Eddie Perez that there was no “systemic issue related to
problems with Dominion software that would affect the tabulation of results” that he
was aware of;57
• A link to a release from Edison Research President Larry Rosin stating that the firm
had never created any report or made any statements about “anomalies in the voting
data,” and declaring that “There is no evidence to support claims of widespread voter
fraud;”58 and
• The fact that D ominion is a nonpartisan U.S. company that is not owned by
Smartmatic.59
53. Intentionally disregarding, among other known facts, the true explanation of why
President Trump’s early “leads” had disappeared, CISA’s findings, and the fact that paper ballots
the facts and evidence from the numerous independent sources that Dominion had sent directly to
Fox and its hosts, reporters, producers, and content managers, Fox continued to promote the known
lies on its most prominent and widely viewed broadcasts and on Fox’s websites, social media
56
OAN Newsroom, Report: Millions Of Votes Lost Through Dominion System Glitches, One
America News Network (Nov. 12, 2020), previously available at https://www.oann.com/report-
millions-of-votes-lost-through-dominion/.
57
Ali Swenson & Amanda Seitz, AP FACT CHECK: Trump Tweets a Tall Tale of ‘Deleted’ Votes,
Associated Press (Nov. 12, 2020), https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-tweets-
tall=tale=votes-13c104367924b8192b4fcecf334f7806.
58
Alec Dent, Did Edison Research Find That Dominion Deleted Trump Votes or Switched Votes
to Biden?, The D ispatch (Nov. 12, 2020), https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/did-edison-
research-find-that-states.
59
SETTING THE RECORD STAIGHT: FACTS & RUMORS (Nov. 14, 2020); see also Did
Edison Research Find That Dominion Deleted Trump Votes or Switched Votes to Biden? No, The
D ispatch (Nov. 12, 2020), https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/did-edison-research-find-that-
states.
accounts, and subscription service platforms. Defendant Dobbs also continued hosting Powell,
thereby giving Powell a platform to widely disseminate and repeat their lies about election fraud
and a supposed Venezuelan-led election scheme to a national (and, indeed, a global) audience, and
54. Indeed, on November 12, Dobbs declared: “It’s stunning. And they’re private firms
and very little is known about their ownership, beyond what you’re saying [the lies Rudy Giuliani
had just told] about Dominion.” He also declared that “the states as you well know now, they have
no ability to audit meaningfully the votes that are cast.” Fox and Dobbs knew that both of these
55. Following up a few days later, Fox published the following false statement to the
@loudobbs Twitter account:60 “Read all about Dominion and Smartmatic voting companies and
you’ll soon understand how pervasive this Democrat electoral fraud is, and why there’s no way in
60
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter (Nov. 14, 2020, 11:27 am),
https://twitter.com/loudobbs/status/1327649331789385728.
the world the 2020 Presidential election was either free or fair.”
Lou Dobbs $
@Lou Dobbs
But it was a front for SMARTMATIC, who was really doing the computing .
Q t.1.
56. Powell expanded her brazen claims of fraud to allege that Dominion had bribed
Georgia officials, giving kickbacks to Georgia’s Republican Governor Kemp and Secretary of
State Raffensberger in exchange for a contract to provide voting machines to the state. The false
accusation that Dominion had bribed Georgia officials—a claim for which Powell never offered a
shred of evidence—was manufactured out of whole cloth in order to discredit Georgia Republicans
after they publicly rebutted Powell’s and her allies’ false claims attacking Dominion and Georgia’s
elections results. Fox repeatedly published and republished these “kickback” claims as its own.
57. The Georgia Secretary of State website, in fact, included voluminous public records
showing that Dominion won the Georgia contract after scoring the highest in a competitive bid
process where it competed against Smartmatic and Election Systems & Software (“ES&S”) for
the contract.61 Nevertheless, Fox endorsed Powell’s false claims on a November 15 broadcast,
accusing Dominion of bribing government officials, while also further amplifying the other lies
Fox had, by this time, repeatedly broadcast about the company’s ownership: “[S]o much news on
the software that was used on the voting machines on election night. There is much to understand
58. A Dominion representative thereafter reached out to Fox’s CEO Suzanne Scott and
President and Executive Editor Jay Wallace to address Fox’s false statements about Dominion.
61
Georgia Secretary of State, Elections Security Is Our Top Priority: SecurityFocused Tech
Company, Dominion Voting to Implement New Verified Paper Ballot System
https://sos.ga.gov/securevoting/.
62
Fox and Friends Sunday, Media Matters for America (Nov. 15, 2020),
https://www.mediamatters.org/media/391956.
Both Scott and Wallace responded, and on November 17, 2020, Wallace spoke with Dominion’s
representative and was expressly informed of the voluminous facts rebutting Fox’s false claims.
59. Dominion also continued sending new and updated versions of the “SETTING THE
RECORD STRAIGHT” emails to Fox, including over 90 of its reporters, producers, and anchors
60. Separate and apart from the information being provided directly by Dominion, on
November 16, 2020, fifty-nine specialists in election security publicly and forcefully rebutted the
lies about Dominion, explaining that they “have never claimed that technical vulnerabilities have
actually been exploited to alter the outcome of any US election.”63 They further explained that
“no credible evidence has been put forth that supports a conclusion that the 2020 election outcome
in any state has been altered through technical compromise.”64 Furthermore, on November 16,
Smartmatic responded to an email from Fox Business Network (sent by D obbs’ coordinating
D obbs’ coordinating producer (at Fox News), among other things, that during the 2020 U.S.
Presidential election, Smartmatic provided technology and software only to Los Angeles County
61. That same day (November 16), Dobbs again hosted Powell on his show, where he
knowingly gave her a platform to falsely claim that Smartmatic had been created in Venezuela for
the purpose of rigging elections for Hugo Chávez and that “Smartmatic owns Dominion.”65 This
63
See Tony Adams et al., Scientists Say No Credible Evidence of Computer Fraud in the 2020
Election Outcome, But Policymakers Must Work with Experts to Improve Confidence, Matt Blaze
(Nov. 16, 2020), https://www.mattblaze.org/papers/election2020.pdf.
64
Id. (emphasis added).
65
Lou Dobbs Tonight, Fox Business (Nov. 16, 2020),
https://archive.org/details/FBC_20201116_220000_Lou_Dobbs_Tonight/start/504/ end/564; Lou
Dobbs, Sidney Powell, Facebook (Nov. 16, 2020),
Fox show was broadcast and rebroadcast at least four times. Powell falsely claimed that she had
a “witness” who was present when Smartmatic, allegedly at the direction of the late Hugo Chávez,
who died on March 5, 2013, had software and hardware “designed in a way…that the system could
change the vote of each voter without being detected.” In all, Fox would broadcast at least thirteen
reports, which Fox repeated in articles and social media postings, falsely stating and/or implying
that Smartmatic had stolen the 2020 U.S. election. Instead of trying to stop Powell from spreading
this disinformation, Dobbs heartily embraced and endorsed Powell’s bogus claims. As Dobbs and
Fox knew—including from the information and substantial documentation cited in the “SETTING
THE RECORD STRAIGHT” emails that Dominion had sent to Dobbs’ producers and which his
producers shared with him—that accusation is demonstrably false. Yet, despite the fact that Dobbs
and Fox knew, or at a minimum recklessly disregarded the fact, that these outlandish accusations
were false, Fox not only published those claims to its live audience, it chose to republish them on
its websites and social media accounts, including Dobbs’ Twitter feed, after the live broadcast had
run.66
communications director told Dobbs’ coordinating producer (at Fox News) that Smartmatic did
not provide any input to CISA (referring to CISA’s November 12 statement disputing allegations
of election fraud), noting that “[o]nly members of the CISA Executive Committee…would have
been eligible to give input to its drafting.” The Editorial Board for The Wall Street Journal, also
on November 17, 2020, published a piece that refuted false claims about Dominion and stated,
“there’s no good evidence of voting problems that would come close to” calling into question
Biden’s leads in the swing states.67 Dominion sent a link to that article to Fox host Bartiromo as
63. On November 18, 2020, Dobbs hosted Giuliani on Lou Dobbs Tonight and began
by repeating a false claim that Powell had touted two days prior about a witness allegedly
establishing that Smartmatic rigged the 2020 U.S. Presidential election the same way it had
allegedly rigged an election in Venezuela. Dobbs did so even though he had obvious reason to
doubt the veracity of the “unidentified whistleblower,” namely, the lack of any evidence or facts
substantiating what the witness had to say. In response to Giuliani’s false assertion that Smartmatic
was “founded in 2005 in Venezuela for the specific purposes of fixing elections” and the alleged
ties of Smartmatic to Dominion, Dobbs did not correct Giuliani, but stated: “It’s outrageous, and
it’s all the more outrageous because Dominion and Smartmatic were denied use in the State of
Texas, which called them out for what they are. They have a clear record.” This Fox show was
64. On November 19, 2020, Dobbs continued his role in the disinformation campaign
on Lou Dobbs Tonight. He started his program by playing portions of a now infamous press
conference held by Giuliani and Powell earlier that day, during which among other false statements
made, Powell told a global audience that Dominion was “created in Venezuela at the direction of
Chávez to make sure he never lost an election” and that Dominion flipped votes from Trump to
Biden by running an algorithm that automatically flips all votes. Dobbs introduced clips from the
November 19 press conference where Giuliani and Powell made the same outlandish and false
67
The Editorial Board, Rage Against the Voting Machine, The Wall Street Journal
(Nov. 17, 2020), https://www.wsj.com/articles/rage-against-the-voting-machine-11605656036.
68
“WSJ Editorial Board Debunks Dominion Rumors” Email (Nov. 17, 2020).
statements as they had personally made on Dobbs’ show, and then interviewed Powell where she
made similar false statements about the alleged use of Dominion voting machines and Smartmatic
software to fix the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, Smartmatic sending votes to foreign countries
for manipulation during the 2020 U.S. election, and Smartmatic and Dominion (in the words of
Powell) being “inextricably intertwined” and “hav[ing] the same history from inception.” Dobbs
ended his discussion with Powell with an endorsement of her statements that Smartmatic and
D ominion had stolen the election. This Fox show was broadcast and rebroadcast at least four
times.
65. On November 19, 2020, Georgia completed its 100% hand audit recount of all the
ballots cast in Georgia in the 2020 election. Following that statewide 100% hand audit recount,
Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger reported that “Georgia’s historic first
statewide audit reaffirmed that the state’s new secure paper ballot voting system accurately
counted and reported results.” 69 As a result of the 100% hand audit, Fox called Georgia for
Biden.70
66. Intentionally disregarding the explanations of CISA and election security experts,
as well as the fact that Arizona’s audit and Georgia’s hand recount of paper ballots had confirmed
the accuracy of the vote tallies by Dominion machines, all of which were communicated directly
to D obbs’ producers, D obbs brought Powell on the Fox airwaves on November 19, 2020 to
falsely claim, again, that D ominion and Smartmatic, using D ominion voting machines with
69
Georgia Secretary of State, Historic First Statewide Audit of Paper Ballots Upholds Result of
Presidential Race,
https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/historic_first_statewide_audit_of_paper_ballots_upholds_r
esult_of_presidential_race.
70
Digital Team, Fox News, AP Calls Georgia for Biden as State Finalized Hand Recount Audit,
Fox 5 (Nov. 19, 2020), https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/ap-calls-georgia-for-biden-as-state-
finalized-hand-recount-audit.
Smartmatic software, had rigged the election by changing votes.71 D obbs even previewed and
endorsed, on November 19, 2020, at 5:32 p.m., why Powell was coming back on the show: to
“provid[e] more details on how Dominion voting machines and Smartmatic software were used to
67. On November 20, 2020, D ominion sent a retraction demand letter to Fox. 72
Dominion, underscored, in particular, that “[h]osts such as Lou Dobbs choose to adopt some of
these defamatory statements and repeatedly regurgitate them as their own.” Dominion specifically
identified D obbs as a primary Fox purveyor of disinformation and identified materially false
information presented by Powell (and others), including the false allegations that Dominion was
involved in changing votes in Venezuela, that D ominion was owned by Smartmatic, and other
false attacks made on Dobbs’ shows. In that letter, Dominion once again put Fox, and therefore
Dobbs, on formal written notice of facts, which Fox already knew from some of its own reporters,
D ominion’s “SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT” emails, and documents and other
information in the public domain, that demonstrated that the claims Fox had been broadcasting,
71
Lou Dobbs Tonight, Fox Business (Nov. 16, 2020),
https://archive.org/details/FBC_20201116_220000_Lou_Dobbs_ Tonight/start/504/end/564; Lou
Dobbs, Sidney Powell, Facebook (Nov. 16, 2020),
https://www.facebook.com/115777632950/videos/1625726320970976; Lou D obbs
(@Lou
D obbs), Twitter (Nov. 16, 2020, 5:45 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1328469195550576645; Trump’s Legal Team Still in
Evidence Collection Process or Election Challenges, Fox Business (Nov. 19, 2020),
https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6211050624001#sp=show-clips; Lou D obbs, Sidney Powell,
Facebook (Nov. 19, 2020), https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=880692419336775; Lou Dobbs
(@Lou
D obbs), Twitter (Nov. 19, 2020, 5:32 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1329553227046588417; Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs), Twitter
(Nov. 19, 2020, 4:55 pm), https://twitter.com/ouDobbs/status/1329543810867671044; Lou Dobs
Tonight (@loudobbstonight), Instagram (Nov. 19, 2020),
https://www.instagram.com/p/CHylMiTBGIs/.
72
Letter from Dominion to Fox News General Counsel Lily Claffee (Nov. 20, 2020) (“Dominion’s
First Retraction Demand Letter”).
publishing, rebroadcasting, and republishing about D ominion and Smartmatic were false,
including:
• Dominion’s voting systems are designed and certified by the federal government, and
all of its vote tallies are 100% auditable.73
• On November 9, 2020, the Michigan Secretary of State had declared that the errors in
Antrim County, Michigan were the result of user error, and she explained further that
Dominion’s “equipment and software did not malfunction and all ballots were properly
tabulated.”75
• Votes are counted and reported by municipal, county and state election officials—not
by Dominion or any other election technology company. Dominion equipment is used
by municipal, county and state officials to tabulate ballots. All vote tallies are 100%
auditable. D ominion’s voting systems are designed and certified by the U.S.
government to be closed and do not rely on network connectivity.77
73
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: FACTS & RUMORS emails.
74
Letter from Clint Hickman to Maricopa County Voters (Nov. 17, 2020),
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/64676/PR69-11-17-20-Letter-to-Voters.
75
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, False Claims from Ronna McD aniel Have No
Merit (Nov. 6, 2020), https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-93094-544676--,00.html.
76
D ominion’s First Retraction D emand Letter; Ali Swenson, Smartmatic D oes Not Own
D ominion Voting Systems, Associated Press (Nov. 17, 2020), https://apnews.com/article/fact-
checking-afs:Content:9740535009.
77
Dominion’s First Retraction Demand Letter; Jude Joffee-Block, False Reports Claim Election
Servers Were Seized in Germany, Associated Press (Nov. 15, 2020),
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363.
• Dominion’s source code is subject to review by independent third-party labs that test
for, among other things, accuracy and security as part of the federal and state
certification process.78
• No software updates were made on the eve of the 2020 presidential election.
68. Fox received but never responded to Dominion’s November 20, 2020 letter.
69. Also on November 20, Rupert Murdoch’s The Wall Street Journal once again stated
that the accusations against Dominion were false and that the Georgia recount had confirmed the
78
See, e.g., How the U.S. Election Assistance Commission Facilitates Fair and Secure Elections,
EAC, https://www.eac.gov/news/2020/12/03/how-us-election-assistance-commission-facilitates-
fair-and-secure-elections/ (“Before voting machines and election management systems are used in
elections, the systems undergo rigorous hardware and software testing by laboratories accredited
by the EAC and the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST). The testing
encompasses security, accuracy, functionality, accessibility, usability, and privacy based on
requirements in the EAC’s Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG)”); Frequently Asked
Questions, EAC, https://www.eac.gov/voting-equipment/frequently-asked-questions (“the test
labs will examine the source code to ensure compliance with the voluntary voting system
guidelines”); Testing & Certification Program Manual, Version 2.0, EAC (May 31, 2015),
https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/28/Cert%20Manual%207%208%2015%20FI
NAL.pdf (the VSTL [Voting System Test Laboratory] must complete the source code review of
the software delivered from the manufacturer for compliance with the VVSG [Voluntary Voting
System Guidelines]”).
79
Dominion’s First Retraction Demand Letter; Georgia Secretary of State, Historic First Statewide
Audit of Paper Ballots Upholds Result of Presidential Race (Nov. 19, 2020),
https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/historic_first_statewide_audit_of_paper_ballots_upholds_r
esult_of_presidential_race.
80
Letter from Congresswoman Maloney to Henry M. Paulson (Oct. 6, 2006), Complaint at Ex. 24,
Pearson v. Kemp, No. 1:20-cv-04809 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 25, 2020) [Dkt. 1-24].
81
The Editorial Board, Georgia Certifies: Donald Trump Lost, Wall Street Journal
(Nov. 20, 2020), https://www.wsj.com/articles/georgia-certifies-donald-trump-lost-
11605915757.
70. On November 21, 2020, the day after Fox received Dominion’s letter, Fox resumed
the attack on Dominion and Smartmatic, and continued to advance the bogus Venezuelan election
conspiracy, with Fox host Jeanine Pirro, a former New York Westchester County judge no less,
mirroring Powell’s claims, that D ominion was an “organized criminal enterprise” “started in
Venezuela with Cuban money” that could and did “flip[] votes” “with the assistance of Smartmatic
software,” thus creating the “stunning” ballot “dump[s]” in the early morning of November 4 that
“fill[ed] in” votes for Biden. In order to drive home the lies about Dominion and Smartmatic, Pirro
rhetorically asked, “why was there an overnight popping of the vote tabulation that cannot be
explained for Biden?”82 Also on November 21, Dobbs also appeared on Watters’ World, another
program broadcast by Fox News, to spread the disinformation campaign’s theme that the 2020
U.S. Presidential election had been stolen by a cyber-attack. In addition to being blatantly false,
this statement was a prelude to the equally false accusation that Plaintiff was involved in the
71. On November 22, 2020, on ABC News’s This Week, then-Trump ally Chris Christie
gave an interview in which he called out Powell’s and Giuliani’s misinformation campaign,
stating, “If you’ve got the evidence of fraud, present it. . . . The conduct of the President’s legal
82
Jeanine Pirro, Opening Statement, Facebook (Nov. 21, 2020),
https://www.facebook.com/judgejeaninepirro/videos/3424348634350374; Jeanine
Pirro (@JudgeJeanine), Twitter (Nov. 21, 2020, 9:15 pm),
https://twitter.com/JudgeJeanine/status/1330333931028115456; Jeanine Pirro (@JudgeJeanine),
Twitter (Nov. 21, 2020, 9:16pm), https://twitter.com/JudgeJeani
ne/status/1330334182732484611.
team has been a national embarrassment. . . . If you’re unwilling to come forward and present the
72. Around that time, Republican senators called the White House, warning that Powell
seemed “unhinged” and that the Trump Campaign should distance itself from her.84
73. On November 22, 2020, the Trump Campaign itself disavowed Powell by issuing
the following statement: “Sidney Powell is practicing law on her own. She is not a member of the
Trump Legal Team. She is also not a lawyer for the President in his personal capacity.”85
74. On November 24, D ominion sent an email to more than 90 Fox reporters,
producers, and anchors, including producers and other content managers for Lou Dobbs Tonight
and other Fox shows. The email outlined statements—with links—made by conservative leaders
over the last 24 hours debunking the false claims about Dominion: former DHS Deputy Assistant
Secretary under George W. Bush, Paul Rosenzweig; former Assistant United States Attorney for
the Southern District of New York under Rudy Giuliani, Andrew McCarthy; and Republican Ohio
independent audits and hand recounts of paper ballots, publicly available documents about
83
Paul Kane & Felicia Sonmez, Chris Christie Calls the Conduct of Trump’s Legal
Team a ‘National Embarrassment,’ Wash. Post (Nov. 22, 2020),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republicans-christie-trump-
concede/2020/11/22/05c280e6-2cda-11eb-bae0-50bb17126614_story.html.
84
Aaron C. D avis, Josh D awsey, Emma Brown & Jon Swaine, For Trump Advocate Sidney
Powell, A Playbook Steeped in Conspiracy Theories, Wash. Post (Nov. 28, 2020),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-trumpkraken-
lawsuit/2020/11/28/344d0b12-2e78-11eb-96c2-aac3f162215d_story.html.
85
Maggie Haberman & Alan Feuer, Trump Team Disavows Lawyer Who Peddled Conspiracy
Theories on Voting, N.Y. Times (Nov. 22, 2020),
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/22/us/politics/sidney-powell-trump.html.
86
November 24, 2020 Email, Conservative leaders’ comments on election fraud.
Dominion’s origins, and Dominion’s emails and letter putting Fox on specific written notice of the
facts—and despite the fact that prominent Republicans and the Trump Campaign itself had
publicly disavowed Powell—on November 24 and 25, 2020, Fox again hosted Powell (and
Giuliani) on its most-watched shows, where its on-air talent endorsed their false claims that
Dominion had been created in Venezuela to rig elections for Hugo Chávez, and had rigged the
76. On November 26, 2020, D ominion sent another email to more than 90 Fox
reporters, producers, anchors, hosts, and content managers with the same sets of facts from the
earlier “SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT” emails, as well as additional specific facts
debunking claims that Dominion had rigged the election in Pennsylvania, including that Dominion
serves only 14 of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties, that Trump exceeded his 2016 vote percentage in 11
of those 14 counties, that Trump won 12 of those 14 counties, and that “Dominion doesn’t operate
campaign on Lou Dobbs Tonight. Dobbs used his program to undermine the joint statement that
had been issued by the Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council and the Election
Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees, which had reported that the 2020
87
Lou Dobbs Tonight, Fox Business (Nov. 24, 2020),
https://archive.org/details/FBC_20201124_220000_Lou_Dobbs_Tonight/start/1080/end/1140;
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter (Nov. 24, 2020, 5:37 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1331366325629968386; Lou Dobbs, Sidney Powell Breaking
News, Facebook (Nov. 24, 2020),
https://www.facebook.com/115777632950/videos/381418186402867; Lou Dobbs Tonight
(@loudobbstonight), Instagram (Nov. 24, 2020), https://www.instagram.com/p/CH ZbqTBHSE/;
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter (Nov. 25, 2020, 6:17 pm),
https://twitter.com/loudobbs/status/1331738732228173825.
88
November 26, 2020 Email, FACT SHEET: Dominion Voting Systems in Pennsylvania.
United States election was the most secure in the country’s history. This Fox show was broadcast
78. Fox’s pounding repetition of the baseless narrative that Dominion and Smartmatic
rigged the election paid off big time. On November 29, 2020, after almost an entire month of
endorsing and promoting the lie that Dominion and Smartmatic had stolen the election from then-
President Trump, President Trump—who just weeks before had lambasted Fox for accurately
reporting that he lost the election—agreed to appear for an exclusive interview on Sunday Morning
Futures with Maria Bartiromo, his first interview since he lost the election.
79. At the same time, on November 29 and November 30, 2020, Dominion sent fact
sheets to more than 90 Fox reporters, producers, content managers, hosts, and anchors. The fact
sheets included external links to independent websites disproving claims that Dominion had rigged
80. On November 30, 2020, Powell repeated her falsehoods on a Fox program, falsely
stating that Dominion machines “ran an algorithm that shaved off votes from Trump and awarded
them to Biden. And they used the machines to trash large batches of votes that should have been
awarded to President Trump. And they used the machines to inject and add massive quantities of
81. Meanwhile, Fox continued beating the drum via Defendant Dobbs, who that same
day explained: “We have, across almost every state, whether it’s Dominion, whatever the company
– voting machine company is, no one knows their ownership, has no idea what’s going on in those
89
November 29, 2020 Email, FACT SHEET: Dominion Voting Systems in Arizona; November
30, 2020 Email, FACT SHEET: Dominion Voting Systems in Michigan.
servers, has no understanding of the software, because it’s ‘proprietary.’ It is the most ludicrous,
82. On December 1, 2020, Trump appointee and then-U.S. Attorney General William
Barr stated: “There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim
that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ
have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.”91
83. Meanwhile, D ominion sent another fact sheet—this time specifically debunking
claims that Dominion rigged the election in Georgia—to more than 90 Fox reporters, producers,
content managers, hosts, and anchors. The fact sheet detailed the independent audits, hand
recounts, and other measures taken by Georgia’s Republican administration that had verified that
84. Nevertheless, for more than a week after that, Fox continued to deliberately provide
Powell and Giuliani a platform to lie about Dominion and Smartmatic. Far from challenging the
now repeatedly and affirmatively debunked lies, Fox continued to endorse them.93
90
Lou Dobbs, Sidney Powell, Facebook (Nov. 30, 2020),
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=830918901055891; Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter
(Nov. 30, 2020, 6:03 pm), https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1333547266032984064 Lou
Dobbs Tonight (@loudobbstonight), Instagram (Nov. 30, 2020),
https://www.instagram.com/p/CIO6-KVBKb8/.
91
Michael Balsamo, Disputing Trump, Barr Says No Widespread Election Fraud, Associated
Press D( ec. 1, 2020), https://apnews.com/article/barr-no-widespreadelection-fraud-
b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d.
92
December 3, 2020 Email, FACT SHEET: Dominion Voting Systems in Georgia.
93
See Lou D obbs, Sidney Powell, Facebook (Nov. 30, 2020),
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=830918901055891; Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter
85. And throughout this timeframe, Fox and Dobbs continued pushing a fraud narrative
that, based on D efendants’ prior false statements, was entirely dependent upon D ominion and
Smartmatic. One analysis found, for example, that “[i]n the two-week period after Fox News
declared Joe Biden the president-elect, the network questioned the results of the election or pushed
conspiracy theories about it at least 774 times.”94 Fox had already linked Dominion with the false
claims of fraud and as a key part of the fictitious story that the election was “rigged.” As Fox itself
reported during the mid-December timeframe, “[s]eventy percent of Republicans think the election
Fox Arranges For Powell To Appear On Lou Dobbs Tonight And Defendants Falsely Identify
Mr. Khalil As The COO Of The Alleged Vote Rigging Conspiracy
86. On D ecember 10, 2020, Fox again scheduled Powell to appear on Lou Dobbs
Tonight. Dobbs provided Powell with a powerful platform to continue to peddle the false claims
that Fox and D obbs knew, prior to D ecember 10, 2020, had been conclusively disproven and
rejected by election security experts, President Trump’s appointees, prominent Republicans, and
87. It appears that, just prior to Powell’s appearance on Dobbs’ show on December 10,
2020, counsel to Smartmatic (J. Erik Connolly of Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP)
sent a twenty-page single spaced demand letter seeking retraction of the false and defamatory
statements that had been made on Fox, including on Dobbs’ show by email (and federal express)
to the general counsel of Fox News Network LLC. The letter, entitled “Legal Notice and
Retraction Demand from Smartmatic USA Corp.,” made the following points, among others: (i)
Fox had engaged in a “concerted disinformation campaign against Smartmatic;” (ii) Fox falsely
told “millions of viewers and readers that Smartmatic was founded by Hugo Chávez, that its
software was designed to fix elections, and that Smartmatic conspired with others to defraud the
American people and fix the 2020 U.S. election by changing, inflating and deleting votes;” (iii)
Smartmatic is not a Venezuelan company, and while it did “election projects” in Venezuela from
2004 to 2017, it stopped doing business in Venezuela in 2017; (iv) Smartmatic had no ties to
George Soros; (v) Smartmatic had a limited role, in one county (Los Angeles), in the 2020 U.S.
election; and (vi) Smartmatic has had no corporate relationship with Dominion.96
96
See Smartmatic, et al. v. Fox, et al., supra, NYSCEF Doc. No. 79. While Mr. Connolly’s letter
does not indicate the precise time on December 10, 2020 that it was sent via email to the general
counsel of Fox News Network LLC, Mr. Connolly’s letter (which details a litany of “broadcasts,
articles, and postings regarding Smartmatic” during the period “November 2020 through today”)
88. At approximately 4:56 p.m. on December 10, 2020, Fox, through the @LouDobbs
account, tweeted a detailed promotion for the December 10 Lou Dobbs Tonight show later that
evening. The tweet, which was the first Fox publication to identify the Plaintiff, stated: “The 2020
Election is a cyber Pearl Harbor: The leftwing establishment have aligned their forces to
overthrow the United States government #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs.” The tweet identified
four individuals or “names,” including Plaintiff, as perpetrating the alleged “cyber Pearl Harbor,”
and stated that “[p]eople need to get familiar with four names.” Plaintiff also was identified as one
of “[t]wo political leaders.” Plaintiff is neither a political leader, nor a politician. The tweet
described Plaintiff as “a Venezuelan of Lebanese origin, who is the right hand and business front
man of Jorge Rodriguez. He has been the effective ‘COO’ of the election project, under Chávez
and Maduro. Khalil is a liaison with Hezbollah.” Also named were three other individuals: Jorge
Rodriguez and two “technical experts” (Antonio Mujica, identified as the CEO of Smartmatic and
Gustavo Reyes Zumeta, identified as an “American-born Venezuelan, who came up with the idea,
and designed, and created the programs”). By this tweet, Fox and Dobbs falsely told their millions
of followers that Plaintiff engaged in a plot with three other individuals to attack the U.S.
89. Embedded within the tweet was a two-page, type-written document that falsely
stated:
does not make specific reference to the election-related statements made by Fox and Dobbs on
December 10, 2020, suggesting that this email was sent by Mr. Connolly and received by Fox
prior to the December 10 defamatory tweets, broadcast and re-broadcasts that are set forth below,
all regarding Plaintiff. Put another way, prior to the defamatory tweets and broadcasts of
December 10, 2020, it appears that both Dominion and Smartmatic had put Fox and Dobbs on
notice, in great detail, that all the factual underpinnings of the alleged election conspiracy by
Dominion and Smartmatic, which was the alleged predicate to publicly add Plaintiff by name to
this nonexistent election conspiracy, were themselves entirely bogus and without any factual
basis whatsoever.
We have a warning to the mainstream media: you have purposely sided with the
forces that are trying to overthrow the US system. These four people [including
Plaintiff] and their collaborators executed an electoral 9-11 against the United
States, with the cooperation and collusion of the media and the Democrat Party and
China. It is a cyber Pearl Harbor. We have identified, roles, and background of
Dominion. Smartmatic people. This will turn into a massive RICO filing. It is
Smartmatic, Dominion Voting Systems, Sequoia, SGO. … We have technical
presentations that prove there is an embedded controller in every Dominion
machine. … We have the architecture and systems, that show how the machines
can be controlled from external sources, via the internet, in violation of voting
standards, Federal law, state laws, and contracts.97
97
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter D( ec. 10, 2020, 4:56 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337154346795012098 (emphasis added).
Lou0obbs O
@louOobbs
-,....--·--·
____. .......,
,.......
....,IO
............., - h t . J h ~.-t..,.. ll<!'llll(~-Vt"'tt..-.:_.,_,,._,.•Wfl"lill'w~t.
Malft,...,......t1,QOW..,w\V..,_..ent• 1N Oa,1,ol Ctww.t Hl'P,Oft fY.,..,_IN'i'W
-• ....... ._.,..,,...,.._.,__...,,,__olllwfOl<t-ll«I...
. . . --.,---·•-r,cl,t-.
·-.. . . -o.-,..,.,.._ .
..,_. ,... ·c11ro1c
- -
-"•--11Hot-h
-.-..-, -
- - ........... o1 ..... - -• ........ _P,,,tltttNo'CDO'ol .... N<to,
.._
,_,_,.,_,.
_...,.,..,....... ........ ........... .........
........,..am.. ,,,......,_,,", _ _ ...... ,_.,._,,..,,..• ., ... .,..
t.eOICfM,nlft) ...... "91
Antofllle~•CCO_,$fft,tt.,•thtJC •M nvi.t,c•oltht~Pt,ro.,
,c,t,o,--
.,.,.,.,..,..,..,_.,.IAlll"t..,. _,__,_.,. ,_._ ...... ~--f«1ttttYl.#1'
.,,,.,_ol"'"--
Y,,•Mwil'•w~to~~Mfl'WCM 10U .......
_.,,_,.a.,.
_ _ ._,, _ ... _lt,•.i _u. _ _
__
, ... _ , . . ,_ _ ow,., ...
___
______ ____ .. ..
C..-..-\1-~MCJIM • 'lll'"'woS<Ho,, d,oC._ , ..- . , P-,y . , . _ . ,
...,,, ..,...,._uo _ _,. ..... .,.,__,..,.,_Ul
.., ....,. ..,._ "'".___....,
, _ ........ .,ct.._ v., . ...iy...,._,••o.--..__... .,
SA00.000.000 ... •°"""'-Mt•-IJ~lh<--•....
.. _,
....._,.,.._NWC:O,,WM.t~t..t'\t,,......ol~~ ..... .,._... ....od.l,...,,eJlllflif\.
W.NW1"°"'utp,
_ _ _ _ ...... .._t"-'P'Off
,.. _ _ aw,.,•.,.~~lftr"l(ff"(~
_ _N,O,IO--OW"-ont-<10""°""'
_.....
W.11nth 1ru,,t-•.,,o-U..1--lht"',_.., .. _ _ .._
_ _ _ u.,_,.,.._ .. ,..,._., _ _ _ _
W.,_.....Jlf'OC)lt"tte~~lf'«MIIII~
.. i.w ............
•f1"'"Nf.....,e)~Wof
0 u 0
90. The document, tweeted out from the official Lou Dobbs Tonight Twitter account,
had no markings on it beyond the typewritten statements accusing Plaintiff, in cahoots with
Smartmatic and Dominion of perpetrating an “electoral 9-11” and “cyber Pearl Harbor” to steal
the election from President Trump. The document had no indication of having originated from
any source other than Defendants. Indeed, the content of the document previews false claims that
D efendants would subsequently make on the D ecember 10, 2020 Lou Dobbs Tonight show,
including a graphic shown multiple times during the broadcast listing “Four Names You Need to
91. With respect to Mr. Khalil, the document was false in at least the following respects:
(i) Mr. Khalil is not a “political leader;” (ii) Mr. Khalil is not the “right hand and business front”
of Jorge Rodriquez; (iii) Mr. Khalil at no point was involved in any election project in the United
States, and was not “the effective ‘COO’ of the election project under Chávez and Maduro;” (iv)
Mr. Khalil was not a “collaborator” in the “execut[ion of] an electoral 9-11 against the United
States,” as no such “electoral 9-11” occurred; (v) Mr. Khalil is not “a liaison with Hezbollah;”
and (vi) Mr. Khalil has had no business dealings or affiliation with either Smartmatic or Dominion.
92. The @LouD obbs D ecember 10 pre-broadcast tweet — including the two-page
“cyber Pearl Harbor” and rigging the 2020 election—was republished by Fox to the over 2 million
98
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter D( ec. 10, 2020, 4:56 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337154346795012098; Sidney Powell raises questions
about security of voting machines, Fox Business D( ec. 10, 2020),
https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6215520845001/#sp=show-clips; Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs),
Twitter (D ec. 10, 2020, 5:51 pm), https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337168084541575171;
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter D( ec. 10, 2020, 5:52 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337168397398921217; Lou D obbs, Sidney Powell,
Facebook (Dec. 10, 2020), https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=681543625896199; Lou Dobbs
93. Just over two hours after Fox tweeted this two-page diatribe falsely accusing Mr.
Khalil of cyber terrorism and being a “frontman” for Jorge Rodriquez in connection with the
alleged Smartmatic/Dominion election scheme, Fox aired the advertised segment in which Dobbs,
aided by Powell, directly promoted the false accusations tweeted out before the show.
94. Dobbs opened his on-air show on December 10, 2020, which Fox broadcast live on
television and satellite radio from New York on the Fox Business Channel, by announcing that he
would have Powell on the show to address what he referred to as a “Pearl Harbor style cyber attack
on the 2020 Presidential election,” a phrase he repeatedly used during the segment. He then
proceeded to put a graphic up entitled “Four Names You Need to Know According to Sidney
Powell,” which included, on the graphic displayed for Fox’s viewers, the following: “Khalil Majid
Majzoub: Rodriguez Frontman.” Dobbs went through the names on the list, falsely referring to
and as we all know, a great American,” immediately falsely tied Plaintiff, whose name had just
been prominently displayed on screen, to the fabricated 2020 Presidential election scheme, with
the following statement: “You say these four individuals led the effort to rig this election. How
did they do it?” Powell responded, accusing the four individuals, including Plaintiff, of having
“designed and developed the Smartmatic and Dominion programs and machines that include a
controller module that allows people to log in and manipulate the vote even as it’s happening.”
96. Powell attempted to lend legitimacy to her demonstrably false claims of election
fraud, claiming that: “We’re finding more and more evidence of this. We now have reams and
reams of actual documents from Smartmatic and Dominion, including evidence that they planned
and executed all of this.” No such “evidence” or “documents” exist, however. Powell has not
presented a single document, let alone “reams and reams” of documents, that reflects any role by
Plaintiff, let alone by Smartmatic or Dominion, in planning or executing any fraud on the U.S.
electoral system
Semitic sentiments to embellish upon her false claims, stating: “We know that $400 million of
money came into Smartmatic from China only a few weeks before the election [and] that there are
George Soros connections to the entire endeavor.” In fact, as Smartmatic has pointed out,
Smartmatic has not received funding from China, and has not provided election technology or
software in connection with any election in China.99 Similarly, the reference to George Soros is
unfortunate and misleading anti-Semitic innuendo by Powell: Soros has had no involvement with
98. Powell again falsely claimed “We have evidence of how they flipped the votes, how
it was designed to flip the votes, and that all of it has been happening just as we have been saying
it has been.” Dobbs again linked this supposed evidence of flipped votes to the “four individuals,”
including Plaintiff, asking Powell: “What is the evidence that you have compiled? How have you
constructed the architecture of this relationship among these four individuals?” In response,
Powell stated that they are still reviewing a “massive amount of documents,” but falsely claimed
to have “communications between them and um all different kinds of messages that indicate their
involvement in it,” at which point the same graphic showing the “Four Names You Need to Know
According to Sidney Powell,” including the Plaintiff’s name, was again displayed while Powell
99
See Compl. ¶ 205, Smartmatic USA Corp., et al. v. Fox Corporation, et al., supra.
stated that “we will be producing more and more [evidence] it will be coming out more by the
day.” Echoing language in the tweet sent prior to this Lou Dobbs Tonight show, Powell described
the alleged election conspiracy as a “massive cyber Pearl Harbor, as we called it.”
99. With the “Four Names You Need to Know” graphic which identified Plaintiff as
“Rodriguez Frontman” still on the screen, Dobbs added to Powell’s embellishments and made his
own false pronouncements about the alleged election scheme. Dobbs identified Rodriquez as the
“former Venezuelan Communications Minister, … the ringleader, the CEO of the enterprise as
you put it.” Dobbs asked Powell: “What is the evidence that this former Communications Minister
could reach into the U.S. electoral system and raise the havoc and commit the fraud that obviously
we have witnessed in 2020?” Powell responded, as follows: “Well we’ve known from early on in
our independent investigation that the entire system was created for the benefit of Venezuela and
Hugo Chávez to rig elections to make sure he continued winning. And then it was passed onto
Mr. Maduro to do the same. And we know it was exported to other countries by virtue of some of
the Dominion executives that proceeded to go about and essentially sell elections to the highest
bidder.” Powell then described Rodriquez as “one of the leaders of the whole election stealing
project” and described the alleged conduct of the four individuals (including Plaintiff), together
with the alleged conduct of Dominion and Smartmatic, as an “illegal web of conduct . . . focused
on rigging the election in this country.” Powell claimed the evidence of this alleged misconduct
100. D obbs concluded the segment by stating that, when they returned after a short
break, he would continue discussions with Powell and the reasons behind, what he described as, a
101. Dobbs, after the short break, summarized Powell’s presentation and made his own
affirmative declaration that Powell “was describing a cyber Pearl Harbor and the 2020 election,
focusing on four names,” which included Plaintiff’s name. Again bringing up the graphic that
falsely identified Plaintiff as one of the four individuals allegedly directing the non-existent
election fraud, Dobbs embellished upon Powell’s false claims about Plaintiff: “I would also like
to put up this element from your investigation if we could have that full screen up so that we could
all go through that with the audience. Because it’s important as we look at these four names [which
included Plaintiff], we’re talking about very large, a very large foreign intrusion and interference
in the, in the election of 2020.” Dobbs then emphasized that while there was already substantial
evidence of election fraud, he welcomed Powell providing further evidence: “We will gladly put
forward your evidence that supports your claim that this was a cyber Pearl Harbor, we have
tremendous evidence already . . . of fraud in this election but I will be glad to put forward on this
broadcast whatever evidence you have.” Powell then promised to get D obbs that “stunning”
102. Of course, Powell never provided any evidence of the so-called “cyber Pearl
Harbor” attack on the 2020 election and Dobbs never returned to the airways to display any of the
involvement in any election fraud has ever been presented by any of the Defendants because no
such evidence exists, which Defendants knew full well when they claimed to have such evidence
already at the time of the broadcast. D efendants falsely claimed to have “tremendous,”
100
Sidney Powell raises questions about security of voting machines, Fox Business (D ec. 10,
2020), https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6215520845001/#sp=show-clips; Lou D obbs
(@Lou
D obbs), Twitter D( ec. 10, 2020, 5:51 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337168084541575171; Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs), Twitter
(D ec. 10, 2020, 5:52 pm), https://twitter.com/LouD obbs/status/133716839 7398921217; Lou
Dobbs, Sidney Powell, Facebook D( ec. 10, 2020),
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=681543625896199; Lou Dobbs Tonight
(@loudobbstonight), Instagram (D ec. 10, 2020), https://www.instagram.com/p/CIo0kAqB6Bq/;
Lou Dobbs Tonight (@loudobbstonight), Instagram D( ec. 10, 2020),
https://www.instagram.com/p/CIo02XjhD1M/.
“overwhelming,” and “stunning” evidence merely to bolster their salacious and false narrative of
103. D efendants’ identification of the supposed four-person cabal, that included the
Plaintiff, similarly served only to further embellish and bolster their false and oft repeated claims
that Smartmatic and Dominion election technology was created at the direction of Hugo Chávez
to change votes without being detected, a claim which had, at this point, been repeatedly debunked
104. Since Plaintiff had no connection to Smartmatic and D ominion, the premise of
preposterous. Powell’s embellishment of her previous false claims about Smartmatic and
Dominion with specious claims that Plaintiff and three other individuals “led” efforts to rig the
2020 U.S. Presidential election and participated in designing and developing alleged Smartmatic
and Dominion programs and machines was equally ludicrous and false. The only true evidence
that existed from reliable, verifiable sources concerning the 2020 election demonstrated that
everything Defendants said and endorsed in the December 10, 2020 broadcast was false.
105. The central premise of Dobbs’ December 10, 2020 segment with Powell was false
and he knew it. Succinctly, with respect to Plaintiff, Plaintiff had no involvement in any respect
with the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, nor did he have any affiliation with D ominion or
Smartmatic, nor was he a “political” figure, nor was he a “frontman” for Rodriquez.
106. The foregoing D ecember 10, 2020 show was rebroadcast on the Fox Business
Channel, and republished on fox.com, foxbusiness.com, Fox Nation and the Twitter account
@loudobbs, the “Lou Dobbs” Facebook account, and the Instagram account @loudobbstonight.
Fox made, endorsed, and adopted all of the false and misleading statements made on such
107. On D ecember 10, 2020, after the show was broadcast, Fox and D obbs posted a
video of the December 10 Lou Dobbs Tonight interview of Powell on Twitter, using the caption:
“Cyber Pearl Harbor: @SidneyPowell1 reveals groundbreaking new evidence indicating our
Presidential election came under massive cyber-attack orchestrated with the help of Dominion,
Smartmatic and foreign adversaries” (i.e., including Plaintiff) and a second time on Twitter, using
the caption: “Evidence of Fraud: @SidneyPowell1 says the FBI and law enforcement aren’t
interested in electoral fraud witnesses and offers to make public evidence of a cyber-attack on the
U.S. election system.” That same day, Fox and Dobbs posted the same videos, with the same
captions on Facebook and Instagram. Each of these additional postings made further false and
misleading statements, including that Powell “reveal[ed]” “groundbreaking new evidence” that the
Smartmatic, Dominion and “foreign adversaries” (the latter, allegedly including Plaintiff) and that
evidence revealing a cyber-attack on the 2020 Presidential election existed. In fact, no such
108. Fox and Dobbs used these platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram) to disseminate
the publication of false and defamatory information regarding Plaintiff to the largest possible
audience and to ensure republication. Fox further encouraged its affiliates to republish and repeat
the claims about D ominion, Smartmatic and Plaintiff that had been made during the national
109. At no point prior to, during, or after December 10, 2020 did any of the Defendants
contact Plaintiff to inquire as to whether he had ever had any contact or association with either
Smartmatic or Dominion; nor at any time did any of the Defendants contact Plaintiff to inquire
whether he had any involvement in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election; nor did any of the
D efendants contact Plaintiff to inquire whether he had any involvement with any Venezuelan
election machinery or software, including any election machinery or software involving Hugo
Chávez or Nicolás Maduro; nor did any of the Defendants contact Plaintiff to inquire whether he
was a “political” figure or “frontman” for Jorge Rodriquez; nor did any of the Defendants contact
Plaintiff to inquire whether he was a “liaison with Hezbollah.” Had any of the D efendants
contacted Plaintiff, he would have confirmed that the answer to all of the foregoing was “no.”
110. From December 18-20, 2020, having now received a retraction demand letter from
Smartmatic, Fox aired a three-minute pre-recorded statement on its shows hosted by D obbs,
Bartiromo, and Pirro: the statement purported to (but did not actually) walk back some of the
claims they had made about Dominion’s competitor, Smartmatic, and featured a guest saying that
it was his understanding that D ominion and Smartmatic are two separate companies and that
Smartmatic did not send U.S. votes to be tabulated in foreign countries. In plain contrast to its
prior peddling of lies about Dominion and Smartmatic, Fox’s on-air talent did not embrace their
guest’s statements as their own, nor did the guest’s statements retract any of the lies Fox had been
endorsing and broadcasting about D ominion or Smartmatic for the last month and a half,
notwithstanding the overwhelming evidence and sources that D efendants’ statements about
Dominion and Smartmatic were false. As for Plaintiff, Fox’s on-air talent were silent.
111. For its part, having received no response to its November 20 retraction demand
letter, on December 22, Dominion sent a second retraction demand letter to Fox that again detailed
facts and evidence in the public domain demonstrating the falsity of Fox’s claims about Dominion.
That letter again explained facts and evidence demonstrating that—and why—the people
(including Powell) peddling the lies were entirely unreliable sources.101 Dominion noted that, after
Dominion had provided Fox with the facts and requested a retraction, Dobbs repeatedly featured
Powell on his show and Dobbs himself “credited and repeated [Powell’s] false claims.” Within
letter that its counsel had sent to Powell on December 16, which reiterated, among other thing, that
Dominion had no connection to Venezuela nor to Venezuelan elections, and detailed additional
facts and evidence debunking her lies and proving that Powell lied about having specific evidence
112. Almost two months after he had begun promoting the falsehood that Dominion had
stolen the election, Dobbs made an astonishing admission: despite his best efforts to make the facts
conform to his preconceived narrative, he had not been able to find any evidence to support the
lies that he had relentlessly promoted and was continuing to promote. On January 4, 2021, Lou
Dobbs stated, “we’re 8 weeks from the election and we still don’t have verifiable tangible support
for the crimes that everyone knows were committed. That is, defrauding other citizens who voted
with fraudulent votes … we have had a devil of a time finding actual proof.”102 Dobbs and Fox,
in fact, did not have “verifiable tangible support” well prior to January 4, 2021 for the claims of
election fraud they had been peddling, they certainly did not have any “verifiable tangible support”
when they made, repeated, and embellished these claims over the prior two months, including the
false claims they advanced regarding Plaintiff. Despite knowing that there was no proof, Dobbs
101
Letter from Dominion to Fox News General Counsel Lily Claffee (Dec. 22, 2020).
102
Lou Dobbs Tonight, Fox Business (Jan. 4, 2021),
https://archive.org/details/FBC_20210104_220000_Lou_Dobbs_Tonight (emphasis added); Matt
Wilstein (@mattwilstein), Twitter (Jan. 4, 2021, 7:00 pm),
https://twitter.com/mattwilstein/status/1346245027932979200.
then concluded his segment by saying “the fact of the matter is that this President is looking at the
Fox Knows That Dominion Machines Did Not Flip Votes, As Evidenced by the Fact That It
Does Not Make That Claim When Republicans Win Elections
113. As further evidence that Fox knew that Dominion machines do not flip votes, Fox
only endorsed that claim when it supported the narrative that the election had been stolen from
then-President Trump. By contrast, when a Republican won an election where votes were counted
using Dominion machines, including the numerous down-ballot races at issue in the 2020 election,
114. For example: after a Republican won the race for New York’s 22nd Congressional
District, the Democrat challenged the results and asked questions about the Dominion machines
that had been used in the race. 104 Fox covered the race extensively. Indeed, Fox had the
Republican candidate on its programs at least four different times to complain about the
Democrat’s challenge of the results.105 Not a single Fox show or host—including Bartiromo, who
with, or even suggested the potential that the Dominion machine tabulations were incorrect or that
Dominion machines had some malicious vote-flipping “algorithm” or had been hacked in the race
115. In fact, on February 4, the Republican candidate told Bartiromo that the Democrat’s
protest about D ominion’s machines working improperly was “frivolous” and a “desperate
103
Id.
104
Mornings with Maria, Fox Business (Feb. 4, 2021),
https://archive.org/details/FBC_20210204_110000
Mornings_With_Maria_Bartiromo/start/2858/end/2918.
105
Id.
measure.” Instead of responding that D ominion machines flipped votes to rig elections (an
assertion Bartiromo had repeatedly made and endorsed when the losing candidate had been
President Trump), Bartiromo applauded the Republican’s efforts “fighting” back against the
Democrat’s protest. On February 6, the Republican candidate was declared the winner and Fox
applauded her victory. That coverage similarly contained no mention of Dominion or its voting
machines.106
Fox Took Affirmative Steps to Ensure Broad Dissemination and Republication of the
Defamatory Claims of Election Fraud
116. Fox, through the @LouDobbs and @MariaBartiromo Twitter accounts, routinely
tagged Trump in tweets with Fox’s broadcasts, ensuring that Trump’s more than 88 million
117. After Fox had broadcast defamatory falsehoods into millions of homes and posted
those falsehoods on its websites and social media accounts, the lies went viral as people tweeted,
retweeted, and raged that Dominion, as part of a conspiracy that, according to Defendants, included
Mr. Khalil, had stolen their votes. This was completely foreseeable to and intended by Fox.
118. While the “mainstream media” and prominent Trump appointees and allies like Bill
Barr, Chris Krebs, Ben Hovland, Brad Raffensperger, Brian Kemp, Chris Christie, and others knew
and publicly confirmed that the concerted disinformation campaign was just that, Fox—the
106
Roman Chiarello, NY Rep.-Elect Claudia Tenney Reacts to Win in Final Disputed House Race,
Fox News (Feb. 6, 2021), https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-claudia-tenney-win-
disputed-house-race.
107
See, e.g., Maria Bartiromo(@MariaBartiromo), Twitter(D ec. 2, 2020, 11:28 am),
https://twitter.com/MariaBartiromo/status/1334172646003650560; Lou D obbs, Sidney Powell,
Facebook(Nov. 30, 2020), https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=830918901055891; Lou Dobbs
(@Lou
D obbs), Twitter (Nov. 30, 2020, 6:03 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1333547266032984064; Lou Dobbs Tonight
(@loudobbstonight), Instagram(Nov. 30, 2020), https://www.instagram.com/p/CIO6-KVBKb8/.
dominant voice in conservative media—relentlessly continued its attacks on the integrity of the
2020 election. These lies, spread on Fox’s unparalleled platform, deceived millions of people. In
the days after Fox’s first broadcast concerning the false claim that an algorithm in D ominion
machines had flipped votes away from Trump, 81% of Trump voters believed that fraud had
119. These lies, culminating in Defendants’ false claims about Plaintiff on December
10, 2020, did not simply harm Plaintiff. They signaled that anyone – but especially a foreigner
fraud on the U.S. electoral system, with impunity, to serve the rich and powerful’s political ends.
120. Fox News is “the profit center of Rupert Murdoch’s American media empire.”109
Indeed, in Fox Corporation’s most recent financial statement, Fox’s cable network programming
was responsible for all of Fox Corporation’s profits— and then some. In the last three months of
2020, the “segment” Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, D epreciation, and Amortization
108
Candice Jaimungal, Three-Quarters of Voters Think Fraud Occurred During the Election,
YouGov (Nov. 12, 2020), https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-
reports/2020/11/12/voters-think-fraud-occurred-during-elec (poll available at
https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/9j7sr0my95/econTabReport.pdf).
109
Rachel Abrams & Michael M. Grynbaum, Fox News Fires a Key Player in Its Election Night
Coverage, N.Y. Times (Jan. 19, 2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/19/business/media/fox-
news-chris-stirewalttrump.html.
(“EBITD A”) for Fox’s cable network programming was $571 million. The rest of Fox
Corporation lost $266 million for a total EBITDA of $305 million across the entire corporation.110
121. In the month following the election, as Defendant Dobbs repeatedly promoted and
endorsed the falsehoods about D ominion and Smartmatic, including his promotion and
endorsement of false statements regarding Plaintiff, his ratings shot up almost 27%.111
122. After nearly a month of Fox relentlessly promoting lies about election fraud, Fox
Corporation’s stock had rebounded to its pre-election value.112 Fox Corporation’s Chief Financial
Officer stated on December 8, just prior to the Fox/Dobbs tweets and broadcast regarding Plaintiff,
that Fox’s “ratings momentum has been extraordinary. It is feeding absolutely into advertising
strength, and so we would expect to have a record advertising year at Fox News.”113
123. On December 8, 2020, after approximately a month of promulgating the lie that
D ominion and Smartmatic rigged the election, and two days before its lies specifically about
Plaintiff, Fox Corporation Chief Financial Officer Steve Tomsic stated that “Fox News specifically
has had a great run.”114 Indeed, Tomsic acknowledged that Fox Corporation has set up additional
revenue streams through Fox Nation and elsewhere “to super-serve the Fox News dedicated fans,”
and has identified this “super-fan” group as “a much bigger opportunity” for the company.115
110
Fox Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2021 Net Income of $230 Million, Earnings Per Share of
$.37, Revenues of $4.09 billion, an increase of 8% at 2, Fox Corp. (Feb. 9, 2021),
https://investor.foxcorporation.com/static-files/129c48a1-e762-4cc4-9fc3c06f2b40c511.
111
See Lou Dobbs Tonight Ratings, Cable Rankings, https://ctv.kwayisi.org/networks/fbn/lou-
dobbs-tonight/.
112
Fox Corp., Business Insider, https://markets.businessinsider.com/stocks/foxa-stock.
113
Transcript of Steve Tomsic at 2, Fox Corp D( ec.8, 2020),
https://investor.foxcorporation.com/static-files/ae329369-a122-44e8-96a8-2344f064d422.
114
Transcript of Steve Tomsic, Fox Corp D( ec. 8, 2020),
https://investor.foxcorporation.com/static-files/ae329369-a122-44e8-96a8-2344f064d422.
115
Transcript of Steve Tomsic Presentation to Deutsche Bank at 12, Fox Corp. (Mar. 2021),
https://investor.foxcorporation.com/static-files/ae329369-a122-44e8-96a8-2344f064d422.
124. On March 4, 2021, Lachlan K. Murdoch, the Executive Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Fox Corporation, stated that “the margins in our businesses, particularly
obviously in Fox News” are “industry-leading.”116 Fox has re-established itself as the dominant
125. In February 2021, Fox News’s CEO Suzanne Scott was rewarded with a multi-year
contract extension. 117 Even D efendant D obbs, whose show was pulled in the days after
Smartmatic filed its own lawsuit, remained under contract with full salary. Fox has denied any
connection between the termination of his show and his repeated lies about Dominion, Smartmatic,
126. As Fox rewarded those who promulgated the lies, it punished those who told the
facts. In January 2021, Fox fired politics editor Chris Stirewalt, one of those who made the
decision to call Arizona for Biden, and Bill Sammon, the Washington bureau chief who oversaw
COUNT I
DEFAMATION PER SE
(The December 10, 2020, 4:56 p.m. pre-broadcast Tweet)
127. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1-126 as if set forth fully herein.
128. On December 10, 2020 at approximately 4:46 pm (ET), Defendants Fox and Dobbs,
through the @LouDobbs Twitter account, published a tweet promoting the December 10, 2020
Lou Dobbs Tonight show that would take place later that evening (“First Tweet”) featuring an
interview with Defendant Powell. The First Tweet is reproduced, supra paragraph 89 and can be
116
Transcript of Lachlan Murdoch at Fox Corp.’s ‘Investor Day’ at 2, Fox Corp. (Mar. 4, 2021),
https://investor.foxcorporation.com/static-files/96a7dbad-e517-4bb7-af38-aeb1e83d2a20.
117
Dade Hayes, Fox News Media CEO Suzanne Scott Signs Multi-Year Contract Extension,
D eadline (Feb. 9, 2021), https://deadline.com/2021/02/fox-newssuzanne-scott-renews-contract-
1234690236/.
found at the link cited below.118 The First Tweet stated “The 2020 Election is a cyber Pearl
Harbor: The leftwing establishment have aligned their forces to overthrow the United States
government #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs” and included an embedded two page document that,
based on the content of the December 10, 2020 Lou Dobbs Tonight show, appears to have been
prepared by Defendants.
129. The First Tweet contained the following false and defamatory statements and/or
implications of or concerning the Plaintiff for which the Plaintiff seeks to hold Defendants liable:
a. Plaintiff is a “political leader[]” and “has been the effective ‘COO’ of the election
b. Plaintiff “executed an electoral 9-11 against the United States, with the cooperation and
collusion of the media and the Democratic Party and China. It is a cyber Pearl Harbor.”
c. There is “evidence,” including “legal documents, ownership structures, and sales of the
amounts of stock they own, their schedules and calendars, and their messages to and
from one another,” that connects Plaintiff to D ominion, Smartmatic and the alleged
130. These statements, which explicitly state and imply that Plaintiff participated in a
a. Plaintiff is not a “political leader” who participated in any “election project” directed
at the United States under Chávez or Maduro or had any involvement with securing
Chávez’s elections.
118
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter D( ec. 10, 2020, 4:56 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337154346795012098.
b. Plaintiff has never worked for or had any business dealings or affiliation with Dominion
or Smartmatic. Defendants’ claims about Dominion and Smartmatic are also false. Far
from being created in Venezuela to rig elections for a now-deceased Venezuelan Hugo
Chávez, Dominion was created in Toronto, and its voting systems are certified under
laboratories accredited by the EAC, and were designed to be auditable and include a
paper ballot backup to verify results. Because of this backup, independent audits and
hand recounts of paper ballots have conclusively and repeatedly disproven the false
claim that votes in Dominion machines were flipped, weighted, deleted, or otherwise
Dominion’s. Dominion was not created in or for Venezuela, has never been located
there, and is not owned by Smartmatic or Venezuelans. Dominion has never provided
D ominion does not use Smartmatic’s software or machines, and there was no
for Smartmatic, while Smartmatic’s technology was used in the first automated election
c. Plaintiff did not participate in any fraud on the U.S. 2020 election. Indeed, as ample
Dominion, Smartmatic, Plaintiff, or otherwise – that tainted the 2020 election; rather,
Pearl Harbor” or “electoral 9-11” in connection with the 2020 U.S. Presidential
election. Indeed, there is no evidence, documentary or otherwise, that any “cyber Pearl
Harbor” or “electoral 9-11” occurred in connection with the 2020 U.S. Presidential
election.
statements of fact about Plaintiff, and were understood by people who saw, heard, and read them
to be statements of fact about Plaintiff, including, without limitation, because the First Tweet
132. At the time the First Tweet was published, D efendants knew the statements
contained therein concerning the Plaintiff were false and had, in fact, been warned by Dominion
and Smartmatic, and by others, of the falsity of their allegations of electoral fraud that had been
made by Defendants prior to publication of the First Tweet on December 10, 2020. Defendants’
investigation of the claims therein, to the extent there was any at all, was grossly inadequate and
based upon unreliable and/or previously-debunked sources. Defendants engaged in this knowing
and reckless propagation of these falsehoods in order to profit from these lies. In particular,
Defendants Fox and Dobbs wanted to continue to protect their broadcast ratings, catering to an
audience deeply loyal to President Trump. Defendant Fox similarly sought to aggrandize certain
of its most significant advertisers, who were supporters of then-President Donald Trump. Along
with the detailed recitation of Defendants’ knowledge and warnings that Defendants had received
of the factual falsity of their election fraud conspiracy prior to their defamatory statements
regarding Plaintiff on D ecember 10, 2020 set forth supra, strong evidence proving D efendants
knew they were spreading lies about 2020 election came from Fox’s own on-air talent. For
example:
• Fox’s then-Politics Editor Chris Stirewalt, for instance, defended the network’s
Arizona call the day after the election, saying: “[w]e haven’t seen any evidence yet that
there’s anything wrong”119—and was fired two months later.120
• Fox anchor Bret Baier reported on November 6, “We are not seeing any evidence of
widespread fraud. We are not seeing anything that can change, right now at least, the
split in these different States.”121
• By November 10, 2020, Fox’s Laura Ingraham had called out Powell on the air for
making false statements about Dominion.122
• The morning of November 12, Fox’s “America’s Newsroom” show concluded that
“nothing filed, any challenge so far, appears likely to overturn the results in any
state.”123
• On November 12, Fox news anchor Eric Shawn called the lies about D ominion
“disinformation.” 219
• On November 18, Fox’s Brit Hume tweeted a link to a November 17 Wall Street
Journal editorial chastising Trump and others for blaming the election results on
Dominion’s systems without any evidence, and added
the comment, “Good question President Trump blames the election result on
Dominion’s systems. Where’s the evidence?”124
• On November 19, Fox’s Tucker Carlson called out Sidney Powell for failing to produce
any evidence to support the outlandish and incredible claims she had been making
119
D iana Falzone & Lachlan Cartwright, Fox News Launches ‘Purge’ to ‘Get Rid of Real
Journalists,’ Insiders Say, The Daily Beast (Jan. 19, 2021), https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-
news-launches-purge-to-get-rid-of-real-journalists.215.
120
Rachel Abrams & Michael M. Grynbaum, Fox News Fires a Key Player in Its Election Night
Coverage, N.Y. Times (Jan. 19, 2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/19/business/media/fox-
news-chris-stirewalt-trump.html.
121
RNC Chair alleges ballot counting problems in Democratic-led counties in key states, Fox
News (Nov. 6, 2020), https://video.foxnews.com/v/6207779696001#sp=show-clips.
122
Sidney Powell - The Ingraham Angle - 11/10/20, YouTube (Nov. 11, 2020),
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHpKZwCLSes.
123
America’s Newsroom, Fox News (Nov. 12, 2020),
https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWSW_20201112_140000_Americas_Newsroom.
124
Brit Hume (@brithume), Twitter (Nov. 18, 2020, 7:49 am),
https://twitter.com/brithume/status/1329044145533558787.
about Dominion on Fox over the last week— claims that Fox, through its agents, had
repeated, republished, and endorsed numerous times on television, online, and on social
media. 125 D espite his invitation to Powell to appear on his show and present her
evidence, “she never sent [] any evidence, despite a lot of requests … not a page.”126
When he and his staff kept pressing Powell to present evidence, “she got angry” and
told them stop contacting her.127 So they checked with others in and around the Trump
campaign and people in positions of authority, who said that Powell had “never given
them any evidence either.”128 Carlson concluded that Powell “never demonstrated
that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to
another. Not one.”129
• On November 20, Fox’s Brit Hume again tweeted out facts disproving the lie about
Dominion, this time tweeting a thread summarizing a November 20, 2020 article by
conservative publication the National Review that explained why those who believe the
lies about Dominion “have been conned.”130 But Fox, knowing the truth about the lies,
continued repeating, republishing, and endorsing the con on its most prominent
platforms, for the purpose of improving ratings.
133. Defendants had no applicable privilege or legal authorization to make these false
and defamatory statements in the First Tweet, or if they did, they abused it.
134. The substantial danger of injury to Plaintiff’s reputation from D efendants’ false
statements in the First Tweet is readily apparent. Such statements would tend to harm the
reputation of another as to lower him in the estimation and esteem of the community or to deter
135. By publishing the false statements in the First Tweet, Defendants caused harm to
Plaintiff’s reputation.
125
Tucker Carlson, Time for Sidney Powell to show us her evidence, Fox News (Nov. 19, 2020),
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-rudy-giuliani-sidney-powell-election-fraud.
126
Id.
127
Id.
128
Id.
129
Id.
130
Brit Hume (@brithume), Twitter (Nov. 20, 2020, 11:38 am),
https://twitter.com/brithume/status/1329826562888380416; Jim Geraghty, Americans Deserves
the Truth, Even If It’s Unpleasant, National Review (Nov. 20, 2020),
https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/americans-deserve-the-truth-even-if-its-
unpleasant/.
136. Defendants’ false statements concerning the Plaintiff are defamatory per se because
they impute to the Plaintiff the commission of a serious crime, specifically, participating in a
conspiracy to commit election fraud in the 2020 U.S. election. Plaintiff is, accordingly, entitled to
presumed damages.
137. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ false statements in the First Tweet,
Plaintiff suffered damages, including, inter alia, injury to his reputation, harm to his ability to carry
138. D efendants’ actions were malicious, willful, wanton, and evidence a conscious
disregard for Plaintiff and his rights. D efendants’ injection of Plaintiff’s name into their false
election fraud conspiracy theory appears to be based solely upon the fact that Plaintiff is a
“Venezuelan of Lebanese origin” with a foreign-sounding name. In peddling their false claims of
a “cyber Pearl Harbor” perpetrated by Dominion and Smartmatic in the 2020 election, Defendants
repeatedly and increasingly invoked what can only be described as conservative “trigger words.”
For example, Defendants falsely claimed that: the (non-existent) election scheme was in service to
Hugo Chávez and Maduro; China had injected millions of dollars into Smartmatic right before the
2020 election; and George Soros, a prominent D emocrat, was involved in the (non-existent)
scheme to rig the 2020 election. Defendants’ identification of Plaintiff as an individual involved
in, and acting as “COO” of, the (non-existent) election scheme is an outrageous false
embellishment Defendants propounded to invoke the xenophobic ire of their audience and further
COUNT II
DEFAMATION PER SE
(December 10, 2020 Lou Dobbs Tonight broadcast)
139. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1-138 as if set forth fully herein.
140. On the evening of D ecember 10, 2020, D efendant Fox broadcast Lou Dobbs
Tonight, which featured a segment in which Defendant Dobbs interviewed Defendant Powell (the
“Dobbs Broadcast”). A true and correct recording of this segment is available at the link cited
below.131 Defendant Fox broadcast the Dobbs Broadcast live on television and satellite radio from
New York on the Fox Business Channel, rebroadcast the Dobbs Broadcast on the Fox Business
Channel, and republished the D obbs Broadcast on fox.com, foxbusiness.com, Fox Nation, the
Twitter account @loudobbs, the “Lou D obbs” Facebook account, and the Instagram account
@loudobbstonight.
141. D uring the D obbs Broadcast, a graphic titled “Four Names You Need to Know
According to Sidney Powell,” which included “Khalil Majid Majzoub: Rodriguez Frontman,” was
put up on the screen on at least three separate occasions. During the Dobbs Broadcast, Defendants
D obbs: You say these four individuals [Jorge Rodriguez, Khalil Majzoub, Gustavo
Reyes-Zumeta, Antonio Mugica] led the effort to rig this election. How did they do it?
Powell: Well, Lou, they designed and developed the Smartmatic and D ominion
programs and machines, that include a controller module that allows people to log in
and manipulate the vote, even as it’s happening. We’re finding more and more evidence
of this. We now have reams and reams of actual documents from Smartmatic and
Dominion, including evidence that they planned and executed all of this. . . . We have
evidence of how they flipped the votes, how it was designed to flip the votes. And that
all of it has been happening just as we’ve been saying it has been.
Dobbs: What is the evidence that you have compiled? How have you constructed the
architecture of this relationship among these four individuals?
Sidney Powell raises questions about security of voting machines, Fox Business (D ec. 10,
131
2020), https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6215520845001/#sp=show-clips.
Powell: Well, we are still reviewing the massive amount of documents that we have,
but we have communications between them and um all different kinds of messages that
indicate their involvement in it.
Powell: [T]he entire system was created for the benefit of Venezuela and Hugo Chávez
to rig elections to make sure he continued winning. And then it was passed on to Mr.
Maduro to do the same. And we know it was exported to other countries by virtue of
some of the D ominion executives that proceeded to go about and essentially sell
elections to the highest bidder. . . . It is a very concerning and troubling and illegal web
of conduct that all of which focused on rigging the election in this country. And we are
seeing the results in multiple states where we’re now identifying specific votes flipped,
like in a couple of Georgia counties.
Dobbs: We’re going to examine in some detail the – the reasons for what is apparently
a broadly coordinated effort to – to actually bring down this President by ending his
second term before it could begin.
Dobbs: We are back now with attorney Sidney Powell. She was describing a cyber
Pearl Harbor in the 2020 election focusing on four names. I would also like to put up
this element from your investigation if we could have that full screen up so that we
could all go through that with the audience. Because it’s important as we look at these
four names, we’re talking about very large, a very large foreign intrusion and
interference in the, in the election of 2020.
...
Dobbs: Let me – let me make you an offer very straightforwardly: We will gladly put
forward your evidence that supports your claim that this was a cyber Pearl Harbor. We
have tremendous evidence already but – of fraud in this election, but I will be glad to
put forward on this broadcast whatever evidence you have, and we’ll be glad to do it
immediately.
Powell: Awesome.
Dobbs: We’ll work overnight. We will – we will take up whatever air we’re permitted
beyond this broadcast, but we have to get to the bottom of this.
Dobbs: How much time do you need to get that evidence to this broadcast and we’ll
put it on the air?
Powell: I’ll get you more information that’s just stunning tonight.132
142. The D obbs Broadcast contained the following false and defamatory statements
and/or implications of or concerning the Plaintiff for which Plaintiff seeks to hold D efendants
liable:
b. Plaintiff “designed and developed the Smartmatic and D ominion programs and
machines, that include a controller module that allows people to log in and manipulate
c. Plaintiff was involved in the creation of an election-rigging system “created for the
benefit of Venezuela and Hugo Chávez to rig elections to make sure he continued
winning,” which was then “passed on to Mr. Maduro to do the same” and “exported to
d. Plaintiff was involved in a “troubling and illegal web of conduct that all of which
132
Sidney Powell raises questions about security of voting machines, Fox Business (D ec. 10,
2020), https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6215520845001/#sp=show-clips: Lou D obbs
(@Lou
D obbs), Twitter D( ec. 10, 2020, 5:51 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337168084541575171; Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs), Twitter
(D ec. 10, 2020, 5:52 pm), https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337168397398921217; Lou
D obbs, Sidney Powell, Facebook D( ec. 10, 2020),
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=681543625896199; Lou Dobbs Tonight
(@loudobbstonight), Instagram (D ec. 10, 2020), https://www.instagram.com/p/CIo0kAqB6Bq/;
Lou Dobbs Tonight (@loudobbstonight), Instagram D( ec. 10, 2020),
https://www.instagram.com/p/CIo02XjhD1M/.
g. Plaintiff was part of “a very large foreign intrusion and interference in the, in the
election of 2020.”
messages that indicate their involvement in it;” “they [including Plaintiff] executed all
of this,” “flipped the votes,” and designed machines to flip the votes; and that “all of
i. There is “tremendous evidence already” supporting the claim that Plaintiff was
involved in a “cyber Pearl Harbor” and that Defendant Powell could provide additional
143. The statements in the D obbs Broadcast, which explicitly state and imply that
Plaintiff participated in a cyber attack on the U.S. 2020 election, and there is overwhelming
evidence of such participation, are, as set forth supra and below, false:
a. Plaintiff did not lead, let alone participate in, any “effort to rig [the U.S. 2020] election”
by participating in the design and development of voting machines for the benefit of
b. Plaintiff has never worked for or had any business dealings or affiliation with Dominion
c. Plaintiff was not a part of any “illegal web of conduct,” “broadly coordinated effort,”
with the U.S. 2020 election. As ample reliable sources have confirmed, and Defendants
knew prior to D ecember 10, 2020, there was no fraudulent scheme – executed by
D ominion, Smartmatic, Plaintiff, or otherwise – that tainted the 2020 U.S. election.
Rather, the 2020 election was the most secure election ever.
d. There is no evidence, let alone “reams and reams of documents,” that, inter alia,
conduct that interfered with the U.S. 2020 election. In fact, Defendants never disclosed
any of the supposed evidence that was discussed on the Dobbs Broadcast.
statements of fact about Plaintiff, and were understood by people who saw, heard, and read them
to be statements of fact about Plaintiff, including, without limitation, because Defendant Dobbs
stated Plaintiff’s name and Plaintiff’s name was displayed in a graphic multiple times during the
Dobbs Broadcast.
145. At the time the Dobbs Broadcast was broadcast Defendants acted with actual malice
and knew the statements contained therein concerning the Plaintiff were false, including, without
146. Defendants had no applicable privilege or legal authorization to make these false
and defamatory statements in the Dobbs Broadcast, or if they did, they abused it.
147. The substantial danger of injury to Plaintiff’s reputation from D efendants’ false
statements in the Dobbs Broadcast is readily apparent. Such statements would tend to harm the
reputation of another as to lower him in the estimation and esteem of the community or to deter
148. By publishing the false statements in the Dobbs Broadcast, Defendants caused harm
to Plaintiff’s reputation.
149. Defendants’ false statements concerning the Plaintiff are defamatory per se because
they impute to the Plaintiff the commission of a serious crime, specifically, participating in a
conspiracy to commit election fraud in the 2020 U.S. election. Plaintiff is, accordingly, entitled to
presumed damages.
150. As a direct and proximate result of D efendants’ false statements in the D obbs
Broadcast, Plaintiff suffered damages, including, inter alia, injury to his reputation, harm to his
151. D efendants’ actions were malicious, willful, wanton, and evidence a conscious
disregard for Plaintiff and his rights, including, without limitation, for the reasons set forth in
COUNT III
DEFAMATION PER SE
(December 10, 2020 “Cyber Pearl Harbor” Posts)
152. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1-151 as if set forth fully herein.
153. On D ecember 10, 2020 at approximately 5:51 p.m. (ET), D efendants Fox and
D obbs, through the @LouD obbs Twitter account, republished the D obbs Broadcast through a
tweet (the “Second Tweet”), which stated: “Cyber Pearl Harbor: @SidneyPowell1 reveals
groundbreaking new evidence indicating our Presidential election came under massive cyber
attack orchestrated with the help of D ominion, Smartmatic, and foreign adversaries. #MAGA
#AmericaFirst #Dobbs.” The Second Tweet is reproduced below and can be found at the link cited
below.133 Also on December 10, 2020, Defendants Fox and Dobbs, through Lou Dobb’s Facebook
account, republished the Dobbs Broadcast through a Facebook post (the “Facebook Post”), which
133
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter D( ec. 10, 2020, 5:51 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337168084541575171.
also included the following caption: “Cyber Pearl Harbor: Sidney Powell reveals groundbreaking
new evidence indicating our Presidential election came under massive cyber-attack orchestrated
adversaries. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs.” The Facebook Post can be found at the link cited
134
below. Also on D ecember 10, 2020, D efendants Fox and D obbs, through the
post (the “First Instagram Post” and with the Second Tweet and Facebook Post, the “Cyber Pearl
Harbor Posts”), which also included the following caption: “Cyber Pearl Harbor Sidney Powell
reveals groundbreaking new evidence indicating our Presidential election came under massive
adversaries. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs.” The First Instagram Post can be found at the link
cited below.135
134
Lou D obbs, Sidney Powell, Facebook D( ec. 10, 2020),
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=681543625896199.
135
Lou Dobbs Tonight (@loudobbstonight), Instagram D( ec. 10, 2020),
https://www.instagram.com/p/CIo0kAqB6Bq/.
154. In addition to the false and defamatory statements in the Dobbs Broadcast set forth
in paragraphs 141-142, supra, which the Cyber Pearl Harbor Posts republished, the Cyber Pearl
Harbor Posts contained the following false and defamatory statements and/or implications of or
election.
155. The statements in the Cyber Pearl Harbor Posts, which explicitly state and imply
that Plaintiff participated in a cyber attack on the U.S. 2020 election, and that there is
“groundbreaking new evidence” of such participation, are, as set forth supra and below, false:
“Cyber Pearl Harbor” on the U.S. Presidential election. As set forth supra, there was
no cyber attack on the U.S. Presidential election and the 2020 U.S. election was, in fact,
adversary” that participated in a “massive cyber attack” the U.S. Presidential election.
In fact, Defendants have never disclosed any of the supposed evidence referenced in
156. Defendants’ statements in the Cyber Pearl Harbor Posts are reasonably understood
to be statements of fact about Plaintiff, and were understood by people who saw, heard, and read
them to be statements of fact about Plaintiff, including, without limitation, because in the Dobbs
Broadcast, republished in the Cyber Pearl Harbor Posts, Defendant Dobbs stated Plaintiff’s name
and Plaintiff’s name was displayed in a graphic multiple times during the Dobbs Broadcast.
157. At the time the Cyber Pearl Harbor Posts were published, Defendants acted with
actual malice and knew the statements contained therein concerning the Plaintiff were false,
including, without limitation, for the reasons set forth in paragraph 132, supra.
158. Defendants had no applicable privilege or legal authorization to make these false
and defamatory statements in the Second Tweet, which republished the Dobbs Broadcast, or if
159. The substantial danger of injury to Plaintiff’s reputation from D efendants’ false
statements in the Cyber Pearl Harbor Posts, which republished the Dobbs Broadcast, is readily
apparent. Such statements would tend to harm the reputation of another as to lower him in the
estimation and esteem of the community or to deter third parties from associating or dealing with
him.
160. By publishing the false statements in the Cyber Pearl Harbor Posts, D efendants
161. Defendants’ false statements concerning the Plaintiff are defamatory per se because
they impute to the Plaintiff the commission of a serious crime, specifically, participating in a
conspiracy to commit election fraud in the 2020 U.S. election. Plaintiff is, accordingly, entitled to
presumed damages.
162. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ false statements in the Cyber Pearl
Harbor Posts, which republished the Dobbs Broadcast, Plaintiff suffered damages, including, inter
alia, injury to his reputation, harm to his ability to carry on his profession, embarrassment,
163. D efendants’ actions were malicious, willful, wanton, and evidence a conscious
disregard for Plaintiff and his rights, including, without limitation, for the reasons set forth in
COUNT IV
DEFAMATION PER SE
(December 10, 2020 “Evidence of Fraud” Posts)
164. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1-163 as if set forth fully herein.
165. On D ecember 10, 2020, at approximately 5:52 p.m. (ET), D efendants Fox and
D obbs, through the @LouD obbs Twitter account, republished the D obbs Broadcast through a
tweet (the “Third Tweet”), which stated: “Evidence of Fraud: @SidneyPowell1 says the FBI and
law enforcement aren’t interested in electoral fraud witnesses and offers to make public evidence
of a cyber-attack on the U.S. election system. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs.” The Third Tweet
is reproduced below and can be found at the link cited below.136 Also on December 10, 2020,
Defendants Fox and Dobbs, through the @LouDobbsTonight Instagram account, republished the
136
Lou D obbs (@LouD obbs), Twitter D( ec. 10, 2020, 5:52 pm),
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1337168397398921217.
D obbs Broadcast through a post (the “Second Instagram Post” and with the Third Tweet, the
“Evidence of Fraud Posts”), which also included the caption: “Evidence of Fraud Sidney Powell
says the FBI and law enforcement aren’t interested in electoral fraud witnesses and offers to make
public evidence of cyber-attack on the US election system. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs.” The
Lou Dobbs O
@Lou Dobbs
166. In addition to the false and defamatory statements in the Dobbs Broadcast set forth
in paragraphs 141-142, supra, which the Evidence of Fraud Posts republished, the Evidence of
Fraud Posts contained the following false and defamatory statements and/or implications of or
137
Lou Dobbs Tonight (@loudobbstonight), Instagram D( ec. 10, 2020),
https://www.instagram.com/p/CIo02XjhD1M/
b. There is “evidence” of, and “witnesses” to, Plaintiff’s participation in “electoral fraud”
and a “cyber-attack on the US election system” and such evidence and witnesses should
167. The statements in the Evidence of Fraud Posts, which explicitly state and imply that
Plaintiff participated in a cyber attack on the U.S. 2020 election, and there is evidence of and
witnesses to such participation, are, as set forth supra and below, false:
a. Plaintiff did not participate in a “cyber-attack on the US election system.” As set forth
supra, there was no cyber attack on the US election system and the 2020 U.S. election
on the US election system.” In fact, D efendants have never disclosed any of the
168. Defendants’ statements in the Evidence of Fraud Posts are reasonably understood
to be statements of fact about Plaintiff, and were understood by people who saw, heard, and read
them to be statements of fact about Plaintiff, including, without limitation, because in the Dobbs
Broadcast, republished in the Evidence of Fraud Posts, Defendant Dobbs stated Plaintiff’s name
and Plaintiff’s name was displayed in a graphic multiple times during the Dobbs Broadcast.
169. At the time the Evidence of Fraud Posts were published, D efendants acted with
actual malice and knew the statements contained therein concerning the Plaintiff were false,
including, without limitation, for the reasons set forth in paragraph 132, supra.
170. Defendants had no applicable privilege or legal authorization to make these false
and defamatory statements in the Evidence of Fraud Posts, which republished the D obbs
171. The substantial danger of injury to Plaintiff’s reputation from D efendants’ false
statements in the Evidence of Fraud Posts, which republished the D obbs Broadcast, is readily
apparent. Such statements would tend to harm the reputation of another as to lower him in the
estimation and esteem of the community or to deter third parties from associating or dealing with
him.
172. By publishing the false statements in the Evidence of Fraud Posts, D efendants
173. Defendants’ false statements concerning the Plaintiff are defamatory per se because
they impute to the Plaintiff the commission of a serious crime, specifically, participating in a
conspiracy to commit election fraud in the 2020 U.S. election. Plaintiff is, accordingly, entitled to
presumed damages.
174. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ false statements in the Evidence of
Fraud Posts, which republished the Dobbs Broadcast, Plaintiff suffered damages, including, inter
alia, injury to his reputation, harm to his ability to carry on his profession, embarrassment,
175. D efendants’ actions were malicious, willful, wanton, and evidence a conscious
disregard for Plaintiff and his rights, including, without limitation, for the reasons set forth in
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter an award and judgment
(b) awarding Plaintiff punitive damages in an amount not less than $ 250 million
to be determined at trial;
(e) such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate.
JURY DEMAND