Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ipc Moot File
Ipc Moot File
SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY
MISS NIDHI TIWARI PAWAN THANVI
B.A.LLB (5TH SEM)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Thank you
PAWAN THANVI
BEFORE THE COURT OF SESSION AT JODHPUR,
RAJASTHAN
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
( APPELLANT )
V.
ANKIT
( RESPONDENT )
SECTION 302, 396 READ WITH SECTION 442 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE,
1860
1. TABLE OF CONTENT
2. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
3. INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
4. TABLE OF CASES
5. BOOKS
6. WEBSITES
7. STATUTES
8. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
9. STATEMENT OF FACTE
13. PRAYER
BOOKS:
WEBSITES:
1. http://www.findlaw.com
2. https://www.casemine.com/search/in/murder%2Bcases
3. https://indiankanoon.org/
4. https://www.livelaw.in/
STATUTES:
Section 177:
‘177. Ordinary place of inquiry and trial –
Every Offence Shall Ordinarily Be Inquired Into And Tried By A Court Within
Whose Local Jurisdiction It Was Committed.’
Ankit Entered Rohit's House With The Intention Of Committing Theft. Rohit And
Other Members Of His Family Surrounded And Attacked Ankit With Lathis. Finding
His Life In Danger, Ankit Whipped His Knife And Stabbed Rohit In The Heart
Region. Rohit Died Immediately Thereafter. Ankit Is Being Tried For The Murder Of
It Is Humbly Submitted Before This Hon’ble Court That The Accuse Ankit Is The
Guilty Of The Offence Of Robbery Under Section 378 With Red Section 380, 390 Of
IPC, As He Was Entered In The House Of Rohit That Had Taken Place, It Is Direct
Evidence To Link Him To The Crime. The Accused Is As He Was In The Charge Of
The Robbery, Furthermore He Had Intention Or Motive To Commit Such A Crime
And Thus, This Crime Can Stand Against The Accused.
ISSUE: 2
It Is Humbly Submitted Before This Hon’ble Court That The Accused Is The Guilty
Of Murder As The Alleged Crime Which He Had Committed Under Section 302 Of
The IPC Read With Sections 396, 397 And 398, Thus This Section Simply Directs
That The Accused Had Committed The Offence With Robbery And Also It Is Found
That Accused Has A Deadly Weapon With Him, That Was Used By Him And Further
It Takes Places Of A Crime.
ISSUE: 3
WHETHER THE ACT IS HOUSE TRESPASS ?
It Is Humbly Submitted To Court That The Act Done By Accused Is House Trespass,
Accused Entered In House With Intension To Commit Theft And The Act Is Done By
Accused Is A Offence Of House Trespass Also Charges With The Offence Under
Section 442 Of The IPC. Accused Is Liable For The Punishment Of The Offence
Done By Him.
ARGUMENTS ADVANCED
Issue: 1
That Is Also Alleged That The Accused Has Deadly Weapon With Him .
Case Laws:-
In This Case Accused Of Offences Under Section 380, 451 And 34 Ipc, Were Held
Liable That The Person Who Is Committed Such Offence With Shall Be Punishable
Under This Section.
In This Following Statement It Is Clear That The Accused Is Entered In The House Of
The Rohit And The Intention Was Clearly States That He Had No Such Control Over
Him, Committed The Offence Single And Also Carry The Deadly The Weapon With
Him But Then Family Member Sew Him And Attack On Him With Lathis He
Stabbed The Knife On The Person Who Dead By Ankit’s Wrongful Act, He Also
Liable For The Intention To Commit Theft, House Trespass And Grievous.
Issue: 2
Dacoity With Murder.—If Any One Of Five Or More Persons, Who Are Conjointly
Committing Dacoity, Commits Murder In So Committing Dacoity, Every One Of
Those Persons Shall Be Punished With Death, Or 1 [Imprisonment For Life], Or
Rigorous Imprisonment For A Term Which May Extend To Ten Years, And Shall
Also Be Liable To Fine.
Case Laws:-
In This Both Person Were Convicted By The Session Judge For An Offence Under
Sec. 302 Ipc For The Murder And Sec. 396 Ipc For The Offence Of The Robbery
And Murder.
The H.C. Confirmed The Conviction But Commuted The Sentence Of Death Into One
Of Imprisonment For Life.
In The Case Of Limbaji And Others V. State Of Maharashtra, The Decision Was
Held By The Court Of Session For The Offence Of The Murder And Theft.
Issue: 3
It Is Humbly Contended Before This Hon’ble Court That The Accused Is Guilty Of
House Trespass, With The Intention Of The Theft, The Act Done By Accused Is A
Offence Of House Trespass Under Sec. 441 Read With 442 Of The Ipc And The Act
Is Done By Accused Is Punishable Under The Sec. 448 Of The Code. Acc. To The
Code For Such Offence The Accused Is Liable For The Punishment Of The Offence
Conduct By Him.
Case Laws:-
In This Case It Was Held By The Court That Without Permission Entered In
Someone’s Home Is Also A Trespass And Can Be Punishable Under The IPC.
PRAYER
Wherefore, in the light of the issues raised, argument advanced and authorities
Citied, may this hon’ble court br pleased to:
1. Convict Mr. Ankit for the offence of committing theft with murder
under section 379/302 of the Indian penal code,
2. Declare a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for a term which may
extent to death sentence or life imprisonment, and also be liable to fine
under section 302/379 of the Indian penal code,1860.
AND/OR
Pass any other order it may deem fit, in the interest of Justice, Equity and Good
Conscience.
Place: RAJASTHAN