Islamic Finance Ala M-Pesa
Islamic Finance Ala M-Pesa
Islamic Finance Ala M-Pesa
Abstract
In my previous writing I have noted and I here reiterate the potential viability of
Grameen bank like projects in Islamic jurisdiction towards socio-economic welfare
and development. I recognize that their application and benefit may be context
specific but it would be fallacious to dismiss the Grameen model simply because the
interest charged may be classified as riba. Being Kenyan and having experienced
the micro-financing success and socio-economic contribution of M-Pesa to the
consumers and development of the nation, I was then drawn to enquire into
whether the M-Pesa model can be emulated by Islamic finance jurisdictions to
serve principles of Islam and the objectives of the Sharia that inspired the likes of
Mit Ghamr in the 1960’s before the advent of the modern Islamic Banking industry.
What follows is a synthesis of my views in this regard.
I. Introduction
Contracts in Islamic commercial law are of two types: unilateral contracts which
are gratuitous in nature; and commutative contracts which are non-gratuitous
and bear the right to make an increased return. It is accepted fact that contracts
of loan, (Qardh) are gratuitous contracts per Islamic commercial law in the sense
that they are extended without the lender requiring an increased return or
benefit yet a benefit or increase may be extended, equally gratuitously, in return
by the borrower to the lender. Such gratuitous extension, either way, must arise
uninstigated by the other and without a feeling of obligation. The lender is not
obliged to lend and the debtor not obliged to be gratuitous in his repayment; a
restatement of an oft-ignored fact.1
By definition, bank loans are commercial credit transactions and thus falls under
the concepts of Dayn and Bay’ (lawful commercial transactions) as a bank is a
commercial enterprise seeking to make a profit/return. It is no stroke of insight
to appreciate that a Bank, whether it bears the label Islam or Islamic, is not a
gratuitous lending house and the loans it extends, whatever the nature, are
commercial loans by very fact that a commercial entity is extending the loan with
an interest, pardon the pun, in making a return on its money extended. Such
loans thus fall under the term Dayn, and not Qardh. My conclusion is especially
strengthened by Al-Baqara: 282 wherein Dayn is subject to the same rules as
commutative contracts falling under Bay’ and therefore I am able to link the two
concepts pertaining to commercial banking transactions.
This means, a bank as a commercial entity seeking to make a profit from its
money lending business cannot be required to lend gratuitously in disregard of
the risk it undertakes in so doing and the various costs it bears in making its
financial services available. If we have made allowance for the operation cost of
2 Saleh, N., Unlawful Gain and legitimate Proft in Islamic Law (Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge). See also, Thomas, A., (ed.) Interest in Islamic Economics:
Understanding Riba (Routledge, London 2006).
all sorts of Islamic finance-related institutions, including Zakat, Bait-ul-mal and
Awqaf, that are essentially for purposes of social welfare, what more for a bank
that is essentially commercial and rent/profit seeking in its activities?
Islamic Banking and Finance is not a gratuitous industry and, in its current
formation, is certainly not a social welfare industry. It is a rent-seeking profit
making entity like any other commercial bank with neither an interest in
gratuitous loans, forgive the pun, nor an obligation towards socio-economic
development. Regardless of the theory touted, the practice of the industry bears
witness to this fact.3
Consumers’ pockets are not deep and they often do not resort to or simply
cannot afford financing their projects or business ventures through commercial
banking establishments, Islamic or otherwise. Those who require such financing
must be rich enough to afford the multi-tier transactions and the legal,
regulatory and structuring costs ensuing from the synthesizing of conventional
finance products by Islamic banks to suit their needs. This cost, passed on to the
customer, is accepted as the ‘price’ one must bear to make Islamic finance a
viable and available option in a mostly conventional finance dominated market. 4
That said, and in the face of otherwise strict prohibition against interest based
lending5, I became curious about the available options for personal/consumer
borrowing? In my previous writing I have noted and I here re-iterate the
potential viability of Grameen bank like projects in Islamic jurisdiction towards
socio-economic welfare and development. I recognize that their application and
benefit may be context specific but it would be fallacious to dismiss the Grameen
model simply because the interest charged may be classified as riba. As noted
above, such interest can, in any case, be synthesized as operational coasts (a fact
3 Saleem, M., Islamic Banking – a $300Billion Deception (New York 2005). See also,
Tarek Al-Diwany, The Problem with Interest, Kreatoc Ltd, 2003.
4 Thomas, A., (ed.) Interest in Islamic Economics: Understanding Riba (Routledge,
London 2006). See also, Usmani, M.T., An Introduction to Islamic Finance (Kluwer Law
International, The Hague 2002).
5 Rodney Wilson, Economics, Ethics and Religion: Jewish, Christian and Muslim
Economic Thought, Palgrave, 2007.
of notorious application by the Islamic finance industry). However, being Kenyan
and having experienced the micro-financing success and socio-economic
contribution of M-Pesa to the consumers and development of the nation, I was
then drawn to enquire into whether the M-Pesa model can be emulated by
Islamic finance (IF) jurisdictions to serve principles of Islam and the objectives of
the Sharia that inspired the likes of Mit Ghamr in the 1960’s before the advent of
the modern Islamic Banking industry. What follows is a synthesis of my views in
this regard.
The tale began, as told, by Islamic banking experiments in 1950s Pakistan based
on Islamic principles but inextricably driven by the patent socio-economic needs
of the country. Of course, given the rift with and from Hindu India, the political
identity dimension is immediately obvious. Ahmed Al-Najjar’s experiment in
Egypt through the socio-economic Mit Ghamr scheme in 1963 followed suit. Al-
Najjar is likely to have been influenced not only by the socio-economic thoughts
he encountered in his years of study in Germany but also by the social ideals of
the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt at the time. The Tabung Haji scheme in
Malaysia in the 1960s addressed, and still fulfils, socio-economic needs of the
people albeit on a specific religious aspect that requires substantial undertaking
by its participants. These examples are rudimentary but real and in their own
way, each attributing a success of real value and contributing proportions to the
populations amongst which they took root in.7
6 For a general introduction see: Vogel, F. and Hayes, S., Islamic Law and Finance:
Religion, Risk and Return (Brill-Leiden, Boston 2006).
7 El-Gamal, Islamic Finance: Law, Economics and Practice, Cambridge University Press,
2006.
Today, as in the last decade, the ideal that sparked Islamic banking seems to have
been ‘lost in translation’ along the way of becoming capitalised Islamic Banks in
Kuwait, Dubai and Saudi Arabia in the 1970s and everywhere they exist today.
Even the success of Malaysia’s Islamic banking hinges not so much on its socio-
economic dimension but its liberality in synthesizing conventional modes of
financing into equivalent ‘Islamic’ counterparts and the governments’ support,
variously, in facilitating its success.
Running away with the ideal, not only did the micro-finance element get lost, but
the socio-economic development-oriented essence got thrown out with the bath
water. Many today criticize Islamic banks for failing to deliver economic and
social development to Muslim populations that remain among the poorest and
least educated in the world. As predicted by its early pioneers, the Islamic
banking industry today has been taken over by foreign banks that have been able
to capture a significant market share in an industry built upon synthesizing loans
and bonds from sales and leases.8
The purpose of this chapter is not however to lament the woes of an industry
gone awry from trading its ideals for capitalist returns and political identity
distinction in an increasingly seamless globe. In light of the foregone, this
chapter aims to explore the potential transposition of the hugely successful
Kenyan M-Pesa system of micro-finance in developing countries that are also
Islamic banking jurisdictions.
Within a year of its launch, M-Pesa (the “M” stands for mobile and the word
“pesa” is Swahili for money) had 1 million subscribers. In five years, it had grown
in operation to more than 37,000 agents and was being used by more than one-
third of the country’s population.
9 http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jul/24/mobile-phones-africa-
microfinance-farming
10 Betty Mwangi-Thuo is the chief officer for new products at Safaricom, Kenya.
She oversees the firm’s value added service department, as well as all of its
projects that intersect with the GSM Association. She is responsible for the M-
PESA mobile financial service.
What Does M-Pesa Comprise? M-PESA comprises four core services:
i) paying bills;
ii) purchasing airtime;
iii) transferring money to other MPesa users and non-users alike; and
iv) depositing and withdrawing money.
✓ Large Unbanked Population: It is fact that the banks in Kenya were just
not interested in the unbanked people because they could not afford their
fees or rates and otherwise fell ‘below’ the class that used bank accounts
and related services. Mpesa came in and gave these very same
disenfranchised people (with a palpable need for banking and finance) a
great service. In economic terms, M-Pesa caters to a hethertofore
‘missing-market’.
✓ Price Matters: Registration is free and M-Pesa users pay a small fee for
the services provided. Comparable to the cost and risks users bore prior
to the availability of M-Pesa in transferring and remitting money outside
the conventional banking system, the fee charged by Safaricom is
reasonable as demonstrated by its ready usership and loyal customer
base even in the face of cheaper rising competitors.
✓ Multiple Usability: Whether its B-B, B-C or C-C (B and C standing for
Business and Consumer, respectively), M-Pesa ticks the box. Businesses
can make mass payments allowing, for instance, builders to send money
to their workers via their mobile M-Pesa accounts or on a bigger scale
allowing companies to pay workers by uploading CVS files. On the
interpersonal front, sending remittances across the country, paying your
bill at the local store or simply transferring money to a loved one has
never been easier and of course infinitely safer than having bundles of
cash.
M-Pesa empowers rural women by making it easier for them to solicit funds
from their husbands and other contacts in the city. The mobile phone, in
conjunction with M-Pesa, is a powerful tool for mobilizing remittances. Before
these technologies were introduced, rural women had to travel to the city or post
office by bus to get money. They then had to travel back to the village. This
process could take over a week. Now they can simply use a mobile phone to
request a remittance and receive it at a nearby agent, making it easier for rural
women to solicit funds from their husbands in the city. It is also easier for them
to solicit cash from other contacts when their husbands refuse to make the
14 Isaac Mbiti and David N. Weil, “Mobile Banking: The Impact of M-Pesa in Kenya”,
NBER Working Paper No. 17129 June 2011, http://www.nber.org/papers/w17129
Robert Cull, “M-PESA: Mobile Payments, Improved Lives for Kenyans” Research at the
World bank, May 2010, http://go.worldbank.org/0SE6OB70I0
15 http://sharedvalue.org/sites/default/files/resource-files/SharedValueinAction_MPESA_12-
2013.pdf
16 Plyler, M. G. et al. 2010. “Community-Level Economic Effects of M-PESA in Kenya: Initial
Findings”. Iris Center, University of Maryland, USA.
transfers. This has increased the financial autonomy of the women and has made
them less dependent on their husbands for their livelihoods. In one study for
instance, reports that women are saving using M-Pesa and are able to pay for the
quantity of fish they take rather than buying on credit.
Many women now have the ability to save their money in a safe place. In the
study, the women stated that they were much less likely to use their money
when they saved it via M-Pesa as opposed to when they kept their money in their
homes. They also have the ability to save for more costly activities and
purchases, help their families or expand their business and more importantly,
send their children to school.
The positive impact of M-Pesa on the women of the Luo fishing community, for
instance, is obvious and as White concludes: “The study could also be expanded
to research the impact of M-Pesa in industries other than fishing.” 17 Indeed, on
many of these points the benefits indicated could well apply to young
entrepreneurs or college students, soliciting, remitting or managing finances
towards their particular needs. A budding entrepreneur or student can request
and receive funding directly, and can remit it directly without having a bank
account, depending on a third party nor suffer being duped or disappointed by
the person collecting or transferring it on his behalf.
White also examines the case of a college-educated woman, very involved in her
community. M-Pesa allows her to have better gains through her ability to receive
payment from other MPesa users. As she does not have to travel to remit or
transfer money, Mpesa also allows her more “free time and since she was well
17 White, D. 2012. “The Social and Economic Impact of MPESA on the Lives of
Women in the Fishing Industry on Lake Victoria”, Independent Study Project
(ISP) Collection. Paper 1246.http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/1246
educated and fluent in Kiswahili, Dholuo, and English, she was able to attend
different conferences, meetings, and trainings in the area. Not only can she profit
and perhaps make a profit by attending these events, but she is also able to use
the knowledge she gains there in her own community. The use of M-Pesa thus
makes women generally and rural women specifically more independent (81%
of interviewees); and they no longer have to rely on others for money or banking
related matters.
Return on Investment: It was also key that Safaricom did not expect an
immediate return on its investment. The operator saw mobile money as a pure
value-added service, a way to cement its bond with its customers.
Peer-to-Peer Component
Kenya has long had urban communities that largely support rural communities,
so people have always been sending money home, but as more and more
services became available on the platform, people wanted to use MPesa to pay
their water, electricity and TV bills, for example. Once again, Safaricom listened,
rolling out payment agreements with utility companies, supermarkets and other
retailers. Employers are also able to pay salaries through M-Pesa.
It is no false claim to state that there is, globally, no mobile-money success story
quite like M-Pesa. The concept has led operators, banks, and credit-card
companies on a far-reaching search for the right formula for mobile wallets,
mobile payments and so on. Today, M-Pesa is integrated with more than 25
banks, both local and international, that operate in Kenya, and which allows
banked subscribers to use M-Pesa to access the funds in their bank accounts. 18
18 The Economist, “Why does Kenya lead the world in mobile money?” May 27th
2013,http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/05/economist-
explains-18#sthash.6oGfJV3g.dpuf
or woman. This should be the focus of Islamic finance and in so doing create a
symbiotic relationship that will feed the success of its product spread much like
with M-Pesa in Kenya. After all, Islam is no ‘Big-Business in Dubai, KL, Doha or
Jeddah’ philosophy. It is for every man, women and child and likewise must cater
to everyone, rich or poor, man or woman, young or old, as does Islam. When we
have homeless people, destitute women, uneducated youth and idle adults
without jobs in Islamic nations, the global extent of Islamic Finance’s success is
worth little. With this in mind, I have deliberately broken down the elements of
M-Pesa set out above into discernible micro-finance and socio-economic aspects
that any jurisdiction would benefit focusing on or attaining.
The specificity of the product spread and financial services created will differ in
each jurisdiction according to its needs. I am not herein advocating that Islamic
banking jurisdictions should replicate M-Pesa’s form in their countries, though
some may and others already have (Bangladesh) with varying success. I am not
rallying Islamic banking jurisdictions to jump on the mobile-banking band
wagon; I am simply setting out an example of a home grown organically
developed financial service and product spread of tangible micro-economic
impact as an example the effect of which can be emulated towards socio-
economic benefit. In other words, it is the substance and socio-economic effect of
M-Pesa that I am putting forward for emulation. Such a project, as detailed in the
preceding section, requires a multi-tiered, multi-party collaboration and effort
along with investment commitment that is willing to wait for a return on its
investment whilst the value takes root among the people. Yet the heart and focus
of the project is socio-economic benefit of all and one that makes a real monetary
and developmental difference to the nation even whilst earning the commercial
entity substantial profit and global success.
The novelty is wearing off and the masses have caught on the ruses employed or
the lacking substance behind the terms that they initially accepted in blind faith
of the label “Islamic”. The growing sentiment is that if the products are the same
under different labels, guises and structures, why should one opt for ‘Islamic
Finance’? why should one pay more for the label? This is a question the Industry
has to answer.
19 Michael Porter, “Creating Shared Value: The Path Forward” FSG CSV Leadership
Summit, Lecture Delivered on May 31, 2012,
http://www.isc.hbs.edu/Creating_Shared_Value.htm
Michael Porter, TED Talk “Why Business Can be Good at Solving Social Problems”
http://www.ted.com/talks/michael_porter_why_business_can_be_good_at_solving_socia
l_problems filmed on June 2013 at Ted Global Talks.